‘There is no planet B’
ACC champs
Duke community takes part in March for Science in D.C. this weekend | Page 3
Duke men’s golf wins - its first ACC title since 2013 in dominant fashion | Sportswrap
The Chronicle T H E I N D E P E N D E N T D A I LY AT D U K E U N I V E R S I T Y
MONDAY, APRIL 24, 2017
WWW.DUKECHRONICLE.COM
SCHOOL VS. SPORTS
ONE HUNDRED AND TWELFTH YEAR, ISSUE 82
Which really comes first for Blue Devil student-athletes? Jack Dolgin The Chronicle This story is the first in a two-part series examining the lives of athletes at Duke. The first part focuses on their academic experiences, and the next story looks at athletes’ social lives, the athlete bubble and Greek life. Does school come first for athletes? Should it? The answers to these questions might seem obvious according to the athletic department’s mission, which “requires that Duke athletes be students first.” But when asked, Chris Kennedy, the senior deputy director of athletics who in various positions has overseen the educational mission of the department for 40 years, replied: “Well, what does the University say?” His response was not much different than that of the other man in charge of the athletic department’s academic affairs—Brad Berndt, senior associate director of athletics for student services. Berndt asked essentially the same question as his colleague, before unlike Kennedy affirming that academics should come before athletics. He said, “The institution is committed to academics first, and the athletic department subscribes to that.” New data—a compilation of publiclydisplayed majors primarily from GoDuke.com and athletes’ LinkedIn profiles—collected by The Chronicle raises further questions about how much athletes prioritize their studies. The data, based on information for 192 upperclassman student-athletes and
|
|
Illustration by Shourya Kumar | The Chronicle
a comparison random sample of 215 current non-athlete seniors, revealed that just 23.4 percent of athletes major in the 13 most quantitative subjects at Duke. This figure is even lower for athletes who are regular contributors. In contrast, among the non-athlete sample—also based on publicly-displayed majors and similar to official data supplied by David Jamieson-Drake, assistant vice provost and director of institutional research—59.1 percent major in at least one of these subjects.
Graphic by Carolyn Sun | The Chronicle
|
|
|
“How important is the major?” Kennedy said. “A company that’s coming here to interview people and to hire people... what they’re looking for is evidence of ability.” Two academic administrators and Berndt, however, were more resolute in their valuation of major choices. Arlie Petters, dean of academic affairs for the Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Academic Dean David Rabiner, director of the Academic Advising Center, and Berndt all said that if the majors students choose were being affected by athletics, it would be “concerning.” That hypothetical may actually be a reality. Interviews with 10 current and former athletes who are still Duke students indicate that athletic demands are one of two main factors affecting major choice, along with how much athletes prioritize their sport. “When you go into sports, especially at Duke, and especially with a sport like swimming that’s so demanding, there’s almost a turn-off from—I don’t want to say hard majors, but just majors that maybe take more of a time commitment,” said junior Parker Pearson, who left the men’s swimming team in March. Even among athletes who have played in less than 25 percent of their team’s games in 2016-17—or in the case of track and field and swimming, have not consistently earned points in their events—only 41.9 percent are majoring in the most quantitative subjects. That figure is 18.0 percent less than the total for non-athletes.
INSIDE — News 2 Sportswrap 5 Classified 9 Crossword 9 Opinion 10 Serving the University since 1905
|
The Chronicle selected the following 13 majors as the most quantitative based on required classes to earn each degree— biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical and computer engineering, civil engineering, physics, mathematics, statistics, chemistry, biology, computer science, economics, neuroscience and biophysics. Environmental engineering was omitted since there were no majors in the athlete and non-athlete samples. But Kennedy said he would be concerned if graduation rates were being affected by athletic participation, not major distribution. “[It’s] a false dichotomy,” Kennedy said of comparing athletics and academics. “We’re an educational department of the University just as much as anything else.” So much to balance, not enough time Currently, 16.4 percent of athletes are majoring in sociology, compared to just 1.4 percent of non-athletes, according to The Chronicle’s data. In contrast, 7.5 percent of athletes are majoring in the more time-demanding subject of economics, 6.8 less than the percentage of non-athletes—despite athletes’ academic interest in business that Kennedy and Petters cited as a reason for sociology’s popularity among them. The University does not offer an undergraduate business degree. All four athletic and administration officials interviewed agreed that the more quantitative classes require more time, See SCHOOL/SPORTS on Page 9
@dukechronicle
|
© 2017 The Chronicle