SOAR ANALYSIS The model we used to focus on our situational analysis was the SOAR, Strengths, Opportunities, Aspirations and Results. It is a model of appreciative inquiry. We chose this in preference to the more traditional SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis because it is more reflective of our strength-based approach to mentorship. In considering our strengths, we identified the following: • • • • • •
Diversity of our staff who bring diverse perspectives and experiences to our work. Efficiency and the willingness to adapt to achieve greater outcomes. Consistent and positive communication. Established name and brand with a legacy of trust. Strong partnerships with our donors and community. Ability to adapt to changing circumstances and community needs.
SOAR ANALYSIS
We identified our opportunities to be the flip side of challenges: • • • • • • •
Supply of volunteers for children/families. Diversity of funding. Staff resources. Training and educations for mentors. Collaboration and partnerships in the community. Inclusive marketing messages. Staff retention strategies.
Our aspirations included: • • • • • • • • •
Collaboration between BBGV and BBGV Foundation. Combining fundraising with volunteer recruitment. Research and knowledge mobilization. Adapting technologies to improve processes. Education and collaboration with our network – mentors, families, donors. Ongoing adult mentor and staff training. Volunteer engagement strategies. Balanced workload for staff. Staff retention strategies.
We will know we have succeeded when we see the following results: • • • • • •
Waitlist reductions for children and families. Increased number of volunteers. Increased number of donors and funding. Increased engagement with our internal network. Effective marketing programs developed. Broad representation of diverse communities as Mentors/Staff/Board members and families.
11
