White nationalist scheduled to speak at Penn Carey Law class taught by Amy Wax
Jared Taylor’s scheduled return to Wax’s seminar comes as Penn remains silent on whether it will sanction Wax
JARED MITOVICH Senior Reporter




A white nationalist will visit campus this semester to deliver a guest lecture in a course taught by University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School professor Amy Wax.
Wax invited Jared Taylor — editor of American Renaissance, a publication that the Southern Poverty Law Center calls a promoter of eugenics and pseudoscience — to speak at her Nov. 28 class of LAW 9560: “Conservative and Political Legal Thought,” according to a copy of the course syllabus obtained by The Daily Pennsylvanian. This will be at least Taylor’s second visit to campus after he spoke at the same class in fall 2021.
Taylor’s scheduled return to Wax’s seminar comes as Penn is yet to announce whether it will sanction Wax — three months after a faculty panel held disciplinary hearings and over 19 months since an investigation began. The University has alleged that Wax’s controversial conduct and claims have violated Penn’s behavioral standards, naming Wax’s invite of Taylor to her class as one such example.
Representatives from Penn Carey Law, Wax, and Taylor did not respond to requests for comment by publication. Previously, Wax declined to comment on the University’s disciplinary proceedings when approached outside her office earlier this year on April 17.
Penn Carey Law third year and Council of Student Representatives President Vinila Varghese said she was not surprised that Taylor was visiting campus — but she was surprised that Wax was able to invite him again.
“Probably because [Penn’s] investigation is still ongoing, she can do what she wants because she is a professor, and they have that freedom and discretion,” Varghese said. “I just think that there are some people you don’t invite into a school, and someone who is well known as a white nationalist is definitely someone I wouldn’t invite into a school.”
Taylor has previously stirred controversy at other university campuses, including a visit to Arizona State University last fall hosted by its College Republican United club. He has also visited Vanderbilt University, Northwestern University, and George Mason Law School.
“I have spent 25 years patiently establishing the factual and moral bases for discrimination,” Taylor
Students concerned by COVID-19 resurgence on campus
Penn urges precautionary measures while students say that existing resources, guidance have left them disappointed
BEN BINDAY Senior ReporterPenn is encouraging precautionary measures against COVID-19 as students report a widespread increase in cases across campus. While Wellness at Penn no longer has public data on the campus's COVID-19 positivity rate, students told The Daily Pennsylvanian that they have noticed an increase in cases since the end of summer. All students that the DP spoke with reported knowing multiple contacts who had tested positive since returning to campus in August.
Some students said that Penn's existing resources and guidance has left them disappointed or unsure how to proceed after testing positive for COVID-19 during this latest surge, while others have felt secure with the information that has been shared by the University.
College senior Ellie McKeown, who is immunocompromised and recently tested positive for COVID-19, said she has been "failed" by Penn’s existing resources, which have "jeopardized" her safety and the safety of
those around her.
McKeown said the removal of Penn's testing center was a “huge policy failure" and called on the University to publicize COVID-19 information to prevent people from having to hunt for information — often with no success. She added that instating a temporary COVID19 testing center closer to campus would improve access.
"Just not testing doesn’t make COVID-19 go away," she said. "I shouldn’t have to choose between my education and my health. I especially shouldn’t have to hear the institution I attend debate whether my life is actually worth protecting as a disabled individual.”
McKeown said she consistently used masks since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and has been saving up tests since last semester. She said she has encountered a lack of testing availability, adding that many online links to resources direct to dead University web pages, and the walk to Student Health and Counseling’s
Penn First Plus suspends initiative that helped students afford course materials, alarming FGLI groups

Students said that the announcement of the initiative’s discontinuation — which came days before the fall semester began — will create financial challenges
JESSICA WU Staff ReporterPenn suddenly suspended an initiative that helped hundreds of students afford their course materials, causing alarm among first-generation, low-income students.

In late August, Penn First Plus announced online that it had ended its Course Materials Access Code Initiative for the fall semester. The initiative — which arose during remote learning in the fall of 2020 as a partnership with Penn's undergraduate schools and financial aid office — provided free access codes for materials in "key gateway courses across a variety of fields." It grew to support approximately 350 students per semester, according to the announcement.
Three students with whom The Daily Pennsylvanian spoke said that, despite some issues, the access codes were a helpful resource. They said that the announcement of the initiative's discontinuation — which came days before the fall semester began — will create financial challenges.
College sophomore and Penn First Board Mentorship Chair Bill Chen said that the codes were particularly helpful when he was taking ECON 0100: "Introduction to Micro Economics" and other introductory courses.
“Without [the codes], it would have placed a financial burden on me to pay out of pocket, especially


Medical Care office is prohibitively difficult.
Both McKeown and College first year Kathleen Zhang said that when they called Student Health to inform them of positive COVID-19 test results and seek guidance, they were redirected to voicemail and did not receive a response until nearly a full day later.
"I just ended up going home to avoid any complications with my roommate," Zhang, who tested positive using a test from a friend, said.
In contrast, College first year Lucas Zhu said he was satisfied with the help he received from Penn. Zhu picked up a test from Student Health and Counseling’s Medical Care office at 3535 Market St. — only having to show his PennCard — and self-isolated at home in New Jersey.
“Penn was pretty helpful in letting me know what to
Penn Museum holds previously undisclosed remains of MOVE bombing victims, activists allege
Community organizers demand more transparency after new evidence was found
MOLLY COHEN Senior ReporterLocal community organizers said that they believe there is new evidence that the Penn Museum holds previously undisclosed remains of MOVE bombing victims.
Abdul-Aliy Muhammad, a local community activist, spoke at a press conference on Aug. 31 about claims of new evidence of the Penn Museum’s possession of additional remains of two victims of the MOVE bombing. The evidence comes from photos on an online photo-sharing site from a public event hosted in 2014.
A Penn Museum spokesperson wrote to The Daily Pennsylvanian that the museum “reunited all known MOVE remains with the Africa Family in
page 7
Penn has made several changes to its undergraduate application that will be in effect for the upcoming 2023-2024 admissions season. Here are three of the biggest, and what they mean for applicants:
1. Alumni interviews will become “alumni conversations”











The first change was to alumni interviews — now called “alumni conversations” — which have historically been offered to applicants solely based on alumni availability.
"Each year Penn attempts to connect as many applicants as possible with alumni, depending on volunteer availability," the Penn Admissions website reads. "We foster these connections to provide an opportunity for you to learn about Penn through an alum’s experience, and for us to learn more about you as an individual."
Laurie Kopp Weingarten, the president and chief educational consultant at One-Stop College Counseling, said that the application now describes the conversations as “non-evaluative."










She notes that on the Penn Admissions website linked beneath the new policy on the Common Application, the conversations are still “strongly encouraged,” if a student is matched with an interviewer.
“To me, that is sending a strong signal that Penn wants the conversation," Weingarten said. "However, right on the application, it says you can opt out with absolutely no disadvantage."
She speculated that many students will opt out of the alumni conversations, but that due to the ambiguous wording of the policy, “more savvy applicants" will be afraid to.
All alumni conversations will be held virtually for this admissions cycle.



Brian Taylor, a managing director of the college counseling service Ivy Coach, said that the interview is “one of the least important parts of the
college admissions process,” and that the change is actually not very significant. Taylor described the interviews as a way to keep alumni involved in the admissions process, adding that they do not receive significant training nor are representatives of the admissions office.
“Nothing has changed with respect to Penn’s alumni interview process,” he said. “It's always been a conversation; it's never been really evaluative as they suggested.”

Still, Weingarten said that when she brought up the change at a meeting of the Wharton Club of New Jersey, “it was not a good reaction.”
“People were not happy,” she said, adding that many people in that group are "active Penn alumni" who are part of the interview program.
2. Removal of intended area of study question
The application no longer includes a question asking an applicant’s intended area of study for applicants to the College of Arts and Sciences, the Wharton School, and the School of Nursing.

. Applicants to the School of Engineering and Applied Science can indicate their intended major in the "Academics and Interests" section of the





supplemental essay, Penn Admissions wrote in an FAQ response.
While Penn no longer offers a drop-down for students to select their intended area, it is asking students to write a new school-specific essay.

Previously, instead of the school-specific essay, Penn had applicants to all four schools answer a single short-answer response about their academic interests. With the introduction of school-specific prompts, Penn Admissions has added links to provide applicants with more information on the College, Wharton, the Engineering School, and the Nursing School.
3. Question added about campus group involvement Penn has added a drop-down question that allows students to select from a list of campus groups that they are interested in joining if accepted.
"Penn is home to many resource centers and hubs designed to enrich student experiences and build community," the application reads. "You can learn more about these centers and other ways students find belonging at Penn by visiting this page."


The University did not add additional questions to the application that ask about a candidate’s background or experience with diversity in the face of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn affirmative action — which Taylor said the majority of top schools in the United States, such as Harvard University have chosen to do.
“That sort of question, regardless of the verbiage, is popping up on a lot of college supplements this year as a knee-jerk reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision,” he said.



Other changes to the Penn application questions in recent years include the introduction of the gratitude prompt to the supplemental essays in 2022.
Weingarten said that the nature of college admissions is constantly changing, citing emails she receives almost every day announcing changes to schools’ admissions processes and policies.
“The more things change, the more things stay the same,” Taylor said describing changes to admissions practices. “People might talk a whole lot about the significant changes that are on this year's application, but in reality, not much has changed.”
do,” Zhu said. “I think Penn has been doing a fairly good -19job as they are currently following CDC guidelines when dealing with COVID-19, [and] I think they should continue to do what the CDC recommends when dealing with COVID-19.”
Rebecca Huxta, the director of public health at Wellness at Penn, wrote that Penn's public health team is continuing to support contract tracing efforts and keep the COVID-19 FAQ section on the website updated.

“Headlines concerning raising COVID-19 case counts understandably cause concern and worry,” Huxta wrote.
Wellness at Penn is also working with College Houses and Academic Services to provide and distribute rapid COVID-19 tests to all 13 college houses, she wrote.
The apparent resurgence in COVID-19 at Penn is concurrent with a similar surge nationwide. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, hospital admissions attributed to COVID-19 have increased by 18.8% over the past week, although experts say this may be understating COVID-19 transmission levels in the United States.
"As more students returned to campus, we saw an increase in the number of positive COVID-19 test results being reported to our public health team; in a parallel fashion, PDPH has reported an increase in the number of positive cases in Philadelphia County," Director of Communications for Wellness at Penn Mary Kate Coghlan wrote in a statement to the DP.
An increase in upper respiratory infections is common around this time of year, Wellness at Penn's Medical Director of Student Health and Counseling Vanessa Stoloff wrote.
“We have means to minimize the spread of all respiratory infections within our reach: Wearing a mask, washing our hands, and coughing in our sleeve, all of which can reduce transmission,” Stoloff wrote.
The reported uptick comes after Penn closed its oncampus COVID-19 testing site and the Penn Cares website around May 12 upon the end of the public health emergency in the United States. The Penn Cares Testing Program was also suspended — eliminating Penn’s on-campus COVID19 testing site, related contact tracing measures, and the COVID-19 resource call center. College first year Natasha Kobelsky, who tested positive using two tests that she bought at CVS, was disappointed with the apparent lack of a requirement for her to report her positive test results.
"The information was not readily available and [it] took a lot of jumping from site to site and calls and redirects to get to where I needed to be and figure out what protocol I was supposed to follow," Kobelsky said.
Students are "starting to panic" and testing as word spreads of positive results, Nursing senior Joshua Lee said. The same day that he tested positive in the emergency room, so did three of his friends.
Outbreaks are also concentrated among some student groups, including the heavyweight rowing team, where College first year Finn Broder said several of his teammates tested positive. He said student-athletes are required to quarantine and abstain from competing until they take a heart exam.
Stoloff wrote that students who feel unwell and are seeking assistance can schedule an appointment with Student Health and Counseling through the Wellness Portal or by calling (215) 746-WELL.
AAUP-Penn calls on admin to remove antiunion websites in support of RA, graduate student efforts
AAUP-Penn’s executive committee drafted its letter after observing the uptick in anti-union messaging on campus
SOPHIA LEUNG Staff ReporterPenn’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors requested a policy of neutrality and removal of anti-union messaging from University administrators in a June 8 letter.
The letter referenced six web pages published by the Office of the Provost with “Frequently Asked Questions About Unionization” and recommendations to faculty on permissible ways to communicate with graduate students about unionization. The letter was addressed to President Liz Magill, Provost John Jackson, and College Houses and Academic Services Senior Director for Housing Operations Lulu Kaliher.
AAUP-Penn President and History professor Amy Offner said in an interview with The Daily Pennsylvanian that the links have been forwarded by deans across the University encouraging faculty
to “pass along anti-union talking points to graduate students.” She said that AAUP-Penn’s executive committee decided to draft its letter after observing the uptick in anti-union messaging in response to unionization efforts by resident advisors and graduate students last spring.
Offner said that these are “standard features of anti-union campaigns that are designed by highpriced, anti-union law firms” — one of which is Cozen O’Connor, which AAUP-Penn said the University is currently working with in its “campaign against resident advisors.”
Penn’s “FAQs” page, for example, includes information about union elections, dues, and contracts to encourage graduate students to consider a “range of views.” According to AAUP-Penn’s letter, this language inaccurately depicts unions as third parties interfering with student-faculty and employer relationships.
“Varieties of perspectives already exist within the body of graduate workers themselves, and the goal of the union campaign is to have those conversations amongst ourselves,” College Ph.D. candidate and organizer for Graduate Employees
Together-University of Pennsylvania Sam Schirvar said.
The DP obtained the University administration’s email response to AAUP-Penn from June, which reiterated its stance that the websites are not intended to discourage workers from unionizing, but instead meant to provide students with as much information as possible to be able to make the decision for themselves.
A University spokesperson confirmed that the University received the letter.
Scott Williams, an OPEIU Local 153 union organizer and 2016 graduate of the Graduate School of Education, said that he supported AAUP-Penn’s request on behalf of RAs and GRAs unionizing at Penn.

“It has nothing to do with providing academic discourse,” Williams said. “We believe that Penn is
systematically opposing union organizing, which is a fundamental right that workers have been fighting for for centuries.”
To allow student workers to make the decision to unionize without employer influence, AAUP-Penn’s letter requested that the University implement a policy of neutrality by removing all messaging related to unions in order to allow workers full influence over their own decision to unionize or not.
“A policy of neutrality means that the employer stands back and lets workers make their own decision,” Offner said.
Offner and associate professor of English and Vice President of AAUP-Penn Emily Steinlight recently wrote a guest column in the DP advocating for faculty to disengage from the University’s antiunion campaigns.
“In past organizing drives at Penn, some deans simply have not transmitted anti-union communications and have declined to testify against graduate student workers before the NLRB,” they wrote in the column. “Some department chairs, graduate chairs, and faculty advisors have likewise made principled decisions not to serve as conduits for anti-union messages.”
Schirvar said that the University has been leveraging faculty as a vehicle for distributing this messaging, rather than communicating with graduate students directly.
“Because at the end of the day, it’s us who decide whether or not to form a union, and it’s up to [us to] decide what the priorities of that union should and shouldn’t be,” he said.
AAUP-Penn plans to hold several events over the course of the semester, which Offner said will keep members informed about anti-union messaging and how to avoid passing it on to their employees.
“We need to be talking amongst ourselves as faculty about how we maintain our own integrity, and how we prevent ourselves from being instrumentalized by anti-union law firms and an anti-union administration,” Offner said.
www.upenn.edu/prehealth
an information session,
It’s recruiting season for clubs and pubs at Penn, and The Daily Pennsylvanian is looking for new reporters, columnists, photographers, analysts, and more. You know the drill — we’re excited to welcome enthusiastic DPers in the making, aiming to spend long production nights at 4015 Walnut St. with us and take on an unofficial journalism major. You can apply by filling out our interest form, which closes this Friday at 11:59 p.m.
Before you flip the page, I’d also like to address the more casual browsers of the DP, who probably haven’t attended our interest meetings these past two days (there’s an Open House this Thursday! There’s still time!), or those who only check out our newsletter a handful of times a month.
The DP is an army that is over 300 students strong, diverse in background and aspirations but above all dedicated to keeping students, faculty, and all of West Philadelphia in the know. Many of us entered Penn with no journalism experience, and all of us love what we do.
But we are nothing without the
(yes, you!)
engagement of our readers. In an age of shrinking attention spans and hundreds of publications publishing hundreds of articles a day, I am asking you to read this one, and maybe a few more on the site if you’ve got the time. It’s not that my writing is the best you could possibly be reading — though I’d like to think my three years at the DP have improved it considerably. Rather, it’s that what we publish at the DP is earnest content by students, for students. Our content is timely, Penn-oriented, and meant to spark conversation in a way that big-name publications aren’t.
Reading your campus newspaper has myriad benefits: It is an excellent form of civic engagement, it introduces you to perspectives and insights outside your “Penn Bubble,” and — frankly — there’s just a ton of fascinating articles, videos, digital art, and podcasts to peruse.
The DP is a comprehensive publication for the whole Penn community with a whole lot of heart (I’m sorry, Penn Today — you just don’t cut it). We report news stories with breakneck speed without
compromising the facts, and we provide insightful commentary on our athletics, academics, administration, and more. We offer advice, be it through arts and culture recommendations from 34th Street, or the recent Penn Bucket List and “Freshman 15” columns in our Opinion section. We make you laugh with Under the Button, Penn’s only intentionally satirical publication, and help you unwind with our crosswords.
None of what we publish is meant to be a one-way conversation: Though we lack a formal comment section on our articles, we want to spark discussion and debate around campus — whether in classrooms, at parties, or on social media.
So if you’ve ever disagreed with an opinion we’ve published — which, well, if you haven’t, you haven’t read enough opinion columns yet — then great! We welcome respectful disagreement and debate; it’s our bread and butter. We want to hear from you, as we are currently looking for new columnists and always looking for guest columns.
But if you’re not feeling like penning a
Penn Face’s ultimate foe: Sidechat
nameless, faceless accounts. It became available to Penn students in early 2022 and, since then, has become a popular yet controversial platform. When it comes to combating Penn Face, the anonymity that Sidchat provides has served as a positive force on campus.
Penn Face is characterized by the fear that one will be viewed as less accomplished, adequate, or worthy for admitting their struggles. However, when we take away the identities associated with experiencing challenges or mental health setbacks, Penn Face collapses.
650-800 word guest column, we encourage you to at least start a conversation about something you’ve read. Ask your best friend what their thoughts are about it, bring it up in a lecture hall, or repost it to Sidechat, Reddit, or what-have-you.

In a time where free speech is a flashpoint on college campuses and polarization remains on the rise, we are committed to representing the Penn community’s diverse views and fostering conversation wherever and whenever possible.
Penn has stronger discourse when we all get involved — I implore you to join the DP, and, in the meantime, share an article you like with someone you know. Even the smallest conversations have the potential to grow into something big.
CAROLINE MAGDOLEN is the opinion editor for the 139th Daily Pennsylvanian Board. She is a College and Engineering senior studying environmental science and systems engineering from New York City. Her email is magdolen@sas.upenn.edu.
who are experiencing the same negative emotions. Whether you’re passively scrolling through the app or actively engaging with other anonymous users, it is not difficult to find voices of people who will candidly discuss their struggles.
ILLUSTRATION BY INSIA HAQUE“[U]pvote if you’re not doing well at the moment, i’m (sic) trying to see something,” an anonymous Penn student posted on Sidechat. 563 other Penn students upvoted it.
It’s no surprise that Penn students are unhappy and incredibly good at hiding it. This is Penn Face, a phenomenon that occurs when students put up a facade to make their lives appear perfect. In reality, many are struggling and unable to admit it.
The prevalence of Penn Face is a component of the University’s larger mental health problem. With insufficient support from Wellness at Penn and a horrific pattern of suicides, Penn Face adds salt to a festering wound. Under the constant pressure to present an appearance of perfection, it is unsurprising to see students’ mental
health deteriorate during their time here.
The University recognizes the presence of Penn Face on campus. It has been selected as the topic of discussion in two College Dean’s Advisory Board panels, a Wharton fireside chat, and an Undergraduate Assembly website. Among students as well, Penn Face has been repeatedly identified as a part of our campus culture; we have been urged to acknowledge it, take it off, and rename it.
Despite the constant encouragement to purge Penn Face from University administration and students, very little has changed. Luckily, there is a different, less conventional solution.
Sidechat is an anonymous application that was designed for college students to communicate with one another through
The idea of anonymous apps combating mass mental health stigma is not confined to Penn’s campus. Platforms like Tethr, an anonymous app catered to men’s mental health, have been shown to provide a safety net for those who have trouble expressing themselves publicly. Unlike in-person mental health support groups, Tethr allows users to both give and receive emotional support without risking self disclosure. John Naslund, instructor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard University, says that these networks “connect individuals with others facing similar challenges and offer commiseration within a safe, nonjudgmental virtual environment.”
Similar to men’s mental health, Penn Face is composed of the same unspoken stigma surrounding experiencing and expressing emotional setbacks. And like Tethr, Sidechat is a platform that removes identity altogether to form a space where conversations can be had openly.
At its very core, Sidechat demonstrates to students that, despite how unbothered their peers might seem in person, there are people sitting behind a phone screen
Admittedly, Sidechat has received its fair share of criticism, due to the anonymity it provides users. This anonymity leads to the online disinhibition effect, which occurs when individuals feel less restricted when communicating in cyberspaces, in comparison to real-life situations. Platforms like Sidechat have the potential to breed an environment where users can be unabashedly cruel and demeaning, an issue that has been pointed out at both Penn and other universities with their own versions of the app.
However, prior to Sidechat’s introduction to campus, unfiltered conversations about mental health were rare. With the app’s growing popularity, students now have a place where they can share negative experiences and emotions without having to disclose their name or face. They can have discussions with other students, offer and receive advice, and find a safe haven where identity does not exist.
After years of unsuccessful attempts to shut down Penn Face, it has become clear that face-to-face lectures and interventions are simply ineffective. Fortunately, with anonymous apps like Sidechat becoming increasingly present on campus, we may finally witness the downfall of Penn Face. SANGITHA AIYER is a College sophomore from Singapore. Her email is saiyer@sas.upenn.edu.
Penn must address the e-scooter epidemic on campus
GUEST COLUMN | Let’s facilitate a safe campus environment
Head to class on Locust Walk or any other sidewalk on Penn’s campus, and you can feel the wind from an electric scooter zooming past you. You may have noticed students carrying this two-wheeled vehicle up the stairs, placing them in lecture halls, or charging its electric motor in dorm spaces.
Due to their convenience, e-scooters are becoming increasingly popular across college campuses in the United States. For Penn students and athletes, it reduces the time it takes to get around campus. Given their increasing presence, Wellness at Penn and Penn’s Division of Public Safety should create new policies to better regulate the usage of these vehicles on campus.
E-scooters can travel up to 15 miles per hour. Consequently, there have been instances where e-scooter rides have gone wrong, resulting in visits to an emergency room. Injuries treated during these visits ranged from minor to severe with abrasions, lacerations, concussions, and intracranial hemorrhage. For a college student who is still undergoing development, experiencing any of those injuries is concerning because of the lifelong effects and impact on adulthood. The trauma associated with e-scooter accidents poses a serious public health concern and introduces the need for regulating e-scooter usage among college students.
There are very few studies investigating this issue, but a study published in JAMA Network Open exposes the scope of this issue among college students. They reviewed medical records at two urban emergency departments in Southern California. Of the 249 cases they reviewed, almost a quarter of e-scooter injuries applied to adolescents between the ages of 18

and 25, and of those injured, only 4.4% of riders reported wearing a helmet. Helmets save lives for bicycle riders, so helmets can help prevent injuries for e-scooter riders. Given these findings, Wellness at Penn and DPS should implement a helmet policy along with other e-scooter regulations.
It is also important that Penn administrators consider the current legality of riding e-scooters in the City of Philadelphia. The Pennsylvania state government, which influences policy-making in Philadelphia, has banned both public and private usage of e-scooters even among adult riders due to injury risk and traffic and congestion concerns. When I shared this with a couple of Penn professors, classmates, and friends, they were shocked. It has become normal to see an e-scooter on campus, which are all privately owned. Students who purchase escooters online are also probably not aware of this policy because there is no enforcement of this law in the city. However, it does explain why public e-scooter rental-sharing companies, like Bird and Lime, are not doing business in Philadelphia. As a result of this policy, there have been few incidents of e-scooter related injuries reported in major Pennsylvania cities, demonstrating how policies help protect the wellbeing of communities.
So, if Philadelphia is not regularly enforcing this ban and addressing private usage of e-scooters, what should Penn administrators do?
First, Penn administrators should consider the age of its students and how the risk of riding e-scooters is increased for them.
Second, Penn administrators should enforce the current daytime ban, prohibiting the use of e-scooters on campus from 8:30
a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on Mondays through Fridays. Unfortunately, the current daytime ban, supplemented with educational approaches, is loosely recognized by students, so further awareness is needed.
Third, if Penn administrators decide to further regulate e-scooter usage on campus, they should consider their policy options. For example, in California, state policy allows adolescents over 16 years to rent an e-scooter if they have a driver’s permit, but they are required to wear a helmet while riding. Penn administrators may want to encourage helmet use among its students.
Meanwhile, administrators at Boston University, New York University, Columbia University, and some other universities decided to ban these vehicles. If Penn administrators do choose to implement a ban and enforce state law, they should consult
class boards and gather student input on how to implement it, and hopefully this improves compliance with the regulation.
It will be interesting to see how Penn administrators address this issue on campus and prevent injuries from escalating on campus. Whatever changes Penn makes to its e-scooter policies, it should involve students’ opinions to help with compliance with any current or future policy. In that way, Penn can maintain a safe campus environment and support the wellbeing of students.
Penn must provide immediate support to sexual assault survivors
GUEST COLUMN | After seeking help from Penn, it became clear that sexual assault resources are extremely lacking
Content warning: The following text describes sexual assault and can be disturbing and/or triggering for some readers.
I never thought that I would have to write this article. Sexual violence pervades Penn’s campus; one in four undergraduate women report unwanted sexual contact. However, I didn’t anticipate having to navigate the system until something happened to me. I didn’t think that I would have to rely on resources for sexual assault survivors. And I didn’t think that I would have to confront what turned out to be a bureaucratic nightmare.

I called Student Health Service the day after the incident. I trusted that a health care professional would be a safe, confidential resource, who could also address my concerns about billing and low appointment availability. I anxiously waited as the phone rang, telling myself that I would feel better once I talked to someone. When I reached the nurse on call, I clearly stated why I was calling. I explicitly said the words “sexual assault.”
But she didn’t acknowledge that.
Instead, she cut me off mid-sentence, instructing me to contact the billing department or my insurance company, neither of which I felt comfortable calling alone. I asked if she knew of organizations in Philadelphia that offered free health services, which I later discovered do exist — places such as the Philadelphia Sexual Assault Response Center and the Mazzoni Center. But she didn’t know that either of them existed. In that short call, I wasn’t directed to any mental health resource or any on-campus resource for that matter. I felt invalidated and unheard. I left the call sobbing and scared to call back.
Over the next two days, I called Penn Violence Prevention several times during business hours, but nobody picked up the phone. I tried the Penn Women’s Center, but I was told that confidential resources weren’t available due to staffing issues. The student at the front desk was sympathetic, but the only advice
she gave was to keep calling.
It’s mentally taxing to make a call in the first place; nobody should be sent to voicemail or left without help. Penn has a responsibility to employ enough trained staff to meet students’ needs. The lack of response made me feel stuck. Powerless. As if help was unattainable. Someone else in my position may have stopped trying.
In the meantime, a friend of mine found out about PSARC. We called an Uber to the Center with our own money and on our own time. I spent a few hours there due to the wait, and showed up late to a class in which I was scheduled for a final presentation, one that the professor still expected me to give. Most students don’t have the time and money to make a trip to North Philadelphia on their own. Nobody should have to deal with that stress. I shouldn’t have had to risk my class attendance and academic performance for a forensic rape exam. I rushed back to campus sleep-deprived, in immense pain, and re-traumatized. Prioritizing my medical needs and meeting the 72 hour window for a rape exam was incredibly difficult with no help from the school.
Penn must do a better job at helping survivors who need immediate support. Penn should make information about PSARC and how to get there easily accessible to students. Student Intervention Services can help students navigate academic and work commitments, but researching all of these resources separately imposes a barrier on students in crisis. It’s imperative for the University to streamline information so that survivors can get the help they need.
I was later able to reach staff at the LGBT Center and Special Services, but it took over a month to reach the Title IX office. By that time, the perpetrator had graduated. I expressed concerns from the start about reaching their office, but due to miscommunication between departments, they didn’t schedule a meeting until it was too late. Regardless of what my options were, I could no longer file a complaint. It was never
clearly communicated to me that a complaint must be filed before graduation for Penn to have jurisdiction.
A degree can be revoked decades later for a violation of academic integrity; it was a surprise to me that the same standard did not hold for sexual misconduct. My options were taken away from me unknowingly. And all because I was under the false impression that staff had contacted the Title IX office on my behalf.
I shouldn’t have had to take so much initiative in the wake of a traumatic event that I had barely processed. I contacted separate departments for medical, mental, and legal support. It was more challenging than it should have been to figure out who to contact, understand what kind of help they offered, and find the words to call — all while I was a working student. My initial interaction with SHS was almost enough to turn me away from seeking help. A nurse at Penn should be trained to approach what is unfortunately a common form of violence on campus. It took a while to determine where to call next, as I jumped from webpage to webpage, confused
Why we should have a mandatory CIS class at Penn
GUEST COLUMN | Addressing the advent of artificial intelligence
algorithms are used to model and predict voting patterns, data analytics is being used to decode public sentiment, and simulations are offering insights into policy impact. Similarly, in English literature, computer science has transformed textual analysis through intricate pattern recognition in authorship. Computer science is used almost everywhere — be it at NASA or your neighborhood grocer.
So, it was even easier for me to figure out that the presence and use of computers would only be amplified manifold in the real world outside of college. Thankfully, this realization dawned on me early enough, helping me appreciate CIS as a subject that is beyond useful in its omnipresence, especially in today’s digital, AI-driven age. Clearly, Penn ought to design a simplified introductory CIS course that every incoming first years can relate to as a beginner and enjoy learning in, irrespective of their chosen major. More importantly, Penn should do all the incoming first-year students a favor by making this simplified CIS beginners’ class a general education requirement.
appreciate the endless possibilities of computing and coding in any and every subject of their choice. With a simplified CIS class, students will have a strong springboard into computer science, leading to greater ease in grasping more complex topics like artificial intelligence and machine learning. This type of class may even inspire some students to pursue CIS as a minor or major.

In addition to a phenomenal increase in computer science major offerings at universities nationwide, there is a large increase in the number of non-majors taking computing courses. This highlights the obvious fact that computer science is not bound to a single discipline but is of the utmost importance to students majoring in a variety of disciplines – something that many are unaware of.
about hours, confidentiality, and types of support that centers at Penn offered. The lack of organization overwhelmed me. As I was writing this article, what I found to be the most helpful guide for on-campus resources took 45 minutes to find. The Penn Police number is posted in almost every hallway in residence halls on campus — what about other resources? The University must make those numbers known. And even if these numbers are made accessible, it’s unacceptable that those lines may not be staffed due to lack of support by Penn.
Survivors already have very little power over what kinds of consequences their perpetrators face. Penn should at least pick up the phone.
FARAH SAYED is a 2023 College graduate in psychology, now working as a research coordinator at the Annenberg School for Communication. Her email is fsayed@sas. upenn.edu.
The College’s Quantitative Data Analysis, Wharton’s Science and Technology, and Nursing’s Reasoning, Systems, and Relationships requirements are meant for students to take classes that can help them become tech-savvy in their chosen domains.
Prior to Penn, I had never studied computers. I came into my first computer and information science lecture feeling intimidated. However, I enjoyed it and every lecture thereafter. My entry into the world of computer science, albeit late, made learning a seemingly scary subject that much more exciting and mentally enriching. Having used computers at the very basic levels thus far, CIS opened new vistas because now I started thinking about and understanding how things work at the hardware, software, and logical levels — things I was previously impervious to until I initiated my CIS journey at Penn.
I soon realized the widespread application of computerization across the interdisciplinary landscape of Penn. I witnessed and now understand the influence of computational methods in political science, where
CIS has had a pivotal role even in fields as esoteric as art and history, in which machine learning models are helping to differentiate between different art periods, authenticate art pieces, or assist in the restoration of historical artifacts. In the realm of anthropology and sociology, social network analysis is being leveraged to elucidate the complexity of human relationships and social phenomena. Even in the areas of environmental science, the power of data modeling is enhancing our capacity to understand and mitigate climate change.
Thanks to these explorations, I grasped the all-pervasive, transformative potential of computer science, which fueled my enthusiasm for and motivated me to choose CIS as my second major, in addition to bioengineering.
Students can learn and experience the wide variety of CIS applications; they can brainstorm about and
All the elephants in the room
Students use computers, software, search engines like Google, and make use of AI technologies like Chat-GPT on almost a daily basis. Tech tracks our every move and is becoming increasingly prevalent in our lives. Without us realizing and at times without our consent, information about our personal preferences is constantly being collected. Educating students about modern tech through a simplified beginner CIS course can build their awareness about the benefits and possible pitfalls of such technologies. Tech-aware students understand how and why data is collected, who uses it, and the risks associated with its misuse. Such awareness will protect them from possibly becoming victims of technological abuse and empower them to make the best use of technology throughout their careers.
Knowledge of computer science also provides internship and job applicants with an edge, as recruiters want incoming talent to be tech-savvy and equipped with modern computer technology skills. A lack of knowledge in modern computing is, ultimately, a professional disadvantage.
COMMON SENSE | The state of the GOP primaries following the first Republican debate
Lexi: Welcome back to campus! I started my year off tabling for College Republicans at the SAC Fair, where countless budding Wharton finance bros asked if we could get Vivek Ramaswamy to come speak! Seems like he really made a splash at the Republican Primary Debate last month.
Vinay: It’s good to be back, Lexi. A splash is definitely an understatement. Personally, I found myself irritated every time he interrupted informed veteran policy makers to virtue signal hyper-right populist talking points, but alas! And, for the record, many analysts on both sides more or less shared that sentiment. He definitely speaks to a very specific demographic that … shall we say, predominates on Penn’s campus.
Lexi: One man’s veteran policymaker is another man’s deep state insider, Vinay!
Vinay: Touché.
Lexi: To the rest of your point … his performance did highlight a stark contrast between the likes of Mike Pence and Nikki Haley who had a breadth of political experience and knowledge in their arsenal, making Ramaswamy appear somewhat lacking on the issues. That being said, his popularity among the Donald Trump base, certainly challenges status quo perceptions of “MAGA.”
Vinay: It’s not at all surprising that the MAGA base loves him given that at certain points in the debate he felt more like a Trump apologist — or, better yet, cheerleader — than a serious candidate in his own right. Coupled with his obvious inexperience (see Haley obliterating him over his foreign policy proposals on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine), the debate morphed into cheap political theater when he was involved.
Lexi: A non-white candidate speaking that rhetoric definitely changes the tone though. As a brief aside, I think that his popularity speaks to growing pro-meritocracy sentiments in immigrant populations, which is
building an interesting voter coalition. I wonder what the strategy is behind his relatively indistinguishable persona to that of Trump. Trump has even gone so far as to celebrate his performance since the debate.
Vinay: Race is definitely playing an interesting role here and, without getting too into the weeds, I think maybe some of his more out-there rhetoric like “the climate change agenda is a hoax” and “the nuclear family is the greatest form of governance known to mankind” is a gross overcompensation for the fact he doesn’t fit the mold of the typical white, Christian Republican candidate.
Lexi: That’s fair. Surely, this is indicative of Ramaswamy’s understanding of the base he is fighting for. That said, I think he is less of a deviation from the traditional conservative values he is purporting than Trump. I am interested in the candidates who have continued separating themselves from the populists by emphasizing their commitment to living out their conservatism, notably Pence.
Vinay: Maybe we’re all so used to Trump that it’s hard to see his rhetoric as anything other than authentic, and everyone else looks like a cheap imitation in comparison. But to your point, I did find Pence’s performance interesting in that he stood in pretty stark contrast to Ramaswamy and Ron DeSantis. I think all the Jesus references were a bit much, although maybe that resonated with some …
Lexi: Politics is all about knowing your audience, Vinay! Speaking as the resident believer in this column, it’s certainly a refreshing contrast to both the populist right — and left — which often read very out of touch with the 27% of Americans who are regular churchgoers (and the broader 65% who identify as Christian). Even so, I tend to lean on the side that the politicization of religion in the United States can be very problematic to the health of religion — but that is a separate conversation entirely.
Vinay: All of Pence’s God talk might have landed with some voters, but his commentary on Jan. 6 certainly didn’t with the Trump-loyalist crowd. And the other candidates definitely took note of that, since none were quick to jump to his defense except for Chris Christie, the self-proclaimed Trump antagonist.
Lexi: I was pretty pleased by the conversation around Jan. 6, honestly. I was glad that Pence’s presence (and his comments) forced the rest of the candidates on the stage to wrestle with the issue. It’s absolutely vital that they rebuke Trump, and support Pence’s actions on the day to explain to the electorate why they are better suited for the presidency, particularly when they are fighting his overwhelming primary support.
Vinay: Agreed, but none of them were willing to take that stand. Even DeSantis ended up looking like a Trump groupie by the end of the exchange. Only Asa Hutchinson was willing to say he wouldn’t support a Trump candidacy if he was a convicted criminal, which is why I appreciated what (admittedly little) he had to say on the subject. Everyone else lacked a certain conviction which was a bit concerning: DeSantis made a look around the stage before he raised his hand!
Lexi: You and I will likely disagree about this, but I am more sympathetic to what (I assume) is the opinion of establishment types like Haley and Tim Scott that the prosecutorial antagonizing of presidents, a culture which has persisted since the Nixon era, has more damning effects on our culture than a pardoning. Nevertheless, I think it’s indisputable that they distinguished themselves from “Trump groupies” in other ways.
Vinay: I’m glad you brought up Haley because she had an absolutely phenomenal performance. I think she toed the line between moderatism and conservatism perfectly, and that shows her promise as a general election candidate. But her hesitancy to fully lean into the rhetoric that plays to the base makes me question whether she has
Based on my personal interactions and experiences, CIS is perceived to be extremely difficult and time-consuming at Penn (supplemented by difficulty and workload levels above 3.0 out of 4.0 on Penn Course Review). Since it is so taxing and not mandatory, many students tend to opt for other subject courses. The campus buzz amplifies the feeling that tackling CIS during your first year can be a daunting task, especially for the uninitiated. Although a majority of students realize they ought to take CIS, many end up giving it a cold shoulder, put off by the long waitlists and non-availability of CIS classes for nonmajors. The lack of awareness about the subject and perceived relative difficulty of a CIS class, coupled with the dissuading effects of nay-saying peers and upperclassmen, tilts many a first year’s decision away from CIS. The tragedy is that those who need a beginner CIS class the most are the ones who turn away from such a wonderful subject.
Clearly, Penn needs to come up with a CIS course that has simplicity as its core value, designed to introduce first years to the excitement of the digital world. I strongly suggest that Penn make such a CIS course a gen-ed requirement so that every incoming student benefits therefrom. This will ensure that it is all smooth sailing for them all, right from the very start of their working careers.
SUHANI PATEL is an Engineering sophomore studying bioengineering and computer science from Vadodara, India. Her email is psuhani7@seas.upenn.edu.
what it takes to make it out of the primaries. That said, she put on a masterclass in balancing practical policy with sharp wit and received a well-deserved bump in the polls for it.
Lexi: Yes … I recall our texts during the debate; I think this is the most endeared I’ve seen you be toward a Republican (even more so than you tolerate me!) Haley did have a spectacular showing. She got to debut her experience, class, and just basic literacy on the issues. There was a headline following the debate that I think summarized the situation beautifully, “Nikki Haley claimed the spotlight among crowd of ‘screaming men.’”
Vinay: To that point, her pivot from her largely uninspiring tenure as South Carolina governor to her performance on the debate stage was just phenomenal. She is frankly the only Republican candidate who doesn’t make me feel a sense of impending existential dread at their possible election. However, her showing really highlighted some of the more lackluster ones, especially DeSantis’.
Lexi: To say you feel “existential dread” about the compassionate, school-choice-obsessed, South Carolina senator, Scott, being president is liberal alarmism if I’ve ever seen it, Vinay.
Vinay: Well, let’s just focus on serious candidates for now, Lexi. Read the rest at thedp.com.
VINAY KHOSLA is a College junior studying english and political science from Baltimore, Md. His email is vkhosla@sas.upenn.edu.
LEXI BOCCUZZI is a College senior studying philosophy, politics, and economics from Stamford, Conn. Her email is boccuzzi@ thedp.com.
After closing for renovations over the summer, 1920 Commons reopened with extended dining hall weekend hours, a new hot chicken bar in Gourmet Grocer, and a range of building updates.









Commons opened for the start of New Student Orientation with improvements and upgrades to the dining hall, Gourmet Grocer, and Starbucks on the ground floor. The renovation work included roof patching, ramp top replacement in the loading dock, new grease traps, new flooring, and replacement of many of the ceiling tiles, light fixtures, and equipment, Penn Business Services Director of
Communications and External Relations Barbara Lea-Kruger wrote in an email to The Daily Pennsylvanian.
Other changes included painting the interior walls and hand railings and reorganizing the serving stations to offer more variety and convenience, Lea-Kruger wrote.





Plans for renovations to address building infrastructure concerns were already underway before the Philadelphia Office of Food Protection found the dining hall to be noncompliant with the Philadelphia Health Code after inspections.




















In addition to changes in the building and layout of the dining hall, Penn Dining implemented changes to the dining experience after receiving student feedback. For example, Commons is now open for continuous service from brunch to dinner on weekends. The dining hall also now offers a variety of fruits for students to add to their water during the weekend brunch service, a new station that highlights ethnic cuisines from around the world called “Near and Far,” and made-to-order smash burgers.
During warmer months, Lea-Kruger wrote that the water stations will offer tea with a variety of spices to choose from. This week, “Near and Far” served a Mediterranean assortment, while the new hot chicken bar in Gourmet Grocer will offer rotisserie chicken and two sides paid for with Dining Dollars, a meal swipe, or cash or credit. A new espresso machine was also introduced to Starbucks in 1920 Commons.
Steven Green, director of residential dining for Bon Appétit,































