HOUSING PROJECTS 2013//
Birmingham School of Architecture
BA [Hons] Architecture Level 5 2013//2014 ARC5001 [03] Precedent Analysis
This book brings together precedent studies of some of the best examples of British housing. The work was undertaken by year 2 students over a two week period. They were also responsible for editing and producing the book. Professor Jim Low + Hannah Vowles Level 5 tutors.
3
Editing Team_ Tamanna Akhter Joshua Boardman Joseph Bowman Callum Campbell Adriana Chesaru Jac Doody Matt Evans Gaurav Janey
4
CONTENTS [01] Bedford Park
4
[02] Boundary Estate
8
[03] Keeling House
12
[04] Span Blackheath
16
[05] The Ryde
20
[06] Robin Hood Gardens
24
[07] Highgrove
28
[08] Alexandra + Ainsworth
32
[09] Lillington Gardens
36
[10] Odhams Walk
40
[11] Byker
44
[12] Accordia
48
[13] Harper Square
52
5
[01] Bedford Park
6
Construction:
1877
Architects:
Richard Norman Shaw
Location:
West London
Size:
24 acres
Total number of houses:
356
Density:
14 homes per acre
Bedford Park came to fruition as the architect’s experiment to provide housing for London’s middle class, who had been increasingly more influenced by the arts and crafts movements. The development was undertaken in four main stages, changing architects and, consequently, evolving design proposals. The vision of the land owner and the overall project overseer was to create residential areas that built communities around gardens and open fields, evoking a sense of the countryside in contrast with the built environment.
7
Bedford Park’s design was classified as English baroque with Dutch/ Flemish influence, characterised by the many rounded and stepped gables and large sash windows. Health considerations were taken into account towards the detailed planning of ventilation and drainage systems, allowing good air circulation and preventing the onset of water-related infections and diseases. Many of the original buildings are now Grade II listed and are still inhabited by local families with small renovation works to the housing.
8
9
[02] Boundary Estate
10
Construction:
1900
Architects:
London County Council
Location:
Shoreditch, London
Size:
12.5 acres
Total number of apartments:
1069
Density:
85 homes per acre
The Boundary Estate is the first project commissioned by the London County Council in 1893 and it is, arguably, the world’s first social housing scheme. It replaced one of the worst housing areas in the late Victorian London, in an effort to provide adequate housing to its 5700 residents.
11
Many of the estate’s features promoted the well-being of the residents. However, as a social project, it was deemed a failure. High rent and prejudice against living in flats resulted in only 11 residents being rehoused, while the rest moved to other areas of East London, which presented worsening housing conditions. Instead, clerks, nurses, policemen and other working class families moved to the Boundary Estate. Due to the design and high-quality materials used, there has only been one major renovation of the estate, in the 1960s. The estate still provides social and private housing to over 1000 people in 600 flats.
12
13
[03] Keeling House
14
Construction:
1954
Architects:
Denys Lasdun
Location:
Bethnal Green, London
Size:
16 storeys
Total number of apartments:
72
The project is a multi-storey residential building located in the Bethnal Green area of London. It was originally part of a larger social housing scheme proposed by the local planning authority. Keeling House was built on similar principles to two already completed projects in the same district. Although a modernist approach was adopted in the design phase, the architect questioned whether it would account for the aspects that made a neighbourhood work.
15
Ladsun’s purpose was to include ideals of the community, replicating the relations between neighbours in the traditional Victorian terraced houses. For example, the orientation was constructed for the flats to overlook each other. This was to encourage interaction between inhabitants, as well as to offer communal surveillance. The scheme was popular initially, before declining in the 1970s and 1980s due to social problems in estates at the time. The building was given a Grade II listing in 1993 and was renovated into luxury flats in 2000 by private developers
16
17
[04] Span Blackheath
18
Construction:
1956
Architects:
Eric Lyons
Location:
Blackheath, London
This urban intervention is located in Blackheath, an inner suburban area in the South-East side of London. Following WWII, this area was facing the same acute housing shortage spread throughout the city. The large scale of the problem inspired a widespread adoption of modernist solutions for high-rise living.
19
The vision of the Span project was to combine the modernist interventions of ‘high-rise’ with Victorian principles of the English suburb. The interventions were spread over several sites within older areas of the London suburbs, mainly due to the higher land costs of suburban sites closer to the city centre. The four sites in question, constructed between 1953 and 1967, had several ideals to reach through their design. Most importantly, there was a desire to include the sense of community and establish an idea of society within the estate. This was achieved by developing the sites into the landscape, leaving open garden spaces that could be used as social areas.
20
21
[05] The Ryde
22
Construction:
1963
Architects:
Phippen, Randall + Parkes
Location:
Hatfield
Size:
2.75 acres
Total number of houses:
28
Density:
10 homes per acre
The brief of the project had a few basic guidelines: it was to be designed as low cost housing regarding materiality and construction, the location - close to the railway and existing industrial sites - would need to be considered and the interests of the Cockaigne members had to be put at the forefront of the design. The sense of community was also a key point of interest. Open spaces were planned for activities and interaction between residents of the estate.
23
Materiality was considered primarily at a cost effective standpoint, using traditional concrete breeze block and cavity wall structures with a wooden beam ceiling, topped with an asphalt roof, to keep costs down. Most of the buildings were Grade II listed and suffered some degradation. However, they are still currently occupied and the listed status has not interfered with the renovations carried out. The estate is now seen as an attractive place to live and the unit cost exceeds the average of the surrounding area.
24
25
[06] Robin Hood Gardens
26
Construction:
1972
Architects:
Peter + Alison Smithson
Location:
Tower Hamlets, London
Size:
5 acres
Total number of apartments:
214
Density:
42 homes per acre
The brief called for the design of a new social housing project. The initial idea proposed by the Greater London Council was an effort to re-plan the city and experiment in post war architecture. Robin Hood Gardens was seen as a redevelopment project. The scheme was constrained to being a quick and economic construction, offering a new and exciting way of living in the city centre.
27
The aesthetics of the building followed a brutalist rationale, as well as the adoption of the ‘streets in the sky’ concept. It was also tailored to its location, taking into consideration the nearby roads, docks and rail networks. Although the design satisfied some of its primary criteria in being an economic and efficient design, the desired outcome of the project was not fully achieved. This was mainly due to overcrowding and deteriorating living conditions, which led to the scheduled demolition in April 2013.
28
29
[07] Highgrove
30
Construction:
1972-1977
Architects:
Edward Cullinan Architects
Location:
Ruislip, Greater London
Size:
8 acres
Total number of dwellings:
102 dwellings
Density:
12 per acre
In the 1960s, Hillingdon council were trying to fill a eight acre greenfield site that had been attached to the Highgrove house. Due to the oil crisis at the time, developers were forced to sell the site to the council. The architects were asked to keep low building costs. The houses were organised in terraces on a grid layout between the roads, which created a suburban environment. The intention was to create an open plan both outside and inside.
31
However, while circulation within the site was improved by the system of alleyways, accessibility from the main roads was somewhat restricted. The plan was having four gardens in one. It would create a vast area of open space, a place for social interaction. The result: people were unhappy with the perception of lower levels of privacy and security. Hedges and fences were used to create boundaries and divide the large open space into more private dwellings.
32
33
[08] Alexandra + Ainsworth
34
Construction:
1978
Architects:
Camden Council Architects
Location:
Camden, London
Size:
5.4 hectares
Total number of dwellings:
520
Density:
96 homes per hectare
The project design for the Alexandra Road Estate was finished in 1968. It was a plan for a low-rise, high density project to challenge the government’s tendency towards high-rise buildings. The scale of the estate made it one of the most expensive housing schemes in the country. The façade of Alexandra Road needed constant maintenance, but due to the arrival of Thatcher and rate capping, the building appearance quickly deteriorated.
35
A group of residents carried out a petition to return the estate to its former glory. The campaign was successful, making Alexandra Road the youngest and largest building to be listed (Grade II listed), and also the first modern building to do so. The estate has grown to be regarded as an example of important social housing in Europe. It has been displayed in international exhibits, studied in universities and used in many ways in the media, becoming an important part of the national heritage.
36
37
[09] Lillington Gardens
38
Construction:
1961-1980
Architects:
John Darbourne + Geoffery Darke
Location:
Westminster, London
Size:
4 hectares
Total number of dwellings:
777
Density:
194 homes per hectare
Lillington Gardens housing scheme was the subject of an open architectural competition in 1961. The winners set a new standard in the style and planning of housing schemes, combining high density with a medium rise structure. The estate was built retaining the church of St James the Less, which influenced the design and materials of the estate. It is generally known for its complex form, generous green spaces, community-focused design and distinctive use of reinforced concrete and red-brown brick.
39
Aesthetically, one of the major aspects is the staggered treatment of the elevations, which varies around the estate in order to respect the terraces of the surrounding buildings. This play with height and depth of the blocks added to the informal character of the layout. Even though there was an unfortunate lack of similarity between the planning, the general environment and the architectural concept, the overall solution to a very high density housing problem was considered successful.
40
41
[10] Odhams Walk
42
Construction:
1981
Architects:
Greater London Council
Location:
Covent Garden, London
Size:
0.6 hectares
Total number of dwellings:
102
Density:
170 homes per hectare
After Covent Garden was proposed for extensive clearance in 1968, this plan proposed rebuilding the area with megastructures. This generated controversy over its proposed displacement of working class uses and housing. As one of the workers wrote: “The main attraction in Covent Garden is the people ‌ The market workers and the working class tenants. Remove these and what have you got? Any other characterless area.â€?
43
The residents demanded, and received, substantial input in the Odham’s Walk design process. The focus point was the community and residents created their own on-site management system. The result was a project that reviewer Kenneth Campbell called “the most ingenious and satisfactory answer… an urban village in an area where community feeling is the most strong and at the same time most threatened”. Based on the satisfaction of those living in Odhams Walk and the huge increase in the property values over the years, we can conclude that this was not only a successful project, but it can still meet the expectation of the dwellers.
44
45
[11] Byker
46
Construction:
1969-1982
Architects:
Raplh Erskine
Location:
Newcastle
Size:
80 hectares
Total number of dwellings:
circa 2000
Density:
25 homes per hectare
Byker Estate replaced nearly 1200 Victorian terraced houses that were deemed unfit for human inhabitation in 1953. The scheme would see the original residents moved to the new estate in order to keep the original community. Erskine wanted resident involvement in his project, so much so that he turned an old funeral parlour in Byker into an architects’ office. Janett Square was built as a pilot scheme in which residents would give feedback on the design. The estate was then built to incorporate some of the environmental technologies that are only nowadays becoming mainstream.
47
The high design specifications of the buildings made it very expensive to refurbish. The estate was particularly badly affected by the economic decline of the late 20th century. It did not receive the level of service delivery from public agencies that it required, while the original community left. This led to higher house prices, increased crime rates and a weaker bond between residents.
48
49
[12] Accordia
50
Construction:
2008
Architects:
Fielden Clegg Bradley
Location:
Cambridge
Size:
9 hectares
Total number of dwellings:
378 dwellings
Density:
42 homes per hectare
The initial aim for the Accordia project was to create a housing scheme that worked closely with the environment, promoting a sustainable future and way of living. The geographical context was also taken heavily into account; much of the materiality of the site resembles the surrounding area (e.g. the use of yellow brick). The site was once part of a large garden for a country house. New houses were positioned surrounding the central garden and courtyards; the spaces could then be used for recreational activities, able to promote a neighbourhood atmosphere between the housing divisions
51
The houses themselves bring novelty in their appearance. Due to the way they are built upwards rather than outwards, they conserve much of the ground space, limiting the destruction of the natural ground that previously existed. The houses range from 2 to 4 storeys, they feature indoor gardens, car parking and use rooftops as outdoor spaces.
52
53
[13] Harper Square
54
Construction:
2013
Architects:
de Rijke, Marsh + Morgan [dRMM]
Location:
London
Size:
0.6 hectare
Total number of dwellings:
591
Density:
985 homes per hectare
Harper Square development in the Southwark district of London was commissioned by Family Mosaic, a housing group selling shared ownership housing, and designed by dRMM architects. It is a scheme of three apartment blocks with a landscaped square in the middle, creating a common space for people of different ages and a variety of activities.
55
The design was carefully considered in order to cater for all social groups, providing better and more affordable social housing in the area. Other important factors were the integration of the residents into the community and safety related improvements. Harper Square is linked with Symington House, an existing apartment block, and was designed for residents to merge between the two dwellings. This plan was developed through the creation of a shared recreational area.
56
57
STUDENTS
2013//2014
Taylor BEECH Adam CLARKE Ben JAMES
Jeyani JAMES Naheeda RAHMAN Rachelle SALAZAR
Tamanna AKHTER Ellen DAVIES Michalis KOUNOUNIS
Callum CAMPBELL Saffa DEGHANI Stanley FU
Jatinder SAGOO Asose SALIH Obinna SPRINGER-WILLIAMS
Gaurav JANEY Glen MOELO Jagdeep SEHMAR
Adriana-Elena CHIRITA Dagmar HEIMAN Laura-Elena NICULA
Vitalijus DUK Aron MATEFI-TAKACS Corina OANCEA
Joseph BOWMAN Fran CHAPPELOW Lucy DUNN
Lewis BUCKLEY Matt EVANS Kimran FAROOQ
Joshua BOARDMAN Adriana CHESARU Jac DOODY
Jack BERRETT Jack BOWDEN Jรถrn WAGNER Bonnie CARSWELL Mariam MANN Anila SAFEER
IMAGE CREDITS [00] Cover
AGF81
http://agf81.deviantart.com/art/Concrete-Texture-14-204951168 [edited]
[01] Steve Cadman
http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevecadman/2221050495/in/set-72157603801995531 [edited]
[02] Jamie Barras
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ddtmmm/2246116643/
[03]
http://landobreaks.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/the-towers-of-hackney.html
[04] Iqbal Aalam [scanned] http://www.flickr.com/photos/iqbalaalam/2402141249/
58
[05] PRP Architects
http://www.prparchitects.co.uk/50/timeline/1963-1972/the-ryde-hatfield.html
[06] London Arc Blog
http://www.londonarchitectureblog.com/2013/08/week-29-13-feature-22-robin-hood-gardens.html
[07] Rachelle Salazar
Student contribution
[08] R P Marks
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/rpmarks/6654705299/
[09] Richard Roberts
http://www.piano-tuning.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/wpid-20120904_1031561.jpg
[10] James Boardwell
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mashed_potatoe/144759877/
[11]
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/local-news/byker-wall-residents-celebrate-transfer-1368008
[12] Jordan Egglestone
http://jegglestone.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/8163421154_5503a7c22d_o.jpg
[13]
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sarflondondunc/8450527245/
Birmingham Institue of Art and Design http://www.bcu.ac.uk/biad/architecture