Chi Hung Leung Work Sample

2012-2015 Work Sample Southern California Institute of Architecture Chi Hung Leung 9138-8927 Brandon_Leung@Hotmail.com

2013 Summer Internship Olympic Pavilion Location: Los Angeles, CA OCDC Summer Internship May 2013 - Sep 2013

I participated in drawing the details of THe Olympic Pavilion, in which it’s a compeition project. While I was in the office, I was also in charge of the producion of the physical model.

4 OCDC Summer Internship | Olympic Pavilion

OCDC Summer Internship | Olympic Pavilion

5

2A Studio Fire Protection Water Reservoir Location: South Antelope Valley, CA

Individual Project Instructor: Eric Kahn Sep - Dec 2012 If cube is 3D, knot is 2D, and Root is 1D, Knoop is a transitional transformation from volume to line. The figure is anexct which means two similar things separated by a slightly different dissimilitude from each other. All figure and roots are not the same in the knoop project. For example, there is an origin between knot and roots. Following the origin, there are two groups of similar roots. Even though they look the same, they have different amounts of arrayed branches.

This project explores the integration between DIscrepancy and Dissimilitude. DIscrepancy refers to The state or quality of being discrepant; difference; inconsistency. It is also an instance of difference or inconsistency: There are certain discrepancies between the two versions of the story. On the other hand, dissimilitude has the similar meaning of disimilarity which means differences. It can also refer to a point of difference.

6 2A Studio | Fire Protection Water Reservoir

2A Studio|Bridge to Nowhere Water Station

17

2A Studio | Fire Protection Water Reservoir

7

2B Studio Los Angeles Art Museum Location: Little Tokyo, Los Angeles, CA 2B Studio Individual Project Instructor: Jenny Wu Jan - Apr 2013 The primiary interest of this project is to create a continuous spatial experience that is composed by a folded circulating geture. Through the explorations of parts-to-whole relationship, the museum is composed by five diffierent parts.

The architectural form of this museum encourages people to enter the building through its tail, and it will lead people all the way to the top floor of the whole museum. The secondary circulation lead people from the undergraound level to converge with the main circulation in the lobby. The secondary emphasis of this project is to create an architectural from that emerges from the ground gradually. This is why the spatial sequence of the museum starts in the underground level, and ends in the air.

8 2B Studio | Los Angeles Art Museum

2B Studio | Los Angeles Art Museum

9

3A Studio Pier 26 Natatorium Location: Embarcadero, san francisco, CA

Structure Diagram

B

C

Primary A-Frame

Secondary Supportive A-Frame

Tertiary Supportive One Way Frame

3A Studio Program Diagram A

A

Group Project Instructor: Christopher Korner Sep - Dec 2013 Second Level Floor Plan 1/32” scale

B

C

Large Swimming Pools

This project explores the relationship between structural morphology and overall building mass and organization in the design of a natatorium located on a pier in The Embarcadero in San Francisco.

The proposal for this project is to create a multiplatform megastruture natatorium in order to form a modern, relaxing water pool experience while conserving the historic context of the surrounding environment. The inspiration is the Tokyo Bay Project by Kenzo Tange. Without altering the site, the natatorium is like a floating island that sits on top of the original pier columns so as to preserve the existing cultural context. The programs are located inside the giant A-frames with secondary structures supporting the pools. The beginning and the end of structure are composed by repeating A-frames structures.

The middle section of the project consists a series of gathering pools in which the idea was from the gathering hot springs from nature. It also has water slides underneath the gathering pools, with several waterfalls coming off from different pools.

10 3A Studio | Pier 26 Natatorium

Medium and Small Swimming Pools

Third Level

Circulation Diagram Second Level

First Level

High Tide Low Tide

Level 3 Circulation Level 2 Circulation Level 1 Circulation

LEVEL iii Matrix Diagram

Section A 1/16” scale

Third Level

Third Level

Second Level

Second Level

LARGE POOL 15’ -3’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE LARGE INDIVIDUAL POOLS 10’ DEPTH / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / LEISURE

LARGE POOL 3’ - 15’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE

2 SMALL + 2 WADING POOLS 3” - 8’ / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / LEISURE

First Level

LEVEL ii

First Level

Matrix Diagram

LARGE POOL 15’ - 3’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION

LARGE SLIDE 6” DEPTH / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION

High Tide

High Tide

Low Tide

Low Tide

MEDIUM POOL 3’ - 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE

LARGE POOL 3’ - 15’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION 2 SMALL + 2 WADING POOLS 3” - 8’ / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE

MEDIUM POOL 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / FITNESS

LEVEL i Matrix Diagram

MEDIUM POOL 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / FITNESS

Section C 1/32” scale

Section B 1/32” scale

B

C

A

A

B

Third Level Floor Plan 1/32” scale

B

C

A

C

A

B

C

First Level Floor Plan 1/32” scale

3A Studio | Pier 26 Natatorium

11

3B Studio School of Music Location: manhattan, new york

Group Project Instructor: Darin Johnstone Jan - Apr 2014 For the concept of this music school project, we used two different morphologies to different the performance spaces with from the typical programs. We wanted to bring out the continuity and the dynamics aspect of the performance space in the music school. THerefore, the theater spaces are connected to each other continuously. The appearance of the external facade came from the internal floor plan datum and the levels of importance.

The more important of the internal program is, the more coffers and windows would be attracted to it. Because the largest theater is located at the right half of the music school, The right half of the external facade expresses a very intensed characteristic. This is why the right half of the external facade are appeared to be more dramatic and denser than the left half of the facade. On the other hand, we also want to connect the internal public spaces with the site environment. This is why we chose the combination of windows and coffer so as to support our argument.

12 3B Studio | School of Music

Morphology A: Single Curved Mass

Primary program is bounded by single curvature planes to generate a morphology of creased edges and curved surfaces.

Morphology B: Prismatic Shell

quadrilateral tesselations envelope the auxiliary program to create an exterior prismatic skin.

Morphology A+B: Nested

The negative void from the impacted morphologies enables access to light wells and spatial affects.

Bound Theatres

Academic

Administrative

Program Massing

Acoustical

Circulation

Public

3B Studio | School of Music

13

4A Studio City Operations Location: Downtown Los Angeles, CA 4A Studio Group Project Instructor: Alexis Rochas Sep - Dec 2014 Website: http://brandonleung.wix.com/studio4a Description: We looked at the downtown Los Angeles Zoning Map and discovered that it’s The existing zoning map of downtown Los Angeles is figural and each zone is well segregated from each other.

There are four basic zoning which are residential zone, commercial zone, industrial zone, and green space. For instance, green space includes parks and public spaces while residential zone has residential houses, and apartments, etc. We have the idea that each city block even a single building has its own zoning. Through manipulating and redistributing the ratios between different zonings, each one square mile microzones will produce a variety of different results.

We Also have the idea that the city won’t behave in a concentrated metropolis, but it could potentially be like a distributed metropolis, in which all of the one square mile microzone samples are all separated from each other.

14 4A Studio | City Operations

4A Studio | City Operations

15

Design Development BAM

Final Booklet

B

Golkar

Architects Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar

music

TAUT

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation

Location: New York, CA

PROJECTdescription The TAUT Institute of Music is a non-profit project. It contains 3 theaters for student and public use, and classes for up to 720 students.

56,236 SQ FT 11 Floors 3 Theaters 500 Seats 1A Construction Type A1, A3, B Occupancy Types

Permeable Roof 2' x 2' panel

Permeable Roof 2' x 2' panel

Radiant Floor 4" OC

Primary Structure 24' steel pipe

Concrete

structural floor

Secondary

6" x 6" steel member

Metal Decking

3" corrugated steel

musicTAUT is the new home of the NewYorkMusicInstitute. The NewYorkMusicInstitute is recognized around the world as the spearhead of acoustical academia, consistently ranking in the top 5 globally with their world-renown Master of Music (M.Mus) and Master of Arts in Pedagogy of Music Theory (MA.MusT). The new facility, a mere three blocks from their current home, will allow them to comfortably double the student body: three new theatres enable student performances to be kept in house, with the addition of 15 classrooms, 10 large practice rooms and 6 recording studios to facilitate the arts. These new spaces are also available for public use, to better integrate the school into its neighboorhood.The NewYorkMusicInstitute is pursuing LEED gold on the musicTaut project, as it is commited to bettering the world around them; here, music is taught.

Tertiary

3" x 3" steel member

I-beam

W18 x 119/W10 x 112

A.0.0 COVERpage

Panel

4' x 8' expanded mesh panel

Hanging Ceiling gypsum board

Radiant Floor

4A Seminar

4" OC

Catwalk 30" width

Concrete

structural floor

BAM Thompson Street

La Guardia Pl

Golkar Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar

TAUT

aluminum window frame

I-beam

W18 x 119/W10 x 112

Primary Structure 24' steel pipe

Hanging Ceiling gypsum board

Secondary

6" x 6" steel member

Glass

double-glazed

Tertiary

3" x 3" steel member

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation

West Houston Street

B A M P

m

T

H A

Mullion Panel

4' x 8' expanded mesh panel

Interior Finish

A D

West Broadway Street

Thompson Street

A.0.2 SITEplan

1’-0” = 0’ - 1/32”

F

177'-4 3/4"

A

aluminum window frame

GFRG

Description:

C

D

E

165'-6"

125'-6"

B

105'-6"

BAM Golkar

A

36'-6 3/4"

65'-6"

Architects Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar

3

music

53'-0"

THe students are required to produce a 9’x9’ drawing by the end of the semester.

The drawing needs to incorporate multiple systems such as ADA, egress, fire sprinklers, and hvac systems, etc.

Metal Decking

3" corrugated steel

Mullion

Architects

music

Group Project Instructor: Scott Uriu, Pavel Getov Sep - Dec 2014

Glass

double-glazed

G

2

TAUT

MAIN THEATER

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City 33'-0"

AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation

LOBBY

1

A B

A.1.0 FIRSTfloor F

G

177'-4 3/4"

125'-6"

B

C

D

E

165'-6"

105'-6"

65'-6"

THEATRE 902 CLASS ROOM

177'-4 3/4"

165'-6"

C

D

E

105'-6"

125'-6"

B

65'-6"

BAM Golkar

A

36'-6 3/4"

Architects 3

53'-0"

music

LOBBY

TAUT

8TH FLOOR

AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation

Golkar Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar

music

EL97'-11"

CLASS ROOM

TAUT

7TH FLOOR EL84'-0"

THEATRE 801

6TH FLOOR EL70'-0"

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City

5TH FLOOR

EL56'-0"

CONCERT HALL 303

CLASS ROOM

AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation

Primary structure 24ӯ steel pipe

Secondary

6” x 6” steel member

Tertiary

3” x 3” steel member

Panel

4’ x 8’ perforated aluminum

Radiant Floor 4” OC

Concrete

structural floor

Metal decking steel

4TH FLOOR EL42'-0"

BAM Golkar

Architects Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar

music

TAUT

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation

I-beam

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City

33'-0"

RECORDING

RECORDING

CLASS ROOM

2

CONCERT HALL 303

Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar

BAM Architects

9TH FLOOR EL112'-0"

F

A

36'-6 3/4"

W18 x 119/W10 x 112

CLASS ROOM

3RD FLOOR EL 28'-0"

Hanging ceiling

CONCERT HALL 202

GFRG

Glass

2ND FLOOR EL14'-0"

double-glazed

1

LOBBY

Mullion

aluminium window frame

STREET LEVEL EL 0’-0”

A.1.1 THIRDfloor

16 Design Documentation | Final Booklet

CONCERT HALL 101

A.2.0 LONGsection

A.4.1 SMALLchunk

Panel

4' x 8' expanded mesh panel

BAM

BAM

Architects

Architects

Golkar

Golkar

Tertiary

3" x 3" steel member

Secondary

6" x 6" steel member

Primary Structure 24' steel pipe

Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar

Waterproof Membrane 0.065" @ 500,000 ohms/ft²

Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar

music

music

GFRG

interior panel

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City

Catwalk

AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation

Finish coat

gloss coat acrylic concrete sealer

Rigid Insulation

TAUT

Extruded Polystyrene Foam

Shotcrete Grade1

Primary Steel Cage 10' OC

30" width

TAUT AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation

I-beam

W18 x 119/W10 x 112

Radiant Floor 4" OC

Concrete

structural floor

Metal Decking

3" corrugated steel

Return Air Hanging Ceiling gypsum board

Supply Air

Outside Air

B

Mechanical Unit

A.4.4 2DwallSECTION

A.7.0 HVACdiagram

BAM

Pipe Structure Panel Structure Expanded Mesh

$ $ $ $

Facade

3,614 226,840 3,185,100 3,415,554

$/SF 560

SteelSystem

$ 25,607,736 1,743,588 Costs 24” $Diameter Steel Pipe 27,351,324 $ Shell Costs Costs 4’ x 8’ Expanded MetalLand Lathe

SOFT COSTS Comission 18% 18%

Total $9,888,484.88 $1,088,640.00

$10,977,124.88

Brandon Leung Factory weld Shell

Concrete FloorKim $ 3,915,480 Arnold Member Shotcrete+GFRG 7” x$7” Steel 5,612,188 Melody Javaherian 9,527,668 $

SteelSystem_Structural Steel

$924 @ 27,714 ft

Shell_Concrete Floor

$120 @ 32,629 SF

SystemAssembly_Sprinklers

_Core

$3.50 @ 3,152 ft

$120 @ 95,012 SF

music $

11,032 8,160 19,192

TAUT

Facade_Panel Structure

CONTINGENCIES Contingencies

Expanded Metal Lathe Estimation SystemAssembly W 1$x 10 $

m

1/2” Dual Glazing Radiant Floor

T

Structural Floor W 1 x 10 W 2 x 10

6” x 6” Steel Member Paniz Golkar

Sprinklers HVAC

Br A M Pa

Total $6,048,000

$6,048,000

Architects

$1.91 @ 1892 ft

A

LAND COSTS Lot Size 10,800SF

Golkar

Structural Steel Rolled Steel Rib

Facade_Pipe Structure

G

Construction

Margin 5% 10%

Ceiling

H A

Total $2,746,801.36 $5,493,602.71

AS D

$8,240,404.07

3” x 3” Steel member

$21.40 @ 10,600 ft

3” x 1” Diameter Pipe

Core Glazing Finishes

Interior+Finishes $ $ $ $

11,401,440 1,107,925 2,112,924 12,509,365

Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City

OVERALL PROJECT COST Category Land Cost Shell Cost Soft Cost Contingency

Total $6,048,000.00 $54,936,027.00 $10,977,124.88 $8,240,404.07

$80,201,555.95

TOTAL SHELL COSTS

AS 3040 Fall 2014 $ 54,936,027 Design Documentation

Facade_Expanded Mesh

$100 @ 31,851 SF

SteelSystem_Rolled Steel Ribs

$462 @ 3,774 ft

Shell_Shotcrete+GFRG

$172 @ 32,629 SF

SystemAssembly_HVAC

Pipe Structure Panel Structure Expanded Mesh

Facade_Pipe Structure

$1.91 @ 1892 ft

_Glazing

$2 @ 4,080 ft

Structural Steel Rolled Steel Rib

$ $ $ $

Facade

3,614 226,840 3,185,100 3,415,554

$65 @ 17,045 SF

25,607,736 1,743,588 27,351,324

Terms 3.81% @ 15yr

Monthly Payment $548,775

LAND COSTS Lot Size 10,800SF

$/SF 560

Total $6,048,000

$6,048,000

SteelSystem

$ $ $

LOAN COSTS Loan $80,201,555.95

SOFT COSTS Costs Shell Costs

Comission 18%

Total $9,888,484.88

Design Documentation | Final Booklet

17

Construction Documents Final Booklet

Sheet List Sheet Name Cover Page 3D Views Interior Rendering Parcel Profile Navigate LA Site Plan with Tax Assessor Map

A1.00 A1.01 A1.02 A1.03 A2.00 A2.01 A2.02 A2.03 A2.04 A3.00 A3.01 A3.02 A3.03 A3.04 A3.05

Location: Los Angeles, CA

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

General Notes and Drawing Symbols Site Plan Site Axonometri c SIte Section - North Site Section - East Control Plan First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan Third Floor Plan Roof Plan Rendered Section Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Wall Section Details of Wall Section West Elevation North Elevation East Elevation South Elevation Enlarged Plan Kitchen Kitchen Elevation Enlarged Plan Bathroom Bathroom Elevation Door and Window Schedule Wall Types and Schedule First Floor Plan Electrical Plan Second Floor Plan Electrical Plan Third Floor Plan Electrical Plan

A3.06 A4.00 A4.01 A4.02 A4.03 A5.00 A5.01 A5.02 A5.03 A6.00 A6.01 E1.00

E1.01

E1.02

3

1

9

A4.01 1

1

No.

Description

A1.03

1

Date

1

A3.01

A3.04 34' - 7 7/32"

8

Chi Hung Leung Residential House Cover Page

Drawn by

A3.03

A0

3D View 0

DN

UP

1

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

Project number Date

Checked by

1

2

0' - 0"

A0.5

15' - 6"

Scale

10' - 1"

A0.3 A0.4

4/22/2015 3:16:32 PM

Sheet Number A0 A0.1 A0.2

4B Seminar Lobby R

9

R

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

7

Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

4' - 0"

1 A1.02

Group Project Instructor: Jay Vanos, Pavel Getov Jan - Apr 2015

1

5

A3.02

1

6

A1.02

7

R

8

Date

A4.00

1

1

Library

Bedroom

7

8

6

Chi Hung Leung Residential House Site Section - East

A3.02

3/16" = 1'-0"

R

R

A1.03 Scale

R

Checked by

4/22/2015 3:17:42 PM

Drawn by

Description:

1

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

Project number Date

A4.02 -

20' - 3 1/8"

Description

R

No.

29' - 8 1/8"

R

4

R

1

9

A4.01 1

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

Bathroom 6

5

5' - 5"

2

R

3

9' - 2 7/8"

3' - 9 27/32"

THe students are required to produce a revit-based digital model and a set of tecnical drawings.

1 A3.01 Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

8

4

1 A3.03

7 1

19' - 0"

A1.02

1

15' - 7 7/32"

5' - 4 5/8" 0' - 0 29/32"

A4.02 -

A4.00 1

No.

Description

Date

1

6 1 A3.02

A4.03

5

4

Chi Hung Leung Residential House Control Plan 1

Date Drawn by Checked by

4/22/2015 3:17:43 PM

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

Project number

A4.03

A2.00 1/4" = 1'-0"

Scale

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

3

2

1

9 Room Schedule

A4.01

11' - 0"

A3.01

Garage Bedroom Bathroom Living Room Kitchen Bathroom Library Bedroom Lobby Bathroom Closet Bedroom Closet Bedroom Lobby Bathroom Mechanical Room

5' - 4 5/8"

1 A3.04

1

8 1

47

A3.03

Bathroom

1 R

3

R

5' - 2"

R

R

2

3

15' - 6"

Bedroom 2

48

Number

Area

A1.03

23' - 7 7/32"

1

Name

1

1

58

1 2 3 4

506 SF 195 SF 92 SF 580 SF

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

112 SF 159 SF 537 SF 353 SF 464 SF 180 SF 118 SF 614 SF 109 SF 323 SF 272 SF 142 SF 63 SF

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

UP

7

No.

Description

Date

1 A1.02

1 R

R

57

2

Description

Date

16' - 1"

No.

1

28' - 1"

Garage

A4.02 -

R

R

R

A4.00 1

Living Room

1

4 R

6

1

No.

Revision 1

Description

Date 4-18-15

1 A3.02

45

12' - 0"

R

R

Kitchen

1

3D View 1

2

3D View 2

19' - 0"

Chi Hung Leung

5 10' - 6 31/32"

Residential House 3D Views

10' - 4 7/8"

4

Chi Hung Leung

Date

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

A2.01 Scale

18Construction Documents | Final Booklet

1/4" = 1'-0"

Drawn by Checked by

A0.1 Scale 4/22/2015 3:17:43 PM

5' - 0"

1 A4.03

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

Project number

Residential House First Floor Plan

Chi Hung Leung Residential House Interior Rendering Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

A0.2 Scale

4/22/2015 3:16:40 PM

W

39

4/22/2015 3:16:37 PM

42

REF.

DW

5

9 3

9

3

Keynote Legend

06 11 00.H1

Key Value

Level 4a 31' - 0"

Level 4a 31'Roof - 0" 30' - 0" Level 4 30' - 0" 5 A3.06

1 A3.06

level 3 28' - 0"

Level 4a 31'Roof - 0" 30' - 0" Level 4 30' - 0"

06 11 00.B12 Roof 06 11 00.B12

Roof 30' - 0"

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

30' - 0"

Level 4 30' - 0"

Level 4 30' - 0"

level 3 28' - 0"

level 3 28' - 0"

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

06 13 23.C2

level 3 28' - 0"

Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

06 11 00.B12 Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

06 11 00.B12

5

First Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0" 1

3

Level 3 22' - 0" Level 3 20' - 0"

Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"

Level 3 20' - 0"

6 A3.06

06 11 00.B12

2 A3.06

Level 3 20' - 0"

Level 3 20' - 0" 06 13 23.C2

Level 2 15' - 0"

06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12

Description

Date

No.

Level 2 10' - 0"

7 A3.06

6

3

2

Second Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"

3

9 9

Level 2 12' - 0" 06 11 00.B12

Chi Hung Leung

Level 1 0' - 0"

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

1

A3.05

Callout of Section 2 1/2" = 1'-0"

1/2" = 1'-0"

Scale

Level 1 0' - 0"

Level 2 10' - 0"

Level 1 0' - 0"

06 13 23.C2

Residential House Details of Wall Section

Level 1 0' - 0"

Project number Date Drawn by

7

Checked by

Third Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0" 8

Fourth Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"

3

Third Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"

4

Scale

As indicated

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

Description

Date

No.

Chi Hung Leung

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

A0.3

Description

Date

Chi Hung Leung

Residential House Parcel Profile

Scale

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

A3.06

Fourth Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"

Chi Hung Leung Architecture

No.

Chi Hung Leung

Level 1 0' - 0"

Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos

Residential House Navigate LA Site Plan with Tax Assessor Map Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

Project number Date 4/22/2015 3:17:00 PM

Second Callout of Section 2 1/2" = 1'-0"

Level 1 0' - 0"

06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12

06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12

4/22/2015 3:17:52 PM

4 A3.06

8 A3.06

Level 2 10' - 0"

06 13 23.C2

Residential House Wall Section

Level 1 0' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"

Date

Second Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

3 A3.06

Level 1 0' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"

Description

4/22/2015 3:17:54 PM

No.

Level 2 12' - 0" Level 2 10' - 0"

Drawn by Checked by

A0.4 Scale

4/22/2015 3:17:19 PM

Level 2 15' - 0"

2

Keynote Text

06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.H1 06 13 23.C2

Level 4a 31' - 0"

Construction Documents | Final Booklet

19