the barrister
#38
ESSENTIAL READING FOR BARRISTERS
1 st O ctober 2008 – 21 st D ecember 2008
E st . 1999
www.barristermagazine.com
MICHAELMAS TERM ISSUE
ISSN 1468-926X
Review of the Public Access rules The public access scheme allows lay people to instruct barristers directly, without the need for the involvement of a solicitor or other professional client. The scheme is limited in the areas that can be covered and the different sorts of work that must be done by both barrister and client. When the Bar Council introduced the public access scheme in 2004, it was careful not to allow public access in all areas of work in order to ensure that the service provided by barristers continued to be in the interest of the client and the administration of justice generally. It also agreed that, as part of the implementation, the scheme would be reviewed after three years to establish whether it was working properly. Under the present regulatory arrangements, this review falls to the Standards Committee of the Bar Standards Board (BSB) to conduct. The Standards
Features
Committee has established a working group, which includes experienced public access practitioners, c h a m b e r s ’ managers and lay members to take forward the review. In this CHRIS GIBSON QC article we provide Bar Standards Board background to the group’s work and to comment on the issues raised by the recent consultation.
Origins of scheme
the
public
access
Prior to the publication of the June consultation
be in the midst of preparing it’s response to
paper the LSC embarked on an unhelpful publicity
the second Ministry of Justice (‘MofJ’)/Legal
campaign, with selective press briefings where
Services Commission (‘LSC’) consultation paper
they provided information to the press without
this year. It is expected to propose fixed fees
sharing it with the Family Bar beforehand. This
for the payment of solicitors and counsel; one
resulted in a frank exchange of correspondence
case one fee (‘OCOF’) or family one case one fee
between the FLBA, Tim Dutton QC (Chairman of
(‘FOCOF’).
the Bar) and the LSC. As a consequence the LSC wrote to the Times accepting that the £140,000
In June the MofJ and the LSC published a
figure that appeared as an LSC quote in the Times
consultation paper ‘Reforming the Legal Aid
report on the 19th May as the average annual earnings from family legal aid work of the family bar was not correct and must have arisen from a ‘misunderstanding’.
a two year period from the Family Graduated Fee Scheme (‘FGFS’). The FLBA response
In preparing its response to the June consultation
to that consultation was submitted on 10th
paper the FLBA fees team sought and
September and is available on the FLBA website
received considerable feedback from the
(www.flba.co.uk).
FLBA membership, particularly those in
www.haysmacintyre.com
Witness Anonymity under the spotlight Witness anonymity has caught the media’s attention and rightly so: it is a part of the justice system and affects some of the most serious and complicated criminal cases. . By Tim Dutton QC, Chairman, Bar Council
12
A new Framework for Plea Negotiation in Fraud Cases The management of long and complex fraud cases has for some years been a concern in our legal system. The Lord Chief Justice’s Protocol already requires the prosecution and defence to resolve issues and agree evidence where possible prior to the trial. Formal Criminal Procedure Rules encourage this and build opportunities for discussions into the court timetable. By Stephen Hockman QC, Head of 6 Pump Court Chambers
16
By the time you read this the Family Bar will
12/08). That paper proposed cuts of £13m over
3
p.32
Access to Family Justice
Family Barrister Scheme’ (Consultation Paper CP
price £3.00
When Memory is the Evidence: Key Points from the Science of Human Memory It is not unusual to encounter cases where the only evidence is accounts of what are claimed to be memories. This frequently occurs in cases of historic sexual abuse but can occur in many other types of case too, for example in a recent action outside the UK workers brought a case of forced unpaid overtime based solely on memories of hours worked up to 25 years ago. By Professor Martin A. Conway, Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds
News p.20 Fees Matters - Contractual Terms Update p.21 New Criminal Bar Chairman calls for fresh focus on training editor: nigel simmonds 0870 766 2715 email: info@barristermagazine.com publishers: media management corporation ltd publishing director: derek payne
p.8
Design and Production: Alan Pritchard email: info@soinspire.me.uk Printed by: NewNorth, Milton Keynes
Bespoke tax advice for barristers Chancery Lane, London