CENTRE ON HOUSING RIGHTS AND EVICTIONS
International Secretariat 83 rue de Montbrillant 1202 Geneva Switzerland
Duluth 8 N. 2nd Avenue East, Suite 208 Duluth, MN 55802 USA
Porto Alegre Rua Demetrio Ribeiro 990/conj.202 90010-313 Porto Alegre - RS Brazil
Colombo 106 1/1 Horton Place Colombo 7 Sri Lanka
Melbourne PO Box 1160 Collingwood, Victoria 3066 Australia
Accra PMB CT 402 Cantonments Accra Ghana
COHRE is registered as a Non-Profit Foundation (Stichting No 41186752) in the Netherlands, and is also registered in Australia, Brazil, Ghana, Sri Lanka and USA. COHRE is an NGO in Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). COHRE has Participatory Status with the Council of Europe, Consultative Status with the Organisation of American States and Observer Status with the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
2003-2005 www.cohre.org
ACTIVITY REPORT WWW.COHRE.ORG
COH4-COVER.indd 1
7/2/07 10:15:00 AM
COH4-COVER.indd 2
7/2/07 10:15:06 AM
Contents
Chairperson’s Message
2
Executive Director’s Message
3
The Human Right to Housing – Two steps forward, three steps back
4
Examples of COHRE’s work around the World
6
Forced Evictions
8
Zimbabwe and Operation Murambatsvina
Housing and Property Restitution
9
10
The Pinheiro Principles
11
Women and Housing Rights
12
Inheritance Rights are Human Rights
13
Litigating Housing Rights
14
The Chixoy Dam case
15
The Right to Water
17
Indicators for monitoring the Right to Water
19
United Nations and other advocacy
21
Forced Evictions condemned by the Human Rights Committee
23
Focus on Africa
24
Focus on the Americas
26
The Right to the City
27
Focus on Asia-Pacific
28
Focus on Europe
30
The ERRC v Greece – Legal victories on Roma Housing Rights
31
Media and Communications
32
COHRE Publications 2003-2005
33
COHRE Boards
34
Financial statements
35
Donors and supporters
36
Help COHRE achieve real change
36
Acknowledgements
37
Chairperson’s Message
I am delighted to be able to write my first message in my capacity as COHRE’s Chairperson, a position I am
Housing rights issues have never been higher on the global agenda than today. International law has
honoured to hold. Since its establishment over a decade ago, COHRE’s standing and reach have grown
never taken these rights as seriously as today, and violators are finding it harder and harder to act with
steadily. This expansion – achieved through its highly competent and dedicated worldwide staff – has enabled
impunity – or at least without attention. And yet, COHRE’s work remains as vital as ever, as the global
COHRE to make increasingly important contributions to the effective realisation of housing rights in more and
housing crisis persists and contributes to the perpetuation of under-development, and insecurity and
more parts of the world. COHRE is achieving measurable results while reminding policy- and law-makers,
poverty. COHRE is well-placed to confront the challenges. With its established expertise, accumulated
together with administrators at varying levels, that the human rights dimensions of where people live must be
experience, widening networks and growing resources, COHRE aims to do more. To enhance its
taken into account and are integral to good governance and sustainable development.
impact, COHRE has recently reviewed and improved its methodologies and systems, and embarked on a vigorous fundraising drive for the period 2006-2010.
When I joined COHRE’s Board of Directors at its first incorporation in 1994, COHRE was a small organisation with a staff of two and an annual budget well under USD 100,000. Today with a staff of nearly 60, operating
In my capacity as Chairperson of the COHRE Board of Directors, I would like to encourage all State and
from 12 locations and a budget of over USD 2,500,000 COHRE is better equipped than ever to tackle housing
inter-governmental institutions, private foundations and philanthropists to assist COHRE in reaching its
rights abuses and address challenges in most parts of the world and in fairly short order.
financial goals which, in turn, will ensure that COHRE’s efforts on behalf of the world’s one billion slum dwellers can be more effective and generate the reforms of policy, law and practice which can bring
For those not working directly in the human rights field, it is often difficult to imagine how a small group of
meaningful changes in their lives.
determined people can actually change things for the better – especially when working against seemingly overwhelming powers of globalisation and daunting levels of poverty. To be sure, the global housing crisis is
Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to thank those Board members who have stepped down
immense; and tackling it requires the combined efforts of many. But COHRE demonstrates that a relatively
during the past three years (Cees Flinterman, Aart Hendriks, Virginia Dandan and Virginia Leary), and
small, focused and dedicated group of people can make a real difference, far beyond what might be expected
to warmly welcome those who have joined during that time: Paulo Sergio Pinheiro and Antoine Buyse.
given it’s size and material resources. Ingenuity, collaboration, and plain hard work and persistence, have
I look forward to working with the other Board Members and the COHRE senior management to bring
become hallmarks of COHRE’s successful approach.
COHRE forward to new heights of effectiveness and reach.
Through 2003-2005, COHRE has continued to work in its inimitable ways, combining with poise both orthodox and innovative strategies; helping to build a housing rights movement by improving international standards and the mechanisms designed to implement them; filing cases at national and regional courts or bodies; training government officials in how best to protect housing rights; receiving significant and wide-spread media attention in its efforts to stop forced evictions; drawing attention to the forgotten victims of housing rights violations wherever they may be; and, not least, suggesting practical solutions and appropriate processes through which housing rights violations can be stopped or avoided in the first place. Put simply, COHRE works.
2
WELCOME MESSAGES
John Packer COHRE Chairperson
Executive Director’s Message
As always in the world of human rights work, the last
land disputes, courtroom battles and others are merging
three years witnessed both unimaginable courage and hope,
together, integrally, with a common thread; the unifying thread of
as well as acute despair and chronic violations of human
housing rights.
rights which in some parts of the world are clearly getting worse. COHRE’s efforts during 2003-2005 brought us
Housing rights do, indeed, tie together war and peace,
face-to-face with both.
poverty and development, human rights abuses and justice, in a way few other themes can do. And though the world now
On the positive side of the spectrum, COHRE’s expanded
faces aglobal assault on housing rights – aptly described
team prevented planned forced evictions, breathed new
by one author as ‘domicide’ – COHRE will remain vigilant
life into a series of new or moribund global human rights
and committed to protecting the advances made in recent
standards and won several important judicial victories in
years, holding violators of housing rights to increasingly strict
support of communities struggling for their housing rights.
levels of accountability and arguing for a world order that is
Working from our offices throughout the world, in Africa,
arranged in such a way that no one, anywhere in the world,
Asia, Latin America and beyond, COHRE was able to work
will see their homes taken from them without recourse, be
simultaneously in post-conflict settings, urban slums, areas
forced to sleep on the street for lack of a home or live their
affected by natural disasters and anywhere housing rights
lives in squalor.
were under threat. Our ability to work as closely with urban poor communities as with Governments and the UN, remains
To COHRE this simple wish does not seem too much
one of our greatest strengths.
to expect.
But sadly, these strides forward must be seen against the larger backdrop of the global housing rights crisis which seems to worsen, just as it looks about to improve. COHRE engages in issues that affect where and in which conditions people live and bases its work firmly on existing human rights. And over the years – perhaps more than ever during the past three years – we have witnessed a strange convergence of events in areas which have traditionally been treated as distinct. Now issues as diverse as poverty, war, environment, gentrification, globalisation,
Scott Leckie
economics, natural diasters, housing prices and the increased
COHRE Executive Director
commodification of the world’s homes, the rights of women, WELCOME MESSAGES
3
The Human Right to Housing – Two steps forward, three steps back
It is difficult to envisage what future the drafters of the Universal Declaration on
human rights law – security of tenure, privacy, adequate space, affordable, access
Human Rights and those who prepared the subsequent Covenant on Economic,
to clean water and services, and others – it would not be an exaggeration to assert
Social and Cultural Rights might have imagined when they added the word ‘housing’
that well over half of the world’s people have still yet to enjoy a life where their
to both of these infinitely important global standards. Could they possibly have
housing rights are fully in place. And, of course, if these numbers are even close to
envisioned a world where everyone, everywhere – without exception – had a safe,
accurate, it goes without saying that no human rights are violated anywhere near
secure, affordable home in which to live, without fear of eviction or harassment? Is
the extent to which housing rights are abused, denied and neglected.
this the housing rights future they had in mind? What then is to be done? How do we remedy this abhorrent situation where more Or were the drafters (as they can often be) far more prescient than that, and
children are born into families who do not enjoy their legitimate housing rights, than
conversely picture a future, some several decades later, where access to housing
those who are born into homes which comply with what human rights laws are meant
– rather than treated universally as a basic birthright of all humanity – instead
to promise everyone, everywhere? What can be done when powerful governments
became increasingly commodified; an ever more rare affordable good, with higher
such as the United States continue to oppose treating housing as a right; when
and higher value, capable of access or acquisition only to the highest bidder?
simplistic solutions to the global housing crisis such as granting title deeds alone are touted as a save-all despite so much evidence to the contrary; and when even well-
In which direction did the outlook of the drafters and the States who signed or ratified
intentioned documents such as the UN’s Millennium Development Goals speak of
international norms enshrining housing rights tend, all those years ago when their
improving the lives of 100 million slum dwellers by 2020, even as the UN predicts the
pens and their votes began building the most important legal framework of hope that
total number of slum dwellers will have grown by a further 500 million by that date?
humanity has ever witnessed? Which world did they forecast to emerge as a result of their efforts? Perhaps we will never know this answer for sure, but it is probably
Similarly, what can be done to confront what has become in the last several years,
safe to say that most surely hoped for the first prospect, just as they may have feared
nothing less than a global evictions epidemic; particularly in Africa and Asia where
the latter. And, indeed, the world we face today – the world seen through the lens of
leaders and Governments think nothing of evicting hundreds of thousands of people
housing rights – is sadly far more reminiscent of the world the drafters sought to prevent
in a matter of days or weeks in order to confiscate land for what they see as more
emerging, than the world they had hoped to create.
profitable purposes? And when Governments in nations decimated by disasters like tsunamis or earthquakes decide to prevent survivors from returning to their ancestral
4
Today more than 30 percent of humanity live in desperately poor housing conditions,
homes so that they can allocate the land to property developers (for a kickback, of
which threaten their lives, their health and their livelihoods. Millions of the world’s
course), what can be done? When Central Banks lower interest rates to such an extent
poor are violently evicted from their homes every year. More than two billion people
that house prices shoot skywards, encouraging just about everyone to become a
do not possess legal protection against arbitrary forced evictions. Were we to
buyer (read: mortgage holder), and then the inevitable decline in prices arrives, what
combine all of the attributes of ‘adequate housing’, as defined under international
can be done to stop this boom and bust cycle from occurring yet again in the future?
THE HUMAN RIGHT TO HOUSING
When housing budgets are decimated, when rent caps are lifted and tenant’s rights reduced, when there are no policies to ensure access to housing by the most vulnerable – the disabled, the elderly, victims of war and others – and when ‘faith-based initiatives’ alone are seen as the guarantors of the rights of the poor rather than the State, what then are we to do? Of course, the simple answer is that much can be done and much is being done by an increasingly consolidated movement, in which COHRE is proud to be a key player, intent on protecting and securing housing rights for every person in every country, nation or territory; rather than leaving people’s access to an adequate home solely up to the invisible hand of markets. And there is good housing rights news to report, with positive advances in law, policy and practice in many parts of the world. UN Habitat’s Campaign for Secure Tenure, for instance, has motivated the international community, governments and civil society to do more to protect the rights of the urban and rural poor. The Advisory Group on Forced Evictions, established by UN Habitat’s Executive Director, Mrs. Anna Tibaijuka, is another positive development. Tibaijuka’s mission to Zimbabwe to examine the eviction crimes sponsored by the Mugabe regime was another step forward in the recognition of forced evictions being a threat to peace and security. Though no action was ultimately taken (at least not thus far) against Zimbabwe, that these issues were raised at the UN Security Council and that charges of crimes against humanity were levelled by some States, is further evidence that in some instances, housing rights are being taken more seriously than before. During the past three years, a range of new housing rights standards have been approved by the UN and national governments. New rules governing housing and property restitution rights for refugees and displaced persons have emerged. The global outpouring of support for rebuilding the shattered homes of tsunami survivors throughout Asia was further testimony that the people of the world care about and support COHRE’s standard refrain of – Housing Rights for Everyone, Everywhere. It is perhaps most appropriate to conclude this brief overview of housing rights today on this very point, for this is the essence of any perspective that takes housing rights seriously. And this, of course, remains that basic and timeless truth that the world’s citizens, by a huge measure, support the assertion that everyone must have access to an adequate home and expect their housing rights to be protected. It will be up to governments and those economic institutions that so often control them, to embrace the view of the global majority that housing must never become a privilege, it must always remain a basic human right.
5
Examples of COHRE’s work around the World
Colombia
Zimbabwe
1
COHRE is working closely with local groups in Colombia to help resolve Latin
COHRE continues its longstanding efforts
America’s worst and most persistent
in Zimbabwe to end arbitrary evictions
displacement crisis.
and land confiscations and to hold public officials responsible for these abuses.
Brazil Brazil’s most marginalised groups
South Africa
– the Quilombos, indigenous groups
Working with local partners, COHRE
in Amazonas, and favela dwellers – are
continues to put pressure on the
working with COHRE to strengthen
Government of South Africa to implement
housing and land rights.
the pro-housing rights and anti-evictions provisions of the 1996 Constitution.
Guatemala COHRE is supporting the restitution
Ghana
and reparation rights of the Rio Negro
COHRE actively campaigns for an
community, filing several cases before
improved national housing policy in
national and regional human rights tribunals.
Ghana and to prevent a series of planned forced evictions.
Argentina
Kenya
Together with several urban poor associations, COHRE is engaged in efforts
In conjunction with Kenyan housing rights
COHRE Offices
NGOs, COHRE has campaigned to stop
1
Duluth, USA
planned evictions in some of Nairobi’s
2
Porto Allegre, Brazil
to secure the right to water for Argentina’s poorest communities.
6
EXAMPLES OF COHRE’S WORK AROUND THE WORLD
3
Accra, Ghana
4
Geneva, Switzerland
5
Colombo, Sri Lanka
6
Melbourne, Australia
2
largest slums, including Kibera.
Sri Lanka Working from its Colombo office, COHRE continues to advocate on behalf of
4
those displaced by the conflict and the 2004 tsunami for the right to return to their original homes.
Cambodia Through training public officials and grassroots groups, COHRE is striving to reduce both the severity and the scale of forced evictions in the Cambodian capital Phnom Penh.
3
Pakistan
5
COHRE has publicised the often violent and massive forced evictions carried out in connection with the Lyari Expressway project in Karachi.
Burma COHRE is seeking to build a greater understanding within Burma of the human rights implications of the housing and land rights crisis facing the citizens of this modern-day dictatorship.
6
THE HUMAN RIGHT TO HOUSING - TWO STEPS FORWARD, THREE STEPS BACK
7
Forced Evictions
Every year many millions of people around the world are forcibly evicted, leaving them homeless and, in the process, entrenching patterns of poverty, discrimination and social exclusion. Evictions take place in virtually all countries and are usually directed at poor and vulnerable communities living on the edge of legality under informal tenure arrangements. Most communities are evicted against their will and without consultation, compensation or alternative housing being provided.
The consequences of forced eviction for families and communities, and particularly for the poor, are severe and traumatic. Property
Although forced evictions are often justified in the name of ‘development’, they
is often damaged or destroyed, productive assets are lost or rendered useless, social networks are broken up, livelihoods are lost,
directly contradict Millennium Development Goal 7, which aims to achieve ‘significant
access to essential facilities and services is denied, and violence is often used to force people to comply. The prospect of being
improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers by the year 2020’. Evictions
forcibly evicted can be so terrifying that it is not uncommon for people to risk their lives in an attempt to resist or, in extreme cases, to
continue despite the fact that international law explicitly recognises the human right to
take their own lives when it becomes clear eviction cannot be stopped.
adequate housing and has repeatedly condemned the practice of forced eviction as a gross and systematic violation of human rights.
While the outcome of the practice of forced eviction is always the same – the removal of a person or family from their home against their will – the causes of displacement and the powerful forces responsible for these abuses are often more difficult to pinpoint.
COHRE’s attention to the practice of forced evictions has been a core element of its
In many cases, forced evictions may occur in connection with seemingly unstoppable economic development processes, with
work since its inception. The severity and scale of forced evictions in recent years
clearly identifiable individuals or institutions publicly supporting the removal of people from their homes. Conflicts, both domestic and
has been such that COHRE was prompted to establish a Global Forced Evictions
international, generate millions of evictions every year, while urban ‘beautification’ projects, gentrification and modernisation lead to
Programme in January 2003, with a mandate to monitor, prevent and remedy forced
further millions losing their homes. In other cases however, the factors leading to eviction may be more subtle and smaller in scale;
evictions throughout the world. Since its inception, the programme has made significant
a poor landlord in a slum may decide arbitrarily to evict even poorer tenants or a large landowner may falsely claim that work is no
progress in carrying out its mission. COHRE has forged alliances and partnerships with
longer available for those working his farm and may use this as a false pretext for removing them from his land. But while the causes
a growing network of communities and support organisations around the world. This
vary, the human rights implications for those evicted are the same, and the rights they are meant to enjoy need to be taken seriously,
integrated approach has enhanced COHRE’s effectiveness in fighting against forced
no matter where or what the justification for their eviction from their place of residence.
evictions. Together with its partners, COHRE has sought to prevent forced evictions using the following tools:
8
FORCED EVICTIONS
Zimbabwe and Operation Murambatsvina In May 2005, the Government of Zimbabwe launched Operation Murambatsvina (literally “drive out rubbish”), a violent and systematic attempt to destroy Zimbabwe’s slum areas
Global networking
Kenya; Agbogbloshie / Old Fadama,
be to further develop the momentum of
and force residents out of the inner city areas in which they lived and worked. Operation
COHRE has developed and played a
Accra, Ghana; Pommahakan, Bangkok,
resistance to forced evictions globally;
Murambatsvina left at least 700,000 people homeless or without a livelihood, and indirectly
central role within a global network of
Thailand; Quilombos communities in
to engage governments in dialogue to
affected a further 2.4 million people. On 23 June 2005, a coalition of more than 200
organisations and community groups
Alcantara, Brazil; Johannesburg Inner
highlight their human rights obligations
African and international NGOs coordinated by Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights,
resisting forced evictions, covering more
City, South Africa; various locations
with the aim of preventing evictions
Amnesty International and COHRE held simultaneous media conferences in Harare,
than 50 countries.
in Zimbabwe; Roma evictions in a
and developing viable alternatives;
Johannesburg, Windhoek, Lagos and Cairo, declaring “There can be no justification for
number of countries in Europe; and
and to find ways to tackle and change
the Government of Zimbabwe’s action which has been carried out without prior notice,
Chixoy Dam, Guatemala.
the policies and practices of the worst
due process of the law or assurance of adequate alternative accommodation.”
Eviction monitoring
violators of the right to adequate
COHRE has established standardised information gathering and recording
Advocacy
housing and protection against forced
In the wake of Operation Murambatsvina and Zimbabwe’s economic crisis – which has
procedures and systems, and compiles
In partnership with its allies, COHRE
evictions, such as China, whose
seen inflation of almost 1000 percent and severe food and fuel shortages – millions of
up-to-date information sheets on key
has directly or indirectly assisted in the
example is being followed by many
Zimbabweans continue to face poverty, malnutrition, starvation and disease.
eviction cases around the world.
prevention of planned forced evictions
weaker emerging economies.
of tens of thousands of families through
The Zimbabwe Government responded to international pressure with Operation Garikai
Media and publicity
issuing letters of protest and media
In order to meet these challenges,
(“rebuilding and reconstruction”), although without funds to address needs in any
COHRE has brought increased media
releases, organising local and international
COHRE will seek to expand the existing
meaningful way. The Government continues to shun international offers of assistance and
attention to the issue of forced eviction,
campaigns, and engaging in other
global forced evictions information
has withheld international aid from distribution. It continues to forcibly evict residents and
and has exposed the perpetrators of
creative eviction prevention initiatives.
network; collect, record and analyse
informal traders who attempt to resettle in areas cleared by Operation Murambatsvina.
comprehensive,
forced evictions at local, national, regional and international levels.
Case work Through
intensive
quality
information
In spite of such successes by COHRE
on evictions around the world; finalise
On 16 November 2005, COHRE, Amnesty International, and Zimbabwe Lawyers for
and the many other organisations and
and roll out a comprehensive global
Human Rights coordinated a second joint action with over 250 organisations, who called
groups who are working to prevent
forced evictions database, accessible
on the Zimbabwe Government to provide emergency relief and restitution, compensation
fact-finding,
and remedy forced evictions, the
to a broad range of partners; continue
and access to justice to all those affected. They also urged African leaders to end their
preventative and remedial work on a
problem of forced evictions persists
to build and consolidate emerging
silence and pressure the Government to halt and remedy the evictions.
growing number of eviction cases,
on a massive scale. In the past three
alliances and partnerships against
COHRE is increasingly successful in
years a renewed spate of mass forced
forced evictions; undertake effective
COHRE also supplied a dossier of information to the UN Special Envoy, Mrs. Anna
halting planned forced evictions before
evictions, in Asia and Africa particularly,
joint actions to prevent forced evictions
Tibaijuka, during her visit to Zimbabwe in June 2005. In November, during the 38th African
they can be carried out. Major efforts
has
crucial
in at least twenty key focus countries;
Commission on Human Rights Session in Banjul, Gambia, COHRE and its partners
in this regards were undertaken from
importance of intensified efforts to turn
and develop, promote and publicise
lobbied for a resolution on Zimbabwe. COHRE is currently researching the possibility
2003-2005
Expressway,
the tide. It is clear that COHRE’s key
viable alternatives to forced eviction.
of having perpetrators of the Operation Murambatsvina evictions charged with crimes
Karachi, Pakistan; Kibera, Nairobi,
challenges for the next three years will
in:
Lyari
demonstrated
the
against humanity. FORCED EVICTIONS
9
Housing and Property Restitution Finding effective and just ways to secure housing,
persons to return to and reclaim their original homes and
Colombia
This report, and COHRE’s work towards a just and stable
land and property restitution rights for refugees and
lands. Since 1998 COHRE has worked closely with
COHRE has carried out several missions to Colombia
peace between Israel and the Palestinians, makes the
internally displaced persons wishing to return to their
governments, UN bodies, NGOs, community-based
to examine restitution issues, one result of which was
case for the housing and property restitution rights of
places of habitual residence are emerging as some of
groups and refugees and internally displaced persons
the 2005 release of Defending the Housing Rights
Palestinians dispossessed of their former homes and
the key challenges facing policy- and law-makers and
(IDPs) to systematically address the immense housing,
of Internally Displaced Persons, which addresses
lands. COHRE’s media team carried out ten days of
the United Nations in post-conflict countries. Resolving
land and property restitution challenges facing refugees
housing and property restitution rights for those
filming in both Palestine and Israel in May 2005 for a film
restitution claims successfully is now increasingly seen
and internally displaced persons in numerous post-
displaced by the ongoing civil war. Cyprus
on the restitution rights of Palestinian refugees which will
as a fundamental element in peace-building efforts
conflict and post-disaster settings. COHRE has worked
designed to bring stability and development to countries
directly on housing and property restitution issues in
More than 170,000 Greek Cypriots from the northern
decimated by war. The new UN Peacebuilding
many post-conflict and post-disaster trouble spots
part of the island remain unable to access their original
Maldives
Commission will surely need to institutionalise support
including Albania, Bhutan (for refugees in eastern Nepal),
homes. Vocal demands for the restitution of housing and
COHRE worked in the Maldives in the immediate
for housing and property restitution in countries where it
Cyprus, East Timor, Georgia (and South Ossetia), Iraq,
property have ensured that this remains a major political
aftermath of the 2004 Asian tsunami to explore whether
becomes actively involved.
Kosovo, Maldives, Palestine/Israel, Sri Lanka, and
issue in the country. In late 2005, COHRE undertook a
the proposed relocation of some tsunami survivors to
elsewhere. COHRE is regularly called on by UNHCR,
mission to Cyprus to examine the restitution question
island’s other than their own was consistent with the
The removal of people from their homes and the
UN-Habitat, UNDP, OCHA and other UN agencies for
first-hand, and to determine how the agency might best
human rights of the displaced.
confiscation of their land on the basis of race or ethnicity
policy and legal advice on restitution issues.
assist in resolving outstanding restitution claiMs
community. Therefore, ensuring the restitution of
During 2003-2005, COHRE worked on restitution
Guatemala
Since 2003, COHRE has regularly worked in Sri Lanka
homes, lands and property (usually lost through
issues in a growing number of countries:
COHRE has worked intensively with the Chixoy Dam
on housing and property restitution questions. In 2003,
be released in early 2006.
Sri Lanka
is now widely condemned by the international
arbitrary
10
Reparations Campaign in Guatemala, in an effort to
it prepared a detailed proposal for the establishment of a
uncompensated expropriation and discriminatory
displacement,
Burma (Myanmar)
achieve restitution and compensation for the displaced
Sri Lankan Housing, Land and Property Commission at
confiscation) has become a prominent component of
COHRE continued its efforts to promote the rights
families of more than 400 people who were murdered in
the request of UNHCR-Colombo. The proposal is now
efforts in support of housing rights within the context of
of all the displaced within and outside of Burma to
the early 1980s resisting the construction of the massive
under consideration by both the Government and the
post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation. Securing
return home and reclaim their original homes and
Chixoy dam.
LTTE. In 2005, following the tsunami, COHRE provided
the equal rights of women in post-conflict settings is
lands when they choose to do so. COHRE has also
often most concretely carried out in terms of protecting
worked to raise the profile of housing, land and property
Israel/Palestine
combine efforts to simultaneously resolve both conflict-
women’s equal rights to property ownership, including
rights within Burma, and continues to encourage the
In 2005, COHRE released the report Ruling
induced displacement and the displacement caused
their right to housing, land and property inheritance.
people of Burma to consider how these issues might
Palestine: A History of the Legally Sanctioned Jewish-
by the tsunami. Given the extent of work on restitution
best be addressed in a future democratic Burma.
Israeli Seizure of Land and Housing in Palestine in
to be done in the country, COHRE established an office
COHRE’s work on housing and property restitution
collaboration with the Palestine-based BADIL Resource
in Colombo in mid-2005, which has greatly enhanced
works to protect the rights of refugee and displaced
Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights.
COHRE’s efforts in the country.
HOUSING AND PROPERTY RESTITUTION
ethnic
cleansing,
advice on how the international community might best
The Pinheiro Principles The UN endorsed the Principles on Housing and Property
Expanding awareness
The Principles have already become tools for future training
Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons (‘The
To expand global awareness of these issues, COHRE has produced
programmes in Afghanistan, Burundi, Colombia and Sri Lanka, and
Pinheiro Principles’) on 11 August 2005. The Pinheiro
more than ten publications on housing, land and property restitution
have been utilised to inform human rights litigation pending before
Principles are the most comprehensive global standard
issues. Most significantly, in 2003 the edited volume Returning
the European Court of Human Rights.
ever adopted on the question of housing, land and property restitution rights for
Home: Housing and Property Restitution Rights of Refugees and
the world’s 35 million displaced persons. They are designed to provide practical
Displaced Persons was published by Transnational Publishers. A
guidance to States, UN agencies and the broader international community on how
second volume of Returning Home was completed in late 2005
Embracing Housing Rights within every UN Peace Operation
best to address the complex legal and technical issues surrounding housing, land
and will also be published by Transnational Publishers.
COHRE has worked within several UN Peace Operations – including Kosovo and East Timor – and in a much wider range
and property restitution. For the first time, the Principles provide a consolidated and universal approach to dealing effectively with outstanding housing and property
Improving restitution standards
of post-conflict nations, assisting local and international authorities
restitution claiMs They augment the international normative framework in the area
COHRE has long been active in promoting the adoption of new
to address housing, land and property concerns that arise within
of housing and property restitution rights, and are grounded firmly within existing
international standards on housing and property restitution. In
all post-conflict settings. Beyond the question of restitution, land
international human rights and humanitarian law. Sections II-IV of The Principles
August 2005, the most significant standard to date was endorsed
disputes, structural discrimination against women, forced evictions,
(Principles 2-10) re-affirm existing human rights and apply them to the specific
by the UN. The UN Principles on Housing and Property Restitution
the destruction of homes, housing reconstruction, repairing
question of housing and property restitution.
for Refugees and Displaced Persons (‘The Pinheiro Principles’) are
housing and property registration systems and many other issues
a major achievement in the area of standard-setting with respect
are common challenges facing countries in the aftermath of war or
National policy-makers, UN and NGO officials and others involved in the practical
to restitution, and are the culmination of a four year process
during the transition to democracy.
transformation of restitution rights from paper to deed, will find Sections V-VI
which COHRE initiated in 2001. In the run-up to the adoption of
(Principles 11-22) of particular relevance. In these sections, the Principles elaborate
the Principles, COHRE organised two expert panel discussions
In 2004, COHRE completed a comprehensive policy paper for
what States should do in terms of developing national housing and property
in Geneva, as well as a 2-day Expert Consultation from 21-22
UNHCR entitled United Nations Peace Operations and Housing,
restitution procedures and institutions, and ensuring access to these by all displaced
April 2005 which explored the draft Principles, held at Brown
Land and Property Rights in Post-Conflict Societies: A Proposed U.N.
persons. They stress the importance of consultation and participation in decision-
University (Providence, USA). The Expert Consultation allowed
Integral Policy Framework. The paper was used as the background
making by displaced persons, and then outline approaches to technical issues of
discussion of the development of the Principles in partnership with
paper for an Expert Group meeting (10-11 November 2004, in
housing, land and property records, the rights of tenants and other non-owners
a broad range of international experts. The Expert Consultation
Geneva) designed to garner support within the UN system for just
and the question of secondary occupants. Legislative measures, the prohibition
was coordinated jointly by COHRE and the Watson Institute
such a policy. COHRE is in the process of sponsoring research
of arbitrary and discriminatory laws, the enforcement of restitution decisions and
for International Studies at Brown University, with the generous
towards a comparative survey of past UN peace operations and
judgments and the issue of compensation are then explored. Finally, Principle 22
support of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for
their involvement in the housing, land and property rights issues
discusses the responsibility of the international community to protect housing and
Refugees (UNHCR) and the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
which will be published in 2007.
property restitution rights.
Now that the Principles have been adopted by the SubCommission, COHRE is drafting a plan of action on followup activities and the implementation of the Principles.
HOUSING AND PROPERTY RESTITUTION
11
Women and Housing Rights
Despite the many significant human rights advances
rights perspective: lack of information and training on
organisations working on broader issues of violence
how such rights intersect with housing and land
during the past half century and a clear recognition that
the right to housing; lack of collective action focused on
against women and women’s rights more generally.
rights for women.
human rights belong equally to both genders, women
women’s housing rights; a belief that housing, especially
Despite initial reluctance to embrace housing and land
continue to be structurally deprived of equal treatment,
for women, should be left to the private sector; and an
rights issues, innumerable women’s organisations
Information collection and dissemination
opportunities for economic advancement and personal
overall disregard for the importance that the right to
have over time realised the centrality of these issues,
The issue of inheritance rights for women, particularly
autonomy in all corners of the world. The increasing
housing plays, especially for women. Though these
and how fundamental they are to the problems their
focused on sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle
feminisation of poverty throughout the world is testimony
problems are widely known and some important steps
clients face, in both the North and the Global South.
East and North Africa (MENA) region, has been the
to the fact that the mere recognition of women’s human
have been taken to address them, the specific impacts
rights is not enough; rights must be protected and
they have upon the deprivation of housing and land
COHRE has been actively coordinating the
rights. Inheritance is a fundamental issue with regard
fulfilled, not simply accorded recognition.
rights for women is rarely acknowledged, let alone
emergence of the Women’s Land Link Africa, a
to how wealth is transferred within a society, and is
positively addressed.
collaborative effort with the Huiarou Commission,
closely related to the protection of women’s housing,
UN-FAO Southern Africa and UN-HABITAT. The
land and property rights. In 2003-2004, legal
slums, shantytowns, transit centres, refugee camps
COHRE has been actively engaged in efforts to support
project has developed an information database
systems relating to civil and customary inheritance
or the streets, often for no reason other than their
women’s housing, land and property rights since 1998.
on legal and practical matters relevant to women’s
rights in ten sub-Saharan countries were analysed
gender. In dozens of countries, women are legally
The last three years have been critical in addressing
housing and land rights in Africa, and linked
within a human rights framework, and the realities of
barred from inheriting housing, land and property on an
these issues and seeking change. Our work during
organisations throughout the region to share
women’s inheritance were investigated. This research
equal basis with men. Women disproportionately face
2003-2005 focused on three main areas of activity:
strategies and experiences on the issue.
continued in the MENA region in 2004-2005.
the brunt of forced evictions. Women perform two-
international coalition building, information collection
thirds of the world’s total working hours, yet they own
and dissemination, and effecting policy change:
COHRE remains actively involved on women’s
Fact-finding missions exploring these issues were
issues at the UN Commission on Human Rights,
carried out in Zambia, South Africa, Turkey and
As a result, millions of women have been relegated to
less than 1 percent of the world’s property. Women
12
cornerstone of COHRE’s efforts to protect women’s
and girl children make up 80 percent of the world’s
International coalition building
and during 2003-2005 participated in the work of
Kuwait. Throughout these countries, COHRE found
refugees and internally displaced persons. Women’s
Working at all levels, from the UN to the grassroots,
the UN Commission on the Status of Women, the
that the international and national protection of
economic disadvantage and income disparities place
COHRE devoted considerable time to building a
World Urban Forum and the International Experts
inheritance rights is largely inadequate. Inheritance
considerable economic strain on the mothers, sisters,
strong base and support network. Informed by
Group Meeting on Housing and Land Rights.
is a multi-faceted issue, ranging from the complex
wives and daughters of the world.
the women’s global political movement, COHRE
At each conference, COHRE organised side events
world of customary law, to the intense burdens of
concentrated on raising awareness of the causes
on the issues of housing rights and women, inviting
poverty and the harsh impact of HIV/AIDS. Women
Gender inequity gives rise to many barriers which
behind the denial of housing and land rights for
those organisations traditionally involved in issues
in both regions are blatantly denied their rights to
COHRE believes can be addressed from a human
women, and has consistently sought to involve
such as health, education and political rights to see
equal inheritance.
WOMEN AND HOUSING RIGHTS
Inheritance Rights are Human Rights
In an effort to address the problems identified in 2004-2005, workshops of activists from
Inheritance rights play a fundamental role in the transfer of wealth in society, and directly
the focus countries in sub-Saharan Africa and the MENA region highlighted similarities
impact on the degree to which women’s rights to adequate housing and land are
surrounding inheritance rights violations in the two regions. Both workshops resulted
protected. Ensuring equal inheritance rights will help to redress the high levels of poverty
in the emergence of regional networks focused on the issue of inheritance rights. This,
and housing insecurity facing women throughout the world today.
in turn, led to the convening of the Inheritance Rights are Human Rights Summit, a two day conference held in Geneva during the 2005 UN Commission on Human Rights.
Every society has predetermined formal laws and informal rules governing rights of
The Summit drafted the Declaration on Inheritance Rights, which is intended to act as
succession. In principle, laws of succession and inheritance are designed to counteract the
the impetus for stronger policy and protection for inheritance rights, at both the local
disruptive effect of death on the integrity of the family unit. In reality, however, if the law and
and international levels.
practice of inheritance is not based upon human rights standards, it often has the opposite effect, effectively robbing widows and girls of their lands and homes and forcing them into
Effecting policy change
homelessness, destitution and social isolation.
Effecting policy change has been another key focus of COHRE work on women’s rights in recent years. The publication in 2004 of Bringing Equality Home: Promoting
In many countries, even those with statutory systems that purportedly protect women,
and Protecting the Inheritance Rights of Women – A Survey of Law and Practice in
inheritance is in practice determined by systems of custom and tradition. These often
Sub-Saharan Africa included a set of detailed recommendations to ten countries, the
discriminate against women through measures ranging from quiet persuasion to violent
international and regional community, civil society and donors. The recommendations
coercion. For example, in sub-Saharan Africa, this often leaves widows homeless after in-
focused on effecting change based on human rights law and respect for women’s
laws claim the husband’s property as their own, inappropriately citing customary law. The
equality, participation and autonomy, and have been well received.
denial of inheritance rights has devastating consequences: it has for example been linked to an increase in the HIV/AIDS rate for women. Denied inheritance rights, evicted from housing
Information on women’s housing rights was disseminated throughout COHRE’s global
and land, women are often forced to seek shelter in urban sluMs COHRE continues to
network through publications and fact sheets, email alerts and network information
lead efforts to ensure that women and men enjoy equal inheritance rights in all countries of
exchanges, and through training and sensitisation programmes. In 2003 and 2004,
the world.
COHRE carried out training programmes on these issues in the Philippines, Morocco, Kenya and Indonesia. COHRE is also seeking to influence policy through use of the Declaration on Inheritance Rights. It has worked at the international level with interested States to develop housing and land rights resolutions at the Commission on Human Rights and the Commission on the Status of Women.
WOMEN AND HOUSING RIGHTS
13
Litigating Housing Rights COHRE’s litigation work promotes and protects economic, social and
Direct litigation
Amicus Curiae litigation
cultural (ESC) rights through capacity building and training, and assisting
COHRE v. Sudan (Darfur): Complaint to the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Dominican Republic
litigation efforts at the domestic, national and international levels. From 2003-2005, COHRE undertook or assisted in litigation or quasi-litigation in
COHRE prepared and submitted a Communication to the African
Dominican Republic before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in
or against the US, Guatemala, Nigeria, Kenya, India, Israel, Greece, Ireland,
Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights with respect to past
support of Movimiento de Mujeres Dominico-Haitianas (MUDHA), Centro
the Dominican Republic, the Philippines, Sudan, Cambodia, Croatia, Israel,
and ongoing human rights violations in the Darfur region of Sudan.
por la Justicia y el Derecho Internacional (CEJIL) and the International
Zimbabwe and South Africa. Training workshops and seminars were held in
COHRE intervened in the case of Dilcia Yean and Violeta Bosica v.
Human Rights Law Clinic of the University of California Berkeley Law
Cambodia, Ghana, Finland, the Gambia, Kenya, the Philippines and the US.
COHRE v. Guatemala et al (Chixoy Dam Case): Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
ESC Rights training, workshops and seminars
In September 2004, COHRE filed a case to the Inter-American
In partnership with the Institute for Human Rights at Åbo Akademi in Turku/
Commission on Human Rights on behalf of the victims of the Chixoy Dam
The Philippines
Åbo, Finland, COHRE presented an Intensive Course on Justiciability of
in Guatemala. This case was filed against the Government of Guatemala,
COHRE has an amicus curiae brief before the Regional Trial Court of
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 2004 and again in 2005.
the US Government, the World Bank and the Inter-American Development
the National Capital Judicial Region, a domestic court in the Philippines,
Bank. This is one of the first ever cases designed to hold Member States
in the case of José R. Morales, et al. v. Metro Manila Development
In May 2004, COHRE carried out a two-day intensive workshop for judges
and International Financial Institutions (IFI) accountable for human rights
Authority, et al. This case is an attempt to prevent the forced eviction of
and lawyers entitled Seminar on Litigating ESC Rights for the Bench and
violations carried out in the context of IFI projects.
several persons by the municipal authorities in Manila. Zimbabwe
and regional law, both substantive and procedural, binding on the
Heather Mundy v. Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: UN Human Rights Committee
Government of Ghana with respect to housing rights and the prohibition
COHRE was co-petitioner in the above case, brought before the Human
cases in 2005. The first, Dare Remusha Cooperative v. The Minister
on forced eviction.
Rights Committee, challenging the eviction of several persons in Sri Lanka
of Local Government and Urban Development, the Chairperson of the
to make way for an expressway from Colombo to Matawa.
Harare Commission, the Minister of Home Affairs, the Commissioner
School (Boalt Hall). This case involves the denial of primary education to two girls of Haitian descent and those similarly situated.
Bar. Participants included members of the judiciary from Ghana, Nigeria and the Gambia. The workshop involved an examination of international
COHRE assisted the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights in two
In 2005, at the invitation of the Chief Justice of the Gambia, COHRE held a
of Police and the Harare City Council, sought injunctive relief from the
two-day seminar on the justiciability of ESC rights, with a particular focus on
Supreme Court of Zimbabwe for the massive forced evictions taking
housing rights, including the prohibition on forced eviction.
place as a result of the so-called Operation Murambatsvina, which left over 300,000 homeless by early June.
In March 2005, COHRE also took part in a two-day training on housing as a human right, with a particular focus of the prohibition on forced evictions
The second was a case before the African Commission on Human and
and the justiciability of housing rights. The training was attended by lawyers
Peoples’ Rights in the case of Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights v.
and other human rights advocates.
Zimbabwe. COHRE provided an amicus curiae brief which analysed the forced evictions at issue in this case through the lens of the Government of Zimbabwe’s international human rights obligations.
14
LITIGATING HOUSING RIGHTS
The Chixoy Dam case In the early 1980s the Government of Guatemala was widely known as one of
Strategic litigation in the United States
CERD: Ireland
the world’s worst human rights abusers. During this time, the World Bank and the
Alvarez-Machain v. Sosa et al.
COHRE submitted a Shadow Report to the Committee on the
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) negotiated a multi-million dollar deal with
COHRE joined other human rights organisations in an amicus
Elimination of Racial Discrimination regarding discriminatory
the military Government of Guatemala. Both Banks partnered with the Government
curiae brief to the US Supreme Court in this case involving a
legislation and practices, including forced eviction, of and by the
of Guatemala in order to fund the construction of the Chixoy Hydroelectric Dam,
challenge by the US Government to the application of the Alien
Government of Ireland with respect to housing and Travellers.
a project that would greatly benefit many of the military leaders who owned vast
Tort Claims Act to human rights violations.
Legal advice
tracts of land in the area to be serviced by the dam. The first phases of the dam project involved displacing the rural Mayan peasants from the reservoir basin in
Khulumani et al. v. Barclays Nat’l Bank et al.
which they had lived for generations.
COHRE joined other human rights organisations in an amicus
Hearing before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
curiae brief to the US Federal Court in the case of Khulumani et
COHRE worked with several US-based organisations in
The residents of Río Negro, one of the communities to be displaced, were offered
al v. Barclays Nat’l Bank et al. The brief argued that internationally
order to arrange for a hearing before the Inter-American
grossly unfair compensation for the homes and lands, and sought to negotiate
recognised “gross violations of human rights” fall under the
Commission on Human Rights on housing rights in
further with Guatemalan authorities. The Guatemalan authorities responsible for
scope of the Alien Tort Claims Act.
the Americas with a particular focus on Brazil, Canada and the US.
the construction of the Chixoy Dam, a project funded by and under the supervision of the World Bank and IDB, decided on a different solution. In 1982 the Guatemalan
Israel v. Ascherman et al.
authorities carried out a series of brutal massacres as a means to forcibly evict the
COHRE submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Jerusalem
Legal memorandum to PILAP, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
village of Río Negro. These massacres left over half the village’s population dead,
District Court in support of Rabbi Arik Ascherman.
COHRE submitted a Legal Memorandum on the threatened forced eviction of families living near Preah Monivong Hospital
as the survivors went into hiding. Working on behalf of the Río Negro survivors, COHRE filed a case with the Inter-
Quasi-litigation: Treaty-Monitoring Bodies’ periodic reporting procedure
American Commission on Human Rights in 2004. The Petition is one of the first
Human Rights Committee: Kenya
cases to attempt to hold the governments that make up the Banks accountable
COHRE submitted a Shadow Report to the Human Rights
Uganda: Forced eviction prevention advocacy
when they use the Banks to violate their respective human rights obligations.
Committee addressing violations of the International Covenant
COHRE intervened to prevent a threatened forced eviction of the
States cannot abrogate their respective human rights obligations simply by acting
on Civil and Political Rights in the context of forced evictions
Naguru and Nakawa estates in Kampala, Uganda. Some 1,500
collectively through inter-governmental organisations, including inter-governmental
from informal settlements in Kenya. COHRE also assisted in
persons were threatened by the forced eviction. The evictions
development banks. Human rights advocates and indeed human rights mechanisms
bringing three Kenyan human rights advocates to the session
were prevented.
such as those of the United Nations, Organisation of American States, African
of the Human Rights Committee at which the report on
Union and Council of Europe, must hold such entities and their Member States
Kenya was considered.
in Phnom Penh for the Public Interest Legal Advocacy Project (PILAP).
accountable for human rights violations. To do otherwise will simply create and maintain impunity for some of the gravest violations of international law. With the Chixoy Dam case, COHRE has set an example as to how to finally hold such organisations as the World Bank accountable for human rights violations. LITIGATING HOUSING RIGHTS
15
THE RIGHT TO WATER IS ONE OF THE MOST WIDELY DENIED HUMAN RIGHTS, WITH OVER 1.1 BILLION INDIVIDUALS LACKING ACCESS TO AN AFFORDABLE SUPPLY OF CLEAN WATER FOR THEIR BASIC NEEDS. OVER 2.4 BILLION PEOPLE LACK ACCESS TO BASIC SANITATION.
16
The Right to Water
The right to water is one of the most widely denied human rights, with over 1.1 billion
COHRE’s response to the water challenge
individuals lacking access to an affordable supply of clean water for their basic needs.
COHRE began working on water issues in 2002, and achieved its first success when, at the initiative of COHRE and with its legal
Over 2.4 billion people lack access to basic sanitation. The poor, often living in
assistance, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted General Comment No. 15 on the Right to Water in
deprived urban and rural areas, are frequently neglected in infrastructure development
November 2002. The standard is now widely quoted in current debates on water issues, and several countries have taken steps to
and maintenance. They frequently pay exorbitant prices for drinking water or have
integrate the right into their Constitutions or water laws. COHRE’s aim since 2003 has been to promote and assist in the implementation
no alternative but to use contaminated water from rivers or wells. The laws and policies
of the General Comment at the international and national levels. As a small programme, COHRE’s strategy is to build expertise in key
of many countries provide scant protection for vulnerable and marginalised groups.
areas and to act as a catalyst to enable greater use of rights-based actions by development organisations working on water issues.
Furthermore, they are rarely enforced. Water services can be disconnected without notice and without provision of an alternative water supply, despite the dire threats to life
There have been political challenges preventing progress. A small number of States have opposed the right to water, thereby holding back
and health. Water prices can be arbitrarily increased even where water costs constitute
international progress on its implementation. A greater number of countries accept the right, but have not yet acted to implement the General
a major part of an individual or family budget.
Comment, on the basis that although it is an interpretation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, it is not legally binding. COHRE has therefore sought to ensure clear acceptance of the right to water by States, including through the adoption of
Inadequate access to water cannot be explained as being purely due to lack of
stronger legal standards.
resources. For many people, inadequate access is due to discrimination, failure to prioritise the needs of the poor, failure to involve communities in decision-making,
Building capacity for advocacy and implementation
and the absence of adequate structures to monitor the actions of public officers and
COHRE has sought to build the capacity of those who could implement the right to water (government officials, service providers and
service providers. The access of marginalised communities to water would be
development agencies) and advocates of the right to water. These groups were reached through publications designed specifically for
immensely strengthened by human rights-based actions at the international, national
their use, which are made available free of charge on COHRE’s web-site (see www.cohre.org/water) and extensively publicised through
and local levels.
international networks.
THE RIGHT TO WATER
17
Key publications have included Legal Resources for the Right to Water: International and
The resulting draft UN Guidelines on the Implementation of the Right to Water set out
National Standards, the most comprehensive compilation of treaty provisions, national
urgent priorities for all levels of government with regard to implementing the right through
legislation, international declarations and national case-law on the right to water. COHRE
feasible steps in the short term.
has also helped to disseminate the concept of the right to water to an international audience; for example, through a booklet on the right to water produced in collaboration
As a long-term objective, COHRE is working toward an international treaty that would
with the World Health Organization and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for
codify the key components of the right to water and State obligations to implement them.
Human Rights, as well as articles on the right to water in journals and magazines such as
In 2004, COHRE, together with 19 international and national civil society organisations
Water Resources Development and Green Cross Optimist.
based in developed and developing countries, formed a coalition called Friends of the Right to Water to promote the right and a international treaty on its implementation.
In 2004-05, COHRE drafted a Manual on the Right to Water primarily addressed at
COHRE prepared a draft treaty and has participated in efforts to promote the treaty and
development practitioners, some of whom asked COHRE to show how the right to
to solicit feedback internationally.
water can be implemented in the context of limited public resources and capacity, and to demonstrate cases where this has been achieved. The Manual, to be published
Empowering communities to advocate for their Right to Water
with the World Health Organization, the American Association for the Advancement of
Since 2003, COHRE has worked in Conet and La Cava, two low-income communities
Science and UN-HABITAT, is under review by an external Advisory Committee and will be
on the outskirts of Buenos Aires, Argentina in close cooperation with the Buenos
released during 2007.
Aires-based Centre for Legal and Social Studies (CELS). The project provided information to community members on their rights under international and Argentine law,
Promoting stronger International Standards on the Right to Water
on the regulatory framework for water services and on the mechanisms by which they
COHRE has advocated clear acceptance of the right to water by States in a resolution
could influence decision-making and hold the State to account for service provision.
of the Commission on Human Rights. It participated in successive sessions of the
The project team has assisted the community members in preparing petitions and
Commission of Human Rights and in 2005, together with the Governments of
requesting access to information, and accompanied them to meetings with public
Germany and Mexico, hosted a parallel event to increase awareness of the right
officials. The project has improved the capacity of the communities to secure their
to water. COHRE also engaged in dialogue with the Governments of Canada and
rights. Immediate access to water has not been secured, but there have been concrete
the UK and provided extensive legal and policy advice to national NGOs in these
improvements: the Conet community was formally recognized by the State and given
countries advocating the right to water.
priority for the extension of piped water access, and in La Cava, a tender was issued for the construction of low-cost housing (including water services), in spite of opposition
To support progress towards practical implementation of the right to water, COHRE provided legal and policy advice to the member of the UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights responsible for drinking water and sanitation.
18
THE RIGHT TO WATER
from the local mayor.
Indicators for monitoring the Right to Water Human rights indicators hold the promise of making advocacy and implementation of the right to water more focused and concrete. They assist in: monitoring the
In 2005, COHRE with local partners in Kenya, developed strong links with a range of community
actions of States and other actors, providing clarity on what States should (and
associations in informal settlements in Nairobi and Kisumu and began the initial stages of
should not) do in regard to water governance, identifying gaps in implementation
consultation and training to empower communities to secure the right to water. As COHRE
and helping to prioritise the use of scarce resources.
can only work in a small number of communities, the results and lessons of the community projects are being documented and disseminated in order to assist other advocates to carry out
In October 2004, COHRE co-organised, together with the Heinrich Böll Foundation
successful rights-based advocacy.
and Bread for the World, a workshop that brought together the leading UN agencies responsible for monitoring access to water, government officials from South Africa
Monitoring and promoting national implementation of the Right to Water
and Germany, a representative of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and
COHRE has been at the forefront in taking initial steps to monitor implementation of the right to
Cultural Rights, and advocates from developed and developing countries. COHRE
water. COHRE was contracted to re-design the World Health Organization’s Water Standards
prepared a subsequent study, Monitoring the Right to Water: A Framework for
Database (a public document on the internet), in order to ensure that the database questions
Developing Indicators to examine potential indicators to measure implementation
reflect the substantive aspects of the right to water. It is working to develop international indicators
of right to water. The study sets out a methodology for developing indicators and a
on the right to water (see text box).
set of draft indicators. The study was published and an electronic version released on the Internet. The draft indicators are currently being used by European NGOs
In 2005, COHRE commenced work to review the laws and policies in its focus countries,
monitoring the right to water. Further work is planned over the next two years with
linked to its community empowerment projects. In Argentina, it prepared an assessment of the
the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) to develop a
institutional framework for provision of water and sanitation in the Buenos Aires Province, and the
final and coherent set of indicators for the right to water which would be used by
concession arrangements with water providers. In Kenya, it is assessing the ongoing water-sector
States, civil society and international human rights monitoring bodies.
reforms, and their impact, with particular focus on their compatibility with the right to water. These assessments will form the basis for multi-stakeholder discussions and collaborative processes intended to lead to reforms in water laws and policies in these countries. COHRE has also made submissions to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights regarding violations of the right to water in a number of countries, and sent formal letters of protest to the Government of India concerning a number of rural communities being deprived of access to water.
19
FOR THE FIRST TIME, STATES ARE COMING TOGETHER AT THE INTERNATIONAL LEVEL TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING AN INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINT MECHANISM FOR ESC RIGHTS . COHRE HAS PRIORITISED THIS ISSUE IN ITS INTERNATIONAL ADVOCACY WORK BECAUSE OF THE IMPLICATIONS SUCH AN INSTRUMENT WOULD HAVE FOR GREATER ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF ESC RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, IN STRENGTHENING MONITORING OF DOMESTIC IMPLEMENTATION AND TO ALLOW FOR PARITY BETWEEN ESC RIGHTS AND IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS UNDER THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS.
20
United Nations and other advocacy work
The housing impacts of international events such as the Olympic Games
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
UN Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for refugees and internally displaced persons
COHRE, in partnership with the Graduate Institute of International Studies,
For the ďŹ rst time, States are coming together at the international level to
COHRE has been working in close cooperation with the UN Sub-
the Geneva School of Architecture, UN-Habitat, the Special Adviser of the
discuss the possibility of establishing an individual complaint mechanism for
Commission’s Special Rapporteur on Housing and Property Restitution,
UN Secretary General on Sport for Development and Peace, the University
ESC rights. COHRE has prioritised this issue in its international advocacy
Mr. Paulo Sergio Pinheiro for the last four years on the development of the
of Toronto, the New York University Law School and the University of
work because of the implications such an instrument would have for
UN Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and
Wisconsin, is carrying out an international research project focusing on the
greater access to justice for victims of ESC rights violations, in strengthening
Displaced Persons. The Principles were adopted by consensus by the
housing impacts of hosting the Olympic Games. The project is funded by the
monitoring of domestic implementation and to allow for parity between ESC
Sub-Commission on 11 August 2005, during its 57th session. The Principles
Geneva International Academic Network (GIAN/RUIG). National researchers
rights and implementation mechanisms under the Covenant on Civil and
aim to develop a set of international standards providing a universal approach
are also undertaking research in Athens, Atlanta, Barcelona, Beijing, Seoul
Political Rights. COHRE is working for the adoption of such an instrument,
to housing, land and property restitution policy at both the national and
and Sydney; cities that have hosted or will host the Games. The researchers
in partnership with other NGOs, and is playing a prominent role in this
international levels, by drawing upon existing international human rights
hope to examine how the hosting of the Games impacted the housing
process. COHRE is a member of the Steering Committee of the NGO
and humanitarian law. The Principles incorporate some of the most useful
situation in the host city and also to identify best practices in this regard.
Coalition for the adoption of an Optional Protocol to the International Covenant
provisions from various pre-existing national restitution policies and programs,
Through this research COHRE hopes to propose concrete and collaborative
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (OP-ICESCR). Within the framework
including those developed for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Cyprus,
mechanisms, within the International Committee and the United Nations, that
of the coalition, COHRE has initiated a whole range of awareness raising
Guatemala, Kosovo, South Africa and Rwanda.
could prevent the practice of forced evictions in the lead up to international
and advocacy initiatives with local partners in 2004 and 2005, as well as
events such as future Olympic Games.
at the international level with governments, United Nations mechanisms and other international NGOs. The discussions at the last working group were more positive than those that had occurred in the past and more governments and regional groups have expressed their support for such an instrument. However, the next working group and Commission sessions (in 2006) are crucial and strong lobbying and advocacy by NGOs is needed at the national level to ensure that Governments support the drafting of the OP to ICESCR. If the working group and the Commission do not authorise the drafting of an OP to ICESCR, this window of opportunity and the momentum built up through the efforts of many NGOs across the last few years, could be lost. UNITED NATIONS AND OTHER ADVOCACY
21
Submissions to UN Human Rights bodies COHRE continues to submit information on housing rights and forced evictions to various UN Human Rights
to enforce laws and regulations prohibiting forced evictions and ensure that persons evicted from their homes
Bodies to use this advocacy process to highlight and support the efforts of local NGOs and communities to
be provided with adequate compensation or offered alternative accommodation, in accordance with the
address these issues. COHRE also increasingly facilitates and supports the participation of local NGOs at
guidelines adopted by the Committee in its General Comment No.7 on forced evictions.
UN Human Rights Bodies. In 2005, COHRE sponsored organisations from Zambia, Nigeria and Kenya to participate in the review of their country’s reports by the Committee on Economic, Cultural and Social Rights,
The Committee also recommends that, prior to implementing development projects, China should undertake
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and Human Rights Committee respectively. COHRE
open, effective and meaningful consultations with affected residents.
has itself also made submissions on Kenya, Ireland, Australia, Zambia and Brazil so far in 2005.
Brazil Kenya
COHRE presented preliminary information on forced evictions and violence linked to land and housing rights
COHRE worked with a coalition of Kenyan NGOs on cases of evictions in Nairobi and also in certain rural areas,
violations in Brazil to the Human Rights Committee in July 2005. In the list of issues sent to the Government
particularly forest reserves of Kenya, to prevent evictions and promote alternatives, leading to the presentation
of Brazil, in preparation for its review in October 2005, the Committee included specific questions on forced
of a detailed submission to the UN Human Rights Committee in New York in February 2005. As a result of
evictions of indigenous populations and on violent deaths of rural workers. COHRE will submit a more detailed
these and other efforts the threatened eviction of hundreds of thousands of Nairobi shack dwellers remains
parallel report on Brazil to the Committee and will try and facilitate participation of Quilombos community
on hold. COHRE submitted a parallel report to the Human Rights Committee and facilitated the participation of
representatives at the October session.
Hakijamii, a partner organisation at the session. The report and joint lobbying by COHRE and Hakijamii were effective in getting the Committee to examine the practice of forced evictions in Kenya. Indeed, it resulted in the
Nigeria
first ever Concluding Observation by the Committee that forced evictions may amount to a violation of Article
COHRE facilitated and supported the participation of a representative from the Movement for the Survival
17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which protects people from arbitrary or unlawful
of Ogoni People (MOSOP) at the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. MOSOP raised
interference with the home.
important issues about discrimination that exists in Nigeria on land and housing issues, including forced evictions. MOSOP also highlighted the existence of discrimination in other areas, such as education.
China
22
COHRE, jointly with the Habitat International Coalition-Housing and Land Rights Network, submitted a parallel
Greece
report on China to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The report highlighted the evictions
COHRE drafted a protest letter concerning Roma communities living in different parts of Patras, which have
of Tibetans and the demolition of historic homes, structures and Tibetan culture in Lhasa, forced evictions and
repeatedly been subjected to forced evictions and demolitions of their homes or threatened with evictions
housing demolitions in China, including those occurring as a result of preparations for the 2008 Beijing Olympics
since August 2001. Seven organisations signed the letter, which was circulated in June 2005 to Greek
and as a result of development projects such as the Three Gorges Dam, and homelessness. The report also
authorities, as well as regional and international human rights monitoring bodies. COHRE was subsequently
highlighted the violent repression of peaceful public protests against forced evictions and the targeting and
informed by the OHCHR that the communication on these forced evictions would be taken up under the
harassment of housing rights defenders. The Committee recommended that China take immediate measures
confidential 1503 procedure of the Commission on Human Rights. COHRE joined a protest letter issued by
UNITED NATIONS AND OTHER ADVOCACY
Forced Evictions condemned by the Human Rights Committee
Greek Helsinki Monitor along with seven other human rights organisations about the planned forced evictions
For the first time in history, on the basis of a COHRE submission, the HRC examined, in its February
of 70 Albanian Roma families, with legal resident permits, in the area of Votanikos, where the City of Athens has
2005 session, the practice of forced evictions in Kenya. In its concluding observations, the HRC
announced the construction of a football stadium as part of Greece’s official bid for the 2012 European Football
recognised that forced evictions may amount to a violation of Article 17 of the International Covenant on
Championship. COHRE also issued a press statement on these evictions, highlighting the situation and calling
Civil and Political Rights, which protects people from arbitrary or unlawful interference with the home. In
on Greece to immediately halt the planned evictions and meet with the affected Roma communities to develop
this respect, the HRC recommended that Kenya “should develop transparent policies and procedures
relocation plans in consultation with them and with their consent.
for dealing with evictions and ensure that evictions from settlements do not occur unless those affected have been consulted and appropriate resettlement arrangements have been made”.
Czech Republic COHRE supported a joint protest letter by the European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) highlighting developments
The HRC ruling has been of crucial importance for COHRE’s NGO partners working in Kenya against
in the town of Bohumin, where a large number of Roma and others are threatened with forced eviction from
forced evictions. As a result of this and other efforts, the threatened eviction of hundreds of thousands
their housing, or have already been pressured into moving into racially segregated or otherwise substandard
of Nairobi shack dwellers remains on hold. On a broader level, such a ruling opens new avenues for
housing arrangements.
NGOs and activists fighting against forced evictions. It also recognises that this practice violates a wide range of rights, including civil and political rights.
Romania COHRE’s UN Liaison Coordinator participated as a resource person in a training working on housing rights for Roma activists in Romania in July 2005. The training workshop was organised by Romani CRISS and ERRC. In 2004, COHRE, ERRC and the Milan Šime�ka Foundation had developed a training manual on Defending Roma Housing Rights in Slovakia, using COHRE’s general training manual as a model. The Slovakian manual was adapted for Romania and translated into Romanian in 2005 by Romani CRISS and ERRC.
Zambia COHRE facilitated the participation of two women’s organisations, Justice for Widows and Orphans Project and Women and Law in Southern Africa Trust, from Zambia at the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights session in April 2005. The organisations highlighted the situation of women’s housing and inheritance rights in Zambia as well as the threat of evictions on the settlement in the Zambia copper belt.
23
Focus on Africa
In the last three years, COHRE’s work in Africa has focused on Ghana, the Gambia, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
Africa is the fastest urbanising region in the world. Slum-dwellers account for an
Fact-finding missions
estimated 72 percent of sub-Saharan Africa’s urban population. Extreme poverty
In response to threatened forced evictions, COHRE carried out fact-finding missions in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa.
caused by corruption, natural disasters and conflict has severely impacted on the lives of Africa’s urban poor. Regional leaders have proven unable to translate their ratification
COHRE’s Kenya mission investigated large-scale demolitions and eviction threats and the availability of alternatives to eviction. After
of international and regional human rights treaties into effective policies addressing
consultations with communities in many informal settlements, governments and other stakeholders, a report, Listening to the Poor:
violations of economic, social and cultural rights.
Housing Rights in Nairobi, Kenya, concluded that the demolitions violated the Convention Against Torture and that planned evictions were inconsistent with international and domestic law. After a series of consultations with stakeholders, the report was publicly
In spite of these challenges, African countries have made some progress in
released in March 2005. Kenya’s National Commission on Human Rights and residents from informal settlements spoke at the
acknowledging ESC rights, including the right to adequate housing and protection from
report’s launch. COHRE is now engaged in an intensive follow-up exercise.
forced evictions. During the 2nd African Union (AU) Summit, member States included urbanisation and related problems in their policy framework. In February 2005, the first
Working with governments
ever African Ministerial Conference on Housing and Urban Development was held in
COHRE has gained the confidence of some of the African governments with which it has been working. This is evident in the many
South Africa. The AU’s decision to send an envoy to investigate the 2005 evictions in
joint events held by COHRE in collaboration with departments, national human rights institutions and the judiciary. In Ghana, COHRE
Zimbabwe was a tentatively positive sign.
was one of the leading agencies working with the Ministry of Works and Housing to draft a housing policy for Ghana. This policy was presented to the Parliament of Ghana in September 2005.
Despite these developments, a lack of resources and political will continues to hamper realisation of the right to housing and violations continue. Throughout Africa, millions of
Two of COHRE’s training sessions – in Ghana and the Gambia - were co-hosted with local authorities and the judiciary. National and
people are forcibly evicted every year, protection from abusive tenancy practices is rare,
local government officials as well as judges and parliamentarians have also attended COHRE’s training workshops in Kenya.
vulnerable groups are exploited and severe housing shortages continue. The forced
24
eviction of over 700,000 urban residents in Zimbabwe is just one graphic example.
COHRE’s good working relationships with governments reflect its ability to highlight problems while at the same time proposing
While the Zimbabwean Government rightly attracted international condemnation, many
realistic solutions. In a continent where NGOs are often regarded as antagonists of governments, these relationships are significant.
countries, including Kenya, Botswana, Nigeria and Ethiopia, continue to carry out large-
At the same time, relationships with some governments remain difficult, particularly where criticism has been made on forced
scale evictions with little international concern.
evictions or other housing rights violations.
FOCUS ON AFRICA
Monitoring housing rights violations with partners
Training
COHRE continues to work and strengthen relationships with its local and national partners. Cooperation has ranged from capacity building
From 2003-2005, COHRE trained over 200 people in Africa on the right to
and training to active partnership on advocacy projects. Local knowledge and organisational strength of individual partners, coupled
adequate housing, the prohibition on forced evictions, women and inheritance
with COHRE’s expertise, have made an impact on monitoring evictions and promoting and protecting the right to adequate housing in Africa.
rights and the right to water. Training sessions usually combined international and regional human rights law and case studies with discussions on strategies to
In Senegal, Sierra Leone, the Gambia, South Africa, Kenya, Ghana and Nigeria, COHRE has built a large and active network of
combat housing violations at the local and national level.
partners from local community groups, local and national NGOs and academic institutions. In addition to work carried out in these countries, COHRE developed many strong contacts in countries where it intervened in strategic cases of forced evictions.
Regional and international interventions COHRE worked closely with UN-Habitat on the production of the first report of the
COHRE provided much-needed support for partners on the ground battling forced evictions and other housing rights violations
Advisory Group on Forced Evictions. In March 2005, COHRE presented a report
through protest letters, media releases, training workshops, legal and strategic advice, litigation and fact-finding missions. In the case
to the UN Human Rights Committee entitled ‘Civil and Political Rights in Kenyan
of Zimbabwe, COHRE worked with Amnesty International and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights to form a coalition of over 250
Informal Settlements’. COHRE sponsored Opiata Odindo from Hakijamii Trust to
international and African NGOs which signed a petition on the 2005 evictions.
attend the Committee session to represent the views of Kenyan NGOs working on housing rights. COHRE also submitted a petition on Sudan to the African
COHRE also focused on women’s inheritance rights. COHRE partners used a concise version of COHRE’s women’s inheritance
Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The petition alleged that violations
rights report as an advocacy and lobbying tool. COHRE continued to use information gathered at the international level to influence
were carried out by the Sudanese Government in the Darfur region in the form of
the UN and regional bodies, increasing the pressure on African States to make their inheritance laws compatible with international
mass forced evictions accompanied by human rights abuses.
laws protecting the rights of women. At the regional level, COHRE developed a working relationship with the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights (ACHPR), after acquiring Observer Status in 2003. COHRE’s report on women’s inheritance rights in ten sub-Saharan countries formed the basis for discussions and collaboration with the ACHPR’s Special Rapporteur on Women’s Rights, Dr. Angela Melo. COHRE also held discussions with the Social Affairs Department of the African Union on outcomes of the first African Ministerial Conference on Housing and Urban Development. FOCUS ON AFRICA
25
Focus on the Americas COHRE has been particularly active throughout the Americas, with more than one quarter of COHRE’s staff working in the region. Because political support for housing rights is – with the notable exception of the United States – comparatively so strong throughout the region, and the practice of forced evictions is also so limited in scale in comparison to other regions, COHRE’s work throughout South America, Central America, the Caribbean and North America focuses particularly on the most vulnerable and disadvantaged communities. During 2003-2005 COHRE was particularly active in Colombia, Nicaragua, Guatemala, US, Brazil and Argentina: Colombia
in Nicaragua. For this purpose, a joint team undertook a fact-finding
US
The 40-year ongoing conflict between the Colombian armed forces,
mission, interviewing housing rights advocates, community leaders,
In 2003, COHRE and the National Law Center on Homelessness &
left-wing guerrilla groups and right-wing paramilitary organisations has
community-based organisations (CBOs) and NGOs working on housing
Poverty (NLCHP) held a workshop on the Right to Adequate Housing
generated what has been referred to as “the largest humanitarian crisis
issues, current and former Government officials, politicians, political
and its potential application in the United States, resulting in the creation
in the Western Hemisphere.” Between two and three million Colombians
analysts and indigenous leaders. In 2004, COHRE released the final
of a network of advocates around the country utilising a human rights
have become displaced as a result of the war, most of them losing their
report of this mission, entitled Housing Rights in Nicaragua: Historical
framework in their work to protect people from homelessness, inadequate
homes and lands in the process. In 2003 COHRE conducted an intensive
Complexities and Current Challenges.
housing conditions, forced evictions and housing discrimination. Building
fact-finding mission to Colombia and in 2004 COHRE participated in
26
on these successes, in 2005 COHRE and the NLCHP initiated a two-
a two-day national conference in Bogotá on restitution of housing and
Guatemala
year project to provide training to increase the capacity of state, local and
property to Colombia’s internally displaced people (IDPs). In 2005,
Since 2003, COHRE has been working as part of a broader Chixoy Dam
allied national groups to advocate successfully for housing by adding
COHRE released a report highlighting the housing rights dimensions
Reparations Campaign. In 2004, COHRE released a report Continuing the
human rights tools to existing strategies.
of the ongoing crisis in Colombia. The report analyses the housing
Struggle for Justice and Accountability in Guatemala: Making Reparations a
situation of Colombia’s IDPs in terms of their rights to adequate housing,
Reality in the Chixoy Dam Case. This report, prepared in collaboration with
Brazil
to be protected from forced eviction, and to restitution of housing and
Rights Action, addresses the issue of reparations for the forced eviction and
Since 2002 COHRE has carried out an extensive training programme on
property, and has been used as an advocacy tool by COHRE in its
displacement of Maya-Achi communities in Guatemala, in the context of the
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights targeting low-income communities
follow-through activities on Colombia. The report was subsequently
construction of the Chixoy Dam. Between 1980 and 1982, an estimated
and NGOs, in partnership with the Legal Assistance Service from the
translated into Spanish and distributed widely in Colombia. Colombia
440 people in the Río Negro community were brutally murdered in a series
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. The group has produced
was designated a COHRE priority country in 2005.
of massacres, the principal means used to forcibly evict the community in
innovative training tools such as the games “Access to Justice” and
order to make way for the Chixoy Dam Reservoir. Prior to the massacres, a
“The Housing Rights Board Game”. From 2003 to 2005 more than 200
Nicaragua
large number of residents had peacefully resisted displacement from their
community leaders benefited from this training programme.
COHRE joined forces with the Wisconsin Co-ordinating Council
village. COHRE has carried out various activities, including meetings with
on Nicaragua (WCCN) and the Nicaraguan Human Rights Center
representatives of the World Bank and the Inter-American Development
In collaboration with the National Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate
(CENIDH), based in Managua, to produce a report on housing rights
Bank, to seek justice in this case.
Housing, COHRE undertook fact-finding missions within Brazil to identify
FOCUS ON THE AMERICAS
The Right to the City The new millennium dawned with half of the world’s
housing rights violations and propose solutions for land conflicts and human
urban land and adequate housing. It was concluded that Argentina does not
population living in cities. The Americas is the most highly
rights abuses affecting low-income populations living in informal areas and
have laws or legal instruments to compel private proprietors to realise the social
urbanised region of the world, with 75 percent of its population
vulnerable groups such as African-descent communities (Quilombos) and
function of their property, even on land which is vacant or partially utilised.
living in cities. Cities are potentially territories with vast economic,
indigenous peoples.
environmental, political and cultural wealth and diversity.
International advocacy
However, the urban development models implemented in the
Since 2003 COHRE has been working with the Quilombo communities and
As a member of the UN-Habitat Advisory Group on Forced Evictions since
majority of impoverished countries are characterised by the
launched a joint National Campaign entitled ‘A Matter of Social Justice: Land
2004, COHRE has been monitoring acts of forced eviction in the Americas
tendency to concentrate income, power and land property.
Ownership Regularization of Quilombo Territories’. As part of this campaign,
region. It has also provided advisory services to governmental bodies and
These processes favour proliferation of vast urban areas marked
COHRE carried out training sessions, fact-finding missions, advocacy before
NGOs, alerted the international community on potential and current forced
by poverty, precarious conditions and vulnerability to natural
UN monitoring bodies and litigation. Further information about Quilombo
evictions and its effects, facilitated the provision of legal assistance to the
disasters. The majority of the urban population is deprived or
communities can be found at www.cohre.org/quilombos.
victims, and documented selected cases.
limited in the satisfaction of their most elemental needs and rights. Public urban policies and legislation implemented by
COHRE is a coordinating member of the National Forum of Urban Reform,
Since 2003 COHRE has presented a range of shadow country reports to
national and local governments have contributed to deepen
which has been playing a role in drafting housing public polices and legislation,
relevant UN monitoring bodies. COHRE has also been leading an international
territorial segregation and social exclusion as they do not tackle
participatory master plans, policies to prevent forced evictions and the
initiative to raise awareness and develop the concept of the right to the city,
democratisation of access to land, housing, public services
implementation of the City Statute and human rights instruments. As a result
by drafting a World Charter on the Right to the City. The Charter is intended to
and urban management.
of these efforts, the national law creating a Social Housing National Fund was
contribute to the success of urban struggle and to the process of recognition
approved after a 12 year delay in the National Chamber of Congressmen.
of human rights in the international human rights system. The Right to the City
In order to produce changes in current urban development
is defined as the equitable enjoyment of the city by all its inhabitants while
trends, social movements have been struggling to build a
Argentina
respecting the need for sustainability and social justice, so that the primary
sustainable model of society and urban life, based on the
In 2004 COHRE carried out an extensive fact-finding mission in Argentina on
object of achieving an adequate standard of living for all is attained.
principles of solidarity, freedom, equity, dignity, and social justice.
urban land and housing in the Metropolitan area of Buenos Aires and the right
Since the first World Social Forum, these social movements
to land of the indigenous communities of the provinces of Salta and Jujuy.
International research
have worked to implement the Right to the City by the adoption
During the mission it was found that the Argentinean housing deficit had
In 2004-05 COHRE worked with UN-Habitat to coordinate extensive
of a World Charter for the Right to the City. The Right to the
reached alarming levels. The number of poor families being evicted is alarming
research on land and law reform in Latin America. The focus of the research
City broadens the traditional focus on improvement of people’s
and the State is not assuming the obligation to facilitate access to adequate
was to give an updated overview of legislation and policies, both national
quality of life based on housing and the neighbourhood, to
alternative accommodation.
and local, regarding land, housing, inheritance and marital property. In
encompass quality of life at the scale of the city and its rural
addition, the research sought to identify innovative tenure types that work
surroundings, as a mechanism to protect the population living
In 2005, as a follow-up activity, COHRE carried out a workshop in the province
best for the urban poor, particularly women, and examine land management
in cities or regions with rapid urbanisation processes. The
of Jujuy, targeting indigenous leaders. COHRE and a range of local partners
structures. The research findings and recommendations will form the basis
Right to the City is defined as the equitable usufruct of cities
also carried out an international seminar in Buenos Aires to discuss public
for further action under the UN Global Campaign for Secure Tenure and for
within the principles of sustainability, democracy, equity, and
policies and national legislation applying to the promotion and protection of
the provision of technical advice.
social justice. It is a collective right that is interdependent with all internationally recognised human rights.
27
Focus on Asia-Pacific COHRE has long been active throughout Australia the Asia and Pacific regions opposing Through the efforts of COHRE and partner groups in Australia, awareness of housing rights has greatly increased. COHRE planned forced evictions, working with initiated a variety of training workshops on the right to housing community-based organisations to promote and has sought to raise the profile of economic and social rights housing rights in the massive urban slums more generally, through a series of joint projects with other NGOs that dominate many cities in the region and community-based groups. and drawing attention to the housing rights Bangladesh challenges facing countries in the region Pressure on the Government to develop vacant ‘khas’ land (land which are engaged in conflict or which have for special purposes) has led to increased forced evictions in been affected by natural disasters. COHRE Bangladesh. More than 200,000 people have faced forced eviction since 2000. COHRE has discussed the prospects of carried out major activities in eleven countries assisting local groups in developing campaigns against forced in the Asia-Pacific region in 2003-2005, and evictions and has supported their eviction monitoring and supported campaigns in a range of other community organising work. countries when requested. Burma
Cambodia Land and housing issues continue to be a problem in Cambodia, with poor people often forcibly evicted. With the support of UN-Habitat and in collaboration with the Municipality of Phnom Penh, COHRE organised a training workshop on housing rights for local government officials in July 2005. This was followed by a two-day workshop on Master Plans and the Urban Poor which drew attention to the human rights ramifications of master planning processes.
East Timor Legal security of tenure remains a key issue for East Timor, where customary, colonial Portuguese, Indonesian and post-independence property titles vie for priority. To strengthen the work of local NGOs with grassroots communities, in 2003 COHRE organised a Housing Rights Conference in partnership with the local group KSI. Community leaders from districts affected by land, housing and eviction issues attended alongside Government officials and local groups.
India Resistance against forced evictions is spearheaded by India’s National Forum on
Forced relocation, displacement and military confiscation of land
Housing Rights. COHRE supported the publication of the Forum’s Eviction Watch
continue unabated in both ceasefire and conflict areas in Burma.
Report, which documented forced evictions and examined national laws in the context
Despite the difficult political situation, COHRE developed a project
of international human rights. In September 2003, COHRE responded to the brutal
to investigate land ownership, abandonment, confiscation and
eviction of 1400 families from Tolly Nala in Kolkata and attended the National Workshop
losses of land of Burmese ethnic groups in collaboration with
on Housing Rights there in November 2003.
local NGOs. The project has conducted a significant survey of internally displaced Karens and Mons in Thailand, and will result
In late 2004, over 200,000 people were forcibly evicted in Mumbai. COHRE visited
in the first of its kind book on these vital issues.
Mumbai in January 2005 and was on the panel of the Indian People’s Tribunal on Environmental and Human Rights which investigated the evictions. Through the efforts of local organisations and their campaigns against forced evictions, which COHRE supported, the evictions were stopped. Millions of urban poor continue to live in precarious and uncertain circumstances in Mumbai.
28
FOCUS ON ASIA-PACIFIC
Indonesia
Philippines
COHRE monitored the housing rights situation in Aceh, where – prior to the eventual
Forced evictions and housing rights advocacy remain major concerns for NGOs in
peace agreement - an Indonesia military offensive displaced over 100,000 civilians,
the Philippines. COHRE supported the Grassroots Women’s Empowerment Centre
many of them forcibly relocated. COHRE is also monitoring the housing rights situation
(GWEC) in its efforts to develop alternative, rights-based solutions to evictions. GWEC
in West Papua where villages were reportedly burnt down and over 1,000 people
and other NGOs successfully lobbied for an Inter-Agency Committee of government
displaced by a military operation in the Highland Regions in 2004. COHRE encouraged
agencies to consider resettlement for thousands of families living along the Caloocan
the development of links and collaboration among NGOs and academic institutions for
railway facing impending eviction. A COHRE fact-finding mission in July 2003 received
more effective promotion of housing rights in Indonesia.
extensive media coverage in the Philippines. The mission concluded that the Metro Manila Development Authority had breached both domestic and international law.
Malaysia COHRE invited members of the judiciary and human rights lawyers in Malaysia to
Sri Lanka
a regional workshop on the justiciability of economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights
The Institute for Social Development (ISD) conducted training programmes and held
in the Philippines. Great interest was shown in amicus curiae briefs on ESC rights
forums on housing rights in their work with plantation workers, trade union leaders and
litigation in domestic courts.
political activists. ISD has translated COHRE material into the local language and plans to monitor evictions. ISD’s awareness raising campaign has resulted in negotiations
Pakistan
with government to build adequate houses for plantation workers with full housing
Thousands of families have been evicted to make way for Karachi’s Lyari Expressway and
rights. To address these and other displacement issues, COHRE established
other infrastructure development projects. Many more live under the constant threat of
an office in Colombo.
eviction. COHRE supported the campaign against urban forced evictions and inappropriate development projects coordinated by the Urban Resource Centre. Significant international
Tsunami
support persuaded the Government of Pakistan to suspend the evictions.
On 26 December 2004, a devastating tsunami hit Aceh, Indonesia, Thailand, Burma, India, Sri Lanka, the Maldives and Somalia. COHRE has been working with several
In March 2004, COHRE and three Indonesian activists attended a people’s tribunal
groups investigating the situation and sharing information. COHRE was involved in
organised by the People’s Rights Movement. An irrigation project supported by the
organising a People-Centered Recovery and Reconstruction Process and facilitated
Asian Development Bank caused flooding, destroyed the livelihood of thousands and
the Tsunami-Affected Community-to-Community Exchange in March 2005.
rendered many homeless.
FOCUS ON ASIA PACIFIC
29
Focus on Europe COHRE’s trans-European advocacy and research is helping to
eviction and that anti-discrimination laws be enacted. In France, the
COHRE also organised a session for NGOs to present their concerns to
catalyse a growing regional housing rights movement. With a focus
denial of water, sanitation and electricity to Roma families in 25 French
the Committee. An alternative report on violations of the right to respect
on marginalised groups such as Roma, Travellers, the homeless and
towns was condemned in a protest letter sent to local authorities. In
for the home of Roma in Greece was presented to both the Human
refugees and internally displaced people (IDPs), COHRE has carried
Greece, COHRE has repeatedly intervened in cases of forced evictions
Rights Committee and Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural
out fact-finding missions, worked to halt forced evictions, initiated
of Roma in Patras, Votanikos, Marousi and Crete and called for reform of
Rights (CESCR). CESCR made extensive recommendations which
litigation, trained stakeholders and developed new partnerships.
Greek laws on evictions and more effective implementation of housing
urged Greece to abide by international human rights law with respect to
Projects have been carried out in Western, Central, Eastern and South-
programs targeting Roma. A law permitting summary eviction of Roma
evictions, provide adequate compensation for the loss of any property,
eastern Europe, Central Asia and Russia, as well as with transnational
has since been amended. COHRE has called on the Government of
provide adequate alternative housing and provide detailed information
institutions such as the Council of Europe, the EU and UN. Successes
Ireland to repeal discriminatory trespass legislation and provide adequate
in the next report about the number of Roma evicted from their homes,
have been achieved with reforms of national and regional laws and
Traveller-specific accommodation. In 2004, the Russian Federation
especially in the context of the 2004 Olympic Games.
increased awareness among marginalised groups and decision-makers
received one of COHRE’s Housing Rights Violator Awards. While Russia
about housing rights.
has been a long-term supporter of the human right to adequate housing
Legal advice and litigation
and has specific housing rights provisions embedded in its Constitution,
COHRE regularly provides legal advice to locally based individuals and
Advocacy
its treatment of those displaced by the conflict in Chechnya, along with
organisations in Europe, and participated in the first housing rights case
Fact-finding missions have been undertaken in a number of European
the ongoing demolition of houses there, constitute serious violations
before the European Committee on Social Rights, helping to represent
countries. In Ireland, investigations focused on forced evictions of
of the right to housing. The Award highlighted the lack of action on
the ERRC in their case against Greece. In its decision, the Committee
Travellers (an ethnic minority) carried out using trespass and other laws,
homelessness, discrimination against minority groups and forced
ruled Greece had violated the rights of Roma by failing to provide sufficient
and the resultant failure of the Government to provide traveller-specific
evictions of many Roma communities. Follow-up projects on housing
accommodation and ensuring its laws did not permit forced evictions.
accommodation in accordance with national legislation. The mission
rights in Russia are now being planned. In Slovakia, COHRE and others
After the initiation of the complaint, Greece reformed one particularly
resulted in a series of advocacy actions. In the United Kingdom, COHRE
called on the Government to reform Slovakia’s housing legislation.
obnoxious law that specifically targeted Roma for eviction. COHRE also
investigated and reported on cases of forced evictions of Gypsies and
In Turkey, COHRE condemned the demolition of 35 homes in Istanbul
filed a collective complaint against Ireland before the Committee alleging
Travellers. The draft report was presented and discussed at a national
and called for compensation. In the United Kingdom, COHRE intervened
that violations of Traveller’s right to housing. The case should be heard
conference on Gypsies and Travellers in early 2005.
in a series of evictions of Gypsies/Travellers.
in 2006. COHRE is planning future litigation with respect to Russia,
COHRE has raised housing rights violations with European governments
COHRE has made regular use of international and regional mechanisMs
by issuing protest letters and media advisories, submitting petitions to
An alternative report on Roma and housing rights in Bulgaria, Turkey, Italy,
Standard-setting
the Council of Europe, United Nations and European Union (EU), and
Greece, Romania and Hungary was submitted by COHRE in conjunction
COHRE also contributed to standard-setting and research work of
undertaking follow-up advocacy and research. In the last three years, this
with the European Roma Rights Centre to the European Committee
the Council of Europe, the EU, and the Organisation for Security and
has included advocacy in the following cases. In the Czech Republic,
on Social Rights. A report was submitted to the UN Committee on
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). COHRE has participated in expert
COHRE and the European Roma Rights Centre urged that alternative
the Elimination of Racial Discrimination alleging discrimination in the
consultations on housing policy, Roma and Travellers and women’s rights.
accommodation be provided to low-income and Roma residents facing
realisation of the right to adequate housing of Travellers in Ireland.
One series of consultations led to the adoption of two groundbreaking
Bulgaria, Greece and Slovakia.
30
FOCUS ON EUROPE
The ERRC v Greece – Legal victories on Roma Housing Rights recommendations by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of
In May 2005, the European Committee on Social Rights issued it’s first decision on
Europe. Recommendation 2004(14) on Movement and Encampment
housing rights. The Committee ruled that Greece had violated the rights of Roma
of Travellers in Europe and Recommendation 2005(4) on Improving the
by failing to respect their right to adequate housing, which was protected under
Housing Conditions of Roma and Travellers in Europe set out human
the right to family life in the European Social Charter. They found that insufficient
rights-based approaches to overcoming forced evictions, segregation
accommodation has been made available for Roma and that Greek legislation
and ghettoisation of Roma and Travellers in Europe. COHRE made
provided inadequate protection from forced evictions. COHRE staff were part of
significant contributions to both texts in a series of expert consultations.
the legal team representing the European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC), who had lodged the case with the Strasbourg-based Committee.
Training Staff from COHRE have organised or led housing rights training
After the initiation of the complaint, Greece reformed one particularly obnoxious
workshops in Slovakia, Uzbekistan, United Kingdom, Romania and
law that specifically targeted Roma for eviction. COHRE is now also working with
Serbia. Romani activists in Kosicˇe , Slovakia were trained on combating
the Greek Helsinki Monitor and ERRC to ensure that Greece implements the
discrimination and forced eviction. In Uzbekistan, COHRE provided
decision. However, recent evictions of Roma by local authorities indicate that there
training on housing rights to Uzbek human rights NGOs, activists,
is a long way to go until Greek national authorities are willing to make all levels of
journalists and community leaders at a training organised by the Legal
Government accountable for human rights violations against Roma.
Aid Society (LAS) and OMCT Europe. In Serbia, human rights NGOs were trained in the use of international mechanisms and the right to
In a parallel development, COHRE staff were heavily involved in consultations
property and housing.
that led to the adoption by the Ministers at the Council of Europe of specific and comprehensive recommendations on the housing rights of Roma and Travellers (Recommendations (2004)14 and (2005)4). These two standards will provide a critical basis for the development of future advocacy and litigation to protect Roma and Traveller housing rights in Europe. For copies of standards, see www.cohre.org/europe
FOCUS ON EUROPE
31
Media and Communications COHRE’s Media and Communications Unit seeks to raise awareness of housing rights and related issues among activists, communities at risk of housing rights violations, governments and other actors and the public at large, by developing a broad range of media products, disseminating these products to the widest possible audiences and carrying out media liaison activities to ensure housing rights issues are dealt with in a substantive and informed way by as many media outlets as possible.
On the Map
Website
© 2005, COHRE; 8 mins; PAL VCD
COHRE’s website at www.cohre.org is the principal internet location
In the Indian city of Indore, over half the two million
focusing on the right to housing, providing a wide range of information
residents live in slum conditions. With no security of tenure, slum
and resources on all aspects of housing rights, forced evictions and
dwellers fall prey to land speculation and forced evictions – violations
related issues. Visitors to the site can download COHRE’s published
of their basic human rights. Now a local organisation, Deenbandhu,
reports free of charge, research an extensive array of legal resources,
is developing innovative ways to work with the urban poor to resist
and find out how to get involved in campaigns against forced
evictions and claim their rightful place in the city – ensuring slum
evictions. COHRE plans to revamp
communities are for the first time “on the map”.
its website in 2006 to ensure it is even more up-to-date and user-
Pommahakan – People of the Fort
friendly, with regular features and new
© 2004, COHRE; 12 mins; PAL, VHS or VCD
stories and a host of new housing
For more than six generations, the people of
rights resources and tools.
Pommahakan have lived a traditional lifestyle in the bustling heart of Bangkok, preserving its sacred trees and old houses. Now they face
COHRE’s Housing Rights Awards
Focusing media attention on housing rights
eviction at the hands of the city authorities, who want to turn their land
Since 2002, COHRE has announced its annual Housing Rights Awards
COHRE liaises with an extensive network of media contacts
into a park. The community has proposed a cheaper alternative, but
designed to both ‘name and shame’ those responsible for serious and
worldwide, distributing regular media releases and other information
the authorities refuse to listen.
ongoing violations of the human right to housing (three Violator Awards), and – on a more positive note – to commend governments, institutions
to assist journalists and other media professionals covering news and issues in the housing rights field. COHRE has achieved a significant
Vuka Vrcevica – A Violation of Housing Rights
and individuals for their efforts to respect, promote and fulfil housing
degree of media coverage for an NGO of its size, particularly for its
© 2003, COHRE; 6 mins; PAL, VHS or VCD
rights (the Protector Award to a government or institution, and the
The right to adequate housing is a fundamental human right
Defender Award to an individual).
annual Housing Rights Awards.
protected by international law, and applying equally to all people,
Documentary films
everywhere. But for the Roma community of Vuka Vrcevica in
Award winners may be nominated by any member of the public or
Moving images are an extraordinarily powerful way to convey the
Belgrade, grossly inadequate living conditions amount to a violation
by institutions, NGOs and community-based organisations, using
stark realities of housing rights violations such as inadequate housing,
of their human rights.
the nomination form available from COHRE. Award winners are announced in early December each year. Please visit our website at
forced evictions and displacement to the general public. COHRE has to date developed and distributed several short documentary films on
More information on COHRE’s documentary film projects can be
www.cohre.org for further information on COHRE’s Housing Rights
housing rights themes:
found on our website, and copies of completed films can be ordered
Awards. Award winners during 2003-2005 were:
from documentary@cohre.org
32
MDMEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS
COHRE Publications 2003-2005 2003 Housing Rights Awards
2003
2005
Housing Rights Violators Indonesia Guatemala Serbia and Montenegro
Forced Evictions: Violations of Human Rights (Global Survey 9) (100pp.)
Defending the Housing Rights of Displaced Persons in Colombia (95pp.)
Housing Rights Protector Scottish Executive
Housing Rights in Brazil: Gross Inequalities and Inconsistencies (73pp.)
Housing Rights in Argentina: Challenges for Promoting the Right to Adequate Housing (114pp.)
Litigating Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Achievements, Strategies and Challenges (184pp.)
A Place to Live: Women’s Inheritance Rights in Africa (31pp.)
Housing Rights Defender Ms Rachel Corrie (posthumous award)
2004 Housing Rights Awards Housing Rights Violators Russia Sudan United States Housing Rights Protector Municipality of Sao Paulo Housing Rights Defender Mr Rajeev John George
2005 Housing Rights Awards Housing Rights Violators China Maharashtra State, India Zimbabwe
2004
Achieving Housing for All (24pp.)
Sources 8: Legal Resources for the Right to Water: International and National Standards (136pp.)
The Pinheiro Principles (28pp.)
Continuing the Struggle for Justice and Accountability in Guatemala: Making Reparations a Reality in the Chixoy Dam Case (88 pp.)
Ruling Palestine: A History of the Legally Sanctioned Jewish-Israeli Seizure of Land and Housing in Palestine (242pp.)
Bringing Equality Home - Promoting and Protecting the Inheritance Rights of Women: A Survey of Land and Practice in Sub-Saharan Africa (227pp.)
Any Room for the Poor? Forced Evictions in Johannesburg, South Africa (102pp.)
Housing Rights in Nicaragua: Historical Complexities and Current Challenges (108 pp.)
Listening to the Poor: Housing Rights in Nairobi, Kenya (128pp.)
Housing Rights Protector Mr Tasneem Siddiqui, Sindh Katchi Abadi Authority
Housing Rights in West Africa: Report of Four Fact-finding Missions (118pp.)
Housing Rights Defender Ms Wardah Hafidz
A Precarious Future: The Informal Settlement of Agbogbloshie, Accra, Ghana (73pp.)
COHRE PUBLICATIONS
33
COHRE Boards COHRE Board of Directors (at December 2005) Mr. John Packer, Chairperson
Prof. Sandy Liebenberg, Treasurer
Independent Human Rights Advocate
University of Stellenbosch
Canada
South Africa
Drs. Antoine Buyse, Secretary
Prof. Paulo Sergio Pinheiro
Leiden University
University of Sao Paulo
Netherlands
Brazil
COHRE Advisory Board
Prof. Virginia Dandan
Prof. Aart Hendriks
Mr. Felix Morka
(at December 2005)
University of the Philippines
Equal Treatment Commission/
Philippines
Leiden University
Social and Economic Rights Action Centre Nigeria
Netherlands Prof. Philip Alston
Prof. Cees Flinterman
New York University Law School
Netherlands Institute for Human Rights
Prof. Virginia Leary
United States
Netherlands
Universities of Buffalo and California United States
Mr. Enrique Ortiz Habitat International Coalition Mexico
Mr. Geoff Budlender
Prof. Savaitri Goonesekere
Legal Resource Centre
University of Colombo
Fr. Joe Maier
Dame Anita Roddick DBE
South Africa
Sri Lanka
Human Development Centre
Founder, The Body Shop
Thailand
United Kingdom
COHRE’s Staff Team (at December 2005)
Americas
Asia-Pacific
Women and Housing Rights
Forced Evictions
Scott Leckie Executive Director
Leticia Marques Osorio Coordinator
Fionn Skiotis Acting Coordinator
Birte Scholz Coordinator
Jean du Plessis Coordinator
Jean du Plessis Deputy Director
Emily Walsh Administrator
Ashley South Burma Researcher
Mawuse Agyemfra Women’s Housing Rights Officer
Daniel Bailey Research Officer
Nathalie Mivelaz International Secretariat Manager/ UN Coordinator
Sebastian Ernesto Tedeschi Research Officer
Celine Lim Administrative Assistant
Miriam Acquaah-Harrison Administrator
Deanna Fowler Research Coordinator
Carlos Arenas Researcher
Kees Wouters Colombo Office Manager
Sylvia Horname Noagbesenu Women’s Land Link Africa Information Officer
Litigation
Karla Moroso Project Officer
Nuwan Rupesinghe Legal Officer
Housing and Property Restitution
Cintia Beatriz Muller Women’s Housing Rights Officer
Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena Senior Legal Advisor
International Secretariat
Dinah Towle Development Officer Paula de Cardoso Accountant Jessica Marasovic Executive Assistant / Awards Officer Rob Stuart Publications Editor
Africa Jean du Plessis Acting Coordinator
Julian Bardelli Research Assistant
Jayantha de Almeida Guneratne Senior Legal Advisor
Anelise Froes da Silva Programme Assistant
Pubudini Wickramaratne Legal Officer
Sinara Sandri Journalist
Rasika Mendis Research Officer
Daniel Manrique Perez Research Consultant
34
COHRE BOARDS
Scott Leckie Coordinator Mayra Gomez Research and Policy Officer
Right to Water Ashfaq Khalfan Coordinator Carolina Fairstein Legal Officer Malcolm Langford Senior Legal Officer
Bret Thiele Coordinator Aoife Nolan Legal Officer Jeff King Legal Officer
Media and Communications Fionn Skiotis Coordinator Radhika Satkunanathan Media Officer
Financial statements Summary of COHRE Expenditure 2003 to 2005
Summary COHRE Income 1994 - 2005
Programme / Area
2003-05
2003
2004
2005
COHRE Global (includes Advocacy)
703,210
136,494
266,755
299,961
COHRE Asia/PaciďŹ c
546,058
128,323
216,276
201,459
COHRE Americas
384,060
112,477
137,700
133,883
COHRE Africa
404,541
87,855
158,885
157,801
Thematic Programmes
1,702,217
324,915
585,612
791,690
Publications/Website/Films
375,391
152,246
126,998
96,147
Overheads
461,855
111,797
177,491
172,567
Total USD
4,577,332
1,054,107
1,669,717
1,853,508
COHRE Expenditure per Programme 2003 - 2005 Overheads Publications/Website/Films Thematic Programmes
2003 -2005
COHRE Africa
2003
2004
2005
COHRE Americas COHRE Asia/Pacific COHRE Global (includes Advocacy)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
35
Donors and supporters
Help COHRE achieve real change
2003-2005 Donors
COHRE is unique: it is the only international human rights organisation systematically monitoring the practice
During the period 2003-2005, COHRE increased its donor base by one third. COHRE would like to thank the
of forced evictions and seeking to prevent them wherever they occur or are planned. COHRE stands alone
following generous supporters who made our activities possible during this period:
in focusing on the legal aspects of housing rights throughout the world, and is devoted to finding creative solutions to all housing-related problems, using international human rights law as a key tool. Though COHRE
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
has had many victories, it faces enormous challenges and its work remains as necessary as ever.
Bread for the World Foundation Coordenadoria Ecumênica de Serviço (CESE)
We believe COHRE’s work is increasingly supported by donors because of the success of our efforts and our
Cordaid
growing reach and impact in the developing world.
Government of the United Kingdom (DFID) Government of Finland
While COHRE’s work has already protected the housing rights of hundreds of thousands of slum dwellers,
Ford Foundation
displaced persons and disadvantaged women, requests for assistance and advice from grassroots groups,
Friedrich Ebert Foundation
popular movements and victims of housing rights violations around the world still overwhelm our capacity to
Government of Germany
respond. This has resulted in dramatic growth in our programmes over the past few years.
Heinrich Böll Foundation ICCO
In order to continue meeting these demands and providing the assistance requested from us, COHRE requires
Mertz Gilmore Foundation
greater financial resources.
Misereor Government of Netherlands (Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Housing)
Please consider donating to COHRE – we accept all donations from individuals, organisations and institutional
Government of Norway
donors from around the world, no matter how small. Your contribution may make the difference in allowing
Norwegian Refugee Council
a new housing rights project, publication or documentary film to get underway, thus helping COHRE to
Oxfam
achieve real change.
Réseau universitaire international de Genève (RUIG) Servicio Latino Americano, Asiatico y Africano de Vivienda Popular (SELAVIP) Government of Sweden (SIDA) Swedish NGO Foundation Government of Switzerland United Nations Development Programme UN-Habitat UNICEF United Nations High Commission for Refugees World Health Organization
36
DONORS AND SUPPORTERS
Every donation makes a difference.
Acknowledgements
COHRE would like to thank the following service providers and others for their contributions during 2003-2005: Legal Services Robert Zoells of Peck, Warren et Zoells, Geneva Auditors KPMG Design and Publication Suggestie and Illusie, Utrecht, Netherlands www.illusie.nl RaynerBrown, Melbourne, Australia
www.raynerbrown.com
Documentary Film Volunteers Suze Houghton and Adis Hondo of Hand in Hand Productions All participants in COHRE’s Internship Programme and numerous other volunteers COHRE works in close collaboration with an extensive network of activists, researchers, local, national and regional NGOs, community-based organisations and communities around the world. We wish to thank all those who have worked with and assisted us in our efforts to prevent forced evictions and to protect and promote the human right to housing during 2003-2005.
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
37
CENTRE ON HOUSING RIGHTS AND EVICTIONS
International Secretariat 83 rue de Montbrillant 1202 Geneva Switzerland
Duluth 8 N. 2nd Avenue East, Suite 208 Duluth, MN 55802 USA
Porto Alegre Rua Demetrio Ribeiro 990/conj.202 90010-313 Porto Alegre - RS Brazil
Colombo 106 1/1 Horton Place Colombo 7 Sri Lanka
Melbourne PO Box 1160 Collingwood, Victoria 3066 Australia
Accra PMB CT 402 Cantonments Accra Ghana
COHRE is registered as a Non-Profit Foundation (Stichting No 41186752) in the Netherlands, and is also registered in Australia, Brazil, Ghana, Sri Lanka and USA. COHRE is an NGO in Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). COHRE has Participatory Status with the Council of Europe, Consultative Status with the Organisation of American States and Observer Status with the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
2003-2005 www.cohre.org
ACTIVITY REPORT WWW.COHRE.ORG
COH4-COVER.indd 1
7/2/07 10:15:00 AM