SchoolHouse
An Educational-Residential Co-op and Community Center for Pennsport Architectural Thesis 2014-2015 By: David Golden Advisor: John Defazio Pennsport, located in south Philadelphia, lost its neighborhood elementary school in the 2013 round of Philadelphia school closings. As the building undergoes privatization, its role within the community changes. SchoolHouse seeks to provide a new model of education in Philadelphia, while allowing a privatized building to serve its neighborhood. The project introduces five different residential developments, phased to not displace current residents. Four of the five are market-rate and low-income units, whose children have reserved space in a new k-12 school, located in the adapted Abigail Vare School. The remaining space in the school is open to the neighborhood. The fifth residential development is reserved for senior citizens, who pay a reduced rate in exchange for volunteering their time at the new Pennsport community center, also located in the adapted Abigail Vare School. The new school and community center share resources with each other, and allow the building to serve the community throughout the year.
Site Pennsport is a predominantly residential neighborhood located in South Philadelphia that is notable for being home to the various Mummers groups. The Abigail Vare School sits prominently on Dickinson Square, the largest park in Pennsport. Pennsport Statistics: • 2010 Population: 11,200 • 70% white, 17% black, 8% Asian, 5% Latino • Median Household Income: $45,000 • Homeownership rate: 62% • Population below poverty level: 23.6% • 31.9% without a high school degree • Average age: 35 • Average Household size: 2.4 • About 2,200 k-12 students • Percentage of students K-12 enrolled in private schools: 53.4%
15 MINS
20 MINS
20 MINS
IUS AD GR KIN AL .W N I M 10
5
WASHING K-8
ING AL .W IN M
TON AV
E
IUS RAD
TASKER ST
57
Ave ing SNYDER
ST
2nd ST
FRONT
ST
oya EM
4th ST
mens
7th ST
9-12
PIER 70
D LV
29
2
SB BU UM
REED
TASKER-MORRIS
IS S T
OL SC
8th ST
11th ST
MORR
12th ST
BROAD ST
47
Users
Program
The Private School and Public Community Center work together to serve Pennsport. The private school draws students from the master-planned houses and from the community. Retirees support the community center, which is open to all.
Abigail Vare Adaptive Reuse Grades 1-2 Homebase Grades 3-5 Homebase Grades 6-8 Homebase Grades 9-12 Homebase Lecture Halls Science Rooms (2) Informal Gathering Space Special Education Teacher Offices/Admin Nurses Office Library Gymnasium Blackbox Theater Art Rooms Music Room Greenhouse Kitchen Cafeteria Wood shop Screening Room Community Center Classroom Teen Room Senior Citizen Room Circulation/Back of House
Community Work at sA va ila b
in in a Rem
f
School
Sp ot
Sp ed ots In rv
g
Re se
le T o
Teachers
Community Center e Use O
f
Fre
Fre
e
Us eO
Family Housing
Volunteer
S or at f
Retiree Housing
ub s
Ancillary Program Preschool and Kindergarten 30 Senior Citizen One/Two Bedroom Apartments 122 Two Bedroom Units 26 Three Bedroom Units Retail
76590 SF 3,300 SF 3,850 SF 3,650 SF 3,400 SF 1,500 SF 1,500 SF 1,950 SF 700 SF 3,000 SF 375 SF 3,400 SF 7,400 SF 3,350 SF 1,675 SF 1,675 SF 2,275 SF 860 SF 760 SF 2,975 SF 850 SF 900 SF 1,500 SF 1,500 SF 18,330 SF
203,250 SF 9,700 SF 30,100 SF 119,650 SF 36,400 SF 7,400 SF
idiz ed Housing
3
Case Studies INTRINSIC CHARTER SCHOOL, Chicago, IL
4
POLARIS K-12 SCHOOL, Anchorage, AK
JUSTUS VAN EFFEN COMPLEX, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Unit Organization + Variety
Parti
Bi-Level, Elevated Street
Flat, Balcony Level
Flat, Garden Level
5
Research The Philadelphia School District: Budget Cuts, School Closings, and Under-performing Schools School District Layoffs, 2011-2014: 8,190 $2.43 Billion Budget Breakdown 18% debt
Financially Disadvantaged Students
During the 1970s, the school populations began to shift from overcrowded to underutilized with the first wave of school Two in three desks in closings in the early 1980s. district schools are Closed School Across Philadelphia 1998 to 2014 occupied
30% charter
87.3% (114,7368)
52% district
One in three students attend a charter School
Graduation Rates
Test Scores, District District School Special Admission Charter School to Charter School District School
57.5
91% 64%
75%
66.9
100 100
The latest national assessment found that just 14 percent of Philadelphia fourth-graders were proficient or better at reading, compared to 26 percent in other big cities and 34 percent nationally. — “Philadelphia’s School Crisis: A City On The Brink”
6
Abigail Vare Elementary School
When a School Closes, its Role within the Community Changes Public > Private Inclusive > Limited
Asset > Element
Participant > Memory
“When a neighborhood loses its schools, it also loses an institution that builds relationships among local residents and binds generations, while it serves local children.”
— Elaine Simon, co-director of the Urban Studies Program at the University of Pennsylvania
Impact on Philadelphia [33%] of Philadelphians live within a half mile of a closed school. Of the top 40 public and private high schools in the Philadelphia area, only 7 are in the city.
Would Philadelphia Millennials Recommend the City as a Place to Raise Children?
7% Depends
1% Don’t Know/ Refused
36% Yes 56% No
LOW INCOME FAMILIES
PUBLIC/ CHARTER
PUBLIC/ CHARTER
PRIVATE
How Likely Are You to Be Living in Philadelphia 5-10 Years From Now?
MIDDLE INCOME FAMILIES
PUBLIC/ CHARTER
PUBLIC/ CHARTER
PRIVATE
21% Definitely Will Not
UPPER INCOME FAMILIES
PUBLIC/ CHARTER
— Ben Novak, 29
PUBLIC/ CHARTER
PRIVATE
29% Probably CITY LIVING
19% Definitely Will
“I intend to stay, but the education system is bad enough that when people I know say they have to move because of the schools, there’s no negative judgment from me about that. Nobody I know sees a future in having school-age kids in Philadelphia.”
SUBURBAN LIVING
Will Not
31% Probably Will
7
Fall Review Residential Sectional Concept
Tri-Level Three Bedroom
Bi-Level Two Bedroom
Two Bedroom Flat
n
St re e
t
G ar de
St re e
DN
t
UP
Two Bedroom Flat
Parking
Residential Units
Retiree Housing
UP DN
One Bed
One+ Bed
One+ Bed
One+ Bed
One+ Bed
DN
One Bed
One Bed
One Bed
One Bed
Two Bed
DN
Bi-Level Two Bedroom
Typical Floor’
Daycare
UP
Two Bedroom Flat Retiree Housing
Site Masterplan
8
Ground Floor
UP
Adaptive Reuse Concept
School Exterior
School Atrium
Ground Floor
Third Floor
Lower Level
Second Floor
School Exterior
9
Technical Review Ground Floor Demo
Second, Third Floor Demo
DEMO EXG COAL STORAGE
1 Demo Level 3 1/16" = 1'-0"
REPLACE STAIRS WITH CODE-COMPLIANT STAIRS, TO MATCH NEW FLOOR HEIGT
DEMO 9'-0" AFF OPENING TO RECEIVE TIMBER HEADER
DEMO REAR WALL AND REPLACE WITH WOOD TRUSS DEMO EXG COLUMN TO FIRST FLOOR
ATE GROUND NEW BELOWADE ENTRYS
DN UP DN
DEMO EXG RAISED PLAYGROUND, STAIRS, AND STONE WALLS
DN
O ENTRANCE FLOOR, AND URROUNDING WALLS
UP
DEMO EXG EGRESS STAIRS AND ENCLOSURE
Demo Level -1 1/16" = 1'-0"
HEATING: Retrofitted Existing Floors w/ In-Floor Board Radiant Heating New Concrete Slab w/ Radiant Tubing
3
DEMO ALL NONLOAD BEARING WALLS IN ADDITION
Demo Level 2 1/16" = 1'-0"
REPLACE ALL WINDOWS
2
DEMO EXG STAIRS
COOLING & VENTILATION: Displacement Ventilation UP UP
UP DN
MEP Axon 10
Gynasium Wall Section
Exploded Axon
4 leveL "0 - '84
FOOR LATEM ENARBMEM EVISEHDA-FLES BSO NOITALUSNI DIGIR "6 GNIHTAEHS DOOWYLP GNICAPS "42 @ "6X"2 YTIVAC RETFAR NI NOITALUSNI ESOLULLEC
5.3 leveL "0 - '14
D LAIRETAM HSINIF MAEB MALULG "42 X "21 ETALP NOITCENNOC LATEM
3 leveL "0 - '43
"0 - '3 "0 - '3
5.2 leveL "0 - '72 "0 - '3 FOOR LATEM ENARBMEM EVISEHDA-FLES BSO NOITALUSNI DIGIR "6 "0 - '3
GNIHTAEHS DOOWYLP GNICAPS "42 @ "6X"2 YTIVAC RETFAR NI NOITALUSNI ESOLULLEC
"0 - '3
2 leveL "0 - '02
"0 - '3
LAIRETAM HSINIF MAEB MALULG "42 X "21
"0 - '3
5.1 leveL "0 - '31
GNIDAHS DETARGETNI HTIW LLAW NIATRUC
"2/1 2 - '3 "8/3 1 - '21
"2/1 9 - '7
1 leveL "0 - '6
ROTCENNOC LEETS SSELNIATS 81R LEGOREA 速ARIMUL + 速ARELOS NAMDAED ETERCNOC NMULOC REBMIT ERAUQS "61
LLAW GNINIATER ETERCNOC "21
dnuorG 0 leveL "2 - '0
GNIDDAP LLAW MYG NMULOC ETERCNOC ERAUQS "42 LLAW NOITADNUOF ETERCNOC "61
"9 - '01
GNIDDAP LLAW MYG
1- leveL "0 - '4ROOLF ELPAM ROOLFBUS DOOWYLP REPEELS "3 X "2 DAP MAOF "8/3 REIRRAB ROPAV ENELYHTEYLOP .C.O "0-'1 DECAPS ,GNIBUT GNITAEH ROOLF TNAIDAR EDARG NO BALS ETERCNOC "6 NOITALUSNI DIGIR "6
1.1- leveL "7 - '8-
LEVARG ESOOL
xoBkcalB- leveL "8 - '21-
11
Final Review
Existing
Demolition
Existing after Demolition
New Construction
ADAPTIVE REUSE STRATEGY 12
PARTI
Most Flexible
Least Flexible
Circulation
FLEXIBILITY
STRUCTURE
GROUND LEVEL 13
Final Review
DN
DN DN DN UP
UP UP DN
DN
FOURTH FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
UP
UP
UP UP
UP
DN UP
DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
DN
THIRD FLOOR 14
LOWER LEVEL
15
16
17
Final Review
18
19
20