June 19, 2019 Board Packet

Regular Meeting of the Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) Board of Managers, for Wednesday, June 19, 2019 6:00 p.m. at the office of the CRWD, 595 Aldine Street, St. Paul, Minnesota.

I.

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Call to Order of Regular Meeting (President Joe Collins) A) Attendance B) Review, Amendments, and Approval of the Agenda

Materials Enclosed

II.

Public Comment – For Items not on the Agenda (Please observe a limit of three minutes per person.)

III.

Permit Applications and Program Updates (Permit Process: 1) Staff Review/Recommendation, 2) Applicant Response, 3) Public Comment, and 4) Board Discussion and Action.)

A) B) C)

Permit 09-011 Magnolia Earl – Closure (Hosch) Permit 15-013 Jamestown Homes – Closure (Hosch) Permit 15-039 Sunrise Banks Office Building – Closure (Hosch)

IV.

Special Reports – No Special Reports

V.

Action Items A) AR: Approve Minutes of the June 5, 2019 Board Workshop and Regular Meeting (Sylvander) B) AR: Approve May 2019 Accounts Payable/Receivable (Sylvander) C) AR: Approve Consultant Services Agreement for Communications & Engagement Plan with Tunheim Partners, Inc. (Bromelkamp) D) AR: Authorize Full-Time Temporary Outreach Assistant Position (Bromelkamp) E) AR: Approve Promotion of Sarah Wein to Technical Specialist II (Fossum) F) AR: Approve City of St. Paul Local Surface Water Management Plan (Kelley) G) AR: Approve 2019-2020 Professional Service Providers (Zwonitzer) H) AR: Approve CRWD’s 2018 MS4 Annual Report (Eleria) I) AR: Adopt 2019 CRWD Strategic Plan (Fossum)

VI.

Unfinished Business A) 2020 Budget Update (Doneux) B) Partner Grant Update (Schwantes)

VII.

General Information A) Board of Manager’s Updates

VIII. Next Meetings A) Wednesday, July10, 2019 5:00 PM - Board Workshop B) Wednesday, July10, 2019 6:00 PM - Board Meeting C) Wednesday, July 17, 2019 CAC Tour IX.

Adjournment Our mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District

June 19, 2019 III. Permit Applications A.-C. Permit Close Outs (Hosch) DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

June 11, 2019 CRWD Board of Managers Elizabeth Hosch Permit Closeouts

Background Construction activity is complete for permits #09-011 Magnolia-Earl, #15-013 Jamestown Homes, and #15-039 Sunrise Banks Office Building.

Issues Magnolia-Earl #09-011 This permit was issued for the reconstruction of residential streets and associated utilities in the neighborhood of Magnolia and Earl on the east side of St. Paul. The project split the boundary with the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District. CRWD stormwater requirements were met with one infiltration swale and deferral of volume reduction credits. An additional 344 cf of treatment was constructed which would reduce the overall credit debit to 18,012 cf (originally 18,356 cf). The site is stable and the stormwater treatment practice has been confirmed functional. No surety was collected for this public project.

Jamestown Homes #15-013 This permit was issued for the renovation of an existing apartment complex at Central and Kent in St. Paul. Stormwater requirements were met with one underground infiltration system. The site is stable and the stormwater treatment practice has been confirmed functional. $6,800 surety is available to return.

Sunrise Banks Office Building #15-039 This permit was issued for redevelopment at Wabash and Curfew in St. Paul. Stormwater requirements were met with five surface iron-enhanced filtration basins. The site is stable and the stormwater treatment practices have been confirmed functional. $15,900 surety is available to return.

Action Requested Approve volume bank withdrawal of 18,012 cubic feet and Certificate of Completion for permit #09011, Magnolia-Earl.

Approve $6,800 surety return and Certificate of Completion for permit #15-013, Jamestown Homes.

Approve $15,900 surety return and Certificate of Completion for permit #15-039, Sunrise Banks Office Building.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\Board Memos\2019-06-19 Permit Closeout Board Memo.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

June 5, 2019 Board Meeting V. Action Item A) Approve Minutes of May 15, 2019 Regular Board Meeting (Sylvander)

Regular Meeting of the Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) Board of Managers, for Wednesday, June 5, 2019, 5:00 p.m. at the office of CRWD, 595 Aldine Street, St. Paul, Minnesota.

WORKSHOP AGENDA

I. Call to Order of Board Workshop Managers Joe Collins Seitu Jones, absent w/notice Shirley Reider Rick Sanders Mary Texer Motion 19-089:

Staff Present Mark Doneux, CRWD Michelle Sylvander, CRWD

Call to order the Board Workshop to review the 2020 Preliminary Budget.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously Approved New staff members were present to provide introductions. Ms. Mary Van Sant introduced herself as the new Communications Associate to the Communication & Outreach Division. Ms. Anna Annim-Wilson introduced herself as the new Administrative Assistant to the Administration team.

II. Review 2020 Budget Draft Administrator Doneux reviewed the 2020 preliminary budget with the Board of Managers. Expenses and revenue were reviewed for administration, programs, projects and capital improvement projects. A board workshop will be scheduled in July.

III. Adjourn Board Workshop President Collins closed the Board workshop at 6:00 p.m.

Motion 19-090: Reider/Sanders

Adjourn the Board Workshop

Unanimously Approved REGULAR MEETING MINUTES I.

A)

Call to Order of Regular Meeting (President Joe Collins)

Managers Joe Collins Seitu Jones, absent w/notice Shirley Reider Rick Sanders Mary Texer

B)

Staff Present Public Attendees Mark Doneux, CRWD Pat Cavanaugh, CAC Anna Eleria, CRWD Chris Kunz, Master Water Steward Forrest Kelley, CRWD Lindsay Schwantes, CRWD Michelle Sylvander, CRWD Nate Zwonitzer, CRWD James Mogen, Ramsey County Attorney

Review, Amendments and Approval of the Agenda.

Administrator Doneux requested that Action item H. Authorize Public Comment Period on 2018 MS4 Annual Report be added to the agenda and to drop Unfinished Item A) Ford site update.

Motion 19-091: Approve the Agenda of June 5, 2019. With the addition of Action item H. Authorize Public Comment Period on 2018 MS4 Annual Report and to drop Unfinished Item A) Ford site update.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously Approved II.

Public Comment – For Items not on the Agenda

No comments were made.

III.

Permit Applications and Program Updates A) Adopt 2019 Rule Amendments

Mr. Kelley reviewed changes that went out for public review. Summary comments were received from nine parties. Mr. Kelley asked for any questions. Manager Reider asked if there were any concerns from the comments. Mr. Kelley replied that there were no major concerns.

Motion 19-092: Approve Response to Comments and Adopt Resolution Approving Amended Watershed District Rules Texer/Reider Unanimously Approved Motion 19-093: Adopt the Amended Watershed District Rules.

Texer/Reider Unanimously approved B) Permit #09-017 Knapp Raymond – Closure (Hosch) Mr. Kelley reviewed this permit was issued for the reconstruction of residential streets and associated utilities in the neighborhood of Knapp and Raymond in St. Paul. Stormwater requirements were met with three underground infiltration trenches. The overall treatment constructed on site was less than originally proposed and the applicant requests addition of smaller volume 2,141 cf to their volume bank.

(Original deposit for excess treatment was approved at 2,338 cf.) The site is stable, and the stormwater treatment practices have been confirmed functional. No surety was collected for this public project.

Motion 19-094: Approve volume bank deposit of 2,141 cubic feet and Certificate of Completion for permit #09-017, Knapp-Raymond.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved C) Permit #11-004 Blair-Griggs - Closure (Hosch) Mr. Kelley reviewed permit #11-004 Blair-Griggs. This permit was issued for the reconstruction of residential streets and associated utilities in the neighborhood of Blair and Griggs in St. Paul. Stormwater requirements were met with four underground infiltration trenches. The linear cost cap was met, and the additional treatment was credited in the amount of 5,935 cf. There is additional surplus in overall treatment constructed on site, and the applicant requests additional deposit of 1,383 cf to their volume bank. The total volume bank deposit available is 7,318 cf. The site is stable, and the stormwater treatment practices have been confirmed functional. No surety was collected for this public project.

Motion 19-095: Approve volume bank deposit of 7,318 cubic feet for permit #11-004 Blair-Griggs Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved Motion 19-096: Approve Certificate of Completion for permit #11-004, Blair-Griggs.

Reider/Sander Unanimously approved D) Permit #18-004 Como Paving 2018 - Closure (Hosch) Mr. Kelley reviewed permit #18-004 Como Paving. This permit was issued for the reconstruction of Como from Commonweath to Brompton in St. Paul. Stormwater requirements were met with on underground infiltration trench that met the linear cost cap. The site is stable, and the stormwater treatment practices have been confirmed functional. No surety was required for this public project.

Motion 19-097: Approve Certificate of Completion for permit #18-004, Como Paving 2018.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved IV.

Special Reports No Special Report

V.

Action Items A)

AR:

Approve Minutes of the April 17, 2019 Board Workshop (Sylvander).

Motion 19-098: Approve the Workshop Minutes of the April 17, 2019 Board Workshop.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved B)

AR:

Approve Minutes of the April 17, 2019 Board Meeting (Sylvander)

Motion 19-099: Approve the Meeting Minutes of the April 17, 2019 Board Meeting.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved C) AR: (Sylvander)

Approve Minutes of the May 15, 2019 Board Workshop and Regular Meeting

Motion 19-100: Approve the Workshop and Regular Meeting Minutes of May 15, 2019 Board Workshop and Meeting.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved D) AR: Approve Parkview Stormwater Project Plans and Authorize Bidding for Construction (Zwonitzer) Mr. Zwonitzer reviewed the Parkview Stormwater Project. In 2016 CRWD was awarded a 1.76 million grant through BWSR’s Targeted Watershed Program (TWP) for work in the Como and McCarrons sub watersheds. One of the projects identified was a regional BMP at Parkview Center School in Roseville.

The project engineering is nearing completion and construction is anticipated to be complete in 2020.

Mr. Zwonitzer reviewed site plans of the project layout. The project will reduce phosphorus load to Lake McCarrons by an estimated 45 pounds per year, exceeding the goal of 37 pounds established in the TWP grant. Mr. Zwonitzer reviewed the underground filtration system. Samples can be collected from treated and untreated storm runoff. Manager Texer asked if filters will need to be replaced in the system. Mr. Zwonitzer replied that CRWD will monitor the system. President Collins asked if the filters are removable. Mr. Zwonitzer replied that they are removable. Manager Texer asked if the flow

can be turned off. Mr. Zwonitzer replied that flow can be turned off for maintenance, and that the system was designed to make modifications for water reuse.

Motion 19-101:

Approve plans for the Parkview Center School Filtration BMP Project.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved Motion 19-102: Project.

Authorize solicitation of bids for the Parkview Center School Filtration BMP

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved E) AR: Approve SRF Contract Amendment for Parkview Project Construction Administration (Zwonitzer) Mr. Zwonitzer shared that SRF Consulting Group completed the feasibility work and is finalizing construction plans and documents for the Parkview Center School Filtration BMP. SRF has completed 90% of the designs and are incorporating final design modifications based on comments from our project partners and staff.

Motion 19-103: Approve amendment SRF amendment #7 to the consultant services agreement with SRF for construction administration of the Parkview Center School Filtration BMP for an amount not to exceed $67,560 and authorize the Administrator to execute the amendment and additional amendments up to $10,000.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved F) AR: Approve AES Contract Amendment for Willow Reserve Vegetation Management Plan (Zwonitzer) Mr. Zwonitzer provided a review of the Willow Reserve located off Maryland Avenue between Arundel and Virginia Streets in St. Paul. The 23-acre bird and wildlife sanctuary restoration plans are coming to a close in 2019. Staff are requesting a scope of work from Applied Ecological Services to develop a vegetation management plan that will address short term needs for the site and provide guidance for long-term adaptive management.

Motion 19-104: Approve amendment to consultant services agreement with Applied Ecological Services for the Willow Reserve Vegetation Management plan for an amount not to exceed $12,350 and authorize the Administrator to execute the amendment and change orders not to exceed $5,000.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved

G)

AR:

Approve Master Water Stewards 2019-2020 (Schwantes)

Ms. Schwantes reviewed the enrollment for the Master Water Steward program. The Board agreed to participate in the Master Water Stewards program in 2015 with the class of Stewards in 2016. CRWD currently has four classes of Stewards with 12 graduates and four individuals working on capstone projects. Ms. Schwantes shared that staff is recommending that CRWD participate in the program and accept up to six Master Water Stewards for the fall 2019 to spring 2020 program at a cost of $2,500 per steward.

Master Water Steward Ms. Chris Kunz was present. President Collins requested her opinion of the program. Ms. Kunz replied that she has been inspecting raingardens and finds that she is getting into a groove. Ms. Kunz was grateful for being a part of the program.

Motion 19-103: Authorize the Administrator to enter into an Agreement with Freshwater to host up to six Master Water Stewards for the 2019-2020 program year at a cost of $2,500 per steward with a total not to exceed $15,000.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved H)

AR:

CRWD 2018 MS4 Annual Report

Ms. Eleria provided the Board of Managers with an update on the MS4 Annual Report. CRWD is required to prepare and submit an annual report of activities and accomplishments associated with its stormwater pollution prevention program (SWPPP) by June 30th to MN Pollution control Agency (MPCA). CRWD staff propose that the public comment period on CRWD’s 2018 SWPPP work commence on June 6th and end on June 27th and the public meeting for presenting this work occur at the second June Board meeting, June 19th. Announcements of the public comment period and public meeting will be published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and CRWD’s website. The 2018 annual report will be available on CRWD’s website.

Motion 19-104: Authorize public comment period on CRWD’s MS4 Annual Report for 2018; and approve the June 19, 2019 Board meeting as the public meeting date for the annual report Reider/Sanders Unanimously approved VI.

Unfinished Business A) Ford Site Update (Fossum) - removed B) Adopt a Drain Update (Schwantes)

Ms. Schwantes provided a review of the Adopt-a-drain program which has been in operation since 2014.

A pilot was funded in 2014 through a Partner Grant and launched in the Como neighborhood. In March of 2019, the Watershed Partners launched a new Adopt-a-Drain website that includes catch basin locations across the metro region. The new website has made the program accessible to new watershed districts and cities metro wide. Just this spring the program added 200 new sign ups. No action required; update provided for information only.

C) 2020 Partner Grant Funding Structure Update (Schwantes) Ms. Schwantes shared that the number of partner grant applications has increased. No changes are planned for the structure at this time. In the last review changes on building the program included reviewing applications with new ideas and using the funding to build on relationships. President Collins requested that grant information be sent to the church now located at the former Joe’s Sporting Goods store and welcome them to the neighborhood. Ms. Schwantes will add their information to the partnership contact data base. Manager Texer commented that they would likely be interested in gardens.

D) Building Update (Doneux) Administrator Doneux reviewed the progress of the building; landscaping and pocket park construction underway. JE Dunn is continuing to work on punch list items. The contract for a building manager continues. The solar and water reuse systems are in place. No date has been set for the Grand opening event at this time, one will most likely take place in August or September.

E) 2020 Watershed Management Plan Update (Eleria) Ms. Eleria thanked the Board for their support of the Watershed Management Plan. The last meeting wrapped up on Tuesday, June 4th. The on-line survey will remain open until the end of June. Ms. Eleria will be requesting the input from staff, CAC and Board. Ms. Eleria will provide a summary and review with the Board at a later date.

F) Snelling Midway Stormwater Project Update (Eleria) Ms. Eleria shared that CRWD and the City of St. Paul has hired a public relation firm to put together video to promote the rainwater harvesting system. An unveiling event will take place in the end of June.

President Collins recommended contacting MPR to help with the promotion of the unveiling. Manager Reider suggested the short video be played at stadium.

VII. A)

General Information

Administrator’s Report 1) Administrator Approved or Executed Agreements a) Stewardship Grant Agreement with Jason Alley for 2019 raingarden for an amount not to exceed $374.

b) Consultant Services Agreement with This is Folly for Scavenger Hunt Project an amount not to exceed $8,675. c) BMP Maintenance Services Agreement with Outdoor Lab Landscape Design Inc for an amount not to exceed $36,390. d) Customized Training Income Contract between the State of Minnesota and Century College not to exceed $750 for safety training. e) Clean Water Grant Fund Work Order with Conservation Corps Minnesota for installation and maintenance of rain gardens and lake shoreline restoration projects in St. Paul in 2019. f) Well Sealing Grant Agreement with Natasha Nicole Cardinal not to exceed $750. g) Partner Grant Agreement with Freshwater Society not to exceed $2,500 per steward or $15,000, whichever is less, with a minimum payment of $10,000 for 4 stewards. h) Consultant Services Agreement Amendment with SRF Consulting Group Inc for Parkview Center School Stormwater BMP Feasibility for an amount not to exceed $7,194. i) Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Roseville for Williams Street Pond Maintenance. j) Stewardship Grant Agreement with Michelle and Tom Crain for BMP project for an amount not to exceed $4,500. k) Services Agreement with Landbridge Ecological Inc for Highland Ravine Maintenance Services for an amount not to exceed $12,000. l) Partner Grant Agreement with Public Art Saint Paul not to exceed $8,000. m) Consultant Services Agreement with Christine Baeumler for Artist Consultant Services not to exceed $12,600.

2) Board Approved Agreements a) Project Grant Agreement with Zero Abuse Project Biosolar Demonstration at the Guardian Building for an amount not to exceed $62,500.

3) General Updates a) BWSR Board meeting was held at CRWD, Wednesday, March 27, 2019. b) 2019 Water Summit Tour was held at CRWD, Friday, May 10, 2019.

4) Upcoming CRWD events and meetings a) CRWD’s 2020 Watershed Management Plan Workshop, Thursday, June 4th 6:00pm-8:00pm Arlington-Hills Community Center at 1200 Payne Ave., St. Paul, MN b) Wednesday, June 12, 2019 CAC meeting c) Board Meeting, 6:00 PM, Wednesday, June 19, 2019 5) Staff issued Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) permits from 2018 and 2019 to date.

Does not include staff issued ESC permits in advance of a full Board approved permit when grading work is scheduled to begin before stormwater details have been settled.

18-019, Ford TCAP railyard expansion (railyard removal adjacent to Ford redevelopment site) 18-021, Parkview Center School filtration project grant (disturbance over 1 acre)

18-024, Lafayette Road clearing (removal of trees and debris in preparation for land auction, located just north of RR on west side of Lafayette at St. Paul Police Training Center)

VIII. Next Meetings A) Wednesday, June 12, 2019 CAC Meeting, Mary will attend B) Wednesday, June 19, 2019 Board Meeting, Joe will be absent IX.

Adjournment

Motion 19-105: Adjournment of the June 5, 2019 Regular Board Meeting at 6:58 p.m.

Reider/Sanders Unanimously Approved Respectfully submitted, Michelle Sylvander

June 19, 2019 Board Meeting V. Action Items – B) Accounts Payable & Budget Update (Sylvander)

DATE: June 13, 2019 TO: CRWD Board of Managers FROM: Michelle Sylvander, Office Manager RE: May 2019 Accounts Payable/Receivable and Administrative/Program Budget Report - REVISED _________________________________________________________________________________

Enclosed are the Accounts Payable/Receivable and the Administrative/Program Budget Reports for the Month of May 2019.

Summary of Budget Report: (May Only Expenses) Administrative Budget (100’s) Program Budget (200’s) Project Budget (300’s) Capital Improvement Budget (400’s) Debt Service (500’s)

$ $ $ $ $

81,375.69 142,818.56 77,751.03 521,201.97 0.0

TOTAL

$

823,146.62

Summary of Accounts Payable/Receivable Report through May 31, 2019: (Past, present and future months) (May 2019 Only)

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable

$ $

879,772.04 35,778.25

Request Action Approve May 2019 Accounts Payable/Receivable and Budget Report and direct Board Treasurer and President to endorse and disperse checks for these payments. enc:

May 2019 Accounts Payable May 2019 Budget Report

2019 Operations and CIP Monthly YTD Expenditures to Budget $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $Jan

Feb

March

April

May

Jun

July

August

Sept

Oct

2019 Operations Budget

Operations Cumulative Expenditures

2019 CIP Budget

CIP Cumulative Expenditures

W:\02 Budget and Finance\Board Memos\Board Memos 2019\BD Memo AP Budget Report 06192019.docx

Nov

Dec

Capitol Region Watershed District

Check Register For the Period From June 1, 2019 - June 30, 2019

Date 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19

Payee 9Yum Yum Alley, Jason Amanda Friebergs Applied Ecological Services, Inc. Association of Counties Barr Engineering Barr Engineering Barr Engineering Barr Engineering Barr Engineering Barr Engineering Benefit Extras, LLC Budget Sign & Graphics C Lanphear Design Cabela's Marketing Canteen Cari Ness Nesje Casket Arts Building Christine Baeumier City of St. Paul Financial Services City of St. Paul P&R City of St. Paul Public Works Colonial Life Comcast - Business Comcast - Business Digi-Key Don Hermes Forestry Suppliers, Inc. Forrest J. Kelley Fresh Color Press Frogtown Farm Gopher State One Green Solar Leasing, LLC Hamline University Hardaway, Crystal HealthPartners Holiday Fleet Houston Engineering, Inc. Joseph Collins KidZibits Limno Tech McCaren Designs, Inc. Meadowlark Institute Megan Frisvold Menards MetLife Midway Ford Minnesota State Auditor Mississippi Watershed Mgmt. Organization MSR MUSC Holdings, LLC Nelson Cheese & Deli

Total

Check #

171.00 338.13 750.00 1,281.40 75.00 6,036.00 2,918.00 1,146.30 6,951.50 3,315.92 776.50 82.50 221.15 425.00 89.44 1,032.77 1,060.00 1,728.00 625.00 100.00 75.00 400.00 755.38 389.92 1,836.03 1,240.53 750.00 1,510.14 1,440.00 510.00 25.00 48.60 163.20 3,935.87 180.00 28,088.64 209.55 32,552.00 1,028.42 9,780.00 6,557.50 1,078.22 990.00 12.00 118.52 559.18 30,809.74 12,046.50 20,000.00 23,734.67 5,000.00 868.35

Page 1 of 2

19802 19803 19804 19805 19806 19807 19808 19809 19810 19811 19812 19813 19814 19815 19816 19817 19818 19819 19820 19821 19822 19823 19824 19825 19826 19827 19828 19829 19830 19831 19832 19833 19834 19835 19836 19837 19838 19839 19840 19841 19842 19843 19844 19845 19846 19847 19848 19849 19850 19851 19852 19853

Description Ice Cream Tickets/WaterFest Raingarden Grant Reimbursement Well Sealing Cost Share Professional Services Job Posting - Inspector Professional Services Lake McCarron's Management Plan Ford Site Area Watershed Management Plan Update Work Order #1 of 11/11/09 Agreement Professional Services Employee Benefits Decals Design Work Three Fork Coffee Grant Reimbursement Sediment on Canvas Consulting Electric Service Fee-Bob Vento Bugs Night Out Permit Permit Fees/Boulevard Rain Garden Employee Benefits Internet & Voice Mail Office Phones/Business Voice Edge Routers/Modem Well Sealing Cost Share Hobo Water Level Logger Office Cleaning 2019 Como Lake Management Plan June 13th Community Celebration E-Mail Tickets Power Purchase Payment Welcome Packets Children Activities - WMP Meetings Employee Benefits Fuel for Vehiclese BMP Final Design Manager Per Diem/Expense Interactive Water Feature Como Lake Management Plan Monthly Horticulture Services Art of Hosting Training Workshop Water Summit Parking Supplies Employee Benefits 2019 Fusion 2018 State Auditor Contribution to CEZ Study Office Design Granite Block Tour/Workshops/Planning Meetings

Capitol Region Watershed District

Check Register For the Period From June 1, 2019 - June 30, 2019

Date 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19 06/19/19

Payee Onset Pioneer Press Pitney Bowes - Financial Services Quality Locksmith Service Ramsey County - Attorney Royal Textile Manufacturing Rymark Sage Software, Inc. St. Paul Police Dept. False Alarm Permitting SRF Consulting, Inc. SRF Consulting, Inc. St. Paul Regional Water Services VOID Sunrise Bank Syscon, Inc. TCB Marketing, Inc. Tech Sales Teledyne Instruments, Inc. This Is Folly TMC Publications Co. Twin Cities Housing Dev. Verizon Wireless Walters Water Environment Federation Wenck Associates, Inc. Wilson Bohannan Padlock Co. Xcel Energy Xcel Energy Xcel Energy US Bank Staples Business Advantage City of St. Paul

Total

Check #

263.00 142.00 273.75 90.00 3,697.50 779.99 3,045.00 6,284.82 100.00 433.51 28,247.55 192.08 15,900.00 175.00 1,297.90 592.00 5,757.95 2,675.00 705.35 6,800.00 898.11 79.09 170.00 35,694.23 344.08 34.56 32.51 888.86 3,974.11 306.70 416,000.00

19854 19855 19856 19857 19858 19859 19860 19861 19862 19863 19864 19865 19866V 19867 19868 19869 19870 19871 19872 19873 19874 19875 19876 19877 19878 19879 19880 19881 19882 19883 19884 19885

SUB-TOTAL: MAY A/P

$751,691.22

MAY PAYROLL/BENEFITS:

$128,080.82

MAY TOTAL:

$879,772.04

Description Water Level Legal Notices Postage Meter Lease Lockout Server Room Attorney Services Logo Apparel Mini PC for Mississippi Room/Services Additional Licenses False Alarms Professional Services Parkview Center School BMP Final Water/Sewer Charges VOID Surety Return Sage Support Posting for BMP Inspector Communication Cable Monitoring Equipment/Velocity Sensor Design Services BMP Posting/Monitor Advertising Surety Return Wireless Service Trash/Recycling Membership Renewal Permit Program/Ford Site Design Padlocks Kittson Electrical Maryland Electrical Electric & Gas Service Monthly Credit Card Expense Office Supplies Grant Reimbursement

APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:

6/19/2019

MAY, 2019 RECEIPTS UST - 2nd Year Housing Waterford Bay CRWD Apparel Village of Rivoli CRWD Apparel Freshwater Society Urban Academy 4M Fund-General 4M Fund-Bonds MAY RECEIPTS:

$6,600.00 3,500.00 20.50 10,800.00 34.00 394.00 2,000.00 7,486.94 4,942.81 $35,778.25 Page 2 of 2

Surety Permit Fee Miscellaneous Income Surety Miscellaneous Income Reimbursement/Lunch-Tour Group Permit Fee May Interest May Interest - Bonds

Capitol Region Watershed District May 31, 2019 Comparison

May Check Register Totals May A/P

May Financial Statements

Difference

$751,691.22

May J.E. Dunn Construction

-

May Payroll/Benefits

128,080.82

MAY SUB-TOTAL:

$879,772.04

Surety Refunds

($22,700.00)

Less Pre-Paid Expenses:

($33,925.42)

MAY TOTAL:

$823,146.62

Pre-Paid Expenses: Colonial Life Fresh Color Press Crystal Hardaway HealthPartners McCaren Designs, Inc. MetLife Rymark Verizon Wireless

$755.38 510.00 180.00 28,088.64 539.11 559.18 2,395.00 898.11 $33,925.42

Sunrise Bank Twin Cities Housing Development

$15,900.00 6,800.00 $22,700.00

Surety Refund:

Page 1 of 1

$823,146.62

$823,146.62

($56,625.42)

$0.00

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST RECAP FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 2019 ‐ MAY 31, 2019

TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION: 200 ‐ Administration 201 ‐ Groundwater 207 ‐ Rulemaking/Rule Revisions 208 ‐ Permitting 210 ‐ Stewardship Grants 211 ‐ Monitoring & Data Collection 220 ‐ Education & Outreach 225 ‐ Technical Resources & Information Sharing 228 ‐ Future Trends: Research and Positioning 230 ‐ Geographic Informatin Systems (GIS) 240 ‐ Safety Program TOTAL PROGRAMS: 300 ‐ Administration 301 ‐ Shoreline & Streambank Maintenance 305 ‐ Como Lake Subwatershed 310 ‐ Lake McCarron's Subwatershed 313 ‐ Loeb Lake Subwatershed 315 ‐ Trout Brook Subwatershed 317 ‐ Crosby Lake Subwatershed 325 ‐ Wetland, Stream & Ecosystem Restoration 330 ‐ Mississippi River Subwatershed 370 ‐ Watershed Management Plan 390 ‐ Special Projects & Grants TOTAL PROJECTS: TOTAL OPERATING FUND: 405 ‐ Como Lake BMP's 410 ‐ Lake McCarron's BMP's 413 ‐ Loeb Lake BMP's 415 ‐ Trout Brook BMP's 417 ‐ Crosby Lake BMP's 425 ‐ Wetland, Stream & Ecosystem Restoration 430 ‐ Mississippi River Subwatersheds BMP's 440 ‐ Special Projects & Grants 450 ‐ Future Trends: Implementation TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT: 14960 ‐ Debt & Loan Service 15 TOTAL DEBT SERVICES:

2019 ANNUAL BUDGET 0.00 660,840.00 0.00 61,200.00 5,000.00 (289,200.00) $437,840.00 190,872.00 6,480.00 22,300.00 398,590.00 819,880.00 637,770.00 611,620.00 32,680.00 145,080.00 50,390.00 38,460.00 $2,954,122.00 98,328.00 8,000.00 102,410.00 201,700.00 ‐ 344,410.00 28,710.00 ‐ 256,120.00 242,180.00 87,320.00 $1,369,178.00 $4,761,140.00 1,172,200.00 742,320.00 82,980.00 110,000.00 ‐ 30,000.00 834,090.00 719,780.00 175,000.00 $3,866,370.00 1,059,503.00 $1,059,503.00

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES ‐ 77,793.01 3,483.76 98.92 ‐ ‐ 81,375.69 ‐ 1,500.00 250.83 55,486.98 23,639.54 25,246.61 31,083.03 803.67 3,065.93 825.80 916.17 $142,818.56 ‐ ‐ 13,168.38 3,267.19 ‐ 6,594.01 208.49 ‐ 39,081.72 15,431.24 ‐ $77,751.03 $301,945.28 33,402.81 30,325.87 1,711.46 825.10 ‐ ‐ 420,041.31 3,171.82 31,722.97 $521,201.34 ‐ ‐

TOTAL ALL FUNDS:

$9,687,013.00

$823,146.62

$3,277,245.20

$6,409,767.80

33.83%

Fund Balance FUND BALANCES @ 12/31/18 Operations 2,211,785.43 Capital Improvement 2,050,966.04 Debt Service 156,132.97 2,847,820.80 Building/Bond Proceeds TOTAL FUND BALANCE: $7,266,705.24

2019 Fund Transfers ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $0.00

Year‐to‐Date Revenue 40,191.83 123,430.31 ‐ ‐ $163,622.14

Year‐to‐Date Expenditures $1,300,343.08 708,343.65 804,525.47 464,033.00 $3,277,245.20

Fund Balance @ 05/31/19 951,634.18 1,466,052.70 (648,392.50) 2,383,787.80 $4,153,082.18

18970 ‐ General Administration 18 19970 ‐ General Administration 19 19795 ‐ Aldine Operating Expense 19976 ‐ Thomas Operations 19978 ‐ MAWD 00000 ‐ Administration Allocation

JOB COST #/NAME

YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF BUDGET EXPENDITURES REMAINING 13,490.72 (13,490.72) 379,886.64 280,953.36 23,983.73 (23,983.73) 1,104.39 60,095.61 1,621.05 3,378.95 ‐ (289,200.00) $420,086.53 $17,753.47 ‐ 190,872.00 3,925.78 2,554.22 9,117.17 13,182.83 178,957.23 219,632.77 74,118.16 745,761.84 168,506.78 469,263.22 135,048.36 476,571.64 4,205.76 28,474.24 25,502.10 119,577.90 6,678.26 43,711.74 2,771.83 35,688.17 $608,831.43 $2,345,290.57 ‐ 98,328.00 ‐ 8,000.00 85,719.59 16,690.41 13,172.95 188,527.05 ‐ ‐ 38,104.20 306,305.80 4,754.26 23,955.74 ‐ ‐ 58,092.04 198,027.96 71,582.08 170,597.92 ‐ 87,320.00 $271,425.12 $1,097,752.88 $1,300,343.08 $3,460,796.92 57,926.42 1,114,273.58 151,453.01 590,866.99 5,002.88 77,977.12 958.80 109,041.20 ‐ ‐ ‐ 30,000.00 438,373.18 395,716.82 23,032.28 696,747.72 495,630.08 (320,630.08) $1,172,376.65 $2,693,993.35 804,525.47 254,977.53 $804,525.47 $254,977.53

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED ‐‐‐ 57.49% ‐‐‐ 1.80% 32.42% 0.00% 95.95% 0.00% 60.58% ‐‐‐ 44.90% 9.04% 26.42% 22.08% 12.87% 17.58% 13.25% 7.21% 20.61% 0.00% 0.00% 83.70% 6.53% ‐‐‐ 11.06% 16.56% ‐‐‐ 22.68% 29.56% ‐‐‐ 19.82% 27.31% 4.94% 20.40% 6.03% 0.87% ‐‐‐ 0.00% 52.56% 3.20% 283.22% 30.32% 75.93% 75.93%

Page 1 of 7

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST DETAIL FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 2019 ‐ MAY 31, 2019

2018 ANNUAL BUDGET ‐ 660,840.00 ‐ 61,200.00 5,000.00 (289,200.00) TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION: $437,840.00 20000 ‐ Administration Allocation 190,872.00 18000 ‐ District Permit Program ‐ 19000 ‐ District Permit Program 202,640.00 19101 ‐ Permit Tracking & Database Management 14,150.00 18102 ‐ Construction Inspection ‐ 19102 ‐ Construction Inspection 147,250.00 18103 ‐ Permit Closure & Post Construction Inspection/Maintenance ‐ 19103 ‐ Permit Closure & Post Construction Inspection/Maintenance 34,550.00 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐ Permits 16120 ‐ Rules & Annual TAC Mtg. 16 ‐ 18120 ‐ Evaluate Rules/TAC Meetings ‐ 19120 ‐ Evaluate Rules/TAC Meetings 22,300.00 19130 ‐ Groundwater Protection ‐ Well Sealing 6,480.00 17143 ‐ Stewardship Grants ‐ 18143 ‐ Stewardship Grants ‐ 19143 ‐ Stewardship Grants 427,650.00 18144 ‐ Partner Grants ‐ 19144 ‐ Partner Grants 126,340.00 18145 ‐ Inspiring Communities Program 20,490.00 18146 ‐ Rain Garden Projects 24,090.00 16147 ‐ TWP Blvd. Rain Gardens 213,310.00 18148 ‐ MN Greencorps Member ‐ 19148 ‐ MN Greencorps Member 8,000.00 18200 ‐ Baseline Monitoring & Data Collection ‐ 19200 ‐ Baseline Monitoring & Data Collection 331,880.00 19205 ‐ Lake Monitoring & Data Collection 102,610.00 18210 ‐ Villa Park Monitoring & Data Collection ‐ 19210 ‐ Villa Park Monitoring & Data Collection 28,470.00 19215 ‐ Wetland Bio‐Monitoring 17,670.00 19220 ‐ WISKI Database Website 46,720.00 19225 ‐ Remote Data Access & Set Up 12,510.00 18230 ‐ BMP Monitoring ‐ 49,540.00 19230 ‐ BMP Monitoring

18970 ‐ General Administration 19970 ‐ General Administration 19975 ‐ Aldine Operations 19976 ‐ Thomas Operations 19978 ‐ MAWD 10000 ‐ Administration Allocation

JOB COST #/NAME

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES ‐ 77,793.01 3,483.76 98.92 ‐ ‐ $81,375.69 ‐ ‐ 27,806.94 ‐ ‐ 1,663.20 ‐ 200.81 25,816.03 ‐ ‐ 250.83 1,500.00 ‐ ‐ 22,442.23 ‐ 282.45 ‐ ‐ 518.02 ‐ 396.84 ‐ 23,464.31 499.36 ‐ 142.54 ‐ 29.39 ‐ ‐ 578.05

YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET REMAINING 13,490.72 (13,490.72) 379,886.64 280,953.36 23,983.73 (23,983.73) 1,104.39 60,095.61 1,621.05 3,378.95 ‐ (289,200.00) $420,086.53 $17,753.47 ‐ 190,872.00 6,102.03 (6,102.03) 74,695.60 127,944.40 ‐ 14,150.00 74.26 (74.26) 2,632.94 144,617.06 296.99 (296.99) 1,803.36 32,746.64 93,352.05 (93,352.05) 88.77 (88.77) 44.83 (44.83) 8,983.57 13,316.43 3,925.78 2,554.22 74.67 (74.67) 2,434.37 (2,434.37) 53,746.03 373,903.97 1,267.11 (1,267.11) 2,799.02 123,540.98 ‐ 20,490.00 ‐ 24,090.00 11,257.37 202,052.63 221.79 (221.79) 2,317.80 5,682.20 19,154.43 (19,154.43) 129,793.63 202,086.37 1,251.74 101,358.26 1,844.51 (1,844.51) 1,454.79 27,015.21 ‐ 17,670.00 89.28 46,630.72 4,291.95 8,218.05 2,229.31 (2,229.31) 1,946.76 47,593.24

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED ‐‐‐ 57.49% ‐‐‐ 1.80% 32.42% 0.00% 95.95% 0.00% ‐‐‐ 36.86% 0.00% ‐‐‐ 1.79% ‐‐‐ 5.22% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 40.29% 60.58% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 12.57% ‐‐‐ 2.22% 0.00% 0.00% 5.28% ‐‐‐ 28.97% ‐‐‐ 39.11% 1.22% ‐‐‐ 5.11% 0.00% 0.19% 34.31% ‐‐‐ 3.93%

Page 2 of 7

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST DETAIL FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 2019 ‐ MAY 31, 2019

JOB COST #/NAME 15231 ‐ AHUG Exfiltration Monitoring 17232 ‐ Midway Office WH Monitoring 18250 ‐ General Ed & Outreach 19250 ‐ General Outreach & Communications 18251 ‐ General Communications 19255 ‐ Leaf & Litter Clean Ups 19260 ‐ Municipal Training 18262 ‐ Youth Outreach 19262 ‐ Youth Outreach 18263 ‐ Communication Training 19263 ‐ Communications Training 18265 ‐ Sponsorships & Partnerships 19265 ‐ Sponsorships & Partnerships 18268 ‐ Adopt A Drain 19268 ‐ Adopt A Drain 17270 ‐ Website & Social Media 19270 ‐ Website & Social Media 18271 ‐ Master Water Stewards 19271 ‐ Master Water Stewards 17274 ‐ TWP Communications 19275 ‐ Events 16277 ‐ TWP ‐ Adopt a Drain 16278 ‐ TWP Leaf & Litter Clean Ups 18279 ‐ Social Media 19279 ‐ Social Media 19280 ‐ 595 Aldine Education & Outreach 18285 ‐ Awards & Recognition Programs 19285 ‐ Awards & Recognition Programs 17300 ‐ Local & Agency Plan Review & Tech Committee 18300 ‐ Plan Review & Tech Committee 19300 ‐ Plan Review & Tech Committee 18303 ‐ BMP Database Maintenance/Updates 19303 ‐ BMP Database Maintenance/Updates 18330 ‐ District Research Program 19330 ‐ District Research Program 19333 ‐ Public Art Program 18334 ‐ Public Art Program ‐ Aldine 19334 ‐ Public Art Program ‐ Aldine 19335 ‐ Diversity & Inclusion 19336 ‐ Climate Change Impacts 18370 ‐ GIS Program Development 19370 ‐ GIS Program Development 19390 ‐ Safety Training 19395 ‐ Safety Program Updates/Audits 19396 ‐ Safety Equipment

2018 ANNUAL BUDGET 18,560.00 29,810.00 ‐ 270,690.00 ‐ 10,370.00 14,740.00 ‐ 10,640.00 ‐ 10,990.00 ‐ 28,040.00 ‐ 21,360.00 ‐ 37,730.00 ‐ 30,410.00 6,980.00 35,720.00 5,370.00 6,370.00 ‐ 7,260.00 100,000.00 ‐ 14,950.00 ‐ ‐ 17,000.00 ‐ 15,680.00 ‐ 50,200.00 29,120.00 ‐ 25,960.00 20,000.00 19,800.00 ‐ 50,390.00 13,540.00 12,400.00 12,520.00 TOTAL PROGRAMS: $2,954,122.00

CURRENT MONTH YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES BUDGET REMAINING 206.35 3,686.14 14,873.86 326.61 2,764.24 27,045.76 ‐ 2,997.17 (2,997.17) 10,346.93 42,840.47 227,849.53 ‐ 798.54 (798.54) ‐ 31.09 10,338.91 66.13 88.32 14,651.68 ‐ 66.42 (66.42) 809.75 2,314.25 8,325.75 ‐ 0.00 ‐ 11,659.38 (669.38) ‐ 684.36 (684.36) 143.45 143.45 27,896.55 ‐ 456.40 (456.40) 4,035.56 4,533.96 16,826.04 ‐ 17,837.73 (17,837.73) 285.45 1,050.75 36,679.25 ‐ 780.78 (780.78) 554.52 14,024.29 16,385.71 176.36 263.75 6,716.25 1,192.43 4,488.39 31,231.61 ‐ ‐ 5,370.00 ‐ 314.64 6,055.36 44.36 (44.36) 116.50 203.65 7,056.35 13,355.95 21,438.55 78,561.45 ‐ 7,987.66 (7,987.66) ‐ ‐ 14,950.00 ‐ 562.83 (562.83) 48.44 227.73 (227.73) 286.33 1,296.81 15,703.19 ‐ 244.33 (244.33) 468.90 1,874.06 13,805.94 ‐ 53.28 (53.28) 491.66 1,144.35 49,055.65 658.23 4,756.09 24,363.91 1,916.04 17,247.00 (17,247.00) ‐ ‐ 25,960.00 ‐ 2,301.38 17,698.62 ‐ ‐ 19,800.00 ‐ 121.13 (121.13) 825.80 6,557.13 43,832.87 274.74 324.83 13,215.17 607.03 856.62 11,543.38 34.40 1,590.38 10,929.62 $142,818.56 608,831.43 $2,345,290.57

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED 19.86% 9.27% ‐‐‐ 15.83% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 0.60% ‐‐‐ 21.75% #DIV/0!

106.09% ‐‐‐ 0.51% ‐‐‐ 21.23% ‐‐‐ 2.78% ‐‐‐ 46.12% 3.78% 12.57% 0.00% 4.94% ‐‐‐ 2.81% 21.44% ‐‐‐ 0.00% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 7.63% ‐‐‐ 11.95% ‐‐‐ 2.28% 16.33% ‐‐‐ 0.00% 11.51% 0.00% ‐‐‐ 13.01% 2.40% 6.91% 12.70% 20.61%

Page 3 of 7

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST DETAIL FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 2019 ‐ MAY 31, 2019

JOB COST #/NAME 30000 ‐ Administration Allocation 19405 ‐ St. Paul Natural Resources Intern Program 18421 ‐ Como BMP Maintenance & Inspection 19421 ‐ Como BMP Maintenance & Inspection 19425 ‐ Curtis Pond Opti RTC O & M 18427 ‐ Como Lake Management Plan 16430 ‐ TWP Como Lake Project Development 19470 ‐ AIS Management 18476 ‐ Upper Villa Maintenance 16477 ‐ TWP ‐ Lake McCarron's Project Development 19477 ‐ TWP ‐ Lake McCarron's Management Plan 18550 ‐ Inspection & Annual Maintenance 19550 ‐ Inspection & Annual Maintenance 14552 ‐ TBI Easement Verification & Documentation 17554 ‐ TBI Hydraulic/Hydrolic Model Calibration & Update 19570 ‐ NPDES MS4 Stormwater Program 18575 ‐ Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program 19620 ‐ Green Infrastructure for Innovation Districts 17621 ‐ Snelling Midway Redevelopment 19621 ‐ Snelling Midway Redevelopment 18622 ‐ Ford Site Planning 18623 ‐ Ford Site Area C 18624 ‐ CCLRT BMP Maintenance 19624 ‐ Green Line BMP Maintenance 18531 ‐ Highland Ravine BMP Maintenance 19631 ‐ Highland Ravine Maintenance 18650 ‐ 2020 Watershed Management Plan 18655 ‐ Strategic Plan 19660 ‐ Special Grants ‐ Project Development

19703 ‐ Como Lake In‐Lake Management 16705 ‐ TWP Como BMP McMurray 16715 ‐ TWP Como Sr. High 16720 ‐ Willow Reserve Restoration Project 16752 ‐ TWP ‐ McCarrons BMP ‐ Parkview 19790 ‐ Loeb Lake Shoreline Restoration 16815 ‐ TBI Repairs ‐ St. 0+00 ‐ 28+49 19820 ‐ TBI Repair ‐ Station 28+65 ‐ 50+72 19850 ‐ Land Conservation Funding

2018 ANNUAL BUDGET 98,328.00 8,000.00 ‐ 26,070.00 9,500.00 42,920.00 23,920.00 39,300.00 30,000.00 ‐ 132,400.00 ‐ 100,500.00 216,000.00 ‐ 7,910.00 20,000.00 60,800.00 ‐ 29,750.00 119,200.00 10,000.00 ‐ 36,370.00 ‐ 28,710.00 242,180.00 ‐ 87,320.00 TOTAL PROJECTS: $1,369,178.00 TOTAL OPERATING FUND: $4,761,140.00 224,600.00 947,600.00 ‐ 70,360.00 742,320.00 12,620.00 ‐ 110,000.00 30,000.00

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,264.22 ‐ 11,904.16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,267.19 3,315.92 688.58 2,408.47 ‐ 181.04 ‐ 20,094.01 ‐ 23.50 16,347.70 1,359.43 1,257.08 ‐ ‐ 208.49 15,346.54 84.70 ‐ $77,751.03 $301,945.28 ‐ 33,360.46 42.35 1,711.46 30,325.87 ‐ 48.60 ‐ ‐

YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET REMAINING ‐ 98,328.00 ‐ 8,000.00 34.25 (34.25) 3,648.97 22,421.03 ‐ 9,500.00 79,215.17 (36,295.17) 2,821.20 21,098.80 102.85 39,197.15 ‐ 30,000.00 40.72 (40.72) 13,029.38 119,370.62 13,129.32 (13,129.32) 6,088.75 94,411.25 17,319.51 198,680.49 160.81 (160.81) 181.04 7,728.96 1,224.77 18,775.23 20,404.27 40,395.73 643.24 (643.24) 74.19 29,675.81 28,664.36 90,535.64 2,944.49 7,055.51 757.90 (757.90) 4,603.59 31,766.41 100.97 (100.97) 4,653.29 24,056.71 63,937.48 178,242.52 7,644.60 (7,644.60) ‐ 87,320.00 271,425.12 $1,097,752.88 $1,300,343.08 $3,460,796.92 ‐ 224,600.00 57,884.07 889,715.93 42.35 (42.35) 5,002.88 65,357.12 151,453.01 590,866.99 ‐ 12,620.00 182.30 (182.30) ‐ 110,000.00 ‐ 30,000.00

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED 0.00% 0.00% ‐‐‐ 14.00% 0.00% 184.56% 11.79% 0.26% 0.00% ‐‐‐ 9.84% ‐‐‐ 6.06% 8.02% ‐‐‐ 2.29% 6.12% 33.56% ‐‐‐ 0.25% 24.05% 29.44% ‐‐‐ 12.66% ‐‐‐ 16.21% 26.40% ‐‐‐ 0.00% 19.82% 27.31% 0.00% 6.11% ‐‐‐ 7.11% 20.40% 0.00% ‐‐‐ 0.00% 0.00%

Page 4 of 7

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST DETAIL FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 2019 ‐ MAY 31, 2019

JOB COST #/NAME 13852 ‐ Tirllium Site Water Resource 16881 ‐ Green Line Redevelopment BMP's 16886 ‐ Lauderdale Subwatershed Stormwater Improvement Project 19890 ‐ Midway Peace Park 18910 ‐ Special Grants 19910 ‐ Special Grants 19913 ‐ CRWD Opportunity Fund 16917 ‐ Swede Hollow Construction 15918 ‐ Midway Stadium Redevelopment 16918 ‐ North Lake Como Restore 16920 ‐ TWP Grant Administration 17925 ‐ Highland Park Sr. High 17926 ‐ Adams Spanish Immersion 19935 ‐ NW University & Dale 19940 ‐ Zero Abuse Project 16950 ‐ New Office Facility TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT: 14960 ‐ Debt & Loan Service TOTAL DEBT SERVICES:

2018 ANNUAL BUDGET ‐ 603,090.00 51,000.00 180,000.00 ‐ 366,900.00 350,000.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,880.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 175,000.00 $3,866,370.00 1,059,503.00 $1,059,503.00

TOTAL ALL FUNDS:

$9,687,013.00

CURRENT MONTH YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES BUDGET REMAINING 776.50 776.50 (776.50) 419,994.30 423,378.77 179,711.23 ‐ 12,911.63 38,088.37 47.01 2,082.78 177,917.22 ‐ 2,652.03 (2,652.03) 3,080.71 18,512.47 348,387.53 ‐ ‐ 350,000.00 91.11 696.79 (696.79) ‐ 122.17 (122.17) ‐ 40.72 (40.72) ‐ 488.64 2,391.36 ‐ ‐ 0.00 ‐ 81.44 (81.44) ‐ 312.54 ‐ 125.48 31,722.97 495,630.08 (320,630.08) $521,201.34 $1,172,376.65 $2,693,993.35 ‐ 804,525.47 254,977.53 ‐ $804,525.47 $254,977.53 $823,146.62

$3,277,245.20

$6,409,767.80

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED ‐‐‐ 70.20% 25.32% 1.16% ‐‐‐ 5.05% 0.00% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 16.97% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐

283.22% 30.32% 75.93% 75.93% 33.83%

Page 5 of 7

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 2019 ‐ MAY 31, 2019 PERMIT NUMBER 9009 9011 10009 10027 10029 12003 12012 12017 12023 13015 14017 14018 14025 14027 15007 15013 15030 15040 16004 16007 16009 16016 16019 16020 16021 16023 16025 16028 16032 16033 17001 17003 17004 17008 17009 17010 17013 17015 17017 17018 17020

PERMIT NAME Victoria Street Magnolia‐Earl Como Park HS Lafayette Bridge I94 & 280 Cretin‐Derham Hall TIES Cayuga Ford Site Demo Maryland Arkwright St. Paul Academy Frogtown Farms E. 7th Mississippi Market HealthPartners MOB Ramsey County Building Demo Jamestown Homes Farrington Estates Luther Seminary Xcel Pipeline 2016 Community School of Excellence Jackson Street Willow Reserve Habitat of Humanity Roselawn Cemetary Dorothy Day Place 2300 Territorial Apartments Linwood Lower School Snelling Midway Adams School SPJCC Addition AET Campus Expansion Horace Mann Elementary Como Park Sr. High School St. Thomas Stadium & Field SPA Expansion Jackson Street Reconstruction Swede Hollow Great River Schools Wheelock Dale Victoria Dickerman Park Exchange Street Apartments Transfer Road Storage

PERMITTING BUDGET ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES

YEAR‐TO‐DATE EXPENDITURES

‐ 74.25 ‐ 706.10 931.10 ‐ 389.80 3,078.80 450.22 37.12 879.00 ‐ 55.69 ‐ ‐ 55.69 ‐ 510.22 ‐ ‐ ‐ 36.00 ‐ 711.59 510.22 ‐ 1,627.85 ‐ 222.96 546.31 ‐ ‐ 18.00 523.47 ‐ 53.99 ‐ ‐ ‐ 546.31 582.31

31.50 74.25 566.40 706.10 1,417.10 368.26 1,044.04 3,078.80 1,258.78 61.38 2,715.21 376.20 55.69 31.50 85.83 87.19 240.10 2,199.31 31.50 31.50 37.12 72.22 55.24 4,518.29 2,247.68 37.12 6,149.20 73.79 647.91 1,117.89 37.12 54.33 18.00 1,093.89 396.35 183.60 36.89 882.85 18.57 2,413.30 2,322.37

BALANCE OF PERMIT BUDGET REMAINING

% OF PERMIT BUDGET EXPENDED

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Page 6 of 7

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 2019 ‐ MAY 31, 2019 PERMIT NUMBER

PERMIT NAME

PERMITTING BUDGET

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES

YEAR‐TO‐DATE EXPENDITURES

BALANCE OF PERMIT BUDGET REMAINING

% OF PERMIT BUDGET EXPENDED

17022 17023 17024 17025 18001 18002 18004 18007 18008 18009 18010 18011 18012 18013 18014 18015 18016 18017 18018 18019 18020 18022 18023 19001 19002 19003 19004 19005 19006 19007 19008 19009 19010 19011 19012 19013 19014 19015

Regions Birth Center Weyerhaeuser Apts.

St. Catherine Library Lot Rice Park Revitalization Sylvan Park Improvements Menards Trnasload Terminal Como Paving 2018 Woodlawn Jefferson Vomela Beacon Bluff Seal Island at Como Zoo CRWD 595 Aldine Hendrickson Apartments Scheffer Community Center Beacon Bluff Opus Morning Star Met Council Villa Park Sanitary O'Gara's Mixed Use Cathedral Hill Payne Building Development Ford TCAP Railyard Excavation Albion Senior Community Rivoli Phase III Roseville Aldi Fairview Avenue TH94 Mill & Overlay Victoria Park Play Area Wheelock 4, Western to Rice Midway Peace Park McCarrons Hill Luther Seminary South Campus Island Station Redevelopment St. Thomas Iverson Center Raymond Station Summit Avenue Bridge Reconstruction UST 2nd Year Housing St. Paul Gateway Mixed Use 104 MRB Parkview Addition

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

691.79 1,470.46 53.99 468.60 ‐ ‐ ‐ 36.00 515.67 476.28 ‐ 37.12 691.79 503.67 711.59 ‐ 73.12 1,090.00 ‐ 286.42 36.00 1,113.67 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,238.81 1,153.20 524.90 802.20 63.75 90.00 1,140.00

2,079.36 3,129.06 53.99 743.81 18.57 1,138.09 579.60 37.90 2,460.15 2,183.38 64.97 941.16 2,359.11 1,342.61 2,413.96 90.89 337.04 1,135.97 1,682.25 963.99 1,269.64 2,480.51 2,042.70 892.45 1,359.20 2,321.15 3,292.55 1,611.85 2,349.00 2,397.50 855.10 3,597.65 2,355.65 1,952.15 1,815.85 861.75 127.12 1,140.00

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

18000

Sub‐Total: Permits General Permitting

‐ ‐ $202,640.00

25,816.03 27,806.94 53,622.97

93,352.05 80,797.63 174,149.68

‐ ‐ $28,490.32

‐ ‐ 85.94%

TOTAL PERMITS:

Page 7 of 7

June 19, 2019 Board Meeting V. Action Item C) Approve Consultant Services Agreement for Communications and Engagement Plan (Bromelkamp)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

June 11, 2019 CRWD Board of Managers Jessica Bromelkamp, Communications & Engagement Division Manager Approve Consultant Services Agreement for Communications & Engagement Plan

Background CRWD’s communications and engagement efforts have expanded significantly since the Education and Outreach Plan was developed in 2009 and while steps have been taken to prioritize our work through subsequent studies and plans, a unifying document is needed to improve coordination across divisions, identify and prioritize key audiences and programs, and to establish tools for measuring success.

The Board authorized staff to distribute a Request for Qualifications to develop a Communications & Engagement Plan in March 2019. A Review Committee comprised of Managers Shirley Reider and Rick Sanders, Citizen Advisory Committee member Pat Cavanaugh and CRWD staff Jessica Bromelkamp interviewed three firms and selected Tunheim for the project.

Issues CRWD and Tunheim held a kick-off meeting on May 28, 2019 to inform development of a scope of work for the plan (enclosed). A detailed budget will be provided at the Board meeting. During the meeting, staff discussed priorities for the plan, other planning efforts and ways to streamline inclusion of the Communications & Engagement Plan into the 2020 Watershed Management Plan.

Action Requested Authorize the administrator to execute a consultant services agreement not to exceed $70,000 with Tunheim to develop a Communications & Engagement Plan for CRWD. Enc.

Draft Tunheim Scope of Work

"W:\07 Programs\Edu-Outreach\Admin-Workplan\Ed Plan\2019 Ed Plan\Board Memo_CE SOW 6-10-19.docx"

Our mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

DRAFT CLIENT SCOPE OF WORK SUPPLEMENT

CLIENT AND PROJECT NAME: DATE OF SOW AGREEMENT Jessica Bromelkamp June 1, 2019 Capitol Region Watershed District

This Client Scope of Work Supplement (“SOW”) between the Capitol Region Watershed District (“CRWD”) and Tunheim Partners, Inc. (“Tunheim”), and relates specifically to the following engagement.

Scope of Work Description: Tunheim will prepare CRWD’s communication and engagement plan to support CRWD’s overall mission and goals. Because the rapidly changing dynamics of communications channels, stakeholder audiences and engagement best practices, this should be reviewed and updated every three years. To create the plan, Tunheim will execute the following four phases: Phase 1: Research (June‐July)

Estimated budget: $19,495

A. Interview CRWD administrator and division managers B. Conduct an audit of current CRWD communications channels and engagement activities and programs C. Review the communications and engagement input provided by community members, the Technical Advisory Committee and Citizen Advisory Committee as part of the Strategic Plan and Watershed Management Planning processes.

D. Evaluate and prioritize audiences including partners and grant recipients E. Review recent and upcoming CRWD programs, projects, partnerships and grants F. Review current communications measurement data G. Evaluate current internal communications practices and needs H. Provide summary or matrix that includes audiences served by CRWD to highlight gaps/opportunities to adapt, expand or create new programs or engagement opportunities related to specific projects.

Phase 2: Ideation and Recommendations (July)

Estimated budget: $17,905 A. Hold brainstorming session for administrator, division managers and representatives of the Board and Citizen Advisory Committee.

B. Craft and prioritize measurable communications and engagement strategies that support CRWD goals C. Draft matrix for program evaluation D. Provide recommendations and guidance to improve internal communications and coordination of communications and engagement work across all divisions E. Report preliminary recommendations to CRWD

Phase 3: Plan Development (August‐September)

Estimated budget: $17,095 A. Collaborate with CRWD on refinement of messages B. Draft communications and engagement plan that will include communications and engagement strategies with a recommended schedule, budget, FTE and staff lead as well as the rationale

8009 34th Avenue South | Suite 1100 | Bloomington, MN 55425 | 952.851.1600 | www.tunheim.com

Page 2 of 3

behind the recommendation.

C. Finalize, edit and present plan, incorporating CRWD feedback

Phase 4: Plan Implementation (August‐September) Estimated budget: $10,250 A. Propose a concise elevator pitch to be used throughout communications B. Create online repository for communication tools C. Draft communications tool kit, including: a. one‐page overview b. Q&A c. key messages d. media list e. priority community partner list

Deliverables and Schedule: Phase 1: Research

a. summary of communications and engagement audit July 12, 2019 b. summary of identified communications needs July 12, 2019 c. summary or matrix of audiences served by CRWD programs July 12, 2019

Phase 2: Ideation and Recommendations

a. preliminary list of prioritized strategies that support CRWD goals July 31, 2019 b. preliminary matrix for program evaluation July 31, 2019 c. recommendations for improving and coordinating internal July 31, 2019 communications across all divisions

Phase 3: Plan Development

a. communications and engagement plan that will include a September 6, 2019 recommended schedule, budget, FTE and staff lead as well as the rationale behind the recommendation

Phase 4: Implementation

October 1, 2019 a. elevator speech October 1, 2019 b. online communication repository that contains: October 1, 2019 c. one‐page overview October 1, 2019 d. Q&A October 1, 2019 e. key messages October 1, 2019 f. media list October 1, 2019 d. priority community partner list

Compensation: Our fee for the services provided under this SOW will be based on actual hours worked at our standard billing rates of $75 to $350 per hour, excluding out‐of‐pocket expense. Total fees for this project are estimated at $63,545 excluding out‐of‐pocket expenses. No work will be initiated without prior approval.

Page 3 of 3

Term of Engagement: This project is expected to begin June 15, 2019 and completed by October 1, 2019. This SOW will extend until the project is completed, unless either party gives 60 days’ written notice of its intention to terminate the SOW agreement.

June 19, 2019 Board Meeting V. Action Item D) Authorize Full-Time Temporary Position (Bromelkamp)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

June 10, 2019 CRWD Board of Managers Jessica Bromelkamp, Communications & Engagement Division Manager Authorize Full-Time Temporary Position

Background CRWD budgeted for a new Communications Associate position in 2019. Mary Van Sant was hired and began working in this role on April 29, 2019. The Communications & Engagement Division also consists of the Community Outreach Coordinator, Lindsay Schwantes and GreenCorps member, Megan Frisvold. Ms. Frisvold’s term with CRWD ends in late August and Ms. Schwantes will be on maternity leave from July through late September.

Issues In anticipation of changes in staffing, Ms. Bromelkamp proposes to use the remaining Communications Associate budget to hire Ms. Frisvold as a Grade 6, Full-Time Temporary Outreach Assistant through December 31, 2019. In this position, Ms. Frisvold would assist with many of Ms. Schwantes’ responsibilities while she is on maternity leave.

Ms. Frisvold’s primary responsibilities would include coordinating and staffing community events and school presentations, developing or adapting materials for key audiences, developing guidance for using the new H2O on the Go exhibit, and assisting with other Communications & Engagement requests.

Action Requested Authorize staff to hire Megan Frisvold as a Grade 6, Full Time Temporary staff member from September through December 2019.

"O:\Megan Frisvold\Board Memo_FT Temporary CE Position.docx"

Our mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

June 19, 2019 Board Meeting V. Action Item – E) Approve Promotion of Sarah Wein to Technical Specialist II

DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT:

June 13, 2019 CRWD Board of Managers Bob Fossum, Division Manager Approve Promotion of Sarah Wein to Technical Specialist II

Background With significant improvements within the Monitoring, Research and Maintenance Division over the last several years, roles and responsibilities within the Division have evolved. With these changes there is a need and opportunity to re-establish the Monitoring Coordinator Position in this Division. With other staff transitions, many of the tasks of the Monitoring Coordinator position have been completed by Sarah Wein.

Issues The Personnel Committee is recommending that Sarah Wein be promoted to the Technical Specialist II (Monitoring Coordinator) position. The Monitoring Coordinator will lead the planning, implementation, quality control and reporting of the District’s monitoring program. This position will coordinate the work of the monitoring technicians.

In accordance with the District Salary Administration Policy, the Board of Managers must approve any change in Grade for an existing employee. The Personnel Committee has met and supports this promotion and is seeking Board Approval of this action.

Requested Action Approve Promotion of Sarah Wein to Technical Specialist II position. enc:

Draft Technical Specialist II (Monitoring Coordinator) position description

Y:\Wein\Mont Coor Position\Board Memo- Promotion of Wein Tech Specialist II 6-12-19.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District

Adopted: June 19, 2019

GRADE:

1

8

JOB CLASSIFICATION: Technical Specialist II POSITION TITLE:

Monitoring Coordinator

REPORTS TO:

Division Manager--Monitoring, Research and Maintenance

STATUS:

Full time, exempt (from F.L.S.A.)

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Perform skilled to highly skilled duties providing technical assistance in water resource protection and planning as it relates to the implementation of District goals and objectives.

POSITION OBJECTIVE: This Position is responsible for coordination and program management of water and natural resource monitoring. Special emphasis will be placed on the operation, maintenance and reporting of data for a watershed-wide water monitoring program.

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: 1.

Manage and coordinate the District’s Monitoring Program. This will include storm water discharges at key outlets to the Mississippi River and storm water Best Management Practices. Collect data necessary in assessing the inputs to the River relative to the existing quality of the River. Install, operate and maintain monitoring equipment necessary to Implement District’s Monitoring Program. Coordinate lake, wetland and bio-monitoring activities of the District. Install, monitor and maintain monitoring systems for ponds, precipitation and groundwater.

2.

Accurately record and store all data collected from monitoring program. Manage annual and historical datasets collected from the District as well as external data. Monitoring data must be regularly recorded in District’s database and incorporated with other agency data.

3.

Direct the daily work of technicians.

4

Manage budgets, contracts and standard operating procedures for Monitoring Program.

5.

Coordinate monitoring program activities with partners, research institutions and internal programs. This will include coordinating with partner agencies, landowners and obtaining necessary permits.

Adopted: June 19, 2019

2

6.

Manage the QA/QC process of all data collected from Monitoring Program. Prepare reports that document monitoring activities and data summaries, including key observations, trends, and pollutant loading of key water quality parameters. Coordinate with all respective agencies to communicate how to obtain and understand the data accessed on the Water Data Portal.

7.

Manage and coordinate contractors providing analysis and data for Monitoring Program.

These contractors will include, but are not limited to, water chemistry lab data, macroinvertebrate analysis, and lake water quality analysis and aquatic plant surveys.

8.

Manage all equipment associated with water monitoring program. This includes keeping track of equipment in inventory, organizing the calibration, maintenance, and repair of all equipment, and ordering equipment throughout the year.

9.

Manage all equipment associated with the safety program. This includes ordering, organizing, and scheduling calibrations/repairs/annual maintenance for all necessary safety items

ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS 1.

Proficient in the use of word processing, spreadsheet, and database management software (such as Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint, etc.) to produce correspondence, reports, forms, and technical information.

2.

Compose letters, memoranda, reports, and other written communications. Assist staff with surveys and collects/researches data for special projects.

3.

Keep staff informed of meetings, events, and deadlines by disseminating written and verbal information in a timely manner.

4.

Attend and participate in staff meetings to keep abreast of staff activities and to share information with them so that work efforts can be coordinated when necessary.

5.

Perform other duties as needed or required.

(The examples given above are intended only as illustrations of various types of work performed and are not necessarily all-inclusive. This position description is subject to change as the needs of the employer and requirements of the position change.)

SALARY $46,400 - $69,600 depending on qualifications and experience, plus benefits.

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

Adopted: June 19, 2019

3

Bachelor of Science degree, or equivalent in the field of Limnology, Water Resources, Earth Science, Water Resource management or related field. Experience with stream hydrology and water quality monitoring and chemistry are essential. Four years professional experience is preferred. Good communication and computer skills are required.

KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS and ABILITIES 1.

Required Qualifications.

Experienced and proficient in conducting in-stream flow measurements and developing stage discharge relationship. Proficient with Global Water, ISCO, Hobo, and In-Situ automated data loggers and automated water quality samplers. Experienced with storing, summarizing and analyzing data, specifically water quantity and water quality data.

Experienced in preparing technical reports and papers related to water monitoring reports and/or summaries of flow data. Experience with water quality lab analysis, lab methods, QA/QC procedures.

2.

Minimum Software Experience Proficiency with a personal computer (PC) and Microsoft software packages for word processing, spreadsheet, database management and computer generated graphics.

Proficient in the use of the Kisters WISKI water data management software. Proficient in the use of Microsoft Office, Excel, Word, Access, PowerPoint. Proficient in the use of email and internet and other common applications.

3.

Desired Software Experience.

Experience using work specific software including: WISKI, Win-Situ 5, Flowlink 5.1, Global Logger II, ArcView and GPS software.

4.

Field Work and Equipment Fabrication.

Lifting/physical labor and general building skills will be required. The field work component of this position is significant and includes, but is not limited to, the following: Installing steel enclosures, hand trenching for cable chases, post hole digging and setting 4”x4”x10’ posts, building rain gauge platforms, fabricating PVC enclosures, and anchoring cables/probes into storm sewers. Working outside in a variety of weather conditions and terrain is required. Regular confined space entry required for this position.

5.

General Skills and Abilities Ability to take direction, work independently with a minimum of supervision, use good time management practices, possess the ability to set priorities and balance large volumes of diverse work.

Ability to develop and maintain effective working relationships with, CRWD Board of Managers, Citizens Advisory Committee, Ramsey Conservation District staff, Ramsey County staff, City and agency staff, members of the public, and other interested parties.

Adopted: June 19, 2019

4

Ability to effectively communicate orally and in written form. Ability and skill with analysis, planning, and implementation of monitoring programs and solutions. Ability to research and prepare detailed reports and analyses.

Must have valid Minnesota drivers license and have vehicle available for periodic business use on a mileage reimbursement basis. The vehicle must have insurance approved by the District.

SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES None, unless otherwise assigned. Direct the daily work of monitoring technicians.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC CONTACT High level of public contact requiring tact, courtesy and good judgment.

EMPLOYMENT CLASSIFICATION Salaried, exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY The Capitol Region Watershed District will not discriminate against or harass any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance.

The Capitol Region Watershed District embraces and values diversity and seeks to recruit, promote and retain employees that reflect the community we serve. We believe that a diverse mix of employees enrich the workplace and enhance the quality of our service. The Capitol Region Watershed District encourages all qualified to apply for open positions.

Adopted: June 19, 2019

5

WATER MONITORING COORDINATOR PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND JOB DESCRIPTION SUPPLEMENT WORK ENVIRONMENT 1.)

Normal shift = eight (8) hours for five (5) consecutive days. Occasional evening meetings required.

2.)

Work location varies from controlled indoor environment to working outdoors.

3.)

Stress level varies from low to very high.

PHYSICAL DEMANDS Type of Activity Walking/standing:

Frequency M/S

Sitting:

M

Standing in One Place:

M

Climbing:

O

Pulling/Pushing:

M/S

Crawling/Kneeling/Squatting:

M/S

Bending/Stooping:

M/S

Twisting/Turning:

M/S

Repetitive movement:

M/S

Lifting waist to shoulder:

M/S

Lifting knee to waist:

M/S M/S

Lifting floor to knee: S = Significant

M = Moderate

O= Occasional

Y:\Wein\Mont Coor Position\Monitoring Coordinator Position Description 6-19-2019.doc

June 19, 2019 V. Action Items F) Approve City of St. Paul Surface Water Management Plan (Kelley)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

June 12, 2019 CRWD Board of Managers Forrest Kelley, Regulatory Division Manager City of St. Paul Surface Water Management Plan

Background Cities within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area are required to complete a surface water management plan (SWMP) to identify how water resources will be protected and improved. City SWMPs must be consistent with the watershed management plans of the Districts within their boundaries. CRWD staff reviewed and provided comment on the St. Paul’s draft plan on November 6, 2017. The comments identified items necessary to be addressed prior to approval by the CRWD Board. A revised plan and response to comments was provided on June 12, 2018.

Issues Local Surface Water Management plans must identify local controls consistent with the plans and regulations of watershed districts. The City has been working through a process to update the stormwater requirements within Chapter 52 of the municipal code. St. Paul’s new proposed ordinance adopts a Stormwater Management Design Standards document that directly references CRWD and RWMWD’s Rule C Stormwater Rules.

One item not included in the ordinance revision that is discussed within CRWD’s 2010 Watershed Management Plan (WMP) within the issues section of the WMP is Goal 16.1c Work with District partners to achieve volume reduction on small sites (disturbing less than one acre) through District Rules or municipal ordinances. There are no related implementation initiatives in the WMP. Staff propose to address this within the 2020 WMP and determine how to ensure this long-standing goal will be consistently achieved within St. Paul.

Staff reviewed the revised plan and response to comments and find the SWMP to be generally consistent with CRWD’s WMP and recommend the Board approve the Plan.

Requested Action Approve City of St. Paul’s Local Surface Water Management Plan. enc:

City of St. Paul Response to CRWD Comments (electronic only) St. Paul Surface Water Management Plan, Agency Comment Draft-June, 2018 (electronic only) Draft Proposed Chapter 52 Ordinance Language (electronic only) Draft Proposed St. Paul Stormwater Management Design Standards (electronic only)

W:\08 Orgs-Cities-Agencies\St. Paul\2017 Local Surface Water Management Plan\2019 drafts\Brd Memo Approve St. Paul SWMP.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

701 Xenia Avenue South | Suite 300 | Minneapolis, MN 55416 | (763) 541-4800

Memorandum To:

Capitol Region Watershed District Attn: Mark Doneux

From:

Stephanie Hatten, WSB & Associates

Date:

June 12, 2018

Re:

City of St. Paul SWMP Comment Responses WSB Project No. 1610-150

Section 1.1 Comment: The surface water drainage explanation is inaccurate and provides an incomplete list of water resources. Either move this discussion, or revise for accuracy.

Response: Discussion of drainage was removed. Drainage is discussed on Section 2.5 and 2.8.

Section 2 Comment: The requirements of this section is to describe the existing and proposed physical environment and land uses. CRWD suggests removing subsections pertaining to NPDES permits, City ordinance or policy, water resource issues, or other discussion not solely focused on specific land and water resources.

Response: The NPDES and City ordinance sections have been moved to Section 3 in relation to agency coordination. The subsection relating to water resource issues has been deleted.

Section 2.6.1 Comment: Table 2-3 identifies two wetlands that “each watershed is responsible for” and identifies Willow Reserve as a wetland managed by CRWD. This is an inaccurate representation of the multiple layers of ownership, management, and regulation surrounding one specific wetland in CRWD. Response: The wetland section has been revised to incorporate a general overview of the management of wetlands within St. Paul.

Section 2.6.1 Comment: This section should provide a comprehensive inventory of the existing wetlands within the city regardless of ownership or management practices.

Response: The wetland section has been revised to incorporate a general overview of the management of wetlands within St. Paul. The existing Wetland Management Plan is now referenced to provide an inventory of the existing wetlands.

Section 4 Comment: CRWD recommends removing corrective actions from this section and shift focus to identification of water quality issues. Specific actions to address water quality issues should be included in the implementation program section.

Response: The City will consider moving the corrective actions to the implementation section.

Section 5 Comment: It is unclear how the policies identified within this section will be implemented, where the specific technical requirements are stated in code or ordinance, and what internal procedures may need to be modified to ensure these policies are enforced. To ensure consistent stormwater management within the City, policies throughout this section should be revised to reduce ambiguity by replacing terms such as “encourage”, “preferred strategy” or “seek opportunity” in favor of more definitive language.

Building a legacy – your legacy.

Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com K:\01610-150\Admin\Docs\LSWMP2016\Agency Comments\CRWD Comment Response.docx

Capitol Region Watershed District June 12, 2018 Page 2 Response: Section 5 has been reviewed and updated for more definitive language as appropriate. The City is currently in the process of reissuing their MS4 permit. This is anticipated to be completed by July 2018. Within 18 months of this reissuance date, the City will develop Design Guidelines document consistent with the SWMP, outlining specific technical requirements for stormwater management, erosion control, etc. The City will revise and adopt updated ordinances that reference the Design Guidelines document to ensure policies are enforced. The City will consult with CRWD as these ordinances are updated to ensure consistency.

Section 5.2.2 Comment: References are made to updating policies to ensure rate control is met. Provide a detailed process and schedule to review existing rate control issues, standards, and potential revisions.

Response: See response for Section 5 Comment above.

Section 5.2.2 Comment: Item 9 - Provide clarification on when easements would be obtained for stormwater management features, specifically public vs. private ownership.

Response: Clarification has been provided stating that easements will be requirements over private stormwater management features.

Section 5.2.3 Comment: Where design storm frequencies are included, the intent to use Atlas 14 should be clearly stated and use of TP-40 should be eliminated.

Response: It has been specified to use Atlas 14 when design storm frequencies are mentioned.

Section 5.2.4 Comment: The volume control policy is generally consistent with CRWD Rules, but it is unclear where this is stated in City requirements. The Chapter 52 language provided within the appendix is not the currently adopted ordinance language. Other language within the plan indicates Chapter 52 will be updated, but a specific timelines or process is not provided. CRWD suggests continuing the comprehensive review of stormwater related City ordinances conducted in 2015, and expanding that review to internal processes for interdepartmental code enforcement in partnership with CRWD, RWMWD, MWMO, and LMRWMO. Response: See response for Section 5 Comment above. Within the 18 month adoption process, the City will coordinate with the watersheds for consistency in the ordinance update.

Section 5.3.2 Comment: Provide clarification on the intent of identifying lake classification systems developed by watershed organizations. No discussion is provided to determine if these are to be considered adopted polices incorporated by reference.

Response: The policy was revised to state that the City adopts the lake classification systems by reference.

Table 5-1 Comment: This is an incomplete list of sites and does not fully describe the extent of monitoring conducted within St. Paul. CRWD suggests expanding the scope of the table to include monitoring conducted by St. Paul personnel. Placement within the appropriate section of the plan should be reviewed as well.

Response: Table 5-1 has been updated and moved to Section 2.6.2. Section 2.6.2 has also been expanded to include additional information and links pertaining to monitoring.

Section 5.3.2 Comment: Part 18 – Provide specific local controls that identify how impervious surface reduction will be encouraged.

Response: See response for Section 5 Comment above. This will be addressed in the adoption of the development of the Design Guidelines document.

K:\01610-150\Admin\Docs\LSWMP2016\Agency Comments\CRWD Comment Response.docx

Capitol Region Watershed District June 12, 2018 Page 3 Section 5.3.2 Comment: Part 19 – Provide specific local control that identify how Low Impact Development design concepts will be promoted.

Response: See response for Section 5 Comment above. This will be addressed in the adoption of the development of the Design Guidelines document.

Section 5.3.2 Comment: Part 20 – Clarify the status of current stormwater ordinance, plans to review and adopt revisions, and the specific language that establishes the standards.

Response: See response for Section 5 Comment above. This will be addressed in the adoption of the development of the Design Guidelines document.

Section 5.4.2 Comment: Parts 5-7 – Provide a process and schedule for implementation and review of updates to the referenced Wetland Management Plan. If a current Wetland Management plan exists, it should be included in the appendix.

Response: The current Wetland Management Plan is now included in Appendix D. The City is not anticipating updating this plan as there are limited wetlands within the City and the City is fully developed.

The City still requires developers to perform wetland delineations on a site by site basis.

Section 5.11.1 Comment: As stated in this section’s goal, Shared Stacked Green Infrastructure (SSGI) practices have the potential to provide multiple benefits far beyond water quality alone. Recent and past attempts to implement SSGI have proven difficult without experiencing major road blocks stemming from institutional uncertainty regarding process. In order to move SSGI projects forward, a process must be clearly laid out, conflicting codes identified, and revised, and departmental roles and responsibilities defined.

Response: See response for Section 5 Comment above. This will be addressed in the adoption of the development of the Design Guidelines document.

Section 6 Comment: A greater level of specificity on the projects listed in Table 6.1 is required. This will improve the City’s position in terms of eligibility for future and local, state, and federal grants. Specifically, each action in the implementation plan needs to have a schedule, estimated cost, and funding source identified as accurately as possible.

Response: Table 6.1 is intended to be an evolving document that the City will revisit and revise regularly.

Once specific projects are identified each year, the City will update the Table to include each item with cost, schedule, and funding source.

K:\01610-150\Admin\Docs\LSWMP2016\Agency Comments\CRWD Comment Response.docx

LOCAL SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

FOR THE CITY OF ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA

DRAFT ADDRESSING AGENCY COMMENTS June 2018

Prepared By: WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 763-541-4800 763-541-1700 (Fax)

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Table of Contents SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION 2. LAND AND WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY SECTION 3. AGENCY COOPERATION SECTION 4. ASSESSMENT OF ISSUES SECTION 5. GOALS AND POLICIES SECTION 6. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Figures APPENDIX B. TMDLs APPENDIX C. City Codes and Ordinances APPENDIX D. Wetland Management Plan

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Table of Contents

List of Acronyms BMP CRWD LGU LMRWMO LSWMP BWSR EPA FEMA FIS FIRM LOMA LOMR MCBS MDH MGD MGS MNDNR MNDOT MNRRA MPCA MRCCA MS4 MWMO NOAA NPDES NRCS NWI PCB RFC RWMWD SONAR SPRWS SSGI SWPPP TCMA TMDL TOD TP TSS USDA WCA WD WMO

Best Management Practices Capitol Region Watershed District Local Government Unit Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization Local Surface Water Management Plan Board of Water and Soil Resources U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study Flood Insurance Rate Map Letter of Map Amendment Letter of Map Revision Minnesota County Biological Survey Minnesota Department of Health Million gallons per day Minnesota Geological Survey Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Transportation Mississippi Natural River and Recreation Area Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Mississippi Watershed Management Organization National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Natural Resources Conservation Service National Wetland Inventory Polychlorinated Biphenyls Request For Comments Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Statement of Need and Reasonableness St. Paul Regional Water Service Shared Stacked Green Infrastructure Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Total Maximum Daily Load Transit Oriented Development Total Phosphorus Total Suspended Solids United States Department of Agriculture Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 Watershed District Watershed Management Organization

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

List of Acronyms

SECTION 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1. Background This report provides the City of St. Paul with a Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) that serves as a guide to managing the City’s surface water system, and brings the City into compliance with Minnesota Statutes. This plan is an update to the 2006 LSWMP. The plan will guide stormwater activities in the City for the next 10 years (2018-2027). If significant changes to the plan are deemed necessary prior to that date, the City may revise this plan in its entirety.

The City of St. Paul (population 294,870) is located in Ramsey County in the seven county Twin Cities metropolitan area (Figure A1, Appendix A). The City covers over 56 square miles. All surface water eventually discharges into the Mississippi River. Few natural wetlands remain because of their removal and alteration from urbanization and development over the past century.

1.2. Local Surface Water Management Plan Purposes The City of St. Paul’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) is a local management plan that meets the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 103B.235, Minnesota Rules 8410 and Minnesota Statute 103B.201. St. Paul’s LSWMP addresses the purposes of water management programs as listed by Minnesota Statute 103B.201: •

Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems;

•

Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems;

•

Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality;

•

Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management;

•

Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems;

•

Promote groundwater recharge;

•

Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and

•

Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater.

1.3. Surface Water Management Responsibilities and Related Agreements In addition to being in conformance with the above state law, this LSWMP has been developed to meet the needs, requirements, and direction outlined by the watershed districts (WDs) and watershed management organizations (WMOs) whose rules and regulations apply to the City of St. Paul. Figure A2 in Appendix A illustrates the Watershed Management Organization Boundaries in St. Paul.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 1 Page-1

SECTION 1 •

Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) Plan

•

Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) Plan

•

Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization (LMRWMO) Plan

•

Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) Plan

This LSWMP also incorporates the following regulations from the State level:

•

State Laws and Rules concerning wetland management as outlined in the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 and amendments

•

State and Federal laws regarding the need to secure a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharge permit

The City has entered into water resource-related agreements that govern in part how the City must manage its water resources. These agreements include joint powers agreements between the City and Watershed Management Organizations having jurisdiction within its boundaries, agreements between the City and adjoining communities, or agreements it may have with other governmental units or private parties. Listed below is a description of the water resource related agreements which the City has entered into.

Cities of Inver Grove Heights, Lilydale, St. Paul, Mendota Heights, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, and West St. Paul •

Joint powers agreement for the establishment of the Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization to provide an organization to preserve and use the natural water storage and retention of the Lower Mississippi River Watershed, 1985. This was updated in 2003.

Cities of Columbia Heights, Fridley, Hilltop, Lauderdale, Minneapolis, St. Anthony Village, St. Paul and Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board •

Joint Powers Agreement for the establishment of the Middle Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization, 1985.

•

Amended Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the establishment of the Middle Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization, 1997.

•

Restated Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the establishment of the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization, 2002.

•

Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization, 2012

1.4. Executive Summary Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 1 Page-2

SECTION 1 The St. Paul Local Surface Water Management Plan is divided into six sections: •

Section 1.0 Executive Summary provides background information and summarizes the plan contents.

•

Section 2.0 Land and Water Resource Inventory presents information about the topography, geology, groundwater, soils, land use, public utilities, surface waters, hydrologic system and data, and the drainage system.

•

Section 3.0 Agency Cooperation outlines other governmental controls and programs that affect stormwater management.

•

Section 4.0 Assessment of Problems and Issues presents the City's water management related problems and issues.

•

Section 5.0 Goals and Policies outlines the City's goals and policies pertaining to water management.

•

Section 6.0 Implementation Program presents the implementation program for the City of St. Paul, which includes defining responsibilities, prioritizing, and listing the program elements. Table 6-1 outlines the projects, programs, studies, and Stormwater Management Program activities that have been identified as a priority to address water resource needs and problem areas within the City.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 1 Page-3

SECTION 2 2. LAND AND WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY 2.1.

Topography and Geology 2.1.1. Topography The topography of the City of St. Paul varies from steep river bluffs along the Mississippi River to moderately or gently rolling land north and south of the river. Stormwater runoff from the City is generally directed from higher elevations to depression areas. A majority of stormwater runoff drains to the Mississippi River either directly via storm sewer systems, or indirectly due to the topography.

The majority of St. Paul is urban with an elevation of 900 feet above sea level, approximately 200 feet above the Mississippi River. The area north of the bluff is relatively flat. The area south of the bluff gradually increases in elevation. The highest elevation within the City of St. Paul is 1,070 feet above sea level at Hillcrest Golf Course. The lowest elevation is 687 feet above sea level in the Mississippi River floodplain.

The City’s hydrologic system is divided into many major watersheds. Drainage areas, which depict the topography for areas within the city, are shown in Figure A3. The City resides within four WDs and WMOs, which are described in Section 1.3.

2.1.2. Geology The City of St. Paul is located in southern Ramsey County. Information regarding the City’s surficial and bedrock geology and aquifers was obtained from the Ramsey County Geologic Atlas from the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) of 19921.

The geomorphology of the City in the uppermost geologic formation shows quaternary deposits that are more than 500 feet thick along some of the deeper valleys. Unconsolidated quaternary deposits of glacial and post glacial material conceal a majority of the bedrock within the City. All of the bedrock formations are marine sedimentary rocks of Early Paleozoic age when shallow seas covered southeastern Minnesota. Large-scale block faulting caused the formation of an elongated, northeast-trending basin beneath what eventually became the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area.

Six aquifers are located within the City boundaries: the St. Peter Aquifer, Prairie Du ChienJordan Aquifer, Franconia-Ironton-Galesville Aquifer, and the Mt. Simon Aquifer, which is the deepest high-yield aquifer available to Ramsey County.

2.2.

Climate and Precipitation 2.2.1. Climate The climate within the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area is described as a humid continental climate with moderate precipitation, wide daily temperature variations, warm humid summers and cold winters. Additional climatological information for the area can be obtained from the Minnesota State Climatology Office2.

Ramsey County Geologic Atlas, 1992. http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/programs/gw_section/mapping/platesum/ramscga.html 2 Minnesota Climatology Working Group. http://www.climate.umn.edu/ 1

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-1

SECTION 2 2.2.2. Precipitation The total average annual precipitation in this area is approximately 31 inches, of which nearly one-third occurs in the months of June, July, and August. The annual snowfall average is 54.4 inches, equivalent to about 5.4 inches of water. Average monthly temperature and precipitation are shown in Table 2-1.

The probability of a rainfall event occurring in the City of St. Paul in any given year is illustrated in Table 2-2. The recurrence interval is a measure of the probability of occurrence of the storm event. The rainfall data was obtained from the Atlas 14 website produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)3.

Table 2- 1. Average Temperature and Precipitation Data for the City of St. Paul

Month January February March April May June July August September October November December Totals

Average Temperature (F) 15.6 20.8 32.8 47.5 59.1 68.8 73.8 71.2 62.0 48.9 33.7 19.7 46.2

Precipitation Snowfall (in) (in) 0.90 0.77 1.89 2.66 3.36 4.25 4.04 4.30 3.08 2.43 1.77 1.16 30.61

12.20 7.70 10.30 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 9.30 11.90 54.40

State Climatology Office for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport, 1981-2010 Table 2- 2. Storm Events in St. Paul

Recurrence Interval (years) 2 10 100

2.3.

Soils

24-Hour Rainfall (inches) 2.49 4.19 7.42

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA

The soils in St. Paul were mapped in the United States Department of Agriculture’s Natural 3

NOAA’s National Weather Service. http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-2

SECTION 2 Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Soil Survey of Ramsey County (Figure A4), which was updated in 20154. The original soils of the St. Paul area are largely unknown because the majority of the City is covered with impervious surface or has been subject to cutand-fill activities. Onsite investigation is typically needed on a case-by-case basis to determine the soil type at a specific site.

Infiltration capacities of soils affect the amount of direct runoff resulting from rainfall; the higher the infiltration rate for a given soil, the lower the runoff potential. Conversely, soils with low infiltration rates produce high runoff volumes and high peak discharge rates. Figure A5 illustrates soil infiltration potential throughout the City. Since St. Paul is fully developed, limited land grading will occur within the City in the future.

In planning for infiltration projects the City will also need to consider other factors such as depth to bedrock, karst, groundwater, and contaminated soils.

2.4.

Land Use St. Paul is designated by the Metropolitan Council as a “developed community,” meaning that over 85 percent of the community is developed. Data patterns from 2016 show that developed land use is divided into the following percentages: 41% low density (single family) residential development, 5% medium-high density (multifamily and mixed use) residential, 6% commercial, 8% industrial, 7% institutional, 14% green and open space, 6% transportation including highways and rail, and 7% water. The remaining 4% is comprised of land that remains vacant.

Figure A6 illustrates existing land use, and Figure A7 depicts the expected future land uses by 2040 as indicated in the Land Use Section of the City of St. Paul’s Comprehensive Plan5.

St. Paul’s Land Use Plan indicates that growth will be targeted in unique neighborhoods by developing Neighborhood Centers, Corridors, the Central Corridor, and Downtown with the intention of creating communities where housing, employment, and other amenities are supported by transit and provide sufficiently for the needs of the people who live and work in them. In addition, land will be reclaimed and provided for employment centers or businesses that can provide living wage job.

Future land use projections are important in estimating surface water runoff. The impervious surface areas associated with each land use greatly affect the amount of runoff generated from an area. Current land use shows that approximately 43% of the City is impervious land cover.

Over 90% of the runoff in St. Paul goes directly to the Mississippi River through storm sewers and surface drainage; the rest flows through various lakes, which eventually lead to the Mississippi. Although the projected additional 52 acres of parks and green space by 2040 will increase pervious surface area and help treat runoff before draining into the river, total impervious area will also increase with development of new commercial industries, which will affect future runoff rates. The City incorporates land dedication fees as part of development to

NRCS Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov Land Use, Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan, 2010. https://www.stpaul.gov/sites/default/files/Media%20Root/Planning%20%26%20Economic%20Development/web %20Land%20Use%202-18-10.pdf 4 5

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-3

SECTION 2 implement additional green space. The City’s Comprehensive Plan provides additional detail on future land use and green space throughout the City. Figure A7 in Appendix A shows the City’s planned land use division by 2040; Section 2.6 discusses how these changes will affect surface water.

2.5.

Public Utilities St. Paul and the Metropolitan Council share the responsibility of collecting sanitary sewage. The City owns 806 miles of sanitary sewers and 24 sanitary sewage pumping stations. The Metropolitan Council treats 80 percent of the Twin Cities’ wastewater. The Metropolitan Plant is the largest in the State of Minnesota, serving 1.8 million users with a maximum capacity of 251 million gallons per day. As of 2015, about 75 residential properties in St. Paul were not served by sanitary sewers, due to reasons such as high bedrock and low density development that led to high costs for sewer construction. No negative impacts have been identified to any surficial groundwater from inadequate drain fields. The City will address any future impacts as needed.

Chapter 50 in the City’s Legal Code provides requirements for individual sewage treatment systems. The City’s Water Chapter in the Comprehensive Plan provides additional information on the co-managed utilities.

The City’s water system is owned by the City of St. Paul, operated by the Saint Paul Regional Water Service (SPRWS), and provides retail water to many cities and over 400,000 residents of the East Metro. The water processed by SPRWS comes from three primary sources, including the Mississippi River, Vadnais Lake Watershed, and wells. River water is pumped from the Fridley intake and flows into the Vadnais chain of lakes. From Vadnais Lake, water flows through conduits to be treated. Several wells that draw from the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer are connected to these conduits to provide sufficient flow when needed. For additional information regarding groundwater, see Section 2.7.

Storm sewers, ditches, curbs, and gutters provide drainage for the City. St. Paul operates over 450 miles of storm sewer pipes and tunnels. Future street maintenance and redevelopment will likely dictate the extension or reconstruction of the storm drainage system. The City inspects storm sewers on a ten-year cycle or prior to any street reconstruction activities to determine if replacement is required during the street project. Inspections conform to Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program and all inspectors (Contractors or In-house) are required to be certified.

Storm sewers are then prioritized for rehabilitation (CIPP Lining), replacement (during Street Projects), or repair (via Contract or In-house Dig up). Additional information can be found on the City’s website: https://www.stpaul.gov/departments/public-works/sewer-utility-divison/cleaningand-televising.

Mapping of stormwater utilities will be updated as improvements of the system are completed to stay in compliance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) requirements. Figure A8 depicts the City’s existing system of stormwater pipes.

RWMWD owns and manages the St. Paul Beltline Storm Sewer Interceptor, which drains a large portion of stormwater runoff from the east side of St. Paul. This interceptor conveys runoff from the entire Phalen Chain of Lakes subwatershed and the Beaver Lake subwatershed to the Mississippi River. Additional information on the St. Paul Beltline Interceptor and drainage areas can be found in RWMWD’s Watershed Management Plan.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-4

SECTION 2 2.6.

Surface Waters 2.6.1. Wetlands Wetlands provide several valuable functions and therefore, are important resources to a city.

Wetlands are a critical part of the natural storm drainage system, help maintain water quality, reduce flooding and erosion, provide food and habitat for wildlife, and provide open spaces and natural landscapes for residents. Wetlands allow for groundwater interactions, whether it is recharge or discharge. Additionally, wetlands provide aesthetic value, nature observation areas, and areas for education and scientific research. Because of the importance of wetlands and the role wetlands play within a community, they must be considered during development review and city-wide planning in order to balance protection of the wetlands and development and growth in the City. Since the City of St. Paul is fully developed, protecting and restoring the remaining wetlands and their functions is a high priority.

Figure A9 presents the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) for St Paul. The NWI map provides guidance on where wetlands occur in the City, though the NWI wetland boundaries cannot replace wetland delineations for determining legal wetland boundaries.

In 2008, the City completed a Wetland Management Plan (WMP) that assessed approximately 152 wetlands using the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (MnRAM).

The WMP provides an approach for the protection and management of wetlands within the City. The Plan also provides greater flexibility and control over wetland management and protection, identifies regional wetland mitigation sites, identifies potential wetland restoration areas, and provides management strategies for different types of wetlands. The current Wetland Management Plan can be found in Appendix D. The Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) dictates that Local Government Units (LGUs) are responsible for administering their rules. The City is the LGU responsible for administering the WCA. MnDOT is the LGU responsible for administering the WCA on its rights-of-way. The intent of the WCA is to promote no net loss of wetlands. The City can issue or deny permits depending on whether or not the project is in conformance with the WCA or the requirements of this Plan. The WCA exemptions are discussed in Minn. Rules 8420 and are included by reference to this Plan. The procedures for wetland impact application, sequencing, and replacement are outlined within the WCA. Regardless of the LGU, Minnesota’s statutory wetland protection standards mean uniform wetland protection throughout the City. Wetlands and lakes under MnDNR jurisdiction have an added level of protection.

Each watershed district has developed a watershed management plan that incorporates policies concerning wetland management within their boundaries. The MWMO and the LMWMO leave administration of the WCA as the responsibility of the cities as acting Local Government Units (LGUs). The CRWD and the RWMWD have additional wetland regulations that vary from the WCA and additional approvals are needed from these Watershed Districts for projects that impact wetlands. These rules concerning wetland management by the corresponding watershed district are available on each organization’s

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-5

SECTION 2 web site listed in Section 3 of this Plan. The goal of St. Paul’s WMP is to work in conjunction with these existing policies.

2.6.2. Water Quality Data The City will continue to support monitoring of surface waters and stormwater BMPs within its jurisdictional boundaries and outside these boundaries for waters to which the City discharges. Data will be obtained through cooperation and coordination with other various agencies, including the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, cities adjacent to St. Paul, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Capitol Region Watershed District, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District, Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization, Mississippi Watershed Management Organization, Ramsey County and Three Rivers Park District. The links below provide monitoring and water quality information for each organization. Table 2-3 provides a summary of monitoring locations for each watershed district.

• • • • •

•

Capitol Region Watershed District: http://www.capitolregionwd.org/ourwork/monitoring-and-mapping/ Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District: http://www.rwmwd.org/waterquality Mississippi Watershed Management Organization: https://www.mwmo.org/reports/water-quality-monitoring/ Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization: http://www.dakotaswcd.org/watersheds/lowermisswmo/monitor.html Metropolitan Council monitoring information, including the Citizen-Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP), can be found at: http://www.metrocouncil.org/Wastewater-Water/Services/Water-QualityManagement.aspx?source=child Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s Citizen Lake Monitoring Program (CLMP) information can be found at: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/clmp.html

Table 2- 3. Water Quality and BMP Monitoring Programs Operated by Entities Other Then the City of St. Paul WD or Monitoring Sites WMO CRWD6 • Lake Como • Loeb Lake • Phalen Creek • Crosby Lake • Little Crosby Lake • Hidden Falls • East Kittsondale • Trout Brook Outlet • Trout Brook – West Branch CRWD Water Quality and Flow Monitoring. http://www.capitolregionwd.org/our-work/monitoring-andmapping/flowmo/ 6

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-6

SECTION 2

LMRWMO7 MWMO8 RWMWD9

• • • • • • • • •

Sarita Outlet St. Anthony Park Arlington Pascal Stormwater Improvement BMPs CCLRT BMP Project Area Monitors DNR public waters within its boundaries Monitors select storm sewers and streams that outlet to the Mississippi River Kasota Ponds Wetlands Mississippi River mercury TMDL Monitors DNR public waters within its boundaries including Beaver Lake and Lake Phalen,

Water quality data for the City is available from the MPCA’s Environmental Data Access site. This data provides a snapshot of overall water quality and health of local waterbodies and can be accessed here https://www.pca.state.mn.us/environmental-data . The database is utilized by participating agencies to compile water quality testing data and is almost entirely used for the storage of water quality parameters.

Refer to Figure A10 for a map of water quality monitoring locations by the MPCA and various other organizations.

The City performs yearly monitoring for water quality and quantity. The focus of the City’s stormwater monitoring program has been to monitor the effectiveness and maintenance needs of stormwater BMPs. Outfall monitoring data, collected by Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD), is used to evaluate pollutant loading from major subwatersheds, and to estimate City-wide pollutant loading from the MS4. The most recent yearly report can be found on the City’ Website.

2.6.3. Impaired Waters The MPCA lists the following water bodies (Table 2.4) located within or near the City as being impaired, meaning that the waters are too polluted or otherwise degraded to meet the water quality standards set by governing bodies. A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study is undertaken to determine the amount of pollutant that is currently entering the water, and the maximum amount that can be present in the water while meeting water quality standards.

Table 2.4 – Impaired Waters Waterbody/Watercourse

Year Added to

Affected Use

Pollutant/Stressor

TMDL Status

LMRWMO Watershed Management Plan, 2015 http://www.dakotaswcd.org/watersheds/lowermisswmo/pdfs/2011%20Lower_Mississippi_River_WMO_adopted_p lan_2015amend.pdf 8 MWMOP Annual Monitoring Report, 2015. http://cdn.mwmo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/AnnualMonitoring-Report-2015-Final.pdf 7

9

RWMWD Water Quality Monitoring. http://www.rwmwd.org/WaterQuality/link.htm

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-7

SECTION 2

Mississippi River (07010206-814) Mississippi River (07010206-814)

Impaired List 1998 2008 2014

Aquatic Consumption Aquatic Consumption

Mississippi River (07010206-814) Mississippi River (07010206-814) Mississippi River (07010206-814)

2016

Aquatic Life

1994

Aquatic Recreation Aquatic Consumption

Fecal coliform

Not complete

Mercury in fish tissue

**Battle Creek (07010206-592)

2017

Aquatic Life

**Battle Creek (07010206-592)

2008

Aquatic Life

Aquatic macroinvertebrate bioassessments, fishes bioassessments Chloride

Completed in 2007: State-wide Mercury Reduction Plan Completed in 2017: RWMWD WRAPS

Como Lake (62-0055-00)

1998

Aquatic Consumption

Mercury in fish tissue

Como Lake (62-0055-00)

2014

Aquatic Life

Chloride

Como Lake (62-0055-00) *Beaver Lake (62-0016-00)

2002

Aquatic Recreation Aquatic Consumption

Excess nutrients

**Phalen Lake (62-0013-00)

2012

Aquatic Consumption

Mercury in fish tissue

Pickeral Lake (19-0079-00)

2002

Aquatic Consumption

Mercury in fish tissue

1998

2008

PCB in fish tissue

Not complete

PFOS in fish tissue and in water column Excess nutrients

Not complete

Mercury in fish tissue

Not complete

Completed in 2016: TCMA Chloride Management Plan Completed in 2008: State-wide Mercury Reduction Plan Completed in 2016: TCMA Chloride Management Plan Completed in 2010: Como Lake TMDL Completed in 2008: State-wide Mercury Reduction Plan Completed in 2013: State-wide Mercury Reduction Plan Completed in 2010: State-wide Mercury Reduction Plan Completed in 2017: RWMWD WRAPS Completed in 2017: RWMWD WRAPS Completed in 2008: State-wide Mercury Reduction Plan Not complete

Wakefield Lake 2002 Aquatic Excess nutrients (62-0011-00) Recreation Fish Creek 2014 Aquatic Fecal coliform (07010206-592) Recreation Unnamed Lake (Eagle 2008 Aquatic Mercury in fish Lake) Consumption tissue (62-0237) Unnamed Lake (Eagle 1998 Aquatic PCB in fish tissue Lake) Consumption (62-0237) *Beaver Lake was originally listed as impaired for excess nutrients. It was delisted in 2014. ** Met Council Priority Lakes

Approved TMDL Report Summaries

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-8

SECTION 2 •

State-wide Mercury Reduction Plan - Approximately two-thirds of the water impairments on Minnesota’s Impaired Waters List are due to mercury. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved Minnesota's Statewide Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load study in March 2007. The TMDL study includes data collection and assessments and the development of a pollution reduction plan and implementation strategies. Every two years, the MPCA updates information in the approved statewide mercury TMDL by adding any new impaired waters or those that have been delisted.

This plan can be located online here: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/statewidemercury-reduction-plan

•

Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District WRAPS – In 2017, RamseyWashington Metro Watershed District completed watershed-wide TMDL and WRAPS reports. The approved TMDL addresses nutrient impairments, bacteria impairments, and biotic impairments for lakes, streams and wetlands. Impaired waterbodies within the City of St. Paul that are addressed in this report include Fish Creek, Battle Creek, and Wakefield Lake. This plan can be located online here: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/tmdl/ramsey-washington-metro-watershed-districtwatershed-restoration-and-protection-strategy Wakefield Lake was designated a wasteload allocation for total phosphorus of 93.1 lbs/year with an overall percent reduction of 43%. This allocation is to be split among the 3 MS4s within the drainage area: St. Paul, Maplewood, and North St. Paul. The City of Maplewood contains the majority of land that drains to Wakefield Lake.

Battle Creek and Fish Creek were designated percent reductions for TSS and fecal coliform based on flow zones for MS4 communities located within the drainage areas.

The City of St. Paul is within about half of the drainage area in the Battle Creek subwatershed and a very small portion of the drainage area in the Fish Creek subwatershed.

•

Como Lake TMDL – The TMDL for Como Lake was approved in 2010. The City of St. Paul contains a majority of the land that drains to the lake. A load allocation for total phosphorus was designated to all MS4s within the Como Lake drainage area. This TP load allocation is 248.92 lbs/year. This plan can be located online here: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/tmdl/como-lake-excess-nutrients-tmdl-project

•

Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) Chloride Management Plan – The MPCA approved the TCMA Chloride Management Plan in 2016. This plan is intended to discuss the impacts of chloride on water quality, set performance based goals, and provide implementation strategies to communities to reduce salt runoff and usage. This plan can be located here: https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Chloride_Management_Plan

The locations of these impaired water bodies are shown on the water resource problem areas map, Figure A10. Appendix B includes the approved TMDL plans for Como Lake and RWMWD WRAPS. All other plans can be found online at the links listed above.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-9

SECTION 2 2.6.4. Appropriations from Small Watercourses The City is responsible for administering appropriations from small watercourses for those areas within MWMO boundaries. These include a public water basin or wetland that is less than 500 acres or a protected watercourse that has a drainage of less than 50 square miles (Minnesota Statute 103B.211 Subd. 4). The City will choose to defer to the watersheds in administering this policy.

2.7.

Groundwater The various agencies responsible for groundwater management and protection are summarized below: The DNR regulates groundwater usage rate and volume as part of its charge to conserve and use the waters of the state. Suppliers of domestic water to more than 25 people or applicants proposing a use that exceeds 10,000 gallons per day or 1,000,000 gallons per year must obtain a water appropriation permit from the DNR. Many of the agencies charged with regulating water usage are currently involved in assessing and addressing concerns of water usage.

The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) is the official state agency responsible for addressing all environmental health matters, including groundwater protection. For example, the MDH administers the Well Abandonment Program, and, along with the MNDNR, regulates installation of new wells.

The MPCA administers and enforces laws relating to pollution of the state's waters, including groundwater. The Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) provides a complete account of the state's groundwater resources.

Ramsey County developed a Groundwater Quality Protection Plan in 1992 that coordinates groundwater planning and provides non-regulatory recommendations for protection techniques for each municipality, and the identification of abandoned wells in St. Paul that might need to be sealed as required by MDH rules. The plan received approval from the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) in 1995. In 2016, county staff have been exploring the possibility of updating the 1995 Plan to address recent developments and opportunities in groundwater management. The City of St. Paul will coordinate with Ramsey County to implement goals and policies from the approved groundwater plan.

While very few people in the City of St. Paul still use well water for their drinking water, there are numerous abandoned wells in the area that should be sealed, as they are direct routes for groundwater contamination. There are currently six wells on reserve that provide an alternate source to the surface water supply from the Mississippi River, with a capacity of 26 million gallons per day (MGD). All wells draw from the Jordan aquifer. The City currently does not have a wellhead protection plan in place.

St. Paul has implemented a Source Water Protection Plan that meets the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act. This plan provides a means of reducing the risk of contamination of drinking water supplies by managing the potential sources of contamination within the area that supplies water to a public well or surface water intake. The plan also outlines Priority Areas and associated DWSMA locations to manage potential sources of contamination. A copy of the Plan can be requested from the St. Paul Public Works.

Potable water within the City and neighboring communities is provided by the Saint Paul

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-10

SECTION 2 Regional Water Services (SPRWS). SPRWS functions as an external entity, as their service area extends well beyond St. Paul. Additional. Additional information can be found in the City’s Water Supply Plan. The City’s existing water supply system meets the primary contaminant standards as set forth by regulating bodies listed above.

2.8.

Hydrologic System and Data The City’s hydrologic/hydraulic system consists of ponds, wetlands, and storm sewer pipe systems within multiple subwatersheds that drain towards the Mississippi. The City is divided into approximately 23 subwatershed areas. Modeling projects have been completed in support of the sewer and street projects.

In 2010, the City completed the first phase of a program that includes stormwater modeling, a citywide volume reduction inventory and plan to address stormwater on the 2010 Residential Street Reconstruction Program. The modeling includes the development of an XPSWMM and P8 modeling and uses the CRWD monitoring data for calibration. Three major subwatersheds, as well as the 2010 street reconstruction subwatersheds, were modeled. In 2011, the City began modeling as a component of the storm tunnel rehabilitation program. The Saint Anthony Park and Davern subwatersheds have been modeled. In 2012, the City began modeling the Phalen Creek storm sewer interceptor. These models will be used by the City in the development of future stormwater programs and projects. A map of the Citywide modeling areas is located in Appendix E.

The peak runoff rates and volume from most subwatersheds in the City of St. Paul are not expected to change significantly due to future development. Stormwater runoff rate and volume controls will be required to be in conformance with City, Watershed, and State requirements. Modeling results and other studies regarding water quantity can be obtained from the St. Paul Public Works Department.

With the additional precipitation data provided by Atlas 14, dependent upon funding, the City may choose to complete additional risk assessments by updating their current H & H models.

This will allow them to identify any potential flooding areas not listed in Section 4 of the plan.

2.9.

Natural Communities and Rare Species The Minnesota DNR produces the Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) identifying natural communities and rare species. Completed in 1994, the Ramsey County survey identifies where evidence indicates the presence of federally or state listed plants. The survey shows rare plants and animals are present throughout St. Paul. Figure A11 provides a map of these areas.

The DNR has jurisdiction over these areas. Based on state statute, any work within these areas is required to meet DNR permit requirements. The watershed districts have also identified natural communities and rare species, which can be found in their Watershed Management Plans.

2.10. Flood Insurance Studies/Floodplain Management In an effort to control flooding from the Mississippi River, the City of St. Paul has worked with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other State agencies to construct permanent levees and headwalls. The City has also looked to maintain open space in flood prone areas. As part of this, the City administers floodplain and levee applications for developments along these areas.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-11

SECTION 2 FEMA completed the map modernization process for its Flood Insurance Study (FIS)10 and Flood Insurance Rate Maps11 (FIRMs) to identify flood risk within Ramsey County in 2010. Any Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) can be located on the mapping function of FEMA’s website11.

Figure A12 illustrates the floodplain for the City of St. Paul.

2.11. Mississippi River Critical Corridor The Minnesota State Legislature enacted the Critical Areas Act in 1973 and an executive order (79-19) was signed in 1976 declaring the Mississippi River corridor a Critical Area (MRCCA).

The executive order states the following purposes for the Critical Area designation: •

To protect and preserve a unique and valuable state and regional resource for the benefit of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens for the state, region, and nation;

•

To prevent and mitigate irreversible damage to this state, regional and national resource;

•

To preserve and enhance its natural, aesthetic, cultural, and historical value for the public use;

•

To protect and preserve the river as an essential element in the national, state and regional transportation, sewer and water and recreational systems; and

•

To protect and preserve the biological and ecological functions of the corridor.

The MRCCA includes 72 miles of the river, extending from the Cities of Dayton and Ramsey to just south of the City of Hastings. The boundary of the MRCCA can generally be described as from the river bluff down to the river, with the corridor width varying.

In 1976, four corridor districts were established, corresponding to the following different types of land use along the Mississippi River: rural open space district, urban developed district, urban open space district, and urban diversified district. Each district has its own set of guidelines. The Critical Area Act requires that each city having jurisdiction over land within the Critical Area develop a Critical Area Plan. Executive Order 79-19 includes the rules and guidelines that each city must incorporate in its Critical Area Plan.

In 1988, the U.S. Congress designated the Mississippi River corridor as the Mississippi Natural River and Recreation Area (MNRRA), a unit of the National Park System. The boundaries of the MNRRA corridor are the same as the Critical Area corridor. The Mississippi River Coordinating Commission and the National Park Service adopted the MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan in 1995.

The City’s current Critical Area Plan is located on the City’s website here: https://www.stpaul.gov/departments/planning-economic-development/planning/current-activities.

FEMA Flood Insurance Study, 2016. ftp://ftp.dnr.state.mn.us/pub/waters/floodplain/County_data/Ramsey/Ramsey%20County%20MN%20Final%20FIS/ 27123CV000A.pdf 11 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. https://msc.fema.gov 10

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-12

SECTION 2 The City will review and update the Plan to address the new rules released by the DNR. This item was added to Table 6-1 to be completed in 2019.

Additional information can be found on the DNR website. http://dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/critical_area/index.html The City of St. Paul’s MRCCA Rulemaking Districts are shown in Figure A13.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 2 Page-13

SECTION 3 3. AGENCY COOPERATION There are a number of local, State, and Federal agencies that have rules and regulations related to local water management. The City recognizes the roles of these other agencies and will cooperate, coordinate, and when possible, partner with these agencies.

This Plan is in conformance with, but does not restate, all other agency rules that are applicable to water resource management. The following agencies deal with or regulate water resources throughout the City: ●

Minnesota Department of Health www.health.state.mn.us

●

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency www.pca.state.mn.us and the Minnesota Stormwater Manual www.pca.state.mn.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-manual.html

●

Board of Water and Soil Resources www.bwsr.state.mn.us and the Wetland Conservation Act www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/index.html

●

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources www.dnr.state.mn.us

●

US Army Corps of Engineers www.mvp.usace.army.mi

●

Minnesota Department of Agriculture www.mda.state.mn.us

●

US Fish and Wildlife Service www.fws.gov

●

Ramsey County https://www.ramseycounty.us/

●

Ramsey County Public Health https://www.ramseycounty.us/yourgovernment/departments/health-and-wellness/public-health

●

Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization http://www.dakotaswcd.org/watersheds/lowermisswmo/

●

Capitol Region Watershed District http://www.capitolregionwd.org/

●

Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District http://www.rwmwd.org/

●

Mississippi Watershed Management Organization http://mwmo.org/

●

Minnesota Environmental Quality Board www.eqb.state.mn.us

●

Metropolitan Council www.metrocouncil.org

●

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) https://www.fema.gov/

●

Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) http://www.dot.state.mn.us/

3.1. NPDES Permitting Process

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 3 Page-1

SECTION 3 The City of St. Paul is required to have a MS4 permit through the MPCA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase I Program. MS4s, designated by rule, are urban areas with populations over 100,000.

As a MS4, the City will be required to implement the following eight minimum control measures: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Public Education and Outreach Public Participation/Involvement Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Post-Construction Stormwater Management Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Monitoring Analysis Discharges to Impaired Waters with a TMDL

The City of St. Paul’s MS4 Permit was first issued on December 1, 2000, and was reissued on January 21, 2011. This permit requires a revised Stormwater Permit Annual Report. A report summarizing 2016 activities is found on the City of St. Paul’s website12. The current annual report can be found on the City’s website.

NPDES Construction General Permits are also generally required for construction activities that result in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre or a common plan of development or sale13. Additionally, stormwater from large wastewater treatment plants and other privatelyowned facilities that process wastewater must be permitted through the NPDES/SDS Industrial Stormwater Permit process.

3.2.

Water Resource Management Ordinances and Policies The City of St. Paul has adopted a number of ordinances and zoning overlay districts in an effort to protect water resources within the City and provide consistency with applicable agency requirements. Ordinances and zoning overlay districts currently in place are available on the City’s website14. Items relevant to the City’s LSWMP include the following: •

Chapter 51. Allowable Discharges to the Storm Sewer System This chapter is adopted in accordance with the city's national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) municipal separate storm sewer (MS4) permit which authorizes the discharge of stormwater to surface water. Pursuant to permit regulations, the city is required to control the introduction of non-stormwater discharges to the city's municipal separate storm sewer system.

•

Chapter 52. Stormwater Runoff

City of Saint Paul’s Stormwater Permit Annual Report, 2016. https://www.stpaul.gov/sites/default/files/Media%20Root/Public%20Works/Stormwater%20Permit%20Annual%20 Report%20June%202016.pdf 13 NPDES General Permit, 2013. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-strm2-68a.pdf 14 St Paul Code of Ordinances. https://www.municode.com/library/mn/st._paul/codes/code_of_ordinances 12

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 3 Page-2

SECTION 3 The purpose of this chapter is to control stormwater pollution associated with land disturbance and post construction runoff in the city. It establishes standards and specifications for practices and planning activities, which minimize stormwater pollution, soil erosion and sedimentation. Chapter 52 is currently being revised by the City and is scheduled to be adopted in 2018/2019.

•

Section 63.600 Wetland Conservation The purpose of this section is to implement the Wetland Conservation Act and the accompanying rules of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources throughout the City.

•

Section 68.402. Protection of shorelands, floodplains, wetlands, and bluffs

•

Section 68.404. Protection of Water Quality The objective of standards and criteria is to maintain the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the river corridor in conformance to the St. Paul Mississippi River Corridor Plan by reducing the effects of poorly planned shoreline and bluffline development; providing sufficient setback for sanitary facilities; preventing pollution of surface and groundwater; minimizing flood damage; preventing soil erosion; and implementing metropolitan plans, policies and standards.

•

Chapter 72. Floodplain Management Overlay Districts This chapter is adopted to adopt regulations to minimize flood losses and guide development within the floodplain areas. This chapter also references applicable FEMA regulations and ensures compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program.

•

Chapter 91. Water Code – Miscellaneous Provisions

•

Saint Paul Sustainable Building Policy for Private Development The purpose of this policy requires private developers to meet the standards for a building rating systems for sustainability. Some of these include LEED, Minnesota Green Star, Silver and Saint Paul Port Authority Green Design Review. This policy applies for any new construction more than $200,000 in City and/or HRA funding.

•

Sustainable Building Policy for New Municipal and HRA Owned Buildings This policy lists rating systems for the City and HRA to choose from when constructing facilities within St. Paul. The building must meet mandatory requirements established in the 2009 Sustainable Building Policy as the “Saint Paul Overlay”.

The full text for each of these ordinances or zoning overlay districts is included in Appendix C. The City is currently in the process of reissuing their MS4 permit. This is anticipated to be complete

by July 2018. A part of this permit renewal includes the updating of the City’s ordinances. Within 18 months of the MS4 reissuance date, the City will review and update their ordinances. For stormwater management, the City anticipates developing a revised ordinance with performance criteria, possibly supported by a comprehensive document that explains various development review related topics such as: volume reduction, rate control, erosion and sediment control, etc. Procedural requirements from Watershed Districts and Watershed Management Organizations will be incorporated into the document to aid developers in navigating various requirements within the City limits. The timeline Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 3 Page-3

SECTION 3 associated with updating local controls will adhere to the schedule identified in the City’s MS4 permit.

A tentative schedule is provided below.

• July 2018 - Finalize renewal of MS4 permit • August 2018 – November 2018: Review current ordinances and perform a gaps analysis in comparison with watershed rules, MRCCA new rules, etc.

• December 2018-April 2019 - Create Design Standards document and provide a review period that includes all watersheds. Includes a draft review of the proposed ordinances.

• May 2019-July 2019 – Finalize ordinances and Design Standards with agency comments.

• August 2019 – October 2019 – Adopt ordinances with City Council.

3.3. City Coordination Processes There is an existing Site Plan Review Committee that reviews public/private developments. There is also the Water Resource Work Group that meets on a regular basis to discuss water related topics ranging from coordinated projects to grant opportunities. Both of these groups are comprised of members from City Departments such as: Public Works, Parks, Planning, Safety and Inspections, etc.

Additionally, staff from area Watershed Districts are also involved in these groups.

When there is a large development (West Side Flats, Ford Plant, Snelling-Midway Soccer Stadium), multi-faceted teams are brought together for the review of Stormwater management alternatives.

These teams assist in design review, financing review, agreements, etc. As part of these three major redevelopments, an initiative is being led to develop the policy, design, and finance of green infrastructure. The City has developed a memo outlining the strategic roadmap to finance green infrastructure throughout the City through the updating of policy and legal framework. The City partnered with numerous agencies to outline the concept of “shared, stacked-function green infrastructure (SSGI),” seeking to manage stormwater as an asset that embraces environmental health, community livability and cost efficiencies.

The City is interested in pursuing public/private, district and/or regional stormwater management alternatives, and has partnered with such entities as: Watershed Districts, Saint Paul Public Schools, Saint Paul Port Authority, etc. This has resulted in the installation of many partnership BMPs including: Beacon Bluff, Trout Brook Nature Sanctuary, Como Senior High School, etc. Potential items that may limit the City’s ability include: equitable means of sharing capital costs, assignment of operating and maintenance responsibilities for the life of the facility, equitable means of sharing maintenance costs, easement and access rights if the facility is located on non-city owned property, insurance and indemnity requirements. Ideally, these items would be addressed on a system-wide basis, but given complexities with potential partners, they may need to be addressed on a site by site basis.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 3 Page-4

SECTION 4 4. ASSESSMENT OF ISSUES Outlined below is an assessment of existing and potential local water resource-related issues that are known as of 2016. These issues have been identified based on an analysis of the land and water resource data collected during the preparation of this plan and through information provided by the City, its residents, and the watershed organizations. A description of any existing or potential issue within the City has been listed and potential future corrective actions have been incorporated into an implementation plan.

4.1. Water Quality Problems Issue - The City discharges to the following impaired waters as listed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA): Mississippi River (ID 07010206-505) A TMDL Plan for mercury approved in 2008. This stretch of the Mississippi River is impaired for fecal coliform, mercury and PCB in fish tissue, and total suspended solids (TSS). This stretch was added to the impaired waters list by the MPCA in 1996 for fecal coliform, and again in 1998 for the additional pollutants.

Corrective Action The City will continue to work with the MPCA, watershed commissions, and surrounding communities to help improve these bodies of water and address the TMDL requirements.

Many of the projects outlined in the implementation plan will help work toward achieving the TMDL improvement goals. The City is also interested in partnering with the watershed commission, neighboring cities, and other agencies on future projects or opportunities that arise that help achieve the goals of the TMDLs. Refer to the detailed TMDL report or implementation plans located on the MPCA website15 for more information on each TMDL or refer to Appendix B. The City’s annual NPDES Stormwater Reports16 also provide additional detail on activities that have been completed.

Battle Creek (ID 07010206-592) Battle Creek was added to the impaired waters list by the MPCA in 2008 for chloride, and in 2014 for aquatic macroinvertebrate and fish bioassessments.

Corrective Action The Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) established a TMDL in April, 2016 aimed at restoring aquatic recreation in Battle Creek. Elevated Total Suspended Solids (TSS) concentrations in Battle Creek are caused by high sediment loading mobilized by watershed runoff and erosion within the immediate stream channel and corridor. Excess TSS was identified as a primary stressor to the aquatic life. TSS load reductions of 66% to 91% are required to meet water quality standards, depending on the flow conditions.

The RWMWD TMDL focuses on collectively meeting the MPCA’s water quality standards for Fish Creek and Wakefield Lake in Maplewood, and Bennett Lake in Roseville. This MPCA TMDL Projects. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-projects Ctiy of St. Paul Stormwater Permit Annual Report, 2015. https://www.stpaul.gov/sites/default/files/Media%20Root/Public%20Works/June%202015%20report%20with%20app endix%20reduced.pdf 15 16

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 4 Page-1

SECTION 4 TMDL17 has not yet been approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The draft is provided in Appendix B. The City of St. Paul should focus on implementing recommendations from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) Chloride TMDL18 as well as the TCMA Management Plan19.

Como Lake (ID 62-0055-00) A TMDL Plan for mercury was approved in 2008 and a TMDL Plan for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators approved in 2010. Como Lake was added to the impaired waters list by the MPCA in 1998 for Mercury in fish tissue, 2002 for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators, and again in 2014 for chloride.

Corrective Action The primary pollutant load was identified as excess phosphorus. The watershed load to Como Lake represents approximately 34% of the total load to the lake, and internal load represents about 65%. A reduction in watershed load and a 97% reduction in internal load are required in the TMDL20.

The reduction will be accomplished through the implementation of the techniques described in CRWD’s 2002 Como Lake Strategic Management Plan21. Several structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) are recommended in the Management Plan, including water quality ponds, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, and alum treatment for stormwater.

The Public Outreach group also developed an education and outreach plan to encourage public participation in the Como watershed community. BMPs will also be identified from the Como Regional Park Stormwater Master Plan once approved. CRWD will lead implementation items for in-lake load management.

The remaining load reduction is accomplished by allocating point sources, identified as permitted MS4 stormwater and construction stormwater.

Beaver Lake, Phalen Lake, Pickeral Lake Beaver Lake (ID 62-0016-00) was added to the impaired waters list by the MPCA in 2002 for mercury in fish tissue and nutrients/eutrophication. Phalen Lake (ID 62-0013-00) was added to the impaired waters list by the MPCA in 2012 for mercury in fish tissue. Pickerel Lake was added to the impaired waters list by the MPCA in 2010 for mercury in fish tissue.

Corrective Action Corrective action in the watershed, such as stormwater treatment, has removed Beaver Lake from the impaired waters list. The Minnesota Statewide Mercury TMDL22 was approved by the MPCA in March, 2007.

RWMWD TMDL Draft, 2016. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw8-54b.pdf Twin Cities Area Chloride TMDL Study, 2016. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw11-06e.pdf 19 Twin Cities Metro Area Chloride Management Plan, 2016. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw1106ff.pdf 20 Como Lake TMDL, 2010. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw11-05e.pdf 21 Como Lake Strategic Management Plan, 2002. http://www.capitolregionwd.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/09/CLSMPFinal.pdf 22 MN Statewide Mercury TMDL, 2007. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw4-01b.pdf 17 18

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 4 Page-2

SECTION 4 Because the source for almost all mercury in Minnesota waters is atmospheric and shared by all mercury-impaired waters of the state, pollutant allocation applies state-wide. Human activity causes 70% of atmospheric deposition and natural sources make up the remaining 30%. Minnesota is divided into two regional TMDLs: northeast (NE) and southwest (SW).

The two regions have the same target fish tissue level, with different necessary load reductions to achieve it. St. Paul falls in the SW region.

4.2. Flooding and Stormwater Rate Control Issues Issue – Flooding that occurs in Bridal Veil Creek and Bridal Wetland.

Corrective Action – Flooding in this area is largely managed by the Eustis tunnel project, which is owned by the City of St. Paul. The City will maintain existing storm tunnels as identified in their Capital Improvement Plan.

Issue – Flooding in the Lowertown neighborhood.

Corrective Action – The City will evaluate and pursue permanent flood control options for this area. A study will be completed to identify BMP options and potential locations.

Issue – Localized flooding throughout the City.

Corrective Action - The City will continue to implement BMPs during road reconstruction projects and redevelopment to address general flooding city-wide. The City will also continue to do yearly storm sewer maintenance and storm tunnel rehabilitation projects.

4.3. Adequacy of Existing Regulations and Programs to Address Stormwater Management Issue – The new Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Rules and Standards have been adopted by the DNR. Corrective Action – The City will update its controls as required to meet the goals of the new MRCCA rules. This item is shown to be completed in Table 6-1 by 2019.

Issue – The City has experienced challenges in regulating stormwater management due to lack of consistency in city ordinances and rules governed by external agencies.

Corrective Action – Chapter 52 of the City Code will be revised to be consistent with watershed standards. A schedule for completion is provided in Section 3.2.

4.4. Impacts of Erosion and Sedimentation on Local Water Resources Issue – Erosion and sedimentation issues have been occurring in the ravine near Cherokee Heights.

Corrective Action – The City will partner with West St. Paul, Mendota Heights, and the Lower Mississippi River WMO to complete a ravine stabilization project to limit sediment discharge and help intercommunity flows.

Issue – City-wide bluff erosion along the Mississippi River.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 4 Page-3

SECTION 4 Corrective Action – The City will coordinate ongoing projects along the Mississippi River such as regular park maintenance, natural areas restoration, and lake management to prevent erosion and sediment discharge along the bluffs.

Issue – City owned ponds are in need of maintenance for vegetation management and sedimentation issues.

Corrective Action – The City performs maintenance on stormwater ponds as necessary to ensure they continue to provide the intended stormwater management benefit. The City will continue to prioritize inspection and maintenance needs for stormwater ponds and BMPs throughout the City.

Dredging projects have been completed in 2013, 2016 and 2017.

4.5. Impact of Land Use Practices and Development on Local Water Resource Issues Issue - The City of St. Paul is near full development and contains varying topography with the presence of many different soil classifications. These conditions can make it difficult for the City to implement stormwater management BMPs to efficiently meet watershed requirements on a site by site basis.

Corrective Action - The City will investigate opportunities to implement water quality and volume reduction BMPs during future reconstruction projects. In areas where project specific BMPs will be unfeasible, the City will consider completing regional water quality improvement projects to help meet future stormwater management requirements.

Issue – The City’s Wetland Management Plan (WMP) was last completed in 2008 and is needs to be updated. This plan provides an approach for the protection and management of wetlands within the City as development occurs. The WMP provides greater flexibility and control over wetland management and protection, identifies regional wetland mitigation sites, identifies potential wetland restoration areas, and provides management strategies for different types of wetlands.

Corrective Action - The City will complete a Wetland Management Plan that will include a wetland inventory, habitat assessment, and management plan for wetlands and water bodies on public property. This is listed in the Implementation Plan as occurring by 2020.

4.6. Education Program Issue –The City of St. Paul recognizes the need for local water education programs to increase public awareness of local water management and improve the quality of stormwater runoff.

Corrective Action – The City of St. Paul will continue to provide educational content and opportunities to residents, businesses, developers, and others. These efforts may include regular notices in the City's monthly newsletter, articles in the local paper, postings on the City website, and flyers in the utility bill. The City may work with the watershed districts to improve the efficiency of educational efforts and reduce duplication. Educational topics may include but are not limited to: • • •

Wetland buffers Yard/Pet waste management Illicit discharge to stormwater

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 4 Page-4

SECTION 4 • • • • • •

Utility Easements BMP functions Controlling invasive species Sustainable groundwater and recharge Adopt-a-Drain program Localized flooding

4.7. Identification of Potential Issues Which are Anticipated in the Next 20 Years Issue – New and emerging contaminants are becoming more prevalent in water bodies throughout the City. These include: • An increase in nutrient loading including phosphorus, sediment and nitrate.

• An increase in chloride concentrations from road salt use in the winter.

• The prevalence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in stormwater ponds from runoff of roadways and other surfaces.

• Prevalence of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals.

Corrective Action – The City will implement the following measures to ensure the treatment of these contaminants.

• Addressing TMDLs and corresponding wasteload allocations for impaired water bodies through the implementation of water quality projects with new development, redevelopment, and street reconstruction projects.

• Implementing measures outlined in the TCMA Chloride Management Plan where possible.

• Identifying stormwater ponds that are contaminated and follow protocol for disposal of dredged material. The City also bans the use of materials for paved surfaces that contain PAHs for future development and redevelopment.

• Construct innovate BMP’s and integrated systems to better treat a variety of contaminants. The City will look into undertaking a study that identifies these potential regional or watershed treatment areas that could benefit from integrated systems.

Issue – The changing climate will influence rainfall and flow patterns of water bodies within the City.

Corrective Action – The City will need to adapt an integrated water resource management approach to ensure the resiliency and longevity of stormwater treatment facilities as well as the management of the lakes and rivers. The City will look to invest in both green and gray infrastructure to store and transport stormwater runoff and will implement standards to help plan and cope with the climate variability. Green infrastructure will be the first priority of the City when looking to address the changing climate. The City will partner with MWMO and other watersheds to integrate green infrastructure opportunities and provide for a new system management approach.

Issue – While very few people in the City of St. Paul still use well water for their drinking water, there are numerous abandoned wells in the area that should be sealed, as they are direct routes for groundwater contamination.

Corrective Action – The City will work directly with the County and other agencies to identify and seal these abandoned wells within the timeframe of this Plan. The City will continue to implement groundwater Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 4 Page-5

SECTION 4 protection initiatives listed in the Ramsey County Groundwater Protection Plan.

4.8. Availability and Adequacy of Technical Information to Manage Water Resources Issue – Atlas 14 (updated precipitation probability information) was released by NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) in 2013 and adopted by all watersheds within St. Paul as a design standard.

Corrective Action – Previously developed areas within the City (designed to meet TP-40 hydrologic demands) will continue to operate under this design criteria. New development, redevelopment, and areas where issues may exist will be evaluated (as needed) by completing a risk assessment using Atlas 14. The City will work with the DNR and the Watershed in FIRM updates as needed. The City will evaluate their current H&H models to incorporate Atlas 14 data. This will allow the City to provide a risk assessment for areas possibly affected by an increase in rainfall precipitation.

Issue - The City has mapped a majority of its storm sewer system. As new and redevelopment projects are completed, the storm sewer GIS database needs to continually be updated.

Corrective Action - The City will annually update its storm sewer GIS database to incorporate recent projects and associated storm sewer improvements 4.9. Stormwater Treatment in Redevelopment Issue The City is continuing to undergo significant redevelopment and requires modern, effective stormwater treatment to protect the Mississippi River and other surrounding water resources.

The City is also experiencing competing needs between density and space for stormwater treatment.

Corrective Action The City of St. Paul has shifted from a solely case-by-case to a more regional approach to address stormwater treatment in redevelopment and other street projects. The following studies summarize recent examples of the City’s stormwater treatment solutions.

4.9.1. Ford Site The Ford Site, labeled by the City as A 21st Century Community, will be a mixed-use neighborhood that will support many types of transportation, living, clean energy and technology, jobs and recreation. Rainwater reuse with man-made streams has been proposed throughout the development, which will flow into trees and raingardens rather than stormwater ponds.

4.9.2. Light Rail Transit Green Line Shared stacked green infrastructure (SSGI) concepts (See Section 5.7) were introduced in the Twin Cities’ Light Rail Transit Green Line Project, which is expected to spark additional redevelopment along its corridor, a trend referred to as Transit Oriented Development (TOD).

SSGI was utilized to increase “location efficiency” and livability in a dense, mixed-use area.

Green infrastructure is located in street boulevards using tree trenches, rain gardens, and boulevard swales. These green infrastructure solutions increase aesthetic value to the area surrounding the Light Rail, while providing stormwater treatment to reduce polluted runoff Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 4 Page-6

SECTION 4 into the Mississippi River. The final document, Strategic Stormwater Solutions for TransitOriented Development,23 is available on the City of St. Paul’s Planning and Economic Development Department website.

4.9.3. West Side Flats The West Side Flats Greenway will be an example application of a shared public-private stormwater management facility using green infrastructure in the City. The West Side Flats Master Plan and Development Guidelines24 were adopted as an addendum to the St. Paul Comprehensive Plan in June 2015.

4.9.4. CHS Field CHS Field was built in downtown St. Paul to help revitalize the Lowertown neighborhood.

Providing sufficient water for the stadium was a challenge for the large development. The City of St. Paul, Saint Paul Saints, Metropolitan Council, and CRWD collaborated to implement a rainwater collection system. Roof space from CHS Field and the Green Line light rail Operations and Maintenance Facility next door harvest rainwater and use it to irrigate the ball field and flush toilets after it is treated with UV light. Project details are available at the CHS Field Project website25.

4.9.5. Snelling-Midway Redevelopment Site The new soccer stadium development will be encompassed by a completely redeveloped 34.5-acre superblock with a mixed use of commercial, residential, and retail lots. North of the stadium are two large open green spaces. Roof runoff sized for ultimate development will be collected in underground cisterns and treated and reused for irrigation on vegetated areas. The Stormwater Management Plan26 for the project site is available on the City of St. Paul’s Planning and Economic Development Department website.

23

Strategic Stormwater Solutions for TOD, 2013. http://www.corridorsofopportunity.org/sites/default/files/Strategic_Stormwater_Solutions_for_TOD_Final_Report.pdf 24 West Side Flats Master Plan & Development Guidelines, 2015. https://www.stpaul.gov/sites/default/files/Media%20Root/Planning%20%26%20Economic%20Development/WSFMP _FINAL_121715_Web.pdf 25 CHS Field Project Details. http://chsfield.com/about/project-details 26 Snelling-Midway Redevelopment Site Stormwater Management Plan, 2016. https://www.stpaul.gov/departments/planning-economic-development/planning/snelling-midway-redevelopment-site Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 4 Page-7

SECTION 5 5. GOALS AND POLICIES 5.1. General The primary goal of St. Paul’s LSWMP is to bring the City into statutory compliance with County, Regional, and State goals and policies, and provide the City a framework for effective surface water management. These goals and policies have been developed to complement County, Regional or State goals and policies, and to be in conformance with the policies required by comprehensive plans for the Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD), RamseyWashington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD), Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization (LMRWMO), and the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO). Cooperation, collaboration, and partnering results in projects that are less likely to conflict with the goals of the affected entities, are better able to meet long-term goals, and are generally more cost-effective. Effective surface water management includes guiding redevelopment activities and identifying and implementing retrofits to the existing system.

The goals and policies described in this section are intended to incorporate the foundation of several regional, state, and federally mandated programs. They are not meant to replace or alter the regional, state and federally mandated programs, rules and regulations, but to serve as an enhancement and provide some general policy guidelines. The City is in the process of updating its comprehensive plan to plan until 2040. The goals address the management strategies dictated by the WDs and WMOs while addressing the vision and changing needs of the City. The various watershed districts in the City have a separate rule process. These rules will apply to projects within the City and separate approvals may be required for projects. Additional city goals and policies are contained throughout this section. The most recent rules and standards of the WDs and WMOs can be found at the following links: CRWD: http://www.capitolregionwd.org/ LMRWMO: http://www.dakotaswcd.org/watersheds/lowermisswmo/ MWMO: http://mwmo.org/ RWMWD: http://www.rwmwd.org/ These goals and policies have also been developed to preserve and use natural water storage and retention systems in order to: • • • • • •

Limit public capital expenditures that are necessary to control excessive volumes and rates of runoff.

Improve water quality.

Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems.

Promote groundwater recharge.

Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities.

Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface water.

The goals and policies the City has developed address issues related to water quantity, water Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-1

SECTION 5 quality, recreation, fish and wildlife, enhancement of public participation, information and education, ground water management, wetland management, soil erosion management, Mississippi River management, the NPDES Stormwater Permit, and shared stack green infrastructure. Outlined below are the goals and policies that have been developed for each of the above areas of concern.

5.2. Water Quantity 5.2.1. Goals Control excessive runoff volumes, rates, and downstream impacts from development and protect, preserve, and expand (where possible) the stormwater storage and detention systems to prevent flooding and protect public health and safety while limiting public capital expenditures.

5.2.2. Policies: Rate Control 1. Runoff rates into public storm sewers shall be controlled, reviewed, and approved in accordance with the department of public works policy. The City requires rate control according to Chapter 52 of the current City code. The City will update the rate control policy as necessary to ensure rate control is met.

2. Runoff rate control shall meet the performance standards of the LMRWMO requiring no increase in peak runoff rate for the Atlas-14 5- or 10-year event and the 100-year event. It is encouraged that there is also no rate increase for the 2-year event as well.

3. A hydrograph method based on sound hydrologic theory shall be used to analyze runoff rates and high water levels for proposed development and redevelopment projects.

4. The City will maintain maximum and average Atlas-14 100-year discharge rates and storage volume in regional detention areas.

5. Outlets for landlocked basins will be provided based on the following conditions: a. Only the existing tributary area may discharge to a landlocked basin, unless provision has been made for an outlet from the basin. b. The form of outlet may range from temporary pumps to gravity storm sewers.

The outlet is to be in place before increased water levels are likely to affect vegetation, slope stability and property values. c. The City will encourage the reduction of impervious area coverage and increase infiltration opportunities in watersheds tributary to landlocked basins. d. In establishing high water elevations and whether outlets are needed for landlocked basins, the long duration events, such as multiple-year wet cycles and high runoff volume events will be considered (e.g. snowmelt events that last for many weeks).

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-2

SECTION 5 e. Emergency overflows or outlets to drainage systems will be provided to any landlocked area if the available stormwater storage capacity is inadequate to prevent flooding of residences and if the available downstream conveyance system capacity is adequate to accept additional flow.

6. Detention facility design will include access for maintenance of the outlet structure and to the facility in general.

7. Easements over floodplains, detention areas, wetlands, ditches, and all other parts of the stormwater system are required as areas develop or redevelop.

8. Project proposers will need to contact the local watershed district or watershed management organization to determine if there are additional rate control requirements.

9. The City intends to use both designated and non-designated areas to store stormwater runoff. Non-designated areas include general depressions, areas lacking easements, low points, and streets where structures and/or property is not damaged and any inundation that occurs will only be temporary in nature.

10. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over newly constructed private stormwater management features (volume, rate control, and water quality treatment infrastructure) including but not limited to ponds, infiltration basis, rain gardens, underground storage and treatment devices, tree trenches, etc. Easements shall be acquired as necessary for existing stormwater management features.

5.2.3. Policies: Flood Control 1. The level of flood protection to be provided along trunk conveyance systems streams, channels, wetlands, ponds, detention basins, and lakes shall be based on the criticalduration 100-year flood for Atlas-14.

2. A levee system is in place to protect certain areas of the City along the Mississippi River corridor. A levee permit will be required for developments in proximity to the City levee.

3. The critical 1% chance event will be defined as the event that requires the greatest stormwater storage volume in a storage facility. These facilities include lakes, ponds, and their outlets.

4. Trunk stormwater systems shall be designed to provide discharge capacity for the critical-duration runoff event that is not less than the Atlas-14 10-year frequency event.

For open channel conveyance systems, the design criteria shall be for the critical Atlas14 100-year event.

5. All minor drainage systems (non-trunk) and local stormwater collection systems analyses and design will be based on the Atlas-14 5-year event unless otherwise specified.

6. New storm sewers and open channels shall be designed using a technical method approved by the City.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-3

SECTION 5 7. The high-water levels of stormwater detention facilities shall be based on a minimum Atlas-14 100-year frequency storm event. Freeboard requirements shall meet the requirements in Chapter 52 of the City Code. The 100-year high water level shall be determined based on the more restrictive of the City’s hydrologic/hydraulic model, FEMA floodplain and watershed districts.

8. Emergency overflow structures (e.g. swales, spillways) are to be incorporated, where feasible, into pond outlet structure designs to prevent undesired flooding resulting from storms larger than the Atlas-14 100-year (one percent) event or plugged outlet conditions.

9. Emergency overflow drainage routes shall be provided at all low point locations a minimum of 1.5 feet below the lowest adjacent building opening. Emergency overflow drainage routes shall be constructed in a manner that will accommodate the Atlas-14 100-year storm event.

10. Uses or activities within the 100-year floodplain are regulated under Chapter 72 of the City Code. Refer to Chapter 72 for more information regarding floodplain management within the City.

11. The City will work with the local watershed districts and watershed management organizations to monitor lake levels and modify predicted flood levels when necessary 12. The minimum building elevation for new or redevelopment shall meet the following criteria: a. The basement floor will be 4 feet above the currently observed groundwater elevations in the area. b. The basement floor elevation will be 2 foot above the 100-year high surface water elevation for the area. c. Apply to all areas within the City except the River Corridor Overlay Districts which are required to be in conformance with Chapter 68 of the Zoning Code.

5.2.4. Policies: Infiltration and Volume Control 1. The City will require the development of enhanced infiltration practices wherever practical and feasible to reduce impervious areas. The City will not maintain private infiltration areas.

2. Pretreatment will be required prior to discharge to any new infiltration system to preserve the function of the system. Pretreatment practices shall be sized and designed per the recommendations set in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.

3. For projects that disturb one or more acres of land, the following volume control standard must be applied: stormwater runoff shall be retained onsite in the amount equivalent to 1.1 inches of runoff over the impervious surfaces of the development. Volume control requirements must also be met for the relevant watershed requirements depending on the Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-4

SECTION 5 project location within CRWD, RWMWD, MWMO, and LMRWMO. 4. St. Paul’s flood control strategy is to reduce the volume of its runoff through regional stormwater facilities and reuse or infiltration projects. The City will work with the CRWD, LMRWMO, MWMO, RWMWD, and surrounding communities to achieve their flood control goals.

5. Drainage calculations must be submitted and approved as part of any development or redevelopment applications for sites larger than one quarter acre or greater in accordance with to the Stormwater Ordinance and the Stormwater Management Site Plan Review Worksheet prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit.

6. The City maintains a hydrologic model of the stormwater system. A hydrologic model was developed for the City of St. Paul Sewer Separation project. This model is included in the Comprehensive Sewer Plan for the City of St. Paul and is available at the St. Paul Public Works Department.

7. The City will ensure that City development, redevelopment, and/or infrastructure projects will not overtax the existing downstream stormwater drainage system.

5.3. Water Quality 5.3.1. Goal Maintain and/or enhance the water quality of the lakes, streams, or rivers within and immediately downstream of the City of St. Paul.

5.3.2. Policies 1. The watershed districts and watershed management organizations have developed the following lake classification system for lakes within their watershed: Lake Name Como Lake Crosby Lake Loeb Lake

Capitol Region Watershed District Plan Strategic Lake Management Plan Lake and Natural Resource Plan Strategic Lake Management Plan

Status Complete Complete Complete

Strategic Lake Management Plan identifies important management issues through input from key stakeholder groups, prioritizes the issues and associated goals, and identifies implementation activities, including institutional and public roles, time frames, and funding.

Lake and Natural Resource Plan to address resource concerns and future management.

Cooperation between the City, residents, businesses, watershed district, and non-profit organizations will aid in developing the plan.

Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Lake Name Use Level Management Class Beaver Lake 3 Restore/Improve Lake Phalen 1 Restore/Improve

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-5

SECTION 5 Level-1 activities require excellent lake water clarity. As water begins to appear green, clarity and color appeal decline. Clarity for swimming and scuba diving should be at least 5.25 feet.

Level-3 activities require good lake habitat for fish and wildlife, along with public boat access for fishing. In the urban setting it is wise to manage for less than or equal to 60 ug/L TP to minimize the potential for foul odor when poor conditions occur, such as long periods of hot days.

Fish production is affected by a lake’s dissolved-oxygen concentration under the ice during the winter months. Lake depth is critical in predicting the tendency of a lake toward winterkill conditions, when large numbers of fish perish due to low dissolved-oxygen concentrations during the late winter. A minimum depth of 13 feet is generally needed to avoid winterkill. Lake aeration can also be used to provide oxygenated water during winter months.

Lake Name Pickerel Lake*

Lower Mississippi River WMO Classification Minimum Action Needed Category III Trend Analysis; Secchi disc monitoring

Category III water body classification recommends water quality monitoring to include secchi disc monitoring (i.e. MPCA’s Citizen Lake Monitoring Program). *Intercommunity water resources are the responsibility of the WMO.

Mississippi River WMO

No designated water bodies currently exist within St. Paul for this watershed.

More information regarding the lake classification system can be obtained in the watershed district or watershed management organization comprehensive plans. The City adopts the lake classification system policies for each watershed by reference through the adoption of the LSWMP. 2. Continue the cooperative monitoring programs with WDs and WMOs to collect stormwater data from the subwatersheds and stormwater BMPs. The City will coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies to establish, implement, and evaluate lake, wetland, and stream monitoring programs. Section 2.6.2 provides detail on the extent of the monitoring programs within St. Paul.

3. The City will require adherence to the NPDES/SDS Construction Permit for all construction sites disturbing 1 acre or more.

4. In the design and construction of new, or modifications to the existing stormwater conveyance systems, pretreatment of stormwater runoff to Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) recommendations must be provided prior to discharge from the site and/or to a wetland, lake, or stream. Utilize, where feasible, regional stormwater detention facilities when possible to enhance water quality by removing sediment and nutrients from runoff.

5. The City’s natural ponding areas, such as wetlands and lakes, currently provide and

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-6

SECTION 5 will continue to provide for the impoundment and treatment of surface water runoff as appropriate and according to local, state, and federal regulations.

6. The City has adopted the NURP design recommendations for the design of stormwater treatment basins as required in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.

7. The City will work with the watershed districts and watershed management organizations when practical and feasible to construct regional detention basins to treat stormwater runoff when upstream facilities cannot effectively reduce sediment and nutrient loads to target levels.

8. Project proposers will need to contact the local watershed district or watershed management organization to determine if there are additional water quality requirements.

9. The owner of a detention basin, water quality pond or water quality treatment device shall provide either the City, CRWD, or RWMWD with an executed copy of an Agreement for Maintenance and Inspection of Utility and Storm Drainage Systems in an acceptable form.

10. The City will continue to respond to hazardous spills as required by state law.

11. The City will continue to work cooperatively with Ramsey County to implement the household hazardous waste disposal program and educate residents on the proper disposal of household hazardous waste. For more information see http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/.

12. The City has worked to eliminate illegal connections to the City's stormwater conveyance system and will continue this work when additional connections are identified.

13. The City anticipates working with neighboring municipalities to control runoff rates and provide water quality treatment prior to the discharge of stormwater across municipal boundaries.

14. The City will continue to follow the MPCA NPDES Phase I guidelines and has obtained a Municipal Storm Sewer Permit in 2000 as part of the MPCA requirements.

15. The City will share water quality data and trends with the surrounding cities, watershed districts, and watershed management organizations.

16. The City requires implementation of best management practices during development and redevelopment to achieve the goal of reducing non-point source pollution. The City will work to reduce small non-point sources of pollution through community education, demonstration projects, and various housekeeping practices and maintenance procedures in compliance with the Municipal Storm Sewer Permit.

17. The City will reference the Minnesota Stormwater Manual for water quality guidance for new development and redevelopment projects.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-7

SECTION 5 18. The City will encourage the reduction in the amount of impervious surface upon development or redevelopment.

19. The City will promote Low Impact Development (LID) design concepts into development and redevelopment projects to the greatest extent feasible. Additional information on LID is available in the St. Paul Department of Public Works.

20. The City has adopted the Stormwater Ordinance, which includes established standards and specifications for practices and planning activities, which minimize stormwater pollution, soil erosion, and sedimentation.

21. The City will adopt and implement MnDNR shoreland ordinances when required by the MnDNR. 22. Utilize the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Study27 in Cooperation with the MPCA to identify and address threats to water quality. The information from the WRAPS Study serves as the basis for TMDL reports published by the MPCA. Battle Creek, Beaver Lake, and Lake Phalen were all evaluated as a part of WRAPS. The WRAPS Study areas and impaired waters are illustrated in Figure A14.

5.4. Recreation, Fish and Wildlife 5.4.1. Goal Protect and enhance recreational facilities and fish and wildlife habitat.

5.4.2. Policies 1. The City will cooperate with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and other appropriate agencies in promoting public enjoyment and protecting fish, wildlife, and recreational resources in the City.

2. The City will work to preserve wetlands that provide habitat for wildlife and spawning of fish.

3. The City will encourage land owners to maintain wetlands and open space areas for the benefit of wildlife.

4. The City will participate with local watershed districts, watershed management organizations, and the MnDNR Natural Heritage Program to identify high value natural communities, and collectively discourage, critically review, and modify proposals where appropriate to avoid the loss of high value natural resources (wetlands, forests, shrublands, grasslands, and open spaces).

5. The City will update their current Wetland Management Plan that includes a wetland inventory, habitat assessment, and management plan for wetlands and water bodies on public property. The City will request assistance from the local Watershed Districts.

27

MPCA WRAPS. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/watershed-approach-restoring-and-protecting-water-quality

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-8

SECTION 5 6. The City will require buffers on private land to be implemented around storm ponds, lakes, wetlands, and streams upon new development or redevelopment. These buffers will be promoted and encouraged for all existing properties adjacent to lakes, streams, and wetlands and promoted through public education.

7. The City will establish and maintain vegetative buffer areas around lakes, wetlands, and streams on public property where practical. The extent and location of these buffers will be assessed as part of the Wetland Management Plan development.

8. Encourage alternative landscape designs into proposed projects that: a. Increase beneficial habitat, wildlife and recreational uses; promote infiltration and vegetative water use; and b. Decrease detrimental wildlife uses (such as beaver dams, goose overabundance) that damage water control facilities, shoreline vegetation, water quality or recreational facilities.

9. The City will manage and control noxious and invasive plant species as practical and work to increase awareness of the problem.

10. Cooperate with watersheds and other units of government to complete habitat and recreation corridor connections (greenways).

11. Continue to manage key conservation areas within the City. Coordinate efforts to protect rare and endangered species and areas of significant natural communities with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Refer to the zoning map from the comprehensive plan for a reference of these areas.

12. Coordinate efforts with state, county and neighboring municipalities to enhance water based recreation to the extent practical.

5.5. Enhancement of Public Participation, Information, and Education 5.5.1. Goal Increase public awareness, understanding and involvement in water and natural resource management issues.

5.5.2. Policies 1. The City will disseminate information to the public regarding water resources, groundwater, wetlands, native vegetation, buffers, wildlife habitat, litter control, pet wastes, recycling, trash disposal, leaf collection, grass clippings, lawn chemicals, and hazardous materials. Information may be distributed via the City's newsletter, City website, local newspapers, cable television or other appropriate methods.

2. The City will coordinate its education efforts with the local watershed districts, watershed management organizations, and Ramsey County to take advantage of efficiencies of scale where appropriate.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-9

SECTION 5 3. The City will continue to implement an education program. This program includes the following: a. Storm drain stenciling (contracted with Friends of the Mississippi River) b. Door hangers with information about protecting water resources (contracted with Friends of the Mississippi River) c. City Staff go to local schools to share information about protecting water resources d. City newsletters e. City website (http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/). f.

Include informational brochure with storm sewer service utility charge mailing

4. The City will sponsor a city-wide parks cleanup day.

5.6. Public Ditch Systems 5.6.1. Goal There are no public ditch systems owned by the City of St. Paul. The Beltline Interceptor, identified in Table 3.5-2 of the RWMWD Comprehensive Plan, was transferred to the RWMWD district in January 1, 1996.

5.7. Groundwater 5.7.1. Goal Coordinate activities and/or manage surface water runoff to the degree necessary to meet requirements for groundwater protection or management as required by Ramsey County, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, and the Department of Natural Resources.

5.7.2. Policies 1. Encourage groundwater recharge and cooperate with the watershed efforts to protect recharge areas from potential sources of contamination. Provide increased green space, native vegetation, and pond "dead" storage wherever possible and appropriate to allow for the infiltration of stormwater runoff and promote groundwater recharge.

2. The City will work cooperatively with Ramsey County to protect groundwater sources and recharge areas identified in the 2010 Ramsey County Groundwater Protection Plan28.

3. The City will cooperate with state and regional agencies on ground water monitoring, 28

https://www.ramseycounty.us/sites/default/files/2010%20groundwater%20plan%20update%20conservation.pdf

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-10

SECTION 5 inventorying, wellhead protection efforts, and permitting programs.

4. The City will cooperate with the Department of Health and the Ramsey Conservation District to insure that all unsealed or improperly abandoned wells within the City are properly sealed. Technical requirements for the abandonment of these wells will be in conformance with the local and state regulations.

5. The City will coordinate with the watershed districts to evaluate the need and resources for a permanent groundwater quality monitoring program.

6. The City will maintain updated records of all known on-site septic systems and prohibits the installation of new individual septic systems or alterations, repairs or extensions of existing systems when connection can be made to the city sanitary system. The City will also continue to develop a management program and ordinance for individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS) that is consistent with MPCA Rules 7080 and Metropolitan Council policies.

7. The City will encourage the development of alternative stormwater management methods including rainwater reuse, vegetated swales and infiltration practices for stormwater projects, development, and redevelopment, provided these methods do not contaminate ground water.

5.8. Wetlands 5.8.1. Goal The City will protect wetlands in conformance with the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, as amended. Achieve no net loss of wetlands, including acreage, functions, and values. Where practical, improve the functions, values, biological diversity, and acreage of existing wetlands.

5.8.2. Policies 1. The City is the local governmental unit (LGU) responsible for administering the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and rules. The City will protect and manage wetlands in conformance with WCA. 2. The City will seek opportunities to create new wetlands and restore previously impacted wetlands in cooperation with citizens, counties, and the state.

3. The City will encourage public and private landowners to maintain wetlands and open space areas for the benefit of wildlife.

4. Prior to issuance of any city grading or building permits, all development and redevelopment activities must comply with the Wetland Conservation Act. 5. When managing a wetland for the primary purpose of quality management and flood retention, detrimental effects to the other wetland functions and values such as wildlife habitat, species diversity, aesthetics, etc will be minimized to the extent practical and feasible.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-11

SECTION 5 6. The City will encourage buffers on private land to be implemented around storm ponds, lakes, wetlands, and streams upon new development or redevelopment.

7. A vegetated buffer strip with a minimum buffer width of 25-feet and an average width of 30-feet measured from the ordinary high water level of the watercourse or wetland is required adjacent to wetlands, lakes and natural water course.

8. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over wetland buffer areas.

9. Runoff shall not be discharged directly into wetlands without pretreatment of the runoff.

10. The City will work with local watershed districts and watershed management organizations to streamline and coordinate the application and approval process for wetland permits.

5.9. Erosion and Sediment Control 5.9.1. Goal Protect the capacity of the City's stormwater management system, prevent flooding, maintain water quality by preventing erosion and sedimentation from occurring, and correcting existing erosion and sedimentation problems.

5.9.2. Policies 1.

The City of St. Paul is responsible for the review and enforcement of erosion and sediment controls for activities that require a grading and erosion control plan.

2.

Erosion control must meet the requirements outlined in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's NPDES General Permit to Discharge Stormwater from Construction SitesError!

Bookmark not defined.2 .

3.

The City’s Inspectors will conduct erosion control inspections for construction projects.

4.

Point discharges of stormwater to open channels or detention basins shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes erosion.

5.

Effective energy dissipation devices should be provided at all conveyance system discharges to prevent bank, channel or shoreline erosion.

6.

Design of stream bank stabilization and streambed control measures should consider unique or special site conditions, energy dissipation potential, adverse effects, preservation of natural processes and habitat, and aesthetics in addition to standard engineering and economic criteria.

7.

The City will require any development or redevelopment to comply with the erosion control standards found in the City’s Stormwater Ordinance included in Appendix C

8.

The City will maintain its erosion and sediment control standards to be in conformance with the “Minnesota Urban Small Sites BMP Manual” (Metropolitan Council) and “Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas”(MPCA). This Building Code contains information about erosion control requirements and is included in Appendix C.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-12

SECTION 5 9.

It shall be the responsibility of the developer / contractor to keep streets and property adjacent to construction areas free from sediment carried by construction traffic at site entrances and access points, and from site runoff and blowing dust.

10. Acceptable erosion in drainageways is limited to that which causes no net degradation of the watercourse or destruction of properties adjacent to the watercourse.

5.10.

NPDES Stormwater Permit A full copy of the City’s Stormwater Permit Annual Report can be obtained upon request; the document is included in this LSWMP by reference. The goals and policies of the Stormwater Permit are outlined below.

5.10.1. Goal The City will continue to meet the goals of its current NPDES permit to fulfill the obligations of the permit to reduce the amount of sediment and pollution that enters surface and ground water from storm sewer systems to the maximum extent possible.

5.10.2. Policies 1. The City will continue to implement a water quality monitoring program per the NPDES permit.

2. The City will sweep all the City streets and alleys as outlined in the Stormwater Permit Annual Report. Street sweeping frequency ranges from three times per week to twice per year. A copy of the report is available from the St. Paul Public Works Department.

3. The City will continue to implement the City's Public Education Program. More information regarding the storm drain stenciling education program can be found in the Stormwater Permit Annual Report available at the St. Paul Public Works Department or contacting the Friends of the Mississippi River (FMR) citizens’ organization.

4. The City will continue to implement an Asset Management system to have the data and system necessary to accurately determine the drainage area, land use, population, percent impervious surface, and the runoff coefficient for each of the City’s storm sewer outfalls. This system is being jointly implemented with the St. Paul Regional Water Services.

5. The City will maintain a list of facilities that are issued NPDES permits by the MPCA and provide this list in the Stormwater Permit Annual Report.

6. The City will operate, maintain, and construct its storm sewer system in a manner to minimize the impacts on water quality of the receiving waters. The performance measures for this policy are outlined in the Stormwater Permit Annual Report.

7. The City will continue to monitor 20% of its storm sewer outfalls on an annual basis and provide erosion protection as necessary based on the outlet inspection results.

Results of previous inspections are available in the Stormwater Permit Annual Report.

8. The City will continue to inspect its stormwater ponds on an annual basis and perform

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-13

SECTION 5 maintenance as needed.

9. The City will continue to train employees on snow and ice control on streets in order to maintain safe streets in an economical way while protecting the environment.

10. The City will conduct an annual field screening of illicit discharges and improper disposal of materials into the storm sewer system.

11. The City will continue to implement its storm drain stenciling program with assistance from other organizations, such as the Friends of Mississippi River.

12. The City will continue its involvement with Metro Watershed Partners.

13. The City will continue to support Waterfest with the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District.

14. The City will continue to support the Annual Spring Parks Clean Up. 5.11.

Shared Stacked Green Infrastructure (SSGI) Design

5.11.1. Goal Meet stormwater requirements while providing stormwater treatment, recreational space and improved air quality in an aesthetically pleasing environment.

5.11.2. Policies 1. SSGI must be implemented on a case-by-case basis, so projects must determine its feasibility early in development.

2. The EPA’s final document29 outlining the shared-stacked green infrastructure concept provides guidelines for implementing stormwater management in limited, urban space.

3. SSGI will be an approach considered when new roads or other public improvement corollary to private development will required water quality treatment or runoff control.

4. Maximizing runoff control and water quality treatment will be a priority considered during SSGI projects.

5. City staff will establish interdepartmental capacity to implement SSGI and District systems.

5.12. Financing 5.12.1. Goal Minimize and fairly distribute public expenditures for plan implementation, with emphasis on using the City's stormwater utility to finance projects and West Side Flats Greenway Conceptual Green Infrastructure Design. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/saint_paul_tech_assistance.pdf 29

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-14

SECTION 5 collaborating/partnering with other entities.

5.12.2. Policies •

Use the City's Stormwater Utility Fund to pay for stormwater management projects and implementation activities.

•

Use other funding sources including land sale proceeds, partner with the Watersheds, State Aid funds, grants, etc. to pay for the implementation activities, when available and appropriate.

•

The City will use its Stormwater Utility Fund to pay for the public education and information programs.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 5 Page-15

SECTION 6 6. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM 6.1. Implementation Program Components Table 6-1 contains a comprehensive list of the MS4 activities and projects, programs, and studies that make up the City of St. Paul’s implementation program for the next 10 years (2018 through 2027). The program was developed by evaluating the requirements in the MS4 permit, reviewing existing information (Section 2), identifying potential and existing problems (Section 4), reviewing goals and policies (Section 5), and then assessing the need for programs, studies, maintenance, or projects. Costs were estimated, possible funding sources were identified, and a schedule was developed to complete the implementation activities. It is anticipated these tables will be updated/revised on a yearly basis.

6.2. Implementation Priorities The implementation components listed in Table 6-1 were prioritized to make the best use of available local funding, meet MS4 Permit requirements, address existing stormwater management problems, and prevent future stormwater management problems from occurring. Table 6-1 identifies which activities are MS4 Permit Requirements, Annual Requirements, or Capital Projects/Programs/Studies. The City's implementation plan reflects its responsibility to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizens by addressing problems and issues that are specific to the City of St. Paul.

6.3. Financial Considerations The City will use funds generated from its Stormwater Utility as the primary funding mechanism for its implementation program including; maintenance, repairs, capital projects, studies, etc. The City will continue to review the stormwater utility fee annually and adjust as needed. The City will also take advantage of grant or loan programs to offset project costs where appropriate and costeffective.

6.4. Plan Revision and Amendments The City may need to revise this Plan to keep it current. Any significant amendments that are made to the plan must be submitted to the CRWD, LMRWMO, MWMO, and RWMWD for review and approval before adoption by the City. Future changes will be submitted to the WDs and WMOs for their record, but not for review and approval. The City may amend this plan at any time in response to a petition by a resident or business. Written petitions for plan amendments must be submitted to the City Sewer Utility. The petition must state the reason for the requested amendment, and provide supporting information for the City to consider the request. The City may reject the petition, delay action on the petition until the next full plan revision, or accept the petition as an urgent issue that requires immediate amendment of the plan. The City of St. Paul may also revise/amend the plan in response to City-identified needs. This Plan is intended to be in effect for 10 years (implementation program outlines cost/activities for 15 years) per state statute. The Plan will be updated at that time, to the extent necessary.

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Section 6 Page 1

SECTION VI

TABLE 6.1 LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Proposed Cost By Year1

No.

Project Description

10 Year Total Cost Estimate 1,3

Possible Funding Sources 2

$4,500,000

Stormwater Utility, Grants, Watershed District Partnerships

$450,000

$450,000

$450,000

$450,000

$450,000

$450,000

$450,000

$450,000

$850,000

Stormwater Utility, Grants

$85,000

$85,000

$85,000

$85,000

$85,000

$85,000

$85,000

$70,000

City Funding, Stormwater Utility, Grants

$7,000

$7,000

$7,000

$7,000

$7,000

$7,000

$7,000

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

Comments

$450,000

$450,000

Cost dependent on outcome of study, assume 30,000 (verify) cu ft of storage will be required to offset street projects, 12.25 / cu ft

$85,000

$85,000

$85,000

$7,000

$7,000

$7,000

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP) Construct regional infiltration basins based on Volume Reduction Study, implement volume improvements 1

Annual replacement of storm sewer with road projects (includes remaining Como subwatershed) 2

3

Coordinate park maintenance, bluff erosion, natural areas restoration, and lake management along the Mississippi River

4

Partner in implementing projects identified in the Capitol Region Watershed District In-Lake TP Study. This study is currently underway.

5

6

7

Implement projects identified in the Battle Creek subwatershed feasibility study for TSS and E.coli. RWMWD WRAPS implementation table identifies this study to be complete in 2016/2017.

Assess options for inactivation of sediment release in Beaver Lake by 2020 and collaborate with Ramsey-Washington.

Ravine stabilization by Cherokee Heights. The City of St. Paul recently entered into a joint powers agreement (JPA) with the City of West St. Paul and City of Mendota Heights to prepare construction plans and complete a project to rehabilitate the Cherokee Heights upper ravine.

TBD

CRWD

TBD

RWMWD, Grants, Stormwater Utility

$80,000

RWMWD, Grants, Stormwater Utility

$700,000

West St. Paul, Mendota Heights, LMRWMO Grants

$800,000

Stormwater Utility, RWMWD, Grants

TBD

Grants, Stormwater Utility, Other Municipalities

Cost depenent on outcome of study

Cost depenent on outcome of study

$40,000

$350,000

$40,000

$350,000

East Phalen Filtration WQ Project 8

9

Update Dodd study, look at connector to West St. Paul in West Side Flats area. The City will look to partner with neighboring communities.

No current study is underway. x

Identify potential stormwater projects on the Ford site.

10

11

Identify projects from the Como-Park Regional Stormwater Master Plan for capital improvements to achieve TP reduction. This study is currently underway.

Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 1610-150

TBD

Grants, Stormwater Utility

TBD

CRWD, Stormwater Utility, Grants, City Funding

x

Cost dependent on outcome of the study.

TABLE 6.1

SECTION VI

Proposed Cost By Year1

No. 12

Project Description Como Park Senior high school, partnership with public school district and CRWD. This project is nearing completion.

13

Como McMurray Field (Region Field). This project would include a potential partnership with CRWD, St. Paul Park Department, and St. Paul Public Works.

14

15

16

Sacket Pond infiltration feasibility options, partnership with RWMWD. Feasibility study nearing completion.

Provide funding support for projects that provide pollutant reduction to the Mississippi River

Towerside Innovation District - future projects will be developed in this area includeing the Dominion Weyerhaeuser Site/Phase 2 of the Sunrise Building and greening and habitat improvements around Kasota Ponds.

10 Year Total Cost Estimate 1,3

Possible Funding Sources 2

TBD

CRWD, Stormwater Utility, Grants, SSPS

TBD

CRWD, Stormwater Utility, Grants, City Funding

TBD

RWMWD, Stormwater Utility, Grants

TBD

Grants, Stormwater Utility

TBD

Grants, Stormwater Utility, MWMO

$48,000,000

Grants, Stormwater Utility

$75,000

RWMWD, Stormwater Utility, Grants

$150,000

RWMWD, Stormwater Utility, Grants

TBD

Grants, Stormwater Utility

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

Comments

x Diversion installed. Concept study CRWD.

Cost depenent on outcome of study. Projects will be identified over 10 years.

Storm sewer tunnel rehabilitation 17

18

19

Partner with Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District to improve the PHAL-08 Pond. See RWMWD Watershed Management Plan and WRAPS report for additional detail.

Collaborate with RWMWD and Ramsey County on water management issues related to stormwater runoff from the Beltline Interceptor, Battle Creek, and Fish Creek subwatersheds.

Complete projects City-wide to address flooding and stabilization issues

20

Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 1610-150

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$4,800,000

$75,000

Identified in RWMWD's Watershed Management Plan $50,000

$50,000

$50,000

TABLE 6.1

SECTION VI

Proposed Cost By Year1

10 Year Total Cost Estimate 1,3

Possible Funding Sources 2

$31,300,000

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

Stormwater Utility, City Funding

$2,900,000

$3,000,000

$3,100,000

$3,100,000

$3,200,000

$3,200,000

$3,200,000

$3,200,000

$3,200,000

$3,200,000

$13,500,000

Stormwater Utility

$1,200,000

$1,200,000

$1,250,000

$1,250,000

$1,300,000

$1,300,000

$1,500,000

$1,500,000

$1,500,000

$1,500,000

$400,000

Stormwater Utility

$40,000

$40,000

$40,000

$40,000

$40,000

$40,000

$40,000

$40,000

$40,000

$40,000

24

Provide review for all new development or redevelopment of sites within the City to assure the goals, policies, and objectives outlined in this plan are implemented. Includes cost for City staff as well as any consultant review time.

$800,000

Stormwater Utility, City Funding

$80,000

$80,000

$80,000

$80,000

$80,000

$80,000

$80,000

$80,000

$80,000

$80,000

25

Perform Local Government Unit (LGU) Role for Wetland Conservation Act

$100,000

Stormwater Utility

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$150,000

Stormwater Utility, City Funding

$15,000

$15,000

$15,000

$15,000

$15,000

$15,000

$15,000

$15,000

$15,000

$15,000

$10,000

Stormwater Utility, City Funding

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$2,100,000

Stormwater Utility, CRWD

$200,000

$200,000

$200,000

$210,000

$215,000

$215,000

$215,000

$215,000

$215,000

$215,000

$805,000

Stormwater Utility

$75,000

$76,000

$78,000

$80,000

$81,000

$83,000

$83,000

$83,000

$83,000

$83,000

$873,000

Stormwater Utility, City Funding

$80,000

$83,000

$85,000

$87,000

$88,000

$90,000

$90,000

$90,000

$90,000

$90,000

No.

Project Description

Comments

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Continue street sweeping program per MPCA Storm Water Permit and City standards 21

22

23

Conduct Storm Sewer Maintenance. This includes cleaning, inspection, and repair of storm sewer, catch basins, and manholes, as well as BMP cleaning.

Be an active participant in the activities of the local watershed districts and water management organizations

Sponsor City-wide parks clean up day 26

27

Coordinate with Ramsey County to continue to implement the household hazardous waste disposal program

28

Continue NPDES water quantity and quality monitoring program per the MPCA Stormwater Permit

29

Continue a public education program. Includes storm drain stenciling, Metro Clean Water Campaign, and Adopt a Storm Drain.

Perform neighborhood cleanups throughout the City.

30

Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 1610-150

TABLE 6.1

SECTION VI

Proposed Cost By Year1

No. 31

Project Description Annually inspect City storm water ponds and remove sediment as needed

10 Year Total Cost Estimate 1,3

Possible Funding Sources 2

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

$2,445,000

Stormwater Utility

$230,000

$234,000

$239,000

$244,000

$248,000

$250,000

$250,000

$250,000

$250,000

$250,000

$50,000

Stormwater Utility, City Funding

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$30,000

Stormwater Utility

$3,000

$3,000

$3,000

$3,000

$3,000

$3,000

$3,000

$3,000

$3,000

$3,000

$50,000

Stormwater Utility, City Funding

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$100,000

Stormwater Utility, City Funding

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$25,000

Stormwater Utility

$50,000

CRWD, RWMWD, Grants, Stormwater Utility

Comments

Continue to support Waterfest with RWMWD 32

33

34

Continue development of the GIS storm sewer asset management system Manage and control noxious and invasive plant species and work to increase awareness of problems in and around stormwater ponds and wetlands Chloride operations including equipment upgrade

35 Monitor and Study Provide a biennial evaluation for potential projects from the City's regional infiltration study.

36

37

Perform required MS4 activities including the following: -Identify improper/illicit discharges to the storm sewer system -Inventory/prioritize industrial discharge locations -Monitor 20% of storm sewer outfalls annually -Annual training to staff

Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 1610-150

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

TABLE 6.1

SECTION VI

Proposed Cost By Year1

10 Year Total Cost Estimate 1,3

Possible Funding Sources 2

$60,000

CRWD, RWMWD, Grants, Stormwater Utility

$40,000

Grants, Stormwater Utility, CRWD, RWMWD

$30,000

Grants, Stormwater Utility

TBD

MPCA, Watershed Districts, Other Grant Funding

$90,000

Grants, Stormwater Utility

43

Complete wetland management plan update which will include a wetland inventory and habitat assessment.

$30,000

Grants, Stormwater Utility, City Funding

44

Studies for West Side Flats drainage issues and the Ford Site

$100,000

Grants, Stormwater Utility, City Funding

No. 38

39

40

41

42

Project Description Identify and target certain high-priority areas for watershed district, watershed management organizations, and private development redevelopment partnerships Evaluate non-degradation/preservation project opportunities from the following: -Phalen Lake Strategic Management Plan -Beaver Lake Strategic Management Plan -Como Lake Strategic Management Plan -RWMWD WRAPs Study -Wakefield Lake TMDL Atlas 14 Analysis and Ordinance Revision for Chapter 52 of City Code Study Performance of BMPs- collaborate with various partner agencies

Evaluate stormwater asset management program to assist in assessing stormwater BMP performance,maintenance prioritization and budgeting

Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 1610-150

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

$30,000

2024

2025

2026

2027

Comments

$30,000

$40,000

$30,000

x

$50,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

Cost dependent on scope of the study.

x

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$5,000

$30,000

$50,000

$50,000

TABLE 6.1

SECTION VI

Proposed Cost By Year1

No.

10 Year Total Cost Estimate 1,3

Possible Funding Sources 2

$100,000

Grants, Stormwater Utility

45

Project Description Evaluate and pursue permanent flood control options for Lowertown area.

46

Coordinate with partner agencies on Willow Reserve water quality study

$35,000

CRWD

47

Evaluate H&H modeling updates for Atlas 14 rainfall data to better plan for City resiliency

$50,000

CRWD, RWMWD, Grants, Stormwater Utility

48

Evaluate the current Mississippi River Critical Area Plan and update with any rule revisions

$10,000

Stormwater Utility, Grants

$20,000

Stormwater Utility, Grants, MWMO

$18,000

CRWD, RWMWD, Grants, Stormwater Utility

49

50

Partner with the MWMO to complete a study of DNR waters that would be affected by the small watercourse appropriation requirement Review and discuss with watershed districts and watershed management organizations redevelopment plans and identify partnering opportunities TOTAL

$108,596,000

2018

2019

2020

2021

$50,000

$50,000

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

Comments

$35,000

$50,000

$10,000

$20,000

$10,581,000

$2,000

$2,000

$2,000

$2,000

$2,000

$2,000

$2,000

$2,000

$2,000

$10,816,000

$10,770,000

$10,639,000

$10,740,000

$10,666,000

$10,941,000

$10,866,000

$10,861,000

$10,916,000

1

Cost estimates are preliminary and subject to review and revision as engineer's reports are completed and more information becomes available. Table reflects 2015 costs and does not account for inflation. Costs generally include labor, equipment, materials, and all other costs necessary to complete each activity. Some of the costs outlined above may be included in other operational costs budgeted by the City.

2 Funding for stormwater program activities projected to come from following sources - Surface Water Management Fund, Developers Agreements, Grant Funds, General Operating Fund, or Special Assessments.

3 Staff time is not included in the cost shown.

Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 1610-150

TABLE 6.1

Appendix A Figures

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Appendix A

Appendix B MPCA TMDLs

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Appendix B

Appendix C Zoning Ordinances and Overlay Districts Contains the Following Ordinances: 1) Chapter 51. Discharges to the Storm Sewer System 2) Chapter 52. Stormwater Runoff 3) Chapter 68. River Corridor Overlay Districts 4) Chapter 91. Water Code – Miscellaneous Provisions

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 01610-150

Appendix C

APPENDIX D Wetland Management Plan

Local Surface Water Management Plan City of St. Paul WSB Project No. 1610-150

APPENDIX D

Chapter 52. - Stormwater Runoff - Redlines Sec. 52.01. - Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to control stormwater pollution along with soil erosion and sedimentation in the city. It establishes standards and specifications for practices and planning activities, which minimize stormwater pollution, soil erosion and sedimentation.

(C.F. No. 04-267, § 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.02. - Scope.

Any person, firm, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, state agency, or political subdivision proposing a construction activity of one quarter (1/4) acre or more within the city shall submit a Stormwater Management Plan to the city for approval. No land shall be disturbed until the Plan, conforming to the standards set forth within the Design Standards, hereby adopted by reference, is approved by the city.

(C.F. No. 04-267, § 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.03. - Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter, the terms used in this chapter have the meanings defined within the Design Standards.

(C.F. No. 04-267, § 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.04. - Stormwater Management Plan.

Any person, firm, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, state agency, or political subdivision proposing a construction activity of one quarter (1/4) acre or more within the city shall submit a Stormwater Management Plan to the city for approval. No land shall be disturbed until the plan, conforming to the standards set forth within the Design Standards, is approved by the city. At a minimum, these best management practices must address runoff rate, volume and water quality.

Stormwater Runoff Rate Control Stormwater runoff rate control is required for sites larger than onequarter (¼) of an acre which go through the city's site plan review process. Stormwater discharge into public storm sewers shall be controlled, in accordance with the Department of Public Works Design Standards. Proposed stormwater runoff rate shall not increase from pre-project conditions. Discharge of all stormwater runoff and surface water shall be in a fashion so as to preclude drainage onto adjacent property or toward buildings.

Flood control for buildings The low floor elevation for new construction must be a minimum of one (1) foot above the critical one hundred-year flood elevation and at least four (4) feet above normal groundwater elevation.

(f)

Permanent stormwater pollution controls.

(1)

Where a project's ultimate development replaces vegetation and/or other pervious surfaces with one (1) or more acres of cumulative impervious surface, a water quality volume of onehalf (½) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project must be treated in one (1) of the following ways prior to the runoff leaving the site or entering surface waters (excluding drainage systems that convey stormwater to a constructed permanent stormwater management facility designed to treat the water quality volume from the project): wet sedimentation basin, infiltration/filtration, regional ponds, a combination of practices, or

alternate methods in accordance with the current version of the MPCA's general permit to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity under the NPDES. (2)

At a minimum these facilities must conform to the most current technology as reflected in the current version of the MPCA's publication "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" or other sources as defined in section 52.03 and the current requirements found in the same agency's NPDES permits for stormwater associated with construction activities.

(3)

Permanent stormwater pollution controls to be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the state. Constructed controls must be certified by a professional engineer as required in section 52.04(g)(3).

(g) Models/methodologies/computations. Hydrologic models and design methodologies used for the determining runoff characteristics and analyzing stormwater management structures must be approved by the city and shall meet the requirements listed in the Design Standards. (h)

Inspection and maintenance of the stormwater pollution control plan's measures.

(1)

The applicant must routinely inspect the construction site as required in the Department of Public Works Design Standards.

(2)

The city's inspection staff is authorized to perform inspection and enforce provisions of this article as may be required, to ensure that erosion and sediment control measures are properly installed and maintained. If the applicant fails to maintain proper erosion control measures on site and/or perform necessary remedial action, as directed by the inspector, the inspector may take such enforcement action as may be required to achieve compliance.

Enforcement may be, but is not limited to, stopping all construction work at the site, until necessary remedial actions have been completed and erosion and sediment controls are in compliance with the approved plans.

(3)

For sites that require a Stormwater Management Plan, a certification letter shall be submitted after the permanent facilities have been installed to affirm that construction has been completed in accordance with the approved Stormwater Management Plan and related construction plans. At a minimum, certification shall include a set of as-built drawings comparing the approved Stormwater Management Plan with what was constructed. Other information shall be submitted as required by the approving agency.

(4)

It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain any necessary easements or other property interests to allow access to the stormwater management facilities for inspection and maintenance purposes.

(5)

All stormwater pollution control management facilities must be designed to minimize the need of maintenance, to provide easy vehicle and personnel access for maintenance purposes and be structurally sound. These facilities must have a plan of operation and maintenance that ensures continued effective removal of the pollutants carried in stormwater runoff.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.05. - Review.

The city shall review the Stormwater Management Plan pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statute Sec. 15.99.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.06. - Modification of plan.

An approved Stormwater Management Plan may be modified upon submission of a written application for modification to the city, and after written approval by the city. In reviewing such an application, the city may require additional reports and data.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.07. - Financial securities.

The city may require financial security, in the form of either bond, letter of credit or cash escrow, for the performance of the work described in the approved Stormwater Management Plan and any related remedial work. This security must be available prior to commencing the project. (a)

(b)

Action against the financial security. The city may act against the financial security if any of the conditions listed below exist. The city shall use funds from this security to finance any corrective or remedial work undertaken by the city or a contractor under contract to the city and to reimburse the city for all direct cost incurred in the process of remedial work including, but not limited to, staff time and attorneys' fees.

(1)

The applicant ceases construction activities and/or filling and abandons the work site prior to completion of the Stormwater Management Plan.

(2)

The applicant fails to conform to the Stormwater Management Plan as approved by the city, or to related supplementary instructions.

(3)

The techniques utilized under the Stormwater Management Plan fail within one (1) year of installation.

(4)

The applicant fails to reimburse the city for corrective action taken under section 52.08.

(5)

Emergency action is taken under section 52.08.

Returning the financial security. Any unspent amount of the financial security deposited with the city for faithful performance of the Stormwater Management Plan and any related remedial work must be released not more than one (1) full year after the completion of the installation of all such measures and the establishment of final stabilization.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.08. - Failure of the Stormwater Management Plan . (a) Notification by the city. The city shall notify the applicant, when the City has determined that any of the conditions set forth in 52.07(a) exist. The initial contact will be to the party or parties listed on the Stormwater Management Plan as contacts. Except during an emergency action, the city at its discretion may begin corrective work forty-eight (48) hours after notification by the city. Such notification should be in writing, but if it is verbal, a written notification should follow as quickly as practical. If after making a good faith effort to notify the responsible party or parties, the city has been unable to establish contact, the city may proceed with corrective work. (b)

Emergency action. If circumstances exist that pose an immediate danger to the public health, safety and welfare, the city, upon making this determination, may take immediate action to abate said circumstances for the purpose of restoring the site to a safe condition. The city shall, as part of this action, make reasonable effort to contact and give notice to the applicant of the decision to institute this emergency procedure. Any cost to the city associated with this emergency action is recoverable from the applicant or the applicant's financial security.

(c)

Erosion off-site. If erosion breaches the perimeter of the site, the applicant shall immediately develop a cleanup and restoration plan, obtain the right-of-entry from the adjoining property owner, and implement the cleanup and restoration plan within forty-eight (48) hours of obtaining the adjoining property owner's permission. In no case, unless written approval is received from the city, shall more than seven (7) calendar days go by without corrective action being taken. If, in the discretion of the city, the applicant does not repair the damage caused by the erosion, the city may do the remedial work required and charge the cost to the applicant.

(d)

Erosion into streets, right-of-ways, wetlands or water bodies. If eroded soils (including tracked soils from construction activities) enter or appear likely to enter streets, right-of-ways, wetlands, or other

water bodies, prevention strategies, cleanup and repair must be immediate. The applicant shall provide all traffic control and flagging required to protect the traveling public during the cleanup operations and secure required right-of-way permits from the department of public works. (e)

Failure to do corrective work. When an applicant fails to conform to any provision of sections 52.07 or 52.08 within the time stipulated, the city may take the following actions: (1)

Withhold the scheduling of inspections and/or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

(2)

Revoke any permit issued by the city to the applicant for the site in question.

(3)

Direct the correction of the deficiency by city forces or by a separate contract.

(4)

All costs incurred by the city in correcting stormwater pollution control deficiencies must be reimbursed by the applicant. If payment is not made within thirty (30) days after costs are incurred by the city, payment will be made from the applicant's financial securities as described in section 52.07.

(5)

If a financial security as described in section 52.07 was not required by the city, or if there is an insufficient financial amount in the applicant's financial securities to cover the costs incurred by the city, then the city in its discretion is authorized to either certify the remaining amount to the property taxes or to assess the remaining amount against the property.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.09. - Enforcement.

The city shall be responsible for enforcing this chapter. Any person, firm, or corporation failing to comply with or violating any of these regulations, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and be subject to a fine or imprisonment or both. All land use and building permits must be suspended until the applicant has corrected the violation. Each day that a separate violation exists shall constitute a separate offense.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.10. - Right of entry and inspection.

The applicant shall allow the city and their authorized representatives, upon presentation of credentials to: (a)

(b) (c)

Enter upon the permitted site for the purpose of obtaining information, examining records, conducting investigations or surveys or for the purpose of correcting deficiencies in stormwater pollution control.

Bring such equipment upon the permitted site as is necessary.

Examine and copy any books, papers, records, or memoranda pertaining to activities or records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permitted site.

(d)

Inspect the stormwater pollution control measures.

(e)

Sample and monitor any items or activities pertaining to stormwater pollution control measures.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.11. - Record retention.

The Stormwater Management Plan and all changes to it must be kept at the site during construction.

The applicant must keep the Stormwater Management Plan, along with the following additional records, on file for three (3) years after completion of the construction project: (a)

Any other permits required for the project;

(b)

Records of all inspections and maintenance conducted during construction;

(c)

All permanent operation and maintenance agreements that have been implemented, including all right-of-way, contracts, covenants and other binding requirements regarding perpetual maintenance and;

(d)

All required calculations for design of the temporary and permanent stormwater management systems.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.12. - Abrogation and greater restrictions.

This chapter is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this chapter imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.13. - Other statutes, rules and ordinances.

The applicant shall comply with all federal and state statutes and local ordinances including the current version of the MPCA's general permit to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity under the NPDES and the requirements of the applicable watershed district or watershed management organization.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04) Sec. 52.14. - Severability.

The provisions of this chapter are severable, and if any provisions of this chapter, or application of any provisions of this chapter to any circumstance, are held invalid, the application of such provisions to other circumstances and the remainder of this chapter shall not be affected.

(C.F. No. 04-267, ยง 1, 4-7-04)

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul April 2019

Stormwater Management Design Standards TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DESIGN OVERVIEW............................................................................................................... 2 1.1 1.2

Context ............................................................................................................................. 2 Intent................................................................................................................................. 2 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................... 4 PROCEDURE FOR REVIEWING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS ............ 9

3.1 Exemptions ....................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Review Process .............................................................................................................. 11 3.3 Permit Review Requirements if in Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) or Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) ................................................... 12 3.4 Permit Review Requirements if in Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) or Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization (LMRWMO) . 13 3.5 Erosion and Sediment Control ........................................Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.6 Modification of the Plan................................................................................................. 13 SUBMITTAL REQUIRMENTS ...................................................................................... 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STANDARDS ............................................. 15 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN STANDARDS ........................................ 23 STORMWATER TREATMENT PLAN DESIGN CRITERIA ....................................... 24 STORMWATER TREATMENT PRACTICE DESIGN STANDARDS ........................ 29 DESIGN EXAMPLES ...................................................................................................... 34 STORMWATER TREATMENT PRACTICE DETAIL DRAWINGS ........................... 35 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................... 36 CHECKLISTS .................................................................................................................. 37 AMENDMENT PROCEDURES...................................................................................... 37 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C

Stormwater Management Plan Checklist Construction Sediment and Erosion Control Checklists MIDS Design Flowchart

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 1

Stormwater Management Design Standards 1. DESIGN OVERVIEW 1.1

Context

The City of Saint Paul has regulated stormwater runoff from parcels since 1982. Zoning code mandated controlling the rate of discharge from development activity greater than onequarter acre. The singular goal was preserving conveyance capacity of the separated storm sewer system and preventing flooding.

Nonpoint source pollution from the city’s separate storm sewer system has been regulated under the Clean Water Act since 2000. This compelled the City of Saint Paul to adopt in 2004 a legislative code chapter to address erosion control from construction activity greater than 1 acre, which included the rate control requirement for sites greater than one-quarter acre.

Due to continued decline in local water quality, and absence of robust municipal controls, two local watershed district agencies—covering 90% of the city—jointly implemented stormwater rules in 2006. This created an external agency permit program to mitigate stormwater runoff volume and pollution from activity greater than 1 acre.

To align regulations for water quality and rate control both on small sites and larger, in 2010 the City adopted an ordinance requiring “stormwater landscaping” on parking lots. That same year the City adopted sustainable building policies include a stormwater overlay. The overlay required that eligible projects conform with watershed volume control standards on sites greater than one-quarter acre.

Flood control became a key topic again when in 2013 the National Weather Service released NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8. The information in Atlas 14 supersedes precipitation frequency estimates from decades ago upon which the city’s original rate control requirements were based.

In 2018, the City of Saint Paul’s Clean Water Act permit authorizing stormwater discharge from the city’s separate storm sewer system was reissued. This again compels updated local controls for stormwater.

1.2

Intent

The subject of controlling stormwater runoff has evolved to be lengthy and complex.

Engineering analysis, layers of regulation and agency programs, and a wide range of site Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 2

Stormwater Management Design Standards development constraints all factor into stormwater permitting decisions. The City of Saint Paul has chosen to simplify its city ordinance and rely upon an official Stormwater Design Standards publication to convey the thorough and precise requirements necessary for effective stormwater regulation. This approach provides a nimble framework to respond to any future regulatory changes.

The purpose of the Design Standards is to fully align the city’s obligations and technical resources pertaining to surface water management. This includes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program (Clean Water Act), Local Surface Water Management Plans (Minnesota Statute 103B) and engineering best practices such as the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.

The goal of the Design Standards is to consolidate the city’s various stormwater controls to a single authoritative location, unify the various permitting thresholds and development requirements to a common platform, and streamline development permitting procedures.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 3

Stormwater Management Design Standards DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Design Manual, the following definitions describe the meaning of the terms used in this Design Manual: Applicant means any person or entity that applies for a building permit, subdivision approval, or a permit to allow construction activities. Applicant also means that person's agents, employees, and others acting under this person's direction.

Best Management Practices (BMPs) mean the erosion and sediment control and water quality management practices that are the most effective and practicable means of controlling, preventing, and minimizing degradation of surface water, including avoidance of impacts, construction phasing, minimizing the length of time soil areas are exposed, prohibitions, and other management practices published by state or designated area-wide planning agencies.

Individual BMPs are described in the current version of "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas," Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2000. BMPs must be adapted to the site and can be adopted from other sources. However, they must be similar in purpose and as effective and stringent as the MPCA's BMPs. Other sources include the current versions of "Minnesota Small Sites Urban BMP Manual," Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 2001, and "Erosion Control Design Manual," Minnesota Department of Transportation, 1993.

Construction activity means activities including clearing, grading, and excavating, that result in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre, including the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb equal to or greater than one acre. This includes a disturbance to the land that results in a change in the topography, existing soil cover, both vegetative and nonvegetative, or the existing soil topography that may result in accelerated stormwater runoff that may lead to soil erosion and movement of sediment. Construction activity does not include a disturbance to the land of less than five acres for the purpose of routine maintenance performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, and original purpose of the facility. Routine maintenance does not include activities such as repairs, replacement and other types of non-routine maintenance. Pavement rehabilitation that does not disturb the underlying soils (e.g., mill and overlay projects) is not construction activity.

Channel means a natural or artificial watercourse with a definite bed and banks that conducts continuously or periodically flowing water.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 4

Stormwater Management Design Standards Dewatering means the removal of water for construction activity. It can be a discharge of appropriated surface or groundwater to dry and/or solidify a construction site. It may require state department of natural resources permits to be appropriated and if contaminated may require other MPCA permits to be discharged.

Discharge means the release, conveyance, channeling, runoff, or drainage, of stormwater, including snowmelt, from a construction site.

Erosion means the wearing away of the ground surface as a result of the movement of wind, water, ice, and/or construction activities.

Erosion control means methods employed to prevent erosion including, but not limited to soil stabilization practices, limited grading, mulch, temporary or permanent cover, and construction phasing.

Final stabilization means that all soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and a uniform, evenly distributed perennial vegetative cover with a density of seventy (70) percent of the cover for unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent structures has been established, or equivalent permanent stabilization measures (such as the use of riprap, gabions, or geotextiles) have been employed.

Impervious Surface means a constructed hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil and causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than prior to development. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, and concrete, asphalt, or gravel roads. Bridges over surface waters are impervious surfaces.

Land Disturbance means any activity that results in a change or alteration in the existing ground cover (both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to, development, redevelopment, demolition, construction, reconstruction, clearing, grading, filling, stockpiling, excavation, and borrow pits. Routine vegetation management, and road milling/overlay activities that do not alter the soil material beneath the road base, will not be considered land disturbance.

Linear Project means construction or reconstruction of roads, trails, sidewalks, or rail lines that are not part of a common plan of development or sale. Rehabilitation is not considered reconstruction. Rehabilitation includes mill and overlay and other resurfacing activities within existing right-of-way that do not expose underlying soils.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 5

Stormwater Management Design Standards Maintenance Agreement means a document recorded against the property which provides for long-term maintenance of best management practices.

Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) means design requirements such that the rate and volume control and water quality standards of predevelopment stormwater reaching receiving waters is unchanged compared to the runoff from developed land.

MPCA means the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) means the system of conveyances including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels or storm drains that is: owned and operated by the city, or other public entity, and designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater, and which is not used for collecting or conveying sewage.

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) means a permit issued under the Clean Water Act (Section 301, 318, 402, and 405) and United States Code of Federal Regulations Title 33, Section 1317, 1328, 1342, and 1345 authorizing the discharge of pollutants to water of the United States.

Nonpoint Source Pollution means pollution from any source other than from any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyances, and shall include but not be limited to, pollutants from agricultural, silvicultural, mining, construction, subsurface disposal and urban runoff sources.

Off-Site Facility means a stormwater management measure located outside the subject property boundary described in the permit application for land development activity.

Owner means the person or party possessing the title of the land on which the construction activity will occur; or if the construction activity is for a lease holder, the party or individual identified as the lease holder; or the contracting government agency responsible for the construction activity.

Permanent cover means final stabilization. Examples include grass, gravel, asphalt, and concrete.

Responsible Party means the entity which will be responsible for ownership and maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMPs).

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 6

Stormwater Management Design Standards Runoff means rainfall, snowmelt, or irrigation water flowing over the ground surface.

Sediment control means the methods employed to prevent sediment from leaving the site.

Sediment control practices include, but are not limited to, silt fences, sediment traps, earth dikes, drainage swales, check dams, subsurface drains, pipe slope drains, storm drain inlet protection, and temporary or permanent sedimentation basins.

Site means any tract, lot, or parcel of land or combination of tracts, lots, or parcels of land, which are in one ownership or are contiguous and in diverse ownership, where development is to be performed as part of a unit, subdivision, or project. Final determination of the applicable area for stormwater management shall be made by the City.

Stabilization means covering the exposed ground surface with appropriate materials such as mulch, staked sod, riprap, wood fiber blanket, or other material that prevents erosion from occurring. Sowing grass seed is not considered stabilization.

Standard plates mean general drawings having or showing similar characteristics or qualities that are representative of a construction practice or activity.

Stormwater Management Plan means a plan, prepared by the applicant, for stormwater discharge that includes erosion and sediment control measures that, when implemented, will decrease soil erosion on a parcel of land and decrease off-site pollution.

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) means a set of plans prepared by or under the direction of a licensed professional engineer or certified contractor indicating the specific measures and sequencing to be used to control the sediment and erosion on a project site during and after construction. This plan will be consistent with NPDES requirements.

Stormwater runoff includes precipitation runoff, snow melt runoff, and any other surface runoff and drainage. "Stormwater" does not include construction site dewatering.

Surface Waters means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, wetlands, reservoirs, springs, rivers, drainage systems, waterways, watercourses, and irrigation systems.

Temporary erosion protection means short term methods employed to prevent erosion.

Examples of temporary cover include: straw, erosion control blankets, wood chips, and erosion netting.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 7

Stormwater Management Design Standards Watercourse means a permanent or intermittent stream or other body of water, either natural or fabricated, which gathers or carries surface water.

Watershed means the total drainage area contributing runoff to a single point.

Wetlands as defined in Minnesota Rules 7050.0130, subpart F, "wetlands," are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Constructed wetlands designed for wastewater treatment are not waters of the state.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 8

Stormwater Management Design Standards PROCEDURE FOR REVIEWING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS These Design Standards are an official statement of City policy and rules pursuant to Saint Paul Legislative Code 52.02.

Any person, firm, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, state agency, or political subdivision proposing a construction activity that results in land disturbance equal to or greater than one-quarter (Âź) within the city shall submit a Stormwater Management Plan to the city for approval. Two site improvements that are completed within 5 years are considered connected under the same Stormwater Management Plan. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) may also be required based on the applicability outlined below.

These plans shall be consistent with NPDES permit requirements, and the filing or approval requirements of other regulatory bodies. When required, these plans shall be approved prior to the issuance of any permits.

These Stormwater Management Design Standards adopts and incorporates citywide the Rule C stormwater criteria, parts b-d for rate, volume and quality jointly implemented by RamseyWashington Metro and Capitol Region Watershed Districts. All Stormwater Management Plans must also include erosion and sediment control provisions as required herein.

3.1

Regulation Volume control/water quality: Any land disturbing activity that disturbs one or more acres of land, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times.

Rate control: Any land disturbing activity that disturbs 1/4 acres (10,890 square feet) of land or greater.

Erosion and Sediment Control Any land disturbing activity that disturbs 1/4 acres (10,890 square feet) of land or greater. A NPDES General Construction Permit and SWPPP will be required for construction activity that results in land disturbance equal to or greater than 1 acre or

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 9

Stormwater Management Design Standards if a project is part of a common plan of development or sale that ultimately will disturb greater than 1 acre.

If the City determines that the Stormwater Management Plan and the SWPPP meet the requirements of these standards, the City shall issue a permit for erosion control, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements. The permit shall be valid for a specified period of time that authorizes the land disturbance activity contingent on the implementation and completion of this plan. The table below summarizes the City regulations.

≥ 0.25 acres

City Project Review

Meet City rate control and erosion and sediment control standards (reviewed by Public Works)

3.2

≥ 1 acre

New/Redevelopment Meet WD volume reduction and water quality requirements of Section 7.2 Linear Development Meet WD volume reduction and water quality requirements of Section 7.2

Exemptions

The following activities are exempt from submitting a Stormwater Management Plan: 1. Land disturbing activity or the development of land that post construction creates 100% pervious surfaces unless the land disturbing activity or the development of land alters the existing drainage boundaries; 2. Construction on individual lots within a residential subdivision approved by the WD or City, provided the activity complies with the original common plan of development; 3. Annually cultivated land used for farming, research or horticulture; 4. Installation of fence, sign, telephone and electric poles and other kinds of posts or poles.

5. Any projects not subject to site plan review pursuant to SPLC 62.400 6. Emergency work to protect life, limb or property.

7. The site’s disturbed area is more than one quarter of an acre but less than an acre and the proposed construction will not result in a net increase of the site’s impervious area and runoff. Erosion control plans will still be required for sites that disturb greater than one quarter of an acre.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 10

Stormwater Management Design Standards

Unless otherwise exempted, Applicants are required to follow requirements of these Design Standards and/or the Watershed District requirements.

3.3

Review Process

Preliminary review or early staff consultation is an available for potential applicants.

Site plan review is codified in SPLC 61.402. The City shall not grant site plan approval, nor by extension a building permit, unless the applicant is considered by staff as having satisfied the requirements of these Standards. The Departments of Public Works and Safety and Inspections shall jointly review the Stormwater Management Plan for conformance with the Standards. The follow is an outline of the site plan review: 1. Applicant to submit site plan and completed application form to the Department of Safety and Inspections.

2. City staff reviews the site plan. Various City departments will review including Sewers, Water, Traffic, Zoning, Parks and Fire.

3. Applicant to meet with the District Council for the neighborhood in which the project is proposed. District Councils have an advisory role and send comments to City staff to be considered during the site plan review.

4. Applicant to meet with City staff to discuss the project and any needed revisions to the plans.

5. City staff to submit comments to the applicant following the meeting, 6. Applicant to make any needed revisions to the site plan. The revised plans will be reviewed against the comments City staff had from the site plan meeting. This review takes about one week. Another meeting with City staff is not usually needed.

7. City staff to issue a letter approving the site plan if all comments have been addressed.

8. Applicant applies for building permits. No private development, utility or street construction will be allowed, and no building permits will be issued unless the development is in full compliance with the requirements of these Standards.

The Stormwater Management Plan for construction activity which exceeds one acre must also include a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit program. The applicant is responsible to obtain and provide copies of any other stormwater related permits prior to receiving final site plan approval.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 11

Stormwater Management Design Standards

The City’s Public Works department will review the following: • Erosion/sediment control associated with utility upgrades and street reconstruction occurring within City Right-of-Way • Rate control for all development • Storm sewer connections to and modifications to public storm sewer system • Water quality and volume reduction for street reconstruction occurring within City Right-of-Way • Construction and design of stormwater best management practices constructed within City Right-of-Way The City’s Department of Safety and Inspections will review the following: • Erosion/sediment control associated with developments occurring outside of City Right-of-Way • Water quality and volume reduction for development outside the City Rightof-Way • Construction and design of stormwater best management practices constructed outside the City Right-of-Way 3.4

Permit Review Requirements if in Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) or Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) Regulation for Stormwater Management: No person or political subdivision shall commence a land disturbing activity or the development of land one acre or greater without first obtaining a permit from the District that incorporates and approves a stormwater management plan for the activity or development.

Additional permit requirements can be found on the CRWD and RWMWD websites.

City Project Review ≥ 0.25 acres Meet City rate control standard (reviewed by Public Works)

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

CRWD/RWMWD Project Review ≥ 1 acre Meet WD volume reduction and water quality requirement

Page 12

Stormwater Management Design Standards 3.5

Permit Review Requirements if in Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) or Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization (LMRWMO) No separate permit is necessary from MWMO or LMRWMO.

3.6

Modification of the Plan Any changes to the approved plan must be submitted to the City and/or watershed agency for review and approval before work can commence.

The applicant must amend the Stormwater Management Plan and/or SWPPP as necessary to correct problems identified or address situations whenever: 1. A change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather, or seasonal conditions that has a significant effect on the discharge or pollutants to surface waters or underground waters.

2. Inspections or investigations indicate the plans are not effective in eliminating or significantly minimizing the discharge or pollutants to surface waters or underground waters or that the discharges are causing water quality degradation; or 3. The plan is not achieving the general objectives of minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges associated with construction activity; or 4. The plan is not consistent with the terms and conditions of these standards, or other permitting authority standards.

SUBMITTAL REQUIRMENTS Stormwater Management Plan Requirements The applicant shall include all stormwater design information as part of the official site plan review process. Materials shall be provided to the city in accordance with the city’s electronic plan review and approval program. All site plan applications are pre-screened by staff to assess adequacy and completeness. The Stormwater Management Plan at a minimum should include the following: • Grades or contours to define the routing of storm water and storm water detention areas • Outline of each separate drainage area within the site property lines or improvement limits, including roofs and all other surface areas.

• Area in acres of each drainage area.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 13

Stormwater Management Design Standards • • • • • • •

•

•

• • • •

Separate pervious and impervious curve numbers along with drainage area descriptions.

Time of concentration in minutes of drainage areas.

Outline of each separate on-site detention area. Ponding may be provided in parking lots, green areas, roof tops or underground storage.

Depth in ft. of on-site detention.

Area in acres of on-site detention.

Volume in acre-ft. of on-site detention.

Overflow route of on-site detention. Hydrologic and hydraulic design calculations for all structural components of the stormwater system (i.e., storm drains, open channels, swales, management practices, etc.) for the predevelopment and post development conditions must be submitted. Such calculations shall include: Existing and proposed condition analysis for runoff rates, volumes, velocities, and water surface elevations showing methodologies used, design parameters, and supporting calculations. Atlas 14 rainfall data and MSE 3 distributions must be used.

Final sizing calculations for structural stormwater management practices including contributing drainage area, storage, normal and high-water levels, peak inflow and outflow, and outlet configuration. Drainage areas must include any offsite drainage.

Stage-discharge or outlet rating curves and inflow and outflow hydrographs for storage facilities (e.g., stormwater ponds and wetlands).

Analysis, computations, and supporting materials indicating that volume control, water quality, and water quantity design criteria are being met.

Final analysis of potential downstream impact/effects of project, where necessary.

Soils information including Hennepin County Soil Survey or logs of borehole investigations that may have been performed along with supporting geotechnical report.

Projects disturbing less than 1 acre and requiring site plan review must provide erosion and sediment controls (SPLC 61.402(c)11). These controls must be shown within the submitted site plan package and at minimum must be consistent with the MPCA’s “Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas.”

Projects disturbing 1 acre or more must provide erosion, sediment, and waste controls. These controls must be shown within the submitted site plan package and must reflect all requirements of the MPCA’s must current general permit to Discharge Stormwater Associated with

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 14

Stormwater Management Design Standards Construction Activity No. MN R100001. The site plan must incorporate the following categories as described in the general permit: a. BMPs to minimize erosion. b. BMPs to minimize the discharge of sediment and other pollutants. c. BMPs for dewatering activities. d. Site inspections and records of rainfall events. e. BMP maintenance. f. Management of solid and hazardous waste on each project site. g. Final stabilization upon the completion of construction activity, including the use of perennial vegetative cover on all exposed soils or other equivalent means. h. Criteria for the use of temporary sediment basins.

The city’s standard ESC checklist will be used as a guide in pre-screening to determine if submittal requirements are met.

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STANDARDS 5.1

Erosion Control 1. The Applicant must plan for and implement appropriate construction phasing vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices to minimize erosion. All areas not to be disturbed shall be marked (e.g. with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence etc.) on the project site before any work begins.

2. All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion but in no case later than 14 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased and no later than seven (7) days after construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased when discharge points on the project is within one mile of a special or impaired water and flows to that special or impaired water.

3. Additional BMPs together with enhanced runoff controls, are required for discharges to special waters and impaired waters. The BMPs identified for each special or impaired water are required for those areas of the project draining to a discharge point on the project that is within one mile of a special or impaired water and flows to that water. The additional BMPs are identified in Appendix A of the NPDES Construction General Permit.

4. The applicant must stabilize the normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale that drains water from any portion of the construction site, or diverts water around the site, within 200 linear feet from the property edge, or from the point of discharge into any surface water. Stabilization of the last 200 linear feet must be completed within 24-hours after connecting to a surface water or property edge.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 15

Stormwater Management Design Standards 5. Pipe outlets must have temporary or permanent energy dissipation before connecting to surface water.

6. When possible, all slopes must be graded in such a fashion so that tracking marks made from heavy equipment are perpendicular to the slope.

7. All areas disturbed during construction must be restored as detailed in the NPDES Construction General Permit.

8. All erosion control measures must be maintained for the duration of the project until final stabilization has been achieved. If construction operations or natural events damage or interfere with any erosion control measures, they shall be restored to serve their intended function.

9. Additional erosion control measures shall be added as necessary to effectively protect the natural resources of the City. The temporary and permanent erosion control plans shall be revised as needed based on current site conditions and to comply with all applicable requirements 5.2

Sediment Control Practices 1. Sediment control practices must be established on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. These practices must remain in place until final stabilization has been achieved.

2. If down gradient treatment system is overloaded additional up gradient sediment control practices must be installed to eliminate overloading. The SWPPP must be amended to identify the additional practices.

3. All storm drain inlets must be protected by approved BMPs during construction until all potential sources for discharge have been stabilized. These devices must be maintained until final stabilization is achieved. Inlet protection may be removed if a specific safety concern (street flooding/freezing) has been identified.

4. Temporary stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls on the down gradient side of the stockpile and shall not be placed within twenty-five (25) feet from any road, wetland, protected water, drainage channel, or stormwater inlets. Stockpiles left for more than 14 days must be stabilized with mulch, vegetation, tarps or other approved means.

5. Vehicle tracking of sediment from the project site shall be minimized by approved BMPs. These shall be installed and maintained at the City approved entrances. Individual lots shall each be required to install and maintained entrances throughout the construction building until a paved driveway is install.

6. Sediment that has washed or tracked from the site by motor vehicles or equipment shall be cleaned from paved surfaces throughout the duration of construction.

7. Silt fence or other approved sediment control devices must be installed in all

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 16

Stormwater Management Design Standards areas as shown on the SWPPP. 8. Dust control measures, such as application of water must be performed periodically due to weather, construction activity, and/or as directed by the City.

9. Flows from diversion channels or pipes (temporary or permanent) must be routed to sedimentation basins or appropriate energy dissipaters to prevent the transport of sediment to outflow or lateral conveyors and to prevent erosion and sediment buildup when runoff flows into the conveyors.

10. A concrete washout shall be installed on projects that require the use of concrete. All liquid and solid wastes generated by concrete washout operations must be contained in a leak-proof containment facility or impermeable liner. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility to inform operators to utilize the proper facilities.

11. All sediment control measures shall be used and maintained for the duration of the project until final. If construction operations or natural events damage or interfere with any erosion control measures, they must be restored to serve their intended function.

12. Additional sediment control measures shall be added as necessary to effectively protect the natural resources of the City. The temporary and permanent erosion control plans shall be revised as needed based on current site conditions and to comply with all applicable requirements.

13. Restrict clearing and grading adjacent to an existing wetland boundary to provide for a protective buffer strip of natural vegetation as per Section 8.

5.3

Temporary Sediment Basins A temporary sediment basin (or permanent) shall be provided when 10 or more acres of disturbed soil drain to a common location prior to the runoff leaving the site or entering surface waters. The Applicant is also encouraged, but not required to install temporary sediment basins in areas with steep slope or highly erodible soils even if the area is less than ten (10) acres and it drains to one common area. The basins shall be designed and constructed according to the following requirements: 1. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2-year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin.

2. Where no such calculation has been performed, a temporary (or permanent) sediment basin providing 3,600 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe per acre drained to the basin shall be provided where attainable until final stabilization of the site.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 17

Stormwater Management Design Standards 3. Temporary basin outlets will be designed to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. The basin must be designed with the ability to allow complete basin drawdown (e.g., perforated riser pipe wrapped with filter fabric and covered with crushed gravel, pumps or other means) for maintenance activities, and provide a stabilized emergency overflow to prevent failure of pond integrity. Energy dissipation must be provided for the basin outlet.

4. In the construction of new basin outlets, skimmers are required. Skimmers are also required to be incorporated into the existing system whenever feasible and practical.

5. Temporary (or permanent) basins must be constructed and made operational concurrent with the start of soil disturbance that is up gradient of the area and contributes runoff to the pond.

6. Where the temporary sediment basin is not attainable due to site limitations, equivalent sediment controls such as smaller sediment basins, and/or sediment traps, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips or any appropriate combination of measures are required for all down slope boundaries of the construction area and for those side slope boundaries deemed appropriate as dictated by individual site conditions. In determining whether installing a sediment basin is attainable, the Applicant must consider public safety and may consider factors such as site soils, slope, and available area on-site. This determination must be documented in the SWPPP. 7. The Applicant shall maintain the sedimentation basins and will remain functional until an acceptable vegetative cover is restored to the site, resulting in a predevelopment level rate of erosion. The city will not issue building permits for lots containing sediment basins until they have been removed or relocated based on the projects restoration progress.

8. Basins designed to be used for permanent stormwater management shall be brought back to their original design contours prior to acceptance by the City.

5.4

Dewatering and Basin Draining 1. If water cannot be discharged into a sedimentation basin before entering a surface water it must be treated with appropriate BMPs, such that the discharge does not adversely affect the receiving water or downstream landowners. The Applicant must make sure discharge points are appropriately protected from erosion and scour. The discharge must be dispersed over riprap, sand bags, plastic sheeting or other acceptable energy dissipation measures. Adequate sediment control measures are required for discharging water that contains suspended soils.

2. All water from dewatering or basin draining must discharge in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downslope

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 18

Stormwater Management Design Standards properties, or inundation in wetlands causing significant adverse impacts to wetlands.

5.5

Inspections and Maintenance 1. The Applicant shall be responsible for inspecting and maintenance of the BMPs. 2. The Applicant must routinely inspect the construction project once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24-hours of a rainfall event of 0.5 inches or greater in 24-hours.

3. All inspections and maintenance conducted during construction must be recorded in writing and must be retained with the SWPPP. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: 1) Date and time of inspections.

2) Name of person(s) conducting the inspections.

3) Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective actions.

4) Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and the party completing the maintenance activities).

5) Date and amount of all rainfall events 0.5 inches or greater in 24-hours.

6) Documentation of changes made to SWPPP. 4. Parts of the construction site that have achieved final stabilization, but work continues on other parts of the site, inspections of the stabilized areas can be reduced to once a month. If work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, the required inspections and maintenance must take place as soon as runoff occurs or prior to resuming construction, which ever happens first.

5. All erosion and sediment BMPs shall be inspected to ensure integrity and effectiveness. All nonfunctional BMPs shall be repaired, replaced or supplemented with a functional BMP. The Applicant shall investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: 1) All silt fences must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/2 of the height of the fence.

These repairs shall be made within 24-hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access.

2) Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches 1/2 the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access.

3) Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems, must be inspected for evidence of sediment being deposited by erosion. The Applicant shall remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems, and

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 19

Stormwater Management Design Standards restabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. The removal and stabilization shall take place within seven (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. The Applicant shall use all reasonable efforts to obtain access. If precluded, removal and stabilization shall take place within seven (7) calendar days of obtaining access. The Applicant is responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work.

4) Construction site vehicle exit locations shall be inspected for evidence of offsite sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment shall be removed from all off-site paved surfaces, within 24-hours of discovery, or if applicable, within a shorter time. It shall be the responsibility of the developer / contractor to keep streets and property adjacent to construction areas free from sediment carried by construction traffic at sites entrances and access points, and from site runoff and blowing dust.

5) The Applicant is responsible for the operation and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality management BMPs, as well as all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, for the duration of the construction work at the site. The Applicant is responsible until another Applicant has assumed control over all areas of the site that have not been finally stabilized or the site has undergone final stabilization, and a Notice of Termination (NOT) has been submitted to the MPCA. 6) If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations of sediment shall be removed in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize offsite impacts (e.g., fugitive sediment in streets could be washed into storm sewers by the next rain and/or pose a safety hazard to users of public streets).

6. All infiltration areas shall be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activities is reaching the infiltration area and that these areas are protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the infiltration area.

5.6

Pollution Management Measures/Construction Site Waste Control 1. The Applicant must implement the following pollution prevention management measures on the site.

1) Solid Waste – Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and must comply with MPCA disposal requirements.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 20

Stormwater Management Design Standards 2) Hazardous Materials including oil, gasoline, paint and other hazardous substances must be properly stored, including secondary containment to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to storage areas shall be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste shall be in compliance with MPCA regulations.

3) External washing of trucks and other construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff shall be contained and waste from the washing activity properly disposed of. No engine degreasing is allowed onsite.

4) The City of St. Paul prohibits discharges of any material other than stormwater or treated discharges from dewatering or basin draining activities.

Prohibited discharges include but are not limited to vehicle and equipment washing, maintenance spills, wash water, and discharges of oil and other hazardous substances.

5) The Applicant must comply with all other pollution prevention/good housekeeping requirements of the MPCA NPDES Construction General Permit.

5.7

Final Stabilization 1. The Applicant must ensure final stabilization of the project. Final stabilization is not complete until the following is completed: 1) All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils will be stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of at least 70 percent over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions; and 2) All drainage ditches, constructed to drain water from the site after construction is complete, must be stabilized to preclude erosion; and 3) All temporary synthetic, and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (such as silt fence) must be removed as part of the site final stabilization; and 4) The Applicant must clean out all sediment from conveyances and from temporary sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins. Sediment must be stabilized to prevent it from washing back into the basin, conveyances or drainage ways discharging off-site or to surface waters. The cleanout of permanent basins must be sufficient to return the basin to design capacity.

2. For residential construction only, final stabilization has been achieved when:

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 21

Stormwater Management Design Standards 1) Temporary erosion protection and down gradient perimeter control for individual lots has been completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner.

2) The Applicant has distributed the MPCA “Homeowner Fact Sheet� to the homeowner so the homeowner is informed for the need, and benefits, of final stabilization.

5.8

Training 1. The SWPPP must provide a chain of command showing who prepared the SWPPP, who is responsible for the management of the construction site and inspections.

2. The training shall consist of a course developed by a local, state or federal agency, professional organization, water management organization, or soil and water conservation district and must contain information that is related to erosion prevention, sediment control, or permanent stormwater management and must relate to the work that the trainee is responsible for managing.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 22

Stormwater Management Design Standards STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN STANDARDS 6.1 Guidance on Stormwater Treatment Practices (BMPs) The Stormwater Management Plan shall meet the volume control, water quality, and water quantity requirements of these Standards. Deviations from recommended guidance will require detailed written explanation with discretion given by the City.

Final site design and choice of permanent stormwater volume reduction practices shall be based on outcomes of the MIDS Calculator (or other model that shows the performance goal can be met) and shall meet the performance goals in Section 8 of these design standards. The MIDS calculator is available on the MPCA’s website.

6.2 List of Acceptable Stormwater Treatment Practices The Minnesota Stormwater Manual identifies a number of potential BMPs that can be used during design to meet stormwater management requirements. Volume control systems are foremost of importance to apply in the design. Filtration is warranted when site conditions do not allow for an effective infiltration facility. Volume reduction can be met with any combination of BMPs with the highest preference given to green infrastructure techniques and practices. Low Impact Design (LID) practices are encouraged when they can be functionally incorporated into the design. For projects where infiltration is not feasible the BMPs proposed shall meet the performance identified in the MIDS Flexible Treatment Options (FTO) (Appendix C).

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 23

Stormwater Management Design Standards

STORMWATER TREATMENT PLAN DESIGN CRITERIA • Where industrial facilities are not authorized to infiltrate industrial stormwater under and NPDES/SDS Industrial Stormwater Permit issued by the MPCA. • Where vehicle fueling and maintenance occur.

• With less than three (3) feet of separation distance from the bottom of the infiltration system to the elevation of the seasonally saturated soils or the top of the bedrock.

• infiltrating stormwater.

The use of infiltration techniques shall be prohibited in any of the following areas: • Soils are predominately Hydrologic Soil Group D (clay) soils.

• Within 1,000 feet up-gradient, or 100 feet down-gradient of active karst features.

• Drinking Water Supply Management Areas are present, as defined by Minn. R. 4720.51000, subp. 13, unless precluded by a local unit of government with an MS4 permit.

• Soil infiltration rates are more than 8.3 inches per hour, unless soils are amended for an infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour.

The City may allow a lesser volume reduction requirement than required if the project meets one of the prohibitions listed above and if the project implements to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) other volume reduction techniques such as evapotranspiration, reuse/harvesting, conservation design, green roofs, etc. on site. If other volume reduction techniques are not used, documentation must be provided on why that decision was made and detailed in the Applicant’s SWPPP per NPDES MS4 permit requirements.

6.3 Water Quality The water quality requirements shall be considered satisfied if the volume control standard has been satisfied. In the event that it is infeasible to meet the volume control standard due to site constraints, the proposed BMP will need to provide for the following Alternative Compliance Sequencing, consistent with watershed requirements: Alternative Compliance Option 1 First, the applicant shall comply or partially comply with the volume reduction standard to the maximum extent practicable on-site through alternative volume reduction methods as listed below. If the applicant meets these requirements, the project is compliant, and no further Sequencing steps are necessary.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 24

Stormwater Management Design Standards •

•

• •

If filtration of the water quality volume is deemed necessary through alternative compliance sequencing, the required stormwater runoff volume shall be multiplied by 1.82 (i.e. 55% filtration credit) and the filtration BMP shall provide this storage volume below the invert of the low overflow outlet of the BMP (perforated drain pipes for filtration will not be considered the low overflow outlet).

If iron-enhanced sand is used as a filtration media, the required stormwater runoff volume shall be multiplied by 1.25 (i.e. 80% filtration credit) and the filtration BMP shall provide this storage volume below the invert of the low overflow outlet of the BMP (perforated drain pipes for filtration will not be considered the low overflow outlet).

Iron-enhanced media shall include a minimum of 5% of iron filings by weight and shall be uniformly blended with filtration media.

Other enhanced filtration media may be considered and credited at the sole discretion of the City.

Alternative Compliance Option 2 Second, for the remaining volume reduction required to fully meet the standard, the applicant shall comply or partially comply with the volume reduction standard at an offsite location or through the use of qualified banking credits as determined by the watershed districts. If the applicant meets these requirements, the project is compliant, and no further Sequencing steps are necessary.

•

Volume reduction may be accomplished at another site outside of the project area or through the use of banked credits as long as it yields the same volume reduction benefit, and is approved by the City prior to construction. When possible, offsite compliance and banking credits shall be achieved in the same drainage area as the project site in the same sub-watershed as the project site. Projects that propose to construct stormwater BMPs to achieve volume reduction credits require City and Watershed District permit application, review and approval.

For areas that discharge directly to the Mississippi River or to an impaired water body for which a TMDL has been completed, the findings of the TMDL will replace this requirement (where more stringent). The required reduction of total phosphorus may be accomplished through the use of regional or on-site stormwater BMPs such: ponds, biofiltration, vegetated swales, mechanical devices, porous pavements, or any other techniques effective at phosphorus reduction. Linear construction projects should meet the above water quality

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 25

Stormwater Management Design Standards policy where possible and feasible. Linear projects will be required to meet watershed district and NPDES Construction Permit requirements.

1. It is required that implementation of best management practices during development and redevelopment to achieve the goal or reducing nonpoint source pollution, with emphasis placed on the watershed that drain (or will drain) to the Mississippi River.

2. It is encouraged to reduce the amount of impervious surface upon development or redevelopment.

3. For replacement discharge points/outfalls or existing stormwater discharge points/outfalls, there should be pretreatment of stormwater prior to its discharge to wetlands and other water resources.

4. For new stormwater discharge points/outfalls, the City will provide pretreatment (at least grit removal) of stormwater prior to its discharge to wetlands and other water resources.

6.4

Rate Control 1. Rate control will be required for site that disturb an area greater than Âź of an acre.

Linear projects will be exempt from this rate control threshold. A Stormwater Management Plan will be required for linear projects for sites greater than an acre.

2. Proposed runoff rates shall not exceed existing runoff rates for the 2-year, 10year, and 100-year critical storm events using Atlas 14 precipitation depths and storm distributions. Runoff rates may be restricted to less than the existing rates when the capacity of downstream conveyance systems is limited.

3. Detention systems shall be designed with capacity for the critical 100-year event, which is defined as the 100-year event that produces the highest water level among a 2-hour, 6-hour, 12-hour, or 24-hour rainfall events or the 10-day snowmelt runoff event.

4. Atlas 14 24-hour rainfall events used for rate control analysis shall use the depths listed in the table below: Event 2-year, 24 hour 10-year, 24 hour 100-year, 24 hour 100-year, 10-day snowmelt

Rainfall/Snowmelt Depth (inches) 2.8 4.2 7.4 7.2

5. The maximum duration for rainfall critical event analysis shall be 24-hours except in cases where basins are landlocked, where back to back 24-hour events and the

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 26

Stormwater Management Design Standards 10-day 7.2-inch snowmelt runoff event shall also be used. In all cases a hydrograph method of analysis should be used. For the 24-hour rainfall event, or back to back 24-hour rainfall events, a MSE 3 distribution should be used. For shorter duration, critical events other distributions may be used with the approval of the City Engineer.

6. Easements over floodplains, detention areas, wetlands, ditches, and all other parts of the stormwater system as areas develop or redevelop are required.

7. All drainage system analyses and designs shall be based on proposed full development land use patterns.

8. For basins with a suitable outlet, freeboard will be 2 feet above the HWL determined by modeling the 100-year critical event. Emergency overflows a minimum of 1.5 feet below lowest ground elevation adjacent to a structure should also be provided.

9. Adjacent to channels, creeks, and ravines freeboard will also be 2 feet to the 100year critical event elevation.

10. A MSE 3 24-hour rainfall distribution with average antecedent moisture conditions should be utilized for runoff calculations.

11. Multistage outlets are to be incorporated into pond designs to control flows from smaller, less frequent storms and help maintain base flows in downstream open channels where practicable.

6.5

Freeboard Building elevation separations with respect to ponds, lakes, streams, and stormwater features shall be designed as follows: 1. The low floor elevation for new construction must be a minimum of one (1) foot above the critical one hundred-year flood elevation and at least four (4) feet above normal groundwater elevation.

6.6 Mitigation Requirements Under certain circumstances, some construction projects cannot meet the TSS and/or TP reduction requirements for new or redevelopment projects on the site of the original construction. All methods must be exhausted prior to considering alternative locations where TSS and TP treatment standards can be achieved. If the City has determined that all methods have been exhausted, the applicant will be required to identify alternative locations where TSS and TP treatment standards can be achieved. • Mitigation projects will be chosen in the following order of preference: 1. Locations that yield benefits to the same receiving water that receives runoff from the original construction activity.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 27

Stormwater Management Design Standards

•

• •

6.7

2. Locations within the same Department of Natural Resource (DNR) catchment area as the original construction activity.

3. Locations in the next adjacent DNR catchment area up-stream.

4. Locations anywhere within the City of St. Paul.

Mitigation projects shall involve the establishment new structural stormwater BMPs or the retrofit of existing structural stormwater BMPs, or the use of a properly designed regional structural stormwater BMPs. Previously required routine maintenance of structural stormwater BMPs cannot be considered mitigation.

Mitigation projects must be finished within 24 months after the original construction activity begins.

Long Term Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities 1. No private stormwater facilities may be approved unless a maintenance plan is provided that defines how access will be provided, who will conduct the maintenance, the type of maintenance and the maintenance intervals. At a minimum, all private stormwater facilities shall be inspected annually and maintained in proper condition consistent with the performance goals for which they were originally designed and as executed in the stormwater facilities maintenance agreement. Maintenance plans must meet any requirements outlined in the City’s NPDES MS4 permit.

2. Access to all stormwater facilities must be inspected annually and maintenance shall be performed as needed. The applicant shall obtain all necessary easement or other property interests to allow access to the facilities for inspection or maintenance for both the responsible party and the City of St. Paul.

3. All settled materials including settled solids, shall be removed from ponds, sumps, grit chambers, and other devices, and disposed of properly.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 28

Stormwater Management Design Standards STORMWATER TREATMENT PRACTICE DESIGN STANDARDS 7.1

Storm Sewers 1. Manhole spacing shall not exceed 400 feet.

2. Where more than one pipe enters a structure, a catch basin/manhole shall be used.

3. Storm sewer pipe should match top of pipe to top of pipe unless grade constraints prevent this. In that case, hydraulic calculations will be necessary to verify that excessive surcharging will not occur.

4. Stormwater pipes shall be designed utilizing the Rational Method or other approved method by the City. Channel design shall be hydrograph method only.

All methods are subject to the City Engineer’s approval.

5. Lateral systems shall be designed for the 10-year Atlas-14 rainfall using the Rational Method or other approved method by the City. State Aid roadway storm sewer shall be designed per the State Aid requirements.

6. The minimum full flow velocity within the storm sewer should be 3 feet per second (fps). The maximum velocity shall be 10 fps, except when entering a pond, where the maximum velocity shall be limited to 6fps.

7. Trunk storm sewer should be designed at a minimum to carry the 100-year storm event pond discharge in addition to the 10-year design flow for directly tributary areas. The following table shall be used for the calculation of peak rates using the Rational Method: Cover Type Single-family Residential Multi-family Residential Commercial Industrial Parks, Open Space Ponds, Wetlands

10-Year Runoff Coefficient 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.2 1.0

8. For rainfall events greater than the 10-year event, and in the case of plugged inlets, transient street ponding will occur. For safety reasons, the maximum depth in streets should not exceed 1.5 feet at the deepest point.

9. To promote efficient hydraulics within manholes, manhole benching shall be provided to 1/2 diameter of the largest pipe entering or leaving the manhole.

10. Catch basin castings to be used on all streets shall be consistent with City standard plates.

11. The maximum design flow at a catch basin for the 10-year storm event shall be three (3) cubic feet per second (cfs), unless high capacity grates are provided.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 29

Stormwater Management Design Standards Catch basins at low points will be evaluated for higher flow with the approval of the City Engineer.

12. All structures located in the street shall be consistent with City standard plates.

13. Storm sewer connections are not permitted to City catch basins or sanitary sewers.

14. Storm sewer connected must be no deeper than 5 feet to invert at the property line.

15. Minimum pipe size is a 4-inch diameter pipe.

16. The submitted plan must include a note stating that “Connections to public sewers must be done by a Licensed House Drain Contractor under a permit from Saint Paul Department of Public Works.�

17. Set the tailwater elevation equal to the invert elevation of the connecting point of the City sewer. If the peak discharge time of the private connecting pipe coincides with that of the City sewer, the City may require that the tailwater effects on the proposed on-site storage be investigated.

18. Storm sewer service passing within 10 feet of a building are governed by the MN Plumbing Code.

19. Developments must have primary rain leaders have direct connection to storm and secondary discharge to permeable surface at grade.

7.2

Outlet and Inlet Pipes 1. Inlet pipes of stormwater ponds shall be extended to the pond normal water level whenever possible.

2. Outfalls with velocities greater than 4 fps into channels, where the angle of the outfall to the channel flow direction is greater than 30 degrees, requires energy dissipation or stilling basins.

3. Outfalls with velocities of less than 4 fps, that project flows downstream into a channel in a direction 30 degrees or less from the channel flow direction, generally do not require energy dissipaters or stilling basins, but will require riprap protection.

4. In the case of discharge to channels, riprap shall be provided on all outlets to an adequate depth below the channel grade and to a height above the outfall or channel bottom. Riprap shall be placed over a suitably graded filter material and filter fabric to ensure that soil particles do not migrate though the riprap and reduce its stability. Riprap shall be placed to a thickness at least 2.5 times the mean rock diameter to ensure that it will not be undermined or rendered ineffective by displacement. If riprap is used as protection for overland drainage routes, grouting may be recommended.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 30

Stormwater Management Design Standards 5. Discharge velocity into a pond at the outlet elevation shall be 6 fps or less. Riprap protection is required at all inlet pipes into ponds from the NWL to the pond bottom.

6. Where outlet velocities to ponds exceed 6 fps, the design should be based on the unique site conditions present. Submergence of the outlet or installation of a stilling basin approved by the City is required when excessive outlet velocities are experienced.

7. Multi-stage outlets are to be incorporated into pond designs to control flows from smaller, less frequent storms and help maintain base flows in downstream open channels where practicable.

8. City standard detail plates should be utilized for pond outlet structures.

7.3

Channels and Overland Drainage 1. Overland drainage routes where velocities exceed 4 fps should be reviewed by the City Engineer and approved only when suitable stabilization measures are proposed.

2. Open channels and swales are recommended where flows and small grade differences prohibit the economical construction of an underground conduit. Open channels and swales can provide infiltration and filtration benefits not provided by pipe.

3. Design of streambank stabilization and streambed control measures should consider unique or special site conditions, energy dissipation potential, adverse effects, preservation of natural processes and habitat and aesthetics in addition to standard engineering and economic criteria.

4. Point discharges of stormwater to open channels or detention basins shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes added erosion.

5. Effective energy dissipation devices should be provided at all conveyance system discharges to prevent bank, channel or shoreline erosion.

6. Open channels shall be designed to convey the critical 100-year event.

7. The minimum grade in all unpaved areas shall be 2%.

8. Maximum length for drainage swales shall be 400 feet.

9. Channel side slopes should be a maximum of 4:1 (horizontal to vertical) with gentler slopes being desirable.

10. Riprap shall be provided at all points of juncture, particularly between two open channels and where storm sewer pipes discharge into a channel.

11. Open channels should be designed to handle the expected velocity from a 10-year design storm without erosion. Riprap may need to be provided.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 31

Stormwater Management Design Standards 12. Acceptable erosion in drainageways is limited to that which causes no net degradation of the watercourse or destruction of properties adjacent to the watercourse.

13. Grassed waterways are encouraged to maximize infiltration where feasible and not detrimental to groundwater supplies.

14. Periodic cleaning of an open channel is required to ensure that the design capacity is maintained. Therefore, all channels shall be designed to allow easy access for equipment.

7.4

Ponds

The size and design considerations will be dependent on the receiving water body's water quality category, the imperviousness of the development and the degree to which on-site infiltration of runoff is achieved. Design of on-site detention basins, as described in the site's runoff water management plan, shall incorporate any design requirements from the NPDES Construction Permit, the City’s NPDES MS4 permit, and/or the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, including NURP standards. These designs include permanent detention for water quality treatment.

7.5

Infiltration/Filtration Practices 1. Sizing of filtration/infiltration practices, or BMPs, shall be in conformance with the volume control requirements of this manual and the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.

2. When designing an infiltration practice for volume control and water quality management, on-site testing and detailed analysis are strongly encouraged in order to determine the infiltration rates of the proposed infiltration facility.

Documented site-specific infiltration or hydraulic conductivity measurements (double-ring infiltrometer) completed by a licensed soil scientist or engineer is required. In the absence of a detailed analysis, the saturated infiltration rates listed in the Infiltration Rates for Infiltration BMPs table found on the Minnesota Stormwater Manual shall be used. A piezometer shall be installed in order to ascertain the level of the local groundwater table and demonstrate at least three feet of separation between the bottom of the proposed facility and the groundwater. The soil boring is required to go to a depth of at least five feet below the proposed bottom of the BMP. The soils shall be classified using the Unified Soil Classification system. The least permeable soil horizon will dictate the infiltration rate. Infiltration practices shall be designed to infiltrate the required runoff volume within 48 hours.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 32

Stormwater Management Design Standards 3. Pretreatment, in the form of ponds, forebays, filter strips, or other approved methods, shall be provided for all infiltration areas. Pretreatment upstream of volume management practices is a key element in the long-term viability of infiltration areas. The level of pretreatment varies largely depending on the BMP and drainage area of the watershed. City staff and Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommendations shall be utilized for determining the appropriate level of pretreatment on a case-by-case basis.

4. The infiltration practice shall not be used within fifty feet of a municipal, community or private well, unless specifically allowed by an approved wellhead protection plan.

5. The infiltration practice shall not be used for runoff from fueling and vehicle maintenance areas and industrial areas with exposed materials posing contamination risk, unless the infiltration practice is designed to allow for spill containment.

6. The infiltration practice shall not be used in Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) C or D soils without soil corrections.

7. Vegetation of infiltration/filtration practices shall be as shown in the City of St. Paul’s Standard Details. A plan for management for vegetation shall be included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.

8. If soils are unsuitable for infiltration, then filtration may be used with drain tile, provided in accordance with the City of St. Paul’s Standard Details.

9. Subgrade soils for infiltration/filtration practices shall be as presented in the City of St. Paul’s Standard Details. Assume a 40% void ratio for clean washed rock and 20% for construction sand for the purposes of volume calculations.

10. Rock storage beds shall be constructed using crushed angular granite that has been thoroughly washed to remove all fine particles that could result in clogging of the system.

11. For infiltration benches adjacent to ponds, benches shall have slopes no steeper than 5:1 over the proposed infiltration zone. A slope of 10:1 is preferred. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual cites concerns with locating infiltration features immediately adjacent to ponds. To address this, benches shall be located to maintain hydraulic separation from the saturated zone of the pond to minimize the loss of infiltration potential over time.

7.6

Emergency Overflow Paths 1. Emergency Overflows (EOFs) shall be sized with a minimum bottom width of five feet and 4:1 side slopes or as required by the City.

2. EOFs for low points on paved surfaces must be designed for the 100-year rainfall event.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 33

Stormwater Management Design Standards 3. The maximum flow depth in EOFs shall be less than or equal to one foot as calculated for a 100-year back-to-back storm event.

DESIGN EXAMPLES The design process for each of the acceptable Stormwater Treatment Practices is detailed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 34

Stormwater Management Design Standards STORMWATER TREATMENT PRACTICE DETAIL DRAWINGS Please refer to the City of St. Paul’s Engineering Details for the following: • Bioretention • Media Filter System • Vegetative Filter System • Infiltration Trench • Infiltration Basin • Stormwater Pond/Wetland • Catch Basins • Manholes • Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 35

Stormwater Management Design Standards CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS Construction specifications and details are found in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual for each of the acceptable BMPs, unless otherwise restricted by this manual.

Additional specifications will follow the City of St. Paul’s Governing Specifications manual, Standard Specifications for Constructing and Repairing Private Sewer Connections, and any other specifications deemed applicable by the City.

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 36

Stormwater Management Design Standards CHECKLISTS Refer to Appendix A & B • Stormwater Management Plan Checklist • Checklists for Construction Inspection and Operation & Maintenance • Construction Inspection and Operation & Maintenance Checklists for each of the approved Stormwater Treatment Practices are available in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.

AMENDMENT PROCEDURES

Stormwater Management Design Standards City of St. Paul, MN WSB Project No. 1610-150

Page 37

June 19, 2019 Board Meeting V. Action Items G) Approve 2019-2020 Professional Services Pool (Zwonitzer)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

June 12, 2019 CRWD Board of Managers Nate Zwonitzer, Water Resource Project Manager Approve 2019-2020 Professional Services Consulting Pool

Background CRWD adopted a policy for soliciting professional services in 2010 and solicits statements of qualifications from interested consultants on a bi-annual basis. The last time CRWD staff solicited qualifications from consultants was in early 2017 for the 2017–2018 consultant pool. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for general water resource professional services for 2019 and 2020 was distributed to CRWD’s previous RFQ list as well as approximately 95 Minnesota businesses that meet WBE (womenowned) or MBE (minority-owned) certifications through MNUCP (Federal/State database) and/or CERT (Metro database administered by St. Paul) Issues Staff have reviewed Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from 28 firms and determined their qualifications for specific service areas as shown in the enclosed table. Of the submittals received 15 were firms in CRWD’s 2017-2018 pool, and 13 are new firms for 2019-2020. Of the new firms, six are disadvantage business enterprises (DBE) bringing the total DBE firms in the pool to seven. Six firms previously on the list did not submit a SOQ for 2019-2020. Going forward, staff will request proposals or qualifications for projects from the pool within a respective service area as needed. Staff are seeking Board approval of the 2019-2020 Professional Services Consulting Pool.

Requested Action Approve 2019-2020 Professional Services Consulting Pool.

enc:

Draft 2019-2020 Professional Services Consulting Pool

W:\01 Administration\Contracts & Agreements\2019-2020 RFQ\Brd Memo, 2019-2020 Consultant Pool.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

Capitol Region Watershed District 2019- 2020 Professional Services Consultant Pool Updated:

Services Areas

6/13/2019

COMPANY

2019-2020 Consultant Pool Status

Certified DBE or NonProfit

106 Group Alliant Engineering Applied Ecological Services Barr Engineering Company CNA Consulting Engineers EOR HDR Houston Engineering HR Green HTPO HZ United, LLC Inter-fluve Kimley Horn Landbridge Ecological Lanscape Architecture Incorporated LHB LimnoTech Metro Blooms Nova Consulting PAAP Drones, LLC RESPEC SEH Inc. SRF Stanley Consultants Studio Gro Sunde Land Surveying Wenck Young Environmental Consulting Group, LLC

New for '19-20 New for '19-20 $ $ In Pool $ In Pool $ In Pool New for '19-20 New for '19-20 $ New for '19-20 New for '19-20 $ New for '19-20 $ New for '19-20 New for '19-20 New for '19-20 In Pool New for '19-20 $ New for '19-20 New for '19-20 $ $ $

DBE

Notes 2019-2020 Consultant Pool Status

$ In Pool NA

Certified DBE

DBE NP

Service Areas

X

1 Watershed, Subwatershed and Water Resource Management and Planning

3

Lake, Wetland and Hydrologic, Hydraulic Stream and Water Quality Restoration and Modeling and Analysis Management

4 Stormwater BMP Design and Construction Mgmt.

5

6

Water Resource Permitting

Land Surveying

X X X X X X X X

DBE

X X X

X

X X X X X

X X X X X X X X

X

X

X

X

X

X X

NP

X X X

X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X

8

9

10

GIS

Landscape Architecture

Storm Sewer Inspection, Maintenance and Repair

Brownfields, Enviro.

Assessments and EISs

X X

X X X

X

X X

X X

X

X X X X

X X X X X

X

X X X X

X X X X

X X

X

X X X

X X

DBE

X X X

X X

X X X X

X X

X

X X X X X

X X X X

X X X X

DBE

DBE

7

X X X

DBE DBE

2

X X

X

In Pool and did work for CRWD in 2017-2018 In Pool for 2019-2020 but did not do work in 2017-2018 In previous pool but did not submit for 2019-2020

Certified as a DBE Non Profit Qualified for Professional Services for 2019-2020

W:\01 Administration\Contracts & Agreements\2019-2020 RFQ\[2019-2020 Professional Services Providers RFQ List.xlsx]2019 - 2020 Pool

X X

X X X X X X

X X

X X

X

X X

X X X

X

X

X X X

X X

X

2019-2020 Summary 28 Consultants in Pool (30% Increase from 2017-2018) 12 active/recent contracts (60%) 22 Firms in Urban Stormwater BMP Design (most) 8 Firms in Stormwater Tunnel Inspection or Repair (fewest) 13 new firms

X

June 19, 2019 Board Meeting V. Action Item – H) CRWD MS4 Annual Report for 2018 and Public Meeting (Eleria)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

June 13, 2019 CRWD Board of Managers Anna Eleria, Division Manager Approve MS4 Annual Report for 2018

Background As a regulated operator of a small municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4), CRWD is required to prepare and submit an annual report of activities and accomplishments associated with its stormwater pollution prevention program (SWPPP) by June 30th to MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). CRWD must solicit public comment on the MS4 annual report and hold an annual public meeting to present the SWPPP activities and accomplishments made in the previous year.

Issues The June 19th Board meeting serves as CRWD’s annual public meeting for its SWPPP. CRWD staff will give a brief presentation of CRWD’s stormwater management accomplishments and accept comments from the public. Any comments received at the meeting or in writing by June 27th will be considered and if appropriate, incorporated into the annual report.

Action Requested Authorize Administrator to submit CRWD’s MS4 Annual Report for 2018 and to reasonably incorporate comments received during the public comment period. enc:

Draft CRWD MS4 Annual Report for 2018

W:\06 Projects\Trout Brook Interceptor\NPDES MS4 Permit\Board Memos\BM MS4 Annual Report Public Meeting 06-19-19.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

MS4 question worksheet for 2018 annual report

Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) Reporting period January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 Due June 30, 2019 Copy of questions – Not for submittal Instructions: This form is for your personal use only. Complete the online Annual Report to provide a summary of your activities under the 2013 MS4 Permit (Permit) between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. The online Annual Report and additional information can be found on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) website at: https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=MS4_Annual_Report.

Questions: Contact Cole Landgraf (cole.landgraf@state.mn.us, 651-757-2880)

Contact information MS4 General contact information Full name:

Anna Eleria

Title: Division Manager

Mailing address: 595 Aldine Street City: Phone:

Saint Paul

State: MN

651-644-8888

Zip code: 55104

Email: anna@capitolregionwd.org

Preparer contact information (if different from the MS4 General contact) Full name:

Title:

Mailing address: City:

State:

Phone:

Zip code:

Email:

Minimum Control Measure (MCM) 1: Public education and outreach The following questions refer to Part III.D.1. of the Permit.

2.

Did you select a stormwater-related issue of high priority to be emphasized during this Permit term?

[Part III.D.1.a.(1)]

3.

If ‘Yes’ in Q2, what is your stormwater-related issue(s)? Check all that apply.

Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Local businesses Residential best management practices (BMPs) Pet waste Yard waste Deicing materials Household chemicals Construction activities Post-construction activities

Yes

No

Other (describe): 4.

Have you distributed educational materials or equivalent outreach to the public focused on illicit discharge recognition and reporting? [Part III.D.1.a.(2)]

Yes

No

5.

Do you have an implementation plan as required by the Permit? [Part III.D.1.b.]

Yes

No

https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 1 of 9

6.

How did you distribute educational materials or equivalent outreach? [Part III.D.1.a.] Check all that apply in table below.

7.

For the items checked in Q6 below, who is the intended audience? Check all that apply in table below.

8.

For the items checked in Q6 below, enter the total circulation/audience in table below (if unknown, use best estimate).

Q6. How did you distribute

Q7. Intended audience? (Check all that apply.)

educational materials?

(Check all that apply):

Residents

Local businesses

Developers

Students

Q8.

Employees

Other

Total circulation /audience:

5000

Brochure Newsletter Utility bill insert Newspaper ad

885,406

Radio ad

142,857

Television ad Cable access channel Stormwater-related event School presentation or project

6000 700 23,480

Website Other (1): describe Workshop Other (2): describe Blog Posts Other (3): describe Tour

90 1500 175

For Q9 and Q10, provide a brief description of each activity related to public education and outreach (e.g., rain garden workshop, school presentation, public works open house) held and the date each activity was held from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018.

[Part III.D.1.c.(4)] 9.

10.

Date of activity in table below Description of activity in table below Q9. Date of activity Q10. Description of activity

11.

1/19/2018

Tour of CHS Field with Minnesota Public Radio

5/19/2018

Residential rain barrel workshop with community members and Master Water Stewards

9/21/2018

CRWD's 20th Anniversary celebration with residents and partners

10/24/2018

School presentation to 75 students at Higher Ground Academy

12/6/2018

Public meeting #3 for Como Lake Mangement Plan

Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, did you modify your BMPs, measurable goals, or future plans for your public education and outreach program? [Part IV.B.]

Yes

No

If ‘Yes,’ describe these modifications:

MCM 2: Public participation/involvement The following questions refer to Part III.D.2.a. of the Permit.

12.

You must provide a minimum of one opportunity each year for the public to provide input on the adequacy of your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). Did you provide this opportunity between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018? [Part III.D.2.a.(1)]

Yes

No

13.

If ‘Yes’ in Q12, what was the opportunity that you provided? Check all that apply.

Yes

No

Public meeting Public event Other

https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 2 of 9

14.

If ‘Public meeting’ in Q13, did you hold a stand-alone meeting or combine it with another event?

Stand-alone Combined

15.

Enter the date of the public meeting:

June 19, 2018

Enter the number of citizens that attended and were informed about your SWPPP:

0

If ‘Public event’ in Q13, describe:

Enter the date (mm/dd/yyyy) of the public meeting: Enter the number of citizens that attended and were informed about your SWPPP: 16.

If ‘Other’ in Q13, describe:

Enter the date (mm/dd/yyyy) of the public meeting: Enter the number of citizens that attended and were informed about your SWPPP: 17.

Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, did you receive any input regarding your SWPPP?

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

If ‘Yes,’ enter the total number of individuals or organizations that provided comments on your SWPPP. 18.

If ‘Yes’ in Q17, did you modify your SWPPP as a result of written input received? [Part III.D.2.b.(2)] If ‘Yes,’ describe those modifications.

19.

Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, did you modify your BMPs, measurable goals, or future plans for your public participation/involvement program? [Part IV.B.] If ‘Yes,’ describe those modifications.

MCM 3: Illicit discharge detection and elimination The following questions refer to Part III.D.3. of the Permit.

20.

Do you have a regulatory mechanism which prohibits non-stormwater discharges to your MS4?

[Part III.D.3.b.]

Yes

No

21.

Did you identify any illicit discharges between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018?

[Part III.D.3.h.(4)]

Yes

No

22.

If ‘Yes’ in Q21, enter the number of illicit discharges detected.

23.

If ‘Yes’ in Q21, how did you discover these illicit discharges? Check all that apply and enter the number of illicit discharges discovered by each category.

7

Public complaint Staff 24.

If ‘Public complaint’ in Q23, enter the number discovered by the public:

2

25.

If ‘Staff’ in Q23, enter the number discovered by staff:

5

https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 3 of 9

26.

If ‘Yes’ in Q21, did any of the discovered illicit discharges result in an enforcement action (this includes verbal warnings)?

Yes

No

27.

If ‘Yes’ in Q26, what type of enforcement action(s) was taken and how many of each action were issued between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018? Check all that apply. For each of the below checked, enter the number that were issued.

Yes

No

Yes

No

Verbal warning: 7 Notice of violation: Fine: Criminal action: Civil penalty: Other: describe 28.

If ‘Yes’ in Q26, did the enforcement action(s) taken sufficiently address the illicit discharge(s)?

29.

If ‘No’ in Q28, why was the enforcement not sufficient to address the illicit discharge(s)?

30.

Do you have written Enforcement Response Procedures (ERPs) to compel compliance with your illicit discharge regulatory mechanism(s)? [Part III.B.]

Yes

No

31.

Between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018, did you train all field staff in illicit discharge recognition (including conditions which could cause illicit discharges) and reporting illicit discharges for further investigations? [Part III.D.3.e.]

Yes

No

32.

If ‘Yes’ in Q31, how did you train your field staff? Check all that apply.

Email PowerPoint Presentation Video Field training Other: describe

The following questions refer to Part III.C.1. of the Permit.

33.

Did you update your storm sewer system map between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018?

[Part III.C.1.]

Yes

No

34.

Does your storm sewer map include all pipes 12 inches or greater in diameter and the direction of stormwater flow in those pipes? [Part III.C.1.a.]

Yes

No

35.

Does your storm sewer map include outfalls, including a unique identification (ID) number and an associated geographic coordinate? [Part III.C.1.b.]

Yes

No

36.

Does your storm sewer map include all structural stormwater BMPs that are part of your MS4?

[Part III.C.1.c.]

Yes

No

37.

Does your storm sewer map include all receiving waters? [Part III.C.1.d.]

Yes

No

38.

In what format is your storm sewer map available:

Yes

No

Hardcopy only GIS CAD Other: describe

39.

Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, did you modify your BMPs, measurable goals, or future plans for your illicit discharge detection and elimination program? [Part IV.B.] If ‘Yes,’ describe those modifications.

https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 4 of 9

MCM 4: Construction site stormwater runoff control The following questions refer to Part III.D.4. of the Permit 40.

Do you have a regulatory mechanism that is at least as stringent as the Agency’s general permit to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity (CSW Permit) No. Minn. R. 100001 (http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=18984) for erosion and sediment controls and waste controls? [Part III.D.4.a.]

(Permit can be found on the MPCA website at https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/constructionstormwater (titled ‘Minnesota NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater General Permit’).

Yes

No

41.

Have you developed written procedures for site plan reviews as required by the Permit? [Part III.D.4.b.]

Yes

No

42.

Have you documented each site plan review as required by the Permit? [Part III.D.4.f.]

Yes

No

43.

Enter the number of site plan reviews conducted for sites an acre or greater between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018.

44.

What types of enforcement actions do you have available to compel compliance with your regulatory mechanism? Check all that apply and enter the number of each used from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018.

Verbal warning, Number that were issued: Notice of violation, Number that were issued: 880 Administrative order, Number that were issued: Stop-work order, Number that were issued: 3 Fine, Number that were issued: Forfeit of security of bond money: 0 Withholding of certificate of occupancy Criminal action, Number that were issued: Civil penalty, Number that were issued: 0 Other: describe. , Number that were issued:

45.

Do you have written ERPs to compel compliance with your construction site stormwater runoff control regulatory mechanism(s)? [Part III.B.]

Yes

No

46.

Enter the number of active construction sites an acre or greater that were in your jurisdiction between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018:

47.

Do you have written procedures for identifying priority sites? [Part III.D.4.d.(1)]

Yes

No

48.

If ‘Yes,’ in Q47, How are sites prioritized? Check all that apply.

Site topography Soil characteristics Types of receiving water(s) Stage of construction Compliance history Weather conditions Citizen complaints Project size Other: describe

Yes

No

24

62

Staff availability/work schedule 49.

Do you have a checklist or other written means to document site inspections when determining compliance? [Part III.D.4.d.(4)]

50.

Enter the number of site inspections conducted for sites an acre or greater between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018.

1185

51.

Enter the frequency at which site inspections are conducted (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly).

[Part III.D.4.d.(2)]

biweekly

52.

Enter the number of trained inspectors that were available for construction site inspections between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018.

4

53.

Provide the contact information for the inspector(s) and/or organization that conducts construction stormwater inspections for your MS4. List your primary construction stormwater contact first if you have multiple inspectors.

https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 5 of 9

(1) Inspector name: Organization: Elizabeth Hosch, Capitol Region Watershed District Phone (office):

651-644-8888

Phone (work cell): Email:

ehosch@capitolregionwd.org

Preferred contact method:

email

(2) Inspector name: Organization: Dave Dahle, Capitol Region Watershed District Phone (office):

651-644-8888

Phone (work cell): Email: Preferred contact method:

2018 seasonal worker - no longer with CRWD

(3) Inspector name: Organization: Wenck Associates (Louis Sigtermans, Eric Osterdyk, Brendan Barth) Phone (office):

651-294-4580

Phone (work cell): Email:

lsigtermans@wenck.com, eosterdyk@wenck.com, bbarth@wenck.com

Preferred contact method: 54.

email

What training did inspectors receive? Check all that apply.

University of Minnesota Erosion and Stormwater Management Certification Program Qualified Compliance Inspector of Stormwater (QCIS) Minnesota Laborers Training Center Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Installer or Supervisor Minnesota Utility Contractors Association Erosion Control Training Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC) Certified Professional in Stormwater Quality (CPSWQ) Certified Erosion Sediment and Storm Water Inspector (CESSWI) Other: describe On the job training with other inspection staff

55.

Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, did you modify your BMPs, measurable goals, or future plans for your construction site stormwater runoff control program? [Part IV.B.]

Yes

No

If ‘Yes,’ describe those modifications:

MCM 5: Post-construction stormwater management in new development and redevelopment The following questions refer to Part III.D.5. of the Permit.

56. Do you have a regulatory mechanism which meets all requirements as specified in Part III.D.5.a. of the Permit?

Yes

No

57. What approach are you using to meet the performance standard for Volume, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Total Phosphorus (TP) as required by the permit? [Part III.D.5.a.(2)] Check all that apply.

Refer to the Technical Support Document at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/viewdocument.html?gid=17815 for guidance on stormwater management approaches. The TSD can be found on the MPCA website at https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/municipal-stormwater-ms4 (refer to the Post Construction Stormwater Management section under the ‘Guidance and BMPs’ tab).

Retain a runoff volume equal to one inch times the area of the proposed increase of impervious surfaces on-site Retain the post-construction runoff volume on site for the 95th percentile storm Match the pre-development runoff conditions Adopt the Minimal Impact Design Standards An approach has not been selected Other method (Must be technically defensible - e.g., based on modeling, research and acceptable engineering practices) If ‘Other method,’ describe:

https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 6 of 9

58. Do you have written ERPs to compel compliance with your post-construction stormwater management regulatory mechanism(s)? [Part III.B.]

Yes

No

59. Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, did you modify your BMPs, measurable goals, or future plans for your post-construction stormwater management program? [Part IV.B.]

Yes

No

If ‘Yes,’ describe those modifications.

MCM 6: Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations The following questions refer to Part III.D.6. of the Permit.

60. Enter the total number of structural stormwater BMPs, outfalls (excluding underground outfalls), and ponds within your MS4 (exclude privately owned). Enter the number for each category below: Structural stormwater BMPs: 32 Outfalls: 1 Ponds: 0 61. Enter the total number of structural stormwater BMPs, outfalls (excluding underground outfalls), and ponds that were inspected from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 within your MS4 (exclude privately owned) [Part III.D.6.e.]. Enter the number for each category below: Structural stormwater BMPs: 32 Outfalls: 1 Ponds: 0 62. Have you developed an alternative inspection frequency for any structural stormwater BMPs, as allowed in Part III.D.6.e.(1) of the Permit?

Yes

No

63. Based on inspection findings, did you conduct any maintenance on any structural stormwater BMPs? [Part III.D.6.e.(1)]

Yes

No

65. Do you own or operate any stockpiles, and/or storage and material handling areas? [Part III.D.6.e.(3)]

Yes

No

66. If ‘Yes’ in Q65, did you inspect all stockpiles and storage and material handling areas quarterly? [Part III.D.6.e.(3)]

Yes

No

67. If ‘Yes’ in Q66, based on inspection findings, did you conduct maintenance at any of the stockpiles and/or storage and material handling areas?

Yes

No

Yes

No

64. If ‘Yes’ in Q63, briefly describe the maintenance that was conducted: BMP maintenance included regular removal of sediment, debris, and trash and catch basin cleaning twice a year. In the spring, plants and mulch were replaced as needed.

68. If ‘Yes’ in Q67, briefly describe the maintenance that was conducted: 69. Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, did you modify your BMPs, measurable goals, or future plans for your pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations program? [Part IV.B.] If ‘Yes,’ describe those modifications:

Discharges to impaired waters with a EPA-approved TMDL that includes an applicable WLA If you have been assigned a Waste Load Allocation (WLA) in a TMDL that was approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prior to August 1, 2013, and were not meeting WLA(s) at the time of your permit application, you must complete the TMDL Annua Report Form, available on the MPCA website at: https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Download_page_with_TMDL_forms.

Attach your completed TMDL Annual Report Form to the actual Annual Report as instructed within that document. [Part III.E.] 71. [question left blank for you to attach a file] https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 7 of 9

Alum or Ferric Chloride Phosphorus Treatment Systems The following questions refer to Part III.F.3.a. of the Permit. Provide the information below as it pertains to your alum or ferric chloride phosphorus treatment system.

72.

Date(s) of operation: Month

Date(s) of operation (mm/dd/yyyy – mm/dd/yyyy)

January February March April May June July August September October November December Q73 Month

Q74

Chemical(s) used for treatment

Gallons of alum or ferric chloride treatment

Q76

Q75

Gallons of water treated

Calculated pounds of phosphorus removed

January February March April May June July August September October November December 77.

Any performance issues and corrective action(s), including date(s) when corrective action(s) were taken, between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018:

Partnerships 78. Did you rely on any other regulated MS4s to satisfy one or more permit requirements?

https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

Yes

•

No

Available in alternative formats Page 8 of 9

79. If ‘Yes’ in Q78, describe the agreements you have with other regulated MS4s and which permit requirements the other regulated MS4s help satisfy: [Part IV.B.6.]

Capitol Region Watershed District partners with the City of Saint Paul (Phase I MS4) and contracts with Hamline University to implement the Adopt-A-Drain (AAD) program. The program goal is to improve water quality by empowering local community members to take visible, tangible, and meaningful action towards responsible management of water resources by “adopting a storm drain”. Actions include signing up online, collecting and removing debris from the storm drain and reporting how much was collected and removed. There are currently over 600 residents participating in the program in the City of Saint Paul / CRWD.

Additional information If you would like to provide any additional files to accompany your Annual Report, use the space below to upload those files. For each space, you may attach one file.

80.

81.

82.

83.

[Optional space for you to attach a file] [Optional space for you to attach a file] [Optional space for you to attach a file] Optional, describe the file(s) uploaded: CRWD's 2018 Annual Report for BWSR

Owner or Operator Certification The person with overall administrative responsibility for SWPPP implementation and permit compliance must certify this MS4 Annual Report. This person must be duly authorized and should be either a principal executive (i.e., Director of Public Works, City Administrator) or ranking elected official (i.e., Mayor, Township Supervisor).

Yes - I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete (Minn. R. 7001.0070). I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment (Minn. R. 7001.0540).

By typing my name in the following space, I certify the above statements to be true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and that information can be used for the purpose of processing my MS4 Annual Report.

Name of certifying official: Title:

The certifying official must electronically sign the online Annual Report form. .

Administrator

Date:

06/28/2019

(mm/dd/yyyy)

Note: In the online form, you will be prompted to provide the email(s) of the individual(s) you would like to receive the MS4 Annual Report for 2018 submittal confirmation email from the MPCA. After you submit the form, please allow up to three business days to receive this confirmation email.

Email (1)

anna@capitolregionwd.org

Email (2)

mark@capitolregionwd.org

Email (3)

https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-strm4-06a • 1/30/19

•

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 9 of 9

June 19, 2019 Board Meeting V. Action Item I) District Strategic Plan (Fossum)

June 13, 2019 DATE: CRWD Board of Managers TO: FROM: Bob Fossum, Division Manager Adopt CRWD Strategic Plan RE: __________________________________________________________________________________ Background In 2008, The Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) completed a strategic planning process with Barbara Deming, MN Management and Budget. In 2018, the District began development of its next watershed management plan renewing the ten-year-old strategic plan. Staff completed the first draft of the District Strategic Plan this spring and reviewed it with staff, CAC and the Board. The Board reviewed the draft plan at the May 15, 2019 Board Workshop.

Issues Staff have incorporated comments received into a final draft 2019 District Strategic Plan. Staff will review the plan with the Managers and are recommending adoption of the Plan.

Requested Action Adopt 2019 CRWD Strategic Plan enc: CRWD 2019 Strategic Plan, dated June 13, 2019

CRWD Strategic Plan, June 13, 2019 In late 2018, Capitol Region Watershed District began a strategic planning process. The strategic plan was timed to be completed ahead of the District’s 2020 Watershed Management Planning process and sought to understand the current situation and define the vision, values and high-level goals of the organization for the next 10 years. A detailed description of the planning process can be found in Appendix 1.

Mission To protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District

Vision statement Cleaner waters through innovative, resilient and equitable watershed management in collaboration with diverse partners.

Values The District values our vibrant, and varied communities and strives to focus our work to support the goals of each community. We complete our work with the following values: • • • •

Integrity: transparency, accountability, fiscal responsibility Diversity: equity, inclusion, openness Collaboration: strategic partnerships, communities Innovation: bold, science-based

Goals (desired future condition) 1. Cleaner waters Measurably cleaner water resources will be achieved as documented by conventional water quality metrics.

Additionally, the public perceives that the District’s water resources are noticeably cleaner.

2. Stormwater managed to mimic natural hydrology Stormwater management approaches, that include more green infrastructure systems, will improve water quality, recharge groundwater, achieve healthy ecosystems and provide multiple other benefits for the community. Stormwater runoff is embraced as a resource instead of a waste product.

1

3. Communities connected to water Re-establish historic or previously lost water resources. Connect communities to water resources to achieve more equitable access to water across all communities of the District.

4. Community awareness and action for water quality Community understanding and support of the need for and value of clean water is foundational to implementing the work of the District and accomplishing our mission. A community that is engaged and informed is empowered to take action.

5. Resilient watershed management strategies Changing climate will require the District to incorporate resilient strategies and practices into everything we do.

Through implementation of adaptive management, the District will achieve more resilient water management infrastructure.

6. Improved, consistent water governance Water governance will be more consistent, streamlined, and equitable in and adjacent to the District. Consistent watershed boundaries and regulation across municipal jurisdictions will result in better and more efficient efforts towards water quality improvement.

7. Equity in the work of CRWD Diversity of our community will be reflected in the District’s staff, board and Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC).

Programs and projects are offered and implemented equitably across the watershed.

8. Organizational excellence The District will be a key partner and innovator, both locally and nationally. The District will implement industryleading work while widely sharing our experiences to help advance the field of water management. The District will be a creative and collaborative workplace with passionate, skilled staff, CAC and Board Managers.

Strategies (actions to achieve our goals) A. Leadership (Lead in stormwater management) 1. Increase implementation of green infrastructure The District will continue to promote green infrastructure. This approach to stormwater management provides additional community benefits (social, environmental, economic) beyond the stormwater function and focuses on rain as a resource rather than a waste product to be managed.

2

2. Bring water back to St. Paul The District will work to restore/re-create water resources that have previously been lost or buried. This strategy includes bringing water back to the consciousness of the community through increased awareness, connection, and access to water.

3. Innovate using new technologies and research The District will innovate when developing, implementing and evaluating its programs and projects to be most effective in carrying out its mission. Research, including practical application of new technologies, will be critical to effective innovation.

4. Ensure long-term project operation and maintenance Significant investment has been made in stormwater management practices. Providing adequate resources and commitment to ensure long-term operation and maintenance is critical to making sure these investments are protected and continue to function as designed.

5. Implement targeted water management projects that improve water quality, are resilient and provide community benefits The District will ensure that the most value is derived from funds spent to implement water management projects. These strategic investments will be maximized through targeted identification and prioritization of cost-effective projects that are resilient to climate change and provide equitable community benefits.

B. Inspiration (Inspire and engage stakeholders to actively support the District’s mission) 6. Increase visibility to cultivate support Increased visibility of the District and its mission is important for long-term public support of its work.

Sharing and communicating who the District is, the work we conduct and why its beneficial to the community will help to build community support.

7. Maintain existing and cultivate new partnerships The District has been successful in cultivating partnerships and will continue to maintain them. Cultivation of new partnerships will need to occur as they are a key method for implementing work to all areas of the District.

8. Expand connections and engage with diverse/underserved communities of CRWD The District will expand its work with, and in, diverse and underserved communities by connecting them to District work and focusing new projects/programming where the District has had less of a presence.

3

C. Organizational Strength (Strengthen and expand the District’s role and capacity) 9. Promote consistent, efficient water management, governance and funding Watershed District representation across all of St. Paul would provide a more consistent, equitable and efficient delivery of water resource improvement/protection work to all City residents. The District will strive for consistent water management regulations across all its member municipalities.

10. Hire, develop and retain high quality staff Passionate and highly skilled staff are vital to implementing the often times complicated and nuanced work of the District. The District will provide competitive compensation, enriching professional development, and a challenging and collaborative workplace to develop and retain high quality staff.

11. Recruit and retain high quality volunteers Support, train and empower volunteers to help expand the reach and work of the District.

4

Appendix 1—Strategic Planning Process CRWD strategic planning process In 2018-2019 the Capitol Region Watershed District created a 10-year strategic plan, which will guide development of the next watershed management plan. The process engaged partners and staff in assessing the current situation, reaffirming the agency’s mission and articulating values, and describing a vision of the desired future, 10-year goals and strategies to achieve the goals. Specific implementation actions will be included in the watershed management plan. The CRWD contracted with the State of Minnesota’s Management Analysis and Development (MAD) office to facilitate the planning process.

Strategic plan elements Elements of the strategic plan are intended to answer the following questions: Situation assessment: What should we keep in mind as we plan for the future?

Vision: What is the desired future state we are helping to create (brief description)?

Mission: Who are we and why do we exist?

Values: How does the organization approach its work?

Goals: What specific outcomes should we look for within this broad vision?

Strategies: How will we achieve the goals?

Situation assessment (see Appendix 2) Over the Fall and Winter of 2018-2019 MAD met with stakeholders in one-on-one interviews and focus groups, discussing the following questions: 1. Describe in your own words the mission of the CRWD. 2. What is the CRWD doing well?

3. What are the two most important issues the CRWD needs to address?

4. What should the CRWD enhance or change in order to respond to these issues and effectively carry out its mission over the next 10 years (may include internal organizational considerations)?

5. Is there anything else you would like to comment on?

The stakeholders included: • •

Focus groups • • •

Citizen Advisory Council Board of Managers CRWD staff

Agency and city partners Grantees, citizens and community groups

Interviews • 5

St. Paul Public Works Director

• •

St. Paul Water Resource Coordinator St. Paul Chief Resilience Officer

•

CRWD artist in residence

Mission and vision Board members and strategic planning team members [describe team membership] met in February 2019 to review and draw conclusions about the current situation, review and confirm the agency’s mission and identify possibilities for a 10-year vision. Participants also brainstormed values to complement the mission, as a way to express how the organization approaches its work.

Goals The strategic planning team met in March 2019 to review and refine products created at the previous meeting, identified goals and brainstormed strategies for achieving the goals.

6

Appendix 2—CRWD 2018 Situation Assessment CRWD Situation assessment February 2019

Introduction In preparation for developing a new 10-year strategic plan, the Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) asked Management Analysis and Development (MAD) to conduct a situation assessment. Over the Fall and Winter of 2018-2019 MAD met with stakeholders in one-on-one interviews and focus groups, discussing the following questions: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Describe in your own words the mission of the CRWD. What is the CRWD doing well?

What are the two most important issues the CRWD needs to address?

What should the CRWD enhance or change in order to respond to these issues and effectively carry out its mission over the next 10 years (may include internal organizational considerations)?

5. Is there anything else you would like to comment on?

The stakeholders included:

Focus groups • • • • •

Citizen Advisory Council Board of Managers CRWD staff Agency and city partners Grantees, citizens and community groups

Interviews • • • •

St. Paul Public Works Director St. Paul Water Resource Coordinator St. Paul Chief Resilience Officer CRWD artist in residence

MAD’s summary of the interview and focus group results is presented below, for review and discussion at the February 28, 2019 meeting with CRWD board and strategic planning team members. The intent is to stimulate thinking about the vision and strategies for the CRWD’s next strategic plan.

7

Mission All of the interviewees see the mission of the CRWD as to protect, manage, and improve the water resources within St. Paul or the Capitol Watershed district. Many interviewees explained that the CRWD does so through: • Education and outreach to the public • Advocating for water resource management • Coordination and collaboration with other municipal and government entities for water management • Gathering sound data and using scientific evidence for decision making • Technical expertise and guidance in developing Best Management Practices (BMPs) • Securing funds for projects and developing programs to promote water quality • Playing a regulatory role such as permitting, wetland management, etc.

Accomplishments Leadership • •

Many interviewees described the CRWD as leaders in watershed management in the region. Some also added that that work done by CRWD is transferable and they have done a good job of sharing that knowledge.

One interviewee noted that while in the past the CRWD’s role as a regulator had caused friction, the CRWD has managed to balance its role as a regulator and partner.

Partnership •

•

Several people commended the work done by CRWD to engage with stakeholders and partners in a meaningful way in the work they do. Examples include: o Working with cities to do cooperative projects to share dollars o Work with other agencies such as the Central High School parking lot project o Work with the city of St. Paul and individual homeowners on raingardens in the Como Park neighborhood o Work with the city on the storm water management project at Alliance Field by providing funds to make the system viable and cost competitive. o Stormwater management project along University Avenue and Aldine Street.

One interviewee also noted that CRWD partnerships help to foster innovation in how stakeholders approach watershed management. The interviewee cited the example of the stormwater management project at Alliance Field: “That site is the first time the city has done a district stormwater system… the district saw the benefit of that approach. [The CRWD is] a key partner in them pursuing that approach. In fact, ordinance changes are in process to structure rates differently to users. This is really valuable to the city.”

• •

A few interviewees noted that the CRWD has worked on relationship building over time. One interviewee noted that they have improved their relationship with the communities compared to 10 years ago, while another discussed how CRWD has worked to build trust in their partner relationships.

One interviewee also noted that the CRWD builds relationships not just with stakeholders in a technical capacity, but also others in the watershed communities to get their involvement in a meaningful way.

8

Innovation •

•

Several people described the CRWD as innovative in their approach to their work. Interviewees mentioned work done by CRWD including: working with the community and individual home owners to use boulevards for raingardens; building cisterns; porous pavements, daylight Trout Brook, work with the CHS field and Met Council to collect water for watering the field and flushing toilets, etc.

Some interviewees praised the innovative and can-do attitude in leadership and staff of the CRWD.

Operations • •

•

Many interviewees noted that the high level of skills and expertise of the staff at CRWD. Staff pointed out that CRWD has established ways to collaborate across projects and expertise level, and that the organizations leaderships supports the work they do.

Similarly a few interviewees noted that the board and staff trusted each other. The board lauded the way that the staff gather information and new ideas. Staff members commended the board for governing well and described them as functional and supportive. Others noted the high level of engagement of the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) compared to other districts, some who do not have a CAC. Interviewees noted the effective management of the CRWD, including: o Thoughtful and informed decision on where to allocate resources and documenting logical decision making (e.g., rule making) o Technical expertise in watershed management with well-planned processes grounded in science o Clear processes for competing for funds o Commitment to monitoring and evaluating impact of project over long-term, and adapting strategies based on this information o Tracking information to build database of information (WSKI database and DIRT) o Ensuring distribution of projects throughout the district, and willingness to put resources to projects, and o Looking for projects with more comprehensive benefits (example reducing groundwater pumping and use of potable water, aesthetic benefits and ways to better engage the community, etc.

A few interviewees noted that the CRWD’s skilled workforce, trust between staff and leadership, data-driven decision making, and stakeholder engagement positions them well to address the future needs of the organization.

9

Future Challenges When asked about the two most important issues on the horizon for the CRWD, interviewees noted:

Climate change The majority of interviewees noted that CRWD needed to address changing conditions related to climate change. Several interviewees highlighted that the changing climate, resulting in increased storm events, temperature extremes, and higher precipitation will affect how the district manages its watershed and stormwater systems. One interviewee noted about heavier precipitation, “there are going to be challenges with existing infrastructure handling those events in particular . . . requiring even larger facilities, larger pipes, which could create tension with development.” Another noted that the CRWD will need to develop a crisis communication plan. Another interviewee said the CRWD needed to make a deeper connection between water quality and climate change mitigation in its education efforts.

Education and outreach Many interviewees focused on changing people’s attitudes towards water through education and outreach. As one interviewee noted, the CRWD needs to “elevate the awareness and appreciation of water across the watershed. Everyone gets drinking water importance. Other water is seen as a waste product.” Specific outreach and education efforts mentioned include: • • •

•

The need to raise awareness about the CRWD and its role to build stakeholder support Outreach to communities who have not been engaged with in the past, such as apartment owners Partnership with communities that are underserved by the district now such as racial and ethnic minority groups, and connecting the work of the district to equity and justice issues. Some interviewees also noted the importance of communicating water quality messages with communities that are different from them (e.g., those who had previously lived in arid regions with different relationship to water), and suggested tapping into local knowledge and cultural heritage of other communities to deliver those messages Build capacity of the public to play a role in advocating for public policy changes

Development and infrastructure A few interviewees discussed the capacity of the existing infrastructure of the watershed management systems and highlighted future challenges related to development in the region. Interviewees noted that the region is heavily built out, with aging storm systems and infrastructure, so there is a greater need for public policy changes to build resilience. Interviewees cited priorities, such as the need to work together across county, city and the watershed to address these issues, and the need to work with policy makers and individuals to promote changes such as permeable surfaces and raingardens. One city official noted that, with the growing need for newer infrastructure, CRWD can play a role in helping stakeholders work through new systems. Another interviewee noted that CRWD should continue to guide and support the city of Saint Paul in long term maintenance of green infrastructure that has been installed.

10

Addressing diversity A few interviewees discussed the need for the CRWD to address diversity both within the organization and in how it interacts with the communities. One interviewee noted that attracting staff that is diverse is important for the CRWD stating that, “[We] cannot have people go to public meetings and tell the great things we’re doing if the staff don’t reflect the communities we serve.” Some interviewees noted that the CRWD does have a diversity plan aimed at working on issues of race, class and gender, however, as one interviewee noted implementation of the plan is a long journey.

CRWD’s role A few interviewees discussed the potential for growth in the role and scope of the CRWD, including: • • • • • • • • •

How to manage the staff and budget of the CRWD with the growth in the organization Providing funding and maintenance for BMPs that are existing and will be built over the next 10 years How to address emerging issues such as related to emerging contaminants, and how to address them in project planning, monitoring, and communications Prioritizing the initiatives of the CRWD to identify their role while being aware of capacity, and understanding the role of the CRWD within larger state system Tackling projects under one acre Providing access to water ways by providing seed money to recreation departments such as canoeing and fishing opportunities Attracting staff who are forward-thinking, risk-taking, and willing to try new things Dealing with impact of salt and road salt Advocating for expansion of the watershed boundary to include the rest of St. Paul, which has a lot of activity and development and needs more protection.

Opportunities When asked about what the CRWD should enhance or change in order to respond to the challenges outlined above and effectively carry out its mission in the next 10 years, interviewees noted the following; •

Funding: Interviewees noted the need to continue to funding BMPs and to develop stable and predictable funding for BMPs such as using bond financing. Other suggestions include alternative funding mechanisms to build new infrastructure to improve water quality, such as environmental impact bonds and new taxing districts. One interviewee proposed setting aside funding for future projects that may come up (e.g.

Opportunity Fund).

•

Improve communication and outreach: Interviewees discussed the need for improving outreach to communities not represented well in CRWD’s work, including expanding outreach efforts, hiring more staff dedicated to outreach and education, advancing diversity and hiring from underrepresented communities, expanding opportunities for youth stewardship (e.g., Youth Farm), collaboration with organizations (such as Fresh Water Society master water stewards, Conservation Corps, Urban Boat Builders), and using arts as an engagement tool. Other suggestions focused on enhancing the brand recognition of the CRWD, including using social media for visibility and credibility. One group suggested specific strategies such as internship and partnership programs (e.g., Kitty Anderson program at the Science Museum, and Frogtown Farm) to promote this field amongst students of color who may otherwise not be exposed to this field.

11

•

Collecting and sharing data: A few interviewees discussed the need to collect data including helping communities to collect data, centralizing the data in a storm water database, to allow for more robust tracking and sharing.

•

New building: A few interviewees the opportunity to use the new building to bring visibility to the work of the CRWD and its outreach efforts. As one interviewee noted, “[the new office will be] a much more dynamic space, designed with so many more elements that explain and illustrate water resources and stormwater management. It will help visitors to understand.”

•

Maintenance: Interviewees also discussed the need to allocate more resources to doing inspection of previously installed projects, as well as budgeting resources to maintain those projects.

•

Partnerships: Interviewees discussed the need to diversify partners or consultants in the work that the CRWD does, highlighting the need to target young people and bring them in to the field. They also stressed the importance of maintaining and developing new relationships with large-scale partners, individual residents, etc. Others mentioned educational institutions and other public entities for partnership in research.

•

Clear strategy and prioritization: Interviewees also discussed the need for the CRWD to have a clear strategy for the work they do. They also discussed the need to move towards a unified sense of priorities and to develop a priority plan.

12

CAC vision In addition to responding to the same questions discussed in all of the other interviews and focus groups, the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) brainstormed a vision for the future as a result of the CRWD’s work in its next strategic plan. Their individual brainstormed ideas are included below in regular type, and their collective vision themes are included in boldface type.

Enhanced public recognition • • •

High positive visibility of CRWD among residents and organizations All of St. Paul + Falcon Heights + Roseville loves the CRWD Strong brand/image and broad name recognition

Water quality outcomes • • • • • • •

People swimming in Como Lake safely At least one unimpaired water body (Como, McCarrons, etc.)

Water leaves CRWD better and healthier than when it arrives Cleaner water in the sewer drains Increased water quality and clarity for Como A big impact on Ford Plant Development with high visibility Happy wildlife

Recognized leadership • •

Establish leadership beyond Minnesota . . . doing similar things in other organizations An organization recognized for its innovation and leadership

Fully engaged public in water quality activities • • •

Residents managing their run-off (in a CRWD style) Alternatives to turf (ex. Low mow, bee lawns) Every drain is adopted

Equity, diversity in outreach •

10 BMPs on the East Side of St. Paul (Trout Brook area)

Organizational health • • • • •

Maximize skills of CAC members to support CRWD projects Succession plan for staff is in place Secure, diverse funding sources Have a crisis communication plan Increased diversity of CRWD staff and CAC

13

(Ungrouped) Strong sustainable partnerships with commitments to water quality Continuing successful CRWD projects and activities The better for CRWD the better for St. Paul/Roseville and the world Make peace with Ma Nature Stormwater is seen as a utility (resource that can be reused; grey water, etc.)

14