Set for the Final Four
Students connect with faculty
Duke field hockey takes on UNC seeking its second title game appearance in the past 3 years | Sports Page 11
A new initiative called DukeBurst showcases faculty members and Durham attractions | Page 3
The Chronicle T h e i n d e p e n d e n t d a i ly at D u k e U n i v e r s i t y
thursday, november 19, 2015
www.dukechronicle.com
ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVENTH YEAR, Issue 53
Boundary between hate speech, free expression unclear at Duke Likhitha Butchireddygari The Chronicle After recent events involving hate speech both on campus and nationally, administrators and students are debating how to balance freedom of speech with an inclusive, safe campus climate. Although a hate crime is punishable by law because it perpetrates violence or harm, hate speech is more difficult to eliminate because it is often protected by the First Amendment. Long-standing traditions of free speech on campus have also established a precedent of protecting extreme and even hateful speech. After the defacement of the Black Lives Matter poster with a racial slur along with other racially charged incidents, students have protested and called for administrative action to create policies against hate speech on campus. According to Duke Student Affairs’ website, University student conduct policy currently does not specifically mention racial harassment or hate speech. “We [will] be revisiting and reconsidering the question of whether our disciplinary rules should have specific mention of bias and hate and specific weighting of penalties for those things,” President Richard Brodhead said during an interview Friday. Brodhead added, however, that introducing policies against bias and hate speech runs the risk of inhibiting free expression on campus. As a result, designing such policies can be complicated, and few universities have managed to do so successfully.
Graphic by Yuhkai Lin | The Chronicle
“If the great majority of universities in America don’t have that kind of regulation, it isn’t because they don’t care about these things,” he explained. “It’s because there are complications in administering that have to be worked through.” Free speech advocacy organizations in particular have taken a number of universities across the country to task for adopting regulations on student conduct that may limit certain types of speech. Robert Shibley, executive director of
the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and Trinity ‘00, wrote in an email that his organization would oppose any attempt by Duke to limit expression in the wake of hateful incidents on campus. “Free speech is the bulwark of minority rights and acceptance. If Duke compromises free speech, it will compromise both of these things,” he wrote. “Having attended Duke myself, I can think of no reason this would be untrue on Duke’s campus when it has
been true so many times throughout history.” FIRE—which rates colleges based on their free speech policies—gives Duke a speech code rating of “yellow,” meaning that there is at least one policy that could be used to abuse the free speech rights of students. According to FIRE, Duke’s Bias Response Advisory Committee threatens the freedom of speech of students. See SPEECH on Page 4
Texas A&M outlasts Blue Devils in OT Hank Tucker The Chronicle
Ian Jaffe | The Chronicle Despite Rebecca Greenwell’s 22-point outing Wednesday, Duke suffered its first loss.
|
|
For the second straight year, the outcome between the Blue Devils and Aggies came down to the final possessions. And for the second straight year, the Aggies prevailed. After leading by double-digits in the second half, No. 12 Texas A&M outlasted No. 14 Duke in overtime 72-66 Wednesday night at Cameron Indoor Stadium, handing the Blue Devils their first loss of the season. Redshirt sophomore Rebecca Greenwell led the way for Duke with 22 points on 8-of10 shooting, but the veteran guard play of Courtney Walker and Jordan Jones led the Aggies to a marquee road win. “There was certainly a time there that we fought really hard, but the reality is, that’s how we have to be playing the game the entire
|
|
|
game, not just when you’re trying to come back,” Duke head coach Joanne P. McCallie said. “Hopefully we’ll understand what that feels like, that intensity that we showed when we came back from 10 points down.” In the extra period, forward Courtney Williams—the Aggies’ third senior starter—gave Texas A&M a 65-64 lead it would not relinquish with a runner that bounced high off the back of the rim and dropped in, and Blue Devil freshman guard Crystal Primm let a pass slip through her hands on the ensuing possession to hand it back to the Aggies (3-0). Duke (2-1) scored the first point of overtime on a Kyra Lambert free throw just 21 seconds into the period, but would not score again until Primm made a contested layup to trim the deficit to 69-66 with 35.5 seconds remaining. Texas A&M made a few free throws down the stretch to ice the game as Duke’s 3-point attempts in the final
INSIDE — News 2 Sports 11 Classified 13 Puzzles 13 Opinion 14 Serving the University since 1905
|
minute did not fall. Freshman Angela Salvadores made a stepback jumper to tie the game with 7:26 remaining in the fourth quarter, and the game went back and forth for the rest of regulation. Greenwell converted a driving layup to give Duke a 63-61 lead with 2:23 left to play, but the Blue Devils could not score on their next two chances to make it a two-possession game. Aggie center Khaalia Hillsman tied the contest with a layup with 34 seconds remaining, and the teams went to overtime deadlocked at 63. “I just tried to talk to everyone in the huddle, keep doing the little things,” Greenwell said. “We did a really good job and I think in the second half we all came together and played a lot better together.” The Blue Devils could not exploit height advantages all over the floor Wednesday, as See W. BASKETBALL on Page 16
@dukechronicle
|
© 2015 The
Chronicle