Report: Expanded Early Recovery Project

Final Report

June, 2013

Evaluation of Immediate Impacts of Community Physical Infrastructure (CPI) Projects under Expanded Early Recovery Project (EERP)

Project funding by

www.srsp.org.pk

Final Report

June, 2013

Evaluation of Immediate Impacts of Community Physical Infrastructure (CPI) Projects under Expanded Early Recovery Project (EERP)

Associates in Development (AiD) Pvt. Ltd, Pakistan

4

TABLE OF CONTENT Executive Summary 7 Conclusions and Recommendations 13 1.

Background and Context: Malakand Division and the EERP 2.

Objectives and Scope of Work 17 3.

Approach and Methodology 18 3.1 Stage 1 - Inception 19 3.1.1 Work Plan 19 3.1.2 Tools 19 3.1.3 Staffing 19 3.1.4 QA Plan 20 3.1.5 Sampling 20 3.2 Stage 2 – Field Work 21 3.2.1 Pre-testing and Finalization of tools 21 3.2.2 Field Activities 22 3.2.3 Challenges in the field 22 3.3 Stage 3 22 3.3.1 Data Entry, Analysis and report writing 23 4.

Findings: 24 4.1 CPI documentation: Availability and Adequacy 26 4.1.1 Social Feasibility 27 4.1.2 Environmental Screening 27 4.1.3 Technical Feasibility: 28 4.1.4 Water Quality Test 30 4.1.5 Project Proposal 30 4.1.6 Project Approval 30 4.1.7 PI register 30 4.1.8 Project completion report 31 4.1.9 PI completion certificate 31 4.1.10 Handing and taking over certificate: 31 4.2 Design Validation 32 4.2.1 Scheme Layouts: 32 4.2.2 Design Validation: 32 4.2.3 The following is a type wise breakdown of the CPIs: 33 4.3 Relevance 34 4.3.1 Priority 34 4.3.2 Participation 34 4.3.3 Community Contribution 35 4.4 Effectiveness 37 4.4.1 Functionality: 37 4.4.2 Benefits 39 4.4.3 Problems 41 4.5 Efficiency: 42 4.6 Sustainability 42 4.6.1 Design and layout. 42 4.6.2 Quality 44 4.6.3 O&M systems 45 4.6.4 Institutional Maturity 48 4.6.5 Meetings 48 4.6.6 Trainings 49 4.6.7 Self-initiated community projects 50 4.7 Impact 52 4.7.1 Overall impact analysis 52 4.7.2 Drinking Water Supply - CPI Scheme Impact 53 4.7.3 Street pavements and drainage 55 4.7.4 Link roads and bridges 56 4.7.5 Irrigation 57 4.8 Conclusions and Recommendations 58

16

5

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AiD Associates in Development AusAID the Australian Agency for International Development CBR California Bearing Ratio Test CO Community Organization CPI Community Physical Infrastructure DWSS Drinking Water Supply Scheme ERP Early Recovery Programme ER Environmental Review EERP Expanded Early Recovery Programme ES Environmental Screening FGD Focus Group Discussion GF Gravity Flow GoKP Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa GPS Global Positioning System HH Household HO Head Office IRR Irrigation KII Key Informant interviews KP Khyber Pakhtunkhwa MH/MHP/MHPP Micro Hydel / Micro Hydel Power / Micro Hydel Power Plant MTDF Medium Term Development Framework NGO Non-Governmental Organization O&M Operations & Maintenance PCC Plain Cement Concrete PCNA Post-Crisis Needs Assessment PCR Project Completion Report PI Physical Infrastructure QA Quality Assurance RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete SPD Street Pavement and Drainage SRSP Sarhad Rural Support Programme TOP Terms of Partnership

6

Location map of the expanded early recovery project area (Pl see annex 9 for details district wise maps)

Faizabad

TA J I K I S TA a

ary

ud

Am

Shu nji gol

er iv

Ch itr

al r

r

na

Ku

Chitral

Gi

lgi

FANA

Indus

KPK

Chilas

Swat

Upper Dir

t

Gilgit

Kohistan

Mahmud-e Raqi Asadabad

A FG A I S TA

Saidu Bajaur Agency

ar

n Ku

Mehtarlam

Kabul

Î!

A ber Khy

Parachinar Sadda

cy gen Jamrud

Peshawar Peshawar

Daggar Buner

L in

Abbottabad

Swabi Haripur Attock

Kohat Kohat

Hangu

AJK Punch

Rawalpindi

ISLAMABAD

Thal Karak Indu

Bannu Bannu

North Waziristan Agency

s

Bhimbar

Tribal Area Adj. Lakki Marwat

South Waziristan Agency

Tank Gujranwala

Tank D.I. Khan ob

Tribal Area Adjacent D.I. Khan

PA K I S TA

Sargodha

Dera Ismail Khan Gu

Chenab

ma

l Jhelum

Gumal

Zh

Gujrat

Lakki Marwat

Tribal Area Adjacent Tank

Kotli

Mangla reservoir

Tribal Area Adjacent Bannu

FATA

tr o

I DI A

Tithwal

Î! Islamabad

Tribal Area Adj. Peshawar Tribal Area Adj. Kohat

n f Co eo

Mansehra Muzaffarabad

Nowshera

rakzai Agency

Kurram Agency

Gardez

Mingora

Malakand Pa Mohmand Agency Mardan Ghalanai Char Mardan sad da

Jalalabad

Batagram

Shangla

Lower Dir

l

Charikar

BALOCHISTAN Indus

Zhob

Jhang Sadar

Faisalabad

PUNJAB

Ravi

Kasur

7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background and Context

Scope of Work

The 2010 floods affected large parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Nearly 1,500 people lost their lives and 37,000 homes were destroyed. Malakand Division was one of the worst affected areas. During this period, AusAid funded Sarhad Rural Support program (SRSP) for ‘an initial Early Recovery Programme designed to target the flood affected districts of Peshawar, Nowshera and Charsadda. However, based on the PCNA1 findings and priorities identified for early recovery, SRSP submitted a revised proposal to AusAid for an Expanded Early Recovery Programme (EERP) that would focus on reconstruction in the entire Malakand Division2.

The scope involved the assessment of 213 schemes implemented by SRSP across the entire Malakand Division.

The objective of the study was the verification and validation of the CPI schemes and an assessment of the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and immediate impact on the lives of the local communities.

In 2011, AusAid earmarked AUS$ 3 million (PKR 255 million) for EERP that aimed to re-build communities in areas hit by floods and insurgency in Malakand Division3 . Focused on immediate recovery and rehabilitation needs, the program called for completing all identified targets within a nine month period.

The challenging environment in Malakand was not new to SRSP, which had been working in the project area since 2001.

As part of its development approach SRSP typically ensures a long term engagement with the local communities and maintains a presence even after the project implementation comes to an end. This has enabled the organization to continue supporting the capacity building and networking needs of communities and also retain a knowledge base of the area and its people. With this structure in place SRSP has the potential to ensure sustainability by leveraging additional resources for the communities, as and when the opportunities arise.

The project area covered 191 villages (75 union councils) of 7 districts in the Malakand Division. The targeted districts include, Chitral, Upper and Lower Dir, Swat, Buner, Malakand Agency and Shangla The programme had 5 components including Community Institutions and Networking, Rebuilding Community Physical Infrastructure Improved Livelihoods - through micro Enterprise, and through NRMbased enterprises and Support to the local government.

Under its component on community institutions, the project organized nearly 400 local community-based organizations.

The target group included people hit by insurgency and floods, particularly the poor and marginalized, comprising nearly 74,000 households.

The Community Infrastructure was the most visible and the largest component of the project and consumed 93% of the programme development budget. Specific interventions included the restoration of community enabling infrastructure, predominantly in the drinking water sector but also link roads, micro hydro electricity projects, protective works, bridges and sanitation projects. Approximately, 37,507 households gained access to clean drinking water and improved services through rehabilitation/construction of community-based physical infrastructure schemes. The project also included enterprise and vocational training for vulnerable groups particularly women. Over 700 households were also provided access to improved livelihood opportunities.

The geographic spread included all 7 districts of Malakand division including Buner, Chitral, Lower Dir, Malakand, Shangla, Swat and Upper Dir. Approach and Methodology The primary focus of the study was two pronged; an engineering assessment and a structured community survey.

The engineering assessment focused on: i) an assessment of the availability and adequacy of the various engineering documentation required for the implementation of the schemes; and ii) a physical verification of the schemes’ existence and the state of their functionality. The community survey included: iii) a Household interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) held with a sample of the direct and indirect beneficiaries. . The survey, sample covered 60 schemes out of the total of 213 that were randomly selected (proportional to the type and geographic spread of the schemes in the districts covered). The sample size represents a confidence Level of 93 % with less than 10% margin of error.

The study commenced in mid-February 20134 and was completed by mid June 2013. Led by a an experienced team leader, multiple field teams assisted with the assessment to ensure timely completion of the full scope spread over vast and a challenging terrain. Each team comprised a field supervisor and two researchers. In addition, a short-term advisor, a senior engineer, and short-term inputs from a Social Sector/Gender Specialist, and Data Analyst were tapped during implementation.

A variety of assessment tools helped generate the quantitative and qualitative analysis that provided the basis for this report.

Findings The following sections summarize the key findings: 1.1 Documentation: Availability and Adequacy: Except for a small number of CPIs, documentation showing compliance with the SRSP processes such as social feasibility, Terms of partnership (TOP), project completion reports (PCRs), certificate of completion and handover documents to the community were available and found to be adequate.

However the engineering design basis and calculations were unavailable or inadequate for bulk of sample CPIs, particularly for the road infrastructure CPIs. 1.2 Design validation: All the 60 schemes were visited and checked for variations

1 Post Conflict Needs Assessment: A multi-donor initiative.

2 Livelihood Strengthening Programme - Expanded Early Recovery Project in Border Areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Malakand Division) – SRSP, April 2011 3 Expanded Early Recovery Project (Livelihood Strengthening Programme) Project Completion Report - SRSP 4 See Annex 7

8 in relation to the original plans and designs. The layout of 9 schemes had significant variations while the rest had minor or no variations. The significant variations in layout were for DWSS. They either had to do with lengths of pipe network or the variations in the location/number of storage or supply water tanks from what was originally planned.

Furthermore, the measurement of the structures showed major variations for 12 schemes, whereas 21 schemes had relatively minor variations.

Although a detailed investigation was not made on the rationale for the change, however, it was reported that the change was necessitated by site conditions.

1.3 Relevance Relevance refers to whether or not the selected schemes responded to the needs and priorities of the target community.

A number of indicators covered this important assessment parameter and aimed at assessing the prioritization of the CPI schemes; participation in planning and implementation; and the community contributions towards the schemes.

1.3.1 CPI Prioritization An overwhelming majority, (98 percent of all male and females surveyed in all districts, except Lower Dir, indicated that the schemes implemented under the EERP addressed the priority needs of the communities.

1.3.2 Participation The majority of respondents reported their own or the household’s participation in the planning and implementation of the CPIs. The highest participation in planning and needs assessment of CPI schemes was in the district of Chitral (100 %) and the least in Shangla where it was 67 %. Given the social norms of the area it came as no surprise that participation of females was found to be low, however 32 % females indicated that they or another female from their household did participate in the needs assessment. Overall participation in the implementation was reported as 82 %. Again the highest level of participation was reported from Chitral and the lowest in Shangla.

1.3.3 Community Contribution Community contribution is an important indicator of ownership. Nearly 77 percent of the respondents (75 percent females; and 79 percent males) claimed to have made contributions in cash and/or in kind to the construction of CPI schemes, while the rest of the 23 percent did not contribute. Relatively higher contributions were made in Chitral, Upper Dir and Buner (100, 92 and 83 percent, respectively). Interestingly, 77 percent of respondents which were non CO members also contributed towards construction. Of the total households that contributed, 17 percent contributed in cash. The highest frequency of cash contributions (30 percent) was witnessed in Shangla. 70 percent of the contributions were in the form of labor whereas 20 percent contributed additional items in kind.

1.4 Effectiveness Effectiveness refers to whether the CPI schemes are practically meeting the need for which they were designed and built.

Accordingly the indicators against which effectiveness has been gauged are functionality and recurring benefits of the CPI schemes. Except for an odd few cases, all the schemes

were found to be functioning well and providing the anticipated benefit to their respective communities.

1.4.1 Functionality From the community perspective, approximately 91 percent of the respondents across the 7 districts acknowledged that the CPI schemes were working and functional. Across the respondents, 86 % of the female respondents believed that the schemes were 100 percent functional, as compared to the more cautious replies of male respondents, 61 % of whom felt that the schemes were 100 % effectively working. FGD analysis supported the overall satisfactory responses from majority of the male and female participants.

Functionality on the ground was also verified by the field engineers. Out of the total sample of 60 schemes, the field engineers were able to inspect and verify that 52 schemes were fully functional.

Of the remaining 8 CPIs, 4 schemes were not operational at the time of the visit. These schemes included the MHPP scheme in Shao Kalam, district Swat, and Khanabad, district Upper Dir; both of them had technical breakdown and were in the process of being repaired by the communities. Whereas, the Irrigation Channel in Meragai Swat was not operational, since it was not an irrigation season, whereas in the case of DWSS Dardyal, Kabal Swat, the intake structure had been damaged due to a snow slide and the communities were waiting for the snow to melt before attempting any repairs.

The remaining 3 schemes namely Drainage CPI, Bazkhel, DWSS Sher Khan, and Link Road Gujjer Tangi, were partially functional. A major reason for this seemed to be lack of an effective O&M system for these CPIs. 1.4.2 Scheme Benefits Overall 90 percent of respondents claimed to be directly benefitting from the CPI schemes. A relatively higher percentage of people (100, 97 and 80 percent) were found to be benefiting from the CPI schemes in Shangla, Lower Dir and Chitral, reinforcing the communities’ high levels of participation in planning, implementation and cash contribution in these 3 particular districts. Furthermore, the schemes were benefiting members and nonmembers alike as nearly 88 % of the non-members interviewed also confirmed that they were directly benefitting.

1.5 Efficiency: Bulks of the CPIs were implemented within the planned budgets and time of completion. The review shows that 95% of the schemes were completed within the planned timeframe while 87 % of the sample schemes were completed within the estimated budgets. A relatively modest 7% of the schemes exceeded the approved budget by 10% while 6% of the scheme sample was completed under the estimated budgets. It is noteworthy that in the case of budget overrun it was the community which invariably contributed to meet the shortfall.

Although hard comparative data is not available for similar sized schemes which the GoKP or other organizations have implemented, there is anecdotal evidence that cost per beneficiary in the case of SRSP CPIs is relatively low. One reason is community contributions which on average is at least 20 % of the total cost of schemes

9 1.6 Sustainability Sustainability of the schemes refers to whether i) the schemes will fulfill its design life and ii) whether or not communities will continue to maintain the systems independent of any support from SRSP. The indicators for this assessment parameter included quality of the CPI schemes; and the Operations & Management (O&M) systems put in place (including transparency), and the overall institutional maturity of the community organization.

1.6.1 Quality Despite the rough and remote mountain terrain, the quality of schemes of the majority of schemes was found to be good. Community perception in this regard corroborated the engineering team’s findings. The focus group discussions indicated that more than 91 percent of the respondents were satisfied with the current condition of the CPI schemes, out of these 87 % were non members.

In Buner, Chitral and Malakand Agency, nearly 100 % of the male respondents showed satisfaction; while 86 to 97 % of the females indicated satisfaction with the quality of work. Out of the 9 schemes which had quality issues, most indicated quality of concrete in the PCC link roads as an issue.

1.6.2 O&M systems Knowledge of any O&M system was generally low. Almost 48 % of the respondents were not aware of any O&M system. Of these 24 % were male and 79 % were female respondents. Approximately 39 percent of respondents claimed to have made contributions to O&M. The largest contribution was in irrigation schemes (55 percent); and ‘others’ (77 percent). Of the contributors, 52 percent were CO members, and 49 percent non-CO members.

Respondents acknowledged awareness that most of the maintenance funds were being run through SRSP and then CO bank accounts. The FGD analysis reflects that about half the male respondents claimed to be satisfied with the O&M system, however less than a quarter of the females showed satisfaction with O&M.. Majority of female respondents were unaware of any O&M system.

For the engineering team, verification of O&M involved observation of how well the CPIs were being maintained and discussed the functioning of the O&M committees.

It was reported that O&M committees for half the CPI schemes were found fully functional; whereas it was observed that O&M existed and functioned partially at 27 percent of the sites; while 24 percent cases there was no functional system for O&M. From the engineering view point a total of 14 schemes were not well maintained.

1.6.3 Institutional Maturity Another indicator of ‘Sustainability’ is Institutional Maturity, which assesses the capacity of the communities to independently run the CPI schemes in the longer-run.

Indicators for this assessment are complex and tricky.

However some of these were captured during the field survey. Among these include; Community meetings during- and post-implementation of CPI schemes; trainings of community of members; and community’s local initiative.

1.6.3.1 Meetings While 70 % of the respondents said that they met either fortnightly or monthly before CPI completion,

only 12 % meet on a regular basis once the CPI was completed. Most of the respondents however said that they continue to meet on need basis.

1.6.3.2 Trainings Nearly half the respondents, 46 % said that someone from the community has been given trainings with the lowest proportion in Dir and highest being reported from Malakand. Most of these trainings were in leadership and financial management, but 14% were on O&M, related which were all given to the males of the community.

1.6.3.3 Self-initiated community projects 17 % of respondents indicated that they had imitated other projects besides the CPI which was assisted by SRSP. Of these, 67 % respondents were CO members whereas, 33 were non-CO members.

Furthermore, the new indicatives by CO members were predominantly donor assisted as compared to the once implemented by the non CO members, showing a greater capacity to network and leverage external funds for local development.

Linking the above analysis to the subject of community’s ability to self initiate projects and/or run existing schemes independently, majority of the FGD responses endorsed the confidence of the male and female participants claiming that the CPI schemes could very well continue to run in the absence of support from SRSP. However, scheme-wise response from FGD participants believed that irrigation and drinking water supply schemes respectively could not run solely by the communities.

1.7 Immediate Impact Overall the community felt a significant positive impact of the schemes.

For the irrigation schemes include enhanced yields, crop production and increase in overall farm incomes.

Construction of street pavements and drainage, and implementation of improved drinking water supplies led to a decrease in foul smells and a perception of decreased waterborne diseases. With the construction of link roads and bridges, approximately 68 percent of respondents across all 7 districts acknowledged a positive impact on women’s free time, enabling them to manage their daily activities more efficiently and productively. Some indirect benefits include a significant positive impact on girls’ and boys’ education reported by all respondents across all 7 districts, post implementation of the various CPI schemes. More specifically, this was in terms of greater access/lesser distances due to the construction of link roads and bridges, etc. However, the main immediate outcomes, as a direct result of the CPI schemes are as follows: 1.7.1 Drinking Water Supply - CPI Scheme Impact Post implementation, the average time taken to reach the water source decreased drastically, allowing community members, particularly females, to allocate their time more efficiently to other important daily tasks. The result findings indicate that the responsibility of collecting water is now being shared most often by the daughters (21 percent), allowing the mothers to utilize their time more efficiently. Satisfaction levels with the new DWS CPI schemes were 100 percent for males and 97 percent for females, implying lower risks of waterborne diseases.

10 1.7.2 Street pavements and drainage Majority of the respondents (92 percent) in the 3 districts where the scheme was implemented, Malakand Agency, Shangla and Swat agreed that post implementation of the CPI; the issue of stagnant water in the streets had either been completely or partially eliminated.

Additionally, post-SPD CPI, in Shangla and Swat, 75 and 93 percent respondents, respectively claimed high incidences of reduction in foul smell, while only 50 percent respondents reported the same in Malakand Agency. However, majority of the respondents from Shangla (approximately 62 percent) are still claiming that waste water is not disposed properly even after implementation of the scheme. Post implementation of the CPI scheme, nearly 50 percent of the respondents in both Malakand Agency and Shangla perceived an improvement and positive effect on the health of the children as a result.

1.7.3 Link roads and bridges The new link roads and bridges/communication infrastructure has remarkably decreased the average time taken for community residents to avail essential daily requirements including distances to the nearest drinking water supply; grocery stores; girls’ and boys’ schools;

hospital; and the nearest local Tehsil administration. In Malakand Agency, 3 percent respondents claimed to not use it all. Of these 3 percent respondents, 33 percent stated the reason that the new infrastructure was of no use to them. The 8 percent respondents in Swat, who claimed the same, all reported ‘poor quality’ as the reason. In terms of overall traveling cost, it decreased by 25 percent for all respondents in Lower Dir and between 25 to 75 percent across all districts at varying levels. There was an overall 75 percent decrease in the cost of freight transport across all districts except Buner, where no change was reported.

1.7.4 Irrigation The household surveys show that there was a remarkable increase in crop production. While 100 percent respondents reported a 50 percent increase in wheat production; between 50 to 80 percent reported a 100 percent increase in rice and grain production. Production of maize also increased considerably. In vegetables, 100 percent increase in production of onions, tomatoes, okra and garlic was also reported by all respondents.

With regards to the overall impact on farm income, 100 percent respondents reported a minimum of 50 percent increase.

11

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In view of the early recovery context and the difficult terrain, SRSP’s outreach and successful conclusion of this challenging project is commendable. The schemes have been implemented in areas where the government had limited outreach and other non-governmental players had no presence. Working in the target areas meant many hours of driving and trekking through often rugged and mountainous terrain. Despite these difficulties, the overall quality of work is of good standards. All project outputs were also achieved within the agreed timelines. Thanks to a motivated team, nearly 400 community organizations were formed, local priorities identified and over 200 CPIs implemented within a short span of 9 months.

•

Overall the communities have reported a very positive impact of the CPI program.

•

•

•

Post implementation of the DWSS, the average time taken to reach the water source decreased significantly, allowing community members, particularly females, to allocate their time more efficiently to other important daily tasks. Satisfaction levels with the new DWS CPI schemes were 100 percent for males and 97 percent for females, also, implying lower risks of waterborne diseases.

In case of Sanitation and drainage CPIs, the majority of the respondents (92%) in the 3 districts where the scheme was implemented noted that the issue of stagnant water in the streets had either been completely or partially eliminated. Additionally, 75 and 93% respondents in Shangla and Swat, respectively claimed reduction in foul smell, while 50 percent respondents reported the same in Malakand Agency.

The new link roads and bridges has remarkably decreased the average time taken for community residents to avail essential daily requirements; travel to the nearest drinking water supply schemes; grocery stores; girls’ and boys’ schools; hospital; and the nearest local Tehsil administration. The respondents reported an overall 75 percent decrease in the cost of freight transport across all districts except Buner, where no change was reported.

•

The survey also shows considerable increase in crop production due to the implementation of irrigation schemes. Nearly all respondents reported a 50 percent increase in wheat production; while between 50 to 80 percent reported a 100 percent increase in rice and grain production. With regards to the overall impact on farm income, 100 percent respondents reported a minimum of 50 percent increase.

•

Combined capacity of the 3 MHPs in Chitral, Swat and Upper Dir has the designed capacity of 225 KW, which will benefit approximately 600 HH. The MHP in Chitral has been functioning at full capacity and is not only supplying electricity to the communal HH’s, but also to a local hotel, Bashalini(Menstruation/Maternity Home), Jasthakhan (Funeral Dance Hall), a school and also mosque.

•

All 60 schemes in the evaluation sample were physically verified to be on the ground. Except for one scheme all the rest have been identified by the local community as fulfilling their priority need. Given the tight time lines and the difficult terrain, this is a remarkable achievement

•

Project documentation has been meticulously kept in the regional office, showing detailed record of community interaction and the field processes from the ‘first dialogue’ to the handing of checks in the 3rd dialogues and the subsequent installments. However the technical documentation covering the design basis, design calculations and the environmental assessment remains a weak area. .

•

The CPIs are predominantly functional , and have a positive impact on the communities; however some of these ( about 10 % ) are not delivering the required benefits due to poor quality and/or weak O&M systems.

•

A majority of females in the sample confirmed that the CPIs chosen represented their priority needs and directly benefiting them. However CPI implementation remained a predominantly male affair. Out of the 64 WCO which were formed, a total of 4 CPIs were for the women organization, which is disproportionally low.

•

Although CPIs such as DWSS or sanitation and drainage were being implemented there was little attempt to build the capacity of the organizations on related issues such as health and hygiene.

•

SRSP’s presence in the project areas was a significant factor in the rapid response and timely completion of the project activities. Interviews with senior SRSP managers suggest a continued interest in the region and a commitment to maintain the needed support for post project support through existing resources.

•

CPIs are highly visible, ensure immediate benefits to the community and also typically consume the largest chunk of development budgets in any community program. Accordingly these should receive a higher level of attention from the feasibility through design, implementation as well as the O&M. The survey shows a generally good performance on the “implementation fronts” however the design and O&M phases could benefit from further attention. Among other areas of focus the CPIs are generally small in scope, however a rapid “environmental screening and mitigation” protocol could help some categories of schemes. Overall the team recommends additional investments in staff skills for field surveys and design; use of design standards and guidelines and customized training modules for O&M practices. This will allow SRSP to further build on its current success and ensure that the CPIs continue to yield long term dividends without the need for any hand holding or follow up repairs in project areas that are generally remote and difficult to access.

12

MALAKAND DIVISION AND THE EERP The floods that affected large parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in 2010 only compounded the issues being faced by the population; almost 1,500 people lost their lives and 37,000 homes were destroyed. Malakand Division was one of the worst affected areas; the region had not yet recovered from fundamentalist insurgency and the subsequent military intervention that took place in 2009 and displaced over 2 million people5.

AusAid development aid to Pakistan has burgeoned over the last four to five years. In 2001-2002, AusAid donated an estimated $4.5 million to Pakistan with the focus on increased access to basic education for girls and better management of the environment6. In contrast, in 2010-11, assistance to Pakistan soared to $67.5million, with a major chunk of the budget being directed towards humanitarian assistance and reconstruction7. An initial Early Recovery Programme was designed to target the flood affected districts of Peshawar, Nowshera and Charsadda. Once the activities and interventions for the three districts had been implemented, SRSP, keeping in view the Pakistan governments plans for the province, out lined in the PCNA, MTDF and Early Recovery Priorities in KP, submitted a proposal to AusAid for the Expanded Early Recovery Programme (EERP) which would focus on reconstruction in Malakand Division8.

In 2011, AusAid, as part of its mandate for reconstruction of the Malakand region, earmarked AUS$ 3 million (PKR 255 million) for the Expanded Early Recovery Programme (EERP). EERP is a nine month long initiative by Aus-AiD, in collaboration with SRSP, whose overall objective is to “build resilient communities in areas hit by floods and insurgency in Malakand Division9” . This objective was to be achieved using a multi- pronged approach with the restoration of Community Physical Infrastructure being a central focus of the project, accounting for 93% of the financial outlay.

The challenging environment suited SRSP, which had been working in the project area since 2001, with a long term community based approach. Typically for SRSP, a basic skeleton structure of the organization remains in the area to interact with communities even after the project it implements comes to an end. This Core enables SRSP to continue to support the capacity building and networking of communities and also retain a knowledge base of the area and its people; with this structure in place SRSP leverages additional resources for the communities when opportunities arise. This is particularly important from sustainability point of view, comparing it to other imitative which have a short terms ‘project specific’ approach.

The overall impact of initiatives carried out under EERP is significant; 74,385 men and women, representing individuals from the 191 poorest and most vulnerable districts of Malakand Division10 have benefitted from the programme.

The selection of schemes was to be carried out using the platform of 395 community based organizations or COs. The CO platform was chosen in order to make the process a participatory and transparent one. The CO members were to be trained and their capacities built in a bid to enable them to organize themselves, voice their concerns and needs collectively, and most importantly take collective ownership of their schemes to achieve long term sustainability. The 395 CO’s formed for this purpose worked towards reconstructing/ rehabilitating 213 CPI schemes which were to benefit a targeted 37,000 households.

The entire process, from the formation of the COs, to selection of schemes, through to the implementation and eventual handover of the schemes to communities was to be carried out within the mandated timeframe of nine months, from May 2011 to January 2012.

5 Malakand Comprehensive Stabilization and Socio-Economic Development Strategy – GoNWFP, 2009 6 Aid budget summary 2001-02http://www.ausaid.gov.au/Budgets/Pages/default.aspx 7 Australia’s International Development Assistance Budget, 2010 8 Livelihood Strengthening Programme - Expanded Early Recovery Project in Border Areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Malakand Division) – SRSP, April 2011 9 Expanded Early Recovery Project (Livelihood Strengthening Programme) Project Completion Report - SRSP 10 ibid

13

SCOPE OF WORK Associates in Development Pvt. Ltd. was contracted to carry out an evaluation of the Community Physical Infrastructure (CPI) Projects in order to establish the immediate impacts of the schemes and validation of design and planned outcomes.

The scope of work is the evaluation of the 213 Community Physical Infrastructure (CPI) projects implemented by communities with SRSPs assistance under the EERP. The majority of them, 40 % were built in Swat, followed by Shangla, Lower dir and Malakand which had 12 %, and lastly, Buner, Upper Dir and Chitral which had 5 % of the total11.

Most of these schemes were to assist communities in the provision of DWSS, followed by Road Infrastructure, Sanitation, Bridges, Irrigation Schemes, and Micro Hydel.

There is an odd one CPI of a rehabilitation of a sports facility as well.

Schemes range in costs from Rs 110,000 for a Hand pump in Buner to Rs 8, 600,000, average cost of the different type

11 12 13 14

See Annex 2 CPI Distributions See Annex 2 CPI Distributions See Annex 2 CPI Distributions See Appendix 4 - Evaluation Matrix

of schemes range from Rs 5.8 million for Bridges, to Rs 0.7 million for DWSS12. Cost per beneficiary is most favorable in the case of irrigation CPIs. At Rs 1977 per HH benefited, where 4 irrigation related schemes are benefiting 463 beneficiaries as compared to soil conservation works where 2 schemes costing more that Rs 7 mill with an average cost of Rs 23,675 per beneficiary.13 At the individual scheme level, the aim was to assess; i) the Relevance of the CPI to the intended beneficiaries’ needs; ii) the Efficiency with which the schemes were implemented, in terms of costs and time; iii) assessment of the scheme Effectiveness; iv) the direct and indirect Impacts of the scheme and’ v) the Sustainability of the scheme14. These criterions were used to judge whether or not the expected outcomes envisaged in the projects proposal/financing agreement are being realized by the community built and maintained infrastructure schemes.

14

3. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY The approach and methodology of the study revolved around the physical verification of the technical information and obtaining a firsthand account of how the beneficiaries viewed this initiative.

The activities were divided into a three staged approach outlined below:

Inception/Desk review

• Understand stated and unstated expectations of SRSP

Data analysis and report writing

Field work

• Data collection from target UCs

• Data entry and analysis

• Review relevant project documents and reports

• Meetings with and relevant stakeholders and review of records of facilities

• Presentation to the client on key findings

• Design checklists, templates, finalize data gathering instruments and detailed work plan

• IDIs & Focus Group Discussions with with Project staff, community members and other stakeholders

• Submission of inception report

• Record Field Observations

• Prepare Draft report for sharing with the client • Incorporate Feedback and submit Final report

Stage 1 was the inception phase which lasted from the 8th April to 17th April 2013. This time was used to develop an understanding of the programme, review all relevant documentation and secondary data and to finalize the tools used in the field and the teams’ work plan. This stage culminated with the submission of the Inception.

Stage 2 was the Field research phase during which the teams were mobilized and they completed data collection in the targeted villages. Key Informant interviews with Project staff, community members and other stakeholders, the household survey, engineering field reports and FGDs were all conducted during this phase.

The final stage of the process, Stage 3, involved the entry and analysis of all the data collected and the preparation of the Final Report. A draft of the Final Report is to be shared with SRSP, and the comments made by the client, if any, are to be incorporated before the Report is handed over and the findings are presented.

3.1 Stage 1 - Inception

would verify the O&M systems and their effectiveness.

3.1.1 Work Plan

In addition, the tools for the social sector assessment were drafted at this stage. An extensive review of material available on CPI schemes and on other similar assessments in the target districts, inputs from social sector specialists and Aid’s extensive prior experience with similar assignments were all drawn on to draft the initial tools which consisted of a i) detailed household questionnaire and ii) a form for Focus Group Discussions (FGDs).

The field work was spread over 7 districts where drive time over rugged mountain roads could take over 5 hours. The entire evaluation was to be completed within a tight deadline and the work plans for the teams were designed accordingly.

Initial work plans were submitted to SRSP along with the original Technical Proposal and Inception report. These plans had to be modified due to a number of factors, most crucially due to the difficulty in finding female researchers willing and able to work in the project areas. A final version of the work plan was drafted near the close of the inception phase15.

3.1.2 Tools At this stage it was decided that the engineering focus would be on i) a preliminary desk review which studies the availability and adequacy of the documentation on design estimation and the documentation on approvals of the completion process. The data from the desk review has been reported in the form of the “Desk Review Report”. ii) The engineering team was to carry out extensive site visits during which they would physically validate the design and outcomes of the individual CPI schemes. Additionally, they 15 See Annex 7 – Work Plan

3.1.3 Staffing In order to carry out the work in the least amount of time and maximize the use of available resources, it was decided that two field teams would carry out operations simultaneously in two clusters. Each field team comprised of a Field Supervisor and two Researchers. The Researchers were responsible for gathering qualitative and quantitative information from the project sites using the purpose designed data gathering forms. The team also included a short-term Advisor, a full time Team Leader, a senior Engineer, and short terms inputs from a Social Sector Specialist, Gender Specialist, and Data Analyst.

The Field supervisors, Team Leader and other sector specialists

15 not only supervised these activities but also participated actively in the data collection. The Field Supervisors were the first level Quality Assurance; at the second tier, a Quality Assurance Manager rechecked and validated the quality of the data collected in the field.

The proposed Team Leader retained overall control of the research operations and maintained close liaison with the designated representatives of SRSP. The team was mobilized immediately after the contract was signed. Team coordination was ensured through constant communication and contact (including frequent meetings) between all team members; head office staff and the field teams.

The team was fully mindful of the cultural sensitivities and local norms which had to be adhered to when working in the target areas. The team received the full support from SRSP staff in terms of logistical arrangements, facilitation of meetings and coordination at the field level.

5% 9%

5%

10%

40% 43%

12% 12%

Swat Bunner Malakand

12%

Shangla

12%

Lower Dir 11%

Upper Dir

7%

12%

Chitral 10% Note: Outside Ring: = Total EERP CPI s Inside Ring: = Evaluation Sample

Fig 1.1: CPIs by District

3.1.4 QA Plan In order to ensure that all tasks are completed with the high standards quality that clients have come to expect. All field work, data collection, results and reports were passed through Aid’s comprehensive yet dynamic Quality Assurance (QA) system.

At the inception stage, the top management at AiD, along with the project Team Leader and senior Sector Specialists designed QA policies which consist of specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used to gauge the level of performance and resultantly, the quality and timeliness of project delivery.

For the Evaluation of Immediate Impacts of CPIs under EERP, a 4 tier QA approach was chosen which functioned in parallel to Aid’s standard QA measures16.

The first level of QA was the Field Supervisors who were required to scrutinize all the primary data collected on a daily basis. This was important for identifying, and subsequently ratifying, any gaps or omissions in the questionnaire whilst still in the field. Next, staff at Aid’s head office in Islamabad reviewed the questionnaires sent in by the Field Supervisors on a weekly basis. A third level of QA took place once the data has been entered cleaned and analyzed. The sector specialists then prepared a Final Report QA’d by the Project Advisor.

3.1.5 Sampling In order to ensure that a representative sample was selected for the study, a multi stage sampling method was used. In the first stage the seven districts were divided into two clusters namely Cluster A and Cluster B. Cluster A consists of Swat, Shangla, Buner and Malakand while Cluster B consists of Lower Dir, Upper Dir and Chitral. The sample was designed with a view to capturing the diversity of the entire Project area and the types of schemes.

A total sample of 60 schemes out of the total of 213 was randomly selected; this represents a Confidence Level of 93% with less than 10% margin of error.

The total sample was first distributed in terms of the proportion of schemes in each district and then further divided according to the number of each sub-type of scheme, i.e. irrigation, drinking water supply, roads and drainage in each region.

The second list for ‘types of schemes’ in each region was first 16 17 18 19

See Annex 5 – QA Diagram See fig 1.1 and 1.2 See Annex 3 Sampled 60 CPIs This is further detailed in Stage 3: Challenges in the Field

ranked in descending order of number of beneficiaries of the scheme, then the nth scheme of each subtype was selected based on an approximation of the sample/the population17.

See fig 1.1 and 1.2 The field teams managed to look at 26 schemes in district Swat, 7 each in district Shangla and Lower Dir, and Malakand, 6 in district Upper Dir, 4 in Buner and 3 in District Chitral.

Out of these 60 Schemes, 22 schemes were DWSS, 19 road infrastructure, 7 Sanitation, 5 Bridges, 4 irrigation and 3 were micro Hydel18.

Ten additional schemes were chosen to replace any scheme from the initial selection that could not be visited due to unforeseen circumstances, such as security concerns, inaccessibility etc. Eventually, four schemes were selected from the list of ten to replace schemes that could not be visited19.

6% 7%

8%

4%

1%

5%

36%

40%

8%

11% 12%

32% 30%

Fig 1.2: CPIs by Type

Note: Outside Ring: = Total EERP CPI s Inside Ring: = Evaluation Sample

16 3.2 Stage 2 – Field Work 3.2.1 Pre-testing and Finalization of tools After all formats, sampling and work planning was finalized the two teams were mobilized in the field. Initially, they were accompanied by the Team Leader and sector specialists who supervised activities at this stage. The data collection tools were initially pre-tested at two schemes in Swat. The team leader led the pre testing exercise and both teams accompanied him for the exercise. After the pre-test, the team held a session during which the forms were re-checked for any inconsistencies, gaps or redundancies. The necessary changes were made to the data collection tools and the finalized forms were used for all subsequent data collection.

3.2.2 Field Activities The field teams adhered strictly to a predefined protocol for conducting visits to the CPI sites. Before each visit, the engineers reviewed all available documentation for the scheme to be assessed on that day. They extracted all necessary information before the social and engineering teams were taken together to the site by the local SRSP representatives who were facilitating the visits.

Once the teams arrived at the village, the engineering and social teams split up; the engineers went to the CPI to make physical verifications and fill out the corresponding forms.

In the meanwhile, the social sector team dispersed in the village; the females would fill questionnaires going from door to door, whilst the men went to the hujra to meet with the males. The females would continue on to conduct FGDs with those women who had not been included in the HH survey.

Once the engineers had completed the physical inspection of the schemes, the male researchers and the engineers would gather the members and management of the allmale COs. Together, they would go over all of the COs documentation and interview the management to assess the adequacy, or lack thereof, of the O&M system in place for the scheme. Afterwards, the engineers and social researchers would together to conduct an FGD with male members of the community; ensuring both members and non-members participated.

3.2.3

Challenges in the field

The field teams faced a number of challenges working in

some very volatile areas. The sample schemes were spread out over a sizeable area and many were located in remote areas. SRSP’s outreach to these areas is commendable; the schemes had been implemented in areas where no other government or non-government entities had any presence.

This meant many hours of driving and trekking through often rugged and mountainous terrain for the field teams.

Some of the schemes could not be visited. For instance, two schemes from Swat; Chinawatt and Foladai were replaced, as was one scheme in Buner. Chinawatt was replaced due to the fact that it could only be reached after a three and a half hour walk through treacherous, snow covered mountain paths; a trip that locals said was only advisable for locals familiar with the village. It was replaced with a scheme implemented in Saidu Sharif. Foladai was replaced with a scheme in Deolai because Foladai was rendered inaccessible due to torrential rains. Similarly, Malikpur, a village in Buner could not be visited because there were on-going military operations in the area.

3.3 Stage 3 3.3.1 Data Entry, Analysis and report writing Data from the field was periodically sent to the AiD Head Office by the field teams for parallel data entry. The final set of data from the field was received on 12th April when the entire team held a collective work shop to discuss their experiences, recommendations and the lessons learnt.

The forms had all been coded for ease of management and to minimize the potential for errors. Nonetheless, as per QA protocols, the forms received from the field were checked for any major inconsistencies, missing information or collection errors. These forms were then passed on to data entry operators who used Microsoft Excel™ spreadsheets to record the data.

The Excel™ spreadsheets were exported to Stata™ software which was used to analyze the varied forms. After data cleaning, the Data Analyst prepared an extensive list of tables which were used to develop the results and findings for the Final Report.

The final report is organized around the five Evaluation Parameters initially decided upon. Each parameter has been given a separate section and the CPI’s have been analyzed in terms of each one in great detail.

17

4. FINDINGS CPI DESCRIPTION

BRIDGES

The evaluation team visited 60 CPI schemes, of these 43 % were in Swat, 12% in Shangla and Lower Dir, 11 % in Malakand, 10 % in Upper Dir 7 % in Buner and 5 % in district Chitral. Schemes costs range from Rs 0.22 million, hand pump CPI in Mankass, Kabal Swat to Rs 8.6 million Micro-Hydel in Shao, Swat.

Out of the 18 bridges which SRSP assisted with under the EERP project the team was able to see 5 bridges, 4 of which were pedestrian suspension bridges whereas 1 was a RCC bridge for regular traffic. One of the suspension foot bridge were located in Buner, 2 were located in upper dir whereas 1 was in Shangla. The RCC Bridge in Kamay, Swat.,

These schemes reflected the priority needs of the community.

Of the total 60 schemes 22 are DWSS, 19 were Road infrastructure, 7 Sanitation, 5 Bridges, 4 Irrigation or 3 MHP.

The bridge CPIs cost from Rs 0.92 million for the suspension bridge constructed in Bazarkot, district Buner to Rs 2.5 million for the RCC bridge, constructed in Kamay Swat.

DWSS

Bridges like roads benefit not just the immediate community which has been involved in the construction of the scheme but any adjacent village or hamlet which is using it. In one case however the team found that the HH reported were less than what were planned.

Aid looked at 22 DWS, 3 were in Buner, 2 in Chitral, 3 in Lower Dir, 3 in Malakand, 1 in Shangla, 1 in Upper Dir, and 9 in Swat.

These schemes ranged in cost from Rs 1.2 million, for a Gravity flow, scheme in Abbaseen Colony, district Shangla to Rs 0.22 million for a hand pump based scheme in Mankass Kabal, district Swat. There were various subtypes, but the majority was Gravity flow, i.e. in which case the water was stored in large tanks which were supplied from natural springs and fed into the communal areas by gravity flow by a distribution network of pies. On the other hand 7 schemes were for hand pumps.

In the 22 schemes which AiD looked at the planned beneficiaries was 1700 whereas the actual beneficiaries were reported to be 2600.

Cost per beneficiary house hold ranged from Rs 2000 to Rs 24000 for a HP scheme in Jabba, Swat and a Gravity flow scheme e in Shaqi Ghawaljai also in swat respectively.

ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE Road infrastructure included link road and causeways. Link roads were either, what are called as PCC rigid pavement or earthen rehabilitation works of existing alignments or construction of causeways.

Cost per beneficiary varied from Rs 4585 for the Pedestrian suspension bridge in Swat to Rs 10123 for Malow, in Upper dir.

SANITATION 7 schemes which addressed the sanitation and drainage of the communities were built. 5 of these are in district Swat, whereas 2 are in Shangla. These schemes are mainly construction of drains and rigid pavement The total cost of each sanitation related scheme ranged from Rs 0.3 million for a drainage scheme in Bazkhelin district Shangla , to Rs 1.2 million for the Street pavement and drainage in Shagai, district Swat.

The total beneficiaries of the road infrastructure were reported to be 1430 instead of the originally planned 1030.

The cost per beneficiary ranged from Rs 1717 in village Faqira; district Swat, to Rs 11780 for Bazkhel, Drainage scheme where the number of beneficiaries was very low.

IRRIGATION

A total of 19 road infrastructure where constructed out which 2 was causeways and the rest were either rigid pavement or earthen road improvements with retaining wall and cross drainage structures. 8 schemes were in Swat, 4 in lower Dir, 2 each in Malakand and Upper Dir, and 3 were in Shangla district.

Out of the total of 12 irrigation schemes which were done under EERP, the evaluation team looked at 4. Most of them were in Swat district, and one in Malakand. The schemes range from installation of a pump, to a construction of irrigation channel to channel lining and in one case construction of a retaining wall.

Their cost ranged from Rs 1.33 million for a link road in Gujjer Tangi Badro, Swat district to Rs 0.5mill road in Aminabad, also in district Swat.

The cost of the schemes range from Rs 0.55 million for the ram pump in Babu Maira in Swat to Rs 1.1 million for the irrigation channel lining and construction of retaining wall, in Meragai, Swat.

Total beneficiary household were shown as 2900, however an estimate which the engineers gather after discussions in the field indicated the figure to be close to 4000.

Cost per beneficiary ranged from Rs 1944 to Rs 9029 for Akhun Baba, Pcc link road in district Swat, and Baghgay Maloch, RCC cause way also in district Swat.

The total beneficiaries for the 4 schemes are around 800 HH. MHP The team visited 3 out of the 8 MHP done under EERP. One of these was in Swat; the other two in Upper Dir and Chitral

18 respectively. MHP are technically complex and relatively costly. The schemes cost ranged from Rs 2.7 million for the 50 Kw MHP in Khanabad, Upper Dir, to Rs 8.6 million for the 100 Kw MHP in Bhamborate, Chitral.

All the 60 schemes sampled had the required Social Feasibility documentation and it was found to be adequate.

Two of the schemes i.e. the one in Shao, Swat and Bhamborate, Chitral are being implemented using an innovative approach of what is called a social enterprise in which both SRSP and the community are co-managing the scheme.

Environmental Screenings were carried out using a simple template developed by SRSP for its field staff. The screenings were used indicate whether or not the proposed project is safe for the environment and weather a detailed environment assessment is to be made or not.

The number of beneficiaries is around 900 and the cost ranges from Rs 12176 per beneficiary to Rs 31300 per beneficiary.

4.1 CPI documentation: Availability and Adequacy The Engineer’s Desk Review constituted the first level of verification of the 60 CPI schemes mentioned above. Before the schemes themselves were visited the engineering team assessed the availability and adequacy of the CPIs’ documentation annexure 620, shows a simplified diagram of the PI process, and the various documentation required.

The process of implementation of any CPI is triggered by a resolution from the Community Organization. This resolution indicates that the community is interested in a development partnership have reached a consensus on a priority problem which they would like to address in the shape of a possible CPI. This is also, what can be termed as the culmination of a series of meetings called 1st dialogues.

Once a resolution is passed by the community, it is received by the local social organizer(s) who prepare a Social Feasibility for the scheme. Engineers, meanwhile, prepare the required technical reports such as Design and Estimates and carry out an Environmental Screening to ensure that there are no major environmentally detrimental effects of the scheme.

If the results of the social and engineering reports and the environmental screening are found to be positive and they fall within the criterion set by EERP, the scheme is given a formal approval for implementation by the SRSP Head Office.

Afterwards, SRSP representatives engage the community in a ‘3rd dialogue’ during which a Terms of Partnership (TOP) document is signed by the community. The TOP is included in the final Project Proposal.

For record keeping, all copies of receipts, expenditures as well as any and all other documentation pertaining to the construction of the schemes are to be maintained in a Physical Infrastructure (PI) Register by the CO’s secretary.

Once the scheme is completed a Project Completion Report (PCR) showing the actual cost and date of completion is prepared; the PCR also becomes part of the CO’s and SRSP’s records. If the schemes is successful and is handed over to the community, and a Project Completion Certificate is issued.

The evaluation team assessed the availability and adequacy of this essential documentation for each of the sampled schemes and has come up with the following result. The detailed scheme wise summary is available in a tabular form in the annexure21.

4.1.1 Social Feasibility A social feasibility report serves several functions; it shows that the Community Organization exists on the ground, it has an open bank account, and that there was no conflict amongst the CO’s members in general or around the priority ranking of the CPI itself.

20 See Annex 6 21 See Annex 1A 22 See Annex 1 A Table 1.2

4.1.2 Environmental Screening

The Environmental Screening consists of a three stage process. At the first level, an environmental sensitivity assessment is carried out. Environmental sensitivity is taken in terms of the proximity of the proposed scheme to natural habitats/vegetation, slopes, populated areas, various kinds of wetlands, historical and cultural sites, etc.

In the second stage, the level of environmental screening required for the scheme is determined based on the results of the environmental sensitivity assessment. An Environmental Review (ER) is the basic minimum level of screening required for all schemes, regardless of their ranking/categories from the sensitivity assessments. Higher levels of screening; those which are more detailed and are to be performed by professional environmentalists are required for schemes which rank poorly in the environmental sensitivity assessment.

The Environmental Review is the third and final section of the environmental screening. The ER is used to determine the potential negative impacts of the scheme on the environment and details the measures that must be taken to mitigate those negative impacts. These mitigation measures must be included in the schemes’ proposals.

Environmental Screening documentation was available for the first two stages, albeit partially in some cases for 49 of the 60 schemes. The ES documentation for the remaining 11 schemes was either not available or had not been filled in.

Furthermore, the team was unable to see any Environmental Review reports.

4.1.3 Technical Feasibility: 4.1.3.1 Design Basis The most crucial aspect of any technical feasibility is the design basis and assumptions on which the schemes has actually been designed and estimated.

The table below shows some examples of the required design basis which would necessary for a correct design.

Type of Scheme

Required Design basis

Road/Bridge

CBR or bearing capacity, Axle load, Details of construction joints

Drinking Water Supply

Capacity, HH requirements

Drainage

Rainfall Intensity, Catchment area

Irrigation

Crop water requirements/Soil type

The design basis for 27 of CPI’s was not available or inadequate. Most of these were link road or street pavements.

Key information such as bearing capacities of soil and the Axle loads were missing22.

19 4.1.3.2 Design Calculation Once we have the design basis of any engineering structure or its component the next step is to calculate the design parameters. Depending on weather a design is for a street pavements, roads or drinking water supply storage tanks, for the engineer the design of the thickness, compaction of roads, tank wall thickness, concrete slab thickness or reinforcement design, all need to be calculated. These calculations are made to ensure the integrity and efficiency of the structure and to ensure that there is a backup in case of any liability For the schemes implemented by SRSP, it was found that the design calculations for 32 schemes were not available. Of the remaining 28 schemes the Calculations for 10 seemed inadequate. For instance, in the case of storage reservoirs, the calculations for the determining the dimensions of water tanks were missing23.

4.1.3.3 Construction Drawings: Construction drawings are needed to ensure that the community and labor working on the ground are able to construct the schemes in accordance to the designs envisioned.

Accept for one scheme namely Jabba in district Swat, all the CPI proposals reviewed had at least the basic schematic construction drawings attached as part of the project proposals. See table 1.424 4.1.3.4 Material and works specifications Material and works specifications must be detailed because they are essential for ensuring the quality of the construction is up to the standard anticipated by the project proposal. The site engineer and the community must be very clear on what is to be used for the construction of the schemes and how it is to be used.

All the CPIs mentioned what materials were required, such as bricks, sand and steel. However, it was observed that invariably, there was no mention of the detailed specifications for these materials such as the standard quality of the bricks, the type of sand or strength of the steel.

Detailed Material Specifications Should be: Cement

Grey Portland Cement shall be normal setting cement of make and source as approved by the Engineer. Cement shall conform to the requirements of ASTM C 150 unless otherwise acceptable to the Engineer.

Fine Aggregates

Fine Aggregate shall be clean River sand from an approved source of supply and of uniform quality having fineness modules between 2.3 and 3.10.Fine aggregates shall comply with the requirements of the relevant ASTM C-33 Specifications, and shall be graded as follows: Sieve Number/Size 9.50 mm 3/8” 4.75 mm (No.4) 3/16” 2.36 mm (No.8) 3/32” 1.18 mm (No.16) 3/64” 0.6 mm (No.30) 0.3 mm (No.50) 0.15 mm (No.100)

%age (by weight) passing 100 95-100 80-100 50-85 25-60 10-30 2-10

Limits for deleterious substances of total sample shall be: Clay lumps and friable particles Maximum 3% by weight Material passing No.200 sieve Maximum 3% by weight Coal and lignite Maximum 0.5% by weight Weight loss of sand subjected to 5 cycles of soundness test when sodium sulphate is used shall not be greater than 10%.

Coarse Aggregates

Coarse aggregate shall be 3/4“ down, hard crushed stone from a source approved by the Engineer. For members up to 3“ thickness, 1/2“ down crushed stone shall be used. Coarse aggregate shall comply with the graduation requirements of ASTM C-33 and shall be graded as follows: Nominal Size of Graded Aggregates shall be 19 mm (3/4”) down Sieve Number/Size 19.00 mm (3/4”) 12.50 mm (1/2”) 09.50 mm (3/8”) 04.75 mm (3/16”) 02.36 mm (3/32”)

%age (by weight) passing 90-100 20-55 0-10 0-5

Weight loss of coarse aggregate when subjected to 5 cycles of soundness test using sodium sulphate shall not exceed 12% and %age loss for Los Angles Abrasion (500 revolutions) not be greater than 50. Aggregates shall be screened and washed if required to the satisfaction of the Engineer Water

Water to be used in the work shall be clean water or approved by the Engineer. The community shall supply sufficient water for all purposes including mixing the concrete, curing, and cleaning plant and tools. It should be clean and free from injurious amounts of oils, acids, alkalis, salts, organic materials or other substances that may be deleterious to concrete or reinforcement. Where doubt exists as to the suitability of water, it should be tested in accordance with BS 3148.

Steel

Unless otherwise specified, all deformed reinforcing bars shall comply with the requirements of ASTM 615 for deformed cold worked new stock billet steel bars and shall have a minimum characteristic strength of 40,000 lb. per square inch.

23 See Annex 1 A Table 1.3 24 See Annex 1 A Table 1.4

20 4.1.3.5 Costing/Estimates The costing and estimates for all 60 schemes were checked and found to be correct.

4.1.4 Water Quality Test Water Quality tests had to be carried out for DWS schemes to ensure that the water from these schemes was potable.

Out of the 22 DWSS schemes Water Quality tests reports were available for all the schemes.

4.1.5 Project Proposal The project proposals are detailed documents that cover the technical (engineering), social, procedural and management aspects of the schemes. The engineering documentation listed in the previous sections such as environmental assessment reports and design and cost estimates are part of this proposal. Similarly, the objectives of the project, the roles of the key stakeholders and the protocols for management of the project are all outlined in the proposal.

Project proposals for all 60 schemes were available, in the regional offices albeit some were incomplete as mentioned elsewhere in this section.

4.1.6 Project Approval All the schemes had received formal approval by the competent forum.

Project approval documentation was available for all schemes.

4.1.7 PI register A PI register is to be maintained by the CO, typically by the CO’s secretary. The PI register contains all documentation related to the implementation phase of the scheme, most commonly the receipts for outlays during the construction phase, or for O&M. PI registers were available for 54 of the 60 schemes and most were diligently maintained, however, the team was not able to see the PI registers for 6 schemes25.

4.1.8 Project completion report The project completion report details the initially estimated quantities of various materials and labor required for implementation of the CPI and the actual quantities used as well as the variation between the estimate and actual outlays.

The project completion reports were missing at 4 of the schemes visited. Of the remaining 56, completion reports for 5 were deemed to be inadequate because they did not have signatures of the community members26.

4.1.9 PI completion certificate A PI completion certificate is prepared by engineers once the scheme is ready for hand over to the community. It lists the contributions made by the stakeholders and the dates of completion.

All of the CPI’s had completion certificates except Shao, MHP in Swat, and Bazarkot and Riaz Ambela in district Buner27.

4.1.10 Handing and taking over certificate: The Handing and Taking over Certificate is signed by the 25 26 27 28 29 30

See Annex 1 A Table 1.5 See Annex 1 A Table 1.6 See Annex 1 A Table 1.7 See Annex 1 A Table 1.8 See Annex 1 B See Annex 1 B

community members once the scheme has been completed and is officially being handed over to them by SRSP. The certificate is a crucial for ensuring the sustainability of the scheme since it makes official the community’s ownership of the scheme and lists the members of the O&M committee. It also certifies that O&M systems have been put in place, such as the opening of a bank account specifically to hold an O&M fund.

The Handing and Taking Over certificates were available for 55 schemes. Out of the remaining 1 had failed, 2 schemes had not yet been handed over and 2 schemes did not have a certificate on file28.

4.2 Design Validation This section outlines the Engineering Team’s findings of the physical validation of the various design parameters of the CPI’s. The design parameters verified include scheme layouts, design measurement, material specifications as well as the workmanship, the scheme outcomes, environmental screening, operation & maintenance, and finally the schemes functionality, efficiency and effectiveness.

This section in particular covers the findings from the layout and design, environmental screening, and material validation, the rest of the findings from the engineers visit to the site are in their relevant sections which follow.

4.2.1 Scheme Layouts The scheme layout was verified on how the various CPI components are laid physically on the ground. For example the alignment of the road, or the location of the various structures mentioned in the design.

The engineering team conducted site visits to all sample schemes to validate the physical layout and schemes layout.

It was observed that except for 9 CPI29 all the rest were implemented according to the planned layout.

The major problems either related to a difference of what was observed in the pipe network, such as missing pipes or tanks observed at Yakh Tangay village in Swat, Banjo Tangay in Buner, Abbaseen village in Shangla and missing elements, such as RCC culverts in village Gujjer Tangi Swat30.

Five schemes were found to have minor problems. For example the design of the Gravity Flow DWSS (GF) in Sory Kad village, Swat, showed two supply lines were showing in a schematic layout but it was observed that instead of two lines, four lines were originating from the tank. However, despite the deviation from the scheme layout, the desired design discharge was acquired satisfactorily. In Asilo village, Lower Dir, the designed/proposed layout of distribution lines of the DWSS had not been adhered to on site. Similarly the drawings of the Gravity Flow scheme in Ambela village, Buner, indicated that 4 supply lines were originating from the storage tank. However, it was observed that 05 distribution lines were in connection with the storage tank.

4.2.2 Design Validation: All the 60 schemes were checked to validate the design in terms of the measurement of the structure, the material used and its workmanship.

It was reported that 48 % of the schemes were found to be exactly as per design, 34% had minor variations and were marked as satisfactory. However, 18 % had major variations, from what was originally planned.

21 The schemes with variations either had missing structures, such as those at Sanam village in Shangla, Gujjer Tangi & Mankass Kabal in Swat and Faqira, in Swat, or the measurement of structures did not match as was the case in, Banjo Tangy DWWS , district Buner, Abbaseen Colony, DWSS in district Shangla, amongst other31.

4.2.3 The following is a type wise breakdown of the CPIs:

building of road and bridges, water and sanitation, irrigation, and power Infrastructure. The CPIs done under EERP closely match the priority of the GoKP as it has set down in its strategy document.

AusAid is concerned EERP comes under its objectives # 3 for Pakistan as it is explained in the Pakistan Annual Program Performance Report 201133, this is;

4.2.3.1.1 Drinking Water supply Schemes

•

Out of the 22 schemes the design and layout of 4 schemes could not be validated on site. For e.g. In DWSS Yakh Tangay, district Swat, Banjo Tangay, district Buner, Abbaseen Colony in District Shangla, and Danwa, Lower Dir, the original design has a different configuration than what is on site. In Kuru Bala, Chitral, the community has not built the Dug well where originally laid out by SRSP, and as a result the scheme has failed.

All the CPIs contribute towards improving rural livelihoods; on the other hand sustainable development requires sustainable institutions which at the local level would require a longer period of engagement with the communities than the timeline available under the EERP. Perhaps SRSP would needs to creatively develop a ‘sustainability’ pool towards which any client contributes when engraining SRSP.

4.2.3.1.2 Road Infrastructure: Out of the 19 road infrastructures which were visited, there was one scheme for which a layout could not be seen. Only 2 were found to be out of sync with the original layout. Gujjer Tangi, Islampur in district Swat, did not have 7 culverts originally designed, similarly in Baghgay Maloch, also in district Swat, the layout of the culverts is different from what was shown in the project proposals. See table for detail Furthermore, the measurements of the structures in road infrastructure CPI in village Samteer and Aminabad, district Swat and village Sanam, district Shangla did not match with was planned. See Table for details.

4.2.3.1.3 Bridges All the bridges were on the spot which they were planned for; however the design basis or calculation were missing.

Only in the case of Tangir we have some design however the calculations were not adequate.

4.2.3.1.4 Sanitation The layouts of all the schemes were found to be as planned. However the design for drains and pavement did not have a technical basis or any reference.

4.2.3.1.5 Irrigation The layout of the schemes are fine, however there are discrepancies in measurement of the structures in the case of Meragai and Babu Maira scheme. In the case of Babu Maria a tank has been constructed which is not part of the original design and is not mentioned in the documentation, where as in the case of Meragai, the retaining wall is shorter and also lower than what was proposed.

4.2.3.1.6 Micro Hydel Project All the schemes have been constructed as per documented layout and design 4.3 Relevance From the GoKP’s viewpoint one key document which indicates the priority areas of investment of the GOKP for Malakand Division is the Malakand Strategy prepared in 200932. It is noteworthy that one of the means to achieve its objectives, the strategy envisions the rehabilitation or

Sustainable economic development - through increasing agricultural productivity and improving rural livelihoods.

To directly gauge the perceptions of the local communities both a HH survey and Group discussions with local communities in all the 60 villages where the CPIs were implemented.

To assess relevance, the HH survey grouped related questions under 3 indicators one asked them directly about whether the scheme was a priority for the whole community. The second related to their participation in the implementation process and third was about their contribution in cash or kind.

4.3.1 Priority An overwhelming majority, 98 percent of all people surveyed in 6 districts said that they considered the CPIs which were implemented by SRSP a priority. This response is more or less the same across all the districts, and gender. What is significant is that the response for non members is also very similar and 97.3 % also said that the scheme was a priority need of the community.

4.3.2 Participation The highest participation was in districts Chitral (100 percent), where the community members felt they had participated thought the implementation of the schemes. Whereas he lowest level of participation about 60 % was reported from Shangla.

Given the socio cultural norm of the area it was not surprising that participation of females was low. Participation in identification and planning /implementation ranged from a very low of 6% for both Upper and Lower where around 11 % of the respondents were members, to 67 % for Chitral where membership for WO was 100 %.

Irrespective of that 96 % of the female respondents felt that the CPI was a priority need.

The FGD analysis supports the findings of participation of females, with males more involved. Approximately 17 percent female participants claimed that ‘no one’ was involved and/ or interested in the project-related activities, as compared to 3 percent males who reported the same. Another 23 percent females were unaware/unable to comment on the query. While 63 percent male FGD participants claimed that most and/or all members fully involved, only two-third of the females (43 percent) thought the same. The highest rate of responses regarding non-interest were from Swat (23 percent), while FGD participants claimed high levels of

31 See Annex 1 B 32 Government of Pakistan’s Comprehensive Stabilization and Socio-Economic Development Strategy for Malakand Division. 2009 33 http://www.ausaid.gov.au/Publications/Documents/pakistan-appr-2011.pdf

22 full involvement in Buner, Malakand Agency and Shangla.

Scheme-wise, the FGD participants claimed to be most involved in irrigation (71 percent).

HH Participation Identification Planning Implementation

120 100 80

Of the households that contributed positively, 17 percent of them contributed cash. An average of PKR 5800 was contributed these respondents, where the male average was PKR 8000 and the female average was approximately PKR 4500. The highest frequency of cash contributions (30 percent) was witnessed in Shangla; the highest amount in Chitral (PKR 60000); and the CPI scheme contributed most towards was street pavements and drainage (20 percent).

60 40 20 0

Buner

Chitral

Lower Dir Malakand Shangala

Swat

Upper Dir

Women Response 120

Around 70 percent of the respondents (25 percent; CO members and 15 percent; non-CO members) also contributed in kind offering themselves for labor, mostly in Buner and Malakand Agency (90 and 81 percent, respectively). The average number of labor days contributed by both males and females was 31, which was spent evenly on each CPI scheme.

Further, 20 percent of respondents contributed additional items in kind, almost evenly (20 percent) across districts, with the exception of Chitral (40 percent) and Malakand Agency (no additional contribution). These included the following, district- and CPI scheme-wise:

100 80 60

Graphs 3.3 & 3.4: Mean cash distributed by location and type of CPI scheme (PKR):

40

900

20 0

1543 Buner

Chitral

Lower Dir Malakand

Shangala

Swat

Upper Dir

Member of a WO

6435

CPI is a priority Participation in identification

8505

Participation in planning & implementation

4.3.3 Community Contribution One indicator on how relevant the community considers initiation and implementation of any project can be determined by how much they are willing to contribute towards it – in terms of cash and/or in kind (labor, etc). This is also an important indicator to ensure high (or low) levels of ownership of the project, so that chances of its sustainability are higher. In terms of community-based contribution to the construction (cash and/or in kind), 77 percent of the respondents claimed to have made contributions (75 percent females; and 79 percent males). The highest amounts of contributions were made in Chitral, Upper Dir and Buner (100, 92 and 83 percent, respectively). Pl see the graph below for contribution towards different CPI schemes.

Interestingly, an equal amount of non-CO members (approximately 77 percent) as compared to their counterpart members contributed towards the construction of CPI schemes.

7000

23 4.4 Effectiveness The second evaluation parameter, effectiveness, was evaluated in terms of weather it is fulfilling the needs it was designed to meet, is it operational.

Accordingly, the indicators identified for Effectiveness were: Functionality of the CPI schemes; benefits for community members; and problems encountered with the schemes.

4.4.1 Functionality As part of the approach, functionality of the scheme was also checked on site by the field engineers. In this regard they were able to check 55 CPIs out of the total sample of 60 and found that 95 % of the CPIs were functioning well whereas 5% or 3 schemes had some problems.34

and males, respectively stated that the schemes were functioning above 75 percent, making the overall gender-wise level of satisfaction equal. Scheme-wise, on average, 72 percent of the schemes were termed fully (100 percent delivery). Scheme-wise, on average, 72 percent of the schemes were fully (100 percent delivery) and 15 percent partially functional (delivery above 75 percent) across the 7 districts (see Graph 3.6 below).

Is the CPI functional at present?

% YES

Out of the remaining 5 CPIs which could not be checked, 4 were not operational at the time of the visit and 1 dug well DWSS, had been declared a failure due to unavailability of groundwater.

The 4 schemes were not operational at the time of the visit included the MHP scheme in Shao Kalam, district Swat and Khanabad, district Upper Dir, Irrigation CPI in Meragai Swat and DWSS Dardyal, district Swat. The two MHP had technical breakdown and were in the process of being repaired by the communities, whereas, the Irrigation Channel in Meragai Swat was not operational, since it was not an irrigation season, whereas in the case of DWSS Dardyal, Kabal Swat, the intake structure had been damaged due to a snow slide and the communities were waiting for the snow to melt before attempting any repairs. schemes which were non operational included the MHPP scheme in Shao Kalam and Khanabad, in Upper Dir, both of them had technical breakdown and were in the process of being repaired.

4.4.1.1 Functionality: DWSS All the schemes were fully functional accept for 2. One of them was a gravity flow scheme Dardyal, in Kabal, Swat and the other was a hand pump scheme in Sher khan, Swat, where out of 5 hand pumps of to 3 were working.

% NO

Graph 3.6: Level of functionality of CPI schemes

71

80

18

31

75

102

81

75

50

656

71

10

% Delivering 75%

40

51

2

% Delivering 100%

7

% Delivering 50%

0

% Delivering 25%

In the case of Kura Bala, the community decided to relocate the originally location for the CPI to one which was closer to them, however despite digging to a depth of 90’ the well remains dry and has been officially declared as a failure

Total Drinking Water supply

Total Street Pavement and drainage

4.4.1.2 Functionality Road Infrastructure

Total irrigation

Total Other

Despite the problems mentioned, all the schemes were functional albeit, in some cases partially as was the case of Link Road in Gujjer Tangi, district Swat, Feza, and Sur Kamar in District Shangla, where either the cross drainage work were not functional or some portions of the road had been severely eroded.

Total Link road/Bridges

All bridges were found to be functional and effective.

From the HH survey, approximately 91 percent of the respondents acknowledged that the CPI schemes were functional across the 7 districts. When asked how effectively the CPI schemes were delivering, the female respondents gave more optimistic assessments stating that 86 percent of the schemes were 100 percent functional, as compared to the more cautious replies of male respondents, claiming 61 percent of the schemes to be fully functional. Another 3 and 26 percent females 34 See Annex 1B Table 2.6

03

3

% Delivering 0%

FGD analysis supported the overall satisfactory responses from majority of the male and female participants. In some cases, respondents gave mixed reviews, such as in Chitral, where 33 percent reported that certain schemes were currently not working, and 67 percent stated that the schemes over there are working and they had no further complaints. CPI scheme-wise, the data is reflected in Table 3.1 (Annex: 1-C).

There appeared to be no bias in positive responses of CO members who fully ‘owned’ the process, as opposed to the opinions of non-CO members, where 89 and 87 percent of both types of respondents, respectively acknowledged that the CPI schemes were between 75 to 100 percent functional.

24 4.4.2 Benefits Community response was close to what the engineers found on the ground. The result of the HH survey Overall 90 percent of respondents claimed to be directly benefitting from the CPI schemes; including 67 percent of CO members and 58 percent of the non-CO members surveyed. Further, responses reflected that 80 percent of the surveyed people were benefiting from the CPI schemes in Chitral, reinforcing this district’s high rates of proactively in planning, implementation and cash contribution.

A gender-wise break down reflects 67 percent satisfied male respondents and 100 percent females claiming to be directly benefitting from the CPI schemes there. Approximately 87 percent of the females reported to be directly benefitting from the CPI schemes, with 100 appreciations in Chitral, Shangla and Upper Dir. All CPI schemes were allocated above 86 percent priority by females, with irrigation reported to be 100 percent important for them. Female priority, based on CPI schemes is as follows: 2.9

50

26.9 73.1

100

100

50 97.1 Drinking Water Supply

Irrigation

Link road/ Bridges

Street Pavement and drainage

2 Have access to another source

5

The household is from another caste/tribe/social class Low quality of output form the CPI High cost/userfee of the CPI

6 1 1

The House is far away from the CPI location Other

1

An enlightening aspect is that even a high number of nonCO members (88 percent) were gaining positive externalities from the implementation of the CPI schemes. Reasons for respondents not In terms of related responses of satisfaction levels through the FGD analysis, 80 and 76 percent male and female respondents, respectively claimed to be aware of and receiving most and/or all the intended benefits of the CPI schemes. Highest claims (above 80 percent responses) were received in Lower Dir, Malakand Agency and Shangla; and CPI scheme-wise for link roads and bridges; and street pavements and drainage.

4.4.3 Problems

Other

Respondents in Shangla and Lower Dir claimed to be the most satisfied direct beneficiaries (100 and 97 percent, respectively), consistent for both males and females. Of the female respondents, 86 percent claimed to be direct beneficiaries, as compared to 93 percent of males.

The highest complaints of problems were reported in Upper Dir, followed by Shangla (19 and 11 percent, respectively).

Overall, 10 percent respondents identified the problems in street pavements and drainage, and 7 percent in link roads and bridges (and 55 percent in ‘other’ schemes). A list of problems is given in Table 3.4 (see Annex 1-B). The following graph shows the gender-wise break down of respondents’ reporting problems, if any, with the CPI schemes – less than 10 percent reported any complaints: Graph 3.11: Gender-wise break down of respondents’ reports of problems with CPI schemes 9

79

21

88

12

100

93

0

81

Yes %

83

7

91

75

0

17

Yes %

No %

7

No %

Dont Know %

Are there any problems/issues with the scheme at the time of interview?

Type of CPI Drinking Water supply Type of CPI irrigation

Type of CPI Street Pavement and drainage

Sex Male

Total of CPI Link road/Bridges

91

88

Yes %

9

12

CO/VO Membership Yes CO/VO Membership No

No %

Sex Female

In terms of whether or not the respondents perceived the projects as being cost effective, results from the FGDs reflect a high level of unawareness of females as opposed to almost all males 98 percent sharing their viewpoints, with male perceptions spread out across the options. One female stated during an FGD that ‘this topic was male domain’. The projects in Chitral were proclaimed most cost effective by 67 percent respondents during the FGDs. Details are given in Table: 3.5 (see Annex 1-B).

4.5 Efficiency: The efficiency of CPI construction has been evaluated with regard to the completion of the CPIs within the specified time and costs.

25 In terms of time taken for completion, it was found that 95% of the schemes were completed within the planned timeframe.

In terms costs, 87 % of the sample schemes were completed within the estimated budgets. . A relatively modest 7% of the schemes were completed at over 10% of the estimated cost while 6% were completed under the estimated budgets.

What is significant to note is that in case of cost overrun, local communities contributed to cover the balance.

Assessment of the comparative beneficiary costs from earlier studies show that SRSP investments are generally cost effective.

As a comparison, one study done in Nov 2002, “Cost and Impact Analysis of Water Supply and Environmental Sanitation in Pakistan” by Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Nov 2002, shows a figure of Rs 14228/HH for Government of KP and Rs 5521/ HH for NGOs for Water supply and Sanitation schemes. Adjusted for inflation this would be close to Rs 13000 per HH today.

On the other hand, based on the data of the sample schemes the average cost of the EERP Sanitation CPIs this comes to Rs 3430/ HH about 3-4 times less in terms of cost per beneficiary.

Although hard comparative data is not available for similar sized schemes which the GoKP or other organizations have implemented, there is anecdotal evidence that cost per beneficiary in the case of SRSP CPIs is relatively low. One reason is community contributions which on average is at least 20 % of the total cost of schemes 4.6 Sustainability The sustainability of EERP CPI and for that matter any infrastructure relate to its technical design, quality of construction and system of O&M. In case the scheme has been poorly designed or constructed, even a good O&M system will struggle to keep it going. On the other hand even if the structure has been designed and built to the best of standards, it will deteriorate over time if not maintained properly.

4.6.1 Design and layout.

The CPI scheme designs invariably are based on the traditional technologies and designs being used in the area.

Scheme design were available for more than half the schemes however as mentioned earlier that there was no design basis for 27 CPIs was either not available or inadequate and similarly design calculations were missing from 32 schemes.

All the construction drawing were very basic and left the details to the discretion of the technician on the ground.

About 15 percent of the schemes had changed the layout significantly from what had been planned. Although this is not a bad thing in itself, since for a community based project needs to have an inbuilt flexibility to match the conditions in the field. On the other hand this also reflects on the weak feasibility and lack of time given to technical planning and thinking.

Workmanship in a large number of schemes was found to be excellent. This was despite the difficulty in carriage of material and water for curing. One example is the RCC Bridge in Kamay, in Swat district.

The quality of workmanship at the sites was also observed in the field. It was found that, at 44% of the schemes workmanship were ranked good and at 38% it was found to be satisfactory. However, 18% of the schemes were ranked 35 See Annex 1-B Table 2.5

as being poor quality work. Road alignments, wear and tear, poor surface finishes and honey combing in concrete structures resulting from poor quality of workmanship was observed in villages Feza, Sanam & Sur Kamar in Shangla.

In Gujjer Tangi, Swat road cutting was carried out without proper slope35.

To further get some depth in understanding the key indicators i.e. quality of the CPI schemes; and the Operations & Management (O&M) systems put in place (including transparency) were also explored in the HH survey and the FGD. 4.6.2 Quality When inquired, 91 percent of the respondents (92 and 89 percent, respectively) were satisfied with the current condition of the CPI schemes. Other than only 84 percent satisfaction in Swat (86 and 82 percent for males and females, respectively), all respondents elsewhere claimed above 88 percent satisfaction, with 100 percent in Lower Dir. In the districts of Buner, Chitral and Malakand Agency, while male respondents were 100 percent satisfied, female rate of satisfaction ranged between 86 to 97 percent. Approximately 9 and 14 percent of females were dissatisfied with drinking water supply; and link roads and bridges, respectively and above 93 percent satisfaction levels for the rest of the CPI schemes. As for males, only 75 percent were satisfied with the irrigation scheme; 92 percent with link roads and bridges, and above 93 percent with the rest of the CPI schemes.

Interestingly, 87 percent of non-CO members showed satisfaction with the CPI schemes, as opposed to 94 percent of CO members.

Graph 3.12: Percentage of respondents who considered good quality of CPI schemes Drinking water supply Irrigation

53.3

Link road/Bridges

80.4

Street pavement and drainage Other

89.7 85.7

76.6

In the household survey, fewer females (68 percent) rated the material used in the CPI schemes as ‘good’, as opposed to males (89 percent). Additionally, 20 percent of females also claimed to be unaware/unable to respond/make a judgment.

In Upper Dir, only 55 percent of the respondents perceived the material used to be as ‘good’ and 70 and 74 percent in Lower Dir and Shangla, respectively, while the rest of the districts received responses between 82 and 96 percent. Interestingly, a considerable percentage (82) in Swat perceived the material used as ‘good’, despite overall satisfaction levels stated as low.

Overall 79 percent of the respondents termed the material as ‘good’. In the case of link roads and bridges, 77 percent of the respondents perceived the material used as ‘good’; and 13 percent labeled it as ‘average’ or ‘poor’; while 11 percent said they ‘didn’t know’. A detailed CPI scheme-wise breakdown is given in Annex: 1-C in Table 3.3, whereas the percentage of respondents who considered the quality good is presented in Graph 3.12.

26 Once again, 79 percent of the non-CO members cautiously rated the material used in CPI schemes as ‘good’, as opposed to 86 percent of the CO members with the same rating.

Similarly, workmanship of the construction was rated as ‘good’ by 73 percent of the respondents; 59 percent by females and 85 percent by males. Only 36 percent of the respondents in Upper Dir labeled the workmanship as ‘good’; and overall 68 percent respondents’ perceiving the workmanship of link roads and bridges as ‘good’; thus, both reflecting consistent results as above.

Awareness of any O&M Committee Males (YES)

23 8 3

29 0

Burner Chitral

8

Lower Dir Malakand Agency Swat

100

that can determine community levels of ownership and acceptability of the surrounding CPI schemes. Knowledge of any O&M system was generally low with 76 percent males; and only 20 percent females acknowledging them, with the least amount of awareness in Lower and Upper Dir (overall 40 and 42 percent, respectively).

Approximately 39 percent of respondents claimed to have made contributions to O&M; 32 percent males and 50 percent females; mostly in Chitral (overall 91 percent contributions) and less than 45 percent elsewhere. The largest contribution was in irrigation schemes (55 percent); and ‘others’ (77 percent). While 52 percent of CO members interviewed claimed to have contributed to the O&M of the CPI schemes, even 49 percent of the non-CO members that were surveyed claimed to have done so as well. Majority of the respondents (overall 28 percent) claimed to pay for as and when required. The high spirit of community members to contribute and even take charge of maintenance was quite apparent during the FGD sessions. The breakdown of CPI scheme-wise contributions is as follows: Table 3.7: How do you pay money for maintenance?

Upper Dir

Pre-testing of the scheme before hand over to the community is another important aspect to ensure the quality of the scheme. Overall 68 percent of the respondents (73 percent males; and 58 percent females) claimed that the CPI schemes were tested before being handed over according to their communities. Complete pre-testing was undertaken in Buner.

4.6.3 O&M systems The engineering reports suggest that for the schemes which were functional, O&M existed and functioned only partially at 22% of the sites, while at 30% there was no functional system for O&M36.

Type of CPI

Drinking water supply

•

•

%

%

%

%

%

6.4

2.9

26.9

24.0

39.8

44.4

14.8

40.7

30.3

46.1

23.6

38.8

52.2

42.9

14.3

3.6

Other

39.3

Additionally, overall 23 percent, but interestingly 29 percent females and only 18 males claimed knowledge of the existence of an O&M committee. There were very stark contrasts in female and male respondents in Malakand Agency and Shangla, where awareness levels of female respondents appeared to be comparatively very high.

Graphs 3.13 & 3.14: Awareness of O&M Committees – by gender

31

30

31 75 Burner Chitral

40

Lower Dir

FEMALES

Malakand Agency

23

29

8 8 3

In the case of Bazkhel, district Shangla, the scheme is pretty much non functional, since the drains a clogged and there does not seem to be any organized effort towards making it functional again.

36 See Annex 1 Table 2.4

Don’t know

9.0

No O&M systems or protocols were available for the implementation of maintenance works at a majority of the schemes.

Existence and functionality of O&M systems are indicators

Never

Link road/Bridges

30

O & M problems were observed in Sher Khan Bazdara, Malakand, Mankass, Kabal, and Swat. In all these schemes there ‘seems’ to be no system to resolve the problems because of which the scheme is non functional. As a result, the whole community is suffering.

When Needed

Street pavement and drainage

No O&M committee existed in PI register Meragai, Gujjer Tangi Badro & Khan Palao in Swat and Khan Abad in Upper Dir.

In some villages, O&M committees existed but were not performing their roles & responsibilities in this regard.

Bazkhel Sanam & Sur Kamar in Shangla are examples of this case.

Annually

Irrigation

The 15 schemes which were not performing O&M works were lacking in this regard because: •

Monthly

100 MALES

Swat Upper Dir

27 Existence of maintenance funds were acknowledged for drinking water and supply (33 percent); and link roads and bridges (32 percent); and the rest for ‘others’ (90 percent).

Respondents stated they were aware that most of the maintenance funds were being run through SRSP and then CO bank accounts (Table: 3.8). Overall, 8 percent of respondents believed that the O&M fund covers its own maintenance costs, 44 percent believed that it covered none.

Approximately 39 percent of the respondents reported any knowledge of an O&M Committee; 30 percent denied it; and 32 percent reported no knowledge whatsoever – 66 percent females did not know, as compared to 12 percent male respondents.

Table 3.8: How are the funds being maintained?

District

CO bank Account

With Project Committee

%

%

Buner

33.3

Chitral

68.8

Malakand Agency

16.7 27.3 6.5

%

%

6.3 100.0

Shangla

With the SRSP

44.4

Lower Dir

Swat

With the CO Manager

18.2

Upper Dir

Don’t Know

Own help

%

%

22.2 18.8

6.3

41.7

41.7

36.4

9.1

9.1

15.2

39.1

17.4

21.7

100.0

A gender-wise analysis of how decisions are made for the fund shows that a very small percentage of females agreed that they – the beneficiaries and/or the CO members - had any say (5 percent); whereas SRSP and others were the main decision-makers (see Table 3.9 in Annex 1-B for more details). Approximately, 12 percent females and 25 percent males claimed to be members of the O&M Committee.

Overall highest membership was in Shangla (41 percent).

Overall satisfaction with the Project Committee is provided in Tables 3.10 and 3.11 in Annex 1-B, both district- and CPI scheme-wise, with Chitral once again topping the list with 100 percent satisfaction (rated between ‘OK’ and ‘good’). The highest level of satisfaction with the Project Committees was reported in Street pavement and drainage, where 56 percent rated it as ‘good’, and 44 percent selected, ‘OK’, ‘poor’, and/or ‘don’t know’.

Graph 3.15: Performance rating of Project Committees (Good %) Drinking Water Supply Irrigation

24.6

Link road/Bridges Street pavement and drainage

56.1 20

21.1

With regards to their views on transparency in the planning, development and O&M of the CPI schemes, the FGD analysis reflects that 53 percent male respondents claimed to be satisfied. Only 24 percent female respondents claimed the same, but an additional 65 percent of them also stated that they were unaware. Highest levels of efficiency with regards to perception of transparency were found in Chitral (83

percent); and Buner (50 percent). The FGD respondents were most satisfied with transparency and availability of records in the CPI schemes of street pavement and drainage (64 percent). A detailed table (3.12) can be found in Annex 1-C. 4.6.4 Institutional Maturity A follow-up to ‘Sustainability’ this is the evaluation parameter addressed in this sub-section: Institutional Maturity of the CO, which assesses the capacity building of the communities to enable permanent running of the CPI schemes by themselves in the long-run. Such an assessment can be determined with the help of the following indicators: Community meetings during- and post-implementation of CPI schemes; trainings of community of members; and community’s ability to selfinitiate additional schemes.

4.6.5 Meetings While 23 to 40 percent of all respondents claimed to have met for planning and construction discussions on need-basis for each CPI scheme; 67 percent of respondents claimed to meet fortnightly on irrigation schemes, followed by 44 and 41 percent on street pavements and drainage; and drinking water supply, respectively. Even non-CO members claimed to participate in such discussions, mostly fortnightly (38 percent); and on need-basis (49 percent).

District-wise, respondents appeared the most active in Malakand Agency, where 69 percent claimed to meet on a fortnightly basis. In Swat and Lower Dir, the frequency was more monthly and/or on need-basis: Table 3.13: How often did you meet during the CPI planning & construction stages?

Fortnightly

District

Monthly

On need basis

Never

Total

%

%

%

%

%

%

Buner

42.3

11.5

38.5

7.7

100.0

Chitral

61.9

-

38.1

-

100.0

Lower Dir

9.1

33.3

42.4

15.2

100.0

Malakand Agency

69.4

13.9

16.7

-

100.0

Shangla

54.5

27.3

18.2

-

100.0

Swat

47.5

18.8

33.7

-

100.0

Upper Dir

13.3

36.7

33.3

16.7

100.0

In terms of frequency of meetings during the planning and construction phases of CPI schemes, the gender breakdown is as follows, with 47 percent males (females; 20 percent) reporting to have gathered on a fortnightly basis, while 40 percent females (males; 20 percent) claimed to meet only on needs-basis. Approximately 34 percent females claimed to have ‘never’ participated. Understandably, given the cultural constraints, once again, males appeared to be more active and females perhaps being unaware or unable to participate that constructively.

With regards to frequency of meetings after the completion of the CPI schemes, the highest number of responses, scheme-, gender- and district-wise were unanimously reported as on ‘need-basis’.

4.6.6 Trainings In addition to membership, training can be another key indicator of how active a CO is and the level of awareness of its members. 46 percent of the respondents/members claimed to have received any training in the Committee. Interestingly,

28 Table 3.14: Nature of Trainings Gender breakdown Disaster Preparedness

Sex

Total

Financial management

Leadership

O&M

Any other

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Male

3.5

15.8

50.9

13.2

16.7

100.0

Female

-

56.3

18.8

-

25.0

100.0

even non-CO members claimed to have received training.

The nature of training received, both gender- and CPI scheme-wise is illustrated below. Females received the highest amount of training in financial management, and males in leadership. However no respondent or any female member was given any O&M training as compared to male 15 % for male. Similarly, CPI scheme-wise, the greatest amount of training was received for leadership and financial management, according to 47 and 21 percent respondents, respectively, with consistent male and female breakdown below (and a CPI scheme-wise breakdown in Table 3.9: Annex 1-C): 37

4.6.7

Self-initiated community projects

Assuming that the training and high participation of CO members led to their improved skills and institutional maturity, a greater percentage of them (27) were involved in self initiated additional projects, as opposed to 14 percent of non CO members involved in self help assignments and 86 percent in donor initiated projects.

On inquiry, 9 percent females and 19 percent males reported that their communities had initiated other projects as well.

Approximately 19 percent CO members claimed to have done so, as well as 10 percent non-CO members. The highest response was found in Malakand Agency (43 percent), followed by Buner and Swat (22 and 21 percent, respectively).

Scheme-wise, street pavements and drainage was reported as the most popular (34 percent) additional project to have been initiated. Of these additional projects, 28 percent males proclaimed them as ‘self-help’, while 72 percent of the projects were labeled as ‘donor initiated’. Of these projects were in irrigation (100 percent); and street pavement and drainage (92 percent). Chitral and Malakand Agency witnessed 100 percent donor initiated additional projects, and Buner reportedly had the highest rate (83 percent) of self initiated projects undertaken.

Of the female respondents, 58 percent were aware of SRSP and its work in their communities. Chitral witnessed 100 percent awareness; followed 82 percent of female respondents claiming to be aware in Buner; and awareness levels between 46 to 68 percent in the rest of the districts.

Level of awareness of female non-CO members was also considerably high at 57 percent of the non-members surveyed.

A highly significant finding was that 64 percent of the females who were CO members were also a part of another organization, whereas the rate of participation of non-CO member females was 10 percent. This could positively indicate an increase in female mobilization in local communities due to their involvement in the SRSPAusAid CPI schemes.

Whether or not the female respondents had been actively involved as members, and/or in the planning and construction phases, almost all of them (97 percent) were fully aware of the existence of the CPI schemes in their communities.

50 percent of the funds were utilized in street pavement and drainage. Details are provided in Table 3.10 in Annex 1-C. Cohesion and harmony within the CO can be understood in terms of conflict between members with regard to the project. A minor percent (3: both males and females) reported any conflict concerning the CPI schemes, mainly in Buner and Lower Dir in the following schemes: drinking water supply; and street pavement and drainage.

Greater than 50% of SRSP money was utilized within the community (%)

23

Irrigation Link roads and bridges

19

In terms of SRSP funds, in all the schemes it is mandatory that 15 to 20 percent of the budget comes from the community.

Most of the budget is spent and monitored by the SRSP staff, but at times when the money is given to the community to spend, proper records are maintained. Most of the laborers, both skilled and unskilled, belong to the local community and were paid by SRSP for their services. While majority of the female respondents (approximately 80 percent) were largely unaware (80 percent) of SRSP spending, male respondents gave scattered views during the FGDs. Overall, 50 percent of the respondents in Chitral claimed that greater than 50 percent of the funds were utilized within the community; and 57 percent in Shangla; and less than 43 percent in all the other 5 districts. CPI scheme-wise, 50 percent of the respondents, the highest response, stated that greater than

Street pavement and drainage Other

Support from SRSP With regards to support from SRSP on the functioning of CPI schemes, 88 percent respondents were satisfied (50 percent ‘good’ and 38 percent ‘Satisfactory’); 1 percent were dissatisfied; and 11 percent claimed to be unaware (largely female respondents).

Drinking Water and supply

15

23

20

Reasons for Conflict: •

A minor dispute related to a piece of land, but resolved on time

•

A minor issue of land piece bur resolved by the community elders with in the week

•

During the construction one household was reluctant to provide a piece of land for the CPI, but the issue was resolved immediately

•

Land problem from the adjacent village arouse but was resolved on time by the local Revenue Department

•

Two tribes are not ready to share the CPI

37 Approximately 25 percent of non-CO members interviewed; possibly trainings under some other organizations.

29 Majority of the FGD responses endorsed the confidence of the male and female participants claiming that the CPI schemes could very well continue to run in the absence of support from SRSP. However, scheme-wise response reflected another story, where 43 and 27 percent FGD participants believed that irrigation and drinking water supply schemes could not run solely by the communities.

Table 3.18: Is there any change in women’s free time

District

Table 3.17: Do you think that the project can continue in the absence of SRSP? There is no O&M system but the community does have some capacity

There is no O&M system but the community has been trained to implement

There is an O&M system and the community has been trained to implement

There is no O&M system and the community is actively contributing

Don’t know

%

%

%

%

%

%

Drinking water supply

28.6

4.8

4.8

33.3

7.1

Irrigation

42.9

14.3

There is no O&M system and the community does not have any capacity

Scheme type

28.6

21.4

14.3

Link road/ Bridges

20.9

18.6

16.3

23.3

4.7

Street pavement and drainage

7.7

-

15.4

30.8

23.1

Other

33.3

16.7

16.7

33.3

16.3 23.1

4.7 Impact 4.7.1 Overall impact analysis All respondents across all 7 districts reported a significant positive impact of the CPIs implemented under EERP by SRSP. In the case of villages where a Link Road or a Bridge had been constructed, respondents in Buner and Malakand Agency reported a positive change in both cases, as high as, 80 and 77 percent, respectively. Even in a district as conservative as Shangla respondents claimed that the impact led to between 13 to 16 percent positive changes in education for both girls’ and boys’ Similarly time to fetch water has been reduced by nearly 12 times due to the drinking water supply schemes and whereas earlier only 34 % had access to drinking water 24 hr, now nearly 93 % do.

While the survey results reflect that 97 percent respondents acknowledged a stark positive change in female mobility, as a result of the CPI schemes; however, findings across the indicators reflect extreme lack of awareness and participation on the part of women. They need to be mobilized and encouraged to take greater initiative and be more involved in the process for a greater sense of ownership of the schemes, as well as, higher self-esteem and general knowledge. This is their key to greater empowerment. Approximately 68 percent of respondents across all 7 districts acknowledged a positive impact on women’s free time, enabling them to manage their daily activities more efficiently and productively. Some, however, did state that no change was witnessed in this regard: With the exception of 23 and 7 percent respondents, respectively in Lower and Upper Dir, who reported no benefit/ change in marketing of agricultural surplus, 67 percent respondents across all 7 districts reported a positive impact in this regard as well. Same is the case with impact on cost of farm input (and access to business opportunities): with the exception of 50 (50), 23 (25) and 3 (6) percent respondents, respectively in Buner, Lower and Upper Dir, who reported no benefit/change, approximately 68 (89) percent respondents across all districts reported a positive impact, respectively.

Large benefits

Some benefits

No benefit

Don’t Know

Buner

40.0%

10.0%

50.0%

Lower Dir

22.5%

32.5%

45.0%

Malakand Agency

50.0%

29.2%

20.8%

Shangla

14.3%

40.0%

42.9%

2.9%

Swat

32.4%

35.1%

5.4%

27.0%

Upper Dir

30.0%

66.7%

3.3%

4.7.2 Drinking Water Supply - CPI Scheme Impact This segment analyzes the immediate impact of the Drinking Water Supply CPI on reducing the time and effort taken to get to the water source. Overall, before DWSS CPI implementation, the average time taken to reach the water source and come back was 24 minutes for males, which, after the implementation of the schemes, was cut down to a fifth; to around 6 minutes. For females, an initial average time of 47 minutes, was cut drastically to a twelfth of the original amount of time taken; down to 4 minutes. Overall, it now takes an average of 5 minutes to get to and from the water source than the pre-CPI implementation estimate of 35 minutes, reflecting a major reduction in time, allowing community members to allocate their time more efficiently on other important daily tasks. The numbers now indicate that this responsibility is now being shared amongst the rest of the household members, most often the female child (21 percent), thus giving females higher opportunities utilize their time efficiently since the CPI scheme implementation has increased ease of accessibility.

Table 3.19: Average time taken to reach water source and return (in minutes), before and after the implementation of DWS CPI schemes; by gender Average minutes after CPI by gender

Average minutes before CPI by gender

Mean Minutes

Mean Minutes

Male

6

Male

24

Female

4

Female

47

Percentage distribution of tasks undertaken by community members in a typical day shows that females now spend approximately 90 percent of their time on other household chores: District-wise, drastic savings in time allocation have been realized by beneficiaries due to DWS CPI. In Chitral and Upper Dir, it now takes almost no time to reach the most utilized water source. The time saved in Lower Dir, Swat and Shangla is almost 12 times as little. However, it takes the beneficiaries in Malakand longer to reach the DWS CPI source now than it did before installation.

Table 3.20: Average time taken to go to water source and come back (in minutes), before and after the implementation of DWS CPI schemes; by District Average minutes by location District

Mean Minutes

District

Mean Minutes

Buner

9.1

Buner

32.3

Chitral

N/A

Chitral

10.0

Lower Dir

4.2

Lower Dir

48.7

Malakand

11.4

Malakand

2.7

Shangla

2.1

Shangla

35.1

Swat

3.8

Swat

40.5

Upper Dir

N/A

Upper Dir

69.0

Total

4.8

Total

34.9

30 Before the implementation of DWS CPI schemes, 60 percent of respondents from 6 out of the 7 districts reported that mainly adult women would fetch water for the HH’s use. The only exception was Malakand Agency, where water is most often fetched by a female child (over 60 percent cases). After the implementation of DWS CPI, the highest percentage is still of adult women who fetch water, but this has almost halved to approximately 34 percent; with the exception of Chitral and Malakand Agency.

Satisfaction levels with the new DWS CPI schemes were 100 percent for males and 97 percent for females. In addition to coverage of lesser distances now, another reason for high satisfaction was that the frequency of water availability was also raised by almost 100 percent after the implementation of the DWS CPI schemes. The tables 3.21 and 3.33 reflect the stark positive differences: Table 3.21: The frequency of water available to HH before implementation of the DWS CPI scheme; by Gender Before CPI?

Male

Female

Total

Full time/24 hours

37.6

34.4

36.1

Daily intermittently

53.2

61.5

57.1

4.7.3 Street pavements and drainage Analyzing the immediate impact of the Street Pavement and Drainage CPI scheme, in terms of water disposal and improvement in the local environment, will eventually help to evaluate the current health scenario of the beneficiaries.

Majority of the respondents (96 percent) in the 3 districts: Malakand Agency, Shangla and Swat agreed that their streets had stagnant water with no effective way of its disposal. Post SPD CPI, the situation positively reversed with approximately 92 percent of the respondents indicating that the issue of stagnant water in the streets had either been completely or partially eliminated, with majority leaning towards complete elimination. Hence, the SPD CPI scheme has been a source of great convenience for the beneficiaries. It not only saves them transport time, but may also result in better health as the diseases contracted from stagnant water might be greatly reduced.

Table 3.24: Respondents claims of cases of elimination stagnant water after CPI? Yes

No

To some extent

%

%

%

Alternate days

0.0

2.1

1.0

Malakand

100.0

0

0

Twice a week

9.2

1.0

5.4

Shangla

50.0

25.0

25.0

Swat

97.7

2.3

0

Others

0.0

1.0

0.5

Total

100.0

100.0

100.0

Table 3.22: The frequency of water available to HH after implementation of the DWS CPI scheme; by Gender After CPI?

Male

Female

Total

Full time/24 hours

97.1

90.1

93.9

Daily intermittently

2.9

7.7

5.1

Alternate days

0.0

1.1

0.5

Twice a week

-

-

0

Others

0.0

1.1

0.5

Total

100.0

100.0

100.0

With regards to households using any additional water treatment method for drinking water after the implementation of DWS CPI scheme; a 100 percent claim of no water treatment was reported. Though, Malakand and Swat still seemed to have its doubts about the purity of water provided and thus continued to use some form of water purification methodology. Once again, strengthening the claim that whereas, other districts were saving time and manual input, Malakand Agency was still struggling with the concept. This highlights the need for further training and follow-up with Cos in Malakand Agency. Similarly, while almost 100 percent respondents from Malakand Agency and Swat reported that the water from the CPI schemes had a clear appearance, sweet taste and was odorless; they reported cases of disease due to these water schemes (see Table 3.11 in Annex 1-C). This rendition of doubt (still using some form of water treatment) by Malakand and Swat would be better explained if the quality of water provided by CPI was unsatisfactory, but ironically both districts claim almost zero percent dissatisfaction. There is however, one point that may support their claim, that being the information that Malakand and Swat both have reported a higher percentage of diseases contracted through water (even after CPI) as compared to other districts. This might be cause for worry, hence, needs to be investigated.

District

Approximately 96 percent of the respondents from the 3 districts reported a rampant foul smell due to improper drainage systems. Post-SPD CPI, whereas in Shangla and Swat the situation was quite favorable towards the SPD CPI, with 75 and 93 percent respondents from both districts, respectively claiming a reduction in foul smell, there was a 50/50 split in Malakand Agency. This calls for revisiting the CPI scheme impact in Malakand.

In regards to domestic waste water’s appropriate disposal, the responses generated have made for an interesting analysis. Pre-SPD CPI, the distinction by sample district claims that whereas in Shangla 100% of the respondents claimed that the waste water was not being disposed properly; the situation was relatively better in Swat with only half the respondents claiming that it was not. Post-SPD CPI, the scheme has performed well enough almost half the male respondents to agree that domestic waste water is now being disposed properly in contrast to 93 percent stating the contrary before the implementation of the scheme.

In the same way, the percentage of female respondents increased from 67 to approx 89 percent. In Swat, now up to 75 percent respondents are satisfied with the output of the scheme, whereas majority of the respondents from Shangla (approximately 62 percent) are still claiming that waste water is not disposed properly.

Furthermore, the resulting answer to the question whether there has been any significant decrease in Mosquitoes or flies the answer was no from 100 % of the female beneficiaries, whereas 7.5 % male said that it did. The answer to the query of improved children health before the CPI scheme of street pavement and drainage was a resounding 100 percent ‘No’ on all accounts. Similarly, to the Post implementation of the CPI scheme, above 50 percent of the respondents in both Malakand Agency and Shangla perceived an improvement and positive effect on the health of the children as a result.

If this can assessed based on actual figures, this would reflect the impact the CPI schemes have had on increased life expectancy and economizing family budgets to save the amount of money spent on health treatment.

31 4.7.4 Link roads and bridges The impact of implementation of CPI schemes of link roads and bridges, in other words, communication infrastructure has remarkably decreased the average time taken for community residents to avail essential daily requirements including access to the nearest drinking water supply; distance to grocery shopping; distance to girls’ and boys’ schools; access to hospital; and distance to the nearest local Tehsil administration: Table 3.25: Before CPI Schemes in Communication Infrastructure – Average (mean) time taken to acquire the following facilities (minutes): District

Drinking water supply

Grocery shopping / General store

Boys’ school

Girls’ school

Hospital

Local Tehsil administration

Buner

46.5

1

36.6

38.1

9.8

1

Lower Dir

17.8

33.4

13.2

16.3

13

1

Malakand

4.2

37.9

29.7

30.1

39.3

51.6

Shangla

15.6

145.4

115.3

123.9

197.4

133.3

Swat

110.6

151.6

126.3

121.6

162.8

54

Upper Dir

17

35.4

42.4

23.9

71.6

9.3

Total

39.7

84.1

67.2

61

97.3

49.2

Table 3.26: After CPI Schemes in Communication Infrastructure – Average (mean) time taken to acquire the following facilities (minutes): District

Drinking water supply

Grocery shopping / General store

Boys’ school

Girls’ school

Hospital

Local Tehsil administration

Buner

17.5

1

15.4

17.1

5.3

1

Lower Dir

9.3

17.4

6.7

8.6

6.1

1

Malakand

1.6

12.1

14.1

14.8

24

28.8

Shangla

9.6

36.9

12.6

14.8

43.9

19.1

Swat

28.9

41.7

27.6

24.8

52.7

46.2

Upper Dir

5.4

14

17.8

11.8

32.7

5.4

Total

12.9

25.1

15.6

14.3

30.3

16.4

Among the above listed facilities, a rather unique shift was witnessed in the mode of transport used to gain access the nearest general/grocery store. Comparing before- and after- CPI construction cases, the mode of transport ‘on foot’ surprisingly decreased (except in Buner); the usage of motorbikes and four wheel engine vehicles increased (other than in Lower Dir); and also witnessed was an increase in usage of public transport across all districts. This is quite alarming since the first assumption that can be made is that the distance due to the link roads has in fact, expanded

rather than the reverse, which would placed the community members at a greater convenience.

The usage and hence, relevance of the link roads and bridges constructed under the CPI schemes is detailed in Table 3.12 in Annex 1-C. Of the 3 percent respondents in Malakand Agency who claimed to not use it all, 33 percent of them stated that the new infrastructure was of no use to them. The 8 percent (approximately) respondents in Swat who claimed the same all reported ‘poor quality’ as the reason. The rest of the higher majority of respondents, however, in both districts, and elsewhere were highly satisfied with the quality of the new communication infrastructure.

In terms of overall traveling cost, it decreased by 25 percent for all respondents in Lower Dir and between 25 to 50 percent for respondents in Upper Dir. As for the 5 districts, travel cost decreased between 25 to 75 percent at varying levels.

Additionally, there was an overall 75 percent decrease in the cost of freight transport due to the new CPI communication infrastructure across all districts except Buner, where no change was witnessed at all. The detailed breakdown of the impact is illustrated in Table 3.12 in Annex 1-C. 4.7.5 Irrigation The household survey results reflect that there was a remarkable increase in crop production of community members surveyed owing to the implementation of CPI irrigation schemes. While 100 percent respondents reported a 50 percent increase in wheat production; between 50 to 80 percent reported a 100 percent increase in rice and grain production. Production of maize also increased considerably.

In vegetables, 100 percent increase in production of onions; tomatoes; lady fingers; and garlic was also reported by all respondents. Fruits such as apples; plums; and apricots comparatively did not witness such levels of increase in production. Production increments ranged between 50 to 70 percent. A 63 percent increase in rearing was also reported by respondents; with 10 out of 16 respondents surveyed claiming an increase, and 6 reporting no change.

With regards to the overall impact on farm revenue, as indicated in the table below, 100 percent respondents reported minimum 50 percent increase. This is a substantial outcome of the irrigation CPI scheme, raising the economic empowerment of beneficiaries working on agricultural land.

Table 3.29: Overall Farm Revenue Farm revenue

50%

70%

80%

Total

Overall Farm revenue

28.6

42.9

28.6

100

32 4.8 Conclusions and Recommendations In view of the early recovery context and the difficult terrain, SRSP’s outreach and successful conclusion of this challenging project is commendable. The schemes have been implemented in areas where the government had limited outreach and other non-governmental players had no presence. . Working in the target areas meant many hours of driving and trekking through often rugged and mountainous terrain. Despite these difficulties, the overall quality of work is of good standards. All project outputs were also achieved within the agreed timelines. Thanks to a motivated team, nearly 400 community organizations were formed, local priorities identified and over 200 CPIs implemented within a short span of 9 months.

Overall the communities have reported a very positive impact of the CPI program.

•

•

Post implementation of the DWSS, the average time taken to reach the water source decreased significantly, allowing community members, particularly females, to allocate their time more efficiently to other important daily tasks. Satisfaction levels with the new DWS CPI schemes were 100 percent for males and 97 percent for females, also, implying lower risks of waterborne diseases.

In case of Sanitation and drainage CPIs, the majority of the respondents (92 percent) in the 3 districts where the scheme was implemented noted that the issue of stagnant water in the streets had either been completely or partially eliminated. Additionally, 75 and 93 percent respondents in Shangla and Swat, respectively claimed reduction in foul smell, while 50 percent respondents reported the same in Malakand Agency.

•

The new link roads and bridges has remarkably decreased the average time taken for community residents to avail essential daily requirements; travel to the nearest drinking water supply schemes; grocery stores; girls’ and boys’ schools; hospital; and the nearest local Tehsil administration. The respondents reported an overall 75 percent decrease in the cost of freight transport across all districts except Buner, where no change was reported.

•

The survey also shows considerable increase in crop production due to the implementation of irrigation schemes. Nearly all respondents reported a 50 percent increase in wheat production; while between 50 to 80 percent reported a 100 percent increase in rice and grain production. With regards to the overall impact on farm income, 100 percent respondents reported a minimum of 50 percent increase.

•

Combined capacity of the 3 MHPs in Chitral, Swat and Upper Dir has the designed capacity of 225 KW, which will benefit approximately 600 HH. It was reported that the MHP in Bhamborate, Chitral has been functioning at full capacity and is not only supplying electricity to the communal HH’s, but also to a local hotel, Maternity Home, Funeral Hall, a school and also mosque.

•

•

All 60 schemes in the evaluation sample were physically verified to be on the ground. Except for one scheme all the rest have been identified by the local community as fulfilling their priority need. Given the tight time lines and the difficult terrain, this is a remarkable achievement Project documentation has been meticulously kept in the regional office, showing detailed record of community interaction and the field processes from the ‘first

dialogue’ to the handing of checks in the 3rd dialogues and the subsequent installments. However the technical documentation covering the design basis, design calculations and the environmental assessment remains a weak area. .

•

The CPIs are predominantly functional, and have a positive impact on the communities; however some of these (about 10 %) are not delivering the required benefits due to poor quality and/or weak O&M systems.

•

A majority of females in the sample confirmed that the CPIs chosen represented their priority needs and directly benefiting them. However CPI implementation remained a predominantly male affair. Out of the 64 WCO which were formed, a total of 4 CPIs were for the women organization, which is disproportionally low.

•

Although CPIs such as DWSS or sanitation and drainage were being implemented there was little attempt to build the capacity of the organizations on related issues such as health and hygiene.

•

SRSP’s presence in the project areas was a significant factor in the rapid response and timely completion of the project activities. Interviews with senior SRSP managers suggest a continued interest in the region and a commitment to maintain the needed support for post project support through existing resources.

•

CPIs are highly visible, ensure immediate benefits to the community and also typically consume the largest chunk of development budgets in any community program. Accordingly these should receive a higher level of attention from the feasibility through design, implementation as well as the O&M. The survey shows a generally good performance on the “implementation fronts” however the design and O&M phases could benefit from further attention. Among other areas of focus the CPIs are generally small in scope, however a rapid “environmental screening and mitigation” protocol could help some categories of schemes. Overall the team recommends additional investments in staff skills for field surveys and design; use of design standards and guidelines and customized training modules for O&M practices. This will allow SRSP to further build on its current success and ensure that the CPIs continue to yield long term dividends without the need for any hand holding or follow up repairs in project areas that are generally remote and difficult to access.

Specific recommendations: 1. Improve Engineering technical feasibility: 1.1. Establish policy to adhere to basic technical engineering standards.

1.2. Outsource technical assistance on engineering complex structures 1.3.

Outsource essential engineering tests.

1.4.

Acquire modern survey and test equipment

1.4.1. Total Station

1.4.2. GPS enabled cameras

1.4.3. Use Google earth where possible, else develop proper base map layout to ensure proper planning.

1.5. Establish Mobile lab for remote locations to ensure that the necessary tests such as soil analysis, CBR are carried out when necessary.

33 1.6.

Staff training

2. Improve Environmental Feasibility 2.1.

Revisit the Environmental review process

2.2.

Hire an environmental engineer.

2.3.

Staff training

3. Improve Quality of Scheme Construction 3.1.

Establish quality standards

3.2.

Training of project committee

3.3.

Ensure a effective ratio of field engineers to scheme ratio for effective field supervisor

3.4.

Training of ‘skilled’ and unskilled local labor.

4. Improve O & M system 4.1.

Develop scheme specific O&M schedules

4.2. Develop basic troubleshooting guidelines defining what to do and when with clearly defined roles and responsibilities.

4.3. Establish intensive training of O&M committee and members and ensure refreshers.

4.4.

Encourage an O&M fund and before hand-over of the scheme.

4.5.

Monitor outcomes instead of outputs.

4.6.

Use of cell phone technology to monitor O&M

5. Focus on Female organization or investments: 5.1.

Establish link between investment in CPI and female activities.

5.1.1. Implement CPI’s only where WCO are formed or at least where female SOs is given access.

6. Plan for CPI investments holistically.

6.1.

This is especially important in the case of DWSS and Sanitation CPIs where basic health and hygiene should be seen as a overarching framework

6.2.

Irrigation related schemes should be followed up with water conservation and erosion control trainings.

34

ANNEXURES 1A Table 1.1 Environmental Screening Documentation not available/Inadequate S.No.

District

Village

Scheme Type

1

Swat

Meragai

Irrigation channel Lining & RT wall

2

Swat

Aladand Dherai

Irrigation (Gabion structure)

3

Swat

Pengen

Street pavement & Drainage

4

Swat

Mankass Qabel

DWSS (HP)

5

Swat

Faqira

Link Road Rehabilitation

6

Swat

Kamay

RCC Bridge

7

Swat

Samteer

Link road (Earthen)

8

Swat

Kaho

Link Road Rehabilitation)

9

Swat

Babo Maira

Irrigation (Ramp Pump)

10

Swat

Pirkhel khass

RCC cause way

11

Upper Dir

Qulandai Payeen

Suspension Bridge(Pedestrian)

Village

Scheme Type

Table 1.2 Design Basis Unavailable/Inadequate S.No.

District

1

Swat

Faqira

Link Road Rehabilitation

2

Swat

Kamay

RCC Bridge

3

Swat

Quanj

Street pavement & Drainage

4

Swat

Kokari Sar

Link road (Earthen & PCC)

5

Swat

Samteer

Link road (Earthen)

6

Swat

Kaho

Link Road (Rehabilitation)

7

Swat

Shagai

Street pavement & Drainage

8

Swat

Bar Jopeen

Street pavement & Drainage

9

Swat

Faqira

Street pavement & Drainage

10

Swat

Pirkhel khass

RCC cause way

11

Swat

Pengen

Street pavement & Drainage

12

Malakand

Palai khpa

Link Road (PCC)

13

Shangla

Sanam

Link Road (PCC)

14

Shangla

Sur Kumar

Link Road (PCC)

15

Swat

Gujer Tangi Badro

Link Road

16

Shangla

Sanila

Street Pavement & Drainage

17

Lower Dir

MataKhazana

Link Road

18

Lower Dir

Moranai

Link Road

19

Lower Dir

Munjay

Link Road

20

Upper Dir

Panakot

Link Road

21

Lower Dir

Shal Kandi

Link Road

22

Swat

Baghgay Maloch

RCC Cause Way

23

Shangla

Feza

Link Road (PCC)

24

Upper Dir

Malow

Suspension Bridge(Pedestrian)

25

Upper Dir

Shamorgar

PCC Link Road

26

Swat

Akhun Baba

PCC Link Road

27

Upper Dir

Qulandai Payeen

Suspension Bridge(Pedestrian)

35 Table 1.3 Design Calculations Not available S.No.

District

Village

Scheme Type

1

Swat

Faqira

Link Road Rehabilitation

2

Swat

Kamay

RCC Bridge

3

Swat

Quanj

Street pavement & Drainage

4

Swat

Kokari Sar

Link road (Earthen & PCC)

5

Swat

Samteer

Link road (Earthen)

6

Swat

Sorykad

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

7

Swat

Kaho

Link Road (Rehabilitation)

8

Swat

Badardam

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

9

Swat

Shagai

Street pavement & Drainage

10

Swat

Bar Jopeen

Street pavement & Drainage

11

Swat

Faqira

Street pavement & Drainage

12

Swat

Pirkhel khass

RCC cause way

13

Swat

Pengen

Street pavement & Drainage

14

Malakand

Palai khpa

Link Road (PCC)

15

Buner

Banju Tangey

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

16

Buner

Ambela

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

17

Shangla

Sanam

Link Road (PCC)

18

Shangla

Sur Kumar

Link Road (PCC)

19

Swat

Gujer Tangi Badro, Islampur

Link Road

20

Shangla

Sanila

Street Pavement & Drainage

21

Swat

Dardyal,Qabel

DWSS Graivty Flow

22

Lower Dir

Inzaroo

DWSS Graivty Flow

23

Lower Dir

MataKhazana

Link Road

24

Lower Dir

Moranai

Link Road

25

Lower Dir

Munjay

Link Road

26

Upper Dir

Panakot

Link Road

27

Lower Dir

Shal Kandi

Link Road

28

Swat

Baghgay Maloch

RCC Cause Way

29

Upper Dir

Malow

Suspension Bridge(Pedestrian)

30

Upper Dir

Shamorgar

PCC Link Road

31

Upper Dir

Qulandai Payeen

Suspension Bridge(Pedestrian)

32

Chitral

Khoran dok

DWSS Gravity flow

Inadequate S.No.

District

Village

Scheme Type

Remarks

1

Swat

Yakh Tangey

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Missing for water storage reservoir

2

Swat

Akhun Baba

PCC Link Road

Missing for axle loads etc.

3

Swat

Shagai Ghwajalgai

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Missing for water storage reservoir

4

Malakand

Khan Palao

DWSS (Hand pump)

Missing for HP apron and foundation

5

Swat

Amin Abad

Link Road

Missing for axle loads etc.

6

Malakand

Sherkhan,Bazdara

DWSS (Hand pump)

Missing for HP apron and foundation

7

Shangla

Tangir

Suspension Bridge(Pedestrian)

Load bearing not mentioned

8

Shangla

Abbasin Colony

Gravity Flow

Missing for water storage reservoir

9

Shangla

Feza

Link Road (PCC)

Missing for axle loads etc.

10

Lower Dir

Asilo

DWSS Gravity Flow

Missing for water storage reservoir

11

Lower Dir

Danwa

DWSS Gravity Flow

Missing for water storage reservoir

12

Upper Dir

Doonpayeen

DWSS Gravity Flow

Missing for water storage reservoir

13

Swat

Mankass Qabel

DWSS (HP)

Missing for HP apron and foundation

14

Swat

Yakh Tangey

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Missing for water storage reservoir

36 Table 1.4 Construction Drawings Unavailable S.No.

District

Village

Scheme Type

1

Malakand

Khar

DWSS (Hand pump)

2

Swat

Gujer Tangi

Link Road

Inadequate Sr.

District

Village

Scheme type

Remarks

1

Swat

Jabba

DWSS (Hand pump

Plan shows 3 hand pumps, section shows a Dug well with a storage reservoir

Table 1.5 PI Register Not available Sr

District

Village

Scheme type

Remarks

1

Swat

Jabba

DWSS (Hand pump)

2

Swat

Meragai

Irrigation channel Lining & RT wall

3

Swat

Khar

DWSS (Hand pump)

4

Swat

Gujer Tangi Badro, Islampur

Link Road

5

Lower Dir

MataKhazana

Link Road

6

Lower Dir

Moranai

Link Road

Table 1.6 Project Completion Report Not available Sr

District

Village

Scheme type

Remarks

1

Swat

Shao

MHP 75Kw

Project not handed over as yet

2

Buner

Bazarkot

Foot Bridge (Suspension)

Not found in PI file

3

Buner

Riaz Abad, Ambella

DWSS (Hand Pumps)

Not found in PI file

4

Chitral

Khoran dok

DWSS (Gravity flow)

CPI Failed

Inadequate Sr

District

Village

Scheme type

Remarks

1

Buner

Banju Tangey

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Date and signatures missing

2

Buner

Ambela

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Date and signatures missing

3

Shangla

Abbasin Colony

Gravity Flow

Signatures are missing

4

Swat

Lawar Deolai, Qabil

Irrigation Channel

Signatures are missing

5

Chitral

Kuru Bala

Dug Well

CPI Failed; not completed

Table 1.7 Completion Certificate Not available Sr

District

Village

Scheme type

Remarks

1

Swat

Shao

MHP 75Kw

Project not handed over as yet

2

Buner

Bazarkot

Foot Bridge (Suspension)

Missing in PI file

3

Buner

Riaz Ambella

DWSS (Hand Pumps)

Missing in PI file

Sr

District

Village

Scheme type

Remarks

1

Swat

Banju Tangey

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Dates and SRSP Officials’ signatures missing

2

Buner

Ambela

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Dates and SRSP Officials’ signatures missing

3

Chitral

Kuru Bala

Dug Well

Completion certificate not made as CPI failed

Inadequate

37 Table 1.8 Handing over Certificate Not available Sr

District

Village

Scheme type

Remarks

1

Swat

Shao

MHP 75Kw

Not Handed over

2

Buner

Bazarkot

Foot Bridge (Suspension)

Not available in PI file

3

Chitral

Bamburate

MHP

Not Handed Over

4

Chitral

Kuru Bala

Dug Well

Scheme failed so not handed over.

5

Upper Dir

Khan abad

MHPP

Not available in PI file

38

ANNEXURES 1B Table 2.1 Scheme Layouts Schemes with Layout differences Sr

District

Village

Scheme

Remarks

1

Swat

Yakh Tangey

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

• 4 transmission lines detailed in plans, but 7 transmission lines observed on site • Plan described previously existing water tank in between intake chamber and water storage tank; actually, there was a direct line from the intake chamber to the main water storage tank.

• Planned main supply line was of 2‘’ dia and 7290 rft length. On ground a 1.25’’ dia and 9000 rft length was observed

2

Buner

Banju Tangey

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

• In the drawings, there was only 01 storage tank with 01 supply line; 02 water storage tanks and 02 supply lines observed on site

3

Shangla

Abbasin Colony

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

• Drawings showed two supply lines from the storage tank, however it was observed that only one line was in connection with the storage tank while the second line was directly connected to the main supply line.

4

Swat

Gujer Tangi Badro, Islampur

Link Road

• In designs, 07 RCC culverts were shown; however no culverts were constructed on site.

5

Lower Dir

Danwa

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

• In designs, there was 1 source planned. However, 2 sources were observed.

6

Swat

Baghgay Maloch

RCC Cause Way

• In drawing, 06 pipe culverts were shown at one location. However 2 culverts were constructed in different location with 2 pipes each.

7

Chitral

Kuru Bala

Dug Well

• Site changed by community.

8

Lower Dir

Asilo

DWSS

• The distribution network on site does not match the plans • There is no Storage tank in the plan • Planned number of lines from the distribution tanks are 3 vs 9 on site.

9

Swat

Sorykad

DWSS

• 4 distribution lines coming out of the tank vs planned 2

39 Table 2.2 Design Validation Schemes ‘not built as per approved design’ Sr

District

Village

Scheme

Remarks

1

Shangla

Sanam

Link Road (PCC)

850 rft of drains planned were not constructed at site.

Length of PCC pavement was changed compared to design

2

Swat

Gujer Tangi

Link Road

None of the culverts were constructed

3

Swat

Mankass Qabel

DWSS (HP)

120ft drilling depth was mentioned, however no drilling was undertaken, and a Hand Pump was installed over an existing dug well It was also noted that a 4“ dia PVC pipe of 124 rft had not been installed at site

4

Chitral

Kuru Bala

Dug Well

CPI failed/not completed. Resistivity test not conducted

5

Buner

Banju Tangey

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Length Main Line 1 Main Line 1 Supply Line 1 Supply Line 2 Supply Line 3 Supply Line 4 Supply Line 5

Design 3608’ NA 2840’ 1360’ 2240’ 2410’ NA

Actual 1700’ 600’ 1500’ 2000’ 1750’ 1800’ 1600’

6

Shangla

Abbasin Colony

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Length Water Tank Main S. Line Supply line 1 Supply line 2

Design 14’ 15000’ 1200’ 1400’

Actual 13.5’ 19700’ 550’ 450’

7

Swat

Amin abad

Link Road

Length PCC Road RT wall Cutting

Design 800’ 55’ with 5’h 450’

Actual 150’ 75’ with 3.5’h 700’

8

Swat

Samteer

Link road (Earthen)

Length PCC RT wall

Design 250’ 160’

Actual Not Done 750’

9

Shangla

Sanam

Link Road (PCC)

Length PCC Pavement Side Drain

Design 850’ 850’

Actual 1150’ NA

10

Swat

Meragai

Irrigation channel Lining & RT wall

Length Channel RT wall 01 RT wall 02

Design 750’ 70’ 70’

Actual 880’ 30’ 25’

11

Swat

Quanj

Street pavement & Drainage

Length PCC Pavement Side Drains Stairs

Design 1482’ 1482’ 150’

Actual 1190’ 464’ 50’

12

Shangla

Sanila

Street Pavement & Drainage

Length PCC Stair (L) PCC Street (L) Side Drain (L)

Design 799’ 1034’ 1833’

Actual 975’ 827’ 780’

40 Table 2.3 Schemes Design & estimate II Schemes with ‘minor’ variations Sr

District

Village

Scheme

Remarks

1

Swat

Faqira

Link Road Rehabilitation

• Length of PCC link road planned was 1200 ft. However, at site it was 1350ft. 80 ft of planned RW were not constructed.

• Design quantity of cutting was 600ft in BOQ; however at site 700ft of cutting was noted

2

Swat

Jabba

DWSS (Hand pump)

Drilling Depth HP # 01 HP # 02 HP # 03

3

Swat

Khan Palao

DWSS (Hand pump)

Minor difference was observed in drilling depth

Design 150’ 150’ 150’

Actual 160’ 85’ 110’

4

Swat

Pengen

Street pavement & Drainage

Minor difference was observed in street pavement and drainage lengths

5

Swat

Palai khpa

Link Road (PCC)

Length Pavement Side drain Pavement width

Design 1400’ 1400’ 12’

Actual 1250’ 1270’ 14’

6

Swat

Sherkhan, Bazdara

DWSS (Hand pump)

Drilling Depth HP # 02 HP # 03 HP # 04 HP # 05

Design 150’ 150’ 150’ 150’

Actual 135’ 135’ 70’ 105’

7

Buner

Ambela

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

Minor difference was observed in storage tank dimension and supply line length

8

Buner

Bazarkot

Foot Bridge (Suspension)

Minor difference was observed in railing length

9

Shangla

Feza

Link Road (PCC)

10

Shangla

Sur Kumar

Link Road (PCC)

11

Buner

Riaz Abad

DWSS (Hand Pumps)

12

Shangla

Sanila

Street Pavement & Drainage

13

Lower Dir

Asilo

DWSS Gravity Flow

Minor difference was observed in storage tank dimensions and supply line length

Pavement (L) Pavement (W) Side Drain (L)

Design 900’ 08’ 900’

Actual 850’ 09’ 600’

Pavement (L) Pavement (W) Side Drain (L)

Design 850’ 08’ 850’

Actual 900’ 09’ 500’

Drilling Depth HP # 01 HP # 02 HP # 03

Design 130’ 130’ 130’

Actual 155’ 125’ 139’

PCC Stair (L) Pavement (W) Side Drain (L)

Design 799’ 04’ 1833’

Actual 975’ 05’ 780’

14

Lower Dir

Danwa

DWSS Gravity Flow

Minor difference was observed in storage tank dimensions and supply line length

15

Upper Dir

Doonpayeen

DWSS Gravity Flow

Minor difference was observed in Intake chamber and storage tank dimensions and supply line length

16

Lower Dir

Mata Khazana

Link Road

17

Lower Dir

Munjay

Link Road

18

Upper Dir

Panakot

Link Road

19

Lower Dir

Shal Kandi

Link Road

20

Upper Dir

Shamorgar

PCC Link Road

21

Chitral

Khoran dok

DWSS gravity Flow

Link Road (L) Link Road (W) Side Drain (L)

Design 988’ 10‘ 700‘

Actual 1195’ 08‘ 280‘

Link Road (L) Link Road (W) Side Drain (L)

Design 700’ 10‘ 500‘

Actual 740’ 10‘ 740‘

Link Road (L) Link Road (W) RT Wall (L)

Design 1350’ 10‘ 275‘

Actual 1220’ 10‘ 252‘

Link Road (L) Link Road (W)

Design 1100’ 10‘

Actual 1126’ 10‘

Link Road (L) Link Road (W)

Design 1100’ 10‘

Actual 1300’ 10‘

Minor difference was observed in storage tank dimensions and supply line length

41 Table 2.4 Schemes O&M Schemes with poor O&M Sr

District

Village

Scheme

Remarks

1

Swat

Faqira

Link Road Rehabilitation

There was no O&M committee

2

Swat

Meragai

Irrigation channel Lining & RT wall

There was no O&M committee

3

Swat

Samteer

Link road (Earthen)

No O&M system in place

4

Malakand

Pengen

Street pavement & Drainage

There was no O&M committee

5

Malakand

Sherkhan, Bazdara

DWSS (Hand pump)

O&M was deemed not functional since 02 HPs had been out of order for the last one month

6

Shangla

Bazkhel

Drainage

No O&M system in place

7

Shangla

Feza

Link Road (PCC)

There was no O&M committee

8

Shangla

Sanam

Link Road (PCC)

There was no O&M committee

9

Shangla

Sur Kumar

Link Road (PCC)

There was no O&M committee

10

Swat

Gujer Tangi Badro

Link Road

There was no O&M committee

11

Swat

Sanila

Street Pavement & Drainage

There was no O&M committee

12

Swat

Mankass Qabel

DWSS (HP)

There was no O&M committee

13

Swat

Dardyal, Qabel

DWSS Gravity Flow

The scheme was not functional for the last two months because the water source had frozen. Community members said that the source had been damaged and that they plan to reconstruct a cut off wall once the snow melts fully. The team was further informed that the source is currently inaccessible

14

Upper Dir

Shamorgar

PCC Link Road

No O&M system in place

Table 2.5 Scheme Workmanship (Also See Annex 8 for pictures) Schemes had Poor Workmanship Sr

District

Village

Scheme

Remarks

1

Shangla

Feza

Link Road (PCC)

Workmanship observed was very poor. There was an irregular finish to the surfaces observed as well as honeycombing in concrete structure

2

Shangla

Sanam

Link Road (PCC)

Workmanship observed was very poor. There was an irregular finish to the surfaces observed as well as honeycombing in concrete structure

3

Shangla

Sur Kumar

Link Road (PCC)

Workmanship observed was very poor. There was an irregular finish to the surfaces observed as well as honeycombing in concrete structure

4

Swat

Gujer Tangi Badro

Link Road

Cutting had been carried as preliminary work for the road, however, no proper side slope was observed

5

Swat

Samteer

Link road (Earthen)

Workmanship observed was very poor. There was an irregular finish to the surfaces observed as well as honeycombing in concrete structure

6

Lower Dir

Mata Khazana

Link Road

Workmanship observed was very poor. There was an irregular finish to the surfaces observed as well as honeycombing in concrete structure

7

Swat

Quanj

Street pavement & Drainage

Workmanship observed was very poor

8

Swat

Sanila

Street Pavement & Drainage

Workmanship and quality of work observed was very poor

9

Upper Dir

Khan abad

MHPP

Workmanship and quality of work in power house observed was very poor

42 Table 2.6 Schemes Functionality Schemes not verified physically as they were not operational at the time of visit Sr

District

Village

Scheme

Remarks

1

Swat

Meragai

Irrigation channel Lining & RT wall

• • •

Irrigation was not needed during the time of the visit According to some community members the scheme was not functional due to flood damages However, the community planned to repair

2

Upper Dir

Khan abad

MHP

•

The scheme had been recently repaired and was not ready to be started.

3

Swat

Shao

MHP 75Kw

•

The day the of the site visit, the evaluation team was informed that a bearing of the turbine needed repair and had been taken to Mardan for repair.

4

Swat

Dardyal, Qabel

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

• •

The scheme was not functional Community members stated that the source had been damaged and the scheme had not functioned for the last two months, however they plan to repair it once the ice melts.

The team could not visit the source due to the glacier, which made it inaccessible.

• Schemes which are partially functional 1

Shangla

Bazkhel

Drainage

•

The drains were blocked and water was overflowing from sides of the drains

2

Swat

Sherkhan,Bazdara

DWSS (Hand pump)

• •

Three hand pumps are functional and in satisfactory conditions.

While two hand pump are not functional and need maintenance.

3

Swat

Gujer Tangi Badro, Islampur

Link Road

• • •

Severe problems of erosion and cutting The designed pipe culverts have not been constructed.

However, road is being used occasionally as no alternative is available

Kuru Bala

Dug Well

•

CPI failed as Water table was too low.

Scheme Failed 1

Chitral

Table 2.7 Schemes completed over estimated cost Schemes completed over estimated cost Sr

District

Village

Scheme

Remarks

1

Malakand

Khan Palao

DWSS (Hand pump)

Community informed the team that they had paid an extra 80,000 PKR for the completion of scheme.

2

Malakand

Sherkhan, Bazdara

DWSS (Hand pump)

The community members said that an additional Rs. 20,000 had been required for completion of the scheme.

3

Upper Dir

Doonpayeen

DWSS (Gravity Flow)

The community members said that an additional Rs. 69,000 had been required for completion of the scheme.

4

Upper Dir

Malow

Suspension Bridge (Pedestrian)

The community members said that an additional Rs. 60,000 had been required for completion of the scheme.

Table 2.8 Schemes completed with Savings Schemes completed with Savings Sr

District

Village

Scheme

Remarks

1

Swat

Mankass Qabel

DWSS (HP)

The scheme was completed within budget. Savings made were further utilized for the construction of a PCC street pavement

2

Lower Dir

Inzaroo

DWSS Gravity Flow

The scheme was completed with savings of approximately RS. 35,000 which were deposited in the CO’s bank account.

3

Swat

Baghgay Maloch

RCC Cause Way

The scheme was completed with savings which were further utilized for the construction of a 1,000 ft. link road

43

ANNEXURES 1C Table 3. 1 Current condition of the CPI scheme - by Scheme Type The scheme is not working currently Drinking water supply Irrigation

The scheme is working but all the participants complained

The scheme is working but most of the participants complained

The scheme is working but some of the participants complained

Scheme is working & no one complained about the condition

Don’t know

%

%

%

%

%

%

9.5

4.8

2.4

9.5

73.8

-

-

85.7

-

18.6

65.1

2.3

14.3

Link road/Bridges

4.7

Street pavement & drainage

9.3

7.1

Other

16.7

Total

5.4

7.1

78.6

7.1

16.7

-

66.7

-

5.4

11.6

71.4

1.8

4.5

Table 3.2 Was the project completed cost effectively? - by Gender All the participants agreed that the project was not cost effective Male

Some (around 25%) the participants agreed that the project was cost effective

Most (around 75%) of the participants agreed that the project was cost effective

All the participants agreed that the project was cost effective

Don’t know

%

%

%

%

%

%

3.4

5.2

10.3

24.1

55.2

1.7

3.8

7.7

5.8

82.7

1.8

4.5

9.1

12.7

31.8

40.0

Female Total

Half (around 50%) of the participants agreed that the project was cost effective

Table 3.3 How would you rate the material used in the CPI? - by Scheme Type

Drinking water supply

Good

Average

Poor

%

%

%

Don’t know %

80.4

5.9

2.0

11.8

Irrigation

85.7

8.6

2.9

2.9

Link road/Bridges

76.6

10.5

2.4

10.5

Street pavement and drainage

89.7

9.0

1.3

Other

53.3

33.3

13.3

Total

79.1

9.7

1.8

9.4

Table 3.4 How decisions about the utilization of the O&M fund are made - by Gender

Male

The O&M Committee

The CO Leaders

The SRSP staff

All CO Members

All Beneficiaries

Contractor

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

6.7

8.9

15.6

44.4

17.8

2.2

4.4

.9

1.9

Female

3.2

28.6

63.5

1.6

3.2

Total

4.6

20.4

43.5

19.4

9.3

Other

44 Table 3.5 Performance rating of Project Committees – by District Good Buner

OK

Poor

Don’t Know

%

%

%

%

36.0

32.0

-

32.0

Chitral

50.0

50.0

-

-

Lower Dir

15.1

22.6

-

62.3

Malakand Agency

35.6

24.4

-

40.0

Shangla

10.4

33.3

-

56.3

Swat

37.9

29.1

7.8

25.2

Upper Dir

25.0

18.2

2.3

54.5

Total

29.0

28.1

2.7

40.2

Table 3.6 Performance rating of Project Committees - by CPI Scheme Good

OK

Poor

Don’t Know

%

%

%

%

Drinking water supply

24.6

32.2

2.5

40.7

Irrigation

20.0

40.0

30.0

10.0

Link road/Bridges

22.1

27.9

.6

49.4

Street pavement and drainage

56.1

12.2

4.9

26.8

2.7

40.2

Other

66.7

33.3

Total

29.0

28.1

Table 3.7 Perception towards transparency in the planning/development/O&M of the scheme - by CPI Scheme All the participants agreed that there was no record keeping Drinking water supply

Records were kept but there was no transparency

Records were kept but most of the participants still complained

%

%

%

2.3

4.7

7.0

Records were kept but some of the participants still complained

Records were kept/ no one complained about lack of transparency

Don’t know

%

%

%

20.9

37.2

27.9

14.3

28.6

57.1

7.0

11.6

32.6

37.2

7.1

7.1

64.3

21.4

20.0

60.0

20.0

15.2

39.3

32.1

Irrigation Link road/Bridges

7.0

4.7

Street pavement and drainage Other Total

3.6

3.6

6.3

Table 3.8 Nature of Trainings - by Scheme Type

Drinking water supply

Disaster Preparedness

Financial management

Leadership

O&M

Any other

%

%

%

%

%

2.3

27.3

27.3

11.4

Irrigation Link road/Bridges

3.4

15.5

60.3

15.5

Street pavement and drainage

4.5

27.3

63.6

4.5

Total

3.1

20.8

46.9

11.5

Total (%)

31.8

100.0

100.0

100.0

5.2

100.0

17.7

100.0

100.0

45 Table 3.9 How did the SRSP contribution in direct cash help the local economy? - by Scheme Type Greater than ¾ of the SRSP money was utilized within the community

Between ½ and ¾ of SRSP money was utilized within the community

Between ¼ to ½ of the SRSP money was utilized within the community

Less than ¼ of SRSP money was utilized within the community

None of the SRSP money was utilized within the community

%

%

%

%

%

%

Drinking water supply

20.7

10.3

13.8

6.9

3.4

44.8

Irrigation

40.0

Link road/Bridges

12.1

30.3

Street pavement and drainage

33.3

16.7

Other

50.0

Total

21.5

Don’t know

60.0 3.0

12.1

6.1

36.4 50.0

17.7

6.3

16.7

33.3

8.9

41.8

Table 3.10 Diseases contracted from DWS CPI scheme’s water - by District Had the diseases

Buner

Chitral

Lower Dir

Malakand

Shangla

Swat

Upper Dir

Total

Yes

15.4

10.0

0.0

23.5

10.0

25.0

0.0

15.5

No

84.6

90.0

81.3

35.3

90.0

35.0

80.0

60.3

Don’t know

0.0

0.0

18.8

41.2

0.0

40.0

20.0

24.1

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Total

Table 3.11: How often do/did you use the road/bridge? - by District

Buner

Not at all

Occasionally

Often

%

%

%

%

50.0

0

0

50.0

55.0

45.0

3.3

10.0

6.7

80.0

Lower Dir Malakand Agency Shangla

All the time

0

17.5

32.5

50.0

Swat

7.8

11.8

29.4

51.0

Upper Dir

15.2

30.3

54.5

Total

7.4

30.4

54.4

7.8

Table 3.12: Decrease in cost of freight transport (% age of respondents) District Lower Dir Malakand Agency Shangla

<=25%

26%-50%

51%-75%

>=76%

Total

100

0

0

0

100

5

90

0

5

100

16.67

56.67

23.33

3.33

100

Swat

4.88

95.12

0

0

100

Upper Dir

13.33

86.67

0

0

100

Total

17.95

74.36

5.98

1.71

100

46,442,900 5,805,363

971,000 234,226,994

9 18 8 1 1 63 20 85 40 8 4 1 2 8 1 12 6 1 10 5 19 1 2 21 3 1 1 64 30 1 4 18 23 11 1 1 2 1 1 213

SUSPENSION BRIDGE PEDESTRIAN

Sub Total

Average

BOREWELL

DUGWELL

GRAVITY FLOW

HAND PUMP

Sub Total

Average

MICRO HYDRO POWER UNITS

GABION STRUCTURE

PIPE IRRIGATION

WATER COURSE LINING

WATER DRIVEN PUMP SYSTEM

Sub Total

Average

CAUSEWAY

EARTHEN & PCC

EARTHEN

PCC

LINK ROAD EXTENSION

LINK ROAD PCC & R/W

LINK ROAD REHABILITATION

RCC CAUSEWAY

BRIDAL PATH (STONE PITCHING)

RCC PIPE CAUSEWAY

sub total

Average

DRAINAGE

STREET PAVEMENT

STREET PAVEMENT AND DRAINAGE

Sub Total

Average

DRY STONE PROTECTION WALL

PROTECTION WALL

Sub Total

Average

UPGRADATION OF SPORTS FACILITY

MHP

IRRIGATION

TOTALS

UPGRADATION

SOIL CONSERVATION

SANITATION

COMMUNICATION

DWSS

3

SUSPENSION BRIDGE

3,503,850

7,007,700

5,457,000

1,550,700

916,150

16,490,700

12,855,400

3,340,800

294,500

996,963

63,805,600

611,500

500,700

2,495,700

21,654,300

1,345,000

1,079,700

16,142,600

7,035,000

12,218,800

722,300

914,892

10,978,700

556,000

8,361,600

1,435,000

626,100

704,843

59,911,694

9,510,120

49,680,254

298,320

423,000

1,589,928

28,618,700

10,206,900

5,309,100

13,102,700

6

RCC SMALL BRIDGE

BRIDGE

Total Cost

No

Sub-type of Scheme

Type of Scheme

49,517,303

0

609,850

1,219,700

909,500

310,200

182,931

3,292,760

2,565,820

668,040

58,900

199,416

12,762,630

122,300

100,100

499,000

4,331,070

269,000

215,940

3,228,620

1,408,300

2,443,800

144,500

174,285

2,091,420

26,000

1,672,220

247,000

146,200

1,551,104

12,408,833

141,390

12,018,160

1,954,950

9,928,890

49,720

84,600

317,989

5,723,800

2,041,400

1,061,800

2,620,600

Community Contribution

37,507

250

148

296

200

96

160

2,885

2,590

200

95

224

14,321

345

200

526

5,730

580

152

3,153

1,420

2,150

65

463

5,552

50

1,430

72

4,000

295

2,362

91

7,701

2,170

5,091

30

410

230

4,140

1,561

1,005

1,574

No of Beneficiary HHs

5

0%

0

17%

20%

1

20%

20%

20%

2

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

1

5%

20%

17%

23%

27%

1

21%

20%

17%

20%

1

20%

20%

20%

Community Contribution

405,424

3,884

23,675

43,438

27,285

16,153

5,716

24,767

4,963

16,704

3,100

4,455

49,091

1,772

2,504

4,745

3,779

2,319

7,103

5,120

4,954

5,683

11,112

1,977

37,054

11,120

5,847

19,931

157

19,663

201,926

7,780

25,117

4,383

9,758

9,944

1,032

6,913

20,146

6,539

5,283

8,324

Cost per HH

41,703

0

4,121

7,779

4548

3231

1,141

4,951

991

3340

620

891

9,819

354

501

949

756

464

1421

1024

992

1137

2223

377

5,156

520

1169

3431

37

5,254

5254

1,561

4,715

901

1950

1657

206

1,383

4,029

1308

1057

1665

Contribution per HH

0.5

1

0.5

0.5

11

8.5

1.9

0.5

30

0.5

0.5

1.4

9.9

0.9

0.5

8.9

2.3

4.7

0.5

6

0.5

3.8

0.9

0.5

3.8

40

9.4

29.6

0.5

0.5

8

4.2

1.4

2.8

Type of scheme as a %age of total schemes

0.4

3

2.3

0.7

7

5.5

1.4

0.1

27

0.3

0.2

1.1

9.2

0.6

0.5

6.9

3.0

5.2

0.3

5

0.2

3.6

0.6

0.3

19.8

26

4.1

21.2

0.1

0.2

12

4.4

2.3

5.6

Cost of scheme as a %age of total cost

0.7

1

0.5

0.3

8

6.9

0.5

0.3

38

0.9

0.5

1.4

15.3

1.5

0.4

8.4

3.8

5.7

0.2

15

0.1

3.8

0.2

10.7

6.3

21

5.8

13.6

0.1

1.1

11

4.2

2.7

4.2

Beneficiary HH as a % of total beneficiary HHs

46

Annex 2: Total EERP CPI

47

Annex 3: Sampled CPI S.No

District

Village

Type of Scheme

Scheme subtype

Date Initiation

Completion

Beneficiaries HH

Total Cost

Planned

Estimated

Actual

Cost per Beneficiary

1

Buner

Riaz Abad, Ambella

DWSS

Hand Pumps

7/9/11

7/12/11

125

139

400,000

2878

2

Buner

Banju Tangey

DWSS

Gravity Flow

12/9/11

12/12/11

113

130

652,400

5018

3

Buner

Ambela

DWSS

Gravity Flow

9/23/11

23/12/2011

65

65

648,900

9983

4

Buner

Bazarkot

Bridge

Foot Bridge (Suspension)

7/9/11

7/12/11

128

200

917,000

4585

5

Chitral

Kuru Bala

DWSS

Dug Well

12/12/11

12/3/12

60

60

310,800

5180

6

Chitral

Khoran dok

DWSS

Gravity Flow

8/9/11

8/12/11

64

64

1,108,700

17323

7

Chitral

Bamburate

MHP

MHPP

9/24/11

24/02/2012

457

500

6,736,700

13473

8

Lower Dir

Munjay

Road Infrastructure

Link Road

11/11/11

11/2/12

100

150

610,700

4071

9

Lower Dir

Inzaroo

DWSS

Gravity Flow

5/9/11

05/03/2013

90

100

457,500

4575

10

Lower Dir

Moranai

Road Infrastructure

Link Road

12/12/11

12/3/12

69

120

645,200

5377

11

Lower Dir

Danwa

DWSS

Gravity Flow

missing

missing

120

120

742,900

6191

12

Lower Dir

Asilo

DWSS

Gravity Flow

1/11/11

01/02/2012

35

120

766,700

6389

13

Lower Dir

MataKhazana

Road Infrastructure

Link Road

4/11/11

4/2/12

200

300

764,000

2547

14

Lower Dir

Shal Kandi

Road Infrastructure

Link Road

10/30/11

1/30/12

200

300

769,400

2565

15

Malakand

Khar

DWSS

Hand Pump

8/22/11

11/22/11

80

200

657,867

3289

16

Malakand

Sherkhan,Bazdara

DWSS

Hand Pump

9/19/11

12/19/11

115

200

707,131

3536

17

Malakand

Aladand Dherai

Irrigation

Gabion Structure

10/20/11

20/02/2012

455

455

626,100

1376

18

Malakand

Khan Palao

DWSS

Hand Pump

8/15/11

11/15/11

45

120

634,865

5291

19

Malakand

Pirkhel khass

Road Infrastructure

RCC cauce way

11/21/11

2/21/12

70

150

915,600

6104

20

Malakand

Palai khpa

Road Infrastructure

Link Road (PCC)

11/29/11

29-01-2012

200

350

1,083,500

3096

34

Malakand

Amin abad

Road Infrastructure

Link Road

10/21/11

1/21/11

45

120

524,800

4373

21

Shangla

Abbasin Colony

Sanitation

Drainage

9/9/11

9/12/11

25

25

294,500

11780

22

Shangla

Sanam

Road Infrastructure

Link Road (PCC)

8/30/11

11/30/11

34

110

759,414

6904

23

Shangla

Sur Kumar

Road Infrastructure

Link Road (PCC)

6/9/11

6/11/11

54

125

765,417

6123

24

Shangla

Abbasin Colony

DWSS

Gravity Flow

5/9/11

05/12/2011

45

100

1,194,500

11945

25

Shangla

Feza

Road Infrastructure

Link Road (PCC)

8/28/11

11/28/11

44

120

883,761

7365

26

Shangla

Sanila

Sanitation

Street pavement & Drainage

6/9/11

6/12/11

56

200

916,200

4581

27

Shangla

Tangir

Bridge

Suspension Bridge (Pedestrian)

9/13/11

12/13/11

155

155

1,110,500

7165

28

Swat

Quanj

Sanitation

Street Pavement & Drainage

10/13/11

1/13/12

80

175

598,000

3417

29

Swat

Jabba

DWSS

Hand Pump

11/21/11

1/21/12

140

200

402,850

2014

30

Swat

Saidu Shareef

DWSS

Hand Pump

11/28/11

1/28/12

110

190

524,900

2763

31

Swat

Mankass Kabel

DWSS

Hand Pump

11/24/11

2/24/12

52

80

223,244

2791

32

Swat

Sorykad

DWSS

Gravity Flow

11/24/11

2/24/12

46

100

308,100

3081

33

Swat

Faqira

Sanitation

Street pavement & Drainage

2/15/12

5/15/12

250

300

515,000

1717

35

Swat

Babo Maira

Irrigation

Ramp Pump

11/19/11

19/01/2012

44

44

556,000

12636

48 36

Swat

Bar Jopeen

Sanitation

Street pavement & Drainage

12/23/11

3/23/12

200

200

586,500

2933

37

Swat

Dardyal,kabel

DWSS

Gravity Flow

5/9/11

05/03/2013

90

120

700,000

5833

38

Swat

Baghgay Maloch

Road Infrastructure

RCC Cause Way

12/27/11

27/03/2012

65

80

722,300

9029

39

Swat

Badardam

DWSS

Gravity Flow

11/28/11

2/28/12

50

80

853,500

10669

40

Swat

Pengen

Sanitation

Street pavement & Drainage

9/15/11

12/15/11

260

260

807,500

3106

41

Swat

Faqira

Road Infrastructure

Link Road - Rehabilitation

6/9/11

6/2/12

65

125

832,300

6658

42

Swat

Yakh Tangey

DWSS

Gravity Flow

8/27/11

11/27/11

60

60

838,600

13977

43

Swat

Meradai

DWSS

Gravity Flow

10/30/11

1/30/12

40

40

667,500

16688

44

Swat

Lawar Deolai, Qabil

Irrigation

Irrigation Channel

6/11/11

6/1/12

180

180

1,062,200

5901

45

Swat

Akhun Baba

Road Infrastructure

Link Road PCC

2/13/12

4/13/12

450

550

1,069,000

1944

46

Swat

Kaho

Road Infrastructure

Link Road (Rehabilitation)

9/18/11

2/18/12

250

250

1,079,800

4319

47

Swat

Meragai

Irrigation

Irrigation channel Lining & RT wall

12/8/11

12/11/11

120

25

1,086,300

43452

48

Swat

Samteer

Road Infrastructure

Link road (Earthen)

10/25/11

12/25/11

150

150

1,093,300

7289

49

Swat

Shagai Ghwajalgai

DWSS

Gravity Flow

10/14/11

1/14/12

26

26

620,100

23850

50

Swat

Shagai

Sanitation

Street pavement & Drainage

8/22/11

11/22/12

160

275

1,201,000

4367

51

Swat

Kokari Sar

Road Infrastructure

Link road (Earthen & PCC)

10/31/11

12/31/12

315

315

1,309,700

4158

52

Swat

Gujer Tangi Badro, Islampur

Road Infrastructure

Link Road

3/2/12

3/5/12

400

425

1,333,000

3136

53

Swat

Kamay

Bridge

RCC Bridge

10/25/11

1/25/12

300

450

2,561,500

5692

54

Swat

Shao

MHP

MHPP

5/7/12

5/12/12

250

275

8,612,000

31316

55

Upper Dir

Doonpayeen

DWSS

Gravity Flow

10/15/11

4/15/12

120

250

655,000

2620

56

Upper Dir

Shamorgar

Road Infrastructure

Link Road (PCC)

1/11/11

1/2/12

145

145

823,400

5679

57

Upper Dir

Panakot

Road Infrastructure

Link Road

10/30/11

4/30/11

67

40

1,250,700

31268

58

Upper Dir

Malow

Bridge

Suspension Bridge (Pedestrian)

1/16/11

4/16/12

332

150

1,518,500

10123

59

Upper Dir

Qulandai Payeen

Bridge

Suspension Bridge (Pedestrian)

1/9/11

1/3/12

170

225

1,540,800

6848

60

Upper Dir

Khan abad

MHP

MHPP

10/13/11

3/13/12

218

218

2,654,300

12176

49

Annex 4: Evaluation Matrix Evaluation Parameters

1

2

3

Relevance

Effectiveness

Efficiency

Areas of focus

Evaluation Tools EERP Secondary data

• Do the schemes respond to the stated project objectives and overall goals of AusAid? • Do the selected CPIs reflect the felt need of the community?

• Is it a priority • Gender wise analysis • GOKPK context o PCNA o Malakand strategy o Priority areas o Post flood and Insurgency • Are the schemes functional?

• Are the schemes delivering the designed services?

• Is the scheme benefitting all intended beneficiaries? (or some?)

• Whether the CPI schemes meet the accepted engineering designs, specs and standards?

• Actual design coverage vs. Planned.

• Gender wise breakdown

Engineers CPI Field Report

HH Survey

Focus Group Discussions

Meeting with GOKPK Line departments and other Key Informants

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

Engineers CPI Desk Review Report

• • • •

PCNA Report Malakand Strategy EERP proposal Completion Document • Monitoring Report (H/O and District) • AusAid Goals/objective (Website) • CBO Files/record

• SRSP Monitoring Reports • CPI Completion Reports

• Cost and time comparison relative to original timelines and budgets • Unit scheme costs in relation to other GOKP/SRSP/CSO schemes • Cost per beneficiary for various scheme types • Illustrative Cost benefit analysis for sample schemes

• • CSR comparative GOKP • SRSP non EERP CPI proposal • Other CSO costing if available.

P

4

Immediate Outcomes/ Impacts

• Reported direct benefits (additional land irrigated, greater yields, additional drinking supplies, enhanced land value, reduced burden of disease, others • Un-intended and/or indirect benefits • Gender wise breakdown

• • CPI Completion reports • Case studies by SRSP

5

Sustainability

• Adequacy of design • Quality of construction and workmanship.

• Systems for maintenance/O&M • Government support?

• Current condition of schemes

• • CBO Files

P

P

P

P

50

Annex 5: QA Process

SRSP

AiD HO Field Plan Final Report Compilation, Preparation and 4th Level QA

by Project Advisor

Field Supervisor

Compilation and Report Writing

by Sector Specialists

House Hold Survey

Focus Group Discussion

3rd Level QA and Compilation at AiD’s HO.

Data Entry, Cleaning and Analyses by the Data Analyst

Engineer’s Field Visit

Compilation and 2nd Level QA At AiD’s HO

1st Level QA

by Field Supervisor

51

Annex 6: Physical Infrastructure( PI )- Implementation- Process 1st Dialogue • Program Introduction • Need Identification

Type of Documentation reviewed for Availability and Adequacy

CO Resolution

2nd Dialogue

Environmental Feasibility • Environment Screening • Enviornmental Review

Not Feasible

Social-Feasibility • Formation of CO • Opering of Bank Account • Conflict free

Technical Feasibility • Design • Material Specifications • Construction drawings • Cost Estimates • Water Quality test

Feasible • Project Proposal

Project Approval

Audit Committee

3rd Dialogue • Terms of Partnership Formation of • Project Implementation Committees • Audit Committee • O&M Committee

CPI Construction • Documentation of Record in PI Register

Project Completion • PI Completion Report • PI CompletionCertificate

O&M Committee

Handing Over to CO • Handing and taking over Certificate

52

Annex 7: W

Work Plan for the Evaluation of Imm February

March

Week 1 18

19

Inception Phase

Inception Phase

1

Contracts signed by SRSP

8th

2

Contract Signed by AiD Pvt Ltd

15th

3

Inception meeting with SRSP

4

Team Mobilization

5

Development of Evaluation Tools / Sampling

6

Teamâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s orientation and pre-testing of evaluation tools

Field Work and Data Collection Phase Phase Cluster A 1

Data Collection District Swat

2

Data Collection District Malakand

3

Data Collection District Buner

4

Data Collection District Shangla

Cluster B 5

Data Collection District Lower Dir

6

Data Collection District Upper Dir

7

Data Collection District Chitral

Data Analysis and Report Writing Phase 1

Consolidation and Clean up of Data

2

Data Analysis and Draft Report prepartion

3

Submission of First Draft

4

Feed back by SRSP on First Draft

5

Final report with changes

20

21

Week 2 22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Week 3 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Week 4 8

9

10

11

12

13

14

We 15

16

17

18

19

20

Field Work and

2

53

Work Plan

mediate Impact of SRSP EERP CPIs April

eek 5

21

Week 6 22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Week 7 29

30

31

1

2

3

4

Week 8 5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Week 9 12

13

14

Data Collection Phase Phase

Data Analysis and Report Writing

15

16

17

18

Week 10 19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

54

Annex 8: Community Infrastructure Pictures Chitral

55

Swat

Dir Upper

Dir Lower

Malakand

Annex 9: EERP Maps

www.srsp.org.pk

Sarhad Rural Support Programme 109, Street 2B, Defence Officersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Colony, Khyber Road, Peshawar Telephone: 92-91-9211417, 5285389 Fax: 92-91-5276734 E-mail: srsp@srsp.org.pk