120822

UCHICAGO’S

FINALS WEEK VOL. 135, ISSUE 6

New Pritzker Dean Mark Anderson Wants Med School Without Tuition or Student Debt

By ANU VASHIST | Deputy News Editor

The Pritzker School of Medicine at the University of Chicago is the most diverse schools in the U.S. News and World Report’s top 20 medical schools and one of the most generous in its financial aid offerings, with 92 percent of students receiving tuition aid.

But for new Pritzker dean Mark Ander son, that’s not enough.

we can even further expand the diversity of our students.”

On October 1, Anderson began his tenure as ex ecutive vice president for medical affairs, dean of the Division of the Biological Sciences, and dean of the Pritzker School of Medicine. courtesy of the university of chicago

“I want to capture the value of the cen tennial of our school to try and move us to an even better place in terms of tuition sup port,” Anderson said, speaking of Pritzker’s upcoming 100-year anniversary in 2027. “My goal would be to move the University into tuition- or debt-free scenarios so that

UChicago Men’s Soccer Wins First-Ever National Title

By FINN HARTNETT | Sports Editor

The UChicago men’s soccer team made history on and off the field Saturday after noon when the Maroons beat Williams Col lege 2-0 in Salem, Virginia, to claim the first national championship in the program’s 75year history. Julianne Sitch, in her first year as head coach of the Maroons, became the first-ever female head coach to win a men’s collegiate soccer championship.

This victory represented a major accom plishment for a university that had only won its first NCAA team championship last year in men’s tennis. But the 2022 men’s soccer team was by no means a Cinderella story.

NEWS: At Vigil for China Fire Victims, Attendees Support Movement From Abroad

PAGE 3

UChicago’s win against Williams came after a dominant regular season in which the Ma roons won 16 games, drew one (a 0-0 match against NYU), and lost none. They added six more wins to that tally in the playoffs.

It was Williams who looked to play the role of spoiler in the championship match. The Ephs had drawn more games than they had won in the regular season before em barking on a magical postseason run, which had seen them upset NYU, Ohio Northern, and Kenyon on their way to the finals. How ever, UChicago third-year Ryan Yetishefsky

CONTINUED ON PG. 2

VIEWPOINTS: The Problem of White Grievance: A Defense of Critical Inquiry

PAGE 9

On October 1, Anderson began his ten ure as executive vice president for Medical Affairs, dean of the Division of the Biological Sciences, and Dean of the Pritzker School of Medicine. He replaced Kenneth Polonsky, who is now a senior advisor to the president of the University.

Anderson joins UChicago after nearly a decade at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, where he most recent ly served as the director of the Department of Medicine and physician-in-chief of the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Prior to his time at Hopkins, he served on the faculty at Van derbilt University and the University of Iowa College of Medicine.

Anderson hopes to bring to UChicago

CONTINUED ON PG. 2

NEWS Kate Mabus, editor Nikhil Jaiswal, editor Tess Chang, editor Anushka Harve, editor Jinna Lee, editor Rachel Wan, editor Michael McClure, editor

GREY CITY Laura Gersony, editor Milutin Gjaja, editor Solana Adedokun, editor Rachel Liu, editor

VIEWPOINTS

Irene Qi, head editor Ketan Sengupta, associate editor

ARTS

Angélique Alexos, head editor Natalie Manley, head editor Dawn Heatherly, deputy editor

SPORTS Finn Hartnett, editor Eva McCord, editor Kayla Rubenstein, editor

COPY

Skyler Lorenty, copy chief Michael McClure, copy chief Arianne Nguyen, copy chief Caitlin Lozada, copy chief Tejas Narayan, copy chief Kayla Rubenstein, copy chief

WEB

Firat Ciftci, lead developer

VIEWPOINTS: Graduate Student Unionization: The Path Forward for the University

PAGE 12

DESIGN Allison Ho, production editor Elena Jochum, design editor Eric Fang, deputy designer

PHOTO Han Jiang, editor Angelina Torre, editor Emma-Victoria Banos, editor

VIDEO Lisa Raj Singh, editor Lade Tinubu, editor

CROSSWORD Henry Josephson, head editor Pravan Chakravarthy, associate editor Cooper Komatsu, associate editor Siyanda Mohutsiwa, associate editor

PODCAST Gregory Caesar, chief editor Carter Beckstein editor Jake Zucker, editor

BUSINESS

Kaelyn Hindshaw, director of finance Nathan Ohana, director of finance Prathana Kaygee, director of community engagement Aisling Murtagh, director of marketing Maya Russell, director of operations

Editor-in-Chief: Editor@ChicagoMaroon.com Newsroom Phone (312) 918-8023 Business Phone: (408) 806-8381

For advertising inquiries, please contact ads@ChicagoMaroon.com or (408) 806-8381.

Circulation: 2,500 © 2022 The Chicago Maroon Ida Noyes Hall / 1212 East 59th Street Chicago, IL 60637

ARTS: The Drink of December: A Ranking of UChicago’s Best Cups of Hot Cocoa

Like our Facebook page at facebook.com/chicagomaroon and follow @chicagomaroon on Instagram and Twitter to get the latest updates on campus news. chicagomaroon.com

Gage Gramlick, Editor-in-Chief Yiwen Lu, Managing Editor Matthew Chang, Chief Production Officer Astrid Weinberg & Dylan Zhang, Chief Business Officers

The Editorial Board is run by the editor-in-chief of The Maroon and composed of members from various editorial sections of the paper.

CONTINUED FROM PG. 1

the broadened diversity and equity practices he implemented in his previous roles, par ticularly those at Johns Hopkins. “At Hop kins, not to oversimplify, but there are many similarities [with UChicago] between the vulnerable populations that surround the medical school and the long and sometimes complicated relationship of those popula tions to the medical school,” Anderson said.

Anderson made sure to highlight how his former colleague at Hopkins, Sherita Golden, now the vice president and chief diversity officer at Johns Hopkins Medi cine, shaped his perspective on equity and community practices.

“She pointed out that the [hospital] was more than the faculty, and it was even more than the nurses. Because of the structure, it involved lots of people who lived in our com munity—people who transported patients and were medical assistants [and] environ mental services workers,” Anderson said. “There were almost 6,000 employees, and we started to focus on this broader group to create engagement through a mission-val ues exercise that was broadly inclusive, and I think successful, through a series of discus sions with various groups called Journeys in Medicine.”

The program created a forum for Johns Hopkins faculty and staff to share their experiences as underrepresented individ uals while also connecting them with local leaders, such as members of religious com munity,

“Some of this was really pretty hard to

hear, but I think it ended up engaging us more broadly, including as a faculty and as learners,” he said.

Speaking on how he wants to apply lessons from Johns Hopkins to UChicago, Anderson said, “I want [us] to be a more effective partner with the South Side of Chicago and make sure that we’re authen tically engaged with the population...but I also want to make sure that people know the really remarkable things that are already happening.”

Anderson also feels expanding UChica go’s base of care is important—a task UChi cago Medicine has already begun to under take with the construction of a new $633 million clinical cancer center. “I think a real point of pride is building the first freestand ing cancer center in the whole Midwest right here in Hyde Park.”

Before becoming a physician scientist, Anderson grew up with much exposure to health care. He grew up in Rochester, Min nesota, home to the world-renowned Mayo Clinic—a nonprofit academic medical center that integrates health care, research, and medical education. His father worked there as a consultant, publication editor, and pro fessor, and his paternal grandparents were also both physicians. “It was hard not to be thinking about medicine,” Anderson said.

Despite his family history, Anderson did not originally want to pursue medicine. “My initial predilections were to go into law to do something that wasn’t so predetermined, and I loved history and political science. Those were my first majors in undergrad

uate,” Anderson said. “But I think I was drawn in by several factors, one of them for sure just being so interested in biology and the kind of discoveries that were starting to occur at that time.”

Clinically trained as a cardiologist, An derson completed his internal medicine residency and fellowships in cardiology and clinical cardiac electrophysiology at Stan ford University after earning an M.D.–Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1989.

For nearly 30 years since then, Ander son has led research funded by the National Institutes of Health focused on heart fail ure and arrhythmias. His research profile consists of more than 160 peer-reviewed publications.

As his career progressed, Anderson came to especially value academic medi cine. “I could try and improve the human condition through reducing suffering, un derstand[ing] the unmet needs, [and] using science as a tool to gain a deeper mechanis tic, molecular-level understanding of how things worked.”

A new challenge Anderson and his col leagues have had to tackle is the burnout facing medical workers on the front lines of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. “It just goes on forever,” Anderson said. “Especially at the beginning of the pandemic, when we didn’t have a good sense of how the virus was transmitted, that was even scarier.”

Burnout in health-care professionals remains an unresolved task. “There [are] not simple solutions. I think part of it is ac knowledging the value of teams and what

Side”

people do and making sure that people have access to wellness resources and en gagement so that they can talk to their su pervisors in a candid, safe way.”

Beyond the stresses of being on the front lines, the pandemic brought social and po litical turmoil that resulted in less uptake of the unprecedented tools, like vaccines, that were developed to combat the virus, Ander son said. “I think the failure to really broad ly uptake some of these great treatments is partially a failure of better communication.”

Other than recovery from the pandem ic, Anderson also hopes to strengthen the Pritzker School’s collaboration with other UChicago divisions and other Chicago-area research universities. “Biology and medi cine are generating tremendous and rich datasets that, until very recently, hadn’t been that interesting outside their commu nities. But now with the growth in data sci ences and the power of computing, I think we’re seeing a lot of interest by adjacent or nontraditional allies,” he said.

Through this research, Anderson hopes to advance patient care—what he considers the backbone of the UChicago medical sys tem.

“That is what creates the revenue streams to support education and research and engage more effectively with the broad er university and all its assets,” Anderson said. “I want to make sure that the health system prospers because that’s how we ac tually touch people.”

CONTINUED FROM PG. 1

told The Maroon that the team was non plussed by William’s recent results. “Going into the finals, we were very confident that we were the better team. We’d seen plenty of film of our opponents and knew what to expect in the match. Our mentality was to respect the threats that Williams posed but ultimately to come in and impose our style of play onto them,” he said.

After a cagey first half of the champion ship match, third-year Robbie Pino gave the

Maroons the opening goal in the 66th min ute. After controlling a pass from fourth-year Naz Kabbani 25 yards out, Pino unleashed a beautiful shot that sailed past Ephs goal ie Ben Diffley and into the top corner. Ye tishefsky, who led the Maroons in scoring in 2022, then capped the game off with a second goal with 13 seconds left to play. Af ter Williams brought their entire team for ward in search of an equalizer, the Chicago striker found himself with the ball in space following a Williams free kick. Yetishefsky

flew downfield and was able to pass the ball into an empty net from about 40 yards away, sending the UChicago fans who had made the trip south—as well as the entire Maroon bench—into delirium. “Honestly, I felt that before I scored the game was already over,” Yetishefsky admitted. “Our defense was ex ceptional today.… I was happy to score, but I was more excited for the team.”

The game ended not long after. As players on both the winning and losing sides dropped to their knees, one could feel the emotions re

verberate in the damp Virginia air. Williams College had fallen short after a magical play off run; UChicago, who had made the NCAA championship tournament four times in the last five years, had finally gone all the way. It was an intense moment, to be sure. Head coach Sitch, however, remained relatively calm. As the cameras cut to her, she smiled slightly, applauding her team as she walked onto the field. It was only after a few players from the subs bench doused her with a Gato rade cooler that she broke into a grin.

“I want [us] to be a more effective partner with the South

“UChicago, who had made the NCAA Championship tournament four times in the last five years, had finally gone all the way.”

Bartlett Dining Commons to Close for Renovation During Spring, Summer Quarters

By ERIC FANG | Deputy News Editor

Bartlett Dining Commons will be closed for the spring quarter and for most of the summer. Beginning spring quarter, Baker Dining Commons access will also be restricted to students and staff living in Campus North or Max Palevsky Resi dential Commons who have purchased a UChicago Dining meal plan. Full service is expected to return by fall 2023.

The closure and associated changes were announced in a December 1 email to residents of Max Palevsky Residential Commons and Snell-Hitchcock Hall by Executive Director of UChicago Dining Christopher Toote. He announced the fu ture restrictions on Baker in a separate email on December 2 to all on-campus housing residents with a UChicago Din

ing plan.

According to the emails, the closure is necessary for the next phase of ex ternal improvements on Bartlett, built from 1901 to 1904. Work began on the first phase of these improvements this summer. Exterior scaffolding and fencing remain around the building and at its en trances, although major work has paused for the autumn and winter quarters, per the emails.

During spring quarter, residents of both Max Palevsky and Snell-Hitchcock will receive five additional meal exchang es usable during lunch periods from Mondays through Fridays each week, an additional 100 Maroon Dollars, and 10 ad ditional “to-go” meals from dining halls.

Additionally, all dining halls will serve lunch from 11 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., extend ed from the standard window ending at 2:30 p.m.

For those eligible to dine at Baker in the spring and summer quarters, credit cards and Maroon Dollars will no longer be accepted as they normally are at cam pus dining halls. Further, Baker will no longer be available for outside groups nor for private dining events.

Operations at Cathey Dining Com mons and Woodlawn Dining Commons, located next to Renée Granville-Gross man Residential Commons and Wood lawn Residential Commons respectively, will remain unchanged. Retail food ven dors in Hutchinson Commons will also remain open.

For spring quarter, the eight tables

corresponding to Max Palevsky’s resi dential houses will be in Baker Dining Commons. House tables for Snell House and Hitchcock House will be in Cathey Dining Commons.

“Additional resources and program ming will be provided to ensure that we continue to offer a dining program that promotes service, quality, safety, and community dining while the essential improvements are made in Bartlett Hall,” Toote wrote in both emails.

Toote encouraged students to direct questions at dining@uchicago.edu. In his email to Max Palevsky and Snell-Hitch cock residents, he also promised the com munication of “additional operational changes to ease access to dining services” closer to the start of spring quarter.

At Vigil for China Fire Victims, Attendees Support Movement from Abroad

By YIWEN LU | Managing Editor

Editor’s note: The Maroon granted an onymity to some sources in this story who raised concerns over retaliation and person al safety.

It started with a simple, black flyer: “Global Vigil: Remember the Urumqi Fire.” When Rik, a first-year undergradu ate at Northwestern University, first came across the candlelight vigil on Instagram, he immediately decided to travel into the city. “I wanted to meet the fellow organiz ers,” he said. “I wanted to be part of the community.”

More than 100 community members gathered on the main quad of the Univer sity of Chicago on Sunday night, mourning the 10 victims of an apartment fire in Xin jiang, China. The fire, which broke out in a residential high-rise in Xinjiang’s capital Urumqi, has become a focal point for those protesting China’s zero-COVID policy. COVID-19 lockdowns forbidding residents from leaving their homes have been in place

for more than 100 days across the Xinjiang region, the home of many of China’s ethnic minorities, including the Uighur people. While local officials continue to be circum spect, many in China believe that stringent lockdown measures, including a roadblock and the building’s closed fire exit delayed emergency responders from responding to the fire.

The tragedy has sparked mass demon strations across major cities in China against the zero-COVID policy. Thousands of protestors have demanded that the gov ernment lift COVID-related restrictions, with some going as far as to challenge Chi na’s leader, Xi Jinping, and the Chinese Communist Party. The movement has also spread throughout the Chinese diaspora abroad.

By 7 p.m., the scheduled start time, those on the quad stood in silence around candles and bouquets they had brought to the vigil. The organizers started to play background music—such as popular Chi

nese songs from the 1980s and Western songs about revolution like “Do You Hear the People Sing?”—to which the growing crowd started to chant along. Some brought signs with slogans on them or held up blank sheets of paper, a symbol for censorship seen across protests in China.

A graduate student from Ohio State University who was visiting Chicago during Thanksgiving brought a printed road sign of a street named “Urumqi Road” in Shang hai. According to videos spreading online, the original sign was removed after a largescale demonstration on the street, after which hundreds were arrested.

“I grew up in Shanghai and frequented the street,” the student said. “When I saw the police taking those protestors away, I felt devastated. I hope to do something to pay respect to the protestors.”

As the night went on, organizers passed a microphone among the participants. “We gathered here not only to mourn the victims in the Urumqi fire,” one speaker said, listing social injustices in China that have made headlines during the past three years: farm

ers in Korla, Xinjiang, who saw mass deaths of their livestock during the lockdown; mi grant workers who caught COVID-19 but were not treated after being forced into centralized quarantine; 38 factory workers, many of them women, who were killed in a deadly fire in Anyang, Henan. These sto ries spread across Chinese social media and internationally on Instagram and Twitter, though they were eventually censored and scrubbed in China.

Later on, speakers chanted demands like “Free press! Free speech!,” “Democra cy, law, and freedom!,” and “For tomorrow!”

Many shouted slogans in Mandarin, such as “We don’t want PCR tests; we want food! We don’t want a dictator; we want elections!”

Those assembled also called for the Chinese government to release an unnamed protes tor who in October hung large banners from a bridge in Beijing with slogans calling for Xi Jinping to step down. The act of defiance drew widespread attention both within and outside of China because of its brazen na ture and its proximity to China’s National

CONTINUED FROM PG. 3

Party Congress—an event that occurs every five years in China and is often preceded by heightened security and censorship efforts.

“The protesters in China faced much higher risks than us,” a graduate student who made the flyer advertising the vigil said. “Because we are fortunate to stay here without risks or police throwing tear gas at us, we are responsible for doing more.”

The student who helped organize the event said the number and diversity of

people who attended were beyond expec tations. “We have friends from different programs, from the local church, and from Hong Kong,” they said. “People may stand differently on the political spectrum, but I was touched to have such a time and space that we can agree with each other and stand together.”

Rik said that fellow students who did not seem to be politically active in their everyday lives showed up on Sunday. That showed him a sense of belonging. The vig

il attracted the attention of students who were passing by as well, many of whom stopped and participated out of solidarity with the protestors. “The exposure, I be lieve, is part of the goal,” Rik said.

One of the speakers at the vigil iden tified as a social worker from Hong Kong. “Sometimes the work we do might not in tersect all the time, but I believe that we all share the same universal values like democ racy and freedom and, most importantly, just human dignity,” they said. “We really

want to show our support to you guys.”

The vigil was not the only event in Chi cago at which people expressed solidarity with protestors in China. On Tuesday eve ning, almost 200 protested in front of the Chinese consulate at the corner of West Erie Street and North Clark Street. At uni versities across the country—such as Co lumbia, Harvard, and Duke—international students and members from surrounding communities have organized and partici pated in similar events.

UChicago’s Business Economics Track Facing Supply-and-Demand Crisis

By PETER MAHERAS | Senior News Reporter

The business economics specializa tion of the economics major has grown rapidly since launching during the 2018–19 academic year. As the track continues to grow, students have struggled to reg ister for required classes as the econom ics department attempts to keep up with rising demand.

In an interview with The Maroon, economics department chair Robert Shimer said he expects growth to slow over the next few years but is unsure about what consistent percentage of stu dents would choose the business econom ics track going forward. About half of all economics majors are currently pursuing the business economics track.

“Frankly, our thinking was that adop tion was going to be a lot slower than it’s been,” Shimer said. “We just did not see how strong the demand was going to be for this [specialization].”

The business economics track’s re quired courses are split between the following categories: core, methods, empirical analysis, perspectives, and electives. Three of the elective cours es must be taken at the Booth School of Business. Shimer said the department has struggled to keep up with the demand for business economics courses, especially in the methods and empirical analysis cat egories.

“The surprise for us has been—be cause the growth has been so strong—

that we have to shift resources into the methods and econometrics classes, and [the department is] still not fully satisfy ing the demand for those classes,” Shimer said.

Eight of the 10 courses offered during fall quarter that fill the methods require ment without requiring calculus are ei ther full or overenrolled, according to the UChicago Class Search system. For example, both of the Intro to Economet rics sections (which fulfill the empirical analysis requirement) are overenrolled.

In order to meet demand, Shimer said the economics department had been in creasing class sizes and the number of sections offered for required courses. Individual instructors decide whether to allow overenrollment in their classes, but they are often limited by the physical size of classrooms.

“What we think we have right now is an unusually large number of students who need to take the methods classes,” Shimer said. “Because we’ve been behind for a few years on offering it, students weren’t able to get into the methods class es in their second year that they wanted to take. So we’ve got second-years, thirdyears, and fourth-years who are trying to take methods classes.”

Shimer said the registrar recently granted the economics department per mission to change pre-registration rules to prioritize economics majors over other

students. He hopes this change will alle viate some of the bottlenecks in getting students into required courses.

The department plans to hire addi tional instructors to increase course of ferings and shrink class sizes, but Shimer could not specify an intended number of new hires.

“The problem is we could get some warm bodies off the street to teach class es, but that’s not serving anybody well to do that,” Shimer said. “We want to hire great people, and that’s a time-consuming process.”

The business economics program was originally proposed in early 2018 as a standalone major jointly controlled by the Department of Economics and the Booth School of Business. The proposal generated pushback from some students and faculty. Opponents claimed that a business economics major would be akin to a pre-professional degree and would deviate from the University’s tradition of a liberal arts education.

In a petition dated April 3, 2018, more than 100 faculty members outlined their objections to the proposal. They worried that the major would have lower academic standards compared to other majors and would attract applicants who view educa tion “primarily as a preparation for lucra tive careers.”

“Creating a business major would do a disservice to future students who would be lured into a narrow technical track that is likely to be less academically rig

orous and intellectually stimulating than existing programs in economics and the other social sciences,” the petition reads.

Shimer said the main difference be tween the business economics track and the standard economics major is the math requirement. Students in the standard economics track are required to complete a full calculus sequence, but students in the business economics track have no specific math requirement outside of the Core.

“For a lot of students, the math is go ing to be a barrier for entry,” Shimer said. “We think there are really important, fundamental economic things which are independent of mathematics. If mathe matics didn’t exist, the economics would still be there. It’s just a question about using different approaches to get at those economics things.”

Shortly after the petition was pub lished, the proposal for a standalone major was withdrawn. Instead, business economics became a specialization with in the existing economics major.

“I think we are teaching something which is useful, and I don’t think that’s a horrible thing,” Shimer said, “but we’re also not teaching courses which are, ‘You need to take this course in order to get a job at a Fortune 500 company or a tech company or something like that.’ That’s not how we envisioned it, and it’s not the way it’s constructed.”

“Because we are fortunate to stay here without risks or police throwing tear gas at us, we are responsible for doing more.”

University Appoints New Housing and Residence Life Director

By NOAH GLASGOW | Senior News Reporter

David Hibbler Jr. will become the new executive director of Housing and Resi dence Life (HRL) at the start of winter quarter, a University press release an nounced Tuesday, November 15.

As executive director of HRL, Hibbler will oversee the management of all sev

en University dorms, which collectively house about 4,500 students. He will lead a department that employs almost 300 staff members.

Hibbler comes to Chicago from the University of South Florida (USF), where he spent nearly a decade working in stu

dent affairs management. His most recent position at USF was director of residential education. He has also served as a Title IX investigator at USF, according to his LinkedIn page.

In 2020, Hibbler, who is Black, re ceived his Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from USF for research in managing the “racialized role strain”

that Black administrators face at pre dominantly white institutions of higher education.

“I look forward to creating an environ ment for residents to live, eat, debate, play together, but most importantly, rest, to fully live out UChicago’s values and bring forth ideas that change the world,” Hib bler said in the University press release.

“Victory for Team Normal”: Representative Liz Cheney Expresses Post-Midterm Optimism during IOP Event

By ERIC FANG | Deputy News Editor

Outgoing House of Representatives member Liz Cheney (R-WY) spoke about the importance of defending the nation’s democracy on November 11 during an In stitute of Politics (IOP) speaker series event at Mandel Hall moderated by Dean of the Harris School of Public Policy Katherine Baicker.

Cheney has served as Wyoming’s atlarge Congressional Representative since 2017 but recently lost the Republican pri mary for her seat after she voted to impeach former president Donald Trump in 2021 fol lowing the events of January 6. Cheney was also ousted as the House Republican Caucus Chair, the third most powerful position in the Republican Congressional Caucus, as a result of her impeachment vote and subse quent cooperation with Democrats in inves tigating the events of January 6.

Born in Wisconsin in 1966, Cheney, the daughter of former vice president and Republican power broker Dick Cheney, re ceived her J.D. from the University of Chi cago Law School in 1996.

Cheney, who was introduced by Presi dent of the UChicago College Republicans and third-year mathematics major Chad Berkich, began the conversation with Ba icker by reflecting upon last Tuesday’s midterm elections and the underwhelming performance of Republicans.

“I think, in terms of the election, the fact that we are here on Friday, and that we do not know which party will control the House or Senate tells you a lot about defying expectations and the extent to which it was a victory for team normal,” Cheney said. “I

think it was a really important and frankly hopeful outcome for democracy.”

Most pollsters predicted a “red wave” for the 2022 midterm elections which would see Republicans winning control of both the House and the Senate. However, the victory of Senator Cortez Masto (D-NV), called the day after Cheney’s event, secured Demo cratic control of the Senate. Across the eight most competitive Senate races, Democrats on average performed about three percent age points better than Real Clear Politics’ final polling averages.

Prior to the midterms, Cheney endorsed a select few Democratic candidates who were in critical races against Trump allies. With one exception, all of the Democrats endorsed by Cheney won their races this year. Although Cheney saw these results as progress, she emphasized that there is still much more work to be done to end Trump’s political influence.

“I think we have a long way to go,” Cheney said. “We certainly have a threat that we have never faced before in this coun try in terms of a former president who tried to overturn an election, tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power, who is still say ing things that he knows caused violence on the sixth, and for whom there is still tre mendous loyalty to in the Republican party. I think we have a lot to do but the outcome this week is a step in the right direction.”

Cheney then spoke about the danger that threats to the peaceful transfer of power and constitutional democracy could become commonplace in the United States.

“I think elected officials need to un

derstand that words matter,” Cheney said. “When you see again and again people ac cepting things that are indefensible like Jan uary 6, that can very easily become the new normal. It can become legal. I think that is a big danger, and we need to make sure that we use our votes to encourage those who

“I think what we have done as a com mittee in terms of our hearings has been to put forward for people the evidence for the multi-part plan that Donald Trump oversaw and directed to stop the peaceful transition of power,” Cheney said. “I think it is really important for people to go back and

will stand up for the Constitution.”

In July 2021, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appointed Cheney to the House Se lect Committee to investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol. In September 2021, she became vice chair of the committee.

watch the hearings if they haven’t. We need to make sure that we don’t become numb to what Donald Trump did.”

Cheney also addressed the role of social media in helping to foment the political rad icalism that led to January 6. She stated that

Liz Cheney speaks at an Institute of Politics event on November 11. eric fang

“My advice is to go do it.”

CONTINUED FROM PG. 5

she is not in favor of removing the federal legal protections which exempt social me dia companies from civil liability stemming from third-party content on their platforms. However, she does believe that if social me dia companies use algorithms that push users toward ideological extremes, then there should be more transparency and accountability. She also stressed the need for personal accountability in fact-checking information consumed online.

“I think our laws haven’t caught up with the role social media is playing in our lives, and when you hear that the leaders of the so

cial media platforms aren’t letting their own children onto the app, that tells you every thing that you need to know,” Cheney said.

Finally, Cheney offered advice to stu dents who are hoping to drive positive change in the political sphere.

“My advice is to go do it,” Cheney said. “It can be easy to sit back and be intimidated by all the different pieces of running for office, but what I have learned since January 6 is that having good, committed, responsible people in office is necessary for the survival of the republic. So if you are at all interested in running, I don’t care if you are a Demo crat or Republican, if you are smart, good,

and committed to fighting for the Consti tution, please run for office.”

After finishing her conversation with Baicker, Cheney took questions from stu dents in the audience. She notably addressed two questions concerning a conspiracy the ory about an Arizona man named Ray Epps. Specifically, prominent conservatives such as former president Donald Trump, Fox News Host Tucker Carlson, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), and Repre sentative Thomas Massie (R-KY) have all claimed that Epps represents one of many federal agents deployed to the Capitol on January 6 with the goal of instigating vio

lence. In response to questions regarding Epps, Cheney emphasized that the commit tee has found no evidence pointing towards Epps being a federal agent. Cheney also answered questions regarding her foreign policy stance on China and the regulation of social media.

The event, originally scheduled for Oc tober 13, was moved twice, once to October 24 due to “an unforeseen and unavoidable scheduling conflict” and later to November 11 due to a flight cancellation.

Cheney will serve as Wyoming’s Con gressional Representative until January 3.

Botany Pond Restoration Prioritizes Expansion and Improvement of Habitat

By GUSTAVO DELGADO | Senior News Reporter

A picturesque staple of UChicago’s main quad, Botany Pond will remain closed to the public from October until summer 2023 due to a restoration project. During the construction process, the bridge through Botany Pond that connects to Hutchinson Courtyard will be closed, but the northsouth quad path through Cobb Gate will remain open.

The project aims to increase accessibil ity to Botany Pond. “The new design will eliminate the temporary fencing that has been installed at the pond annually, making the grassy banks fully accessible to human visitors,” Associate Director for Public Af fairs Gerald McSwiggan told The Maroon. This mesh fencing borders the area near the bridge to prevent visitors from getting too close to the pond edge and falling in.

The project also aims to improve the pond’s habitat and better incorporate the surrounding area. “A new water filtration

system will be among the improvements in tended to promote the health of the pond’s flora and fauna,” McSwiggan said.

Each spring, turtles, birds, fish, and clutches of ducklings arrive at Botany Pond. When the campus was closed during the pandemic, professor emeritus Jerry Coyne frequented the pond to feed and check on the wildlife that resides there. Two female ducks, Honey and Dorothy, have called Botany Pond home since at least 2017 and have raised over 20 ducklings. They nest atop window ledges at Erman Hall, which faces the pond.

The much-loved ducks have been relo cated for their safety. Faculty experts in the Department of Ecology and Evolution were consulted for this work. “A certified wildlife habitat has agreed to care for the wildlife from Botany Pond,” McSwiggan wrote in an email to The Maroon. “All entities in volved in the wildlife removal process are

licensed by the Illinois Department of Nat ural Resources.”

Additionally, a 24/7 livestream that was set up for visitors to watch the ducks will not be active during the course of the construction.

Although Botany Pond has been drained and cordoned off, the University has not yet chosen a contractor or finalized a design

plan. “A contractor for construction has not been determined; the University will run a competitive bidding process to select a con tractor and Facilities Services will oversee the project,” McSwiggan wrote.

Construction will occur between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. The fencing that surrounds Bot any Pond will remain until the conclusion of the project.

Class of 2026 Acceptance Rate Reaches Record Low of 5.4 Percent

By AUSTIN ZEGLIS | Senior News Reporter

The acceptance rate for the College Class of 2026 was 5.4 percent, the lowest in the University’s history, according to data re

leased by the admissions office.

This year, 37,526 students applied to the College, compared with 37,977 last year. In

total, 2,041 students were accepted into the Class of 2026, 1,729 of whom chose to enroll. This represents an 84.7 percent yield rate, the highest in the past 10 years.

With yield rate generally understood as

a metric of students’ demonstrated interest in a school, UChicago was also among the universities with the highest yield rates, only slightly below the Massachusetts Institute of

Each spring, turtles, birds, fish, and clutches of ducklings arrive at Botany Pond. courtesy of angelina torre

CONTINUED FROM PG. 6

Technology’s 85 percent.

The Class of 2026 is made up of students from across the country, with strong repre sentation from the East and West Coasts and the Midwest. International students make up 16 percent of the incoming class.

Students’ SAT scores ranged from 1020 to 1600, with a middle 50 percent of 1510 to 1560. ACT scores ranged from 20 to 36, with a middle 50 percent of 34 to 35. UChicago has not required standardized testing scores

since 2018 in an effort to make the admis sions process more accessible to first-gener ation, low-income students.

Yet erasing testing requirements did not make the application process easier for the Class of 2026. As high school seniors, the class grappled with the complicated land scape of applying to college during a global pandemic, facing barriers such as canceled standardized testing opportunities, virtual tours, and few opportunities for athletes to compete, The Maroon previously reported.

The newly admitted class is made up of a diverse group of students with wide-ranging interests. Twenty-two percent of the Class of 2026 are Hispanic or Latino, 22 percent are Asian, and 14 percent are Black or African American. Eighty-four percent of the Class of 2026 took part in community service ac tivities in high school, and 67 percent were varsity athletes. Additionally, thirty-five percent of the class were a part of their high school’s student government, while 21 percent contributed to high school student

publications. meghan hendrix

GSU Submits Letter Requesting Union Recognition by University

By NIKHIL JAISWAL | News Editor

At 9 a.m. on Wednesday, November 16, members of UChicago Graduate Student’s United – United Electrical Workers (GSUUE) delivered a letter asking the University to voluntarily recognize them as a Union representing graduate student workers across all departments at the University of Chicago.

The letter, addressed to University President Paul Alivisatos, Provost Ka Yee C. Lee, and the University’s Board of Trust ees, requested that the University respond to GSU-UE’s request for voluntary recog nition by 5 p.m. on Tuesday, November 29, 2022.

Natalie Farrell, a graduate student in the music department and GSU-UE’s General Secretary, said that the Union has received signed Union cards from most

graduate workers at UChicago.

Union cards, which are signed by work ers who wish to be represented by a union, are collected by unions and can be used to demonstrate to an employer that a majority or substantial number of employees wish to be in a union. This process of unionization is called voluntary recognition.

According to Valay Agarawal, a graduate student in the chemistry department and GSU-UE’s Communications Secretary, “[GSU-UE members] have put in thousands of hours already in organizing and talking to people. We hope that we don’t have to do it all over again for an election, but we’d be happy to do it.”

If at least 30 percent of employees have signed union cards and an employer re fuses to voluntarily recognize a union, the

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal body which adjudicates labor disputes, will conduct an election. If most employees vote to form a union, the NLRB will certify the Union and the employer will be required to recognize it.

GSU-UE’s renewed push for recognition comes at a moment of heightened campus labor activism across the country. Graduate students at Yale University and Northwest ern University are gearing up for recogni tion elections on their own campuses while over 40,000 unionized graduate workers across the University of California system are striking for a new contract.

GSU, which recently affiliated with the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, has a history of fight ing for recognition from the University. This current push would be the Union’s second; and critically, it would be its first

under a Democratically controlled NLRB.

The Union withdrew its previous NLRB petition for recognition in 2018 due to fears that a Republican-controlled NLRB would use the case to reverse NLRB precedent in a way that could prevent graduate student unions across the country.

In a statement to The Maroon, the Uni versity said, “We appreciate our students’ efforts to enhance the graduate student ex perience at UChicago. The University will provide a response to GSU-UE by their re quested deadline.”

“All the steps that led up to creating this voluntary letter have been extraordinarily unifying across departments on campus,” Farrell said. “One way or another, we’re ready to join the ranks of the dozens and dozens of peer institutions that are now, if not fully recognized unions, in the process of unionizing through the NLRB.”

Award-Winning Chef Thai Dang Brings Vietnamese Cuisine to UChicago

By SABRINA CHANG | Senior News Reporter

If you venture outside of the dining halls for food this quarter, you will probably see the long lines formed in Hutchinson Com mons and the William Eckhardt Research Center—the two locations of chef Thai Dang’s new restaurants, Dang Good Wings and Cà Phê Đá.

Dang is not new to the restaurant scene—his restaurant HaiSous Vietnam

ese Kitchen has received many notable rec ognitions, including two nominations by the James Beard Foundation for Best New Restaurant in 2018 and Best Chef: Great Lakes in 2019, along with several consecu tive Michelin Bib Gourmands.

He attended L’Academie de Cuisine in Maryland, where he learned French cuisine and culinary techniques. He then

moved to Chicago, where he worked for Michelin-starred restaurants such as L20, RIA, and Balsan at the Elysian Hotel Chicago before co-opening his first restaurant, Em beya, in Chicago’s West Loop in 2012. After a trip back to Vietnam to find new inspiration, Dang opened HaiSous in the Pilsen neigh borhood in 2017.

Dang’s passion for the culinary field started early in life. He was born in Viet nam as the youngest of nine children, and

his family arrived in the U.S. as refugees in the late 1980s when he was only seven years old. His experiences as an immigrant in a family-oriented household are what encour aged him to pursue his interest in cooking.

“My mom wanted us to leave Vietnam for a better life. Having such a nurturing and supportive mother and that freedom to cook inspires me, because it allows me to think outside the box, but also be proud of who I

“International students make up 16 percent of the incoming class.”

food has already become a big hit on campus.”

CONTINUED FROM PG. 7

am and where I come from,” Dang said. “And of course, being Vietnamese, that entrepre neur in our blood, our desire and sheer will to want to do something for ourselves or our family outweighs anything.”

When creating new dishes, Dang likes to combine ingredients and techniques from many different cultures. “Authenticity is so subjective because we are more alike than we are different,” Dang said. “There is so much borrowing from one culture to anoth er, the word ‘authentic’ just doesn’t have a place in America because we are so diverse.”

Dang Good Wings, which opened in Hutchinson Commons in August, serves fried chicken on a bed of fries, but these aren’t just any wings—you get to choose between Vietnamese and Asian fusion–inspired sauces such as caramelized fish sauce, honey sriracha sauce, and Thai chili buffalo sauce. Each one provides a unique burst of flavor with a little hint of spice.

“We try to provide something that stu dents can relate to, and it’s cool to see Asian students have a sense of pride in what we do,” Dang said. “But we also tailor to so many different palates, so we have to be adaptive

to really care about everyone here.”

Dang’s favorite dish from Dang Good Wings is the caramelized fish sauce wings. “I came up with [the caramelized fish sauce] years ago, and it just became a big hit. It won multiple awards years in a row, and I felt really proud,” Dang said. “When other Viet namese people have it, they are so proud of it too, they just can’t believe it.”

Cà Phê Đá, in the William Eckhardt Re search Center is a café that showcases clas sic Vietnamese dishes like phở, papaya sal ad, and bánh mì, as well as specialty coffee drinks like vanilla egg custard coffee and cà phê sữa đá, which is an intensely brewed coffee concentrate mixed with sweetened condensed milk.

Dang’s favorite menu item at Cà Phê Đá is the Vietnamese coffee, which is imported straight from Vietnam. “You can’t go wrong with Vietnamese coffee. The coffee is roast ed by my sister-in-law’s family in Vietnam, and we get it shipped here on campus to serve hundreds of people.”

Another popular dish at the café is phở, a Vietnamese soup consisting of bone broth, rice noodles, and thinly sliced meat. While this dish usually takes a significant amount

of time to make, Dang has perfected his rec ipe and execution to be able to keep up with the high demand and constant rush of col lege students. “What takes 10 to 15 minutes at a restaurant, I’m serving within a min ute,” Dang said. “We produce phở faster than McDonald’s can give you a burger. Isn’t that crazy?”

Dang also places a lot of importance on his partnerships with other Asian compa nies. Dang formed a partnership with Happy Lemon, a Taiwanese tea company which is now available at Cà Phê Đá. “Happy Lemon is a husband-and-wife team that took a chance at a franchise, and I believe in their work, so I partnered up with them,” Dang said. “And now you look around and every table is drinking Happy Lemon bubble tea.”

At Dang Good Wings and Cà Phê Đá, the sriracha is provided by first-generation Viet namese Americans who created their own company, Fix Hot Sauce, for which Dang is a brand ambassador. “These long-term part nerships bring in a lot of value; it creates an ecosystem that supports one another, es pecially being Asian entrepreneurs,” Dang said.

Dang first came to UChicago last year to

do a Lunar New Year pop-up buffet in the Woodlawn dining hall. He also held a small cooking class for students. “I’m very fortu nate and grateful to be here and be part of the university. It’s a great honor to operate my concepts here at one of the top univer sities in the country.”

His food has already become a big hit on campus. “As a whole, the students, staff, and faculty here have just been killing it. It’s amazing—the lines around lunchtimes are just nonstop,” Dang said. “We’re just getting our butts kicked, and it’s such a great feel ing.”

Dang can be found in the kitchen at Cà Phê Đá almost every day, and places partic ular emphasis on hospitality. “My wife and I are here to greet people and to show our team that everyone that comes here is smil ing, and that’s why we’re open. So we have to create this great environment that supports it,” Dang said.

Dang hopes that the UChicago communi ty continues to try his food as an introduc tion to Vietnamese cuisine. “It’s just really awesome Vietnamese food executed prop erly,” Dang said. “You just got to come in and give it a shot.”

What Is the Maroon Key Society?

By KATI LANGILLE | News Reporter

Maroon Key Society (MKS) member Amani Mryan, a fourth-year, told The Maroon about the University’s relation ship with its most selective student advi sory board.

The Maroon Key Society, described on UChicago’s Orientation website as “the College’s honorary society and its princi ple [sic] student advisory group,” met for the first time this year on October 25 to choose their topics of conversation for this year. The group solicits applications every year and only admits those with GPAs of 3.5 or higher. An essay is also required.

Those admitted have the opportunity to work directly with senior administra tors on some of the biggest issues facing the University.

The Maroon interviewed Amani Mry an, a fourth-year in the College who has been a member of the Maroon Key Society since her third year. “At the beginning of

the year, we all propose different people that we want to speak to, different admin istrators who deal with issues that either pertain to us or pertain to our communi ties, and so it’s a way for people to just kind of give their perspective,” Mryan said.

Mryan also discussed the issues that led her to join the Maroon Key Society, including the shift to nine-week quarters and her interest in examining the rela tionship between the University and the South Side.

“A lot of my questions with different departments are about accountability and what the University has intended to do, what they’ve actually been able to do, what the goals are,” Mryan said. “It’s kind of bringing that voice back into their mind essentially to just say we are watch ing, we’re interested in what you’re doing, we’re interested in hearing updates.”

Mryan also mentioned that she hoped

to address school spirit, safety, college advising, alumni career connections, and dining to improve the undergraduate ex perience this year.

“I’d like to hear more from dining spe cifically, just about the different accommo dations that dining can provide. And I eat halal, so it would be interesting to know how we can improve the experience for both Jewish and Muslim students who are looking to have better dining experiences,” Mryan said.

While the Maroon Key Society hopes to discuss improvements to the on-cam pus experience this year, Mryan also talk ed with The Maroon about the community that the society provides for its members.

“I like that all of our members are incredibly respectful of one another. I mean, almost never do people interrupt each other,” Mryan said. “We snap often at meetings to encourage if someone else is saying something. We’ll ask follow-up questions if we agree with what a speaker

is saying, and if we don’t necessarily agree with what another student has said, then it’s a very respectful kind of disagreement that comes from a point of logic. It’s not in flammatory.”

This year, one of the group’s main goals is to reflect on the changes return ing members tried to implement last year. Mryan mentioned that while she believes the administration listens to the society, it can be difficult to know how much their conversations affect school policy.

“Honestly, it’s hard to tell after just one year. It is difficult to tell where the conver sation ended up, which is why I think many of the returning members for MKS in the first meeting requested that the groups that we spoke to last year be brought back so we can ask them after our last conver sation what happened,” Mryan said. “I can tell you it seems like they listen. I don’t know how tied their hands are in changing things. A conversation isn’t the end of it, I think, but it’s a good start.”

“His

VIEWPOINTS

The Problem of White Grievance: A Defense of Critical Inquiry

Reactionary attacks on academics are not new. What’s new about the practice in the 21st century is the force multiplier of social media.

By REBECCA JOURNEY

Content Warning: This op-ed discusses racism, white suprem acy, antisemitism, and threats of violence and sexual assault. It also contains screenshots of emails that reference these themes.

On the morning of Novem ber 2, an automated email from

the Office of Equal Opportu nity Programs appeared in my UChicago inbox, nudging me to complete a training module on harassment prevention. As it happened, this email arrived sandwiched between 23 others urging me among other things to come to Jesus, go into hiding, and “delete myself.” I could ap preciate the irony, but as the day unfolded the invective got uglier.

A quick search revealed its ori gin: A UChicago undergraduate, whom I’ve never met, had appar ently attacked my seminar on whiteness on Twitter the after noon prior. In a lengthy thread, the student accused my course, which had just opened for regis tration in winter quarter, of ex emplifying “anti-white hatred.” One tweet dissected a screenshot of my course description, as if it

served as evidence of my bigot ry, that he had “exposed.” An other offered over 30k followers a screenshot of my faculty page, including my university email and headshot. This is the face, the student implied, of institu tionalized “anti-white” racism:

On November 5, he tweeted an UPDATE.

Contrary to the student’s proclaimed “victory,” my class

was not in fact cancelled. I made the call to move it to spring quar ter precisely because of his cyber harassment campaign, which placed a target on me and there fore on my classroom.

In this discussion I want to pull focus on where it belongs: on the torrent of abuse this ha rassment campaign has incited. I won’t spend time here character izing the 146 and counting taunts and threats to my body, safety, and psyche that have flooded my inbox since November 2. Read some of them for yourself in select screenshots published here. I want to ask instead how an institution avowedly commit ted to free expression has come to condone its weaponization. So let me begin with a thought experiment.

Had the student reached out to me with concerns about my course, The Problem of White ness, I would have happily sched uled office hours to discuss them. During that meeting, I would have listened to his concerns and addressed them by elaborat ing far beyond the five sentences published in the course catalog.

I would have clarified that the class is not about “anti-white hatred” or my personal “problem with white people.” Both of those statements are value judgments; judgements which get in the way of critical inquiry. I would have explained that critical inquiry involves the rigorous study of so cial problems—problems which exert a shaping force on history and society. Grappling with such problems and the questions that

UPDATE POSTED ON NOVEMBER 5. COURTESY OF REBECCA JOURNEY

flow from them—even and espe cially sticky ones, like race—is essential to the pedagogical en terprise.

I would have then walked the student, as I would any stu dent, through what decades of careful scholarship on race and racism in the U.S. have taught us: whiteness, like any racial identi ty, has no basis in biology. It is a scientific and cultural fiction; a “pigment of the imagination,” if you like. It is, however, as histo rian George Lipsitz writes, a so cial fact “created and continued with all-too-real consequences for the distribution of wealth, prestige, and opportunity.” As an unmarked norm against which difference is constructed,

“whiteness is everywhere in U.S. culture,” Lipsitz observes, “but it is very hard to see.” The act of marking whiteness, then, is to lo cate it as a specific historical and ideological formation, and to ask what it does in the world. That’s the mission of the class.

During this notional discus sion, I would have let the student know that there is a long scholar ly literature on whiteness which he might find fascinating. As a primer, I would have steered him to the Peabody Award-nominat ed series Seeing White, a podcast produced by the Center for Doc umentary Studies at Duke Uni versity, which I use as a teaching tool in my class. Then I would have introduced him to the wide-ranging literature, from

the foundational works of W.E.B. Du Bois, Nella Larsen, and James Baldwin, to whom my course title pays tribute, as well as to the con temporary scholarship of Sara Ahmed, bell hooks, and Shannon Sullivan. I would have urged the student to approach these texts with a generous eye, to reflect on his own sense of grievance and victimization, and to consider other habits of mind, like intel lectual curiosity and charity. I would have invited him to culti vate those habits in the seminar. I would have encouraged him to bring his ideas to the table, and to be open to the seminar as a space of spirited deliberation. In short, I would have done my job.

But this conversation never happened, because this student

never reached out. He didn’t ask questions about my course de scription or request a copy of the syllabus. There was no thought ful exchange of ideas during of fice hours. Clearly, this student is not interested in learning. As ev idenced by his expertly packaged Twitter feed, he is interested in generating content for his MAGA media persona. In his bio, he po sitions himself as an amateur investigative reporter “expos ing insanity” at the University of Chicago. White grievance— the notion that the true victims of institutionalized racism in the U.S. are white people—seems to be his main beat.

All of this leads me to con clude that this student has not been acting in good faith; that

is, as a pupil expressing sincere concerns about a course offering. Rather, he has acted as a cynical opportunist chasing likes and shares. For this reason, I will re fer to him as such in the remain der of this essay.

Because teaching fellows are junior scholars, we are insti tutionally precarious. To what extent this young opportunist understood this and saw me as an easy mark is for the reader to assess. What is knowable are the consequences of his actions (thus far).

When the opportunist found my course description in the winter term schedule, he seized a chance to go viral on social me dia by stoking racial resentment.

“I want to ask instead how an institution avowedly committed to free expression has come to condone its weaponization.”

In the “EXCLUSIVE” Twitter thread in which he deputized an indignant mob to attack me via email, he crafted just enough plausible deniability to dodge a lawsuit. Yet his followers clear ly understood what they were being invited to do (harass a professor). As their emails and comments below show, they also understood the subtext of racial grievance in play:

“Thank you for sharing *****@uchicago.edu’s contact information. Peeps, you know what to do. Now get to it.”

“Just sent her an email…Sug gest others do the same.”

“Keep going. Journey needs to be fired.”

“You should sign up and livestream it.”

“Yes. Put this across the in ternet.”

“Rebecca Journey is among the most dishonest, disgusting, degenerate, and deeply evil fig ures in public life.”

“People like Rebecca are rot ten inside and that shows with

the ugly outside.”

“Hell I got sick of people who look like her talk about ‘gender’ in like 1997.”

“Is she white or an actual ghost? Why are these people always pasty, rail thin white women? How many cats does she have?”

“She ain’t white. She’s fuck ing translucent.”

“She’s a ginger, they don’t have souls.”

“She’s Jewish though, right?”

“I’m guessing the teacher is a J.”

“Physiognomy never lies.”

This is not trolling. It is not cancellation. This is abuse. The opportunist did not simply “call [me] out.” He preyed on a private figure—a precariously employed postdoc—to further his own cra ven ambitions. He weaponized his free speech to stifle mine.

Reactionary attacks on aca demics are not new. What’s new about the practice in the 21st century is the force multiplier of social media. I am not even on Twitter, and yet I was targeted

and terrorized through it. In just 280 characters or fewer, a user can mobilize a collective, decen tralized attack and walk away, feigning ignorance. Righteous ness, even. I was just “calling out” “anti-white racism.” Let the dregs of the internet do the work.

Putting aside for a moment the logical incoherence of this tactic (free speech for me; cen sorship for you), I want to focus on how it undermines the educa tional mission of the University.

The University of Chicago has long taken an absolutist stance on the principle of free expression. In the Report of the Committee on Freedom of Ex pression commissioned in 2014, the authors affirm the Universi ty’s “profound commitment” to supporting “the freedom of all members of the community ‘to discuss any problem that pres ents itself.’” However, they write: “The freedom to debate and discuss the merits of competing ideas does not, of course, mean that individuals may say whatev er they wish, wherever they wish.

The University may restrict ex pression that violates the law, that falsely defames a specific in dividual, that constitutes a gen uine threat or harassment, that unjustifiably invades substantial privacy or confidentiality inter ests, or that is otherwise directly incompatible with the function ing of the University.”

Does a torrent of hate speech on Twitter constitute a discus sion? Is placing a target on an instructor’s body and classroom compatible with the function of the University? These are the

dystopian affordances of social media. The College is not a closed system.

Offering no public comment apart from a “note on course offerings” briefly posted on the Global Studies homepage, the University responded to the inci dent two weeks later in an inter nally circulated set of two emails. The administration has taken the position that the opportun ist’s targeted harassment cam paign does not violate University policy on free expression. At the time of writing, he has faced no

“ This is not trolling. It is not cancellation. This is abuse.”

disciplinary consequences for his conduct. This, despite being known to the administration for cyberbullying a fellow student earlier this year.

The University’s belated, tepid response to this incident reduces its stakes to an abstract question of academic freedom. It sanitizes the white rage, mi sogyny, and antisemitism that hundreds of speakers routed through the opportunist’s prov ocation. There is more to say here about the interplay of each of these dynamics in the spectac ular demolition of a female junior scholar. There is also more to say about the extent to which the far right has normalized violence in American life. But I want to stop here and ask: Why has the University shirked its “profound commitment” to protect the ped agogical project?

What this ugly incident re veals is just how hollow these commitments actually are, and just how little the administration has reckoned with the power of technology to thwart them. It exposes this language as naïve. What would it mean to affirm those commitments today, to

borrow philosopher Wendy Brown’s phrase, in the “apoca lyptically populist” present?

Is going viral by doxxing and harassing an instructor—partic ularly a structurally vulnerable one—a viable path to a media ca reer? That is the message being telegraphed to others watching this play out. Bad faith actors will learn that they can hide behind the cover of free expression as they defame scholars and com promise classrooms.

The University has permit ted the opportunist to terrorize an instructor, her students, and, I would also argue, our campus. Let me spell out the nature of that terror if it is not already clear. A teacher is not free to do her job if she is fearful that an armed white nationalist, activated by a provocateur, will track her down and shoot up her classroom. This is not hyperbole. This is America in 2022.

Membership in the Univer sity community requires accep tance of its educational mission. This opportunist has rejected that mission. Indeed, his conduct has placed it in harm’s way.

On November 16, members of UChicago Graduate Students United—United Electrical Work ers (GSU-UE) delivered a letter

to the offices of President Alivi satos, Provost Lee, and Secretary of the University Lori Berko. This letter was a request for the University administration to

al Labor Relations Board and the University on November 30. Following the University’s public response to our union

CONTINUED ON PG. 13

“The University’s belated, tepid response to this incident reduces its stakes to an abstract question of academic freedom.”

CONTINUED FROM PG. 12

effort on November 29, we are continuing to engage in public dialogue about our campaign. At this juncture in our organizing, we want to pause and contex tualize our efforts, to highlight our reasons for unionizing and our aspirations for the UChicago community.

Over the last few months, we have conducted surveys, con vened mass meetings, and en gaged in hundreds of one-on-one conversations in labs and offices across campus. We have become increasingly aware of a number of challenges faced by graduate student workers on this campus that prevent us from achieving the highest standards for aca demic research and instruction, including but not limited to: an nual salaries below the living wage in Cook County, expensive dental and vision insurance, in sufficient grievance and time off policies, and a lack of resources for graduate workers who are parenting, disabled, or interna tional students.

To excel as a world-class institution, the University of Chicago must invest in making graduate programs accessible to graduate students from a variety of backgrounds and experiences, especially our colleagues of col or, our international colleagues, our first-generation colleagues, our disabled colleagues, and our caregiving/parenting col leagues. This is why GSU-UE is fighting for commonsense improvements to our working conditions as researchers and instructors. We are fighting for:

1. A living wage that keeps up with cost of living.

2. Guaranteed dental, vision, and comprehensive benefits.

3. Equitable policies for our labs, classrooms, and commu nity.

4. Fairness and support for international students.

5. Transparency and deci sion-making power.

In our capacity as research ers and instructors, we work alongside faculty and adjuncts year-round, teaching students, grading assignments, running experiments, collecting and an alyzing data, assembling manu scripts, and otherwise ensuring that UChicago is a world-class institution for research and learning. Through countless conversations with our cowork ers, it is clear that UChicago does not provide us with sufficient resources to efficiently produce the best research possible. As employees of the University of Chicago—and as experts in what we need to produce high-quali ty work—we are seeking a seat at the table when it comes to our working conditions, pay, and protections.

As a labor organization that formed in 2007, we’ve been around for long enough to know that the University prefers to see us as students, not workers. De spite the University’s assertions about our student status, we are acutely aware that if we do not fulfill labor obligations related to teaching and research, we are unable to retain our pay, our benefits, or our statuses as stu dents. As individuals tasked with running data analysis, teaching undergraduate and master’s level courses, and working to support the research of our fac ulty supervisors, we are indeed workers, and we are motivated to organize in solidarity with each other.

Furthermore, unions for graduate students are a fun damentally normal feature in U.S. universities. Graduate employees at many public uni versities have benefited from strong unions since the 1960s (for example, at the University of Illinois Chicago, University of Michigan, and University of Wisconsin–Madison). We look forward to joining our union ized peers in private univer sities at New York University (NYU), Columbia, Harvard, The New School, Brown, and Georgetown, all of whom have bargained contracts with their administrations, along with the many others who are building campaigns right now, such as our fellow UE-affiliated graduate unions at MIT, Indiana Univer sity, Northwestern, Dartmouth, and Johns Hopkins.

GSU-UE currently rep resents a majority of graduate students who perform work across the University. Over 2,000 graduate workers in every division of the University have signed union cards, indicating their desire for representation in bargaining a labor contract with the University. (For context, the University census indicates there are 3,135 Ph.D. students enrolled. We also estimate sev eral hundred masters students perform work as TAs or RAs.) As a fundamentally democratic body, we aim to set bargaining goals for a contract that will meet the needs of every department and every graduate student. A union provides the substantive, democratic decision-making power that graduate students currently lack in our workplaces.

We know that unions deliv er tangible, meaningful wins

for graduate students. Student Workers of Columbia recent ly won a 40% increase of the minimum hourly wage, guar anteed 3% annual raises for the duration of the contract, 75% coverage for dental premiums, $5,000 child care stipends, an out-of-pocket medical expenses fund of $350,000 that increases over time, two weeks guaranteed sick leave, and access to neutral arbitration for cases of harass ment and discrimination. Uni versity of Michigan graduate students have negotiated better conditions for international stu dents, including reimbursement of Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVIS) fees, covering the cost of an English Language Proficiency workshop, overwork protections to prevent violating the terms of the student visa, and the creation of a legal ho tline for international students to call with visa and immigra tion issues. The Harvard Grad uate Student Union recently won dedicated funds for childcare, dental, and out-of-pocket medi cal expenses, 12 weeks of unpaid family and medical leave where access to healthcare and bene fits is retained, guaranteed desk space and private advising space, prepayment for work-related travel, and discounted transit passes. In 2021, student work ers at NYU ratified a contract that prevented U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection from entering campus and the university from giving either agency information about NYU community members’ immi gration statuses as well as desig nating the presence of the New York City Police Department on campus as a health and safety

concern that the union can bar gain over. While these represent just a few, incomplete examples of the many real improvements that unions bring about for grad uate students, they reveal the importance of using workers’ power to improve broader cam pus conditions.

As an organization with a long history of collective orga nizing at UChicago, our unified demands of the University ad ministration have played sub stantive roles in a number of ma terial improvements for graduate workers in recent years. After our 2018 walkout, the University overhauled its funding structure to ensure that Ph.D. students are funded for the duration of our programs, rather than abruptly cutting funds before comple tion. After our student services fee refusal campaign in 2021, the University agreed to cover the fee for Ph.D. students in all divi sions. Graduate workers no lon ger have to take $1,200–$1,600 out of their stipends each year to pay the university for unnamed services. We proudly claim these organizing victories as examples of what we can accomplish as a union, and we feel confident that with legal recognition, our voice will only get stronger.

Graduate workers at the Uni versity of Chicago spend count less hours working for the bene fit of everyone at the university. We teach, research, and support our faculty and undergraduates because we believe in the im portance of a strong intellectu al community. As individuals invested in the robust intellec tual legacy of our university, we see graduate unionization as the logical extension of that pow

“Through countless conversations with our coworkers, it is clear that UChicago does not provide us with sufficient resources to efficiently produce the best research possible.”

erful tradition–in supporting graduate workers’ free speech and protecting our labor, we will only grow in our capacity to produce world-class research

and instruction here. We look forward to winning the election and sitting down at the bargain ing table with the University.

Pence and Cheney Come to Campus: What Our Guest Speakers Reveal About Campus Conservatism

By HENRY CANTOR

Members of the UChicago community gathered in Mandel Hall on November 11 for “In Con versation with Rep. Liz Cheney” and reentered the same theater on November 29 for “On the Record with Vice President Mike Pence.”

I think it’s a fair estimation to say the theater was filled with older, left-leaning adults. Rep resentative Liz Cheney received two standing ovations and eager applause from this crowd, and every time she said “democracy” there was a concert of head nods. It sounded like my parents when a plane lands, and I couldn’t help but laugh. A crowd who almost cer tainly voted for Clinton, Obama, and Biden was enamored with her, while the campus conservatives from the Chicago Thinker were trying to turn the event into the “Roast of Liz Cheney.”

Anticipating a crowd simi lar to the one that gathered for Cheney, I was curious to see how Pence would be received. Let me first remark that Pence and Cheney are not made in the same image. Cheney’s attention to Jan uary 6 is unmatched by any other Republican, and her political os tracization is unenviable. But the event was a nice reminder that the bar is low. Cheney was the first to admit that she voted with Trump 93 percent of the time.

Cheney’s relationship with

Trump before January 6 was barely touched on during the event. The moderator let her off too easily, and the same can be said for student questions—at least for the few that managed to slip past the Chicago Thinker ’s blockade at the microphone. In our fanaticism, we failed to ask why she went along with Trump for four years, especially since the events on January 6 were prog nosticated before Trump spoke at the Ellipse that afternoon.

To my surprise, the crowd, similar to the one that gathered for Cheney, greeted Pence with mild applause and tender silence. The only standing ovation came from members of the Chicago Thinker at the conclusion of the conversation.

I have to admit: I wrongly predicted the response from the audience. I assumed the crowd would applaud Pence for his ac tions on January 6, and I assumed the Chicago Thinker would try to smash his political wings as they did with Cheney.

I’m trying my best not to be critical, but I’m confused. While the Chicago Thinker’s articles only reflect the opinions of the authors, it’s telling that Cheney was fea tured in an article entitled, “How Liz Cheney Lied to Me at an IOP Event,” whereas Pence was fea tured in an article entitled, “Vice President Mike Pence, Christian Warrior, to Visit UChicago.” Why

does campus conservatism cham pion Mike Pence but criticize Cheney? Certainly the Thinker does not represent the views of every conservative on campus, but it is the dominant (and most vocal) conservative group.

Maybe I’m overly optimistic, but I assumed campus conser vatives would be more favorable to the intellectual conservatism of Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater and the never-Trump movement, instead of the conspir atorial and culture war rhetoric of Donald Trump and Fox News.

Though Pence is more social ly conservative, Pence and Cheney share similar conservative philos ophies (as already stated, Cheney supported most of the Trump ad ministration’s policy agenda). So if it’s not a difference of philosophy, why do they elicit such opposing reactions from campus conserva tives? The only explanation I can find is our speakers’ fundamental disagreement as to Trump’s role on January 6.

Apparently, campus conser vatism isn’t as different from the mainstream Republican Party as I anticipated. The speaking events revealed the most obvious and sometimes forgotten fault line in the party: Donald Trump.

Pence was noncommittal about holding the former presi dent accountable; instead, Trump remained almost unnamable by Pence throughout the event. Any

targeted questions by Axelrod were diverted and unanswered.

On the other hand, Cheney un equivocally condemned the for mer president. There was no ob fuscation with Cheney. I left the event knowing exactly how she felt.

The same cannot be said for Pence. He was unwilling to draw contrast between himself and his predecessor, and he refused to offer attribution when it came to Trump. For a man of faith, Pence made no moral estimates about the former president’s actions. Everything was contextualized under the vocabulary of the Con stitution. Pence said he had no Constitutional power to over turn the election but never said it would be wrong to do so even if he had had. He said he respects the American people’s “right” to vote for Trump’s confrontational style but never said whether he disagrees with or supports this rhetoric. Pence deflected every question by reaffirming the rights in the Constitution, and when the question called for a more editori alized response, he hid under the unarguable call to God.

Originalism and faith gave Pence a convincing hall pass from making his own judgments.

The two events revealed the fine line Republican politicians must walk with Trump and elec tion denialism to avoid party excommunication. Apparently,

there is an important difference between the seditious mob and Trump. Condemning the former is acceptable, but condemning the latter is too far. Pence has narrowed his commentary on election denial to the events of January 6, which is more forgiv able to the Republican base than censuring Trump.

It’s worth mentioning that un til January 6, Pence was complicit in the sordid scheme to overturn the election. He helped steer the ship into the storm, then jumped off when he heard thunder. But his “heroism” on January 6 perfect ly manages the desire to appear loyal to the Constitution without completely splitting ties with the former President and his support ers, which became clear in Mandel Hall.

Neither speaker is a purist, but I have more admiration for some one who can be forthright in front of an audience rather than losing any form of clarity in order to please everybody. Campus con servatism, it seems, disagreed.

At a time when it feels like nothing is disqualifying anymore, I assumed a place like UChicago would feature a conservatism that still believes that character matters.

Henry Cantor is a second-year in the College.

Representative Liz Cheney and Vice President Mike Pence sat on the same stage but received wildly different applause.

“We know that unions deliver tangible, meaningful wins for graduate students.”

College and Other Liminal Spaces

By RACHEL ONG

A friend of mine recently asked me why I prefer living off-campus instead of living in the dorms. What was meant to be a quick text in response ended up being a five-paragraph essay: I found my self recalling Sunday grocery shop ping trips and making eye contact with the mouse that would (more often than not) make its weekly appearance scuttling across our kitchen floor. Certain routines unique to taking care of your own space—putting away dishes in the quiet of the morning, checking in on my roommates at strange hours of the night—had become concrete. These small moments breathed life into my experience at UChica go in a way that living in the dorms hadn’t. Most of my college experi ence had been insulated within campus, and my dorm’s close prox imity to the rest of the school had

forced a closeness between myself and the school that I desperately needed in my first two years here. But now, by having space from the College, I’ve become closer to it than I’ve ever been. We need to be able to build our own lives out side of the College to occasionally perceive it as a liminal space rather than the point of destination.

Last month, I worried that liv ing in an apartment would mean a clean split from UChicago and its culture—I wasn’t exactly ready to let go of that yet, nor was I ready to start officially adulting so soon. To be so distant from the University almost felt like a command, a notso-gentle reminder that we weren’t kids floundering about amongst the real adults anymore. You are too old to be here! There are new, younger first-years that we need to take care of! It hadn’t sunk in yet that I was nearly 21 and had my own keys to an apartment. It just

felt like I had blindly taken on the expected “next step” of upperclass men instead of properly thinking through all options.

College was the focal point of my past two years, a medium through which all of my experi ences had been filtered. When I reflect on my college experiences— the slog of exam seasons, the pan ic of the pandemic, the occasional instant ramen dinner—I think about how much of it was spent within the four walls of my dorm room, anxious and alone. Without access to most resources on cam pus and the persistent struggle of maintaining a work-life balance, college felt like a never-ending online course where the stakes seemed extraordinarily high.

Now, college inhabits a differ ent role in my life. The weight of as signments feels less pressing when I’m busy planning meals with my roommates or dealing with mold

on our bathroom ceiling. I feel much more protective over these quiet moments that I call my own.

Perhaps college belongs in the negative space. In an apartment removed from the campus web of libraries and lecture halls, I can still enjoy what this University has to offer without letting it swal low my life whole. When I walk to class now, I spend a little more time taking in the familiar scenes of autumn on campus: professors chatting over coffee on a bench, the frisbee players sneaking in anoth er game before class, someone in a hammock soaking in the warmth of October. There’s a lightness that didn’t exist before—or maybe it just needed some time to settle.

While there is certainly en couragement to create your own sense of self in the first two years of living on campus, it’s often drowned out by the noise of cam pus culture and social expecta

tions. After two years of optimis tic autumns, long stretches of winter, and burgeoning springs, I hadn’t realized how many mo ments were fraught with a fear of absence—the absence of knowing what college was actually supposed to feel like, the absence of making college a home. Echoing my previ ous columns, it can be easy to feel like you’re never really doing col lege right—everyone else feels the same way.

Even if living off-campus hasn’t completely erased that feeling, it’s offered a new thesis on how to go about these next two years left at UChicago. Joy doesn’t have to be sequestered, nor does it have to be earned. It belongs at the forefront— it always did—despite the need to make it an if, not a when.

Rachel Ong is a third-year in the College.

By CHERIE FERNANDES

Let’s talk options. The Uni versity of Chicago offers a total of four meal plans: Unlimit ed ($2,376/quarter), Phoenix ($2,376/quarter), Apartment ($1,684/quarter), and Off-Cam pus ($153/10-meal pack). As the names suggest, the Apartment and Off-Campus plans are ex clusive to students who live in on-campus apartments and off-campus housing, respective ly. This leaves two options for students who live on campus.

Between the equally-priced Un limited and Phoenix plans, which both offer five guest swipes, 10 to-go swipes, and Saturday night meal swipes, the notable differ ence is a trade-off in flexibili ty: Unlimited offers unlimited (shocking, I know) dining hall swipes but 100 Maroon Dollars and three meal exchanges, while Phoenix caps you at 150 swipes (approximately two per day) but provides 50 extra Maroon Dollars and 12 additional meal exchang es. First-years are required to be enrolled in Unlimited—probably

something about not being trust ed to feed themselves.

Now of course there’s the ob vious complaint; first-years and the majority of second-years fork over $7,000 for dining per year, while the average college and uni versity charges about $4,500. One might say cost reflects quality, but even a seasoned lawyer couldn’t defend Baker’s decidedly unsea soned chicken. But even if there’s not much that can be done for the price of a given plan, the Universi ty ought to consider offering more variety and flexibility—which are

currently quite limited—in the meal plans available to on-cam pus students.

First, to the first-years’ mandatory Unlimited meal plan: First-years generally burn through their 100 Maroon Dol lars at coffee shops and such— reasonable given that more and more eateries around campus, like the Smart Museum Café and Harris Café, have begun ac cepting Maroon Dollars since 2015—but don’t have that same occasion to take advantage of un limited meals. Between take-out

when one can’t brave the winter, trusty cup ramen for the noctur nal, and food trucks for when the Bartlett taco bar just won’t cut it—not to mention all the house/ RSO feeds and social dining off campus—it’s uncommon to con sistently use three meal swipes a day, every day of the week, much less more. This is particularly true of students with dietary re strictions or a consistent prefer ence for cuisine associated with a particular culture (look, I enjoy most of the dining hall fare, but

Living off-campus can create the separation needed to shape an experience of your own and to build a new appreciation for UChicago.

A case for more variety, flexibility, and affordability in campus meal plans. Can I Customize That Order?

its tendency to mistake salt for a spice has me pining after my mother’s cooking); while dining halls adequately address their needs, the unavoidable dearth of options might make eating out or preparing one’s own meals more attractive. Then, in effect, most first-years pay an extra $1000–$3000 for a service they won’t use.

Even beyond first year, sec ond-years and upperclassmen who live on campus (excepting the lucky bastards who managed to snag apartments) don’t have it much better, choosing between the somehow equivalently priced Unlimited Plan and the Phoenix Plan; the 50 extra Maroon Dol lars aren’t much of a draw when you remember that the conver sion is 1 MD = 1 USD. Non–firstyears are also often more deeply entrenched in Greek Life and oth er social/scholastic groups, and so the dining halls won’t exactly be their usual haunts; there is less of a community-building incen tive to encourage their presence. Rather, they’re at the stage where being able to prepare simple dorm-friendly meals and make

decisions about which places to patronize are crucial skills, and students should be able to opt into plans that make room for them.

Columbia University, for in stance, offers three meal plans for first-years to select from based on their needs, with varying num bers of meal swipes traded off for varying amounts of their Maroon Dollars equivalent; all are equal ly expensive at around $3,000 a year. Since UChicago’s plan costs more than double this, modulat ing the price to prevent a financial barrier would be of interest. Even under the new UChicago Empow er initiative, families earning less than $125,000 per year (i.e. eligi ble for full free tuition) but more than $60,000 still do not have standard room and meals cov ered by financial aid. These costs put additional financial stress on students.

It might then be appropriate to follow other schools in offer ing limited meal plans at corre sponding prices: e.g., the annual cost of two meal swipes per day is about $1000 less than three swipes per day, so a person on the former plan might simply opt to stock up on cereal and fruit to

eat breakfast in their dorm. Yes, there is a concern with freshmen grappling with their newfound independence—specifically, that access to unlimited meals is a necessary safety net for when they overestimate their ability to plan ahead. But the per-quar ter setup of the University’s meal plan makes this easy to adjust for: perhaps an Unlimited meal plan should be mandatory only for a student’s first quarter, after which they have a good enough sense of their habits to adjust the plan as necessary.

And for those of us that are all grown up, additional options can only be a benefit. Several schools with similar sizes and endowments to UChicago’s own can provide a template for this: Duke has dining plans A through F, with various price points tai lored to different needs—some what uninspired naming, yes, but we’re looking for substance over frills. Similarly, Cornell offers the standard Unlimited in addi tion to “Bear Traditional,” “Bear Choice,” and “Bear Basic,” (what was their mascot again?) which are, respectively, the standard two swipes a day, a 10 per week

STELLA BEVACQUA

variation that favors on-campus eateries, and a seven per week variation that favors cooking for oneself. Admin, changes in this direction would shape a student body that is able to avoid financial struggle, cultivate healthy eating habits, and make and plan for cru

cial decisions about their health— and more importantly, maybe if dining here gets more love, we’ll crack number 5 on USNews.

Cherie Fernandes is a sec ond-year in the College.

ARTS

The Drink of December: A Ranking of UChicago’s Best Cups of Hot Cocoa

Arts reporter Lainey Gregory rates hot chocolates on UChicago’s campus.

By LAINEY GREGORY | Arts Reporter

As the holidays approach, there’s no better way to avoid work than to relax in a café with a hot chocolate in hand. With so

many cafés on campus, it can be hard to know where to start your search. I scoured the quad to find the perfect cup of hot choc

olate, which, just like the UChicago Core Curriculum, has a few requirements that must be met.

Richness: Richness describes the intensi ty and quality of the drink’s chocolate flavor

on a scale from 1 to 10.

Sweetness: Sweetness refers to how well the beverage’s sugar content complements the overall drink on a scale from 1 to 10.

It might then be appropriate to follow other schools in offering limited meal plans at corresponding prices.

Creaminess: Creaminess characterizes the overall consistency of the hot chocolate on a scale from 1 to 10.

Whipped Cream: I gave a bonus point if the drink came with whipped cream just because I like whipped cream!

8) Starbucks at Saieh Hall

Richness: 4

Sweetness: 3 Creaminess: 4 Whipped Cream: +1

Overall: 12/30

Starbucks is a beverage hotspot that dutifully serves the economics students of Saieh Hall. Unfortunately, its hot chocolate is terrible, representing the worst that hot chocolate has to offer. It has the consisten cy of water and excessive sweetness, and the chocolate flavor is overly strong. And on top of all that, the drink was scalding hot. Priced at $3.75 for the smallest size, Starbucks’s hot chocolate was the most expensive on this list. While I don’t think this beverage is worth your money, at least it has whipped cream!

7) Peach’s

Richness: 6

Sweetness: 3 Creaminess: 5

Overall: 14/30

Peach’s hot cocoa recipe features both powdered hot chocolate mix and Hershey’s syrup. This combination regrettably result ed in a hot chocolate that was overly sugary. Additionally, the processed chocolate mix gave the drink a strange aftertaste. My cup was also lukewarm and had a thin consisten cy, which I attributed to improper aeration of the beverage. With a little more time in the

frother, Peach’s hot chocolate has the poten tial to be a warm winter treat.

6) Hallowed Grounds

Richness: 6 Sweetness: 4 Creaminess: 8 Overall: 18/30

Hallowed’s hot chocolate came in my favorite purple “My Grandma Rocks” mug. I was joined by my friend Tom, who noted that he appreciates the “depth of flavor” in Hallowed Grounds’s hot chocolate. I regret to say that I did not get a cup like that. The drink was very creamy, but it lacked any chocolate flavor. I felt like I was drinking a mildly sweet, steamed milk. Then, when I reached the bottom of the cup, I was hit with a wave of dense chocolate. The syrup had not been mixed with the milk and had settled at the bottom of the mug. Next time I stop at Hallowed, I will be sure to stir my cocoa well.

5) Harper Café

Richness: 7 Sweetness: 8 Creaminess: 4 Whipped Cream: +1 Overall: 20/30

Nestled in the east tower of Harper Me morial Library, Harper Café boasts cheap coffee and a dark academia environment. Its hot chocolate was perfectly sweet, which makes for a very pleasant cup. The chocolate flavor was bold but unfortunately had an ar tificial taste. Harper was the only café that made hot chocolate with water, which came at the cost of the creaminess of the beverage. Overall, I thought that the drink was pretty standard, but I really enjoyed it.

4) Grounds of Being

Richness: 6 Sweetness: 5 Creaminess: 10 Overall: 21/30

With cash in hand, I descended into the basement of the Divinity School to sample my next cocoa. The best part of this hot choc olate was undoubtedly the texture. However, there was very little flavor, most likely be cause of poor mixing of the chocolate sauce. I recommend asking for extra chocolate sauce to create a perfect cup. Regardless, I am now a huge fan of Grounds of Being’s hot chocolate and will be back very soon! If you would like to try a cup for yourself, don’t forget to bring your wallet; Grounds of Being only accepts cash!

3)

Cobb Café

Richness: 6.5 Sweetness: 9 Creaminess: 8 Overall: 23.5/30

My love for Cobb Café runs deep, so I had very high expectations for its hot chocolate. My order was met with confusion, and the barista admitted to me that he did not know if Cobb sold hot chocolate. After consulting an off-the-clock friend, he managed to locate some and charged me $2, his best guess at the price (which was later discovered to be $3.75). The drink itself had a very subtle sweetness and a silky-smooth consistency. My cup would have benefited from a little bit more chocolate, as the intensity of the flavor was slightly lacking. Despite that, Cobb’s hot cocoa was quite good and is certainly worth a return visit.

2) Ex Libris

By FRANCESCO P. RAHE | Arts Reporter

Richness: 7.5 Sweetness: 9 Creaminess: 8

Whipped Cream: +1 Overall: 25.5/30

Located in the Reg, Ex Libris provides re spite to those in the throes of deadlines and late-night study sessions. My cup was filled to the brim and had just the right amount of chocolate flavor. After burning my tongue on other hot chocolates on this list, I was extremely grateful for the mild warmth of this cup of cocoa. The chocolate syrup had a delicately sweet aftertaste, which earned this cup of hot cocoa the number two spot. While you’re there, snag one of Ex Lib’s fresh pastries because its hot chocolate is best paired with a chocolate old-fashioned donut!

1) Plein Air

Richness: 9 Sweetness: 9 Creaminess: 9 Overall: 27/30

Plein Air was one of the last stops on my hot chocolate adventure. A few friends and I arrived just before closing, but the baristas were very kind and made us a drink despite my tardiness. What made this cup wonder ful was Plein Air’s house-made chocolate syrup, which added a light sweetness that left me wanting more. I usually prefer a slightly bolder flavor in my hot chocolate, but this drink’s silky consistency was more than satisfying. After so many cups, my appetite for hot cocoa was starting to ebb. However, I was surprised to find myself bickering with my friends over who got to finish off the mug. We will be back very soon to purchase our own cups because Plein Air’s hot chocolate is too good to share!

“As the holidays approach, there’s no better way to avoid work than to relax in a café with a hot chocolate in hand.”

“Brutus is an honorable man.” Even if you’ve never seen Shake speare’s Julius Caesar, you’re likely to

have heard this quote from Caesar’s funeral in act 3, scene 2. Of course, the

quote’s speaker, a simmering Mark Ant ony (played by a mostly skillful Mikha’el Amin in Invictus Theatre’s most recent production) is being sarcastic. He has no intention whatsoever of persuading his audience that Brutus is honorable. He’s condemning Brutus as a butcher, a murderer of Antony’s beloved sovereign Caesar. In other words, he’s describing Brutus as honorable according to one definition (having a good reputation) and dishonorable according to anoth er (being a good person). The tension between those two definitions, and the question of which applies most aptly to the protagonist Brutus, is at the core of Julius Caesar —and, when it’s most ef fective, at the core of Invictus Theatre’s production. Unfortunately, the most powerful moments of this production come part and parcel with poorly fit ting political metaphors and occasional weak acting.

Said weakness is rooted in a small, yet pernicious problem: A few of the ac tors tend to confuse shouting with im passioned acting. The play is staged in a very small room, which largely makes the experience more intimate and upclose. Sadly, it also leads to the roaring of Daniel Houle (who plays Cassius) and Chuck Munro (who plays Caesar) be coming absolutely deafening. I struggled not to cover my ears at points. Worse, much of the subtlety of Shakespeare’s dialogue is lost in indiscriminate noise.

Shouting aside, most of the act ing comes across as genuinely strong. Charles Askenaizer plays Brutus and mostly plays him well—a good thing, since Brutus is the center of this play. Brutus comes across as slightly delicate, a scholar even, in military fatigues. His vanity is apparent from the outset, as is his naïveté and genuine conviction. Askenaizer shines in particular during his interactions with Cassius (whom Houle portrays with an intriguing mix ture of brash aggression and sly shrewd ness whenever he isn’t yelling). Their relationship evolves convincingly from pure trickery on Cassius’s part in the first scene into a friendship that’s equal parts authentic and touching by the end. That Askenaizer and Houle make this improbable journey not just believable but powerful is a remarkable accom plishment. It’s also a genuine pleasure to watch.

Amin as Mark Antony also deserves praise. His oration over Caesar’s body in the immediate aftermath of Caesar’s bloody death does the play justice. In Amin’s capable hands, all the artifice of Mark Antony’s oration only serves to better reveal his unending grief and fury. His king is dead, and he wants the world to burn.

I’ve emphasized thus far truth and earnestness. Julius Caesar is indeed a play about rhetoric and reputation, themes the directors highlight in the program. But far more than that, it’s a

play about who people are, deep down in their cores. It’s about that central ques tion of who Brutus is, and in what way, if at all, he can be called an honorable man. The problem is, this rendition, despite posing that question, can’t seem to come to a consensus about Brutus. That’s in no small part a result of the fact that the directors chose to turn the play into a January 6 metaphor.

To clarify, I don’t have anything against January 6 metaphors in Shake speare. A Richard III production I once saw used contemporary politics to great effect; however, in that case, the play fit the metaphor. Richard III is a villain— one with a sympathetic backstory, no doubt—but a conniving, calculating villain nonetheless. As an allegory for Trump, Richard III works. The problem with Invictus Theatre’s use of contem porary politics, aside from bludgeoning its message into viewers’ heads with all the subtlety of a cannonball (lines from Donald Trump’s January 6 speech are played over a loudspeaker at the end of the production, with a spotlight shining on Brutus’s bloody corpse), is that it just doesn’t fit. Invictus Theatre associates rebellion against Caesar with the Janu ary 6 rioters (early criticizers of Caesar wear red baseball caps, and Brutus’s army in the second half thrusts high a “Don’t Tread on Me” flag), but Brutus and his buddies are quite arguably the good guys in the play.

By over and over again associating

the January 6 rioters with Caesar’s as sassins, Invictus Theatre muddles its own message. Are Cassius and company meant to be villains in the production, duping the over-earnest Brutus into treachery? The tent scene, along with Caesar’s egotistical lines, would suggest otherwise. Are they meant to be heroes? Clearly not, unless Invictus Theatre is significantly more right-wing than one would expect. Is Invictus Theatre trying to portray Brutus as a truly honorable man in the end? Trump’s words played over Brutus’s corpse would suggest otherwise. The likeliest interpretation I can come up with is the first—that In victus’s Brutus is a cautionary tale, a poor fool duped by a mixture of vanity and good will into evil…but again, the intense complexity of Shakespeare’s text, which this production uses in its entirety, shoots that interpretation full of holes. The result is a rendition more confusing than powerful.

For a production faithful in text and emotionally potent, go see Invic tus Theatre’s Julius Caesar. However, if you’re expecting coherent themes or perfection (or sympathize with January 6 rioters), I’d advise looking elsewhere.

Invictus Theatre’s production of Ju lius Caesar ran at the Reginald Vaughn Theater through November 20.

Steep Theatre’s Our Dear Dead Drug Lord Is Terrifying and Thrilling, in

Spite of an Imperfect Script

By ZACHARY LEITER | Associate Arts Editor

Content Warning: This article men tions drug use and contains graphic de pictions of violence and abortion.

In a make-believe tree house in a re al-life-used-to-be-church on the North Side of Chicago, Steep Theatre’s produc

tion of Alexis Scheer’s Our Dear Dead Drug Lord is not for the faint of heart. The play, which premiered in 2021 to much acclaim, depicts four teenage girls in Miami in their quest—indeed, quite a saga—to summon the ghost of drug kingpin Pablo Escobar. Whether

or not this feat is accomplished by the play’s end is up for debate, in part be cause the girls are on cocaine for much of the duration. Friends Pipe, Squeeze, Zoom, and Kit struggle much more with each other and their adolescence than with the otherworldly, even as they try to convince themselves otherwise. Make no mistake, however: This play is not a

conventional coming-of-age narrative.

Our Dear Dead Drug Lord is, in two words, a spectacle. Anarchic drawings adorn the walls of the small black box Steep Theatre, whose motto is appro priately “Incredible Stories, Incredibly Close.” But to call this a black box would be to suggest an absence of frills, where

“By over and over again associating the January 6 rioters with Caesar’s assassins, Invictus Theatre muddles its own message.”

in reality, the room is decked out floorto-ceiling and wall-to-wall in reminis cences of an early-aughts adolescence. It’s more like theater in-the-round, but with a rather small circumference. Drug Lord makes strong use of its space: Char acters dash around, banging into things and assaulting the audience with their performed physicality.

Lights rise and fall and flash. The young girls scream at one another, and their shrieks echo. This is a loud and frantic play, and it’s a play in which ev erything seems to happen all at once (but that, this reviewer supposes, is how he felt in high school). Drug Lord ’s big gest fault is that these characters depict normal adolescence only to a certain de gree; they have way more than their fair, or reasonable, share of struggles. The characters have so many dead relatives and depressive bouts that their traumas begin to lose their shock value—and their true value to the audience. And that’s a shame, because the four girls’ actors, despite being adults, present very

believable angsty teenagers.

Lauren Smith, as Zoom, is partic ularly fantastic. Smith’s eager energy pervades the play, providing a robust counterpart to Isabella Maria Valdes’s strong-willed and certain-minded Pipe, who leads the four girls. Zoom is a whirl ing dervish of sorts, spinning around the stage somewhat unawares. She fidgets with her clothing constantly, climbs everything, and spies on her friends’ conversations. Zoom is living in a world entirely of her own imagination, where she believes her friend Kit to be Pablo Escobar’s long-lost daughter.

And Zoom still believes in the pow er of magic. It is therefore particularly heartbreaking to watch her sudden dis illusionment upon witnessing the cruel reality of Pipe’s ambitions. All four of these girls just want to feel self-assured and stable, and Smith demonstrates that adolescent desire with incredible genu ineness.

However, the play’s end is differently heartbreaking: Just as quickly as Zoom realizes her naïveté, the play pivots,

becoming a hasty, strange sort of qua si-feminist, pseudo-anarchist tirade. And in that ending, the characters’ trau mas and faults are stripped away. The result is a less interesting product.

Where Drug Lord succeeds is in its graphic depiction of the blurred line between dangerous insanity and child hood. Growing up is tough, and Pipe, Squeeze, Zoom, and Kit are just trying to assert control over the world around them. Where Drug Lord fails is where it attempts, especially at play’s end, to be a manifesto.

These are, however, faults of the script, and Steep Theatre’s produc tion is otherwise near flawless. It is especially thrilling, and chilling, in its startlingly frank exploration of adoles cents’ experiences with issues of race, sexuality, and religion. Drug Lord is nothing if not startling. There’s a par ticularly difficult-to-watch scene at the play’s end—the scene in which Zoom is disillusioned—in which her friends per form a forced coat hanger abortion on a pinned-down Zoom in a sacrifice to

summon Escobar.

This play is, again, not for the faint of heart, nor for those desiring coolly manicured, digestible theater.

But re-creating adolescence is a hard task, as is summoning a drug lord. And if it’s unclear whether the four friends are successful in summoning said drug lord, there’s much less doubt that Steep The atre has been successful in conjuring up a fabulous and frightening spectacle.

Steep Theatre’s production of Alex is Scheer’s Our Dear Dead Drug Lord is in Edgewater through December 10. Content warnings for the show include drug use, animal cruelty, and graphic violence.

A Tireless, Thesis-less Tirade on the Tiresome Trials and Troubling Tribulations of Too Many Terrible Christmas Movies

By ZACHARY LEITER | Associate Arts Editor

When I first took the pitch for this article—to write about my takeaways from a classic holiday movie—I was de termined to write a passionate defense of Frank Capra’s 1946 classic It’s a Won derful Life. Then two things happened. First, I talked to almost everyone I know at this school, and an alarmingly small number of those people had any inter est in watching—or, god forbid, reading about—a movie from the post-war era.

Second, I realized I was writing this ar ticle during finals week.

I present below, then, not a passion ate polemic but a tireless tirade. To fol low are some of the most famous holiday movies, according to myself, my friends, and the interweb. I will try to present takeaways from each one. I have seen some of these movies.

It’s a Wonderful Life

Featuring Jimmy Stewart, absurdly long camera shots, and a scene involv ing a swimming pool hidden beneath a dance floor! Black and white! Naked girls talking from behind bushes! “Ev ery time a bell rings, an angel gets his wings,” and every time I watch this movie, I reminisce about an era I nev er experienced and am probably glad I never did. Seriously, you should watch this movie if you haven’t watched it yet and if you don’t mind a little bit of New Deal propaganda.

Home Alone

Kevin, a future axe-murderer, at tacks two kindly older gentlemen who happen by his house one day. Kevin’s mother cares about what happens to Kevin exactly as much as your academ ic advisor cares about what happens to you. She’ll come back when Christmas is over, don’t worry. This movie takes place in Chicago, apparently. Maybe Kevin be came the Woodlawn arsonist.

“This is a loud and frantic play, and it’s a play in which everything seems to happen all at once.”

If you haven’t seen It’s a Wonderful Life, you should have, and if you have seen Elf, you shouldn’t have.

The Muppet Christmas Carol

A legitimately lovely movie. Funny, wholesome, and there are talking rats. Michael Caine has a remarkable per formance, especially when you consid er he’s starring alongside a pig-adjacent frog. Definitely the best Christmas Car ol adaptation; this is not up for debate. Takes place in London, which is not Chicago.

Yes, Virginia, There Is a Santa Claus

This is a 1991 TV movie about an 1897 New York Sun editorial. Very relevant today, given that the people in the mov ie are now dead and so is the New York Sun. Haha, journalism joke. Also, true story: When I was eight, I confronted my mom about Santa Claus being fake, and then she actually admitted he was fake, and then I got very sad because I’d been trying to call her bluff and I wanted to still believe in Santa, even as a Jew. That’s the kind of eight-year-old I was. No, Zach, There Is Not a Santa Claus.

Trading Places

This movie has Eddie Murphy and is apparently about Christmas. Moral: Don’t be greedy, and do be Eddie Mur phy. New York City is also not Chicago. Also, plot-holey fuck this movie is bi zarre.

Let it Snow

Netflix. Up to you. :/

The Year Without a Santa Claus

This movie is from an era when ev eryone turned on their TV for the eve ning news after finishing their micro wave mac and cheese and Jell-O salad, and all the TVs across the country were playing the same thing—in this case, the answer to Christmas movies not being Christmas-y enough: The Year Without a Santa Claus. It probably ran between ads to become a flight attendant for Pan Am. This movie is sweet, but honestly, just look up Snow Miser and Heat Miser on YouTube and then skip the rest of the movie.

The Santa Clause

The main character, Scott Calvin, is reproached for eating five desserts. But, like, the blue ice cream at fourth meal is so good. Moral: If you murder Christ mas, you become Christmas.

A Christmas Story

I really should’ve chosen more mov ies I’ve seen, but apparently, this mov ie has no plot, so how far off can I be? Here’s what happens: nothing. And also, Christmas. Starring: probably Bill Mur ray.

Elf

At its best, this movie is endearing. At its worst, it’s infuriating. Elf is never at its best, despite the postulations of the Extreme Value Theorem. In case you haven’t seen this movie, a warning: This movie is what happens when you take Christmas and you beat it over the head with a dead reindeer. This movie is what happens when you put a candy cane, a snowman, Santa, and Will Ferrell into a blender. Featuring: the creepy show er scene where Zooey Deschanel sings “Baby It’s Cold Outside.” If you like this movie, you should join the elves at the North Pole whence Ferrell came at mov ie’s opening and whither he returns at movie’s end. Or, alternatively, you could move to Chicago. Baby, it’s cold outside.

The Polar Express

Tom Hanks is almost all of the char acters. This movie is about a kid who’s kind of depressed and boards a train that has an old man in the ceiling. This movie includes a song, which, to my memory, goes something like, Boy: “San ta never gives us poor kids gifts” gifts.”

Girl: “Christmas “Christmas is fun when you do get gifts.”

Miracle on 34th Street

It’s like The Bee Movie , but about Christmas.

Edward Scissorhands

No matter how you remember this movie, it’s both weirder and sadder than you remember. Roughly half of this

movie is ice sculpting montages. I guess that makes it a Christmas movie? If you like Tim Burton, I suppose you should watch this movie. Otherwise, if you’re just looking for a chilly tale of lost love between a secretly sad popular girl and an artistic loner boy, try Titanic. Titanic is about as much of a Christmas movie as Edward Scissorhands is, and only one of these movies stars Leonardo DiCaprio.

Krampus

No.

Die Hard

“It is a fucking Christmas movie,” says my friend, before describing a mov ie that is as much a Christmas movie as political science is a science. Starring Alan Rickman and Bruce Willis. Did you know that Bruce Willis is on Spotify, singing “Under the Boardwalk”

The Nightmare Before Christmas

The title of this movie literally ad mits that the movie does not occur on Christmas. I watched this movie on Hal loween, as a palate cleanser between The Conjuring and The Conjuring 2. I will not be watching it again. Currently wishing I could conjure up the energy to study for my finals.

Jack Frost 2: Revenge of the Mutant Killer Snowman

This is, apparently, a movie. If you have seen it, please let me know, because I have so many questions.

Gremlins

I have not seen this movie, but I’m told it has “everything and lots of death.” All of the holiday movie staples: grem lins, “the classic glowy pool scene,” and people getting run over by snowplows. The three rules of gremlin care are, apparently : First, do not expose them to sunlight. See: Cullen, Edward. Sec ond, do not let them get wet. See: men, UChicago. Third, don’t feed them after midnight. Or, if you’re Arley D. Cathey, after 8:25 p.m.

This movie is not actually about love. Don’t cheat on your wife. Don’t try to se duce a married woman with creepy post er board signs while you stand outside her door pretending to be a Christmas caroler. Hugh Grant! Emma Thomp son, Alan Rickman, Liam Neeson, Kei ra Knightly, Colin Firth, and also Row an Atkinson! This movie is the kind of movie that you really enjoy, really regret that you really enjoyed, really regret that you regret enjoying because some of the movie really is romantic in a kind of cutesy way, and then feel very proud of yourself for not enjoying because look at you, you’re a college student, and you know what healthy relationships look like.

Catch Me if You Can

This is the perfect amount of Christ mas in a movie (at least to me, as a Jew). The movie is festive, cheery, and only mentions what time of year it is a cou ple of times. Note to directors: The holidays are overrated. There, I said it. Snow is very cold. Candy canes taste like *REDACTED*. I don’t want a tree in my house. And if I hear a single other person play fucking “The Little Drummer Boy” any time before December 23, I swear I’m going to try to hibernate. I’d rather listen to Bruce Willis than Christmas music before Christmas. Alternatively, I could listen to “Dominick the Donkey,” the only Christmas song that’s accept able year-round. And unfortunately, despite Adam Sandler’s various efforts, Hanukkah music remains a nonentity.

“Elf is never at its best, despite the postulations of the Extreme Value Theorem.”