2019-2023 Town of Cumberland Parks System Master Plan - FINAL by Browning Day

Town of Cumberland

2019-2023 Parks System Master Plan

table of contents i. Table of Contents

ii. Acknowledgments

iii

section one: introduction

1.1 A Brief History of Cumberland 1.2 Summary of the Department 1.3 Purpose of the Plan 1.4 Planning Process + Methodology

section two: existing conditions analysis 2.1 Planning Area Overview 2.2 Community Profile 2.3 Recreation Trends Analysis 2.4 Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities Evaluation

section three: needs + priorities assessment 3.1 Community Engagement 3.2 Public Opinion Survey 3.3 A3TM Level of Service 3.4 Summary of Needs and Priorities

section four: master plan vision 4.1 Visioning Process 4.2 Guiding Principles, Goals, + Objectives 4.3 Improve Existing parks 4.4 Future Parks 4.5 Bikeways and Trails 4.6 Programs + Events

section five: action plan 5.1 2019-2023 Action Plan 5.2 Plan Adoption

section six: references + appendices 6.1 Commonly used Acronyms 6.2 References + Citations 6.3 List of Figures 6.4 Supporting Information

3 5 9 13

17 19 25 35 41

53 55 63 71 87

89 91 93 97 111 117 125

129 131 139

143 145 147 151 155

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

acknowledgments TOWN OF CUMBERLAND TOWN COUNCIL Nicole Bell Town Council District 1 Brian Gritter Town Council District 2 Anna Pea (President) Town Council District 3 Aaron Cutshaw Town Council District 4 Joe Siefker (Vice-President) Town Council District 5

TOWN OF CUMBERLAND April Fisher Town Manager Ben Lipps Director of Public Works Christine Owens Director of Planning & Development, Asst. Town Manager Renee Garard Special Projects Coordinator Joni Curtis Town Historian Michael Crooke Chief of Police Katelynn Oleson Assistant to Director of Public Works

TOWN OF CUMBERLAND PARK ADVISORY COUNCIL Angela Waggoner Joanna Johnson Becky Weir Cynthia Malone Joni Curtis Shandy Dearth Brenda Gaston

BROWNING DAY MULLINS DIERDORF Ryan P. Cambridge, PLA, ASLA, APA Project Manager, Planning Practice Leader Brett Schlachter, PLA, ASLA Urban Planner, Landscape Architect Drew Braley, PLA, ASLA Landscape Architect, Editor Mark Beer, PLA Landscape Architect

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

iii

01 introduction

section one: introduction

2 016 CI T Y O F D O R A L PA R K S S Y S T EM M A S T ER P L A N

1.1 a brief history of Cumberland 1.1.1 A Brief History of Cumberland The Town of Cumberland was established on July 7, 1831 along the historic National Road corridor (present day East Washington Street). At the time, it was the western terminus of the National Road, and therefore, was named after Cumberland, Maryland, the eastern terminus. The first official post office was established in 1842 and by 1884 the town had 400 residents. With its adjacency to transportation, Cumberlandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s growth in the 20th Century benefited from the concurrent growth of the Interurban that ran along the south side of Washington Street (Town of Cumberland, 2017). By 1951, the Town had been incorporated and its first town board was elected that same year. Infrastructure improvements, including public water and sanitary sewer, were constructed around the early 1960s (Town of Cumberland, 2017). The Town is unique from a geographic perspective in that its boundary lies within two counties, Marion and Hancock. Originally entirely within Marion County, the first subdivision with Hancock County was annexed in 1968. Subsequently, most of the recent growth for the Town has occurred in Hancock County due to Unigov legislation adopted in 1970 that deters further expansion of the Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s boundaries into Marion (Town of Cumberland, 2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section one: introduction

2 016 CI T Y O F D O R A L PA R K S S Y S T EM M A S T ER P L A N

1.2 summary of the department 1.2.1 Departmental Overview

1.2.2 Mission Statement

In Cumberland, the Department of Public Works (Department hereafter) is responsible for operating and maintaining the Town’s four (4) parks sites and growing trail network. Prior to consolidation under the umbrella of Public Works, the Department of Streets and Parks was responsible for the management and development of park and trail facilities. Currently, there is not a joint use agreement between nearby schools and the parks. Common responsibilities of the Department include:

At the time of the study, the parks and recreationspecific mission statement for the Department and the Parks Advisory Council was:

• Inspect, maintain, and repair Town-owned recreational equipment and facilities, • Develop budgets and work plans for Town parks and trails, • Manage the maintenance and landscaping of Town park and recreation facilities, greenspaces, and trails, • Empty trash receptacles and remove litter from parks, • Improve ADA accessibility by repairing and updating existing infrastructure, • Maintain safety by removing any and all hazards from park and recreation facilities, • Remove all graffiti within 3 days of being reported. At the time of this study, Ben Lipps was the Director of Public Works and the primary contact for parkrelated matters. Housed within the Town Hall complex (11501 E. Washington St. Cumberland, IN 46229), the Department can be reached by phone at (317) 8946214.

“The Town of Cumberland Parks Advisory Council and Department aim to maintain, improve, and enhance its natural resources, parks, trails and recreational opportunities for all generations.” This mission statement will be evaluated and updated as necessary during the Visioning phase of this master planning process to ensure it reflects the current vision and direction of the Department. The primary goals and objectives of the Department and the Parks Advisory Council (PAC) include: 1. Increase the level of service for all Town parks and trails. 2. Promote and build a healthier community. 3. Create new recreational opportunities for the community. 4. Create positive recreation opportunities and welcoming parks that prevent crime. 5. Improve park and trail design standards so that all facilities are welcoming and safe. 6. Encourage local volunteerism. 7. Strengthen community image and sense of place.

1.2.3 Staffing At the time of this study, the Department employed four (4) full-time employees who split their time between the management of both streets and parks. The Department also employs two (2) seasonal and/or part-time employees.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

1.2.4 Budget Overview Over the last six (6) years, the Department’s budget for spending on parks and recreation has fluctuated significantly, ranging from a high of $392,900 in 2016 to a low of $275,000 in 2018. In that time, the Department has spent an average of $338,000 annually on parks and recreation, representing an average of $61 per capita, per year. The adopted budget for 2018 - $275,000 or $48.48 per capita - represents the lowest level of funding of any year analyzed. It noted to the Project Team that the Department’s recent budget reduction was as a result of a necessary but unforeseen infrastructure improvement. The Department anticipates spending to increase in FY2019 and beyond. Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Budgets - FY2013-FY2018 BUDGET CATEGORY Personal Services

FY2013 $182,639

46.7%

FY2014 $215,906

57.6%

FY2015 $79,801

27.1%

FY2016 $137,073

34.9%

FY2017 $142,964

47.7%

FY2018 $162,631

59.1%

Supplies

$22,000

5.6%

$7,700

2.1%

$3,550

1.2%

$4,000

1.0%

$4,000

1.3%

$4,000

1.5%

Other Services & Charges

$176,400

45.1%

$151,394

40.4%

$211,649

71.7%

$151,827

38.6%

$152,560

50.9%

$86,369

31.4%

Capital Outlays

$10,000

2.6%

0.0%

$100,000

25.5%

0.0%

$22,000

8.0%

Budget Total Spending per Capita* Percent Change over Prior FY

$391,039

$375,000

$295,000

$392,900

$299,524

$275,000

$72.62

$68.91

$53.63

$70.17

$53.14

$48.48

n/a

-5.1%

-22.2%

30.9%

-24.3%

-8.8%

* Population estimates through 2016 were obtained from the United States Census Bureau - American Fact Finder. Population estimates for years 2017 and 2018 are projected based on an anticipated 0.66% annual growth.

Figure 1.1: Budget history for the Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation from FY2013-FY2018

1.2.5 Parks Advisory Council The Department and Town Council regularly receive recommendations and advice from the Parks Advisory Council (PAC) on facility improvements, maintenance, and programming of the Town’s parks. Members of the PAC are appointed on an annual basis by the Town Council, with terms expiring on December 31st of any given year. Below is a list of the 2018 Town of Cumberland Park Advisory Council members: Name

Address

Phone

Term

Angela Waggoner

612 Washington Cove, Cumberland, Ind. 46229

(317) 443-5188

awaggoner@buchanangroup.org

2018

Joanna Johnson

153 Yorkshire Blvd East Cumberland, Ind. 46229

(317)891-6946

gatorjo@comcast.net

2019

Becky Weir

26 N. Munsie St. Cumberland, Ind. 46229

becky.weir@yahoo.com

2018

Cynthia Malone

379 N. Arthur Street, Cumberland, Ind. 46229

(317) 667-2079

cyndymalone@yahoo.com

2018

Joni Curtis

222 S. Starter St. Cumberland, Ind. 46229

(317) 919-3517

jonicurtis@hotmail.com

2018

Shandy Dearth

403 Woodland East Dr. Greenfield, Ind. 46140

shandy.dearth@gmail.com

2018

Brenda Gaston

1802 Mace Dr. Greenfield, Ind. 46140

bjgaston@myhoosierneighbors. com

2018

Figure 1.2: Town of Cumberland 2018-2019 Park Advisory Council (2018)

section one: introduction

1.2.6 Key Milestones for 2014-2017 2014 Milestones • Removed unrepairable lighting from National Road Park. • Removed unsafe jungle gym National Road Park. • Completed Section 2 of the Pennsy Trail. 2015 Milestones • Improved Lions Park by adding new barbecue grills near the shelter area. 2016 Milestones • Resurfaced and updated the tennis court at Lions Park using a HCCF grant. • Installed a time capsule within Honors Park. • The swings within all parks were replaced. 2017 Milestones • Removed baseball/softball diamond at Lions Park due to lack of use and safety concerns. • Removed the unsafe metal playground slides from both Lions Park and National Road Park. • Removed the unsafe merry-go-round at Honors Park • Started construction on the Buck Creek Trail. • New trash receptacles were added at National Road Park and Lions Park. • Began the Town’s first 5-Year Park Master Plan planning process.

Figure 1.3: Pennsy Trail adjacent to Honors Park (2017).

Figure 1.4: Resurfaced tennis courts at Lions Park (2017).

Figure 1.5: Updated swings at Honors Park (2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section one: introduction

2 016 CI T Y O F D O R A L PA R K S S Y S T EM M A S T ER P L A N

1.3 purpose of the plan 1.3.1 What is a Parks System Plan? A parks and recreation system master plan is a guiding document that seeks to evaluate, analyze, and strategically plan the long-term development of the Town’s parks and recreation system to ensure that it is meeting the identified goals and objectives of the Town, and is providing equitable, sufficient, and efficient services to its residents. The result of this planning process is a living document which serves as the most consolidated and authoritative source for information related to the Town’s parks and recreation system.

1.3.2 Why Plan? The development of a parks system master plan is one of the most important and impactful planning processes a community can undertake because the benefits it yields have the ability to transcend many of the municipality’s existing physical and operation systems, and have a tangible impact on many residents’ daily lives. In the modern era, parks must be thought of as more than just “fields and facilities;” they are far too important to be in such a small box. The Town’s parks system serves as the “gatekeeper” for its community image and overall quality of life. This role is critically important today, more than ever, as people are choosing where to live and work based on quality of life provided by a community, rather than on what jobs and/or industries may be located within that community. To remain competitive in securing both jobs and residents (both current and future), the Town must embrace the role of quality of life – and parks – in community-wide economic development.

As John Crompton notes in his book “Community Benefits and Repositioning; The Keys to Park and Recreation’s Future Viability,” a well-planned and designed parks and recreation system also has the ability to increase a community’s economic, environmental, and social sustainability (Crompton, 2007): something few traditional plans achieve. To put further pressure on the system, parks and recreation departments nationwide are now finding themselves on the front lines of the battle to improve community health by combating obesity, promoting healthy lifestyles, and increasing connectivity. What was in the past often relegated to the management of “fields and facilities,” the objectives of modern parks systems now also encompass social justice, multi-faceted sustainability, and community-wide economic development to name only a few. The Town of Cumberland is projected to continue growing modestly in the coming years, and without proper planning, will struggle to provide its increasing population with the same parks and recreation level of service it is currently providing its existing residents. If the level of service drops, so will quality of life. To be competitive as a high-quality place to live, work, and play, the Town must to provide a sufficient and equitably distributed supply of high-quality parks and recreation facilities, programs, and services. This plan – when coupled with appropriate action on behalf of the Town and its residents – will help move the Town of Cumberland closer to being one of the most desirable small towns in Indiana.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

1.3.3 More Than Just Parks! It is important to note that while this is a “parks and recreation” master plan, it takes into account the many systems – both physical and operational – which form the framework of the Town’s public realm; the interstitial network of public and quasi-public spaces which link together the various neighborhoods and districts of the community. Examples of these systems include parks and public spaces, natural lands, transportation systems, bikeways/trails, and civic and cultural destinations. The thoughtful planning and design of the public realm is of significant importance because of its influence on overall quality-of-life and user experience. Every resident and visitor to the Town will interact with the public realm multiple times on any given day; it will be the first thing people experience upon arrival, and the last impression on departure. A well-designed and implemented public realm system, complete with networks of streetscapes, parks, trails, public places, and natural areas, serves as the framework for the various types of development and land uses found in the Town, thus helping to ensure a similar experience and quality of life across its entirety. Although the Town may not have full control over how each and every parcel is developed, they do have significant control over the public realm, making it one of the Town’s most important assets.

1.3.4 Relationship to Other Planning Efforts The Cumberland Parks System Master Plan is just one of several planning processes which seek to guide the overall developmental trajectory of the Town of Cumberland, however, it is intended to serve as the single most authoritative source for information specific to Cumberland’s parks, recreation, and open space system. In addition to making its own observations and recommendations, this plan seeks to identify, vet, and prioritize relevant parks and recreation-specific recommendations found across existing city planning processes and products. Examples of relevant plans and planning processes where coordination and or research was anticipated by the Project Team include:

section one: introduction

• Cumberland Thoroughfare Plan Update • Cumberland Comprehensive Plan • Cumberland Land-Use Plan • Town of Cumberland Access Management Plan: Mt. Comfort Road and U.S. 40 • Cumberland Connections 2025 • Cumberland Code of Ordinances • Pennsy Trail and Carrol Road Corridor Reuse Plan In addition, this planning effort is acknowledging and seeking to further the aligned objectives found within relevant regional planning processes developed key community partners, including the City of Indianapolis, Hancock County, and the State of Indiana.

T RAI L S

AYS

E RE

T RAN S I T

ROA DWAYS

RAIL LINES

AN L L A N AT U R

E IK

R .O.W.

S BL

U E W AY S

Figure 1.6: Public realm methodology diagram.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Photo Caption

section one: introduction

1.4 planning process + methodology 1.4.1 There is no Silver Bullet! There is no “one size fits all” approach to parks system planning because no two communities are the same. Each community must select an approach and methodology which will best achieve their desired end result. The approach utilized to develop this master plan was both collaborative and linear in nature, beginning with discovery and visioning at the macro-level, which informed the site and program-specific recommendations at the micro-level. The Project Team worked intentionally and diligently throughout the planning process to build consensus amongst the project stakeholders by incorporating multiple engagement points in each key phase of the project. This plan is anchored in detailed analysis, hands-on Client interaction, meaningful public involvement, and broad community support. The recommendations are both visionary and actionable, each supported by a realistic implementation strategy. Following are summarized descriptions of each of the five core phases of the planning process. 1. Discover: Goals and Outcomes The Master Planning process begins with a “Discovery” effort, during which the Project Team met with the representatives from the Town and key project stakeholders in a collaborative setting to better understand the project’s guiding goals and objectives, and to establish metrics against which success could be gaged. In addition, a Steering Committee composed of diverse but allied Town residents and stakeholders was assembled and tasked with helping oversee the planning process.

2. Evaluate: Existing Conditions Analysis The Existing Conditions Analysis process represents the comprehensive inventory, evaluation, and analysis of the Town’s existing parks and recreation system. During this phase of the process, the Project Team visited and evaluated each of the Town’s existing parks, documenting the quantity, location, and condition of individual facilities. Private recreation facilities were also inventoried and analyzed to the greatest degree possible. In addition, a better understanding of resident lifestyles was obtained through the completion of a community profile (demographics), and trends analysis. This data was then assimilated in a uniform project base map that was utilized throughout the life of the project. 3. Engage + Analyze: Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment The Needs Assessment process utilized a variety of triangulated analysis techniques - qualitative, quantitative, and anecdotal - to understand the needs and priorities of the Town’s residents and the physical system as a whole. Examples of these techniques included a review of programs and events, level of service (LOS) analysis, and an online community survey. During the Needs Assessment Process, the Project Team engaged both the Town staff and the community at-large by using a variety of public involvement techniques such as collaborative workshops; public presentations; stakeholder interviews, public surveys; and a dynamic web-based project portal. Having a detailed and accurate understanding of both needs and priorities will help to ensure that every dollar spent towards implementing the Master Plan Vision provides the most benefit possible for the Town’s residents, and serves as the decision-making framework for the Vision to follow.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

4. Envision: Master Plan Vision Once community needs and priorities were understood, the Project Team spent an equal amount of effort developing creative, innovative, and sustainable solutions which respond to them. The foundation of this “visioning” effort was established in a participatory, workshop setting in Cumberland. The input gained from the Visioning Workshop informed the multiple initiatives and recommendations found in the Master Plan Vision, including those associated with existing parks/programs, new parks/programs, natural lands, trails, and quality of life. 5. Implement: Action Plan A master plan is only as realistic as its implementation strategy! After a Master Plan Vision was established, the Project Team took the time to understand the costs and challenges associated with its long-term implementation. As is the case with the majority of communities, the cumulative cost of the Vision exceeded the resources available at time of the planning process. Anticipating this, the Project Team worked to establish a phased and prioritized action plan that will allow for shortterm progress towards long-range goals and identified alternative funding approaches to help further facilitate implementation.

1.4.2 From the Perspective of “Place” Unfortunately, when it comes to the public realm, not all “spaces” – or parks for that matter - end up becoming true “places” that have the ability to increase a community’s quality of life, health, and economic development. To attempt to buck this trend, this planning process was approached with a placemakingbased methodology. According to the Project for Public Spaces (PPS), “placemaking” is more than just better planning; “Placemaking is a collaborative process by which we can shape our public realm in order to maximize shared value. More than just promoting better urban design, Placemaking facilitates creative patterns of use, paying particular attention to the physical, cultural, and social identities that define a place and support its ongoing evolution.” With community-based participation at its center, an effective Placemaking process capitalizes on a local community’s assets, inspiration, and potential, and it results in the creation of quality public spaces that

section one: introduction

contribute to people’s health, happiness, and well-being. A great public space cannot be measured by its physical attributes alone; it must also serve people as a vital community resource in which function always trumps form. When people of all ages, abilities, and socioeconomic backgrounds can not only access and enjoy a place, but also play a key role in its identity, creation, and maintenance, that is when we see genuine Placemaking in action” – (Project for Public Spaces, 2016). A placemaking approach that is grounded in collaborative stakeholder involvement produces solutions that involve and integrate all components of a community, from the built environment to the numerous interstitial spaces of the “public realm” where residents spend a large portion of their daily lives. If the Town of Cumberland wishes to become one of the most livable “people places” in the region, then it’s planning and design processes must be people-led with placemaking at their core. Absent of community support and participation, even good planning and design do not guarantee that a “space” will become a true “place.”

Figure 1.7: Planning process diagram.

existing conditions analysis

section two : existing conditions analysis2 0 1 6 C I T Y O F D O R A L P A R K S S Y S T E M M A S T E R P L A N

2.1 planning area overview 2.1.1 Planning Area Overview The Town of Cumberland resides in both Marion and Hancock County, Indiana. The municipal boundary is approximately 2.85 square miles, with approximately 75% of its landmass within Hancock County. The Town directly abuts the City of Indianapolis to the west and unincorporated areas of Hancock County to the east. Due to the Unigov legislation adopted by Indianapolis/ Marion County in 1970, any future expansion of the town must occur within Hancock County (Town of Cumberland, 2017). The geographic planning area for this master plan is defined by the Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s municipal boundary and is represented in the Figure 2.1. Due to its proximity to the City of Indianapolis and surrounding unincorporated areas of Hancock county, the Department acknowledges that citizens outside of the municipal limits likely also utilize their facilities and programs.

2.1.2 Natural Features and Landscape Topography Most of Cumberland is located on fairly level terrain, without any dramatic changes in topography. This is beneficial when evaluating potential sites for new recreational facilities like baseball or soccer fields. Conversely, the corridor surrounding the Buck Creek floodplain has upwards of fifteen (15) feet in elevation change. Though not preferred for traditional recreation development, floodplain locations are often suitable for trail development and preservation of natural areas; something the Town is currently embracing through the construction of the Buck Creek Trail.

Soils The dominant soil types for Cumberland consist of Crosby silt loam and Brookston silty clay loam, which when combined, account for approximately 75% of total soil makeup. Brookston soils are classified as being poorly drained soils with a low water table depth (0-12 inches) and are susceptible to frequent ponding, making them less than ideal for athletic field uses. Crosby soil types are slightly more favorable, classified as somewhat poorly drained soils with a depth to water table ranging from 6 to 24 inches and are not as susceptible to ponding. Additional soil types found in Cumberland range from various silty loam and silty clay loam profiles. Sloan silty clay loam and Shoals silt loam are both found along the banks of Buck Creek and are classified as poorly drained soils that experience frequent flooding (USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, 2017). When evaluating future locations for recreational facilities and parks, soil suitability for recreation activities should be part of the assessment. Development on sites that drain poorly and are susceptible to ponding should be discouraged unless appropriate management strategies are established for those sites which anticipate the additional maintenance and/or challenges associated with that soil type. Land Cover The majority of the land in Cumberland is developed, with most of the undeveloped remaining as agricultural fields. The remaining woodlands areas are primarily confined to along the banks of waterways. Water Resources The primary water resource within Cumberland is Buck Creek, which runs north-south through the Town and is part of a tributary that eventually connects to Sugar Creek and Flatrock River. Recreational activities along

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Figure 2.1: Project base map illustrating the â&#x20AC;&#x153;planning areaâ&#x20AC;? and the location of existing park and recreation facilities.

section two : existing conditions analysis

the creek include the recently constructed Buck Creek Trail, which follows the creek corridor and eventually connects into the Pennsy Trail (Town of Cumberland, 2010). The floodplain for Buck Creek extends beyond both sides of the creek to a significant degree in many areas, encompassing most of Lions Park. Additional water resources in Cumberland include private lakes within some of the existing neighborhood subdivisions, which may offer their residents access to water-based activities like canoeing, kayaking, and/or fishing. Man-made, Historical, and Cultural Assets Transportation Infrastructure Cumberland is adjacent to several major roadways and has access to multiple modes of transportation. The Historic National Road (State Road 40/East Washington Street) is a major east-west thoroughfare in Cumberland and serves as the Town’s “Main Street.” Though outside of the Town’s boundary, access onto Interstate 70 and Interstate 465 is available approximately 4-5 miles to the west. The existing roadway network enables Cumberland residents to travel to downtown Indianapolis within approximately 20-30 minutes, and allows them generally good regional, vehicular connectivity. At the time of the study, Cumberland had access to several public transportation options, including several IndyGo bus routes (buses #8, #10, and #87). There are bus stops at the Meijer in Cumberland (adjacent to Town Hall) and the existing routes provide transportation to key destinations within Indianapolis including downtown and the Indianapolis International Airport. Bus #8 frequencies occur in intervals of 15 minutes or less, while buses #10 and #87 are between 16 to 30-minute intervals (IndyGo, 2017). The Blue Line, a proposed 24mile electric bus rapid transit route that is part of Indy Connect’s Central Indiana Transit Plan, will eventually connect the Town of Cumberland to downtown Indianapolis and the airport with a frequency of stops every 10 minutes (Indy Connect, 2016). The Town should proactively plan for this major infrastructural asset, which will help to increase the overall desirability of Cumberland as a sister community of Indianapolis.

Industries and Employers Most industries within Cumberland are located along or south of National Road. Those along National Road are composed primarily of restaurants, shopping centers, small businesses, and auto-related services. The largest employers located within Cumberland include: • Meijer • Harland Sprague • Schrieber Lumber • Masco • Hutchison Signs • Tucker • Town of Cumberland • U.S. Post Office (Town of Cumberland, 2017) Additionally, Cumberland is positioned between two (2) large employment nodes in Indianapolis and Greenfield which provide numerous job opportunities for a town of Cumberland’s size. While the list of large employers that exist within Marion County is extensive, below is a list of some of the largest employers in nearby Hancock County, all of which are based in Greenfield. • Keihin Ipt Mfg LLC • Executive Management Svc Inc • Hancock Regional Hospital • Indiana Automotive Fasteners • Walmart Supercenter • Elanco Animal Health • University Loft Co • Novelty Inc. • Drug Treatment Helpline • Covance Laboratories (Indiana Department of Workforce Development, 2017)

The Town has made efforts to improve connectivity to its park system via its trail network. National Road Park, Honors Park, and Wayburn Pocket Park are all under a half-mile walking distance to the bus stop at the Meijer and only lack a few segments of sidewalk or trail to complete the connections. Lions Park can be accessed by bike via the Buck Creek Trail which connects to the Pennsy Trail.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

2.1.3 Cultural + Historical Much of Cumberlandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s history and cultural identity is tied to its location along the historic National Road. While the town has benefited from and grown around its adjacency to the road, it has recently taken strategic measures to preserve and celebrate it. Already designated on the National Register of Historic Places, the Town worked with the City of Indianapolis at the local level to establish a historic conservation district around the National Road within Marion County (City of Indianapolis, 2017). The Town has also adopted an overlay district to help guide development along the historic corridor and has made recent investments into enhancing the streetscape. (Town of Cumberland, 2017).

In addition to embracing its National Road heritage, the community hosts several annual events including Cumberland Weihnachtsmarkt, Cumberland Arts Goes to Market, National Night Out, and a weekly farmerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s markets (Town of Cumberland, 2017). Many of the Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s events occur at or near Honors Park and Wayburn Pocket Park and serve as consistent programmatic activities that engage those parks during the events. That said, the Town could benefit from a designated location within one of their parks to become the events hub for all future events.

Figure 2.2: Mural along backside of Dollar Tree building facing National Road Park. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

section two : existing conditions analysis

Figure 2.3: Washington Street in Cumberland looking west. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section two : existing conditions analysis

2.2 community profile 2.2.1 Methodology This demographic and lifestyle analysis was undertaken to better understand the unique characteristics of Cumberland’s existing population, projected trends, and how the town’s demographic makeup compares to that of Central Indiana and the State as a whole. While the demographic analysis is quantitative in nature and lacks psychographic information, it does provide a comprehensive snapshot of who lives in the community based on the latest data available to the Project Team. The data utilized for this analysis was collected from Esri Community Analyst, the U.S. Census, and from the Town of Cumberland. Unless noted otherwise, data represents information gathered in 2017.

2.2.2 Population In 2016 the Town of Cumberland had an estimated population of 5,439, which increased from 5,294 in 2010. The Town’s population is projected to continue to increase by approximately 0.66% annually from 2016-2021, although at a lower rate than both Marion County (0.79%) and Hancock County (1.12%). If this projection holds true, Cumberland will have an estimated population of 5,622 by 2021 (U.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst, 2017). This potential growth, although modest, could correlate to an increase in demand for recreational amenities in the Town. If population projections hold true and no additional park acreage is developed, the level of service (LOS) for parks and recreation in Cumberland will decrease. Population Distribution Cumberland’s age distribution is balanced between the different age groups with none accounting for more than 14.3% of the total population. This distribution is

comparable to both Marion County and Hancock County (U.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst, 2017). When evaluating age distribution over time, the percentage of Cumberland’s population between ages 55-85+ has grown between 2010 to 2016 (25.2% of total population to 28.1%) and is projected to continue to increase by 2021 (28.1% to 31.5%). Furthermore, the percentage of the population between the ages of 0-24 and 25-54 are decreasing. If these projections are realized, the percentage of the total population over the age of 55 will increase from one quarter to one third in the near future. Consequently, the median age of Cumberland also increased from 37.8 in 2010 to 38.9 in 2016 and is projected to increase to 40 by 2021. These trends are comparable to Hancock County as a whole, however, the County’s average age is higher than Cumberland’s and is projected to continue to increase to 40.9 in 2021 (U.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst, 2017). This data could suggest that as the Town and County’s population continues to age, it will be important to provide recreational uses and facilities that meet the needs of an older population that is aging in place. Conversely, providing recreational uses and facilities targeted at the demographic groups that are decreasing could be part of a greater strategic effort to attract those groups to Cumberland.

2.2.3 Race + Ethnicity Approximately three-quarters of the population of Cumberland identified as white alone (74.6%). The next highest ethnicity was black alone at 18.4% with no other race accounting for more than 5% of the total population. Cumberland’s ethnic diversity falls between the two counties in which it resides. Hancock County has a much

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

higher percentage of white alone (94.3%) while Marion County has a lower percentage of white alone (60.2%). Looking at trends over time, Cumberland and both of its counties are projected to slowly become more diverse. As Cumberland becomes a more diverse community, it should plan for recreational facilities and programs that meet the needs of those growing ethnicities.

2.2.4 Income The average and median household incomes of Cumberland ($64,110 and $51,821 respectively) fall between Marion ($60,973 and $43,816) and Hancock County ($79,363 and $62,751). Per capita income for Cumberland ($23,953), however, is lower than both Marion County ($24,719) and Hancock County ($29,823) (U.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst, 2017). The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) notes that the 2016 poverty line for a 3-person household is $18,850. (ASPE, 2016) This would imply that approximately 15% of Cumberland’s population was under the poverty line in 2016. (U.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst, 2017) This places Cumberland slightly higher than the national average of 12.3% as stated by the Center for Poverty Research at University of California, Davis. (Center of Poverty Research, 2018) Despite a higher level of poverty, Cumberland residents have a slightly lower unemployment rate of 4.1% than the national average of 4.6-5% for 2016. (U.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst, 2017) (NCSL, 2019)

2.2.5 Education Approximately 90% of the Town’s population over the age of 25 have at least a high school graduate degree, while one-third of the population has at least a bachelor’s degree. These trends fall between Hancock County (95% with at least a high school graduate degree) and Marion County (85%).

2.2.6 Housing Cumberland’s median home value ($150,808) is roughly the half way point between Marion County ($128,385) and Hancock County ($176,904). The average home value, however, for Cumberland ($160,274) is lower than both Marion County ($163,519) and Hancock

section two : existing conditions analysis

County ($205,151) (U.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst, 2017). The number of owner occupied-housing versus rental for Cumberland is 69.2% owner to 30.8% rental which falls between Marion (56.5% owner to 43.5% rental) and Hancock (79.4% owner to 20.6% rental) (U.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst, 2017).

2.2.7 Lifestyle Profiles Methodology Lifestyle assessments differ from traditional, strictly census-based, demographic assessments by looking at both demographic and socioeconomic datasets. The result is a more fine-grained analysis which provides insight into diverse population groups. For the purposes of this analysis, the Project Team utilized Esri’s Tapestry Segmentation to help identify the lifestyle choices and behaviors of the various populations. Esri’s Tapestry Segmentation is a sophisticated market segmentation system that identifies consumer markets, matching consumer traits with geographic areas and populations. These segmentations are classified into 67 unique market segments, each of which can be grouped into 14 overarching LifeMode Groups, or into 6 urbanization groups. Each market segment identifies a particular population’s demographic profile and socioeconomic characteristics. The Tapestry Segmentation makes use of several cluster analysis methods and data from multiple respectable sources including Census 2010, The American Community Survey, Esri’s demographic updates, Experian’s ConsumerView database, and consumer surveys (Esri, 2016). Tapestry Segmentation: The tapestry segments for Cumberland are listed below, in order of predominance. 1. Hardscrabble Road – 39.1% 2. Comfortable Empty Nesters – 29.6% 3. Midlife Constants – 13.2% 4. Soccer Moms – 9.6% 5. Rustbelt Traditions – 8.5% (Esri, 2017) Graphic summaries – created by ESRI – of each of the top three Tapestry Segments found in Cumberland, which together represent over 80% of the Town’s

population can be found in the Appendix. Additional information on all tapestry segments can be found in by visiting Eri’s website at http://www.esri.com/landingpages/tapestry

2.2.8 Implications The demographics of Cumberland tend to fall somewhere between both Marion and Hancock Counties. Census statistics on race, income, housing, and education are all approximately in the middle of Marion and Hancock County, suggesting that Cumberland is a transitional area between the urban characteristics of Marion County to the predominantly rural characteristics of Hancock County. When looking forward over the next five years, and if population projections for Cumberland hold true, an older generation will become a larger percentage of the Town’s population. Coupled with an anticipated lower population growth rate than both counites, Cumberland is becoming an older community. Understanding the recreational needs and choices of this demographic could help the Town proactively plan to accommodate them over the next five years. Alternatively, the Town may also wish to provide recreational facilities that appeal to those age groups that are decreasing as a way of attracting those age groups back to Cumberland. Despite the modest projected growth, this analysis suggests that additional park land will need to be acquired and developed, as the Town grows, in order to maintain the current level of service (see Section 3.4 of this report). Similar to the demographics, the tapestry segments tend to predominantly target two distinct groups. Comfortable Empty Nesters and Midlife Constants likely represent the older population noted above. These tapestry segments tend to desire recreational activities such as biking for physical activity and could suggest the Town’s investment in their trail network would directly appeal to this demographic. Conversely, those under the Hardscrabble Road tapestry tend to seek more sport field related amenities like basketball and thus may benefit from investment of these amenities in the Town’s parks. It should be noted that these tapestry segments cover a broad overview of the country and these recreational preferences should be validated at the local level within Section 3 Needs Assessment.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

LifeMode Group: Middle Ground

Hardscrabble Road Households: 1,489,000 Average Household Size: 2.64 Median Age: 31.7 Median Household Income: $26,000

WHO ARE WE?

OUR NEIGHBORHOOD

SOCIOECONOMIC TRAITS

Hardscrabble Road neighborhoods are in urbanized areas within central cities, with older housing, located chiefly in the Midwest and South. This slightly smaller market is primarily a family market, married couples (with and without children) and single parents. Younger, highly diverse (with higher proportions of black, multiracial, and Hispanic populations), and less educated, they work mainly in service, manufacturing, and retail trade industries. Unemployment is high (almost twice the US rate), and median household income is half the US median. Almost 1 in 3 households have income below the poverty level. Approximately 60% of householders are renters, living primarily in single-family homes, with a higher proportion of dwellings in 2–4 unit buildings. This market is struggling to get by.

• Renters: About three-fifths of households.

• Education completed: 38% with a high school diploma only (Index 133); 25% with some college or an associate’s degree (Index 86).

• Primarily family households, married couples with or without children, single parents (Index 203), and multigenerational households (Index 137).

• Unemployment rate is higher at 16.6%, almost twice the US rate.

• Primarily single-family homes (61%), with a higher proportion of dwellings in 2–4 unit buildings (Index 225).

• Labor force participation rate is lower at 57.4%. • Wages and salaries are the primary source of income for 71% of households, with contributions from Supplemental Security Income for 10% (Index 242) and public assistance for 7% (Index 280).

• Older housing, built before 1960 (62%), with a higher proportion built in the 1940s (Index 211) or earlier (Index 252). • Four-fifths of owned homes valued under $100,000 (more than 3.5 times the US).

• These cost-conscious consumers purchase sale items in bulk and buy generic over name brands.

• Higher percentage of vacant housing units at 17% (Index 147).

LifeMode Group: Middle Ground

TAPESTRY • They tend to save money for a

Hardscrabble Road TAPESTRY

• Most households with 1 or 2 vehicles (71%), but 18% have no vehicle (Index 202).

SEGMENTATION

specific purpose.

esri.com/tapestry

SEGMENTATION esri.com/tapestry

Note: The Index represents the ratio of the segment rate to the US rate multiplied by 100. Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI.

AGE BY SEX (Esri data)

RACE AND ETHNICITY (Esri data)

INCOME AND NET WORTH

Median Age: 31.7 US: 37.6

The Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity).

Net worth measures total household assets (homes, vehicles, investments, etc.) less any debts, secured (e.g., mortgages) or unsecured (credit cards). Household income and net worth are estimated by Esri.

| Indicates US 85+ 80–84 75–79 70–74 65–69 60–64 55–59 50–54 45–49 40–44 35–39 30–34 25–29 20–24 15–19 10–14 5–9 <5

Diversity Index: 74.2 US: 62.1 Hispanic*

Median Household Income

19.8%

Multiple

4.5%

Other

9.3%

Asian and Pac. Island American Indian

$26,000 0

1.9%

Black

Male

27.5%

Female

$60k

$120k+

20%

40%

* Hispanic can be of any race.

60%

$300k

$400k+

US Median $71,000

80% 0

US Average

$100k

$200k

AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD BUDGET INDEX

OCCUPATION BY EARNINGS

The index compares the average amount spent in this market’s household budgets for housing, food, apparel, etc., to the average amount spent by all US households. An index of 100 is average. An index of 120 shows that average spending by consumers in this market is 20 percent above the national average. Consumer expenditures estimated by Esri.

The five occupations with the highest number of workers in the market are displayed by median earnings. Data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Housing

$35,000

Median Earnings

Food

Apparel & Services

Transportation Health Care

Entertainment & Recreation

50 50

Education Pensions & Social Security

47 0

Transportation and Material Moving

$25,000

Food Preparation and Serving Related

0 50

100

150

200

250

300

350

50,000

100,000

150,000

Workers (Age 16+)

Figure 2.4: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Hardscrabble Road segment (Esri, 2017).

section two : existing conditions analysis

Production

Office and Administrative Support

Sales and Related $15,000

$5,000

Other

$90k

$12,000

55.0%

$30k

Median Net Worth

1.8%

White 8%

US Median $51,000

200,000

250,000

LifeMode Group: Middle Ground

TAPESTRY

Hardscrabble Road

MARKET PROFILE

SEGMENTATION esri.com/tapestry

HOUSING

(Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI)

Median home value is displayed for markets that are primarily owner occupied; average rent is shown for renter-occupied markets. Tenure and home value are estimated by Esri. Housing type and average rent are from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

• Little extra money to invest in retirement savings plans, stocks, or bonds. • For those with young children at home, watching Disney Channel, Cartoon Network, and Nickelodeon on TV is popular; diapers, baby food, and children’s clothing are priority expenditures. • Favor shopping through an in-home sales rep, QVC, or HSN. • Read parenting and health magazines. • Watch programs on BET, MTV, and Game Show Network. • Prefer to listen to gospel, R&B, rap, and hip-hop music.

Own

41.2%

• Participate in basketball, football, and volleyball.

Typical Housing:

Home Ownership US Percentage: 63.6% Own 36.4% Rent

Rent

58.8%

Single Family

Average Rent: $690 US Average: $990

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS

ESRI INDEXES

Total population, average annual population change since Census 2010, and average density (population per square mile) are displayed for the market relative to the size and change among all Tapestry markets. Data estimated by Esri.

Esri developed three indexes to display average household wealth, socioeconomic status and housing affordability for the market relative to the US.

900,000

Population

11,000,000

4,045,000

Population

-0.5%

Growth (Annual %)

3.0%

0 -0.1% 25,000

1000

350

58 Socioeconomic Status Index

Population Density (Persons per sq. mile)

350

33 Wealth Index

LifeMode Group: Middle Ground

Hardscrabble Road

182 Housing Affordability Index

350

TAPESTRY

SEGMENTATION esri.com/tapestry

SEGMENT DENSITY This map illustrates the density and distribution of the Hardscrabble Road Tapestry Segment by households.

High

Low

Copyright © 2014 Esri. All rights reserved. Esri, the Esri globe logo, Tapestry, @esri.com, and esri.com are trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of Esri in the United States, the European Community, or certain other jurisdictions. Other companies and products or services mentioned herein may be trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of their respective mark owners.

G62222

ESRI2C7/14dl

For more information 1-800-447-9778 info@esri.com esri.com

Figure 2.5: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Hardscrabble Road segment (Esri, 2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

LifeMode Group: GenXurban

Comfortable Empty Nesters Households: 2,973,000 Average Household Size: 2.50 Median Age: 46.8 Median Household Income: $68,000

WHO ARE WE?

OUR NEIGHBORHOOD

SOCIOECONOMIC TRAITS

Residents in this large, growing segment are older, with more than half of all householders aged 55 or older; many still live in the suburbs where they grew up. Most are professionals working in government, health care, or manufacturing. These Baby Boomers are earning a comfortable living and benefitting from years of prudent investing and saving. Their net worth is well above average (Index 363). Many are enjoying the transition from child rearing to retirement. They value their health and financial well-being.

• Married couples, some with children, but most without (Index 149).

• Education: 34% college graduates; nearly 66% with some college education.

• Average household size slightly lower at 2.50.

• Low unemployment at 7%; average labor force participation at 61%.

• Found throughout the suburbs and small towns of metropolitan areas, where most residents own and live in single-family detached homes (Index 142).

• Most households income from wages or salaries, but a third also draw income from investments (Index 154) and retirement (Index 166).

• Most homes built between 1950 and 1990 (Index 129).

• Comfortable Empty Nesters residents physically and financially active.

• Households generally have one or two vehicles.

LifeMode Group: GenXurban

• Prefer eating at home instead of dining out.

TAPESTRY

Comfortable Empty Nesters

TAPESTRY AGE BY SEX

esri.com/tapestry

SEGMENTATION (Esri data)

esri.com/tapestry

Median Age: 46.8 US: 37.6 | Indicates US 85+ 80–84 75–79 70–74 65–69 60–64 55–59 50–54 45–49 40–44 35–39 30–34 25–29 20–24 15–19 10–14 5–9 <5

RACE AND ETHNICITY (Esri data)

INCOME AND NET WORTH

Note: Themeasures Index representstotal the ratio of the segment rate to the US rate multiplied by 100. Net worth household assets (homes, vehicles, Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI. investments, etc.) less any debts, secured (e.g., mortgages) or unsecured (credit cards). Household income and net worth are estimated by Esri.

Diversity Index: 30.6 US: 62.1 Hispanic*

6.1%

Multiple

1.9%

Other

1.6%

Asian and Pac. Island American Indian

Median Household Income $68,000 0

2.2%

Black

Male

Female

$30k

$60k

$90k

$120k+

$300k

$400k+

Median Net Worth 5.5%

$258,000

88.3%

US Median $51,000

0.4%

White 8%

20%

40%

* Hispanic can be of any race.

60%

US Median $71,000

80% 0

US Average

$100k

$200k

AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD BUDGET INDEX

OCCUPATION BY EARNINGS

The five occupations with the highest number of workers in the market are displayed by median earnings. Data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

117

Housing

$80,000

Median Earnings

114

Food

Apparel & Services

116

Transportation

126

Health Care Entertainment & Recreation

123

Education

118

Pensions & Social Security

121 118

Other 0

100

Health Care Practitioners and Technical

$60,000

$40,000

200

250

300

350

Office and Administrative Support

Education, Training, and Library

$20,000

Sales and Related

0 150

Management

100,000

300,000

500,000

Workers (Age 16+)

Figure 2.6: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Comfortable Empty Nesters segment (Esri, 2017).

• Home maintenance a priority among these homeowners. SEGMENTATION

section two : existing conditions analysis

700,000

LifeMode Group: GenXurban

TAPESTRY

Comfortable Empty Nesters

MARKET PROFILE

SEGMENTATION esri.com/tapestry

HOUSING

(Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI)

• Residents enjoy listening to sports radio or watching sports on television. • Physically active, they play golf, ski, ride bicycles, and work out regularly. • Spending a lot of time online isn’t a priority, so most own older home computers. • Financial portfolio includes stocks, certificates of deposit, mutual funds, and real estate.

Own 87.5%

Typical Housing:

Home Ownership US Percentage: 63.6% Own 36.4% Rent

Rent

12.5%

Single Family

Median Value: $187,000 US Median: $177, 000

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS

ESRI INDEXES

Esri developed three indexes to display average household wealth, socioeconomic status, and housing affordability for the market relative to US standards.

900,000

Population

11,000,000

7,545,000 -0.5%

Population Growth (Annual %)

3.0%

0 0.4% 0

25,000

1000

350

137 Socioeconomic Status Index

Population Density (Persons per sq. mile)

277

350

147 Wealth Index

LifeMode Group: GenXurban

350

185 Housing Affordability Index

TAPESTRY

Comfortable Empty Nesters

SEGMENTATION esri.com/tapestry

SEGMENT DENSITY This map illustrates the density and distribution of the Comfortable Empty Nesters Tapestry Segment by households.

High

Low

G62222

ESRI2C7/14dl

For more information 1-800-447-9778 info@esri.com esri.com

Figure 2.7: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Comfortable Empty Nesters segment (Esri, 2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

LifeMode Group: GenXurban

Midlife Constants Households: 3,043,000 Average Household Size: 2.30 Median Age: 45.9 Median Household Income: $48,000

WHO ARE WE?

OUR NEIGHBORHOOD

SOCIOECONOMIC TRAITS

Midlife Constants residents are seniors, at or approaching retirement, with below average labor force participation and above average net worth. Although located in predominantly metropolitan areas, they live outside the central cities, in smaller communities. Their lifestyle is more country than urban. They are generous, but not spendthrifts.

• Older homes (most built before 1980) found in the suburban periphery of smaller metropolitan markets.

• Education: 64% have a high school diploma or some college.

• Primarily married couples, with a growing share of singles.

• Unemployment is lower in this market at 7.4% (Index 86), but so is the labor force participation rate (Index 89).

• Settled neighborhoods with slow rates of change and residents that have lived in the same house for years.

• Almost 42% of households are receiving Social Security (Index 150); 28% also receive retirement income (Index 160).

• Single-family homes, less than half still mortgaged, with a median home value of $141,000 (Index 80).

• Traditional, not trendy; opt for convenience and comfort, not cutting-edge. Technology has its uses, but the bells and whistles are a bother. • Attentive to price, but not at the expense of quality, they prefer to buy American and natural products.

LifeMode Group: GenXurban

TAPESTRY • Radio and newspapers are the media

Midlife Constants TAPESTRY

SEGMENTATION

of choice (after television). esri.com/tapestry

SEGMENTATION esri.com/tapestry

Note: The Index represents the ratio of the segment rate to the US rate multiplied by 100. Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI.

AGE BY SEX (Esri data)

RACE AND ETHNICITY (Esri data)

INCOME AND NET WORTH

Median Age: 45.9 US: 37.6

| Indicates US 85+ 80–84 75–79 70–74 65–69 60–64 55–59 50–54 45–49 40–44 35–39 30–34 25–29 20–24 15–19 10–14 5–9 <5

Diversity Index: 34.0 US: 62.1 Hispanic*

7.0%

Multiple

2.1%

Other

2.2%

Asian and Pac. Island American Indian

Median Household Income $48,000

1.8%

6.4%

White 8%

Male

Female

$60k

$120k+

20%

40%

* Hispanic can be of any race.

60%

$300k

$400k+

US Median $71,000

80% 0

US Average

$100k

$200k

AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD BUDGET INDEX

OCCUPATION BY EARNINGS

The five occupations with the highest number of workers in the market are displayed by median earnings. Data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Food

$70,000

Median Earnings

Housing

Apparel & Services

Transportation

Health Care Entertainment & Recreation

90 82

Education Pensions & Social Security

87 0

Health Care Practitioners and Technical

$50,000

Education, Training, and Library

$30,000

0 100

150

200

250

300

350

Management

Sales and Related

Office and Administrative Support

$10,000

Other

200,000

400,000

Workers (Age 16+)

Figure 2.8: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Midlife Constants segment (Esri, 2017).

$90k

$104,000

86.9%

$30k

Median Net Worth

0.6%

Black

US Median $51,000

section two : existing conditions analysis

600,000

LifeMode Group: GenXurban

TAPESTRY

Midlife Constants

MARKET PROFILE

SEGMENTATION esri.com/tapestry

HOUSING

(Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI)

• Prefer practical vehicles like SUVs and trucks (domestic, of course). • Sociable, church-going residents belonging to fraternal orders, veterans’ clubs and charitable organizations and do volunteer work and fund-raising. • Contribute to arts/cultural, educational, political, and social services organizations. • DIY homebodies that spend on home improvement and gardening. • Media preferences: country or Christian channels. • Leisure activities include scrapbooking, movies at home, reading, fishing, and golf.

Own

73.6%

Typical Housing:

Home Ownership US Percentage: 63.6% Own 36.4% Rent

Rent

26.4%

Single Family

Median Value: $141,000 US Median: $177, 000

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS

ESRI INDEXES

Esri developed three indexes to display average household wealth, socioeconomic status, and housing affordability for the market relative to US standards.

900,000

Population

11,000,000

7,238,000 -0.5%

Population Growth (Annual %)

3.0%

0 0.4% 0

25,000

1000

350

104 Socioeconomic Status Index

Population Density (Persons per sq. mile)

303

350

91 Wealth Index

LifeMode Group: GenXurban

350

175 Housing Affordability Index

TAPESTRY

Midlife Constants

SEGMENTATION esri.com/tapestry

SEGMENT DENSITY This map illustrates the density and distribution of the Midlife Constants Tapestry Segment by households.

High

Low

G62222

ESRI2C7/14dl

For more information 1-800-447-9778 info@esri.com esri.com

Figure 2.9: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Midlife Constants segment (Esri, 2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section two : existing conditions analysis

2.3 recreation trends analysis 2.3.1 Overview + Methodology

2.3.2 Summary of National Trends

The Project Team utilized the 2016 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report produced by the Sports and Fitness Industry Association (SFIA) to help better understand national trends in parks and recreation and how those compare to the population of Cumberland.

Walking for fitness is the most popular sport or fitness activity with over 109 million users in 2015. This activity has remained popular for some time due to the generally low level of skill required and ability to partake in a wide variety of environments. According to the report, participating with a friend was a strong motivator to exercising, something that is very easy to achieve with fitness walking (SFIA, 2016). Other fitness activities were high in participation including treadmill and running/jogging at 50 and 48 million. Off road triathlons (+23.6%) and adventure racing (+20.9%) had the highest percentage of growth over the past year, while snowmobiling had the largest decrease in participants (-11.1%) over the prior year (SFIA, 2016).

As part of the Topline Report, SFIA conducted 32,658 online interviews with individuals over the age of six from different locations and ethnic groups nationwide. These interviews helped to determine the findings for the report, which look at activity levels and participation of a sport or fitness type in combination with age groups to determine which sport or fitness activities are more common within certain age groups (SFIA, 2016). These trends were then reviewed in conjunction with the local market potential index (MPI) of Cumberland – a measure of how likely, based on the demographic makeup of the Town as reported by ESRI’s Sports and Leisure Market Potential Report, a resident is to participate in a certain activity – to see how they may apply at a local level. A MPI of 100 represents the national average while a number above 100 represents higher than the national average and consequently below 100 represents lower than the national average (Esri, 2016). For this analysis, each available and applicable core recreation activity was grouped to best correlate with the 2016 SFIA Topline Report’s categories of Fitness Activities, Individual Sports, Outdoor Sports, Racquet Sports, Team Sports, Water Sports, and Winter Sports.

Overall, participation in fitness activities, team, winter, and water sports have increased steadily over the last few years. Of those, team sports have seen the largest increase in participation, with over seven different sports growing in use by at least 4% over 2014 numbers. Individual sports saw a slight decrease overall in 2015, while outdoor and racquet sports stayed about the same. Correlations between age groups and sport or fitness type were also determined with participants born in this millennium participating in team sports more often than any other age group. Fitness activities were the most popular sport or fitness category among the remaining age groups (SFIA, 2016). The 2016 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report defines inactivity as “those participants who reported no physical activity in 2015 and an additional 18 sports/fitness activities that require minimal to no physical exertion” (SFIA, 2016). The number of people ages 6 and older who identified themselves as inactive for 2015 decreased slightly from

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

28.3% to 27.7% of the total population, bringing the number of “inactive” Americans to 81.6 million. The 13 to 17 age group had the biggest decrease in inactivity levels at -1.4% from 2014 while 55 to 64 age group had a slight increase in inactivity levels at +0.4% more (SFIA, 2016).

2.3.3 Fitness Activities The most popular fitness activity is walking for fitness (109.8 million), using a treadmill (50.4 million), running/ jogging (48.5 million), free hand weightlifting (42.7 million), and stretching (35.7 million). The fitness activities that had the most growth for the past year include barre (+12.0%), calisthenics (+9.8%), cardio cross trainer (+6.7%), tai chi (+6.0%), and swimming for fitness (+4.0%). Fitness activities that had a decline the past year include running/jogging (-5.1%), walking for fitness (-2.4%), weight/resistance machines (-1.5%), free barbell weights (-0.9%), and boot-camp style training (-0.8%). Though walking for fitness and running/jogging had the largest decreases in participation for the past year, the sheer volume of participants still make these high demand activities (SFIA, 2016).

Cumberland exhibits greater than average market potential for the following fitness activities: • Aerobics (MPI 105) Cumberland exhibits lower than average market potential for the following fitness activities: • Walking for exercise (MPI 99) • Pilates (MPI 95) • Weightlifting (MPI 91) • Swimming (MPI 90) • Running/jogging (MPI 78) • Yoga (MPI 78)

2.3.4 Individual Sports Bowling was the most popular individual sport reported in 2015 with 45.9 million participants; almost double the second highest sport, golf, at 24.1 million. Ice skating (10.4 million), archery (8.3 million), and trail running (8.1 million) round out the top five individual sports with the greatest participation. Several individual sports, mostly centered on running, have seen a large growth in participation over the past year. Off-road triathlons had the most growth with

Figure 2.10: Cumberland Residents riding on the Pennsy Trail. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

section two : existing conditions analysis

23.6% more participants than the prior year while adventure racing (+20.9%), road triathlons (+13.4%), and trail running (+8.1%) also had significant growth. The sports that declined the most over the last year include 2x2 wheel roller skating (-3.9%), golf (-2.3%), and skateboarding (-2.2%). Three of the most popular individual sports (bowling, golf, and ice skating) saw a decrease in participation the past year, trail running had the fourth highest number of participants and was also one of the fastest growing individual sports (SFIA, 2016). Cumberland exhibits greater than average market potential for the following individual sports: • Archery (MPI 115) • Ice skating (MPI 108) • Target shooting (MPI 101) Cumberland exhibits lower than average market potential for the following individual sports: • Bowling (MPI 96) • Golf (MPI 90)

2.3.5 Outdoor Sports The most popular outdoor sports for 2015 were road biking (38.2 million), fresh water fishing (37.6 million), hiking (37.2 million), camping (27.7 million), and wildlife viewing (20.7 million). Shooting related outdoor sports had the most growth over the past year with four out of the top five activities including clay shooting (+15.4%), trap shooting (+13.9%), hunting with a handgun (+10.0%), and target shooting with a handgun (+9.1%). BMX biking also had significant increase in participation at +14.5%. Similar to fitness activities, most of the popular outdoor sports had a decrease in participation over the last year, including road biking (-3.6%), camping (-3.2%), wildlife viewing (-1.9%), and freshwater fishing (-0.4%), however, the total number of participants for these activities is still significantly higher than the fastest growing sports (SFIA, 2016). Cumberland exhibits greater than average market potential for the following outdoor sports: • Boating (MPI 113) • Backpacking (MPI 112) • Mountain biking (MPI 110) • Canoeing/kayaking (MPI 103) • Hunting with a shotgun (MPI 102) Cumberland exhibits lower than average market potential for the following outdoor sports: • Hunting with a rifle (MPI 99) • Freshwater Fishing (MPI 99) • Horseback riding (MPI 97) • Road biking (MPI 93) • Downhill Skiing (MPI 91) • Saltwater fishing (MPI 90) • Hiking (74)

2.3.6 Racquet Sports The most popular racquet sports for 2015 include tennis (17.9 million), table tennis (16.5 million), and badminton (7.2 million). While none of these activities experienced a decrease in participation over the last year, cardio tennis (+12.6%), racquetball (+8.1%), and squash (+7.2%) had substantial growth (SFIA, 2016). Cumberland exhibits lower than average market potential for the following racquet sports: • Tennis (MPI 90)

Figure 2.11: Example of racquet sports.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

2.3.7 Team Sports

2.3.8 Water Sports

The most popular team sports by total volume of participants for 2015 were basketball (23.4 million), baseball (13.7 million), outdoor soccer (12.6 million), slow-pitch softball (7.1 million), and touch football (6.4 million). The team sports that have seen the most growth from the past year are roller hockey (+9.8%), swimming on a team (+6.7%), indoor soccer (+6.2%), flag football (+5.8%), and rugby (+5.7%). Team sports that have seen the largest decrease in participation over the last year include ultimate Frisbee (-2.7% decrease), paintball (-1.7% decrease), touch football (-1.5%), and volleyball on grass (-0.6% decrease) (SFIA, 2016).

The most popular water sports in 2015 were canoeing (10.2 million), kayaking (9.4 million), snorkeling (8.8 million), and jet skiing (6.2 million). Several water sports experienced significant growth over the last year including boardsailing/windsurfing (+13.1%), stand-up paddling (+9.8%), and kayaking recreational (+7.3%), white water kayaking (+7.1%), and sea kayaking (+5.7%). One noteworthy observation is that, unlike many of the most popular sports, recreational kayaking is one of the most popular and fastest growing sports. Water-based activities that had a decrease in participation included water skiing (-1.5%), jet skiing (-1.5%), and surfing (-0.7%) (SFIA, 2016).

Cumberland exhibits greater than average market potential for the following outdoor sports: • Baseball (MPI 105) • Frisbee (MPI 104) • Football (MPI 102) Cumberland exhibits lower than average market potential for the following outdoor sports: • Softball (MPI 99) • Volleyball (MPI 91) • Basketball (MPI 87) • Soccer (MPI 87)

Figure 2.12: Example of team sports.

section two : existing conditions analysis

Cumberland exhibits higher than average market potential for the following water-based sports: • Canoeing/kayaking (MPI 103) Cumberland exhibits lower than average market potential for the following water-based sports: • Freshwater fishing (MPI 99) • Saltwater fishing (MPI 90) • Swimming (MPI 90)

2.3.9 Winter Sports The most popular winter sports in 2015 were downhill skiing at 9.3 million total participants, followed by sledding (8.8 million) and snowboarding (7.6 million). Many of the most popular winter sports also had significant growth over the past year including free style and downhill skiing, sledding, and snowboarding all having at least a 2.9% growth or higher. Snowmobiling, however, experienced the most drastic decline in participation, with 11.1% less than 2014. Cross-country skiing also experienced a decline of 3.4% (SFIA, 2016). Cumberland exhibits higher than average market potential for the following winter sports: • Ice skating (MPI 108) Cumberland exhibits lower than average market potential for the following water-based sports: • Downhill skiing (MPI 91)

2.3.10 Implications Cumberland’s most popular sport and fitness activity was “walking for exercise” with 1,076 participants for 2016, nearly twice as many as the second and third most popular, swimming (565 participants) and fresh water fishing (496 participants). All three of these activities had a MPI roughly at or slightly below the national average. The least participated sport and fitness activities included horseback riding (97), downhill skiing (100 participants), ice skating (107 participants), and Pilates (107 participants). Similar to the most participated activities, the MPI for these activities were comparable the national average. Cumberland residents participated above than the national average for a third of the sport activities listed available. The sport and fitness activities with the highest MPI occurred in outdoor sports and individual sports. Archery had the highest percentage of participants compared to the national average with an MPI of 115. Boating (113 MPI), backpacking (112 MPI), and mountain biking (110 MPI) were the next three highest percentages. In contrast, activities with the lowest MPI were primarily in the fitness sports category. Activities with the lowest percentage of participation compared to the national average were hiking (74 MPI), yoga (78 MPI), and running/jogging (78 MPI).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section two : existing conditions analysis

2.4 existing parks and recreation facilities evaluation 2.4.1 Park Site Evaluation Methodology The Project Team, along with Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation staff, visited the Town’s parks and recreation facilities on September 20, 2017. The Town’s four (4) existing parks sites were evaluated using Browning Day’s Site Score™ Park Site Evaluation Tool – a copy of which is provided in the Appendix – which evaluated the town’s parks and facilities using the following four key categories of criteria: Access + Linkages: • Visibility from a distance; can one clearly see into the park from the surrounding neighborhood/roadways? • Ease of walking/biking to the park; can someone walk directly into the park safely and easily? • Ease of walking/biking within the park; can someone navigate the interior of the park safely and efficiently to access its major components? • Clarity of wayfinding/signage; is there signage that identifies the park, and/or signage that provides additional information for users? • Universal accessibility; does the site generally appear to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) laws for accessibility, and if not, what are the major barriers? Comfort + Image: • Overall attractiveness; is the park attractive at first glance? • Feeling of safety; does the park feel safe at the time of the visit? • Quality of maintenance; are exterior areas of the park clean, free of litter, and maintained appropriately? • Perception of safety; is the park designed and

maintained in a way that facilitates a feeling of safety and security while in the park? • Comfort of places to sit; are there a variety of different, comfortable places to sit? • Evidence of design standards; is there clear evidence of quality planning and design standards in place which result in a cohesive and functional site? Uses, Activities, + Sociability: • Mix of uses/things to do; in accordance to PPS’s Power of 10 principles, are there a variety of things to do, given the park typology? • Activation; is the park activated by a variety of people of different age groups, ethnic backgrounds, and abilities using the park throughout the day and across the seasons? • Distribution of activity; is there consistent activity which is evenly distributed, geographically, throughout the park site? • Programming flexibility; how flexible is the park in accommodating multiple uses/activities and future change in trends? • Integration of technology; is technology – such as Wi-Fi – integrated within the site in a meaningful and appropriate way? Sustainability: • Stormwater management; are green infrastructure systems embraced to help manage stormwater? • Multi-modal capacity; is the park accessible and does it facilitate the use of multiple modes of transportation (bikes, transit, walking, driving, etc.)? • Sustainable site maintenance practices; are sustainable maintenance practices/policies in place, appropriate for the scale and program of the site?

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

• Healthy lifestyles; does the park intentionally and clearly promote healthy lifestyles through the use of supporting facilities/programs/advertisement? Each of the sites was scored based on the above questions using a scale of 1 to 5 where: 1.0 = Well Below Expectations 2.0 = Not Meeting Expectations 3.0 = Meets Expectations 4.0 = Exceeds Expectations 5.0 = Far Exceeds Expectations Scores were assigned to each based on an evaluation of the park site compared to other sites in the Town. Although the process of scoring is based on the professional opinion of the Project Team, and is therefore inherently subjective, consensus on the results was reached through review and discussion with the Department. The Site Score™ tool includes 20 total questions, each worth a maximum of five (5) points, resulting in a maximum aggregate score of 100 points per park. Based on the aggregate score per park, each site was rated as: Total Score of 100-81 = Exceeding Expectations Total Score of 80-61 = Meeting Expectations Total Score of 60-0 = Not Meeting Expectations The purpose of the rigorous scoring was to establish an understanding of how the park system rates in terms of quality and its ability to serve users within the Town of Cumberland specifically and to identify areas for potential improvement. It is worth noting that identifying system-wide trends, both positive and negative, is as important as the score of an individual park.

2.4.2 System-Wide Trends and Observations General Observations Overall, the Town’s existing parks system appears “tired,” with many facilities that are either outdated and/or are in need of repair. This is especially true with the Town’s oldest park facilities, which include National Road Park and Lions Park. The amenities present within the park sites are varied and traditional, including a mix of play areas, sports courts, shelters, and multi-purpose greenspace.

section two : existing conditions analysis

Of the four (4) sites evaluated, Honors Park and Wayburn Pocket Park were the highest scoring, each with a total score of 62 (Meeting Expectations). The lowest scoring park was National Road Park (50), followed closely by Lions Park (51). The Wayburn Pocket Park site was the smallest park evaluated (.07 acres), whereas Lions Park was the largest at 9.45 acres. The majority of Cumberland’s developed park acreage is on the Hancock County side of the town (57%), however, 75% of the total park sites are in the Marion County portion of Cumberland. Access and Linkages The Town is benefiting significantly from the increased connectivity provided by the Pennsy Trail and the recently constructed Buck Creek Trail. These trail networks help to connect the Town’s existing park sites, however, dedicated trail or pedestrian connections from the trails and trailhead locations into the surrounding neighborhoods are lacking. Pedestrian connectivity within the park sites could be improved, especially at Honors Park where no paved walkways exist. With the exception of Wayburn Park, the remaining park sites lacked dedicated pedestrian entrances from established pedestrian corridors. In general, all facilities evaluated had ADA accessibility challenges, some of which were the result of the facility’s age while others were associated with design or maintenance practices. Although most of the park sites had accessible routes within the park, few lead to any of the amenity areas, and all lacked accessible seating options. The majority of the structured play areas appeared to be inaccessible as a result of missing routes to them and/or issues with the surfacing (either mulch or sand). In the condition observed, none of the amenities within Honors Park were accessible, either because of poor design, or because an accessible route into the park space from the street was absent. As park improvements are made, increasing universal accessibility system-wide will be very important given the aging population of the Town. Comfort and Image The most attractive and well-maintained park site is the Wayburn Pocket Park. Although a small site with little recreational value, Wayburn is well-designed, well-maintained, and contextually sensitive. In contrast, National Road Park is the least attractive park with the greatest amount of maintenance challenges. The majority of the amenities that remain within National

Figure 2.13: SiteScoreTM Park Site Evaluation Matrix.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Road Park are in varying states of disrepair, and its location in under-embraced and difficult to access in a vehicle. Both Lions Park and National Road Park have issues with vandalism, although likely for different reasons. Lions Park is appears to be well-used, and has the highest recreational value of any of the Town’s park sites, however, it is secluded and visible almost exclusively from private property. The addition of the Buck Creek Trail through Lions Park will help to add surveilling users to the site, however, consideration should be given to expanding the park property westward towards Buck Creek Road. The vandalism issues at National Road Park likely have a social origin, and are compounded by the Town’s continued disinvestment in the park site. Over the last five years, almost all of the recreational amenities have been removed from the park – for reasons ranging from disrepair to vandalism and abuse - and have not been replaced. Uses, Activities, and Sociability As previously stated, Lions Park has the greatest diversity and quantity of amenities in functional physical condition, and therefore, has the greatest recreational value of any of the existing park sites evaluated. The majority of the park amenities are collocated on the western portion of the property however, leaving the greenspace east of the creek largely passive. The size and amount of available greenspace allows Lions Park a significant degree of flexibility for programming and amenities. Both Wayburn Pocket Park and Honors Park have limited programming flexibility due to their size. While Wayburn serves as a community gathering location, the programming of Honors Park is appealing almost exclusively to families with children. None of the parks visited exhibited an intentional integration of technology (Wi-Fi, solar, charging stations, etc.), and in the case of the shelters observed, lacked even basic electrical infrastructure. The park sites were visited in the afternoon of a sunny fall weekday in generally pleasant weather, however, park users were only observed at National Road Park, and appeared to be passing through the space rather than utilizing it. It should be noted that these visits occurred during common “working hours” for a limited duration, and therefore are not likely a reliable indicator of actual park usage.

section two : existing conditions analysis

Sustainability Overall, the park sites observed were neither exceptionally sustainable or unsustainable. Given their traditional design and age, the sites lacked contemporary green infrastructure systems such as bioswales, on-site stormwater retention/detention, native plantings, and/ or energy-efficient fixtures. Given the limited amount of impervious surface observed at the park sites, it’s likely that there is an opportunity to retroactively integrate sustainable stormwater management infrastructure as parks are updated and improved. This is especially relevant to Lions Park, which is bisected by Buck Creek. In addition, more sustainable site-maintenance practices and polices could be implemented system-wide to reduce the amount of mowing required. Park Site Evaluations Following is a summary of results of each park site evaluated; copies of the completed SiteScore™ form for each site can be found in the Appendix. Recommendations and observations specific to Universal Accessibility and/or the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), can be found in Section 2.4.3.

Honors Park Site Score™: 62 (Meeting Expectations) Acreage: 1.36 ac. Park Type: Mini-Park Address: 11657 E Saturn St. Amenities: • Multi-purpose field • Playground • Benches/picnic tables (4) • Grill • Swings • Children’s basketball court • Time capsule • Monument Summary: Honors Park is a small neighborhood park located east of Town Hall, on the Marion County side of Cumberland. Situated at the corner of a low-volume intersection, the park is highly visible from the surrounding properties. Despite this great visibility, the park has insufficient pedestrian and vehicular access resulting from the lack of dedicated parking spaces and pedestrian routes into and within the park site. The Pennsy Trail runs nearby, but lacks a connection to the park. Amenities provided include a fenced in playground, child’s basketball court, swings, benches, a monument/marker with a time capsule, picnic tables for seating and a grilling station. These amenities are used often by families with younger kids and are well-maintained. The field directly west of the playground, which is not officially part of the park space, has the potential to offer additional flexible greenspace for events such as the Cumberland Arts Festival. The park lacks any lighting, which limits the times of the day or season the park can be used. Opportunities: • Available land for expansion • Neighborhood setting • Immediately adjacent to the trail network and Town Hall Challenges: • Lack of dedicated on-street parking and paved walking paths to and within the park. • Programming and amenities are relevant only to families with children.

Figure 2.14: Honors Park (2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Wayburn Pocket Park Site Score™: 62 (Meeting Expectations) Acreage: .07 ac. Park Typology: Mini Park Address: 1 South Wayburn St. Amenities: • Benches (2) • Landscaping beds • Pedestrian lighting • Interpretive signage Summary: Wayburn Pocket Park is pocket park located within the vacated right-of-way of Wayburn Street at its intersection with Washington Street. The park is highly visible from Washington Street by both vehicle and pedestrians and is easily accessible on foot. Due partly to its diminutive size, Wayburn Pocket Park contains very few amenities and has limited programming flexibility within the park proper. The park provides users with two (2) benches along either side of a concrete walk that leads to an educational signage exhibit along Washington Street. These amenities, as well as the surrounding landscape, are in good condition. The park serves as the location for Cumberland’s annual Weihnachtsmarkt Festival which takes place in December. Opportunities: • Prominent and historic location • Adjacent to local businesses along Main Street Constraints: • Small site with limited flexibility

Figure 2.15: Wayburn Pocket Park (2017).

section two : existing conditions analysis

Lions Park Site Score™: 51 (Not Meeting Expectations) Acreage: 9.45 ac. Park Typology: Community Park Address: 301 Buck Creek Rd. Amenities: • Multi-purpose fields (2) • Playgrounds (2) • Picnic shelters (2) • Benches/Picnic Tables (19) • Grills (3) • Drinking fountains (2) • Basketball court • Children’s basketball court • Sand volleyball court • Tennis court • Trash Receptacles (8)

Figure 2.16: Lions Park (2017).

Summary: Lions Park, the largest of Cumberland’s parks, is also the only site located within Hancock County. The park offers the greatest variety of activates of all the Town’s parks, some of which (tennis and volleyball) are only provided here. There are two separate play areas, each of which target a different age group, however, with the most recent playground installed in 2006, the amenities are starting to show some age despite being well-maintained. A singular sidewalk connects the parking lot to most of the amenities, though some, like one of the playgrounds and picnic shelters, lack a sidewalk connection. Buck Creek bisects the park into two areas with most amenities located within the portion of the park west of Buck Creek. Due to this proximality to Buck Creek, the park sits with its floodplain. Lions Park suffers from poor visibility and limited access into the site. The adjacent properties all face away from the park and, in combination with its long narrow entrance drive from Buck Creek Road, make visibility into the park from a public street impossible. The primary access is point is off Buck Creek Road which lacks both sidewalks and bike lanes, making driving to the park almost necessary. Access will be improved once the Buck Creek Trail is constructed, which will run through the park and connect the park to the neighborhoods adjacent to the creek. There is also an existing pedestrian connection from the eastern greenspace into the adjacent neighborhood near Oak Boulevard S Drive. Opportunities: • Ability to expand the park northward into the undeveloped natural area. • Good flexibility and availability of greenspace. • Ability to access and embrace Buck Creek. • Multiple potential neighborhood connections. • Diverse amenities. • Available utilities and infrastructure. • New trail will increase users and access. Challenges: • Floodplain land. • Limited visibility and accessibility. • Creek bisects the park site.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

National Road Park Site Score™: 50 (Not Meeting Expectation) Acreage: 5.6 ac. Park Typology: Community Park Address: 11506 E Washington St. Amenities: • Multi-purpose fields (2) • Picnic shelters (3) • Playground area • Benches/Picnic Tables (20) • Lighted basketball courts (2) • Trash Receptacles (6) • Paved walking paths • Mature shade trees Figure 2.17: National Road Park (2017).

Summary: National Road Park is located north of Washington Street across from the Town Hall. The second largest park in Cumberland, it offers two basketball courts, a playground, and three picnic shelters. Some of these amenities are damaged and/or have missing equipment. The basketball courts are heavily used and are in need resurfacing. Debris and litter were observed near the courts. Covered picnic shelters are generally in good condition, although at least one had no seating beneath it. The paved sidewalks are in generally good condition, and have recently been repaired to remove or mitigate potential trip hazards. The large central green space within the park is frequently wet from ponding stormwater. This park suffers from frequent vandalism. Part of these challenges may be contributed to limited visibility and access into the park, which is set back from Washington Street. A series of earthen mounds and tree plantings surround the park further obscuring views into the site. Consideration should be given to acquiring additional property to expand the park site south towards Washington Street. Vehicular access is limited to a one-way drive shared with the Town’s post office parking lot which can make visiting the park potentially confusing to new visitors. No accessible features or parking spaces were observed. Additionally, the park does not have any internal lighting, limiting the time of day the park can be used. Opportunities: • Good flexibility and available greenspace. • Ability to connect directly into multiple surrounding neighborhoods. • Location is adjacent to Main Street area and Town Hall. • Potential community partners (adjacent businesses, Post Office, apartments). • Opportunity for green infrastructure stormwater solution. • Opportunity to embrace the history of the Town and National Road. • Potential opportunity for a mural along the back side of adjacent commercial properties. Challenges: • Existing, negative perception of the park by Town leaders and residents, resulting in a pattern of disinvestment. • Existing issues with vandalism and crime. • Poor site access and visibility. • No dedicated parking. • Poor signage and wayfinding.

section two : existing conditions analysis

2.4.3 Universal Design + Accessibility Overview The Town has recently undertaken efforts to improve its accessibility compliance community-wide by adopting an ADA Transition Plan. As part of the plan, the Town hired Butler, Fairman, & Seufert to audit the Town’s current accessibility compliance. Though much of the infrastructure reviewed was deemed non-compliant, the Town has since adopted many accessibility standards such as 2010 Americans with Disabilities Standards for Accessible Design and 2011 Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right of Way as well as committing that all new construction will be compliant. The Town has also adopted an annual sidewalk repair and curb ramp installation/reconstruction plan with designated funding that prioritizes non-compliant ramps and curbs (Town of Cumberland). A copy of the ADA Transition Plan can be found online by visiting http://www.town.cumberland.in.us/government/ departments/planning_and_development/ada_title_ vi.php. City ADA Coordinator Within an ordinance restating the Town’s policies on ADA, the Town of Cumberland officially appointed Christine Owens to serve as the as the ADA Coordinator. As ADA Coordinator, her responsibilities include implementing the Town’s ADA Transition Plan, responding to ADA grievances, and verifying overall ADA compliance. She can be reached at the following address: Christine Owens ADA Grievance Coordinator Town of Cumberland, Town Hall 11501 E. Washington St. Cumberland, IN 46229 (317) 894-6203 planner@town-cumberland.com (Town of Cumberland, 2015)

Public Notice of ADA Requirements The Town of Cumberland provides a public notice of ADA requirements through their document Notice Under the Americans with Disabilities Act located on the Town’s website. The document states that the government agencies and departments will not discriminate against anyone due to their disabilities and will provide appropriate aids and services when necessary to allow everyone to participate equally (Town of Cumberland). A copy of the public notice can be found online by visiting: http://www.town.cumberland.in.us/government/ departments/planning_and_development/ada_title_ vi.php and clicking the grievance procedure link. Grievance Procedure Grievances can be submitted to the ADA Coordinator no later than 60 days after the potentially noncompliant incident. The ADA Coordinator or an assigned designee will then meet with the complainant within 15 days after the grievance submittal to discuss in detail the issue and offer any potential resolutions. The ADA Coordinator will then formally respond in writing within 15 days after the meeting with the official position from the Town regarding the incident and offer possible resolutions. If the complainant finds the written response inadequate, they may appeal it within 15 days of its issuance (Town of Cumberland). A copy of the full grievance procedure and grievance form can be found online by visiting http://www.town. cumberland.in.us/government/departments/planning_ and_development/ada_title_vi.php. System-wide Accessibility Observations All four of the Town’s parks were evaluated for current accessibility conditions by the Project Team during the site evaluation process. Upon evaluation, it was apparent that most of Cumberland’s parks were constructed prior to the enforcement of many accessibility standards and/or availability accessible facilities. As such, each park has multiple accessibility challenges that increase correlatively to the age of the facility. Overall, the majority of the Town’s existing park and recreation amenities – items within existing parks or facilities – are inaccessible, and in some cases, accessible parking spaces and/or accessible routes into existing park sites were absent.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Park-Specific Accessibility Recommendations The following are site-specific recommendations for each park. Given the challenges noted above in the systemwide observations, these recommendations are intent on providing organization and prioritization for improving the accessibility of each park and are anticipated to be implemented over-time as deemed appropriate and as budgets allow. These recommendations are intended to supplement – not supersede - the recommendations outlined within the Town’s existing ADA Transition Plan. Lions Park • Provide an accessible route to the picnic shelter closest to the parking lot and the smaller playground adjacent to the picnic shelter. • Provide an accessible picnic/seating area under both picnic shelters. • Ensure accessible route into each of the play areas • Ensure that the engineered wood fiber (EWF) play surface meets the ASTM F 1292-04 standard. • Replace the sand play surface at the larger play structure with an accessible surface. • Restripe the ADA spot as paint is faded. • Consider upgrading/adding accessible features to playground • Consider upgrading/adding an accessible swing with an accessible route • Repair potential trip hazard along sidewalk • Ensure accessible route from each of the ADA parking spaces into the park. • Provide an additional accessible parking space adjacent to the new Buck Creek Trail, or provide an accessible route from the existing ADA parking spaces to the future trail. • Provide accessible route into the small picnic shelter.

Figure 2.18: No accessible route to play area at Lions Park (2017).

Figure 2.19: No accessible route to picnic shelter at Lions Park (2017).

Figure 2.20: Potential trip hazard at National Road Park (2017).

section two : existing conditions analysis

National Road Park • Provide at least one (1) accessible parking space dedicated to the park site along an accessible route that connects the parking space to the existing sidewalk system within the park. • Provide an accessible picnic/seating area under both picnic shelters. • Provide accessible route to swings and child basketball court. • Repair remaining trip hazards along sidewalks. • Ensure slope of sidewalk that connects to Dollar Tree property meets ADA standards. • Ensure that the engineered wood fiber (EWF) play surface meets the ASTM F 1292-04 standard. • Provide at least one (1) accessible swing at the play area. • Provide at least one (1) accessible seating area along the primary walkway.

Figure 2.21: No accessible route to play area at Honors Park (2017).

Honors Park • Provide accessible route into the park and its various amenities. • Provide at least one (1) accessible picnic/seating area near the playground. • Provide at least one (1) accessible picnic/seating beneath the shelter. • Ensure that the engineered wood fiber (EWF) play surface meets the ASTM F 1292-04 standard. • Consider upgrading/adding accessible features to playground • Provide at least one (1) accessible swing along an accessible route. • Provide accessible portable restroom facility. Wayburn Pocket Park • Consider striping an accessible parking space • Provide at least one (1) accessible seating area that does not impede pedestrian circulation.

Figure 2.22: No accessible route into Honors Park (2017).

Figure 2.23: Consider accessible seating area at Wayburn Pocket Park (2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

needs + priorities assessment

3.1 community engagement 3.1.1 Overview Parks are for the people, and as such, community participation was a key component of this master plan. The Project Team utilized multiple engagement techniques throughout the process to reach the greatest number of residents as possible, including those who do not use the Town’s park facilities. In addition, the Project Team created an online project engagement page for use throughout the planning process. This “project portal” served as a means to convey announcements and information to the general public and to review documents/presentations. In addition to viewing information, the general public had the ability to provide real-time feedback to the Project Team, as well as to engage in comment-based discussion and dialogue. Following is a summary of each engagement technique and its associated implications.

3.1.2 Steering Committee One of the most critical components of a successful planning process is an active and dedicated Project Steering Committee. The purpose of the Steering Committee is to serve as a “voice” for the community at large, and to help oversee and guide the implementation of the master plan long after the planning process is complete. For this master plan, the Steering Committee was composed of seven (7) influential, local residents and stakeholders invited by the Town. These individuals are leaders in the community and represent elected officials, Town employees, Parks Advisory Council representatives, and active community members.

The Steering Committee participants were selected based on their involvement with the Town’s parks and recreation system, as well as their community leadership and influence. These individuals are known for executing plans and “making things happen.” The many responsibilities of the Steering Committee included raising awareness of, and promoting, the planning process, helping to circulate information throughout the community, and providing community feedback and diverse perspectives to the Project Team. The Steering Committee remained involved in the planning process throughout its duration, and was engaged by the Project Team at key points during the planning process. The Steering Committee was engaged at a Kick-Off Workshop during the early phases of the project to ensure consensus on scope, approach, and schedule. Notes from that meeting can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. The Project Steering Committee members included: 1. Anna Pea – Town Council President, District 3 2. April Fisher - Town Manager 3. Brian Gritter - Town Council, District 2 4. Christine Owens - Director of Planning and Development 5. Angela K. Waggoner - Parks Advisory Council 6. Cynthia Malone -Parks Advisory Council 7. Brenda Gaston - Parks Advisory Council

3.1.3 Stakeholder Focus Groups On November 29th, 2017, the Project Team conducted a total of five (5) focus groups at Town Hall in Cumberland. The focus groups were held at 1:00pm, 2:00pm, 4:00pm, 4:30pm, and 6:00pm. Individual project stakeholders were selected by the Town to be interviewed by the

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Project Team and were given a list of “talking points” to guide the discussion. The intent of these meetings was to solicit broad-based input on the existing conditions of the Town and to learn, from a resident’s point of view, what is working and what isn’t. Participants were asked to be open and honest, encouraged to focus on the “big picture,” and to not let any current constraints facing the Town - fiscal or otherwise - limit their vision for the future. In total, 14 people from eight (8) different boards and/ or organizations participated in these focus groups including representatives from the Parks Advisory Council, Town Council, and multiple Town Departments/ Boards including: 1. Planning and Development 2. Parks and Streets 3. Public Works 4. Clerk-Treasurer 5. Special Projects 6. Plan Commission A copy of the sign in sheet and full minutes from each of these focus groups can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. Following is a summary of the input received for each of the core discussion topics. Review of Scope and Schedule At the beginning of each interview or focus group, the Project Team provided participants with a high-level overview of the master planning process, scope, and schedule to ensure that everyone had an appropriate framework for the discussion which followed, and more importantly, to identify and answer any questions they may have had about the process. Participants were also asked if there were any additional meetings, workshops, presentations or other outreach efforts that the Project Team should consider. The majority of questions raised were associated with the workshop process and overall project schedule. Overall, participants had a good understanding of the planning process, and no significant concerns were identified. Needs Participants were asked to identify what they believed, based on their unique perspectives and experiences, to be high-priority parks and recreation needs in Cumberland. Participants responded with a diverse array of potential needs which ranged from small maintenance

section three : needs + priorities assessment

issues to large-scale capital improvements. Interestingly, the three (3) most common themes accounted for almost 64% of all needs identified; 1. Improve existing parks and facilities (39.6%) 2. New park facilities (14.8%) 3. Increased security and safety (9.4%) Following are summarized common themes for parks and recreation needs in Cumberland, as identified by the participants of the stakeholder interviews and focus groups. The number in parenthesis next to the identified theme corresponds to the approximate number of comments for that theme across all interviews and focus groups. The need to improve existing parks and facilities being the most commonly mentioned need by a significant margin. 1. Improve existing parks and facilities (59) 2. New park facilities (22) 3. Increased security and safety (14) 4. New/additional programs and events (10) 5. Increased walkability and connectivity (8) 6. Improved signage/wayfinding (7) 6. Improved system-wide maintenance (7) 7. Leverage park system for Town identity and economic development (6) 8. Acquire land for additional parks and facilities (5) 9. Increased use of technology (3) 10. Better embrace existing environmental assets (2) 10. Need better advertisement of programs/events (2) 10. Increase universal accessibility (2) 10. Use parks to promote a healthy/active lifestyle (2) The most commonly mentioned needs for specific new facilities included: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Dog park (6) Event and performance venue (5) Indoor community center (5) Central recreation hub (3) Multi-use parks and facilities Adult/Millennial entertainment/events/destination Need attractions and destinations

Approximately 41% of the improvements to existing parks and facilities mentioned were system-wide or not site-specific, with the balance distributed between National Road Park (27%), Lions Park (20%), and Honors Park (12%). The most commonly referenced new amenity needs included:

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Splashpads (7) Restrooms (5) Power at shelter sites (2) Community gardens (2) Playground equipment (2)

Priorities After discussing a diverse array of needs, participants were asked to identify their highest priorities regarding future investment in parks and recreation in Cumberland. The highest priority identified by participants was the need to improve the existing parks and facilities that the Town already has developed. Many of the existing facilities are in desperate need of repair and updating which limits both their usage and relevancy. The second most important priority was the need to provide additional, contemporary and relevant amenities system-wide. It was noted several times that the amenities provided needed to reflect not just the existing demographics and lifestyles of the Town, but also those projected into the future and those which the Town wishes to attract. The third highest priority focused on the need to think proactively about the Town’s projected future growth and acquire land for future park spaces within those areas. Following are summarized common themes for parks and recreation investment priorities in Cumberland, as identified by the participants of the stakeholder interviews and focus groups. The number in parenthesis next to the identified priority corresponds to the approximate number of comments for that priority theme across all interviews and focus groups. 1. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 5. 5.

Improve existing parks and facilities (8) Provide new, relevant amenities (6) Develop new park spaces (3) Increase safety and security of existing parks (3) Improve signage and wayfinding (2) New parks and facilities (2) Expand programs and events offerings Improved system-wide maintenance Increase ADA accessibility Increase community-wide connectivity

Benchmarking To facilitate future benchmarking, participants were asked to identify cities and/or communities which they felt had positive attributes worth studying further.

Desirable attributes were not limited to parks and recreation alone, including also quality of life, wellconnected trail networks, embraced natural lands, and suburban locations. No boundaries were given with regard to the size, location, or density of the communities; participants were free to respond based on their own unique experiences. Participants responded with a broad list of potential benchmark communities which included both large and small cities spread from Indianapolis to Los Angeles. Approximately 87% of the benchmarked communities identified were in Indiana, and 57% were in the greater Indianapolis metro area. The reasons communities were selected by participants varied, however, community size, context, and welldeveloped trail networks were commonly referenced factors. Following is a list of the communities suggested by the interview participants. The number in parenthesis at the end of each community name indicates the number of unique times that community was suggested. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Fishers, Ind. (4) Greenfield, Ind. (4) Plainfield, Ind. (3) Avon, Ind. Carmel, Ind. Zionsville, Ind. Fountain Square, (Indianapolis), Ind. Meridian Hills (Holliday Park), Indianapolis, Ind. Irvington, (Indianapolis), Ind. Ft Wayne, Ind. McCordsville, Ind. New Palestine, Ind. San Diego, Cal. Los Angeles, Cal. Minneapolis, Min.

Funding/Implementation Understanding a community’s opinions associated with various funding and implementation strategies upfront is critically important, as this information should help inform the framework for the overall master plan Vision. As such, participants were asked what types of funding sources they would support, anticipating that this plan would result in “millions of dollars’ worth” of needed improvements. A list of common funding sources was provided to help facilitate discussion.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

In general, participants supported the idea that the Department should utilize a diverse variety of funding sources, both traditional and non-traditional, to supplement the currently depleted Parks budget. Participants indicated that the majority of the funding for parks currently comes from traditional sources such as the general fund, property taxes, and Riverboat funds (for trails only). The most commonly referenced potential funding sources were the use of increased general fund spending on parks and recreation, selective user fees for specialized facilities and programs, grant-based funds, and the development of a park impact fee structure. The latter of these mechanisms will need to be implemented in the future, once the Town’s parks and recreation level of service is increased enough to justify it. In addition, participants were largely supportive of utilizing alternative funding sources, such as TIF funds and public-private partnerships, to supplement the Department’s traditional sources. Given the Town’s limited history with bonding, there wasn’t firm consensus among the group on whether a park system-specific municipal bond would be a viable funding option, however, the group wanted to explore the idea further. Questions that arose included the bonding capacity of the Town, the need to clarify exactly what the bond would be used for, and what the bondrelated fees would cost. In addition, the participants indicated that some of the Town’s capacity may be eroded by a potential sewer main bond that is intent on funding infrastructure improvements north to Mount Comfort. The least popular funding mechanisms, ones which participants indicated would likely not be supported by the public, included increasing taxes and special assessments. The participants also noted that the Town was hiring a new financial advisor in the near future, who should be consulted during the implementation process, if possible.

recommendations on how to increase the usage of the Town’s park system.

3.1.4 Public Input Workshop In addition to the Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups, the Project Team also conducted a general public input workshop on the evening of March 29th, 2018 from 6:00 – 8:00 pm. The workshop was held at the Town Hall and was attended by 22 residents from Cumberland. Meeting Format This workshop was open to the general public; a key difference between this workshop and the stakeholder interviews, which were by invitation. The result was a free-flowing discussion between the Cumberland residents and the Project Team. The workshop was conducted in an open-house setting, where participants were given a brief overview of the planning process and were provided with an agenda that outlined five (5) different participation exercises. In total, 22 participants from the community attended the workshops. Following is a summary of the input received during the workshops; a copy of the agenda, sign-in sheets and full meeting minutes can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. Exercise #1 – Town-wide Needs “We have placed a chart on the wall listing a variety of different types of parks and recreation programs and facilities; some offered by the Town, others not. Please place a dot besides those programs/facilities that you believe are important but for which the need is not being met adequately in the Town of Cumberland.”

Metrics of Success Participants were also asked to identify what they believed were core metrics of success of this planning process. Participants indicated that they needed a realistic and implementable plan that balances improvements needed now with a greater, long-range vision. Key outcomes of the process that were identified included developing a vision for National Road Park, identifying realistic funding sources, and providing Figure 3.1: Public Input Workshop (2018).

section three : needs + priorities assessment

Following are the key needs for both facilities and programs as indicated by the workshop participants. The number in parenthesis following the program/facility indicates the number of times that program/facility was identified. Facility Needs: 1. Dog parks (12) 2. Bicycle/walking/multi-purpose trails (10) 3. Community gardens (9) 4. Pickleball courts (7) 5. Other facilities: Community/Rec Center (6) 6. Outdoor amphitheaters (6) 7. Spray/splash pads (6) 8. Small neighborhood parks (5) 9. Art galleries (3) 10. Disc golf courses (3) 11. Multi-purpose fields/greenspaces (3) 12. Nature center and trails (2) 13. Outdoor swimming pools water parks (2) 14. Playgrounds (2) 15. Basketball courts (1) 16. Farmer’s Markets (1) 17. Fishing piers (1) 18. Golf course (1) 19. Large community parks (1) 20. Outdoor sand volleyball courts (1) 21. Performing arts center (1) 22. Softball baseball diamonds (1) 23. Tennis courts Figure 3.2: Public Input Workshop (2018).

Program Needs: 1. Community gardening (8) 2. Programs for pets and owners (6) 3. Community special events (5) 4. Adult fitness classes (3) 5. Nature programs (3) 6. Adult art, dance, theater (2) 7. Programs for people with special needs (2) 8. Senior adult programs (2) 9. After school programs (1) 10. Birthday parties (1) 11. Enrichment classes (1) 12. Fishing and boating programs (1) 13. Volunteer opportunities (1) Exercise #2 – Vision for the Future! “Before you is a blank canvas, literally! Please use the pens and Post-It notes provided and write your “vision” for the future of parks and recreation in the Town of Cumberland. What kind of programs/events will there be? What do you want to be able to do or

see? How is the community different, and what is the Parks Department’s role in the community? Use your imagination!” When participants were asked about their vision for the future of parks and recreation in Cumberland, several key trends emerged. Following is a summary of those trends, which have been aggregated into various categories, as well as the direct comments submitted by the participants. Recreation Facilities: • A multi-use facility for all to use. • Provide ample green space. • Splash pad for children and adults. • Offer activity year-round. • Need for activities. • Bike rental on trails/in town. • Offer a multi-use facility and well-maintained parks. • Activities and green space for all.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Programs and Events: • Events and programs run by community members. • Boys and Girls Club. • Provide events to draw out and aid in community involvement and entertainment. • Have fun events and bring neighbors together. Operations/Management/Maintenance: • Better communication on what is available. • Be a safe, attractive, peaceful area for community and individual use. • Be maintained to the envy of other communities. • Be safe, clean, and well-maintained! • Need safe parks/lighting. • Clean and updated parks. • Include bike cops on trails. Other: • Please don’t take any more of my property to expand your trails. • I don’t think it will be used. It’s all wishful thinking.

• Be emotionally and physically healthier for all. • Be an attractive asset to draw people to want to live in the area. • Bring groups together. Exercise #3 – Chat with the Director “This is your chance to have a short, one-on-one chat with the Town’s parks and streets Superintendent, Mr. Ben Lipps. Participants should feel free to provide open feedback to Mr. Lipps, and to ask him any park-related questions they wish. Representatives from the Project Team will be on hand to take down notes which may result from these informal conversations, some of which may require follow-up at a later date.” During the open house portion of the workshop, participants were free to approach Mr. Lipps with any questions they may have that pertained to parks and recreation in Cumberland. In addition to gathering data to help inform this high-level planning process, this exercise also sought to provide an opportunity for participants to voice opinions and/or ask questions with regard to more detailed operations, management, and maintenance tasks associated with the Department. Following is a summary of the comments received: • “This meeting is too comprehensive at this time. The plan is too early; we need to improve what we have.” • “We need to improve lines of communication between the town and residents.” • “Don’t take anymore of my property to expand on your trails.” • “There is bad drainage along spots of Buck Creek Trail.” • “How can I get more involved in the community? I would love to see a community center and be able to teach classes. I would like to see what classes people want.” • “Where is the Buck Creek Trail?” • ”We need better ways to advertise information; the town app is underutilized.” • “Are there programs I’m missing out/ unaware of?” • “Good communication with residents is needed.” • “I like the Pennsy Trail.” • ”We need Pickleball courts; we can use the tennis courts at Lions Park.” • “We need to improve the maintenance and safety of what we have.” • “We need to clean up the tall grass near Lions Park.” • “Was the baseball field near Lions Park removed?”

Figure 3.3: Public Input Workshop (2018).

section three : needs + priorities assessment

Exercise #4 – Priority Spending “We have placed numbered buckets on the table representing key areas of potential spending priorities, and “$100” in coins for each participant (each coin = $10). Please distribute your coins among the buckets based on how you believe parks and recreation spending should be prioritized.” This question sought to understand how workshop participants would prioritize spending with regard to parks and recreation in Cumberland. The participants were given the option of distributing their coins across six (6) different buckets, each representing a budget/ investment category. A total of 210 coins were distributed, representing a total possible amount of $2,100 (at $10/coin). The total for each of the buckets was calculated as a ratio of investment out of a total of $100 utilizing the following formula: ( a * 100 ) / b = c Where: a = Total number of coins in individual bucket b = Total number of coins distributed across all buckets c = Average of individual bucket out of a possible $100 Following is a summary of how participants allocated their funds, as well as any comments which were provided. 1. Improvements to EXISTING parks, trails, and facilities ($42.86/$100) 2. Development of NEW walking and biking trails ($18.57/$100) 3. Construction of a NEW multi-use community center ($18.57/$100) 4. Acquisition of NEW park land and open space ($9.05/$100) 5. Other? ($8.57/$100) a. Please stop spending money on this. Spend on your infrastructure. (10) b. Pickleball Courts (8) 6. Construction of NEW sports fields ($2.38/$100)

Exercise #5 – Barriers to Participation “What keeps you from visiting/using the Town’s parks and recreation facilities more often? Perception of safety? Awareness of what is available and happening? Schedule? Lack of the right amenities or programs? Please place a dot/sticker next to each barrier; if you don’t see one, please write it in one of the spaces provided on the poster, and then place your dot. You may use as many dots as necessary, however, please only place one dot per barrier, per person.” Following are the barriers to usage of parks and recreation facilities and programs in Cumberland, as indicated by the workshop participants. Comments are listed below each barrier. 1. I don’t feel safe in some parks/facilities (15) a. Most feel safe, one in particular is not good. (1) 2. Events/programs/amenities I want aren’t offered (14) 3. I don’t know what’s being offered or what there is to do (13) 4. I use facilities/programs in other cities (8) 5. Not enough parking (8) 6. Parks/facilities are not well maintained (7) 7. Access to greenspace is too limited (6) 8. Wayfinding; I don’t know where to go (5) 9. Other (3) a. Need effective communication with all residents (1) b. Not sure how to get involved in offering more programs (1) c. I don’t need these (1) 10. I have trouble getting there by walking/biking (1)

Figure 3.4: Public Input Workshop (2018).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section three : needs + priorities assessment

3.2 public opinion survey 3.2.1 Survey Methodology

3.2.2 Park + Facilities

In an effort to reach a broad cross-section of the general public, an online public opinion survey was conducted. This survey was intended primarily for Town of Cumberland residents. The 27 question survey took approximately 10-15 minutes to complete and participants remained anonymous. The survey was available to the public from February 8th, 2018 to April 27, 2018.

Condition Most respondents rated the physical condition of the Cumberland Parks and Recreation facilities as either “fair” (38.43%) or good (36.68%). Additionally, 10.92% of the respondents rated the physical condition as poor or they do not use/visit any of the facilities and only 3.06% of the respondents rated the parks as “excellent”. The results of this physical condition rating may have a correlation to common barriers noted below by the respondents for the quality of maintenance of facilities and amenities.

The online survey was administered by Browning Day through the use of the online platform developed by SurveyMonkey®. Because the survey was elective (in that anyone could choose to take the survey), the results are not statistically-valid, however, do provide insight into the opinions of a much larger and diverse population when compared to the other engagement techniques utilized. The survey was advertised to the general public for several weeks prior to its launch and was made available by the Town. A common concern associated with online surveys is that some residents may not have sufficient access to the internet needed to be capable of accessing and completing an online survey. To address this, paper copies of the identical survey instrument were provided to the Department, and were available upon request by the Town. At the end of the survey period, paper copies were collected and manually entered online by the Project Team to ensure consistent analysis of the results. There was a total of 229 unique respondents to the survey, all collected from the online survey web link. A copy of the survey instrument, as well as the survey response data are provided in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. Following is a summary of the input received from the public opinion survey process.

Usage Pennsy Trail was the overwhelmingly most visited park or facility by the respondents, with over 60% visiting at least once within the past year and approximately 30% indicating they had visited the trail at least 10 times or more within the past year. Other popular parks and facilities include Lions Park (44.10% visited once within the past year) and Buck Creek Trail (31.44%). The least visited parks and facilities within the past year included Wayburn Pocket Park (89.96% had not visited the park within the past year) and National Road Park (81.22%) though most of the parks or facilities had low attendance among the respondents. Only the Pennsy Trail and Lions Park had a higher percentage of respondents who indicated they had visited the park as opposed to not visiting. Additionally, 12.66% of the respondents stated they do not use/visit any of the Town’s park facilities. Most Visited Parks Below is a comprehensive list of the park and facilities that respondents stated they had visited at least once within the prior 12 months. Additional comments/

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. 1. Pennsy Trail (60.50%) 2. Lions Park (44.10%) 3. Buck Creek Trail (31.44%) 4. Honors Park (15.72%) 5. 21st Street Trail (14.85%) 6. I do not use/visit ANY Town of Cumberland Park facilities (12.66%) 7. National Road Park (11.79%) 8. Wayburn Pocket Park (6.99%) Use of Alternative Service Providers Roughly two-thirds of the respondents indicated that they participate in alternative sources for recreation, those not offered by Cumberland, with the most popular being churches/places of worship (39.30%), public schools (34.93%), and private recreation/fitness centers (31.00%). Additionally, several surrounding neighboring parks and facilities were commonly noted by the respondents including Paul Ruster’s Park in Indianapolis and Southeastway Park in New Palestine. The overwhelmingly most popular activity participated in at these alternative service providers is swimming and/ or swimming lessons. Interestingly, this may correlate with swimming being identified as one of the most common amenity needs as listed below under Amenity Needs. Below is an inclusive list of the alternative service providers respondents have visited. Additional comments/feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. 1. Churches/places of worship (39.30%) 2. Public schools (34.93%) 3. I/we do not use “private” facilities or providers for recreation purposes. (33.19%) 4. Private recreation/fitness centers (YMCA, LA Fitness, etc.) (31.00%) 5. Youth sports associations/travel sports (18.78%) 6. Homeowners associations/apartment complexes (14.85%) 7. Private dance/gymnastics studios (8.73%) 8. Private golf clubs (8.30%) 9. Private schools (4.8%) 10. Boys & Girls Club (2.62%) Barriers to Usage of Parks and Facilities Over 80% of all respondents indicated there was at least one barrier preventing them from using Cumberland’s parks and facilities. A common barrier noted by almost two-thirds of the respondents was uncertainty of

section three : needs + priorities assessment

what activities are being offered or the locations of the facilities. Other noteworthy barriers included poor quality of amenities/facilities not well maintained (38.42%) and safety (31%). Below is a complete list of barriers noted by the respondents. Additional comments/feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. 1. I do not know what is being offered (37.55%) 2. I don’t feel safe (31%) 3. I do not know locations of the facilities or what they have to offer (27.51%) 4. The quality of amenities is poor (21.83%) 5. Nothing prevents me from using the Town’s parks and recreation facilities more often. (18.78%) 6. Facilities are not well maintained (16.59%) 7. Access to parks and green space is limited; there aren’t enough (12.23%) 8. I/we use facilities in other cities/communities (11.35%) 9. Facility I want/need is not offered (9.61%) 10. Other (please specify) (9.61%) 11. Lack of parking at park facilities (7.42%) 12. No bicycle/walking/multipurpose trails (6.11%) 13. Too far from residence (3.49%) 14. Parks are too crowded (1.31%) 15. Operating hours are not convenient (0.87%) 16. Fees are too high (0.44%) 17. Poor customer service by staff (0.44%) Respondents were asked to identify how safe they felt within each of the Town’s parks and facilities. All trail networks as well as Honors Park were listed as the perceived safest with a rating between 2.20-2.29 out of 5, which equates to feeling between somewhat safe to neither safe or unsafe. National Road Park ranked as the perceived least safe park with a rating of 3.5 out of 5, which equates to feeling between neither safe or unsafe to somewhat unsafe. It is worth noting the low percentage of respondents that feel “very safe” at each park could represents a system-wide barrier for residents which likely correlates with safety indicated as a common barrier by the respondents.

3.2.3 Amenities Amenity Usage Approximately 90% of the respondents had indicated they had participated in or used one of the Town’s amenities – things within parks and/or facilities – within the last 12 months. Among the most popular amenities were events held by the Town (63.32%) and walking/

biking trails (59.83%). Below is a full list of commonly used amenities. Additional comments/feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. 1. Events: Farmer’s Market/Cumberland Arts Goes to Market/Weihnachtsmarkt (63.32%) 2. Walking and biking trails (59.83%) 3. Playgrounds (30.57%) 4. Natural areas (17.03%) 5. Open play areas and greenspace (16.59%) 6. Picnic shelters (11.35%) 7. I/we have not sued any Town of Cumberland Parks Facilities in the last 12 months (9.17%) 8. Basketball courts (6.99%) 9. Tennis courts (3.93%) 10. Other (please specify) (3.49%) 11. Volleyball courts (0.44%) Amenity Needs Respondents were asked whether they had a need for several types of recreational amenities and to indicate how well that need is currently being met. The following list represents the greatest percentage of respondents who indicated they had a need for an amenity that was at least partially unmet (75% or less unmet). Additional comments/feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. 1. Public restrooms (80.78%) 2. Indoor Pools/water parks (67.98%) 3. Outdoor pools/water parks (66.99%) 4. Farmer’s markets (64.54%) 5. Large community park (64.04%) 6. Picnic shelters (63.55%) 7. Nature trails (62.56%) 8. Small neighborhood park within walking distance (61.57%) 9. Splash pads (61.08%) 10. Indoor recreation and events centers (60.6%) 11. Outdoor amphitheaters (58.13%) 12. Nature centers (57.64%) 13. Bicycle/walking/multipurpose trails (57.64%) 14. Playgrounds (53.70%) 15. Community gardens (52.71%) 16. Fishing piers (49.26%) 17. Art galleries (46.31%) 18. Dog parks (42.85%) 19. Kayak and canoe launches (41.88%) 20. Outdoor jogging track (37.44%) 21. Disc golf courses (35.46%) 22. Outdoor sand volleyball courts (30.55%) 23. Basketball courts (29.06%)

24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.

Golf course (27.10%) Tennis courts (27.10%) Baseball and softball diamonds (25.62%) Skate parks (22.66%) Pickleball courts (19.70%) Soccer fields (15.77%) Multi-purpose fields/greenspace (15.77%)

Below is a list of the top five amenities that had the highest percentage of respondents indicating they had a need for this facility that was 25% or less unmet. 1. 2. 2. 4. 5. 5.

Public restrooms (67.48%) Indoorpools/water parks (63.05%) Outdoor pools/water parks (63.05%) Splash pads (56.65%) Indoor recreation and events centers (50.74%) Outdoor amphitheaters (50.74%)

The highest priority facility and amenity needs are those which are needed by the greatest amount of residents (those which have the highest percentage of total need indicated), which also have a high level of unmet need. To help classify high priority needs for facilities and amenities, each facility/amenity was assigned a score. These scores were obtained by adding the total number of respondents who indicated they had an unmet need for that facility/amenity (A) with the total number of respondents who indicated their need for that facility/ amenity was met by 25% or less (B), and then subtracting from that subtotal the number of respondents who reported that they did not have a need for that facility/ amenity at all (C). Priority Need Score = (A+B)-C Utilizing the above methodology, the top 10 highest priority facility and amenity needs reported by respondents (in order of priority) include: 1. Public restrooms 269 2. Outdoor pools/water parks 204 3. Indoor pools/water parks 200 4. Splash pads 163 5. Large community park 156 6. Small neighborhood park within walking distance 153 7. Indoor recreation and events centers 149 8. Outdoor amphitheaters 138 9. Nature trails 137 10. Farmer’s markets 134

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

3.2.4 Programs Usage Respondents were asked to rate the Town’s existing events on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent). All five events listed had an aggerate score between a 3.49-3.90, which places them between “good” and “neither good nor poor”. While Cumberland Arts Goes to Market had the highest aggregate score, Cumberland Farmer’s Market had the least amount of respondents who had not participated in the event as well as had the highest percentage who rated the event as “good” or excellent”. Program Needs Respondents were asked to indicate whether they had a need for several types of recreational programs. The following list represents the greatest percentage of respondents who indicated they had a need for a program. Additional comments/feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. 1. Community special events (festivals, gatherings, celebrations, etc.) (46.46%) 2. Adult fitness classes (29.26%) 3. Adult art, music, dance, or theater (21.72%) 4. Community gardening (19.19%) 5. Adult fitness programs (18.69%) 6. Nature programs/environmental education (18.18%) 7. Enrichment classes (sewing, cooking, etc.) (14.65%) 8. Youth athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.) (14.14%) 9. Volunteer opportunities (14.14%) 10. Youth art, music, dance, or theater classes (14.14%) 11. Programs/events for pets and owners (11.11%) 12. Fishing and boating programs (9.60%) 13. Swim lessons (8.59%) 14. Wellness/health screenings (8.08%) 15. Birthday parties (7.58%) 16. After school programs (7.07%) 17. History programs (6.58%) 18. Other (please specify) (5.56%) 19. Adult athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.) (5.05%)

3.2.5 Community Priorities High Priority Actions Respondents were asked to indicate their level of support for various “actions” that could be taken by the Town of Cumberland to improve the parks and recreation system. Respondents were provided with a list of potential actions (as well as the opportunity to

section three : needs + priorities assessment

suggest ones which were not included) and asked to indicate their level of support for each action. According to the respondents, upgrading or improving existing parks and trails received the highest percentage of support. Following is a list of the most supported potential actions – ranked by their combined percentage of “very supportive” or “somewhat supportive” ratings - that could be taken by the Department, according to respondents. Additional comments/feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. 1. Upgrade/improve EXISTING parks (89.59%) 2. Upgrade/improve EXISTING walking/biking trails (87.56%) 3. Acquire more open space for PASSIVE activities (trails, picnicking, etc.) (80.92%) 4. Develop/build NEW walking/biking trails (73.06%) 5. Develop/build NEW indoor community center/civic center (69.94%) 6. Acquire more open space for PROGRAMMED activities (soccer, baseball, etc.) (61.90%) 7. Develop/build NEW dog park (58.63%) 8. Develop/build NEW special events rental facilities (58.20%) 9. Develop/build athletic fields/courts (53.19%) Additionally, development of new special events facilities and athletic courts/fields had the lowest percentage of support according to the respondents. Below is a list of the least supported potential actions – those indicated as “not supportive”. 1. Develop/build NEW special events rental facilities (23.56%) 2. Develop/build athletic fields/courts (17.02%) 3. Develop/build NEW dog park (16.93%) 4. Acquire more open space for PROGRAMMED activities (soccer, baseball, etc.) (14.81%) 5. Develop/build NEW walking/biking trails (13.99%) 6. Develop/build NEW indoor community center/civic center (11.92%) 7. Acquire more open space for PASSIVE activities (trails, picnicking, etc.) (9.79%) 8. Upgrade/improve EXISTING parks (4.69%) 9. Upgrade/improve EXISTING walking/biking trails (4.15%) Investment Priorities Respondents were asked to rank a series of five (5) investment priorities for improving parks and recreation facilities in Cumberland. Improvement and maintenance of the Town’s existing parks and trails was listed as the

highest priority of investment with a score of 4.02 out of 5 while construction of new sports fields was listed as the lowest priority for investment with a score of 2.11 out of 5. Following is a complete list of the respondents’ priorities for investment, ranked from highest to lowest, based on the weighted average ranking. Additional comments/feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. 1. Improvements/maintenance of existing parks, trails and recreation facilities. 4.02 2. Construction of a new multi-use community center 3.09 3. Development of additional walking and biking trails 3.06 4. Acquisition of new park land and open space 2.79 5. Construction of new sports fields (softball, soccer, baseball, etc.) 2.11 Bond Referendum Respondents were asked if a bond referendum was held to specifically fund much needed improvements to – or expansion of- the Town’s parks, recreation, and trails system, how likely they would be in support of it. Roughly 70% of the respondents indicated they would or might vote in favor of it while roughly 10% indicated they would vote against or might vote against it. The following is the results of the respondent’s preference for a bond referendum. Additional comments/feedback can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix. Will vote in favor 42.56% Might vote in favor 28.72% Not sure 16.92% Will vote against 9.74% Might vote against 2.05%

3.2.6 Communication Respondents were asked to indicate all the ways they learn about Town of Cumberland programs and activities. The Town’s Facebook page was the most popular form learning about the town’s programs with 63% of the respondents. Friends and neighbors (51.58%) and the Town’s website (33.68%) were among the most common methods. Additionally, many respondents noted that the NextDoor app is how they learn about the Town’s programs and activities. As awareness of existing facilities and amenities was noted as a common barrier, understanding the most popular methods of communicating information to residents will be useful in reducing that barrier.

3.2.7 Lifestyles + Demographics Respondents were asked a series of demographic and lifestyle questions to better correlate the demographic make-up of the respondents with that of the Town as a whole. As this is not a statistically-valid survey, the respondents tended to vary slightly from the greater Cumberland demographic make-up. Survey respondents appeared to have a higher average level of income and represent a higher ratio of women to men as well as a higher ratio of White/Caucasian. Respondents were also asked to provide their primary residence. Slightly over 50% indicated their primary residence was Cumberland while an additional 25% indicated it was Indianapolis. The balance of the respondents indicated they lived in either Greenfield or one of the other surrounding communities.

3.2.8 Observations After the results from the public opinion survey had been calculated and analyzed, several core observations were made which should help inform the overall needs priorities of the respondents: • Many of the parks and/or facilities had a low attendance by the survey respondents. This low attendance suggests a focus on the common barriers the respondents noted that prevent them from using the park facilities. Several common barriers observed include: 1. Two-thirds of the respondents indicated they are unaware of the facilities and/or what is being offered. Additionally, several individual comments throughout the survey noted they were unaware of many of the facilities listed within the survey. 2. Almost 40% of the respondents indicated that maintenance and quality of the existing amenities and facilities was a barrier. This correlates to 75% of the respondents rating the physical condition of the parks and facilities as “good” or “fair” while only 3% rated it as “excellent”. 3. Almost a third of the respondents indicated that safety was a barrier for them. Additionally, respondents ranked most of the parks as somewhat safe to neutral, which suggests the safety barrier is system-wide constraint instead of concentrated entirely within one park or facility.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

• Trails, specifically the Pennsy Trail, are the most popular and valued amenity. Trails were indicated by the respondents as the most used amenity after hosted events, and the Pennsy Trail was the most visited park or facility over the past 12 months. Trails also represented the highest percentage of respondents indicating their need was being met. • Special events, such as the Farmer’s Market, Cumberland Arts Goes to Market, or Weihnachtsmarkt, are the most participated activity by the respondents and festivals, gatherings, and celebrations were identified as the highest program need. • Swimming pools and/or swimming lessons represented the most common activity respondents participated in by an alternative service provider. Swimming pools and splash pads were also one of the top identified unmet amenity needs by the respondents. Future planning should take into consideration the current amenities these alternative services are providing and how they can complement any new amenities that aim to address those unmet needs. • Respondents were most supportive of upgrading/ improving existing parks and trails, and improvements/ maintenance of existing parks, trails, and recreation facilities were prioritized over construction of new facilities and fields.

section three : needs + priorities assessment

(page is intentionally left blank)

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section three : needs + priorities assessment

3.3 A3™ level of service analysis 3.3.1 Ensuring Equity The Indiana State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) defines a parks or open space Level of Service (LOS) analysis as “a process of strategic planning which takes into account the unique aspects of individual communities and measures demand for recreation opportunities, current park and recreation resources, and the needs and preferences of community residents” (INDNROR, 2015). The purpose of the LOS analysis found herein is to attempt to identify gaps in access or equity with regard to parks and open space facilities or amenities. The reasoning behind a LOS analysis is that parks are for the people – all people – and that all people should have “equal opportunity” to benefit from them (Mertes, 1996). In his book “The Excellent City Parks System; What Makes it Great and How to Get There”, author Peter Harnik stresses the importance of equity by stating that an “excellent city park system is accessible to everyone regardless of residence, physical abilities, or financial resources. Parks should be easily reachable from every neighborhood, usable by the handicapped and challenged, and available to low-income residents” (Harnik, 2003).

3.3.2 LOS Methodology There are multiple ways to measure LOS from a parks and open space perspective; each of which is necessary but not sufficient alone. Embracing the concept of “triangulation,” LOS must be evaluated from multiple vantage points as there are no concrete standards or guidelines that apply universally to all communities. Additionally, there is no one LOS evaluation technique that can account for every variable contributing to accessibility and equity. In the end, it is up to each

individual community to decide what role they want their parks to play, and what standards are required to achieve or maintain that standard. All too often, communities rely solely on acreage-based analysis (a ratio of acres per 1,000 population) because it is the most widely referenced and is also the easiest to calculate. Evaluating acreage LOS alone however, does not paint the full picture with regard to equity because it does not take into account quality, amenities present (or lacking), or geographic location. To provide a more comprehensive view of LOS, this section of this master plan will evaluate LOS for both amenities (presence of facilities), and access (geographic distribution of resources), in addition to the traditional LOS for acreage Amenity LOS is important because not all parks provide users with the same facilities; just because a park is classified as a “regional park” does not necessarily mean it will have a pool. Therefore, knowing only park acreage or classification does not provide an accurate understanding of facility inventory compared against the existing population’s demand for those facilities. Similarly, evaluating access LOS is equally important. If a community has over 100 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents – an exceptionally high LOS – but 95% of those acres are located on one side of the community, is that equitable? Understanding the geographic distribution of facilities and resources is key to understanding equity, or lack thereof. Following is a summary of the findings from each of the three (3) LOS techniques.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

3.3.3 Acreage LOS Acreage LOS evaluates the total amount of park acreage a community has when compared with its population – both existing and projected – expressed in acres per 1,000 residents. As previously stated, this technique is often one of the most widely utilized due to its ease of calculation. It is generally regarded that the higher the acreage LOS, the higher the quality of life enjoyed by the community’s residents. At the time of this planning process, no established benchmark for Acreage LOS (acres/1,000 residents) existed for Cumberland. The 2016-2020 Indiana Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan makes recommendations of 20 acres of park land per 1,000 residents at the local level (County, Township, City, or Town). Currently, Cumberland has approximately 17.11 acres of public parkland servicing roughly 5,439 residents, which yields an Acreage LOS of 3.1 acres per 1,000 residents. For comparison purposes, Marion County was providing an Acreage LOS of 12.5 while Hancock County was providing 7.7 (Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Outdoor Recreation, 2015). When evaluating surrounding communities, Indianapolis is providing an Acreage LOS of approximately 13.2 and Greenfield (one of the identified benchmark communities) is providing 19.8 acres per 1,000 residents (Indy Parks, 2016) (United States Census, 2017) (Anderson, 2017). Utilizing population projections from data obtained from the U.S Census Bureau, Cumberland’s population is expected to grow at 0.66% annually. If these projections hold true and the number of acres of park land remain the same, Cumberland’s Acreage LOS will begin to slowly decrease from 3.1 acres per 1,000 residents to 2.9 acres/1,000 residents by 2030. If the Town wishes to maintain their current Acreage LOS of 3.1, they will need to increase their park acreage by 1 acre by 2030. Though these findings would suggest that Cumberland will have sufficient acreage to relatively maintain their current Acreage LOS for at least the next five (5) years, consideration should be given to increase the Acreage LOS benchmark for the Town. When compared to surrounding communities, the Town is providing a much lower Acreage LOS. For demonstration purposes, if the Town wished to increase their Acreage LOS to match Hancock County (7.7 acres per 1,000 residents), the Town would need to acquire an additional twenty-five (25) acres of park land by 2030. 72

section three : needs + priorities assessment

Additionally, increasing park acreage aligns with objectives identified for two goals within the Town’s 2031 Comprehensive Plan: • Goal 5 Objective 1: “Maintain and enhance the Town’s quality of life through historic and cultural preservation, development of family friendly events, and the expansion of the parks and trails system.” • Goal 10 Objective 5: “The Town shall actively purchase park land to expand the Town’s network of parks, trails, and other greenways.”

Figure 3.5: Acreage LOS chart.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

3.3.4 Amenities LOS Amenity LOS (often also referred to as “Facilities LOS”) evaluates equal opportunity through the availability of recreation facilities (e.g. basketball courts) within a community when compared with its population (Barth, 2009). In the 1990’s, the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) published standards indicating the maximum population served by a recreation facility (e.g. one baseball field serves 10,000 population). These standards were intended to serve as a flexible benchmark, however, were blindly adopted by many communities and have been largely abandoned as a reliable technique. Now, a more community-specific approach is often taken when evaluating Amenity LOS, with communities determining their own standards based on the vision of their residents, current programming trends, and operational capacity. At the time of this planning process, neither the Town, Marion or Hancock County, or the Indiana SCORP provide specific guidelines on Amenity LOS. In lieu of a local benchmark or requirement, this Amenity LOS analysis utilized the median population per facility data as reported in the 2016 NRPA Field Report (National Recreation and Park Association, 2016). This analysis also incorporated the same population projections used in the Acreage LOS analysis. It should also be noted that this is by no means a comprehensive list of facilities, however, the facilities selected were the most applicable to the Town based on the data available in the 2016 NRPA Field Report. When evaluating the Amenity LOS of Cumberland, most facility types meet or exceed the quantity recommended per the 2016 NRPA Field Report for a community of Cumberland’s size. Basketball courts, playgrounds, and multi-purpose fields all show a surplus of at least two (2) facilities. Inversely, baseball, soccer, and softball fields have a deficiency of one (1) facility each. Evaluating Amenity LOS with similar population projections as Acreage LOS suggests that even as the Town’s population increases the surplus/deficiency of facilities will stay the same to 2030.

section three : needs + priorities assessment

Based purely on this Amenity LOS analysis, the data would suggest that Cumberland should focus on providing the following additional facilities (the number in parenthesis indicates the quantity needed): • Baseball field (1) • Soccer field (1) • Softball field (1) In addition, the Town may wish to further evaluate the need and demand for the following facility types: • Community centers • Community gardens • Dog parks • Football fields • Gymnastics centers • Ice rinks • Nature centers • Recreation centers • Swimming pools • Tennis courts

Figure 3.6: Amenities LOS chart reflecting only Town-owned amenities.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

3.3.5 Access LOS A quantitative approach to parks and recreation level of service is to evaluate LOS through the development of spatial “service area” guidelines for specific park or amenity types; this technique is referred to as access LOS. These resulting service areas are representative of the true distance, utilizing the existing transportation network, that residents must travel to access a particular type of facility. To complete this analysis, the Town’s existing facilities were mapped in GIS, and then a service area was calculated using Esri’s Network Analyst extension. The resulting “bubble” indicates which residential areas have access to an individual park or facility-type within the given Access LOS standard. The resulting maps also indicate voids in the service areas, helping to indicate where new facilities may need to be located within the Town. Different types of facilities necessitate different Access LOS parameters. For example, residents would expect to have to travel further to a regional facility, such as an aquatics center, then they would to a neighborhoodscale amenity like a playground. Taking this into account, the Project Team – in consultation with the Town – developed the following categories, each with its own unique Access LOS parameters: Neighborhood Amenities (1/2-mile service area) • Basketball courts • Playgrounds • Multi-purpose fields/greenspace • Volleyball courts • Picnic shelters • Trailheads Community Amenities (2-mile service area) • Football/soccer fields • Baseball diamonds • Softball diamonds • Dog parks (off-leash) • Community rooms • Tennis courts Special-Use Amenities (5-mile service area) • Pools (indoor and outdoor) • Indoor recreation centers • Skate parks Resource-based Amenities (5-mile service area) • Nature centers 76

section three : needs + priorities assessment

The following pages are a summary of the Access LOS findings for each of the facilities present in Cumberland at the time of study. 10-Minute Walk Campaign The Trust for Public Land, in conjunction with the National Recreation and Park Association and the Urban Land Institute, is organizing a nationwide campaign to ensure that every person in America is within a 10-minute walk to a great park. The campaign calls for mayors across the country to commit their towns and cities to this effort. More information on the 10-minute walk campaign, including all the mayors who have joined the cause, can be found on their website at: https:// www.10minutewalk.org. (Trust for Public Land, National Recreation and Park Association, Urban Land Institute, 2019) The 10-minute walk campaign states that a 10-minute walk equates to, on average, a half-mile in distance. For comparable purposes, a half-mile Access LOS for each park was generated to determine approximately how many of the Town’s residents are within a half-mile, or 10-minute walk, of a park. As demonstrated in Figure 3.7, approximately one-third of the Town’s residential areas fall within the 10-minute walk area of a park. 1. Honors Park 2. National Road Park 3. Lions Park 4. Wayburn Pocket Park

Figure 3.7: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for all parks.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Basketball (1/2-mile service area) Lions Parks and National Road Park are the two (2) park sites in Cumberland that offer basketball courts. When analyzed at a half mile service area, these two park sites provide ample access to residential areas southwest of Lions Park while neighborhoods north and east of Lions Park are outside of the service area. 1. Lions Park 2. National Road Park

Figure 3.8: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for existing basketball courts.

section three : needs + priorities assessment

Playgrounds (1/2-mile service area) There are three (3) park sites that provide playgrounds: Lions Park, National Road Park, and Honors Park. Combined, these three park sites provide sufficient access to residential areas located southwest of Lions Park. Gaps in access occur to the north and east of Lions Park. 1. Honors Park 2. Lions Park 3. National Road Park

Figure 3.9: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for existing playgrounds.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Multi-Purpose Fields (1/2-mile service area) Multi-purpose greenspaces, open areas large enough to throw a football or frisbee, exist on three (3) park sites. Residential areas southwest of Lions Park are within a half-mile service area of these parks while neighborhoods primarily to the north and east fall outside of the service area. 1. Honors Park 2. Lions Park 3. National Road Park â&#x20AC;&#x192;

Figure 3.10: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for existing multi-purpose fields.

section three : needs + priorities assessment

Volleyball Courts (1/2-mile service area) The Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s only volleyball court is located at Lions Park and provides access to the neighborhood directly southwest of Lions Park. Residential areas to the north, east, and far west are outside of the half-mile service area. 1. Lions Park

Figure 3.11: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for volleyball courts.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Picnic Shelters (1/2-mile service area) Picnic Shelters area located in Lions Park and National Road Park and combined provide access to residential areas southwest of Lions Park. Gaps in access occur to the north and east of Lions Park. 1. Lions Park 2. National Road Park

Figure 3.12: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for existing picnic shelters.

section three : needs + priorities assessment

Trailheads (1/2-mile service area) For the purposes of this analysis, a trailhead is defined as any public park site which has immediate access to the existing trail network and provides public parking. Therefore, Lions Park is the only park site that provides access to a trailhead. When analyzed with a half-mile service area, only the neighborhood directly to the southwest of Lions Park has adequate access. Residential areas to the north, east, and far west of the town are outside of the half-mile service area. 1. Lions Park

Figure 3.13: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for trailheads.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

Tennis Courts (2-mile service area) Tennis Courts are located at Lions Park. When evaluated with a two-mile service area, tennis courts provide sufficient access to nearly all residential areas apart from the neighborhood directly east of Lions Park. 1. Lions Park

Figure 3.14: Access LOS map illustrating a 2 mile service area for existing tennis courts.

section three : needs + priorities assessment

Summary When evaluating a half-mile service area for neighborhood facilities, many residential areas fall outside of the service area for some or all facilities. When amenities are located in both Lions Park and either National Road Park or Honors Park, residential areas within the Marion County side of Cumberland have sufficient access within the service area parameter. This is the opposite for residential areas with Hancock County, which have little to no access. These gaps can be partly contributed to the nature of the Town’s suburban street grid and geographic location of the parks; all parks are approximately within a mile of each other. With future growth expected to occur towards the east, most future residential areas will continue to be outside of the service areas of existing facilities. Based on this analysis technique, the Town of Cumberland is deficient in the following facility types: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Basketball courts Playgrounds Multi-purpose fields/greenspace Volleyball courts Picnic shelters Trailheads Football/soccer fields Baseball diamonds Softball diamonds Dog parks (off-leash) Community rooms Tennis courts Pools (indoor and outdoor) Indoor recreation centers Skate parks Nature centers

Note: Facility types not present in Cumberland at the time of study were not mapped, and therefore assumed to be a need based on this analysis technique, however, this conclusion will need to be vetted against the cumulative findings of the remaining techniques.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section three : needs + priorities assessment

3.4 summary of needs and priorities 3.4.1 Key Findings

3.4.3 Intermediate-Priority Needs

After the completion of the existing conditions analysis and the needs assessment processes, the key ﬁndings of the nine (9) individual analysis and engagement techniques were analyzed cumulatively. Using the process of triangulation, needs identiﬁed by the greatest number of individual analysis techniques represent the highest priorities for the Town to address within this plan.

In addition, a number of needs were identiﬁed as intermediate priorities. Many of these needs have some degree of overlap with the high priority needs mentioned above, and should also be considered when solutions are crafted to address the high priority needs.

It should be noted that other valid “needs” may exist outside of this grouping, however, based on this process are not sufﬁciently quantiﬁable at this point in time to necessitate specialized focus.

3.4.2 High-Priority Needs Based on this planning process and methodology, the following were the high priority needs selected to be addressed with the greatest degree of detail within the Master Plan Vision (Section 4 of this report). The number following each need indicates the percentage of total analysis techniques which identiﬁed that particular need or priority.

Intermediate needs identiﬁed included: • Increased ADA accessibility (22%) • Football fields (22%) • Event venue (22%) • Multi-purpose facilities (22%) • Playgrounds (22%) • Indoor community centers (22%) • Picnic shelters (22%) • Restrooms in parks (22%) • Community/special events (22%) • Improved outreach/communication (22%) • Pools (22%) • Softball diamonds (22%) • Soccer fields (22%)

High priority needs identified include: • New parks and facilities (67%) • Increased trail connectivity (44%) • Baseball fields (33%) • Improved existing parks/facilities (33%) • Dog park (33%) • Increased security/safety (33%) • Tennis courts (33%) • Additional programs + events (33%)

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

master plan vision

4.1 visioning process 4.1.1 Purpose of a “Vision” The vision articulated herein represents the longrange direction, goals, and aspirations of the Town of Cumberland Department of Public Works which cumulatively strive to address the key priority needs identified during this planning process. Guided by community engagement and consensus, this vision will serve as the decision-making framework for prioritizing investment in the Town’s park facilities, amenities, and programs over the next five (5) years and beyond.

4.1.2 Visioning Workshop The foundation for this visioning effort was established in a collaborative workshop setting where the Project Team, representatives from the Town, key project stakeholders, and the general public had the opportunity to weigh in on strategies that address the high-priority needs identified in Section 3 of this Master Plan. The Visioning Workshop was held on September 29th, 2018 at the Town Hall in Cumberland. The workshop was publicly advertised by the Town in accordance with its ordinances associated with meeting advertisement. The workshop began with an overview of the findings indicated from the Existing Conditions Analysis and Needs Assessment. These findings served as the agenda for discussion which followed in a charrette-style setting where the Project Team worked with the participants to develop solutions that address the high-priority findings. The workshop concluded with a public open house in the evening where the general public was invited to come and review the progress and provide critical input to the Project Team that would help establish the Vision for this plan.

In total, ten (10) people participated in the Visioning Workshop and its associated community open house. The agendas, sign-in sheets, and presentations from the Visioning Workshop and Open House can be found in Section 6.7 of the Appendix.

4.1.3 Vision Framework The feedback obtained during the Visioning Workshop established a framework for the Project Team to further reﬁne and develop, and ultimately informed a series of vision subsystems; categorical groupings of aligned recommendations and initiatives designed to meet high priority needs: 1. Improve Existing Parks 2. Future Parks 3. Bikeways + Trails Each of these subsystems, and their associated recommendations, will be discussed in additional detail in the sections to follow.

Figure 4.1: Visioning Workshop (2018).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section four : master plan vision

4.2 guiding principles, goals, + objectives 4.2.1 Organizational Vision of the Town of Cumberland Parks Department As previously noted, the Department of Public Works (Department hereafter) is responsible for operating and maintaining the Town’s four (4) parks sites and growing trail network. At the visioning workshop, the question was posed: What is the desired operational structure of the current department? Does the Town want a dedicated Parks and Recreation Department? The Town has acknowledged that additional staffing focused solely on parks will be needed in order to provide the level of quality desired by the community. Additionally, the Town is exploring the implications of having a dedicated Parks Director, which would necessitate a separate department whose focus is solely on parks and recreation. The challenge and key driver identified by the Town for establishing a separate department to manage parks and recreation facilities, programs, and events will be finances. A new department would need a financial plan that justifies its existence and sustainability and adequate budgets for both maintenance, capital improvements, and special events. Role of Department in the Community The role the Town envisions for a Parks and Recreation Department is to be stewards of the Town’s quality of life. To achieve this vision, the future Parks and Recreation Department will need to clearly define and differentiate its responsibilities compared to those of the Public Works Department. The Town envisions that

Public Works would still handle most of the maintenance responsibilities as well as construction and maintenance of trails, which is further discussed in Section 4.5. Any programs or events will likely necessitate collaboration with the Town’s Special Projects Coordinator (currently responsible for all events hosted by the Town). Metrics During the visioning workshop, participants were asked to identify some key, town-wide “metrics” that the Department could – or should – affect. Key metrics identified by the participants can be grouped into two distinct categories: quality of life and economic sustainability. Participants indicated that one of the most important roles of the parks system in Cumberland is its ability to build community by facilitating personal connections between residents and the Town government’s staff, amenities, and events. In addition, the Town’s parks system should work proactively to improve equity, universal accessibility, and safety town-wide, while also serving as a conduit for education and enriching experiences for residents of all ages. Participants also expressed the importance of community health as it relates to overall quality of life. Currently, the Town partners with Hancock Health to promote healthy lifestyles through its parks, programs, and communications. Participants identified the extension of their bikeways and trails system as a key metric correlated with overall community health, as it provides a readily accessible means of both

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

transportation and recreation available to residents of all ages. Participants voiced the desire that the Department be both economically and environmentally sustainable. Parks and trails should serve as catalysts for economic development within the community and the properties adjacent to the Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s parks and trails should experience increased property values and encourage investment/reinvestment around them. It will also be important for the Department to understand its own capacities and limitations prior to committing to a project. Maintenance budgets must be developed for any new capital improvements during the planning and design process, not as a reactionary afterthought.

4.2.2 Organizational Vision for the Town of Cumberland Parks Advisory Council Currently, the Town of Cumberland and its Public Works Department receives recommendations and advice related to park improvements, maintenance, and programs/events from its Parks Advisory Council (PAC). Each member of the PAC is appointed by the Town Council (more information on the current PAC can be found in Section 1.2). The organizational structure of the PAC was reviewed during the Visioning Workshop and it was concluded that the Town should explore converting the PAC to a traditional Parks Board. While a Parks Board would operate in a very similar manner to the PAC, its members are prohibited from being a municipal executive or a member of the municipal fiscal body. This change will increase the transparency of the guidance provided to the Town by minimizing potential conflicts of interest by Board members. In addition, converting to a Parks Board structure may increase community engagement and participation by encouraging residents passionate about their park system to volunteer for the board.

section four : master plan vision

(page is intentionally left blank)

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

section four : master plan vision

4.3 improve existing parks 4.3.1 System-wide Challenges Feedback from the community workshop and public opinion survey rated improving the existing parks through the repair/upgrading of existing amenities and the addition of new ones - as one of the communities’ highest priorities. A common sentiment expressed by participants was that the Town needs to improve and maintain what they have right now before building anything new. In general, all four (4) existing Town-owned park properties share several common challenges:

• • • • •

Poor visibility into/out of the park site Lack of internal and external wayfinding Challenges with vandalism and abuse Limited parking Barriers to universal accessibility

As part of this planning process, concept plan sketches were developed for each of the four (4) existing parks that strive to address the site-specific challenges identified while simultaneously helping to meet the community’s priority parks and recreation needs. It’s likely that given the amount of funding available, these plans will need to be implemented incrementally over time. As such, all plans proposed are composed of both short-term and longer-term initiatives.

Figure 4.2: Honors Park along Saturn Street (2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

4.3.2 National Road Park Areas of Focus/Challenges One of the most significant challenges faced by National Road Park is the poor visibility and access into the park. Currently, the park is accessible by vehicle from a oneway road spurring from the parking lot of the Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s post office. A row of commercial parcels separates the park property from US-40 to the south. In addition, the park site has a combination of landscape screening and mounding that obstructs views into the park from the surrounding streets. This, combined with the lack of lighting within the park, has fostered a concern for safety and has allowed for regular instances of vandalism. Additionally, limited parking and lack of signage/ wayfinding from highly visible areas such as Washington Street further hinder the accessibility and visibility to the park. All these elements combined make visiting the park challenging and difficult. Poor drainage also limits the usability of the park site. Currently, the central open space acts as detention area during rain events, however, it does not drain properly and is often left muddy or wet, thus limiting the usability of the space for recreation and/or events.

Figure 4.3: Existing basketball courts at National Road Park (2017).

section four : master plan vision

Figure 4.4: Existing entrance into National Road Park (2017).

Short-term Strategies Improve Safety by Improving Access - There are some short-term strategies the Town could implement to improve access into the park. One of the potential strategies is converting the existing roadway into the park from a one-way into a two-way. This would provide access directly off Washington Street instead of requiring park users to drive through the Post Office in order to enter the park. It is assumed, pending further traffic study, that both entrances/exits would need to be right-in/right-out. Additional parking spaces could be added along the northern side of the existing drive facing into the park to make it more convenient for users to visit.

Figure 4.5: Existing one-way exit from National Road Park (2017).

Long-term Strategies Reworked Road Network - Ultimately, in order to improve visibility and access to the park, infrastructure improvements will need to be made that provide connecting, two-way roadways through the park site. Several potential two-way roadway alignments were identified, the first of which connects Niles Street to the east to Woodlark Drive to the west at its intersection with Knollridge Lane. Colmar Street to the north would then be extended southward to intersect with the Niles Street extension and ultimately, US-40. In addition, as adjacent parcels redevelop over time, additional two-way north-south roadways should be created to increase north-south connectivity to the park site. Redevelopment Catalyst - The Niles Street extension that runs through the park site should include a highquality streetscape, complete with street and pedestrian lighting, wide sidewalks, on-street parking (either 90-degree or parallel), signage, and site furnishings (benches, waste receptacles, bike racks, etc.). In addition to improving the accessibility and visibility of the park site, this pedestrian-friendly street may encourage any

Figure 4.6: Diagram of existing circulation at National Road Park.

Figure 4.7: Diagram of potential circulation at National Road Park.

Improve Basketball Courts â&#x20AC;&#x201C; The existing basketball courts appear to be the one amenity still actively utilized at National Road Park, however, they are in poor condition. Resurfacing the courts and providing lighting around them will help to maintain this activation while also minimizing the potential for vandalism. Any improvements to the physical amenities within National Road Park are secondary to first addressing site security through improved visibility and access.

Figure 4.5: Example of outdoor dining facing a park. Credit: Figure 4.8: Diagram illustrating reworked road network at National Road Park

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

redevelopment of the adjacent commercial parcels to the south to embrace – or front – the park site rather than solely US-40.

National Road Park Concept Plan Components Key park improvements or components at National Road Park include:

Any redevelopment of the adjacent commercial parcels should strategically not turn its back on either US-40 or the park site, but rather have two “front faces” that address both. Furthermore, any future commercial uses should strategically help activate the park. Examples include restaurants that have outdoor seating that faces towards the park or retail stores that walk out onto the park.

1. Niles Street extension w/ on-street parking 2. One (1) resurfaced basketball court 3. One (1) new basketball court 4. Existing shelter 5. Flexible greenspace with improved drainage 6. New, accessible playground 7. Reforested natural area w/ walking paths and/or nature play components 8. Removed earthen mounds 9. Additional, fixed seating near basketball courts 10. Crosswalks (typ.) 11. Opened views into the park site 12. Screening backside of existing commercial properties 13. Sidewalk extensions 14. Flexible plaza space 15. New, two-way roadway 16. Outdoor seating/activation facing park 17. Existing commercial building 18. Potential future commercial redevelopment site (to embrace park site) 19. US-40/Washington Street crosswalk 20. Pennsy Trail (existing) 21. Town Hall

NOTE: The concept plan for National Road Park, as articulated herein, will require land acquisition on behalf of the Town and significant coordination with adjacent land owners to subdivide some existing parcels and/or obtain easements for the required infrastructure. As such, this concept is intent on illustrating the cumulative potential of the greater National Road Park area and will need to be vetted and developed further through additional study and engagement with the surrounding land owners. Improved Drainage - In addition to the roadway improvements, drainage in the park should be reworked to be more functional and provide better use of the primary open space. Any drainage improvements made to the greenspaces should take into account the drainage and utility systems required for the proposed roadway extensions. In addition to the large infiltration areas (open greenspace), the Town should consider the inclusion of additional, green infrastructure such as bioswales (rain gardens), and/or porous pavement as components of any streetscape design.

Figure 4.9: Example of potential redevelopment to front and activate National Road Park.

100

section four : master plan vision

Figure 4.10: Conceptual site plan of National Road Park.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

101

4.3.3 Lions Park Areas of focus/challenges The location of Lions Park creates significant access and visibility challenges for the park, resulting in regular vandalism and undesirable behavior. The existing park site is very secluded as a result of being setback from North Buck Creek Road by approximately 600 feet. In addition, the majority of the developed park site is approximately 15 to 20 feet lower in elevation than North Buck Creek Road, and within the floodplain of Buck Creek. The creek divides the park into two halves, leaving the eastern portion largely unusable for anything other than greenspace due to challenges with flooding. Most of the remaining amenities at Lions Park are located on the western half and are aging and in need of updating. Most currently sit within the flood plain as well. Despite having some newer equipment/amenities, there is still limited ADA accessibility. Short-term Strategies Open Up Views into the Park - The park’s best opportunities for improvement, both short and long term, coincide with the recent purchase of the residential parcel immediately west of the park along North Buck Creek Road. To improve visibility into the park shortterm, the Town should strategically and thoughtfully remove some of the undesirable vegetation on the property to open views into the park. Events Pavilion - The newly acquired 6-acre residential parcel includes a 2,500 SF, two-story house, a small detached garage, and a 40’x60’ pole barn. During the planning process the Town determined that retrofitting the house for a civic use would likely be cost prohibitive, however, the pole barn could be converted into an open-air events pavilion. The events pavilion would need dedicated parking and access off North Buck Creek Road and would also include an outdoor events lawn and “biergarten-style” gathering space complete with picnic tables, overhead carnival lights, and a new, prefabricated restroom building (CXT or similar). The Town may wish to conduct further study to determine the feasibility of repurposing the existing house. If deemed infeasible, it should be demolished.

Figure 4.11: Flooding at Lions Park. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

Figure 4.12: Example of open air pole barn. Image Credit: (Kitchen Decor 2019)

Relocate Play Equipment - The Town may wish to consider relocating the existing play equipment that is in good condition adjacent to the events pavilion. This benefits the park by creating a synergy between events hosted at the pavilion and relocates the play equipment outside Figure 4.13: Existing house on newly acquired residential parcel at Lions Park. Image Credit: Hancock County

102

section four : master plan vision

of the flood-prone portion of the site. If the equipment is relocated, the Town should ensure there is an ADA accessible route leading to the equipment. Natural Area – The Town of Cumberland Park & Recreation Board currently owns a 15.8 acre undeveloped parcel of land, immediately north of Lions Park. Buck Creek and the Buck Creek Trail corridor serve as the eastern boundary of the site, the majority of which is composed of understory vegetation with some mature trees along the banks of the creek. Approximately 80% of the parcel also lies within either the floodway or the floodplain, limiting its uses and development potential. It is recommended that the Town embrace this space as a managed and accessible natural area by providing additional connections to Lions Park and from the Buck Creek Trail into the natural area. The Town should prioritize the removal of any non-native plant species and work to establish new, native plant ecosystems that can withstand regular flooding. In addition, the Town should look for opportunities to integrate pollinator habitat in the non-flood prone areas on the western edge of the property. A management plan for the property consistent with the ecosystems desired or proposed should also be created. The provision of soft-surface walking/hiking trails through the site is also recommended. The Town may wish to consider the inclusion of interpretative exhibits that educate visitors on the importance of

Figure 4.15: Natural area north of Lions Park (2017).

the ecosystems present, the impacts of flood, and/or the benefits of green infrastructure. Any permanent structures or amenities should be located outside of the floodway. Trailhead Amenities – The Town should consider using the existing southern shelter as a trailhead for the Buck Creek Trail through the provision of trail-specific amenities such as water fountains, bike racks, bike repair stations, trail map kiosks, and emergency call stations (if implemented). The Town should ensure that there are several ADA accessible parking spaces adjacent to the trailhead, and accessible routes from these spaces to the shelter and the trail. Softball Diamond – During the planning process, the Town indicated that they had made the decision to remove the softball diamond on the eastern portion of the park largely as a result of the vandalism and undesirable

Figure 4.14: Example of biergarten style space. Image Credit: (Our Michigan Ave 2019)

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

103

activities occurring in the dugouts. This portion of the site is almost entirely within the floodplain, and as such, has limited potential for development/use beyond field space. The Town may wish to consider providing a new softball diamond in this area, provided that there is a community partner who would use it. The new diamond would likely be for recreation/practice purposes only, and should not include enclosed (cinderblock or similar) dugouts so as to increase visibility into the site, or a permanent outfield fence (as a result of regular flooding). Alternate uses for this portion of the property could include flexible open greenspace, or using the existing grade as a sledding hill during the winter months. Long-term Strategies Roadway Extension â&#x20AC;&#x201C; In an effort to increase access and visibility into the park site, it is proposed that the Town extend Buckley Road south, eventually merging with the existing park entrance road. This would eliminate the existing dead end roadway and allow for regular circulation and patrolling through the most secluded portion of the site.

Figure 4.16: Diagram of roadway extention at Lions Park.

104

section four : master plan vision

New Amenities â&#x20AC;&#x201C; The addition of a new connecting roadway through the park site would allow for additional parking distributed throughout the eastern portion of the site which could serve the proposed off-leash dog park and community garden areas, as well as any events that may take place in the flexible greenspace within the floodplain (e.g. recreational play, practices, etc.). Lions Park Concept Plan Components Key park improvements or components at Lions Park include: 1. Off-leash dog park 2. Community gardens 3. Existing shelter 4. Buckley Road extension 5. Expanded parking area 6. ADA accessible parking 7. Trailhead location 8. Relocated playground 9. Multi-purpose court with storage shed 10. New shelter 11. Repurposed events pavilion 12. Events lawn 13. Biergarten space 14. Prefabricated restroom building 15. New parking lot 16. Managed natural area with soft-surface trails 17. Natural/native landscape areas 18. Passive park space 19. Flexible greenspace 20. New park entry signage 21. Possible future softball diamond and/or sledding hill

Figure 4.17: Conceptual site plan of Lions Park.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

105

4.3.4 Honors Park Areas of Focus/Challenges The most significant challenge facing Honors Park is physical (and ADA) accessibility. Honors Park consists largely of various types of playground equipment (for younger children) and the Town of Cumberland time capsule marker. The park does not provide any dedicated on or off-street parking and there are no sidewalks leading to or between the various play amenities within the park. Additionally, most of the amenities, including slides, playground structures, and swings do not meet current ADA accessibility standards. In addition to access, the small size of the developed portion of Honors Park (0.25 acres) limits the types of events, programs, and amenities that can be provided there. Short-term Strategies Provide Dedicated Parking - To address the challenges with parking, the Town should consider providing dedicated, on-street parking along Saturn Street and Munsie Street. Saturn Street should be prioritized as it is owned by the Town, whereas Munsie Street is owned by the City of Indianapolis. Additionally, the Town can explore the feasibility of partnering with the adjacent church to the east to create a shared parking strategy that utilizes the church’s parking lot during non-peak hours. A cross-walk and accessible sidewalk should be provided from any proposed parking area into the park site. Improve Pedestrian Access - While constructing the on-street parking, the Town should provide a sidewalk from Town Hall to the intersection of Saturn and Munsie Streets, connecting the on-street parking to Honors Park. In addition, a sidewalk should be provided from Honors Park south to its intersection with the Pennsy Trail. Increase ADA Accessibility – Despite containing only play equipment, Honors Park is the least ADA accessible park in the system. To make progress towards greater ADA accessibility in the short-term, the Town should upgrade the playground and swings to meet current accessibility standards while also providing an accessible route within the park that connects to each amenity. The Town may wish to consider adding small shade structure adjacent to the playground as well. Provide Trailhead Amenities – The Town should capitalize on Honors Park’s adjacency to the Pennsy Trail by

106

section four : master plan vision

making it a dedicated trailhead location through the provision of trail-specific amenities such as a small shelter, water fountains, bike racks, bike repair stations, trail map kiosks, and emergency call stations (if implemented). The Town should ensure that there are several accessible parking spaces adjacent to the trailhead, and accessible routes from these spaces to the shelter and the trail. Long-term Strategies Park Expansion - The long-term vision for Honors Park is to expand the park westward onto the approximately 4.4 acres undeveloped greenspace owned by the Town that is adjacent to the Streets and Parks Department facility. Primary uses of the expansion would be flexible green space that could accommodate temporary striping for soccer, football, or softball fields. The open space should also be used to host future recreational programs and special events. An additional picnic shelter should be added east of the creek. Destination Accessible Playground - The playground should be upgraded to include additional accessible equipment and sensory-based experiences. The Town should consider converting the play surfacing from engineered wood fiber mulch to a stabilized resilient surface, such as rubber tiles or poured-in-place rubber, that is easier to maintain in an ADA accessible condition. As the playground area of the park is improved, the Town may wish to consider opening up views into that space by limiting the fencing to just be around the play equipment. Honors Park Concept Plan Components Key park improvements or components at Honors Park include: 1. Improved playground with accessible route 2. Flexible play lawn 3. Trailhead location 4. Honors Park sign and time capsule 5. Seating area 6. Small picnic shelter 7. On-street parking 8. New sidewalk connection 9. Crosswalks 10. Possible shared-parking area 11. Multi-purpose greenspace 12. Bioswale/rain garden 13. Landscape screening 14. Native, low-maintenance landscape plantings (wildflowers, prairie, etc.) 15. Park signage

Figure 4.18: Conceptual site plan of Honors Park.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

107

4.3.5 Wayburn Pocket Park Focus Areas/Challenges Wayburn Pocket Park is unique not only in size but in that it does not face many of the same challenges as the other parks. It achieved one of the higher park evaluation scores as part of this assessment with high marks in Access + Linkage and Comfort + Image, yet scored the lowest on Uses, Activities, + Sociability and had the lowest number of visitors per the public opinion survey. Consequently, a focus for Wayburn Pocket Park is finding consistent ways to activate it. Short-term Strategy Increasing Usability - The short-term strategies for Wayburn concentrate on simple improvements that better define and activate the space. Relocating the landscape to the edges of the park will allow access to clearly defined flexible turf space that can be used for special events and/or informal gatherings. The addition of affordable, moveable cafĂŠ and/or lounge furniture along the sidewalk and/or within the park space will provide a space for the adjacent residents and/or business owners to sit and eat.

Figure 4.19: Photo of Wayburn Pocket Park (2017).

Finding Partners - Sustained activation could be achieved by partnering with the adjacent law firm (who owns the buildings on both sides of the park) or other surrounding businesses to encourage use and activity in the space, either daily or one-off events. Cost Effective Lighting - The Town may also wish to explore the feasibility of installing overhead carnival lighting (string lighting) over the park space to encourage evening usage and increase visibility. Long-term Strategy As the activity level in the park becomes more constant, the long-term strategy should be to expand the hardscape along Washington Street to create a unique urban plaza. Characterized by an overhead structure with string lighting, this new pedestrian scale space provides additional location for moveable seating or programming. Located off Washington Street, the new plaza would help draw users visiting Cumberlandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s downtown into the park.

108

section four : master plan vision

Figure 4.20: Example of carnival lighting and movable seating. Image Credit: (Penniman 2019)

Wayburn Pocket Park Concept Plan Components Key park improvements or components at Wayburn Pocket Park include: 1. Concrete plaza with moveable seating and overhead lighting 2. Flexible greenspace 3. Existing sidewalk to remain 4. Improved parking area 5. Expanded entry plaza space w/ parking bollards 6. Ornamental trees (typ.) 7. Landscape planting beds 8. Existing shade tree 9. Existing interpretative exhibit

Figure 4.21: Conceptual site plan of Wayburn Pocket Park.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

109

110

section four : master plan vision

4.4 future parks 4.4.1 Quantifying the Need The needs assessment identified that Cumberland should identify strategies to increase its amount of park acreage in order to increase overall level of service (LOS) and to account for any anticipated increases in population. For Cumberland to match Hancock County’s current acreage LOS acreage of 7.7 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, the Town would need to acquire an additional 25 acres of parkland by 2030 to account for anticipated population increases.

4.4.3 Strategy - New Parks in Existing Neighborhoods Another strategy for increasing park acreage is to develop parks within existing developed residential areas. These parks are envisioned to be smaller neighborhood-scale parks located within the fabric of built-out residential areas and would provide amenities that meet local residents’ daily needs for recreation and leisure (e.g. walking paths, greenspace, playgrounds, etc.).

Following are several strategies identified to increase the amount of developed park acreage accessible to Cumberland residents.

4.4.2 Strategy - Target Growth Areas Due to Indianapolis’s Unigov restrictions, all future new growth in Cumberland will be in Hancock County, likely focused east towards County Road 600W. As this expansion occurs, the Town should proactively identify and secure land for park development in the targeted growth areas. Doing so will help ensure that the Town’s LOS for parkland does not decrease as population increases. In addition, this strategy will also help to provide park spaces that are located close to (ideally within walking distance of) where the growth is occurring. To help fund the acquisition and development of new park space, the Town should explore the feasibility of implementing a park impact fee.

Figure 4.22: Welland Park with Cumberland United Methodist Church beyond (2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

111

10th Street Park During the visioning workshop, two (2) neighborhood areas, both identified in the needs assessment as being outside of the level access to most neighborhood park amenities, were selected as potential areas for new parks. The first area is near the intersection of German Church Road and 10th Street on the Town’s far west side (hereafter referred to as 10th Street Park). Despite being relatively close to National Road Park, this neighborhood has poor street connectivity to it and falls outside of the ½ mile access to the park. Eastridge Elementary School, though outside of the Town’s limits, is located across the intersection from the park and provides potential opportunities for partnership and programming.

Figure 4.24: Map illustrating 21st Street Park potential location.

21st Street Park The second site is within the neighborhoods north of 21st Street, one of the furthest locations from the Town’s existing park sites. In addition to providing neighborhood-level amenities, this park should seek to connect to the 21st Street Trail which would provide users access to the Buck Creek Trail, Lions Park, and eventually the Pennsy Trail. The Town should evaluate the availability of undeveloped residential parcels in the Cobblefield neighborhood located at the intersection of Brownstone Court and North Buck Creek Road.

Figure 4.23: Map illustrating 10th Street Park potential location.

Welland Park Another potential park site, informally referred to as the Welland Park parcel, is located near North Starter Street and is already owned by the Town. This 7.5-acre property is largely undeveloped, and is immediately adjacent to two (2) churches. The only amenities currently on the site are some soft-surface trails (maintained by the Town) which serve as a connector between Starter and Michigan Streets. At least one concept plan for the park was developed in 2012, however, it will need to be revisited to reflect any changes in Town needs and priorities that have taken place since then.

Figure 4.25: Map illustrating Welland Park location.

112

section four : master plan vision

4.4.4 Strategy â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Expand Existing Park Sites A third strategy for expanding the park system is to opportunistically expand the existing park sites as adjacent parcels become available for acquisition. Doing so presents an opportunity to expand total park acreage while at the same time addressing some of the individual park challenges identified in Section 4.3. The Town has already begun implementing this strategy at Lions Park by acquiring a strategic residential parcel west of the park. In addition, they have access to over 15 acres of natural areas immediately north of Lions Park that are owned by the Park and Recreation Board. Similarly, the expansion proposed for Honors Park utilizes land already owned by the Town.

Figure 4.26: Map highlighting Honors Park expansion.

Figure 4.27: Map highlighting Lions Park natural area expansion.

Figure 4.28: Map highlighting Lions Park residential parcel expansion.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

113

FUTURE PARKS + PARK EXPANSIONS Future Parks 1. 10th Street Park 2. 21st Street Park 3. Welland Park Park Expansions 4. Honors Park Expansion 5. Lions Park Natural Area Expansion 6. Lions Park Residential Parcel Expansion

1/2 mile (10 minute walking distance)

Figure 4.29: Map illustrating future parks and park expansions.

114

section four : master plan vision

4.4.5 Vision: 30 (additional acres) by 2030 During the visioning workshop, the Town established a desire to increase their park acreage by 30 acres by the year 2030 (“30 by 2030”). Of the strategies referenced, priority should be placed on developing (or providing recreational access to) parcels of land the Town already owns or is owned by a friendly partner (such as the Cumberland Park and Recreation Board). These examples include: Lions Park Residential Parcel Expansion Lions Park Natural Area Expansion Honors Park Expansion Welland Park Development Total New Acreage:

8.1 acres 15.8 acres 4.4 acres 7.5 acres 35.8 acres

If these additional lands are accessible to the public and activated (either with amenities and/or programs/ events) they have the potential to add 35.8 acres of new parkland, exceeding the Town’s identified vision goal of adding 30 additional acres by the year 2030. It should be noted however that all of these parcels are located in the central and/or western portion of the Town. As the town continues to expand to the north and to the east, new park spaces will need to be identified, acquired, and developed in these as new communities are built, regardless of the total, system-wide amount of existing park acreage count.

Figure 4.30: Level of service acreage chart illustrating Cumberland’s 30 by 2030 goal.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

115

116

section four : master plan vision

4.5 bikeways and trails 4.5.1 Vision The planning process validated the long-held notion that multi-purpose trails are one of the most important and often used park amenities for Cumberland residents. Anticipating this, the Town has made trail expansion a priority in recent years by completing construction of Phases 1 and 2 of the Pennsy Trail and Phase 1 of the Buck Creek Trail. During the visioning workshop, guiding principles were established to guide the ongoing development and maintenance of the Town’s growing trail network. These goals center around three main ideas: community-wide connectivity, developing a “smart” system, and partnering for implementation. Community-wide Connectivity Cumberland’s trail network is envisioned to be an interconnected network of nodes and destinations where every neighborhood should have access to and every park should be linked by - the trail network. The Town established a bold vision for neighborhood connectivity to work to ensure that all residences in Cumberland are within a five-minute walk (along a sidewalk) of a trail. Currently, approximately 50% of the developed residential areas are within a five-minute walk of an existing trail. This analysis does not take into account the presence of a sidewalk within those neighborhoods, as that is data that the Project Team did not have access to at the time of the study. A “Smart” System The Town believes that their trail system should leverage new technologies to be as “smart” as possible. An immediate benefit to a smart trail system is increased safety. With fiber as a universal media, cameras and call-boxes can help improve safety – both actual and

perceived - along the system. Additionally, a smart trail system has opportunities for wireless access points, the support of a dedicated parks and trails app with the ability to release real-time information and updates to trail users (such as emergency notifications), digital informational kiosks, and multi-media opportunities for art and education. All these examples expand the trail system experience beyond just recreation. Potential examples of smart experiences include digital versions of the existing “Planets on the Pennsy” signs along the Pennsy Trail and creating nature-based elements along the Buck Creek Trail using lighting and sound. Partnering for Implementation As the Town continues to grow, it should leverage this new development to help assist with the funding and implementation of the trail network expansion into these growth areas. This public-private strategy endeavors to ensure that new development or future growth areas are already connected into the larger trail network at occupancy and not retroactively constructed afterwards. To realize this, the Town will need to work to either codify the trail development requirements or work on a case by case basis with developers during the plan approval process, with the former being more sustainable in the long-term. Role of (Parks) Department Based on feedback from the Town and participants of the Visioning Workshop, the future Parks Department would participate in and help guide the design and planning of the trail network, whereas the Public Works Department would be responsible for the construction and ongoing maintenance of the system. Funding to support the development and maintenance of the trails system should be included within the Public Works budget.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

117

4.5.2 Trail Typologies + Complete Streets In order to achieve a safe and robust trail network, a hierarchy of trail typologies should be developed that work together to create a complete trail system across a variety of contexts. Each trail type has advantages and disadvantages and should be selected based on the context of the location, available ROW/easements, and anticipated traffic volume. Complete Streets Workshop participants expressed the desire to pursue, wherever road development or improvements take place, the implementation of a “complete streets” policy. Complete Streets are characterized as providing a safe and functional means of transportation for everyone; walkers, bicyclists, and motorists of all ages and abilities. Creating Complete Streets means transportation agencies must change their approach to designing and constructing community roads, ensuring that the entire right of way (ROW) is safe for all types of users. A Complete Streets approach to design helps ensure that every transportation improvement project will make the street network better and safer for everyone while also making Cumberland a better place to work and live (Smart Growth America, 2019). The design of Complete Streets varies by their context; a Complete Street in a rural area will look quite different from a Complete Street in an urbanized area, however, both should be designed to balance safety and convenience for all ROW users. Common Complete Streets components include: • • • • • • • • •

Figure 4.31: Complete Street diagram. Image Credit: NACTO

Trail Typologies Following are the individual trail typologies identified during the visioning workshop, in order of most preferred (e.g. appeals to the largest possible user group) to the least. While not every roadway section can (or even should) include all of these typologies, together they represent a toolkit of approaches that can be implemented by the Town to help make transportation in Cumberland safer for all users. Multi-Purpose Trails Multi-purpose trails are designated paths for both bicyclist and pedestrians that are separated from the roadway. These types of trails tend to be a minimum of 10-12’ in width and are not necessarily constrained to following the street network. While multi-purpose trails are perhaps the most ideal for the users, they can be more difficult to implement in areas where existing rightof-way is narrow and/or where land acquisition is will be required.

Sidewalks Designated bike lanes Separated multi-purpose trails Wide paved shoulders Public transit stops Frequent and safe crosswalks Accessible pedestrian signals and signage Narrow travel lanes Median islands at crossings

More detailed information on the planning, design, and implementation of Complete Streets can be found at www.SmartGrowthAmerica.org.

Figure 4.32: Pennsy Trail. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

118

section four : master plan vision

Cycle Tracks The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) defines a cycle track as “an exclusive bike facility that combines the user experience of a separated path with the on-street infrastructure of a conventional bike lane” (NACTO, 2019). Cycle tracks are located adjacent to a vehicular travel lane and are physically protected from vehicular traffic by curbs/ medians, bollards, on-street parking, or pavement striping (of appropriate width). Cycle tracks can be either one-way or two-way, and appeal to a wider user base than traditional bike lanes because of the greater sense of security and comfort provided. Cycle tracks can often be built within existing rights-of-way or street sections; however, the physical separation and increased pavement width result in a higher construction cost when compared to a traditional bicycle lane.

Figure 4.33: Example of cycle track. Image Credit: (Bike East Bay 2013)

Bicycle Boulevards (SHARROWs) A bicycle boulevard is defined as a roadway where bicyclists share a drive lane with motorists. These types of “trails” work best on streets with both low-speed and low-volume traffic. They are typically designated with pavement markings and/or vertical signage directing motorists of the requirement that they share the lane with bicyclists. Because bicycle boulevards usually don’t require altering the street section (with the exception of adding signage and markings), they have a significantly lower construction cost when compared to other trail typologies (NACTO, 2019). Bike Lanes On streets that have high-volume vehicular traffic, a designated bike lane may be appropriate means for bicyclists to travel. Bike lanes are typically located immediately adjacent to a vehicular travel lane with bicyclists traveling in the same direction as the motorists. Although bike lanes can often be added to existing roadway sections with minimal investment, their immediate adjacency and frequent interface with vehicular traffic results in them appealing to the smallest potential user group (often only serious cyclists who would ride on the road anyway).

Figure 4.34: Example of bicycle boulevard. Image Credit: (The Wisconsin Gazette 2018)

Figure 4.35: Example of bike lane.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

119

4.5.3 Trailheads A trailhead, for the purposes of this study, is defined as any publicly accessible space that provides users with access to the trail system, dedicated paved parking, and other core trail-related amenities. Regardless of the level of system-wide connectivity, a portion of users will still prefer to drive to a park or other public facility to access the trail system. At a minimum, trailhead sites should provide users with access to basic trail-related amenities such as trail signage/wayfinding, bike racks, water fountains, pet waste stations, and paved parking. Trailheads that are located along heavily traveled routes, remote routes, and/or those within larger parks, are good candidates for a larger variety of additional trail-specific amenities such as: • • • • •

Bicycle lockers Bikeshare stations Repair stations Air stations Vendors/Vending machines (for concessions and bicycle supplies) • Emergency call stations • Restrooms Six (6) primary trailheads locations are proposed: 1. National Road Park 2. Lions Park 3. Honors Park 4. Welland Park (future) 5. 10th Street Park (future) 6. 21st Street Park (future)

Figure 4.36: Example of a trailhead. Image Credit: (Harrington 2011)

Over time, as funds become available and/or larger park system improvements are made, it is recommended that trailhead locations along heavily trafficked routes, those within larger community park spaces, and/or those in more isolated locations also provide (in addition to the basic amenities listed above): • Dedicated paved parking area • Public art • Access to other park amenities (playgrounds, sports courts, etc.) • Bike rental/share stations • Access to a public restroom facility • WiFi hotspot

In the short term, the Town should focus on adding basic trailhead amenities at its existing park sites that are identified as trailhead locations (all but Wayburn Pocket Park). Examples of these basic amenities include: • • • • • • •

Directional wayfinding/signage Pet waste stations Water fountains A small picnic shelter and table or seating area Bike racks A bicycle repair station Emergency call station (if implemented)

5 4

1 3

Figure 4.37 Potential locations for trailheads.

120

section four : master plan vision

Trails Master Plan - Although potential gaps in access and future trail routes were considered as part of this park systems planning process, they will need to be further and more thoroughly vetted as part of a town-wide trailsspecific master plan. This master plan should seek to:

Figure 4.38: Informational signage along Pennsy Trail. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

4.5.4 5-Year Priority Focus Neighborhood Connectors - Over the last several years, the Town has invested significant funds and effort in developing their primary, arterial trails (Buck Creek Trail and the Pennsy Trail). In the near term, the Town should focus on providing local connections to the system from existing residential areas, especially those which are high in density and/or have poor roadway connectivity. The Town should focus on providing linkages between the existing communities and trail networks. To limit the amount of land acquisition required for implementation, it’s likely that many of the connections within existing neighborhoods will need to be in the form of widened sidewalks and/or bicycle boulevards (provided the traffic volumes and speeds are appropriate for these typologies).

• Identify/confirm gaps in access based on the adopted vision standard (5-min or ¼ mile walking distance along a sidewalk), • Identify potential trail expansion corridors and the appropriate trail sections for those corridors, • Articulate design, construction, signage/wayfinding, and maintenance standards for the trail system (important for both the Town and any private development partners who will participate in trail funding/construction), • Create a long-range, sustainable capital plan for trail development that coincides with anticipated roadway and/or other infrastructure improvements, • Identify potential alternative funding sources such as grants, TIF funds, impact fees, etc. to support the ongoing development of the system. Figure 4.41 illustrates that if the Town builds out the identified high priority trail segments and neighborhood connectors, nearly every existing resident in Cumberland at the time of this study would have access to a trail within a 5 minute – or ¼ mile – walk from their home. For comparable purposes, Figure 4.40 illustrates a 5 minute walk for the existing trail network.

High-Priority New Trail Segments - In addition to the neighborhood connectors, several high-priority potential new trail segments were identified that warrant further investigation, including: • A new north-south trail segment that would link the Pennsy Trail to Honors Park, Town Hall, and National Road Park. This segment would continue north past National Road Park eventually following the alignment of Woodlark Drive until its intersection with 10th Street. • A new trail east-west trail segment along 10th Street/E. Harvest Glen Drive/Oak Boulevard S. which would link the proposed 10th Street Park to the west to Lions Park, the Buck Creek Trail, and the existing neighborhoods to the east.

Figure 4.39 Identified high-priority new trail segements and neighborhood connectors.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

121

EXISTING TRAIL NETWORK

1/4 mile (5 minute walking distance) from trail access

Figure 4.40: Map illustrating a 1/4 mile (approximate 5 minute walk) from existing trail network.

122

section four : master plan vision

FUTURE + EXISTING TRAIL NETWORK

1/4 mile (5 minute walking distance) from existing trail access 1/4 mile (5 minute walking distance) from future trail access

Figure 4.41: Map illustrating a 1/4 mile (approximate 5 minute walk) from existing and future trail network.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

123

124

section four : master plan vision

4.6 programs + events 4.6.1 Recreation Programs

4.6.2 Special Events

At the time of this planning process, the Town of Cumberland did not offer any recreational programs. During the visioning process, the Town expressed a desire to explore the feasibility of selectively offering some recreational programs through partnerships with other entities (to be identified). In this sort of arrangement, the Town would assist in the provision of facilities and amenities that other private partners can use to offer programs. These programs would focus on recreation and social-services as opposed to competition-based programs or events. Examples of potential partners that the Town could work with include:

Special events in Cumberland are the most often attended amenity per the public opinion survey. Cumberland currently holds six (6) recurring events throughout the year, which include (in order of attendance/popularity): 1. Weihnachtsmarkt (December) – Located along US-40 between Musing Street and Starter Street with Wayburn Pocket Park serving as the kids area. The Town Christmas Tree is located in the park.

• Churches/places of worship • Public schools • Homeowners associations/apartment complexes • Boys & Girls Club • Private dance/gymnastics studios/recreation/fitness centers • Existing local sports or athletic leagues Potential Location/Hubs Lions Park, with the recent land acquisitions, serves as an excellent location to start hosting programs. In addition to ample open space, the park offers several picnic shelters plus the two existing structures, which combined, can be used to offer programs year-round. The open greenspace space west of Honors Park appears to be sufficiently level and well-drained, making it ideal for recreational play and/or practice field space. The greenspace at National Road Park is too poorly drained to rely upon for recreational programming, however, the existing basketball courts, with some minor improvements, could serve as a location for courtspecific programs/events. Figure 4.42: Games during Weihnachtsmarkt (2015). Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

125

2. Cumberland Arts Festival (August) – Located down Saturn Street and into the field west of Honors Park. This program is organized by a local church with support from the Town.

Fortunately, the 2019 municipal budget will represent the first-time special events will have a designated budget. This dedicated allocation will help contribute to developing a strong event space at Lions Park in addition to continuing to fund the Town’s popular events.

3. Brews, Blues, and BBQ (June-September) – Located in the alley at Saturn Street near Honors Park, this event occurs four to five times a year. 4. National Night Out (August) – Located at the Streets and Parks Department facility west of Honors Park, this event is organized by the Town’s Police Department. 5. Honors Park Ceremony (October) – This event is located in Honors Park, thought it is not offered every year. 6. Farmers Market (April-November) – Independently offered at Town Hall from the Spring through November Family Fun Day - In the past the Town has previously held Family Fun Day and informal pop-up cook outs. Family Fun Day was a May-June event hosted in National Road Park and appealed to local, lower income families, however it was canceled in part to low attendance. Except for the Farmers Market (which is more representative of a program than a special event), there are no special events that occur in spring months. Given this, the Town may wish to consider the feasibility of restarting the annual Family Fun Day in National Road Park. Doing so would simultaneously activate the park space, raise awareness of residents for its amenities and location, and serve the local neighborhood residents.

Figure 4.43: Cumberland’s Farmers Market. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

Location/Hubs – Nearly all of the existing programs or special events are hosted at or near Town Hall and Honors Park. The Town should evaluate the feasibility of offering programs/events (either new or relocated) at Lions Park, which is envisioned to become the special events hub in Cumberland. Saturn Street Alley and the remaining parks will all become supporting event locations. Funding - Special events represent one of the largest expenses for the Parks Department, averaging approximately $60,000 annually. Most of the funds are drawn from the General Fund, and these costs are in addition to the approximately $100,000 the Town spends annually on capital improvements for parks. The Town currently tries to offset costs of events through sales revenues from tickets, food/beverage, and merchandise. Figure 4.44: Family Fun Day. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

126

section four : master plan vision

SPECIAL EVENT LOCATIONS

Lions Park Hub

Existing Special Event Locations

Figure 4.45: Map illustrating future and existing special event locations.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

127

05 action plan

5.1 2019-2023 action plan 5.1.1 Methodology As is the case with many communities, the full cost of the long-range Vision articulated in Section 4 of the Master Plan will dramatically exceed the amount of funding currently projected to be available over for the Department in the next five (5) years (2019-2023). As such, the intent of Section 5 of this report is to help craft a 5-year action plan that seeks to meet existing, highpriority needs while at the same time moving the Town incrementally closer to realizing the long-range vision. During the visioning process, the Town indicated that they have, on average, invested approximately $100,000 annually in capital improvements; it is assumed that this level of spending will remain consistent over the 20192023 fiscal years. For the purposes of this Action Plan, the $100,000 annual capital budget is exclusive of costs associated with the following: • Maintenance and operations of the parks and trails system • Events and programs • Capital costs associated with new trail development • Roadway/infrastructure improvements

The pay as you go strategy will allow for incremental improvements to the existing system, however, will preclude any projects associated with major infrastructure improvements, utility improvements, and/or new park development. These types of projects, despite being of a high priority in some cases, far exceed the existing annual capital capacity of the Department and will require that the Town seek out a combination of alternative funding mechanisms such as: • • • • • •

Grants Impact fees Partnerships with other Town initiatives or budgets Sponsorships Special assessments Parks-specific general obligation bond.

5.1.3 Pay-As-You-Go The Department’s $100,000 annual funding capacity for capital projects derived from their municipal budget will allow for incremental, high-priority improvements to the existing system, intent largely on improving access to, the safety of, and amenities within, existing developed park sites. These initiatives are spread across improvements to each of the Town’s four (4) existing park sites:

5.1.2 Approaches to Funding Given the scale of the vision and the level of need within the existing system, multiple funding mechanisms will be necessary to make a meaningful impact in the near term. The first of these is the traditional, “pay as you go” approach which continues to leverage the existing annual departmental budget for capital improvements. If recent trends in funding remain consistent, this funding mechanism would provide a capital capacity of approximately $500,000 for fiscal year 2019-2023 in $100,000 annual increments.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

131

National Road Park - 5-Year Action Plan

New park entry signage - vehicular New park entry signage - trail/pedestrian

$13,800

2021

$7,200

2022

Improve the existing basketball courts by filling cracks, resurfacing/striping the courts, painting backboards, and replacing rims/nets. Fix/improve court and shelter lighting. Add new park entry/monument signage at existing vehicular entrances to the park (main entrance on Washington Street and Niles Street). Add new park entry signage where existing sidewalks enter the park property (4 locations)

2019

2021

2020

$42,500

Improve existing basketball courts

$131,300

2021

Extend Niles Street approximately 350 LF to the west to merge with the existing one-way park access road. Re-sign and re-stripe existing access roadway to be two-way. Provide on-street parking along Niles Street extension to serve park space.

$56,300

2022

2020

$7,200

2019

$131,300

$1,800

2021

2019

$15,100

$40,900

2022

$12,600

Install a 6' wide concrete sidewalk that connects the basketball court area to the existing sidewalk network along Washington Street to the south (approx. 280 LF).

$10,500

2023

2019

$2,500

Install 6' sidewalk from Washington Street into park

National Road Park 5-Year Subtotal:

Notes

Begin reforesting the identified woodland area by planting approxiamtely (40) new native trees (variety of species appropriate for area, one tree per 500 SF; assumed to be 3-gal plant material).

Plant native trees in woodland area

Extend Niles Street west; merge with existing park drive.

Target FY

$35,400

2019

Est. Budget

$6,800

2020

Recommendation/Initiative

$2,500

$209,900

Honors Park - 5-Year Action Plan Recommendation/Initiative

Est. Budget

Target FY

Notes

2019

Improve the ADA accessibility of the existing main playground area by adding one (1) special-needs swing to the existing swing set, and providing the appropriate depth of EWF safety surfacing beneath the swing set.

2021

Add seven (7) on-street parallel parking spaces on new pavement (no curb) on the southern side of Saturn Street near the developed portion of the park. At least one (1) space should be ADA accessible. Provide an ADA accessible sidewalk from the parking spaces into the park and up to the intersection of Saturn and Munsie Streets.

$5,600

2021

Add a 5' wide (min.) accessible walkway from Saturn Street onstreet parking to the playground areas (approx. 150 LF)

$7,500

2021

Stripe crosswalks at the intersection of Saturn and Munsie Streets

New park entry signage - vehicular

$6,900

2022

New park entry signage - trail/pedestrian

$3,600

2022

Improve safety and ADA accessibility of existing playground

$1,800

Provide on-street parallel parking along Saturn Street

$27,800

Add an ADA accessible walkway from parking into the playground area Add crosswalks at intersection of Saturn and Munsie Streets

Build trailhead near Pennsy Trail

$35,400

Honors Park 5-Year Subtotal:

2023

Add new park entry signage at the intersection of Saturn and Munsie Streets Add new park entry signage where the Pennsy Trail enters the expanded park site on both the east and west sides. Develop a trailhead location near where the Pennsy Trail enters the park site to include a small picnic shelter, water fountain, bike rack(s), bike repair station, pet waste station, (2) picnic tables, and a paved walkway linkage to the trail and/or the playground area.

$88,600

Wayburn Pocket Park - 5-Year Action Plan Recommendation/Initiative

Est. Budget

Re-organize turf and landscape areas

$6,300

Target FY

2019

Notes

Create a larger, usable greenspace in the center of the site by relocating the existing shrubs and perennials to the outer edges of the parcel. Install new sod in the greenspace and address any drainage issues that may exist. Install additional supporting shrubs, perennials, and/or groundcover to fill the perimeter beds, mulch all beds.

Install carnival-style string lighting over greenspace

$500

2019

String consumer-grade (Costco or similar) overhead carnival lights over the new greenspace between the two existing buildings to encourage evening event use and increased visibility.

Purchase moveable lounge furniture for lawn area

$2,500

2020

Provide affordable, colorful, and moveable lounge furniture (Adirondack chairs or similar) in the new lawn area and/or along the existing walkways. Allow users to move furniture as desired.

Wayburn Pocket Park 5-Year Subtotal:

$9,300

Figure 5.1: Chart illustrating the 5-year action plan items associated with the pay-as-you go funding strategy.

132

section five : action plan

Lions Park - 5-Year Action Plan

$30,500

2019

Town to finalize land swap with adjacent residential owners and reparcel park property accordingly.

$35,100

2019

Fix lighting within each of the existing picnic shelters and add five (5) pole-mounted area security lights near the parking lot and shelters.

Identify and remove invasive plant species from former residential parcel(s)

$5,000

2020

Identify and remove invasive plant species from newly acquired residential parcels.

Identify and remove invasive plant species from new natural area expansion

$10,000

2022

Identify and remove invasive plant species from managed natural area expansion parcel.

$8,200

2022

$15,300

2022

$7,500

2022

Dog Park - Phase 1

$38,100

2022

New park entry signage - vehicular

$12,500

2023

Add new park entry/monument signage at existing vehicular entrances to the park (main entrance and event pavilion entrance).

$30,000

2023

Install interconnected, soft-surface (#11 stone or similar) walking trails selectively within the managed natural area.

Convert pole barn to events pavilion

Finalize land swap with adjacent residence Add/fix site security lighting

Add trailhead amenities at southern shelter

Relocate existing play equipment

New park entry signage - trail/pedestrian

Add soft-surface trails to managed natural area (2,000 linear feet) Lions Park 5-Year Subtotal:

Add trailhead amenities near the southern shelter including a water fountain, bike rack, bike repair station, pet waste station, and new picnic tables (3). Relocate existing playground equipment that is in good condition (and meets current safety code) to the western side of the park, adjacent to the events pavilion. Provide ADA accessible EWF safety surface and an ADA accessible walkway leading to the playground from the parking area. Add new park entry signage where existing trails enter the expanded park property (4 locations) Build out Phase 1 of the dog park in its final location by installing the perimeter fencing, double-gated entrance to the dog areas, and a paved walkway leading to the entrance from the existing sidewalk network.

FY Total

2019

Notes

Convert pole barn to events pavilion by opening up side walls, adding lighting, clearing out trees and shrubs to create an events lawn area, and building a 10-space gravel parking lot (temporary). $65,600

2020

Target FY

$5,000

2022

Est. Budget

$79,100

2023

Recommendation/Initiative

$42,500

$192,200

Figure 5.2: Chart illustrating the 5-year action plan items associated with the pay-as-you go funding strategy.

Figure 5.3: Charts illustrating the 5-year action plan items distributed among years and park sites.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

133

5.1.4 Partnership Projects Bikeways and Trails As noted in the findings from the Needs Assessment, bikeways and trails are one of the most important recreation amenities to Cumberland residents. The Public Works Department is responsible for constructing and maintaining trails in Cumberland, however, the planning and design of those trails should include active participation from the Parks Department. Given that the Parks Department does not play a capital role in the development of new trails, funds associated with their ongoing development is in addition to the action plan budget proposed in Section 5.1.3. High-priority trail projects over the next five (5) years include (additional detail on each of these efforts can be found within Section 4.5): 1. Development of a Town-wide Trails Master Plan that includes design, safety, and signage standards, 2. The development of high-priority neighborhood connectors which provide disconnected residential areas with safe access to the existing trail network, 3. The design and development of the 10th Street Trail corridor, 4. Provision of trailhead amenities within existing park spaces (included within the 5-Year Action Plan budget). Roads and Streets A number of the identified safety and accessibility concerns associated with the existing park sites can only be solved as part of larger infrastructure improvement efforts such as the relocation of roadways or the improvement of utility infrastructure. This is especially true with both National Road Park and Lions Park where key roadway improvements are required to improve access, safety, and usability. The Parks Department should seek additional funding and operational support for these efforts from the Streets Department and/ or other local transportation partners. In addition, the Town should seek to opportunistically leverage already known roadway and/or utility efforts to further the goals and objectives of this plan.

134

section five : action plan

Examples of high-priority park roadway projects include: • The extension of Niles Road westward through National Road Park, terminating at the existing intersection of Knollridge Lane and Woodlark Drive. This project should also include addressing the drainage and utilities associated with the park space to the north and seek to provide on-street parking available for park users. • The extension of Buckley Road south through Lions Park, terminating at the existing access roadway to the park space along N. Buck Creek Road. Plans, Studies, and Policies The planning process also identified a need for additional plans, studies and policies to fully realize the long-range vision. Many of these items are necessary in the nearterm in order to make progress on some of the highpriority improvements within this action plan. Following is a summary of the key studies, plans, or policies recommended, which are broken down into three (3) categories; plans and studies, policies, and operational recommendations. Plans and Studies • Develop and adopt a Trails System Master Plan (see Section 4.5) • Undertake a Park Impact Fee (PIF) study to determine the feasibility and potential return on implementing a PIF. • Commission a feasibility study to inform the best use of the existing residential structure on the newly acquired Lions Park parcel. • Develop a management plan for the natural area at Lions Park. Policies • The Town should formally develop and adopt a Complete Streets policy aligned with the recommendations of Section 4.5. • The Town should convert their existing Parks Advisory Council to a traditional Park Board (See Section 4.2). Operational Recommendations • The Town should create a separate Parks Department and hire a qualified Certified Parks and Recreation Professional (CPRP) to serve as its Director. An annual capital and operational budget should be established for this Department in accordance with the recommendations contained herein.

5.1.5 Potential Alternative Funding Sources Smaller improvements and/or projects can more easily be implemented over time within the existing budget structure, however, the system would benefit from the use of additional, alternative funding sources that will increase the Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s capacity for both new capital projects and ongoing maintenance and repair. Following is a brief summary of potential alternative funding sources that should be explored by the Department. Grants There are many sources of potential funding through grants, and while considerable time is required to manage these opportunities and respond to their deadlines, the information contained within this report can be useful in submitting for these grants. As part of this planning effort, the Project Team created a list of commonly used grant sources administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). This list is not comprehensive, as the availability of resources at both the state and federal levels are constantly changing. Additionally, there is no guarantee implied that the various Vision initiatives meet all the requirements of each individual funding source. As such, it is highly recommended that the Town employ the services a professional grant writer to assist in the important activity of monitoring and responding to potential opportunities, as the long-term implementation of the Master Plan Vision will likely require them. State Programs President Benjamin Harrison Conservation Trust Fund (PBHCTF) The President Benjamin Harrison Conservation Trust Fund (PBHCTF), formerly the Indiana Heritage Trust, was established in 1992 to assist in the acquisition and protection of lands that represent outstanding natural resources and habitats, or have recreational, historical or archaeological significance. Additional information on funding requirements and amounts can be obtained by contacting the PBHCTF at (317) 233-1000 (IDNR, 2017). Bicentennial Nature Trust (BNT) The Bicentennial Nature Trust program was created by the State of Indiana in 2012 to celebrate Indianaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 200th anniversary in 2016. The BNT is designed to encourage local participation, so each project requires a $1:$1 match. To ensure availability of funds for a wide

variety of projects across the state, a cap of $300,000 has been set for the BNT portion of an individual project, which may only be used for the acquisition of land, and not for capital improvements, stewardship, or programming. The BNT Project Committee, responsible for administering the funds, meets on a quarterly basis. The submission deadlines include February 1st, May 1st, August 1st, and November 1st of each year (IDNR, 2017). Federal Programs Recreational Trails Program (RTP) The Recreational Trails Program is a matching assistance program that provides funding for the acquisition and/or development of multi-use recreational trail projects. The Indiana RTP will provide 80% matching reimbursement assistance for eligible projects. Applicants may request grant amounts ranging from a minimum of $10,000 up to a maximum of $200,000. Applications are available online or from the Division of Outdoor Recreation and are typically due May 1st of each calendar year (IDNR, 2017). Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) The Land and Water Conservation Fund was passed by Congress in 1965 to assist eligible governmental units in the provision of new parks and/or expansions of existing parks through a matching assistance program that provides grants for 50% of the cost for the acquisition and/or outdoor recreation facilities. The Land and Water Conservation Fund grants are available for projects that range from $10,000 up to a maximum of $200,000. All applications are available online at the IDNR website, and must be post-marked by June 1st of each calendar year for consideration (IDNR, 2017). DNR Shooting Range Program The Department of Natural Resources Shooting Range grant program is an assistance program for the development of rifle, handgun, shotgun, and archery facilities designed to provide the citizens of Indiana with additional and safer places to fire their guns, and train hunter education students. The project sponsor (the City) must fund the upfront cost of the project and will be reimbursed for a maximum of 75% of the expenses incurred for the project per the terms of the project agreement. Applicants may request a minimum of $10,000 and a maximum of $100,000. At the time of the application, the project sponsor must have at least 25% of the total project cost available. The local share may include tax levies, bond issues, and/or the or the donated value of cash, labor, equipment and materials (IDNR, 2017).

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

135

Additional information on IDNR grants can be found by visiting http://www.in.gov/dnr/outdoor/8328.htm. Park Impact Fees Given the amount of future residential grown potential in the region, it is recommended that the Town implement a park impact fee (PIF) to help offset the additional burden placed on the Department by new developments and an increasing population. If new developments add additional homes and/or increase population density in currently developed areas, the demand for parks and recreation facilities within those areas will also increase. Park impact fees are payments required by the Town of new developments to offset the cost of the additional public parks and open spaces which are necessary to support those developments. PIFs help to shift the cost of financing necessary park land acquisition and development from the general taxpaying resident to the primary beneficiaries of the new facilities (those within the new developments). Despite the common sentiment expressed by the private sector, little evidence exists to suggest that impact fees have limited new development (APA, 2017). An adopted ordinance is required to implement a PIF. The first step of this process would be to hire a specialized consultant to assist in drafting this ordinance, and the cost policy which supports it. It is recommended that the Town begin this process in the next five (5) years, to ensure they capitalize on the greatest amount of redevelopment possible.

136

section five : action plan

(page is intentionally left blank)

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

137

138

section five : action plan

5.2 plan adoption 5.2.1 Final Public Plan Presentation The final draft version of the 2019-2023 Town of Cumberland Parks System Master Plan was presented to the general public at 6:00 PM on April 8th, 2019. The presentation was led by representatives of the Project Team, and was held at the Town Hall in Cumberland. The public meeting was publicly advertised by the Department in advance, per Town policy. During the presentation, representatives from the Project Team highlighted the overall planning process, the summarized findings from the Existing Conditions Analysis and Needs Assessment, provided a detailed overview of the overall Master Plan Vision, and detailed the proposed five (5) year implementation and action plan. A copy of the presentation agenda, sign-in sheets, and presentation slides can be found in Section 6.4 of the Appendix.

5.2.2 Park Advisory Council Resolution for Adoption On April 10th, 2019, the Town of Cumberland Park Advisory Council voted unanimously to adopt the 20192023 Town of Cumberland Parks System Master Plan, as described herein. A signed copy of the resolution and the signed ADA Section 504 Compliance Form are found on the following pages.

In total, 17 participants attended the final presentation. Following the conclusion of the presentation, the Project Team remained in the room to answer any questions participants had. Participants were also provided with comment sheets on which comments/questions could be written and provided to the Project Team. A PDF version of the final draft master plan was also uploaded to the Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s website where residents review it prior to its formal adoption by the Cumberland Parks Advisory Council.

Figure 5.4: Town Hall sign advertising the final presentation and PAC meeting dates and times.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

139

Figure 5.5: Scan of original, wet-signed Cumberland PAC resolution adopting the 20109-2023 Parks Master Plan as contained herein.

140

section five : action plan

Figure 5.6: Scan of original, wet-signed ADA Section 504 Compliance Form.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

141

references + appendices

6.1 commonly used acronyms AC Acre ADA American Disabilities Act APA American Planning Association ASLA American Society of Landscape Architects BCSC Bartholomew Consolidated School Corporation BNT Bicentennial Nature Trust CAAC The Columbus Area Arts Council CAMPO Columbus Area Metropolitan Planning Organization CAVC Columbus Area Visitors Center CPRD Columbus Parks and Recreation Department CY Cubic yard DNI Does not include Esri Environmental Services Research Institute EWF Engineered Wood Fiber FFY Foundation for Youth GIS Geographic Information Systems I-65 Interstate 65 IDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources LF Linear foot/feet LOS Level of service LS Lump sum LWCF Land Water Conservation Fund MI Mile MPI Market Potential Index

NACTO National Association of City Transportation Officials N.D. No date NRPA National Recreation and Parks Association NTS Not to scale OPC Opinion of probable cost PBHCTF President Benjamin Harrison Conservation Trust Fund PIF Park impact fee PPS Project for Public Spaces ROW Right of way RTP Recreational Trails Program SC Steering Committee SCORP State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan SF Square foot/feet SFIA Sports and Fitness Industry Association SPI Spending Potential Index SR State Road U.S. United States TPL Trust for Public Land

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

145

146

section six : references + appendices

6.2 references + citations -AAnderson, B. (2017, August 8). personal communication discuss total park acreage of Greenfield, IN. ASPE. (2016, 04 25). Commutations for the 2016 Poverty Guidelines. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: https://aspe.hhs.gov/computations-2016 poverty-guidelines

-BBarth, D. (2009). Providing Equity for Parks and Recreation Facilities; Alternatives for Calculating Level of Service (LOS). FRPA Journal, Spring 2009. Bike East Bay. (2013). Protected Bike Lanes, i.e. ‘Cycle Tracks,’ coming to El Cerrito, Berkeley, Alameda. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from: https:// bikeeastbay.org/cycletrack

-CCenter of Poverty Research. (2018, 10 15). What is the current poverty rate in the United States. Retrieved from UCDavis: https://poverty. ucdavis.edu/faq/what-current-poverty-rate united-states City of Indianapolis. (2017). Cumberland. Retrieved from The Official Website of the City of Indianapolis and Marion County: http://www. indy.gov/eGov/City/DMD/IHPC/Districts/ Conservation/Pages/Cumberland.aspx

Crompton, J. (2007). Community Benefits and Repositioning: The keys to park and recreation’s future viability. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.

-EEsri. (2016). Sports and Leisure Market Potential. Redlands, CA. Esri. (2017). Tapestry Segmentation Area Profile. Redlands: Esri.

-HHarnik, P. (2003). The Excellent City Park System; What Makes it Great and How to Get There. San Francisco, CA: Trust for Public Land. Harrington, Kevin. (2011). Wounded Warrior Ride. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from: http:// kevinswoundedwarriorride.blogspot.com/

-IIDNR. (2017). About the President Benjamin Harrison Conservation Trust Fund. Retrieved from Indiana Department of Natural Resources: http://www.in.gov/dnr/heritage/4426.htm IDNR. (2017). Bicentennial Nature Trust. Retrieved from Indiana Department of Natural Resources: http://www.in.gov/dnr/heritage/7309.htm IDNR. (2017). DNR Shooting Range Program. Retrieved from Indiana Department of Natural Resources: http://www.in.gov/dnr/outdoor /4070.htm

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

147

IDNR. (2017). Land & Water Conservation Fund. Retrieved from Indiana Department of Natural Resources: http://www.in.gov/dnr/ outdoor/4071.htm IDNR. (2017). Recreation Trails Program (RTP) Grant Program. Retrieved from Indiana Department of Natural Resources: http://www.in.gov/dnr/ outdoor/4101.htm Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Outdoor Recreation. (2015). Indiana Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan. Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Outdoor Recreation. Indiana Department of Workforce Development. (2017). Major Employers for Hancock County. Retrieved from Hoosiers by the Numbers: http://www. hoosierdata.in.gov/major_employers. asp?areaID=059 Indy Connect. (2016). Service Maps and Studies. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from Indy Connect: http://indyconnect.org/the-central-indiana transit-plan/service-maps-studies/ Indy Parks. (2016). Indy Parks & Recreation Comprehensive Master Plan. Indianapolis: Indy Parks. IndyGo. (2017). IndyGo Full System Map. Indianapolis: IndyGo. Retrieved from https://indygobus. wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ system_web.pdf

-KKitchen Decor. (2019). Small Metal Barns And Ports Car. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from https:// kitchendecor.club/files/small-metal-barns-and ports-car.html

-OOur Michigan Ave. (2019). Spartan Village Development. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from Planning a Greater Lansing: http://www.ourmichiganave. org/ projects/5

148

section six : references + appendices

-MMertes, J.D. (1996). Park, Recreation, Open Space, and Greenway Guidelines. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.

-NNACTO. (2019). Bicycle Boulevards. Retrieved from National Association of City Transporation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/urban bikeway-design-guide/bicycle-boulevards/ NACTO. (2019). Cycle Tracks. Retrieved from National Association of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-bikeway design-guide/cycle-tracks/ National Recreation and Park Association. (2016). 2016 NRPA Field Report Park and Recreation Agency Performance Benchmarks. Ashburn: National Recreation and Park Association. NCSL. (2019, 02 01). National Employment Monthly Update. Retrieved from National Conference of State Legislatures: http://www.ncsl.org/ research/labor-and-employment/national employment-monthly-update.aspx

-PPenniman, Allen. (2019). Grays Ferry Triangle Tactical Urbanizm. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from: http:// www.allenpenniman.com/gft Project for Public Spaces. (2016). What is Placemaking? Retrieved June 21, 2016, from Project for Public Spaces: http://www.pps.org/reference/ what_is_placemaking/

-SSFIA. (2016). 2016 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report. Silver Spring, MD: Sports & Fitness Industy Association. Smart Growth America. (2019). What are Complete Streets? Retrieved from Smart Growth America: https://smartgrowthamerica.org/program/ national-complete-streets-coalition/ publications/what-are-complete-streets/

-TTown of Cumberland. (2010). Buck Creek Trail. Cumberland: Town of Cumberland. Retrieved from http://www.town.cumberland. in.us/business_development/projects/ docs/1436541578_68706.pdf Town of Cumberland. (2015). Ordinance Restating the Town of Cumberlandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Policies Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Cumberland: Town of Cumberland. Retrieved from http://www.town.cumberland.in.us/ government/departments/planning_and_ development/docs/Plannning/ADA/Town%20 of%20Cumberland%20Policies%20under%20 the%20Americans%20with%20Disabilities%20 Act%20of%201990.pdf Town of Cumberland. (2017). Communication & Events. Retrieved from Cumberland Indiana: http://www.town.cumberland.in.us/community/ communication_and_events/index.php Town of Cumberland. (2017). Community Profile. Retrieved from Town of Cumberland, Indiana: http://www.town.cumberland.in.us/about/ community_profile/index.php

-UU.S. Census Bureau via Community Analyst. (2017). Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2016 and 2021. Redlands, CA: ESRI. United States Census. (2017). American FactFinder Community Facts. Retrieved from American FactFinder: https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/ nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml?src=bkmk USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service. (2017). Web Soil Survey. Retrieved June 13, 2017, from Web Soil Survey: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov. usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

-WThe Wisconsin Gazette. (2018). Bicycle boulevard coming to Riverwest in 2020. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from: https://www. wisconsingazette.com/news/bicycle-boulevard coming-to-riverwest-in/article_1cc38a46-2ba8 11e8-bf36-778631170555.html

Town of Cumberland. (2017). History. Retrieved from Town of Cumberland, Indiana: http://www.town. cumberland.in.us/about/history.php Town of Cumberland. (n.d.). ADA Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way. Cumberland: Town of Cumberland. Retrieved from http://www. town.cumberland.in.us/government/ departments/planning_and_development/docs/ Plannning/ADA/ADA%20Transition%20Plan. pdf Town of Cumberland. (n.d.). Notice Under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Cumberland: Town of Cumberland. Retrieved from http://www. town.cumberland.in.us/government/ departments/planning_and_development/docs/ Plannning/ADA/Grievance%20Procedure.pdf Trust for Public Land, National Recreation and Park Association, Urban Land Institute. (2019, February 7). Retrieved from 10 Minute Walk: https://www.10minutewalk.org

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

149

150

section six : references + appendices

6.3 list of figures PART ONE Figure 1.1: Budget history for the Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation from FY2013-FY2018 Figure 1.2: Town of Cumberland 2018-2019 Park Advisory Council (2018) Figure 1.3: Pennsy Trail adjacent to Honors Park (2017). Figure 1.4: Resurfaced tennis courts at Lions Park (2017). Figure 1.5: Updated swings at Honors Park (2017). Figure 1.6: Public realm methodology diagram. Figure 1.7: Planning process diagram.

PART TWO Figure 2.1: Project base map illustrating the â&#x20AC;&#x153;planning areaâ&#x20AC;? and the location of existing park and recreation facilities. Figure 2.2: Mural along backside of Dollar Tree building facing National Road Park. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland Figure 2.3: Washington Street in Cumberland looking west. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland. Figure 2.4: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Hardscrabble Road segment (Esri, 2017). Figure 2.5: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Hardscrabble Road segment (Esri, 2017). Figure 2.6: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Comfortable Empty Nesters segment (Esri, 2017). Figure 2.7: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Comfortable Empty Nesters segment (Esri, 2017). Figure 2.8: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Midlife Constants segment (Esri, 2017). Figure 2.9: Graphic summary, created by Esri, of the lifestyle characteristics of the Midlife Constants segment (Esri, 2017). Figure 2.10: Cumberland Residents riding on the Pennsy Trail. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland

Figure 2.11: Example of racquet sports. Figure 2.12: Example of team sports. Figure 2.13: SiteScoreTM Park Site Evaluation Matrix. Figure 2.14: Honors Park (2017). Figure 2.15: Wayburn Pocket Park (2017). Figure 2.16: Lions Park (2017). Figure 2.17: National Road Park (2017). Figure 2.18: No accessible route to play area at Lions Park (2017). Figure 2.19: No accessible route to picnic shelter at Lions Park (2017). Figure 2.20: Potential trip hazard at National Road Park (2017). Figure 2.21: No accessible route to play area at Honors Park (2017). Figure 2.22: No accessible route into Honors Park (2017). Figure 2.23: Consider accessible seating area at Wayburn Pocket Park (2017).

PART THREE Figure 3.1: Public Input Workshop (2018). Figure 3.2: Public Input Workshop (2018). Figure 3.3: Public Input Workshop (2018). Figure 3.4: Public Input Workshop (2018). Figure 3.5: Acreage LOS chart. Figure 3.6: Amenities LOS chart reflecting only Town owned amenities. Figure 3.7: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for all parks. Figure 3.8: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for existing basketball courts. Figure 3.9: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for existing playgrounds. Figure 3.10: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for existing multi-purpose fields. Figure 3.11: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for volleyball courts. Figure 3.12: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for existing picnic shelters. Figure 3.13: Access LOS map illustrating a 1/2 mile service area for trailheads.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

151

Figure 3.14: Access LOS map illustrating a 2 mile service area for existing tennis courts.

PART FOUR Figure 4.1: Visioning Workshop (2018). Figure 4.2: Honors Park along Saturn Street (2017). Figure 4.3: Existing basketball courts at National Road Park (2017). Figure 4.4: Existing entrance into National Road Park (2017). Figure 4.5: Existing one-way exit from National Road Park (2017). Figure 4.6: Diagram of existing circulation at National Road Park. Figure 4.7: Diagram of potential circulation at National Road Park. Figure 4.8: Diagram illustrating reworked road network at National Road Park Figure 4.9: Example of potential redevelopment to front and activate National Road Park. Figure 4.10: Conceptual site plan of National Road Park. Figure 4.11: Flooding at Lions Park. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland Figure 4.12: Example of open air pole barn. Image Credit: (Kitchen Decor 2019) Figure 4.13: Existing house on newly acquired residential parcel at Lions Park. Image Credit: Hancock County Figure 4.14: Example of biergarten style space. Image Credit: (Our Michigan Ave 2019) Figure 4.15: Natural area north of Lions Park (2017). Figure 4.16: Diagram of roadway extention at Lions Park. Image Credit: (Our Michigan Ave 2019) Figure 4.17: Conceptual site plan of Lions Park. Figure 4.18: Conceptual site plan of Honors Park. Figure 4.20: Example of carnival lighting and movable seating. Image Credit: (Penniman 2019) Figure 4.21: Conceptual site plan of Wayburn Pocket Park. Figure 4.22: Welland Park with Cumberland United Methodist Church beyond (2017). Figure 4.23: Map illustrating 10th Street Park potential location. Figure 4.24: Map illustrating 21st Street Park potential location. Figure 4.25: Map illustrating Welland Park location. Figure 4.26: Map highlighting Honors Park expansion. Figure 4.27: Map highlighting Lions Park natural area expansion. Figure 4.28: Map highlighting Lions Park residential parcel expansion. Figure 4.29: Map illustrating future parks and park expansions. Figure 4.30: Level of service acreage chart illustrating Cumberlandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 30 by 2030 goal. Figure 4.31: Complete Street diagram. Image Credit: NACTO

152

section six : references + appendices

Figure 4.32: Pennsy Trail. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland Figure 4.33: Example of cycle track. Image Credit: (Bike East Bay 2013) Figure 4.34: Example of bicycle boulevard. Image Credit: (The Wisconsin Gazette 2018) Figure 4.35: Example of bike lane. Figure 4.36: Example of a trailhead Image Credit: (Harrington 2011) Figure 4.37 Potential locations for trailheads. Figure 4.38: Informational signage along Pennsy Trail. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland Figure 4.39 Identified high-priority new trail segements and neighborhood connectors. Figure 4.40: Map illustrating a 1/4 mile (approximate 5 minute walk) from existing trail network. Figure 4.41: Map illustrating a 1/4 mile (approximate 5 minute walk) from existing and future trail network. Figure 4.42: Games during Weihnachtsmarkt (2015). Image Credit: Town of Cumberland Figure 4.43: Cumberlandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Farmers Market. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland Figure 4.44: Family Fun Day. Image Credit: Town of Cumberland Figure 4.45: Map illustrating future and existing special event locations.

PART FIVE Figure 5.1: Chart illustrating the 5-year action plan items associated with the pay-as-you go funding strategy. Figure 5.2: Chart illustrating the 5-year action plan items associated with the pay-as-you go funding strategy. Figure 5.3: Charts illustrating the 5-year action plan items distributed among years and park sites. Figure 5.4: Town Hall sign advertising the final presentation and PAC meeting dates and times Figure 5.5: Scan of original, wet-signed Cumberland PAC resolution adopting the 20109-2023 Parks Master Plan as contained herein. Figure 5.6: Scan of original, wet-signed ADA Section 504 Compliance Form.

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

153

154

section six : references + appendices

6.4 supporting information Note: This section of the appendix contains supporting information utilized in the creation of, or referenced within, the Town of Cumberland 2019-2023 Parks System Master Plan document. In some print and/ or digital versions of this document, the contents of Section 6.4 have been omitted due to length. A digital copy of the Town of Cumberland 2019-2023 Parks System Master Plan document, containing the full appendices, may be obtained by contacting the Town of Cumberland Public Works Department.

Components within Section 6.4 include: –– Meeting minutes and sign-in sheets –– Park site evaluation forms –– Stakeholder interviews/focus groups talking points sheet and individual notes –– Copy of the public opinion survey questionnaire and raw survey data –– Copies of public presentation slides

Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf

155

156

section six : references + appendices

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

157

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

158

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

159

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

160

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

161

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

162

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

163

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

KICK-OFF MEETING AGENDA Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time Location Project/File No.:

2018 Town of Cumberland Parks Master Plan Kick-Off Meeting Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:00 pm Town Hall 17L016

Meeting Overview: The purpose of this meeting is officially “kick off” the 2018 Town of Cumberland Parks Master Plan process with the Town’s Parks Staff and key project stakeholders. During this meeting, the participants will be introduced to the Browning Day Project Team as well as the overall project process. In addition, the Project Team will elaborate on some key responsibilities of the Town and Steering Committee throughout the life of the project, and beyond. 5:00 PM

Welcome and Introductions

5:05 PM

Review of Project Scope and Schedule, including key Town/Steering Committee responsibilities: − Data Collection − Project Brand/Advertisement/Promotion − Promoting the survey − Direct people to project webpage − Stakeholder Interviews/Focus Groups (who?) − Visioning Workshop − Implementation Planning

5:15 PM

For this plan to be a success, it must ____________________________!

5:30 PM

“Hot Button” Topics (positive and negative)

5:45 PM

Brainstorm Project “Brand”

5:55 PM

Next Steps

6:00 PM

Adjourn

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

164

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

KICK-OFF MEETING AGENDA Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time Location Project/File No.:

2018 Town of Cumberland Parks Master Plan Kick-Off Meeting Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:00 pm Town Hall 17L016

1. Review of Project Scope and Schedule, including key Town/Steering Committee responsibilities: a. Town to assist with: i. Data Collection ii. Project Brand/Advertisement/Promotion iii. Promoting the survey iv. Direct people to project webpage v. Selecting stakeholders/focus groups vi. Visioning Workshop – securing a location, scheduling, advertisement vii. Implementation Planning – providing funding data 2. For this plan to be a success, it must ____________________________! a. Economic development tool b. Marketable asset c. Barely able to maintain current facilities; parks need to be a point of pride and an asset, not a liability. d. Need additional private sector/commercial investment. e. Quality of life as marketing tool f. Plan needs to be for the benefit of our citizens g. Need to increase the LOS we have h. Identify potential revenue sources – both internal and external i. Look at trail connectivity j. Revitalize National Park i. Need parking ii. Improve existing facilities iii. Potential market site (European market style) k. National Park is a “troubled” park l. Increase accessibility m. Identify event spaces n. Ballfields i. Need more, possible different types ii. Potential dog park. iii. What is the future of this facility? Need to know… iv. Ballfields are in a flood zone now, do flood. o. System is a hodge-podge of facilities; nothing talks to each other. p. Resources are stretched thin… q. Community center – need to plan for one. r. No programs currently offered. s. Need a professional parks director; more organization to the “department.” t. Potential future annexation 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

165

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

KICK-OFF MEETING AGENDA u. v. w. x. y.

Plan needs to be actionable and supported… Immediate action, but also long-range vision. Growth would likely be east…not west. How do we partner with developers to build greenspace. Potential Partners i. Hancock Community Foundation z. Organization i. Director of Parks and Recreation ii. Statutory Board iii. Volunteer Corp iv. Foundation aa. Wayfinding is important. i. Has been designed, not implemented. 3. “Hot Button” Topics (positive and negative) a. “Two Counties” i. Town hall may need to relocate to the east. b. Security – within communities, within parks i. Perception issue c. National Park is an issue. 4. Brainstorm Project “Brand” a. Xx 5. Next Steps a. Browning Day to send list of data needed. b. Town to brainstorm a Project Brand c. Town to identify potential steering committee members d. Browning Day to craft overall project schedule. e.

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

166

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time: Location Project/File No.:

2018 Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups November 29, 2017 1:00 PM – Town Staff Town Hall 17L016

Review of Scope/ Schedule:

Do you have any questions about the project scope/ methodology? Are there any additional meetings, workshops, presentations or other outreach efforts that we should consider? a. No questions.

Needs: Based on what you know, see and hear about your community, what do you believe are the top priority parks and recreation needs? a. Improved equipment and furnishings – at all parks. b. More contemporary equipment c. Improved maintenance d. Additional amenities which correspond to the demographics of the Town. i. Lions Park should have “something for everyone” e. Performance Venue/event venue i. Clamshell/pavilion, etc. f. Increased accessibility – physical and ADA… g. Innovative/destination park. h. Security lighting, cameras in key locations. i. Trail Cams? ii. Fiber will be run along the trail system. 1. Infrastructure is already present in Buck Creek. i. Themes for each park… j. Splashpads. k. Restrooms i. Lions Park ii. National Road Park (concern of vandalism) l. National Road Park i. Needs substantial improvement ii. Needs new everything iii. Potential event venue? iv. Need additional parking v. Need to change the tide/perception of National Road. vi. Best asset is visibility from US-40 vii. Need 2-way entrance in. viii. Visibility is an issue, as is vandalism. ix. Potential ice skating (temporary) 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

167

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS x. Need a vision for this park. m. Honors Park i. Need to expand to the west into the open field ii. Possible location for a performance venue. n. Town Hall i. If Town Hall moves to Hancock County, Police, Fire, and Parks will stay at existing site. o. Indoor Community Center i. No existing indoor facilities ii. Potentially part of the future Town Hall? iii. Residents want a “rec” center, but haven’t quantified a need. p. Trails i. Valued amenity, but major corridors are complete ii. Need to provide secondary connections to the newly developed trail network. iii. How do we connect to new/future subdivisions? 1. Subdivision control ordinance. q. More active lifestyle is a goal; need to use parks to help facilitate that. r. Embrace natural assets/environments i. Greenway/wetland/flood areas s. RV (remote control vehicle) track (Avon has one). t. Drone course? u. Programs i. Warren Central Athletics is looking for field space/court space to expand programming. v. Fisbee Golf course w.

Priorities: Of the needs you listed above, what are your top 3 priorities? a. b. c. d. e. f.

Maintain and improve what we have New equipment and furnishings at parks Better security/lighting Bathrooms at Lions and National Park Expand Honors Park Craft vision for National Road Park (expand)

Benchmark Communities: As we analyze your system, who should we compare you to? Are there any communities that you wish to emulate? a. Fishers Brooks School Road Park (116th and Brooks School Road). b. Holiday Park c. Competitors i. McCordsville, New Pal d. Avon e. Fishers (II) f. Carmel 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

168

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS g. Zionsville h. Plainfield 5.

Funding/ Implementation: Assuming that the Master Plan will identify millions of dollars in desired/ needed improvements, what funding source(s) would you support? a. Current Funding: i. Parks fund that is funded with property taxes – largely the only source. ii. Trails 1. Riverboat Funding has been dedicated for trail maintenance – will remove the maintenance from Parks budget. iii. “Circuit breakers” depleted the parks capital budget, which used to be about $200k$300k/yr. Tax caps were the catalyst for decline. b. OK/GOOD: i. Park impact fees – 1. Need a higher level of service first. ii. Subdivision control ordinance 1. Open space requirement and/or tree requirement. Potential swap for offsite improvements. 2. Need to define “open space” – what does that mean to the developer. iii. TIF – if there was something to TIF; cannot TIF on Marion County side and not enough development on the Hancock County side. c. MAYBE? i. Bonds – contentious within the community, but there have been bonds passed. 1. What is our bonding capacity? d. NO: i. Raise taxes

6. Metrics of Success: a. Incremental plan b. Increase use and support of the system. c. Increased levels of service i. Quality and usability. d. Identify realistic approaches to funding sources.

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

169

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time: Location Project/File No.:

2018 Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups November 29, 2017 1:00 PM – Town Staff Town Hall 17L016

Review of Scope/ Schedule:

Do you have any questions about the project scope/ methodology? Are there any additional meetings, workshops, presentations or other outreach efforts that we should consider? a. No questions.

Needs: Based on what you know, see and hear about your community, what do you believe are the top priority parks and recreation needs? a. Indoor community center, but likely in the future, maybe part of a new city hall b. Wifi in every major park c. Better amenities within our existing parks. i. Perception of the community is that the Town can’t even handle what it has, so why talk about more. d. Dog park (x2) i. No off-leash areas in the town, no where to play with your pets. e. Stronger, more durable equipment. f. Increased g. Skating area? h. National Road Park – needs major overhaul i. Vandalism has always been an issue. ii. Apartments are a perception challenge. iii. People think the park belongs to the apartments, i. Lions Park i. Vandalism is increasing ii. Dugouts had to be torn down as a result of heroin use. iii. Major other improvements made, including the trail. iv. Security is a major issue – both perception and reality. 1. Limited patrolling. 2. j. Attract the millennials i. Wi-Fi in parks ii. Community gardens k. Capitalize on Wellon property – what do we do with it? l. Programs i. Need stuff for kids to do ii. Don’t offer anything currently. m. Events i. Trail-specific events (night rides, etc.) 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

170

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS

n. o.

p. q. r.

s. t. u. v. w. x. y. z. aa.

ii. “Guide Rides” – guided trails iii. Events are a key part of the future identity of Cumberland iv. Working on providing family events; need additional events focused on adults. 1. Concerts, etc. v. Better advertisement of programs/events 1. Current advertisement: a. Facebook/social media b. Street signs c. Community Event Calendar (Channel 6) d. Town website e. Bottom of sewer utility bills f. Pole banners 2. Additional options: a. Radio? b. Utility bills? i. Not sure who is responsible for water ii. Currently do advertise within sewer. Need attractions and destinations i. Garfield Park 1. Festival of lights Honors Park i. New equipment needed ii. In a good location (Old Town) iii. Possible issue with the grading of the site. Dog Park i. Relatively new dog park on Fall Creek Parkway – good comparable for new design standard. Increased walkability and connectivity. Increased safety (x2) i. Paul Ruster Dog Park (off Prospect, west of Carol) – Indianapolis Park 1. Problems with undesirable activity a. Increased patrols have reduced the undesirable activity, but that has pushed that activity to Lions Park. ii. Kids are picking up needles in parks iii. Parks have security issues; both real and perceived. iv. Very low ADA accessibility Determine the real demand for programs and facilities. Adult/Millennial entertainment/events/destination. Splashpad Dog Park within Lions Park Garden Playground equipment Splash Pad Pavilion/event center Purchase land for new park(s)

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

171

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS 3.

Priorities: Of the needs you listed above, what are your top 3 priorities? a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k.

Connectivity and walkability: finish the trails; do them well; increase connectivity. Figure out how to maintain what we have. Increased security (x2) Increased ADA accessibility Signage and wayfinding New and relevant equipment/programming. Reasons for increased use: programs, events, attractions Need to fix up what we have. Playground Equipment Dog Park Splashpad

Benchmark Communities: As we analyze your system, who should we compare you to? Are there any communities that you wish to emulate? a. Greenwood, Ind. b. Greenfield, Ind. c. Irvington, Ind. d. Fountain Square, Ind. (redevelopment focus)

Funding/ Implementation: Assuming that the Master Plan will identify millions of dollars in desired/ needed improvements, what funding source(s) would you support? a. Non-starters i. Raise taxes b. Bonding? i. Maybe? How much and for what? ii. Would need to be dedicated to a specific use. iii. Bond probably wouldn’t be well received if it was just for National Road Park – voters wouldn’t approve it. iv. Fees associated with the bond may make it less feasible v. Potential sewer main bond? 1. Reaching north to Mount Comfort c. Yes i. Fees for specialized facilities (dog park) ii. General fund iii. Grants

6. Metrics of Success: a. Need a plan that addresses improvements needed now, and has a long-range vision. b. Need a plan that is realistically scaled and appropriate for Cumberland. c. Vision for National Road Park

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

172

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time: Location Project/File No.:

2018 Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups November 29, 2017 4:30 PM – Town Staff Town Hall 17L016

Review of Scope/ Schedule:

Do you have any questions about the project scope/ methodology? Are there any additional meetings, workshops, presentations or other outreach efforts that we should consider? a. No questions.

Needs: Based on what you know, see and hear about your community, what do you believe are the top priority parks and recreation needs? a. Prioritize healthy living b. Need recreational programming i. Not just “amenities” ii. Need “administrative” in for residents c. Central recreation hub i. Includes indoor recreation center 1. No indoor facility exists, therefore no indoor winter events exist 2. Banquet/conference space ii. Year-round programming d. Splashpad e. Restrooms and drinking fountains along the trail system and in key parts. f. Power at shelter sites. g. Challenges: i. Vandalism is a problem near Town Hall (Marion County) ii. Most growth is to the northeast (Hancock County) h. Focus major improvements near where the majority of the population is (Hancock County). i. Dog park j. Lions Park i. Add permanent restroom ii. Need rules signage for parks 1. No driving, etc. iii. Need to replace the equipment at the back of the park, either with new equipment or with another use. iv. No sewer in Lions Park k. National Road Park i. Restroom isn’t as needed given that most users walk to the park. l. Splashpad i. Water lines already exist in Lions Park m. Need to take care of the parks that we already have. n. Need to improve the existing park infrastructure – driveways, parking lots, etc. 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

173

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS i. Lions Park’s parking lot needs replaced o. Shelters need power (or have the power removed) p. Expand Honors Park to the west. i. Performance area/bandshell q. Master Plan for large undeveloped space along 40? r. Marquee i. Strict signage rules along 40 s. New Town Hall i. Proposed location: 700 & SR-40 t. Crime i. More of a perception than a reality? u. Improved signage/wayfinding v. Splashpad w. Signs along the Pennsy Trail (solar) x. Soccer field at Lions Park y. Trails i. New Life Church wants to work with the Town to establish a spur connection to the Buck Creek Trail ii. Trail just west of 700 needs surface repair iii. Trails need a dedicated “grounds keeper” to keep clear after flooding iv. Need an access point out of Valley Brook Farms to the Buck Creek Trail

Priorities: Of the needs you listed above, what are your top 3 priorities? a. b. c. d. e. f.

Restrooms Restrooms Restrooms Parking Indoor Center/Programming Splashpad

Benchmark Communities: As we analyze your system, who should we compare you to? Are there any communities that you wish to emulate? a. Greenfield, Ind. – maintenance/management b. Plainfield, Ind. (and skate park) c. Fishers, Ind. d. Minneapolis, MN

Funding/ Implementation: Assuming that the Master Plan will identify millions of dollars in desired/ needed improvements, what funding source(s) would you support? a. Non-starters i. Raise taxes b. Bonding? i. Limited bonding history ii. Unsure of capacity 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

174

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS c. Maybe i. Outsource some municipal services? d. Yes i. Increased general fund spending on parks. e. Misc: i. New financial advisor coming in; unsure of approach.

6. Metrics of Success: a. Need a plan that has incremental steps that correspond to realistic funding sources. b. Give a vision; hope, and a means to achieve it.

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

175

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time: Location Project/File No.:

2018 Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups November 29, 2017 6:30 PM – Town Staff Town Hall 17L016

Review of Scope/ Schedule:

Do you have any questions about the project scope/ methodology? Are there any additional meetings, workshops, presentations or other outreach efforts that we should consider? a. No questions.

Needs: Based on what you know, see and hear about your community, what do you believe are the top priority parks and recreation needs? a. Trails i. Need to promote the trails ii. Hope the trails increase the usage of Lions Park, and visa versa iii. Some concerns from residents about “trails in my backyard” iv. Valley Brook Farms needs a connection – adjacent church willing to donate land to help make connection from Buck Creek Road. v. Need to develop maintenance program to take care of flood debris along Buck Creek Trail. b. Lions Park i. Need permanent bathrooms c. National Road Park i. Currently useless ii. No one knows it’s a town park iii. There’s no parking, any parking for it is used by the Post Office iv. Park floods when it rains v. Need better signage vi. Adjacent apartments have a crime issue. d. Honors Park i. Explore expanding the park into the greenspace to the west. ii. Need on-street parking e. Radio Controlled Airplane field i. “Park Flyer” planes ii. STEM focus? f. Need to increase the usage of the parks; bring additional people in. g. Dog park h. Splash pad i. Indoor multi-purpose space i. Carol and Washington Street as possible location (across from Pizza King). j. Restaurants/venues along the trail i. Unique to Cumberland 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

176

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS k. l. m. n. o. p. q. 3.

Increased advertisement and awareness of parks/facilities Need the basics New equipment and furnishings Better lighting Wi-Fi in the parks More events; need a dedicated â&#x20AC;&#x153;hubâ&#x20AC;? Multi-use parks and facilities.

Priorities: Of the needs you listed above, what are your top 3 priorities? a. b. c. d.

Multi-use facilities Permanent restrooms at key parks More/New Playground equipment Increased visibility; signage, wayfinding, lighting.

Benchmark Communities: As we analyze your system, who should we compare you to? Are there any communities that you wish to emulate? a. Plainfield, Ind. b. Greenfield, Ind. c. San Diego, Cal. d. Los Angles, Cal. e. Ft. Wayne, Ind.

Funding/ Implementation: Assuming that the Master Plan will identify millions of dollars in desired/ needed improvements, what funding source(s) would you support? a. NO: i. Sales tax ii. Special assessments b. YES: i. Selective user fees (Indianapolis) ii. Grants iii. Park impact fees (in the future, when LOS)

6. Metrics of Success: a. Communicate the location of the park assets b. Convince more people to use them, or of the value of them c.

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

177

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time: Location Project/File No.:

2018 Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups November 29, 2017 ___________________________________________________ Town Hall 17L016

1. Review of Scope/ Schedule:

Do you have any questions about the project scope/ methodology? Are there any additional meetings, workshops, presentations or other outreach efforts that we should consider?

2. Needs: Based on what you know, see and hear about your community, what do you believe are the top priority parks and recreation needs?

3. Priorities:

Of the needs you listed above, what are your top 3 priorities?

4. Benchmark Communities: As we analyze your system, who should we compare you to? Are there any communities that you wish to emulate?

5. Funding/ Implementation: Assuming that the Master Plan will identify millions of dollars in desired/ needed improvements, what funding source(s) would you support? Borrowing: • General Obligation Bonds • Revenue Bonds • Others (please specify)

Pay As You Go: • General Fund/ CIP • Sales Tax • Park Impact Fees • Grants • User Fees • Special Assessments • Others (please specify)

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

178

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

STAKEHOLDER TALKING POINTS planning process

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

179

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time Location Project/File No.:

2018 Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Input Meeting – Needs and Priorities March 29, 2018 6:00 PM Town Hall 17L016

6:05 pm

Welcome, Introductions

6:10 pm

Overview of the Project Scope and Schedule

6:15 pm

Open House Exercises:

For the remainder of the workshop, participants will be encouraged to visit all five (5) of the exercise stations listed below. There is no correct order, so please feel free to start at the one you are most interested in! Exercise #1 – Town-wide Needs We have placed a chart on the wall for listing a variety of different types of parks and recreation programs and facilities; some offered by the Town, others not. Please place a dot besides those programs/facilities that you believe are important but for which the need is not being met adequately in the Town of Cumberland.

Exercise #2 – Vision for the Future Before you is a blank canvas, literally! Please use the pens and Post-It notes provided and write your “vision” for future of parks and recreation in the Town of Cumberland. What kind of programs/events will there be? What do you want to be able to do or see? How is the community different, and what is the role of parks in the community? Use your imagination!

Exercise #3 – Chat with the Director He’s a borderline celebrity in Cumberland; this is your chance to have a short, one-on-one chat with the Town’s Superintendent of Streets and Parks Mr. Ben Lipps. Participants should feel free provide open feedback to Mr. Lipps, and to ask him any park-related questions they wish. Representatives from the Project Team will be on hand to take down notes which may result from these informal conversations, some of which may require follow-up at a later date.

Exercise #4 – Priority Spending We have placed numbered buckets on the table representing key areas of potential spending priorities, and “$100” in coins for each participant (each coin = $10). Please distribute your coins among the buckets based on how you believe parks and recreation spending should be prioritized.

Exercise #5 – Barriers to Participation What keeps you from visiting/using the Town’s parks and recreation facilities more often? Perception of safety? Awareness of what is available and happening? Schedule? Lack of the right amenities or programs? Please place a dot/sticker next to each barrier; if you don’t see one, please write it in one of the spaces provided on the poster, and then place your dot. You may use as many dots as necessary, however, please only place one dot per barrier, per person.

7:00 pm

Adjourn

(Please utilize the back of this sheet to provide any additional feedback to the Project Team regarding today’s meeting and/or exercises. To ensure incorporation, please leave this completed form with a member of the Project Team prior to departing the workshop. If you would like to be contacted, please provide your contact information.) 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

180

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA Notes/Comments:_________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

181

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

182

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

183

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

184

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

185

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

186

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

187

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

VISIONING WORKSHOP AGENDA Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time Location Project/File No.:

2018-2022 Town of Cumberland Parks Master Plan Visioning Workshop September 29th, 2018 9:30 am -7:00 pm Town Hall 17L016

9:30 am

Welcome, introductions

9:35 am

Review of Needs and Priorities

9:00 am

Work Session #1 – Department Mission + Vision − −

10:30 am

What is the desired operational structure for the “Parks Department?” What role will the Department play within the community?

Work Session #2 - Improve Existing Parks − − −

What types of improvements are most needed to better activate our existing parks and facilities? What types of new amenities are desired? What would improve the feeling of safety at each park site?

--------------------------------------12:00 pm (Working Lunch Break)--------------------------------------1:00 pm

Work Session #3 – New Park Spaces − −

2:30 pm

Work Session #4 – Bikeways + Trails − − −

4:00 pm

Where are our targeted expansion areas, and what parcels/resources are available to meet this need? What partners and/or funding sources/mechanisms exist to help us expand the parks and recreation system (private foundations, developers, grants, donors, etc.)?

Where are there “gaps” in the existing network, especially between existing parks, key destinations, and neighborhoods? Where are additional trailheads – places where you can access the trail system – needed? What types of amenities do you expect to find at a trailhead?

Work Session #5 – Programs + Events − − −

What is the role of programs + events in Cumberland? What events are missing? What would improve existing events?

5:00 to 6:30 pm - Public Open House Come join us at Town Hall for an informal and informational “pin up” session, where members from the Town and the Project Team will provide updates on the day’s progress for each system.

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

188

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

INTERMEDIATE PRIORITY LOWER PRIORITY

Notes:__________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________

HIGH PRIORITY

VISIONING WORKSHOP AGENDA

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

189

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

MEETING MINUTES Project Name Meeting Subject: Date Time: Location Project/File No.:

2019-2023 Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Visioning Workshop September 29, 2018 9:30 AM – 7:00 PM Town Hall 17L016

1. Mission – Vision Organizational mission/vision a. Desired Operational Structure of “Department” i. Additional staffing needed specific to parks. ii. Would like to explore having a dedicated parks director. 1. Challenge – finances are key driver 2. Parks would be a separate department. 3. PW would still retain maintenance responsibility 4. Need both maintenance and capital budget. 5. Work hand-in-hand with Renee on Special Events 6. Work hand-in-hand with PW on trails (Parks would participate in design/planning/programming and PW would be in charge of construction/maintenance); funding would be shared. iii. Challenges/concerns 1. Need financial plan to justify existence 2. Time to ramp up; get acclimated. 3. Who reports to whom? (DPW vs. Parks) b. Role of the Dept. within the Community i. Provide fields, facilities, and amenities (build and maintain). ii. Provide selective programs that should be offered internally. iii. Find community partners who want to provide programs in Town facilities. iv. Steward of Town’s quality of life: 1. Provide facilities, amenities, and programs that provide a high quality of life for Town residents. v. What are some of the key metrics that the Department could affect? When we make a decision regarding investment, maintenance, or programming, what do we want as outcomes? 1. Improve community health a. Town partners with Hancock Health to promote health. 2. Serve as catalysts for economic development a. Affect property values and investment/re-investment. 3. Improve connectivity and multi-modal capacity 4. Increase equity in facilities and experiences 5. Embrace universal accessibility 6. Ensure Safety in and around parks 7. Facilitation of recreation and play Before competition. 8. Increase both economic and environmental sustainability a. Don’t out-build the capacity of the department (Staffing or economic) 9. Serve as conduits for educational experiences for all generations. 10. Build community by facilitating connections between residents, their government, and its facilities and amenities. 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

190

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

MEETING MINUTES a. Bridge the gap in communication between the public and the “Town” 2. Improve Existing Parks a. System-wide Challenges i. Visibility ii. Wayfinding iii. Vandalism and abuse iv. Access 1. Limited parking v. Universal accessibility b. National Road Park i. Areas of focus/challenges? 1. Site access a. One-way roads, lack of signage, lack of parking 2. Safety a. Tied to visibility, lack of investment 3. Drainage a. Main portion of the open space is also drainage that stays wet – limits capacity. ii. Opportunities 1. Long-range a. Expansion towards Washington b. Connect roadway from east to west through site c. Re-work drainage to be more functional d. Encourage redevelopment along Washington. 2. Short-term a. Partner with adjacent MedCheck on Washington b. Add parking along existing road c. Convert road to two-way 3. c. Lions Park i. Areas of focus/challenges: 1. Lack of visibility a. Very secluded; challenges with vandalism. 2. Lack of amenities east of the creek 3. Limited connectivity over the creek 4. Amenities need updating 5. Most of the land is floodplain; newly acquired land is not in floodplain. 6. ii. Opportunities 1. Short Term a. Open up views into the site via land acquisition b. Better signage etc. from trail c. Convert pole barn to open-air event pavilion d. Determine future of house – possible rental venue? e. Move good play equipment up near event area 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

191

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

MEETING MINUTES f. 2. Long Term a. Move amenities closer to the roadways b. Dog park c. Community garden d. Move flood-sensitive amenities out of floodway e. Connect to natural area to the north f. Nature pavilion g. E d. Honors Park i. Challenges 1. Visibility 2. Accessibility 3. No parking ii. Opportunities 1. General a. Adjacent to police/town hall i. Limited vandalism ii. Room to expand to the west b. Adjacency of trail i. No connection to the park, no sidewalks, etc. 2. Short Term a. Shared parking with Church? b. Paved connection from trail to park c. Accessible route within the park d. Picnic shelter e. Accessible swings f. Improve turf quality of greenspace g. Add additional trees to screen Streets and Parks Building h. Add on-street parking i. Muncie Street is owned by Indianapolis, not the best location for any improvements. i. Connection between Pennsy and Town Hall, east of the Streets Department 3. Long Term a. Expand into the greenspace to the west b. Picnic shelter west of creek. e. Wayburn Pocket Park i. Opportunities 1. Short-Term a. Partner with Law office to activate space. b. Add moveable cafĂŠ furniture c. Open up landscaping to allow access to flex turf space 2. Long Term a. Add additional hardscape along US-40 i. Pergola, moveable furniture, overhead lighting f. Future funding 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

192

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

MEETING MINUTES i. $100k per year in capital improvements 3. Future Parks a. Target growth areas i. Look for additional park land in future annexation areas b. New parks in existing developed areas i. Need to provide smaller, pocket parks within built-out residential areas (west side, Marion County) 1. Poor connectivity in this area, despite adjacency of National Road Park c. Expand existing park sites opportunist as parcels become available d. “Urban Farm” parcel i. Nature trails, connect to Michigan Street ii. Concept plan has been developed. iii. Serves as an important trail connector between Starter Street and Michigan Street. e. Raise LOS goal i. 30 acres by 2030? f. Policy i. Convert to Parks Board ii. Develop park impact fee 4. Bikeways and Trails a. Vision i. Connectivity 1. Every neighborhood should have access to the trail system. 2. Every Park should be linked by the trail system. 3. Interconnected network of nodes and destinations. 4. 5-min walk along a sidewalk to the network. a. Do we have sidewalk GIS data? ii. “Smart” trail system 1. Increase safety 2. Fiber is a universal media a. Add cameras, wireless access points, call-boxes, informational kiosks, dedicated parks and trails APP. b. Multi-media opportunities for art and education i. E.g. digital version of the “Planets on the Pennsy” ii. Nature-based elements along Buck Creek. 1. Mural under bridge at 40, lighting, sound. iii. Leverage future development to help implement the trail network in growing areas of the Town. b. Hierarchy of Trail Components i. Focus on Complete Streets ii. SHARROWs iii. Bike lanes on arterial roadways iv. Side paths/Cycle Tracks v. Multi-purpose trails c. Role of Parks Department 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

193

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

MEETING MINUTES i. Parks would participate in the design/planning of the trail network and PW would be primarily responsible for construction and maintenance. d. Trailheads i. Minor (keep you going) 1. Wayfinding/signage 2. Emergency call station 3. Bicycle racks, repair stations. 4. Small picnic shelter w/ picnic table 5. Water fountain w/ dog fountain and water bottle filler 6. Dog waste station ii. Major (including all â&#x20AC;&#x153;minorâ&#x20AC;? components) (destination) 1. Paved parking area 2. Public art 3. Access to other park amenities 4. Bike rental/bike share. e. Priorities i. Provide linkages between communities and the trail network ii. Develop a trails master plan, design standards, etc. iii. National road through Town Hall to Honors Park and Pennsy Trail iv. Start the Friends groups to help maintain trails. 5. Programs + Events a. Recreation Programs i. Do not currently offer them ii. Would like to selectively add some through partners 1. Lean heavily to providing facilities and amenities that other private partners can help to program. iii. Focus on recreation and social-service style programs, not competition b. Special Events i. Current main events in order of popular: 1. Weihnachtsmarkt (December) a. Along US-40 between Musing Street and Starter Street. b. Wayburn Pocket Park serves as the kids area. i. Town Christmas tree is in Wayburn Pocket Park 2. Cumberland Arts Festival (August) a. Down Saturn Street and into the field behind Honors Park b. Program run by local church, supported by Town 3. Brews, Blues, and BBQ (June-Sept) a. Four to five events b. Saturn Street at Honors, in alley 4. National Night Out (August) a. Run by Police Departments b. Streets and parks garage 5. Honors Park Ceremony (October) a. Honors Park, not every year 6. Farmers Market (April-Nov) a. Independently offered at Town Hall, spring through November. 626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

194

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

MEETING MINUTES ii. Past Events 1. Family Fun Day (spring) a. Hasn’t been done in a while, for political reasons. b. Used to be held in National Road Park; never a huge event c. Local, low-income families really appreciated it. d. Picnic stuff, games, etc. e. Usually offered in May/June 2. Informal pop-up cook outs. c. Locations/Hubs i. Primary 1. Events hub at Lions Park ii. Supporting 1. Saturn Street Alley 2. National Road Park 3. Honors Park 4. Wayburn Pocket Park d. Funding i. 2019 budget is first to have separate budget ii. Events are one of the largest costs – Avg. $60K annually 1. Comes out of General Fund 2. $100k capital program does not include programming. iii. Trying to offset costs through the sale of t-shirts, etc. e. Vision i. The value of programs and events offered should offset their cost. ii. Need quality events that attract quality sponsors. iii. Gap is in event offerings for youth iv. New Events 1. Desire for more kid-friendly events 2. Fall Event? a. Fall Family Festival b. Lots of preparation and other staff duties in the fall i. May need to outsource some prep? 3. Spring Event? a. Spring Fling at National Road Park i. Find event sponsor – new tire shop? ii. Road (tire) themed event.

626 N. Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204 | 317.635.5030 | www.bdmd.com

195

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016 Park Name:

TOTAL SCORE:

Classification: % Programmed: Adjacent Land-Uses/Proximities: Residential – SF Residential – MF Commercial – Retail Commercial – Office Commercial – Mixed-Use

Transit Civic Schools/Educational Industrial Natural Areas

Agricultural Water Body Trails/Greenways

Football Field Gymnasium Multi-purpose Field Multi-Purpose Room Parking (Paved/Unpaved) Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Pool – Outdoor Pool - Indoor

Recreation Ctr. Restrooms Skate Park Soccer Field Softball Diamond Tennis Court Track and Field Facility Trail – Multi-use (paved) Trail - Nature (unpaved) Other__________________

Park Components: Baseball Diamond Basketball Court Boardwalk Boat Ramp Canoe/Kayak Community Ctr. Community Garden Dog Park Exercise/Walking Path Fishing Pier/Dock

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary of Observations: Economic Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Partnership Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Environmental Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Page 1 of 6 PAGE TOTAL:________ 196

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

1: ACCESS + LINKAGES Visibility from a Distance (“eyes on the park”) (1 being poor visibility to the interior of the park from the surrounding properties/streets due to man-made structures or natural feature that obstruct views versus 5 being able to clearly see into the park from the surrounding neighborhood/roadways) 1

Ease in Walking/Biking to the Park (1 being poor access to the park from the surrounding neighborhood due to disconnected sidewalks, lack of shade trees, unmarked pedestrian street crossings on fast/wide streets, and single sided park frontage onto the street versus 5 being ADA accessible access on wide shaded sidewalks/trails that lead to the park, pedestrian-timed street crossings on narrow streets that lead to an interconnected park sidewalk network, multiple side of the park face the street) 1

Ease in Walking/Biking Within the Park (1 being a lack of efficient, accessible, and well-maintained circulation routes – such as sidewalks, paths, and trails within the park sufficient to move users between the major areas of the park versus 5 being the presence of efficient, accessible, and well-maintained circulation routes within a park that get users to where they need to go and/or where they want to be). 1

Clarity of Wayfinding (1 being the presence of gateway signage and/or minimal regulatory signage versus 5 being a hierarchy of signage reflective of the program of the park (gateway, location map, identification, regulatory, directional, educational, interpretative etc.) that is clear, legible, accessible and well-maintained. 1

Universal Design (ADA compliance) (1 being the park presents many barriers to accessibility due to a lack of appropriate ramps, equitable distribution of facilities, level paving, etc. and does not appear to easily/equitably usable by someone with special needs versus 5 being the majority of the park shows evidence that it is intent is to be accessible and would allow equitable use of people with a wide range of needs/abilities) 1

Page 2 of 6 PAGE TOTAL:________ 197

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

2. COMFORT & IMAGE Overall Attractiveness (1 being a park that is perceived to be uninviting, unsafe, outdated/irrelevant, abandoned, dilapidated, and/or unmaintained, versus 5 being a park that is perceived to be inviting, safe, impeccably maintained, and provides appropriate/relevant site features that contribute to the overall positive aesthetic of the park) 1

Perception of Safety (1 being surroundings that evoke a feeling of danger due to the obstruction of natural surveillance and eyes on the park, extreme pedestrian access control (high fences, single access point), lack of or inappropriate lighting, lack of a sense of ownership, and limited to no protection from the elements versus 5 being surroundings that evoke a feeling of safety and security through the promotion of eyes on the park, appropriate lighting, selectively placed entry and exit points, short and least sight-limiting fencing, well maintained spaces) 1

Quality of Maintenance (1 being unclean, damaged, and/or vandalized structures, recreational facilities, pavements, furnishings, and other hardscapes, dying, damaged and unmaintained landscaping, and the presence of litter, versus 5 impeccably maintained structures, recreational facilities, pavements, furnishings and other hardscapes; healthy, vibrant, and well maintained landscaping, and little to no litter) 1

Comfort and Variety of Places to Sit (1 being limited, uninviting, inflexible, damaged, dirty, and sensorially unpleasant seating areas versus 5 being a variety and appropriate quantity of inviting, neat, clean, and sensorially pleasant seating areas, including those which are movable/flexible) 1

Evidence of Design Standards (1 being a clear lack of best-practice design standards, resulting in a park which appears to have been piecemealed together over time versus 5 being clear evidence of quality planning and design standards and practices in place, resulting in a cohesive, attractive, and functional site whoâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s design aesthetic is appropriate for the context and program of the park). 1

Page 3 of 6 PAGE TOTAL:________ 198

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

3. USES, ACTIVITIES, AND SOCIABILITY Mix of Uses (Power of Ten) (1 being single use park that can only be used in specific weather conditions versus, with limited modern upgrades versus 5 being a park that offers low/no cost activities for a variety of users (children, adults, and elderly) at all times during the day, and incorporates new park features such as wireless internet and cafes) 1

Activation (1 being a few people using the park at limited time periods throughout the day versus 5 being a large variety of people of different age groups, ethnic backgrounds, and abilities using the park throughout the day) 1

Distribution of Activity (1 consistent activity at the park is relegated to one – or a few – areas/facilities, leaving a large portion of the park underutilized versus 5 being consistent activity which is evenly distributed, geographically, throughout the park site). 1

Programming Flexibility (1 being inflexible limited use due to topography, size, access, physical limitations, and single season versus 5 being most flexible, large range of options due to support system, shelter and water etc. for multi uses, flexible topography, open space) 1

Integration of Technology (1 being a lack of integrated or embraced “technology” in the park versus 5 being the intentional and meaningful integration of technology such as Wi-Fi, VR, geotagging, QR codes, charging stations, dedicated “hashtags,” real-time maintenance reporting, etc.) 1

Page 4 of 6 PAGE TOTAL:________ 199

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

4. SUSTAINABILITY Stormwater Management (1 being a drainage system that discharges the majority of the stormwater from the site without any intermediate detention or treatment, and/or has large amount of impervious surfaces versus 5 being a system that successfully incorporates features or systems which capture, hold, treat as much water on site as feasible through the use of retention/detention basins, bio-swales, wetlands, pervious paving, green roofs, and the like) 1

Multimodal Capacity (1 being a park that is only accessible by car and/or a transit stop located more than ½ mile from the park site, and provides limited or no alternative transportation infrastructure versus 5 being a park which can be easily accessed by car, mass transit (within ½ mile), on-foot, and bike (via bike lane/trail), and provides infrastructure which supports/encourages the use of multiple modes of transport (bicycle racks/lockers, transit shelters, EV charging stations and/or spaces, etc.) 1

Sustainable Site Maintenance Practices (1 being a site which requires a level of maintenance that is greater than the “value” provided by the site to the community versus, 5 being a site where sustainable maintenance practices are in place, appropriate for the scale and program of the site, incorporating components and practices such as gray-water irrigation, no-mow areas, naturalized/native plantings, fuel efficient vehicles/equipment, on-site recycling/composting of waste, etc.)

Resource Management (1 being no evidence of energy efficient appliances/lighting/ building fixtures, and/or a clear lack of an on-site materials recycling effort, a predominance of high maintenance, non-native landscaping, use of non-renewable resources versus 5 being evidence of the incorporation of EE light fixtures/bulbs/appliances (where applicable), low-impact site development, alterative energy generation, embracing of on-site materials recycling, use of recycled/renewable construction materials, native landscape planting) 1

Healthy Lifestyles (To what degree does the park promote health and wellness through opportunities for walking, biking, running, skating, and/or health and wellness programs such as fitness testing/community gardens, healthy cooking classes, immunizations, health provider referrals, and partnerships with schools/hospitals/health departments to help them achieve similar health-related missions? 1 being no obvious promotion versus 5 being a clear promotion with/ supporting facilities/programs/advertisement) 1

Page 5 of 6 PAGE TOTAL:________ 200

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

RESIDENT/USER QUESTIONS Frequency of neighborhood/ community events/activities

Who is using the park?

Does the park meet the specific needs of the surrounding community?

How many different types of activities are occurring?

Which parts of the space are used and which are not?

What do you see as areas for improvement within this park?

GENERAL COMMENTS __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 6 PAGE TOTAL:________ 201

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

fitment

Engineman

TRAIL OPEN

202

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016 Park Name:

HONORSPAR

TOTAL SCORE:

Classification:

% Programmed:

2090

Adjacent Land-Uses/Proximities: Residential – SF Residential – MF Commercial – Retail Commercial – Office Commercial – Mixed-Use

an inn

Transit Civic Schools/Educational Industrial Natural Areas

Agricultural Water Body Trails/Greenways

Football Field Gymnasium Multi-purpose Field Multi-Purpose Room Parking (Paved/Unpaved) Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Pool – Outdoor Pool - Indoor

Recreation Ctr. Restrooms Skate Park Soccer Field Softball Diamond Tennis Court Track and Field Facility Trail – Multi-use (paved) Trail - Nature (unpaved) Other__________________

Park Components: Baseball Diamond Basketball Court Smith Boardwalk Boat Ramp Canoe/Kayak Community Ctr. Community Garden Dog Park Exercise/Walking Path Fishing Pier/Dock

GRIN MONUMENT TIME capsule

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Partnership Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Environmental Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Page 1 of 6

203

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 2 of 6

204

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

Page 3 of 6

205

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 4 of 6

206

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 5 of 6

207

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

RESIDENT/USER QUESTIONS Frequency of neighborhood/ community events/activities

Who is using the park?

Does the park meet the specific needs of the surrounding community?

How many different types of activities are occurring?

Which parts of the space are used and which are not?

What do you see as areas for improvement within this park?

208

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

209

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016 Park Name:

NATIONAL ROAD PARK

TOTAL SCORE:

Classification: % Programmed:

3090

Adjacent Land-Uses/Proximities: Residential – SF Residential – MF Commercial – Retail Commercial – Office Commercial – Mixed-Use

Transit Civic Schools/Educational Industrial Natural Areas

Agricultural Water Body Trails/Greenways

Football Field Gymnasium Multi-purpose Field Multi-Purpose Room Parking (Paved/Unpaved) Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Pool – Outdoor Pool - Indoor

Recreation Ctr. Restrooms Skate Park Soccer Field Softball Diamond Tennis Court Track and Field Facility Trail – Multi-use (paved) Trail - Nature (unpaved) Other__________________

townAnn

Park Components: Baseball Diamond Basketball Court SMM Boardwalk Boat Ramp Canoe/Kayak Community Ctr. Community Garden Dog Park Exercise/Walking Path Fishing Pier/Dock

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Partnership Opportunities List Opportunities:

Environmental Opportunities List Opportunities:

low opportunity / potential / high potential

APARTMENTS METER RETAIL Bv NESSES low opportunity / potential / high potential

storm WARD

Page 1 of 6

210

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 2 of 6

211

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

Page 3 of 6

212

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 4 of 6

213

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 5 of 6

214

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

RESIDENT/USER QUESTIONS Frequency of neighborhood/ community events/activities

Who is using the park?

Does the park meet the specific needs of the surrounding community?

How many different types of activities are occurring?

Which parts of the space are used and which are not?

What do you see as areas for improvement within this park?

215

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

NAT

SIBIU NOW

216

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016 Park Name:

TOTAL SCORE:

Classification: % Programmed: Adjacent Land-Uses/Proximities: Residential – SF Residential – MF Commercial – Retail Commercial – Office Commercial – Mixed-Use

Transit Civic Schools/Educational Industrial Natural Areas

Agricultural Water Body Trails/Greenways

Football Field Gymnasium Multi-purpose Field Multi-Purpose Room Parking (Paved/Unpaved) Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Pool – Outdoor Pool - Indoor

Recreation Ctr. Restrooms Skate Park Soccer Field Softball Diamond Tennis Court Track and Field Facility Trail – Multi-use (paved) Trail - Nature (unpaved) Other__________________

Park Components: Baseball Diamond Basketball Court Boardwalk Boat Ramp Canoe/Kayak Community Ctr. Community Garden Dog Park Exercise/Walking Path Fishing Pier/Dock

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Partnership Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Environmental Opportunities List Opportunities:

low opportunity / potential / high potential

ONEEK troop p Page 1 of 6

217

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 2 of 6

218

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

Page 3 of 6

219

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 4 of 6

220

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 5 of 6

221

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

RESIDENT/USER QUESTIONS Frequency of neighborhood/ community events/activities

Who is using the park?

Does the park meet the specific needs of the surrounding community?

How many different types of activities are occurring?

Which parts of the space are used and which are not?

What do you see as areas for improvement within this park?

222

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

223

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016 Park Name:

TOTAL SCORE:

Classification: % Programmed: Adjacent Land-Uses/Proximities: Residential – SF Residential – MF Commercial – Retail Commercial – Office Commercial – Mixed-Use

Transit Civic Schools/Educational Industrial Natural Areas

Agricultural Water Body Trails/Greenways

Football Field Gymnasium Multi-purpose Field Multi-Purpose Room Parking (Paved/Unpaved) Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Pool – Outdoor Pool - Indoor

Recreation Ctr. Restrooms Skate Park Soccer Field Softball Diamond Tennis Court Track and Field Facility Trail – Multi-use (paved) Trail - Nature (unpaved) Other__________________

Park Components: Baseball Diamond Basketball Court Boardwalk Boat Ramp Canoe/Kayak Community Ctr. Community Garden Dog Park Exercise/Walking Path Fishing Pier/Dock

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Partnership Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Environmental Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Page 1 of 6

224

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 2 of 6

225

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

Page 3 of 6

226

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 4 of 6

227

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 5 of 6

228

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

RESIDENT/USER QUESTIONS Frequency of neighborhood/ community events/activities

Who is using the park?

Does the park meet the specific needs of the surrounding community?

How many different types of activities are occurring?

Which parts of the space are used and which are not?

What do you see as areas for improvement within this park?

229

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016 Park Name:

TOTAL SCORE:

Classification: % Programmed: Adjacent Land-Uses/Proximities: Residential – SF Residential – MF Commercial – Retail Commercial – Office Commercial – Mixed-Use

Transit Civic Schools/Educational Industrial Natural Areas

Agricultural Water Body Trails/Greenways

Football Field Gymnasium Multi-purpose Field Multi-Purpose Room Parking (Paved/Unpaved) Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Pool – Outdoor Pool - Indoor

Recreation Ctr. Restrooms Skate Park Soccer Field Softball Diamond Tennis Court Track and Field Facility Trail – Multi-use (paved) Trail - Nature (unpaved) Other__________________

Park Components: Baseball Diamond Basketball Court Boardwalk Boat Ramp Canoe/Kayak Community Ctr. Community Garden Dog Park Exercise/Walking Path Fishing Pier/Dock

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Partnership Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Environmental Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Page 1 of 6

230

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 2 of 6

231

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

Page 3 of 6

232

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 4 of 6

233

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 5 of 6

234

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

RESIDENT/USER QUESTIONS Frequency of neighborhood/ community events/activities

Who is using the park?

Does the park meet the specific needs of the surrounding community?

How many different types of activities are occurring?

Which parts of the space are used and which are not?

What do you see as areas for improvement within this park?

235

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016 Park Name:

TOTAL SCORE:

Classification: % Programmed: Adjacent Land-Uses/Proximities: Residential – SF Residential – MF Commercial – Retail Commercial – Office Commercial – Mixed-Use

Transit Civic Schools/Educational Industrial Natural Areas

Agricultural Water Body Trails/Greenways

Football Field Gymnasium Multi-purpose Field Multi-Purpose Room Parking (Paved/Unpaved) Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Pool – Outdoor Pool - Indoor

Recreation Ctr. Restrooms Skate Park Soccer Field Softball Diamond Tennis Court Track and Field Facility Trail – Multi-use (paved) Trail - Nature (unpaved) Other__________________

Park Components: Baseball Diamond Basketball Court Boardwalk Boat Ramp Canoe/Kayak Community Ctr. Community Garden Dog Park Exercise/Walking Path Fishing Pier/Dock

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Partnership Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Environmental Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Page 1 of 6

236

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 2 of 6

237

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

Page 3 of 6

238

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 4 of 6

239

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 5 of 6

240

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

RESIDENT/USER QUESTIONS Frequency of neighborhood/ community events/activities

Who is using the park?

Does the park meet the specific needs of the surrounding community?

How many different types of activities are occurring?

Which parts of the space are used and which are not?

What do you see as areas for improvement within this park?

241

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016 Park Name:

TOTAL SCORE:

Classification: % Programmed: Adjacent Land-Uses/Proximities: Residential – SF Residential – MF Commercial – Retail Commercial – Office Commercial – Mixed-Use

Transit Civic Schools/Educational Industrial Natural Areas

Agricultural Water Body Trails/Greenways

Football Field Gymnasium Multi-purpose Field Multi-Purpose Room Parking (Paved/Unpaved) Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Pool – Outdoor Pool - Indoor

Recreation Ctr. Restrooms Skate Park Soccer Field Softball Diamond Tennis Court Track and Field Facility Trail – Multi-use (paved) Trail - Nature (unpaved) Other__________________

Park Components: Baseball Diamond Basketball Court Boardwalk Boat Ramp Canoe/Kayak Community Ctr. Community Garden Dog Park Exercise/Walking Path Fishing Pier/Dock

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Partnership Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Environmental Opportunities

low opportunity / potential / high potential

List Opportunities:

Page 1 of 6

242

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 2 of 6

243

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

Page 3 of 6

244

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 4 of 6

245

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits – September 20, 2016

Page 5 of 6

246

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Town of Cumberland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Site Visits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; September 20, 2016

RESIDENT/USER QUESTIONS Frequency of neighborhood/ community events/activities

Who is using the park?

Does the park meet the specific needs of the surrounding community?

How many different types of activities are occurring?

Which parts of the space are used and which are not?

What do you see as areas for improvement within this park?

247

PAGE TOTAL:________

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Welcome to Our Survey!

Dear Town of Cumberland Resident: Your response to the following survey is extremely important, and confidential! Please complete this survey by March 1, 2018! The Town of Cumberland is conducting a Community Attitude and Interest Survey to establish priorities for the future improvement of parks and recreation facilities, programs and services within the community, therefore, it is very important that you participate. We appreciate your time! We realize that this survey will take approximately 10 minutes to complete, but each question is very important. The time you invest in completing this survey will aid the Town in taking a resident-driven approach to making decisions that will enrich the future of our community and positively affect the lives of its residents. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Ben Lipps in the Cumberland Department of Streets and Parks at (317) 894-6210. The Community Attitude and Interest Survey is a tool that will benefit all residents. Please take this opportunity to let your voice be heard! Tell your friends and family! Anyone can take this survey by visiting the following link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CumberlandParksMP Please copy and paste this link into your email and encourage your friends, family, and colleagues to participate as well! The more people we hear from the better! The survey will also be posted on the project's dedicated website https://www.cumberlandparksmp.com/. Here you will also be able to find information about upcoming meetings and other ways to get involved with the project! Sincerely, Ben Lipps

1 248

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information Town of Cumberland Superintendent of Streets and Parks

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey USAGE of Existing Parks and Facilities

Please tell us about if/how you currently use the parks and recreation facilities in Cumberland. * 1. Overall, how would you rate the physical condition of ALL the Town of Cumberland's parks and recreation facilities that you have visited? Excellent Good Fair Poor I/we do not use/visit Town of Cumberland parks/facilities

2 249

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information * 2. Please CHECK ALL the reasons that PREVENT you or other members of your household from using Town of Cumberland parks and recreation facilities more often. I do not know what is being offered

Parks are too crowded

Too far from residence

Fees are too high

Facility I want/need is not offered

Operating hours are not convenient

I don't feel safe

I/we use facilities in other cities/communities

The quality amenities is poor Facilities are not well maintained

Poor customer service by staff I do not know locations of facilities or what they have to offer

Access to parks and green space is limited; there aren't enough Lack of parking at park facilities No bicycle/walking/multipurpose trails Nothing prevents me from using the Town's parks and recreation facilities more often.

Other (please specify)

* 3. Please indicate if you or any members of your household have used/visited any of the following Town of Cumberland parks, facilities, and trail sites during the past 12 months. Honors Park

Wayburn Pocket Park

Buck Creek Trail

Lions Park

Pennsy Trail

National Road Park

21st Street Trail

z I do not use/visit ANY Town of Cumberland Parks facilities.

* 4. From the following list, please check ALL the Town of Cumberland amenities you or members of your household have used or visited over the past 12 months. Walking and biking trails

Open play areas and greenspace

Tennis courts

Playgrounds

Basketball courts

Natural areas

Picnic shelters

Volleyball courts

Events: Farmers Market/Cumberland Arts Goes to Market/Weihnachtsmarkt z I/we have not used any Town of Cumberland Parks Facilities in the last 12 months.

Other (please specify)

3 250

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information * 5. From the following list, please check the top THREE Town of Cumberland amenities you or members of your household have used or visited most often. Walking and biking trails

Open play areas

Tennis courts

Playgrounds

Basketball courts

Natural areas

Picnic shelters

Volleyball courts

Events: Farmers Market/Cumberland Arts Goes to Market/Weihnachtsmarkt z I do not use any Town of Cumberland Parks Facilities.

Other (please specify)

* 6. Please indicate how often you and members of your household have used each of the following major facilities operated by the Town of Cumberland during the past 12 months by checking the appropriate bubble to the right of each facility. Never

1-9 times

10-24 times

35-49 times

50+ times

Honors Park Lions Park National Road Park Wayburn Pocket Park Pennsy Trail 21st Street Trail Buck Creek Trail

* 7. From the following list, please check ALL the non-Town of Cumberland organizations and facilities that you and members of your household have used for recreation activities during the last 12 months. Please indicate the activities in which you participate. Private schools

Boys & Girls Club

Public schools

Churches/places of worship

Private golf clubs

Homeowners associations/apartment complexes

Youth sports associations/travel sports

Private recreation/fitness centers (YMCA, LA Fitness, etc.) I/we do not use "private" facilities or providers for recreation purposes.

Private dance/gymnastics studios

Please list what activities you participate in. If a facility is missing, please list it here.

4 251

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information * 8. SAFETY. Please indicate how safe you feel within each of the Town's existing parks and recreation facilities N/A - I/we have not used any of these facilities Very safe

Somewhat safe

Neither safe or unsafe

Somewhat unsafe

Very unsafe

within the last 12 months.

Lions Park (301 N Buck Creek Rd.) National Road Park (11510 East Washington St.) Honors Park (corner of Saturn and South Munsie Streets) Wayburn Pocket Park (southern intersection of E. Washington St. and Wayburn St.) Pennsy Trail Buck Creek Trail 21st Street Trail (north side of 21st St. from Hancock/Marion County line to Buck Creek Rd) Comments:

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey FACILITIES and AMENITIES

5 252

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

Please tell us about the greatest priority needs for FACILITIES (courts, fields, indoor centers, etc.) and AMENITIES (restrooms, seating areas, picnic shelters, etc.) in Cumberland * 9. FACILITY NEEDS. Please indicate if YOU or any member of your household HAS A NEED for the parks and recreation facilities listed below. If your household has a need, please indicate how well your need is being met on a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means all of your needs are being met (“100% Met”) and 1 means none of your needs are being met (“0% Met).

(100% Met) 5

(75% Met) 4

(50% Met) 3

(25% Met) 2

(0% Met) 1

I DO NOT have a need for this facility.

Nature trails Bicycle/walking/multipurpose trails Soccer fields Multi-purpose fields/greenspace Baseball and softball diamonds Nature centers Indoor recreation and events centers Kayak and canoe launches Fishing piers Playgrounds Picnic shelters Outdoor amphitheaters Spray/splash pads Indoor pools/water parks Outdoor pools/water parks Outdoor sand volleyball courts Disc golf courses Farmers’ markets Community gardens Golf course Tennis courts

6 253

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information I DO (100% Met)

(75% Met)

(50% Met)

(25% Met)

(0% Met)

NOT have a need for this

facility.

Basketball courts Small neighborhood parks within walking distance Large community parks Dog parks Skate parks Outdoor jogging track Art galleries Pickleball courts Public restrooms within parks Other (please specify)

* 10. Which THREE of the FACILITIES listed below are most important for the Town of Cumberland to provide for your household? Additional neighborhood (small) parks within walking distance

Fishing piers

Golf course

Playgrounds

Tennis courts

Picnic shelters

Basketball courts

Outdoor amphitheaters

Dog parks

Outdoor swimming pools/water parks

Skate parks

Bicycle/walking/multipurpose trails Soccer fields

Spray/splash pads

Multi-purpose fields/greenspace

Outdoor sand volleyball courts

Baseball and softball diamonds

Disc golf courses

Nature centers

Farmersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; markets

Kayak and canoe launches

Community gardens

Additional community (large) parks Nature parks and/or natural areas Nature trails (soft surface)

Outdoor jogging track Art Galleries Pickleball courts

Other (please specify)

7 254

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey PROGRAMS and EVENTS

* 11. PROGRAM and EVENT NEEDS. Please indicate if YOU or any member of your HOUSEHOLD has a need for each of the programs or events listed below. Please check all that apply. Adult art, music, dance, or theater

Camps

Adult fitness classes

Community gardening

Youth athletic programs/sports

Community special events

leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.)

(festivals, gatherings, celebrations, etc.)

Adult athletic programs/sports

Enrichment classes (sewing,

leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.)

cooking, etc.)

Adult fitness programs Youth fitness programs After school programs Birthday parties

Fishing and boating programs History programs Nature programs/environmental education

Programs/events for pets and owners Swim lessons Volunteer opportunities Wellness/health screenings Youth art, music, dance, or theater classes Youth fitness classes Youths sports leagues I/we do not have a need for any recreation PROGRAMS or EVENTS

Programs/events for people with special needs

Other (please specify)

8 255

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information * 12. Which THREE of the PROGRAMS from the list below are MOST IMPORTANT for the Town of Cumberland to provide for your household? Adult art, music, dance, or theater

Camps

Adult fitness classes

Community gardening

Youth athletic programs/sports

Community special events

leagues (soccer, football,

(festivals, gatherings, celebrations,

basketball, etc.)

etc.)

Adult athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football,

Enrichment classes (sewing, cooking, etc.)

basketball, etc.)

Programs/events for pets and owners Swim lessons

Wellness/health screenings Youth art, music, dance, or theater classes

Fishing and boating programs

Adult fitness programs

Youth fitness classes

History programs

Youth fitness programs

Volunteer opportunities

After school programs

Nature programs/environmental education

Birthday parties

Programs/events for people with

Youths sports leagues

special needs Other (please specify)

13. How would you rate the Town's existing special events and programs? N/A - I/We have Very Poor

Poor

Neither good nor poor

Good

Excellent

not participated in this event

Blues, Beer, and BBQ Summer Concert Series Cumberland Arts Goes to Market Cumberland Weihnachtsmarkt (holiday celebration) Cumberland Farmers Market National Night Out

9 256

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Community Priorities

Please tell us about how you would prioritize actions, improvements, and investment with regard to the parks and recreation system in Cumberland. * 14. Following are major actions that the Town of Cumberland could take to improve parks, recreation, and services to its citizens. Please indicate how supportive, or not supportive, you would be of each action. Very Supportive

Somewhat Supportive

Not Sure

Not Supportive

Acquire more open space for PASSIVE activities (trails, picnicking, etc.) Acquire more open space for PROGRAMMED activities (soccer, baseball, etc.) Upgrade/improve EXISTING parks Upgrade/improve EXISTING walking/biking trails Develop/build NEW walking/biking trails Develop/build NEW athletic fields/courts Develop/build NEW dog park Develop/build NEW special events rental facilities Develop/build NEW indoor community center/civic center Other (please specify)

10 257

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information 15. Please rank the following actions in terms of importance with regard to spending and investment, with "1" representing the most important action and "5" representing an action of lower importance.

Note: Each action must have a unique ranking (e.g. no two actions can be ranked the same number; each number 1-5 must be used only once). Improvements/maintenance of existing parks, trails and recreation facilities. Acquisition of new park land and open space Construction of new sports fields (softball, soccer, baseball, etc.) Development of additional walking and biking trails Construction of a new multi-use community center

* 16. If a bond referendum was held to specifically fund much needed improvements to - or expansion of - the Town's parks, recreation, and trails system, how likely would you be to support it? Will vote in favor Might vote in favor Not sure Might vote against Will vote against Comments

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Basic Demographic Data

11 258

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

This information allows us to compare the responses from this survey to other analytical techniques utilized in the planning process. Your individual responses are appreciated and will remain strictly confidential! * 17. Please check ALL the ways you learn about Town of Cumberland programs and activities. Parks and Recreation program & events guide (hard copy) Town of Cumberland Web site Cumberland Connected App

Local TV

Town e-mail bulletins

Flyers/posters at Town Facilities

Conversations with Town staff

Utility bills or mail bulletins

Town of Cumberland Facebook page

From friends and neighbors

Newspaper articles/advertisements

Flyers distributed at school

Radio

Are there other methods of outreach you would prefer? If so, please let us know!

* 18. Please indicate the MAXIMUM distance you would be willing to travel to visit a park/facility/program for each of the modes of transportation. Less than 1/2 mi.

1/2 mi. - 1 mi.

1 mi - 2 mi.

2 mi - 3 mi.

3 mi - 5 mi.

5 mi. +

Would not use.

Walking/running Riding a bike Driving in a car Taking a bus

* 19. Your Gender: Male Female

* 20. What is your household income? Under $25,000

$50,000-$74,999

$25,000-$49,999

$75,000-$99,999

$100,000 or more

* 21. Are you or members of your household of Hispanic or Latin ancestry? Yes No

12 259

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information * 22. Check ALL of the following that describes your race/ethnicity. (Check all that apply) African American/Black Asian

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander

Native American

White/Caucasian Other (please specify)

* 23. Counting yourself, how many people are in your household? 1 2 3 4 5 or more

* 24. How many people in your household are 14 years old or younger? 0 1 2 3 4 5 or more

* 25. Please indicate the location of your primary residence (where you receive your mail) Town of Cumberland, Ind. Indianapolis, Ind. Greenfield, Ind. Unincorporated Hancock County Mt. Comfort, Ind. Spring Lake, Ind. Philadelphia, Ind. Other (please specify)

13 260

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

* 26. What is your age? Under age 5

20-24 years old

55-64 years old

5-9 years old

25-34 years old

65-74 years old

10-14 years old

35-44 years old

75-84 years old

15-19 years old

45-54 years old

85 + years old

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Questions and/or Comments?

27. Please share any additional comments that could assist the Town of Cumberland in improving parks, trails, open space, or recreational facilities and services in the space provided below.

Thank you for completing this survey! Please click the "done" button at the bottom of this page to submit your results . Please visit the project's website at https://www.cumberlandparksmp.com/ to get updates on the overall planning process and ways to get engaged!

14 261

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q1 Overall, how would you rate the physical condition of ALL the Town of Cumberland's parks and recreation facilities that you have visited? Answered: 229

Skipped: -1

Fair

Good

Poor

I/we do not use/visit To...

Excellent

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Fair

38.43%

Good

36.68%

Poor

10.92%

I/we do not use/visit Town of Cumberland parks/facilities

10.92%

Excellent

3.06%

TOTAL

229

1 / 64 262

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q2 Please CHECK ALL the reasons that PREVENT you or other members of your household from using Town of Cumberland parks and recreation facilities more often. Answered: 229

2 / 64 263

Skipped: -1

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey I do not know what is bein... I don't feel safe I do not know locations of... The quality amenities is... Nothing prevents me... Facilities are not well... Access to parks and gr... I/we use facilities i... Facility I want/need is... Other (please specify) Lack of parking at p... No bicycle/walk... Too far from residence Parks are too crowded Operating hours are no... Fees are too high Poor customer service by... 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

I do not know what is being offered

37.55%

31.00%

27.51%

I don't feel safe I do not know locations of facilities or what they have to offer

3 / 64 264

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey The quality amenities is poor

21.83%

Nothing prevents me from using the Town's parks and recreation facilities more often.

18.78%

Facilities are not well maintained

16.59%

Access to parks and green space is limited; there aren't enough

12.23%

I/we use facilities in other cities/communities

11.35%

Facility I want/need is not offered

9.61%

Other (please specify)

9.61%

Lack of parking at park facilities

7.42%

No bicycle/walking/multipurpose trails

6.11%

Too far from residence

3.49%

Parks are too crowded

1.31%

Operating hours are not convenient

0.87%

Fees are too high

0.44%

Poor customer service by staff

0.44%

Total Respondents: 229 #

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

play equipment is outdated and not inclusive, court surfaces are in disrepair,

4/18/2018 11:21 AM

New trails are flooded and unusable

2/25/2018 6:29 PM

No splash pad for kids I do to my disability that kids playground is way way way in the back and a long walk

2/24/2018 10:35 AM

I am disabled and use a power chair to get around so anything to make that better within the parks and recreations will be ideal

2/22/2018 3:43 AM

Don't have need for many of the facilities

2/21/2018 8:42 AM

Where is it?

2/17/2018 10:26 PM

Other IndyParks options are better. Cumberland shouldnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t be in the parks business. These are unnecessary expenditures.

2/16/2018 12:30 PM

Lions park is always poorly maintained

2/16/2018 8:51 AM

Moved here in late Fall and havenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t explored parks due to cold weather.

2/15/2018 8:21 PM

Poor lighting of outdoor facilities

2/15/2018 7:55 PM

Lions Park, tennis court needs repaired, always glass on it. The net was not up last year until later than could of been.

2/15/2018 3:11 PM

Large groups of non-english speaking people overwhelmn the park and make parking or using any of the amenities impossible, and the level of feeling safe diminishes

2/12/2018 7:19 PM

No dog area

2/12/2018 2:16 PM

Pretty old, so stick closer to home now.

2/11/2018 5:20 PM

The only park I know of is very small and rundown. I do use the walking path though. It is very nice. I feel safe and I enjoy it.

2/10/2018 12:54 PM

4 / 64 265

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 16

Pennsy trail is poor. The bushes along each side are great places for criminals to launch an attack. We just don't feel safe. Cut out most of the bushes and it won't feel like we are walking/biking through a tunnel. Lions Park is totally unacceptable. It is a dump. Based upon what I have seen of these two parks, I have no interest in using them. As for the new trail along Buck Creek, we refuse to be a part of the community that does use it. I was totally against it, but found out too late before construction started. What a waste of our tax dollars!!! And, worse yet, the town received federal dollars to build it. NEVER take money from the feds - Cumberlan is now enslaved to them. It was an extremely poor decision!!! You want honesty, well, you got it!

2/10/2018 12:53 PM

Needles, condoms, thugs

2/8/2018 10:13 PM

Lionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Park is so isolated. In theory, that would be nice to have the country park right in town but I have seen syringes there in the past and people in cars that made me feel uncomfortable. I donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t even want to have a little picnic there anymore. And it NEEDS gardens of perennials. It is not aesthetically pleasing though the trees are nice.

2/8/2018 9:50 PM

Please promote the Pennsy Trail more. Can we extend the trail further East? Love the trail!

2/8/2018 7:13 PM

2/8/2018 6:47 PM

No bathroom facilities

2/8/2018 5:52 PM

Would love to have a city swimming pool.

2/8/2018 2:31 PM

5 / 64 266

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q3 Please indicate if you or any members of your household have used/visited any of the following Town of Cumberland parks, facilities, and trail sites during the past 12 months. Answered: 229

Skipped: -1

Pennsy Trail

Lions Park Buck Creek Trail

Honors Park 21st Street Trail z I do not use/visit AN... National Road Park Wayburn Pocket Park 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Pennsy Trail

65.50%

150

Lions Park

44.10%

101

Buck Creek Trail

31.44%

Honors Park

15.72%

21st Street Trail

14.85%

z I do not use/visit ANY Town of Cumberland Parks facilities.

12.66%

National Road Park

11.79%

Wayburn Pocket Park

6.99%

Total Respondents: 229

6 / 64 267

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q4 From the following list, please check ALL the Town of Cumberland amenities you or members of your household have used or visited over the past 12 months. Answered: 229

Skipped: -1

Events: Farmers... Walking and biking trails

Playgrounds

Natural areas Open play areas and...

Picnic shelters z I/we have not used any... Basketball courts

Tennis courts

Other (please specify) Volleyball courts 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Events: Farmers Market/Cumberland Arts Goes to Market/Weihnachtsmarkt

63.32%

145

Walking and biking trails

59.83%

137

Playgrounds

30.57%

Natural areas

17.03%

Open play areas and greenspace

16.59%

Picnic shelters

11.35%

z I/we have not used any Town of Cumberland Parks Facilities in the last 12 months.

9.17%

Basketball courts

6.99%

7 / 64 268

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Tennis courts

3.93%

Other (please specify)

3.49%

Volleyball courts

0.44%

Total Respondents: 229 #

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

We haven't used any because there aren't enough trails for walking or biking.

2/24/2018 10:57 AM

Baseball fields

2/18/2018 7:41 PM

Blues & Barb-Q / Get more of these shows

2/16/2018 5:58 AM

parking is so limited in Cumberland...it makes it a challenge for people

2/12/2018 1:02 PM

You need to include post road park off Post

2/11/2018 11:13 AM

Use pensy

2/11/2018 10:43 AM

I donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t know where all these other amenities are.

2/10/2018 12:54 PM

Open area east of garage to fly my RC Planes

2/10/2018 12:06 PM

8 / 64 269

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q5 From the following list, please check the top THREE Town of Cumberland amenities you or members of your household have used or visited most often. Answered: 229

Skipped: -1

Walking and biking trails Events: Farmers...

Playgrounds

Natural areas z I do not use any Town of...

Open play areas Other (please specify)

Picnic shelters Basketball courts

Tennis courts Volleyball courts 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Walking and biking trails

73.36%

168

Events: Farmers Market/Cumberland Arts Goes to Market/Weihnachtsmarkt

73.36%

168

Playgrounds

40.17%

Natural areas

37.99%

z I do not use any Town of Cumberland Parks Facilities.

20.52%

Open play areas

16.59%

Other (please specify)

15.28%

Picnic shelters

12.23%

9 / 64 270

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Basketball courts

6.99%

Tennis courts

3.06%

Volleyball courts

0.44%

Total Respondents: 229 #

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

Walking trail is only thing used

2/26/2018 3:45 PM

They are not useable

2/25/2018 6:29 PM

None

2/25/2018 1:00 PM

N/A

2/22/2018 11:31 AM

Bike Trails

2/21/2018 6:05 PM

Three selections is not always possible

2/21/2018 9:22 AM

ONLY farmer's market

2/21/2018 2:10 AM

Baseball fields

2/18/2018 7:41 PM

I've only used the 2. The fact this won't let me only enter 2.

2/18/2018 5:01 PM

I haven’t used any

2/18/2018 9:49 AM

Why force me to choose 3 when it’s only 2?

2/17/2018 11:50 AM

Only walking trails

2/16/2018 7:09 PM

Pocket park

2/16/2018 2:26 PM

You made me pick three. So I just checked the last two, so I could move on. It’s a question that makes the survey faulty if people have only 1 or 2 to check. This should be edited for an accurate survey.

2/16/2018 12:30 PM

Music Festivals

2/16/2018 5:58 AM

Sorry

2/15/2018 10:17 PM

Error in survey. Prompted me to select three.

2/15/2018 8:27 PM

no additional items than items selected

2/15/2018 7:28 PM

This question has a glitch. I can't select 3 of I haven't used any.

2/15/2018 7:25 PM

Haven't visited three amentities. Only use of the trails.

2/14/2018 12:45 PM

2/13/2018 12:54 PM

The survey will not allow me to continue without picking 3, so...

2/13/2018 8:53 AM

No other

2/12/2018 10:41 PM

No others

2/12/2018 9:12 PM

None!!! How can we list 3?

2/11/2018 5:20 PM

Pensy

2/11/2018 10:43 AM

Only used the trails

2/11/2018 10:16 AM

How many times are you going to ask the same question?

2/10/2018 12:53 PM

Only Farmers Market

2/10/2018 12:09 PM

RC flying area

2/10/2018 12:06 PM

Not provided dates and times

2/10/2018 12:01 PM

Not familiar with what’s available other than the Pennsy Trail & Buck Creek Trail.

2/8/2018 7:13 PM

none

2/8/2018 6:09 PM

10 / 64 271

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 34

We only use the two that are marked!

2/8/2018 5:29 PM

No others

2/8/2018 2:04 PM

11 / 64 272

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q6 Please indicate how often you and members of your household have used each of the following major facilities operated by the Town of Cumberland during the past 12 months by checking the appropriate bubble to the right of each facility. Answered: 229

Honors Park

Lions Park

National Road Park

12 / 64 273

Skipped: -1

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Wayburn Pocket Park

Pennsy Trail

21st Street Trail

Buck Creek Trail

10%

Never NEVER

20%

30%

1-9 times 1-9 TIMES

40%

50%

10-24 times 10-24 TIMES

13 / 64 274

60%

70%

35-49 times

80%

90% 100%

50+ times

35-49 TIMES

50+ TIMES

TOTAL

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Honors Park Lions Park National Road Park Wayburn Pocket Park Pennsy Trail 21st Street Trail Buck Creek Trail

78.17% 179

19.21% 44

1.75% 4

0.44% 1

229

46.72% 107

44.54% 102

7.86% 18

0.87% 2

0.00% 0

229

81.22% 186

17.03% 39

1.75% 4

0.00% 0

229

89.96% 206

9.17% 21

0.87% 2

0.00% 0

229

26.20% 60

43.23% 99

18.78% 43

4.37% 10

7.42% 17

229

78.60% 180

14.41% 33

4.80% 11

0.44% 1

1.75% 4

229

62.01% 142

27.95% 64

6.55% 15

2.18% 5

1.31% 3

229

14 / 64 275

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q7 From the following list, please check ALL the non-Town of Cumberland organizations and facilities that you and members of your household have used for recreation activities during the last 12 months. Please indicate the activities in which you participate. Answered: 229

Skipped: -1

Churches/places of worship

Public schools I/we do not use "private... Private recreation/f... Youth sports associations... Homeowners associations... Private dance/gymnas... Private golf clubs

Private schools

Boys & Girls Club 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Churches/places of worship

39.30%

Public schools

34.93%

I/we do not use "private" facilities or providers for recreation purposes.

33.19%

Private recreation/fitness centers (YMCA, LA Fitness, etc.)

31.00%

Youth sports associations/travel sports

18.78%

Homeowners associations/apartment complexes

14.85%

Private dance/gymnastics studios

8.73%

Private golf clubs

8.30%

Private schools

4.80%

15 / 64 276

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 2.62%

Boys & Girls Club Total Respondents: 229 #

PLEASE LIST WHAT ACTIVITIES YOU PARTICIPATE IN. IF A FACILITY IS MISSING, PLEASE LIST IT HERE.

DATE

Southeastway Park, Wolf Run Park, West Commons playground Carmel, Riley Park,

4/18/2018 11:21 AM

Splash pad park

2/24/2018 10:35 AM

swim lessons, ninja/gymnastics classes, piano lessons

2/21/2018 10:48 PM

Boy Scouts; Freewheelin' Community Bikes

2/21/2018 6:05 PM

Get Fit Gym

2/21/2018 9:37 AM

State and national parks. Our neighborhood streets.

2/21/2018 9:16 AM

We love Paul Ruster's Dog Park and would love to have a dog park right off of the Buck Creek or Pensy Trail.

2/19/2018 4:07 PM

Running, Bicycling, Golf, Tennis. (I also use public mountain bike trails and other parks such as Turkey Run and Southeastway Park

2/18/2018 5:01 PM

Bingo/Euchre

2/18/2018 1:44 AM

Seroâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s

2/17/2018 11:50 AM

Public golf courses

2/15/2018 8:21 PM

Disc golf.

2/15/2018 2:21 PM

Swimming, soccer, running, walking

2/15/2018 11:42 AM

swimming pools--Raymond Park, SAHM's, and Shelbyville

2/12/2018 2:33 PM

Dog park in New Pal

2/12/2018 2:16 PM

Bowling.

2/11/2018 5:20 PM

Post road park/cricket area has fantastic trails and I feel safe there compared to Pensey trail there are some places on the trail I don't feel safe to be alone at

2/11/2018 11:13 AM

Swimming

2/10/2018 1:24 PM

RC flying

2/10/2018 12:06 PM

City parks like at 40th and Illinois St

2/10/2018 12:45 AM

Private swim lessons

2/9/2018 10:20 PM

State Parks

2/9/2018 12:06 AM

Mountain biking, climbing, tumbling, cheer

2/8/2018 10:13 PM

Swimming pools

2/8/2018 2:31 PM

16 / 64 277

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q8 SAFETY. Please indicate how safe you feel within each of the Town's existing parks and recreation facilities Answered: 229

Skipped: -1

National Road Park (11510... Lions Park (301 N Buck... Wayburn Pocket Park (southe...

Pennsy Trail Buck Creek Trail Honors Park (corner of... 21st Street Trail (north... 0

VERY SAFE

SOMEWHAT SAFE

NEITHER SAFE OR UNSAFE

SOMEWHAT UNSAFE

VERY UNSAFE

N/A - I/WE HAVE NOT USED ANY OF THESE FACILITIES WITHIN THE LAST 12 MONTHS.

TOTAL

WEIGHTED AVERAGE

National Road Park (11510 East Washington St.)

3.06% 7

6.11% 14

6.55% 15

10.04% 23

64.19% 147

229

3.50

Lions Park (301 N Buck Creek Rd.)

9.61% 22

22.27% 51

9.61% 22

14.85% 34

5.24% 12

38.43% 88

229

2.74

Wayburn Pocket Park (southern intersection of E. Washington St. and Wayburn St.)

5.68% 13

4.80% 11

7.42% 17

3.06% 7

2.62% 6

76.42% 175

229

2.67

17.03% 39

35.81% 82

10.04% 23

3.06% 7

24.02% 55

229

2.29

11.35% 26

20.52% 47

4.80% 11

6.55% 15

2.18% 5

54.59% 125

229

2.29

11.35% 26

10.04% 23

5.24% 12

2.62% 6

68.12% 156

229

2.22

Pennsy Trail Buck Creek Trail Honors Park (corner of Saturn and South Munsie Streets)

17 / 64 278

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 21st Street Trail (north side of 21st St. from Hancock/Marion County line to Buck Creek Rd)

11.79% 27

7.42% 17

6.99% 16

2.18% 5

69.43% 159

229

COMMENTS:

DATE

My wife and I are tennis, basketball, and trail people. Please put up the tennis net in Lions Park. And keep basketball goals up to date with nets.

3/11/2018 9:59 AM

I don't know what the na!e of the park was we visited. South of Washington near a church. You need a map of parks to get better info.

2/22/2018 10:18 AM

I didnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t even know there were any trails besides the Pensy

2/21/2018 3:12 PM

We do not use any of these oaks/faculties because in the last when we used them we felt very unsafe

2/19/2018 7:17 PM

21st Street "Trail" is considered a park? It's a glorified sidewalk. I think the description is wrong. It now runs to Buck Creek Trail.

2/18/2018 5:01 PM

unaware of the never used sites

2/17/2018 10:53 AM

Cumberland has become unsafe in past 5 years ??

2/16/2018 9:44 PM

Feel safer if patrolled and cameras available

2/15/2018 7:28 PM

I have not used some of these facilities because I did not know if them.

2/13/2018 12:54 PM

Lions has one way in and out so feel trapped in there.. No security or protection.

2/13/2018 12:04 PM

I didn't know about the 21st Street and Buck Creek Trails until we moved to Valley Brook Farms. Didn't know that Lions Park existed.

2/13/2018 10:51 AM

I would like to see patrols continue on the trail year around

2/12/2018 10:17 PM

I love the walking/biking paths and enjoy the fresh air and nature on the Pensy.

2/12/2018 8:46 PM

We used to go out, but lack of police presence or young people form the govt subsidized living areas overpopulate these areas and carry weapons, cuss and threaten people

2/12/2018 7:19 PM

I never walk the trails alone however this has nothing to do with the location. I would never walk any trail alone.

2/11/2018 9:38 AM

Splash pads and ramps for accessibility are needed. Upgraded playground equipment needed at Nat Rd and Lions

2/10/2018 12:45 AM

Where is the 21st Street trail?? Never heard of it!

2/8/2018 9:50 PM

Keep the trails coming!

2/8/2018 7:13 PM

18 / 64 279

2.20

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q9 FACILITY NEEDS. Please indicate if YOU or any member of your household HAS A NEED for the parks and recreation facilities listed below. If your household has a need, please indicate how well your need is being met on a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means all of your needs are being met (“100% Met”) and 1 means none of your needs are being met (“0% Met). Answered: 203

Skipped: 25

Indoor pools/water...

Outdoor pools/water...

Spray/splash pads

19 / 64 280

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Public restrooms...

Outdoor amphitheaters

Indoor recreation a...

20 / 64 281

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Fishing piers

Art galleries

Kayak and canoe launches

Community gardens

21 / 64 282

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Nature centers

Disc golf courses

Dog parks

22 / 64 283

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Outdoor sand volleyball...

Large community parks

Small neighborhood...

Skate parks

23 / 64 284

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Skate parks

Golf course

Outdoor jogging track

Pickleball courts

24 / 64 285

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Baseball and softball...

Tennis courts

Basketball courts

25 / 64 286

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Nature trails

Soccer fields

Multi-purpose fields/green...

Picnic shelters

26 / 64 287

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Playgrounds

Bicycle/walking /multipurpos...

Farmersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; markets

10%

(100% Met)5 (0% Met)1

20%

30%

(75% Met)4

40%

50%

60%

(50% Met)3

I DO NOT have a need for this facility.

27 / 64 288

70%

80%

(25% Met)2

90% 100%

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey (0% Met)1 (100% MET)5

I DO NOT have a need for this facility. (75% MET)4

(50% MET)3

(25% MET)2

(0% MET)1

I DO NOT HAVE A NEED FOR THIS FACILITY.

TOTAL

1.48% 3

2.46% 5

1.48% 3

3.94% 8

59.11% 120

31.53% 64

203

1.48% 3

1.97% 4

2.96% 6

3.94% 8

59.11% 120

30.54% 62

203

1.48% 3

2.46% 5

1.97% 4

3.45% 7

53.20% 108

37.44% 76

203

3.45% 7

4.43% 9

8.87% 18

23.15% 47

44.33% 90

15.76% 32

203

0.99% 2

2.46% 5

4.93% 10

8.87% 18

41.87% 85

40.89% 83

203

Indoor recreation and events centers

1.48% 3

2.96% 6

6.90% 14

11.33% 23

39.41% 80

37.93% 77

203

Fishing piers

0.99% 2

0.49% 1

3.45% 7

5.91% 12

39.41% 80

49.75% 101

203

0.99% 2

2.96% 6

2.46% 5

3.94% 8

36.95% 75

52.71% 107

203

0.49% 1

0.99% 2

5.42% 11

34.98% 71

57.64% 117

203

2.96% 6

4.93% 10

10.34% 21

34.48% 70

44.33% 90

203

3.45% 7

3.94% 8

10.84% 22

11.33% 23

31.53% 64

38.92% 79

203

0.49% 1

3.94% 8

1.97% 4

29.06% 59

64.04% 130

203

2.46% 5

5.91% 12

7.88% 16

26.60% 54

54.68% 111

203

1.48% 3

2.96% 6

3.45% 7

22.66% 46

67.98% 138

203

8.87% 18

6.90% 14

17.24% 35

18.72% 38

21.18% 43

27.09% 55

203

14.29% 29

8.37% 17

15.27% 31

20.20% 41

17.73% 36

24.14% 49

203

0.99% 2

1.48% 3

2.46% 5

0.99% 2

17.73% 36

76.35% 155

203

1.97% 4

0.99% 2

4.93% 10

3.94% 8

17.24% 35

70.94% 144

203

4.93% 10

3.94% 8

7.88% 16

15.76% 32

62.56% 127

203

0.49% 1

2.46% 5

1.97% 4

14.78% 30

79.80% 162

203

2.46% 5

2.96% 6

6.40% 13

13.30% 27

71.92% 146

203

1.97% 4

2.96% 6

6.90% 14

8.87% 18

8.37% 17

70.94% 144

203

4.43% 9

2.96% 6

6.40% 13

11.82% 24

7.88% 16

66.50% 135

203

Indoor pools/water parks Outdoor pools/water parks Spray/splash pads Public restrooms within parks Outdoor amphitheaters

Art galleries Kayak and canoe launches Community gardens Nature centers Disc golf courses Dog parks Outdoor sand volleyball courts Large community parks Small neighborhood parks within walking distance Skate parks Golf course Outdoor jogging track Pickleball courts Baseball and softball diamonds Tennis courts Basketball courts

28 / 64 289

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Nature trails

21.67% 44

19.21% 39

22.66% 46

13.30% 27

7.39% 15

15.76% 32

203

1.48% 3

0.99% 2

3.94% 8

3.45% 7

7.39% 15

82.76% 168

203

12.81% 26

10.84% 22

14.29% 29

14.78% 30

7.39% 15

39.90% 81

203

8.37% 17

11.33% 23

23.65% 48

21.67% 44

6.90% 14

28.08% 57

203

6.90% 14

16.26% 33

20.69% 42

11.82% 24

4.93% 10

39.41% 80

203

33.00% 67

25.62% 52

19.21% 39

9.85% 20

2.96% 6

9.36% 19

203

23.15% 47

29.56% 60

21.18% 43

12.32% 25

1.48% 3

12.32% 25

203

Soccer fields Multi-purpose fields/greenspace Picnic shelters Playgrounds Bicycle/walking/multipurpose trails Farmersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; markets

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

Would LOVE some horseback riding trails

2/17/2018 11:54 AM

Would love to see Pickleball courts

2/13/2018 1:18 PM

The use of the word, "need" is inappropriate. Too many people don't know the difference between "want" and "need". I don't see anything in this list that can be described as a "need". It would be "nice to have" some of the items, but I don't "need" any of them.

2/11/2018 2:31 PM

RC flying field

2/10/2018 12:09 PM

We do not NEED any of it

2/9/2018 12:20 AM

Please add a year round restroom on the Pennsy Trail.

2/8/2018 7:22 PM

29 / 64 290

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q10 Which THREE of the FACILITIES listed below are most important for the Town of Cumberland to provide for your household? Answered: 203

Skipped: 25

Bicycle/walking /multipurpos... Farmersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; markets Outdoor swimming... Spray/splash pads

Dog parks

Community gardens Nature parks and/or natur... Outdoor amphitheaters

Playgrounds

Additional community... Nature trails (soft surface) Additional neighborhood...

Art Galleries

Kayak and canoe launches Other (please specify)

Picnic shelters

Fishing piers

Disc golf courses

30 / 64 291

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Basketball courts Outdoor jogging track

Nature centers

Multi-purpose fields/green...

Golf course

Baseball and softball... Pickleball courts

Tennis courts

Soccer fields

Skate parks Outdoor sand volleyball... 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Bicycle/walking/multipurpose trails

34.48%

Farmersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; markets

32.02%

Outdoor swimming pools/water parks

23.15%

Spray/splash pads

21.67%

Dog parks

20.20%

Community gardens

14.78%

Nature parks and/or natural areas

13.79%

Outdoor amphitheaters

13.30%

Playgrounds

12.32%

11.33%

Nature trails (soft surface)

11.33%

Additional neighborhood (small) parks within walking distance

10.34%

Art Galleries

9.85%

Additional community (large) parks

31 / 64 292

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Kayak and canoe launches

8.87%

Other (please specify)

8.87%

Picnic shelters

6.40%

Fishing piers

5.91%

Disc golf courses

5.91%

Basketball courts

5.91%

Outdoor jogging track

5.91%

Nature centers

5.42%

Multi-purpose fields/greenspace

4.43%

Golf course

3.94%

Baseball and softball diamonds

3.45%

Pickleball courts

2.96%

Tennis courts

2.46%

Soccer fields

0.49%

Skate parks

0.49%

Outdoor sand volleyball courts

0.00%

Total Respondents: 203 #

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

None of the above. Who's going to take care of this stuff. Cumberland doesn't take good care of what it has now. It won't get used. And is a waste of money.

2/18/2018 5:08 PM

I donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t want to choose any. Again, the survey is faulty by making you choose options you donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t want. The results of the survey will be inaccurate and unreliable. It should be redone.

2/16/2018 12:32 PM

Community Center where children and families can enriched

2/16/2018 9:55 AM

indoor swimming pool

2/12/2018 2:38 PM

Community Center

2/12/2018 2:35 PM

Cumberland needs more small businesses, to bring in more community involvement.iI have had several people speak about more home town feel businesses, like coffee shop,consighnment,boutique,ikce cream shop, internet coffee house...ect

2/12/2018 1:09 PM

Christmas and 4th of July

2/11/2018 1:32 PM

Concert arena

2/11/2018 9:41 AM

Good roads, more businesses

2/10/2018 8:59 PM

RC flying field - add a small gravel parking area next to the field east of the garage - great area for park flyers

2/10/2018 12:09 PM

But only if the Town does not "steal" people's land to do it

2/9/2018 12:20 AM

Mountain bike trails

2/8/2018 10:15 PM

Cumberland needs a community event building- ideally built behind/to the east of the Town Hall.

2/8/2018 10:00 PM

A community room would be appreciated!

2/8/2018 9:57 PM

Year round restroom on the trail

2/8/2018 7:22 PM

Event parking

2/8/2018 5:31 PM

32 / 64 293

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 17

A nice large public lake

2/8/2018 3:53 PM

I would love to see something like the strip in Irvington with jockamos, black acre, ice cream, legends... something that will draw people into Cumberland!

2/8/2018 2:31 PM

33 / 64 294

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q11 PROGRAM and EVENT NEEDS. Please indicate if YOU or any member of your HOUSEHOLD has a need for each of the programs or events listed below. Please check all that apply. Answered: 198

Skipped: 30

Community special even... Adult fitness classes Adult art, music, dance... Adult fitness programs Volunteer opportunities

Swim lessons Enrichment classes... Community gardening Nature programs/env... Programs/events for pets and... Youth art, music, dance... Wellness/health screenings Fishing and boating... Youth athletic programs/spo... History programs After school programs Adult athletic programs/spo... Youths sports leagues

34 / 64 295

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey leagues

Camps

Birthday parties Youth fitness programs Youth fitness classes I/we do not have a need ... Programs/events for people w... Other (please specify) 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Community special events (festivals, gatherings, celebrations, etc.)

49.49%

Adult fitness classes

47.47%

Adult art, music, dance, or theater

37.88%

Adult fitness programs

36.87%

Volunteer opportunities

29.29%

Swim lessons

27.27%

Enrichment classes (sewing, cooking, etc.)

25.25%

Community gardening

24.75%

Nature programs/environmental education

23.74%

Programs/events for pets and owners

23.23%

Youth art, music, dance, or theater classes

21.21%

Wellness/health screenings

19.70%

Fishing and boating programs

19.19%

Youth athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.)

17.17%

History programs

17.17%

After school programs

16.67%

Adult athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.)

16.16%

Youths sports leagues

16.16%

Camps

15.15%

35 / 64 296

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Birthday parties

14.65%

Youth fitness programs

14.14%

Youth fitness classes

13.64%

I/we do not have a need for any recreation PROGRAMS or EVENTS

10.10%

Programs/events for people with special needs

9.09%

Other (please specify)

3.54%

Total Respondents: 198 #

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

These are definitely not "needed". These are luxuries. These are already available nearby. No reason to waste money recreating the wheel.

2/18/2018 5:14 PM

Horseback riding trails or arena

2/17/2018 11:56 AM

fitness for senior citizens

2/17/2018 11:00 AM

Community center

2/15/2018 3:22 PM

Community center

2/12/2018 2:39 PM

RC Flying field

2/10/2018 12:12 PM

Walking and/or running club! Meet daily/weekly on the trail! This would be great! How can we get this going?

2/8/2018 7:28 PM

36 / 64 297

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q12 Which THREE of the PROGRAMS from the list below are MOST IMPORTANT for the Town of Cumberland to provide for your household? Answered: 198

Skipped: 30

Community special even... Adult fitness classes Adult art, music, dance... Community gardening Adult fitness programs Nature programs/env... Enrichment classes... Youth athletic programs/spo... Volunteer opportunities Youth art, music, dance... Programs/events for pets and... Fishing and boating...

Swim lessons

Wellness/health screenings Birthday parties After school programs History programs Other (please specify)

37 / 64 298

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Adult athletic programs/spo... Youth fitness programs Youths sports leagues Youth fitness classes

Camps

Programs/events for people w... 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Community special events (festivals, gatherings, celebrations, etc.)

46.46%

Adult fitness classes

29.29%

Adult art, music, dance, or theater

21.72%

Community gardening

19.19%

Adult fitness programs

18.69%

Nature programs/environmental education

18.18%

Enrichment classes (sewing, cooking, etc.)

14.65%

Youth athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.)

14.14%

Volunteer opportunities

14.14%

Youth art, music, dance, or theater classes

14.14%

Programs/events for pets and owners

11.11%

Fishing and boating programs

9.60%

Swim lessons

8.59%

Wellness/health screenings

8.08%

Birthday parties

7.58%

After school programs

7.07%

History programs

6.57%

Other (please specify)

5.56%

Adult athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.)

5.05%

Youth fitness programs

4.55%

Youths sports leagues

4.55%

Youth fitness classes

4.04%

38 / 64 299

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Camps

3.54%

Programs/events for people with special needs

3.54%

Total Respondents: 198 #

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

A public swimming pool with water slides the doesn’t cost a arm and leg

2/18/2018 6:47 PM

None. Most important thing Cumberland could do is to do nothing. These are already provided nearby. Why waste money trying to recreate the wheel?

2/18/2018 5:14 PM

Horseback trails

2/17/2018 11:56 AM

Same as previous. Cumberland shouldn’t be doing any of these things. I want to choose “none”. This is a bad survey.

2/16/2018 12:34 PM

Pickleball

2/13/2018 1:20 PM

For grandkids as I often care for them

2/13/2018 1:02 PM

Concert arena

2/11/2018 9:44 AM

None are as important good roads and safe neighborhoods

2/10/2018 9:04 PM

RC flying program - I would be happy to help set it up

2/10/2018 12:12 PM

Not the Town's responsibility to pay for such!

2/9/2018 12:22 AM

Get a walking/running club together! Meet at the trail daily, weekly, or scheduled days.

2/8/2018 7:28 PM

39 / 64 300

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q13 How would you rate the Town's existing special events and programs? Answered: 198

Skipped: 30

Cumberland Arts Goes to...

Cumberland Weihnachtsma...

Cumberland Farmers Market

Blues, Beer, and BBQ Summ...

National Night Out 0

NEITHER GOOD NOR POOR

GOOD

VERY POOR

POOR

Cumberland Arts Goes to Market

0.00% 0

4.06% 8

9.14% 18

39.09% 77

11.17% 22

Cumberland Weihnachtsmarkt (holiday celebration)

1.52% 3

6.57% 13

9.09% 18

32.83% 65

Cumberland Farmers Market

1.01% 2

5.56% 11

21.21% 42

Blues, Beer, and BBQ Summer Concert Series

0.51% 1

4.55% 9

National Night Out

0.51% 1

3.54% 7

WEIGHTED AVERAGE

36.55% 72

197

3.90

18.18% 36

31.82% 63

198

3.87

48.48% 96

12.12% 24

11.62% 23

198

3.74

13.64% 27

25.76% 51

7.07% 14

48.48% 96

198

3.67

11.62% 23

12.12% 24

4.04% 8

68.18% 135

198

3.49

301

N/A - I/WE HAVE NOT PARTICIPATED IN THIS EVENT

TOTAL

40 / 64

EXCELLENT

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q14 Following are major actions that the Town of Cumberland could take to improve parks, recreation, and services to its citizens. Please indicate how supportive, or not supportive, you would be of each action. Answered: 195

Skipped: 33

Upgrade/improve EXISTING parks Upgrade/improve EXISTING... Acquire more open space f... Develop/build NEW... Develop/build NEW indoor... Develop/build NEW special... Acquire more open space f... Develop/build NEW dog park Develop/build NEW athletic... 0

VERY SUPPORTIVE Upgrade/improve EXISTING parks

SOMEWHAT SUPPORTIVE

NOT SURE

NOT SUPPORTIVE

TOTAL

WEIGHTED AVERAGE

67.19% 129

22.40% 43

5.73% 11

4.69% 9

192

3.52

Upgrade/improve EXISTING walking/biking trails

66.32% 128

21.24% 41

8.29% 16

4.15% 8

193

3.50

Acquire more open space for PASSIVE activities (trails, picnicking, etc.)

48.45% 94

32.47% 63

9.28% 18

9.79% 19

194

3.20

Develop/build NEW walking/biking trails

52.85% 102

20.21% 39

12.95% 25

13.99% 27

193

3.12

Develop/build NEW indoor community center/civic center

43.52% 84

26.42% 51

18.13% 35

11.92% 23

193

3.02

Develop/build NEW special events rental facilities

30.69% 58

27.51% 52

26.98% 51

14.81% 28

189

2.74

Acquire more open space for PROGRAMMED activities (soccer, baseball, etc.)

28.04% 53

33.86% 64

21.16% 40

16.93% 32

189

2.73

41 / 64 302

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Develop/build NEW dog park Develop/build NEW athletic fields/courts

32.98% 63

25.65% 49

17.80% 34

23.56% 45

191

2.68

23.40% 44

29.79% 56

17.02% 32

188

2.60

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

Stop wasting money on things that don't matter.

2/18/2018 5:58 PM

Horseback trails

2/17/2018 11:58 AM

Develop a community maker space/ community learning space. Increase community knowledge of volunteer positions available.

2/15/2018 8:05 PM

We need an indoor space for groups to meet (birthday parties, scrapbooking, crafts, etc.).

2/13/2018 10:45 AM

Cumberland can't take proper care of the existing facilities. How on earth can it justify dumping more taxpayer's dollars into new facilities???? STOP WASTING OUR MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2/11/2018 2:46 PM

Develop the field east of garage into a RC Park flying sight

2/10/2018 12:15 PM

The new special events will facilities and indoor community center so excited we depend on cost.

2/10/2018 1:00 AM

42 / 64 303

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q15 Please rank the following actions in terms of importance with regard to spending and investment, with "1" representing the most important action and "5" representing an action of lower importance. Note: Each action must have a unique ranking (e.g. no two actions can be ranked the same number; each number 1-5 must be used only once). Answered: 194

Skipped: 34

Improvements/ma intenance of...

Construction of a new...

Development of additional...

Acquisition of new park lan...

Construction of new sport... 0

Improvements/maintenance of existing parks, trails and recreation facilities.

47.80% 87

25.82% 47

13.19% 24

6.59% 12

Construction of a new multi-use community center

26.70% 51

16.75% 32

14.14% 27

18.09% 34

23.94% 45

6.78% 12 3.28% 6

Development of additional walking and biking trails Acquisition of new park land and open space Construction of new sports fields (softball, soccer, baseball, etc.)

43 / 64 304

TOTAL

SCORE

6.59% 12

182

4.02

24.08% 46

18.32% 35

191

3.09

21.28% 40

19.15% 36

17.55% 33

188

3.06

20.34% 36

35.59% 63

19.77% 35

17.51% 31

177

2.79

12.57% 23

16.39% 30

27.87% 51

39.89% 73

183

2.11

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q16 If a bond referendum was held to specifically fund much needed improvements to - or expansion of - the Town's parks, recreation, and trails system, how likely would you be to support it? Answered: 195

Skipped: 33

Will vote in favor

Might vote in favor

Not sure

Will vote against

Might vote against 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Will vote in favor

42.56%

Might vote in favor

28.72%

Not sure

16.92%

Will vote against

9.74%

Might vote against

2.05%

TOTAL

195

COMMENTS

DATE

I am not a voter in the Town of Cumberland

2/28/2018 10:13 PM

Public safety is priority one

2/19/2018 10:08 PM

This is a waste of money. The current facilities / parks are rarely used. The park near the post office has a basketball court that seems to be used by the apartment residents. The rest are usually empty. Why build a community center when there are empty buildings along Washington Street.

2/18/2018 5:58 PM

I'm on the edge of Cumberland. I'm not sure if it would appear on my ballot.

2/17/2018 11:02 AM

specific plans would need to be announced

2/15/2018 8:05 PM

We already pay members of the town government more than they deserve. We have more dollar stores than any town, ghettos across from the Meijer and Walmart, not enough police presence, highest sewer in the state, NO THANKS!

2/12/2018 7:28 PM

Depends on what the plans are.

2/12/2018 2:26 PM

44 / 64 305

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 8

What a ridiculous way of asking this question! It's an either-or issue. One cannot properly answer the question because it includes two mutually exclusive criteria!! Besides... government has enough money to work with. If it doesn't, it shouldn't spend it.

2/11/2018 2:46 PM

Depends on the plans for the money

2/10/2018 12:15 PM

Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;d first like to know where all of our parks money has gone? We should be receiving funds as part of UniGov. Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;d also like to see us work with Pacers, Colts, Fever, Finish Line and other organizations that help upgrade other areas of the city.

2/10/2018 1:00 AM

Will definitely vote yes if we build a much needed community event center.

2/8/2018 10:13 PM

I do NOT want a walking path going through my side yard.

2/8/2018 5:36 PM

45 / 64 306

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q17 Please check ALL the ways you learn about Town of Cumberland programs and activities. Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

Town of Cumberland... From friends and neighbors Town of Cumberland W... Newspaper articles/adv... Cumberland Connected App Utility bills or mail... Conversations with Town staff

Local TV Flyers/posters at Town... Town e-mail bulletins Flyers distributed ... Parks and Recreation...

Radio 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Town of Cumberland Facebook page

63.68%

121

From friends and neighbors

51.58%

Town of Cumberland Web site

33.68%

16.84%

16.32%

Newspaper articles/advertisements Cumberland Connected App

46 / 64 307

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey Utility bills or mail bulletins

15.26%

Conversations with Town staff

14.21%

Local TV

13.16%

Flyers/posters at Town Facilities

10.53%

Town e-mail bulletins

3.68%

Flyers distributed at school

2.63%

Parks and Recreation program & events guide (hard copy)

2.11%

Radio

1.58%

Total Respondents: 190 #

ARE THERE OTHER METHODS OF OUTREACH YOU WOULD PREFER? IF SO, PLEASE LET US KNOW!

DATE

Next Door Neighbor

3/22/2018 12:47 PM

Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;m going to sign up for online methods of getting updates now that I know they exist

2/21/2018 3:24 PM

Next door

2/21/2018 12:52 PM

Email list

2/21/2018 2:26 AM

Social media

2/19/2018 10:35 AM

Billboard

2/17/2018 12:00 PM

Cumberland Police Facebook

2/17/2018 5:55 AM

NextDoor app

2/16/2018 5:47 PM

Facebook page

2/15/2018 9:37 PM

I did not know about several of the methods listed!

2/15/2018 8:09 PM

We just moved here and have no idea how to get connected or where to go to sign up for newsletters or info. We haven't used our been to many of the offered amenities because we don't know about them yet. We've been here just over a year. :)

2/15/2018 7:38 PM

facebook

2/15/2018 7:17 PM

Not advertised very well

2/15/2018 6:06 PM

Library flyer?

2/13/2018 9:00 AM

Signs in front of Cumberland Town Hall

2/12/2018 8:57 PM

Nextdoor

2/12/2018 7:30 PM

NextDoor app

2/12/2018 2:47 PM

NextDoor App

2/12/2018 2:34 PM

Text blast

2/12/2018 2:28 PM

None

2/11/2018 11:55 PM

Neighborhood app

2/11/2018 12:24 PM

Social media

2/11/2018 10:57 AM

Social Media

2/10/2018 8:45 PM

47 / 64 308

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 24

Nextdoor is where I hear about everything. I didn’t even know we had a Town of Cumberland app. I have since downloaded it. I think that, from my perspective, knowledge is power. And unfortunately I don’t know what any of the events that go on are. I won’t even know that there is an event until I see the cops blocking the road. I see the German festival happen every year but I have no idea what it is and if it is something that would be fun. I don’t know how to get the word out. Maybe if possible pass out or mail out fliers to the town. I’d like to be involved, but unless I go searching for the information I don’t know how to be involved.

2/10/2018 1:04 PM

Flyers distributed to churches in the area, specific email postings, flyers in the local businesses

2/10/2018 1:04 AM

Mail

2/9/2018 12:17 AM

Please do a blast outreach through our sewer bills asking for emails specifically stating that it is for letting us know about upcoming events then the folks at the Town Hall can blast everyone.

2/8/2018 10:19 PM

I feel like I don’t see enough advertisements about Cumberland.

2/8/2018 7:33 PM

I've never heard of anything going on here

2/8/2018 6:18 PM

I would like to get the email bulletins and minutes from your meetings. Insure01@aol.com

2/8/2018 5:39 PM

48 / 64 309

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q18 Please indicate the MAXIMUM distance you would be willing to travel to visit a park/facility/program for each of the modes of transportation. Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

Walking/running

Riding a bike

Driving in a car

49 / 64 310

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey car

Taking a bus

10%

20%

Less than 1/2 mi. 3 mi - 5 mi. LESS THAN 1/2 MI. Walking/running Riding a bike Driving in a car Taking a bus

30%

40%

50%

1/2 mi. - 1 mi. 5 mi. +

1/2 MI. - 1 MI.

60%

70%

1 mi - 2 mi.

80%

90% 100%

2 mi - 3 mi.

Would not use. 1 MI - 2 MI.

2 MI 3 MI.

3 MI - 5 MI.

5 MI. +

WOULD NOT USE.

TOTAL

22.11% 42

28.42% 54

21.05% 40

5.26% 10

8.95% 17

6.84% 13

7.37% 14

190

5.26% 10

21.58% 41

24.74% 47

14.21% 27

9.47% 18

7.89% 15

16.84% 32

190

0.53% 1

1.05% 2

7.37% 14

14.74% 28

23.16% 44

47.89% 91

5.26% 10

190

3.16% 6

1.05% 2

2.63% 5

3.68% 7

5.79% 11

81.05% 154

190

50 / 64 311

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q19 Your Gender: Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

Female

Male

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Female

72.63%

138

Male

27.37%

TOTAL

190

51 / 64 312

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q20 What is your household income? Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

$100,000 or more

$50,000-$74,999

$75,000-$99,999

$25,000-$49,999

Under $25,000

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

$100,000 or more

34.74%

$50,000-$74,999

24.21%

$75,000-$99,999

23.68%

$25,000-$49,999

11.58%

Under $25,000

5.79%

TOTAL

190

52 / 64 313

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q21 Are you or members of your household of Hispanic or Latin ancestry? Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

Yes

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

96.84%

Yes

3.16%

TOTAL

80%

90% 100%

184 6 190

53 / 64 314

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q22 Check ALL of the following that describes your race/ethnicity. (Check all that apply) Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

White/Caucasian

Other (please specify)

African American/Black

Asian

Native Hawaiian or...

Native American

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

White/Caucasian

91.58%

Other (please specify)

5.79%

African American/Black

2.63%

Asian

0.00%

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander

0.00%

Native American

0.00%

174

TOTAL

190

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

Not relevant

2/20/2018 3:24 AM

Hispanic

2/17/2018 7:46 PM

Human

2/17/2018 11:48 AM

None of your business

2/16/2018 7:21 PM

Human

2/16/2018 5:59 PM

I am white, I identify as nonbinary (neither male nor female). Please include an "other" option in future surveys including questions about gender.

2/15/2018 8:09 PM

Prefer not to answer

2/14/2018 12:51 PM

I tried to check more than one but would not allow

2/12/2018 1:18 PM

54 / 64 315

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 9

In response to question #20 - It's none of your buiness. Item #21 - what difference does it make?? Item #22 - again, what difference does it make?. If you dump more money in a non-white community than a white one, wouldn't that constitute racism?

2/11/2018 2:52 PM

American Mutt

2/8/2018 3:57 PM

Human

2/8/2018 2:48 PM

55 / 64 316

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q23 Counting yourself, how many people are in your household? Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

5 or more

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

34.21%

24.21%

21.05%

5 or more

15.26%

5.26%

TOTAL

190

56 / 64 317

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q24 How many people in your household are 14 years old or younger? Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

5 or more

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

56.32%

107

18.95%

12.63%

8.42%

5 or more

2.11%

1.58%

TOTAL

190

57 / 64 318

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q25 Please indicate the location of your primary residence (where you receive your mail) Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

Town of Cumberland,... Indianapolis, Ind. Greenfield, Ind. Other (please specify) Unincorporated Hancock County Mt. Comfort, Ind. Spring Lake, Ind. Philadelphia, Ind. 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Town of Cumberland, Ind.

51.05%

Indianapolis, Ind.

25.79%

Greenfield, Ind.

13.16%

Other (please specify)

5.26%

Unincorporated Hancock County

2.63%

Mt. Comfort, Ind.

2.11%

Spring Lake, Ind.

0.00%

Philadelphia, Ind.

0.00%

TOTAL

190

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

DATE

Far east indy

2/25/2018 10:09 AM

New palestine

2/17/2018 12:00 PM

New Palestine, indiana

2/16/2018 11:58 PM

New Palestine, Ind

2/11/2018 11:15 PM

58 / 64 319

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 5

2/11/2018 8:12 PM

Our mail comes from the post office located in Cumberland, but we have an Indianapolis address. The writer of this survey should have done a better job of developing this survey.

2/11/2018 2:52 PM

New Palestine

2/11/2018 10:57 AM

New Palestine, IN

2/11/2018 10:30 AM

Wannamaker, Indiana

2/9/2018 9:11 PM

New Pal but closer to Cumberland

2/8/2018 10:05 PM

59 / 64 320

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q26 What is your age? Answered: 190

Skipped: 38

Under age 5

5-9 years old

10-14 years old

15-19 years old

20-24 years old

25-34 years old

35-44 years old

45-54 years old

55-64 years old

65-74 years old

75-84 years old

85 + years old 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Under age 5

0.00%

5-9 years old

0.00%

10-14 years old

0.00%

15-19 years old

1.05%

20-24 years old

1.05%

25-34 years old

14.74%

25.79%

21.05%

35-44 years old 45-54 years old

60 / 64 321

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 55-64 years old

24.21%

65-74 years old

10.53%

75-84 years old

1.58%

85 + years old

0.00%

TOTAL

190

61 / 64 322

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey

Q27 Please share any additional comments that could assist the Town of Cumberland in improving parks, trails, open space, or recreational facilities and services in the space provided below. Answered: 53

Skipped: 175

RESPONSES

DATE

Lions Park is a nice place to go via the new trail. However, basketball goals and tennis courts NEED nets and updated goals. It's warm...and we're dying to play tennis!

3/11/2018 10:13 AM

The trail along Buck Creek was major mistake. Fixing roads major need. Leaf pick up in fall needs to be improved. This year went for three weeks without pick up. Sewer bill is outrageous.

2/25/2018 1:17 PM

It would be nice to have arts and crafts that are offered for kids and adults!

2/24/2018 10:57 AM

I’ve only heard of a few events listed on this survey. More advertising is needed.

2/22/2018 8:33 AM

This survey has been enlightening is that there are activities that occur that I didn’t know about advertising on the sign outside the Town Hall - maybe even having a bigger better sign - is a good way to let folks in the area know about upcoming events and About online methods of getting the information

2/21/2018 3:27 PM

Additional Comfort Stations on longer trails. Continue making trail access closer to people using them. Use Neighborhood sites like Nextdoor to get the word out.

2/21/2018 12:50 PM

I walked the Buck Creeek trail yesterday, and it was really nice. I can't wait to see the finished project.

2/21/2018 7:31 AM

I don’t understand why you need my income, age , if I am Hispanic or what color I am

2/20/2018 3:25 AM

Maybe you could reach out to Irvington or Fountain Square to see how they have kickstarted their resurgence. I think the biggest issue is the economic blight that has been slowly spreading past 465 towards Cumberland (Ex: Old Movies 8, Washington Square Mall), and what could be done to make Cumberland more friendly to businesses.

2/19/2018 9:15 PM

We use the Pensy trail the most and would love to see it expanded/connected to Greenfield and Irvington.

2/19/2018 10:38 AM

Putting in a public in ground pool with water slides that doesn’t cost a arm and a leg.

2/18/2018 6:54 PM

I wish Cumberland would stop wasting money on frivolous pursuits.

2/18/2018 6:21 PM

Many people want more place to mark prefer not to answer.

2/17/2018 10:08 AM

Income and race should never require an answer. Disband the town sell the parks.

2/16/2018 7:23 PM

This survey should be thrown out. It requires inaccurate answers for some people to move on to the next page. People must given “none” options. Requiring three answers or forcing rankings makes for a bad survey. This is pretty basic survey design stuff. This is unreliable.

2/16/2018 12:37 PM

Cumberland is a great town. It benefit greatly from a community center that works to enrich the children and families of Cumberland. Dance , fitness, art, and theater classes would add great value to the town of Cumberland and put us on the map!

2/16/2018 10:03 AM

Keep up the good work on the bike trails & The Music festivals

2/16/2018 6:12 AM

Restroom facility on buck creek and or pensy trails

2/15/2018 10:14 PM

Just moved to Cumberland from the south side of Indianapolis and I’m very excited to take advantage of the trails in Cumberland. They look nice and are in a convenient location. Excited to see what else the town can do!

2/15/2018 8:31 PM

If a community center is built, I would love to see the ability for community members to sign up to teach a variety of classes (sewing, arts & crafts, woodworking, computer skills, etc). I want to see greater effort put into keeping community members informed on how they can get involved.

2/15/2018 8:13 PM

62 / 64 323

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 21

Tear down the old Schneider lumber awning by the trail. Use that area and the green lot next to it for another park. Also would be nice to have a disc golf course. The open field east of the buck creek trail and south of 40 would be a nice green spaces. Have some hols that go through the woods.

2/15/2018 2:37 PM

I greatly appreciate your hard work on existing walking/biking trails. It’s truly a gem in the community.

2/15/2018 2:24 PM

Pickleball is one of the fastest growing sports in the USA. All ages and abilities can play.

2/13/2018 1:26 PM

Keeping our young families closer too home is a great thing. It build our commynity. As a grandparent, this would be immigrant to me. Also I have gotten most of my info about communist events because someone who knew posted it I Next door site.

2/13/2018 1:10 PM

I would like to have input on and see improvements in other areas, such as consolidation of trash pick-up, saving money on sewer services, and road improvements in the Town of Cumberland.

2/13/2018 11:00 AM

Investment in the parks will benefit everyone.

2/13/2018 10:47 AM

We need a satellite library branch for both counties.

2/13/2018 9:08 AM

A map of all the facilities would be helpful.

2/12/2018 10:54 PM

Keep building walking trails! I hope someday there will be trails all the way to downtown.

2/12/2018 10:42 PM

I really enjoy the trails. I am happy that the 21st Street and the Buck Creek Trails have been added and look forward to using those plus the Pensy when weather warms up. A Cumberland Rec building would be nice for some of the special programs like the Christmas market, etc.

2/12/2018 8:59 PM

Move out the government subsidized apartments, so that way what he already have stays clean, no drugs, and safer, otherwise forget it. I already have seen graffiti all over the town of Cumberland, and now gang symbols

2/12/2018 7:32 PM

These things are important but , along with them Cumberland needs to focus on new small business, things to bring in. the community for shopping or spending, and provide parking. The main complaint I get is there is no parking anywhere. People would like to see public parking in the old liquor store lot and along the side streets

2/12/2018 1:21 PM

The parks are not safe, Cumberland is turning into a cesspool of crime. Businesses are leaving the area. It is very sad to see what we are becoming.

2/11/2018 11:58 PM

Dog park in Lions Park is the most important improvement

2/11/2018 8:13 PM

Your really need to rework this survey. The results are going to be quite inaccurate. Whatever Cumberland paid to have it developed, it was too much, and should get a refund.

2/11/2018 2:54 PM

Pensy is nice needs work on pavement and shrubbery cut back is a must. Don’t feel very safe. Restrooms would be nice too.

2/11/2018 10:58 AM

I would love to see more trails for running and biking. Adding a restroom or two and water stops would also be a great addition.

2/11/2018 10:33 AM

The Blues, Brews, and BBQ and Winter Market need better organization of the events and what’s offered. On the Pensy Trail it would be nice to have little shops for refreshments or bike repair, etc.

2/11/2018 9:54 AM

Put the resources into roads and safe neighborhoods.

2/10/2018 9:11 PM

Our city needs to be more pro growth & development and less about image.

2/10/2018 8:46 PM

It is imperative that Cumberland sees that the trails, parks, etc. are monitored and maintained.

2/10/2018 2:55 PM

Again, I think the MOST IMPORTANT thing for the town to do is get the word out. People don’t go looking to be involved, they want to be invited to be involved. Whether this is right or not, it’s the truth. I would drive by and see a sign that announces the German festival and think I want to go. But if I got a flyer saying everything that the festival offers, activities, etc I would think, ok, yeah, this sounds fun. And I would go. I am a stay at home mom and I would be willing to volunteer and help in any way I can. (Stacey Gullotto 317-441-8288) But my vote is that the communication is the most important thing. You can have the nicest park, walking trail, festival in all of Indy, but if the community is unaware it’s there then it’s pointless. I was actually shocked to see all of the parks listed in this survey. And I know it’s my fault for not seeking this info out so I’m just being honest and telling you that I’m sure I’m not the only one.

2/10/2018 1:14 PM

63 / 64 324

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

2018-2022 Cumberland Parks System Master Plan Community Survey 43

For a minimal expense of putting down some gravel we could turn the open field east of the garage into a Radio Control Park Flyer field. This is a great hobby that supports the STEM programs that are being promoted in the schools.

2/10/2018 12:18 PM

This should be sent to the churches in the area so that members who would utilize the facilities could answer this.

2/10/2018 1:06 AM

Love the community events! Would love more food trucks at them too!

2/9/2018 10:40 PM

My children visit Lions Park, it is not in great shape. A lot of times I find shoes hung up on the telephone poles. There is almost always trash in the play area and in the grass. My kids love that it is so close to the house but they think it needs updated as well as I do because they find the play things boring if we go more than once a month. We have not been since before winter but I took them as often as I could in the warmer months.

2/9/2018 2:12 PM

We love using the Pensey Trail for walking the dogs, biking to the Farmer's Market, exercising, and getting the kids outside for Pokemon Go adventures. It's a great trail, well maintained and patrolled,and was a deciding factor in staying here in Cumberland. We have been so disappointed in the loss of Marsh and Sams. We would like to see this space utilized and repurposed for something positive, like an events center. Please look at how Kokomo utilized an old Big R store to create the Kokomo Event and Conference Center. It has been a great addition to that community.

2/8/2018 11:52 PM

I do believe if the Town Hall did blast emails or texts about current events it would get more people involved and get questions answered. I never know what is happening unless I see it on Facebook and that is not regular communication. Thank you!

2/8/2018 10:25 PM

Get rid of the crime and thugs, drugs, enforce traffic laws in the Hancock county side, clean up trash, add lighting on trails, widen Buck Creek Road to make trail safe

2/8/2018 10:21 PM

Add restroom to Pennsy Trail. Patrol the trail. Start a walking/running club to meet at the trail. Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;d like to have people to run with.

2/8/2018 7:35 PM

I DO NOT WANT A WALKING PATH going through my side yard!! Putting another walking path to connect the the one you are working on would have me surrounded on 2 sides of my property. I know that this would only affect myself and my family, so it is of little importance to you....but this is MY financial investment, my retirement and my privacy. How many of the folks on the town counsel are willing to give all of that up?

2/8/2018 5:44 PM

Got an idea that I will email you with as soon as I get it ironed out.

2/8/2018 3:58 PM

We would love to see a skating rink built somewhere close. And or a bowling alley.

2/8/2018 2:44 PM

64 / 64 325

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

2018-2022 Town of Cumberland Parks Master Plan

Needs + Priorities Presentation July 19, 2018

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of Planning Process Needs Assessment Findings Visioning Preparation

1 326

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

1. DISCOVER: Goals + Outcomes ‒ ‒

Scoping meeting Kick-off meeting

‒

Steering Committee

2. EVALUATE: Existing Conditions ‒ ‒ ‒

Base mapping Park site analysis Facilities inventory

‒ ‒

Lifestyle analysis Trends analysis

3. ENGAGE + ANALYZE: Needs Assessment ‒ ‒

Stakeholder interviews Public workshops

‒ ‒

LOS analysis Public survey

‒

Cost estimation

‒

Phasing

4. ENVISION Master Plan Vision ‒ ‒

Visioning Workshop Recommendations

5. IMPLEMENT Action Plan ‒ ‒

Project prioritization Funding sources

1. DISCOVER: Goals + Outcomes ‒ ‒

Scoping meeting Kick-off meeting

‒

Steering Committee

2. EVALUATE: Existing Conditions ‒ ‒ ‒

Base mapping Park site analysis Facilities inventory

‒ ‒

Lifestyle analysis Trends analysis

3. ENGAGE + ANALYZE: Needs Assessment ‒ ‒

Stakeholder interviews Public workshops

‒ ‒

LOS analysis Public survey

‒

Cost estimation

‒

Phasing

4. ENVISION Master Plan Vision ‒ ‒

Visioning Workshop Recommendations

5. IMPLEMENT Action Plan ‒ ‒

Project prioritization Funding sources

2 327

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

It’s more than just “parks”

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of Planning Process Needs Assessment Findings Visioning Preparation

3 328

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Stakeholder Interviews

Level of Service Analysis

Steering Committee

Demographic Analysis

Public Workshop

Lifestyle Analysis

Staff Interviews

Public Survey

Focus Groups

SiteScoreâ&#x201E;˘ Park Site Analysis Intercept Interviews 7

Lifestyles + Demographics 8

4 329

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Demographic Analysis - Utilized a combination of Esri and U.S. Census data to evaluate: -

Population Race/ethnicity Income Education Housing

- Compared data against Marion County and Hancock County

Demographic Analysis Key Findings: - In general, demographics of Cumberland tend to fall between both Marion and Hancock Counties - Over two-thirds of the Townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s population fall within two, very different lifestyle groups - Population is expected to grow by approximately 8.6% by 2030, which is lower than both Marion County and Hancock County. - Population is aging in place. 10

5 330

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Recreation Trends Analysis 11

Trends Analysis Combined use of: - National trends findings from the 2016 Sports and Fitness Industries Association (SFIA) Topline Participation Report - Esri Market Potential Index (MPI) findings specific to the Columbus population.

6 331

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Trends Analysis: National Fastest Growing (2010-2015) :

Declining (2010-2015) :

Stand-up Paddling (24.3%)

Snowmobiling (-6.5%)

Adventure Racing (19.4%)

Inline Roller Skating (-5.7%)

Triathlon – Off-road (17.7%)

Football – Touch (-5.5%)

Boxing for Competition (10.5%)

Wrestling (-4.3%)

Trail Running (10.4%)

Jet Skiing (-4.1%)

Squash (10%)

Water Skiing (-4.0%)

Triathlon – On-road (9.8%)

Roller Skating (-3.8%)

Mixed Martial Arts for Competition (9.0%)

Volleyball – Outdoor (-3.7%)

Kayaking – Recreational (8.5%)

Paintball (-3.7%)

10. Mixed Martial Arts for Fitness (8.6%)

10. Softball – Slow Pitch (-3.3%)

11. Rugby (8.3%)

11. Camping (-3.2%)

12. Lacrosse (8.1%)

12. Racquetball (-3.2%)

13. Aerobics (7.1%)

13. Table Tennis (-3.0%)

Trends Analysis: Cumberland Above Avg. MPI:

Below Avg. MPI:

Archery (MPI 115)

Hiking (74)

Boating (MPI 113)

Running/jogging (MPI 78)

Backpacking (MPI 112)

Yoga (MPI 78)

Mountain biking (MPI 110)

Basketball (MPI 87)

Ice skating (MPI 108)

Soccer (MPI 87)

Aerobics (MPI 105)

Swimming (MPI 90)

Baseball (MPI 105)

Golf (MPI 90)

Frisbee (MPI 104)

Tennis (MPI 90)

Canoeing/kayaking (MPI 103)

Swimming (MPI 90)

10.

Weightlifting (MPI 91)

10. Football (MPI 102)

7 332

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Existing Park + Facility Analysis 15

Park + Facility Evaluations Criteria 1. Access + Linkages 2. Comfort + Image

SiteScoreâ&#x201E;˘ is a standardized site evaluation and scoring tool appropriate for your community to track BOTH system-wide and site-based trends

3. Uses, Activities, + Sociability 4. Sustainability 16

8 333

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Park + Facility Evaluations Exceeds Expectations: • • • • •

• • • •

Exceptionally well maintained Aesthetically pleasing Perceived as safe Wide variety of uses Consistently high level of activity

Good design standards Embraced heritage resources Good access, sidewalk/mass transit Embraced sustainability

Meets Expectations: • • • •

Generally well maintained Aesthetically pleasing Perceived as safe Several different uses accommodated

• Good design standards • Reasonable connectivity • Generally compatible with surroundings • Moderate level of activity

Does Not Currently Meet Expectations: • May not be compatible with surrounding uses • Difficult, challenging to access • Not sustainable

• May still be well maintained and aesthetically pleasing • Not perceived as safe • Few accommodated uses • Consistently low level of activity

Park-Specific Trends: - Honors Park and Wayburn Park scored the highest at 62 (meeting expectations) - Both National Road Park and Lions Park scored in the “Not Meeting Expectations” category.

9 334

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

System-wide Trends: - Good visibility, access, and connectivity. - Generally low scores related to accessibility, use of technology, maintenance, and activation.

Stakeholder Focus Groups 20

10 335

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Stakeholder Focus Groups - Took place on November 29th, 2017. - In total, 14 people from eight (8) different boards and/or organizations participated in these focus groups including representatives from: -

Parks Advisory Council, Town Council Planning and Development Parks and Streets Public Works Clerk-Treasurer Special Projects Plan Commission

Stakeholder Focus Groups Needs: The three (3) following themes accounted for almost 64% of all needs identified; 1. Improve Existing Parks and Facilities (39.6%) 2. New Park Facilities (14.8%) 3. Increased security and safety (9.4%)

11 336

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Stakeholder Focus Groups Participant Priorities: 1. Improve existing parks and facilities (8) 2. Provide new, relevant amenities (6) 3. Develop new park spaces (3) 3. Increase safety and security of existing parks (3) 4. Improve signage and wayfinding (2) 4. New Parks and Facilities (2) 5. Expand programs and events offerings 5. Improved system-wide maintenance 5. Increase ADA accessibility 5. Increase community-wide connectivity

Stakeholder Focus Groups Benchmark Communities:

Funding/Implementation:

1. Fishers, Ind. (4) 2. Greenfield, Ind. (4) 3. Plainfield, Ind.(3)

- Most supported funding mechanisms: - Increased general fund spending on parks and recreation - Selective user fees for specialized facilities and programs - Grant-based funds - Development of a park impact fee structure

- Least supported funding mechanisms: - Special assessments - Increasing sales taxes

12 337

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Community Workshop 25

Community Workshop - March 29th, 2018 from 6:00 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 8:00 pm. - The workshop was held at the Town Hall - 22 participants participated - Five (5) separate exercise tables

13 338

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Community Workshop Top 10 FACILITY Needs: 1. Dog parks (12) 2. Bicycle/walking/multi-purpose trails (10) 3. Community gardens (9) 4. Pickleball courts (7) 5. Community/Rec Center (6) 6. Outdoor amphitheaters (6) 7. Spray/splash pads (6) 8. Small neighborhood parks (5) 9. Multi-purpose fields/greenspaces (3) 10. Disc golf courses (3)

Community Workshop Top 10 PROGRAM Needs: 1. Community gardening (8) 2. Programs for pets and owners (6) 3. Community special events (5) 4. Adult fitness classes (3) 5. Nature programs (3) 6. Adult art, dance, theater (2) 7. Programs for people with special needs (2) 8. Senior adult programs (2) 9. After school programs (1) 10. Birthday parties (1)

14 339

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Public Workshop Vision for the Future: • Safe, clean, usable, and activated multipurpose parks • Clear and consistent communication • Regular events that build community

Public Workshop Priorities for Investment/Spending: 1.

Improvements to EXISTING parks, trails, and facilities ($42.86/$100)

Development of NEW walking and biking trails ($18.57/$100)

Construction of a NEW multi-use community center ($18.57/$100)

Acquisition of NEW park land and open space ($9.05/$100)

Other - (infrastructure, pickleball) $8.57/$100)

6. Construction of NEW sports fields ($2.38/$100)

15 340

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Public Workshop Top 10 Barriers to Participation: 1. I don't feel safe in some parks/facilities (15) 2. Events/programs/amenities I want aren't offered (14) 3. I don't know what's being offered or what there is to do (13) 4. I use facilities/programs in other cities (8) 5. Not enough parking (8) 6. Parks/facilities are not well maintained (7) 7. Access to greenspace is too limited (6) 8. Wayfinding; I don't know where to go (5) 9. Other (3) 10. I have trouble getting there by WALKING/BIKING (1)

Public Opinion Survey 32

16 341

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Public Opinion Survey - 27 question public opinion survey conducted online via SurveyMonkeyâ&#x201E;˘ and in hard-copy format. - Ran from February 8th, 2018 to April 27, 2018. - 229 respondents.

Public Opinion Survey Most Commonly Visited Park Sites: 1.

Pennsy Trail (60.50%)

Lions Park (44.10%)

Buck Creek Trail (31.44%)

Honors Park (15.72%)

21st Street Trail (14.85%)

Least Commonly Visited Park Sites: 1.

Wayburn Pocket Park (6.99%)

National Road Park (11.79%)

I do not use/visit ANY Town of Cumberland Park facilities (12.66%)

21st Street Trail (14.85%)

17 342

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Public Opinion Survey Quality of Parks/Facilities: 1. Fair (38.4%) 2. Good (36.7%) 3. Poor (10.9%) 4. Excellent (3.1%)

Public Opinion Survey Common Barriers to Usage: Over 80% of all respondents indicated there was at least one barrier preventing them from using Cumberlandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s parks and facilities

I do not know what is being offered (37.55%)

I donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t feel safe (31%)

I do not know locations of the facilities or what they have to offer (27.51%)

The quality of amenities is poor (21.83%)

Facilities are not well maintained (16.59%)

18 343

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Public Opinion Survey High Priority Amenity Needs: 1.

Public restrooms 269

Outdoor Pools/water Parks 204

Indoor Pools/water Parks 200

Splash Pads 163

Large community park 156

Small neighborhood park within walking distance 153

Indoor Recreation and Events Centers 149

Outdoor Amphitheaters 138

Nature trails 137

10. Farmerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s markets 134

Public Opinion Survey High Priority Program Needs: 1.

Community special events (festivals, gatherings, celebrations, etc.) (46.46%)

Adult fitness classes (29.26%)

Adult art, music, dance, or theater (21.72%)

Community gardening (19.19%)

Adult fitness programs (18.69%)

Nature programs/environmental education (18.18%)

Enrichment classes (sewing, cooking, etc.) (14.65%)

Youth athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.) (14.14%)

Volunteer opportunities (14.14%)

10. Youth art, music, dance, or theater classes (14.14%)

19 344

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Public Opinion Survey Respondents were asked to indicate the â&#x20AC;&#x153;top priority actionsâ&#x20AC;? they believed the Department should take: 1.

Upgrade/improve EXISTING parks (89.59%)

Upgrade/improve EXISTING walking/biking trails (87.56%)

Acquire more open space for PASSIVE activities (trails, picnicking, etc.) (80.92%)

Develop/build NEW walking/biking trails (73.06%)

Develop/build NEW indoor community center/civic center (69.94%)

Public Opinion Survey Respondents were asked to rank a series of spending/investment priorities: 1.

Develop/build NEW special events rental facilities (23.56%)

Develop/build athletic fields/courts (17.02%)

Develop/build NEW dog park (16.93%)

Acquire more open space for PROGRAMMED activities (soccer, baseball, etc.) (14.81%)

Develop/build NEW walking/biking trails (13.99%)

20 345

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Level of Service Analysis 41

LOS Methodology Acreage: acres of park land per 1,000 population Amenities: recreational facilities per 1,000 pop. (NRPA) Access: Spatial analysis/ mapping of the geographic area served by existing recreation facilities and programs 42

21 346

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

LOS – Acreage Current acreage LOS is 3.0 acres/1,000 pop. Population projected to increase 8.7% by 2030. If no additional acres are added, by 2030, acreage LOS will drop to 2.8/1,000 pop. (-6.6%)

22 347

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

LOS â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Amenities (City only) Projected Deficiencies:

Baseball Field (1) Soccer Fields (1) Softball Field (1)

LOS â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Access Neighborhood Amenities 1/2-mile Service Area

Deficiencies: -

Basketball Courts Playgrounds Multi-purpose fields/greenspaces Volleyball Courts Picnic Shelters Trailheads

23 348

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

LOS – Access Community Amenities 2-mile Service Area

Deficiencies: - Tennis Courts

LOS – Access Absent: -

Football/soccer fields Baseball Diamonds Softball Diamonds Dark Parks (off-leash) Community Rooms Pools (indoor & Outdoor) Indoor Recreation Centers Skate Parks Nature Centers

24 349

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Summary of Needs + Priorities 49

Summary of Needs + Priorities

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

HIGH PRIORITIES

INTERMEDIATE PRIORITIES

25 350

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of Planning Process Needs Assessment Findings Visioning Preparation

Priority Sub-Systems 1. New Parks + Facilities 2. Improved Connectivity 3. Improved Existing Parks 4. Programs + Events 5. Department Mission + Vision 52

26 351

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Visioning Workshop Sample Agenda: - Stakeholder Workshop: 9:00 am – 3:00 pm - Public open house: 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm - Similar format to prior public workshop – stations dedicated to priority sub-systems. - Workshop input shall serve as a “framework” for further development.

Questions + Discussion

27 352

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

7/19/2018

Thank You!

Needs + Priorities Presentation July 19, 2018

28 353

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

2018-2022 Town of Cumberland Parks Master Plan

Visioning Work Sessions September 29, 2018

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of Planning Process Needs Assessment Findings Visioning

1 354

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

1. DISCOVER: Goals + Outcomes ‒ ‒

Scoping meeting Kick-off meeting

‒

Steering Committee

2. EVALUATE: Existing Conditions ‒ ‒ ‒

Base mapping Park site analysis Facilities inventory

‒ ‒

Lifestyle analysis Trends analysis

3. ENGAGE + ANALYZE: Needs Assessment ‒ ‒

Stakeholder interviews Public workshops

‒ ‒

LOS analysis Public survey

‒

Cost estimation

‒

Phasing

4. ENVISION Master Plan Vision ‒ ‒

Visioning Workshop Recommendations

5. IMPLEMENT Action Plan ‒ ‒

Project prioritization Funding sources

It’s more than just “parks”

2 355

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of Planning Process Needs Assessment Findings Visioning Preparation

Stakeholder Interviews

Level of Service Analysis

Steering Committee

Demographic Analysis

Public Workshop

Lifestyle Analysis

Staff Interviews

Public Survey

Focus Groups

SiteScoreâ&#x201E;˘ Park Site Analysis Intercept Interviews 6

3 356

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Lifestyles + Demographics 7

4 357

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Recreation Trends Analysis 9

Trends Analysis: Cumberland Above Avg. MPI:

Below Avg. MPI:

Archery (MPI 115)

Hiking (74)

Boating (MPI 113)

Running/jogging (MPI 78)

Backpacking (MPI 112)

Yoga (MPI 78)

Mountain biking (MPI 110)

Basketball (MPI 87)

Ice skating (MPI 108)

Soccer (MPI 87)

Aerobics (MPI 105)

Swimming (MPI 90)

Baseball (MPI 105)

Golf (MPI 90)

Frisbee (MPI 104)

Tennis (MPI 90)

Canoeing/kayaking (MPI 103)

Swimming (MPI 90)

10.

Weightlifting (MPI 91)

10. Football (MPI 102)

5 358

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Existing Park + Facility Analysis 11

System-wide Trends: - Good visibility, access, and connectivity. - Generally low scores related to accessibility, use of technology, maintenance, and activation.

6 359

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Stakeholder Focus Groups 13

7 360

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Stakeholder Focus Groups Benchmark Communities:

Funding/Implementation:

1. Fishers, Ind. (4) 2. Greenfield, Ind. (4) 3. Plainfield, Ind.(3)

- Least supported funding mechanisms: - Special assessments - Increasing sales taxes

8 361

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Community Workshop 17

9 362

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Public Workshop Vision for the Future: • Safe, clean, usable, and activated multipurpose parks • Clear and consistent communication • Regular events that build community

10 363

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Public Workshop Priorities for Investment/Spending: 1.

Improvements to EXISTING parks, trails, and facilities ($42.86/$100)

Development of NEW walking and biking trails ($18.57/$100)

Construction of a NEW multi-use community center ($18.57/$100)

Acquisition of NEW park land and open space ($9.05/$100)

Other - (infrastructure, pickleball) $8.57/$100)

6. Construction of NEW sports fields ($2.38/$100)

11 364

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Public Opinion Survey 23

Public Opinion Survey Quality of Parks/Facilities: 1. Fair (38.4%) 2. Good (36.7%) 3. Poor (10.9%) 4. Excellent (3.1%)

12 365

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Public Opinion Survey Common Barriers to Usage: Over 80% of all respondents indicated there was at least one barrier preventing them from using Cumberland’s parks and facilities

I do not know what is being offered (37.55%)

I don’t feel safe (31%)

I do not know locations of the facilities or what they have to offer (27.51%)

The quality of amenities is poor (21.83%)

Facilities are not well maintained (16.59%)

Public Opinion Survey High Priority Amenity Needs: 1.

Public restrooms 269

Outdoor Pools/water Parks 204

Indoor Pools/water Parks 200

Splash Pads 163

Large community park 156

Small neighborhood park within walking distance 153

Indoor Recreation and Events Centers 149

Outdoor Amphitheaters 138

Nature trails 137

10. Farmer’s markets 134

13 366

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Public Opinion Survey High Priority Program Needs: 1.

Community special events (festivals, gatherings, celebrations, etc.) (46.46%)

Adult fitness classes (29.26%)

Adult art, music, dance, or theater (21.72%)

Community gardening (19.19%)

Adult fitness programs (18.69%)

Nature programs/environmental education (18.18%)

Enrichment classes (sewing, cooking, etc.) (14.65%)

Youth athletic programs/sports leagues (soccer, football, basketball, etc.) (14.14%)

Volunteer opportunities (14.14%)

10. Youth art, music, dance, or theater classes (14.14%)

Public Opinion Survey Respondents were asked to indicate the â&#x20AC;&#x153;top priority actionsâ&#x20AC;? they believed the Department should take: 1.

Upgrade/improve EXISTING parks (89.59%)

Upgrade/improve EXISTING walking/biking trails (87.56%)

Acquire more open space for PASSIVE activities (trails, picnicking, etc.) (80.92%)

Develop/build NEW walking/biking trails (73.06%)

Develop/build NEW indoor community center/civic center (69.94%)

14 367

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Public Opinion Survey Respondents were asked to rank a series of spending/investment priorities: 1.

Develop/build NEW special events rental facilities (23.56%)

Develop/build athletic fields/courts (17.02%)

Develop/build NEW dog park (16.93%)

Acquire more open space for PROGRAMMED activities (soccer, baseball, etc.) (14.81%)

Develop/build NEW walking/biking trails (13.99%)

Level of Service Analysis 30

15 368

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

LOS â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Acreage Current acreage LOS is 3.0 acres/1,000 pop. Population projected to increase 8.7% by 2030. If no additional acres are added, by 2030, acreage LOS will drop to 2.8/1,000 pop. (-6.6%)

16 369

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

LOS â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Amenities (City only) Projected Deficiencies:

Baseball Field (1) Soccer Fields (1) Softball Field (1)

LOS â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Access Neighborhood Amenities 1/2-mile Service Area

Deficiencies: -

Basketball Courts Playgrounds Multi-purpose fields/greenspaces Volleyball Courts Picnic Shelters Trailheads

17 370

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

LOS â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Access Community Amenities 2-mile Service Area

Deficiencies: - Tennis Courts

Summary of Needs + Priorities 36

18 371

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Summary of Needs + Priorities

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

HIGH PRIORITIES

INTERMEDIATE PRIORITIES

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of Planning Process Needs Assessment Findings Visioning Preparation

19 372

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Priority Sub-Systems 1. New Parks + Facilities 2. Improved Connectivity 3. Improved Existing Parks 4. Programs + Events 5. Department Mission + Vision 39

Work Sessions

20 373

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

9/29/2018

Thank You!

Needs + Priorities Presentation July 19, 2018

21 374

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

2019-2023 Town of Cumberland Parks Master Plan

Vision + Action Plan Presentation March 28, 2019

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of High Priority Needs Master Plan Vision Action Plan

1 375

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

1. DISCOVER: Goals + Outcomes ‒ ‒

Scoping meeting Kick-off meeting

‒

Steering Committee

2. EVALUATE: Existing Conditions ‒ ‒ ‒

Base mapping Park site analysis Facilities inventory

‒ ‒

Lifestyle analysis Trends analysis

3. ENGAGE + ANALYZE: Needs Assessment ‒ ‒

Stakeholder interviews Public workshops

‒ ‒

LOS analysis Public survey

‒

Cost estimation

‒

Phasing

4. ENVISION Master Plan Vision ‒ ‒

Visioning Workshop Recommendations

5. IMPLEMENT Action Plan ‒ ‒

Project prioritization Funding sources

Stakeholder Interviews

Level of Service Analysis

Steering Committee

Demographic Analysis

Public Workshop

Lifestyle Analysis

Staff Interviews

Public Survey

Focus Groups

SiteScore™ Park Site Analysis Intercept Interviews 4

2 376

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Summary of Needs + Priorities

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

HIGH PRIORITIES

INTERMEDIATE PRIORITIES

Vision Sub-Systems 1. Guiding Principles 2. Improved Existing Parks 3. Future Parks 4. Bikeways + Trails 5. Programs + Events 6

3 377

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of High Priority Needs Master Plan Vision Action Plan

Guiding Principles 8

4 378

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Role Within Community » The Parks Department will be the stewards of quality of life in Cumberland. » This vision will benefit from the creation of separate Parks Department.

Role Within Community » Metrics the Parks Department should seek to affect:  Build community by facilitating connections between community members and the Town’s staff and amenities.  Improve community health  Pursue environmental and fiscal sustainability  Serve as catalysts for economic development 10

5 379

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Creation of Parks Board Âť It is recommended that the existing PAC be converted to a traditional Parks Board. Âť Operations and function would be similar, however, a Parks Board encourages a more transparent process my minimizing conflicts of interest.

Improved Existing Parks 12

6 380

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

System-wide Challenges » Poor visibility into/out of the park sites » Lack of internal and/or external wayfinding » Challenges with vandalism and abuse » Limited or no parking » Barriers to accessibility 13

National Road Park » Challenges:  Poor visibility into/out of the park  Poor vehicular accessibility  Limited parking  Lack of signage  Vandalism  Poor drainage  Poor condition of remaining amenities

7 381

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

National Road Park » Short-Term Strategies  Improve safety by improving access and visibility  Improve basketball courts

» Long-Term Strategies  Re-work roadway and pedestrian infrastructure  Encourage redevelopment  Improve drainage and usability of greenspace

Lions Park » Challenges:  Poor visibility into/out of the park  Poor vehicular accessibility  Lack of signage  Vandalism  Consistent flooding

8 382

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Lions Park » Short-Term Strategies  Open up views into the park  Convert existing pole barn to event pavilion  Relocate (quality) play equipment  Expand park into natural area to north; provide soft-surface walking trails  Add trailhead amenities  Consider replacing ball diamond  Phase 1 of dog park

Lions Park » Long-Term Strategies  Pursue extension of Buckley Road into the park; re-work pedestrian and vehicular infrastructure  Add paved parking and other amenities to events pavilion  Re-work pedestrian circulation  Finish dog park  Install community gardens.

9 383

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Honors Park » Challenges:  ADA accessibility  Pedestrian access  Signage  Lack of parking  Narrow user group

Honors Park » Short-Term Strategies  Provide dedicated on-street parking along Saturn Street w/ sidewalk into park.  Improve pedestrian access  Add trailhead amenities  Increase ADA accessibility of playground by adding accessible routes, improved surfaces, and a special-needs swing

10 384

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Honors Park » Long-Term Strategies  Expand park westward; improve access and multi-purpose field space  New, destination universally accessible playground

Wayburn Pocket Park » Challenges:  Limited size  Lack of amenities  Low visibility (resulting from size, not location)  Lack of consistent activation

11 385

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Wayburn Pocket Park » Short-term Strategies:  Increase usability by concentrating on simple, low-cost activation improvements (moveable furniture, overhead string lights, etc.)  Re-work landscape spaces to create a central, flexible greenspace for small events/gatherings  Find partners to help establish regular, small programs/events at the site.

Wayburn Pocket Park » Long-term Strategies:  Expand plaza spaces to the north and south  Add vertical structure and lighting along Washington Street

12 386

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Future Parks 25

LOS â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Acreage Current acreage LOS is 3.1 acres/1,000 pop. Population projected to increase 8.7% by 2030. If no additional acres are added, by 2030, acreage LOS will drop to 2.9/1,000 pop. (-6.6%)

13 387

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Vision: 30(ac) by 2030 Add 30 additional acres of developed/accessible parkland by 2030 to exceed Hancock County’s LOS. Target under-served areas, those with poor connectivity, and future growth areas (north-east). Includes new park development and existing park expansions. 27

1. 10th Street Park » Near intersection of German Church Road and 10th Street » Surrounding neighborhood has poor street connectivity » Adjacent to proposed future trail route and Eastridge Elementary School

14 388

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

2. 21st Street Park » Located in an underserved area in the far northeast of the town » Could connect to Buck Creek Trail and Lions Park » Town should evaluate the availability of undeveloped residential parcels in the Cobblefield neighborhood off of N. Buck Creek Rd.

3. Welland Park » Near north Starter Street » Undeveloped land already owned by Town » Adjacent to two (2) churches » Would serve as a connector between Starter and Michigan Streets » Some existing natural areas

15 389

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Expand Existing Parks Honors Park  4. Westward expansion

4.4 acres

Expand Existing Parks Lions Park  5. Natural area expansion 15.8 acres  6. Residential parcel(s) 8.1 acres

16 390

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Vision: 30(ac) by 2030 Lions Park Residential Expansion

8.1 ac.

Lions Park Natural Area Expansion

15.8 ac

Honors Park Expansion

4.4 ac

Welland Park Development

7.5 ac.

Total New Acres:

35.8 ac

W E L L A N D PA R K 33

Vision: 30 by 2030 Today

+ 5-Year Action Plan

+ Welland Park 34

17 391

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Bikeways + Trails 35

Vision: 5 min walk Âť All Cumberland residents should have access to a trail within a 5 minute walk (along a sidewalk) of their home. Âť Currently, approximately 50% of the developed residential areas are within a five-minute walk of an existing trail.

*This analysis does not take into account the presence of a sidewalk within those neighborhoods, as that is data that the Project Team did not have access to at the time of the study.

18 392

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Complete Streets Vision: It is recommended that the Town formally develop and adopt a “Complete Streets” policy

Trail Typologies Multi-Purpose Trail: » Separate from roadway » 10-12’ width » Greatest comfort level for users » Difficult to implement in areas with narrow ROW or require land acquisition

19 393

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Trail Typologies Cycle Track: » Also known as a protected bike lane » Separated/protected path adjacent to vehicular travel lane » Within existing ROW » Greater comfort level for users » Physical separation results in a higher construction cost

Trail Typologies Bicycle Boulevard: » Also known as SHARROWs » Bicyclist share drive lane with motorist » Work best on streets with low volume traffic + low speed » Designated with pavement markings and signage » Doesn’t modify street section – lower construction cost » Less comfort level for users 40

20 394

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Trail Typologies Bike Lanes: » Located immediately adjacent to vehicular travel lane » More appropriate for higher volume vehicular traffic » Fairly easy to implement » Lowest comfort level for users

Trailheads » Publicly accessible space that provides users with access to trail system » Basic amenities:  Signage/wayfinding  Bike racks  Water fountains  Pet waste stations  Paved parking

21 395

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Trailheads » Heavily travel route amenities:  Bicycle lockers  Bikeshare stations  Repair stations  Air stations  Vending machines/vendors  Emergency call stations  Restrooms

Trailheads Locations: 1. Honors Park 2. Lions Park 3. National Road Park 4. 10th Street Park (future) 5. 21st Street Park (future) 6. Welland Park (future)

1 44

22 396

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Priority New Segments Multi-Purpose Trail: 1. East-west 10th Street Trail connecting 10th Street Park (future) to Lions Park, Buck Creek Trail, and eastern neighborhoods. 2. National Road Trail Extension (north from park to 10th Street Trail

1 Neighborhood Connectors: A. 10th Street neighborhoods west of National Road Park B. Northern neighborhoods

Vision Âť Proposed priority segments would increase the amount of residents living within a 5-minute walk of a trail to approximately 95%. Âť Future trails in the eastern and northern portions of the Town will need to be developed as development in those areas increases over time.

23 397

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Programs + Events 47

Recreation Programs » Selectively offer recreational programs through partnerships with other entities, such as:  Churches/places of worship  Public schools  Homeowners associations/apartment complexes  Boys & Girls Club  Private dance/recreation/fitness centers  Existing local sports/athletic leagues

» Provide facilities/amenities that partners can use to offer programs 48

24 398

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Recreation Programs » Potential Locations: 1. Lions Park  Amble open space  Year-round events

2. Honors Park

 Greenspace west of park

3. National Road Park  Basketball courts

2 49

Special Events » Special Events Hub: Lions Park » Existing Special Events ($60K budget):  Weihnachtsmarkt  Cumberland Arts Festival  Brews, Blues, and BBQ  National Night Out  Honors Park Ceremony  Farmers Market

» Consider reinstating Family Fun Day at National Road Park and/or Lions Park 50

25 399

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of High Priority Needs Master Plan Vision Action Plan

Methodology Âť During the visioning process, the Town indicated that they have, on average, invested approximately $100,000 annually in capital improvements.

general fund

impact fees

bonds

grants

Âť This Action Plan assumes that this level of capital spending will remain consistent over the 20192023 fiscal years.

26 400

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Methodology » The $100,000 annual capital budget excludes costs associated with the following:

general fund

 Maintenance and operations

impact fees

 Events and programs

bonds

grants

 Trail development  Roadway/infrastructure improvements

Methodology » Action Plan items divided into (2) categories:  Pay-As-You-Go Projects – Projects at existing park sites which can be achieved using traditional (general fund) funding sources

general fund

impact fees

bonds

grants

 Partnership Projects – Those which require alternative funding strategies and/or partnerships.

27 401

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

5-Year Action Plan - Honors Park

5-Year Action Plan - Lions Park

28 402

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

5-Year Action Plan - Lions Park (cont.)

5-Year Action Plan - National Road Park

29 403

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

5-Year Action Plan - National Road Park NATIONAL ROAD PARK

DOLLAR TREE US POST OFFICE

5-Year Action Plan - National Road Park NATIONAL ROAD PARK

PARKING

DOLLAR TREE US POST OFFICE

30 404

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

5-Year Action Plan - Wayburn Pocket Park

5-Year Action Plan - Distribution of Capital Funds Wayburn Pocket Park $9,300

160,000 138,800

140,000

National Road Park $209,900

120,000 100,000

97,200

96,800

Honors Park $88,600

89,300 77,900

80,000

$500K

60,000 40,000 20,000 0

2019

2020

2021

2022

Lions Park $192,200

2023

31 405

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Partnership Proj. - Bikeways + Trails » High-priority trail projects over the next five (5) years include:  Development of a Town-wide Trails Master Plan + Complete Streets Policy  The development of high-priority neighborhood connectors  The design and development of the 10th Street Trail corridor  Provision of trailhead amenities within existing park spaces 63

Partnership Proj. - Roads + Streets » High-priority roadway projects over the next five (5) years include:  Buckley Road Extension - The extension of Buckley Road south through Lions Park, terminating at the existing access roadway to the park space along N. Buck Creek Road.

32 406

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Partnership Proj. - Roads + Streets » High-priority roadway projects over the next five (5) years include:  Niles Road Extension - The extension of Niles Road westward through National Road Park.  This project should: • Include any necessary land acquisition for ROW’s • Address the drainage and utilities associated with the park space to the north • Provide on-street parking available for park users. 65

Partnership Proj. - Plans, Studies, + Policies » Plans + Studies:  Develop and adopt a Trails System Master Plan  Undertake a Park Impact Fee (PIF) study to determine the feasibility and potential return on implementing a PIF.  Commission a feasibility study to inform the best use of the existing residential structure on the newly acquired Lions Park parcel.  Develop a management plan for the natural area at Lions Park 66

33 407

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Partnership Proj. - Plans, Studies, + Policies » Policies:  Formally develop and adopt a Complete Streets policy aligned with the recommendations of Section 4.5.  The Town should convert their existing Parks Advisory Council to a traditional Park Board.

Partnership Proj. - Plans, Studies, + Policies » Operational Recommendations:  Formally develop and adopt a Complete Streets policy aligned with the recommendations of Section 4.5.  The Town should convert their existing Parks Advisory Council to a traditional Park Board.

34 408

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

3/28/2019

Potential Funding Sources » Grants (State):  President Benjamin Harrison Conservation Trust Fund (PBHCTF)  Bicentennial Nature Trust (BNT)

general fund

» Grants (Federal):

impact fees

 Recreational Trails Program (RTP)  Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)  DNR Shooting Range Program

bonds

grants

» Value Capture:  Park Impact Fees 69

Thank You!

Vision + Action Plan Presentation March 28, 2019

35 409

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

2019-2023 Town of Cumberland Parks Master Plan

Final Public Plan Presentation April 8, 2019

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of High Priority Needs Master Plan Vision Action Plan

1 410

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

1. DISCOVER: Goals + Outcomes ‒ ‒

Scoping meeting Kick-off meeting

‒

Steering Committee

2. EVALUATE: Existing Conditions ‒ ‒ ‒

Base mapping Park site analysis Facilities inventory

‒ ‒

Lifestyle analysis Trends analysis

3. ENGAGE + ANALYZE: Needs Assessment ‒ ‒

Stakeholder interviews Public workshops

‒ ‒

LOS analysis Public survey

‒

Cost estimation

‒ ‒

Phasing Plan Adoption

4. ENVISION Master Plan Vision ‒ ‒

Visioning Workshop Recommendations

5. IMPLEMENT Action Plan ‒ ‒

Project prioritization Funding sources

Summary of Needs + Priorities

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

HIGH PRIORITIES

INTERMEDIATE PRIORITIES

2 411

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Vision Sub-Systems 1. Guiding Principles 2. Improved Existing Parks 3. Future Parks 4. Bikeways + Trails 5. Programs + Events 5

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of High Priority Needs Master Plan Vision Action Plan

3 412

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Guiding Principles 7

Role Within Community

The Parks Department will be the stewards of quality of life in Cumberland.

4 413

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Role Within Community The Parks Department should…  Build community by facilitating connections between community members and the Town’s staff and amenities.  Improve community health  Pursue environmental and fiscal sustainability  Serve as catalysts for economic development 9

Improved Existing Parks 10

5 414

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

System-wide Challenges Poor visibility into/out of the park sites Lack of internal / external wayfinding Challenges with vandalism and abuse Limited or no parking Barriers to accessibility Limited usable amenities 11

National Road Park Challenges:  Poor visibility into/out of the park  Poor vehicular accessibility  Limited parking  Lack of signage  Vandalism  Poor drainage  Poor condition of remaining amenities

6 415

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

National Road Park Vision:  Increase safety by adding lighting and improving access and visibility (vehicular and pedestrian)  Invest in improving basketball courts (lighting, goals, and surfacing); find partner to help program  Position park as economic catalyst  New accessible playground  Restored woodland area  Flexible greenspaces for events and athletics.

Lions Park Challenges:  Poor visibility into/out of the park  Poor vehicular accessibility  Lack of signage  Vandalism  Consistent flooding

7 416

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Lions Park Vision:  Expand park into available parcels to increase size, visibility, and accessibility.  Convert existing pole barn to event pavilion w/ event lawn/biergarten, and parking.  Relocate (quality) play equipment adjacent to event pavilion.  Extend Buckley Road into the park  Dog park  Community gardens  Flexible greenspace (flood-prone) 15

Honors Park Challenges:  ADA accessibility  Pedestrian access  Signage  Lack of parking  Narrow user group

8 417

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Honors Park Vision:  Improve pedestrian accessibility into and within the park space by providing dedicated on-street parking along Saturn Street w/ sidewalk into park  Add trailhead amenities  Expand park westward; improve access and multi-purpose field space for recreational athletics and/or events  Destination universally accessible playground  Provide connection to Town Hall and National Road Park 17

Wayburn Pocket Park Challenges:  Limited size  Lack of amenities  Low visibility (resulting from size, not location)  Lack of consistent activation

9 418

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Wayburn Pocket Park Vision:  Re-work landscape spaces to create a central, flexible greenspace for small events/gatherings.  Park would serve as an “outdoor room” for existing events along US40.  Expand plaza spaces to the north and south.  Activate space with moveable furniture, overhead string lights, etc.  Find partners to activate!

Future Parks 20

10 419

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Vision: 30(ac) by 2030 Add 30 additional acres of developed + accessible parkland by 2030 to exceed Hancock Countyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s LOS.

Future Parks 1. 10th Street Park - near intersection of German Church Road and 10th Street 2. 21st Street Park - located in an underserved area in the far northeast of the town

3. Welland Park â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Existing Townowned parcel near north Starter Street 22

11 420

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Expand Existing Parks Honors Park  Westward expansion

4.4 acres

Expand Existing Parks Honors Park  4. Westward expansion

4.4 acres

Lions Park  Natural area expansion  Residential parcel(s)

15.8 acres 8.1 acres

12 421

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Vision: 30(ac) by 2030 Lions Park Residential Expansion

8.1 ac.

Lions Park Natural Area Expansion

15.8 ac

Honors Park Expansion

4.4 ac

Welland Park Development

7.5 ac.

Total New Acres:

35.8 ac

W E L L A N D PA R K 25

Bikeways + Trails 26

13 422

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Vision: 5-min walk » All Cumberland residents should have access to a trail within a 5 minute walk (along a sidewalk) of their home. » Currently, approximately 50% of the developed residential areas are within a five-minute walk of an existing trail.

*This analysis does not take into account the presence of a sidewalk within those neighborhoods, as that is data that the Project Team did not have access to at the time of the study.

Complete Streets Vision: It is recommended that the Town formally develop and adopt a “Complete Streets” policy

14 423

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Trail Typologies Multi-Purpose Trail: » Separate from roadway » 10-12’ width » Greatest comfort level for users » Difficult to implement in areas with narrow ROW or require land acquisition » Highest comfort level

15 424

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Trail Typologies Bike Lanes: » Located immediately adjacent to vehicular travel lane » More appropriate for higher volume vehicular traffic » Fairly easy to implement » Lowest comfort level

16 425

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Trailheads Major Trailheads: 1. Lions Park 2. National Road Park 3. 21st Street Park (future)

Minor Trailheads: 4. Honors Park 5. 10th Street Park (future) 6. Welland Park (future)

2 4

1 Neighborhood Connectors: A. 10th Street neighborhoods west of National Road Park B. Northern neighborhoods

17 426

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Programs + Events 36

18 427

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Recreation Programs » Selectively offer recreational programs through partnerships with other entities (e.g. Boys and Girls Club, churches, rec leagues, etc.) Potential Locations: 1. Lions Park (fitness programs) 2. Honors Park (field sports) 3. National Road Park (court sports)

1 3 2

Special Events » Special Events Hub: Lions Park » Existing Special Events:  Weihnachtsmarkt  Cumberland Arts Festival  Brews, Blues, and BBQ  National Night Out  Honors Park Ceremony  Farmers Market

» Consider reinstating Family Fun Day at National Road Park. 38

19 428

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Presentation Agenda

1 2 3

Review of High Priority Needs Master Plan Vision Action Plan

Methodology » Action Plan items divided into (2) categories:  Pay-As-You-Go ($100K annually) – Projects largely at existing park sites which can be achieved using traditional (general fund) funding sources

general fund

impact fees

bonds

grants

 Partnership Projects – Those which require alternative funding strategies and/or partnerships. 40

20 429

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

National Road Park 5-Year Action Plan A. Extend Niles Street west; merge with existing park drive. B. Plant native trees in woodland area C. Install 6' sidewalk from Washington Street leading into park D. New park entry signage (vehicular and pedestrian) E. Improve existing basketball courts by fixing lighting, improving shelter, adding new goals, and re-surfacing.

National Road Park 5-Year Action Plan E. Improve existing basketball courts by fixing lighting, improving shelter, adding new goals, and re-surfacing.  Partner with local community groups to host a “day of service” in the park to repair shelter, clean up space.  Seek our funding partners such as the Pacers/NBA/WBA for grant dollars and/or sponsorships.  Find community partner who will host regular events on-site.

21 430

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Lions Park 5-Year Action Plan A. Convert pole barn to events pavilion B. Finalize land swap with adjacent residence(s) C. Add/fix site security lighting D. Identify and remove invasive plant species from new parcel(s) E. Add trailhead amenities F. Relocate existing play equipment G. New park entry signage (vehicle and pedestrian) H. Dog Park - Phase 1 I. Add soft-surface trails natural area 43

Honors Park 5-Year Action Plan A. Improve safety and ADA accessibility of existing playground B. Provide on-street parallel parking along Saturn Street C. Add an ADA accessible walkway from parking into the playground area D. Add crosswalks at intersection of Saturn and Munsie Streets E. New park entry signage â&#x20AC;&#x201C; vehicular and pedestrian. F. Build trailhead near Pennsy Trail; connect via sidewalk/trail. 44

22 431

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Wayburn Pocket Park 5-Year Action Plan A. Re-work landscape spaces to create a central, flexible greenspace for small events/gatherings B. Increase usability by concentrating on simple, low-cost activation improvements (moveable furniture, overhead string lights, etc.) C. Find partners to activate!

5-Year Action Plan - Distribution of Capital Funds Wayburn Pocket Park $9,300

160,000 138,800

140,000

National Road Park $209,900

120,000 100,000

97,200

96,800

Honors Park $88,600

89,300 77,900

80,000

$500K

60,000 40,000 20,000 0

2019

2020

2021

2022

Lions Park $192,200

2023

23 432

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Partnership Proj. - Bikeways + Trails » High-priority trail projects over the next five (5) years include:  Development of a Town-wide Trails Master Plan  The development of high-priority neighborhood connectors  The design and development of the 10th Street Trail corridor  Provision of trailhead amenities within existing park spaces 47

24 433

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Partnership Proj. - Plans, Studies, + Policies » Plans + Studies:  Develop and adopt a Trails System Master Plan  Undertake a Park Impact Fee (PIF) study.  Commission a feasibility study to inform the best use of the existing residential structure at Lions Park.  Develop a management plan for the natural area at Lions Park

L I O N S PA R K 50

25 434

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Partnership Proj. - Plans, Studies, + Policies » Policies:  Formally develop and adopt a Complete Streets policy aligned with the recommendations of Section 4.5.  The Town should explore the feasibility of converting their existing Parks Advisory Council to a traditional Park Board.

Potential Additional Funding Sources » Grants (State):  President Benjamin Harrison Conservation Trust Fund (PBHCTF)  Bicentennial Nature Trust (BNT)

general fund

» Grants (Federal):

impact fees

 Recreational Trails Program (RTP)  Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)  DNR Shooting Range Program

bonds

grants

» Value Capture:  Park Impact Fees 52

26 435

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Thank You!

Final Public Plan Presentation April 8, 2019

5-Year Action Plan - National Road Park

27 436

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

5-Year Action Plan - National Road Park NATIONAL ROAD PARK

DOLLAR TREE US POST OFFICE

5-Year Action Plan - National Road Park NATIONAL ROAD PARK

PARKING

DOLLAR TREE US POST OFFICE

28 437

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

5-Year Action Plan - Lions Park

5-Year Action Plan - Honors Park

29 438

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

5-Year Action Plan - Lions Park (cont.)

5-Year Action Plan - Wayburn Pocket Park

30 439

SECTION 6.4 - Supporting Information

4/8/2019

Trailheads » Minor Trailheads:  Signage/wayfinding  Bike racks  Water fountains

 Pet waste stations  Paved parking

» Major Trailheads: (in addition to above)

 Bicycle lockers  Bikeshare stations  Repair stations  Air stations

 Vending machines/vendors  Emergency call stations  Restrooms

31 440

626 North Illinois Street | Indianapolis, IN 46204 | p: 317.635.5030 | f: 317.634.5409 | bdmd.com