Sports
University
blue devils drafted to WNBA
divinity students reflect on friendship house
Page 7
Page 3
The Chronicle T h e i n d e p e n d e n t d a i ly at D u k e U n i v e r s i t y
xxxxxday,april tuesDAY, mmmm 15, xx, 2014 2013
DUSDAC deliberates food truck lineup
www.dukechronicle.com
ONE ONEHUNDRED HUNDREDAND ANDEIGHTH ninth YEAR, YEAR, Issue Issue xxx 113
Inspiring humanity at its best
by Yiyun Zhu The chronicle
The Duke University Student Dining Advisory Committee deliberated Monday on what food trucks and Merchants-onPoints restaurants should be recommended to Duke Dining for next year based on a survey administered to the student body. Parlez-Vous Crepe and Foster’s on the Fly received the highest number of votes for favorite food trucks in the survey. Those receiving the lowest number of votes were Captain Poncho’s, Baguettaboutit and Chirba Chirba. Mac-Ur-Roni and Deli-icious had highest ratings as potential food trucks to be added. Among the lowest-rated Merchants-on-Points vendors were Skewers Hookah Bar and Grill, Palace International, Nosh and Pizza Mia Italian Grill. DUSDAC members expressed concerns over the opening hours of Serrano Delicafe, a potential Merchant-on-Points vendor and a local delicatessen. The vendor’s Facebook page reveals that the restaurant has limited hours—it is closed on Sundays and Mondays. It is open from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 or 5 p.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays., from 9:30 a.m. to 9 p.m. on Thursdays and on Saturdays it is open from 4 to 11 p.m. “That’s a lot of days when they are not delivering during prime hours,” said coChair of DUSDAC Chris Taylor, a senior. Junior DUSDAC member Gregory See DUSDAC, page 6
EMMA LOEWE/the Chronicle
The Coalition for Preserving Memory presented an exhibit at the Brown Gallery featuring original works made by students representing their understanding of the six recognized genocides Monday evening. See story on page 4.
UNC researchers find better long-term health linked to early education by Rebecca Chen The Chronicle
Researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill found that children who receive quality educational enrichment very early in their lives may have better health decades later. The Abecedarian Project studied the potential benefits of early childhood education for underprivileged kids. The project, which began in the 1970s, followed underprivileged children from pre-kindergarten age into their 30s to trace the effects of an early childhood enrichment program. Recent findings of the project indicated that children who received educational interventions from infancy to the age of five were not only more likely to succeed in school,
but were also more likely to have better health in their 30s—as suggested by their lower blood pressure and risk for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The randomized controlled trials and the study’s long-running design are strengths that point to its high validity, said Elizabeth Pungello, a principal investigator of the project. “Kids literally were selected off the streets,” Pungello said. “The fact that it’s longitudinal and that it’s a randomized design really gives us more confidence in the results.” Pungello noted that the children were followed for 35 years, which strengthens the conclusions made in the paper. She said she considers stress to be one of the potential factors in these results.
“When you’re living [with long-term] stress, you’re constantly activating a biological response, and it has a wear and tear on the system,” Pungello said. “Our hypothesis is that by providing the education, they have a high-quality, certified, stable place all year long, [and] that experience helps combat the chronic stress.” Frequent relocation may be another factor influencing the results of the study, said Francis Campbell, a principal investigator of the study. Children who received the higher-quality education were able to attend the same childcare center with most of the same instructors for many years, whereas other children living in poverty might have had to move around to multiple childcare centers,
missing out on the benefits of the first group’s more stable environment. Other explanations include a better diet for the children receiving the intervention—they were provided with two meals and a snack—and regular structured active playtime, Campbell said. The findings are very interesting and have a lot of merit, but they should not be overblown, said Kenneth Dodge, director of the Center for Child and Family Policy. “This study is one of our country’s best early childhood intervention studies ever, and that is positive,” Dodge said in an interview. “[But] the effects See UNC page 6