City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
…helping organizations make better decisions since 1982
Submitted to the City of Lee’s Summit, Missouri by: ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Lane, Olathe, Kansas
Final Report
Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................ i Section 1: Charts and Graphs................................................................................ 1 Section 2: Benchmarking Analysis ...................................................................... 30 Section 3: Importance-Satisfaction Analysis ...................................................... 43 Section 4: GIS Maps ............................................................................................ 61 Section 5: Tabular Data ..................................................................................... 170 Section 6: Survey Instrument............................................................................ 212
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
Overview and Methodology During October and November of 2013, ETC Institute administered a citizen survey for the City of Lee’s Summit. This was the third citizen survey administered by the City; previous surveys were conducted in 2004 and 2008. The purpose of the survey was to assess citizen satisfaction with the delivery of major city services and to help determine priorities for the community so that tax dollars are spent wisely. Methodology. A seven-page survey was mailed to a random sample of households in the City. The mailed survey included a postage paid return envelope, cover letter explaining the purpose of the survey and link to the online version of the survey (www.lssurvey.org). Approximately seven days after the surveys were mailed, residents who received the survey were contacted by phone. Those who indicated that they had not returned the survey or completed it online, were given the option of completing it by phone. The goal for the project was to complete 700 surveys; this goal was far exceeded, with a total of 919 surveys being completed. The results for the random sample of 919 households have a 95% level of confidence with a precision of at least +/- 3.2%. Location of Respondents. To better understand how well services are being delivered in different parts of the City, the home address of respondents to the survey were geocoded. The dots on the map to the right show the distribution of survey respondents based on the location of their home.
ETC Institute (2013)
i
Executive Summary Report
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey Executive Summary Report
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
This report contains the following: • an executive summary • charts depicting the overall results of the survey along with comparisons to the results from previous surveys • benchmarking data that shows how the survey results for Lee’s Summit compare to other cities, including cities in Kansas and Missouri • an importance satisfaction analysis • GIS maps that show the results of selected questions on the survey • tabular data that shows the overall results for each question on the survey • a copy of the cover letter and survey instrument.
How Lee’s Summit Compares to Other Communities The City of Lee’s Summit rated at or above the national average in 50 of the 55 areas that were assessed and rated at or above the Kansas City Metro average in 52 of the 55 areas that were compared. The areas in which Lee’s Summit rated at least 10% above the national average are listed below: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
City employees were timely in their response (+30%) City employees resolved my issue to my satisfaction (+26%) Overall quality of City services provided (+26%) Answers provided by City employees was prompt, accurate and complete (+26%) How well the City is managing growth (+25%) City employees were courteous and polite (+23%) Maintenance of City streets/buildings/facilities (+21%) Quality of City communication (+20%) Feeling of safety in your neighborhood at night (+19%) Visibility of police in neighborhoods (+18%) Number of walking/biking trails (+18%) Availability of City programs/services information (+18%) Overall value received for City taxes/fees (+17%) Cleanliness of City streets & other public areas (+17%) Quality of parks/recreation programs/facilities (+15%) The number of City parks (+15%) The City's adult athletic programs (+15%)
ETC Institute (2013)
ii
Executive Summary Report
Don’t Knows. The percentage of “don’t know” responses has been excluded from many of the graphs in this report to assess satisfaction with residents who had used City services and to facilitate valid comparisons with other communities in the benchmarking analysis. Since the number of “don’t know” responses often reflects the utilization and awareness of city services, the percentage of “don’t know” responses has been included in the tabular data in Section 4 of this report. When the “don’t know” responses have been excluded, the text of this report will indicate that the responses have been excluded with the phrase “who had an opinion.”
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
Quality of customer service from City employees (+14%) Visibility of police in retail/business areas (+13%) Clean up of litter & debris (+13%) City's efforts to keep you informed (+13%) Overall quality of local police protection (+13%) Quality of fire/ambulance services (+12%) Overall quality of life in the City (+10%)
The City of Lee’s Summit rated below the national average in 5 of the 55 areas that were assessed and rated below the Kansas City Metro average in 3 of the 55 areas. The areas in which Lee’s Summit rated at least 5% below the national average were: • • •
Public transportation system (-11%) Quality of the City's cable channels (-6%) Maintenance of traffic signals/street signs (-5%)
Quality of Life in the City Most (90%) of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of life in the City; 8% were “neutral” and only 2% were dissatisfied. When asked how likely they would be to recommend the City as a place to live, ninety percent (90%) of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, were “very likely” or “likely” to recommend the City; 7% were “neutral” and only 4% were not likely to recommend the City.
Overall Satisfaction with City Services Eighty-three percent (83%) of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of services provided by the City of Lee’s Summit; 14% of the residents were “neutral” and only 4% were dissatisfied. The overall city services that had the highest levels of satisfaction, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: the quality of fire and emergency medical services (92%), the quality of local police services (86%), the quality of City parks and recreation programs and facilities (86%) and the quality of City water services (78%).
Satisfaction with Specific City Services •
Police Services. The highest levels of satisfaction with police services, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: the professionalism of police employees (80%), how quickly the police department responds to emergencies (76%) and the visibility of police in neighborhoods (75%).
ETC Institute (2013)
iii
Executive Summary Report
• • • • • • •
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
•
Fire and Emergency Medical Services. The highest levels of satisfaction with fire and emergency medical services, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: the overall quality of local fire protection (92%), overall quality of ambulance service (88%) and how quickly the fire department responds to emergencies (86%).
•
City Services. The highest levels of satisfaction with City services, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: the maintenance and preservation of Downtown Lee’s Summit (82%), the overall cleanliness of City streets and public areas (81%), the maintenance of traffic signals and street signs (72%) and snow removal on major City streets (72%).
•
City Code Enforcement. The highest levels of satisfaction with City code enforcement services, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: the overall appearance of the City (85%), enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris (60%) and enforcing the maintenance of business property (60%).
•
City Water Services. Residents were generally satisfied with City water services. Eightynine percent (89%) of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, were “very satisfied” and “satisfied” with the reliability of water pressure in their home; 83% of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, were “very satisfied” and “satisfied” with the availability of account information and 82% were satisfied with the overall quality of customer service.
•
Parks and Recreation. The highest levels of satisfaction with the City’s parks and recreation services, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: the number of city parks (86%), the maintenance of City parks (85%), the Legacy Park Community Center (80%), the Downtown Summer Music Festivals (79%) and the Legacy Park Youth Sports Field (78%)
•
City Communication. The highest levels of satisfaction with the City’s communication services, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied” responses among residents, who had an opinion, were: the availability of information about City programs and services (71%), the information provided on the City’s website (62%) and City efforts to keep residents informed on local issues (61%).
ETC Institute (2013)
iv
Executive Summary Report
Residents were also asked to rate how safe they felt in various situations in the City. The areas/situations were residents felt most safe, based upon the combined percentage of “very safe” and “safe” responses among those who had an opinion, were: feeling of safety in your neighborhood during the day (96%), overall feeling of safety in the City (92%) and feeling of safety traveling on City streets (91%).
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
Customer Service. Residents were asked to indicate how often City employees they interacted with displayed various behaviors. The items that residents rated highest, based upon the combined percentage of residents who reported the City employee “always” or “usually” displayed the behavior, were: they were courteous and polite (92%), they gave prompt, accurate and complete answers (87%) and they did what they said they would do in a timely manner (86%).
Trends in Satisfaction Ratings Satisfaction ratings for the City of Lee’s Summit improved or stayed the same in 60 of the 72 areas that were assessed in both 2008 and 2013; 41 of these improvements were statistically significant (changes of more than 3% were significant). There were decreases in satisfaction ratings in 12 of the 72 areas that were rated in both 2008 and 2013; only 1 of these decreases was significant. The most notable changes in satisfaction from 2008 to 2013 are listed below and on the following page: Notable Increases from 2008 to 2013: • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Visibility of police in business districts (+21%) Maintenance of City streets (+19%) Overall flow of traffic and congestion management (+16%) Maintenance of sidewalks in the City (+16%) Frequency City employees helped resolve an issue to your satisfaction (+16%) How well City is managing growth (+14%) Overall quality of ambulance service (+14%) Frequency that City employees did what they said they would do in a timely manner (+14%) Overall image of City government (+13%) Maintenance of City streets, municipal buildings and facilities (+13%) Maintenance of stormwater drainage system (+13%) Visibility of police in neighborhoods (+11%) Frequency that City employees gave prompt, accurate and complete answers (+11%) Snow removal on neighborhood streets (+10%)
Notable Decreases from 2008 to 2013: City efforts to keep you informed (-5%) Effectiveness of appointed boards and commissions (-3%) Quality of sanitary sewer services (-3%) • Efforts to enhance fire prevention (-3%) • • •
ETC Institute (2013)
v
Executive Summary Report
•
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
Some of the other major findings from the survey are listed below: •
City Growth and Development. Residents were asked a series of questions related to City growth and development. The major findings from these questions are highlighted on the following page: o Seventy-one percent (71%) of those surveyed, who had an opinion, were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the rate of growth in Lee’s Summit; 69% of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with residential growth in the City and 59% were satisfied with business growth. o The type of development that residents rated highest as being “much too slow” or “too slow” was industrial development (44%); the type of development that residents rated highest as being “much too fast” or “too fast” was multi-family residential development (37%). o Residents were asked to rate their support for various development initiatives. The initiatives that residents were most supportive of, based upon the combined percentage of “very supportive” and “supportive” ratings among residents who had an opinion, were: retail development (58%) and industrial development (55%). o Seventy-two percent (72%) of the residents surveyed were “very supportive” or “supportive” of the City becoming more aggressive with attracting commercial development; 16% were “neutral,” 8% were not supportive and 4% did not know. o Half (50%) of the residents surveyed were “very supportive” or “supportive” of the City dedicating an economic development fund for activities or programs targeting commercial development; 26% were “neutral,” 17% were not supportive and 7% did not know.
•
Primary Sources of City Information. The primary sources where residents reported they received information about the City were: City publications (67%), Lee’s Summit Illustrated (65%) and the Lee’s Summit Journal (50%). The top four sources where residents most preferred to receive information about the City were: City publications (49%), Lee’s Summit Illustrated (46%), the Lee’s Summit Journal (40%) and the City website (37%).
•
Ease of Contacting the City. Most (90%) of residents who had contacted the City, felt it was “very easy” or “somewhat easy” to reach the person they needed; 5% felt it was “difficult” or “very difficult” to reach the person needed and 5% did not know.
ETC Institute (2013)
vi
Executive Summary Report
Other Findings
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
Recommended Priorities for the Next Two Years. In order to help the City identify investment priorities for the next two years, ETC Institute conducted an Importance-Satisfaction (I-S) analysis. This analysis examined the importance that residents placed on each City service and the level of satisfaction with each service. By identifying services of high importance and low satisfaction, the analysis identified which services will have the most impact on overall satisfaction with City services over the next two years. If the City wants to improve its overall satisfaction rating, the City should prioritize investments in services with the highest Importance Satisfaction (I-S) ratings. Details regarding the methodology for the analysis are provided in the Section 3 of this report. Based on the results of the Importance-Satisfaction (I-S) Analysis, ETC Institute recommends the following: •
Overall Priorities for the City. The first level of analysis reviewed the importance of and satisfaction with major categories of City services. This analysis was conducted to help set the overall priorities for the City. Based on the results of this analysis, the major services that are recommended as the top three priorities for investment over the next two years in order to raise the City’s overall satisfaction rating are listed below in descending order of the Importance-Satisfaction rating: o Maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities o Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Lee’s Summit o Overall quality of police services
•
Priorities Within Departments/Specific Areas: The second level of analysis reviewed the importance of and satisfaction of services within departments and specific service areas. This analysis was conducted to help departmental managers set priorities for their department. Based on the results of this analysis, the services that are recommended as the top priorities within each department over the next two years are listed below: o Police Services: Efforts to prevent crime o Fire and Emergency Medical Services: No high priorities identified o City Services: Maintenance of City streets and snow removal on neighborhood streets o City Code Enforcement: enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris, enforcing the maintenance of residential property and enforcing the mowing of grass/weeds on private property o Parks and Recreation: Maintenance of City parks and Youth Athletic Programs o Customer Service: No high priorities identified
ETC Institute (2013)
vii
Executive Summary Report
Investment Priorities
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Section 1:
Charts and Graphs
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 1
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction With Items That Influence Perceptions Residents Have of the City by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
Overall quality of life in the City
33%
Overall quality of services provided by the City
57%
22%
Overall image of City government
15%
How well City is managing growth
13%
Overall value received for City tax dollars/fees
14% 0%
Very Satisfied (5)
8% 2%
14%
61%
57%
24%
55%
20%
Satisfied (4)
11%
27%
40%
60%
5%
10%
22%
48%
80%
Neutral (3)
4%
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction With Items That Influence Perceptions Residents Have of the City - 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 83% 84% 90%
Overall quality of life in the City
71% 75%
Overall quality of services provided by the City
83% 56% 59%
Overall image of City government
72% 46% 54%
How well City is managing growth
68% 50% 54%
Overall value received for City tax dollars/fees
62% 0%
20%
40%
2004 Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
60%
2008
80%
100%
2013
Trends
Page 2
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with City Leadership by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
Leadership of elected officials
10%
Effectiveness of City Manager and professional staff
Effectiveness of appointed boards/commissions
50%
13%
47%
10%
0% Very Satisfied (5)
44%
20%
7%
33%
7%
39%
40%
Satisfied (4)
33%
60%
Neutral (3)
7%
80%
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with City Leadership - 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
57% Leadership of elected officials
60% 60% 56%
Effectiveness of City Manager and professional staff
61% 60% 49%
Effectiveness of appointed boards/commissions
57% 54% 0%
20%
2004 Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
40%
2008
60%
2013
Trends
Page 3
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with City Growth by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
Rate of growth in Lee's Summit
13%
58%
22%
Quality of residential growth
14%
55%
24%
Quality of business growth
12%
0% Very satisfied (5)
47%
20%
22%
40%
Satisfied (4)
60%
Neutral (3)
7%
7%
20%
80%
100%
Dissatisfied (2/1)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with City Growth - 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
59% Rate of growth in Lee's Summit
64%
71%
63% Quality of residential growth
63%
69%
62% Quality of business growth
55%
59% 0%
20%
40%
2004 Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
2008
60%
80%
2013
Trends
Page 4
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
How Likely Would You Be to Recommend the City in the Following Areas: by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
52%
As a place to live
38%
38%
As a place to do business
41%
28%
The City's financial health to a visitor
0%
7% 4%
15%
41%
20%
40%
Very Likely (5)
Likely (4)
60% Neutral (3)
6%
25%
6%
80%
100%
Not Likely (2/1)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Overall Satisfaction With City Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 44%
Quality of fire and emergency medical services
48%
34%
Overall quality of police services
52%
41%
Quality of parks/recreation programs/facilities
8%
0%
10% 5%
45%
10% 3%
Quality of water services
20%
58%
16%
6%
Quality of sanitary sewer services
19%
58%
19%
4%
Customer service from City employees
22%
51%
Maintenance of City streets/buildings/facilities
18%
49%
Quality of communication
17%
49%
Public safety education programs
17%
Programs designed to connect citizens with City
Quality of new commercial development Flow of traffic/congestion management
13%
46%
14%
43%
Enforcing private property/building ordinances
13%
42%
0% Very Satisfied (5)
20% Satisfied (4)
40%
5% 3%
34% 30% 27%
6% 12% 16%
22%
43%
13%
35%
47%
14%
3%
28%
44%
10%
Quality of municipal court
19%
46%
16%
Quality of City's stormwater management system
24%
21%
40% 34% 60%
Neutral (3)
4%
11%
80%
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 5
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Overall Satisfaction With City Services 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) Not previously asked
Quality of fire and emergency medical services
92% 84% 86%
Overall quality of police services
86%
81% 84%
Quality of parks/recreation programs/facilities
86%
72%
Quality of water services Not previously asked
Quality of sanitary sewer services
80%
78%
80%
77% 71% 72%
Customer service from City employees
73%
34%
Maintenance of City streets/buildings/facilities
54%
67% 64% 65%
Quality of communication
66%
60% 59%
Public safety education programs
63%
Programs designed to connect citizens with City
Not previously asked
60% 48%
Quality of City's stormwater management system Quality of new commercial development
54%
59%
57% 32%
Flow of traffic/congestion management
41%
57% 52% 54%
Quality of municipal court
57% 58% 57%
Enforcing private property/building ordinances
55%
0%
20%
2004
2008
40%
60%
80%
100%
2013
Trends
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Overall City Services That Residents Think Are Most Important for Lee’s Summit to Provide by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices
84% 77%
Overall quality of police services Quality of fire and emergency medical services
60%
Maintenance of City streets/buildings/facilities
34% 28% 27% 16% 14% 10% 7% 6% 6% 4% 4% 2%
Quality of water services Quality of parks/recreation programs/facilities Flow of traffic/congestion management Quality of new commercial development Quality of sanitary sewer services Enforcing private property/building ordinances Quality of City's stormwater management system Quality of communication Customer service from City employees Public safety education programs Programs designed to connect citizens with City Quality of municipal court
0% 1st Choice
20% 2nd Choice
40% 3rd Choice
60%
80%
100%
4th Choice
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 6
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with Police Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
Professionalism of police employees
31%
28%
How quickly the police department responds
Visibility of police in neighborhoods
48%
22%
54%
19%
Efforts to prevent crime
20%
50%
Quality of animal control
21%
46%
Very Satisfied (5)
20%
53%
Visibility of police in business districts
0%
16%
49%
20% Satisfied (4)
8%
22%
5%
26% 60%
Neutral (3)
4%
17%
27%
40%
5%
80%
4%
7% 100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with Police Services 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) Not previously asked
Professionalism of police employees
80% 72% 71%
How quickly the police department responds
76% 61% 64%
Visibility of police in neighborhoods
75% 53% 52%
Visibility of police in business districts
73% 65% 64%
Efforts to prevent crime
70% 63% 63%
Quality of animal control
67% 0%
20%
40%
2004 Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
60%
2008
80%
100%
2013
Trends
Page 7
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Police Services That Residents Think Are Most Important for the City to Provide by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top three choices
74%
Visibility of police in neighborhoods
72%
Efforts to prevent crime
69%
How quickly the police department responds
33%
Visibility of police in business districts
28%
Professionalism of police employees
7%
Quality of animal control
0%
20%
40%
1st Choice
60%
2nd Choice
80%
3rd Choice
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with Fire and Emergency Medical Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
42%
Overall quality of local fire protection
Overall quality of ambulance service
How quickly the fire department responds
Number of fire stations
50%
43%
45%
12%
43%
43%
13%
27%
Visibility of fire department personnel
57%
33%
Efforts to enhance fire prevention
0% Very Satisfied (5)
7%
24%
20% Satisfied (4)
14%
49%
17%
44%
40%
30%
60%
Neutral (3)
80%
0%
1%
1%
2%
1%
2%
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 8
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with Fire and Emergency Medical Services 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 89% 91% 92%
Overall quality of local fire protection
74% 74%
Overall quality of ambulance service
88% 82% 81% 86%
How quickly the fire department responds
81% 84% 84%
Number of fire stations
74% 75% 82%
Visibility of fire department personnel
71% 71% 68%
Efforts to enhance fire prevention
0%
20%
40%
2004
60%
2008
80%
100%
2013
Trends
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Fire and Emergency Medical Services That Residents Think Are Most Important for the City to Provide by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top two choices
62%
How quickly the fire department responds
59%
Overall quality of local fire protection
46%
Overall quality of ambulance service
9%
Number of fire stations
8%
Efforts to enhance fire prevention
2%
Visibility of fire department personnel
0%
20%
40%
1st Choice
60%
80%
2nd Choice
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 9
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
How Safe Residents Feel In Various Situations by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
61%
In your neighborhood during the day
Overall feeling of safety in Lee's Summit
Traveling on City streets
In your neighborhood at night
60%
7%
34%
57%
8%
35%
53%
10% 0%
9%
60%
35%
In city parks during the day
4% 1%
32%
27%
In other public areas in Lee's Summit
In city parks at night
35%
20%
Very Safe (5)
40%
4%
12%
44%
Safe (4)
2%
11% 1%
51% 34%
1%
60% Neutral (3)
1%
13% 80%
100%
Unsafe (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
How Safe Residents Feel In Various Situations 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 94% 97%
In your neighborhood during the day
96% 88% 89%
Overall feeling of safety in Lee's Summit
92% Traveling on City streets
Not previously asked
91% 84% 87%
In your neighborhood at night
88% 80% 80%
In other public areas in Lee's Summit
87% 81% 83%
In city parks during the day
86% 42% 40%
In city parks at night
44% 0%
20%
40%
2004 Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
60%
2008
80%
100%
2013
Trends
Page 10
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with City Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) Maintenance & preservation of downtown
29%
53%
18%
Overall cleanliness of City streets/public areas Maintenance of traffic signals/street signs
63%
16%
Snow removal on major City streets
Maintenance of sidewalks in the City
55%
14%
52%
12%
Snow removal on neighborhood streets
Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Adequacy of public transportation system
42%
12%
35%
7%
Very Satisfied (5)
15% 29%
18%
14%
33%
17%
32%
20%
33%
26%
42%
20%
7%
26%
25%
0%
15%
26%
41%
9%
14%
18%
40%
12%
40%
Satisfied (4)
4%
8%
14%
48%
14%
Adequacy of shared use path/trail system
21%
51%
13%
Maintenance of stormwater drainage system
15%
56%
21%
Maintenance of City streets
13% 5%
60%
80%
Neutral (3)
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with City Services - 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 73%
Maintenance & preservation of downtown Overall cleanliness of City streets/public areas
63% 69%
Maintenance of traffic signals/street signs
64%
Snow removal on major City streets Maintenance of City streets
49%
42% 44% Not asked in 2004
Adequacy of shared use path/trail system
Not previously asked
Adequacy of sidewalks
Not previously asked
Adequacy of bicycling accommodations
Not previously asked
Adequacy of public transportation system
Not previously asked
74%
44%
66% 60%
54% 53% 51%
0%
20%
47% 32% 40%
2004 Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
72%
68%
47% 53%
Maintenance of sidewalks in the City
81%
72%
29%
Maintenance of stormwater drainage system
Snow removal on neighborhood streets
82%
82% 71% 73%
60%
2008
2013
80%
100%
Trends
Page 11
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
City Services That Residents Think Are Most Important for the City to Provide by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices
82%
Maintenance of City streets
64%
Snow removal on major City streets
48% 42%
Snow removal on neighborhood streets Maintenance of traffic signals/street signs
29% 26% 23% 19% 10% 10% 7% 6%
Overall cleanliness of City streets/public areas Maintenance of stormwater drainage system Maintenance of sidewalks in the City Maintenance & preservation of downtown Adequacy of public transportation system Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Adequacy of shared use path/trail system
0%
20%
1st Choice 4th Choice
40%
2nd Choice
60%
80%
100%
3rd Choice
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with City Code Enforcement by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
66%
19%
Overall appearance of the City
Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris
11%
49%
Enforcing the maintenance of business property
10%
50%
Enforcing sign regulations
10%
13%2% 28%
46%
33%
7%
38%
6%
Enforcing the maintenance of residential property
8%
42%
33%
Mowing/trimming of grass/weeds on private property
9%
41%
30%
0% Very Satisfied (5)
20%
Satisfied (4)
40% Neutral (3)
60%
12%
17%
20% 80%
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 12
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with City Code Enforcement 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 76% 77%
Overall appearance of the City
85% 54% 52%
Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris
60% Enforcing the maintenance of business property
56% 55%
Enforcing sign regulations
54% 56%
60%
56% 46% 44%
Enforcing the maintenance of residential property
50% 49% 43%
Mowing/trimming of grass/weeds on private property
50% 0%
20%
2004
40%
2008
60%
80%
100%
2013
Trends
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Code Enforcement Services That Residents Think Are Most Important for the City to Provide by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top two choices
49%
Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris
48%
Overall appearance of the City
34%
Enforcing the maintenance of residential property
26%
Mowing/trimming of grass/weeds on private property
22%
Enforcing the maintenance of business property
7%
Enforcing sign regulations 0%
20%
40%
60%
1st Choice 2nd Choice Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 13
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with City Water Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
40%
Reliability of water pressure in your home
49%
6%
5%
Availability of account information
30%
53%
15%
Overall quality of customer service
29%
53%
14% 3%
0%
20%
Very Satisfied (5)
40%
Satisfied (4)
60%
Neutral (3)
80%
2%
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with City Water Services 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
84%
Reliability of water pressure in your home
89%
89%
Availability of account information
Not previously asked 83%
Overall quality of customer service Not previously asked 82% 0%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
20%
2004 2013
40%
60%
80%
100%
2008
Trends
Page 14
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with Parks and Recreation by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 31% 27% 36% 29% 32% 25% 29% 22% 27% 24% 21% 25% 20% 21% 21% 24% 18%
The number of City parks Maintenance of City parks Legacy Park Community Center Downtown Summer Music Festivals Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Miles of walking/biking trails Gamber Community Center Lee's Summit Parks and Recreation Board Harris Park Community Center Youth athletic programs Other recreation program Hartman Park Sports Area Number of playgrounds Ease of registering for programs Adult athletic programs Yout Sports Practice Areas Fees charged for activities
0%
20%
Very Satisfied (5)
55% 58% 44% 50% 46% 48% 44% 50% 44% 46% 48% 44% 48% 46% 45% 41% 42% 40% Satisfied (4)
12% 2% 13% 2% 3% 18% 2% 18% 2% 20% 8% 18% 2% 25% 4% 25% 2% 27% 4% 27% 3% 29% 30% 4% 28% 5% 28% 4% 31% 7% 28% 9% 31% 1%
60%
80%
Neutral (3)
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with Parks and Recreation 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 75% 77%
The number of City parks 70%
Downtown Summer Music Festivals Not previously asked
Miles of walking/biking trails
Not previously asked
80% 79%
79% 78%
73%
Gamber Community Center
Not previously asked
Lee's Summit Parks and Recreation Board
Not previously asked
Harris Park Community Center
Not previously asked
73% 72% 71% 70% 72%
Youth athletic programs
70% 68% 67%
Other recreation program
69%
Not previously asked 69% 63% 65%
Number of playgrounds
68% 70% 68%
Ease of registering for programs
67% 61% 60%
Adult athletic programs
66%
Not previously asked 65%
Fees charged for activities
55%
0%
20%
40% 2004
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
74% 74%
Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields
Yout Sports Practice Areas
86%
85%
Legacy Park Community Center
Hartman Park Sports Area
86%
80%
Maintenance of City parks
59%
60%
60% 2008
2013
80%
100%
Trends
Page 15
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Parks and Recreation Services That Residents Think Are Most Important for the City to Provide by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices
74%
Maintenance of City parks Youth athletic programs Miles of walking/biking trails The number of City parks Downtown Summer Music Festivals Other recreation program Legacy Park Community Center Fees charged for activities Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Number of playgrounds Lee's Summit Parks and Recreation Board Adult athletic programs Gamber Community Center Yout Sports Practice Areas Ease of registering for programs Harris Park Community Center Hartman Park Sports Area
34% 32% 25% 24% 21% 20% 19% 17% 14% 13% 12% 11% 10% 9%
3% 1% 0%
1st Choice 4th Choice
20%
40%
2nd Choice
60%
80%
3rd Choice
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Satisfaction with City Communication by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
16%
Availability info about City programs/services
Information on City's website
City efforts to keep you informed
Programming on City's cable channels
Level of public involvement in local decisions
14%
48%
14%
47%
13%
25%
34% 20%
29%
Satisfied (4)
Neutral (3)
4%
9%
41%
42% 40%
5%
34%
41%
9% 0%
Very Satisfied (5)
55%
60%
4%
15%
80%
100%
Dissatisfied (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 16
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with City Communication 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 70% Availability info about City programs/services
69%
71%
Information on City's website
Not previously asked
62% 64% City efforts to keep you informed
66%
61%
Programming on City's cable channels
Not previously asked
54% 43% Level of public involvement in local decisions
42%
43% 0%
20%
40%
2004
2008
60%
80%
2013
Trends
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
How Often Residents Watch the City's Government Access Cable Channels by percentage of respondents
2013
2008 Less than once a month 20%
At least once a month 14%
Less than once a month 24% At least once a month 13%
At least once a week 14% At least once a week Everyday 6% 1%
Everyday 2% Don't know 1% Not at all 49%
Not at all 54%
Don't know 2%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 17
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
How Often Residents Watch Public Meetings on the City's Government Access Cable Channels or on the City’s website by percentage of respondents
2008
2013
Once or twice a year 8% Once or twice a year 20%
A few times a year 11%
A few times a year 2% At least once a month 12%
At least once a month 9%
Don't know 1% Almost never 68%
Almost never 68%
Don't know 1%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Sources of Information Currently Used to Get Information About Lee's Summit by percentage of respondents 67% 65%
City publications Lee’s Summit Illustrated, LSPR’s program/activity
50% 44% 42% 38% 38%
Lee’s Summit Journal City website (cityofls.net) Broadcast news television City Scope Quarterly Newsletter Kansas City Star Special message section on water bill Gov’t cable channel e-newsletters Facebook Lee’s Summit Post-Tribune
22% 18% 17% 14% 14%
6% 4% Video streaming on the City’s website 2% Twitter 2% Pinterest 0.4% 0% YouTube 0.3% 0% Public meetings
Nixle
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 18
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Sources of Information Currently Used to Get Information About Lee's Summit - 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents 56%
City publications
67% 63%
Lee’s Summit Illustrated, LSPR’s program/activity
65%
50%
Lee’s Summit Journal
50%
40%
City website (cityofls.net)
44% 47%
Broadcast news television
42%
City Scope Quarterly Newsletter
38%
Kansas City Star
38%
Special message section on water bill
22%
Gov’t cable channel e-newsletters Facebook
18%
31% 31%
Not previously asked
17%
Not previously asked
14% 14%
Lee’s Summit Post-Tribune
14% 7%
Public meetings Nixle
50% 47%
6%
Not previously asked
4%
Video streaming on the City’s website
Not previously asked
Not previously asked
Not previously asked
YouTube
Not previously asked
2% 2% 0% 0.4%
0.3% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
2008 2013
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
80%
Trends
Sources of Information Residents Would Prefer to Receive Information About the City by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices City publications Lee's Summit Illustrated, LSPR's program/activity Lee's Summit Journal City website (cityofls.net) City Scope Quarterly Newsletter Broadcast news television Kansas City Star Governement cable channel Facebook e-newsletters Special message section on water bill Lee's Summit Post-Tribune Public meetings Other Nixle Twitter Video streaming on the City's website YouTube Pinterest
49% 46% 40% 37% 28% 27% 23% 11% 11% 11% 10% 8% 5% 4% 4% 2% 1% 0.4% 0% 0.1% 0%
0% 1st Choice
20% 2nd Choice
40%
60%
3rd Choice
4th Choice
80%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 19
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Have You Had Any Contact with the City of Lee’s Summit During the Past Year? by percentage of respondents
Yes 54%
No 46% Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Which City Department did you contact most recently? by percentage of respondents who had contacted the City during the past year Parks and Recreation Police Water Utilities Animal Control Codes Administration Administration Public Works Operations (Streets) Fire City Clerk Public Works - Admin & Engineering Solid Waste and Environment Planning and Development Finance/Treasury Law Municipal Court Airport Human Resources Procurement and Contract Services Fleet Division
25% 22% 20% 16% 11% 11% 10% 10% 9% 8% 8% 7% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 0.2% 0% 20%
33%
40%
60%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 20
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
How easy was it to reach the person you needed to reach? by percentage of respondents who had contacted the City during the past year
Very easy 60%
Don't Know 5% Very difficult 2% Difficult 3%
Somewhat easy 30% Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
How Often Did the City Employees You Contacted Display the Following Behaviors: by percentage of respondents who had contacted the City during the past year and who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
64%
They were courteous and polite
28%
They gave prompt/accurate/complete answers
55%
32%
They did what they said in a timely manner
56%
30%
53%
They helped resolve an issue to your satisfaction
0% Always (5)
20% Usually (4)
29% 40%
Sometimes (3)
60%
7%2%
9%
4%
8% 6%
10% 8%
80%
100%
Seldom/Never (2/1)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 21
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
How Often Did the City Employees You Contacted Display the Following Behaviors: 2004, 2008 & 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows) 85% They were courteous and polite
87%
92% 70% They gave prompt/accurate/complete answers
76%
87% 72% 72%
They did what they said in a timely manner
86% 68% 66%
They helped resolve an issue to your satisfaction
82% 0%
20%
40%
2004
60%
2008
80%
100%
2013
Trends
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Customer Service Items That Residents Think Are Most Important for the City to Provide by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top two choices
56%
They gave prompt/accurate/complete answers
49%
They did what they said in a timely manner
40%
They helped resolve an issue to your satisfaction
33%
They were courteous and polite
0%
20%
1st Choice
40%
60%
80%
2nd Choice
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 22
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Ratings of the City’s Current Pace of Development by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
Industrial development
10%
34%
Office development 5%
25%
Retail development 5%
24%
Single-family residential development
Multi-family residential development
52%
62%
13%
72%
5%
17%
58%
1%
0%
Much Too Slow (5)
8%
58%
9%
2%
5%
20%
Too Slow (4)
37%
40%
60%
Just Right (3)
80%
100%
Too Fast (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Support for Various Development Incentives by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
Retail development
19%
Industrial development
18%
Multi-family residential development
37%
15%
Office development
Single-family residential development
39%
11%
4%
39%
30%
14%
0% Very Supportive (5)
16%
31%
15%
32%
14%
35%
36%
20%
26%
40%
Supportive (4)
25%
46%
60% Neutral (3)
80%
100%
Not Supportive (1/2)
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 23
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
How supportive would you be of the City becoming more aggressive with attracting commercial development? by percentage of respondents
Very supportive 29%
Supportive 43%
Don't know 4%
Neutral 16%
Not supportive at all 4% Not supportive 4%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
How supportive would you be of the City dedicating an economic development fund for activities or programs targeting commercial development? by percentage of respondents
Supportive 36% Very supportive 14%
Don't Know 7%
Neutral 26%
Not Supportive at all 7% Not Supportive 10%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 24
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Demographics
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Demographics: Number of People Living in the Home by percentage of respondents
Two 43%
One 12%
Five or more 11%
Three 18%
Four 16%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 25
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Demographics: Current Employment Status by percentage of respondents
Employed outside home 61%
Not currently employed 5%
Employed in home 6% Student 1%
Retired 26%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Demographics: Where Residents Work by percentage of respondents
34%
In Lee's Summit
30%
Kansas City, MO
14%
Johnson County, KS
11%
Elsewhere in Jackson County, MO
9%
Independence, MO
Elsewhere in MO
6%
Elsewhere in KS
6% 1%
Clay/Platte Counties in MO
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 26
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Demographics: Do you own or rent your current residence? by percentage of respondents
Own 94%
Rent 6%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Demographics: Number of Years Lived in the City by percentage of respondents
5-14 years 28%
Under 5 years 9% 15-24 years 28%
Not Provided 4%
35+ years 13% 25-34 years 18% Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 27
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Demographics: Total Annual Household Income by percentage of respondents
Under $30,000 5%
Not provided 9% $100,000 or more 40%
$30,000 to $59,999 19%
$60,000 to $99,999 27%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
Demographics: Gender of the Respondents by percentage of respondents
Female 49%
Male 51% Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 28
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Demographics: Approximately how much have you or other members of your household spent on Internet purchases during the past week? by percentage of respondents
None 54%
Less than $50 18%
$50 to $100 12%
$101 to $200 8%
Not provided 1% More than $500 2% $201 to $500 5%
Source: ETC Institute (December 2013 - Lee's Summit, MO)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 29
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Section 2:
Benchmarking Analysis
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 30
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey Overview ETC Institute's DirectionFinder® program was originally developed in 1999 to help community leaders in Kansas and Missouri use statistically valid community survey data as a tool for making better decisions. Since November 1999, the survey has been administered in more than 210 cities and counties in 43 states. This report contains benchmarking data from two sources: (1) an annual national survey that was administered by ETC Institute to a random sample of more than 2,000 residents in the continental United States and (2) surveys that have been administered by ETC Institute in 30 communities in the Kansas City metro area between January 2009 and December 2013. Some of the Kansas and Missouri communities represented in this report include: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Ballwin, Missouri Blue Springs, Missouri Bonner Springs, Kansas Butler, Missouri Columbia, Missouri Excelsior Springs, Missouri Gardner, Kansas Grandview, Missouri Harrisonville, Missouri Independence, Missouri Johnson County, Kansas Kansas City, Missouri Lawrence, Kansas Leawood, Kansas Lee’s Summit, Missouri
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Lenexa, Kansas Liberty, Missouri Merriam, Kansas Mission, Kansas O’Fallon, Missouri Olathe, Kansas Overland Park, Kansas Platte City, Missouri Pleasant Hill, Missouri Raymore, Missouri Riverside, Missouri Roeland Park, Kansas Shawnee, Kansas Spring Hill, Kansas Unified Government of Kansas City and Wyandotte County
National Benchmarks. The first set of charts on the following pages show how the overall results for Lee’s Summit compare to the national average based on the results of an annual survey that was administered by ETC Institute to a random sample of more than 2,000 U.S. residents. This set of charts also includes the average of 10 selected KC metro communities, including: Lenexa, Blue Springs, Olathe, Johnson County, Overland Park, Independence, Kansas City, Jackson County, Liberty and Shawnee. Lastly, this set of charts includes the KC metro average taken from the 30 communities listed above.
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 31
BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS
Benchmarking Analysis
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 32
BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS
Kansas City Metro Benchmarks. The second set of charts show the highest, lowest, and average (mean) levels of satisfaction in the 30 communities listed above. The mean rating is shown as a vertical line, which indicates the average level of satisfaction for the metropolitan Kansas City area. The actual ratings for Lee’s Summit are listed to the right of each chart. The dot on each bar shows how the results for Lee’s Summit compare to the other communities in the Kansas City area where the DirectionFinder® survey has been administered.
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
National Benchmarks (All Communities) Note: The benchmarking data contained in this report is protected intellectual property. Any reproduction of the benchmarking information in this report by persons or organizations not directly affiliated with the City of Lee's Summit is not authorized without written consent from ETC Institute.
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Satisfaction with Issues that Influence Perceptions of the City: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "very satisfied" and 1 was "very dissatisfied" Overall quality of life in the City
83%
71%
90%
80% 90%
The City as a place to live
79%
Overall quality of City services
75%
54%
90%
84% 83%
57% 72%
Overall image of the City
65%
How well the City is managing growth
44%
58% 52%
77%
72% 68%
62%
Overall value received for City taxes/fees
40%
60%
45%
0%
Lee's Summit Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
20%
40%
Selected KC Metro Avg
60%
KC Metro Avg
80%
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Page 33
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Overall Satisfaction with City Services: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "very satisfied" and 1 was "very dissatisfied"
92%
Quality of fire/ambulance services Overall quality of local police protection
80%
73% 73%
86% 86%
Quality of parks/recreation programs/facilities
82%
69% 71%
78%
73% 74% 78%
Water services
77%
Sanitary sewer (wastewater) services
68%
75% 74%
73%
Quality of customer service from City employees
70%
57% 59%
Maintenance of City streets/buildings/facilities
67%
59%
48% 46%
66%
Quality of City communication
63%
48% 46%
63%
66% 61% 60%
Public safety education programs
59%
Quality of City's stormwater runoff/management
52%
65%
62%
57%
Flow of traffic/congestion management
54%
60% 61%
55%
Enforcement of codes
44%
0% Lee's Summit
89%
78% 80%
Selected KC Metro Avg
20%
40%
KC Metro Avg
60%
50%
60%
80%
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Overall Satisfaction with Public Safety Services: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "very satisfied" and 1 was "very dissatisfied" 92%
88% 85%
Overall quality of local fire protection
90%
88%
Quality of local ambulance service
74%
85%
87% 86%
88% 83%
How quickly fire personnel respond to emergencies
87%
76%
72% 74%
How quickly police respond to emergencies
72%
Visibility of police in neighborhoods
75%
66%
53%
57%
Visibility of police in retail/business areas
54%
73%
63%
60% 70%
67% 63%
Efforts to prevent crime
62%
68%
Efforts to enhance fire protection
66%
75%
65% 58% 54%
Quality of animal control
67%
59%
0% Lee's Summit Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
20%
40%
Selected KC Metro Avg
60%
KC Metro Avg
80%
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Page 34
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
How Safe Residents Feel in Their Community: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "very safe" and 1 was "very unsafe"
96% 93% In their neighborhood during the day
92% 92%
88% 81% In their neighborhood at night
73% 69% 0% Lee's Summit
20%
40%
Selected KC Metro Avg
60%
80%
KC Metro Avg
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Overall Satisfaction with City Services: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "very satisfied" and 1 was "very dissatisfied"
81%
Cleanliness of City streets & other public areas
77%
66%
64%
72%
68%
Maintenance of traffic signals/street signs
78%
77% 72% Snow removal on major City streets
69%
76%
65% 68%
Maintenance of City streets
51%
59%
59% 60%
53% 48%
Maintenance of City sidewalks
52% 54%
Snow removal on neighborhood streets
45%
58%
49%
32%
33% 30%
Public transportation system
0% Lee's Summit Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
20%
40%
Selected KC Metro Avg
43% 60% KC Metro Avg
80%
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Page 35
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Overall Satisfaction with City Code Enforcement: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "very satisfied" and 1 was "very dissatisfied"
60% 50% 51%
Clean up of litter & debris
47%
56% 59% 57%
Enforcing sign regulations
56%
50% 48% 49%
Enforcing mowing on private property
48%
50% 48% 45%
Enforcing maintenance of residential property
48% 0%
Lee's Summit
20%
40%
Selected KC Metro Avg
60%
80%
KC Metro Avg
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Overall Satisfaction with Parks and Recreation: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "very satisfied" and 1 was "very dissatisfied"
86%
82%
The number of City parks
62%
71% 85%
82%
Maintenance of City parks
70%
77% 73%
71%
Number of walking/biking trails
53%
55% 70%
66% 67%
The City's youth athletic programs
69% 67%
65% 63%
Ease of registering for programs
62% 66%
60%
The City's adult athletic programs
51%
51% 0% Lee's Summit Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
20%
40%
Selected KC Metro Avg
60% KC Metro Avg
80%
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Page 36
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Overall Satisfaction with City Communication: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "very satisfied" and 1 was "very dissatisfied"
71% 67%
Availability of City programs/services information
47% 53% 62% 59% 54% 59%
Quality of information on City's website
61% 60%
City's efforts to keep you informed
44% 48% 54% 44% 45%
Quality of City's cable channels
60% 43% 41% 39% 41%
Public involvement in local decisions
0%
20%
40%
Selected KC Metro Avg
Lee's Summit
60%
80%
KC Metro Avg
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Overall Satisfaction with City Customer Service: City of Lee's Summit vs. Selected KC Metro vs. KC Metro vs. U.S. by percentage of respondents who rated the item 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale where 5 was "always" and 1 was "never"
92% 92%
The were courteous and polite
68%
69%
87% 84%
Promptness/accuracy/completeness of answers
56%
61%
86% 83%
They were timely in their response
55%
56%
82% 78%
Resolved my issue to my satisfaction
53%
56% 0% Lee's Summit Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
20%
40%
Selected KC Metro Avg
60%
KC Metro Avg
80%
100%
U.S. Avg
National Benchmarking Data - All Communities
Page 37
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Metropolitan Kansas City Benchmarks
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Perceptions that Kansas City Area Residents Have of the City in Which They Live in 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO 29%
Overall quality of life in the City
22%
Overall image of the City
36%
Overall quality of City services
Overall value received for City taxes/fees
How well the City is managing growth
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
90%
96%
72%
92%
24%
81%
18% 51% 20%
40%
90% 60%
80%
83% 62% 68%
78%
The City as a place to live
0%
97%
90%
100%
LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Page 38
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with City Leadership in the Kansas City Area in 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO
80%
60%
79%
60%
38%
Leadership of elected officials
35%
Leadership of the City Manager/staff
24%
Leadership of appointed boards/commissioners
0%
75%
20%
40%
60%
54%
80% 100%
LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Overall Satisfaction With City Services Provided by Cities in the Kansas City Area in 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO 97% 86%
31%
Quality of parks/recreation programs/facilities
Overall quality of local police protection
52%
Sanitary sewer (wastewater) services
51% 22%
Maintenance of City streets/buildings/facilities
30%
Quality of customer service from City employees
25%
Quality of City communication
44%
Public safety education programs Enforcement of codes
0%
28% 20%
77%
89%
78%
88%
67%
88%
73%
82%
32%
Flow of traffic/congestion management
60%
66% 59%
78%
57%
78%
63%
73% 40%
86%
89%
83%
32%
Quality of City's stormwater runoff/management
ETC Institute (2013)
94%
54%
Water services
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
96% 92%
59%
Quality of fire/ambulance services
55%
80% 100%
LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Page 39
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with Various Public Safety Services Provided by Cities in the Kansas City Area in 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO 95% 88%
65%
Quality of local ambulance service
94% 92%
52%
Overall quality of local fire protection
55%
How quickly police respond to emergencies
69%
How quickly fire personnel respond to emergencies
41%
Visibility of police in neighborhoods
58%
Efforts to enhance fire protection Quality of animal control
40%
Visibility of police in retail/business areas
41%
0%
76%
92%
86%
88%
70%
87%
75%
86%
68%
32%
Efforts to prevent crime
92%
67%
79%
73%
74%
20% 40% 60% 80% 100% LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Feeling of Safety in Communities in the Kansas City Area in 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO
82%
In their neighborhood during the day
0% Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
92%
52%
In their neighborhood at night
20%
40%
99% 96%
60%
80%
88%
100%
LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Page 40
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with City Services Provided by Cities in the Kansas City Area in 2012 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO 41%
Snow removal on major City streets
33%
Cleanliness of City streets & other public areas
22%
Snow removal on neighborhood streets
39%
Maintenance of traffic signals/street signs
93%
72%
93%
81%
90%
54%
89%
72%
Maintenance of City sidewalks
21%
88%
60%
Maintenance of City streets
21%
87%
68%
27%
Maintenance/preservation of Downtown
82%
23%
Public transportation system
0%
32%
43%
20%
40%
60%
82%
80% 100%
LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Satisfaction with Code Enforcement by Cities in the Kansas City Area in 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO Enforcing maintenance of business property
Enforcing sign regulations
Enforcing mowing on private property
24%
30%
19%
23%
Enforcing maintenance of residential property
22%
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
60%
76%
56%
74%
Clean up of litter & debris
0%
77%
20%
50%
72%
60%
68% 40%
60%
80%
50% 100%
LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Page 41
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Satisfaction with Parks and Recreation Services Provided by Cities in the Kansas City Area in 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO
Number of walking/biking trails
31%
The City's youth athletic programs
19%
The City's adult athletic programs
18%
Fees charged for recreation programs
0%
88%
17%
The number of City parks
Ease of registering for programs
97% 85%
44%
Maintenance of City parks
73% 86%
86% 82%
26% 31% 20%
70%
80%
66%
79%
67% 60%
72% 40%
60%
80%
100%
LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Source: ETC Institute (2013)
Satisfaction with Various Aspects of City Communication Provided by Cities in the Kansas City Area in 2013 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale
Lee's Summit, MO Availability of City programs/services information
30%
City's efforts to keep you informed
30%
Public involvement in local decisions
0% Source: ETC Institute (2013)
ETC Institute (2013)
79%
38%
Quality of information on City's website
Quality of City's cable channels
84% 71%
23%
20% 20%
40%
76%
61%
62%
64%
54%
62%
43%
60%
80% 100%
LOW---------MEAN--------HIGH New Highs Set Are Underlined in Blue
Page 42
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Section 3:
Importance-Satisfaction Analysis
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 43
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Importance‐Satisfaction Analysis City of Lee’s Summit 2013 Citizen Survey
Overview Today, city officials have limited resources which need to be targeted to activities that are of the most benefit to their citizens. Two of the most important criteria for decision making are (1) to target resources toward services of the highest importance to citizens; and (2) to target resources toward those services where citizens are the least satisfied. The Importance‐Satisfaction (IS) rating is a unique tool that allows public officials to better understand both of these highly important decision making criteria for each of the services they are providing. The Importance‐Satisfaction rating is based on the concept that cities will maximize overall citizen satisfaction by emphasizing improvements in those service categories where the level of satisfaction is relatively low and the perceived importance of the service is relatively high.
Methodology The rating is calculated by summing the percentage of responses for items selected as the most important services for the City to provide. This sum is then multiplied by 1 minus the percentage of respondents that indicated they were positively satisfied with the City's performance in the related area (the sum of the ratings of 4 and 5 on a 5‐point scale excluding “don't know” responses). “Don't know” responses are excluded from the calculation to ensure that the satisfaction ratings among service categories are comparable. [IS=Importance x (1‐ Satisfaction)]. Example of the Calculation. Respondents were asked to identify the overall City services they thought were most important for the City to emphasize over the next two years. Approximately sixty percent (59.5%) selected the “maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities” as one of the most important overall City services for the City to provide.
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 44
Importance‐Satisfaction Analysis
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Interpreting the Ratings Ratings that are greater than or equal to 0.20 identify areas that should receive significantly more emphasis over the next two years. Ratings from .10 to .20 identify service areas that should receive increased emphasis. Ratings less than .10 should continue to receive the current level of emphasis. Definitely Increase Emphasis (IS>=0.20) Increase Current Emphasis (0.10<=IS<0.20) Maintain Current Emphasis (IS<0.10) The results for Lee’s Summit are provided on the following page.
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 45
Importance‐Satisfaction Analysis
With regard to satisfaction, approximately sixty‐seven percent (67.4%) of the residents surveyed rated their overall satisfaction with the “maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities” as a “4” or a “5” on a 5‐point scale (where “5” means “very satisfied”). The I‐S rating for the “maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities” was calculated by multiplying the sum of the most important percentages by 1 minus the sum of the satisfaction percentages. In this example, 59.5% was multiplied by 32.6% (1‐0.674). This calculation yielded an I‐S rating of 0.1940, which ranked first out of fifteen Major City Services. The maximum rating is 1.00 and would be achieved when 100% of the respondents select an item as one of their most important choices and 0% indicate that they are positively satisfied with the delivery of the service. The lowest rating is 0.00 and could be achieved under either one of the following two situations: if 100% of the respondents were positively satisfied with the delivery of the service if none (0%) of the respondents selected the service as one of the most important areas for the City to provide.
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Importance-Satisfaction Rating City of Lee's Summit
Overall City Services Category of Service
Most Most ImportanceImportant Important Satisfaction Satisfaction Satisfaction % Rank % Rank Rating
I-S Rating Rank
High Priority (IS .10-.20)
Maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Overall quality of police services
60% 27% 84%
3 6 1
67% 57% 86%
7 13 2
0.1940 0.1179 0.1169
1 2 3
34% 16% 77% 10% 28% 14% 7% 6% 6% 4% 4% 2%
4 7 2 9 5 8 10 11 12 14 13 15
78% 57% 92% 55% 86% 77% 59% 66% 73% 60% 63% 57%
4 12 1 15 3 5 11 8 6 10 9 14
0.0741 0.0707 0.0622 0.0428 0.0396 0.0327 0.0301 0.0197 0.0154 0.0152 0.0141 0.0095
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Medium Priority (IS <.10)
Overall quality of water services Overall quality of new commercial development in the City Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance) Enforcement of private property/building maintenance ordinances Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services Quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system Overall quality of communication Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City Overall quality of public safety education programs Overall quality of municipal court
Note: The I-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" % by (1-'Satisfaction' %) Most Important %:
The "Most Important" percentage represents the sum of the first, second, third and fourth most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years.
Satisfaction %:
The "Satisfaction" percentage represents the sum of the ratings "4" and "5" excluding 'don't knows.' Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with the each of the items on a scale of 1 to 5 with "5" being very satisfied and "1" being very dissatisfied.
Š 2013 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 46
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Importance-Satisfaction Rating City of Lee's Summit
Police Services
Category of Service
Most Most Important Important % Rank
Satisfaction %
ImportanceSatisfaction Satisfaction I-S Rating Rank Rank Rating
Very High Priority (IS >.20)
Efforts to prevent crime
72%
2
70%
5
0.2163
1
74% 69%
1 3
75% 76%
3 2
0.1862 0.1649
2 3
33% 28% 7%
4 5 6
73% 80% 67%
4 1 6
0.0892 0.0570 0.0228
4 5 6
High Priority (IS .10-.20)
The visibility of police in neighborhoods How quickly the police department responds to emergencies Medium Priority (IS <.10)
The visibility of police in business districts Overall professionalism of police employees Quality of animal control
Note: The I-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" % by (1-'Satisfaction' %) Most Important %:
The "Most Important" percentage represents the sum of the first, second, and third most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years.
Satisfaction %:
The "Satisfaction" percentage represents the sum of the ratings "4" and "5" excluding 'don't knows.' Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with the each of the items on a scale of 1 to 5 with "5" being very satisfied and "1" being very dissatisfied.
Š 2013 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 47
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Importance-Satisfaction Rating City of Lee's Summit
Fire and Emergency Medical Services Category of Service
Most Most Important Important Satisfaction % Rank %
ImportanceSatisfaction Satisfaction Rank Rating
I-S Rating Rank
Medium Priority (IS <.10)
How quickly the fire department responds to emergencies Overall quality of ambulance service Overall quality of local fire protection Efforts to enhance fire prevention The number of fire stations Visibility of fire department personnel
62% 46% 59% 8% 9% 2%
1 3 2 5 4 6
86% 88% 92% 68% 84% 82%
3 2 1 6 4 5
0.0847 0.0574 0.0455 0.0262 0.0148 0.0035
1 2 3 4 5 6
Note: The I-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" % by (1-'Satisfaction' %) Most Important %:
The "Most Important" percentage represents the sum of the first and second most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years.
Satisfaction %:
The "Satisfaction" percentage represents the sum of the ratings "4" and "5" excluding 'don't knows.' Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with the each of the items on a scale of 1 to 5 with "5" being very satisfied and "1" being very dissatisfied.
Š 2013 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 48
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Importance-Satisfaction Rating City of Lee's Summit
City Services Category of Service
Most Important %
Most Important Rank
ImportanceSatisfaction Satisfaction Satisfaction % Rank Rating
82% 48%
1 3
68% 54%
5 8
0.2634 0.2222
1 2
64% 42%
2 4
72% 72%
4 3
0.1816 0.1184
3 4
23% 26% 10% 29% 10% 7% 19% 6%
7 6 9 5 10 11 8 12
60% 66% 32% 81% 51% 47% 82% 53%
7 6 12 2 10 11 1 9
0.0948 0.0878 0.0662 0.0551 0.0467 0.0373 0.0353 0.0291
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
I-S Rating Rank
Very High Priority (IS >.20)
Maintenance of city streets Snow removal on neighborhood streets High Priority (IS .10-.20)
Snow removal on major city streets Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs Medium Priority (IS <.10)
Maintenance of sidewalks in the city Maintenance of stormwater drainage system Adequacy of public transportation system Cleanliness of city streets/other public areas Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Maintenance/preservation of downtown Adequacy of shared use path/trail system
Note: The I-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" % by (1-'Satisfaction' %) Most Important %:
The "Most Important" percentage represents the sum of the first, second, third and fourth most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years.
Satisfaction %:
The "Satisfaction" percentage represents the sum of the ratings "4" and "5" excluding 'don't knows.' Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with the each of the items on a scale of 1 to 5 with "5" being very satisfied and "1" being very dissatisfied.
Š 2013 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 49
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Importance-Satisfaction Rating City of Lee's Summit
City Code Enforcement
Category of Service
Most Important %
Most ImportanceImportant Satisfaction Satisfaction Satisfaction I-S Rating Rank Rank % Rank Rating
High Priority (IS .10-.20)
Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris Enforcing the maintenance of residential property
Enforcing the mowing of grass/weeds on private property
49% 34% 26%
1 3 4
60% 50% 50%
2 5 6
0.1951 0.1688 0.1278
1 2 3
22% 48% 7%
5 2 6
60% 85% 56%
3 1 4
0.0871 0.0708 0.0299
4 5 6
Medium Priority (IS <.10)
Enforcing the maintenance of business property Overall appearance of the City Enforcing sign regulations
Note: The I-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" % by (1-'Satisfaction' %) Most Important %:
The "Most Important" percentage represents the sum of the first and second most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years.
Satisfaction %:
The "Satisfaction" percentage represents the sum of the ratings "4" and "5" excluding 'don't knows.' Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with the each of the items on a scale of 1 to 5 with "5" being very satisfied and "1" being very dissatisfied.
Š 2013 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 50
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Importance-Satisfaction Rating City of Lee's Summit
Parks and Recreation Category of Service
Most Important %
Most Important Rank
ImportanceSatisfaction Satisfaction Satisfaction % Rank Rating
74% 34%
1 2
85% 70%
2 10
0.1109 0.1028
1 2
32% 19% 21% 24% 14% 20% 12% 17% 10% 25% 13% 11% 9% 3% 1%
3 8 6 5 10 7 12 9 14 4 11 13 15 16 17
73% 60% 69% 79% 68% 80% 66% 78% 65% 86% 72% 73% 67% 71% 69%
6 17 11 4 13 3 15 5 16 1 8 7 14 9 12
0.0864 0.0748 0.0663 0.0486 0.0437 0.0412 0.0394 0.0363 0.0356 0.0356 0.0350 0.0290 0.0281 0.0081 0.0041
3 4
I-S Rating Rank
High Priority (IS .10-.20)
Maintenance of city parks Youth Athletic Programs Medium Priority (IS <.10)
Miles of walking/biking trails Fees charged for activities Other recreation programs Downtown Summer Music Festivals Number of playgrounds Legacy Park Community Center Adult Athletic Programs Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Youth Sports Practice Areas Number of city parks Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Parks and Recreation Board Gamber Community Center Ease of registering for programs Harris Park Community Center Hartman Park Sports Area
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Note: The I-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" % by (1-'Satisfaction' %) Most Important %:
The "Most Important" percentage represents the sum of the first, second, third and fourth most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years.
Satisfaction %:
The "Satisfaction" percentage represents the sum of the ratings "4" and "5" excluding 'don't knows.' Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with the each of the items on a scale of 1 to 5 with "5" being very satisfied and "1" being very dissatisfied.
Š 2013 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 51
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Importance-Satisfaction Rating City of Lee's Summit
Customer Service
Category of Service
Most Important %
Most Important Rank
56% 40% 49% 33%
1 3 2 4
ImportanceSatisfaction Satisfaction Satisfaction I-S Rating % Rank Rating Rank
Medium Priority (IS <.10)
They gave prompt, accurate, and complete answers to questions They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction They did what they said they would do in a timely manner They were courteous and polite
87% 82% 86% 92%
2 4 3 1
0.0743 0.0742 0.0692 0.0278
1 2 3 4
Note: The I-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" % by (1-'Satisfaction' %) Most Important %:
The "Most Important" percentage represents the sum of the first and second most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years.
Satisfaction %:
The "Satisfaction" percentage represents the sum of the ratings "4" and "5" excluding 'don't knows.' Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with the each of the items on a scale of 1 to 5 with "5" being very satisfied and "1" being very dissatisfied.
Š 2013 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 52
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
The Importance‐Satisfaction rating is based on the concept that public agencies will maximize overall customer satisfaction by emphasizing improvements in those areas where the level of satisfaction is relatively low and the perceived importance of the service is relatively high. ETC Institute developed an Importance‐Satisfaction Matrix to display the perceived importance of major services that were assessed on the survey against the perceived quality of service delivery. The two axes on the matrix represent Satisfaction (vertical) and relative Importance (horizontal). The I‐S (Importance‐Satisfaction) matrix should be interpreted as follows. Continued Emphasis (above average importance and above average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is meeting customer expectations. Items in this area have a significant impact on the customer’s overall level of satisfaction. The City should maintain (or slightly increase) emphasis on items in this area. Exceeding Expectations (below average importance and above average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is performing significantly better than customers expect the City to perform. Items in this area do not significantly affect the overall level of satisfaction that residents have with City services. The City should maintain (or slightly decrease) emphasis on items in this area. Opportunities for Improvement (above average importance and below average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is not performing as well as residents expect the City to perform. This area has a significant impact on customer satisfaction, and the City should DEFINITELY increase emphasis on items in this area. Less Important (below average importance and below average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is not performing well relative to the City’s performance in other areas; however, this area is generally considered to be less important to residents. This area does not significantly affect overall satisfaction with City services because the items are less important to residents. The agency should maintain current levels of emphasis on items in this area. Matrices showing the results for Lee’s Summit are provided on the following pages.
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 53
Importance‐Satisfaction Analysis
Importance‐Satisfaction Matrix Analysis.
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
2013 Lee's Summit Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -Overall City Services(points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and Satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey)
mean importance
Continued Emphasis
Exceeded Expectations
higher importance/higher Satisfaction
lower importance/higher Satisfaction
!
Quality of police services
and recreation programs/facilities
Quality of sanitary sewer Quality of customer services Quality of public safety education programs
!
!Quality of water services ! Maintenance of streets/
!Communication
municipal buildings/ facilities
! Flow of traffic/congestion management
Enforcement of private property/ building ordinances
Less Important
Opportunities for Improvement
lower importance/lower Satisfaction
Lower Importance Source: ETC Institute (2013) ETC Institute (2013)
!
!
! New commercial Programs to connect citizens w/ City ! development ! Quality of municipal court! ! ! Quality of stormwater runoff/stormwater management system
Quality of fire/emergency medical services
mean satisfaction
Satisfaction Rating
! Quality of parks
higher importance/lower Satisfaction
Importance Rating
Higher Importance Page 54
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
2013 Lee's Summit Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -Police Services(points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and Satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey)
mean importance
Continued Emphasis
Exceeded Expectations
higher importance/higher Satisfaction
lower importance/higher Satisfaction
! How quickly police respond to emergencies
!
Visibility of police in neighborhoods
!
Visibility of police in business districts
Efforts to prevent crime
!
!
mean Satisfaction
Satisfaction Rating
Overall professionalism of police employees
!Quality of animal control Less Important
Opportunities for Improvement higher importance/lower Satisfaction
lower importance/lower Satisfaction
Lower Importance Source: ETC Institute (2013) ETC Institute (2013)
Importance Rating
Higher Importance Page 55
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
2013 Lee's Summit Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -Fire and Emergency Medical Services(points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and Satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey)
mean importance
Continued Emphasis
Exceeded Expectations
higher importance/higher Satisfaction
Quality of local fire protection
!
!
Quality of ambulance service How quickly fire department respond to emergencies
!Number of fire stations
!
!Visibility of fire department personnel
satisfaction Agreement
Satisfaction Rating
lower importance/higher Satisfaction
!Efforts to enhance fire prevention Less Important
Opportunities for Improvement
lower importance/lower Satisfaction
Lower Importance Source: ETC Institute (2013) ETC Institute (2013)
higher importance/lower Satisfaction
Importance Rating
Higher Importance Page 56
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
2013 Lee's Summit Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -City Services(points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and Satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey)
mean importance
Continued Emphasis
Exceeded Expectations
higher importance/higher Satisfaction
lower importance/higher Satisfaction
Cleanliness of city streets/other public areas
!
Satisfaction Rating
Snow removal on major city streets Maintenance of city streets
!Maintenance of Maintenance of stormwater drainage system Maintenance of sidewalks in the city Adequacy of shared use path/trail system
!
Adequacy of bicycling accommodations
!
!
!
traffic signals/ street signs
!
! !Snow removal on
!Adequacy of
neighborhood streets
sidewalks
!Adequacy of public Less Important
transportation system
Opportunities for Improvement
lower importance/lower Satisfaction
Lower Importance Source: ETC Institute (2013) ETC Institute (2013)
higher importance/lower Satisfaction
Importance Rating
Higher Importance Page 57
mean satisfaction
!
Maintenance/preservation of downtown
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
2013 Lee's Summit Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -City Code Enforcement(points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and Satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey)
mean importance
Continued Emphasis
Satisfaction Rating
lower importance/higher Satisfaction
Overall appearance of the city
!Enforcing
maintenance of Enforcing sign business regulations property Enforcing mowing of grass/weeds on private property
!
!
Less Important
Enforcing clean-up of litter/debris
Source: ETC Institute (2013) ETC Institute (2013)
!
!Enforcing maintenance of residential property
Opportunities for Improvement higher importance/lower Satisfaction
lower importance/lower Satisfaction
Lower Importance
!
higher importance/higher Satisfaction
satisfaction Agreement
Exceeded Expectations
Importance Rating
Higher Importance Page 58
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
2013 Lee's Summit Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -Parks and Recreation(points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and Satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey)
mean importance
Continued Emphasis
Exceeded Expectations
higher importance/higher Satisfaction
lower importance/higher Satisfaction
!
Maintenance of city parks
Legacy Park community center Legacy Park youth sports fields
! !Downtown summer music festivals
!
Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit parks and recreation board Gamber community center
!
!
Harris Park community center Number of playgrounds Hartman Park sports area
!
!Miles of walking/biking trails
!
! ! !
satisfaction Agreement
Satisfaction Rating
! Number of city parks
Other recreation programs
!
!
!Youth athletic programs
Ease of registering for programs Youth sports practice areas Adult athletic programs
!
Fees charged for activities
Less Important
Opportunities for Improvement higher importance/lower Satisfaction
lower importance/lower Satisfaction
Lower Importance Source: ETC Institute (2013) ETC Institute (2013)
Importance Rating
Higher Importance Page 59
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
2013 Lee's Summit Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -Customer Service(points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and Satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey)
mean importance
Continued Emphasis
Exceeded Expectations
higher importance/higher Satisfaction
lower importance/higher Satisfaction
!
satisfaction Agreement
Satisfaction Rating
!They were courteous and polite
They did what they said they would do in a timely matter
They gave prompt, accurate and complete answers to questions
!
!
They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction
Less Important
Opportunities for Improvement
lower importance/lower Satisfaction
Lower Importance Source: ETC Institute (2013) ETC Institute (2013)
higher importance/lower Satisfaction
Importance Rating
Higher Importance Page 60
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Section 4:
GIS Mapping
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 61
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Interpreting the Maps The maps on the following pages show the mean ratings for several questions by Census Block Group within Lee’s Summit, Missouri. If all areas on a map are the same color, then most residents in the City generally feel the same about that issue. When reading the maps, please use the following color scheme as a guide: • DARK/LIGHT BLUE shades generally indicate POSITIVE ratings. Shades of blue generally indicate higher levels of satisfaction, higher likelihood, higher safety ratings, higher agreement ratings or higher levels of support for the issue in question. For Question 25, shades of blue indicate higher “much too slow” or “too slow” ratings. • OFF-WHITE shades indicate NEUTRAL ratings. Shades of off-white generally indicate that residents thought the quality of service delivery is adequate or that residents were neutral about the issue in question. For Question 25, shades of tan indicate higher “just right” ratings. • ORANGE/RED shades indicate NEGATIVE ratings. Shades of orange/red generally indicate higher levels dissatisfaction, lower levels of likelihood, lower safety ratings, lower agreement ratings and/or lower levels of support for the item in question. For Question 25, shades of red indicate higher “much too fast” or “too fast” ratings.
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 62
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Location of Survey Respondents
2013 Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Citizen Survey ETC Institute (2013)
Page 63
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q1a. Overall image of City Government
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 64
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q1b. How well the City is managing growth
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 65
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q1c. Overall quality of life in the City
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 66
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q1d. Overall quality of services provided by the City of Lee’s Summit
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 67
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q1e. Overall value that you receive for your City tax dollars and fees
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 68
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q2a. Overall quality of leadership provided by your City elected officials
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 69
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q2b. Overall effectiveness of appointed boards and commissions
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 70
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q2c. Overall effectiveness of the City Manager and professional staff
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 71
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q3a. Rate of growth in Lee’s Summit
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 72
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q3b. Quality of business growth
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 73
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q3c. Quality of residential growth
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 74
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q4a. Recommend the City of Lee’s Summit to others as a place to live
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Likely at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Likely 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Likely
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Likely Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 75
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q4b. Recommend the City of Lee’s Summit to others as a place to do business
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Likely at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Likely 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Likely
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Likely Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 76
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q4c. Recommend the City of Lee’s Summit’s financial health to a visitor
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Likely at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Likely 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Likely
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Likely Other (no responses) Page 77
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5a. Overall quality of police services
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 78
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5b. Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 79
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5c. Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 80
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5d. Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 81
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5e. Overall enforcement of private property/ building maintenance ordinances
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 82
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5f. Overall quality of public safety education programs
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 83
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5g. Overall quality of customer service you receive from City employees
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 84
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5h. Overall quality of communication
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 85
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5i. Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 86
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5j. Overall quality of new commercial development in the City
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 87
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5k. Overall quality of the City’s stormwater runoff/ stormwater management system
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 88
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5l. Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Lee’s Summit
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 89
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5m. Overall quality of water services
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 90
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5n. Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 91
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5o. Overall quality of municipal court
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 92
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q7a. The visibility of police in neighborhoods
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 93
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q7b. The visibility of police in business districts
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 94
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q7c. Efforts to prevent crime
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 95
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q7d. Overall professionalism of police employees
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 96
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q7e. How quickly the police department responds to emergencies
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 97
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q7f. Quality of animal control
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 98
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q9a. Overall quality of local fire protection
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 99
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q9b. Overall quality of ambulance service
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 100
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q9c. Visibility of fire department personnel
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 101
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q9d. Efforts to enhance fire prevention
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 102
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q9e. The number of fire stations
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 103
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q9f. How quickly the fire department responds to emergencies
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 104
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q11a. Feeling of safety in your neighborhood during the day
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Unsafe 1.8‐2.6 Unsafe 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Safe
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Safe Other (no responses) Page 105
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q11b. Feeling of safety in your neighborhood at night
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Unsafe 1.8‐2.6 Unsafe 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Safe
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Safe Other (no responses) Page 106
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q11c. Feeling of safety in City parks during the day
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Unsafe 1.8‐2.6 Unsafe 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Safe
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Safe Other (no responses) Page 107
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q11d. Feeling of safety in City parks at night
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Unsafe 1.8‐2.6 Unsafe 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Safe
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Safe Other (no responses) Page 108
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q11e. Feeling of safety while traveling on City streets
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Unsafe 1.8‐2.6 Unsafe 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Safe
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Safe Other (no responses) Page 109
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q11f. Feeling of safety in other public areas in Lee’s Summit
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Unsafe 1.8‐2.6 Unsafe 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Safe
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Safe Other (no responses) Page 110
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q11g. Overall feeling of safety in Lee’s Summit
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Unsafe 1.8‐2.6 Unsafe 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Safe
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Safe Other (no responses) Page 111
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12a. Maintenance of City streets
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 112
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12b. Maintenance of sidewalks in the City
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 113
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12c. Maintenance of City traffic signals/street signs
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 114
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12d. Adequacy of the public transportation system
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 115
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12e. Adequacy of sidewalks
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 116
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12f. Adequacy of the shared use path/trail system
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 117
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12g. Adequacy of bicycling accommodations
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 118
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12h. Maintenance and preservation of downtown Lee’s Summit
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 119
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12i. Snow removal on major City streets
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 120
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12j. Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 121
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12k. Overall cleanliness of City streets and other public areas
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 122
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12l. Maintenance of stormwater drainage system
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 123
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q14a. Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 124
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q14b. Enforcing the mowing of grass and weeds on private property
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 125
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q14c. Enforcing the maintenance of residential property
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 126
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q14d. Enforcing the maintenance of business property
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 127
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q14e. Enforcing sign regulations
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 128
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q14f. Overall appearance of the City
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 129
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q16a. Reliability of water pressure in your home
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 130
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q16b. The availability of account information
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 131
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q16c. Overall quality of customer service
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 132
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17a. Lee’s Summit Parks and Recreation Board
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 133
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17b. Maintenance of City parks
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 134
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17c. Number of City parks
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 135
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17d. Miles of walking/biking trails
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 136
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17e. Legacy Park Community Center
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 137
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17f. Harris Park Community Center
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 138
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17g. Gamber Community Center
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 139
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17h. Hartman Park Sports Area
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 140
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17i. Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 141
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17j. Youth Sports Practice Areas
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 142
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17k. Youth Athletic Programs
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 143
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17l. Adult Athletic Programs
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 144
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17m. Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 145
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17n. Ease of registering for programs
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 146
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17o. Fees charged for activities
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 147
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17p. Number of playgrounds
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 148
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17q. Downtown Summer Music Festivals
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 149
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q19a. The availability of information about City programs and services
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 150
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q19b. City efforts to keep you informed about local issues
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 151
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q19c. The level of public involvement in local decision-making
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 152
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q19d. Information provided on the City’s website
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses) Page 153
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q19e. Programming on the City’s government access cable channels
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8‐2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Satisfied
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Satisfied Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 154
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q24c-A. They were courteous and polite
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Never 1.8‐2.6 Seldom 2.6‐3.4 Sometimes 3.4‐4.2 Usually
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Always Other (no responses) Page 155
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q24c-B. They gave prompt, accurate, and complete answers to questions
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Never 1.8‐2.6 Seldom 2.6‐3.4 Sometimes 3.4‐4.2 Usually
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Always Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 156
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q24c-C. They did what they said they would do in a timely manner
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Never 1.8‐2.6 Seldom 2.6‐3.4 Sometimes 3.4‐4.2 Usually
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Always Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 157
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q24c-D. They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Never 1.8‐2.6 Seldom 2.6‐3.4 Sometimes 3.4‐4.2 Usually
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Always Other (no responses) Page 158
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q25a. Pace of office development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Much Too fast 1.8‐2.6 Too Fast 2.6‐3.4 Just RIght 3.4‐4.2 Too Slow
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Much Too Slow Other (no responses) Page 159
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q25b. Pace of industrial development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Much Too fast 1.8‐2.6 Too Fast 2.6‐3.4 Just RIght 3.4‐4.2 Too Slow
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Much Too Slow Other (no responses) Page 160
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q25c. Pace of multi-family residential development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Much Too fast 1.8‐2.6 Too Fast 2.6‐3.4 Just RIght 3.4‐4.2 Too Slow
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Much Too Slow Other (no responses) Page 161
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q25d. Pace of single-family residential development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Much Too fast 1.8‐2.6 Too Fast 2.6‐3.4 Just RIght 3.4‐4.2 Too Slow
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Much Too Slow Other (no responses) Page 162
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q25e. Pace of retail development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Much Too fast 1.8‐2.6 Too Fast 2.6‐3.4 Just RIght 3.4‐4.2 Too Slow
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Much Too Slow Other (no responses) Page 163
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q26a. Support to encourage office development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Support. at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Supportive 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Supportive
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Supportive Other (no responses) Page 164
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q26b. Support to encourage industrial development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Support. at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Supportive 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Supportive
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Supportive Other (no responses) Page 165
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q26c. Support to encourage multi-family residential development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Support. at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Supportive 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Supportive
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Supportive Other (no responses) Page 166
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q26d. Support to encourage single-family residential development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Support. at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Supportive 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Supportive
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Supportive Other (no responses) Page 167
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q26e. Support to encourage retail development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Support. at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Supportive 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Supportive
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
4.2‐5.0 Very Supportive Other (no responses) Page 168
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q27. Support for the City becoming more aggressive with attracting commercial development
LEGEND Mean rating on a 5‐point scale, where:
1.0‐1.8 Not Support. at All 1.8‐2.6 Not Supportive 2.6‐3.4 Neutral 3.4‐4.2 Supportive
2013 Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey
4.2‐5.0 Very Supportive Other (no responses)
Shading - mean rating for all respondents by CBG (merged as needed)
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 169
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Section 5:
Tabular Data
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 170
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q1. Several items that may influence your Perception of the City of Lee's Summit are listed below. Please rate each item on a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied." (N=919) Satisfied 54.8%
Neutral 22.7%
Q1b. How well the City is managing growth
12.5%
52.6%
21.1%
8.3%
1.6%
3.8%
Q1c. Overall quality of life in the City
33.0%
55.8%
8.1%
1.7%
0.2%
1.1%
Q1d. Overall quality of services provided by the City of Lee's Summit
21.3%
60.2%
13.3%
3.6%
0.5%
1.1%
Q1e. Overall value that you receive for your City tax dollars and fees
13.8%
47.3%
26.5%
8.2%
2.6%
1.6%
Q1a. Overall image of City Government
Dissatisfied 3.2%
Very Dissatisfied 1.3%
Very Satisfied 14.0%
Don't Know 4.0%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q1. Several items that may influence your Perception of the City of Lee's Summit are listed below. Please rate each item on a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied." (Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q1a. Overall image of City Government
Very Satisfied 14.6%
Satisfied 57.1%
Neutral 23.7%
Dissatisfied 3.3%
Very Dissatisfied 1.4%
Q1b. How well the City is managing growth
13.0%
54.7%
22.0%
8.6%
1.7%
Q1c. Overall quality of life in the City
33.4%
56.5%
8.2%
1.8%
0.2%
Q1d. Overall quality of services provided by the City of Lee's Summit
21.5%
60.8%
13.5%
3.6%
0.6%
Q1e. Overall value that you receive for your City tax dollars and fees
14.1%
48.1%
26.9%
8.3%
2.7%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 171
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q2. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Leadership. (N=919)
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Don't Know
Q2a. Overall quality of leadership provided by your City elected officials
9.2%
45.4%
29.8%
5.2%
1.5%
8.9%
Q2b. Overall effectiveness of appointed boards and commissions
8.3%
38.3%
34.0%
4.7%
1.2%
13.5%
11.5%
41.1%
29.3%
4.8%
1.2%
12.1%
Q2c. Overall effectiveness of the City Manager and professional staff
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q2. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Leadership. (Without "Don't Know") (N=919) Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Q2a. Overall quality of leadership provided by your City elected officials
10.1%
49.8%
32.7%
5.7%
1.7%
Q2b. Overall effectiveness of appointed boards and commissions
9.6%
44.3%
39.3%
5.4%
1.4%
Q2c. Overall effectiveness of the City Manager and professional staff
13.0%
46.8%
33.4%
5.5%
1.4%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 172
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q3. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Growth. (N=919)
Q3a. Rate of growth in Lee's Summit
Very Satisfied 12.8%
Satisfied 56.2%
Neutral 21.7%
Dissatisfied 5.1%
Very Dissatisfied 1.6%
Don't Know 2.6%
Q3b. Quality of business growth
11.9%
45.3%
21.2%
15.5%
3.6%
2.5%
Q3c. Quality of residential growth
13.4%
54.0%
23.9%
4.9%
1.6%
2.2%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q3. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Growth. (Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q3a. Rate of growth in Lee's Summit
Very Satisfied 13.1%
Satisfied 57.7%
Neutral 22.3%
Dissatisfied 5.3%
Very Dissatisfied 1.7%
Q3b. Quality of business growth
12.2%
46.5%
21.8%
15.9%
3.7%
Q3c. Quality of residential growth
13.7%
55.2%
24.4%
5.0%
1.7%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 173
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q4. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Likely" and 1 means "Not Likely At All," please indicate how likely you would be to do the following: (N=919)
Very Likely
Likely
Neutral
Not Likely At All
Not Likely
Don't Know
Q4a. Recommend the City of Lee's Summit to others as a place to live
51.1%
37.5%
6.6%
2.6%
1.4%
0.7%
Q4b. Recommend the City of Lee's Summit to others as a place to do business
37.3%
40.7%
14.8%
4.1%
1.4%
1.6%
Q4c. Recommend the City of Lee's Summit's financial health to a visitor
25.3%
37.6%
23.0%
4.5%
0.9%
8.8%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q4. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Likely" and 1 means "Not Likely At All," please indicate how likely you would be to do the following: (Without "Don't Know") (N=919) Very Likely
Likely
Neutral
Not Likely
Not Likely At All
Q4a. Recommend the City of Lee's Summit to others as a place to live
51.5%
37.8%
6.7%
2.6%
1.4%
Q4b. Recommend the City of Lee's Summit to others as a place to do business
37.9%
41.4%
15.0%
4.2%
1.4%
Q4c. Recommend the City of Lee's Summit's financial health to a visitor
27.7%
41.2%
25.2%
4.9%
1.0%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 174
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q5. Please rate your Overall Satisfaction with each of the following services provided by the City of Lee's Summit using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied.â&#x20AC;? (N=919)
Satisfied 50.0%
Neutral 9.2%
Q5b. Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance)
40.9%
44.5%
7.3%
0.2%
0.0%
7.1%
Q5c. Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities
40.2%
43.9%
9.7%
3.0%
0.3%
2.9%
Q5d. Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities
17.8%
48.9%
19.1%
10.2%
2.9%
1.1%
Q5e. Overall enforcement of private property/building maintenance ordinances
11.9%
38.1%
30.6%
8.3%
1.3%
9.8%
Q5f. Overall quality of public safety education programs
13.9%
38.2%
29.0%
2.4%
0.2%
16.3%
Q5g. Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees
20.1%
46.7%
22.1%
2.1%
0.7%
8.4%
Q5h. Overall quality of communication
16.3%
46.9%
27.0%
3.8%
1.0%
5.0%
Q5i. Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City, e.g., Citizen's Leadership Academy, Friends of the Parks, Citizens Police Academy
12.4%
35.6%
26.9%
4.5%
0.7%
20.0%
Q5j. Overall quality of new commercial development in the City
12.6%
39.6%
25.1%
11.4%
3.1%
8.3%
Q5k. Overall quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system
11.7%
42.7%
27.3%
8.5%
2.3%
7.5%
Q5l. Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Lee's Summit (excluding MoDOT highway interchanges)
9.9%
45.8%
21.7%
15.8%
4.8%
2.0%
Q5m. Overall quality of water services
19.4%
57.0%
15.7%
4.8%
1.0%
2.1%
Q5n. Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services
18.8%
55.8%
18.6%
2.7%
1.2%
2.8%
Q5o. Overall quality of municipal court
9.3%
29.5%
27.0%
1.9%
0.7%
31.8%
Q5a. Overall quality of police services
ETC Institute (2013)
Dissatisfied 4.2%
Very Dissatisfied 0.9%
Very Satisfied 32.5%
Don't Know 3.3%
Page 175
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q5. Please rate your Overall Satisfaction with each of the following services provided by the City of Lee's Summit using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied." (Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q5a. Overall quality of police services
Very Satisfied 33.6%
Satisfied 51.7%
Neutral 9.5%
Dissatisfied 4.4%
Very Dissatisfied 0.9%
Q5b. Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance)
44.0%
47.9%
7.8%
0.2%
0.0%
Q5c. Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities
41.4%
45.2%
10.0%
3.1%
0.3%
Q5d. Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities
18.0%
49.4%
19.3%
10.4%
3.0%
Q5e. Overall enforcement of private property/ building maintenance ordinances
13.2%
42.3%
33.9%
9.2%
1.5%
Q5f. Overall quality of public safety education programs
16.6%
45.6%
34.7%
2.9%
0.3%
Q5g. Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees
21.9%
51.0%
24.1%
2.3%
0.7%
Q5h. Overall quality of communication
17.1%
49.4%
28.4%
4.0%
1.0%
Q5i. Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City, e.g., Citizen's Leadership Academy, Friends of the Parks, Citizens Police Academy
15.5%
44.4%
33.7%
5.6%
0.8%
Q5j. Overall quality of new commercial development in the City
13.7%
43.2%
27.4%
12.4%
3.3%
Q5k. Overall quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system
12.6%
46.2%
29.5%
9.2%
2.5%
Q5l. Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Lee's Summit (excluding MoDOT highway interchanges)
10.1%
46.7%
22.1%
16.1%
4.9%
Q5m. Overall quality of water services
19.8%
58.2%
16.0%
4.9%
1.0%
Q5n. Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services
19.3%
57.5%
19.2%
2.8%
1.2%
Q5o. Overall quality of municipal court
13.6%
43.2%
39.5%
2.7%
1.0%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 176
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q6. Which FOUR of these items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q6. Most Important Overall quality of police services Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance) Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities Overall enforcement of private property/building maintenance ordinances Overall quality of public safety education programs Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees Overall quality of communication Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City Overall quality of new commercial development in the City Overall quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Overall quality of water services Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services Overall quality of municipal court None chosen Total
Number 515 146 11 58
Percent 56.0 % 15.9 % 1.2 % 6.3 %
8 5 5 5 4 32
0.9 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 0.4 % 3.5 %
9 36 40 3 1 41 919
1.0 % 3.9 % 4.4 % 0.3 % 0.1 % 4.5 % 100.0 %
Q6. Which FOUR of these items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q6. 2nd Important Overall quality of police services Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance) Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities Overall enforcement of private property/building maintenance ordinances Overall quality of public safety education programs Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees Overall quality of communication Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City Overall quality of new commercial development in the City Overall quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Lee's Summit Overall quality of water services Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 172 452 26 59
Percent 18.7 % 49.2 % 2.8 % 6.4 %
8 3 6 10 8 29
0.9 % 0.3 % 0.7 % 1.1 % 0.9 % 3.2 %
8 32 31 31 44 919
0.9 % 3.5 % 3.4 % 3.4 % 4.8 % 100.0 %
Page 177
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q6. Which FOUR of these items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q6. 3rd Important Overall quality of police services Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance) Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities Overall enforcement of private property/building maintenance ordinances Overall quality of public safety education programs Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees Overall quality of communication Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City Overall quality of new commercial development in the City Overall quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Lee's Summit Overall quality of water services Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services Overall quality of municipal court None chosen Total
Number 46 63 108 283
Percent 5.0 % 6.9 % 11.8 % 30.8 %
24 9 17 15 9 41
2.6 % 1.0 % 1.8 % 1.6 % 1.0 % 4.5 %
20 73 127 23 10 51 919
2.2 % 7.9 % 13.8 % 2.5 % 1.1 % 5.5 % 100.0 %
Q6. Which FOUR of these items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q6. 4th Important Overall quality of police services Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance) Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities Overall enforcement of private property/building maintenance ordinances Overall quality of public safety education programs Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees Overall quality of communication Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City Overall quality of new commercial development in the City Overall quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Lee's Summit Overall quality of water services Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services Overall quality of municipal court None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 35 44 115 147
Percent 3.8 % 4.8 % 12.5 % 16.0 %
47 18 25 24 14 48
5.1 % 2.0 % 2.7 % 2.6 % 1.5 % 5.2 %
29 110 111 73 9 70 919
3.2 % 12.0 % 12.1 % 7.9 % 1.0 % 7.6 % 100.0 %
Page 178
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q6. Which FOUR of these items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide (Sum of Top Four Choices) Q6. Sum of Top Four Choices Overall quality of police services Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance) Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities Overall enforcement of private property/building maintenance ordinances Overall quality of public safety education programs Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees Overall quality of communication Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City Overall quality of new commercial development in the City Overall quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Overall quality of water services Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services Overall quality of municipal court None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 768 705 260 547
Percent 83.6 % 76.7 % 28.3 % 59.5 %
87 35 53 54 35 150
9.5 % 3.8 % 5.8 % 5.9 % 3.8 % 16.3 %
66 251 309 130 20 41 3511
7.2 % 27.3 % 33.6 % 14.1 % 2.2 % 4.5 %
Page 179
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q7. Please rate your satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," with the following Police Services provided by the City of Lee's Summit. (N=919)
Satisfied 51.4%
Neutral 16.5%
Q7b. The visibility of police in business districts
17.6%
49.2%
19.7%
4.1%
0.7%
8.7%
Q7c. Efforts to prevent crime
17.6%
44.5%
24.0%
3.1%
0.9%
9.9%
Q7d. Overall professionalism of police employees
27.8%
44.6%
14.1%
2.6%
1.6%
9.3%
Q7e. How quickly the police department responds to emergencies
22.1%
37.6%
15.6%
2.7%
0.2%
21.8%
Q7f. Quality of animal control
17.5%
39.0%
22.2%
4.9%
0.8%
15.6%
Q7a. The visibility of police in neighborhoods
Dissatisfied 7.2%
Very Dissatisfied 0.9%
Very Satisfied 21.5%
Don't Know 2.5%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q7. Please rate your satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," with the following Police Services provided by the City of Lee's Summit. (Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q7a. The visibility of police in neighborhoods
Very Satisfied 22.1%
Satisfied 52.7%
Neutral 16.9%
Dissatisfied 7.4%
Very Dissatisfied 0.9%
Q7b. The visibility of police in business districts
19.3%
53.9%
21.5%
4.5%
0.7%
Q7c. Efforts to prevent crime
19.5%
49.5%
26.7%
3.4%
1.0%
Q7d. Overall professionalism of police employees
30.6%
49.2%
15.5%
2.9%
1.8%
Q7e. How quickly the police department responds to emergencies
28.2%
48.0%
20.0%
3.5%
0.3%
Q7f. Quality of animal control
20.7%
46.2%
26.3%
5.8%
0.9%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 180
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q8. Which THREE of the Police Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q8. Most Important The visibility of police in neighborhoods The visibility of police in business districts Efforts to prevent crime Overall professionalism of police employees How quickly the police department responds to emergencies Quality of animal control None chosen Total
Number 319 25 263 37 223 8 44 919
Percent 34.7 % 2.7 % 28.6 % 4.0 % 24.3 % 0.9 % 4.8 % 100.0 %
Q8. Which THREE of the Police Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q8. 2nd Important The visibility of police in neighborhoods The visibility of police in business districts Efforts to prevent crime Overall professionalism of police employees How quickly the police department responds to emergencies Quality of animal control None chosen Total
Number 186 132 230 91 229 5 46 919
Percent 20.2 % 14.4 % 25.0 % 9.9 % 24.9 % 0.5 % 5.0 % 100.0 %
Q8. Which THREE of the Police Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q8. 3rd Important The visibility of police in neighborhoods The visibility of police in business districts Efforts to prevent crime Overall professionalism of police employees How quickly the police department responds to emergencies Quality of animal control None chosen Total
Number 175 149 170 131 185 51 58 919
Percent 19.0 % 16.2 % 18.5 % 14.3 % 20.1 % 5.5 % 6.3 % 100.0 %
Q8. Which THREE of the Police Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide (Sum of Top Three Choices) Q8. Sum of Top Three Choices The visibility of police in neighborhoods The visibility of police in business districts Efforts to prevent crime Overall professionalism of police employees How quickly the police department responds to emergencies Quality of animal control None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 680 306 663 259 637 64 44 2653
Percent 74.0 % 33.3 % 72.1 % 28.2 % 69.3 % 7.0 % 4.8 %
Page 181
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q9. Please rate your satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," with the following Fire and Emergency Medical Services provided by the City of Lee's Summit. (N=919) Dissatisfied 0.3%
Very Dissatisfied 0.0%
Q9a. Overall quality of local fire protection
Very Satisfied 37.3%
Satisfied 44.3%
Neutral 6.6%
Don't Know 11.5%
Q9b. Overall quality of ambulance service
35.5%
37.7%
9.9%
0.4%
0.0%
16.5%
Q9c. Visibility of fire department personnel
29.9%
44.9%
15.8%
1.0%
0.1%
8.3%
Q9d. Efforts to enhance fire prevention
19.2%
35.2%
23.5%
1.4%
0.1%
20.6%
Q9e. The number of fire stations
24.3%
51.3%
12.7%
1.4%
0.0%
10.3%
Q9f. How quickly the fire department responds to emergencies
33.6%
33.8%
10.0%
0.7%
0.0%
21.8%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q9. Please rate your satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," with the following Fire and Emergency Medical Services provided by the City of Lee's Summit. (Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q9a. Overall quality of local fire protection
Very Satisfied 42.2%
Satisfied 50.1%
Neutral 7.4%
Dissatisfied 0.4%
Very Dissatisfied 0.0%
Q9b. Overall quality of ambulance service
42.5%
45.1%
11.9%
0.5%
0.0%
Q9c. Visibility of fire department personnel
32.6%
49.0%
17.2%
1.1%
0.1%
Q9d. Efforts to enhance fire prevention
24.2%
44.3%
29.6%
1.8%
0.1%
Q9e. The number of fire stations
27.1%
57.2%
14.1%
1.6%
0.0%
Q9f. How quickly the fire department responds to emergencies
43.0%
43.3%
12.8%
0.8%
0.0%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 182
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q10. Which TWO of the Fire and Emergency Medical Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q10. Most Important Overall quality of local fire protection Overall quality of ambulance service Visibility of fire department personnel Efforts to enhance fire prevention The number of fire stations How quickly the fire department responds to emergencies None chosen Total
Number 286 89 4 14 29 439 58 919
Percent 31.1 % 9.7 % 0.4 % 1.5 % 3.2 % 47.8 % 6.3 % 100.0 %
Q10. Which TWO of the Fire and Emergency Medical Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q10. 2nd Important Overall quality of local fire protection Overall quality of ambulance service Visibility of fire department personnel Efforts to enhance fire prevention The number of fire stations How quickly the fire department responds to emergencies None chosen Total
Number 257 336 14 62 57 129 64 919
Percent 28.0 % 36.6 % 1.5 % 6.7 % 6.2 % 14.0 % 7.0 % 100.0 %
Q10. Which TWO of the Fire and Emergency Medical Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? (Sum of Top Two Choices) Q10. Sum of Top Two Choices Overall quality of local fire protection Overall quality of ambulance service Visibility of fire department personnel Efforts to enhance fire prevention The number of fire stations How quickly the fire department responds to emergencies None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 543 425 18 76 86 568 58 1774
Percent 59.1 % 46.2 % 2.0 % 8.3 % 9.4 % 61.8 % 6.3 %
Page 183
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q11. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Very Safe" and 1 means "Very Unsafe," please rate how safe you feel in the following situations. (N=919) Very Safe 60.0%
Safe 34.5%
Neutral 3.6%
Unsafe 0.7%
Q11b. In your neighborhood at night
34.3%
52.5%
8.7%
3.3%
0.2%
1.0%
Q11c. In city parks during the day
32.3%
46.7%
11.4%
0.9%
0.2%
8.5%
8.0%
27.0%
35.2%
9.3%
0.8%
19.7%
Q11e. Traveling on City streets
33.3%
55.4%
7.5%
1.6%
0.2%
1.9%
Q11f. In other public areas in Lee's Summit
26.3%
59.0%
11.1%
1.2%
0.0%
2.4%
Q11g. Overall feeling of safety in Lee's Summit
31.6%
59.5%
6.9%
1.0%
0.1%
1.0%
Q11a. In your neighborhood during the day
Q11d. In city parks at night
Very Unsafe 0.0%
Don't Know 1.2%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q11. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Very Safe" and 1 means "Very Unsafe," please rate how safe you feel in the following situations. (Without "Don't Know") (N=919) Q11a. In your neighborhood during the day
Very Safe 60.7%
Safe 35.0%
Neutral 3.7%
Unsafe 0.7%
Very Unsafe 0.0%
Q11b. In your neighborhood at night
34.7%
53.0%
8.8%
3.3%
0.2%
Q11c. In city parks during the day
35.3%
51.1%
12.4%
1.0%
0.2%
9.9%
33.7%
43.9%
11.5%
1.0%
Q11e. Traveling on City streets
34.0%
56.5%
7.7%
1.7%
0.2%
Q11f. In other public areas in Lee's Summit
26.9%
60.4%
11.4%
1.2%
0.0%
Q11g. Overall feeling of safety in Lee's Summit
31.9%
60.1%
6.9%
1.0%
0.1%
Q11d. In city parks at night
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 184
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q12. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City services. (N=919)
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Don't Know
Q12a. Maintenance of city streets (excluding MoDOT highways)
12.4%
53.9%
18.1%
11.0%
3.6%
1.1%
Q12b. Maintenance of sidewalks in the city
11.3%
46.2%
24.9%
11.2%
3.2%
3.2%
Q12c. Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs
15.2%
53.2%
19.7%
6.2%
1.3%
4.4%
Q12d. Adequacy of public transportation system
5.6%
18.6%
32.1%
14.6%
5.1%
24.0%
Q12e. Adequacy of sidewalks
8.7%
38.8%
30.2%
12.5%
3.2%
6.5%
Q12f. Adequacy of shared use path/trail system
9.9%
35.0%
27.7%
8.6%
3.6%
15.2%
Q12g. Adequacy of bicycling accommodations
9.8%
29.6%
27.8%
11.5%
5.6%
15.7%
Q12h. Maintenance and preservation of downtown Lee's Summit
28.3%
50.7%
13.0%
3.7%
0.9%
3.5%
Q12i. Snow removal on major city streets
20.3%
50.2%
13.9%
9.0%
4.8%
1.7%
Q12j. Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood
13.6%
38.8%
17.3%
17.7%
10.2%
2.3%
Q12k. Overall cleanliness of city streets and other public areas
17.8%
62.0%
14.5%
3.2%
0.9%
1.7%
Q12l. Maintenance of stormwater drainage system
12.5%
46.7%
23.7%
4.1%
2.5%
10.5%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 185
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q12. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City services. (Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Q12a. Maintenance of city streets (excluding MoDOT highways)
12.5%
54.5%
18.3%
11.1%
3.6%
Q12b. Maintenance of sidewalks in the city
11.7%
47.8%
25.7%
11.6%
3.3%
Q12c. Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs
15.8%
55.6%
20.6%
6.5%
1.4%
Q12d. Adequacy of public transportation system
7.3%
24.5%
42.2%
19.2%
6.7%
Q12e. Adequacy of sidewalks
9.3%
41.5%
32.3%
13.4%
3.4%
Q12f. Adequacy of shared use path/trail system
11.7%
41.3%
32.6%
10.2%
4.2%
Q12g. Adequacy of bicycling accommodations
11.6%
35.1%
32.9%
13.7%
6.6%
Q12h. Maintenance and preservation of downtown Lee's Summit
29.3%
52.5%
13.4%
3.8%
0.9%
Q12i. Snow removal on major city streets
20.7%
51.1%
14.2%
9.2%
4.9%
Q12j. Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood
13.9%
39.8%
17.7%
18.2%
10.5%
Q12k. Overall cleanliness of city streets and other public areas
18.1%
63.1%
14.7%
3.2%
0.9%
Q12l. Maintenance of stormwater drainage system
14.0%
52.1%
26.4%
4.6%
2.8%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 186
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q13. Which FOUR of these services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q13. Most Important Maintenance of city streets (excluding MoDOT highways) Maintenance of sidewalks in the city Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs Adequacy of public transportation system Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of shared use path/trail system Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Maintenance and preservation of downtown Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Snow removal on major city streets Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood Overall cleanliness of city streets and other public areas Maintenance of stormwater drainage system None chosen Total
Number 589 8 47 12 2 5 12 16 74 49 18 22 65 919
Percent 64.1 % 0.9 % 5.1 % 1.3 % 0.2 % 0.5 % 1.3 % 1.7 % 8.1 % 5.3 % 2.0 % 2.4 % 7.1 % 100.0 %
Q13. Which FOUR of these services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q13. 2nd Important Maintenance of city streets (excluding MoDOT highways) Maintenance of sidewalks in the city Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs Adequacy of public transportation system Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of shared use path/trail system Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Maintenance and preservation of downtown Lee's Summit Snow removal on major city streets Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood Overall cleanliness of city streets and other public areas Maintenance of stormwater drainage system None chosen Total
Number 82 97 170 24 25 12 14 40 215 99 34 41 66 919
Percent 8.9 % 10.6 % 18.5 % 2.6 % 2.7 % 1.3 % 1.5 % 4.4 % 23.4 % 10.8 % 3.7 % 4.5 % 7.2 % 100.0 %
Q13. Which FOUR of these services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q13. 3rd Important Maintenance of city streets (excluding MoDOT highways) Maintenance of sidewalks in the city Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs Adequacy of public transportation system Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of shared use path/trail system Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Maintenance and preservation of downtown Lee's Summit Snow removal on major city streets Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood Overall cleanliness of city streets and other public areas Maintenance of stormwater drainage system None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 52 54 97 21 34 19 17 65 201 151 76 60 72 919
Percent 5.7 % 5.9 % 10.6 % 2.3 % 3.7 % 2.1 % 1.8 % 7.1 % 21.9 % 16.4 % 8.3 % 6.5 % 7.8 % 100.0 %
Page 187
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q13. Which FOUR of these services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q13. 4th Important Maintenance of city streets (excluding MoDOT highways) Maintenance of sidewalks in the city Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs Adequacy of public transportation system Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of shared use path/trail system Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Maintenance and preservation of downtown Lee's Summit Snow removal on major city streets Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood Overall cleanliness of city streets and other public areas Maintenance of stormwater drainage system None chosen Total
Number 33 55 74 32 27 21 22 57 101 142 141 115 99 919
Percent 3.6 % 6.0 % 8.1 % 3.5 % 2.9 % 2.3 % 2.4 % 6.2 % 11.0 % 15.5 % 15.3 % 12.5 % 10.8 % 100.0 %
Q13. Which FOUR of these services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? (Sum of Top Four Choices) Q13. Sum of Top Four Choices Maintenance of city streets (excluding MoDOT highways) Maintenance of sidewalks in the city Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs Adequacy of public transportation system Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of shared use path/trail system Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Maintenance and preservation of downtown Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Snow removal on major city streets Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood Overall cleanliness of city streets and other public areas Maintenance of stormwater drainage system None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 756 214 388 89 88 57 65 178 591 441 269 238 65 3439
Percent 82.3 % 23.3 % 42.2 % 9.7 % 9.6 % 6.2 % 7.1 % 19.4 % 64.3 % 48.0 % 29.3 % 25.9 % 7.1 %
Page 188
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q14. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Code Enforcement. (N=919)
Q14a. Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris
Very Satisfied 9.6%
Satisfied 42.9%
Neutral 24.7%
Dissatisfied 8.0%
Very Dissatisfied 2.2%
Don't Know 12.7%
Q14b. Enforcing the mowing of grass and weeds on private property
8.3%
35.7%
26.7%
13.1%
4.3%
11.9%
Q14c. Enforcing the maintenance of residential property
7.2%
36.5%
28.7%
12.0%
2.7%
12.8%
Q14d. Enforcing the maintenance of business property
8.2%
41.8%
28.0%
4.7%
1.3%
15.9%
Q14e. Enforcing sign regulations
8.1%
38.7%
31.8%
3.6%
1.2%
16.6%
18.1%
64.4%
12.3%
1.7%
0.4%
2.9%
Q14f. Overall appearance of the City
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q14. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Code Enforcement.(Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q14a. Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris
Very Satisfied 11.0%
Satisfied 49.1%
Neutral 28.3%
Dissatisfied 9.1%
Very Dissatisfied 2.5%
Q14b. Enforcing the mowing of grass and weeds on private property
9.4%
40.5%
30.4%
14.9%
4.8%
Q14c. Enforcing the maintenance of residential property
8.3%
41.9%
33.0%
13.8%
3.1%
Q14d. Enforcing the maintenance of business property
9.8%
49.7%
33.3%
5.6%
1.6%
Q14e. Enforcing sign regulations
9.7%
46.4%
38.1%
4.3%
1.4%
18.7%
66.4%
12.7%
1.8%
0.4%
Q14f. Overall appearance of the City
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 189
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q15. Which TWO of these Code Enforcement Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q15. Most Important Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris Enforcing the mowing of grass and weeds on private property Enforcing the maintenance of residential property Enforcing the maintenance of business property Enforcing sign regulations Overall appearance of the City None chosen Total
Number 250 91 140 59 20 296 63 919
Percent 27.2 % 9.9 % 15.2 % 6.4 % 2.2 % 32.2 % 6.9 % 100.0 %
Q15. Which TWO of these Code Enforcement Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q15. 2nd Important Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris Enforcing the mowing of grass and weeds on private property Enforcing the maintenance of residential property Enforcing the maintenance of business property Enforcing sign regulations Overall appearance of the City None chosen Total
Number 199 143 172 139 42 141 83 919
Percent 21.7 % 15.6 % 18.7 % 15.1 % 4.6 % 15.3 % 9.0 % 100.0 %
Q15. Which TWO of these Code Enforcement Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? (Sum of Top Two Choices) Q15. Sum of Top Two Choices Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris Enforcing the mowing of grass and weeds on private property Enforcing the maintenance of residential property Enforcing the maintenance of business property Enforcing sign regulations Overall appearance of the City None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 449 234 312 198 62 437 63 1755
Percent 48.9 % 25.5 % 33.9 % 21.5 % 6.7 % 47.6 % 6.9 %
Page 190
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q16. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Water Services. (N=919)
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Q16a. ability of water pressure in your home
N/A
38.8%
47.5%
6.1%
3.5%
0.9%
3.2%
Q16b. The availability of account information
28.1%
49.7%
13.8%
1.5%
0.2%
6.7%
Q16c. Overall quality of customer service
26.3%
48.1%
13.0%
1.9%
0.8%
9.9%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q16. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Water Services. (Without "N/A") (N=919)
Q16a. ability of water pressure in your home
Very Satisfied 40.1%
Satisfied 49.1%
Neutral 6.3%
Dissatisfied 3.6%
Very Dissatisfied 0.9%
Q16b. The availability of account information
30.1%
53.3%
14.8%
1.6%
0.2%
Q16c. Overall quality of customer service
29.2%
53.4%
14.4%
2.1%
0.8%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 191
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q17. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of Parks and Recreation. (N=919)
Satisfied
Neutral
Q17a. Lee's Summit Parks and Recreation Board
17.4%
39.7%
20.0%
2.1%
1.0%
19.9%
Q17b. Maintenance of city parks
25.0%
54.7%
12.4%
1.3%
0.2%
6.3%
Q17c. Number of city parks (currently 26 parks)
29.0%
51.7%
11.7%
1.9%
0.1%
5.6%
Q17d. Miles of walking/biking trails (currently 62 miles)
23.0%
43.8%
16.6%
6.0%
1.2%
9.4%
Q17e. Legacy Park Community Center
30.6%
37.2%
14.8%
1.7%
0.7%
15.0%
Q17f. Harris Park Community Center
20.5%
33.3%
20.2%
0.9%
0.3%
24.8%
Q17g. Gamber Community Center
21.0%
32.1%
18.1%
1.3%
0.2%
27.3%
Q17h. Hartman Park Sports Area
16.7%
29.1%
20.2%
0.5%
0.1%
33.3%
Q17i. Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields
25.1%
35.3%
15.5%
1.3%
0.2%
22.6%
Q17j. Youth Sports Practice Areas
17.3%
29.8%
20.4%
3.7%
1.1%
27.7%
Q17k. Youth Athletic Programs
17.2%
33.4%
19.6%
2.2%
0.3%
27.3%
Q17l. Adult Athletic Programs
14.2%
30.7%
21.2%
2.4%
0.3%
31.1%
Q17m. Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps
16.0%
35.9%
21.5%
1.6%
0.2%
24.7%
Q17n. Ease of registering for programs
16.4%
35.0%
21.6%
2.7%
0.7%
23.6%
Q17o. Fees charged for activities
14.0%
32.5%
24.1%
5.5%
1.4%
22.6%
Q17p. Number of playgrounds
16.0%
38.4%
22.3%
2.6%
0.8%
20.0%
Q17q. Downtown Summer Music Festivals
25.4%
43.6%
15.8%
1.5%
0.5%
13.1%
ETC Institute (2013)
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Don't Know
Page 192
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q17. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of Parks and Recreation.(Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q17a. Lee's Summit Parks and Recreation Board
Very Satisfied 21.7%
Satisfied 49.5%
Neutral 25.0%
Dissatisfied 2.6%
Very Dissatisfied 1.2%
Q17b. Maintenance of city parks
26.7%
58.4%
13.3%
1.4%
0.2%
Q17c. Number of city parks (currently 26 parks)
30.8%
54.8%
12.4%
2.0%
0.1%
Q17d. Miles of walking/biking trails (currently 62 miles)
25.4%
48.3%
18.3%
6.6%
1.3%
Q17e. Legacy Park Community Center
35.9%
43.8%
17.5%
2.1%
0.8%
Q17f. Harris Park Community Center
27.3%
44.3%
26.9%
1.2%
0.4%
Q17g. Gamber Community Center
28.8%
44.1%
24.9%
1.8%
0.3%
Q17h. Hartman Park Sports Area
25.1%
43.6%
30.3%
0.8%
0.2%
Q17i. Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields
32.4%
45.6%
20.0%
1.7%
0.3%
Q17j. Youth Sports Practice Areas
23.9%
41.2%
28.2%
5.1%
1.5%
Q17k. Youth Athletic Programs
23.6%
46.0%
26.9%
3.0%
0.5%
Q17l. Adult Athletic Programs
20.6%
44.6%
30.8%
3.5%
0.5%
Q17m. Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps
21.3%
47.7%
28.6%
2.2%
0.3%
Q17n. Ease of registering for programs
21.4%
45.9%
28.3%
3.6%
0.9%
Q17o. Fees charged for activities
18.0%
42.0%
31.1%
7.0%
1.8%
Q17p. Number of playgrounds
19.9%
48.0%
27.9%
3.3%
1.0%
Q17q. Downtown Summer Music Festivals
29.3%
50.1%
18.2%
1.8%
0.6%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 193
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q18. Which FOUR of these Parks and Recreation Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q18. Most Important Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Parks and Recreation Board Maintenance of city parks Number of city parks (currently 26 parks) Miles of walking/biking trails (currently 62 miles) Legacy Park Community Center Harris Park Community Center Gamber Community Center Hartman Park Sports Area Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Youth Sports Practice Areas Youth Athletic Programs Adult Athletic Programs Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps Fees charged for activities Number of playgrounds Downtown Summer Music Festivals None chosen Total
Number 47 490 39 47 38 2 10 2 25 6 37 8 9 20 11 20 108 919
Percent 5.1 % 53.3 % 4.2 % 5.1 % 4.1 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 0.2 % 2.7 % 0.7 % 4.0 % 0.9 % 1.0 % 2.2 % 1.2 % 2.2 % 11.8 % 100.0 %
Q18. Which FOUR of these Parks and Recreation Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q18. 2nd Important Lee's Summit Parks and Recreation Board Maintenance of city parks Number of city parks (currently 26 parks) Miles of walking/biking trails (currently 62 miles) Legacy Park Community Center Harris Park Community Center Gamber Community Center Hartman Park Sports Area Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Youth Sports Practice Areas Youth Athletic Programs Adult Athletic Programs Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps Ease of registering for programs Fees charged for activities Number of playgrounds Downtown Summer Music Festivals None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 27 104 94 113 60 10 22 1 50 33 114 15 44 15 39 21 28 129 919
Percent 2.9 % 11.3 % 10.2 % 12.3 % 6.5 % 1.1 % 2.4 % 0.1 % 5.4 % 3.6 % 12.4 % 1.6 % 4.8 % 1.6 % 4.2 % 2.3 % 3.0 % 14.0 % 100.0 %
Page 194
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q18. Which FOUR of these Parks and Recreation Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q18. 3rd Important Lee's Summit Parks and Recreation Board Maintenance of city parks Number of city parks (currently 26 parks) Miles of walking/biking trails (currently 62 miles) Legacy Park Community Center Harris Park Community Center Gamber Community Center Hartman Park Sports Area Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Youth Sports Practice Areas Youth Athletic Programs Adult Athletic Programs Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps Ease of registering for programs Fees charged for activities Number of playgrounds Downtown Summer Music Festivals None chosen Total
Number 25 55 59 71 55 9 30 7 49 35 85 37 73 37 45 44 56 147 919
Percent 2.7 % 6.0 % 6.4 % 7.7 % 6.0 % 1.0 % 3.3 % 0.8 % 5.3 % 3.8 % 9.2 % 4.0 % 7.9 % 4.0 % 4.9 % 4.8 % 6.1 % 16.0 % 100.0 %
Q18. Which FOUR of these Parks and Recreation Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide Q18. 4th Important Lee's Summit Parks and Recreation Board Maintenance of city parks Number of city parks (currently 26 parks) Miles of walking/biking trails (currently 62 miles) Legacy Park Community Center Harris Park Community Center Gamber Community Center Hartman Park Sports Area Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Youth Sports Practice Areas Youth Athletic Programs Adult Athletic Programs Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps Ease of registering for programs Fees charged for activities Number of playgrounds Downtown Summer Music Festivals None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 17 35 36 63 34 5 36 2 28 19 75 47 71 28 68 49 113 193 919
Percent 1.8 % 3.8 % 3.9 % 6.9 % 3.7 % 0.5 % 3.9 % 0.2 % 3.0 % 2.1 % 8.2 % 5.1 % 7.7 % 3.0 % 7.4 % 5.3 % 12.3 % 21.0 % 100.0 %
Page 195
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q18. Which FOUR of these Parks and Recreation Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide (Sum of Top Four Choices) Q18. Sum of Top Four Choices Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Parks and Recreation Board Maintenance of city parks Number of city parks (currently 26 parks) Miles of walking/biking trails (currently 62 miles) Legacy Park Community Center Harris Park Community Center Gamber Community Center Hartman Park Sports Area Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Youth Sports Practice Areas Youth Athletic Programs Adult Athletic Programs Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps Ease of registering for programs Fees charged for activities Number of playgrounds Downtown Summer Music Festivals None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 116 684 228 294 187 26 98 12 152 93 311 107 197 80 172 125 217 108 3207
Percent 12.6 % 74.4 % 24.8 % 32.0 % 20.3 % 2.8 % 10.7 % 1.3 % 16.5 % 10.1 % 33.8 % 11.6 % 21.4 % 8.7 % 18.7 % 13.6 % 23.6 % 11.8 %
Page 196
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q19. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Communication. (N=919)
Satisfied
Neutral
Q19a. The availability of information about City programs and services
14.5%
50.3%
22.8%
3.8%
0.9%
7.7%
Q19b. City efforts to keep you informed about local issues
13.6%
44.8%
27.7%
7.1%
1.3%
5.4%
Q19c. The level of public involvement in local decision-making
8.1%
29.1%
35.9%
10.3%
2.9%
13.8%
Q19d. Information provided on the City's website (cityofls.net)
10.7%
38.0%
26.5%
2.4%
0.9%
21.4%
8.8%
26.9%
27.1%
1.9%
0.9%
34.5%
Q19e. Programming on the City's government access cable channels (Comcast 7, Time Warner 2, and AT&T U-verse 99)
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Don't Know
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q19. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "Very Satisfied" and 1 means "Very Dissatisfied," please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Communication. (Without "Don't Know") (N=919) Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Q19a. The availability of information about City programs and services
15.7%
54.5%
24.7%
4.2%
1.0%
Q19b. City efforts to keep you informed about local issues
14.4%
47.4%
29.3%
7.5%
1.4%
Q19c. The level of public involvement in local decision-making
9.4%
33.7%
41.6%
12.0%
3.3%
Q19d. Information provided on the City's website (cityofls.net)
13.7%
48.4%
33.8%
3.1%
1.1%
Q19e. Programming on the City's government access cable channels (Comcast 7, Time Warner 2, and AT&T U-verse 99)
13.4%
41.0%
41.4%
2.8%
1.3%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 197
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q20. Approximately how often do you watch the City's government access cable channels? (Channel 2, 7, or 99) Q20. Approximately how often do you watch the City's government access cable channels? (Channel 2, 7, or 99) Everyday At least once per week At least once per month Once or twice per a year Not at all Don't Know Total
Number 7 57 123 220 497 15 919
Percent 0.8 % 6.2 % 13.4 % 23.9 % 54.1 % 1.6 % 100.0 %
Q21. Approximately how often do you watch public meetings (City Council meetings, Council committee, or Planning Commission meetings) on the City's government access cable channel (Channel 2, 7 or 99 or) or on the City's website (cityofls.net)? Q21. Approximately how often do you watch public meetings on the City's government access cable channel (Channel 2, 7 or 99 or) or on the City's website (cityofls.net)? At least once per month Once or more times per week Once or twice per year Almost never Don't Know Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 78 15 188 624 14 919
Percent 8.5 % 1.6 % 20.5 % 67.9 % 1.5 % 100.0 %
Page 198
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q22. Which of the following sources of information do you CURRENTLY USE to get information about the City of Lee's Summit? (Check ALL that apply) Q22. Which of the following sources of information do you CURRENTLY USE to get information about the City of Lee's Summit? City publications (ex: brochures, water report, election info) Broadcast news television Gov’t cable channel (channels 2, 7 or 99) City website (cityofls.net) City Scope Quarterly Newsletter Lee’s Summit Illustrated, LSPR’s program/activity guide Special message section on water bill Public meetings Kansas City Star Lee’s Summit Journal Lee’s Summit Post-Tribune Nixle Facebook Twitter YouTube Pinterest e-newsletters such as Parks, Environmental, and City e-newsletters Video streaming on the City’s website Other None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 611 387 162 407 353 599 198 56 345 461 126 37 128 15 3 4 156 20 47 14 4129
Percent 66.5 % 42.1 % 17.6 % 44.3 % 38.4 % 65.2 % 21.5 % 6.1 % 37.5 % 50.2 % 13.7 % 4.0 % 13.9 % 1.6 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 17.0 % 2.2 % 5.1 % 1.5 %
Page 199
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q22. Other Sources Q22 Other SIGNS EMAIL GOOGLE LS EDC SPOUSE CHAMGER FRIENDS OUR HOA POSTERS EXAMINER INTERNET LINKEDIN MAIL OUTS COUNCILMAN REGULAR TV OBSERVATION MERCHANTS PT SOCIAL MEDIA MY COUNCILMAN WORD OF MOUTH AT COFFEE SHOP COUNCIL MEMBER FRIENDS/FAMILY CITY COUNCILMAN FRIEND/REALTIVES COUNCILMAN EMAILS PERSONAL CONTACTS COUNCILMAN'S EMAIL LEE'S SUMMIT MAGAZINE POSTERS A POST OFFICE TALK TO CITY EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS EMAIL FROM CITY COUNCIL AMY ROBERTSON@ CAMERON'S DISCUSS W/OTHER NEIGHBORS MESSAGE FROM REPRESENTATIVE BLUE SPRINGS/ST JOE EXAMINER MESSAGE FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS PRINTED GYM SCHEDULE FROM LEGACY Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
Percent 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 6.4 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 4.3 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 12.8 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 100.0 %
Page 200
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q23. Which FOUR of these sources of information are the most preferred method for you to get information about the City of Lee's Summit? Q23. Most Preferred City publications (ex: brochures, water report, election info) Broadcast news television Gov't cable channel (channels 2, 7 or 99) City website (cityofls.net) City Scope Quarterly Newsletter Lee's Summit Illustrated, LSPR's program/activity guide Special message section on water bill Public meetings Kansas City Star Lee's Summit Journal Lee's Summit Post-Tribune Nixle Facebook Twitter YouTube e-newsletters such as Parks, Environmental, and City e-newsletters Video streaming on the City's website Other None chosen Total
Number 190 69 14 121 66 90 7 7 52 104 3 9 21 2 3 17 2 15 127 919
Percent 20.7 % 7.5 % 1.5 % 13.2 % 7.2 % 9.8 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 5.7 % 11.3 % 0.3 % 1.0 % 2.3 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 1.8 % 0.2 % 1.6 % 13.8 % 100.0 %
Q23. Which FOUR of these sources of information are the most preferred method for you to get information about the City of Lee's Summit? Q23. 2nd Preferred City publications (ex: brochures, water report, election info) Broadcast news television Gov't cable channel (channels 2, 7 or 99) City website (cityofls.net) City Scope Quarterly Newsletter Lee's Summit Illustrated, LSPR's program/activity guide Special message section on water bill Public meetings Kansas City Star Lee's Summit Journal Lee's Summit Post-Tribune Nixle Facebook Twitter e-newsletters such as Parks, Environmental, and City e-newsletters Video streaming on the City's website Other None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 84 80 29 107 78 145 15 12 62 81 23 5 20 8 15 1 1 153 919
Percent 9.1 % 8.7 % 3.2 % 11.6 % 8.5 % 15.8 % 1.6 % 1.3 % 6.7 % 8.8 % 2.5 % 0.5 % 2.2 % 0.9 % 1.6 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 16.6 % 100.0 %
Page 201
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q23. Which FOUR of these sources of information are the most preferred method for you to get information about the City of Lee's Summit? Q23. 3rd Preferred City publications (ex: brochures, water report, election info) Broadcast news television Gov't cable channel (channels 2, 7 or 99) City website (cityofls.net) City Scope Quarterly Newsletter Lee's Summit Illustrated, LSPR's program/activity guide Special message section on water bill Public meetings Kansas City Star Lee's Summit Journal Lee's Summit Post-Tribune Nixle Facebook Twitter YouTube Pinterest e-newsletters such as Parks, Environmental, and City e-newsletters Video streaming on the City's website Other None chosen Total
Number 92 51 34 72 61 119 32 9 51 104 21 8 28 3 1 1 22 5 5 200 919
Percent 10.0 % 5.5 % 3.7 % 7.8 % 6.6 % 12.9 % 3.5 % 1.0 % 5.5 % 11.3 % 2.3 % 0.9 % 3.0 % 0.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 2.4 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 21.8 % 100.0 %
Q23. Which FOUR of these sources of information are the most preferred method for you to get information about the City of Lee's Summit? Q23. 4th Preferred City publications (ex: brochures, water report, election info) Broadcast news television Gov't cable channel (channels 2, 7 or 99) City website (cityofls.net) City Scope Quarterly Newsletter Lee's Summit Illustrated, LSPR's program/activity guide Special message section on water bill Public meetings Kansas City Star Lee's Summit Journal Lee's Summit Post-Tribune Nixle Facebook Twitter e-newsletters such as Parks, Environmental, and City e-newsletters Video streaming on the City's website Other None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 84 47 24 42 51 66 33 14 47 75 30 11 31 5 47 4 15 293 919
Percent 9.1 % 5.1 % 2.6 % 4.6 % 5.5 % 7.2 % 3.6 % 1.5 % 5.1 % 8.2 % 3.3 % 1.2 % 3.4 % 0.5 % 5.1 % 0.4 % 1.6 % 31.9 % 100.0 %
Page 202
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q23. Which FOUR of these sources of information are the most preferred method for you to get information about the City of Lee's Summit? (Sum of Top Four Choices) Q23. Sum of Top Four Choices City publications (ex: brochures, water report, election info) Broadcast news television Gov't cable channel (channels 2, 7 or 99) City website (cityofls.net) City Scope Quarterly Newsletter Lee's Summit Illustrated, LSPR's program/activity guide Special message section on water bill Public meetings Kansas City Star Lee's Summit Journal Lee's Summit Post-Tribune Nixle Facebook Twitter YouTube Pinterest e-newsletters such as Parks, Environmental, and City e-newsletters Video streaming on the City's website Other None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 450 247 101 342 256 420 87 42 212 364 77 33 100 18 4 1 101 12 36 128 3031
Percent 49.0 % 26.9 % 11.0 % 37.2 % 27.9 % 45.7 % 9.5 % 4.6 % 23.1 % 39.6 % 8.4 % 3.6 % 10.9 % 2.0 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 11.0 % 1.3 % 3.9 % 13.9 %
Page 203
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q24. Have you had any contact with the City of Lee's Summit during the past year? Q24.Have you had any contact with the City of Lee's Summit during the past year? Yes No Not provided Total
Number 496 420 3 919
Percent 54.0 % 45.7 % 0.3 % 100.0 %
Number 56 15 100 48 79 35 49 1 10 24 20 161 38 125 43 55 3 41 110 4 1017
Percent 11.3 % 3.0 % 20.2 % 9.7 % 15.9 % 7.1 % 9.9 % 0.2 % 2.0 % 4.8 % 4.0 % 32.5 % 7.7 % 25.2 % 8.7 % 11.1 % 0.6 % 8.3 % 22.2 % 0.8 %
Q24a. Which City Department did you contact most recently? Q24a.Which City Department did you contact most recently? Administration Airport Animal Control City Clerk Codes Administration Finance/Treasury Fire Fleet Division Human Resources Law Municipal Court Parks and Recreation Planning and Development Police Public Works â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Admin & Engineering Public Works Operations (Streets) Procurement and Contract Services Solid Waste and Environment Water Utilities None chosen Total
Q24b. How easy was it to contact the person you needed to reach? Q24b. How easy was it to contact the person you needed to reach? Very easy Somewhat easy Difficult Very difficult Don't know Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 298 149 15 12 22 496
Percent 60.1 % 30.0 % 3.0 % 2.4 % 4.4 % 100.0 %
Page 204
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q24c. Several factors that may influence your perception of the quality of Customer Service you receive from City employees are listed below. For each item, please rate how often the employees you have contacted during the past year have displayed the behavior described on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Always" and 1 means "Never." (N=496)
Q24c-a. They were courteous and polite
Always 62.6%
Usually 27.1%
Q24c-b. They gave prompt, accurate, and complete answers to questions
53.4%
30.8%
Q24c-c. They did what they said they would do in a timely manner
52.9%
Q24c-d. They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction
50.1%
Sometimes 6.5%
Seldom 1.4%
Never 0.4%
Don't Know 2.0%
8.9%
2.4%
1.4%
3.0%
28.0%
7.9%
3.4%
1.8%
5.9%
27.7%
10.0%
3.3%
4.5%
4.5%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q24c. Several factors that may influence your perception of the quality of Customer Service you receive from City employees are listed below. For each item, please rate how often the employees you have contacted during the past year have displayed the behavior described on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Always" and 1 means "Never." (Without "Don't Know") (N=496) Q24c-a. They were courteous and polite
Always 63.8%
Usually 27.7%
Q24c-b. They gave prompt, accurate, and complete answers to questions
55.1%
31.7%
Q24c-c. They did what they said they would do in a timely manner
56.3%
Q24c-d. They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction
52.5%
ETC Institute (2013)
Sometimes 6.6%
Seldom 1.4%
Never 0.4%
9.2%
2.5%
1.5%
29.7%
8.4%
3.7%
1.9%
29.0%
10.4%
3.4%
4.7%
Page 205
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q24d. Which TWO of these Customer Service Items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q24d. Most Important They were courteous and polite They gave prompt, accurate, and complete answers to questions They did what they said they would do in a timely manner They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction None chosen Total
Number 116 174 67 86 53 496
Percent 23.4 % 35.1 % 13.5 % 17.3 % 10.7 % 100.0 %
Q24d. Which TWO of these Customer Service Items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? Q24d. 2nd Important They were courteous and polite They gave prompt, accurate, and complete answers to questions They did what they said they would do in a timely manner They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction None chosen Total
Number 46 105 178 113 54 496
Percent 9.3 % 21.2 % 35.9 % 22.8 % 10.9 % 100.0 %
Q24d. Which TWO of these Customer Service Items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? (Sum of Top Two Choices) Q24d. Sum of Top Two Choices They were courteous and polite They gave prompt, accurate, and complete answers to questions They did what they said they would do in a timely manner They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction None chosen Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 162 279 245 199 53 938
Percent 32.7 % 56.3 % 49.4 % 40.1 % 10.7 %
Page 206
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q25. Pace of Development: Using a five-point scale where a "5" means much too slow and "1" means much too fast, please rate the City's current pace of development in each of the following areas. (N=919)
Q25a. Office development
Much Too Slow 3.7%
Too Slow 18.0%
Just Right 43.9%
Too Fast 3.7%
Much Too Fast 1.5%
Don't know 29.0%
Q25b. Industrial development
7.3%
25.4%
38.6%
2.3%
1.1%
25.4%
Q25c. Multi-family residential development
0.8%
3.4%
43.3%
17.9%
9.8%
24.8%
Q25d. Single-family residential development
1.5%
7.6%
59.0%
10.6%
3.6%
17.7%
Q25e. Retail development
4.6%
21.0%
49.7%
7.6%
3.2%
13.9%
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q25. Pace of Development: Using a five-point scale where a "5" means much too slow and "1" means much too fast, please rate the City's current pace of development in each of the following areas. (Without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q25a. Office development
Much Too Slow 5.3%
Too Slow 25.4%
Just Right 61.9%
Too Fast 5.3%
Much Too Fast 2.2%
Q25b. Industrial development
9.7%
34.0%
51.7%
3.1%
1.5%
Q25c. Multi-family residential development
1.0%
4.5%
57.6%
23.8%
13.0%
Q25d. Single-family residential development
1.9%
9.2%
71.7%
12.8%
4.4%
Q25e. Retail development
5.4%
24.4%
57.8%
8.8%
3.7%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 207
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q26. Support for Development Incentives: Using a five-point scale where a "5" means Very Supportive and "1" means Not Supportive At All, please rate your level of support for having the City provide economic development incentives to encourage the following types of development in the City. (N=919)
Q26a. Office development Q26b. Industrial development
Very Supportive 12.5%
Supportive 33.0%
Neutral 27.3%
Not Supportive 6.9%
Not Supportive At All 4.8%
Don't Know 15.5%
14.9%
31.7%
26.0%
7.7%
4.9%
14.7%
Q26c. Multi-family residential development
3.7%
11.4%
30.2%
21.5%
17.6%
15.6%
Q26d. Single-family residential development
9.3%
25.3%
29.8%
11.9%
9.3%
14.3%
16.6%
34.2%
22.4%
8.4%
6.0%
12.4%
Q26e. Retail development
WITHOUT DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T KNOW Q26. Support for Development Incentives: Using a five-point scale where a "5" means Very Supportive and "1" means Not Supportive At All, please rate your level of support for having the City provide economic development incentives to encourage the following types of development in the City.(without "Don't Know") (N=919)
Q26a. Office development Q26b. Industrial development
Very Supportive 14.8%
Supportive 39.0%
Neutral 32.3%
Not Supportive 8.2%
Not Supportive At All 5.7%
17.5%
37.2%
30.5%
9.0%
5.8%
Q26c. Multi-family residential development
4.4%
13.5%
35.8%
25.5%
20.8%
Q26d. Single-family residential development
10.9%
29.5%
34.8%
13.9%
10.9%
Q26e. Retail development
18.9%
39.0%
25.6%
9.5%
6.9%
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 208
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Q27. How supportive would you be of the City of Lee's Summit becoming more aggressive with attracting commercial development? Q27.How supportive would you be of the City of Lee's Summit becoming more aggressive with attracting commercial development? Very Supportive Supportive Neutral Not Supportive Not Supportive At All Don't Know Total
Number 266 391 145 40 39 38 919
Percent 28.9 % 42.5 % 15.8 % 4.4 % 4.2 % 4.1 % 100.0 %
Q28. How supportive would you be of the City of Lee's Summit dedicating an economic development fund for activities or programs targeting commercial development? Q28.How supportive would you be of the City of Lee's Summit dedicating an economic development fund for activities or programs targeting commercial development? Very Supportive Supportive Neutral Not Supportive Not Supportive At All Don't Know Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 128 325 237 96 67 66 919
Percent 13.9 % 35.4 % 25.8 % 10.4 % 7.3 % 7.2 % 100.0 %
Page 209
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Demographics: Counting yourself, how many people regularly live in your household Counting yourself, how many people regularly live in your household 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 or more Not Provided Total
Number 111 393 160 152 69 21 7 3 3 919
Percent 12.1 % 42.8 % 17.4 % 16.5 % 7.5 % 2.3 % 0.8 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 100.0 %
Demographics: Which of the following best describes your current employment status? Which of the following best describes your current employment status? Employed outside the home Employed in the home Student Retired Not currently employed outside the home Not provided Total
Number 561 56 8 241 50 3 919
Percent 61.0 % 6.1 % 0.9 % 26.2 % 5.4 % 0.3 % 100.0 %
Number 188 166 51 61 77 8 33 31 3 618
Percent 33.5 % 29.6 % 9.1 % 10.9 % 13.7 % 1.4 % 5.9 % 5.5 % 0.5 %
Number 863 51 5 919
Percent 93.9 % 5.5 % 0.5 % 100.0 %
Demographics: Where do you work? Where do you work? In Leeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summit Kansas City, MO Independence, MO Elsewhere in Jackson County, MO Johnson County, KS Clay/Platte Counties in MO Elsewhere in MO Elsewhere in KS Not provided Total
Demographics: Do you own or rent your current residence? Do you own or rent your current residence? Own Rent Not provided Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 210
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Demographics: Approximately how many years have you lived in the City of Lee's Summit? Approximately how many years have you lived in the City of Lee's Summit? Under 5 5 to 14 15 to 24 25 to 34 35+ Not Provided Total
Number 82 257 257 169 123 31 919
Percent 8.9 % 28.0 % 28.0 % 18.4 % 13.4 % 3.4 % 100.0 %
Demographics: Would you say your total household income is: Would you say your total household income is: Under $30,000 $30,000 to $59,999 $60,000 to $99,999 $100,000 or more Not provided Total
Number 49 173 250 366 81 919
Percent 5.3 % 18.8 % 27.2 % 39.8 % 8.8 % 100.0 %
Number 465 454 919
Percent 50.6 % 49.4 % 100.0 %
Demographics: Your gender: Your gender: Male Female Total
Demographics: Approximately how much have you or other members of your household spent on Internet purchases during the past week? (write â&#x20AC;&#x153;0â&#x20AC;? if none) How much spent on the Internet during the past week None Less than $50 $50 to $100 $101 to $200 $201 to $500 More than $500 Not provided Total
ETC Institute (2013)
Number 500 166 106 74 50 16 7 919
Percent 54.4 % 18.0 % 11.6 % 8.1 % 5.4 % 1.7 % 0.8 % 100.0 %
Page 211
City of Lee's Summit 2013 Citizen Survey: Final Report
Section 6:
Survey Instrument
ETC Institute (2013)
Page 212
City of Lee’s Summit |220 SE Green Street | Lee’s Summit, MO 64063| cityofLS.net | 969.1000
2013 City of Lee’s Summit Citizen Survey Thank you for taking the time to complete this important survey. City leaders will use your input to help set community priorities so that tax dollars are spent wisely. When you are finished, please return your completed survey in the postage-paid envelope provided. You may also complete this survey on-line by going to www.lssurvey.org. 1. Several items that may influence your Perception of the City of Lee’s Summit are listed below. Please rate each item on a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied.” (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with:
A. B. C. D. E.
Overall image of City Government How well the City is managing growth Overall quality of life in the City Overall quality of services provided by the City of Lee’s Summit Overall value that you receive for your City tax dollars and fees
5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
9 9 9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
2. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Leadership. (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with: A.
B. C.
Overall quality of leadership provided by your City elected officials Overall effectiveness of appointed boards and commissions Overall effectiveness of the City Manager and professional staff
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
3. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Growth. (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with:
A. B. C.
Rate of growth in Lee’s Summit Quality of business growth Quality of residential growth
5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
9 9 9
4. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Likely” and 1 means “Not Likely At All,” please indicate how likely you would be to do the following: (Circle your response) How likely would you be to: A. B. C.
Very Likely
Likely
5
4
3
5
4
5
4
Recommend the City of Lee’s Summit to others as a place to live Recommend the City of Lee’s Summit to others as a place to do business Recommend the City of Lee’s Summit’s financial health to a visitor
DirectionFinder® 2013 ETC Institute - Page 1
Not Likely at All
Don’t Know
2
1
9
3
2
1
9
3
2
1
9
Neutral Not Likely
5. Please rate your Overall Satisfaction with each of the following services provided by the City of Lee’s Summit using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied.” (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with:
A. B. C. D. E.
F. G.
H. I.
J. K. L.
M. N. O.
Overall quality of police services Overall quality of fire and emergency medical services (ambulance) Overall quality of parks and recreation programs and facilities Overall maintenance of streets, municipal buildings and facilities Overall enforcement of private property/building maintenance ordinances Overall quality of public safety education programs Overall quality of customer service you receive from employees Overall quality of communication Overall quality of programs designed to connect citizens with the City, e.g., Citizen’s Leadership Academy, Friends of the Parks, Citizens Police Academy Overall quality of new commercial development in the City Overall quality of the City's stormwater runoff/stormwater management system Overall flow of traffic and congestion management in Lee’s Summit (excluding MoDOT highway interchanges) Overall quality of water services Overall quality of sanitary sewer (wastewater) services Overall quality of municipal court
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
9 9 9
6. Which FOUR of these items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? [Use the letters from the list in Question 5 above] 1st: _____
2nd: _____
3rd: _____
4th: _____
7. Please rate your satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” with the following Police Services provided by the City of Lee’s Summit. (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with:
A. B. C. D. E. F.
The visibility of police in neighborhoods The visibility of police in business districts Efforts to prevent crime Overall professionalism of police employees How quickly the police department responds to emergencies Quality of animal control
5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9 9 9
8. Which THREE of the Police Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? [Use the letters from the list in Question 7 above] 1st: _____
2nd: _____
DirectionFinder® 2013 ETC Institute - Page 2
3rd: _____
9. Please rate your satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” with the following Fire and Emergency Medical Services provided by the City of Lee’s Summit. (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with:
A. B. C. D. E. F.
Overall quality of local fire protection Overall quality of ambulance service Visibility of fire department personnel Efforts to enhance fire prevention The number of fire stations How quickly the fire department responds to emergencies
5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9 9 9
10. Which TWO of the Fire and Emergency Medical Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? [Use the letters from the list in Question 9 above] 1st: _____
2nd: _____
11. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means “Very Safe” and 1 means “Very Unsafe,” please rate how safe you feel in the following situations. (Circle your response) How safe do you feel:
A. B. C. D. E. F. G.
Very Safe
Safe
5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
In your neighborhood during the day In your neighborhood at night In city parks during the day In city parks at night Traveling on City streets In other public areas in Lee’s Summit Overall feeling of safety in Lee’s Summit
Neutral
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Unsafe
Very Unsafe
Don’t Know
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9 9 9 9
12. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City services. (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with:
A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L.
Maintenance of city streets (excluding MoDOT highways) Maintenance of sidewalks in the city Maintenance of city traffic signals/street signs Adequacy of public transportation system Adequacy of sidewalks Adequacy of shared use path/trail system Adequacy of bicycling accommodations Maintenance and preservation of downtown Lee’s Summit Snow removal on major city streets Snow removal on streets in your neighborhood Overall cleanliness of city streets and other public areas Maintenance of stormwater drainage system
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
13. Which FOUR of these services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? [Write in the letters below using the letters from the list in Question 12 above]. 1st: _____
2nd: _____ 3rd: _____
4th: _____
DirectionFinder® 2013 ETC Institute - Page 3
14. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Code Enforcement. (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with:
A. B.
C. D. E. F.
Enforcing the clean-up of litter and debris Enforcing the mowing of grass and weeds on private property Enforcing the maintenance of residential property Enforcing the maintenance of business property Enforcing sign regulations Overall appearance of the City
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9
15. Which TWO of these Code Enforcement Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? [Write in the letters below using the letters from the list in Question 14 above]. 1st: _____
2nd: _____
16. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Water Services. (Circle your response. Choosing number 9 indicates your water is provided by district 13 or Cass County district three.) Very Very Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with:
A. B. C.
Reliability of water pressure in your home The availability of account information Overall quality of customer service
5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
N/A
9 9 9
17. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of Parks and Recreation. (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with:
A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M.
N. O. P. Q.
Lee’s Summit Parks and Recreation Board Maintenance of city parks Number of city parks (currently 26 parks) Miles of walking/biking trails (currently 62 miles) Legacy Park Community Center Harris Park Community Center Gamber Community Center Hartman Park Sports Area Legacy Park Youth Sports Fields Youth Sports Practice Areas Youth Athletic Programs Adult Athletic Programs Other recreation programs, such as classes and summer camps Ease of registering for programs Fees charged for activities Number of playgrounds Downtown Summer Music Festivals
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9
18. Which FOUR of these Parks and Recreation Services do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? [Write in the letters below using the letters from the list in Question 17 above]. 1st: _____
2nd: _____
3rd : _____
4th: _____
DirectionFinder® 2013 ETC Institute - Page 4
19. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means “Very Satisfied” and 1 means “Very Dissatisfied,” please indicate how satisfied you are with the following aspects of City Communication. (Circle your response) Very Very Don’t Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Know
How satisfied are you with: A.
B. C. D. E.
The availability of information about City programs and services City efforts to keep you informed about local issues The level of public involvement in local decision-making Information provided on the City’s website (cityofls.net) Programming on the City’s government access cable channels (Comcast 7, Time Warner 2, and AT&T U-verse 99)
5
4
3
2
1
9
5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
9 9 9
5
4
3
2
1
9
20. Approximately how often do you watch the City’s government access cable channels? (Channel 2, 7, or 99) ___(1) Everyday ___(2) At least once per week ___(3) At least once per month
___(4) Once or twice a year ___(5) Not at all
21. Approximately how often do you watch public meetings (City Council meetings, Council committee, or Planning Commission meetings) on the City’s government access cable channel (Channel 2, 7 or 99 or) or on the City’s website (cityofls.net)? ____(1) At least once per month ____(3) Once or twice per year ____(2) One or more times per week ____(4) Almost never 22. Which of the following sources of information do you CURRENTLY USE to get information about the City of Lee’s Summit? (Check ALL that apply) ___(A) City publications (ex: brochures, water report, election info) ___(K) Lee’s Summit Post-Tribune ___(B) Broadcast news television ___(L) Nixle ___(C) Gov’t cable channel (channels 2, 7 or 99) ___(M) Facebook ___(D) City website (cityofls.net) ___(N) Twitter ___(E) City Scope Quarterly Newsletter ___(O) YouTube ___(F) Lee’s Summit Illustrated, LSPR’s program/activity guide ___(P) Pinterest ___(G) Special message section on water bill ___(Q) e-newsletters such as Parks, ___(H) Public meetings Environmental, and City ___(I) Kansas City Star ___(R) Video streaming on the City’s website ___(S) Other: _________________________ ___(J) Lee’s Summit Journal 23. Which FOUR of these sources of information are the most preferred method for you to get information about the City of Lee’s Summit? [Write in the letters below using the letters from the list in Question 22 above.] 1st: _____ 2nd _____ 3rd _____ 4th _____ 24. Have you had any contact with the City of Lee’s Summit during the past year? ___(1) Yes [answer Q24a-d] ___(2) No [go to Q25] 24a. [Only if YES to Q#24] Which City Department did you contact most recently? ____(1) Administration ____(11) Law ____(2) Airport ____(12) Municipal Court ____(3) Animal Control ____(13) Parks and Recreation ____(4) City Clerk ____(14) Planning and Development ____(5) Codes Administration ____(15) Police ____(6) Finance/Treasury ____(16) Public Works – Admin & Engineering ____(7) Fire ____(17) Public Works Operations (Streets) ____(8) Fleet Division ____(18) Procurement and Contract Services ____(9) Human Resources ____(19) Solid Waste and Environment ____(10) Information Technology (IT) Services ____(20) Water Utilities DirectionFinder® 2013 ETC Institute - Page 5
24b. [Only if YES to Q#24] How easy was it to contact the person you needed to reach? ____(1) Very easy ____(4) Very difficult ____(2) Somewhat easy ____(9) Don’t know ____(3) Difficult 24c. [Only if YES to Q#24] Several factors that may influence your perception of the quality of Customer Service you receive from City employees are listed below. For each item, please rate how often the employees you have contacted during the past year have displayed the behavior described on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means “Always” and 1 means “Never.” (Circle your response) Always
Frequency that:
A. B. C.
D.
They were courteous and polite They gave prompt, accurate, and complete answers to questions They did what they said they would do in a timely manner They helped you resolve an issue to your satisfaction
Usually Sometimes Seldom Never
Don’t Know
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
5
4
3
2
1
9
24d. Which TWO of these Customer Service Items do you think are the most important services for the City to provide? [Write in the letters below using the letters from the list in Question 24c above]. 1st: _____
2nd: _____
25. Pace of Development: Using a five-point scale where a “5” means much too slow and “1” means much too fast, please rate the City’s current pace of development in each of the following areas. Type of Development
A. B. C. D. E.
Office development Industrial development Multi-family residential development Single-family residential development Retail development)
Much Too Slow
Too Slow
Just Right
Too Fast
Much Too Fast
Don’t Know
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9 9
26. Support for Development Incentives: Using a five-point scale where a “5” means Very Supportive and “1” means Not Supportive At All, please rate your level of support for having the City provide economic development incentives to encourage the following types of development in the City. Not Very Not Don’t Supportive Neutral Supportive Supportive Supportive Know At All
Type of Development
A. B. C. D. E.
Office development Industrial development Multi-family residential development Single-family residential development Retail development)
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1
9 9 9 9 9
27. How supportive would you be of the City of Lee’s Summit becoming more aggressive with attracting commercial development? ____(5) Very Supportive ____(4) Supportive ____(3) Neutral ____(2) Not Supportive ____(1) Not Supportive At All ____(9) Don’t Know DirectionFinder® 2013 ETC Institute - Page 6
28. How supportive would you be of the City of Lee’s Summit dedicating an economic development fund for activities or programs targeting commercial development? ____(5) Very Supportive ____(4) Supportive ____(3) Neutral ____(2) Not Supportive ____(1) Not Supportive At All ____(9) Don’t Know 29. What is your age? _______________ years 30. Counting yourself, how many people regularly live in your household? ______ 31. How many persons in your household (counting yourself), are: Under age 5 ____ Ages 20-24
____
Ages 55-64
____
Ages 5-9
____
Ages 25-34
____
Ages 65-74
____
Ages 10-14
____
Ages 35-44
____
Ages 75+
____
Ages 15-19
____
Ages 45-54
____
32. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? ____(1) Employed outside the home If so, where do you work? ___(a) In Lee’s Summit ___(e) Johnson County, KS ___(b) Kansas City, MO ___(f) Clay/Platte Counties in MO ___(c) Independence, MO ___(g) Elsewhere in MO ___(d) Elsewhere in Jackson County, MO ___(h) Elsewhere in KS ____(2) Employed in the home ____(3) Student ____(4) Retired ____(5) Not currently employed outside the home 33. Do you own or rent your current residence?
____(1) Own
____(2) Rent
34. Approximately how many years have you lived in the City of Lee’s Summit? ______ years 35. Would you say your total household income is: ____(1) Under $30,000 ____(2) $30,000 to $59,999 36. Your gender: ____(1) Male
____(3) $60,000 to $99,999 ____(4) $100,000 or more
____(2) Female
37. Approximately how much have you or other members of your household spent on Internet purchases during the past week? (write “0” if none) ______ dollars 38. Do you have any other comments you would like to make?
This concludes the survey. Thank you for your time! Please Return Your Completed Survey in the Enclosed Postage Paid Envelope to: ETC Institute, 725 W. Frontier Circle, Olathe, KS 66061 Your responses will remain Completely Confidential. The information printed on the sticker to the right will ONLY be used to help identify which areas of the City are having problems with city services. If your address is not correct, please provide the correct information. Thank you. DirectionFinder® 2013 ETC Institute - Page 7