Ian Beardsley On Dovid Krafchow

1 of 28 Ian Beardsley on Dovid Krafchow by Ian Beardsley © 2016

2 of 28 Richard Feynman said calculus is the language of God. Let’s explain it so non-scientific intuitive types can understand it. Acceleration is the change in velocity with time: a = meters /sec/sec = meters /sec

2

The time over which an object accelerates is its velocity: €

meters meters ⊗ sec = = velocity 2 sec sec dx velocity = v = dt

at =

Velocity is the change in distance over time. €

We write: dx = at dt

€

Take the dt from the bottom left and throw it to the top right and put an elongated “s” on both sides of the equation evaluated from 0 to x on the left and 0 to t on the right: ∫

x

t

dx = a ∫ 0 tdt 0

Remove the elongated s on each side and dx becomes x and dt becomes t: €

€

1 x = at 2 2

That is distance in terms of acceleration. Calculus is the mathematics of change. The factor of one half comes in because if the acceleration is that of earth gravity, which is 9.81 meters per second squared, the falling object is traveling 9.81 meters per second after one second, but will have traveled half of 9.81 meters after that time. Remember a falling object starts at rest and speeds up over time.

Ian Beardsley April 15, 2014

3 of 28

Equations of Light


4 of 28 Dovid Krafchow says: “Faster Than The Speed of Light” 365 squared times 2000 equals 266,450,000 He says: “The thing about this number is it is the approximate number of years the scientists say that the stars blinked on after the big bang,…

That, there was a thing that happened and there were no stars. Then, after about a quarter of a billion (two hundred and fifty million years) all the sudden the stars went on, …”

And this has a reverse meaning in the Kabbalah. Instead of the big bang, the Zohar explains that there was a big evacuation,…”

Because in the beginning, all there was was called hard light. Light without any space, … therefore there is no time,… just hard light” And, if God wanted creation - time and space - there had to be a hole made inside of the hard light,…and that is where creation is, …”

So instead of there being,.. instead of light coming to us for millions of years, it was really the opposite: that the shards, the stars, moved from this place. And, that is why we see that the stars are moving away from us in every direction that we look,… because we’re actually at the center of creation. This is how the Zohar explains it.”

Dovid’s Constant (D) = 266,450,000 Einstein’s Constant (C=186,282) This means since, 266,450,000/186,282 = 1430 That Dovid’s Speed is 1,430 times faster than the speed of light.

The speed of light in meters per second is 2.998E8 meters per second (2.998E8 m/s)(1,430) = 4.28714E11 m/s = 4.28714E8 km/s (365 days/year)(24 hours/day)(60 minutes/year)(60 seconds/minute) = 3.1536E7 seconds per year (4.2871E8 km/s)(3.1536E7 seconds/year)=1.35E16 km/year = Dovid’s Velocity The closest star system is Alpha Centauri = 4.367 light years away There are 9.461E12 kilometers in one light year (9.461E12 km/ly)(4.367 ly)=4E13 kilometers to Alpha Centauri

5 of 28 Distance = (Velocity)(Time) Or, Time = (Distance)/(Velocity)=(4E13 km)/(1.35E16 km/year)=0.003 years to reach Alpha Centauri at Dovid Velocity, which takes about 4.367 years at Einstein Velocity.

4/0.003 =1,333 times faster which is right (1,430 above because we rounded numbers making the output slightly different). The key numbers here suggest to predict the future, we make 3 jumps away from the star system and 4 towards is, meaning we make it in 3+4=7 jumps instead of the 10 jumps of Einstein’s Velocity, which means human development will be quicker and so we will develop hyperdrive sooner. Let us see what the results are with Dovid’s Constant by running my program, ModelFuture. First we Run it for Einstein, then Dovid, so we can compare the two and see how much Dovid speeds up human progress, if he is right.

6 of 28 Using Einstein’s Constant (p^n1)(q^n2)[W=N!/(n1!)(n2!)] x=e^(c*t) W is the probability of landing on the star in N jumps.

N=n1+n2, n1=number of one light year jumps left, n2=number of one light year jumps right.

What is 1, the nearest whole number of light years to the star, and 2, what is the star's name?

Enter 1: 4 Enter 2: alphacentauri Star name: alphacentauri Distance: 4 What is n1? 3 What is n2? 7 Since N=n1+n2, N=10 What is the probability, p(u), of jumping to the left? 1 What is the probability, p(v), of jumpint to the left? 2 What is the probability, q(y), of jumping to the right? 1 What is the probability, q(z), of jumping to the right? 2 p=u:v q=y:z N factorial = 1.000000 N factorial = 2.000000 N factorial = 6.000000 N factorial = 24.000000 N factorial = 120.000000 N factorial = 720.000000 N factorial = 5040.000000 N factorial = 40320.000000 N factorial = 362880.000000 N factorial = 3628800.000000 n1 factorial = 1.000000 n1 factorial = 2.000000 n1 factorial = 6.000000 n2 factorial = 1.000000 W=59062.500000 percent W=59063.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 2.000000 W=29531.250000 percent W=29531.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 6.000000 W=9843.750000 percent W=9844.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 24.000000 W=2460.937500 percent W=2461.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 120.000000

7 of 28 W=492.187500 percent W=492.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 720.000000 W=82.031250 percent W=82.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 5040.000000 W=11.718750 percent W=12.00 percent rounded to nearest integral What is t in years, the time over which the growth occurs? 40 log(W)=1.079181 loga/t=0.026980 growthrate constant=0.062136 log 100 = 2, log e = 0.4342, therfore T=2/[(0.4342)(growthrate)] T=74.13 years What was the begin year for the period of growth? 1969 Object achieved in 2043.13

8 of 28 Using Krafchow’s Constant (p^n1)(q^n2)[W=N!/(n1!)(n2!)] x=e^(c*t) W is the probability of landing on the star in N jumps.

N=n1+n2, n1=number of one light year jumps left, n2=number of one light year jumps right.

What is 1, the nearest whole number of light years to the star, and 2, what is the star's name?

Enter 1: 4 Enter 2: alphacentauri Star name: alphacentauri Distance: 4 What is n1? 3 What is n2? 4 Since N=n1+n2, N=7 What is the probability, p(u), of jumping to the left? 1 What is the probability, p(v), of jumpint to the left? 2 What is the probability, q(y), of jumping to the right? 1 What is the probability, q(z), of jumping to the right? 2 p=u:v q=y:z N factorial = 1.000000 N factorial = 2.000000 N factorial = 6.000000 N factorial = 24.000000 N factorial = 120.000000 N factorial = 720.000000 N factorial = 5040.000000 n1 factorial = 1.000000 n1 factorial = 2.000000 n1 factorial = 6.000000 n2 factorial = 1.000000 W=656.250000 percent W=656.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 2.000000 W=328.125000 percent W=328.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 6.000000 W=109.375000 percent W=109.00 percent rounded to nearest integral n2 factorial = 24.000000 W=27.343750 percent W=27.00 percent rounded to nearest integral What is t in years, the time over which the growth occurs? 40 log(W)=1.431364 loga/t=0.035784 growthrate constant=0.082414 log 100 = 2, log e = 0.4342, therfore

9 of 28 T=2/[(0.4342)(growthrate)] T=55.89 years What was the begin year for the period of growth? 1969 Object achieved in 2024.89 We see that with Einstein’s constant we reach the stars in 2043, but with Dovid’s constant we reach the stars in 2024. We get there 19 years sooner.

To clarify, we said Dovid's constant is 1,430 times faster than the speed of light. Therfore 4-3= 1 and 4+3=7. So input in program is n1 =3 n2=4 landing at plus 1 and n1+n2=7.

We say landing at alpha centauri which is 4, is like landing at 1, because we are traveling faster.

To clarify, we said Dovid's constant is 1,430 times faster than the speed of light.

Therefore 4-3= 1 and 4+3=7. So input in program is n1 =3 n2=4 landing at plus 1 and n1+n2=7. We say landing at alpha centauri which is 4, is like landing at 1 in 7 jumps instead of landing at 4 in 10 jumps, because we are traveling faster.

Ian Beardsley August 17, 2016 

10 of 28 I have written three papers on the anomaly of how my scientific investigation shows the Universe related to the science fiction of Paul Levinson, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur C. Clarke. In my last paper, “The Levinson-Asimov-Clarke Equation” part of the comprehensive work “The Levinson, Asimov, Clarke Triptic, I suggest these three authors should be taken together to make some kind of a whole, that they are intertwined and at the heart of science fiction. I have now realized a fourth paper is warranted, and it is just the breakthrough I have been looking for to put myself on solid ground with the claim that fiction is related to reality in a mathematical way pertaining to the Laws of Nature. I call it Fiction-Reality Entanglement.

In my paper Paul Levinson, Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke Intertwined With An Astronomer’s Research, I make the mathematical prediction that “humans have a 70% chance of developing Hyperdrive in the year 2043” to word it as Paul Levinson worded it, and I point out that this is only a year after the character Sierra Waters is handed a newly discovered document that sets in motion the novel by Paul Levinson, “The Plot To Save Socrates”.

I now find that Isaac Asimov puts such a development in his science fiction at a similar time in the future, precisely in 2044, only a year after my prediction and two years after Sierra Waters is handed the newly discovered document that initiates her adventure. So, we have my prediction, which is related to the structure of the universe in a mystical way right in between the dates of Levinson and Asimov, their dates only being a year less and a year greater than mine.

Asimov places hyperdrive in the year 2044 in his short story “Evidence” which is part of his science fiction collection of short stories called, “I, Robot”.

This is a collection of short stories where Robot Psychologist Dr. Susan Calvin is interviewed by a writer about her experience with the company on earth in the future that first developed sophisticated robots. In this book, the laws of robotics are created and the idea of the positronic brain introduced, and the nature of the impact robots would have on human civilization is explored. Following this collection of stories Asimov wrote three more novels, which comprise the robot series, “The Caves of Steel”, “The Naked Sun”, and “The Robots of Dawn”.

“I, Robot” is Earth in the future just before Humanity settles the more nearby stars. The novels comprising “The Robot Series” are when humanity has colonized the nearby star systems, The Foundation Trilogy, and its prequels and sequels are about the time humanity has spread throughout the entire galaxy and made an Empire of it. All of these books can be taken together as one story, with characters and events in some, occurring in others.

11 of 28

Hyperdrive is invented in I, Robot by a robot called The Brain, owned by the company for which Dr. Susan Calvin works when it is fed the mathematical logistical problems of making hyperdrive, and asked to solve them. It does solve them and it offers the specs on building an interstellar ship, for which two engineers follow in its construction. They are humorously sent across the galaxy by The Brain, not expecting it, and brought back to earth in the ship after they constructed it. This was in the story in “I, Robot” titled “Escape!”.

But Dr. Susan Calvin states in the following short story, that I mentioned, “Evidence”: “But that wasn’t it, either”…”Oh, eventually, the ship and others like it became government property; the Jump through hyperspace was perfected, and now we actually have human colonies on the planets of some of the nearer stars, but that wasn’t it.”

“It was what happened to the people here on Earth in last fifty years that really counts.”

And, what happened to people on Earth? The answer is in the same story “Evidence” from which that quote is at the beginning. It was when the Regions of the Earth formed The Federation. Dr. Susan Calvin says at the end of the story “Evidence”: “He was a very good mayor; five years later he did become Regional Co-ordinator. And when the Regions of Earth formed their Federation in 2044, he became the first World Co-ordinator.”

It is from that statement that I get my date of 2044 as the year Asimov projects for hyperdrive.

Ian Beardsley March 17, 2011

12 of 28

I watched a video on youtube about Terence McKenna where he lectured on his timewave zero theory. I found there was not an equation for his timewave zero graph but that a computer algorithm generated the graph of the wave. The next day I did a search on the internet to see if a person could download timewave software for free. As it turned out one could, for both Mac and pc. It is called “Timewave Calculator Version 1.0�. I downloaded the software and found you had to download it every time after you quit the application and that you could not save the graph of your results or print them out. So I did a one-time calculation. It works like this: you input the range of time over which you want see the timewave and you cannot calculate past 2012, because that is when the timewave ends. You also put in a target date, the time when you want to get a rating for the novelty of the event that occurred on that day. You can also click on any point in the graph to get the novelty rating for that time. I put in:

13 of 28

Input: Begin Date: December 27 1968 18 hours 5 minutes 37 seconds End Date: December 2 2011 0 hours 28 minutes 7 seconds McKenna said in the video on youtube that the dips, or valleys, in the timewave graph represent novelties. So, I clicked on the first valley after 1969 since that is the year we went to the moon, and the program gave its novelty as: Sheliak Timewave Value For Target: 0.0621 On Target Date: August 4, 1969 9 hours 53 minutes 38 seconds I was happy to see this because, I determined that the growth rate constant, k, that rate at which we progress towards hyperdrive, in my calculation in my work Asimovian Prediction For Hyperdrive, that gave the date 2043, a year after Sierra Waters was handed the newly discovered document that started her adventure in The Plot To Save Socrates, by Paul Levinson, and a year before Isaac Asimov had placed the invention of hyperdrive in his book I, Robot, was: (k=0.0621) The very same number!!!

What does that mean? I have no idea; I will find out after I buy The Invisible Landscape by Terence McKenna, Second Edition, and buy a more sophisticated timewave software than that which is offered for free on the net.

Ian Beardsley March 19, 2011

14 of 28

There is a common thread running through the Science Fiction works of Paul Levinson, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur C. Clarke.

In the case of Isaac Asimov, we are far in the future of humanity. In his Robot Series, Asimov has man making robots whose programming only allows them to do that which is good for humanity.

As a result, these robots, artificial intelligence (AI), take actions that propel humanity into settling the Galaxy, in the robot series, and ultimately save humanity after they have settled the Galaxy and made an empire of it (In the Foundation Series).

In the case of Paul Levinson, scholars in the future travel through time and use cloning, a concept related to artificial intelligence (it is the creating of human replicas as well, but biological, not electronic), and the goal is to save great ancient thinkers from Greece, and to manipulate events in the past for a positive outcome for the future of humanity, just as the robots try to do in the work of Asimov.

In the case of Arthur C. Clarke, man undergoes a transformation due to a monolith placed on the moon and earth by extraterrestrials who have created life on earth. The monolith is a computer. It takes humans on a voyage to other planets in the solar system, and in their trials, humanity goes through trials that result in a transformation for the ending of their dependence on their technology and for becoming adapted to life in the Universe beyond Earth. That is, the character Dave Bowman becomes the Starchild in his mission to Jupiter. The artificial intelligence is the ship computer called HAL. So, the thread is the salvation of man through technology, and their transformation to a new human paradigm, where they can end their dependence on Earth and adapt to the nature of the Universe as a whole.

At the time I was reading these novels, I was doing astronomical research, and, to my utter astonishment, my relationships I was discovering pertaining to the Universe were turning up times and values pivotal to these works of Levinson, Asimov, and Clarke. Further, I was interpreting much of my discoveries by developing them in the context of short fictional stories.

In my story, “The Question�, we find Artificial Intelligence is in sync with the phases of the first appearance of the brightest star Sirius for the year, and the flooding of the Nile river, which brings in the Egyptian agricultural season. It is presumed by some scholars that because the Egyptian calendar is in sync with the Nile-Sirius cycle, theirs began four such cycles ago.

I then relate that synchronization to another calculation that turns up the time when the key figure of the Foundation Series of Asimov begins his program to found a civilization that will save the galaxy. We later find his actions were manipulated into being by robots, in order to save intelligent life in the galaxy by creating a viable society for it called Galaxia.

15 of 28

In the case of Paul Levinson, I was making a calculation to predict when man would develop hyperdrive, that engine which could take us to the stars, and end our dependence on an Earth that cannot take care of humans forever. That time turned out to be when the key scholar in the work

by Paul Levinson, began her quest to help humanity by traveling into the past and using cloning, in part, to change history for the better. I can now only feel her quest to save humanity is going to be through changing history to bring about the development of hyperdrive, so humanity will no longer depend on Earth alone, which, as I have said, cannot take care of life forever.

Finally, where Arthur C. Clarke is concerned, I find values in the solar system and nature that are in his monolith, and I connect it to artificial intelligence of a sort, that kind which would be based on silicon.

16 of 28 The Black Night Satellite became known to the public on May 14 1954 in an article that appeared in the San Francisco Examiner. No one including NASA could explain its origins and it is thought by many to be an alien made satellite orbiting the Earth, monitoring us. It brings to mind the Monolith of 2001: A Space Odyssey. It turned out to be an alien sentinel placed on earth to monitor us and give us an evolutionary nudge when we needed it. Why did not NASA retrieve it with the space shuttle? My guess is they figured they did not know what they were dealing with. As we could learn from 2001: A Space Odyssey, the monolith should be approached with caution. The interesting thing is that A Ham Radio operator who received signals from it, decoded them and learned the satellite was 13,000 years old and came from the double star epsilon bootis. That is further interesting in that Our Cosmic Ancestors by Maurice Chatelain told of a story how there was some sort of echo in communication experiments. The echo was studied and its pattern if used on the televisions of the time came out to be a map of the constellation bootes as reported by the Scottish Astronomer Duncan Lunan, highlighting the same star that The Black Night has been reporting to as determined by the Ham Radio operator.

Back in 2005 I in my book Decoding The Universe Two I wrote something that pertains to the Black Knight Satellite. Consider that the satellite is presumed to be extraterrestrial and is sending information to the constellation Bootes. I noticed that the closest star to us, Alpha Centauri, since it is the closest and I point out now that it is composed of a star just like the Sun, that it should be connected to the Earth. Well it is: the Earth is the third planet from the Sun and Alpha Centauri is the third brightest star in the sky. I then proceed to consider the largest planet, and most massive in the Solar System and it is Jupiter. If the above pattern repeats, it should connected to the brightest star in the sky. Well it is: Jupiter is the fifth planet from the Sun and Sirius is the fifth nearest star in the sky.

Let us now consider what Carl Sagan Said: to travel in space is to sail upon the cosmic ocean. Mars is the fourth planet from the Sun and is the best candidate for a body to colonize as it is solid (not gaseous) and is not too cold, or to warm. How appropriate!

The brightest star in the constellation Bootes is Arcturus and it is the fourth brightest star in the sky. Also Bootes means “The Boatman�. Is the Black Knight Satellite then, since theory has it is from Bootes, guiding us towards setting sail upon the cosmic ocean to colonize Mars? 

17 of 28 Star System: Alpha Centauri Spectral Class: Same As The Sun Proximity: Nearest Star System Value For Projecting Human Trajectory: Ideal


18 of 28

The probability of landing at four light years from earth at Alpha Centauri in 10 random leaps of one light year each (to left or right) is given by the equation of a random walk:

{ W }_{ n }({ n }_{ 1 })=\frac { N! }{ { n }_{ 1 }!{ n }_{ 2 }! } { p }^{ n1 }{ q }^{ n2 }\\ N={ n }_{ 1 }+{ n }_{ 2 }\\ q+p=1

To land at plus four we must jump 3 to the left, 7 to the right (n1=3, n2 = 7: 7+3=10): 

19 of 28 Using our equation:

!

We would be, by this reasoning 12% along in the development towards hyperdrive.

Having calculated that we are 12% along in developing the hyperdrive, we can use the equation for natural growth to estimate when we will have hyperdrive. It is of the form: ! t is time and k is a growth rate constant which we must determine to solve the equation. In 1969 Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk on the moon. In 2009 the European Space Agency launched the Herschel and Planck telescopes that will see back to near the beginning of the universe. 2009-1969 is 40 years. This allows us to write: ! log 12 = 40k log 2.718 0.026979531 = 0.4342 k k=0.0621 We now can write: ! ! log 100 = (0.0621) t log e t = 74 years 1969 + 74 years = 2043 Our reasoning would indicate that we will have hyperdrive in the year 2043.

20 of 28 Study summary: 1. We have a 70% chance of developing hyperdrive without destroying ourselves first.

2. We are 12% along the way in development of hyperdrive.

3. We will have hyperdrive in the year 2043, plus or minus.

Sierra Waters was handed the newly discovered document in 2042. 

21 of 28 modefuture.c #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> int main (void) { printf("\n"); int N, r; double u, v, y, z; double t,loga, ratio; int n1, n2; char name[15]; float W,fact=1,fact2=1,fact3=1,a,g,rate,T,T1; double x,W2; printf("(p^n1)(q^n2)[W=N!/(n1!)(n2!)]"); printf("\n"); printf("x=e^(c*t)"); printf("\n"); printf("W is the probability of landing on the star in N jumps.\n"); printf("N=n1+n2, n1=number of one light year jumps left,\n"); printf("n2=number of one light year jumps right.\n"); printf("What is 1, the nearest whole number of light years to the star, and\n"); printf("2, what is the star's name?\n"); printf("Enter 1: "); scanf("%i", &r); printf("Enter 2: "); scanf("%s", name); printf("Star name: %s\n", name); printf("Distance: %i\n", r); printf("What is n1? "); scanf("%i", &n1); printf("What is n2? "); scanf("%i", &n2); printf("Since N=n1+n2, N=%i\n", n1+n2); N=n1+n2; printf("What is the probability, p(u), of jumping to the left? "); scanf("%lf", &u); printf("What is the probability, p(v), of jumpint to the left? "); scanf("%lf", &v); printf("What is the probability, q(y), of jumping to the right? "); scanf("%lf", &y); printf("What is the probability, q(z), of jumping to the right? "); scanf("%lf", &z); printf("p=u:v"); printf("\n"); printf("q=y:z"); printf("\n"); for (int i=1; i<=N; i++)

22 of 28 { fact = fact*i; printf("N factorial = %f\n", fact); a=pow(u/v,n1)*pow(y/z,n2); } for (int j=1; j<=n1; j++) { fact2 = fact2*j; printf("n1 factorial = %f\n", fact2); } for (int k=1; k<=n2; k++) { fact3 = fact3*k; printf("n2 factorial = %f\n", fact3); x=2.718*2.718*2.718*2.718*2.718; g=sqrt(x); W=a*fact/(fact2*fact3); printf("W=%f percent\n", W*100); W2=100*W; printf("W=%.2f percent rounded to nearest integral\n", round(W2)); } { printf("What is t in years, the time over which the growth occurs? "); scanf("%lf", &t); loga=log10(round(W*100)); printf("log(W)=%lf\n", loga); ratio=loga/t; printf("loga/t=%lf\n", ratio); rate=ratio/0.4342; //0.4342 = log e// printf("growthrate constant=%lf\n", rate); printf("log 100 = 2, log e = 0.4342, therfore\n"); printf("T=2/[(0.4342)(growthrate)]\n"); T=2/((0.4342)*(rate)); printf("T=%.2f years\n", T); printf("What was the begin year for the period of growth? "); scanf("%f", &T1); printf("Object achieved in %.2f\n", T+T1); } }

23 of 28 W.HP

Part 1

Percent Development

hp 35s

W001 LBL W W002 INPUT N W003 !

W004 STO X W005 INPUT A W006 !

W007 STO Y W008 INPUT B W009 !

W010 STO Z W011 INPUT P W012 RCL A W013 y^x W014 STO U W015 INPUT Q W016 RCL B W017 y^x W018 STO V W019 RCL U W020 RCL V W021 X (MULTIPLY) W022 STO C W023 RCL Y W024 RCL Z W025 X (MULTIPLY) W026 STO D W027 RCL X W028 RCL C W029 X (MULTIPLY) W030 RCL D W031 / (DIVIDE) W032 100 W033 X (MULTIPLY) W034 RTN To run this, type: XEQ W000 N? 10 R/S A? 3 R/S B? 7 R/S P? 0.5 R/S Q? 0.5 R/S …… RUNNING Answer: 11 23/32

Which is correct, it rounds to 12%

24 of 28 R.HP

Part 2

Growth Rate

hp 35s (Using result from part 1, W.HP)

R001 LBL R R002 INPUT W R003 LOG R004 STO W R005 INPUT T R006 STO T R007 2.718 R008 LOG R009 STO L R010 RCL W R011 RCL T R012 / (DIVIDE) R013 RCL L R014 / (DIVIDE) R015 RTN To run this, type: XEQ R000 W? 12 T? 40

R/S R/S R/S

…… RUNNING Answer: 178/2865 = 0.0621 (Which is Correct)

25 of 28 T.HP

Part 3

Time Objective Achieved hp 35s (Using results from part 2, R.HP)

T001 LBL T T002 INPUT R T003 STO R T004 100 T005 LOG T006 STO L T007 2.718 T008 LOG T009 STO E T010 RCL L T011 RCL R T012 / (DIVIDE) T013 RCL E T014 / (DIVIDE) T015 RTN To run, type: XEQ T000 R? 0.0621

R/S R/S

…… RUNNING

Answer: 74 167/1012 =74.165 years ~ 74 years (Which is correct) 1969 + 74 =2043

26 of 28 HP 35s programmable scientific calculator. You can program it to make any of these calculations. I got mine for about $50.00 at Amazon. It is a powerful piece of machinery and I give it 5 stars. The next model up, the HP 41 CV, goes for about $200.00.â&#x20AC;Š

27 of 28 But where do we get the 2000 in: ((365)^2)(2000) = 266,450,000 Let us continue with the words of Dovid Krafchow: …, 26 in gematria is God’s name — YudHeVuvHe — and, Adam, the first human being,… is 45 and,… the 6 in-between are the six days of creation…”

If God wanted creation — space and time —- he to first make a whole in the hard light,… but we see God played with creation 2000 years before time,… so we see there is this whole web of time.” …, And at that time when Man and God could come together through the six days of creation,…

God said “Stop”,… but stop in Hebrew is Dai,… so God is called Shadai,… which has the gematria of 314,… which is pi. That is why we see pi everywhere we look.”

28 of 28 The Author