Framework Action 3 Under the STX and STT/STJ FMPs

Page 1


FrameworkAction3underthe St.CroixandSt.Thomas/St.JohnFishery ManagementPlans:

ModificationofStatusDeterminationCriteriaandManagementReference Pointsbasedonthe SEDAR80QueenTriggerfishStockAssessments

SarahStephenson,NMFS-SEROCaribbeanBranch

185th CaribbeanFisheryManagementCouncilMeeting

August13-14,2024

CurrentManagementofQueenTriggerfish

• UndertheSt.CroixandSt.Thomas/St.JohnFMPs,queentriggerfishismanagedas anindividualstock(i.e.,notmanagedinagroupwithotherspecies).

• IneachFMP,queentriggerfishisclassifiedunderTier4aoftheCouncil’sAcceptable BiologicalCatchControlRule.

o DataLimited:NoAcceptedAssessmentAvailableandrelativelylowvulnerabilitytofishing pressure.

o Sustainableyieldlevelspecifiedastheoverfishinglimitproxy.

• Annualcatchlimits(ACL)arebasedoncommerciallandings,andaccountability measures(AM)applytoallfishing(commercialandrecreational).

o IfACLsareexceeded,AMsareactionsdesignedtoensurethattheACLisnotexceededinthe followingyear.

CurrentReferencePoints

Table 1.1. Queentriggerfishsustainableyieldlevels(SYL),acceptablebiologicalcatch(ABC), andannualcatchlimits(ACL)undertheSt.CroixandSt.Thomas/St.JohnFMPs.

Background

• TheSoutheastData,Assessment,andReview(SEDAR)80forSt.CroixandSt. Thomas/St.JohnQueentriggerfishwascompletedin2024.

• ForbothSt.CroixandSt.Thomas/St.Johnqueentriggerfish,theassessments indicatedthatoverfishingisnotoccurring.

• Thestockassessmentswerenotabletoestimatetheoverfishedstatusfor St.CroixorSt.Thomas/St.Johnqueentriggerfish;thus,theiroverfishstatuswould remainunknown.

• TheCouncil’sScientificandStatisticalCommittee(SSC)reviewedresultsfrom SEDAR80attheApril2024meetingandsupportedthestockassessmentsas providingthebestscientificinformationavailableanddeterminedthateachstock assessmentwassuitableformanagementadvice.

BackgroundContinued

• TheSSCinconsultationwithNOAAFisheries’SoutheastFisheriesScienceCenter (ScienceCenter)supportedthatqueentriggerfishbereclassifiedfromaTier4a stocktoaTier3stock(DataLimited:AcceptedAssessmentAvailable)underthe AcceptableBiologicalCatchControlRule.

• TheSSCcoordinatedwiththeScienceCentertosetoverfishinglimitandacceptable biologicalcatchvaluesforqueentriggerfish,foryears2024to2027.

• TheSSCpresentedacceptablebiologicalcatchrecommendationstotheCouncilat theApril2024Councilmeeting.

• TheCouncilacceptedthoserecommendationsanddirectedstafftodevelopa FrameworkActiontotheSt.CroixandSt.Thomas/St.JohnFMPstoupdate managementmeasuresforqueentriggerfishbasedonSEDAR80.

CouncilDecisions

• ThroughthisFrameworkAction,theCouncilwouldsetthequeentriggerfishACLs fromtherecommendedacceptablebiologicalcatchvalues,reducedbya managementuncertainty*buffer.

*UncertaintyintheabilityofmanagerstoconstraincatchsotheACLisnotexceeded,andthe uncertaintyinquantifyingthetruecatchamounts(i.e.,estimationerrors).

• Atthismeeting,theCouncilwillreviewthedraftdocument(includedinthemeeting briefingbook)andcanselectapreferredalternativeforsettingtheACLsforqueen triggerfishinSt.CroixandSt.Thomas/St.John.

• AdifferentalternativecouldbeselectedaspreferredforeachFMP.

PurposeandNeedStatements

• ThepurposeofthisFrameworkActionistoupdatemanagementreferencepoints forthequeentriggerfishstocksundertheSt.Croixand St.Thomas/St.JohnFMPstoaccountfortheSEDAR80stockassessmentsand applicationoftheCouncil’sAcceptableBiologicalCatchControlRule.

• TheneedforthisactionistoupdatemanagementmeasuresfortheSt.CroixandSt. Thomas/St.Johnqueentriggerfishstocksbasedonbestscientificinformation availabletopreventoverfishingandachieveoptimumyield,consistentwiththe requirementsoftheMagnuson-StevensFisheryConservationandManagementAct.

Action:UpdateReferencePoints

• ThisFrameworkActionincludesoneactionthatwoulddothefollowingunderthe St.CroixFMPandtheSt.Thomas/St.JohnFMP:

o updatemaximumsustainableyieldorproxy,maximumfishingmortalitythreshold,minimum stocksizethresholdbasedonresultsofSEDAR80;

o updatetheoverfishinglimitandacceptablebiologicalcatchvaluesforyears2024-2027(next slide);and

o SetACLsfromtherecommendedacceptablebiologicalcatchforqueentriggerfish.

OverfishingLimitandAcceptableBiologicalCatch

Table 1.2. Overfishinglimit(OFL)andacceptablebiologicalcatch(ABC)valuesrecommended fortheSt.CroixandSt.Thomas/St.Johnqueentriggerfishstocksforyears2024-2027,based onresultsoftheacceptedSEDAR80stockassessment.

Year

Valuesareinpoundswholeweight

St. Croix

St. Thomas/St. John

ProposedAlternatives

• Alternative 1. NoAction. Referencepointsforthequeentriggerfishstockswould remainasspecifiedundertheSt.CroixandSt.Thomas/St.JohnFMPs(Table2.1).

• Alternative 2. Updatereferencepointsforthequeentriggerfishstocksbasedon SEDAR80andsettheACL(whichequalsOY) equal to theABCrecommendedby theCouncil’sScientificandStatisticalCommittee(SSC).

• Alternative 3. Updatereferencepointsforthequeentriggerfishstocksbasedon SEDAR80andsettheACL(whichequalsOY) equal to 95% oftheABC recommendedbytheCouncil’sSSC.

• Alternative 4. Updatereferencepointsforthequeentriggerfishstocksbasedon SEDAR80andsettheACL(whichequalsOY) equal to 90% oftheABC recommendedbytheCouncil’sSSC.

ProposedAlternatives

Table 2.1. CurrentandproposedACLsforqueentriggerfishinSt.Croixand St.Thomas/St.John.

ComparisonofAlternatives–St.Croix

SeeTable3.3.2inFrameworkAction3documentfor landingsofqueentriggerfishreportedinSt.Croix.

GeneralExpectedEffects–St.Croix

➢ Alternative1: Notbasedonbestscientificinformation. Nochangestocurrentreferencepoints (currentACLexceedstheABCrecommendedbytheSSCbasedonSEDAR80).

➢ Biological/Ecological: Long-termnegativeeffectsfrompotentiallackofsustainability.

➢ Social/Ecological: Noadditionalshort-termeffects(nochangestocurrentlevels),andlong-termnegativeeffects fromdecreasedincomeandfishingopportunitiesforthespeciesfromlackofsustainability.

➢ Administrative: None.

➢ Alternatives2-4: Basedonbestscientificinformation. Updatereferencepoints;decreaseinACL.

➢ Biological/Ecological: Short-termpositiveeffectsfromdecreasedremovals*,andlong-termpositiveeffects frommanagingtothemaximumsustainableyield.(Alternative4ismostconservative)

➢ Social/Economic: Short-termnegativeeffectsfromreducedrevenuesandfishingopportunities**,butlong-term positiveeffectsfromsustainablymanagingthestock.(Alternative4ismostrestrictive)

➢ Administrative:Short-termeffectsfromcreating,administering,andenforcingnewregulationsandfrom additionaloutreacheffortsnotifyingstakeholdersofchanges. (Equaleffectsamongproposedalternatives)

* IffishermenharvesttotheACL.

**NotecurrentcommerciallandingsforqueentriggerfisharewellbelowthecurrentandproposedACLs.

ComparisonofAlternatives–St.Thomas/St.John

SeeTable3.3.6inFrameworkAction3documentforlandings ofqueentriggerfishreportedinSt.Thomas/St.John.

GeneralExpectedEffects–St.Thomas/St.John

➢ Alternative1: Notbasedonbestscientificinformation. Nochangestocurrentreferencepoints.

➢ Biological/Ecological: Long-termnegativeeffectsfromlackofpotentialsustainability.

➢ Social/Ecological: Noadditionalshort-termeffects(nochangestocurrentlevels),andlong-termnegativeeffects fromdecreasedincomeandfishingopportunitiesforthespeciesfromlackofsustainability.

➢ Administrative: None.

➢ Alternative2: Basedonbestscientificinformation. Updatereferencepoints;increaseinACL.

➢ Biological/Ecological: Short-termnegativeeffectsfromincreasedremovals*,andlong-termpositiveeffects frommanagingtothemaximumsustainableyield.(Alternative2isleastconservative)

➢ Social/Economic: Short-termpositiveeffectsfromincreasedrevenuesandfishingopportunities**,andlongtermpositiveeffectsfromsustainablymanagingthestock.(Alternative2isleastrestrictive)

➢ Administrative:Short-termeffectsfromcreating,administering,andenforcingnewregulationsandfrom additionaloutreacheffortsnotifyingstakeholdersofchanges.

* IffishermenharvesttotheACL.

**NotecurrentcommerciallandingsforqueentriggerfisharewellbelowthecurrentandproposedACLs.

ExpectedEffects–St.Thomas/St.JohnContinued

➢ Alternatives3-4: Basedonbestscientificinformation. Updatereferencepoints;decreaseinACL.

➢ Biological/Ecological: Short-termpositiveeffectsfromdecreasedremovals*,andlong-termpositiveeffects frommanagingtothemaximumsustainableyield.(Alternative4ismostconservative)

➢ Social/Economic: Short-termnegativeeffectsfromreducedrevenuesandfishingopportunities**,butlong-term positiveeffectsfromsustainablymanagingthestock.(Alternative4ismostrestrictive)

➢ Administrative:Short-termeffectsfromcreating,administering,andenforcingnewregulationsandfrom additionaloutreacheffortsnotifyingstakeholdersofchanges.(Equaleffectsamongproposedalternatives)

* IffishermenharvesttotheACL.

**NotecurrentcommerciallandingsforqueentriggerfisharewellbelowthecurrentandproposedACLs.

ActionItemsandNextSteps

• Counciltodecideonalternatives.

August 2024

• CouncilselectsapreferredalternativeforSt.CroixandSt.Thomas/St. John(canbethesameordifferent).

Sept.-Nov. 2024

• StaffpreparesfullFrameworkAction3(USVI).

• IPTdevelopsenvironmentalandeconomicanalysesandregulatorytext.

December 2024

• CouncilreviewsfinaldraftFrameworkActionandregulatorytext.

• CouncilapprovesFrameworkAction3(USVI)forsubmissionto SecretaryofCommerce(allowingstafftomakeeditorialchanges).

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.