THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN’S INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER SINCE 1969 Wednesday, October 19, 2011
www.badgerherald.com
Volume XLIII, Issue 32
ARTS | SPOT ON
NEWS | CRIME
SPORTS | FOOTBALL
Meditation medication
A gentleman ‘blacked out’ and broke a fountain at the Orpheum Theater, resulting in expensive damages . | 2
Gigantic battle awaits Badgers
Researchers on campus make use of ancient stress-relieving exercises in treating sufferers of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. | 12
As Michigan State gets a jump on the trash talk, Wisconsin aims to continue its dominance in East Lansing. | 14
House passes health care act
Cuts keep coming UW System may take bigger budget hit UW System cuts
Universities could incur $65.7M decrease on top of $250M from original Wis. 2011-13 allocations
Tori Thompson News Reporter
150
steps taken. What are those [steps]? [They could be] a wide range of things.” UW System spokesperson David Giroux emphasized that there are still many
In their second regular floor meeting of the fall session, Assembly members voted in favor of a bill that would implement the health care reforms of the Affordable Care Act into Wisconsin law, but Democrats contend it includes provisions that would weaken transparency in the Legislature. By a vote of 57-39, the Assembly voted in favor of the bill, which would implement federal health care reform provisions into law Tuesday. As stated in the legislation, the Wisconsin Commissioner of Insurance is given authority to refuse the disclosure information of insurance rates if the information is deemed proprietary. The commissioner is also given the authority of emergency rule making. Also, if a federal court rules the current state health insurance act unconstitutional, then insurers will be “exempt” from the coverage requirements incorporated into the bill. The vote fell along partisan lines, with five nays from Republican representatives and three ayes from Democratic representatives. Among the Democrats opposed to the bill is Rep. Jon Richards, D-Milwaukee. In session, Richards urged others to vote “no” on the bill, stating that passing the bill would be a step in the wrong direction for Wisconsin. “[Implementing AB 210 would] chip away the rights of the people.
SYSTEM CUTS, page 3
ASSEMBLY, page 2
Olivia Raedeke The University of Wisconsin System could be hit with $65.7 million more in budget cuts over the next two years, in addition to the $250 million in cuts originally projected. This new cut would decrease funds across the system by $46.1 million during the 201112 year and $19.6 million 2012-13, totaling $65.7 million in addition to the $250 million in cuts to the System currently in the state budget, according to an email from UW Colleges Chancellor Ray Cross obtained by the Wisconsin State Journal. UW Vice Chancellor for Administration Darrell Bazzell said Gov. Scott Walker was given the ability to issue the cuts through the provisional 2011-13 budget set in June. The budget also slated UW to take a cut of $95 million, making up 38 percent of the original $250 million base reduction, Bazzell said. He added this budget decrease will ask the System to cut even more over the same two-year time frame and affect UW more than the other UW System universities. The email said the new cuts to the System account for approximately 38 percent of the total $174.3 million cuts made for all state agencies. Cross said the numbers are only an estimate and could still increase. “The way it has been expressed, this is the least amount [of cuts] that we are expecting,” Cross said. “[The lapse] could go as high as $300 million.” Cross said it is unfair for the state to ask the UW System to take such a large hit, as the amount is disproportional from the percentage the System is funded. Both Cross and Bazzell said they were unsure what these figures meant for their respective institutions. “It is too early in the process to speculate what will be cut,” Bazzell said. Until it is determined what the cuts will mean, neither could say how the cuts would be dealt with to limit the effect on educational quality, according to the UW System statement. “We do not know how we can take these cuts without negatively affecting the education of our students and the expectations of their families for a quality experience,” the statement said. If the state is expecting the UW System
If lapse requirement goes higher, as per DOA Secretary Mike Huebsch’s indication
100
2012-13
$ (millions)
News Reporter
50
Guaranteed cuts
2011-12
UW-Madison cuts vs. other campuses
UW System cuts vs. other state agencies
Rest of State Agencies
UW System $65.7 million $108.6 million
UWMadison $25.8 million $39.9 million
Rest of UW System
SOURCE: Email obtained by Wisconsin State Journal and UW System
to cover two-fifths of the lapse, there will have to be drastic cuts within the System, Cross said. “We will work together to find a way to meet the requirement if [we] have to do it,” he said. “Clearly there has to be drastic
Pro-choice, GOP leaders clash over sex education Adrianna Viswanatha News Reporter
John Lemmon The Badger Herald
UW law student Jason Myatt speaks in favor of allowing concealed carry in municipal buildings at Tuesday’s meeting.
Council: Concealed carry off limits in city’s buildings Sam Schmitt News Reporter After the governor signed concealed carry into law, Madison city officials unanimously approved an ordinance Tuesday to prohibit weapons in all city buildings. The approved city
ordinance imposes licensing restrictions in Madison and requires that buildings post signs at their entrances to inform citizens weapons are not allowed on the premises. Concealed carry will go into effect Nov. 1 after being signed into law by Gov. Scott Walker in July. According to the text of
the ordinance, this form of “unlawful trespass while carrying a weapon” applies to government, university and city buildings, while owners of other types of property or private pieces of land reserve the right to ban weapons on an individual
COUNCIL, page 2
A bill that would repeal the 2010 Wisconsin Healthy Youth Act is being met with criticism from Wisconsin Democrats and organizations that support the act. The bill, introduced Friday by Sens. Mary Lazich, R-New Berlin, Pam Galloway, R-Wausau, Glenn Grothman, R-West Bend, and Joe Leibham, R-Sheboygan, would repeal several parts of the act, which requires Wisconsin public schools that teach sex education to provide comprehensive, medically accurate and age-appropriate information to students. Discussion of contraceptives and some discussion of pregnancy and parenting would be repealed under the new bill. The bill will be addressed at the Special Session Senate Committee meeting today, Grothman said.
© 2011 BADGER HERALD
WAWH Executive Director Sara Finger said the act requires that parents be informed if their child’s school does not teach about human growth and development. In Wisconsin, it is the school’s decision whether or not human growth and development is taught. The act also requires teaching of safe sex measures, but also the choice to withhold from sex and how to do so effectively and safely. This education would also encourage talking to trusted adults about issues, a Wisconsin Alliance for Women’s Health statement said. Planned Parenthood also spoke out against the bill. “The continuation of teen pregnancy prevention efforts, like the Healthy Youth Act, is key to the health of our youth,” Executive Director Tanya Atkinson said in a statement Tuesday. Grothman, who cointroduced the bill, said
repealing the Wisconsin Healthy Youth Act would likely see a decrease in teen health risks across the state. Grothman said he favors repealing the act because it was legislation pushed by Planned Parenthood, an organization he opposes. “Planned Parenthood’s founders were advocates of promiscuity and racism,” Grothman said. Some are also arguing the bill to repeal is seen as an economic threat. The Planned Parenthood statement pointed out that children born to teen mothers are nine times more likely to live in poverty. In 2007, more than 6,000 girls aged 15-19 gave birth in Wisconsin, according to the Department of Health Services. “In addition, Wisconsin taxpayers spend $156 million a year to cover teen childbearing costs,” the statement said. Atkinson said if the act
SEX ED, page 4