the barrister
#32
ESSENTIAL READING FOR BARRISTERS
Est. 1999
7th april - 25th may 2007 www.barristermagazine.com
EASTER TERM ISSUE
A programme for the future success of the profession I believe in three guiding principles for the Bar.
Against background
APPOINTMENTS – 13 JUDICIAL A QUIET REVOLUTION
of
these
of the publicly and the privately funded Bar, and
it is instructive to
of the employed and self-employed Bars, must
review
work together as equals to preserve and enhance
objectives
the success of our profession.
2007 to see what
April saw the first anniversary of the Judicial Appointments Commission, the new, independent body set up to select candidates for judicial appointment in England and Wales.
principles, my
ISSN 1468-926X
Features
the
First, we must be a united profession. Members
PRICE £3.00
main
JAC Chairman Baroness Usha Prashar reviews the Commission’s achievements to date.
for
progress has been Secondly, our guiding light must be high
made.
standards in terms of both quality and ethics.
•
BAR VOCATIONAL 16 THE COURSE: MONEY WELL
Negotiating a
SPENT?
stable foundation Thirdly, the Bar must be, and be perceived to be,
for publicly funded
accessible to entrants from all backgrounds.
advocacy. •
GEOFFREY VOS QC, Chairman - Bar Council
Dealing with the increasing competition
The profession must have renewed confidence in
from HCAs in both prosecution and defence
its own ability to produce the best advocacy. It will
work.
only survive and prosper if we adhere to these
•
principles, and make each of them a reality.
entrants from all backgrounds.
By Tom Cross, BVC Student
Making the Bar more accessible to
p.6
By Fiona Woolf, President, Law Society
Chancery Lane in January gave their unanimous support to a motion critical of the government's
Legal aid has been at the centre of the law
approach to the proposed reforms to legal aid.
Society’s concerns for a long time now. We are
This sent a very strong signal to policy makers
confronting the long term under-funding of an
that I was able to report to MPs later that same
impoverished legal aid system and the additional
day when giving evidence to the Constitutional
threats posed by the government's foolhardy
Affairs Select Committee.
The SGM highlighted the strength of feeling among All involved in legal aid are caught up in a
both legal aid solicitors and the wider profession
maelstrom of hurried consultations on proposals
about the Governments plans. The Law Society
whose
The
wants the same result as all the solicitors who
Government is running major risks and if, as I
attended the meeting – a sustainable future for
believe, they are getting it wrong the price will be
legal aid and a commitment to the concept of
paid by the most vulnerable and needy members
access to justice to protect vulnerable clients.
of Society
The Society will continue to fight for
is
unknown.
that objective with all urgency. The 400 solicitors who attended the SGM at
The Criminal Defence Services Act reintroduced the means-testing of legal aid for criminal cases. It took effect in the Magistrates’ Court in October 2006 and is expected to be introduced into the Crown Court at the end of 2007. By Dr Peter Kenway, Director, New Policy Institute
News
timetable for changes to the legal system.
effect
IS THE REINTRODUCTION 38 WHY OF MEANS-TESTING FOR CRIMINAL LEGAL AID SUCH A CAUSE FOR CONCERN?
What Price Justice?
compound
I suspect that a significant number of those who sit on pupillage interview panels would openly state that a candidate’s performance on the Bar Vocational Course, or ‘BVC’, is one of the least important factors that are considered in determining applications
p.18 Tougher penalties for misuse of personal data p.19 LSC proposal for Family Graduated Fees: Some improvement but still major concerns, say LAPG Editor: Nigel Simmonds 0870 766 2715 email: info@barristermagazine.com Publishers: Media Management Corporation Ltd Publishing Director: Derek Payne
p.3
Design and Production: Alan Pritchard Cambridge Printing Park Tel: 01223 423000
A4_DPM9600_engl_enqu
12.02.2007
12:29 Uhr
Seite 1
Speech is silver …
… and as precious as gold – with the Digital Pocket Memo 9600. Experience an elegant dictation solution, which perfects your workflow and sets new standards. With an extra large display, intuitive handling, “file download” without PC, cutting-edge data security, an extremely long battery life, crystal clear voice quality and much more … www.philips.com/dictation • enquiries.marketing@philips.com • phone: 01206 755 550
the barrister
But it’s not just lawyers.
03
Our What Price
risks are greatly increased with a move to
Liberal Democrat and other parties shows that
Justice? campaign is supported by Shelter,
fixed fees which will significantly limit the
even the Government’s own back benchers
NSPCC, Mind, Child Poverty Action Group,
revenue earning ability of providers and will
are growing restless with the risks being
Refugee Council and the Advice Services
make the raising of the necessary working
taken on legal aid and access to justice.
Alliance. Much as Vera Baird spins the line
capital to finance the cash flow risk more
this is just a self interested whine got up by
difficult.
the Law Society, the fact is many recognize
These days, it really goes without saying
The broad coalition behind the WPJ campaign
the threat to legal aid and justice and in turn
that contract terms must be very tightly
is helping MPs to understand the importance
support our campaign.
drafted to minimise uncertainty, risk and
of legal aid as well as the impact of the under-
administrative
Public/private
investment. It is clear that MPs are very
burden.
contracts are carefully drafted to minimise
concerned about the future of the system.
We continue to engage closely on the
the scope for requirements, discretions and
The government and LSC are rushing through
profession's
changes resulting in increased cost and risk.
these proposals without the degree of detailed
behalf
with
the
LSC
and
government on their formal consultations.
consideration that is vital. The overall effect
The report we commissioned from economists
of these many changes is uncertain. If they
LECG exposed the fragility of the sector arising
A new legal aid contract must be clear, certain
are introduced to the current timetable there
from years of neglect. Now we are arming
and demonstrably fair. The unified contract
is a real risk that legal aid solicitors will soon
ourselves with more sound economic and
represents a step in the reform of legal aid,
be rarer than NHS dentists
legal arguments to address the very serious
which is why it is exceptionally important
shortcomings of the proposed reforms and
to get off on the right foot.
especially the new contract.
move forward when we have addressed the
The campaign to defend legal aid is also
imbalance between the legal aid practitioner
broadening, with the Magistrates Association
We can only
and the LSC. Whilst the LSC has taken on
and Senior Judiciary both having weighed in
I spent a miserable time over Christmas
some of our concerns, the contract they have
more recently.
trying to get my head around the LSC’s draft
published at the end of February does not go
Unified Standard Contract Terms 2007 – one
far enough. I hope that by the time you read
piece of the nightmare jigsaw puzzle under
this, more progress will have been made.
which legal aid lawyers will be forced to
But importantly to keep the campaign moving we have been asking our members for case
operate. It struck me as so unreasonable and
studies about people they've helped using
oppressive and so full of uncertainty that I
On other fronts, we continue to lobby
legal aid to deal with serious problems in
wondered if it would be enforceable.
One
parliamentarians intensively to secure a
their lives such as housing or family issues.
of the many troubles with the contract is that
viable future for legal aid. Early in January
This will raise public understanding of the
the LSC can change the contract terms like
MPs were given a detailed briefing on the
fundamental importance of properly-funded
it changes its socks. The contract drafting
threat to the future of the legal aid system
access to justice. We would also like to hear
is so loose that it is not really a contract at
in advance of a debate in Westminster Hall.
from you as barristers, if you have similar
all and you might as well agree to do as you
During that debate, MPs expressed concern
examples to share.
are told! My fears have been taken up by
at the lack of opportunity for parliamentary
external legal advisors. As I write, we are
scrutiny of the proposals.
providing that advice to legal aid contact holders so that they can make a properly
Radio 4's PM programme used our case
informed decision as to whether to sign the
So far, 140 MPs, 70 of them Labour, have
studies to run a 20 minute piece on legal
new contract themselves.
declared support for the Law Society’s What
aid in January – we need to keep up the
Price Justice? Campaign by signing an Early
pressure with sustained media presence,
Day Motion in Parliament. Nearly half of
to demonstrate to the Government that we
The LSC is moving us to a very different
those are on the Labour benches and this is
aren’t going to drop our opposition. Their
environment from the past where the public
increasing pressure on the government very
plans are wrong, their timetable foolhardy.
sector is asking the private sector to assume
helpfully.
and manage much more risk. The key risks Please write to me at president@lawsociety.
relate to the vagaries of the justice and social welfare systems, both of which are outside
This is a wake up call for the Government. The
org.uk or contact our Press Office, on 020
the control of legal aid providers.
level of support from Labour, Conservative,
7320 5811. The more evidence we and you
These
04
the barrister
can present to MPs and journalists, the more headway we will make.
For those of you who don’t know, you can
get
updates
on
our
campaign
at
www.whatpricejustice.lawsociety.org.uk. The
Call any of the countries below for the price of a UK national call
Law Society is committed to supporting its members working in the legal aid sector.
Right Here! Right Now! Of course this is an issue which unites solicitors and barristers; we want the government to commitment to access to justice as a reality,
You can begin using this service immediately.
1)
and to enabling a sustainable legal aid system fit for purpose and fit for the future. I am
2)
sure that a joint thinking approach from the profession will be more effective in protecting access to justice and achieving a legal aid system which can flourish.
We seek nothing less.
3)
Just Dial the relevant access number for the country you wish to call (See below) At the prompt dial your international destination number in full (including 00)* That’s it ! you’re connected.
Access number 0870
794 8065 (weekdays) Access number 0844 570 8065 (weekend 5p) Algeria; Andorra; Antartica; Antartica, Mobile; Argentina; Argentina Buenos Aires; Armenia; Athens; Australia; Austria;
Fiona Woolf, President, Law Society
Bahamas; Bangkok; Belgium; Bermuda; Bolivia; Brazil; Brazil Rio De Janeiro & Sao Paulo; Brunei; Brunei, Mobile; Bulgaria; Canada; Canada, Mobile; Chile; China; China, Mobile; Christmas Island; Christmas Island, Mobile; Cocos Island; Colombia; Colombia, Mobile; Costa Rica; Costa Rica, Mobile; Croatia; Cyprus; Cyprus, Mobile; Dominican Republic; Finland; French Antilles; Georgia; Panama; Paraguay Asuncion; Iceland; Indonesia; Indonesia Jakarta; Ireland; Israel; Israel, Mobile; Istanbul; Jamaica; Japan; Korea South; Korea South, Mobile; Kyrgyzstan; Liechtenstein; Luxembourg; Macao; Macao, Mobile; Malawi; Malawi, Mobile; Malaysia; Malaysia, Mobile; Mariana Islands; Mariana Islands, Mobile; Mexico; Mexico City; Mexico Mexico City; Mexico Mexico City, Mobile; Mexico, Mobile; Monaco; Mongolia; Mongolia, Mobile; Moscow; New Zealand; Nigeria; Nigeria Lagos; Peru; Peru Lima; Puerto Rico; Russia; Russia Moscow; Russia Moscow, Mobile; Russia, Mobile; San Marino; San Marino, Mobile; Santa Cruz; Saudi Arabia; Serbia and Montenegro; Singapore; Singapore, Mobile; Slovenia; South Africa; Switzerland; Taiwan; Taiwan, Mobile; Thailand; Thailand Bangkok; Thailand Bangkok, Mobile; Thailand, Mobile; Turkey Istanbul; Uruguay; US Virgin Islands; US Virgin Islands, Mobile; Venezuela; Zambia; Zambia, Mobile; Zimbabwe; Ghana; Gibraltar; Greece; Guadeloupe; Guam; Guam, Mobile; Hong Kong; Hong Kong, Mobile;
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility for information supplied by other parties, views expressed may not necessarily be that of the editor or publishers.
Visit:
www.cheapcallsdirect.co.uk for many more destinations
free range legal research.
JustCite is the only online citator that gives you the freedom to link to full text cases and legislation from all major legal publishers in the UK and Ireland. In addition, the extensive cross-referencing and clear layout make JustCite the best place to hatch your argument.
+44 (0) 20 7284 8080
www.justcite.com
A4 Concepts.indd 1
2/28/2007 4:28:36 PM
06 •
p.1
the barrister
Creating a blueprint for
to force the profession to fund the increasing
Making the Bar more accessible
the regulatory environment in
volume of public family cases by accepting
which barristers will practice in
lower fees. This is unfair and inappropriate.
It is good to see that much has been written on
the future.
It is not the lawyers’ fault that social
this topic in recent months. Historically, the
conditions lead to increased care issues, and
Bar has talked extensively about accessibility
the Government cannot expect the lawyers
and has appointed numerous working parties
quality of the service they receive from the
to accept reduced fees just because there
to consider the issue.
Bar.
are more cases.
is crucial that our present initiatives are
•
Finding ways to assure the public of the
Publicly funding work
The Family Barristers’
In this context, it
Graduated Fees Scheme must be preserved.
successful, and that they do not result in the
Despite these issues, I remain optimistic that
issue being kicked one more time into the
we will succeed in persuading the DCA/ LSC
long grass. We must act now to reduce the
that the availability of proper public funding
barriers to entry, both real and perceived.
for criminal and family cases is crucial to the As always, there is a mixed picture.
future of our democratic society;
reducing
I would be the first to accept that school
the fees to a level at which only the least able
placement programmes and a BVC loan
The good news is that the criminal revised
will be prepared to do the work is a recipe
scheme (which the Bar Council and the Inns
advocacy graduated fee scheme (RAGFS)
for disaster.
are collaborating to introduce now) will not
that Lord Carter recommended will now be
be enough, by themselves, to achieve the
put in place in April 2007. It will provide
desired results. But they are a step in the
increases in fees for defence work, restoring the ravages of inflation over the last 10 years,
right direction. The fact that we need some
Competition from HCAs
fundamental culture changes is not an excuse
and providing the redistribution from the
for doing nothing.
We need to persuade
long cases to the 1-10 day cases that we have
Advocacy is a specialist skill in which
our own people to realise that the Bar is an
campaigned for. I cannot over-estimate the
barristers generally excel. Barristers do not,
intimidating profession even to the most able
amount of work that so many practitioners
however, have a monopoly on the practice
entrants.
and Bar Council staff have contributed
of advocacy. It is a fact of life that HCAs are
present ourselves as genuinely accessible, we
towards achieving this.
increasingly keen to compete for advocacy in
can start to explain how selection processes
Crown Courts and elsewhere.
within
There are other less positive developments.
Competition
Once that is understood and we
Chambers
can
be
made
more
on a level playing field is to be welcomed.
equitable so that the candidates from the less
But quality controls must the same for all
traditional socio-economic backgrounds are
First, the Government has brought forward
advocates
not disadvantaged.
the time when the RAGFS and the new
Advocates in the CPS, in solicitors firms, and
litigators’ graduated fee scheme (LGFS) may
at the self-employed Bar must be judged by
be harmonised, so as to produce one case
the same standards, and the work should
one fee, to October 2008.
be awarded on the basis of merit and fair
At that time, it
is intended to introduce price competitive tendering (PCT).
undertaking
the
same
work.
The new regulatory environment
pricing.
Our view is that neither
In the context of the passage of the Legal
measure is necessary or appropriate, and we
The quality of the justice system will be
Services Bill through Parliament, much has
intend to argue our case forcefully during the
threatened if advocates are chosen because
also been written recently on this topic.
forthcoming consultation process.
they are available in-house without regard to
believe that the new regulatory environment
I
whether or not they are sufficiently able and
is an opportunity for the Bar to launch
Secondly, the Government has no clear
experienced to undertake the type of case in
itself into the 21st century with renewed
direction
recent
question. Moreover, it blows a gaping hole
confidence.
consultation paper suggests a cut rate version
in the Carter philosophy of the advocate’s
Bar Standards Board (BSB) and the light
of the present scheme.
on
VHCCs,
and
their
Regulation by the ring-fenced
What is needed is
ownership of his/ her cases, if HCAs in
touch oversight regulator, the Legal Services
an architecture which will incentivise early
the CPS or in solicitors’ firms keep a case
Board, should persuade even the most
preparation and efficient disposal of long
in-house until they see if it cracks, before
sceptical member of the public that the Bar’s
cases.
That can only be achieved if case
deciding to instruct self-employed counsel
house is truly in order.
fees are bid or negotiated so that the highest
only if it looks like a fight – and then only at
quality advocates can take ownership of the
the last minute.
This undesirable practice
If the Bar Council (through the BSB) accepts
cases and achieve fast, just outcomes.
is becoming more prevalent and should be
after the present consultation process that
stopped: again it threatens the quality and
it is prepared to regulate all those who
efficiency of justice.
undertake full time advocacy in whatever
Thirdly, the prospects of the forthcoming (at the time of writing) consultation on family
business entities, the last vestiges of restrictive
fees are not comforting. There is an attempt
practices will be gone.
The Bar will be
precedents_barrister_master1
2/14/07
4:33 PM
Page 1
Helping you focus on what’s really important. Applying your expertise, not drafting and assembling documents.
Commercial Property Precedents Providing precedents of transactional property documents online. • Search and browse for precedents and clauses, download and customise them to your firm’s own house style.
• Precedents included from the authoritative Commercial Property Development Precedents.
• Supported by a dedicated in-house team of qualified practitioners, documents are continually checked for accuracy and to ensure they are always up-to-date.
For further information please email emma.gilmour@thomson.com
08 p.6
the barrister
competing on an equal footing
years call. Thirdly, the establishment of the
with all other advocates.
And I
Bar Quality Advisory Panel to assist those who
for one have no doubt that we
fall below the usually high standards of the
will compete successfully with all
profession. Fourthly, the BSB is undertaking
comers, because we can provide the highest
a major quality assurance review to ascertain
quality service at the lowest price, since
what measures are necessary to reassure
we generally have (and we generally need)
the public that they are receiving a quality
the lowest overheads and infrastructure to
service.
undertake our work efficiently.
Conclusion Quality assurance We must have confidence in the profession Barristers have conventionally thought that
of which we are part. The future is bright
they did not require any kind of quality
if we grasp the opportunities that present
assurance or accreditation.
themselves.
Surely, they
The demand for high quality
would say, the fact that we are members
advocacy is greater than ever, and we know
of one of the great professions is enough
that we are best placed effectively to service
for our clients to be confident in the quality
that demand.
of services we offer.
And more than that,
surely we are quality controlled by solicitors exercising experienced judgment in choosing whom to instruct for a particular case.
Geoffrey Vos QC, Chairman, Bar Council
A problem has now developed with this approach, work. by
at
least
in
publicly
funded
Less real choice is now exercised
prosecuting
authorities
and
defence
solicitors, particularly in respect of very junior advocates.
This is because the solicitors
in charge of cases are not often able to justify the time spent in attending Court to sit behind their instructed advocates. As a result, quality assurance mechanisms are more necessary to provide confidence in the capability of the advocate. In addition, it is for the benefit of the profession to be able to demonstrate effective quality control processes.
We should not
be afraid of these innovations.
They are
needed to enable the Bar to thrive in the modern world, where competence has to be demonstrated at every stage of a professional career. There are presently 4 initiatives on the quality front: First, the new quality assurance scheme recommended by Lord Carter, which will be introduced in the first instance for publicly funded criminal work.
Secondly, making
advocacy training a compulsory part of the CPD requirement for those between 4 and 6
Telephone:
0208 215 0298 Facsimile: 0208 502 9222 Email: info@bestparkconsultants.co.uk Website: www.bestparkconsultants.co.uk
If so, call us Are you now for free impartial advice looking to with no obligations. get on the We offer discounted all over property the properties UK. With little or ladder? no money down deals. There are: No Membership Fees • No Upgrade Fees No Seminars or Seminar Fees No Monthly Subscription Fees We are a friendly family business offering free one-to-one consultations
O w a in b m s s P
W In w 0
Ch by Reg
welcoming
private clients
Our private client teams are equipped with a modern investment process and a proven track record. Our independence and flexibility, reinforced by direct contact with your fund managers, make sure that investment solutions are dovetailed to your specific requirements. Please contact: William Buckhurst Investment Adviser william.buckhurst@cheviot.co.uk
Cheviot Asset Management 90 Long Acre London WC2E 9RA
0207 845 6160
www.cheviot.co.uk
Cheviot is the trading name of Cheviot Asset Management Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and is a member firm of the London Stock Exchange. Registered Address: 90 Long Acre, London WC2E 9RA. © 2007
10
the barrister
Justice Reinvestment: a new approach to imprisonment and public safety By Andrew Coyle, Professor of Prison Studies, King’s College London
I
n February 2001 the number of
of “honest hard-working families”. More
some considerable way to explaining why
people in prison in England and
fundamentally, the task of the judge is to
the number of people in prison is increasing
Wales was 66,600 and Tony Blair
interpret and implement the law as enacted
exponentially at a time when crime is falling.
announced
government’s
by Parliament. Time was when we looked
As soon as a person who has a mental
intention to provide 2,500 new
for one major criminal justice bill in the life
health problem or a drug addiction problem
prison places as part of a ten year
of each Parliament. We have become used
commits an offence, the criminal justice
plan to deal with crime. In July 2006 the
in recent years to having several in each
system kicks in and takes priority, however
number of people in prison had risen to
session of Parliament. So long as government
reluctantly, over all other considerations.
78,400 and the Home Secretary announced
introduces more punitive criminal justice
The consequence of this, and one which I
his intention to provide an extra 8,000 prison
legislation in each session of Parliament
fear has not yet been recognised, is that if
places. These additional prison places are
and the police, prosecution and judges apply
the criminal justice system continues to be
numbers plucked out of the air or at best
these new laws, as they must, the demand for
used as a means of coping in the short term
made up in response to the latest crisis of
more prison places becomes insatiable.
with what are primarily health and social
the
problems, then there will be almost no limit
prison overcrowding. The media has recently
to the number of people who are likely to be
reported Home Office plans to purchase prison ships, to use former Army barracks
This has brought us to the position in 2007
and to convert disused psychiatric hospitals
where additional prison places are not
into prisons.
needed in response to an increase in crime.
sent to prison.
According to all reliable indicators crime has
Linked to this is the fact that the sentences
not been rising in recent years, nor has the
being handed down by courts are increasing
The question of how many prison places
number of convictions. In a joint consultation
in length. Over ten per cent of all prisoners
are needed in this country has exercised
paper Making Sentencing Clearer published
are now serving indeterminate sentences, a
governments for many years and successive
in November 2006 the Home Secretary, the
higher number than are serving sentences of
Home Secretaries have responded in different
Lord Chancellor and the Attorney General
less than 12 months. This is unprecedented
ways. Some have expressed an opinion about
provided
has
and has serious implications for the future
the need for a greater or lesser number of
become tougher, with offenders more likely
since, by definition, this means that the rate
prisoners. In the mid 1970s Roy Jenkins
to get a prison sentence for almost any
of imprisonment is unlikely to come down if
voiced great concern at the possibility that
offence and that sentence is likely to be
current provisions remain in place.
the number of people in prison might rise to
longer.” As a consequence of this, the three
45,000. During his tenure in that great office,
Ministers pointed out that there are people
Douglas Hurd talked of the need to reduce
in prison who should not be there. They
All of which leads inexorably to the conclusion
the prison population. More recent Home
stated that these include foreign prisoners,
that if the Home Secretary intends simply to
Secretaries have taken the pragmatic view
who should be deported; vulnerable women
continue to provide as many prison places
that the number of prisoners will be dictated
and young offenders; those for whom mental
as are needed, then the figure of 8,000 new
by the judges and that the task of the Home
health treatment would be more appropriate;
places will be hopelessly inadequate. As in
Office is simply to provide as many places as
the majority of non-violent offenders with
so many other areas, our experience in the
are required.
low level disorders, who could be treated
United Kingdom may well be ten or 15 years
in the community without any risk to the
behind the experience of the United States,
public; and those on remand for less serious
which has already gone down this path.
offences.
Their level of imprisonment now stands at
However, judges do not sentence in a
the
answer.
“Sentencing
738 per 100,000 of the population. The
vacuum. At a personal level they are affected
rate of imprisonment in England and Wales
by the political and media climate in which they operate. A sensitive judge cannot fail
The fact that the criminal justice system in
stands at 148 per 100,000, the highest rate in
to be influenced by consistent demands
general and prison in particular is being
Western Europe. If in a decade or so we were
that the criminal justice system should be
used to deal with problems of mental health,
to reach the American rate of imprisonment
“rebalanced” in favour of the victim and
of drug addiction and of homelessness goes
then the Home Secretary would have to
the barrister
11 Part of the TAX Watchdog organisation
provide a total of around 400,000 prison places. That is, not an additional 8,000 places but an additional 320,000 places. And this will happen unless we decide otherwise.
It is worthy of note that the one government department which seems to understand this A UK wide service. Est. 1996
is the Treasury. Since 1997 around 20,000 additional prison places have been provided in England and Wales. Reports indicate that the Treasury has finally baulked at continuing to provide a blank cheque for prison building at a time when spending on other public institutions such as schools and hospitals
MINDCLEAR
is subject to restraint. Since the 8,000 new prison places were announced in December
Take away the pressure of tax
there have been various proposals about how
Our improved triple-action formula eases the pain of tax quickly and effectively. We liaise with HM Revenue & Customs on your behalf, complete and submit your annual accounts and tax return, and provide you with unlimited FREE telephone support. All for a low fixed fee of just £299 plus VAT.*
they are to be funded. One is that the public should be offered the chance to purchase shares in new prisons under a "buy to let"
Call 0800 093 9433 for a prescription today
scheme through which they could invest
or visit www.twdaccounts.co.uk/barristers
in a new-style property company, a "real estate investment trust",
that would build *£299 represents a £50 discount off our annual fee of £349.
Place Campbell Chartered Accountants
O cP
In this age of the specialist, shouldn’t you be dealing with the accountants who specialise in the Bar? We act for approximately 2,500 practising members of the Bar and 60 sets of Barristers’ Chambers We come to see you at your convenience in Chambers either during or out of Court hours We provide the following services:
.. .. .
Tax return and accounts preparation VAT return preparation and advice Chambers accounting services, including Trade Protection Associations Payrolls for Chambers and domestic staff Financial services including mortgages, pensions and insurances
For a free initial consultation call John Constantine or Elizabeth Monk on 01342 324321
Wilmington House High Street East Grinstead West Sussex mail @ placecampbell.com
/
www.placecampbell.com
RH19 3AU
12
the barrister
prisons and then rent them out to private
lasting change in crime-ridden localities
for
prison operators, thus providing the investor
or to improve the quality of life for the
imprisonment in England and Wales has
with a guaranteed dividend from the rental
residents. The ICPS project, called Justice
existed in its present form since the 19th
income. Such a model would still leave the
Reinvestment, is seeking to discover whether
century. It is clearly, to use a current phrase,
Home Secretary having to find the necessary
there might be another way to give towns,
not fit for purpose and needs a fundamental
revenue to finance these new prison places
cities and communities a better return on
overhaul. If it is the system itself that is
on an annual basis.
the money which is spent in the name of
no longer effective, then simply making it
The average cost of keeping a person in
improving their quality of life.
more efficient means that we are merely
prison for one year is around £40,000.
radical
proposals.
The
system
of
improving the wrong system. Increasing its
That means that the cost to the taxpayer of
Take, for example, Birmingham Prison which
use compounds the error. The tax payer
maintaining a prison with 700 places will
holds around 1,450 prisoners. Because of
will be asked to pump more billions into the
be around £28 million per year. This figure
overcrowding and lack of facilities, the cost
system; we may end up with 400,000 of our
means little to the man or woman in the
of holding a prisoner in Birmingham prison
young men and women in prison; and we
street who has no point of comparison. Is
is lower than the national average, in the
will end up feeling less safe than we do at
it a lot, or not much? The reaction might
region of £30,000, and so the total cost to
present.
be that this merely shows that prisoners
the tax payer is around £43 million per year.
are being mollycoddled, given unnecessary
At present that money is paid by the Home
luxuries. Or it might be that if that is what
Office with funding from the Treasury. There
Out of every challenge comes an opportunity.
it costs, then so be it. These reactions are
is little local debate about the value which it
It would be to the advantage of all of us if
unlikely to change while these amounts of
provides to local communities in Birmingham
government ministers, instead of taking the
money, which represent poor value for public
and the West Midlands. Would people feel
easy option and simply providing ever more
money but which are relatively small in
safer if there were only 500 prisoners in
and more prison places, were to pick up that
terms of national government spending, are
Winson Green Prison; or if there were 2,000
challenge and look for a radical solution to
calculated on a national basis. If, however,
young men in the prison? The fact is that
the problem of increasing prison numbers.
they were to be calculated locally then the
we have no way of knowing what would be
public might react differently.
a sufficient amount of imprisonment for the people of Birmingham.
The International Centre for Prison Studies (ICPS) in King’s College London is currently
One way of finding out would be to discover a
engaged in a project along with other partners
mechanism to help the citizens of Birmingham
including local government to consider how
to identify as their money the £43 million
the tax payer might get better money for some
that is spent each year on the local prison.
of the resources that are spent on criminal
They could then be asked how they wanted
justice. The fact is that most crime happens
that money to be spent in order that they
locally, in streets, on estates, in shopping
might feel safer and their quality of life be
centres, in neighbourhoods. Local authorities
improved. They could decide through the
are responsible for keeping their areas safe
courts to continue to send 1,450 of their
and for providing the services to deal with
young men to prison and that would be
a range of social problems. Yet, decisions
the money spent. Alternatively, they might
about crime prevention and criminal justice
decide that actually only 500 were such a
expenditure are mainly taken at the national
threat to the community that they needed to
level. Imprisonment is the most costly
be removed from it. In that case, the prison
intervention available to the criminal justice
spend would be around £15 million. That
system. The local area sees little benefit from
would leave £28 million to be spent in other
that expenditure, except very short term
ways that would improve public safety and
relief from the activities of those imprisoned.
quality of life. It would be for the community
On their return, released prisoners still need
to decide what these might be.
drug treatment, or employment training, or mental health support, or basic education, all of which need to be provided locally
This is a radical proposal which needs a
out of non-criminal justice budgets. Criminal
fuller examination than this short article
justice expenditure often fails to achieve any
can provide. However, the time has come
the barrister
13
Judicial appointments – a quiet revolution April saw the first anniversary of the Judicial Appointments Commission, the new, independent body set up to select candidates for judicial appointment in England and Wales. JAC Chairman Baroness Usha Prashar reviews the Commission’s achievements to date. minister. For example, the judiciary is often
JAC’s collective strength comes from each
involved in adjudicating on lawfulness of
Commissioner’s knowledge, expertise and
he Judicial Appointments
the actions of the Executive. And so the
– above all – independence of mind. Their
Commission will shortly be
appointments system must be, and must be
task is to select candidates for judicial office
celebrating its first birthday.
seen to be, independent of Government.”
in England and Wales across all areas of the
Introduction
T
judiciary, from high court judges to non-legal
During our first year we have made a number of
It should be noted that the JAC’s role is to select
tribunal members and to recommend one
significant
candidate for each vacancy.
to
and recommend, not to appoint candidates.
the ways in which judicial candidates are
For each vacancy JAC Commissioners will
selected for office, and we have developed
select one candidate to recommend to the
At the outset the JAC set ourselves three
a wide-ranging programme to encourage
Lord Chancellor for appointment. The Lord
main tasks: first, to define merit – that is,
eligible candidates from the widest range of
Chancellor can reject that recommendation
what makes a good judge; second to identify
backgrounds to apply.
but he is required to provide his reasons
fair and effective assessment methods; and
to the Commission. He cannot select an
third to devise ways to reach and encourage
alternative candidate.
a wider range of applicants. In carrying out
changes
The Constitutional Reform Act
these tasks we reviewed every aspect of the previous selection process across all sectors
The JAC was set up in April 2006 as part of the far-reaching changes bought in under the
About the Commission
of the judiciary, from where we advertise through to our final recommendation to the
Constitutional Reform Act 2005, which also reformed the office of Lord Chancellor, and
The UK has one of the most highly respected
Lord Chancellor, and we consulted widely on
established the Lord Chief Justice as head of
judiciaries in the world. We have been careful
our proposed changes.
the judiciary of England and Wales.
not to introduce change for change’s sake: the JAC has been mindful that nothing we do
The JAC was set up in order to maintain and
must jeopardise the outstanding reputation
strengthen judicial independence by taking
of our existing judicial office holders.
What makes a good judge? Our new definition of merit comprises five
responsibility for selecting candidates for judicial office out of the hands of the Lord
But the old system of appointments was not
core qualities and abilities, with seventeen
Chancellor and making the appointments
without its critics. One perceived problem was
supportive behaviours. These are the criteria
process clearer and more accountable.
the way in which candidates were identified
against which all judicial applications are
as potential applicants. There was a feeling
assessed. They replace the previous system,
This is a major historical change: for the first
that the system didn’t reach out to applicants
which involved a complex matrix of up to 50
time in its 1000 year history the judiciary
- that you had to be already in a favoured
competencies and behaviours.
is fully and officially independent of the
position to consider applying. We also heard
government and the Lord Chancellor no
criticisms of the process itself, which was felt
longer has the power to choose which judge
to be overly cumbersome and bureaucratic,
to appoint.
and not sufficiently open.
The Constitutional Reform Act was designed
The new, independent Commission selects
in their fields; who can quickly absorb
to enhance the independence of the judiciary
candidates solely on merit, using streamlined
and analyse information; and who have
and to ensure clarity in the relationship
and transparent processes. We are also
appropriate knowledge of the law, and its
between the Executive and the judiciary. The
committed to widening the range of judicial
underlying principles.
current Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer of
applicants: to seeking out merit, wherever it
Thoroton summed up the issue well when
can be found.
Our new qualities and abilities are: • Intellectual capacity. We are looking for people who show a high level of expertise
• Personal qualities. We want people to demonstrate integrity and independence of
he said: The JAC is made up of 15 Commissioners,
mind, who show sound judgement and are
“In modern democratic society, it is no
including
decisive and objective.
longer acceptable for judicial appointments
professionals. The Commissioners themselves
to be entirely in the hands of a government
were selected through open competition. The
judicial,
legal
and
non-legal
• We will select only those candidates who
14
the barrister
show that they are able to treat everyone
identify fair and effective selection methods.
developing our new high-level policies, the
with respect and sensitivity, and are willing
We have streamlined the application process
JAC managed over 40 selection exercises,
to listen with patience and courtesy.
considerably, reducing the application form
including High Court, Deputy District and
by almost a half, to 13 pages. We have
District
• Authority and communications skills are
introduced technical tests and case studies
Tribunal, Care Standards Tribunal and many
essential. Judicial appointees must be able to
in place of a previous system of paper ‘sifts’.
others. So far, some 50 Selection Exercises
inspire respect and confidence, and maintain
For High Court appointments, in particular,
are scheduled for the forthcoming financial
authority when challenged.
the selection process has been made more
year.
Judges,
the
Gambling
Appeals
transparent: all candidates are now obliged to • And they must be efficient, able to work
complete an application form, and references
under
are sought openly and fairly.
pressure
and
show
appropriate
leadership or management skills.
Widening the range of applicants Our third task was to devise ways of reaching
Current programme In addition to these qualities and abilities, the
a wider range of applicants. It is worth stressing again here that the Commission
JAC has published a new ‘good character’
The JAC’s role in the judicial appointments
selects candidates on merit, and merit alone.
guideline. In the past, the Lord Chancellor
process begins when Her Majesty's Courts
We do not have any targets or quotas, and
has always considered whether or not a
Service or the Tribunals Service, working
we do not positively discriminate in favour of
candidate for appointment was of suitable
with the senior judiciary, identify what
any applicant, whatever their background.
character, but for the first time there is a
appointments they will need and issue us
statutory duty on the JAC to determine good
with a vacancy request. We then seek out
Our aim is to seek out merit wherever it can
character and to publish guidance.
the very best candidates, using our new
be found, and to find new ways to attract
processes and the qualities and abilities
suitable candidates, who for various reasons
The judicial selection process
outlined above.
are put off from applying at present. So we
The second task we had set ourselves was to
During 2006/07, at the same time as
are using better-targeted and more prominent advertising to encourage people to apply. We
Experience The Gambia STAY AT THE AWARD WINNING MANDINA LODGES AT MAKASUTU FOREST
NGALA LODGE
L
COCONUT RESIDENCE
L
SHERATON HOTEL & SPA RESORT
L
For a brochure call
0845 330 2088 www.gambia.co.uk/luxury THE KAIRABA
L
the barrister
are expanding and modernising our outreach,
puts pressure on many of our institutions, not
including a much greater emphasis on online
least the courts. Whatever those pressures
marketing, and working in collaboration
– from the media, from public opinion, or
with partners such as Association of Women
from the Government – the judiciary must
Barristers, Society of Asian Lawyers, Black
be seen to uphold the values of justice and
Solicitors Network and many others. We
independence for which they are renowned.
have also developed a monthly newsletter
The JAC’s aim is to select very best candidates
listing all current and forthcoming judicial
for judicial office, on merit, through a system
vacancies. We are also engaged in extensive
which is open, accessible and transparent.
outreach work, including regular roadshows
In this way we can help maintain public
and speaking engagements at conferences
confidence in the institutions that defend our
and events.
freedoms, and administer our justice.
The JAC does not work in isolation. We have
Further
developed a trilateral Diversity Strategy with
its
the Department of Constitutional Affairs and
judicial
the Lord Chief Justice. This commits all three
www.judicialappointments.gov.uk
information
selection
on
process,
vacancies
are
the and
available
15
JAC, current from
parties to bringing about a more diverse judiciary with increased understanding of the communities it serves, in order to ensure a judiciary of the highest quality which contributes to increased public confidence. Today our society is facing dangers and doubts on a scale not seen for 60 years. This
Clarity from Complexity MERLIN FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS is an Independent Financial Consultancy based in High Holborn. Formed in 1988 the company has developed because it is trusted by its clients. A trust based upon an experienced, open and honest approach. One’s personal objectives can fall under many headings, to be achieved they will all require some planning and more often than not some means of finance. Merlin Financial Consultants’ services are designed to aid the setting of financial objectives, support the monitoring of existing targets and liaise with you over the reappraisal of your objectives. In particular to address those longer-term requirements that it is so easy to procrastinate over, which then become a prime cause for serious worry.
WORKING FOR YOU Our purpose is to provide you with quality information to enable you, with our assistance, to create viable financial plans for the future Merlin Financial Consultants has no links to any financial group or institution. Our commitment is to you and nobody else. This enables our advice to be completely unbiased. We are happy to work on a pure fee basis, or if preferable on a disclosed commission basis or combination. Please call us for an initial review to ascertain if we can draw clarity from the complexity of your personal affairs.
Northumberland House, 303/306 High Holborn, London WC1V 7JZ Tel: 020 7404 4711 • Fax: 020 7405 1904 • email: merlin@merlinifa.co.uk
16
the barrister
‘The Bar Vocational Course: money well spent?’ I suspect that a significant number of those who sit on pupillage interview panels would openly state that a candidate’s performance on the Bar Vocational Course, or ‘BVC’, is one of the least important factors that are considered in determining applications By Tom Cross, BVC Student
Q
ualifying to be a lawyer is not
pupillage, performance on the BVC is rightly
to learn the skills at a sensible pace and in a
straightforward nowadays, if
a lesser consideration. Few would disagree,
sensible order.
it ever was. Quite aside from
after all, that academic ability is important
showing dedication to their
at the Bar (not least because true academic
The course is not just a question of box-
often
success comports a certain work ethic), and
ticking. Students can take a great deal from
the
that there can be no substitute for experiencing
the BVC into pupillage. Three examples might
unenviable task of trying to decipher exactly
real life cases with a pupil-supervisor as a
persuade the reader.
what on earth all the abbreviated course
means of training. What prompts this article
names stand for. The ‘law degree route’ to
is not a concern about that but rather about a
Firstly, it is now common for a student’s
qualification involves an LLB or BA, which
distinct yet often conflated view: that the BVC
performance in an advocacy class to be
may be followed by an LLM or a BCL and
is of minimal value to the embryo-barrister,
recorded on DVD, affording him an opportunity
possibly an LL.D. For my part, I took the ‘non-
or, worse still, is simply not worthwhile. The
to observe his court demeanour which he
law degree route’: a BA in Modern Languages
fact is clear: although they may not admit
would otherwise probably never have. As a
followed by a CPE (otherwise known as a
it in formal surrounds, many fully-qualified
result, friends of mine have been able to iron
GDL). This ‘academic’ stage complete, aspirant
barristers remain of the view that the BVC
out undesirable features of their advocacy
solicitors then take the LPC. Barristers-to-be
sooner deserves their disregard than their
before ever appearing in court. The Civil
have to complete the BVC at provider schools
respect. They are, I think, wrong to do so.
Procedure Rules require the court to make
demanding
students
today
studies, face
like BPP or ICSL. Successful candidates are
use of technology where appropriate to do so
then called to the Bar in a state of frank
Today’s BVC is very different from old ‘Bar
to further justice; the same principle is now
bewilderment as to which course they did
Finals’. There is no particular academic
rightly applied to Bar training.
when, and, more importantly, how useful they
emphasis on the new course. It is fundamentally
all were for the pupillage that awaits them
‘vocational’. Designed and taught well, a
Secondly, the practically-based BVC forces
at the start of their professional life. The
modern BVC will never fully equip the law
students to appreciate the differences between
pupillage that awaits those fortunate enough
student for pupillage, (and even less so for a
academic law and law in practice, and helps
to have obtained one, that is.
pupillage in a specialised area of the law), but
them to bridge that gap. My outstanding
it gives him or her a running start. It covers
recollection of academic contract law is that
I suspect that a significant number of those
a wide range of general skills, including civil
it comprised a succession of cases about
who sit on pupillage interview panels would
and criminal litigation, advocacy, conference,
horses (I do myself only a minor disservice).
openly state that a candidate’s performance
negotiation, legal research, opinion writing,
A necessary prelude to the application of
on the Bar Vocational Course, or ‘BVC’, is
drafting, and professional ethics. And contrary
law in practice, my study of contractual
one of the least important factors that are
to the belief of those out-of-touch, it is hard
theory (‘is freedom of contract a good thing’?)
considered in determining applications. Less
work.
nonetheless failed to make me appreciate
important, that is, than purely academic credentials
gained
through
school
the significance of contractual remedies in
and
Even the student with pupillage already
the real world. Working on a typical BVC
university examination performance. Less
secured is ill-advised to take the BVC lightly,
case, I now ask: what precisely are the terms
important than participation in traditionally
because
briefs
alleged to have been breached? Is there, in
recognised forms of legal training such as
(sometimes actual past cases) throw up many
fact, a breach? Are the Defendants entitled to
mooting or debating. Less important, too,
of the issues which typically arise in real life.
withhold payment entirely under the contract
than a candidate’s potential to ‘fit in’ to
Although the course is designed primarily
or must they pay now and claim damages
Chambers. A prevalent belief amongst many
for the general practitioner who concentrates
later? I feel confident enough now to apply
practitioners of all levels of seniority is that
substantively on contract, tort and crime,
these practical concerns to all cases in which
the inevitably artificial training offered by the
the ‘specialist’ is catered for with options
they are pertinent, regardless of whether there
BVC can never compare to the real learning-
such as Chancery and Public Law. The best
is any equine content on the facts.
curve experienced during pupillage.
BVC providers timetable classes on criminal
the
well-designed
‘mock’
and civil litigation to precede corresponding
Thirdly, the requirement on the BVC to
Far be it from one not yet called to the Bar
classes in advocacy in the same week so that
study ‘Professional Ethics’ should not be
to comment upon these views. It may well be
relevant procedure and tests are fresh in the
undervalued. In classes last term, I found
that, in assessing the quality of applicants for
advocate’s memory. Students have the time
it interesting how many students, before
the barrister
17
becoming familiar with the Code of Conduct,
date statistics, The Training Contract and
the occasional exception, it is not their fault
would have withdrawn from representing a
Pupillage Handbook 2007 suggests that out of
that insufficient places are available at the
criminal client they believed was guilty, even if
the 1,745 applicants successfully enrolled on
end of the road. It is not their fault that they
the client had not expressed his guilt to them.
the BVC in the year 2004-5, 598 candidates,
may now be in considerable debt.
It is surely essential that future barristers
at most, commenced pupillage, of which only
understand the adversarial underpinning of
544 were taken on as tenants. Even taking
At least the increasing availability of places on
our justice system before they become vital
account of those who abandon Bar training
this valuable course gives students the chance
members of it.
of their own volition, these figures remain
to apply for pupillage with practical training
startling.
under their belt. However, if people who
The above granted, there remain justified criticisms
of
the
BVC.
The
would otherwise be unable to get pupillage
hugely
This ratio of those who are offered a place
prior to commencing the BVC are realistically
disproportionate fees of the nine month
on the course to the number of places
to have their chances improved by taking it,
course are a plain disgrace. In central London
available in pupillage is, in my view, wholly
the way in which the BVC is regarded by
nearly £12,500 is charged. Even in spite
disproportionate. The contrary view holds that
practitioners may need to change. A student’s
of the availability of Inn scholarships and
to apply the ‘bottleneck of selection’ earlier,
success on the course should, in my view, be
possible ‘draw-down’ money from chambers’
narrowing the field of realistic candidates
an important factor in pupillage decisions,
pupillage awards, the size of the fees does
after only their academic lives, is no better
because it is a serious course from which a
the Bar no credit at a time when it is rightly
in principle. That is not an argument without
great deal can be learned. The Bar should
committed to attracting candidates from all
merit, and on that note it is worth bearing
take greater notice of it.
financial backgrounds. To stress that banks
in mind that the BVC can still be a useful
are more willing to lend to future barristers
qualification for careers other than the Bar,
(on the basis that barristers, as opposed to
such as in business. But the two-thirds of
Tom Cross is currently undertaking the BVC
many other professionals, will be able to
students who pay some £12,500 for the BVC
at a London provider. He begins pupillage at
afford to pay off significant debt in the future)
and for whom no pupillage is available at
Francis Taylor Building (formerly 2 Harcourt
is a weak point in defence of the current
the end are not all naïve and foolish to waste
Buildings) in October 2007, specialising in
situation: fewer than one third of those who
their money. Most genuinely believe that if
Public Law.
complete the course end up in pupillage, not
they work hard, ‘having a go’ might just bear
to mention with tenancy. In its most up-to-
fruit. Are they to be blamed for trying? With
s i l yy Case a D of Ke k
THE LA W REPORTS
L R es .u W mmari orts.co e T h ne Su wrep i
always cited in preference
nl .la e O www e r F
THE WEEKLY LA W REPORTS The most comprehensive coverage of the cases that matter
THE INDUSTRIAL CASES REPORTS the definitive series on employment and industrial relations law
New for 2007 THE BUSINESS LAW REPORTS
THE CONSOLIDATED INDEX
offering prompt and accurate coverage of all cases affecting business professionals and those who advise them
to all leading series of law reports
order your free sample now!
The ICLR is a registered charity and publishes the most authoritative, accurate and up to date series of law reports. Please contact us for a free sample and details of subscription prices.
IC LR
The Incorporated Council of
L AW R E P ORT I N G FOR England & Wales
Megarry House, 119 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1PP Tel: 020 7242 6471 Fax: 020 7831 5247 E-Mail: postmaster@iclr.co.uk
www.lawreports.co.uk
NEWS ROUND UP
18
the barrister
NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Tougher penalties forNEWS misuse ofNEWS personal NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSdata NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS For the first time courts will be able to jail people who trade in - or deliberately misuse - the personal data of others, in a move to crack down NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS on the illegal trade in personal information announced by the Department for Constitutional Affairs in February. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS The decision follows a public consultation on increasing penalties for deliberate and wilful misuse of personal data and is part of the Government's NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS strategy on data sharing to deliver better public services to individuals. The Government has been increasingly concerned about an apparent NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS growth in the trade in personal data. Current penalties of a fine in the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) have not provided a sufficiently strong NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS deterrent. These concerns were highlighted in special reports to Parliament by the Information Commissioner, What Price Privacy, and What NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Price Privacy Now? Lord Falconer, Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor, said: NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS "We are determined to do all we can to stamp out this intrusive and illegal trade. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS "People have a right to have their privacy protected from those who would deliberately misuse it and I believe the introduction of custodial NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS penalties will be an effective deterrent to those who seek to procure or wilfully abuse personal data. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS "Greater data-sharing within the public sector has the potential to be hugely beneficial to the public and is wholly compatible with proper respect NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS for individuals' privacy. One of the essential ways of maintaining that compatibility is to ensure the security and integrity of personal data once NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS it has been shared." NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Bar warns Peers of cost toNEWS consumers Bar Council in lobby NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSpush NEWSover NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS of new legal services bureaucracy independence ofNEWS legalNEWS profession NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS The Bar Council, has given its strongest warning yet over the NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS potential costs of the proposed new Legal Services Board and the The Bar Council has launched a major new lobbying offensive over the NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Office of Legal Complaints. Legal Services Bill, currently before the House of Lords. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS The creation of the Board is a central plank of the Legal Services The Bar has voiced concerns during the passage of the Bill NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Bill. about the impact it could have on the independence of the legal NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS profession, arguing that its contribution to the UK economy could be NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS In a strongly worded letter to key members of the Upper House, jeopardised. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Geoffrey Vos QC, Chairman of the Bar Council, says: NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS It has also warned of the high cost of setting up the Bill’s proposed NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS ‘The Joint Committee, which considered the draft Legal Services new regulatory architecture and the need to limit such costs by NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Bill, concluded that the Government’s estimate of the costs of the ensuring that the new Legal Services Board is a truly light-touch NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS new regulatory framework were “speculative at best”. regulator, and by giving the Office for Legal Complaints the power to NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS delegate complaints handling to the Bar Council, acting through the NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS ‘We agree with that assessment and remain profoundly sceptical Bar Standards Board. The Bar Council’s record on handling consumer NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS about the efficiency savings claimed for the Bill.’ complaints has been both excellent and economical. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS The influential Joint Committee, chaired by Lord Hunt of Wirral, The Bar Council has now written to 200 Peers and begun a round of NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS last year invited the Government to revisit its claims that the Bill face to face meetings to press home its case. Amendments reflecting NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS would produce savings. But the Department for Constitutional its concern have already been tabled during the passage of the Bill to NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Affairs claimed in January 2007 that, after “short-term transition date, though Ministers have as yet been unwilling to make changes. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS costs”, there would be a long-term annual saving of running costs NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS from 2008 of £9.6 million, of which £6.5 million would accrue to the Commenting on the lobbying initiative, Bar Chairman Geoffrey Vos NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS professional bodies. QC: NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS This, the Department claims, would be “passed on to providers ‘The Bar is concerned that the provisions relating to appointments to NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS (through reduced practising certificate fees) and then to consumers the new Legal Services Board will weaken the perceived independence NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS (through charges)”. of the legal profession, by placing too much power in the hands of the NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Government. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Mr Vos says: ‘We believe that this is wishful thinking, and note that NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS the Department describes its own figures as “indicative, rather ‘Apart from the constitutional significance of this proposal, we believe NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS than statistically robust”.’ that the Government’s approach could have a detrimental effect on NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS our overseas markets. This approach could well threaten the Bar’s NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS He added: "the costs regime under the Bill is particularly £200m contribution to the value of the UK ’s service exports. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS unfair because the Government pays for the present system of NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS oversight regulation which is undertaken by the Department for ‘We propose that the Chairman and members of the LSB should be NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Constitutional Affairs, the Lord Chancellor, the Master of the Rolls, made by the Lord Chancellor with the concurrence of the Lord Chief NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS and other Government entities. Under the proposed new system, Justice. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS the entire cost of regulation will pass to the legal profession and NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS then to the public." ‘This would reduce the perception that the appointment could NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS be subject to inappropriate political influence. We note that the NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS The Bar Council is pressing for amendments to the Bill, designed Government has accepted the formula “… in consultation with the NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS to ensure that the start-up costs and additional ongoing costs of President of the Court of Session” in recent legal services reform NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS the new arrangements are borne by public funds so that they do legislation in Scotland .’ NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS not have to be passed on to consumers as a result of increased NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS costs on the professions. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS
the barrister
19
NEWS ROUND UP
NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS LSC PROPSAL FOR FAMILY GRADUATED FEES: IMPROVEMENT BUT STILL MAJOR NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSSOME NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS CONCERNS, SAY LAPG NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS The Legal Aid Practitioners Group welcomed, with reservations, the improvements in the structure of the LSC’s proposals for family graduated NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS fees, but expressed continuing serious concern about the rates on offer. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Director NEWS Richard NEWS Miller said, “The NEWS structure set outNEWS in theseNEWS revised NEWS proposals is a distinct improvement on theNEWS proposals fromNEWS the WayNEWS Ahead NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS document, particularly forNEWS care proceedings. Nonetheless, are still sceptical as to whether fixed feeNEWS systemsNEWS can be appropriate for allNEWS family NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSwe NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS work; and we remain seriously that theNEWS rates payable these proposals will NEWS not be sufficient to ensure an adequate NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSconcerned NEWS NEWS NEWSunder NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSsupplier NEWS base for NEWS this work.” NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS published NEWS NEWS NEWSthe NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS The documents also included LSC’sNEWS intended scheme for immigration. LAPGNEWS committee member andNEWS immigration specialist NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Lawrence Lupin said, “There remain many questions about how the LSC has calculated the proposed payment rates under this scheme. The LSC NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSwho NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS has so far failed NEWS to answer these NEWS questions despiteNEWS repeated requests. MostNEWS of the respected practitioners have seen these figures have NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS concluded that they are not viable. Under these fees, there is no scope to undertake quality work, and clients will suffer even if they are able to NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS find a lawyer.” NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS “NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Miller also expressed concern about the pace and extent of change. I have downloaded nineteen pdf files fromNEWS the Legal Services Commission NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS website, including annexes and regulatory impact assessments. This is on top of consultations published earlier this month on police NEWS station NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS boundaries and the very high costNEWS criminalNEWS case panel, not NEWS to mention the negotiations on theNEWS new unified contract. I am paid full time to keep NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS How NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS on top ofNEWS the LSC’s initiatives, and NEWS I can barely copeNEWS with thisNEWS blizzardNEWS of publications. on earth canNEWS any practitioner who is trying to conduct NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSbe NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSthe NEWS a substantial caseload to aNEWS high standard expected to do NEWS so? The sheer volume, speed and NEWS extent ofNEWS the changes is liable to destroy legal NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS aid system even if the substance doesn’t.” NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS JUSTICE ACCESS DENIED Campaign Bar Standards Makes NewNEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSBoard NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS–NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Launched Appointments NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSinNEWS NEWS NEWSforces NEWS LeadingNEWS organisations the advice fieldNEWS have joined to The Bar Standards Board has announced two new senior appointments. oppose NEWS civil legal aid reforms for implementation later this NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSdue NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Valerie Shrimplin has been appointed Head of Education Standards year. The AccessNEWS to Justice Alliance (AJA) NEWS is to spearhead major NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS aNEWS and Julie Myers have been appointed Head of Strategy and campaign to show that the government’s proposals threatenNEWS a real NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Communications at the BSB. reduction in public access to justice. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Dr Valerie Shrimplin joins the BSB as Head of Education Standards The campaign JUSTICE – ACCESS DENIED brings together key NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSsector NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS advice and voluntary organisations. TheyNEWS fear that the having been Head of Quality Assurance at the Royal College of NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSreforms NEWSwill NEWS NEWS NEWS Carter Report meanNEWS fewer people willNEWS be given legal Surgeons. She has some fifteen years’ experience of quality assurance NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSespecially NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS advice, NEWS and thatNEWS it will impact on those with complex and the management of education and standards, including regulatory NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS needs. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS frameworks and procedures, as applied in UK high level professional NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS statutory bodies and universities. Valerie is also experienced in policy The support the advice is NEWS central NEWS to successful NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSofNEWS NEWSsector NEWS NEWS making in education and standards, and in the drawing up and implementation of the reforms. The campaign asks NEWS the government NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS implementation of appropriate QA systems in universities in the UK to step NEWS back andNEWS reconsider these proposals, especially new NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSthe NEWS and overseas. funding system of fixed fees. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS is NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS The campaign adopting the ‘No Entry’ sign NEWS as a logo (see Julie Myers, Head of Strategy and Communications at the BSB, has NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS attached) to underpin its themes, showing how access to justice a background in regulatory policy-making, consumer affairs and NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSAction NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS will be denied. being planned includes: organisational change. She joins the BSB from the communications NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS regulator Ofcom where she was most recently responsible for • Pressure in parliament for review of Carter reforms NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS managing delivery of the high-profile investigation into the impact • MediaNEWS briefings using case examples from clients NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS of food advertising on children. Previously she established Ofcom’s • A petition to goNEWS to the Government NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS independent Consumer Panel, providing advice on a broad range NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS of consumer issues and developing innovative techniques to make A week of action is also planned for the week beginning 14th NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS regulators accountable for the way they promote and protect the May. There will be campaign launch meeting that week and AJA NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS supporters will NEWS demonstrate outside County Courts and tribunal interests of consumers. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS offices using placards with the noNEWS entry sign logo. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Mark Stobbs, Director of the Bar Standards Board said: NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSofNEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS “The purpose the week of action is to NEWS raise public awareness of the potential impact NEWS the Government’s reforms will have on NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS "I am delighted that Julie and Valerie have joined us. Both bring access to justice.NEWS Everyone concerned about these NEWS services NEWS should NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS valuable knowledge and experience that the Bar Standards supportNEWS the campaign contact AJA members to takeNEWS part,” NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWSand NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Board needs and which will help us greatly in meeting our future says Alison Hannah, the NEWS Chair of NEWS AJA. NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS challenges." NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Press contact Michael MacNeil: mmacneil@lag.org.uk NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS Telephone: 020 7833 7435NEWS (direct NEWS line) NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS
20
the barrister
Increase in the number of barristers suffering from stress, depression and alcohol abuse By Hilary Tilby, LawCare
T
he
below
mitigation for one of the same. Public funding
So, the end result is that lawyers are
demonstrates very clearly
chart
was freely available for contested cases and
understandably
the growth in the number
those paying the bill appeared to value the
demotivated and are suffering from stress
of UK Lawyers in distress.
service provided, since there were few, if any,
and depression. Those can, in turn, lead
The
quibbles about the fee.
to excessive smoking, drinking and eating,
magenta
column
indicates the number of
feeling
undermined
and
because when you are subject to long-term
new LawCare case files opened that relate to
stress you feel lousy and when you feel lousy
stress and depression and the purple column,
Nowadays? Little of the above work is still
you want to feel better. Alcohol, nicotine and
those suffering from alcohol abuse. Bearing
available to young Barristers and Lawyers,
sugar are all quick fixes to sort the problem,
in mind that 80% of those who come to
who in general, seem to rank in the public
but, of course, over a period of time, you
LawCare seeking help with alcohol issues
esteem marginally ( but only marginally)
need more and more of the same substance
say that they started drinking due to stress
above Traffic Attendants. There is a false
to get the same effect, and what goes up
in the workplace, and that the new case files
perception of “fat cats” engendered by the
must come down. Alcohol, in particular is
opened by LawCare are rising, year on year,
press and members of the government, which
a depressant, so that a vicious circle starts
by between 22% and 30%, it is apparent that
might apply to a small minority but which
to develop. Nor should we lose sight of
the strains of life in practise are increasing
fails to take into account the majority, who
drugs, particularly cocaine and crystal meth.
inexorably.
work extremely hard to make only a moderate
Statistics indicate that the highest usage of these drugs is amongst young professionals and with it commonly being available for less
Law C are Cases
than the price of a drink, usage is growing. Currently, only 1% of LawCare’s case files relate to drug abuse and we think that is for two reasons. Firstly, use of these drugs is still
A lcohol
a criminal offence, so even on a confidential
Stress/D epression
basis, lawyers are reluctant to admit their addiction. Secondly, many of the users are still young enough for the damage being caused not to be too apparent. But it is there and in time, it will impinge seriously on the ability to lead a professional and private life.
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
What can you do to avoid this happening?
2006 18
Many Lawyers share the characteristics of the obsessive personality ( driven; ambitious; unable
to
delegate;
perfectionist;
high
Is it any surprise when you examine the
living. Fees are constantly under attack and
achievers;
market place in which members of the Bar
with fixed fees, particularly in relation to
prepared to give 110% of themselves, no
practise today? I was called to the Bar in
publicly funded work, by the time that travel
matter what the consequences in health terms;
1974 and in those days, a young Barrister
expenses and preparation / waiting time are
A type personality etc). That is usually coupled
could cut his or her teeth by doing a number
taken into account, work can end up being
with a perception that as a Barrister, one is
of undefended divorces in a morning in the
done for less than the hourly rate paid to a
in the business of sorting out other people’s
County Court; prosecuting part / the whole
plumber.
problems, so that, by definition, one should
over
conscientious;
only
ever
of a list of guilty pleas on a Friday morning
also be able to sort out one’s own problems
in the Crown Court; or by providing a plea in
and if one cannot, one is “inadequate”, “a
21
the barrister
failure”, and other such pejorative terms. That
The typical symptoms of vicarious trauma are
including one specifically relating to vicarious
then creates an immediate barrier to seeking
reduced tolerance to others; difficulty in relating
trauma), ranging from 1½ hour to 3 hours, at
help and problems just fester and worsen.
to others; increased cynicism; becoming
the time and place of your choosing.
overly
judgemental
of
others;
emotional
numbing; sleep problems; depression; and
As
An important tool in dealing with health issues
addictive behaviour. Vicarious trauma cannot
commented:-
is to actually listen to what your body and
be avoided, but it can be recognised and then
“The most important thing I now know is that
mind are telling you. Few people who suffer
dealt with by de-briefing with a qualified
we all need help. At some point in our lives,
sudden death or breakdown have not actually
counsellor. Such counsellors must, by the rules
we will need help and we should never be
had any warning signs. Either they chose to
of their professional bodies, have regular de-
ashamed to ask for it. Just make that phone
ignore them or they simply did not appreciate
briefing sessions with a supervising counsellor,
call. It will be the best phone call you ever
them for what they were. Our bodies do not
to relieve their emotional pressure, yet lawyers
make.”
just exist as vehicles to move our brains from
open themselves to as much emotional trauma
place to place, and repeated bouts of infection;
and just battle on without thinking of the effect
aching joints for long periods; a clouded mind
it is having on them.
with “scrambled egg brain”, when previously easy tasks become painfully difficult; constant exhaustion; seeing everything in shades of
The most important tool of all in dealing
grey; loss of usual joie-de-vivre; excessive
with the kind of issues set out above is to
negativity; loss of self-confidence and self-
be prepared to ask for help. No one can
esteem; with or without increased drinking,
survive the 21st century isolated and alone. As
smoking and /or eating, are all symptoms of
recognised by Chief Justice Christine Durham
long-term stress which can lead to mental and
of the Utah State Bench
physical ill health if ignored.
“As lawyers and judges we identify ourselves as problem solvers. But we also live lives dominated by high expectations and multiple
There is also the issue of Vicarious Trauma,
demands. We are often convinced that any
a syndrome identified by Lisa McCann and
admission of the stress our lives generate
Dr Laurie Pearlman, and taken very seriously
is a sign of weakness that will undermine
amongst Judges and Lawyers in the USA. The
everything we strive to be. No one is immune
principle is that continued exposure to those
and most of us cannot cope
actively suffering trauma can result in shifts in
alone.”
the personal perception and experience of life of the observer ie. you:“ Anybody who engages with trauma survivors
LawCare is there to help by means of a
or perpetrators …can be open to vicarious
365 day a year, free and totally confidential
trauma, even lawyers and Judges.”
helpline.
“Lawyers and Judges hear terrible things.” By seeing clients in conference; drafting or
0800 018 4299
reading affidavits and / or witness statements;
Monday to Friday
preparing a case for trial; and being involved
9am – 7.30pm
in a trial, in order to do your job properly you
Saturday
have to open yourself to absorbing elements
Sunday
of what you are hearing, reading and writing.
10am – 4pm
and
Over a period of time, that has an effect on you and this applies whatever type of practise
We also provide free
you have. Clients contesting a will or fighting
( save for travelling
a contract dispute can be just as emotionally
expenses) interactive
draining as those who have committed
stress
distressing crimes or whose contact with their
and
children is at stake.
training sessions (
recognition management
someone
who
Hilary Tilby, LawCare
sought
such
help
BARRISTER MAGAZINE SAVE £20 ON TOP PRICE TICKETS
★★★★★ SUNDAY TELEGRAPH
‘THE GREATEST SONGS EVER WRITTEN’ INDEPENDENT
£60 TICKETS REDUCED TO £40 FOR ALL PERFORMANCES (SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY) EXCLUDING FRIDAY AND SATURDAY EVENINGS UNTIL 29 SEPT 2007. A £3 PER TRANSACTION FEE WILL APPLY
SAVOY THEATRE
CALL 0870 164 8787
(24HRS)
AND QUOTE ‘BARRISTER MAGAZINE OFFER’
the barrister
23
Management of compensation claims- Why a well managed compensation claim can be part of the rehabilitation process By Bill Braithwaite QC, Head of Exchange Chambers was asked to give a talk a while
I
the catastrophe, and to do so in a way which
and beyond the ability of all professional
ago to the Walton Neuro Centre
suits them, not the insurers, nor the State,
carers. And yet families are frequently left
in Liverpool, and I used the title
nor even the defence solicitors.
to manage on their own. Good care and
“Lawyers treating severely brain
support can be the key to rehabilitation. It
injured patients”. I wanted to see
Going back to visiting the patient in
is widely acknowledged that a good case
if the doctors could contemplate the
hospital, it can be exceptionally difficult
manager, with suitable support workers, can
possibility that the intervention of lawyers
to return home from hospital; the obvious
provide
could, within the damaging limitations of
example is the patient in a wheelchair, whose
Unfortunately, that can be expensive, and
the judicial system, actually be constructive
house is inappropriate. In order to find new
it may not be realistic to see it as cost-
in the therapeutic process. They appeared
accommodation, the sympathetic lawyer has
effective. Sometimes there is no chance of
to be very receptive to that notion (possibly
to find out what the family really wants. It is
reducing dependence, or of rehabilitation
just being polite), and I wonder if the time
not uncommon for the patient to be told that
back into work, and so the cost is aimed at
has come when doctors and lawyers are
he should move into a bungalow, because that
improving quality of life. If that is so, it can
able to co-operate more extensively in the
would suit his disability. However, bungalows
be difficult for insurers to justify funding an
management of the patient’s rehabilitation.
do not suit everyone, and families should not
expensive package. However, if that is the
This appears to be particularly topical
feel any pressure to alter their wishes to suit
correct course for the individual claimant, his
because insurers are keen to be involved in
lawyers. The correct rule is that there is no
lawyers must make the rehabilitation process
that process, which raises some interesting
fixed rule; I have clients all over the country,
work by obtaining the money, and helping
ethical issues.
in all sorts of different accommodation, and
the client to initiate a suitable package of
the only true guidance they should be given
support and rehabilitation.
community-based
rehabilitation.
In my opinion, the legal management
is that they ought to act reasonably. The
of a claim can and should start, subject to
rule for the lawyers is to listen and enable,
It is all too easy for lawyers to overlook
the family’s wishes, whilst the patient is
thereby managing the client’s expectations
the pressures of continuous care, but it is our
in hospital. That may sound controversial
and solving his problems. By doing that, you
duty to perceive the problem, and manage it
(shades of ambulance chasing) but in fact
discover what he wants, help him to find it
in a way which will suit the family, and help
it is precisely the reverse. Again and again
(eg by giving guidance on how to look, or
them to cope.
I see families who have not been helped by
by employing a property finder), obtain the
That requires money, which has to come
lawyers, doctors or the State, and who have
money to buy it, arrange the legalities, and
from the defendant. Oddly though, it is
consequently struggled to get out of hospital
sort out the moving. What could be more
not universal for claimants’ lawyers to
when ready, and have then found it almost
therapeutic for the patient than to have this
obtain substantial interim payments, even
impossible to survive in the radically changed
huge problem solved to his, and his family’s,
though this is an essential part of the good
circumstances following catastrophic injury.
satisfaction?
management of a claim.
As I write this, I can think immediately of three clients who all need lawyers’ help to
When that first problem is solved,
An area of difficulty which has arisen
move on in their lives; one has been stuck in
by discharge of the patient into suitable
in the last few years is that insurers seek
an institution for well over a year when all
accommodation, all is not over. First, the
involvement in the process of “rehabilitation”,
she wants to do is to go home.
accommodation may prove not to be suitable
used in its widest sense of finding suitable
after all. That raises the question whether
accommodation, implementing a support
This management question raises what
they have to stay, or can they move when
package, sourcing suitable equipment, and
is, I think, a fundamental difference in the
they realise their mistake? Putting that
generally returning life to as near normal as
approach of personal injury lawyers. The
on one side, it’s no good finding the right
can be expected. The concept sounds ideal;
traditional method of managing a claim was
accommodation if the patient cannot survive
co-operation in the way envisaged when the
to take the claimant as you find him, and
without help. Families are often the most
Civil Procedure Rules were implemented in
establish the cost of what he thinks he needs.
powerful support for the injured person, but
1999. Sadly, all is not as it seems, and there
The more sympathetic system is to enable
they cannot always provide continuous care;
can be a risk that outside involvement will
(empower?) the claimant and his family to
it is axiomatic in this world of catastrophic
be damaging. There was an attempt recently
put their ruined lives back together following
injuries that 24/7 care is highly demanding,
to ensure involvement by insurers in the
24
the barrister
brain injury case management of a patient,
that might not be the best way forward. It is
An incidental effect of this form of
but fortunately it did not succeed; case
very difficult to see what a defendant could
rehabilitative management is that, by the time
management is a form of clinical treatment,
add, by way of expertise or advice, to a well-
the case comes to trial, most of the problems
and it should remain part of the treatment
managed claimant’s team.
and uncertainties have been resolved, and
process.
there is less left to argue about; those are the When accommodation and care have
cases which are more likely to settle, thereby
Another example of the difficulty is the
been arranged to the claimant’s satisfaction,
saving the claimant from stress and worry,
attempt by insurers to insist that a claimant
there are many other areas which all need
and aiding his rehabilitation.
should seek local authority or health authority
attention, and money. Transport can be vital
help in finding accommodation, and in the
to a person’s well-being; if he does not have
provision of care. There are all sorts of
a suitable wheelchair or vehicle, he cannot
tactics being used, some covered with sugar
move around with dignity and independence;
to hide the bitter taste, but they all have the
he cannot go out, be entertained, or live life
same object; to reduce the cost to the insurer.
as the rest of us know it. Suitable equipment
Good management of a claim requires the
can make an enormous difference in what
lawyers to understand the law correctly,
an injured person can do, but it all costs
apply it individually to the client, support
money.
Bill Braithwaite QC
the client and his family in their decisions (helping them to reach reasonable ones), and
The more we can persuade doctors that
resist outside pressures. This is not always
we have a place in the therapeutic process,
easy, because in order to obtain sufficient
the more likely it is that they will be prepared
money to buy accommodation, instal care,
to involve us in the therapeutic management
fund equipment, and put life back together
of their patient. By working together as a
again, one has to rely on the insurer (or other
team, it is more likely that the patient will
defendant). Sometimes, they will promise
achieve a good result.
co-operation in return for involvement, and
NW Brown & Company Limited’s Financial Planning division are committed to the concept of truly independent bespoke financial advice.
Putting you first.
Worried about the state of your finances?
Worried about affording your retirement?
Worried about the performance of your investments?
Breadth of service Our service covers the whole spectrum of personal finance, including: Budgeting Protection Tax efficient investments Asset allocation Planning for financial independence Retirement planning
Mortgages and debt planning Planning for education costs Inheritance tax planning
We work on a time-based or fixed-fee basis, and our advice is never influenced by potential commission. We provide an initial, free-of-charge fact-finding discussion with you. From this we can prepare a detailed report which analyses your current situation, identifies areas for potential improvement and recommends a strategy for the future - including any immediate action. Once the strategy has been agreed, we can, if you wish, help with its implementation. Where appropriate, advice is given in conjunction with existing professional advisers, for example your accountant and solicitor. NW Brown & Company Limited has over £400 million under discretionary management. We are also delighted to be able to provide our clients with Continuing Services
Call us on 01223 720 205 or email financial.planning@nwbrown.co.uk NW Brown & Company Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority
the barrister
25
Online challenges face-to-face CPD With online learning, barristers can choose from a whole host of courses that interest them, choosing from content which is continually updated and added throughout the year. The lessons take place in any location: wherever you choose to set up your computer or laptop. Stephen Caine, CEO of CPDChannel.com*, explains why he believes online learning is the future for Continuous Professional Development
E
very year, all practising
lifesaver for barristers. The Bar Council’s
disciplined, and tend to structure their CPD
barristers
the
annual CPD deadline is December 31st and
learning more throughout the year.
UK are required by
while barristers are certainly clever, there
the
to
are more than a few of them that left
Time and money wasted not doing CPD
twelve
meeting their CPD requirements until the
courses online
mandatory Continuous
very last minute in 2006. In fact we saw
Bar
in
Council
complete
points.
more visitors anxiously trying to complete
A typical face to face CPD course usually
Solicitors, as instructed by the Law Society,
their mandatory CPD hours online on New
works out to be somewhere in the region
must achieve sixteen CPD points. The points
Year’s Eve than on any other day in 2006.
of £75 per point. Add to that the cost
can be on any legal subject but practitioners
If it weren’t for online learning, there would
of travel, subsistence, accommodation and
naturally tend to gravitate towards areas of
be many barristers in trouble with the Bar
(most importantly) the loss of billable hours
their own professional interest.
Council right now, facing fines or penalties.
while you travel to and from the courses and
Professional
Development
(CPD)
you’re looking at some very costly sessions. This
is
where
practitioners
usually
Online courses allowed them to log on during
encounter their first problem with meeting
the holiday period,
CPD requirements: shopping around for the
taking
courses that interest them, in a convenient
of the long stretch
location, and at times of the day, month or
of down time, and
year which suit them. It’s a tall order, usually
claim their missing
not met by most course providers in the UK.
points. Our servers
Many family practitioners end up in the odd
were red-hot right
Personal Injury course for example, just
through New Years
because they couldn’t find anything closer to
Eve and on average
their own interests that they could attend in
one
the time they had available.
completed
advantage
course
was every
five minutes in that With online learning, barristers can choose
single
twenty-four
from a whole host of courses that interest
hour period. This
them, choosing from content which is
is a huge amount
continually updated and added throughout
considering people
the year. The lessons take place in any
are
location: wherever you choose to set up
spending the time
your computer or laptop. As for the time,
celebrating
whenever suits you - 9am, 3pm, midnight,
their
weekends, even Christmas day or New
families.
Year’s Eve if you want.
solicitors
usually
slightly
with
friends
appeared This particular benefit has proven to be a
out
So
or far have
to
be more
Invariably barristers are forced to absorb
26
the barrister
the cash loss or compensate for it by giving
It’s not only learners that face massive time
to realise that online CPD training courses
up more of their own personal time.
constraints. Course presenters are also
not only save billable hours, but also allow
reluctant to spend time travelling to and
them greater flexibility and convenience.
Then there are cancellations. Once barristers
from courses. As a result face to face course
have gone to the effort to source and
providers very often may be unable to secure
schedule a suitable course, book and pay for
senior barristers and QCs as lecturers.
* CPD Channel is a CPD course provider accredited by the Law Society and the Bar
it, even arrange their necessary transport and accommodation, invariably a client will
Online courses will often attract the more
Council which broadcasts digital training
have an emergency or a case will need
senior lecturers. It allows them to reach
content in 1 hour courses containing video,
urgent attention. One way or another, you’d
unlimited audiences, in a short space of
sound and text to an online audience.
have to cancel and in most cases lose your
time, from the comfort and convenience of
Practitioners
deposit.
their own chambers.
content from leading barristers in their
receive
quality,
up-to-date
chosen areas of interest and are able to This all adds up to some shocking figures.
Making the change
complete their requisite hours whenever it suits them, without the hassle and extra
Recent research undertaken by CPD Channel estimates that legal professionals in the UK
While solicitors are required to complete
costs associated with attending face to face
are wasting on average 860,000 billable
at least four face to face hours, barristers
courses. Visit www.cpdchannel.com.
hours and £145 million in fees doing their
are free to complete all of their CPD
CPD face to face - just by travelling to and
requirements online. Of course some face to
from courses, waiting around, and taking
face learning will be invaluable, and online
breaks during courses. The figures are
courses can work very well in partnership
conservative, based on the assumption that
with the more traditional training methods.
practitioners attend three blocks of CPD
Many of CPD Channel’s learners visit the
courses per year, and factoring in Legal 500
site simply because they have completed
hourly rates and HMCS’ “Guideline figures
most of their points, and just need to “top
for the summary assessment of costs”, as
up”. They would otherwise be faced with
well as Ministry of Transport statistics on
having to commit to, and pay for, a block
average travel times for business trips in
with too many points. The overrun would be
the UK. So in some cases barristers will be
wasted as you cannot carry points over to
looking at an even larger amount.
the following year.
Legal practitioners have yet to realise
Many barristers privately admit to being
the full impact that attending face-to-
slightly “techno-phobic” but do not realise
face CPD courses has on their time and
that online CPD learning is actually very
their profitability. E-learning, podcasting
simple. Online providers use straightforward
and virtual meetings have taken off on an
processes that allow for all levels of computer
enormous scale in other sectors and with
literacy. No special software is needed,
online CPD learning the legal profession
video presentations open automatically, and
now has at its fingertips the same kind
documents are easy to download.
of convenience. There is no reason why barristers shouldn’t have more control over
The Bar Council has been phasing in an
when, where, and how they complete their
“established practitioners programme” and
CPD courses. Online courses are designed
since January 2005 all barristers have been
with the ultimate aim of giving barristers
subject to CPD requirements, right up to the
more control over their timetables, their
level of Queen's Counsel. As time goes by I
costs, and their billable hours.
expect more and more practitioners will start
the barrister
27
Is the Bar ‘fit for purpose’ in the twenty-first century? Barbara Hewson says the Bar must change its working methods to survive
O
n 8 January 2007, the
and dry, unless they start making proper
be far more pro-active. At a minimum,
new
contracts.
chambers must ask themselves whether it
Chairman
of
the
Bar told the Financial Times:
is reasonable to meet with the instructing
“"Where we're
Much of the Bar fails to recognise that, like
solicitor and his client to set terms in
missing out is ordinary
solicitors, it is in the business of selling
advance. From the lay client’s perspective,
working-class
people,
legal expertise. Chambers that do not
this is perfectly normal. Marginalizing the
from all racial and social origins, who think
recognise this are becoming “price takers,”
Bar is no basis for developing a strong
the Bar is unattainable." It’s unclear who
and will see income per tenant decline. A
relationship between lay client, solicitor and
is working class nowadays. According to a
bizarre situation is developing in some sets,
barrister. After all, they are all on the same
survey carried out for the Royal Liverpool
particularly when high volumes of repeat
side.
Friendly Society last year, “about 2.67m
work are involved, whereby they are being
people consider themselves working-class
excluded from the pricing “loop” altogether,
Many chambers have a slovenly approach to
even though they are among the top 20%
resulting in the imposition of “take it or
fee collection from private clients. This comes
of richest Britons, as do 500,000 who earn
leave it” briefs.
from not setting proper terms as to payment,
more than £100,000-a-year” (BBC News, 5
when work comes in, and (incredibly) not
May 2006). But if such people consider the
A parallel to this would be having your
stipulating a time for payment, or stage
Bar unattainable, maybe it’s because they
doctor refer you to a specialist for a surgical
payments in ongoing cases, still less prompt
don’t fancy being part of a legal theme park.
procedure and telling the surgeon, as you
payment of disbursements and interest.
But if the Bar wants to make itself more
are climbing on to the operating table,
Some silks and juniors do much better and
attractive to clients especially through Direct
what you are prepared to pay him. This
so do some sets but, I suspect, fewer than
Access, it must radically change the way
would result in the
in which it operates.
surgeon
If it doesn’t, the
handing
companies and private equity firms who will
over to his newly
be sniffing around once the Legal Services
qualified
Bill becomes law, will force change upon
surgeon, to allow
us.
him a bit of practice.
house
Such
practices
At present, chambers operate with a model
always
derived from the eighteenth century. We
lowest-common-
wear wigs, have pupils and clerks. The
denominator results
computerised
for the client, and
billings
systems
current
produce
in chambers are primitive, and solicitors
ensure
complain about them with good reason.
experienced,
the
least least
qualified,
lowest-
But it’s the Bar’s archaic terms of work,
priced
person
its pricing practices, and its approach to
does the job. The
fee collection which are beyond the pale.
lay client deserves
It beggars belief that any profession that
better than this.
operates as sole traders, should think it acceptable not to have contracts with private
S u c c e s s f u l
clients. True, there are alternative contractual
chambers looking to
terms on the Bar Council’s website – but who
attract and develop
uses them? Only a few senior practitioners
young barristers by
utilise bespoke contracts.
offering
Code
for
Solicitors,
The new draft
currently
before
personal
development
the Master of the Rolls for approval, has
objectives
dropped solicitors’ professional obligation to
some idea of future
pay counsel. This will leave many sets high
income will have to
and
Busy? Tired? Fed up? Exhausted? And single. You’re bright, confident but time-short, energylow. Never in the right place at the right time. No time. Friends are work colleagues or married. No go. Solution? Outsource your problem. We talk, get your style, define your wish-list, start the search. We meet hundreds of people who have this problem – the ones you never have time to meet. They’re fun, savvy, warm, sincere … one could be your perfect match. We select, we vet, we filter, we’re scrupulous. No uncertainty, no time-wasters, no worries. Result? A partner you’d like to meet but never have the chance. We search, you choose, job done.
NEWS ROUND UP
28
the barrister
one might think.
introduce new, and exclusively contractual
stated, without making clients run for the
terms
hills.
with
its
dominant
client
group,
This is absurd, not least because solicitors
solicitors. These are still being negotiated
insist on such terms, when they take on
with the Law Society. Having seen a draft,
“Charges and expenses.
clients; they cannot get paid without a
they do not seem calculated to enhance the
Unless stated otherwise our charges are
retainer. There is no reason why barristers
Bar’s standing in the fast-changing world
based upon a combination of factors: the time
cannot mirror these arrangements. Yet there
of legal business.
I cannot imagine any
anticipated to complete the matter, urgency and
is a supine reliance on the Bar’s existing non-
busy professional welcoming 16-odd pages of
‘value’. Time recorded will include: Meetings
contractual terms of work. These treat the
legalistic provisions, including four and half
with you and others, travelling, preparing
Bar as suppliants, who should be grateful for
pages of recitals and definitions. It is not until
and working on papers, correspondence and
instructions, and assume that if our solicitor
page 9 that we learn that a barrister “shall
making/receiving telephone calls and other
clients had to treat us as commercial equals,
be entitled to submit a fee note and..to be
electronic communication.
we would simply not be instructed by them.
paid.” Solicitors get two months in which to challenge a fee note. Most businesses require
Time recording charges. The firm charges
The inevitable result is that clients can
you to query an invoice straightaway, or
<partner/staff member’s name> time at $___
withhold fees for excessively long periods and
within 14 days.
per hour for each hour he/she (delete as
get away with it. Most businesses would think
required) is engaged on this matter.
90 days was pushing it. Private hospitals,
There is a cumbersome procedure “for the
Our rates are reviewed annually on <review
doctors and dentists collect payment from
agreement of fees which have not been agreed
date> and any change to charging rates will
the client before they leave the premises. Yet
before the performance of the services have
be notified to you, in writing, following that
barristers who have provided a professional
been completed.” After four months of serving
review.
service, often at very short notice, can be
notices and counter-notices on each other,
In addition to time spent other factors may
reduced to begging for “interim” payments,
and a further six weeks in which a barrister
influence the time charge. These include: The
months after a case has concluded. Worse,
may choose to accept the solicitor’s counter-
speed with which action must be taken, the
they pay tax on aged debt, which has not
offer, the barrister and solicitor are supposed
complexity of the issue(s), the value of the
been collected. No private equity firm taking
to present themselves to a Tribunal, which
subject matter involved. On the basis of the
over a legal practice would tolerate such
will act as an expert and not as an arbitrator.
information currently available we do/do not
financial anarchy.
But this is not an encouraging template for
(delete as appropriate) expect these factors to
modern professional relationships.
influence our charges.
accountant in charge of monitoring and
The new terms in form and content are
Disbursements policy. We will also charge
ensuring fee collection, on a monthly basis.
very
different
from
the
you for any disbursements (court fees,
The time lag in collecting payment in some
straightforward
and
user-friendly
Client
registrations, duties/levies etc.) and travel
chambers reinforces the stereotype that
Care letters for Direct Access clients. By
expenses incurred on your behalf. These will
barristers need private incomes to survive.
an interesting coincidence, the Bar’s latest
be billed separately and in the case of court
The preliminary results of the Bar Council's
Practice Management Guidelines (2006) also
fees, registrations and other unavoidable
Exit Survey show unacceptably high numbers
recommend the use of Client Care letters,
costs must be paid for in advance. A separate
of barristers leaving private practice between
although their model letter is pretty thin
estimate of disbursements will be issued.
five and 10 years after being called to the
on detail. However, a properly drafted,
[…]
Bar. Who can blame them?
accessible client engagement letter should be
I do not know if any set has a qualified Bar
Council’s
the model to adopt. Every solicitor who takes
Billing Arrangements.
One result of the Bar’s dismal inertia is that
on a client is required to send them a client
To help you budget we will send an interim
we do not benefit from the Late Payment
engagement letter, which spells out what the
account at the end of every calendar month
of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998,
relationship entails.
while any work is in progress. We will send a
Directive 2000/ 35/ EC, and the 2002
final bill on completion of the work. For your
Regulations. The statutory rate of interest
To illustrate, consider this extract from a
convenience a number of payments methods
for contracts between businesses concluded
short-form engagement letter in use for
are available: Electronic funds transfer,
before 7 August 2002 is 8% plus the Bank
solicitors in the UK and New Zealand. It has
cheque and credit card.
of England base rate, and for contracts
been kindly supplied by Ashley Balls of Legal
concluded after that date it is 8% plus the
Best Practice (www.legalbestpractice.com), a
All accounts, whether interim or ‘final’ are
reference rate, plus compensation for the
company with a reputation for improving
due for payment immediately. Accounts
cost of chasing late payments. The Bar has
client relationship management, which has
remaining unpaid after a period of 30 days
looked this gift horse in the mouth.
just completed a comprehensive study on
from the date of issue will attract interest at a
this in New Zealand. * It shows how a core
rate of 1.75% above MLR (Minimum Lending
element in the relationship can be simply
Rate) from the date the bill is due. Interest
More recently, the Bar has attempted to
the barrister
will be charged on a daily basis.
cashflow,
most
solicitors
will
29
welcome
chambers that emulate their own professional If you have any query about any bill you
approach to client engagement. If chambers
should contact me immediately.”
are concerned about how regular clients may react, they should invite them in for a meeting
The Solicitors Act governs relations between
to present the new arrangements, and show
solicitor and client. It is but a short stretch to
them how that will benefit them in their
include the relationship between a solicitor and
relationships with their lay clients. I believe
other professionals engaged as a consequence
that the sooner chambers start relating to
or a pre-existing solicitor/client connection.
clients on this level, that is, as professional
Counsel’s fees form an integral part of the
equals, the happier and more productive they
solicitor client relationship, and should be
are likely to be. They can be businesses with a
paid for speedily. Many of Mr Balls’ clients
future, instead of chambers with a past.
now have a policy, whereby all disbursements (including counsel’s fees) must be paid in
* The Business of Law: the essential report
advance.
on management and financial performance in the New Zealand legal profession (Thomson,
One wonders whether the Bar Council took
2006)
advice from an outside consultant, experienced in client relationship management, before it put pen to paper. Chambers will need to get their skates on, however, if they want something more user-friendly. The point is: it’s not difficult! Apart from greater clarity and improved
ISN’T LIFE COMPLICATED ENOUGH?
Individual solutions designed to put you in control
Ash-Ridge Asset Management Independent Financial Advisers
* Income protection * Investment
Temple Chambers 3-7 Temple Avenue London EC4Y OHP
* Retirement Our aim is to bring clarity to our clients’ financial planning arrangements enabling your most important decisions to be made with confidence. We tailor our research, analysis and advice to meet today’s priorities and provide full financial management and portfolio services to ensure effective support and structure for the future.
Judge us for yourself
Tel: 020 7353 8001 Fax: 020 7353 8007 email: enquiry@ash-ridge.com www.ash-ridge.com
30
the barrister
Positive Approaches to Anti-Social Behaviour By John Hedge, Community Safety Director, Thames Valley Partnership, Co-ordinator of the Positive Approaches Alliance The ‘naming’ of Anti-Social Behaviour and its definition
P
erhaps the Labour Government’s most striking contribution to the field of crime and disorder has been the creation of a catchall description for public behaviour which upsets other people and affects their lives adversely. Originally coined as a term to cover ‘bad behaviour’ which was unpleasant but not easily turned into a criminal charge, the term’s usage spread quickly to cover a huge range of activity, including aspects of drug use, criminal damage, and a variety of aggressive behaviours. Government has so far resolutely resisted arguments to produce a more specific definition than the current very general and subjective one: ‘To act in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to one or more persons not of the same household’. The most we have had to date is a typology of behaviours produced by the Home Office Research Group with a categorisation of behaviour. This contributes to considerable variation in the use of the different types of Order available. As the Youth Justice Board’s research on ASBOs indicated in 2006 (1) this could not be explained by examining the type of behaviour leading to the application, but appeared rather to be due to the development of local preferences for a particular route.
cover other forms of behaviour, and Government is currently consulting such an extension in England and Wales, as a final option, possibly after an ASBO. •
The introduction of new ‘Street’ powers for Police, notably Dispersal Orders and Penalty Notices for Disorders. Though these measures are not limited to young people the Government’s Respect Unit acknowledges that this has been the main focus of their use.
Foundation between 2003/5 provided many examples of successful work, and following publication of the project report (3) a number of organisations came together to form the Positive Approaches Alliance in order to campaign for a rebalancing of anti-social behaviour work and government policy.(4) As a key part of its activity Positive Approaches has collected case material from around the country of work which demonstrates the power and robustness of these approaches, and the rest of this article gives some illustrative examples.
Warnings work •
Recognition that community involvement and local action are crucial to tackling asb and raising public confidence. This is reflected in the current review of the Crime and Disorder Act, and in the national introduction of Neighbourhood Policing, with its emphasis on public involvement and the high visibility of Police Community Support Officers.
The range of powers and controls now in place offer a formidable armoury of enforceable options and sanctions. The Respect Unit argues that a range of other measures are also needed- including work with parents backed by sanctions to ensure their participation, and constructive activities for young people are two examples.
Partnerships and Powers
The recent National Audit Office report on anti-social behaviour (5) pointed to the high cost of ASBOs and the low cost of many alternatives. It particularly quoted the success of well- organised warning schemes. Carmarthenshire, for example, has introduced a two stage system of warning letters. Of 111 first- stage letters issued in the year up to September 2006 this action was sufficient in over 90% of cases and only 8 second stage letters were needed. This allows resources and intensive work to be concentrated on the cases where this is needed, and local interagency ASB groups co-operate on action plans to deal with individual cases. Equally impressive results were achieved in Stockton, where a three-stage system of Warnings has been in use. Here, in 2005/6 19 ASBOs or CRASBOs were made as against 1,635 Warnings.
The Positive Approaches Alliance The idea that responding to anti-social behaviour (asb) needed to be based on multiagency working has been central from the beginning, and is enshrined in the Crime and Disorder Act of 1998. ASB work has been a major focus for Crime and Disorder Partnerships. Over time new powers and responsibilities have been added. Some of the main examples are as follows: •
•
The giving of responsibility and powers to Registered Social Landlords and the creation of new forms of tenancy, affecting the tenure of those committing asb, or the parents of children doing so. New powers for Police to close houses where drug taking has caused asb- the so-called Crack House provision. This has been extended in Scotland to
Many practitioners and agencies are concerned, however, at the failure to review the impact of ASBOs, or the extent to which other enforceable powers may be used unfairly or inconsistently. A well- researched example of this is the research undertaken by the Runnymede Trust in 2006 (2), which showed that no systematic system is in place for monitoring the race factors involved in ASBOs. We have no idea as to whether ASBOs have impacted unfairly on black and ethnic minority people, or whether they are being used as a potentially important tool in combating racial harassment. A second area of concern in the community safety field is what seems to be an overemphasis on enforceable options and the limited funding of conflict resolution and preventive work. Work projects undertaken by the Thames Valley Partnership in its Mending Fences project, funded by the Nuffield
Positive Approaches argues that schemes like this should be available everywhere, and the aim should be to ensure that ASBOs are used as a special and ultimate resort, at the peak of a pyramid of responses.
Floating Support in Morpeth Barnabas, a church based project, received funding from the Communities against Drugs initiative to support young people at risk by getting them into accommodation and working to help them keep it. They helped the young people tackle their problems and also worked with neighbours to ensure that their concerns over ASB were met. The ASB Officer worked with the project to make sure that the young people were aware of the enforcement options if they did not cooperate- as a result most of them did, and an evaluation of the work showed impressive results. Positive Approaches argues that schemes like
the barrister
this need to be in place across the country, helping to reduce the back door route to custody caused by poorly targeted ASBOs.
more available than they are now- a major political challenge on changing the focus of public investment. As she says:
Education plus Partnership equals Prevention
‘As things stand, in too many cases families (or those on their behalf) who seek to help to nip problems in the bud do so only to be told that their problems are not serious enough to pass the provider’s ‘threshold of provision’. In effect, ‘go away and come back when things have got much worse’.
Mersey Travel with other partners, including the Police; Fire and Rescue, and transport providers run ‘Your Choice’ Conferences aimed at Years 6 to 8 in schools. The Conferences help young people think about the risks of ASB and the role of emergency services. Art, music and drama are used to involve students in working out the consequences of ASB. In West Berkshire a group of agencies and schools have worked with the Fire and Rescue Service to use the visual art of students in developing young people’s awareness about the impact of hoax telephone calls. The project, supported by Vodafone, had a dramatic impact on the rate of hoax calls, and this work is now being expanded to other areas. Positive Approaches points to the success of partnerships like these in reducing ASB and argues that such schemes should be available across the country.
Breaking the cycle requires intensive work The national children’s charity, NCH, argues that much more needs to be done to tackle root causes, rather than focusing primarily on punishment. In a response to the National Audit Office report Clare Tickell, its Chief Executive, called for Individual Support Orders (ISOs), which involve planned work to tackle young people’s drug or violence problems, to be much more widely used (6) Only 30 have been made since their introduction in May 2003. When intensive work is done with the most difficult young people she pointed out that it can reduce bad behaviour in a high proportion of cases. A case example from NACRO in Leicester gives the same message about intensive and focused work. A 13-year old boy, who came from a troubled family on the brink of eviction by the city council, was causing serious ASB. He was disruptive in school, including violent attacks on other pupils and teachers, and he had little support from his parents. The New Start for Families project worked intensively with him and his family so that he resumed education, began to take part in constructive activities, and stayed out of trouble. There has been too stark a contrast made between voluntary and compulsory involvement in parenting schemes. Both approaches may well have a part to play, but as Rosie Chadwick, Director of Prevention Services at Crime Concern said in an article last year, (7) we need to tackle the fundamental issue of making services much
The Home Office has helped to fund a number of ASB focused schemes, and the results seem overall to be very encouraging. They can save longer-term costs and can turn round lives. Positive Approaches argues that focused work with families is an essential preventive approach and needs to be made available across the country. While compulsion may have something positive to contribute the key issue is early voluntary involvement, and this can only happen if services are expanded.
Young People respond to well planned work The Youth Service can play a major part in reducing ASB. In many parts of the country detached youth workers make an important contribution to resolving problems because of their credibility with young people and their knowledge of local tensions, yet this work is often seriously underfunded. The Youth Service in Leeds works with 16,000 young people in 450 programmes. They have involved young people in work with film making; i n t e r- g e n e r a t i o n a l environmental work, and involved them in steering and managing their own projects such as the Garforth Skate Park. The Service’s REVIZIT programme takes on young people referred from other agencies. Its targets are those on ABCs, Final warnings and even ASBOs. Up to 12 weekly sessions are used to look intensively at attitudes, behaviour and consequences. Results from this pilot project are very encouraging. In Monmouth and Torfaen the view was taken that ASB offenders need to be given a clear choice- behave or face an ASBO. They introduced a Prevention Intervention Programme (PIP), which takes referrals from the Youth Offending Team
31
and other services. After assessment and a case conference an individual action plan is drawn up, which covers all the factors behind the ASB- alcohol or drugs, lack of parental support, need for training and so on. The scheme has been supported by the Welsh Assembly, and has meant that the area has needed very few ASBOs. This means that the ASBO has been kept for the small number who will not so-operate, keeping it as an important final sanction. As the project’s report says ‘Record numbers of ASBOs should be an issue for concern not a pleasing statistic’. Preventive work can be very locally based and very creative. In Berinsfield, South Oxfordshire, local Police and Youth Workers have set up a scheme which involves young people at risk in activity to support the Noah’s Ark charity, working to support a day centre in Kenya. Those who complete their involvement can be selected to work at the project in Kenya, and for many this has been a life changing experience. In Peterborough an ASB Support Worker provides one to one support for those involved in ASB. The worker assesses the young person and identifies the causes behind their behaviour and then ensures that they get appropriate support. The rationale for this approach is that many of those involved do not meet the thresholds for many of the agencies, such as Social Services, and though in need would have slipped through the net
• Legal Journals on line • • Law & Politics Links • • International Law Journals • • Research Material • • Expert Witnesses • • Tenancy Vacancies • www.barristermagazine.com
NEWS ROUND UP
32
the barrister
preventive work. We argue that the current
‘Ami’
having
from experience and avoid the unforeseen
Policy Review on Children and Young People
‘personality disorder’ and after experiencing
consequences of poor ASBO use , and the
must recognise this problem and ensure that
racist bulling at work she became depressed
current huge variation in use from area to
it is recognised in the 2007 Comprehensive
and violent towards her mother, leading to
area.
Spending Review.
her leaving home. Her behaviour worsened
Resolving agreement
Conflict,
promoting
has
been
diagnosed
as
and an ASBO was made prohibiting contact
References:
with her mother. She came to Elmore’s
1)
Anti-social Behaviour Orders. Youth
2)
Equal Respect- ASBOs and Race
attention during her third sentence for breaching the ASBO. They gave her support
Justice Board. 2006.
Much ASB comes from arguments and
on release, but her behaviour problems
Equality,
conflict, which has escalated over time.
began again. A number of agencies became
November 2006.
This can apply to neighbours, schools,
involved and Elmore argued that a secure
inter-generational tensions, or even hostility
psychiatric environment was the best option
between whole communities. Community
for her. Eventually, and after a long struggle
mediation schemes around the country have
this happened.
3)
Runnymede
Trust
Mending Fences Project Work Book. Thames Valley Partnership, June 2005.
4)
shown that they can have a major impact in
Current members of the Positive Approaches Alliance are: NACRO;
up to 80% of the case referred to them. They
Research undertaken by NAPO, a member
NAPO; Runnymede Trust; Revolving
are relatively low cost and solutions tend to
of the Positive Approaches Alliance found
Doors;
‘stick’ because they are agreed rather than
that a significant number of ASBOs had been
Partnership; Mediation UK; National
imposed from outside.
poorly targeted, or unrealistically framed. In many cases the support needed to help
LGIU;
Thames
Valley
Community Safety Network. 5)
National Audit Office. The Home
In Southwark the Community Mediation
people change their behaviour was simply
Office,
Centre
not there.
Behaviour, 7th December 2006.
in
involves
resolving
young
community
people
directly
conflicts,
often
6)
at a serious level involving violence and
VOICE UK, and others have pointed to
weapons. They receive training in mediation
the high use of ASBOs for children with a
techniques, and are role models for young
diagnosed mental health disorder or learning
people in a diverse and challenging area of
difficulty- 35% of ASBOs made on people
central London.
under 17 according to the report published in 2005 by the British Institute for Brain Injured
In Slough the Aiksaath project works for
Childen.
similar results and with similar success. In Milton Keynes a Community mediation
We do know that ASBOs can work very
scheme project demonstrated that young
well, where there is good planning and
people who learn about mediation techniques
implementation.
in school can be involved as well in the wider
Council publicised the success of Craig
community.
Brackenbury in a news report in December
South
Kesteven
District
2006. He had been given an ASBO and had Since much of the misery of ASB stems from
turned his life round, changing his behaviour,
conflict and misunderstanding, or fear about
and sharing his experiences to help other
the activity of other people, Mediation should
young people. He now plans to resume his
be an essential resource in any ASB strategy.
studies. Craig attributes his success to the
In reality up and down the country mediation
support of his mother, but also the constant
schemes
communication
struggle
to
survive
financially.
between
him
and
the
Positive Approaches argues that the Respect
Community Safety Team. Clearly this support
Unit needs to ensure access everywhere to
and interest have been key factors in this
mediation so that people can be helped to
case, but nationally there is little awareness of
tackle their own problems.
‘what works’ in making an ASBO successful.
ASBOs are an important option in the most serious cases- but they need to be used well.
ASBOs are a vital final option when serious
The National Audit Office report (op cit)
behaviour has to be controlled. However there
pointed to the high breach rate of ASBOs and
is much evidence of poor use of them, leading
their cost. For some groups, such as those
to high breach rates. Positive Approaches
with mental health problems the breach
argues that alongside an emphasis on
rate can be very high and the consequences
properly resourced prevention and conflict
severe. The Elmore Team in Oxford, reports
resolution there is an urgent need to review
several such cases.
ASBOs in detail, so that we can learn properly
Tackling
Anti-social
New Start Magazine, 15th December 2006.
7)
New
Start
Magazine,
September 2006.
22nd
the barrister
33
Why are barristers and journalists ranked so low on the public’s ladder of trust ? By Dominic Bascombe, reporter at The Voice Newspaper and a part time Bar student.
B
ut does that mistrust
control freaks and are used to choosing their
think there is a certain aloofness about the
translate between the
words very carefully. We tend to be very
Bar- a sense that we are to be judged by
professions or is there
squeamish about commenting to the press
what we do in court rather than what we
more of a symbiotic
where what we say can be twisted or turned
say outside of court. We’re performers but
relationship at work?
around. In court we exercise total control
unlike the footballers, we’re not very good
Every
barrister
over what is said in our cases. But outside
at interviews.”
dreams of winning the big case that gets
court it's a different matter. It's very easy
own dealings with the media have been
their name into the newspapers, boosts their
for a selective quote to give a completely
generally positive. “I’ve always appreciated
reputation, and, hopefully, leads to more
misleading impression."
the strengths and weakness of the press,”
work. And every journalist dreams of writing
Griffiths admitted that his
he said. “Consequently I don’t think I’ve had
about the public money that goes some way
"In terms of court reporting, I think that
a really bad experience with them to date,
towards lining the pockets of top briefs. Well,
the press does an extremely important
but that’s because I come from a position
maybe not every journalist, but it’s fair to
job. Inevitably the press will focus on what
of awareness having dealt with the media.”
say that there is a certain amount of tension
interests them, which won't
necessarily
One barrister who has had to deal with the
between the two professions. Journalist
present a rounded view. I think some
full glare of the media is Shaun Wallace,
turned barrister Guy Vassall-Adams believes
barristers are very uncomfortable with that
the 2004 Mastermind champion. “I found
that the media's misunderstanding of the
– they would like the case to be reported
it relatively easy to deal with the media,”
limitations on barristers to speak publicly,
just as they would have put it themselves -
he said. “It’s a tribute to the way we are
lies at the heart of it all."I think there is a
but on balance I think most appreciate that
trained to be dispassionate and cold but at
high degree of mistrust," he said. "Barristers
the press are playing a vital role and they
the same time to be yourself and engage
feel that comments they make are in danger
would far rather have imperfect coverage
with the public.” Dominic Ponsford, news
of being quoted selectively and taken out of
than none at all." The strains of inter-
editor of the Press Gazette, believes that the
context."
professional trust are even more apparent
relationship between the two professions
at the criminal bar.
serves both sides equally well. “Its fairly
He continued: "In addition, there are the
mutually beneficial,” he said. “Barristers
rules of professional conduct that prevent
Courtenay Griffiths QC explains: “The first
are fairly keen to get their name in the
barristers from commenting on their own
point is that barristers, particularly defence
press and enhance their reputation. They
cases. The press doesn't always appreciate
barristers, are very wary of the press
are also a very good source of stories for
this limitation. For these reasons, many
because the press are primarily concerned
journalists because they are at the heart of
barristers prefer to leave it to the solicitor
with sensationalism.
important legal decisions.
to speak to the press and solicitors generally
particular pattern in criminal cases, in
are quite keen to get name dropped in the
have much more experience in this area."
that they turn up and hear the prosecution
press.” The fairly low media visibility of the
He added: "It's fair to say that barristers
but don’t listen to the rest of the case,
Bar, apart from high profile cases and the
are people who like the sound of their
so they transmit a warped and distorted
few barristers that have become household
own voices.
Most barristers very much
view of events.” “On an egotistical level,
names, can perhaps be attributed to two
like the idea that what they do is going to
every barrister wants to be doing the cases
main factors: the strict influence of the Bar
be covered by the press, but barristers are
that puts them in the press.”He added: “I
Code of Conduct, and the absence of cameras
The press follow a
And barristers
34 in the
the barrister
courtroom. Tom Crowther of the
tendency to work anonymously. Things have
cases that get tried in the press, the only
Bar’s Professional Practice committee doesn’t
opened up now with accessibility. You are
restriction on what is said is that nothing
believe that there is need for any changes to
seeing barristers being much more engaging,
confidential can be revealed,” said Paynter. So
the code when it comes to barrister’s dealings
not necessarily talking about their work but
can, or even should English lawyers become
with the media. He said: “Most advocates are
showing that they do have a public face.”
as media savvy as their US counterparts?
comfortable with the transparency that that
Vassall-Adams said: "I think that media
“There’s a world of difference between the
gives, in that their roles is a representational
training would be of assistance to barristers.
way their profession operates and ours,”
one. It’s not about your own point of view but
Certainly we're very often in these chambers
said Griffiths. “Attorneys in the states live
presenting a case. Most of us judge that it’s
(Doughty Street) asked for quotes about cases
in a society where the media are everything.
not a part of our job to give opinion. I don’t
or asked to appear in radio and television
Here in the UK we are bit more cynical about
sense any great groundswell to change that.”
programs. I think many barristers feel
the press.”
He added: “I can’t think of many barristers
nervous about taking that step. If they are to
standing on the steps of the Royal Courts of
have that training, it could make them feel
Dominic Bascombe is a reporter at The Voice
Justice giving a statement with flashbulbs
more comfortable with that role." In the US,
newspaper and a part time Bar student.
going off at them.”
lawyers seem to be savvy in their handling of the press, knowing exactly when and where
Crowther believes that dealings between
to inject that perfect soundbite.
barristers and journalists are pretty much
US lawyers such as Johnnie Cochrane and
as they should be: “On an everyday level,
Robert Shapiro immediately spring to mind.
our relationship with journalists in the
Much of their reputation was developed
court is as cordial as with any one of the
through the presence of having cameras in
parties in the courts,” he said “It’s certainly
the courtroom. This is not to say that there
not a relationship of hostility- lawyers and
is any better a relationship between lawyers
journalists are both pretty low in the public’s
and the media there however.
esteem!” And as for media training?
Celebrity
“I
don’t think its necessary,” he said. “Does
Carol Paynter, a senior attorney at the
the general image of barristers in the media
Federal Trade Commission explained: “There
reflect us?
The answer is no. But that’s
is generally not a close relationship between
not media training- it’s what makes good
lawyers and the media. Most cases occur
television.” However both Wallace and Vassall
outside of the spotlight and proceed without
Adams disagree.
fanfare. The exception obviously is the case
“I would recommend media training,” said
that has a lot of notoriety –for example the
Wallace. “No matter how confident you sound,
Enron prosecutions or the prosecution of the
there is a way you present yourself, speak,
mentally ill woman who drowned her five
dress, and stand. Media training is beneficial.
young children. The lawyers may have to give
There is also a perception that barristers
interviews etc but they are bound by issues
come from the middle classes, speak with
of attorney client privilege and generally
posh accents, and are fat cats, and that can
can't say much more than is already in the
be far removed from the truth.” He continued:
public record.” And again, US lawyers don’t
“Traditionally you never knew who barristers
face restrictions on commenting on their own
were -only the famous ones like George
cases unless the case is filed under seal or the
Carman or Michael Mansfield, otherwise they
judge has issued a specific "gag"
were not really known. Barristers also have a
order.”
“So we do have many notorious
the barrister
35
Taking alcohol personally? 1. In November of last year, the European Court of Justice was faced with a preliminary reference of great significance to the Treasury: Staatssecretarias van Financiën v. B.F. Joustra. Unusually, the problem did not involve Carousel fraud, but involved a Dutch wine club and the distance buying of excise goods. If the media were to be believed, the decision put at risk the £16 billion of revenue that the Treasury annually receives from this type of duty. By Ian Macwhannell, Barrister, who at the time of the decision of the ECJ worked as a Caseholder in the Customs and Excise Litigation Department. This article expresses his own opinions and not those of H.M. Revenue and Customs. purposes.
On appeal, the Supreme Court
goods are held for the purposes of a trader
of the Netherlands, the Hoge Raad der
carrying out an economic activity. Article 9
Mr. B.F. Joustra and around seventy
Nederlanden, made a preliminary reference,
states that duty is chargeable in the Member
friends established the ‘Cercle des Amis du
consisting of four questions regarding the
State of destination if the goods are held for
Vin’ (the circle of friends of wine).
The
interpretation of Articles 7 to 9 of Council
a commercial purpose. Article 10 provides
group was conceived when a number of wine
Directive 92/12/EEC, to the European Court
that duty is chargeable in the Member State
enthusiasts purchased wine from vineyards
of Justice.
of destination where transport is arranged by
that they had visited whilst on holiday in
whether a private individual, who purchases
France. Each year the group ordered wine
excisable goods in one Member State for
from producers that they had visited. The
himself and for others and then arranges for
wine was collected by a Dutch transport
them to be transported to another Member
company and delivered directly to Mr. Joustra.
State, by an agent established in that other
He paid for the wine and then stored it in his
Member State, should pay excise duty in that
5.
garage until the other members collected it
latter Member State.
General Jacobs was responsible for the
THE FACTS
2.
The Court had to determine
the vendor.
THE ADVOCATE GENERAL’S OPINION
The
Opinion
of
Advocate
Each member never imported
media excitement that surrounded these
more than the guideline limit of goods, paid
proceedings. Jacobs was of the opinion that
from him.
a proportionate part of the transport costs
THE LAW
excise goods which had been purchased by a private individual could be transported by
and reimbursed Mr. Joustra for their share The Articles of Council Directive
a third party without incurring duty in the
he ever seek to, make any profit from the
92/12 that formed the subject of the reference
Member State of destination. The decision
arrangement.
are part of the legislative framework that
represented a significant departure from the
governs the system of the internal market.
established principle that an individual had
Directive 92/12 distinguishes between goods
to travel with the goods that he had acquired
held for commercial purposes and private
to enjoy them duty free in the Member State
purposes.
of consumption.
of the wine.
Mr. Joustra did not, nor did
THE PRELIMINARY REFERENCE
4.
It dictates that excise duty is
The reference was made in the
chargeable in the Member State in which
course of proceedings between Staatssecretaris
goods are first released for consumption.
6.
van Financiën (State Secretary for Finances)
Article 8, however, stipulates that if private
favoured
and Mr Joustra concerning the EUR 906.20
individuals acquire goods for their own use
‘transported by them’ element of Article 8,
of excise duty levied upon a consignment
and that those goods are ‘transported by
which would render the goods in Mr. Joustra’s
of wine.
Mr. Joustra appealed against the
them’, duty is chargeable in the Member State
case commercial and, therefore, liable to
decision to the regional appeal court, which
in which the products were acquired. Article
duty in the Member State of destination. The
found in his favour, on the basis that he
7 provides that excise duty is chargeable
reasoning behind this was that the goods had
did not hold the importation for commercial
in the Member State of destination where
been transported by an agent and not by the
3.
The a
interested strict
Member
interpretation
States of
the
36
the barrister
commodities. It was submitted that the costs
the Member State of importation’. The panic
of shipping heavy bottles of booze would
was over and the Chancellor breathed a sigh
outweigh the savings that British consumers
of relief. The Court did not adopt the Opinion
interpretation of this element of Article 8,
could make.
of the Advocate-General.
furthering the objectives of the internal
the perpetual need for the convenience of an
market. He distinguished the case of EMU
off-licence. The threat to the Treasury was,
14.
Tabac and Others, also known as ‘The Man
however, undeniable.
Joustra’s case.
individuals themselves.
7.
Jacob’s
preferred
a
flexible
More compelling, perhaps, is
The Court succinctly expressed Mr. It stated that the nature
of his argument was that the Community
in Black’ case, on the basis that it concerned the distance selling of goods and the present
11.
The Opinion of Advocate-General
legislation, in particular Article 8, should not
case concerned the distance buying of goods.
Jacobs appeared to be a sound one, based
be interpreted to mean that an individual
In that matter the Court had ruled that duty
on a workable interpretation of the relevant
must travel with excise goods that he has
would be chargeable in the Member State of
provisions.
It considered the purpose of
acquired, if, he has the initiative to arrange
consumption where individuals purchased
the internal market, in so far as individuals
the transport for himself through an agent.
goods from a vendor who then arranged
should have unbridled access to goods
This argument was based on the aversion
transport
individual.
and services in other Member States. The
that the provisions are designed to ensure
Joustra had arranged the transport in these
Opinion was inline with the recitals to the
that own-use goods can move freely within
proceedings, not the French vendor.
Directive, which state that ‘… to ensure the
the Community.
on
behalf
of
the
establishment and functioning of the internal 8.
Jacob’s formed the opinion that Mr.
Joustra should pay duty only in the country
market, chargeability of excise duties should
15.
The
Court
be identical in all the Member States.’
flexible interpretation.
discounted
this
It found that the
Community legislature used an express
of acquisition on the goods that he had 12.
had arranged for the goods to be transported
countered
individuals
Articles 9(3) and 10(1) of the Directive. The
by an agent.
importing huge quantities of excise goods
Court made reference to the Greek and
because it allowed Member States to set
Danish versions of the legislation and found
In relation to the rest of the
guidelines concerning the importation of such
that they were particularly clear that the
consignment, Jacobs considered that these
goods. The Opinion correctly stated that an
individual must effect transport. It affirmed
goods were held for commercial purposes.
accompanying document scheme monitors
the decision in The Man in Black, where it
He reached this conclusion on the basis
commercial movements of excise goods and
stated that transportation must be effected
that, even if Mr. Joustra imported the goods
that the possibility of large private movements
by the individual and established that the
without any contemplation of making a profit,
would undermine this. In this respect, the
use of an agent was a good indication of
he was still conducting an economic activity
Opinion
commerciality.
because he was acting as a competitor to
of this difference and the practicalities of
not include a situation in which a private
any other business that imported excisable
border control.
individual transports goods for other private
goods.
problem in the United Kingdom, where duty
9.
He outlined that the legislation
provision regarding the use of agents in
imported for himself, despite the fact that he
the
problem
underestimated
of
the
importance
This posed a particular
It interpreted Article 8 to
individuals.
rates and movements of excisable goods are 10.
The
media
pounced
on
what
they described as a terminal decision for the Treasury.
high and Customs patrols are relatively low.
16.
In addition, excise fraud is already rife.
10 did not apply to the situation in the proceedings because the buyer had arranged
The potential for Internet
the transport.
shopping was huge. Individuals could order all the hectolitres of alcohol that they could
The Court determined that Article
Article 9, as a corollary of
Article 8, was not applicable either. The Court
THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
did, however, conclude that the proceedings
guzzle and the tonnes of tobacco that they could smoke and simply arrange transport
13.
The Press Release of the Court
came within Article 7. The Court stated that
from the comfort of their own homes.
could not have been clearer: ‘Only products
if goods were not for private use, they were
was potentially damaging not only for the
acquired
private
necessarily for commercial use. To prevent
Revenue, but also for the traders of these
individuals are exempt from excise duty in
double-recovery of duty, if duty had been
It
and
transported
by
37
the barrister
paid in the Member State of acquisition, it was to be reimbursed in the Member State of destination, once the applicable duty had
1 Case C-5/05, 23rd November 2006
been paid in that State.
2 BBC News, 22nd November 2006
17.
The
interpretation
Court of
the
did
not
alter
provisions
of
the the
Directive, but the Court’s ruling could appear to leave the door open to a situation in which
3 of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1), as amended by Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December 1992 (OJ 1992 L 390, p. 124).
a private individual could use an agent to import goods purely for himself.
This is
4 Delivered on 1st December 2005
because the judgement could be interpreted
5 Case C-296/95, 2nd April 1998
as being confined to a factual situation in
6 The fourth recital of the Directive
which a private individual imports goods for himself and for others.
The Court’s
7 Press Release No.93/06, 23rd November 2006
restrictive interpretation of the ‘transported by them’ element of Article 8 should prevent this.
CONCLUSION
18.
On its face, the Opinion of the
Need a Reason to Subscribe? uif!cbssjtufs
s uif!cbssjtuf:meZgi L^icZhh
Advocate-General appeared to be correct, in light of the purpose of the internal market. It did, however, underestimate other practical issues, such as the damaging effect it would have had upon the Treasury, border control and trade.
Sceptics may have considered
that the narrow factual situation to which the
sjtufs
uif!cbs ESS
BAR G FOR 6 REA DIN ENT IAL July 200
RIS TER
HjeeaZbZci
S
ww w.b
- 31s t Jun e 6th
rma arri ste
gaz ine
.co m
se Respon #29 TRINITY TERM ISSUE airman’s ” Bar Ch ary, fferently for written summ d I woul Law Di of State Lord fails fully, address “Doing the SecretaryChan est, to cellor, two sugg these led
99 Es t. 19
uif!cbssjtufs
PRIC E £3.0 0
-926 ISSN 1468
X
Personal Finance Supplement
#30
Fe atu res
3
N CONCER L EAD OF LOW LEVE WIDESPR ING THE RDED TO REGARD AWA AGES THE UK OF DAM PEOPLE IN report INJURED
l 2006 . and Lord a paper entit s either of In Apri onal Affairs d principles r draw , issue central Constituti of Thoroton The pape ies with first rently”. nt’s polic them Falconer me put Law Diffethe Governme the t Let seeks to “Doing of arise many m and documen the together the legal syste ework. The ge. summges which . of chan to chan regard advocates rent fram t in favour of lves some a cohe paper areas argumen t also invo within fore an men The main already , thus: QC, is there lly, the docu m are language KMAN of refor enta use n. They Incid HEN HOC but the ns in the well know ending STEP RENEWE rman done; innovatio FACE cil Chai de the ge. We s to be the Bar Coun inclu chan need PRISONS G CRISIS of to s role do law “The law law need new r of the eme CROWDIN and a do need to Chancello but we Secretary the prison of a Supr way we r Lord Home do law, of the e into lishment to the pape st they As a new team inquir need as Head and the estab dom. Next intments usual intere nse y.” ministerial more than under imme iary, d King nt such differentl with ial appo rates some buckling system restateme to first Judict for the Unite to the judic y ains system ing reconviction cont face a about of a polic g back shock ng crisis. ess Cour s to changes the paper ideas ssment start by goin pressure, ng overcrowdi the succ refer general Then Any asse a loomi Prison s to what est that dependent m. and ess. need of the sugg some syste e ately h proc esting but director as this . I would ms inal justic Lyon, in whic is ultim , inter the crim also the refor of By Juliet system First the way principles ges in m Trust ew the state justice p.6 sses chan rs. of Refor Revi any r discu of enti w main facto the interests those of the The pape from the Clem ly, the revie G THE upon two m balances ACY” against which the 9Zhe^iZ i]Z l^YZ hegZVY WZa^Z[ “REFUTIN large, emerging ices, and, final R’S FALL to at t r, UTO the syste trials of n PROSEC community nd, the exten cellor’s pape Legal Serv Thomso sses in Vbdc\ Jacquelin Xg^b^cVa e aVlnZgh VcY or the t witne reviewed if well Lord Chan l. Seco l and of exper be rey ive Investment WVgg^hiZgh! 9C6 Zk^YZcXZ VYYjXZY Geoff individua resourced. The a very usefu The role needs to The say Alternat ed on, the is tly Law, ects urgen buying to be restor ssor of system y resp Smith & Williams Profe ns haverule when confidence is man of in man golden The priso Hartwell, former Chair whilst (AIM) may have Vi V ig^Va ^h cdi Vc VhhV^aVWaZ egdd[ run these Market ators and financial and Beresford perfectly witness is t to ons who te of Arbitrr from the ey (the ng antiquesexper accountancy and and artcutti lawye corporati making mon fineCost ered Institu as a minnow, but d[ \j^ai! V 9C6 bViX] WZilZZc V how the Chart an, academic private is life ess). in rsity at rs of started Unive busin l Doug y t out Paulyou l at Brune y of office that g because been good aim of ever advisory group, explains salar le to profi of hjheZXi VcY V Xg^bZ hXZcZ! ZkZc somethin Law Schoo buy so the for peop less than the represents 82% legitimate know, now trusts it opriate to ite a third they to t appr ^[ ^i ^h V recent XdbeaZiZ changes bViX] h]djaY er that, ns (desp same is up is wha “It is not r priso it, but do rememb prisons like es coming tion” speaking ic secto with the g far private all new ofcompani incarcera cdi VjidbVi^XVaan \jVgVciZZ V ce tax . He was dealing rs in publ loyin policy t are affecting inheritan in 1995 market, fine art of office they will be by emp stock rnment’s mes thrus raises e costslike the pensions, this year andXdck^Xi^dc Jack Straw prisons. tive Gove welcoto but market fact that and they shav g is on Billthe the families Council of So said then Conserva anies to run was issues ners) l Services real savin low wages in fluctuate p.20 Bar in planning for many the can a . The te comp opposition the priso tion antiques about draft Lega over important of them do staff haveandold age with iple in ing priva y. On fewer boasts a market capitalisa concerns of allow r areas, princ nt polic will face has had very no only ed to othe detail governme nt has prov ng so that but they h rights of As in value. prisons cost-cutti lated into Governme s in whic criminal £74 res exten ofded private ur bers billion. ion. This in the not trans condition tion ILEX secu for its mem the Labo te privatiser mal pens ns for the inten t p.21 rary, mini nce page lates cont audie passiona s. The m, the implicatio . page be a more than the Torie have euphemis and I real are held oved field you onds ns could prisoners the appr tisation, to justice te priso ding. Theypage Nigel Simm to use e priva Editor: crow 2715 Ltd gazine.com – or priva being, ading area wher is in over ration 0870 766 barristerma services. ng out’ the degr nt Corpo The one rence ‘contracti unity probation email: info@ against tightly The Manageme a diffe Media n, HMP 10 made e a stand ever more more Payne – of comm Publishers: sh priso to: Derek have mad ing people now e not could run Briti Director: e are Pritchard t of pack they chos more Publishing privately 1992. Ther opened 423000 ction: Alan treatmen but instead h have ns in The first and Produ g Park Tel: 01223 et mea 9 of whic that the opened Design into jails in the mark tion of Wales, claims ridge Printin Wolds, e p.42 inten ed and Camb no urag e Offic in Engl prisoners they had has enco others The Hom and operators ove standards 1997. profit fit from since private the ent of ing out. ed to impr also bene enging involvem and has help e miss by chall prisons arch n . e. Ther estate Private innovatio ss the prison their gam the that rese any field to up . What ision in right acro r prisons to ensure m assertion secto latest dec wtel.co for this n means public evidence www.la s the very st moder is no real include the mo
2
E 4HE !TTRACTIONS OF TH T in the !LTERNATIVE )NVESTMEN DNA evidence TION OF TRUST court ! QUES room -ARKET !)-
)NVESTING IN FINE ART AND ANTIQUES
of the recomme
hunger for a story, but the proceedings certainly caused panic at the Treasury. The proceedings were ultimately a damp squib.
Putting
profits
22
Immunity For ExpertsA Step Too Far
Ne ws
is
into the
Criminal Justice: i]ZgZ her id egdiZXi i]Z ZmeZgi Wji Anot Major Over haul ^h id ZchjgZ i]Z ÆegdeZg VcY
Æ^c Veegdeg^ViZ X^gXjbhiVcXZh V On 20th July,
Home i]^gY eVgin announc Xdhih ed dgYZg XVc WZ Secretary,
John Reid, the latest of bulk processin reorganisation, g centres for hbddi] VYb^c^higVi^dc d[ _jhi^XZ or parental minor offenders the criminal compensation system ‘in favour ; justice orders for those with under who commit criminal damage; The rebalanc i]Z bVccZg ^c l]^X] ing ]Z isdg h]Z on five key based custody of serious speeding up the return protectin to priorities: g the public offenders conditions from violent victims and of their licence; who breach the crime; putting \VkZ Zk^YZcXZ communities community service. and extendin first; building confidence in g public sentencing; a tighter grip offenders; and on all The simple, speedy, document itself summary justice. contains no references to The documen the word ‘tough’ less than 34 t, which is This contrasts or ‘tougher’ over 40 pages contains 24 markedly to . long, to causes new proposal just one reference s. This is just short of the of crime, and three Hilary record set by that is a reference Armstrong’s Michael Howard, the mid-90s, to responsibility when he announc in Exclusion for the Social Unit and the of the system. ed a rebalanc need for liaison. ing
law
Lawtel is the most
The European Court did not alter the current interpretation of the legislation and answered the questions that formed the Reference in a
The problems of
harmonisation and reform of the legislation
What is going on? of rapidly falling Why, during a period is criminal justice official crime levels almost permanent apparently mired in right about criminal crisis? Are ministers justice failure? what are the implication If so, s? By Richard Garside, Acting Centre for Crime Director, and Justice King's College Studies,
12 THINKING ACROSS THE DIVIDE Lord Carter’s report heralds a revolution in the way legal procured. Solicitors aid services are each been looking and barristers have themselves, but at the implications for to date there little considerati has on of the impact been relationship between on the of the legal profession.the two branches By Richard Miller, director, LAPG
PUNISHMENT, PENANCE AND 14 IMPACT: THE VAGARIE SENTENCING
News p.20 UK Governm ent to open up legal urges South Africa services market
Editor: Nigel Simmonds 0870 766 2715 email: info@barris termagazine.com Publishers: Media Management Corporation Ltd Publishing Director: Derek Payne Design and Production : Alan Pritchard Cambridge Printing Park Tel: 01223 423000
– Need any more?
double again in the not too distant future.
I wish to take out a subscription to the barrister:
To subscribe, please fill in this form and send to: Media Management Corporation Ltd, 21a-23a Dudden Hill Lane, London NW10 2ET. Forename
Address Postcode/ZIP Telephone No.
Fax No.
E-mail Subscription Rates
IAIN MAC WHANNELL 27th February 2007
www.lawtel.c
Surname
(Air mail except U.K.) 1 Year UK £20 Europe C40 U.S.A./Canada $35 Rest of the world £35
I wish to subscribe to the barrister for 1 year I enclose a cheque for made payable to: Media Management Corp Ltd / Invoice my company Signature Date Method of Payment: Cheques, Payment Orders, Money Orders.
S OF
p.21 LAPG launches Carter discussio forum n
Company/Chambers/University
may, however, have the Treasury seeing
POLICY.
Sentencing has never been so a media issue popular as during the of 2006. What summer has reasoned discussionnot surfaced is a of sentencing principles and penal policies. By Professor Christine Piper, of Social Sciences School and Law, Brunel University
modern means to ensure that into the law include research s the very latest decision in any field.
way that will have allayed the interested Member States’ fears.
CURIOUS TIMES 8 JUSTICE FOR CRIMINA L
of the law abiding children aged lVh V l^icZhh VcY Vh V gZhjai d[ i]gdj\] djg aZ\Va hnhiZb 10-years-old majority’ . or
More reform The main points in the paper include additional 8,000 an This is new prison the third major places; unanimo decisions by the Parole Board attempt by New us to reform Labour the criminal are released; before prisoners justice system. that Parole Board attempt was The first have experien members should in 1997, with ce of the publicati the Crime and third-off discounts being a victim; no automati on of Disorder Act, c introduce which d ASBOs, parentin automatic release for guilty pleas; the end to extended g orders, at the half-way curfews, sex sentenced to point on those offender orders, four years or drug treatmen more; the introduct t orders and ion up of p.30 the setthe youth justice system. It
PRICE £3.00
ISSN 1468-926 X
Featu res
‘rebalancing’ as he called Wgdj\]i V\V^chi hdbZWdYn l]d it, of
22
12
Est. 1999
om
work is free from influence by their represent ative activities.
Why experts need training
befor
Lawtel
most
rmaga zine.c
The Bill sets out a number The Bar Council of key features legal system, is of the to be which must an approved be upheld under new regime. the regulator These include and has supporting the of law, improvin rule already g access to justice, taken action promoting the protecting and interests of consume to separate these competition rs, promotin and promotin g functions . The Bar g adherence professional to the Standard principles. These s Board principles include independence and integrity, was establish the duty to act ed at RUTH EVANS best interests in the the of clients and beginning of Bar Standard Chair of the confidentiality. are crucial principle s Board. These this s for any legal year to take system. over the Council’s work. regulatory The members If implemented, hip was appointe the Bill will Nolan principle d on I]Z egdheZXi Services d[ \^k^c\ Zk^YZcXZ 6ai]dj\] gVgZan ZmegZhhZY establish s and has no a Legal the Board to oversee connectio representative the work of “approve side. The Board’s n with ldgg^Zh bdhi ZmeZgi Y^gZXian! ]VkZ d l^icZhhZh the ZmeZgi regulators” to actl^icZhhZh remit is in the public (called “Front Regulators” interest. The Line to be by Clementi Council is congratu VcY ^i ^h cd ldcYZg# >c i]Z XVhZ Zc_dnZY i]Z lated hVbZ ). These ValVnh regulators must approved on setting us so quickly. ensure up d[ E]^aa^eh k HnbZh :L=8 '((% that their regulator ^bbjc^in [dg hj^i This Vh will di]Zg ensure that y will we be running with full 8] P'%%)R i]Z Xdjgi gjaZY i]Vi l^icZhhZh# I]Z ^bbjc^in ^h cdi effectiveness p.6
5
le e peop
4
Bill carries forward
ndations of Sir David Review of the Regulatory Framewo Clementi’s Services. Its rk for Legal aim is to put consumers of services at the legal heart of regulatio n.
39
Opinion applied may have fuelled the media’s
READIN
TERM ISSUE
www.b arriste
ission and Comm a Law increases , system In 1999, ed ry damages recommendnts to the if the judicia then improveme ted that s fairer, and indica make award the last seven not For d the would should. has ignorey is not parliament rnment simpl Gove and this years ations recommend h president, good enoug on, ers Langt Lawy Richard Personal Injury By of Association (APIL) D
14
ESSEN TIAL
G FOR BARRIS Octob er 2nd TERS - Decem ber 21st 2006
MICHAELMAS
The Legal Serv ices The Bar Standard Bill: s Board Perspect The Draft Legal ive Services
om
38
the barrister
Why is the reintroduction of means-testing for criminal legal aid such a cause for concern? By Dr Peter Kenway, Director, New Policy Institute
T
he Criminal Defence Services Act reintroduced the meanstesting of legal aid for criminal cases. It took effect in the Magistrates’ Court in October 2006 and is expected to be introduced into the Crown Court at the end of 2007. We only became aware of this legislation after it had been passed into law. To an organisation that spends a lot of its time working on the subject of poverty, what caught our eye about this legislation were the rules that determined whether someone would be eligible to legal aid. Money delivered via means testing, both as social security benefits and as tax credits, has been at the heart of this government’s attempts to defeat poverty by encouraging working-age adults into work and supporting them with state money when they are there. The in-work support available is especially generous for lone parent households. Yet when we started to look at how the rules governing the means-testing of legal aid would impact on certain types of family, we quickly discovered that a lone parent with one child, working 40 hours a week on the minimum wage (£5.35 an hour) could be one of those people who would no longer be eligible for criminal legal aid. It is true that this lone parent only just fails the test of eligibility and that just small changes in circumstance could alter the outcome. Even so, it is an extraordinary conclusion. We therefore looked further, using an official dataset on household incomes (the source among other things of the numbers on how well the Government is doing in reducing poverty) in order to work out some overall estimates of how many households are now no longer eligible for legal aid as a result of the means testing rules. Although such figures are always subject to some uncertainty, we estimate that around two-thirds of adults in working households and about a half of all adults in England and Wales (some 20 million people) are now no longer eligible. What is striking about all this is how much at odds it is with the rhetoric that was used when the legislation was going through parliament. Then, to quote the phrase of the minister, Ms Bridget Prentice, during the Bill’s Second Reading, the target was those ‘wellpublicised cases in which apparently wealthy
individuals are able to claim legal aid’. Her ministerial colleague, Mr. Nick Ainger, went further. ‘On too many occasions’, he said, ‘those clearly able to afford the cost of their own representation and perhaps convicted of some of the most repellent and socially corrosive crimes are receiving the benefit of taxpayer's money through the legal aid system’. As examples of what he was talking about, he named a convicted murderer and a professional footballer accused of spitting. 1 There are several things about the way that means testing has been reintroduced into the magistrates’ courts that are troubling. The first is whether this was what parliament intended. It is clear from Hansard that parliament did not object in principle to means testing for criminal legal aid. But there is nothing in the debate on the primary legislation to suggest that parliament knew that the implementation of means-testing would remove eligibility for legal aid from so many. Part of the reason why this happened is the way in which legislation of this kind is enacted in two parts: the primary legislation covering the principle and the secondary legislation setting out the detail. In cases like this, where it is the detail that determines how many, and who, are to lose a right, or pay a charge, the two parts have to be considered together. It was during the scrutiny of the secondary legislation that the Government’s own estimate, that 46% of defendants would fail the test (a figure published in the Final Regulatory Impact Assessment) became clear. 2 This seems as far removed from the original rhetoric as our own estimates are. The deeper problem, however, lies with the type of argument which begins by identifying an ‘undeserving’ group who supposedly should no longer enjoy what was previously a universal right. Whenever such a claim is made – in this case about apparently wealthy individuals, especially if they have committed an odious crime –it must be subject to careful scrutiny and not just accepted as self-evident. Yet that rarely seems to happen nowadays, perhaps because we have become inured to the way in which individuals and groups are singled out by politicians and media. This parade of the ‘undeserving’ then provides a ready source of characters to play the part of the ‘enemy within’, against whom politicians
can battle righteously, rather make the case on its merits. As happened here, once the principle is breached, it is then much easier to enlarge the group of people who will actually be affected as a result of the change. This still leaves the question of why the regulations were implemented in a way that leaves so many people ineligible. That is not an inevitable consequence of means-testing. For example, the £10 a week ‘family element’ of the child tax credit goes to all but about 10 per cent of households with children, the cut-off for entitlement being a gross annual household income of around £50,000. If the Department for Constitutional Affairs had wanted to, it could have borrowed a really simple rule like this from HM Revenue and Customs. This would have had the considerable merit of producing effects commensurate with the case put forward for it. The reason why it did not adopt a rule to exclude, say, just the richest 10 per cent is presumably because it would not have saved enough money. As it is, even when around half of the adult population is rendered ineligible, the Government estimates the saving to be £35 million a year. 3 That works out at just £2 a head for every person we estimate to be no longer eligible – laughably bad value for money. From the economic point of view, this is the essence of the argument against means-testing for legal aid. Certainly, the Government could amend the regulations in order to deal with the most embarrassing examples of people who are not eligible at the moment. But even if it makes these corrections, we do not believe it is possible to devise a means-testing scheme that saves much money without depriving large numbers of working people of eligibility to legal aid. Peter Kenway Director, New Policy Institute www.npi.org.uk 1 Hansard volume 438, 13 Dec 2005 columns 1240 and 1273 2 Criminal Defence Service Act 2006 – Final Regulatory Impact Assessment, paragraph 5.10 3 Criminal Defence Service Act 2006 – Final Regulatory Impact Assessment, paragraph 5.37
LaPlaya ad
6/2/07
10:47
Page 2
27XXX Catalyst 210x297
27/2/07
12:24
Page 1
The Numbers
The Words The Bond is issued by ARM Asset Backed Securities S.A. (the Issuer), a Luxembourg company which is administered by Fortis Intertrust, a part of the Fortis Group, one of Europe’s largest financial institutions. Fortis Intertrust also acts as Bond Registrar, Payment Administrator and Fiduciary. Other key parties include Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Mercer Oliver Wyman and Cantor Life Markets. This growth Bond does not pay an income during the term of the Bond. Instead, you buy the Bonds at deep discount to their face value, which is the
amount a Bond will be worth when it ‘matures’ or comes due. When the Bond matures, you will receive one lump sum equal to the initial investment plus the growth that has accrued. Although the Bond has been structured for institutions, Catalyst Investment Group, as primary distributor, will offer retail investors the opportunity to invest by aggregating minimum amounts of £2,000. The return from the Bond will be paid gross of tax and the stated return will depend on the bonds being held for all of the term.
The Small Print RISK WARNING: Prospective purchasers of interests in bonds should request an information pack and must review the Information Memorandum and any Supplemental Information Memorandum before investing. Investing in bonds is only suitable for those with experience of complex investment products. Prospective purchasers should consult their professional advisers before investing. An investment in this product should be held until its maturity date and, as the bond is not rated or traded on an exchange, it may be difficult to sell before its maturity date and you may get back less than you invested. Capital and/or returns are not guaranteed and may accumulate at a rate less than the amount quoted. THIS DOCUMENT, WHICH CONSTITUTES A FINANCIAL PROMOTION FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION 21 OF FMSA 2000 HAS BEEN APPROVED BY CATALYST INVESTMENT GROUP LIMITED WHICH IS AUTHORISED AND REGULATED BY THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY.
tel: 0207 929 5090 fax: 0207 929 5086
web: www.catalystinvestment.co.uk email: info@catalystinvestment.co.uk
Catalyst Investment Group Limited, is registered in England and Wales, at 10-13 Lovat Lane, London, EC3R 8DN under number 4031316.