100 days in office
Kunshan Krazies
Gov. Roy Cooper has received criticism and praise from both sides | Page 2
Sports have become part of the culture at DKU in just a few short years | Sports Page 11
The Chronicle T H E I N D E P E N D E N T D A I LY AT D U K E U N I V E R S I T Y
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 12, 2017
WWW.DUKECHRONICLE.COM
ONE HUNDRED AND TWELFTH YEAR, ISSUE 77
University tables proposal for $55 million power plant Neelesh Moorthy The Chronicle The University has delayed a decision on whether to build a power plant on campus after heavy criticism of the proposal and a recent report issued by a subcommittee of the Campus Sustainability Committee. Last May, the University announced plans to build a $55 million, 21-megawatt natural gas-fired combined heat and power plant on campus in partnership with Duke Energy Carolinas, a subsidiary of Duke Energy. However, after public outcry from faculty, students and community members, Duke Energy asked North Carolina regulators to postpone the approval process until May 2017 in hopes that the University could consult with stakeholders. A subcommittee of the Campus Sustainability Committee released a report Monday evaluating the construction of the proposed plant. After receiving it, the University indicated it would not bring the proposal to the Board of Trustees in May, and that deliberations will continue into later semesters. “The [Campus Sustainability Committee’s] report was thorough, well informed and reflected a range of views,” wrote Michael Schoenfeld, vice president for public affairs and government relations, in an email Tuesday. President Richard Brodhead and the administration in the past have defended the plant as an efficient way to support Duke Hospital in the event of an emergency or a
Han Kang | The Chronicle A subcommittee of the Campus Sustainability Committee released a report evaluating the power plant, and the University then announced it would postpone its final decision.
power outage. However, the report was unable to reach a consensus about whether the plant should be built. According to the report, some subcommittee members found it an efficient and low-cost option, whereas others wanted the University to further investigate alternatives and talk to shareholders. But the subcommittee—comprised of faculty, staff and students—did agree on several criteria that should be met if the University actually does build the plant. Now that Duke has postponed the decision, these factors will be important during future discussions. Particularly important provisions included requiring that the plant comply with
the Clean Air Act and allowing the University to exit the contract after 10 years if a better alternative presents itself. Using biogas—a renewable energy source fermented from organic materials— instead of fossil fuels was also a sticking point. The subcommittee recommended that the University obtain enough directed biogas through swine waste to “render the CHP plant carbon neutral in its first year of operation.” It added that the University should fully power the plant with directed biogas within five years of operation. Should these conditions prove impossible to fulfill, the report recommended the plant
proposal be scrapped, noting that future research on biogas feasibility is warranted. To conduct further research, postponing the decision might be the ideal scenario, said Tim Profeta, chair of the subcommittee and director of the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions. “There was a projection of the greenhouse gas benefits that could be achieved through various different options and energy investments the University could make,” he said. “And to begin to use biogas to provide our hot water and steam needs is the biggest reduction the University could make.” Sophomore Claire Wang, president of the Duke Climate Coalition and subcommittee member, said she was pleased by the University’s decision. She urged Duke to be confident that it can meet these biogas criteria before creating the plant. She pointed to a prior University project in Yadkin County investing in swine waste technology at a farm as a potential precedent for the use of biogas. The University also needs to consider environmental justice concerns, she said. “The way that pork is produced is through concentrated animal feeding operations, which gather thousands of pigs in one location and of course produce a lot of waste,” Wang said. “This manure is typically gathered in lagoons and produces horribly noxious odors and gasses, which are an environmental justice hazard for surrounding communities, who tend to be lower-income and people of color.” See POWER PLANT on Page 4
Language departments could lose students under new curriculum Lexi Kadis The Chronicle
Neal Vaidya | The Chronicle The current proposed curriculum would only require students to take one semester of a foreign language.
|
|
Foreign language programs may face setbacks if changes to the foreign language requirement in the proposed Trinity College of Arts and Sciences curriculum are approved. Although the newest Trinity curriculum proposal has reinstated the foreign language requirement, it limits this requirement to only one semester. The current policy mandates between one and three courses depending on the student’s language abilities. This switch could be detrimental to Duke’s smaller language programs, said Luciana Fellin, associate professor of the practice of Italian and linguistics and director of the Italian language program. “Less commonly taught languages—not the big languages—are really going to suffer,” she said. Fellin explained that the proposed reduction to the foreign language requirement
|
|
INSIDE — News 2 Sports 11 Classified 13 Crossword 13 Opinion 14
|
would cause students to default to languages they have already learned. “What is probably going to happen is that people are not going to engage [and] invest in discovering a new [language],” she said. Ingeborg Walther, the director of the German language program and a member of the Imagining the Duke Curriculum committee, noted in an email that enrollment in German language courses would “most certainly decline” if the proposal were approved. “I’ve spoken to many students in our language program, most of whom say that while they are glad they took German at least through the intermediate level, they likely would not have done this had they not been required to do so,” Walther wrote. In addition to Walther, Hae-Young Kim, professor of the practice in the department of Asian and Middle Eastern studies and the director of the Korean language program, also said the change to the foreign language requirement would lower enrollment in
Serving the University since 1905
|
Korean courses. “We will lose a lot of students if there’s no requirement,” Kim said. “My projection is that we will lose about 40 to 50 percent of the current enrollment, and even more than that.” Kim expressed that she was “deeply concerned” about the proposed changes, referring to the one semester requirement as “inadequate.” Fellin was also concerned that students would not be able to gain “cultural literacy” from only one semester of a language. “Although the intent of the curricular proposal is to encourage students to follow up with their foreign language study through further coursework at Duke and/or abroad, I don’t think a lot of students will actually do this, unless they are required to do so,” Walther added. Walther has previously said that many students at Duke already speak multiple languages. “We are getting students coming to
@dukechronicle
|
See LANGUAGE on Page 4 © 2017 The Chronicle