Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform Chamfer is a cooperative housing platform, based on a family of discrete parts. The project aims to disruption London’s asset driven housing market by creating a viable alternative originating from the idea that through sharing, we can have more. The Chamfer platform enables resident initiated, funded, democratically designed and self-constructed housing; Made possible through the utilisation of shared living, shared knowledge and the combinatorial possibilities of the Chamfer chunks. The geometry of these chunks promotes the desired spacial and social outcomes: division of space through level change and shared circulatory landscapes, whilst physically they embrace low cost materials and highly accessible fabrication technologies.
Chamfer A Cooperative Housing Platform Alessandro
Alessandro Conning-Rowland Conning-Rowland U19 2018 Unit 19 2018 Low-Rise Cooperative Housing Aggregation Chamfer Housing Platform
Chamfer is a cooperative housing platform aimed at revolutionising the way we fun
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
1.
Project Introduction
03-11
2.
Precedent Study
13-21
3.
Chunk Experimentation
23-53
4.
Chamfer Platform Development
55-91
1
CONTENTS Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
2
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
1.
Project Introduction
3
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Chamfer Chamfer A Cooperative Housing Platform Alessandro Conning-Rowland Unit 19 A Cooperative2018 Housing Platform Alessandro Conning-Rowland Unit 19 aimed 2018 at revolutionising
Chamfer is a cooperative housing platform the way we fund, design, build, own and live in accommodation. The project is a response to London’s asset driven housing climate in which property as investment has pushed aside housing as a basic human right. The resultisofa our current, complex is revolutionising that Londonersthe looking home are forced Chamfer cooperative housing building platformindustry aimed at way for we afund, design, build, own into the developer led market to compete with (and usually get pushed aside by) investment buyers. and live in accommodation. The project is a response to London’s asset driven housing climate in which Chamferas aims to createhas anpushed alternative option, viable now. Resident property investment aside housing as aright basic human right. cooperative initiated, funded and self-constructed housing. The result of our current, complex building industry is that Londoners looking for a home are forced This the is achievable 3 methods: into developerusing led market to compete with (and usually get pushed aside by) investment buyers. Chamfer aims to create an alternative option, viable right now. Resident cooperative initiated, funded 1. Shared Space. Thehousing. Chamfer Platform is based on the fundamental principle that the relationship and self-constructed between “shared” and “private” space within our homes can be fundamentally altered. This change can be made through using a shift3inmethods: our attitude towards adaptability and spatial organisation in the built form This is achievable in order to create high quality, high density housing leading to a new model of cooperative living and 1.ownership. Shared Space. The Chamfer Platform is based on the fundamental principle that the relationship between “shared” and “private” space within our homes can be fundamentally altered. This change can 2. Shared Knowledge. the towards power ofadaptability open-source information has the potential to enable be made through a shift Harnessing in our attitude and spatial organisation in the built form the user and remove reliance upon the developer. Self initiation, and user and site specific generated in order to create high quality, high density housing leading to a new model of cooperative living and designs will be the outcome. ownership. 3. Shared Digital Materials. The universal building blocks of the platform are the has physical embodiment of a 2. Knowledge. Harnessing the power of open-source information the potential to enable new model of living and of shared information. The kit of parts takes current open source platforms to the user and remove reliance upon the developer. Self initiation, and user and site specific generated a new level by integrating envelope, structure, systems and critically connection logic into every chunk, designs will be the outcome. once again enabling the user and bypassing the complexities of the current construction industry. The chunk is the basis for knowledge transfer and the spatial of the design platform. 3. Digital Materials. The universal building blocks of the language platform are the Chamfer physical embodiment of a new model of living and of shared information. The kit of parts takes current open source platforms to Chunk: The name “Chamfer” reflects the basic geometry of the connection family of parts which evolved aThe new level by integrating envelope, structure, systems and critically logiconinto every chunk, from the idea of folding a surface in order to create space. The angles of the chunks are a result once again enabling the user and bypassing the complexities of the current construction industry. of The the deired and social outcomes, spacelanguage through level change anddesign sharedplatform. circulatory chunk is thespacial basis for knowledge transfer division and theof spatial of the Chamfer landscapes. The geometry of the chunks enables high strength structural aggreagations and high density nesting space. Chamferreflects embraces fabrication materials The Chunk: Theofname “Chamfer” the digital basic geometry of technologies the family of and partsaffordable on which evolved which are accessible right now, to create a family of 3 dimensional, non-prescriptive and adaptable from the idea of folding a surface in order to create space. The angles of the chunks are a result of building blocks. Theand foundation of the system is aofsmall library of these the shared fabrication the deired spacial social outcomes, division space through level “chunks”, change and circulatory information for which is accessible to all under a creative commons liscence. landscapes. The geometry of the chunks enables high strength structural aggreagations and high
4
density nesting of space. Chamfer embraces digital fabrication technologies and affordable materials The aggregations of chunks canto follow anaever growing library of predesigned housing-typologies, which are accessible right now, create family of 3 dimensional, non-prescriptive and adaptable or can be adapted suit the needs the user sitelibrary conditions. The“chunks”, materials used are cheap and building blocks. The to foundation of theofsystem is aand small of these the fabrication readily available with an emphasis on rapid assembly rather than ultimate longevity. Each adaptation information for which is accessible to all under a creative commons liscence. made will be fed back into the open-source framework, creating an ever improving resource which potentially changes rolecan of the architect to growing the designer ofof a platform, and the role of the user to The aggregations of the chunks follow an ever library pre- designed housing-typologies, thecan democratic de-signer of personal or be adapted to suit the needs ofspace. the user and site conditions. The materials used are cheap and readily available with an emphasis on rapid assembly rather than ultimate longevity. Each adaptation made will be fed back into the open-source framework, creating an ever improving resource which potentially changes the role of the architect to the designer of a platform, and the role of the user to the democratic de-signer of personal space.
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Specific Dwellings Accessible to the Lower end of the Housing Market, through Integration
Servicing Structure
The Building Chunk is Integrated Structure, Enclosure/ Openings Integrated enclosure, structure and and Servicing, In Order to Create Ultimate Adaptability Through Embedded Redundancy. Integration Reduces Ccomplexity in the servicing forandmaximium adaptibility Construction Industry, Gives Individuals Freedom to Build as they Desire
Enclosure/ Opening
Simple, accessible on-site fabrication process
An Integrated System Fabricated offsite (Taking Adventage of Mass Production), which Allows for Straight forward Assembly by the User, to Suit Highly Specific Conditions
Cooperative living, ownership and design model
Aimed at Cooperative Site Purchase, Ownership and Living, which puts Emphasis on Maintenance and Upgrade Over Time. The Developments are Intended to be Adapted, Expanded altered Over time, Requiring the Chunks to be Reconfigured
An Emphasis on Affordable Shorter Lifespan Chunks to get Homes started, which can Easily Be Upgraded
Low cost, light weight materials
5
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
1.02 A Disruptive Housing System
01_ London’s Property Climate All across London (as shown in Anna Minton’s map below) Estate regeneration schemes are taking place which replace social housing with expensive apartments sold by private developers. Despite an increase in the physical number of homes the price of these developments puts them way out of the reach of the average Londoner, let alone first time buyer. This is due to the asset value of housing in the world-wide market place. British and international investors alike are putting their money into London property, often leaving these homes empty. This in turn creates a trickle down displacement effect, which eventually sees those at the bottom of the financial ladder removed from London entirely.
TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
02_ A Solution Chamfer’s aim is to bypass the current capitalist system and place the resident in control of project initiation, design, construction and financing. The focus is on smaller sites which traditional developers would potentially be less interested in. Due to high land prices in London the system promotes a high density cooperative living and ownership model, through accommodation in which the facilities are largely shared. The system takes into account the lifestyles of the stakeholders in order to democratically design an assembly which minimises confrontation between residents. The pieces themselves will be as cheap as possible as well as light and simple enough to be constructed by the novice, in order to minimise additional costs and entirely boycott the current system.
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT USING CHAMFER
6
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT USING CHAMFER
SITE LOCATION
SITE LOCATION
DEMOLITION AND ESTATE REGENERATION MAP Source: ‘Big Capital’ Anna Minton 2017
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
POTENTIAL SITE TYPOLOGIES
1
2
. TERRACED ROW INFILL SITE
. END OF TERRACE PLOT
TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
1
MONEY
Funded privately by the developer with the aim of making profit
2
DESIGN TEAM/ INITIATION • Devloper Initiated • Architect designed • End user often ignored
3
DESIGN SPECIFICITY • Generic • Repeated units
3
. PARASITIC PLOT: THE AGGREGATION CAN CONTORT ITSELF ONTO DIFFICULT SITES
4
LEGACY
• Short Term • Often no maintenance responsibility • Fixed
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT USING CHAMFER
1
MONEY
Funded by a not for profit cooperative of end users
2
DESIGN TEAM/ INITIATION • End User Initiated • Architect designed (and maintained) system • User input • System Generated • Democratic design process
3
DESIGN SPECIFICITY • User/ Site Specific • Generated using information on set perameters • Automatic variety generated through specific combinations of common (Affordable) elements
4
LEGACY
• Built specifically for now • Easily adaptable for future scenarios • Re-useable chunks
7
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Current For- Profit, Developer Led Housing Market
Problems
1. Generic homes created for individuals
Developer Initiated
2.
Developer Funded
Design and Construction teams contracted
Generic for-profit (often cheaply built) homes constructed
Generic homes sold to individual for a large profit
8
Profits returned to private developer.
Profit driven housing market creates homes which are seen as investments and not spaces for living
Profit driven housing market creates homes which are seen as investments and not spaces for living. This mentality further drives up house prices due to investors fighting to buy.
3. This climate inevitably leads to many people being driven out of the market, unable to afford homes in London
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Solutions
1.
Proposed Non-Asset Cooperative Housing System
D
A B
E
C
Change in attitude towards ownership and housingshared, adaptable housing with living spaces designed specifically for the user and site
2.
Client Initiated. (Resident Cooperative) and crowd funded
End profit driven and developer initiated housing by making high quality large scale self initiated and crowd funded developments a possibility
Chamfer Design and (self) Build Platform used
Knowledge shared
3. B
D
Sha red
A
E
Increase housing density by embracing shared flexible and adaptable spaces, make density desirable!
Shared homes built specifically for the individual
A B
D C
E
Homes are not built to be sold. Chamfer platform can be accessed only by the user.
9
CHUNK COMBINATION MATRIX D4
LEGEND
2400
900
PRIVATE
STRUCTURE
PRIVATE CORNER CONNECTIONS
Facade/ Roof
D3
SHARED
SPATIAL
Interior Landscape
900
Floor
D
2400
CIRCULATION
1500
1500
0
210
0
210
SERVICE CONNECTION
D2
NO CONNECTIONS 1800
1800
0
270
0
270
D1
2700
2700
0
390
0
390
C6
C
900
900
1200
1200
C5
PRIVATE SPACE CONNECTIONS
900
900 1800
1800
C4 900
900
2400
2400
C3 900
900
3900
3900
C2 150
0
150
0 2400
2400
C1 300
0
300
0 3000
3000
A
B4 450
0
450
0
5700
STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS
5700
B3 330
0
330
0 3900
3900
B2 240
0
240
0 3000
3000
B1 120
0
120
0
1500
1500
A2 290
0
290
0
4000
4000
B
E
A1 180
0
180
0
2400
2400
SHARED SPACE CONNECTIONS
SHARED CORNER CONNECTIONS
D4
D1
D2
D3
C6
C5
C4
C3
900
C2
900
C1
150
B4
300
B3
4500
1800 1500
900 0
210
900
0
0
390
270
0
210
0
270
0 120
0
3000 3900
2700
2400
240
5700
3000
2400
0
3900
0
0
3900
240 0
300
150
2400
1800
1200
0
330
4500
900 900 900
330
0
0
900
900 900 2700 1800 1500 2400
0
390
1200
1800
2400
3900
2400
3000
5700
3000
1500
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform COMBINATION TYPES
01_ Kit of Parts
1. Side connection
1. MICRO- HOME
2. L + chamfer end connection
02_ Combinations
3. L end on connection
4. L short leg face connection
SERVICE CONNECTION COMPATIBLE COMBINATIONS
The system comprises of 16 parts divided into 4 families (A,B,C,D) . A: 1200mm Structural/ Circulatory Chamfers B: 600mm Structural/ Spacial Chamfers C: 600mm L shaped Pieces D: Triangular and rounded corner panels
5. L long leg face connection
2. FAMILY HOME
6. L side to short end connection
CHOSEN CASE STUDY
6. L side to long end connection
The matrix defines each possible connection between two parts, and shows its appropriate uses. Certain connections allow for servicing to pass through, while other connections are stronger making them more suitable for use in the structural skeleton of the building. The remaining connections are best suited to the creation of enclosure. The zones are just guidelines and combinations often serve multiple purposes. CHOSEN CASE STUDY
The matrix has been divided into 5 sections as a way of making the selection process easier for the end user when making adaptations to or creating a new assembly.
7. Chamfer face connection
8. Chamfer + L overhang connection
3. COOPERATIVE
9. Chamfer + L overlap connection
MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING
STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS 10. Chamfer A-frame connection (with or Without Spacer)
330
0
B2
A2
B1
290
0
A1
180
0
240
0 120
0
3900
1500
3000
4000
2400
4. COOPERATIVE HIGH RISE
290
0 180
0
4000
2400
11
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
12
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
2.
Prcedent Study
13
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
““Digital fabrication” (Usually) refers to ““Digital fabrication” refers to processes that use the(Usually) computer-controlled processes that use the computer-controlled toolstools thatthat arearethe descendants of mit’s 1952 the descendants of mit’s 1952 numerically controlled mill. the “dignumerically controlled mill. ButBut the “digthosetools tools resides in the ital” ital” partpart of of those resides in conthe controlling computer; the materials themselves trolling computer; the materials themselves are analog. A deeper meaning of “digital A deeper meaning of “digital are analog. fabrication” is manufacturing processes
Digital Material - Analogue (or
Digital Material - Analogue (or digital) Process digital) Process
in which the themselvesprocesses are fabrication” is materials manufacturing ” materials themselves are digital.the in which digital.” “Trash is a concept that applies only to materials that don’t contain enough information to be reusable. All the matter on
“Trash is a concept that again applies the forest floor is recycled and only again. to Likewise, a product assembled from dig-ital materials that don’t contain enough informaterials need not be thrown out when it mation to be reusable. thebematter becomes obsolete. It can All simply disas- on
the forest floor is recycled again and sembled and the parts reconstructed into again. something new.” Likewise, a product assembled from dig-ital materials need notHow be to thrown out when it Neil GershenfeldMake Almosrt becomes obsolete. It can simply be disasAnything sembled and the parts reconstructed into something new.” Neil Gershenfeld- How to Make Almosrt Anything
ogue (or
nformation. ie. Can be alligned to a high level
•
Positioning defined by embedded information. ie. Can be alligned to a high level of accuracy using basic techniques.
•
Unlimited size, size defined by number of pieces.
•
Blocks can be made from a range of materials.
•
of accuracy using basic techniques. Can be dissasembled and re-used.
•
Positioning defined by embedded information. ie. Can be alligned to a high lev
•
Unlimited size, size defined by number of pieces.
•
Blocks can be made from a range of materials.
•
Can be dissasembled and re-used.
Analogue Material - Digital Process
•
es.
Positioning relies on digital tooling data. Material has no embedded positional information, therefore accumulates error.
mber of pieces.
•
Limited size, defined by machine’s dimensions.
of materials.
•
Very limited range of appropriate materials (material must be appropriate for
.
printing process, not necissarily the same requirements as application). •
14
Can not be re-used.
Cellophane House
Wiki- House
Wiki- House Contractor
Adjustable
Disposable
Bespoke Design
Fixed
Personal Fabrication
Contractor
Renewable Energy
Unsustainable
Contractor
Worlds End Estate
PLACE: Ladywell Lewisham Cellophane House
Simple Continuities
Shared Information
Renewable Energy Wiki- House
Fixed Adjustable
Simple Continuities Disposable Re-Useable
Fixed Adjustable
Bespoke Design Shared Information
Unsustainable Renewable Energy
Contractor Personal Fabrication
Disposable Re-Useable
Fixed Adjustable
Bespoke Design
Shared Information
Unsustainable
Renewable Energy
Contractor
Personal Fabrication
Contractor
Renewable Energy Cellophane House
Personal Fabrication
Cellophane House
Fixed
Re-Useable
Disposable
Simple Continuities Disposable
Unsustainable
Adjustable
Re-Useable
Personal Fabrication
Renewable Energy
Shared Information
Shared Information
Contractor
Personal Fabrication
Bespoke Design
Adjustable
Re-Useable Adjustable
Unsustainable
Bespoke Design
Fixed
Disposable
Personal Fabrication
Renewable Energy
Shared Information
Adjustable
Disruptive Architectures Simple Continuities
Fixed
Disposable
Contractor Personal Fabrication
Unsustainable Renewable Energy
Bespoke Design Shared Information
Unsustainable PLACE: Ladywell Lewisham
Contractor
Unsustainable
Bespoke Design
Fixed Adjustable
Re-Useable Bespoke Design
Contractor
Unsustainable Fixed
Disposable Re-Useable
Personal Fabrication
Renewable Energy
Shared Information
Adjustable
Re-Useable
Fixed
Unsustainable
Bespoke Design
Disposable
Contractor Personal Fabrication
Unsustainable Renewable Energy
Bespoke Design Shared Information
Fixed Adjustable
Disposable Re-Useable
Contractor Personal Fabrication
Contractor
Bespoke Design
Fixed
Disposable
Shared Information Unsustainable
Contractor
PLACE: Ladywell Lewisham
Re-Useable
Bespoke Design
Fixed
Disposable
Personal Fabrication
Renewable Energy
Worlds End Estate
Unsustainable
Bespoke Design
Fixed
Disposable
Contractor
Contractor
Unsustainable Renewable Energy
Disposable
Disruptive Architectures
Unsustainable
Shared Information Unsustainable
Personal Fabrication
Renewable Energy
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Wiki- House
15
Bespoke Design
Fixed
Disposable
Personal Fabrication Contractor
Renewable Energy Unsustainable
Shared Information Bespoke Design
Adjustable Fixed
Re-Useable Disposable
Personal Fabrication Contractor
Renewable Energy Unsustainable
Shared Information Bespoke Design
Adjustable Fixed
Re-Useable Disposable
Personal Fabrication Contractor
Renewable Energy Unsustainable
Shared Information Bespoke Design
Adjustable Fixed
Re-Useable Disposable
Analysing the ‘Digital’ Nature of Components at Different Scales
Simple Continuities
Cellophane House
lophane House
Distruptive?
PLACE: Ladywell Lewisham
Lewisham
Bespoke Design Disruptive Architectures Worlds End Estate
te Disruptive Architectures
Re-Useable
Wiki- House
Wiki- House
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Large Scale Chunks Worlds End Estate • Architect: Eric Lyons
1. Tower Blocks 1. Tower Blocks
• Designed: 1963 • Completed: 1977 • Density: 250 People/Acre • Cost: 15m • Units: 750 (housing 2500) D
R G’S
x7 In-situ conrete structure clad in brick 19-23 stories
1
3
KIN
D
R G’S
2. Annex/ Bridge
x7 In-situ conrete structure clad in brick 19-23 stories
3
KIN
RIVE R TH
AME S
1
2. Annex/ Bridge
2
x8 (Varying Length) In-situ conrete structure clad in brick 4 stories, elevated by 2 stories
3. Flexible Outdoor Space
EDITH GROVE
A Repeated Element Worlds End Estate
x2 internal, x2 external Paved walkways, grass and planting
3. Flexible Outdoor Space
2 “community as the goal, shared landscape as the means, and modern, controlled design as the ex pression”
“village style living in the heart of L ondon”
E ric L yons of S pan
B orough of Chelsea,1 9 7 7
Bed 2
Reflection 1B
1A
Stair Chunk
Living Chunk 1A
Lift Chunk
1
Bed 1
Living/ Dining
EDITH GROVE
Entrance Hall
x8 (Varying Length) In-situ conrete structure clad in brick 4 stories, elevated by 2 stories
ENTRANCE
Tower Blocks-Slice
1A
Tower Blocks
Connector
1B
x2 internal, x2 external Paved walkways, grass and planting
1B
1A
1B
2
WC
Kitchen
16
BASE LIVING CHUNK 1A
Annex/ Bridge- Slice
Balcony
Annex/ Bridge
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Simply A Stack Worlds End Estate
CONSTRAINT 1
CONSTRAINT 2
CONSTRAINT 3
Structural Walls
Service Cores
Access & Views
1A (2)
1A (2)
1A (2)
1B
1B
1A
1B
1A
1A
2x 1A 1x 1B
2x 1A 1x 1B
1A (2)
2x 1A 1x 1B
1A (2)
1A (2)
1B
1A
1B
1A
1B
1A
2x 1A 1x 1B
2x 1A 1x 1B
2x 1A 1x 1B
Contstraint/ Necessity Worlds End Estate
Contstraint/ Necessity Worlds End Estate
CONSTRAINT 1
CONSTRAINT 2
CONSTRAINT 3
E
NC
RA
T EN CONSTRAINT 1
CONSTRAINT 2
CONSTRAINT 3
CE
AN
TR
EN
Structural Walls
Structural Walls
Service Cores
Access & Views
Service Cores
Access & Views
17
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Building Scale Lego? PLACE- Ladywell Lewisham •
1. Commercial Units
mmercial Units
• Architect: RSH+P
• • • • •
1. Commercial Units
x8 Fully Fitted Out and Finished Timber box- Pre Fabricated
• Designed: 2014 • Completed: 2016 • Density: 100 People/Acre
• •
2. Living Units
3
• Cost: 5m • Units: 24 (Housing 48)
Fitted Out and Finished Timx8 box-FullyPre Fabricated Fitted Out and Finished Tim-
2
ber box- Pre Fabricated
Living Units ing2.Units
3
3
4
Lifetime: 4 years then move to a new site x24 Fully Fitted Out and Finished Timber box- Pre Fabricated
2
3. External Lift Core
1
4
2
x24 Fully Fitted Out and Finished Timber box- Pre Fabricated
IS
LON
GB
x2 Precast Concrete
y Fitted Out and Finished Tim3. Outdoor Connection Bridges box- Pre Fabricated
1
RID
GE
LEW
4
3. External Lift Core
IGH
WA Y
H AM ISH
ST
LEW
ternal Lift Core
LON
GB
x2 Precast Concrete
RID
GE
1
WA Y
“P lanning permission for P L A CE / L adywell is until 2020 whilst a wider masterplan for the area is agreed and implemented. A fter this time, the scheme can be rede ployed on other Council sites up to fi e times and ith a design life of up to 6 0 years”
Contstraint/ Necessity 2
3. Outdoor Connection Bridges
PLACE- Ladywell Lewisham x4 Pre-Fabricated Timber
LON
x4 Pre-Fabricated Timber
ast Concrete
GB
RID
GE
WA Y
CONSTRAINT 1
CONSTRAINT 2
CONSTRAINT 3
Structural Walls
Service Cores
Access & Views
utdoor Connection Bridges
Fabricated Timber
18
IGH
MH HA
ST
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Ladywell Vs. Lego
Ladywell Vs. Lego
PLACE- Ladywell Lewisham
PLACE- Ladywell Lewisham
1A (3)1A (3) CONSTRAINT 1
CONSTRAINT 1
Structural Walls
Structural 1A (2) Walls
1A (3)
1A (3) 1A (3)
1A (3)
1A (2)
1A (2)
1A (2)
1A 1A
1A 1A (2)(2)
1A
1A
3x 1A
1A
1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
1A (3) 1A (3)
CONSTRAINT 2
CONSTRAINT 2
Service Cores
Service Cores
1A (2)
1A (3)
1A (2)
1A (3)
1A (2)
1A (3)
1A (2)
1A (3)
1A
1A (2)
1A
1A
1A (2)
1A
1A 1A 3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A 1A (3)
CONSTRAINT 3 Access & Views
CONSTRAINT 3 Access & Views
1A (3)
1A (2)
1A (3)
1A (3)
1A (2)
1A (3) 1A
1A (2) 1A 3x 1A
3x 1A
Forgetting Constraints
1A
1A (2)
1A (3) 1A
1A (2)
1A
1A (2)
1A 3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
3x 1A
PLACE- Ladywell Lewisham- Speculative Reconfiguration
2. Un-Successful But Feasable Overlapping and Rotational Stacking
1. Successful Straight-Forward Stacking & Mirroring of Chunk
3. Experemental Stacking Ignoring all Constraints, Using the Chunk only as a definition of space
19
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Easy to Assemble... Cellophane House 1. Structural Frame
• Architect: Kieren Timberlake • Designed: 2008 • Completed: N/A • Density: N/A • Cost: 5m
x56 (5 types) Aluminium Extrusions of varying lengths
• Units: 1 House • Lifetime: Unlimited, Re-Useable, Adabtable
3
2. Floor Plates
1
4 4
x14 (4 types) Structural Plastic
2
3. Service Core & Stairs
1
x4, x4 Structural Plastic
“Many prefabricated designs succeed in breaking down a building into modules that can be quickly joined together, but they typically embody a top-down strategy: design a building, and then devise a system to make it work. Here, we began with the frame-plus-components system as a basis, allowing architecture to grow out of its opportunities and constraints. Unlike prefabricated housing in which originality and site-specificity may be lost in the manufacturing process, Cellophane House™ is a flexible system of building that enables multiple outcomes. The frame can accommodate a variety of materials to suit different needs, tastes, and budgets; the house can adapt to different sites and climatic factors, and interior floor plans can be easily rearranged.”
... When Pre-Fabricated 4. “SmartWrap Skin”
Cellophane House
x44 (8 Types) “Smartwrap” plastic with integrate PVs
20
Keiren Timberlake, 2008
1. Despite Being Composed of Manageable sized, Repeating Components, The structure is Pre-Fabricated and Delivered to Site on a Truck
2. ‘Chunk’ 1 Positioned in Place
3. Legs Positioned and Bolted to Concrete Pad Foundation
4. ‘Chunk’ Type 2 Positioned Above Legs
5. No.2 ‘Chunk’ Type 1 Stacked above Chunk 1
6. ‘Chunk’ Type 3 Positioned Between ‘Chunk’ Type 1 and ‘Chunk’ Type 2
7. Stacking Continues
8. After Stacking is Complete, Canopy and Hand Rails are Installed
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
CONCLUSION: Historical and contemporary “modular unit” methods of construction fail when it comes to thinking of materials and buildings as digital. Their flexibility and resusability becomes limited when we begin to account for structural, environmental and algorithmical implications, as investigated in this presenta- tion. Units that are deemed ‘flexible’ are often in fact highly prescriptive of their outcomes, and attempts to re-assemble or re-use these units, often result in wasted mate- rials and wasted space. The shipping container site office initially seems the most ‘digital’ of the systems I have tested, however after further analysis, the flexibilty is a result of a lack of basic human requirments eg. Water, drainage, light and insulation. These ameneties and services require bespoke retrofitting - rendering the units unflexible. I am, however, intrigued by the idea of a building ‘chunk’ much like the shipping container, when used as intended, which has a higher initial investment, embedded strength and durability in order to ensure its longevity and continued flexibilty throughout its life time. The next step I believe is to re-consider the way in which people live, both at micro and macro sales, to create a system which caters for more flexible spaces, rather than merely boxing and stacking complete living units. A “Chunk” at a smaller, more human scale, will give the opporCONCLUSION: tunity for greater flexibility, and be far less prescriptive, both in terms of built form and the way and contemporary “modular unit” methods of construction fail when it comes to thinking of materials and buildings as digital. inHistorical which live in,becomes own, limited andwhen share space. is the potential for animplications, architecture that Their flexibilitywe and resusability we begin to accountThere for structural, environmental and algorithmical as investigated in thiscan presentation. Units that are deemed ‘flexible’ are often in fact highly prescriptive of their outcomes, and attempts to re-assemble or re-use these units, often result in wasted matechange and/or adapt organically with peoples needs. I would like to consider the building as rials and wasted space. The shipping container site office initially seems the most ‘digital’ of the systems I have tested, however after further analysis, the flexibilty is a result a lack of basicrather human requirments eg. finished Water, drainage, light and insulation. These ameneties and on services require bespoke retrofitting - rendering the units unflexible. a of process than a object. This perspective flexibility embodies potential when I am, however, intrigued by the idea of a building ‘chunk’ much like the shipping container, when used as intended, which has a higher initial investment, embedded strength and durability the in ordersocial, to ensure its longevity and continued flexibilty throughout its life time. one considers economic and political implications of such an architecture or housing system, for instance in its potential tolive,get ontosales, the ‘housing ladder’. The next step I believe is to re-consider the way in which people both people at micro and macro to create a system which caters for more flexible spaces, rather than merely boxing and stacking complete living units. A “Chunk” at a smaller, more human scale, will give the opportunity for greater flexibility, and be far less prescriptive, both in terms of built form and the way in which we live in, own, and share space. There is the potential for an architecture that can change and/or adapt organically with peoples needs. I would like to consider the building as a process rather than a finished object. This perspective on flexibility embodies potential when one considers the social, economic and political implications of such an architecture or housing system, for instance in its potential to get people onto the ‘housing ladder’.
SELF CONTAINED FLATS
SELF CONTAINED UNITS
SHARED SPACE, DECREASING TOTAL AREA
‘TETRIS’ LIKE COLLECTION OF SPACES
THE FLEXIBLE HUMAN SCALE ‘CHUNK’ DEFINING SPACE WHILE CONTAINING STRUCTURE AND SERVICING
21
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
22
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
3.
Chunk Experimentation
23
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
MANIFESTO: A DESIGN WHICH CAN ACCOMMODATE NECESSITY WITHOUT BECOMING PRESCRIPTIVE Historical and contemporary “modular” methods of construction fail when it comes to thinking of materials and buildings as digital. They are merely simple continuities. Their flexibility and realisability becomes limited when we begin to consider structural, environmental and algorithmical implications. Units that are deemed ‘flexible’ are often in fact highly prescriptive of their outcomes, and attempts to re-assemble or re-use these units, result in wasted materials and wasted space. Systems which appear disruptive often achieve flexibility as a result of a lack of basic human requirements eg. Water, drainage, light and insulation. These amenities and services require bespoke retro fitting - rendering the units un exible. I intend to consider a system which has a higher degree of embedded information and properties (ie. strength and durability) and potentially higher initial investment, in order to ensure its longevity and continued flexibilty throughout its life time. The next step I believe is to re-consider the way in which people live, both at micro and macro sales, to create a system which is focused on the freedom of SPACE in between the physical architecture, rather than merely boxing and stacking complete living units. I will consider the building as an ongoing process and encourage post-construction alteration and customization. A “Chunk” at a smaller, more human scale, will give the opportunity for greater flexibility, and be less prescriptive, both in terms of built form and the way in which we live in, own, and share space. I believe there is a Compromise to be found between the ultimate control of the architect and ultimate control of the user, which will provide liberation in the form of a framework without just leading to a newly prescriptive form of living.
24
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Multi Purpose ‘Chunk’ One Building module which encompasses Structure, Servicing and Human necessities including Space, Light and Acess
‘CHUNK’ Containing Human Amenities, structure and Servicing
Place: Ladywell Lewisham Living Unit
Service Core
Opening potentially providing light, Ventilation and Acess Spacial Partitioning
Structural Wall Floor, Potentially defining spacial organisation
Chunk Iteration 1
Chunk Iteration 2 : Repeatable Module
Test Assembly 1
25
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
1 Chunk: Multiple Variations Partitions Treated as Additional Components with a Variety of Options
26
Initial Partition Options
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Flat Pack Chunk If the Chunk is to be Variable, Maybe those Variations should be the product of a Designed System
Chunk as a Collection of Parts
Semi Strucural Partition Components in a 2x3 grid to allow for Openings
Key Structural Element, With in Built Servicing Space
Partition Components in a 3x3 grid to allow for Openings (Slotted together for ease of Use)
Floor Tile 1650mmx1650, With slots and Mortises Pre- Fabricated
Corner Post
Exploded Axo of Components
27
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Component Lifespans
“An abundant pool of easily and freely available elements that can be tried out and perhaps discarded.” - Combinatiorial Commons (Jose Sanchez)
STEEL VERTICAL CONNECTOR
EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM COLUMN
ALMINIUM CONNECTION BRACKETS
UNLIMITED REUSEABLITY, 100+ YEAR LIFESPAN
COMPLETE COMPONENT PURCHASED
FACTORY FABRICATED
NOT CUSTOMIZABLE
GOOD REUSEABLITY, 50+ YEAR LIFESPAN
COMPONENT OR MATERIALS PURCHASED
Structural Column 100 Year Lifespan
CLT FLOOR PANELS OR
FAB LAB
FACTORY FABRICATED OR DIGITALY FABRICATED BY USER
CUSTOMIZABLE (STANDARD OPEN SOURCE DESIGNS AVAILABLE)
LIMITED REUSEABLITY, 10 YEAR LIFESPAN
COMPONENT OR MATERIALS PURCHASED
Floor Panel 50 Year Lifespan
ALUMINIUM LAMINATE LAYER
OR
OSB STRUCTURAL WALL PANELS
FAB LAB
FACTORY FABRICATED OR DIGITALY FABRICATED BY USER
INTENTIONALLY HIGHLY CUSTOMIZABLE (PRE OR POST FABRICATION)
SINGLE USE, <2 YEAR LIFESPAN
MATERIALS PURCHASED
Structural Panels 10 Year Lifespan
LAMINATED, CORRUGATED CARDBOARD PARTITIONS
OR
FAB LAB
DIGITALLY OR MANUALLY USER FABRICATED
28
Interior Fit Out <2 Year Lifespan
SHOULD BE CUSTOMIZED FOR SPECIFICITY
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
System Development The creation of a system which contains the level of embedded information required in order to ensure that an arrangement suitable for any housing requirement can be met, whilst maintaining a level of discreteness in its options of connectivity, which ensures functionality
Column to Wall
1. Initial Corner Column System
System has proved fairly limiting in its production of spaces
2. Extension of Column into a Wall
The Wall mounted system allows for a greater range of outcomes and pieces at a more human scale
Bracket to Self-Supporting Chunk
3. Bracket Supported System The Initial system which I developed relied on small, fiddly components, crucially the brackets which would support the floor sections
4. Self-Supporting Chunk
The living space no longer relies on small brackets and fiddly pieces, it simply hooks into the wall and provides its own structural integrity
29
A system designed to be lived in by humans. It embraces the notion of “micro contextual specificity as logic” (Greg Lynn), rather than the contemporary idea of openness as flexible space.
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Human Scale Chunk
A system designed to be lived in by humans. It embraces the notion of “micro contextual specificity as logic” (Greg Lynn), rather than the contemporary idea of openness as flexible space.
1. Standing (Single Person)
Multiples to be used as circulation and entertainment space
1. Standing (Single Person)
Multiples to be used as circulation and entertainment space
2. Sitting (Single Person)
Multiples and reflections to be used as dining and lounging spaces
2. Sitting (Single Person)
Multiples and reflections to be used as dining and lounging spaces
3. Lying Down (Single Person)
Multiples can be added above as bunk beds or to the side as a double bed
3. Lying Down (Single Person)
Multiples can be added above as bunk beds or to the side as a double bed
4. Sitting at Desk (Single Person)
Sitting with a desk surface at the 4. Sitting at space Desk (Single Person)
30
appropriate height, similar to a dining Sitting space with a desk surface at the space appropriate height, similar to a dining space
Human Scale Chunk 2 â&#x20AC;&#x153;Redefinition of Space from being neutral and timeless to being temporally
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
dynamicâ&#x20AC;?- Greg Lynn, Animate Form
5. Cooking
The cooking space is large enough to host others and serves as a social space also. All services items are along a single wall.
6. W.C. (Single Person)
The same unit will suffice for up to three persons
7. Circulation Stair
Extra chunks can be added to create a greater level difference
8. Storage Space (Single Person)
Suitable as a wardrobe for an individal, additional units should be added for each person inhabiting the space
31
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Iteration 2: Self Supporting Chunks
If the pieces are rotated by 90ยบ they can be hung in discrete positions form the structural component, acting as completely self sufficient structural units. The rotation also promotes a more natural flow of circulation.
Hooks for hanging the pieces on the wall
Sectional Chunk
Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Kitchen Sleeping Space Living/ Working Space W.C.
32
Rotated 90ยบ Section becomes structurally integral
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Flat For Lifeâ&#x20AC;? The units have discrete positions on the wall, however specicifity of the spaces provided is fully informed by the user, and therefore the form is a result of the combination of a collection of parts.
Level_ 01
Level_ 02
33
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Specific Spatial Conditions The pieces provided are more or less generic, either designed for a specific human requirement (Lying down, sitting) or suitable for multiple conditions. The larger pieces would allow for more open space, in further devlopment
1. Sleeping Space
3 No. 900x1000 Chunks create a 2100mm long sleeping space with room for storgae at one end when space becomes a real issue
2. Living Space
3 No. 900x1000 seating chunks create a a natural living space which can also be used for work situations with the addition of desks
4. Cooking Space
3 No. 900x2000 Tall chunks create a fairly large space suitable for cooking equipent (arranged along the core wall), the same arrangement of pieces can easily be used for other applications
4. W.C.
34
2 No. 900x1000 Tall chunks create a shower room with all the serviced items along the core wall
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Iteration 2: Pieces Used Total Pieces used, including all repetitions W.C. 2 No. Pieces 2 No. Types
SITTING 4 No. Pieces 3 No. Types
CIRCULATION 8 No. Pieces 6No. Types
VERT. CIRC. 9 No. Types 4 No. Types
LYING 6 No. Pieces 3 No. Types
COOKING 3. No Pieces 3. No Types
35
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
The Wall: A Framework for Freedom The Wall is the key component of the system, the backbone which allows allows for a real ‘Plug and Play’ system which is truly accessible to the user. The issues of servicing, structural integrity and possiby site planning are taken away from the end user.
Exploded Axo of The ‘Flat for Life’, Showing the Wall as a parts based system
The Wall Potential Building
36
01_Individual House
02_Street Based Low Rise Housing Development
03_Block Based Low Rise Housing Development
04_Simple High RIse
05_L Shape- Greater Sructural Integrity, Potentially Higher Buildings
06_Block Based Low Rise Housing Development
Possible Configurations for System Based Housing Developments
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Combinatorial Experiments_2 Generation of more specific spacial arrangements, considering living spaces Parts Used
Test Assembly 3
Moment Testing
37
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Construction Sequence_01
Using a Hypothetical, In-Fill Site Between Existing Townhouses
01_ Site Selection & Procurement
38
02_ Infrastructural Components, Positions Digitally Generated from Site Constraints & User Requirements
04_Spatial Components are Assembled, Larger chunks prefabricated and craned onto site
03_ Circulatory Components Fixed to Infrastructural Components as Per Generated Design
05_Spaces are Adapted and Grown over Time by the Inhabitants. Parts are assembled by Users.
06_The Topography of the Building is Used as a Communal Landscape, for the Inhabitants
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Infrastructure Generator_01 A Mixture of User Inputs and Site Conditions Will be the Starting Point for the on Site Infrastructure to be Digitally â&#x20AC;&#x153;Grownâ&#x20AC;?
01_ Physical Site Envelope
02_ Envelope Adjusted for Planning & Site Specific Constraints
04_Exclusion Zones Generated
03_ North-South Orientation Considered to Negate Overshadowing
05_Housing Types and density required is input by user
06_Entrance Location Input by User
39
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Infrastructure Generator_02 The Circulation Grows from The User Input Starting Point, Towards
the Points Generated (Based on a Calculation of Optimal Density). The Growth Respects the Exclusion Zones and Follows PreDetermined rules, Designed to Include Communal Space as well as being Efficient
LEGEND Main Circulatory System Meeting Point Expansions In-Dwelling Circulation
Circulatory Generation Parts:
01_ Input Starting point, Destinations Generated
02_Circulation Finds Option 01 for Routing to Destination Points
03_In-Built Rule Set Determines Expansion Points for Circulation to Become Meeting Places
40
04_The Circulatory Structure Branches off to Form the In-Dwelling System
Infrastructure Generator_03 The Infrastructural Components Snap to the Same 300mmx300mm
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Grid and Together they Form the Structural, Circulatory and Servicing Backbone of the Building, from which the Spatial Parts can be Hung
04 Private Circulation Branches
03 Communal Circulation & Expansion Points
02 Structure & Servicing
01 Site
41
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
1 Bed Dwelling: Exploded Parts 33x Parts 5x Part Families 6x Window Panels
Dwelling Type A_ 1 Bed Live/ Work: Assembled
42
Dwelling Type A_ 1 Bed Live/ Work: Exploded
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Spatial Chunks: Dwellings Assembled
The Dwellings have been Arranged on the Site, Supported and Serviced by the Infrastructural Parts. There are 8 Dwellings on the Site, with the capacity for 22 inhabitants
Perspective Elevation of Complete Building Assembly, Part Families are Shown in the same Colour
Iso of Complete Building Assembly, Part Families are Shown in the same Colour
43
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Spatial Chunks: Creating Dwellings A Range of Dwellings have been Developed (Using the Family of Parts) as Approximations for the System Which Generates the Infrastructure to Run Calculations, Based on Real Dimensions
Bed Bed Bed Bed
APPROACHING THE HOUSE
Bed
Bed Bed FIRST GLIMPSE INSIDE
Bed
LIVING LANDSCAPE
VIEW FROM SLEEPING SPACE
44
Diagram Showing the Assembled Diagram Dwellings Showing the Assembled Dwellings Exploded from the Infrastructure Exploded from the Infrastructure
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Spatial Part Development: Folded CLT Testing Robotically Milled, Slotted and Folded CLT Slabs.
The Parts Follow the Same Connection and Spatial Logic as the Previous Iteration, but the 300mm Grid is no Longer Physically Manifesting as Waffling. The Density of the Material Left is Determined by the Structural Application of the Piece and its Required Porosity. A1
A2
B1
B2 Assembled Dwelling Fragment 01 Isometric
C1
D1
E1
E2 Assembled Dwelling Fragment 01 Perspective View
F1
Robotically Milled CLT Part Production, Density of Material Correlating with Strength/ Porosity Required
45
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Aggregation Testing Folded CLT
46
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Scenario Testing Film Stills
47
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Assembly Sequence Scenario_04
N
Student Housing Block
Designated Route Through Site Entrance to Student Dwelling Block
1
2
EN
TR
AN
CE
Empty Site: Townhouse SIzed Infill Site
Structural Skeleton Positioned and Erected
3
4
EN
TR
EN
TR
AN
CE
AN
CE
Public Space/ Circulation Installed to Act as Construction Platform
Dwellings 1 & 2 Constructed Around Central Communal Space Half Height Sleeping spaces are slotted together
5
6
EN
TR
EN
TR
AN
CE
N
Dwellings 3, 4 & 5 Constructed, the Heighest Point at the North
48
A Standard Open Source Configuration has Been Used for Each Dwelling
AN
CE
Roof Constructed Over Communal Zone Student Dwellings Shown in Context with the lLarger Dwellings
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Assembly Logic Scenario_04 Student Housing Block
Structural Skeleton
Communal Space, Circulation & Construction Platform
Private Micro-Living Spaces
Interlocking, Half Height Micro Sleeping Spaces
Roof Over Triple Height Communal Space, with South Facing Windows
49
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Chunk Development Assembly Sequence Aims: 1. Cheaper 2. Lighter 3. Using Readily Accessible Technology
OSB Sheets
Open Source 2Dimensional Parts CNC Cut
Profiles Assembled- Stacking where Structurally Necessary
Skin Cut to Size and Window Openings Inserted as Suitable
Ex
ter
ior
Int
eri
50
Skin Fixed to the RIbs, Creating Structure and Enclosure
or
Capping Panels, Servicing and Pvc Windows Attached
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Student Dwelling Test Assembly of Private Zones in Student Accomodation 32 x Chunks Used
Assembled Student Dwelling
Exploded Student Dwelling
Type A
Type G
Type B
Type H
Type C
Type I
Kit of Parts
Type E
Type J
Type F
Type K
51
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Chunk Development
Testing Variations on the Basic Chunk in Order to Fulfill the Ambition of An Integrated Chunk Which Creates a Truly Flexible Platform
Service Connection Point Window
Integrated Storage
CNC Milled and Folded Foam Body
Basic Chunk
3D Printed Sink Insert
Water Outlet
OSB End Cap Service Connection Point
Chunk Variation Assembled
Variation 01: Integrated Storage
End Cap
Service Cover
Tap
Sink Infill
Variation 02: Window
Service Route
Structural Rib
Variation 03: Integrated Servicing
Window
Outer Skin
End Cap
Foam Body Structural Rib
Variation 04: Integrated Sink
52
Exploded Variation Assembled
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Kitchen Aggregation Test Testing the Ability of the Chunks to Create a Specific Function when Aggregated, In Order to Assess the Level of Variation Required in the Chunks themselves Type A Variation 01
Type F Variation 01
Variation 02
Variation 03
Type B Variation 01
Variation 04
Kitchen Aggregation Iso
Variation 02
Type G Variation 01
Type C Variation 01 Storage Embedded Within Depth of Chunk
Variation 02 Windows Created by Removal of Non-Structural Sections of Chunk Variation 02
Tap Plumbed into Integrated Water System Appliances Integrated into Chunk Depth Assembly of Chunks Creating a Landscape for Living Elimintating the Requirement for Extra Furniture
Integrated Waste Water System
Variation 03
Kitchen Aggregation Perspective
53
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
54
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
4.
Chamfer Platfom Development
55
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Circulation Study
Analysing the Positions of Circulation and Communal Space in the London Townhouse Typology Lower Ground LEGEND Vertical Circulation Horizontal Circulation Serviced Locations
56
Ground Floor
First Floor
Second Floor
Third Floor
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Analysis of Parameters & Assumptions Analysing the â&#x20AC;&#x153;Rulesâ&#x20AC;? Used to Generate the Infrastructural Skeleton of the Infill Site Typology
Assumption 1: Structual Intention to Grow Upwards
Assumption 2: Structural Skeleton Must Respect Vertical Exclusion Zone
Assumption 3: Building has One Entrance Parameter: Entrance Location
2
Parameter: Site Orientation
1 1. (Infra-)Structural Skeleton
3
Parameter: South Orientation- Sun Path
4
Parameter: Access to Light ( Based on Sun Path and Surrounding Buildings)
Assumption 4: Communal Inhabited Spaces may Breach Exclusion Zone
2. Communal Space Branches
Limited Variation in Room SIze Using Current Family of Parts
Parameter: Ground Level Entrance Exclusion
5
Parameter: Dwelling Zone Exclusion Zone. Based on Light Access Direction & Offset from Site Boundary
6
Assumption 4: Front Offset takes Priority (Based On Typical Terraced House Room DImension). Structural Zone is Secondary, Remaining Area Becomes Rear Exclusion Zone
4800mm
5400mm
2400mm
3. Flexible Private Space
57
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
System of Production INPUTS
LEVEL 1: SITE
B START
A
1. SITE SHAPE?
2. SITE AREA?
0ยบ
Dimension A : Dimension B :
Shape
Rectangular
:
Area
3
90
3
90
6m 20m
:
120m2
*Perameters generated from shape data input
B D
C A 8. ENTRANCE LOCATIONS? A
B
C
7. NO. ENTRANCES? D
Entrance Side:
A
0
No. Entrances
0
5
3
6
Location :
2
No.
:
3
*Perameters based on site & entrance information
LEVEL 2: PEOPLE/ PROGRAMME
9. NO. PEOPLE? 1
10. INDIVIDUAL/ FAMILY RATIO
People
:
INDIVDUAL
50
No. People:
30
30
Ratio
70/30
:
*Perameters generated from No. people information
58
FAMILY
Ratio:
70/30
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
B A
B
D C A
3. SITE VOLUME
Height A : Height B : Volume
4. OPEN SIDES?
3
90
3
90
10m
Select Open Sides:
10m
:
D
5. SITE ORIENTATION?
0
5
0
360
0
360
0
360
Direction 1:
Direction 3:
B
*Perameters generated from shape data input
6. VIEWS FROM SITE?
Direction 2:
C
1200m3
*Perameters generated from area data input
No. Views
A
3
Rotation :
0
90
10ยบ
0ยบ Orientation :
N-S
180ยบ *Perameters generated from shape data input 300ยบ
END
11. LIVE/ WORK RATIO INDIVDUAL Ratio:
Ratio
70
:
ASSEMBLY GENERATED BY SYSTEM
12. SOCIABLE/ PRIVATE RATIO FAMILY
SOCIABLE 30
70/30
Ratio:
Ratio
40
:
PRIVATE 60
70/30
59
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
System of Production OUTPUT LEVEL 1: SITE
START
1. SITE SHAPE?
2. SITE AREA? *Perameters generated from shape data input
8. ENTRANCE LOCATIONS?
7. NO. ENTRANCES?
*Perameters based on site & entrance information
LEVEL 2: PEOPLE/ PROGRAMME
9. NO. PEOPLE?
60
10. INDIVIDUAL/ FAMILY RATIO *Perameters generated from No. people information
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
SITE ENVELOPE DATA
2 3
1 1
1
1
2
3
4200mm < 2X Sunlight Penetration Limit
room height
Natural Ventilation Zone
3. SITE VOLUME
4. OPEN SIDES? Use Zoning
*Perameters generated from area data input Most Useful Perameters:
1
3
2
Least Useful
Natural Lighting Natural Ventilation Access
1 2
1 1 3 3
1
1
*Massing adjusted according to orientation data om prder to provide maximum useful space
6. VIEWS FROM SITE?
5. SITE ORIENTATION? Use Zoning Most Useful Perameters:
1
2
3
Least Useful
Natural Lighting Natural Ventilation Access
END ASSEMBLY GENERATED BY SYSTEM
11. LIVE/ WORK RATIO
12. SOCIABLE/ PRIVATE RATIO
61
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
MULTI -FAMILY COMMUNAL DWELLING TYPE 01 A shared house assembled around the logic of separation through split level and shared access to communal space and utility, enambling pleasant, high density living
Rain
Rain
Serviced Zone Cluster (Shared W/C & Shower) Serviced Zone Clust (Shared W/C & Showe
+10800
+10800 Private Sleep Private Sleep
Shared Living Shared Living
+9600
Shared Living Shared Living
Gut Det
+9600
Private Sleep
+8400
+8400 Private Sleep/ Work Private Sleep/ Work
+7200
+7200 Shared Living Shared Living Private Sleep Private Sleep
+6000
+6000
Private Sleep
+4800
Private Sleep
+4800
+3600
+3600
+2400
No
Shared Circulation Shared C
e
is
ad
Ro
e
is
ad
No
Ro
+2400
Spare Zone Plant? Water Storage?
+1200
+1200
Spare Zone Plant? Water Storage?
Shared Living Shared Living
+-0000
62
9600
8400 7200
7200
6000 4800
4800
3600 2400
2400
SECTION 1:100
1200
-2400
0000
-2400
-1200
0000
-1200
+-0000
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
THE SHARED “CORE” BUILDING ORGANISATION LOGIC
1
THE SHARED “CORE”
2
3
4
Shared- Main Living Shared- Eating Private- Sleeping
CIRCULATORY & INFRASTRUCTURAL
SLEEPING SPACES
SHARED SPACE ( KITCHEN, LIVING, WORKING, EATING, WASHING ETC.)
WORKING, EATING,SKELETON WASHING ETC.)
SPATIAL INTEGRATION WITH SHARED “CORE”
Rain
N
N
s
s
Serviced Zone Cluster (Shared W/C & Shower)
Serviced Zone Cluster (Shared W/C & Shower)
Private Sleep Shared Living
Shared Living Gutter/ Water Collection Detail
hared Living Gutter/ Water Collection Detail
Private Sleep
Private Sleep
Shared Living Private Sleep
Private Sleep Private Sleep/ Work Balcony
Shared Kitchen/ Dining
Private Sleep/ Work
Shared Circulation
Balcony
Shared Kitchen/ Dining Shared Circulation Spare Zone Plant? Water Storage?
Kitchen Serviced Zone
Shared Living
Spare Zone Plant? Water Storage?
Circulation- Shared Kitchen Serviced Zone
Circulation- Private Direct Sunlight Indirect Sunlight
Circulation- Shared Circulation- Private Direct Sunlight
19200
16800
14400
19200
18000
12000
16800
15600
14400
9600
7200
13200
12000
4800
10800
2400
Indirect Sunlight
9600
7200
leep
63
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
2.01 Construction Sequence/ Health & Safety 1 Site Procurement
Groundworks + Foundations Contractor Involvement
2
1
Site purchased by residents cooperative Aggregation of parts generated from user/ site specific data input
Contractor Envolvement
Groundworks take place- holes dug for foundations. Heavy machinery required- this stage should be carried out by a contractor or someone qualified to operate plant. Everyone on site must be wearing high visibility PPE.
3
Contra
Pre-fabricate placed in po
Contractor a equipment, e activities are
Structural Skeleten Assembly
5
7
CNC fabrication of parts and assembly into complete chunks.
First chunks moved into position and bolted to foundations.
Second set of cnc cut plates
Proper technique when lifting large sheet materials. Max 20KG to be lifted by any person. Appropriate PPE to be worn when operation CNC machinery
Proper technique when lifting Chunks. Max 20KG to be lifted by any person. Good communication and coordination on site is key to safe assembly. High Visibility PPE to be worn.
Proper techniq by any person. is key to safe a
9
64
6
10
Circulatory chunks positioned. Working platform 1 created.
Additional circulatory chunks positioned.
In addition to circulatory chunks, L shaped chunks should be positioned at the ends of platform to prevent falling. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times.
Temp. support positioned. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
11
Additional platform 2
Temp. supp working at harness at
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform Design Realisation 21
ment
ndations.
d be carried out by ate plant. bility PPE.
CHUNK Fabrication
3
Contractor Involvement
Pre-fabricated concrete foundation pads delivered to site and placed in position.
FAB LAB and Materials delivered to site. On-site Chunk fabrication begins
Contractor activity. Heavy components will require lifting equipment, extreme caution should be taken when lifting activities are taking place, high visibility PPE must be worn.
Proper technique when lifting large sheet materials. Max 20KG to be lifted by any person. Appropriate PPE to be worn when operation CNC machinery
7
8
to foundations.
Second set of chunks moved into position and connected using cnc cut plates and allen bolts.
20KG to be lifted ordination on site be worn.
Proper technique when lifting Chunks. Max 20KG to be lifted by any person. Good communication and coordination on site is key to safe assembly. High Visibility PPE to be worn.
e taken when her fixed to their
4
11
Additional circulatory + structural chunks positioned. Working platform 2 created. Temp. support positioned. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
Cantilevering structural chunks positioned. Although not 100% necessary temporary supports should be positioned in case of joint failure under high stress condition. Appropriate PPE to be work (especially hard hat).
12
Additional circulatory chunks positioned. Temp. support positioned. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
65
2.02 Construction Sequence/ Health & Safety 2
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018 Spatial Assembly
13
14
Additional circulatory chunks positioned. Working platform 3 created.
Spatial chunks begin to form main shared space, structure begins to be tied together.
Temp. supports carefully removed. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
Temp. supports carefully removed. Large chunks require correct no.people to lift with careful organisation. Care should be taken with heavy chunks overhead. Correct PPE to be worn
17
18
South private space structures completed
North private space structures completed
Temp. supports carefully removed. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
Window chunks positioned Contractor Envolvement
21
1
Spa
Larg orga over
19
North priv
Caution sh a safety te lifting.
Legend
22
RI Low
D
H
66
West facing enclosure chunks positioned.
Window chunks positioned and installed
All chunks should be positioned from inside the building. Area below work should be cordoned off. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
Window pieces must be positioned from exterior making the process higher risk. Area below work should be cordoned off. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
Te
Design Realisation 22 Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
e, structure
s require correct e should be E to be worn
orkers have aution when
making the ordoned off. workers have Caution when
16
15
Spatial chunks begin to form shared kitchen.
South private space structures assembled
Large chunks require correct no.people to lift with careful organisation. Care should be taken with heavy chunks overhead. Correct PPE to be worn
Temp. support positioned. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifitng.
Side Enclosure Assembly
19
20
North private space structures completed.
East facing enclosure chunks positioned.
Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
All chunks should be positioned from inside the building. Caution should be taken when working at height, workers have a safety tether fixed to their harness at all times. Caution when lifting.
Legend
RISK
REDUCE RISK!
Low
High
Description of activities
Health and safety consideration Temporary support
67
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Familyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Cluster 01 Investigation
Testing the Organisational Potential of the Kit of Parts to Create 0
270
0
270
0
270
Use Options 1. 2x Individuals 2.1x Couple & 1xIndividual 3. 1x Family Consisting of 1/2 Parents &
0
270
1/2 Young Children or 1 Older Child
3
3
2
2400
2400
2
3000
1 3000
1
0
450
0
450
Key Sight Lines Key Sight Lines
1. Shared Live/Work Space 2.Private Single/ Double Bed Room with Work Facilities 3. Private Basic Micro Room
Exploded Axonometric Showing the Internal Spaces Of Family Cluster 01
68
West Elevation with Cut-Away Family Cluster Zone
North-West Axo with Cut-Away Family Cluster Zone
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Multi-Purpose Shared Space Investigation
Testing the Organisational Potential of the Kit of Parts to Create Private and Shared Spaces in Close Proximity
Use Options 1. General Shared Living/ Working
Space. Parts Create a Landscape Suitable for Group Activity. The Most Open Area of the House, Suitable for Residents to Bring Guests
00 775500
Access to Rest of House, and Increasingly Private Zones
4500
3
4800
2 1 House Entrance
Lines Sight Lines Key Key Sight
1. Shared Live/Work Space 2.Shared Entrance Hall with Access To Shared Storage 3. Private Space With Visual Connecton to Shared Zone
Exploded Axonometric Showing the Entrance Hall and Main General Purpose Shared Living Area
West Elevation with Cut-Away Shared Living Zone
North-West Axo with Cut-Away Shared Living Zone
69
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
PRIVATE AGGREGATION GLOSSARY
LEGEND
D C
D C
1 21 2 5 3 56 43 6 4 9 9 7 8 7 8
PRIVATE SPACE
SHARED SPACE
1 PERSON 1 COUPLE 1 FAMILY (WITH AT LEAST
ONE CHILD)
MICRO SLEEP/ WORK
STANDARD SLEEP/ WORK 01
CIR
CU
STANDARD SLEEP/ WORK 02
LAT
EX
ION
TER
IO
R
R
RIO
TE
EX
1
2
3
CIR
CU
ION
IO
LAT
CU
CIR
LAT
N
1. LARGE SLEEP/ WORK
2. SHARED LIVING
CIR
CU
1. LARGE SLEEP/ WORK
1. LARGE SLEEP/ WORK
2. SHARED LIVING
2. SHARED LIVING
LAT
ION EX
EX
TER
4
IO
R
5
6 CIR
CU
SHARED STORAGE
LAT
ION
CIR
CU
COMMUNAL LIVING & VISITOR SPACE (ENTRANCE HALL)
MA
IN
EN
IOR
CIR
TRA
CU
NC
E
CIR
N
IO AT
UL
C CIR
70
8
LAT
ION
SHARED KITCHEN/ DINING SPACE
TER
EX
7
IOR
TER
R
RIO
TE
EX
CU
LAT
ION
9
LAT
ION
EX
TER
IO
R
SHARED/ PRIVATE CLUSTERING
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Example clusters of private spatial aggregations surrounding a shared & serviced zone
D C
D C
AGGREGATION CLUSTER 01
E B A
E B A
6
MATRIX CONNECTION ZONE
Serviced Zone
01_ Clustering Logic Despite the shared areas of the building being accessible to all inhabitants, the total aggregation is broken down into clusters or neighbourhoods. This strategy enables a more specific shared space aggregation for the local inhabitants. It also ensures that each person lives in close proximity to all the facilities they may need, and because of the small group of people using them a sense of ownership is creating, leading to a level of self initiated maintenance.
5 1 A
2
02_ Social Clustering Many of the inhabitants of Chamfer will be single individuals and the geometry of the clusters encourages a pleasant level of community integration within a small group of neighbours. The system can also potentially group people according to their data inputs.
AGGREGATION CLUSTER 02
3
Serviced Zone
01_ Private Space Strategy
3
A catalogue of pre-designed PRIVATE spaces, which take the form of enclosed pod structures. The aggregations range from a micro-bedroom for an individual to a sleep/ work double bedroom. Working in a shared environment is encouraged the private spaces may be the most quiet spaces, suitable for study.
B 1
02_ Shared Space Specificity
AGGREGATION CLUSTER 02
6
Like the other spaces the aggregation of parts is designed to create a â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;living landscapeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; which replaces most conventional furniture, including lighting and storage. The spaces are minimal as the shared areas are designed to be treated as a a flexible extension of an individuals personal space.
D C
1 2
Serviced Zone
E B A C 5 71
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
SHARED AGGREGATION GLOSSARY
LEGEND
C E B
E B
E B
MATRIX CONNECTION
1
FLEXIBLE SPACE: • W/C • LIVING AREA • QUIET WORKING
2
NO. PEOPLE
QUIET WORKING/ CIRCULATION SUITIABLE IN LOW TRAFFIC AREAS
4 6
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
INDIVIDUAL WORKING
CIRCULATION
GROUP WORKING
FLEXIBLE USE (SERVICED)
EATING
MEETING/ LIVING
COOKING
LIVING
3
NO. PEOPLE AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
1 1 23 2 3 2 4 4 4 6 6 6 5 5 5 7 7 7 8 8 8 10 10 910 9 11 9 13 11 13 11 1413 14 14 12 12 12 1
?3
CIRCULATION BREAK OUT/ MEETING AREA
5 10
NO. PEOPLE AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
4 20
?
4
NO. PEOPLE NOISY WORKING SPACE INDIVIDUAL/ GROUP
3 6
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
7
10
13
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
8
2 20
11
NO. PEOPLE LONG CONNECTION STAIR
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
NO. PEOPLE COMMUNAL EATING SPACE
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
8 8
NO. PEOPLE CIRCULATION PLATFORM AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
9 20
NO. PEOPLE
INDIVIDUAL LIVING LANDSCAPE
5
5 20
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
14
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
12
5 25
? 72
TO SERVE:
5 25
NO. PEOPLE FLEXIBLE SPACE: • W/C • EATING • MEETING POINT
AT ONCE:
9
NO. PEOPLE CIRCULATION BREAK OUT LIVING/ WORKING
NO. PEOPLE CIRCULATION CONNECTION
3 6
NO. PEOPLE
KITCHEN
6
4 20
NO. PEOPLE
COLLABORATION ZONE
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
10 20
NO. PEOPLE MAIN LIVING/ MEETING ZONE LOCATED NEAR ENTRANCE
AT ONCE: TO SERVE:
20 40
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
01_ Shared Space Strategy A catalogue of pre-designed SHARED spaces, circulation and â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;landscapesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; which can be used as the building blocks for the organisational structure of the building. The shared spaces are extensions of the buildings circulatory skeleton and as such maintain the geometry. These aggregations take the form of platforms and landscapes rather than pods, the enclosure is created by the nesting of private spaces.
02_ Shared Space Specificity The shared space aggregations are mostly use specific and the variations in form reflect this. Specific environmental requirements for the intended use, such a slighting conditions, ventilation and noise levels will be addressed through variations of the parts as well as the aggregations location within the build as a whole
E B 1 3 2 4 6 5 7 8 10 9 13 11 14 12
Shared Space within a medium-rise assembly
73
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
MEDIUM - RISE AGGREGATION Breakdown 01_ Aggregation Strategy At this scale the strategy towards shared/ private space becomes clearer. The central shared core of the building runs from bottom to top, connecting all the private spaces Each space is assembled as a specific function within the whole to satisfy the needs of all the inhabitants and create a far greater range of useful spaces than one could own in even a large conventional private home. The circulation and inhabited spaces are blurred, residents are free touse the shared spaces as an extension of their private zones.
1 3
4
NOISY WORKING
5
02_ Shared Core Duties
9
QUIET INDIVIDUAL WORKING
10
CIRCULATION CONNECTION
7
INDIVIDUAL LIVING QUIET ZONE
COOKING AREA SIZE/ NO. TO MEET OCCUPANT REQUIREMENTS
EXTENDED CONNECTION STAIR
14
PRIVATE SPACE
6
8 11+13
COLLABORATIVE ZONE
FLEXIBLE SPACE: • W/C • EATING • MEETING POINT
74
2
CIRCULATION BREAK OUT: LIVING AREA
CIRCULATION BREAK OUT: LIVING AREA EXTENSION OF PRIVATE SPACE
In this case the shared core is not only responsible for circulation but it also acts as the structural skeleton of the building and the infrastructural distributor to create ultimate freedom for the private spaces to be adapted.
FLEXIBLE SPACE: • W/C • LIVING AREA • QUIET WORKING
12
OUTER SHELL
COMMUNAL EATING SPACE
MAIN LIVING/ MEETING ZONE
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Prototypical Use Specific Aggregations
Typical Aaggregation details intended as a basis for 1:5 scale prototype testing
5
+2
l na tio di ture Ad ruc St
CHUNKS
+4
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
Additional Structure
CHUNK A1 Extension to load carrying aggregation
CHUNK C6 Circulation Enclosure- Structural Connection
CHUNK A1 Extension to load carrying aggregation
CHUNK E1 Balustrade + tensile bracing
CHUNK C5 Platform- to be finished with ply
CHUNK A1 With Stair Insert 2 (Long Side) Serving as structural bracing CHUNK C5 Circulation Enclosure- Structural Connection
CHUNK B3 Key ey structural component
CHUNK B3 Key structural component- Top Surface to be finished with ply
Circulation
Circulatio
n
To Foundations
To Foundations
CHUNK E1 Structural tensile bracing
CHUNK A1 With Stair Insert 1 (Short Side)
CHUNK C5 Floor/ Structure/ Enclosure
+4
CHUNK C6 Furniture (desk) CHUNK C7 Balustrade
CHUNK A1 Geometry creating split level. Stair Insert 1 (Short Side)
Wind
ow
Vie
w
Circulatio
n
Wind
ow
Vie
w
CHUNK B3 Structure/ Enclosure
CHUNK C5 Structure/ Enclosure
CHUNK E1 Structure/ Enclosure
75 Circulatio
n
CONNECTION TEST
An exploded diagram showing the components used in typical connection detail, the example is taken from the low rise shared dwelling aggregation
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Chamfer Platform: Construction Prototypical Structral Connection Test
roposed test Chunk onnection
A1 SIDE RIB 1 (OSB/ ALUMINIUM)
CONNECTION PLATES (STEEL)
INTERIOR LAYER (PLY) SIDE RIB 2 (OSB/ ALUMINIUM)
INTERIOR STRUCTURAL LAYER (LAMINATED CARBOARD)
INSULATION LAYER (FOAM)
END CAP (ALUMINIUM)
E1 B5
C5 C4
B3
76
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
CHUNK A1
Alessandro Conning-Rowland
CHUNK A1
The key piece in the geometric logic of the Chamfer construction system. The two different angles (66° & 33°) allow for many different used, most importantly staircases and split level spatial divisions.
CHUNK E1
CHUNK E1
A derivation of the original chamfer piece, a larger version of the 66° angle which suits the structural branching required in many aggregations.
CHUNK C5
The “L” shaped pieces along with the chamfer piece often form the basis of enclosure within the aggregation as a whole. Chunk C5 is a human scale piece suitable for private scale spaces.
CHUNK C5
CHUNK B3
Chunk B3 is a derivation of the original chamfer piece. It is a an enlarged version with extended legs which allows for spatial differentiation and structural spans within the building aggregation.
CHUNK B3
Side Enclosure Assembly Structural Skeleten Assembly
6
Window chunks positioned Contractor Envolvement
Spatial Assembly
13
20
22
77
East facing enclosure chunks positioned.
Window chunks positioned and installed
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
On-Site Chunk Fabrication 01_Fab Lab A fab lab (fabrication laboratory) is a small-scale workshop offering digital fabrication. A fab lab is typically equipped with an array of flexible computer-controlled tools that cover several different length scales and various materials, with the aim to make “almost anything”( Neil Gerschenfeld) This includes technology-enabled products generally perceived as limited to mass production. While fab labs have yet to compete with mass production and its associated economies of scale in fabricating widely distributed products, they have already shown the potential to empower individuals to create smart devices for themselves. These devices can be tailored to local or personal needs in ways that are not practical or economical using mass production.
1.
2.
3.
+
+
FAB LAB Logo
Structural Rib 1
+
+
Folded Cardboard Spanning Component
Structural Rib 2
=
=
CHUNK_A1 1:5 scale prototype of Chamfer chunk A1’s structural core 78
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Construction Seq. Stage 4
Construction Seq. Stage 5
?
FAB LAB and Materials delivered to site. On-site Chunk fabrication begins
CNC fabrication of parts and assembly into complete chunks.
CNC cutting Files
Self- Fabrication + Assembly Sequence Deliver readily available sheet materials to site
Cardboard Net Pre-Folded along CNC cut fold lines
Chunk Prototyping user laser-cut birch ply
Use Fab-Lab CNC machines and cutting files generated by Chamfer Platform to cut parts
Gather Correct Parts for Chunk to be Assembled
Cardboard Slotted into CNC cut Grooved in Kerto LVL side Rib (18mm)
Choice of Skin material and applied using Velcro for changeability
79
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
Structure Options Cardboard Composite Options Tested:
1. Folded Cardboard
2. Laminated 2. Laminated Cardboard & Foam Cardboard & Foam
Suitable for furniture manufacture but lacking in structural integrity and thermal/ acoustic performance
High performing chunk however the lamination process is labour intensive irreversible and inaccurate
4. Corrugated Cardboard fixing type 02
5. Corrugated Cardboard fixing type 03
High performing chunk however fiddly assembly process is time consuming and price of additional fixing increases price of chunk considerable. 100% demountable.
Very high performance and high strength. Leaves cardboard exposed and would require another level of interior finish which would add to chunk cost and weight.
Cho 80
ardboard & Foam
e and high strength. osed and would require or finish which would add
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
2. Corrugated Cardboard fixing type 01
High performing chunk however the tight bends in the cardboard are difficult to assemble. Side of cardboard corrugations not fixed for whole length.
6. Corrugated Cardboard fixing type 04
Very high performance and high strength. Easiest assembly with high levels of accuracy maintainable. Some glue must be used making disassembly more difficult.
Chosen Option
81
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
2.10 Connection Testing Prototype
1.
01_ Prototype Joint Analysis The eometry of the assembly was a success and lead to a strong, lightweight connection. The key lesson learned was the fixing and placement strategy of the butterfly connection plates. The plates are inherently strong along the direction of their length, however they require fixing in position to provide lateral strength to the assembly as well as to keep them in position. The other difficulty is the grid on which the connections are placed, which shifts with many connection types, misaligning the connectors.
82
2.
Connection Plate Assembly
3.
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
4.
83
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
User Input: Chamfer Platform 1. Chamfe hamferr A Cooperative Housing Platform
Some information about you...
Lets get started...
2. Information to be completed by each inhabitant
1. Please scan the site to begin
Name
Sarah James 28 30
Age
Occupation
Working Hours Relationship Status Children
Correct?
Sociability
Architectowner Business 9:00 10:00 6:00
6:00 20:00 16:00
Single Partner 0
Private
1
Social
2. Chamfe hamferr A Cooperative Housing Platform
1. Please scan the site to begin
2. Information to be completed by each inhabitant Name
Occupation
Working Hours Relationship Status Children
84
Sociability
1.
Sarah James 28 30
Age
Correct?
3. Please select desired building massing
Some information about you...
Lets get started...
Architectowner Business 9:00 10:00 6:00
Live/ work
2.
6:00 20:00 16:00
Single Partner 0
1 3.
Private
Social
Live/ work
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
3. Chamfe hamferr A Cooperative Housing Platform
3. Please select desired building massing
Some information about you...
2. Information to be completed by each inhabitant Name
Working Hours Relationship Status Children
Sociability
By sharing, you gained:
28 30
Age
Occupation
Congratulations!
1.
Sarah James
Architectowner Business 9:00 10:00 6:00
Live/ work
245 sqm 87 sqm
2.
6:00 20:00 16:00
of useful space!
Single Partner 0
1 3.
Private
*Compared to similar density conventional housing
Social
4. Chamfe hamferr A Cooperative Housing Platform
3. Please select desired building massing 1.
Congratulations! By sharing, you gained:
2.
245 sqm 87 sqm of useful space!
3. *Compared to similar density conventional housing
85
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
2x Townhouse Aggregation CE
AN
TR
EN
e tur uc Str n- ace ctio d Sp u r e st on Shar .C
&
4
n
No. people who must pass through this point to access dwelling G
KIN
OR
IET
QU
/W
ING
LIV
e
on
nZ
nsio
pa
Ex
2
G
3 EN
CH
KIT
2 ING
LIV LE XIB FLE ATING /E
G
IET
QU
CE
N TRA
EN
31
E NC
IN LIV
01
EN
CH
KIT
3
7
A
TR
EN
Z
ININ PD OU G GR RKIN WO
5
8
6
02
E ON
N
G/
N ATI
/E
ING
LIV
LE
XIB
FLE
2 ing ess roc rain nP lB tio entra a orm C Inf ing 3. uild B
E G TIN ON EE R Z / M ITO ING VIS LIV CE. A SP
form
lat
nP
atio
form
2.
x63
a
Sh
x71
Chunk B3
In red
x52
Chunk C6
x138
Chunk C7
Chunk E1
x353 Chunk C5
x199 Chunk A1
Chunks Required
1. Please scan the site to begin
3. Please select desired building massing
Some information about you...
Lets get started...
86
2. Information to be completed by each inhabitant Name
Age
Occupation
Working Hours
1.
Congratulations!
Sarah James
By sharing, you gained:
28 30
Architectowner Business 9:00 10:00 6:00
6:00 20:00 16:00
Live/ work
2.
245 sqm 87 sqm
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Total
50 M2
59 M2
Site
2x
shared space
Available to each inhabitant
Total people
31
ate
13 M2
Individuals
10x
dio
stu
ed
1b
Priv
33 M2
private space (for 2)
Couples
5x
Families
3x
d
are
Sh
ion
lat
cu
Cir
y
wa
all
dh
are
Sh
Typical Studio Apartment Creating a similar density as the Chamfer aggregation
Private Space Shared Space
65 M2 shared space
Total
137 M2 Available to each inhabitant
AN
TR
EN
g din uil eB n let tio mp ga Co ggre . 5 A
CE
CE
AN
TR
EN
e tur uc Str e c ntio pa ruc red S t s on Sha .C
&
4
87
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
2x Townhouse Aggregation
70 M2
Site
4x
Total
50 M2
45 M2
shared space
1 private space + shared space
Available to each inhabitant
6M
Total people
48
2
ate
dio
stu
ed
1b
Priv
33 M2
Individuals
20x Couples
10x
Families
3x
d
are
Sh
ion
lat
cu
Cir
Typical Studio Apartment Creating a similar density as the Chamfer aggregation
Private Space Shared Space
180 M2 shared space
Total
295 M2 Available to each inhabitant
g
88
CE
AN
TR
EN
din uil eB n let tio mp rega o C g 5. Ag
y
wa
all
dh
are
Sh
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
Low-Rise Cooperative Housing Aggregation Chamfer Housing Platform
89
Alessandro Conning-Rowland, U19, 2018
90 Chamfer:
Chamfer: A Cooperative Housing Platform
91