THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA • FOUNDED 1885 VOL. CXL
PHILADELPHIA, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2024
NO. 6
AMY WAX FACES SANCTIONS A ONE-YEAR SUSPENSION. NO SUMMER PAY. A PUBLIC REPRIMAND.
Wax is now appealing the hearing board’s recommendations, which were approved by then-President Liz Magill in August ELEA CASTIGLIONE Senior Reporter
ANNA VAZHAEPARAMBIL | SENIOR PHOTOGRAPHER
A Faculty Senate hearing board recommended that Penn sanction controversial University of Pennsylvania Carey Law professor Amy Wax, prompting Wax to appeal the ruling — and garnering mixed reactions from community members. According to The Philadelphia Inquirer, sources close to Wax’s case confirmed that, in June 2023, the hearing board comprised of tenured faculty members recommended sanctions against Wax, a tenured faculty member at Penn Carey Law. The ruling, if it is upheld after Wax’s appeal, would be the first time in recent history that a tenured University professor was sanctioned through Faculty Senate procedures. The recommended sanctions against Wax included a one-year suspension at half pay, the removal of her named chair and summer pay, and a requirement for Wax to note in public appearances that she is not speaking on behalf or as a member of Penn Carey Law. The hearing board decided that the University should
issue a public reprimand of Wax, but did not suggest she should be fired or stripped of tenure, according to the Inquirer. The Inquirer reported that Wax’s appeal cited improper procedure, meaning that Penn’s Senate Committee on Academic Freedom and Responsibility will now review the appeal. This further delays a conclusion to the case, which has already been ongoing for two years. Former Penn President Liz Magill signed off on the hearing board’s recommendation of sanctions in August of last year, but Wax quickly appealed the decision, according to the Inquirer. The Daily Pennsylvanian was unable to confirm this timeline of events. Graduate School of Education professor Jonathan Zimmerman, who is also a member of SCAFR, did not speak on matters related to the committee’s confidential proceedings. He clarified that the committee is only tasked with reviewing the procedures of the hearing board — not to render a new recommendation on
whether Wax should be sanctioned. “I think something this serious should take a long time,” Zimmerman said. “I understand the frustration, but this is one of the most important decisions that the University of Pennsylvania is going to make, I would argue in history.” Other SCAFR members told the DP that the committee’s proceedings are “strictly confidential” in response to requests for comment. Vinila Varghese, a third-year student at Penn Carey Law and president of the Council of Student Representatives, said that there has not yet been discussion among law students about the recommended sanctions. Varghese said that she was disappointed Wax did not receive a major sanction, such as the revocation of her tenure. “If this is the best sanctions that they can do, then I’m happy [that] there are consequences to her actions,” she said. “But I wish it was more severe.” Zimmerman, however, warned that sanctioning Wax
could lead to a “cascade of censorship.” Zach Greenberg, a program officer at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, suggested that the hearing board’s recommendations violate Wax’s academic freedom as outlined in Penn’s free speech policies. “We believe that Penn’s violating Amy Wax’s academic freedom rights by trying to punish her for her scholarship,” he said. Greenberg said that any kind of punishment — whether it be in the form of docking pay, stripping of titles, or termination — is inappropriate. “We feel that the University should rescind this punishment or refrain from punishing her,” he said. Zimmerman said there is a distinction between Wax’s public statements and alleged statements directed at students, a distinction he said has been left out of much of the rhetoric surrounding her case. See WAX, page 3
From Black Penn administrator hiring far outpaces faculty growth, Bottom to UC raising concerns of ‘bloat’ Townhomes: The While enrollment has barely budged, administration has increased in size by 78% in the past 20 years, a DP analysis found ongoing fight for affordable in which universities are generally hiring more administrators than instructional faculty. This trend has been observed at other universities, inhousing near cluding Harvard University. Penn Graduate School of Education professor Penn Jonathan Zimmerman called administrative bloat ALEX SLEN AND SRISHTI BANSAL Staff Reporters
Decades of turnover and redevelopment of the University City neighborhood have frustrated residents and community members EMILY SCOLNICK Senior Reporter
For the first three quarters of the 20th century, Black Bottom — a predominantly African-American community in University City — thrived. In the 1960s, its residents came together to fight displacement attempts by developers — but the community was razed despite their protests. In recent years, many of the same residents have faced conflict over the University City Townhomes — a low-income housing development built on the site where Black Bottom stood. In July 2021, IBID Associates Limited Partnership — the property’s owners — announced that it would not renew its contract with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, giving tenants eviction notices and preparing for the site’s demolition. 60 years later, former Black Bottom residents and experts spoke to The Daily Pennsylvanian about the history of Black Bottom and their continued fight for community preservation amid displacement threats in University City. See BLACK BOTTOM, page 3 SEND STORY IDEAS TO NEWSTIP@THEDP.COM
DESIGN BY EMMI WU
Medical staff are excluded from both the administrative and instructional staff values.
Penn is following a national trend of hiring a higher ratio of administrators to instructional faculty, according to a Daily Pennsylvanian analysis. The DP’s analysis found that the number of full-time, non-medical school administrators at Penn over the past 20 years increased by 78% — compared to a 40% increase in full-time, nonmedical faculty. The analysis relied on data from
the United States Department of Education and Penn’s annual reports, concluding that student enrollment has remained relatively constant — increasing by just 5% — while hiring increased at greater rates. A request for comment was left with a University spokesperson. These numbers are consistent with a national trend often described as “administrative bloat,”
ONLINE AT THEDP.COM
“the most important trend that’s happened during [his] career as a scholar.” Zimmerman said there are “necessary” and “even legal reasons” to have institutions become “highly managed places.” However, he also believes administrative bloat “changes the tone of the University in a very real way.” “The students are being socialized to expect a kind of management from the University,” Zimmerman said. “That’s a fundamentally disempowering maneuver.” Richard Vedder, professor emeritus at Ohio University, said that the role of university administrators has historically been to record grades, carry out clerical work, and enforce rules. As colleges expanded and government regulations increased in the 1950s and 1960s, the number of administrators grew as well, according to Zimmerman. Jay Greene, a research fellow at The Heritage Foundation and the former chair of the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas, said that many universities used to feel as if they were run by a “collective of faculty.” Administrative positions increased as responsibilities — including managing student life, residential life, and conduct — were shifted away from faculty, according to Greene. At Penn, the Office of Student Affairs has 160 full-time staff and 10 part-time staff, and it was ranked as one of the most promising places to work See ADMIN, page 3 CONTACT US: 215-422-4640