Presentation: Applied Transportation Studio - Site Planning and Traffic Impact - Campus Pointe

Page 1

Avinash Shrivastava Matt Sandidge Lisa Larsen


Site Design Site on the GRID


Site Design Nodes and Connectors


Site Design Nodes and Connectors


Site Design Preliminary Layout


Land Uses Campus Pointe ‐ Land Use Plan


Layout y Campus Pointe ‐ Master Plan


Land Uses (Reconfigured) ( g ) Campus Pointe ‐ Land Use Plan


Parking Plan  Used adjustment factors for April and hour of day for

each use  Adjustment factors for captive and non‐captive  Fast‐food  Restaurant R  Shopping

 Adjustment factors for mode  Fast‐food  Conference Center  Peak Demand 3,782 parking stalls 1pm on weekday  4,045 available parking stalls


Weekday Demand 4000

3500

3000

2500

Office Residential Convention Space

2000

Hotel‐Business Cineplex

1500

Fast Food Family Restaurant Shopping Center

1000

500

0 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM


Weekend Demand 3500

3000

2500

Office 2000

Residential Convention Space Hotel

1500

Cineplex Fast Food Family Resaurant

1000

500

0 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM

Shopping Center


Entertainment Parking  Peak Demand – 680 parking stalls 1:00 pm weekend  Available – 600 stalls in garage, 133 on street, and 26 surface  Weekdays (624 needed at peak 12:00 pm) allocate one deck of parking

to students 100 spaces reserved. 200 parking spaces reserved for office.


Non‐Residential Parking  Peak Demand – 1006 parking stalls at 8:00 pm on weekday  900 parking stalls in garage and 119 on‐street  900 reserved for residential


North Office/Café Area  Peak Demand – 520 parking stalls 12:00 pm on weekday  500 in garage and 48 on‐street


West Residential Parking  Peak Demand – 766 parking stalls 1:00 pm on weekday  600 stalls in garage, 101 on‐street, and 70 surface parking  400 stalls in garage reserved for office and residential


Hotel/Conference Center Parking  Peak Demand – 1032 parking stalls 11:00 am on a weekday

g g  750 in garage, 222 on‐street, and 85 surface  300 reserved for hotel and 200 reserved for office


Pedestrian Mobility  10‐20 foot sidewalks throughout site  Bicycles allowed on sidewalks  Low speeds on all streets  Connectivity throughout site C ti it th h t it


Pedestrian Mobility


Cross‐Section 1


Cross‐Section 1


Cross‐Section 2


Cross‐Section 2


Cross‐Section 3


Cross‐Section 3


Transit


Transit Route Transit


Traffic Impact  Determine Land Uses  Generate Trips  Internal Capture  Pass Pass‐By By  Trip Distribution  Analysis of Approach LOS and Delay  Recommendations for Improvements


Intersections In Study Area 1: S. College/Hensel 2: S. College/University 2: S College/University 3: University/Moore 4: University/Polo 5: Texas/University 6: Texas/Hensel 7: Texas/Rosemary


Intersections In Study Area 7

6

5

4

1 3 2


Internal Capture Reduction Entering From Internal Capture Portion Not From Internal Capture Portion Total # of Trips Generated

Exiting 1410 661 2071

Total 1227 470 1697

•Internal Capture: 7% Reduction l d •Considered retail, residential, office within roughly 1200 feet of each other (plus some residential just outside of this range).

2637 1131 3768


Pass‐By Trips  Trip Generation Handbook  Added to access points  Already considered in background traffic  Total Pass‐By: 206 Entering Total Pass By: 206 Entering

114 Exiting Supermarket Quality Restaurant

Pass‐By Trips Pass‐By Percentages Calculated # of Generated Trips # of Pass‐by Trips % Entering 36% 151 54 51 50% 533 266 67

% Exiting # of Pass‐by Entering # of Pass‐by Exiting 49 28 26 33 178 88


Trip Distribution  Used engineering judgment to select percentage of

traffic coming from various directions.  Redistribution may help with Level of Service (LOS) and delay.  Distributed trips summed and input into Synchro.


Preliminary Results 2010 Base Smoothed 2015 B 2015 Base Smoothed (Optimized) S th d (O ti i d) 2015 With Additional Trips (Optimized)

SB 46.9 D 53 7 53.7 D 50.1 D

S. College/University NB 51.4 D 60 2 60.2 E 60.1 E

SB 79.7 E 98.1 F 117.3 F

NB 71.3 E 94.1 F 146.3 F

SB 7.2 A 7.8 A 9 A

NB 14.3 B 15.8 B 23.8 C

SB 46.7 D 52.1 D 2243.5 F

NB 19.6 B 33.7 C 60.4 E

EB 83.8 F 85 8 85.8 F 271.2 F

WB 40.8 D 45 2 45.2 D 63.5 E

Total Intersection 62.8 E 66 8 66.8 E 159.8 F

Max v/c Ratio 1.08

EB 110.4 F 124.1 F 201.8 F

WB 125.1 F 112.3 F 177.9 F

Total Intersection 97.6 F 109.8 F 169.0 F

Max v/c Ratio 1.21

EB NA NA NA NA NA NA

WB 20.5 C 20.7 C 20.7 C

Total Intersection 11.5 B 12.5 B 17 B

Max v/c Ratio 0.65

EB 72.6 E 76.3 E 203.7 F

WB 51.0 D 31.5 C 97.6 F

Total Intersection 59.9 E 56.1 E 399.8 F

Max v/c Ratio 1.06

1 09 1.09 2.27

Texas/University 2010 Base Smoothed 2015 Base Smoothed (Optimized) 2015 With Additional Trips (Optimized)

1.32 1.54

Texas/Rosemary 2010 Base Smoothed 2015 Base Smoothed (Optimized) 2015 With Additional Trips (Optimized)

0.72 0.90

University/Polo 2010 Base Smoothed 2015 Base Smoothed (Optimized) ( p ) 2015 With Additional Trips (Optimized)

1.07 5.93


Recommendations  Shift trips from Polo/University to Texas/Hensel.  Texas/Rosemary at LOS B  Add lanes to Texas/Hensel to help accommodate trips  Try to reduce number of trips encountering y p g

intersections along University.  Texas/University needs operation and/or geometric h l help to improve from LOS F. f


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.