Work Samples
1. Undergraduate works Academic year 2005 - 2012 2. Graduate works M.S. Arch Master Thesis Project Academic year 2013 - 2014 3. Professional works Baum Architects 2015 - 2016 Samoo C.M. 2016 - 2019
Space as an architectural problem;
SELECTED WORKS
Undergraduate Works :
01. The Farnsworth Barn 2011 Summer / Design Build Studio
06 - 07
02. Court House 2010 Fall / Horizontal Space Problem
08 - 09
03. Art Gallery 2011 Spring / Vertical Space Problem
10 - 13
04. Low-rise Apartment 2011 Fall / Special Project Research
14 - 17
Graduate Work :
05. Underground Airport 2013 - 2014 / M.S. Arch Master Thesis Project
18 - 31
Professional Works :
06. Jeonnam Museum of Art 2016 / International Architectural Design Competition
32 - 33
07. Hana-stay officetel 2016 / Phase of Design development
34 - 37
08. Hongdae Donggyo Building Renovation 2017 / Office building remodeling project
38 - 41
09. Other project involvements
42 - 43
1. The Farnsworth Barn 2011 Summer Design Build Studio
AN ADDITIONAL FACILITY FOR AN EXISTING VISITING CENTER The Farnsworth House, designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe in 1951, is one of the most important works of 20th century architecture. Originally designed as a country retreat for Dr. Edith Farnsworth, the house today belongs to the National Trust for Historic Preservation and is open to the pubric. More than 1000 visitors annually make the pilgraimage to this masterpiece of Modernism. The existing visitor center is in a desperate need of an additional office space, storage and an exhibition space for artifacts and original furniture of the Farnsworth House.
Floor Plan
6
Section
7
2. Court House 2010 Fall Horizontal Space Problem
A PRIVATE RESIDENCE WITH TWO COURTS A ‘professional’ couple desires a residence in the city with ample space in which to entertain friends and to display a collection of modern paintings and sculpture encompassing notable works from Cubism to “Pop Art”. In addition to the usual basic requirements provide a studio or study that, depending on the arrangement, could possibly double as an overnight quest facility. If not, provide a separate overnight guest facility. Provide off-street parking for at least one auto. Provide a suitable scheme in the ‘Open Plan’ mode.
8
Floor Plan
9
3. Art Gallery 2011 Spring Vertical Space Problem
10
A PRIVATE ART GALLERY A collector of contemporary art (Cubism, to Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art) needs a space to exhibit and store the collection. From time to time the owner plans to use the facility to entertain guests that at times may number only a handful and sometimes as many as 30 persons. The facility should also accomodate overnight guests in a comfortable manner. The facility will be a stand-alone annex to the main residence nearby, both suitated on a slightly slopping (11% slope NW to SE), lightly wooded typically mid-western site.
Section 1
Section 2
11
Roof with operable window
Roof Structure
Elevator Shaft
Interior perspective Collage
Mezzane 3
Mezzane 2
Mezzane 1
Bearing wall
Curtain Wall
Building Component Diagram
12
Main Entrance Above
Mezzane 3
Section line 1
Mezzane 1
a. Work Room b. Kitchen c. Dining d. Pantry e. General Storage f. Coat Room g. Mechanical Room h. Art Storage i. Guest Room j. Gallery
Mezzane 2
Section line 2
Lower Level Floor Plan
13
4. Apartment
LOW-RISE APARTMENT
2011 Fall Special Project Research
A collector of contemporary art (Cubism, to Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art) needs an apartment to reside in the downtown Chicago area. In addition to the usual basic requirements of residence, more than 2 sides of the apartment unit needs to be fully opened to city skyline. From this, try to explore the possibility of implication of the Space Problem idea to the urban setting. It does not have to accomodate many units on the one floor, but should show the possibility of application in various sizes.
Typical unit Floor Plan
Typical unit Elevation
14
Digital Application in Design
15
Digital Application in Design
Interior perspective Collage 1
Interior perspective Collage 2
16
COL CENTER LINE
INTUMESCENT PAINT FIRE PROOFING
FINISH FLOOR LINE
3x5x3/8x6" STL ANGLE
2"
PAIR 3/8" STUD, BOLTS PAIR 5/8" STUD, BOLTS SLOTTED HOLES HORSE SHOE WASHERS
METAL DECK, 1.5VL22
4"
4"x2"x3/16" STL TUBE
B2
7.2 WEB OPENING
4" ∅ PIPE
COL: W10x60
1 1/2" THICK FIRE PROOFING
1'-10"
1 1/2" THICK FIRE PROOFING
G1: W12x30
1 1/2" THICK FIRE PROOFING
#8 WIRE HANGER
CEILING LINE
INTUMESCENT PAINT FIRE PROOFING
10'-0" TO FIN FLR
RADIENT HEATING AND COOLING PANEL
Vertical Section Detail at Column Line 1 and 3
17
5. Underground airport 2013-2014 M.S. Arch Master Thesis Project Academic adviser Project adviser
18
Arthur S. Takeuchi Mahjoub Elnimeiri Derek A.R. Moore Ray clark
The idea of this project is to investigate the possibility of an underground airport with passenger facilities below and aircrafts above with minimum over-ground space. An important advantage is the possibility of loading and unloading passengers at two or more aircraft entrances thereby shortening the turn-around time of aircrafts. This accessibility can be more easily managed when approached from below. Furthermore, an underground facility is expected to provide several additional advantages:
1) greater freedom for aircrafts to get into position to efficiently load and unload; 2) potential for aircrafts to power-in and power-out of gate areas omitting the need for towing; 3) shorter walking distances for passengers due to greater compactness; 4) potential for an effective and efficient Automated People Mover (APM) system; 5) greater potential for systematic airport expansion when needed; 6) potentially reduced operating cost for ventilation, heating, and cooling.
required taxiway clearance departing taxiway parking position underground facility aircraft moving out to depart departure : power-out
arrival : power-in
arriving taxiway aircraft moving into parking position
boarding device gate kiosk 1
gate kiosk 2
gate kiosk 3
gate kiosk 4
arriving taxiway
boarding device underground facility
G.L. ± 0
aircraft moving into parking position
B1 Level B2 Level APM
departing taxiway
APM
Main plannig idea
Aircraft maneuverability and gate kiosk idea
19
In the center between the parallel runways the underground terminal is located surrounding a large sunken landscaped park. The facility on the left side of the landscape is for international flights and the other side is domestic. To the left and right of the terminal, at grade are 4 rows of boarding gates, each containing 24 gates. These 8 rows of gates provide the initial phase of the construction with a total of 192 gates. A future expansion phase will add two more rows of gates on each side of the terminal for a total 12 rows, or a total of 288 gates. All gates are connected to the terminal via sky-lighted underground pedestrian concourses and the underground APM system. The pedestrian concourses can provide access to the gates in case of APM system breakdown. This will minimize and prevent chaotic delays. The scheme provides a proportion of 50% to 50% of domestic and international flights, but this can change if necessary. For instance, if the airport needs approximately 75% of domestic and 25% of international flights, the domestic APM line can extend to one of the international stations and turn that station into a domestic APM station. International APM trains no longer stop at the station. Figure 04.1 shows this in detail. The terminal and its landscaped park are accessed from landside via underground vehicular roadways that slope up to the park’s level at the terminal, as well as from an underground city transit system. Underground parking is located below the landscaped park and the city transit system will have several stations suitably located along the inner circumference of the linear terminal.
20
The terminal will have ample curb space to accommodate large influxes of passengers who choose to come by car, ample check-in space, ample space for security, customs, immigration operations, etc, and potential to accommodate many kinds of concessions, conference centers, theaters, etc. The inner circumference of the terminal will also provide passengers with easy access to nearly all modes of transportation and walkable access to covered parking below the park. The park will function as the terminal’s forecourt and the centroid of the airport. In hot, arid climates, the landscaped park can be mainly a water basin with monumental fountains. In the center of the park will be the airport control tower with unimpeded views of all runways, taxiways and apron areas. The park can also contain a large hotel and convention facilities. Above all, its most desirable features will be the nice and ample landscaped view and natural daylight that will suitably complement and support the underground facility at its busiest edge.
AUTOMOBILE ACCESS TO MECHANICAL BUILDING/APM MAINTENANCE AREA
AUTOMOBILE/CITY TRAIN APPROACH FROM THE CITY CONNECT TO REMOTE PARKING
14763' (4.5km)
INTERNATIONAL GATE KIOSK
384'
DOMESTIC GATE KIOSK
SPACE RESERVED FOR SERVICE LOADING DOCK
SPACE RESERVED FOR SERVICE LOADING DOCK
CENTRAL PLANT
BRIDGE CONNECTING THE TERMINAL AND LANDSCAPE AT B1/B2 LEVEL
INTERNATIONAL APM STATION AT B3 LEVEL
312'
336'
BRIDGE CONNECTING THE TERMINAL AND LANDSCAPE AT B1/B2 LEVEL
192'
APM MAINTENANCE AREA
144'
384'
CENTRAL PLANT
DOMESTIC APM STATION AT B2 LEVEL
LANDSCAPE 384'
336' CITY TRAIN STATION AT B3 LEVEL
APM STATION AT B3 LEVEL
BRIDGE CONNECTING THE TERMINAL AND LANDSCAPE AT B1/B2 LEVEL
DOMESTIC/INTERNATIONAL APM BELOW THE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE
CARGO
APM STATION AT B3 LEVEL
BRIDGE CONNECTING THE TERMINAL AND LANDSCAPE AT B1/B2 LEVEL
BRIDGE CONNECTING THE TERMINAL AND LANDSCAPE AT B1/B2 LEVEL
336'
LANDSCAPE
INTERNATIONAL APM STATION AT B3 LEVEL
FUTURE EXPANSION 2 ROWS OF GATE SATELLITE (48 GATES CAN BE ADDED)
CITY TRAIN STATION AT B3 LEVEL
CITY TRAIN STATION AT B3 LEVEL
384'
DOMESTIC APM AT B2 LEVEL
6624' (2km)
BRIDGE CONNECTING THE TERMINAL AND LANDSCAPE AT B1/B2 LEVEL
APM STATION AT B3 LEVEL
2448'
CONTROL TOWER
DOMESTIC TERMINAL AT B1/B2 LEVEL
INTERNATIONAL APM AT B3 LEVEL
2448'
FUTURE EXPANSION 2 ROWS OF GATE SATELLITE (48 GATES CAN BE ADDED)
INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL AT B1/B2 LEVEL
CITY TRAIN STATION AT B3 LEVEL APM STATION AT B3 LEVEL
DOMESTIC APM STATION AT B2 LEVEL
MAINTENANCE
SPACE RESERVED FOR SERVICE LOADING DOCK
INTERNATIONAL GATE SATELLITE DESIGNED FOR CODE E (GROUP 5) AIRCRAFT
SPACE RESERVED FOR SERVICE LOADING DOCK
INTERNATIONAL GATE SATELLITE DESIGNED FOR CODE C (GROUP 3) AIRCRAFT
DOMESTIC GATE SATELLITE DESIGNED FOR CODE C (GROUP 3) AIRCRAFT
DOMESTIC GATE SATELLITE DESIGNED FOR CODE E (GROUP 5) AIRCRAFT
AUTOMOBILE/CITY TRAIN APPROACH FROM THE CITY BELOW GRADE
SITE PLAN
CITY TRAIN APPROACH FROM THE CITY
FUTURE EXPANSION 4TH RUNWAY
AUTOMOBILE ACCESS TO CARGO AREA/MECHANICAL BUILDING AUTOMOBILE APPROACH FROM THE CITY
UNDERGROUND AIRPORT GATE KIOSK IDEA WITH PARALLEL RUNWAYS SCHEME F M.S. MASTERS THESIS, ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHURL JONG KIM SCALE :
0
DATE : 7/5/14 REV : 11/5/14
200
400
600
800
1000 ft
SK
F1 21
Perspective view at terminal
22
Perspective view at gate waiting area
Train to
GATE 48-72 TERMINAL
Perspective view at international APM station (arrival level / B3)
Perspective view at international APM station (departure level / B2)
23
DOMESTIC GATE KIOSK FOR CODE C (GROUP 3) AIRCRAFT/737 1
1 SECTION 1-1'
48’
WAITING AREA
A
48’
ELV ELV
WAITING AREA
DN
A'
A
A'
ELV ELV UP
SECONDARY SERVICE POD UP
DN
144’ WAITING AREA
1'
1'
at Elev. 0'-0"
at Elev. -18'-0"
ALTERNATIVE SECONDARY SERVICE POD LOCATION (mechanical system can be separated from baggage conveyor)
SECONDARY SERVICE POD
SECTION A-A'
* Emergency exit needs to be provided at every gate kiosk. This will have to be decided after considering the location of spur tunnel and secondary service pod. * Size of the gate kiosk can be reduced to install the air scoops.
SPUR TUNNEL
MECHANICAL SYSTEM BAGGAGE CONVEYOR (possible to expand if necessary)
ALTERNATIVE SPUR TUNNEL LOCATION (mechanical system can be separated from baggage conveyor)
GATE KIOSK AREA UNDERGROUND AIRPORT GATE KIOSK IDEA WITH PARALLEL RUNWAYS SCHEME F M.S. MASTERS THESIS, ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHURL JONG KIM SCALE :
0
DATE : 7/5/14 REV : 11/7/14
24
25
50
75
100
125 ft
SK
F3.1
INTERNATIONAL GATE KIOSK FOR CODE C (GROUP 3) AIRCRAFT/737
SECTION 2-2'
2 DEPARTURE LEVEL
48’
ARRIVAL LEVEL
2
WAITING AREA
OPEN TO BELOW
LIGHT WELL FOR LOWER LEVEL
DN
ELV ELV
48’
B
DEPARTURE
ARRIVAL
DN
B'
B
B'
ELV ELV DN
UP
DN UP
DN DN
144’ OPEN TO BELOW
WAITING AREA
LIGHT WELL FOR LOWER LEVEL
2'
2'
at Elev. 0'-0"
at Elev. -18'-0"
DEPARTURE LEVEL SECONDARY SERVICE POD
ALTERNATIVE SECONDARY SERVICE POD LOCATION (mechanical system can be separated from baggage conveyor)
ARRIVAL LEVEL
SECTION B-B'
* Emergency exit needs to be provided at every gate kiosk. This will have to be decided after considering the location of spur tunnel and secondary service pod. * Size of the gate kiosk can be reduced to install the air scoops.
SPUR TUNNEL
MECHANICAL SYSTEM BAGGAGE CONVEYOR (possible to expand if necessary)
ALTERNATIVE SPUR TUNNEL LOCATION (mechanical system can be separated from baggage conveyor)
GATE KIOSK AREA UNDERGROUND AIRPORT GATE KIOSK IDEA WITH PARALLEL RUNWAYS SCHEME F M.S. MASTERS THESIS, ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHURL JONG KIM SCALE :
0
DATE : 7/5/14 REV : 11/7/14
25
50
75
100
125 ft
SK
F3.2
25
DOMESTIC GATE KIOSK FOR CODE E (GROUP 5) AIRCRAFT/747 SECTION 3-3'
3
3 ELV ELV
ELV ELV
WAITING AREA
SECONDARY SERVICE POD
WAITING AREA
DN
UP
UP
DN
QUEUING AREA
WAITING AREA
3574 SQFT FOR 238 PASSENGERS
384’
AIRLINE DESK
BOTH WAITING AREA WILL BE IN USE WHEN CODE E (GROUP 5) AIRCRAFT IS PARKED
WAITING AREA
3574 SQFT FOR 238 PASSENGERS
C
C'
WAITING AREA
WAITING AREA
DN
48’
QUEUING AREA
ELV ELV
C
C'
ELV ELV
SECONDARY SERVICE POD
UP
UP
DN
QUEUING AREA
WAITING AREA
3574 SQFT FOR 238 PASSENGERS
384’
AIRLINE DESK
BOTH WAITING AREA WILL BE IN USE WHEN CODE E (GROUP 5) AIRCRAFT IS PARKED
WAITING AREA
3574 SQFT FOR 238 PASSENGERS
QUEUING AREA
ELV ELV
ELV ELV
WAITING AREA
WAITING AREA
DN
SECONDARY SERVICE POD
UP
UP
DN
3'
3'
240’
96’ at Elev. 0'-0"
at Elev. -18'-0"
* Emergency exit needs to be provided at every gate kiosk. This will have to be decided after considering the location of spur tunnel and secondary service pod. * Size of the gate kiosk can be reduced to install the air scoops.
ALTERNATIVE SECONDARY SERVICE POD LOCATION (mechanical system can be separated from baggage conveyor)
SECONDARY SERVICE POD
SECTION C-C'
SPUR TUNNEL
MECHANICAL SYSTEM BAGGAGE CONVEYOR (possible to expand if necessary)
ALTERNATIVE SPUR TUNNEL LOCATION (mechanical system can be separated from baggage conveyor)
GATE KIOSK AREA UNDERGROUND AIRPORT GATE KIOSK IDEA WITH PARALLEL RUNWAYS SCHEME F M.S. MASTERS THESIS, ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHURL JONG KIM SCALE :
0
DATE : 7/5/14 REV : 11/7/14
26
50
100
150
200
250 ft
SK
F3.3
INTERNATIONAL GATE KIOSK FOR CODE E (GROUP 5) AIRCRAFT/747
DN
4
ELV ELV
SECTION 4-4'
4 ELV ELV DN
WAITING AREA
ARRIVAL
DEPARTURE
UP
WAITING AREA DN
DN
DN DN
DN
QUEUING AREA
WAITING AREA
3574 SQFT FOR 238 PASSENGERS
384’
AIRLINE DESK BOTH WAITING AREA WILL BE IN USE WHEN CODE E (GROUP 5) AIRCRAFT IS PARKED
OPEN TO BELOW
LIGHT WELL FOR LOWER LEVEL
WAITING AREA
3574 SQFT FOR 238 PASSENGERS
D
D'
ELV ELV
WAITING AREA
ARRIVAL
DEPARTURE
WAITING AREA DN
48’
QUEUING AREA
DN
D
D'
ELV ELV DN
UP
DN
DN DN
DN
QUEUING AREA
WAITING AREA
3574 SQFT FOR 238 PASSENGERS
384’
AIRLINE DESK BOTH WAITING AREA WILL BE IN USE WHEN CODE E (GROUP 5) AIRCRAFT IS PARKED
OPEN TO BELOW
LIGHT WELL FOR LOWER LEVEL
WAITING AREA
3574 SQFT FOR 238 PASSENGERS
QUEUING AREA
DN
ELV ELV
ELV ELV DN
WAITING AREA
ARRIVAL
UP
WAITING AREA
DEPARTURE DN
DN
DN DN
DN
4'
4'
240’
96’ at Elev. 0'-0"
at Elev. -18'-0"
* Emergency exit needs to be provided at every gate kiosk. This will have to be decided after considering the location of spur tunnel and secondary service pod. * Size of the gate kiosk can be reduced to install the air scoops.
DEPARTURE LEVEL
ALTERNATIVE SECONDARY SERVICE POD LOCATION (mechanical system can be separated from baggage conveyor)
ARRIVAL LEVEL
SECONDARY SERVICE POD
SECTION D-D'
SPUR TUNNEL
MECHANICAL SYSTEM BAGGAGE CONVEYOR (possible to expand if necessary)
ALTERNATIVE SPUR TUNNEL LOCATION (mechanical system can be separated from baggage conveyor)
GATE KIOSK AREA UNDERGROUND AIRPORT GATE KIOSK IDEA WITH PARALLEL RUNWAYS SCHEME F M.S. MASTERS THESIS, ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHURL JONG KIM SCALE :
0
DATE : 7/5/14 REV : 11/7/14
50
100
150
200
250 ft
SK
F3.4
27
Collapsible structure
Material and structure
Weather protection
COLLAPSIBLE CANOPY: thin lightweight double-walled reinforced fabric
AIR INFLATED CANOPY
industrial scisoors lift and hinge
6” thick carbon composite
air inflated canopy
In order to resist the jet blast, the whole structure needs to collapse downward. This is to expose the least surface to wind and also to be clear of the aircraft wings when required. Its structure, probably at the landings needs to anchor the ramp to the ground to resist wind and engine forces and the anchorage needs to be able to quickly disengage to allow it to be moved out.
Since the underground airport maximizes the aircraft maneuverability, the boarding structure should be able to withstand the jet blast along with normal wind forces. The ramp structure can be built with Carbon Composite as its low density and high strength makes it a really compatible material, the density of Carbon Composites being about 20% of steel and 64% of aluminum. This is a very significant advantage for the ramp that needs to be moved in and out quickly.
Weather protection for passengers should be provided when required. Weather protection can be achieved by untilizing an air inflatable structure with collapsible canopy. This enables the canopy to be quickly blown up and down, depending on the weather condition.
48'X48' OF TYPICAL BAY
32'X32' BAY FOR PARKING
384' INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL
BY PASS LANE
TERMINAL CURB (4 INNER LANES, 5 OUTER LANES)
APRON LEVEL ON GRADE
STRUCTURAL DEPTH 3' 4'
SECURITY CHECK
B1 LEVEL : DEPARTURE LEVEL
CHECK-IN DESKS
15'-6"
EMIGRATION
CITY TRAIN STATION
B2 LEVEL : ARRIVAL LEVEL
B3 LEVEL
23'
ARRIVAL HALL
8'
BAGGAGE SORTING AREA
CUSTOM AREA
PARKING GARAGE 1
8'-4"
2 TRACKS FOR DEPARTURE/2 TRACKS FOR ARRIVAL
BAGGAGE CLAIM AREA
13'-6"
INTERNATIONAL APM(TOTAL OF 4 TRACKS )
CUSTOM AREA
14'-6"
4'
STRUCTURAL DEPTH
IMMIGRATION
PARKING GARAGE 2
SECTION (INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL) UNDERGROUND AIRPORT GATE KIOSK IDEA WITH PARALLEL RUNWAYS SCHEME F M.S. MASTERS THESIS, ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHURL JONG KIM SCALE :
28
0
DATE : 7/5/14 REV : 11/1/14
10
20
30
40
50 ft
SK
F5.3
Arrival : Aircraft approaching
Boarding / Deboarding : Aircraft parked
adjust angle to be connected to aircraft
adjust angle to clear out of the way of aircraft
extra ramp for 747 (not used for smaller aircraft)
Departure : Aircraft leaving
adjust angle to clear out of the way of aircraft
adjust angle to be connected to aircraft
adjust angle to clear out of the way of aircraft
detached segment
adjust angle to clear out of the way of aircraft
adjust angle to be connected to aircraft
adjust angle to clear out of the way of aircraft
detach to clear out of the way of aircraft adjust angle to be connected to aircraft
32'X32' BAY FOR PARKING
48'X48' OF TYPICAL BAY 336' BY PASS LANE
DOMESTIC TERMINAL
TERMINAL CURB (4 INNER LANES, 5 OUTER LANES)
APRON LEVEL ON GRADE 15'-6"
3' 4'
STRUCTURAL DEPTH
B1 LEVEL : DEPARTURE LEVEL
CHECK-IN DESKS
SECURITY CHECK
14'-6" 8'
B2 LEVEL : ARRIVAL LEVEL
13'-6"
PARKING GARAGE 2
8'-4"
PARKING GARAGE 1
23'
4'
STRUCTURAL DEPTH
B3 LEVEL
ARRIVAL HALL
CITY TRAIN STATION
BAGGAGE CLAIM AREA
BAGGAGE SORTING AREA
DOMESTIC APM
SECTION (DOMESTIC TERMINAL) UNDERGROUND AIRPORT GATE KIOSK IDEA WITH PARALLEL RUNWAYS SCHEME F M.S. MASTERS THESIS, ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHURL JONG KIM SCALE :
0
DATE : 7/5/14 REV : 11/1/14
10
20
30
40
50 ft
SK
F5.2
29
In lieu of a monumental high-ceilinged terminal usual in most contemporary airports an alternative was sought that might be a little more compatible with the “Underground” concept underlying this project. Coupled with the need to relate many of the terminal functions to the outlying and far-flung gates in an even-handed manner, the desirability of centralizing such functions as rail transit systems, vehicular roadways and parking facilities and last but not least, to ensure a robust and centralized site for hotels, convention halls and other related activities that over time will naturally complement a major transportation hub, the centralized landscaped Park came about which could be gradually developed to its full potential just as the airport itself will reach its ultimate capacity. This Park will also provide the desired “center” both physically and symbolically while also integrating nature at a suitable scale with one of the modern era’s most advanced large-scale technologies.
30
31
6. Jeonnam Museum of Art 2016 International Architectural Design Competition / 2nd place location : Jeonnam, South Korea type : culture/exhibition land area : 17,465.00m2 GFA : 12,626.99m2 Work responsibility Design development, Final work production
32
33
7. Hana-stay officetel 2016 Phase of Design development location : Daejeon, South Korea type : residential land area : 2,581.10m2 GFA : 35,731.89m2 Work responsibility Design development, Permit documents production
34
35
36
37
8. Hongdae Donggyo Building Renovation 2017 Office building remodeling project location : Seoul, South Korea type : office land area : 944.80m2 GFA : 6319.10m2 Work responsibility Design development, Permit document production Supervise cooperative companies
38
The client’s request is to renovate the property by remodeling the all underground floors and the floors from 1st to 3rd, and adding one more floor at the top. Another important condition of this project is that the tenants from 4th to 6th floor will be using the building while construction. The slabs of 2nd and 3rd floor are partially opened to provide better spacial experience. Since the floors from 1st to 3rd will be taken out a lease to one tenant, it was thought to be an adequate decision. Because the building is located at one of the busiest area in Seoul with the highest floating population from the subway station close to it, to be able to satisfy the client, it was key to draw the pedestrian’s attention and give unique image to them. In order to achieve that, we applyed undulating vertical louvers to generate the constant changes on facade to the people walking by.
39
40
41
9. Other project involvement
42
2030 Youth Housing
Seocho Peace Museum
Let’s Run Seoul Racehorse Theme Park
2017 Design Competition location : Seoul, South Korea type : residential land area : 5,479.00m2 GFA : 39,293.71m2
2017 Schematic Design location : Seoul, South Korea type : culture/exhibition land area : 74,385.00m2 GFA : 16,787.20m2
2015 Design Competition / 2nd place location : Gyeonggi, South Korea type : culture/exhibition land area : 137,000m2 GFA : 2,990.04m2 (expansion)
Work responsibility Design development, Final work production
Work responsibility Design development, Final work production
Work responsibility Design development, Final work production
Masterplan of Seould Start-up Hub
Suwon Convention Center
Sejong National Aboretum
2015 Design Competition location : Seoul, South Korea type : office/residential land area : 29,095.00m2 GFA : 69,093.71m2
2015 Design Competition location : Gyeonggi, South Korea type : culture/exhibition land area : 50,122.00m2 GFA : 94,398.89m2
Work responsibility Design development, Final work production
Work responsibility Design development, Final work production
2015 Technical Proposal Turnkey Competition location : Sejong, South Korea type : culture/exhibition land area : 649,977.00m2 GFA : 22,462.80m2 Work responsibility Final work production
43
44
To discover more publications of Churl jong Kim Visit
1. Work Samples https://issuu.com/churljongkim/docs/worksamples-1 https://issuu.com/churljongkim/docs/worksamples-2 2. Undergraduate work portfolio https://issuu.com/churljongkim/docs/portfolio-undergraduate 3. Graduate work portfolio https://issuu.com/churljongkim/docs/portfolio-graduate 4. Master Thesis Full text http://share.iit.edu/handle/10560/3439
45