MAY 1st 2024 ISSUE

Coyote

Hemet: A Look at Crime Trends

IN THIS ISSUE

Drake Citron’s Q&A Story

By Arizdelsi Martinez Staff Writer

The University Center for Developmental Disabilities is located on the grounds of California State University, San Bernardino. Its mission is noble: to provide a nurturing environment where these children can receive the care, support, and education they need to thrive. A place that states that it is a safe place for

children on the spectrum or who cannot be able to grow or progress behaviorally. However, recent revelations suggest that this supposed safe place might not be what is expected.

The University Center for Developmental Disabilities has alarming problems with staff wages, overcrowded facilities, and inadequate training protocols that jeopardize the safety and well-being of vulnerable children.

The individuals at the University Center for Developmental Disabilities (UCDD) who dedicated their time and lives to work with children with special needs do not receive enough compensation for the amount of work they do. However, according to sources it was an inequality in the treatment of staff members at the University Center for Developmental Disabilities compared to their counterparts elsewhere in the institution. While other employees within CSUSB receive a minimum wage of $16.50, staff members at the center are compensated at a significantly lower rate of $15.50. This discrepancy not only serves as a slap in the face to the tireless efforts of these dedicated individuals but also raises serious questions about the center’s commitment to fair labor practices.

The staff that works at the UCDD department when understaffed at many points of the week uses the labor of unpaid interns to fill in the spots for the extra help that

they so desperately need. It is unconscionable that those entrusted with the care of some of society’s most vulnerable members are undervalued and underpaid, contributing to a demoralizing work environment and ultimately compromising the quality of care provided.

In addition to the exploitation of its staff, the University Center for Developmental Disabilities also fails to have a stable and safe environment for the children under its care. As an anonymous witness states the neglect starts from the overcrowding in these inadequate facilities. The

department is consistent with two trailers that are old trailers in which these children are doing their sessions. A source revealed that a concerning number of children with developmental disabilities are placed in this trailer with a limited amount of space divided by cubicles that have no doors on them causing the children to elope out of the cubicles heightening tension with other children. Due to this, it can lead to a series of risks such as conflict, injury, an increase in the child’s behavior, and overstimulation of the children on the spectrum. For example, a key witness

stated, “There was once a time where an older child pushed through another staff and ran out of the trailer, we had to chase them down.” According to the witness, there is inadequate security due to the understaffed and overcrowding of children. Only one staff member stands by the door to not let the children run out where the facilities are located very close to the parking lot. This goes to show the neglect of the facilities. That shows how vulnerable children are subject to such substandard and potentially dangerous conditions.

The University Center for Developmental Disabilities programs consist of behavioral intervention programs for toddlers, children, and youth. A concern of these programs is an understanding if these are the appropriate training protocols to address the complex needs of children with developmental disabilities.

Story continues on page 3.

One on one client workspaces inside the UCDD.

The UCDD as seen approaching the entrance.

2

Contributors

Editor-in-Chief

Copy Editors

Graphic Designers

Media Manager

Web Tech Manager

Matthew Pacheo

Matthew Vinson

John Gray

Kiara Jerez

Dimpul Nallagatla

Faculty Advisor

Gregory Gondwe

Gregory.Gondwe@csusb.edu

Department of Communications Studies

commstudies@csusb.edu

Staff Writers

Matthew Amaya, Paola Escobar Pivaral, Jacqueline Flores, Giovoni Gonzalez, Brenda Hernandez Diaz, Jocelyn Martinez-Lopez Arizdelsi Martinez-Perez, Nayeli Melena, Ryu Oshiro, Damaris Preciado, Phillip Radomski, Marco Rimicci, Estela Rodriguez, Estevan Vega

Staff Writers are comprised of students enrolled in COMM2391 Practicum: Print & Online Journalism taught by Dr. Gregory Gondwe. Diego Lomeli

Contact Information Office:(909)537-5289

Advertising:(909)537-5815

Email:coyotecsmm@gmail.com Website:coyotechronicle.net

Mail

California State University, San Bernardino

University Hall Room UH-037 5500 University Parkway San Bernardino, CA 92407

The Coyote Chronicle is published every other Thursday during the academic session by the Communication department. The opinions expressed in the Chronicle are those of the student writers and editors and do not reflect the views of the university, its faculty, or any other person or institution unless expressly noted. The appearance of any advertisement in the Chronicle does not represent an endorsement of the products or services advertised. The Chronicle reserves the right to edit or reject all materials submitted to the paper.

Hemet: Idyllic Past, Uncertain Future A Look at Crime Trends

The city of Hemet has seen a decrease in crime for some categories while other categories of crime have only increased throughout the decades.

By Phillip Radomski Staff Writer

Hemet, California, nestled amidst rolling hills and boasting a vibrant citrus history, was once a picture of tranquility. Bumper stickers proudly declared “Hemet is Heaven,” reflecting a sense of safety and community cherished by residents. However, beneath this idyllic facade lies a city grappling with a persistent and multifaceted challenge: crime.

The early 2000s marked a turning point. Assaults, a growing concern, saw a volatile pattern. In 2000, the city recorded 362.7 assaults, a number that would fluctuate significantly in the following years. The year 2003 stands as a grim reminder, with assaults skyrocketing to a staggering 470.1 incidents. This surge shattered the illusion of security and left residents feeling vulnerable. Despite sporadic declines, such as the dip to 225.4 assaults in 2019, a sense of unease lingered, highlighting the city’s ongoing struggle to address the root causes of violence.

Property crime also casts a long shadow. Thefts and vandalism, once uncommon,

became increasingly commonplace. Data shows a worrying trend. Property crime rates soared in the early 2000s, peaking at 5102.6 incidents in 2005. While brief respites followed, these were often short-lived. In 2019, property crimes reached 3342.2 incidents, a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges for law enforcement and the community.

they also warn of potential resurgences. Property crimes are anticipated to surge initially before tapering off. However, the specter of auto theft looms large, with projections suggesting a persistent challenge for law enforcement in the coming years.

In response to these troubling trends, community leaders and law enforcement

The road to a safer Hemet will be long and arduous. It will require the concerted efforts of not only law enforcement and community leaders but also the active engagement and support of residents from all walks of life.

However, perhaps no crime strikes closer to home for Hemet residents than auto theft. Stealing vehicles, a lifeline for many in this sprawling city with limited public transportation has become a pervasive issue. From 573.9 incidents in 2000 to a concerning 665.6 incidents in 2019, the data paints a sobering picture. These numbers highlight the need for comprehensive and proactive measures to combat this pervasive threat. Looking ahead, predictions offer a mix of hope and uncertainty. While some experts predict a temporary decline in assaults in the early 2020s,

have taken action. Increased police patrols in high-crime areas and community outreach programs aimed at addressing social and economic factors driving criminal behavior are just some of the strategies being implemented.

The road to a safer Hemet will be long and arduous. It will require the concerted efforts of not only law enforcement and community leaders but also the active engagement and support of residents from all walks of life.

As Hemet charts a course forward, a sense of cautious optimism is present, tempered by the realities of the challenges that lie ahead. While the journey may be fraught with obstacles, there is hope that by working together, Hemet can reclaim its status as a beacon of safety and tranquility in the Southern California landscape.

Gas Price Fluctuations in California Over the Past Decade

By Nayeli Melena Staff Writer

Gas prices in California have fluctuated for over the last decade. The fluctuations have shaped the way Californians budget around being able to afford a huge necessity in life, which is gas. Based on the graph, we can clearly see how Californians experienced a pattern of constant ups and downs in gas prices throughout the last decade. This pattern shows how global energy dynamics affect gas prices and how the economy is doing in California.

From 2012 to 2024, the average gas price in California jumped from $3.70 to $4.50 per gallon, more than a 20% increase. There are various reasons for the climb in gas prices over the years. However, from 2014 to 2021, people from California got a bit of a break as gas prices through those years decreased or stayed around the same range price. Since 2022, the prices have skyrocketed till now. The drastic increase happened due to supply chain disruptions and shifts in global oil markets.

Californians are currently experiencing a surge in gas prices and by the looks of it, we might be seeing the price

go as high as it was in the year 2022. From current research, the reason behind our current expensive prices has to do with an isolated market and a special fuel blend. California currently requires a special blend of gas that aims to reduce pollution, but acquiring this blend comes at a higher cost.

There are several factors that have contributed to the reason behind the constant change in California gas prices. When there is less gasoline available compared to how much people want to use, gas prices usually tend to go up. These prices can go up quickly if something goes wrong with getting crude oil, refinery operations, or gasoline pipeline deliveries. Even if crude oil prices stay the same, gas prices can still change because of when more gas is needed during a certain season or when the type of gas people need changes.

The graphs above display the gas price throughout each year

buy electric cars. This incentive has encouraged people to change their habits and affects gasoline demand and prices.

business leads to high prices for everyone else.

The fluctuation does not only impact the amount consumers have to pay at the pump, it also affects the economy as a whole. Industries that rely on moving goods, like shipping, farming, and tourism, face increased operational costs. This issue affects not only businesses but the consumers too. Spending more to operate a

Higher gas prices highly affect people with lower incomes because they have to spend a greater chunk of their paychecks on gas which can make it tough for them to make ends meet.

Gas is a huge necessity in most households which is why low income families do not really have a choice and are forced to buy gas no matter how expensive it may be at the moment.

The fluctuations in gas

prices in California over the past decade highlight how various issues can be the cause for the rise. It could be a mix of economic, environmental, and social factors that shape the state’s energy landscape. Although these price changes create difficulties for both consumers and businesses, they also offer opportunities for the government to create a stronger and more eco-friendly energy system for the future.

Neglectful Practices at the University Center for Developmental Disabilities-Cont

Much research on Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) has been proven effective in promoting positive behaviors and reducing challenging behaviors in children. According to the website of a well-known applied behavioral analysis center: Spring Health Behavioral Health and Integrated Care, “Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) uses scientifically based techniques for the understanding and changing behavior and is the most widely accepted approach to assess and intervene with individuals with autism or other development delays. A qualified behavior analyst or therapist assesses the individual’s strengths and challenges and designs a personalized intervention plan to achieve positive behavior change and skill development… principles and techniques have been adapted and applied to various other populations as well, including:

-Autism Spectrum Disorder

California also has strict rules about the environment like the Low Carbon Fuel Standard and the cap-and-trade program. These rules have contributed to the rise of gas prices because refineries have to use cleaner and more expensive ways to make fuel. California is also known for having the ultimate goal of using more renewable energy and started doing so by giving incentives to those who (ASD)

-Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

-Behavioral and Emotional Disorders

-Language and Communication Disorders

-Challenging Behaviors

-Social Skills Training

-Academic Support

-Parent and Caregiver Training

-Occupational and Speech Therapy

-Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Rehab

-Geriatric Care”

However, the programs that are being administered at the University Center for Developmental Disabilities seem to be a lesser practice of ABA. Apart from this injustice to the parents of the children with special needs, it seems as though staff members at the facilities are not provided with the necessary training and resources to implement these techniques. For example, these staff members

have not received any training on ABA or the fundamentals of children with special needs. This lack of training not only puts the safety of both staff and children at risk but also undermines the effectiveness of the center’s programming. Moreover, despite performing job tasks comparable to those of Behavioral Technicians, who command a maximum salary of $26, staff members at the center are relegated to the role of Teacher Assistants, receiving significantly lower compensation for their critical work. It is a glaring example of the center’s disregard for the well-being and professional development of its staff, as well as its failure to prioritize the needs of the children it purports to serve.

As various problems arise of neglect for all the parties involved at the University Center for Developmental Disabilities. From the underpaid and undervalued staff members struggling to cope with the

overcrowded and unsafe facilities, it is evident that urgent action is needed to address these systemic failures. If not for the faculty but for the vulnerable children that have been entrusted to us as a part of the CSUSB

community. By shedding light on these issues, the center might now be able to be accountable for its failure to uphold its duty to provide a safe, nurturing, and inclusive environment for all individuals, regardless of ability.

Hustle and Homework

Can Gen Z Afford a College Degree Without Juggling

By Margaret Marin Staff Writer

In recent years, it’s not uncommon for college students to work multiple jobs while attending classes throughout the day. Yet, today’s students face financial challenges amid stagnant wages and escalating costs of essentials.

It’s another typical opening routine for Sarah Morgan and Kaya Parrish, who expect another slow day of business.

Morgan is the Key Holder for Hollister Co. at the Inland Center location. She graduated from the University of California, Riverside in 2023. Parrish is one of the store’s Lead Brand Representatives and current students at California State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB).

Both women strive in their academics while also helping to run their store’s business. However, despite the amount of hours worked, the pair expresses concern for their future stability in this current economy.

“I think it’s hard to work in today’s economy because I know it isn’t a good one. It’s very hard to keep working when you know there might not be something you’re working towards. With older generations, they were able to advance their life, but in this economy, we are forced to choose between living and working instead of having a balance.” Morgan states.

Comparisons have been made between the Boomers and Generation Z and the difference in living conditions. Boomers at one point were able to work one job and afford a mortgage while today’s generation works a 40-hour week to afford essentials such as food and rent. This leaves no room for extracurricular activities.

Morgan goes on to say, “It makes it feel like being a Gen Z means that you either work ten times as hard as the older generations to advance or you choose to stay stagnant because you don’t want to risk your mental health.”

Oftentimes jobs advocate for a “work-life balance”. This means employees are encouraged to find time to enjoy themselves outside of their means of work. For students, they spend their free time attending classes to attain their degrees.

“I feel sometimes it can get difficult, especially when I’m working a lot of hours but

typically I like my setup because I can schedule school on certain days and work on the other days.”

Parrish states.

For Parrish, her current employment is temporary. It would feel odd for her not to work and attend school. She has been a dedicated team member for about 3 years now and can learn on-the-job skills while also being a full-time business major.

for in the future as “careers”. These careers are often looked at as jobs Gen Z hopes to enjoy working for while also making a living and comfortable wage. Students who graduate from university are looking for jobs in the field that they studied.

Parrish hopes to find a job as a home realtor. As for now, she is comfortable as a lead. “This job wouldn’t be enough to sustain

find work that meets their expectations and education levels.

Lidia Fernandez, a CSUSB alumni shares her thoughts on the current working conditions and economy as she is currently looking for a career in her field.

“This economy really doesn’t allow a person to live fully and independently which is why we see many people struggling such

Parrish is planning for the future. In today’s unpredictable economic climate, more and more students like her are having to prepare ahead of time.

“I’m not planning on staying long as I’m looking for a career right when I graduate.”

Students like Parrish often refer to jobs they intend to work

me on my own and I’m fortunate enough to have no bills so that’s the only way I can work this job with all that I do at school & extra curriculars.”

While some students are comfortable working and attending school full-time, graduates are struggling to

as living paycheck to paycheck or even seeking second jobs. And prices on living expenses (gas, groceries, rent, etc.) is up the roof. One person cannot afford to live independently based on minimum wage alone and that’s mind blowing.”

Generation Z was

encouraged at a young age to attend college to make above a livable wage. Now, we are seeing some fast food and retail jobs pay more without an education than corporate jobs. So this leads to the question, do college students have an advantage over the rest of the workforce? Fernandez expresses her frustration with the work industry and the educational system.

“Yes and no. Yes because at the end of the day, I’ve always believed ‘knowledge is power’ and it’s something that no one can ever take from you. So you can use that to your advantage, both socially and professionally. However, I say no because if you look at the current state of events, new graduates are getting out of college and seeking entry-level jobs that start at minimum wage because we ‘lack experience’. Which is ridiculous and honestly is not fair after years of education.”

It’s understandable to see the frustration behind paying thousands of dollars for education just to be turned away after meeting the minimum job requirement for the lack of experience. Fernandez is not alone in this issue.

“Recently I’ve applied to jobs that require a Bachelor’s degree and when I tried negotiating the pay to no lower than $22 an hour, they said ‘We need experience if you want that high of a pay.’ Yet fast food workers are soon to be getting paid $20-22 an hour for minimum wage. No education required, no previous experience. It’s ridiculous.”

Living “paycheck to paycheck” is not a new concept, however, students like Morgan, Parrish, and Fernandez are facing the repercussions of a struggling economy. This doesn’t mean there is no hope for the future of Gen Z and the working class.

We’re seeing a shift in student’s motivation and creating realistic financial goals despite what their elders say. Students work hard to try and maintain a healthy work-life balance while also finding ways to earn their degree. There’s no doubt Gen Z works hard and they’ll find a way to make a positive impact on the economy.

Meet Kaya Parrish, 21: Part-time Lead Brand Representative at Hollister Co., a retail industry veteran with over 3 years of experience, juggling her role while pursuing her degree at CSUSB in San Bernardino, California.

Drake Citron’s Q&A Story

By Drake Citron Staff Writer

Kerstin Voigt shares her insights into the ethics, risks, and accountability of artificial intelligence (AI).

Kerstin Voigt has been in the realm of Computer Science education for 40 years. She is one of the senior professors at CSUSB, the first AI-related professor, as well as the Director of the Computer Science and Engineering field.

Navigating Ethical Worries in an evolving landscape of new technologies. In this interview, Kerstin Voigt shared her perspective on ethics surrounding AI, the risks of its use, and where responsibility for safeguards falls.

Q. What role should ethicists play in the development and implementation of AI technologies?

A. Ethicists are people who work in the industry but are often pushed aside and not allowed to do their role at all. Take Timnit Gebru for example. She was the Co-lead for the Ethical AI Research team at Google and was ultimately fired from this position because she produced a paper that highlighted bias in AI. While this is a terrible thing that happened to her; it highlights just how important ethicists are to the industry. If people want to hide something, it’s something that needs to be known.

Q. How can we ensure that AI algorithms are developed and used ethically?

A. If you’re the developer, you are the technical aspect of it, your goal is to just make sure things happen. So as a user, I would imagine you are the one who should use it ethically. Ultimately, it’s a big necessity. AI is just a subfield of computer science. It’s an engineering discipline. Meaning we are held to the IEEE Code of Ethics. While we’re held to it, that doesn’t mean it is policed.

Q. What are the inherent risks of bias in AI systems?

A. This is of course an exaggerated example, but if you truly don’t know, and now this machine, this blinking, powerful thing tells me 3 times 2 is negative 17. Well, who am I to say it’s not, right? This bias is baked into AI inherently when not everyone makes use of giving it data items. If you only have Team Red giving it the answer to 3 times 2 is negative 17 it will just say that. You need Team Blue and Team Green to come and give their input as well since bias will come from those who put information out. But, right now, the way it is, the bias is almost guaranteed

Q. How can it be addressed to ensure fairness then?

A. I think all sides need to contribute and contribute equally. If you could reach that, then I think we wouldn’t have to worry so much about it. But it’s difficult, right? I mean, this is not cheap equipment. Of course, not very many people have it. Elderly people, they’re

still important, right? But they’re not going to contribute to AI data. So, their voices are not getting in there. I think that bias and fairness all sort of go hand in hand.

Q. How large will job displacement and unemployment end up being if AI becomes more prevalent in the work field?

A. It’s just like automation. There will be other jobs emerging, for better or for worse. And they might be very different from the jobs that were lost. There are always new jobs and new concerns.

Q. Who should handle the potential for job displacement and unemployment caused by AI?

A. As someone who would create the AI we (developers) shouldn’t be responsible for that outcome. I think the ethicists, lawyers, and that whole area of professions need to step in there. Developers shouldn’t just not create something because it will have growing pains.

Q. Who holds accountability when AI systems make decisions with significant consequences?

A. I don’t have the answer to that, but that is a huge problem because if you own the software, that triggers a consequence. You didn’t write the software, but you used it. We were talking about new jobs and new directions. I think that’s already in the works, but laws and policies, that

whole legal system, need to be looked into. I think that will be their job to decide that whole accountability thing. I think the ethicists, lawyers, that whole... area of professions need to step in there. I’m pretty sure they are on it, and it’s just super super hard.

Q. What safeguards could be put in place to prevent the manipulation of AI for malicious purposes, such as spreading misinformation?

A. I think there will have to be a new profession whose job is to moderate and manage safeguards.

Community Battle Over Street Vendors

By Ryu Oshiro Staff Writer

In the city of Fontana, California, a raging and continuous battle has been brewing for quite some time now. The topic of street vending has brought on intense passions that have sparked heated debates in our city council chambers.

This practice of street vending has been ingrained in the Latino culture, but now it has been interrupted by a web of regulations and controversy. This conflict captures the broader tensions surrounding race, class, and economic opportunity that highlight the complexities of this evolving community.

For months, Fontana’s City Council meetings have been boiling pots of conflict, social activism, and social justice groups, as well as residents taking turns on the stand to voice their objections against Fontana’s Mayor Acquanetta Warren. Their anger focuses on Warren’s rigid stance on unlicensed street vendors. Under her orders and leadership, the city has enacted strict and rigorous regulations that allow for the arrest of vendors on misdemeanor charges and for confiscating their goods and equipment.

Warren, however, remains determined in her defense of these severe measures.

She argues that the restriction on street vending is not racially motivated, but rather a necessary step to uphold civic regulations and support Fontana’s local businesses. Despite her statements, many critics view the efforts against the street vendors as a direct assault on Latino culture, as well as a direct attack on the livelihoods of marginalized communities. In a city where Latinos comprise the majority of its residents, the movements against street

vending are perceived by many as symbolic of the bigger systemic inequalities and discriminatory practices that have been plaguing the United States for centuries now.

The debate over street vending in Fontana is not just a matter of regulations and permits—it’s a reflection of the broader social, economic, and cultural dynamics at play. The city has been going through rapid transformation, with the building of various

new buildings and businesses.

This conflict highlights the challenges of navigating economic development, cultural preservation, and social justice intersections in a diverse and evolving urban landscape.

There have been multiple studies in the past couple of years that have been conducted in bigger cities like Los Angeles and New York City that shed light on the positive impact of street vending on their local communities. These

studies have found that street vendors contribute to the health and success of urban spaces, providing affordable goods and services to residents and tourists alike. Additionally, they serve as a start for entrepreneurship— offering opportunities for immigrant and low-income individuals who want to start their businesses and achieve financial independence.

Some fear that this enforcement against unlicensed street vending will worsen already existing inequalities and increase divisions within the city of Fontana. Others argue that the regulation of these unlicensed street vendors is necessary to ensure public safety and maintain a fair chance for all businesses.

Despite the polarization and hostility surrounding this issue, there should still be potential for reconciliation.

City officials, activists, and residents must collaborate to find a common ground where both parties win. There is still hope for creating solutions that address the concerns of everyone involved. In the end, the battle over street vending in Fontana is not just about legality or economics, but rather about the city’s identity and values. It serves as a continuous reminder of the transformative potential of activism and the vital role of civic engagement in shaping our community’s future.

Food Makes the World Go Round

By Giovoni Gonzalez Staff Writer

We live in a time where food is everywhere. We no longer have to hunt to eat, we just go to the grocery store or maybe pick up fast food for dinner. The easy access to food has led to an excess in food consumption by Americans across the nation. Excess in food consumption and lack of exercise can lead to obesity. Obesity is more than just a cosmetic issue it is also very dangerous to one’s health. Obesity is a disease that occurs from having too much body fat. This study will show

Culture and Commerce Clash in Fontana America’s Tragic Obesity Epidemic

data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) about the obesity stats in America and its steady climb. Over the course of 20 years, starting from 1998-2018 we can see an increase in obese Americans. In 1998 the CDC calculated that approximately 19.8% of American adults were obese. By 2018 that percentage has increased to 42.5%. There are many factors that have contributed to this surge of obesity.

Obesity is a disease that happens when a person’s body mass index (BMI) is too high.

BMI measures the relationship between height and weight

by dividing someone’s weight in kilograms by the square of height in meters. This is typically used by healthcare professionals, but BMI does have its limitations. For example, it does not account for fat distribution or muscle/bone mass. BMI is usually used as a scale to help categorize people from being underweight to people being severely overweight.

The big question is, why have we seen a rise in obesity in the last 20 years?

Part of the reason is, the food that most people have access to is very processed which makes it difficult for our bodies to break down and digest.

Processed food is everywhere, at almost every street corner you will find some type of fast food.

The portions in America are large and that’s evident at many fast-food establishments where the food is sold in bundles. Jack in the Box has ‘Munchie Meals’ which usually includes multiple entrees, a drink, and a dessert.

Taco Bell also has ‘Cravings boxes’ that are similar to the Munchie Meals.

Fast food is easily accessible and can be cheap if you have the apps and use the deals and rewards to make your order cheaper. You don’t even have to leave your house anymore because almost every place

offers delivery through thirdparty delivery companies like DoorDash or UberEats.

Another major contributor to obesity is lack of exercise. According to the CDC only 24.2% of adults met the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for both aerobic and anaerobic exercises. Aerobic exercises are those that usually involve endurance like running, dancing, bicycling, yoga, etc. Anaerobic exercises are those that build muscle usually through strength training and lifting weights.

California Residents Believe Controlling Food Waste Could Solve World Hunger?

By Estevan Vega Staff Writer

World hunger is a world issue that has been present for as long as anyone can remember but has been an increasing issue since the worldwide pandemic in 2020 brought the world to a screeching halt and millions of people lost their jobs. According to ActionsAgainstHunger.org, “There is more than enough food produced in the world to feed everyone on the planet. Yet as many as 783 million people still go hungry.” While there is debate on what could be the solution, from things like controlling food waste, making food more affordable, and increasing the number of local food banks from city to city, there is no definite answer.

To get to the bottom of this, CSUSB student Estevan Vega interviewed 30 local California residents for their opinion on what could be the sole solution, if any, to world hunger. Asking the question, “Is controlling food waste the sole solution to ending world hunger?” and giving them three options to choose from to narrow down opinions on the topic. The three options are Option A: Yes, it is the solution; Option B: No, it won’t help enough on its own; and Option C: Yes, it will help but it is only the first of many necessary steps. Out of 30 residents surveyed, 21

voted for Option C, 7 voted for Option B and only 2 voted for Option A.

Out of 30 people surveyed, 70% of them believed that controlling food waste starting in California was only the first step towards solving world hunger. While controlling food waste is an essential piece of the puzzle, multiple factors and

options have to be considered to solve an issue as big and serious as the World. In a society run by money-hungry organizations, it is difficult to try to convince big food companies to reconsider how they handle food waste, but it is not impossible. Being a world issue means that it will take the world’s help as a collective to be able to solve world hunger.

According to a media release entitled, UN Report: Global hunger numbers rose to as many as 828 million in 2021 released on July 6, 2022, the World Health Organization said, “The evidence suggests that if governments repurpose the resources they are using to incentivize the production, supply, and consumption of nutritious foods, they will contribute to making healthy diets less costly, more affordable and equitably for all.” If the government were to see the spike in concern for world hunger and the call for its immediate

solution, it could contribute to its solution by making healthy foods more affordable around the world. In an economy that is in a borderline recession, making things like healthy foods more accessible for everyone around the world could help the economy in a major way. There could be an increase in population productivity among those who are less fortunate and this could lead to helping the homeless crisis in the process. Every day, millions of people are going to sleep hungry and there needs to be more initiative to do something about it. No one should have to wake up and worry about where their next meal is coming from or if they are even going to be able to have a meal that day. These are resources that should be available to everyone, no one is above being human, and because of that people need to get together and help their neighbors and communities to make a difference in the world today. Regardless of the current state of the economy, helping people and helping solve an issue starts

with one step, and the world just needs to take that first step to end world hunger. When examining the overall issue of food waste and the impact it plays on world hunger, it is but one piece of the puzzle towards ending world hunger, and because of that it should be the first. This is something that communities could enforce and push on the businesses around them, in a way to better control the waste of food or products that could be helpful to someone less fortunate. Every day, videos about employees being forced to throw away hundreds of dollars worth of perfectly good and safe food and not being allowed to donate it to local food banks go viral on social media platforms like TikTok or Twitter/X. The phrase “an apple a day keeps the doctor away” could mean life or death for someone out there who has no guaranteed food source to get their next meal. If an apple could change someone’s life, so could an extra source of food or other necessities change someone’s life in an instant.

The bar graph above was created to show how 30 California residents believed controlling food waste could solve world hunger.

AN UNFINISHED PARTY!

On March 14th, we hosted a special gathering to celebrate our student-curated show, Unfinished. The event was attended by our special members and most gracious supporters. Our hard-working RAFFMA student assistants did an excellent job of giving guests a tour and explaining the ins and outs of the exhibition, including their thought processes, struggles, and accomplishments. We would like to extend our heartfelt thanks to our Board of Advocates, constant museum contributors, supporters, and members.

But that wasn’t all! The gracious artists who donated their pieces to the museum were also included in the invites to this private event. Amongst those artists was John Sonsini, a painter based in Los Angeles, who has established himself as one of the foremost portrait painters of his generation over the last 40 years. Sonsini is renowned for his portraits of men painted directly from life, capturing his sitter’s physical and psychological presence. RAFFMA has honorably acquired his drawing Rigoberto, which is on display in the Unfinished exhibition.

John Sonsini’s presence captivated RAFFMA staff and our student curators. We were honored for him to come and see his work in their exhibition. The amazing artist shared stories of his artistic visions, past experiences, and personal connections with other artists displayed in the exhibition. This day marked a huge experience for our team and an amazing memory that will stay with our students.

Who said it was UnFinished?

“Study of an Etching” was an original piece I selected for the exhibition because of the emotion it communicated when I first saw it. Despite being primarily composed of watercolors and using blocking techniques, it communicated something of a strong personal emotion I had not really felt with other pieces in the early stages of our research. It was through our collaborative work with Aleah that I understood the process behind how the piece was created, and why the artist made it in this manner.

Words far from UnFinished excerpts from

“...being able to share my ideas, discuss with other teammates, and make a good collaboration was a key to the success of this project...” - Khoa Nguyen

“Curating UnFinished was and still is a deeply rewarding process. It gave me hands on experience with nearly every aspect of museum work...” – Samuel Marshall

The “study” is a technique used by artists in preparation for the creation of a final piece, which was the case for this piece, however from a curator perspective this made sense for why the drawing had such an impact on me. A study is meant to be quick, impulsive, to familiarize yourself with the elements you hope to capture in the final product. Our exhibit highlights the raw emotions that lead artists in the production of their drawings, and the method in which their pieces capture it, and communicate it with the audience, and so our research helped me recognize the value of this piece in our narration, despite its status as a “study.” – Leslie

Study Reveals Surprising Trends in TikTok Usage for News Consumption

Pie chart illustrates the count of how many use the trending platform such as TikTok for their

By Damaris Preciado Staff Writer

A recent study conducted has shed light on the usage patterns of TikTok for news consumption among young adults, uncovering intriguing trends regarding age, gender, race, and status as a student or staff member. The study surveyed a diverse group of individuals aged between 18 and 28, aiming to understand their frequency of TikTok usage for both news and entertainment purposes.

The information we gathered from 22 people showed some interesting things. Most of the people we talked to were women - 18 out of the 22. And the group was pretty diverse, with people from different backgrounds like Hispanic, White, and Black.

Interestingly, the study found that TikTok, a platform often associated with entertainment and viral content, is also being utilized by young adults as a source of news. Among the participants, a significant portion reported using TikTok frequently for news consumption, with 11 out of 22 individuals indicating that they often rely on the platform for this purpose.

The study uncovered interesting trends in the demographics of TikTok news consumers. Women were found to be the majority among news consumers on TikTok, with

Hispanic and White individuals being the most prevalent racial groups. This suggests that TikTok appeals to a diverse audience when it comes to news consumption.

For instance, the study revealed that Hispanic participants were more likely to use TikTok for news compared to their White and Black counterparts. This trend suggests that cultural factors may play a role in shaping preferences for news consumption on social media platforms.

“I never thought TikTok would become my go-to for news updates, but it’s surprisingly informative and convenient,” said Gwen Watson, an 18-year-old freshman student.

“I find myself scrolling through my ‘For You’ page, stumbling upon small news clips that keep

me in the loop without feeling overwhelmed. It’s like getting a quick update while taking a break from studying or waiting for class to start.”

Moreover, the data unveiled variations in TikTok news usage between students and staff members. Interestingly, despite being primarily known as a platform for younger demographics, staff members, typically older individuals, also reported using TikTok frequently for news consumption. This finding challenges the notion that TikTok is exclusively favored by younger generations for entertainment purposes.

Even though the study didn’t talk about how many people make TikTok videos, it suggested that those who use TikTok a lot for fun might also share news with their friends.

This shows that TikTok isn’t just for watching funny videos, but also for spreading news to others.

Emily Rodriguez, Student Affairs Assistant commented on the study, emphasizing the importance of understanding the evolving landscape of news consumption among young adults. “In today’s digital age, it’s important to look at how new platforms like TikTok are changing the way we get our news,” said Rodriguez.

The study has implications for media organizations and content creators seeking to engage with younger audiences. By leveraging TikTok as a platform for news delivery, media outlets have the opportunity to reach a demographic that is traditionally difficult to engage through conventional means.

“I’ve tried using TikTok for news, but I find myself gravitating towards other sources,” shared Alondra, a 21-year-old Junior student.

“While TikTok is great for entertainment, I prefer to get my news from more reliable sources like news websites or other media outlets. I feel like I can trust the information more when it’s coming from those sources.”

It’s important to remember that even though TikTok can be a new way to get news, it’s crucial for users to think carefully and check information from different places to make sure it’s true and trustworthy.

As TikTok continues to grow in popularity, its role in the world of news consumption is likely to expand, presenting both opportunities and challenges for media organizations, content creators, and users alike. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the evolving landscape of digital media and the shifting preferences of young adults in accessing news content.

Looking ahead, there’s a lot more we can explore from here. We’ve just scratched the surface on how different people use TikTok for news and entertainment. We could dive deeper into why some folks are more worried about TikTok’s safety, or how attitudes about banning the app might change over time. There’s also the question of who’s making and sharing news content on TikTok, which could tell us a whole lot more about how information spreads online. So, while we’ve learned a bunch already, there’s still plenty more to uncover!

As TikTok continues to dominate the media landscape, perspectives like those fellow students highlight the evolving nature of news consumption among young adults. Whether it’s through short captivating clips on social media or traditional news outlets.

news consumption.

Arts & Entertainment

“Congrats! It’s Education!”

The Importance of Sex Education.

By Jacqueline Flores Staff Writer

Teen pregnancy is a shushed secret and often neglected and looked down upon in truth. While many continue to fight for sex education, we can hear news throughout our towns and cities about reckless teenagers and their shocking revelations.

Growing up, teen pregnancies seem to be the most feared thing for all parents, having to sit and acknowledge that your teenager made a mistake. In current times, the topic of ‘teen pregnancy’ is accompanied by the fight for sex education. But why is sex education so important? And why are so many against it?

Sex education is as clear as its name, the education of sex, and the consequences that come from it. In California, Sex education is required by state law to be taught at schools beginning in sixth to twelfth grade. According to California’s Department of Education, a law known as the ‘California Healthy Youth Law’, students must be taught about protecting their sexual and reproductive health from things like unintentional pregnancy, and sexual diseases like HIV and STIs.

California has had a progressive history of sex education and teen pregnancies. Compared to other states, while the state contributed big numbers to the count of the overall rate of teen births, California has had the biggest decline in teenage pregnancies, dropping by the masses every year from the year 1991, when California was at its peak of teen pregnancies, hitting up to 73%, to 2015, dropping to a low 8.5%.

During the 1990s, many states participated in ‘Abstinence-until-marriage programs’ before changing to ‘Abstinence only’ programs. These programs lacked actual education and often excluded any other student besides heterosexual students and often depended on scaring students rather than helping them and protecting them. As the evidence mentions, these programs seemed to have no effect, while percentages did drop, it wasn’t enough for the crisis the states were going through, only reducing about one or two percent. California was still producing a higher state rate of teen pregnancies than the rest of the country.

Overall, the programs were not working and did nothing for

the problem they were facing, but they continued.

Many might be shocked to hear that California was not always as progressive as it technically is now. The state had participated in the abstinence programs for years, until 2015, when California decided to stop receiving federal funds for these programs and decided to go another route. This route eventually led to the groundbreaking law of ‘California’s Healthy Youth Law’. This law became a massive controversy, after it excluded the teachings of abstinences only, and instead mandated a more comprehensive and inclusive lesson plan. Many teachers were able to include different types of relationships and genders within their teachings.

While the state rate was dropping over the years, this law pushed California’s teen birth rate by a ton. By 2015, California made its steep decline, down to a single-digit percentage. With this type of progress, many might ask, “Why are so many people against sex education?”

Sex education isn’t seen as a

well-renowned help to those who are against it. Many states that teaching sex education can lead to encouraging the act instead of preventing it. Many might also see the lessons as too vulgar for young kids.

Sex education can be stigmatized due to lack of information. Sex education isn’t meant to encourage sexual acts, but those events are inevitable. Teenagers are in the midst of hormonal chaos and are bound to make mistakes. Learning about themselves and their bodies can

have positive outcomes rather than bad ones. Teens often suffer from unanswered questions about themselves and often seek and crave answers.

Using sex education as a tool isn’t meant to prevent sex, it’s meant to prevent the consequences.

Teen pregnancies, as well as STDs and STIs, are scary and difficult to deal with. At times, it can lead to being shunned, shamed, and even hurt. With sex education, teenagers can continue to learn about the

outcomes of unprotected sex.

Sex education can benefit many and like California, other states can continue to lower their percentages by promoting and mandating lessons.

Sex education isn’t something that should be feared, we should fear the absence of it.

Teen Pregnancy’s steady slope down, as the rates reduce in California.

Trends in Streaming Preferences

By Jocelyn Martinez-Lopez Staff Writer

With the advancement of technology and households investing in broadband internet, streaming services began to gain popularity in the mid-2000s. In the past, physical stores like Blockbuster offered DVD rentals, but now, with streaming, you can access a vast library of content for a monthly subscription.

Streaming revolutionized the way people watch their favorite shows, allowing them to view content at their convenience rather than waiting for scheduled broadcasts on cable networks.

Over time, new streaming services have emerged, offering more specialized content tailored to individual preferences. While Netflix and Hulu were once the dominant players, we now have a variety of options catering to different tastes.

In a survey conducted with 30 participants, they were asked to choose their preferred streaming service. Netflix was the overwhelming favorite, with 73.3% of participants selecting it, followed by Hulu with 30%. It’s worth noting that participants

were allowed to choose up to two options for this question.

It’s intriguing to note that despite the growing array of streaming options, people still tend to gravitate towards these two giants. With the sudden growth of streaming services, it’s beginning to feel reminiscent of the cable era. For instance, if you’re searching for a particular movie and it’s available on Disney+ but not on Netflix, you’re compelled to subscribe to another streaming platform just to access it.

While streaming services

initially offered a breath of fresh air, recent price hikes and the introduction of ads on certain platforms have led us back to a system resembling traditional cable TV. While the convenience of on-demand viewing remains, the abundance of streaming services seems to have diluted their original purpose.

Nevertheless, in the survey, participants were asked about their preferences regarding movies, TV shows, or if they had no preference. The majority indicated a preference for watching TV shows on Hulu and

movies on Disney+. This finding aligns with the content available on each platform; Disney+ offers content from the Walt Disney conglomerate, including beloved Disney movies and Lucasfilm productions like Star Wars. Hulu, on the other hand, features full seasons of exclusive series and Hulu originals. Given these content offerings, it’s understandable why these platforms are the preferred choices for their respective types of media.

On the other hand, Netflix revealed a nearly equal split

among participants in terms of preferences for watching TV shows and movies, with a similarly balanced number of people indicating no particular preference for content on the platform.

Additionally, participants were asked about how frequently they utilized the nine streaming services listed. The results revealed that everyone used at least two services, with an average usage of four services per person. This further underscores the regression in the streaming landscape. Instead of offering a convenient means of accessing media, it has become increasingly challenging to find desired content. Consequently, individuals now find themselves subscribing to multiple streaming services to fulfill their entertainment needs.

Overall, the data indicates that individuals typically dedicate between one to three hours on their favored streaming platform. It’s fascinating to observe the preferences and choices people make regarding their preferred streaming services, as well as the types of content they gravitate towards on these platforms.

San Bernardino County Struggles with Homelessness and Insecure Housing

By Ryu Oshiro Staff Writer

Despite efforts to combat homelessness, San Bernardino County continues to grapple with a multitude of challenges regarding housing insecurity and inadequate living conditions and shelters, according to recent data analysis. The numbers and percentages span from the year 2012 to the year 2022, and they illustrate a nuanced picture of San Bernardino’s housing crisis, shedding light not only on the overall trends, but also the blatant disparities among ethnic and racial groups.

San Bernardino County continues to face a persistent housing issue that is just worsened by economic inequalities and outrageous living costs. The data set examined over the past decade provides more insights into the fluctuating dynamics of homelessness and housing

insecurity, revealing progress, but also setbacks.

Over the years, the number of individual’s living in overcrowded conditions has fluctuated, which indicates the inadequate living situation many residents have to endure. All the meanwhile, the reliance on temporary living accommodations, such as hotels and motels, has been gradually increasing. This just serves to highlight the lack of long-term solutions. Despite homeless shelter accommodations being used frequently, a large portion of the population still remains without shelter, underlying issues in this county’s housing infrastructure. Analysis of the data also reveals notable disparities among different ethnic groups that are experiencing homelessness. While the white homeless population makes up the majority of the unsheltered population, the black homeless population is disproportionately represented. Similarly, the Latino

homeless population accounts for a considerable portion of the unsheltered population, further reflecting the broader inequalities in access to stable housing conditions.

Delving even deeper into the data, it becomes evident that non-Latino individuals make up the majority of the unsheltered population. However, the Latino community still faces huge challenges, since they make up a sizable portion of those that experience homelessness. These findings serve to underscore the complex intersection of race, ethnicity, and the socioeconomic factors that shape housing outcomes.

Addressing the root causes of homelessness requires a complex and multifaceted approach that goes over multiple factors, such as housing affordability, economic disparities, as well as systemic barriers. There are many steps the county can take in order to better the housing

This chart depicts the numbers of people in living situations where multiple families or individuals share one housing unit due to economic necessity between 2012 and 2022. The highest one is in 2015-2016, with 35,251 individuals in San Bernardino County sharing one housing unit. The lowest one is in 2021-2022, with 21,824 individuals.

crisis. Investing in affordable housing initiatives, expanding access to support services, and implementing policies that prioritize housing stability are crucial steps towards resolving

and mitigating this issue in San Bernardino.