Group Document: Bec Hulme, Maxine Dabrowski, Sasha Adato, Amelia Caddy, Alyssa McLeod Public Relations For the purpose of this assessment, our group has decided to review all of our artefacts from a single professional areaís perspective, recontextualising the object in terms of the different viewpoints that the specific area brings to the analysis. This approach not only reinforces Jonathan Rabanís ideas on varying perspective, but also gives us an opportunity to look at each object from a different angle, and deepen our overall knowledge about another professional area. In this instance we have chosen to demonstrate how PR relates to Melbourne artifacts. In analyzing our artifacts in their relation to the field of public relations, we began by first defining the field of public relations itself. Public Relations was defined by the group as encompassing; communicating and enhancing a company or organizations image to a target audience; predicting the way in which a message will be received and interpreted by the audience; and receiving and interpreting messages which their audience communicates. It has been officially defined as being "the art and social science of analyzing trends, predicting their consequences, counseling organizational leaders, and implementing planned programs of action…” (J. Zhao, Encyclopedia of Business). The field of public relations plays a crucial in establishing a relationship between a business entity and the public. Each of the five artifacts of the group was analysed and regarded in terms of how it related to different aspects of these definitions.