Fundamentals of Business Law
Summarized Cases, 8th Ed., and Excerpted Cases, 2nd Ed.
ROGER LeROY MILLER Institute for University Studies Arlington, Texas
GAYLORD A. JENTZ Herbert D. Kelleher Emeritus Professor in Business Law University of Texas at Austin
Learning Objectives • What is a tort? • What is the purpose of tort law? What are the two basic categories of torts? • What are the four elements of negligence? • What is meant by strict liability? In what circumstances is it applied? • What is a cyber tort, and how are tort theories being applied in cyberspace? Copyright © 2010 South-Western
2
Basis of Tort Law • A tort is a civil, legal injury to a person or property caused by a breach of a legal duty. • Plaintiff (the injured party) sues the Defendant (the Tortfeasor) for damages: – Compensatory Damages. – Punitive Damages. – CASE 4.1 Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., (California, 2008). Copyright © 2010 South-Western
3
Classifications • Three Torts: – Intentional. – Unintentional (negligence-no fault). – Strict Liability (absolute liability).
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
4
Intentional Torts Against Persons • Assault and Battery. – Assault: the reasonable apprehension or fear of immediate contact. – Battery: completion (contact) of the assault. – Defenses: • Consent. • Self-Defense and Others. • Defense of Property.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
5
Intentional Torts Against Persons • False Imprisonment. – Confinement or restraint of another person’s activities without justification. – Merchants can detain a suspected shoplifter as long as there is probable cause.
• Infliction of Emotional Distress. – Extreme and outrageous conduct. – Some courts require physical symptoms. Copyright © 2010 South-Western
6
Defamation • Publication of a false statement as fact (oral or written) that injures a person’s good reputation. – CASE 4.2 Lott v. Levitt, (U.S. District Court, Illinois, 2007). – Third party must hear or see statement. – Statements made on the internet may be actionable.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
7
Defamation • An individual who re-publishes the statement will be liable. • Statement must hold someone up to contempt, ridicule or hatred in the community. • Slander per se (no proof of damages is required): – – – –
Loathsome communicable disease. Professional impropriety. Imprisonment for a serious crime. Unmarried woman is unchaste.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
8
Defamation • Defenses: – Truth is normally an absolute defense. – Statement was Privileged: • Absolute: judicial and legislative proceedings. • Qualified: good faith, limited.
– Public Figures: plaintiff must show statement made with “actual malice.”
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
9
Intentional Torts Against Persons • Invasion of the Right to Privacy. – Person has the right to solitude. Breach of that duty is a tort.
• Appropriation. – Use of another’s name or likeness without permission, and for the user’s benefit.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
10
Intentional Torts Against Persons • Fraudulent Misrepresentation. – Intentionally deceive another to believe in a condition that is different from the condition that already exists. • • • •
Knowing misrepresentation of fact. Intent to induce innocent party to rely. Justifiable reliance by innocent party. Causation and Damages.
– Contrast: “puffery” or statements of opinion.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
11
Wrongful Interference • Wrongful Interference with Contractual Relationship. – Valid, enforceable contract exists between two parties. – Third party knows about contract. – Third party intentionally causes either party to breach the original contract.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
12
Wrongful Interference • Wrongful Interference with Business Relationship. – Distinguish competition vs. predatory behavior. Predatory behavior is unlawfully driving competitors out of market. – To prevail, Plaintiff must show Defendant targeted only Plaintiff’s customers and product.
• Defenses to Wrongful Interference: Interference was justified or permissible. Copyright © 2010 South-Western
13
Intentional Torts Against Property • • • •
Trespass to Land. Trespass to Personal Property. Conversion. Disparagement of Property. – Slander of Quality. – Slander of Title.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
14
Unintentional Torts (Negligence) • Negligence is an unintentional tort. • Occurs when someone suffers injury because of the defendant’s failure to comply with a legal duty. • Defendant (tortfeasor) creates foreseeable risk of injury.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
15
Negligence: Analysis • Did the Defendant owe the Plaintiff a legal duty of care? • Did the Defendant breach that duty? • Did the Plaintiff suffer a legal injury? • Did the Defendant’s breach of duty cause the Plaintiff’s injury?
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
16
Negligence: Care and Breach • Duty of Care and Breach. – Duty is based on reasonable person standard. – How would a reasonable person have acted under the circumstances? – Duty of Landowners to business invitees and tenants to keep common areas safe. – Duty of Professionals to clients (attorneys, CPA’s, doctors).
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
17
Negligence: Injury & Damages • Injury Requirement and Damages. – Plaintiff must suffer a legally recognizable injury. – Not all injuries can be compensated.
• Causation. – Causation in Fact (“but for” test). – Proximate Cause (foreseeably strong connection). Copyright © 2010 South-Western
18
Defenses to Negligence • Assumption of the Risk. • Superceding Intervening Cause. – Event must be unforeseeable.
• Contributory Negligence (few jurisdictions). – Plaintiff recovers nothing if he is at fault.
• Comparative Negligence (more common). – As long as Plaintiff is less than 50% at fault he can recover a pro-rata share of the verdict. Copyright © 2010 South-Western
19
Special Negligence Doctrines • Res Ipsa Loquitur. • Negligence Per Se. Violation of law is legal breach of duty. Plaintiff must show: – Defendant broke a law/statute. – Plaintiff is in special class to be protected; and – Statute designed to prevent injury to Plaintiff.
• “Danger Invites Rescue” doctrine. • Dram Shop Acts. Copyright © 2010 South-Western
20
Strict Liability • Does not require fault, intent or breach of duty. • Usually involves ‘abnormally dangerous’ activities and risk cannot be prevented. • Dangerous Animals. • Product Liability—manufacturers and sellers of harmful or defective products. Copyright © 2010 South-Western
21
Cyber Torts • Can a person be liable for a tort committed in cyberspace? • Communications Decency Act (1996). – “No provider/user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher … provided by another information content provider. – CASE 4.3 Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommate.com, LLC (9th Circuit, 2008). Copyright © 2010 South-Western
22
SPAM • Who should be liable for “spam” and computer viruses that cause injury? – Federal CAN-SPAM Act 2003.
• Is SPAM trespass to chattel?
Copyright © 2010 South-Western
23