Sports
Recess
WHO WILL REPLACE WOJO?
Q&A WITH “PARADE” DIRECTOR DREW KLINGNER RECESS PAGE 4
PAGE 5
The Chronicle T H E I N D E P E N D E N T D A I LY AT D U K E U N I V E R S I T Y
WWW.DUKECHRONICLE.COM
XXXXXDAY, APRIL THURSDAY, MMMM10, XX, 2014 2013
Panel challenges social constructs of sexual labor
ONE ONEHUNDRED HUNDREDAND ANDEIGHTH NINTH YEAR, YEAR, ISSUE ISSUE XXX 111
Dismantling the Duke Genome Sciences Institute
by Jenna Zhang THE CHRONICLE
In light of campus and national conversations about adult film actress— Belle Knox—several professors, students and sex workers gathered for an academic discussion about local sex workers Wednesday night at the Sanford School of Public Policy. The panel-led discussion touched on topics including feminism and cultural perceptions of sex. It also examined sex work within historical, societal and economic frameworks. The panelists were Gunther Peck, Fred W. Shaffer Associate Professor of History and Public Policy; Pete Sigal, professor of history; Diane Nelson, professor of cultural anthropology; Luna, a Raleigh-based sex worker; senior Jacob Tobia, Duke Student Government vice president for equity and outreach; and adult film actress Belle Knox, a freshman. The event drew more than 100 attendees. The goal of the discussion was to initiate a broader conversation about sex and sex work, Peck said. “We wanted to move beyond one woman’s decision to engage in sex work,” Peck said. “To talk about sex as work immediately ruptures beliefs held dear by many people. To recognize that is to recognize what the stakes are of this conversation.” The ‘politics of rescue’—or characterization of sex workers as victims—pervade the way in which sexual labor is addressed, Peck said. Such a framework of perception can inhibit positive dialogue by refusing workers the right to narrate their own stories, he noted. Both supporters and critics of Knox have used her to reinforce their own opinions on sex work instead of allowing Knox to voice her own narrative, Sigal said. Sex work is no different from any See SEX, page 4
graPhiC By rita lo/the ChroniCle
After July 1, the Institute of Genome Sciences & Policy will be replaced by a broader three-unit structure in an effort to respond to changes in the field.
by Ashley Mooney THE CHRONICLE
The Duke Institute of Genome Sciences & Policy will be gone July 1— and the transition is somewhat bittersweet. IGSP Director Huntington Willard announced on the IGSP website March 24 that it will be shifting from a formal institute to a broader three-unit structure, effective July 1.
The change parallels the evolution of genomics as a field and will have a narrower scope than the institute has had in the past 11 years. “This has been one of my babies that I developed from scratch,” Willard said. “There’s a lot of ownership there, both intellectual and emotional. Having said that, when you look around and you see what’s here now that wasn’t here 11.5 years ago, there’s a lot to be
proud of, so it’ll be fun to see what happens over the next five years.” When the IGSP was established in 2003, the University believed that genomics would have substantial research and policy implications, said Provost Peter Lange. As a result, the institute’s main goal was to bring genomics to See GENOME page 3
DSG Senate approved resolution to support ePrint allocation By Hayley Trainer THE CHRONICLE
Duke Student Government Senate approved a resolution to support the ePrint initiative introduced by representatives from Students for Sustainable Living, following a debate centered around the exemption system. Sophomore David Clancy and junior Leah Catotti, members of Students for Sustainable Living, presented their proposal for the exemption system to the ePrint quota reduction
that they proposed at the previous meeting. Under the proposed system, students may receive exemptions through an automatic objective process or a subjective process mediated by a committee of students. “Very few schools have exception policies for their printing system, but most schools that do use a council approach to determine if exemptions are warranted,” Clancy said. Clancy explained that students could apply for an exemption through two routes—an objective process in which students would be
granted exemption following the presentation of financial need or medical need documentation and a subjective process in which students could submit online a written request that would be reviewed by a student committee. The proposed system would create a committee composed of students representing Sustainable Duke, the Office of Information Technology and the Duke Libraries, with a See DSG, page 2
201 S. Estes Dr., Chapel Hill | southernseason.com
Easter Cookie Decorating Saturday, April 12 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. FREE
Spring Fling Cookout Saturday, April 12 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. FREE
Weathervane Easter Brunch Sunday, April 20 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. $29 adults; $10 kids
Sign up to receive our email newletters: southernseason.com/sign-up/