Cities As/ Challenges Of Complexity
In her seminal work from 1961, Jane Jacobs offered a comprehensive planning practices, characterizing it as a "pseudoscience" with a problematic replicating failed empirical approaches and disregarding successful p. 183) She made an appeal to urban planners and city policymakers and interrelated nature of the issues facing cities. Jacobs believed in comprehending and utilizing the inherent order of cities, incorporating findings from new sciences and pragmatic methods.
The background to Jane Jacobs' book is the proposed construction Village, where she lived, by New York city planner Robert Moses in the modernist urban planning ideology, which viewed cities as diseased this through large-scale infrastructural solutions, often resulting features. In contrast, Jacobs argued for the importance of social
Lower Manhattan Expressway Robert Moses image fromhttps://www.theguardian.com/ cities/2016/apr/28/story-cities-32-newyork-jane-jacobs-robert-moses
10
comprehensive critique of modern urban problematic preoccupation for ones. (Jacobs, 1993 [1961], policymakers to comprehend the complex believed that the solution lies incorporating the most insightful construction of a highway in Greenwich in 1955. Moses subscribed to diseased and sought to address resulting in the destruction of city social capital, which is linked
to the physical form of the city, such as its streets, sidewalks, parks, and mix of uses. She developed a thesis valuing small-scale city neighborhoods and their unique elements and character, and drew evidence from her own neighborhood to show its transferability to other urban contexts. A central focus of her study was the role of everyday street life in urban areas, referred to as "sidewalk ballet."
under the seeming disorder of the old city, wherever the old city is working successfully, is a marvelous order for maintaining the safety of the streets and the freedom of the city. It is a complex order. Its essence is intricacy of sidewalk use, bringing with it a constant succession of eyes … The ballet of the good city sidewalk never repeats itself from place to place, and in any one place is always replete with improvisations. (Jacobs, 1993 [1961], p. 50)
11
Jane Jacobs introduced a novel perspective on urban planning by emphasizing the importance of the chaotic, small-scale, and social characteristics of a place, as well as diversity. This approach, at the time considered revolutionary, remains relevant today. Moses, a proponent of modernist urban planning, believed that the solution to the problems of cities was through the introduction of topdown, infrastructure-led regeneration. This perspective was challenged by Jacobs, who viewed the complexity of the lived city as being defined by its localized and social characteristics, rather than the controlled and centralized city system represented by the proposed road. The large-scale smart cities projects of today can be seen as similar in that they seek to introduce a technologized infrastructure that dominates the heart of a city's neighborhoods.
Robert Moses/
12
The U.S. city planner and public official
Jane Jacobs/
The Death and Life of Great American Cities image from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/ apr/28/story-cities-32-new-york-jane-jacobs-robert-moses
Jacobs challenged conventional modern city planning by arguing that it had consistently mistaken cities as problems of what she termed ‘simplicity’ and of ‘disorganized complexity’, and had tried to analyse them and treat them as such. She argued that it was not enough for administrators in most fields to understand specific services and techniques, and that instead they needed to ‘understand, and understand thoroughly, specific places’ (Jacobs, 1993 [1961], p. 410). Drawing on thinking from the life sciences she put forward a hypothesis as below where she argues that the solution lay in thinking about cities as problems characterized by unexamined but obviously interconnected and understandable relationships that could only be revealed by observing its small-scale processes.
cities happen to be problems in organized complexity … they do not exhibit one problem in organized complexity, which if understood explains them all. The variables are many, but they are not helter-skelter, they are ‘interrelated in an organic whole’. (Jacobs, 1993 [1961], p. 433)
13
Culsters/ Based On 100 Scraped Archdaily Projects
(0, 0): [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 21, 36, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45, 46, 49, 62, 63, 64, 65, 67, 71, 72, 73, 76, 77, 84, 85, 88, 89, 90, 95, 98],
(5, 2): [6, 52, 69, 91],
(4, 4): [8, 34, 48, 60, 74],
(5, 5): [9, 58, 79],
(2, 2): [12, 25, 28, 86, 87],
(4, 1): [14, 66],
(3, 5): [15],
(4, 3): [19, 31, 56, 70, 94],
(3, 3): [20, 55, 75],
(2, 1): [22, 97],
(6, 0): [23, 59],
(3, 2): [24],
(2, 3): [26, 57],
(5, 4): [27, 83],
(8, 5): [29, 30],
(3, 4): [32],
(5, 3): [33, 54],
(6, 4): [35],
(5, 6): [37],
(1, 3): [38, 50],
(4, 5): [41],
(2, 4): [44],
(4, 0): [47],
(6, 3): [51],
(5, 0): [53, 92],
(5, 1): [61],
(7, 4): [68],
(4, 2): [78],
(7, 2): [80],
(7, 3): [81],
(1, 1): [82],
(7, 5): [93],
(3, 0): [96],
(1, 2): [99]}
The word input('Istabul') output_Title:
1 : Jan Boelen and Deniz Ova, Curators of the 2018 Istanbul Design Biennial, Discuss the Future of Design Education
2 : SO? Wins YAP Istanbul Modern 2013
3 : 2018 Istanbul Design Biennial, "A School of Schools", Launches Open Call
4 : Introducing GSAPP Conversations' Inaugural Episode: "Exhibition Models"
5 : AA Visiting School Istanbul: Cellular Re-Visions
6 : AA Istanbul Visiting School: Vertical Interventions
7 : AA Visiting Schools 2013: Athens & Istanbul
8 : When Urban Planning Gets Political: The History of Taksim Square
9 : 4th Istanbul Design Biennial Opening Program | A School of Schools: Orientation
10 : "A School of Schools": Interview with Jan Boelen, Curator of the 4th Istanbul Design Biennial
11 : AA Athens Visiting School: CIPHER CITY - Recharged
12 : Details Emerge on World’s Largest Airport Terminal in Istanbul
13 : Conversation / Cose Turche: Architecture in Istanbul
14 : After "Are We Human?" – Beatriz Colomina and Mark Wigley Discuss the Istanbul Manifesto
15 : New Publics: Contemporary Architecture and the Public Sphere in Turkey
16 : Tema Istanbul Showroom / Yazgan Design Architecture
17 : 2015 YAP Istanbul Modern Shortlist
18 : The Ultimate Guide to the World's Architecture and Design Biennials
19 : AURA Summer Academy / Istanbul: Past, Present, Future
20 : SO? Unveils Prototype Floating Emergency Structure in Istanbul
22
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1 Alexander, C. (1965). The city is not a tree.Architectural Forum, 122 (1), pp. 58–62.
2 Anthopoulos, L. G. (2017a).Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities, 63, 128-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.005.
3 Banham, R., Hall, P., Price, C. & Barker, P. (1969). NonPlan: an experiment in freedom. New Society, 338, pp. 435–443.
4 Batty, M. & Marshall, S. (2009). Centenary paper: the evolution of cities: geddes, abercrombie and the new physicalism. The Town Planning Review, 80 (6), pp. 551–574.
5 Branch M. C. (1981) Continuous City Planning: Integrating Municipal Management and City Planning. New York, NY:Wiley.
6 Cook, P. (1964) Plug-in city. The Sunday Times Colour Magazine, 33. Cook, P. (ed.) (1973). Archigram. New York:Praeger.
7 Cowley, R. & Caprotti, F. (2018). The smart city as political project. Geoforum, 89, pp. 95–104.
8 Davies W (2015) The chronic social: Relations of control within and without neoliberalism. new formations: a journal of culture/theory/politics 84–85: 40–57.
9 Deleuze G (1990) Control and becoming. Gilles Deleuze in conversation with Antonio Negri. Futur Anterieur 1, np. Available at: www.generation-online.org/p/fpdeleuze3.html
10 Deleuze G (1992) Postscript on the control societies. October 59: 3–7.
11 De Waal, M. (2013). The city as interface..
12 Faludi, A. (1973). Planning Theory. New York: Pergamon.
13 Firmino, R., Aurigi, A. & Camargo, A. (2006) ‘Urban and technological developments: why is it so hard to integrate ICTs into the planning agenda?’. Sustainable Solutions for the Information Society: 11th Inter national Conference on Urban Planning and Spatial Development for the Information Society (CORP) Vienna, Austria: 13-16 February 2006.
14 Gage, S. (2007). The boat/helmsman. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 5(1), 15-24.
15 Galloway AR (2006) Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16 Galloway AR (2014b) Laruelle: Against the Digital. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
17 Gabrys, J. (2014). Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and space, 32(1), 3048.
18 Graham, S. (1997). Cities in the real-time age: the paradigm challenge of telecommunications to the conception and planning of urban space. Environment and Planning A, 29 (1), pp. 105–127
19 Glanville, R. (2007). Try again. Fail again. Fail better: The cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes, 36, 1173–1206.
20 Greenfield A (2013) Against the Smart City. New York: Do Projects.
21 Hall, P. (1993). Urban and Regional Planning (3rd edition). London: Routledge. pp. 2-10
22 Hall R. E. (2000) The vision of a smart city. Presented at the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris, France.
23 Howard, E. (2010 [1898]). To-Morrow: A peaceful Path to Real Reform’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pp.1898
24 Jacobs, J. (1993 [1961]). The Death and Life of American Cities. New York: Random House.
25 Komninos, Nicos (2013). "What makes cities intelligent?".
In Deakin, Mark (ed.). Smart Cities: Governing, Modelling and Analysing the Transition. Taylor and Francis. p. 77.
26 Krivý, M. (2018). Towards a critique of cybernetic urbanism: The smart city and the society of control. Planning Theory, 17(1), 8–30.
27 Luhmann, N. (2000). The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28 Light J. S. (2003) From Warfare to Welfare: Defense
Intellectuals and Urban Problems in Cold War America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29 Lee D. B. (1973) Requiem for large-scale model. Journal of the American Planning Association, 39: 163–178.
30 Lee D. B. (1994)Retrospective on large-scale urban models.Journal of the American Planning Association, 60: 35–40.
31 Mehaffy, M. W. (2019). Assessing Alexander’s later contributions to a science of cities. Urban Science, 3 (2),
59.
31 Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Bertot, J. & Nahon, K. (Eds.), Digital government innovation in challenging times. Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291). New York: ACM.
32 Pask, G. (1961). An Approach to Cybernetics. London: Hutchinson.
33 Paulin, A. (2019). Smart city governance. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
34 Perera D (2015) Beyond patternism: Lessons from the Biological Computer Laboratory, BCL (1960–1980). Paper presented at the 12th Architectural Humanities Research Association conference ‘This Thing Called Theory’, Leeds, 19–21 November.
35 Petroccia, S., Pitasi, A., Cossi, G.M. and Roblek, V. (2020), “Smart cities: who is the main observer?”, Comparative Sociology, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 259-278.
36 Popper, K. R. (1972). Of Clouds and Clocks. In Objective knowledge (pp. 207-255). Oxford University Press.
37 Pinto AT (2014) The pigeon in the machine: The concept of control in behaviourism and cybernetics. Manifesta Journal 18: 65–73. Available at: http://www. manifestajournal.org/sites/default/files/issues-pdf/mj18situationnever-leaves-our-waking-thoughts-long/MJ-18-NC6_0. pdf
38 Rabari, C., & Storper, M. (2015). The digital skin of cities: urban theory and research in the age of the sensored and metered city, ubiquitous computing and big data. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 27-42.
39 Rittel H. Webber M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155–169.
40 Roblek, V., Erenda, I. and Meško, M. (2018). The Challenges of sustainable business development in the postIndustrial society in the first half of the 21st Century. In Leon, M. (Ed.), Managerial Strategies for business sustainability during turbulent times, Hershey, IGI Global, pp. 1-22.
41 Rouvroy A (2012) The end(s) of critique: Databehaviourism vs. due-process. In: Hildebrandt M, De Vries E (eds) Privacy, Due Process and the Computational Turn. Philosophers of Law Meet Philosophers of Technology. New York: Routledge, 143–168.
42 Savas E. (1970) Cybernetics in city hall. Science, 168: 1066.
43 Sassen S (2011) Open source urbanism, The New City Reader, 15. Available at: http://www.domusweb.it/en/oped/2011/06/29/open-source-urbanism.html
44 Sassen S (2012) Urbanizing technology, LSECities. Available at: http://lsecities.net/media/objects/articles/ urbanising-technology/en-gb/
45 Sennett R (2012) The stupefying smart city. LSECities. Available at: http://lsecities.net/media/objects/articles/ the-stupefying-smart-city/en-gb/Söderström, O., Paasche, T., & Klauser, F. (2014). Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City, 18(3), 307-320. DOI:10.1080/13604813.20 14.906716.
46 Turner F (2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 21.
47 Van Hulst, M. (2012). Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 11 (3), pp. 299–318.
48 Wiener, Norbert (1948). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press
24
RC11 CHENSHI LIN RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 DONGCHEN DU RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RC11 RUIJIA XIONG 25