Hi!
Babyteethers really rose to the occasion with this one. As you know, heat rises, so this issue must be on FIRE! Some may say babyteethers are the cream of the crop. Or the feet of the foot! And by this toeken, walk your FEET on over to our termly WORKSHOP 12-3 THIS SATURDAY in SAYLES 252! Drop in any time and stay as long as you want. We will be creating a physical zine together with a panoply of art supplies, vegan chocolate chip cookies, and pure sincere love. Suck it up! (the cookies and the fun)
That’s all for now, adiana “why do they call it” contreras sofia “of in . . .” durdag lily “oven” akre olivia “of out hot eat the food?” ho
editors:
ayla faitelson
nicky pierce ralph
adiana contreras
lily akre
max votruba
violet pody nadia hutson
eliza farley
sofia durdag
STEWIE GOON! contributers: STEWIE GOON! dashiell tidrick
adiana contreras
billy bratton owen roth
the ore barons
eliza farley tyler chodera
olivia ho sofia durdag
eye dee kay, man. eye dee even SEE. say whatever you want about it. this piece of art is:
>beautiful funny stupid just please don’t say you don’t get it. eye don’t see. but i care too much for you not to.
eliza farley
The Room That We Were In The Other Day
For the sake of time, I’ll have to summarize Developments of late, but where it starts Is in that ornate room of pinned-down butterflies Framed under glass. There, somewhere near my heart, A vital muscle in an instant ceased to hold. I felt in my extremities a creeping cold,
That, at the time, I didn’t even realize Would soon consume me, but it now has been Three days and half a night since it materialized, And it has grown. I’d say in terms of pins-and-needles, I have never felt them worse before. I cannot seem to move my body anymore.
Do you recall the room? Just now the butterflies Began to move, as if meaning to tease Me. Pins popped out. The glass then dematerialized, Allowing them to swarm and bite like fleas. All this is just to say that if you can, as soon As possible, please come and drag me from this room
owen roth
how is your comps going? how is your comps going?
is eroticism a historiographical method. is mysticism. are dreams. sacrality is an ocean, a boundless ocean without shore. i imagine myself floating or drowning in this ocean, sinking to the bottom where the profane must lay in silty quiet. thursday night i am sleeping in somebody else’s bed and have feverish, muttering dreams that perhaps if i lived in the fifteenth century i would have interpreted as a divine force speaking to me in the tight close dark. except i live now and i
is eroticism a historiographical method. is mysticism. are dreams. sacrality is an ocean, a boundless ocean without shore. i imagine myself floating or drowning in this ocean, sinking to the bottom where the profane must lay in silty quiet. thursday night i am sleeping in somebody else’s bed and have feverish, muttering dreams that perhaps if i lived in the fifteenth century i would have interpreted as a divine force speaking to me in the tight close dark. except i live now and i
























i am trying desperately to get to the bottom of divine love. i look for it everywhere. my sister. jstor. but it lays beneath something. it is in my eye and beyond it. in the fifteenth century i would have known without a doubt that there are two worlds—the invisible and the visible, the felt and the known. and there is a barrier, an isthmus, but it is permeable, thinner than the width of my palm, if you are a demon, god (in all various forms), or have a perfect shining love under your skin. is love in history, or only echoes. are the echoes constructivist or positivist. if i had lived in the fifteenth century last saturday, i might have understood drunkenness as a metaphor for the ecstasy of divine union, a sip of heaven. oh i wonder what intoxication feels like when you can taste god, and not somebody else’s hamms on somebody else’s mouth. is my paper compromised by this failure of understanding. i think yes probably.


i am trying desperately to get to the bottom of divine love. i look for it everywhere. my sister. jstor. but it lays beneath something. it is in my eye and beyond it. in the fifteenth century i would have known without a doubt that there are two worlds—the invisible and the visible, the felt and the known. and there is a barrier, an isthmus, but it is permeable, thinner than the width of my palm, if you are a demon, god (in all various forms), or have a perfect shining love under your skin. is love in history, or only echoes. are the echoes constructivist or positivist. if i had lived in the fifteenth century last saturday, i might have understood drunkenness as a metaphor for the ecstasy of divine union, a sip of heaven. oh i wonder what intoxication feels like when you can taste god, and not somebody else’s hamms on somebody else’s mouth. is my paper compromised by this failure of understanding. i think yes probably.




















i bury my face in my hands and i truly think all troubles can be reduced to wanting yet not having. how can i cite that. wanting is rapture, if it is of the right kind. is wanting a thesis.
i bury my face in my hands and i truly think all troubles can be reduced to wanting yet not having. how can i cite that. wanting is rapture, if it is of the right kind. is wanting a thesis.
by Tyler Chodera