Special Collections Libraries Building
Space Needs
SPACE TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING ENROLLMENT The project addresses an existing space deficit of almost 200,000 square feet. At the same time, it will accommodate future growth in library collections.
Special Collections Libraries Building
ACQUIRING NEW LAND FOR CONSTRUCTION The Board of Regents already owns the proposed site.
The continuing rapid growth of materials in the library collections, including rare books and manuscripts, coupled with the growth of student enrollment since the last addition to the Main Library was completed in 1973, has brought about a critical shortage of physical space for the University of Georgia Libraries. Applying the most conservative numbers from the University System’s “Guidelines for Preplanning” to our enrollment tells us that we should have over 560,000 square feet of library space, while we currently maintain only 322,000. Our current inventory of library space enables the University to provide about 3,100 student reading seats. This number of seats is 43% below what Regents’ standards prescribe and is sufficient for the enrollment the University had in 1967.
University Libraries Space Needs square feet provided lin es Re gen ts’ Gu ide
600,000 500,000
Student Learning Center
400,000 300,000 200,000
Current Space
100,000 0 CURRENT
2003
2004
2005
2006
In addition, our collections continue to grow by about 90,000 volumes per year, thus increasing our space deficit by 6,300 square feet per year. As illustrated by the graphic above, our current space deficit of more than 240,000 square feet will grow to almost 290,000 by FY 2006. While the Student Learning Center will make a good dent in our space deficit, we will still maintain a critical need for additional space.
Peer Provision Comparison as a % of the guidelines 150% 100% 50%
Regents’ Guidelines 59%
0% UGA
Kentucky
Texas A&M
Tennessee
UNC
The second graph demonstrates that while our peer institutions are providing space to support their teaching, research, and public service missions in line with the Regents’ standards, we clearly are not.
PARALLEL FUTURE GROWTH TARGETS The project will provide both additional space and more modern facilities to accommodate future growth targets as per the campus strategic and physical master plan. BALANCE THE NEED FOR NEW FACILITIES AND REHABILITATE EXISTING FACILITIES Rehabilitation would not add the needed space, nor would it provide the opportunity for the libraries to consolidate their functions or adequately address environmental concerns unique to archival collections. Current special collection space within the Main and Law Libraries will be freed up for general collections and research space needs. PRIORITIES FOR THE USE OF STATE RESOURCES
Instructional
35%
Academic support
45%
Research
20%
Special Collections
Libraries
OTHER THAN STATE FINANCIAL RESOURCES One third of the funding ($12,000,000) for the proposed Special Collections Libraries Building will be provided by private donations. Likewise, the collections are to be endowed entirely with private funds ($10,000,000). HIGH QUALITY FACILITIES The Special Collections Libraries Building will provide a state-of-the-artarchival environment and will be the standard by which similar special collections facilities across the nation will be measured. MODERN FACILITIES AND DISTANCE EDUCATION CAPACITY The emphasis of this building will be the housing and use of rare and valuable collections and thus will require modern, efficient climate control. Materials from the collections will be scanned and made available for use through GALILEO and will support distance education initiatives. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS • This new facility will free up considerable space in the Main and Law Libraries that can be put to more productive use than storage space; • The existing campus infrastructure is being extended to support the new facility; • The facility will improve the cultural life of the University by providing a space for the display of rare and valuable materials, including an auditorium for lectures and screenings; • The facility will be open to the public and thus will enhance the local community and will address the demand for a museum area for the Peabody Awards; • As a new facility, the building will be efficient to operate. TIMELY COMPLETION OF PROGRAMMING AND DESIGN AS WELL AS THE MAINTENANCE OF PROJECTS WITHIN BUDGETS With pre-planning and preliminary design phases already completed within the context of the campus master plan, we are well on our way to fulfilling this final principal.
MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT REQUEST presented by Dr. Michael Adams • June 11, 2002
Fiscal Year 2004
Principles for Capital Resources Allocation