VOL CX, No. 3
Sheffield, Massachusetts
October 11, 2019
No Longer An Experiment The History of Inclusion and Feminism at Berkshire
by Samantha Bernstein ’22 50 years ago, Berkshire School voted to accept female students for the first time. 50 years ago, then-headmaster John Godman decided to welcome nine girls on campus in what he called the “Berkshire Experiment.” And 50 years ago, Berkshire joined the ranks of the first co-educational boarding schools. In response to why this
Berkshire co-ed was a natural decision. So, along with other educational institution like Yale University and Trinity College (also celebrating their 50 years of co-education this year), Berkshire took a leap of faith. With little preparation and almost no successful precedent, the school would soon graduate a new class of exceptional women. With over 300 boys and just nine girls, Mary Jane Anderson Shannon ’71, Mindy Brooks Belter ’72, Alex Brunel ’72, Nancy MacDonald Hecker ’72, Carole Maghery King ’72, Linda Matson Heyes ’73, Paula Pevzner ’73, Pat Davidson Sherman ’73, and Kathy Putnam ’74 were in a stark minority. Originally, girls were only allowed to enroll as day students, enduring ostracization from their male peers during the day and going home to their families at night. They were not allowed to go to dances, play sports, or participate in any extracurricular
decision was made, Mrs. Bullock, class of ’86 and current English teacher, explained that “the school needed more students and that was a population that they could easily tap into.” She also explained that Berkshire had other motivations in making the switch: they made the decision out of principle. Berkshire considered the education of women to be morally just. Combined with the promise of financial stability, making
activities Berkshire had to offer. It took the original nine’s perseverance and eagerness to add more activities to the curriculum, including the Ritt Kellogg Mountain Program and soccer. For afternoon activities, the school quickly realized they needed to hire someone to coach a sport suitable for girls at the time. Dance seemed to be the best option. With little opportunity to express themselves, these nine girls made the best out of their experiences. An inexperienced but enthusiastic Berkshire took any and all of their ideas to help them fit into life as a Bear, including starting a cheerleading program. In the fall of ’72, Berkshire took the greatest remaining step. They took the “experiment” of co-education out of the conference room and into Eipper, where they housed their first female boarding students. Not much physical change went into this transition. In fact, re-
moving the urinals in the bathroom were the most significant renovations the school made. Brunel was one of the first female boarders in the school’s history. Besides “wanting to survive,” Brunel persevered through her high school experience. Never wanting to quit, she helped pave the way for women to come. Inviting female boarders into Berkshire was a step in the right direction — one that led to four girls’ dormitories today. From the original nine girls making up almost 50% of our current population, it’s important to understand the history of women and coeducation at Berkshire and the effects it has had on our school. By recognizing the history of women at Berkshire, we can then look towards the future and create a more inclusive community. Continue to page 4 for more on 50 Years of coeducation.
INSIDE NEWS • Tragic Arson Murder in Kyoto • Global News Brief • Gina Barreca on Feminism • Meet Your New Faculty • Pro Vita Course Proposals ARTS • Berkshire A Capella • Fall Theater SPORTS • Renewed RKMP Program • Athlete Profiles OPINION • New Student Experience • Swap Shop • On the SinoAmerican trade War Berkshire School
Berkshire School
Left to right, Alex Brunel, Linda Heyes, and Marianne Hubert spoke at a panel for all school meeting
Media Influences Regarding The 2019 Hong Kong Protest by Wilson Zheng ’21 Four and a half years after the Umbrella Revolution, the Hong Kong government is facing another Special-Administrative-Region-wide (Hong Kong is technically not recognized as a country) revolution on the extradition law proposed in early 2019, the Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill movement. The Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill was proposed in response to the 2018 murder
of Poon Hiu-wing by her boyfriend Chan Tong-kai in Taiwan, where the two Hong Kong residents were visiting as tourists. If the bill were to be passed, the Hong Kong government would gain the right to extradite fugitives in Hong Kong to the mainland government. A series of protests began as Hong Kong citizens feared that the bill would undermine the sovereignty of Hong Kong as a SAR under the system “one country, two systems” created by Deng Xiaoping. In theory, any number of political refugees and
The original female class of nine at Berkshire School. enemies could be extradited under a series of vague Chinese laws. The Hong Kong government would no longer be able to ensure the independence of its citizens from the Chinese government, gradually moving towards a single-system government fully controlled by China. Having lived in both mainland China and Hong Kong, I have people
around me telling different stories about this protest. This leads to a question: Are the Chinese hearing accurate stories? As one might know, the Chinese government maintains censorship over all media capable of reaching a wide audience, including television broadcast, news websites, and even mobile social applications such as WeChat and TikTok. Many key foreign websites in-
1
cluding Google, Facebook and Twitter are strictly inaccessible without the help of VPN (virtual private networks). Recently, even VPNs are being banned. Most of the protests since the June 9th demonstration have been peaceful, decentralized, and self-organized marches. But what the mainland Chinese people see is a whole different story. After surfing a little bit
in some of the Chinese websites like Baidu, Sina and Weibo, there was an astonishingly lack of information on the Hong Kong protest. The only related posts are ones that depict the protests as extremely violent, either showing police officers or citizens getting beaten up by a crowd. (continued on next page)