THE HARBINGER 39: Satan’s DNA and the Antichrist

THE HARBINGER - 39By Luke

Satan’s DNA and the Antichrist http://www.douglashamp.com/satans-dna-and-the-antichrist/

June 13, 2012

By Douglas Hamp Several people have asked me where will the Antichrist get Satan‘s DNA. I discuss this in my book, Corrupting the Image – where I demonstrate how the

antichrist will genetically become the beast by implanting Satan’s genetic

material or code into himself and then will replicate that and give it to the world. Still how could the antichrist obtain or how could Satan give it? There are some important points in considering this point. Here is what we know: God demonstrated that Satan had seed in Genesis 3:15 when He contrasted it with “her seed” The sons of God (fallen angels) were able to pass on their seed in Genesis 6 Dan 2:43 predicts that the toes / horns / kings will mingle themselves with the genetic information (seed) of men.

At the heart of DNA is information, which according to Dr Verner Gitt, is a non-material entity.

Let’s put the pieces together. Mary mingled her seed with the Holy Spirit when He overshadowed her. Remember, the information is what is important. Just like a CDROM holds information, it is the information itself, not the CDROM that we really care about. The Holy Spirit implanted information (that did need a medium, e.g. nucleic acids/double helix) but it was the genetic information that of great importance. Did the Holy Spirit implant organic tissue or just information? In other words, did the Holy Spirit create organic tissue out of nothing and put the information (seed) in that or did he perhaps “borrow” some of Mary’s tissue and then just rearrange the information – just like rewriting a CDROM? I don’t know the answer to that – though I think the latter is more likely.

Satan will need to give his information to someone. There are various With that as our paradigm, we can see that

ways that he could materialize through occult rituals and such. However, it seems that if Satan knew his own code, he could make that code available and that in turn could be placed in a computer, similar to what Craig Venter and his team did when they created synthetic biology. Once it was in a computer then it could be manipulated and such. One way or another, the information will be passed on to the person of Satan’s choosing.

Craig Venter explains synthetic genomics http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/video/2010/jun/04/craig-venter-syntheticgenomics?intcmp=239

Creator of world's first synthetic genome, Craig Venter, describes how replacing the chromosomal software of a cell transforms the protein hardware of the entire organism.

Craig Venter creates synthetic life form May 20, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/video/2010/may/20/craig-venter-new-lifeform

Craig Venter: How to make a new life form (video link above) Genetic entrepreneur Craig Venter explains how his team of researchers created a new life form, and speculates on the exciting possible applications for the new technology Scientists have created the world's first synthetic life form in a landmark experiment that paves the way for designer organisms that are built rather than evolved.

The controversial feat, which has occupied 20 scientists for more than 10 years at an estimated cost of $40m, was described by one researcher as "a defining moment in biology".

Craig Venter, the pioneering US geneticist behind the experiment, said the achievement heralds the dawn of a new era in which new life is made to benefit humanity, starting with bacteria that churn out biofuels, soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and even manufacture vaccines.

However critics, including some religious groups, condemned the work, with one organisation warning that artificial organisms could escape into the wild and cause environmental havoc or be turned into biological weapons. Others said Venter was playing God.

The new organism is based on an existing bacterium that causes mastitis in goats, but at its core is an entirely synthetic genome that was constructed from chemicals in the laboratory.

The single-celled organism has four "watermarks" written into its DNA to identify it as synthetic and help trace its descendants back to their creator, should they go astray.

"We were ecstatic when the cells booted up with all the watermarks in place," Dr Venter told the Guardian. "It's a living species now, part of our planet's inventory of life."

Dr Venter's team developed a new code based on the four letters of the genetic code, G, T, C and A, that allowed them to draw on the whole alphabet, numbers and punctuation marks to write the watermarks.

Anyone who cracks the code is invited to email an address written into the DNA. The research is reported online today in the journal Science.

"This is an important step both scientifically and philosophically," Dr Venter told the journal. "It has certainly changed my views of definitions of life and how life works."

The team now plans to use the synthetic organism to work out the minimum number of genes needed for life to exist. From this, new microorganisms could be made by bolting on additional genes to produce useful chemicals, break down pollutants, or produce proteins for use in vaccines.

Julian Savulescu, professor of practical ethics at Oxford University, said: "Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity's history, potentially peeking into its destiny. He is not merely copying life artificially ... or modifying it radically by genetic engineering. He is going towards the role of a god: creating artificial life that could never have existed naturally."

This is "a defining moment in the history of biology and biotechnology", Mark Bedau, a philosopher at Reed College in Portland, Oregon, told Science.

Dr Venter became a controversial figure in the 1990s when he pitted his former company, Celera Genomics, against the publicly funded effort to sequence the human genome, the Human Genome Project. Venter had

already applied for patents on more than 300 genes, raising concerns that the company might claim intellectual rights to the building blocks of life. eoa