Participant Four Age: 18 Sex: M Location: UK 1.
From first glance, which piece of work looks more professional and why? Using a different style on the text distinguishing it from everything else catches the eye
2.
What feeling is being provoked in the 3D text piece? The first provokes you to want to buy the car whereas the 2nd just makes you want to keep watching or just ignore it due to the lack of power the draw the person watching it.
3.
What are the main colours represented in the 3D text piece and what do they represent? Main colours are light and dark the light representing the car to attract the readers eyes
4.
Do the two pieces set a sense of false hope? How can you tell? Not at all
5.
What aura do you feel when contrasting the two pieces? How different everything can be
6.
What comes to mind when contrasting the two pieces? Of how the image gets straight to the point and how the animation doesnt, due to the lack of skill informing the person what it is truly about
7.
Are you encouraged to feel a false sensation? If so, how? Possibly in the 3D text, the reader could feel the false sensation of not being able to have a car like that
8.
How does the colour differentiate the two pieces from one another? The animation uses a variety of colours making it different to other designs
9.
What would you change about the two pieces? I would change the animation so it gets straight to the point
10. How does the choice of angles used alter the perspective of the two pieces? It doesn’t, the image will always give the same information, the animation will stay dull. 5 minute break. 11. How do the two pieces instigate you to create something of your own? By seeing how bad the animation is it makes me want to edit that into something worthwhile 12. How does the 3D text piece lead your eyes to the main focal point?
By being near the light of the car and having a different style in comparison to everything else. 13. What subject do you recognize within the two pieces (i.e. political, education, etc) and how does it reflect on reality? The animation seems more educational for students who may want to see many different styles. The image could do its job by advertsing the image
14. How is the lighting different between the two pieces? The lighting in the 1st one focuses the centre of the image which is the main attraction of the image. The animation has random lightining not focusing on anything in particular
15. Do you think the 3D text piece has a good enough message to be shown worldwide, if so why? Yes, because I believe that it does its job attracting the eyes on the car and the text using the techniques used. 16. Who would you recommend the pieces of work to? The animation to schools and the image to advertisers 17. Which piece caught your attention most and why? The 3D image as it gets to the point showing using the lighting affects and the 3D text 18. Do you think the animation still has a strong message if watched several times, if so why? No, due to it not getting the to point 19. What word could you have used instead of the current word in the 3D text piece? The cars name eg. “Audi� 20. Does the soundtrack to the animation work well with the piece? Why? Yes as it does its job of going with each action
3D Text Piece.
Snack and Drink Animation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrXj4CMC2yk