Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
I
U N I V E R S I T Y O F U TA H
In Par tnership with the Salt Lake Chamber
KEM C. GARDNER POLIC Y INSTITUTE
We are an honest broker of
INFORMED RESEARCH that guides
INFORMED DISCUSSIONS and leads to
INFORMED D E C I S I O N Sâ„¢
January 2019
U
tah spent most of the past 12 months at the top of the U.S. economic leaderboard. Strong job growth, low unemployment, rising wages, and net in-migration fuel an economy that just keeps on going. Informed observers will recognize Utah’s prosperity, but also see the nuance, intrigue, challenge, and even wonder in Utah’s economic script.
Utah Informed takes readers behind the curtains and shares fascinating details about Utah and the nation. For example… n
How did South Dakota surpass Utah’s fertility rate? A precipitous rise in teen pregnancies.
n
Why aren’t Utah sales tax revenues keeping pace with economic growth? An aging population that spends a greater share of their income on health care.
n
Why is Utah’s per capita water consumption so high? We are the second driest state with low water rates.
n
Who has the most engaged NBA fans? Utah, of course.
In addition to sharing compelling trends and ideas, in this fourth edition of Utah Informed we give a nod on the cover to our Institute’s home, the Thomas S. Monson Center. The beautiful neoclassical mansion on South Temple Street was home to Enos A. Wall, the first entrepreneur to mine copper in Utah’s Bingham Canyon (today mined by Rio Tinto). Copper, which is known for its conductivity, provides a useful metaphor for the way Utah Informed transmits light to those who study it. The Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute serves as an honest broker of informed research, that guides informed discussions, and leads to INFORMED DECISIONS™. We hope this edition of Utah Informed will help you make wise decisions in 2019.
Thanks for your interest,
Natalie Gochnour
Taylor Randall
Derek Miller
Director, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Dean, David Eccles School of Business
President & CEO, Salt Lake Chamber
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
1
Contents Current Affairs
Utah Economy
Words and phrases to know in 2019. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discoveries in 2018. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Top Google searches in the United States in 2018. . . . . . Voter turnout rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Political affiliations of U.S. Congress and Utah Legislature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 6 7 8 9
Recession Watch Duration of United States economic expansions. . . . . . 10 Federal budget balance as a percent of GDP. . . . . . . . . . 11 A history of yield curve inversion as a recession warning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Extra yield on long over short-dated treasuries . . . . . . . 13 Animal Spirits Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Utah CEOutlook Confidence Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2
Industry-adjusted state-to-U.S. employment growth ratios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Unemployment and other measures of labor underutilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Hachman Index of economic diversity, 2017. . . . . . . . . . 18 Average annual employment growth in the life sciences industry, 2012 to 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Annual employment growth and decline in Utah’s counties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Construction jobs as a percent of all Utah jobs. . . . . . . . 21 Percent of Utah families with income below poverty status by educational attainment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 The nation’s largest commuting zones with most intergenerational mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Utah System of Higher Education graduation rates, 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Female share of the workforce in STEM and other occupations, Fall 2015. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Public elementary and secondary schools pupil-teacher ratios, FY 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Utah public elementary and secondary school pupil-teacher ratios, Fall 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Total miles driven per driving-age population . . . . . . . . 28 Utah Jazz player salaries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Economic Development Qualified opportunity zones in the West. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Qualified opportunity zones in Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 High-growth company density. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Startup density. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Where the state can help rural Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Economic Development Logic Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Utah Jazz 3-point shots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Public Finance Vicious tax cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Utah sales tax base as a percent of personal income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Composition of state funds for higher education in Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Number of services, by category, subject to state sales and use taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Sales tax rates and total tax burden. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 State government employment per 1,000 population. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 State of Utah budget stress test.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Energy and Environment Mountain states’ average annual precipitation, 2013–2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Frequency of floods and flash floods in Utah. . . . . . . . . . 45 Residential water bill for 30,000 gallons of water across the state. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Mountain states’ domestic water consumption. . . . . . . 47 Energy industry employment as a percent of total employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Utah energy production and consumption. . . . . . . . . . . 49 Renewable energy electricity generation in Utah. . . . . 50 Salt Lake County average days per week in each air quality category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Health Health ranking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Life expectancy at birth by Utah small area, 2012–2016. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 County uninsured rates, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Average annual growth in Utah’s family income and health insurance costs, 2006-2016. . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Percent of adult Utahns in fair or poor health by income, 2016. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Percent of kindergarteners with an exemption from one or more vaccines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
3
Contents Real Estate and Construction
Utah Demographics
States with most growth in detached single-family home permits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Ratio of the median value of owner-occupied housing units to median household income, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . 59 Composition of building permits for residential units by housing type, 2000–2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Wasatch Front commerical real estate under construction by property type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Utah median monthly mortgage payment and 30-year mortgage rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Mortgage debt balance per capita, 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Growth in mortgage debt balance per capita, 2016-2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Utah population components of change. . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Total fertility rate, 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Birth rates by age of mother, 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Utah’s foreign born population. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 Salt Lake City population. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Median age in Utah and the United States. . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Cumulative change in Utah persons per household since 1920. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Cities with the most- and least-engaged NBA fans. . . . 78 Utah Jazz Facebook followers by country . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 The whole point. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Travel and Tourism Visitor spending as a percent of state GDP, 2017. . . . . . 65 Private leisure and hospitality sector jobs in Utah’s counties, 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 County Transient Room Tax revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 International visitor spending by country, 2016-2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Utah national park and monument indicators. . . . . . . . 69 Utah skier/snowboarder place of origin and stats. . . . . 70
Editor-in-chief: Juliette Tennert 4
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Words and phrases to know in 2019
n 2.12 – Utah’s current total fertility rate (TFR), the number of children who would be born per woman based on the current schedule of age-specific fertility rates: At 2.12, Utah’s TFR is at an all-time low and approaching the replacement rate. n CA·VU – ceiling and visibility unlimited, a military term indicating an obstruction-free sky, coined by President George H. Bush to mean a clear and visible future where people can “easily identify the objectives and threats” in their paths: Seeking CAVU.
n in·land port – crossroads of the west fulfilled: Utah’s inland port will provide custom clearance for Chinese goods. n juu·ling – a slang term for the recreational use of a leading brand of electronic cigarettes in the U.S., JUUL: The American Academy of Pediatricians warns that juuling is on the rise, with devastating consequences.
n con·sum·able ser·vice – service for which the identification of the place of consumption is straightforward: The State of Utah does not currently tax many consumable services.
n mis·in·for·ma·tion – incorrect or misleading information: The distribution of misinformation—and its close cousin, deliberate disinformation—jeopardizes our ability to make informed decisions. Russian troll farms and others propagate falsehoods on Facebook, Twitter, other social media, and by other means. These untruths imperil our ability to prosper.
n em·pa·thy – the ability to identify, understand, and share the feelings and perspectives of others: Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella believes that empathy is essential for innovation.
n strike team – a mission-driven, multi-disciplinary, and well-resourced enterprise: The the Utah Coal Country Strike Team will raise incomes in Carbon and Emery counties.
n fourth in·dus·tri·al rev·o·lu·tion – mobile internet, Internet of Things, additive manufacturing, and other innovations that will change our lives: The 4th Industrial Revolution will require policy innovations.
n YIM·BY – yes in my backyard, a movement that lays the groundwork for more housing construction for people of all income levels: Can YIMBY overcome NIMBY?
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Current Affairs
5
Discoveries in 2018 n Plague – The sample of the oldest-known strain of the pneumonic plague, perhaps the world’s first major pandemic, was found in remains in a 5,000-year-old tomb in Sweden.
n Ancient Art – A 73,000-year-old drawing was found in a stone in South Africa. The unintelligible but deliberate lines are now called the earliest drawing ever found.
n Christmas Salamander – A newly-discovered aquatic salamander has Christmas-tree-shaped growths from its head, which it uses to breathe underwater.
n Shellless Turtle – A 228 million-year-old fossil revealed turtles once lived without a shell; scientists are now studying how they evolved.
n Saw Wasp – A species of wasp with a saw along its back was discovered. Scientists speculate it uses it to cut its way out of whatever other creature its parents laid its egg in. n Hunchback Shrimp – A round-back and shell-less shrimp discovered in the Antarctic was named Epimeria quasimodo after the title character of “The Hunchback of Notre Dame.” n Extraterrestrial Communications – Repeating radio burst deep in space flashes sporadically, making some researchers wonder if it’s a black hole or an advanced civilization. n Ancient Wealth – An excavation in where Tenea, Greece once thrived revealed pottery, coins, and marble-clad homes, showing ancient Teneans were far wealthier than previously thought. n The Thunderclap – A fossil of the world’s largestknown animal were uncovered. The “Ledumahadi mafube” or “giant thunderclap at dawn” weighed about 26,000 pounds and lived in Argentina 200 million years ago.
6
Current Affairs
n Alzheimers – San Francisco scientists discovered a gene that causes people with it to be far more susceptible to Alzheimer’s. n Blindness Cure – Using a patch of stem cells over the eye, scientists returned the sight of two blind patients. n Martian Photos – NASA’s InSight, a newly landed Mars explorer, sent back clear images of Mars’ landscape, perhaps the next step in unlocking the Red Planet’s past. n Exomoon – Astronomers discovered what may be the first known exomoon (moon outside the solar system). n Gene Editing – A Chinese scientist claimed to have produced “gene-edited babies,” which would be the world’s first. n Uterus Donor Success – A successful birth resulted from a uterus donated by a deceased woman for the first time.
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Signs of our times Top Google searches in the United States in 2018
All Searches
News
1) World Cup 2) Hurricane Florence 3) Mac Miller 4) Kate Spade 5) Anthony Bourdain 6) Black Panther 7) Mega Millions Results 8) Stan Lee 9) Demi Lovato 10) Election Results
1) World Cup 2) Hurricane Florence 3) Mega Millions 4) Election Results 5) Hurricane Michael 6) Kavanaugh Confirmation 7) Florida Shooting 8) Royal Wedding 9) Olympic Medal Count 10) Government Shutdown
People
What is...?
1) Demi Lovato 2) Meghan Markle 3) Brett Kavanaugh 4) Logan Paul 5) KhloĂŠ Kardashian 6) Eminem 7) Urban Meyer 8) Ariana Grande 9) Rick Ross 10) Cardi B
1) What is Bitcoin? 2) What is racketeering? 3) What is DACA? 4) What is a government shutdown? 5) What is Good Friday? 6) What is Prince Harry’s last name? 7) What is Fortnite? 8) What is a duck boat? 9) What is a Yanny Laurel? 10) What is a nationalist?
Source: Google
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Current Affairs
7
A new high! Utah voter turnout exceeds US in 2018 midterm elections Voter turnout rates Counted ballots as a percent of total voting-eligible population
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006 Utah
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
United States
Source: United States Elections Project
8
Current Affairs
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Midterm outcomes Political affiliations of incoming U.S. Congress and Utah Legislature
116th United States Congress
63rd Utah Legislature
100 435
Senate
• • •
53 Republicans Up from 51 in 115th Congress 45 Democrats Down from 47 in 115th Congress 2 Independents
House
• •
199 Republicans Down from 241 in 115th Congress 235 Democrats Up from 194 in 115th Congress
29
Senate
• •
23 Republicans Down from 24 in 62nd Legislature 6 Democrats Up from 5 in 62nd Legislature
75
House
• •
59 Republicans Down from 62 in 62nd Legislature 16 Democrats Up from 13 in 62nd Legislature
1 Disputed North Carolina 9th district
*Party division totals are based on November Election Day results. The actual party division of a particular Congress often changes due to the death or resignation of a Member, contested elections, or changes in Member party affiliations. Sources: House.gov; Senate.gov
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Source: le.utah.gov
Current Affairs
9
Slated for the longest expansion on record Duration of United States economic expansions Lengh of expansion and average annual job growth
October 1945 October 1949 May 1954
Expansion Start
April 1958
37 months (5.1%) 45 months (4.3%) 39 months (2.5%) 24 months (3.6%) 106 months (3.2%)
February 1961 November 1970 March 1975
36 months (3.4%) 58 months (3.5%) 92 months (2.8%)
December 1982
120 months (2.0%)
March 1991 November 2001
73 months (0.9%) 113 months (1.5%)
July 2009
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of National Bureau of Economic Research and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data
10
Recession Watch
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Economy expands, federal budget deteriorates Federal budget balance as a percent of GDP
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
-10%
-12% 1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996 2000 Year
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
Periods of Recession
Note: Balance is the 4-quarter moving sum; Q4 2018 and beyond are forecast. Source: Wells Fargo Securities
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Recession Watch
11
Yielding the yield A history of yield curve inversion as a recession warning Since pre-recession peak in 2005 Date of inversion
Months to recession
S&P 500 performance over next 12 months
February 20, 2006
13.2%
22
37.1%
September 10, 1998
12.2%
May 29, 1989
September 1, 1980
14
0.9%
July 4, 1978
30
11
7.7%
18
February 12, 1973
- 21.6%
9
December 19, 1968
- 15.3%
12
September 8, 1966
January 12, 1966
24.3%
- 9.3%
False Alarm
False Alarm
Note: Inversion date is when the 3-month Treasury yield rises above the 10-year yield. Source: Refinitiv, as published in the Wall Street Journal, December 6, 2018
12
Recession Watch
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Inversion season Extra yield on long over short-dated treasuries
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
Jun 18
Jun 16
Jun 14
Jun 12
Jun 10
Jun 08
Jun 06
Jun 04
Jun 02
Jun 00
Jun 98
Jun 96
Jun 94
Jun 92
Jun 90
Jun 88
Jun 86
Jun 84
Jun 82
Jun 80
Jun 78
Jun 76
-3
10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 3-Month Treasury Constant Maturity 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Recession Watch
13
Do you believe in spirits? Animal Spirits Index
2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 -2.5
1967
1973
1979
1985
1991
Year
1997
2003
2009
2015
Periods of Recession
Note: Index includes S&P 500 index, Conference Board consumer confidence index, yield spread, VIX index, and economic policy uncertainty index; the Animal Spirits Index seeks to “shed light on economic agents’ expectations about the near-term economic outlook.” Source: Wells Fargo Securities
14
Recession Watch
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Utah CEOs less optimistic Utah CEOutlook Confidence Index What is your expectation for the economy six months from now?
Index 70
66.07 65
61.67
61.36
61.43
60 59.21
58.75 55.47
55
50.00
50 17-Q1
17-Q2
17-Q3
17-Q4
18-Q1
18-Q2
18-Q3
18-Q4
Source: Salt Lake Chamber CEOutlook composite score
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Recession Watch
15
Holding on to #1 for job growth in current expansion Industry-adjusted state-to-U.S. employment growth ratios Growth since end of recession, 2009-2017
WA 1.26 OR 1.03
MT 0.70
ND 1.21
ID 1.07 WY 0.51
CA 1.46
NV 1.14
AZ 1.15
MN 0.72
SD 0.70 NE 0.65
UT 1.57
CO 1.32
NM 0.23
KS 0.53 OK 0.53
TX 1.49
AK 0.34
ME 0.41 WI 0.55
IA 0.45 MO 0.53 AR 0.65
NY 1.01
MI 0.69
IN IL 0.64 0.68
OH 0.60
PA 0.65
WV 0.00 VA KY 0.84 0.69 NC TN 1.15 1.02 SC 1.27 GA MS AL 0.67 0.66 1.23
LA 0.58
V T 0.54 NH 0.65 MA 1.16 RI 0.71 C T 0.50 NJ 0.75 MD 0.83 DE 0.93
< 0.50 0.50 - 0.79 0.80 - 0.99 1.00 - 1.29 1.30 +
FL 1.44
HI 0.91
Note: Ratio of actual employment growth to the employment growth the state would have experienced if its industries grew at the same rate as those of the rest of the nation. Numbers above 1 indicate outperforming the nation. Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
16
Utah Economy
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Unemployment limbo Unemployment and other measures of labor underutilization Current and previous economic peak Involuntary Part-time Rate Discouraged/Marginally Attached Worker Unemployment Rate Headline Unemployment Rate
8.3% 7.8%
6.2%
5.0%
2.4%
2.8% 2.9%
0.9% 0.9%
1.9% 0.6% 0.5% 4.6%
4.0%
3.2%
2.6%
Q4 2007
Q3 2018 Utah
Q4 2007
Q3 2018 United States
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Economy
17
Strength in diversity Hachman Index of Economic Diversity, 2017
WA 87.7 OR 89.1
MT 80.1
ND 51.1
ID 79.2 WY 25.1
CA 93.1
NV 64.7
UT 96.9
AZ 95.7
MN 94.6
SD 65.2 NE 69.5
CO 93.6
NM 62.5
KS 90.3 OK 57.7
TX 76.3
AK 31.9
ME 91.1 WI 92.3
IA 74.8 MO 96.8 AR 88.6
NY 79.9
MI 92.2
IN IL 95.6 76.0
OH 93.9
PA 95.5
WV 54.2 VA KY 89.1 90.4 NC TN 92.5 91.9 SC 90.9 GA MS AL 86.8 91.1 95.2
LA 85.6
V T 90.9 NH 95.0 MA 90.0 RI 87.3 C T 91.9 NJ 93.4 MD 87.4 DE 53.5
< 65.0 65.0 - 79.9 80.0 - 89.9 90.0 - 94.9 95.0 +
FL 92.0
HI 71.8
Note: Value of 100 would mean that state’s economic activity is distributed exactly like the nation’s; more diverse economies have a higher index score. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis GDP data
18
Utah Economy
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Life sciences boom (bloom?) in Utah Average annual employment change in the life sciences industry, 2012 to 2017 20 states with most life sciences jobs
WA 2.2% MN 2.0%
CA 1.9%
UT 5.0%
WI 1.0%
IN IL 1.0% -0.2%
CO 3.0%
NY 0.3%
MI 1.6% OH 0.9%
TX 2.4%
NJ -0.7%
NC 1.9%
TN 1.3%
AZ 2.2%
PA 0.1%
MA 2.4%
GA 4.4%
FL 2.2%
decline 0.0% - 1.4% 1.5% - 2.9% 3.0% + Not a top 20 state
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Economy
19
Job Tetris, growth and decline in Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s counties Annual employment growth and decline in Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s counties Beaver Box Elder Cache Carbon Daggett Davis Duchesne Emery Garfield Grand Iron Juab Kane Millard Morgan Piute Rich Salt Lake San Juan Sanpete Sevier Summit Tooele Uintah Utah Wasatch Washington Wayne Weber 2009
2010 Growth
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Decline
Note: 2018 through second quarter. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data
20
Utah Economy
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Construction employment back to pre-bubble levels Construction jobs as a percent of all Utah jobs 9.0% 20-year average = 6.5%
8.3%
8.0%
6.8%
7.0%
6.0%
5.4%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
2018e
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
0.0%
1998
1.0%
Note: e = estimate Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Current Employment Survey data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Economy
21
The importance of educational attainment, a family perspective Percent of Utah families with income below poverty status by educational attainment of householder
15.0%
6.7% 4.9%
4.9%
2.8%
All families
Less than high school graduate
High school graduate Some college, (includes equivalency) Associates degree
Bachelor's degree or higher
Married-couple families
46.6%
29.9% 25.5%
24.2%
22.4% 12.5%
All families
12.1%
Less than high school graduate
Female householder, no spouse present
11.6%
High school graduate Some college, (includes equivalency) Associates degree
10.4%
6.9%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Male householder, no spouse present
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Census Bureau 5-year 2013-2017 American Community Survey data
22
Utah Economy
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Families rising The nation’s largest commuting zones with most intergenerational mobility Average income percentile at age 30 of those whose parent’s income was in the 25th percentile 46.2
Salt Lake City 45.2
Pittsburgh 44.7
San Jose
44.6
Boston San Francisco
44.4
San Diego
44.3
Minneapolis
44.2
Manchester
44.2
Newark
44.1
New York
43.8 43.4
Providence
43.4
Los Angeles
43.2
Seattle
43.2
Washington DC
42.8
Houston
42.7
Sacramento
42.4
Bridgeport
42.3
Fort Worth
42.2
Denver
42.0
Buffalo 41.5
Miami Portland
41.3
Fresno San Antonio Philadelphia
41.3 41.1 40.8
Source: Raj Chetty, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, and Emmanuel Saez “Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States”
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Economy
23
Women finish what they start (and improve higher education graduation rates) Utah System of Higher Education (USHE) graduation rates, 2017 67% 50%
47%
42%
48% 34%
33%
30% 22%
All USHE Schools
University Utah State Weber State Southern of Utah University University Utah University
Snow College
Dixie State Utah Valley Salt Lake University University Community College
All Students 68% 67% 58%
53% 46%
51% 44%
36%
40%
39%
36% 38% 28%
25%
All USHE Schools Female
University Utah State Weber State Southern of Utah University University Utah University Male
Snow College
34% 25% 25%
19%
Dixie State Utah Valley Salt Lake University University Community College
Note: Graduation rates are measured by the percentage of first-time, full-time students who graduate within 150% of the published time for the program (six years for a four-year baccalaureate degree and three years for an associate degree). Source: Utah System of Higher Education
24
Utah Economy
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
The STEM gap Female share of the workforce in STEM and other occupations, 2017
48.2% 46.0%
29.3%
20.6%
Utah STEM Occupations
United States Other Occupations
Note: STEM = science, technology, engineering, and mathematics Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Economy
25
Larger classroom sizes in the West Utah public elementary and secondary school pupil-teacher ratios, Fall 2015 United States = 16.0
WA 18.8 OR 20.9
MT 14.0 ID 18.7 WY 12.4
CA 23.9
NV 20.6
CO 17.4
NM 15.5
SD 13.9
KS 12.4 OK 16.3
TX 15.3
AK 16.9
ME 12.2
MN 15.4
NE 13.6
UT 22.9
AZ 23.1
ND 11.8
WI 14.9
IA 14.2 MO 13.6
IN IL 15.7 18.1
AR 13.7
NY 13.2
MI 18.2 OH 16.9
PA 14.2
WV 14.1 VA KY 14.2 16.4 NC TN 15.5 15.1 SC 15.2 GA MS AL 15.1 18.2 15.5
LA 12.3
V T 10.5 NH 12.4 MA 13.4 RI 13.4 C T 12.3 NJ 12.3 MD 14.8 DE 15.0 DC 12.4
< 13.0 13.0 - 14.9 15.0 - 16.9 17.0 - 19.9
FL 15.3
HI 15.5
20.0 +
Note: The pupil-teacher ratio includes teachers for students with disabilities and other special teachers, while these teachers are generally excluded from class size calculations; ratios reflect totals reported by states and differ from totals reported for schools or school districts; data are most recent available for national comparisons. Source: U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics Common Core of Data
26
Utah Economy
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
QAMO
Provo has the highest student to teacher ratio in the state
AWA R D W I N N E R
Why student-teacher ratios matter
Utah public elementary and secondary school pupil-teacher ratios, FY 2017 Utah average = 21.8
Higher amounts of engagement and retention
Districts with highest ratios Provo
25.2
Morgan
24.8
Alpine
24.6
Davis
24.0 23.6
Cache Uintah
23.3
Juab
23.2
Nebo
23.1
Box Elder
23.0
Jordan
23.0
More individualized attention Accommodation of different learning styles Submitted by David Eccles School of Business QAMO (Quantitative Analysis of Markets & Organiztions) students Jessie Rabe and Jonathan White.
Districts with lowest ratios Kane
17.6 17.2
San Juan
16.6
Park City Grand
15.9
Garfield
15.9
Rich
14.2 13.9
Wayne 12.4
Tintic Piute Daggett
10.2 10.2
Note: District average = 19.8; Charter school average = 22.1 Source: Utah State Board of Education
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Jessie Rabe
Jonathan White
Utah Economy
27
Utahns behind the wheel Total miles driven per driving-age population
14,500 United States
Utah
14,000
13,500
13,000
12,500
12,000
11,500
11,000
10,500
10,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Note: Driving age population aged 15 and above. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Federal Highway Administration and U.S. Census Bureau data
28
Utah Economy
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Jazzonomics Historical Player Salaries
Utah Jazz player salaries Annual and cumulative since 1985 $120
$1.40
$1.20
$100
$1.00 $80
$60 $0.60
Billions
Millions
$0.80
$40 $0.40 $20
$0.20
85‐86 86‐87 87‐88 88‐89 89‐90 90‐91 91‐92 92‐93 93‐94 94‐95 95‐96 96‐97 97‐98 98‐99 99‐00 00‐01 01‐02 02‐03 03‐04 04‐05 05‐06 06‐07 07‐08 08‐09 09‐10 10‐11 11‐12 12‐13 13‐14 14‐15 15‐16 16‐17 17‐18
$0
Annual Player Salaries
$0.00
Cumulative Player Salary
Source: Utah Jazz
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Economy
29
Land of opportunity Qualified opportunity zones in the West
Opportunity Zones Part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 Economically-distressed communities designated by the governor of each state for preferential tax treatment to spur new investment. Investors can defer capital gains until sale or exchange, through 2026 10% exclusion of deferred gains for investments held longer than 5 years 15% exclusion of deferred gains for investments held longer than 7 years 100% exclusion of deferred gains for investments held longer than 10 years
Opportunity Zones (format as c hec klis t bullet points )
Source: U.S. Department of Treasury Community P art of the T ax C uts and J obs ADevelopment c t of 2017 Financial Institutions Fund Opportunity Zones Resources and Internal Revenue Service Opportunity Zones Frequently Asked Questions E c onomic ally-dis tres s ed c ommunities des ignated by the G overnor of eac h s tate
30
for preferential tax treatment to s pur new inves tment Inves tors c an defer c apital gains until s ale or exc hange, through 2026 Economic Development Kemtments C. Gardner Policythan Institute 10% ex c lus ion of deferred gains for inves held longer 5 years 15% ex c lus ion of deferred gains for inves tments held longer than 7 years 100% exc lus ion of deferred gains for inves tments held longer than 10 years
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
How will Utah leverage opportunity zones? Qualified opportunity zones in Utah
CACHE
BOX ELDER
RICH
WEBER
WEBER DAVIS
MORGAN SUMMIT
DAGGETT
MORGAN
SALT LAKE TOOELE
DAVIS
WASATCH UINTAH
UTAH
DUCHESNE
JUAB
CARBON
SANPETE
MILLARD
EMERY
GRAND
TOOELE
SALT LAKE
SEVIER BEAVER
IRON
PIUTE
WAYNE
GARFIELD SAN JUAN
WASHINGTON
UTAH
KANE
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea,
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Economic Development
31
Look at us grow! High-growth company density Number of private businesses with at least $2 million in annual revenue reaching three years of 20 percent annual revenue growth, normalized by total business population
WA 87.9 OR 70.0
MT 26.2 ID 38.3 WY 12.9
CA 88.9
NV 45.3
UT 174.8
AZ 101.6
CO 96.9
NM 16.2
ND 39.9
MN 73.7
SD 42.0 NE 42.6 KS 61.9 OK 30.7
TX 82.8
AK 7.3
ME 28.7 WI 39.9
IA 32.7
NY 67.1
MI 57.3
IN IL 76.6 55.1
OH 85.1
PA 64.2
WV 31.7 VA KY 208.3 30.8 NC TN 69.9 71.2 AR SC 17.9 67.7 GA MS AL 19.7 66.0 124.5 LA 40.9
MO 47.4
V T 12.6 NH 67.2 MA 100.0 RI 19.2 C T 37.9 NJ 73.4 MD 102.8 DE 76.2
< 50.0 50.0 - 74.9 75.0 - 99.9
FL 77.0
HI 26.8
100.0 +
Source: Kauffman Foundation 2017 Kauffman Index of Growth Entrepreneurship State Trends
32
Economic Development
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Start me up Startup density Startups per 1,000 firm population
WA 81.5 OR 77.0
MT 68.5 ID 80.2 WY 70.9
CA 89.6
NV 108.4
CO 88.2
NM 65.2
SD 62.6
KS 64.8 OK 72.9
TX 90.9
AK 69.9
ME 62.8
MN 64.2
NE 61.7
UT 91.0
AZ 85.8
ND 84.7
HI 62.7
WI 59.1
IA 54.7 MO 95.5 AR 66.6
NY 83.3
MI 64.4
IN IL 69.1 61.6
PA 60.6
OH 57.4
WV 51.1 VA KY 73.7 76.3 NC TN 74.7 69.3 SC 73.3 GA MS AL 64.1 63.4 82.4
LA 64.8 FL 98.7
V T 58.0 NH 58.3 MA 66.9 RI 60.0 C T 58.9 NJ 76.1 MD 68.6 DE 77.0
< 70.0 70.0 - 79.9 80.0 - 89.9 90.0 +
Note: Startup businesses here are defined as firms less than one-year-old employing at least one person besides the owner. Source: Kauffman Foundation 2017 Kauffman Index of Startup Activity State Trends
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Economic Development
33
Rural economic development incentives time for an update? Where the state can help rural Utah Items identified in rural county economic development plans
18
11 Infrastructure
Incentive Update
8
7
7
Economic Development Capacity Building
Recruitment/ Investment
Regulation/ Policy
7
7
6
6
3
3
2
Inter-Government & Business Relationships
Transportation
Higher Education Funding & Alligning
Workforce Development
Housing Quality/ Affordability
State Job Relocation
Energy/ Natural Resources
Note: Circle size and number identify count of plans mentioning each item. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of rural county economic development plans submitted to the Utah Governorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office of Economic Development
34
Economic Development
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Some considerations... Economic Development Logic Model
Outcomes Intial/Baseline Conditions Economic Conditions/ Business Cycle (regional, national, global) Industry/Cluster Conditions, Competitiveness & Levels of Definition/ Development Existing Regional Networks & Innovation Ecosystems
Outputs
Capacity Outcomes (Shorter-term)
Inputs
(Program Activities)
Portfolio of Programs
Facilities & Equipment
Product, Production Processes, & Business Capacities
EDA Funding
Events, Networking & Referrals
Markets & Business Networks
Other Funding
R&D & Commercialization Support
Innovation, Technology Transfer, & Commercialization
Client/Participant Resources
Existing Workforce Skills & Knowledge
Financing Support
Financing & Investment
Mentoring, Coaching, & Training
Human Capital & Workforce
Planning & Institutional Development
Organizational Capacity
Realized Outcomes (Longer-term)
Regional-Level: • Establishment Growth/Survival • Job Growth • Earnings/Wage Growth • Revenue/Sales Growth • Opportunities/ Equity • Increased Share of Cluster Activity
Source: U.S. Economic Development Administration
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Economic Development
35
You miss 100% of the shots you donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t take Utah Jazz 3-point shots Attempts and makes
2,425
2,500 Attempts Makes
Quin Synder Coach
2,000
1,500
1,000
887
500
185 59 2018
2016
2014
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
1982
1980
0
Source: Basketballreference.com
36
Economic Development
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Can the cycle be broken? Vicious tax cycle
Tax Base Gets Narrower and Narrower
Increased Pressure for Exemptions and Deductions
Insufficient Tax Revenue
Pressure to Increase Taxes
Source: Utah Governorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office of Management and Budget
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Public Finance
37
Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s narrowing sales tax base Utah sales tax base as a percent of personal income
70%
67%
60%
50%
42% 40%
35%
30%
20%
2025
2020
2015
2010
2005
2000
1995
1990
1985
0%
1980
10%
Note: 2018 and beyond are forecasted. Source: Utah Governorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office of Management and Budget and Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
38
Public Finance
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
No more fiscal wiggle room... Composition of state funds for higher education in Utah
35%
31% 40%
34% 2006 66%
73%
77%
68%
62%
66%
40%
54%
58%
47%
35%
35% 2000 65%
60%
2005 65%
34% 1999 66%
28%
80%
39%
7% 1998 93%
14%
6% 1997 94%
100%
3%
Education Fund and General Fund contributions
Education Fund
2020 3% 97%
2019 4% 96%
2018 27%
2017 32%
2016 23%
2015 38%
2014 46%
2013 42%
2012 65%
2011 69%
2010 60%
2009 61%
2008 9%
2007 34%
2004 86%
2003 97%
2002 72%
0%
2001 53%
91%
20%
General Fund
Note: Fiscal years; 2019 and 2020 figures are based on Governor Herbert’s budget recommendations. Source: Utah Governor’s Office of Management and Budget
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Public Finance
39
Considerations for broadening the base Number of services, by category, subject to state sales and use taxes Maximum, median, and Utah counts WA 44
HI, DE 34
HI, WA NM, DE 20
Computer Services
Business Services
Personal Services
Utilities
1
Utah 0
4
Utah 5
8 6
0
Utah 0 Other Services
5
Utah 11
Utah 12
Utah 15
Fabrication, Repair & Installation
Utah 7
7
Utah 6
HI, WA NM, DE 9
Professional Services
10
HI, WA, NM, SD, TX 8
DE 19
HI, NM, WI 14
Admissions/ Amusements
Utah 8
WA, DE, SD, CT, TX, OH, PA 10 8
Online Services
HI, WA NM, AR 16
Note: Total services equal to maximum taxed in all categories but Admissions/Amusements (15 services) and Other Services (47 services); the most recent counts for AZ, LA, MD, MA, NM, and OK are from 2007; all other counts are from 2017. Source: Federation of Tax Administrators Sales Taxation of Services Survey; Medians calculated by Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
40
Public Finance
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s all relative Sales tax rates and total tax burden
Combined State and Local Sales Tax Rates
All State and Local Taxes as a Percent of Personal Income
WA 9.2%
WA 9.2% MT no sales tax
OR no sales tax
ID 6.0%
NV 8.1%
UT 6.8%
CA 8.6%
AZ 8.4%
MT 9.1% OR 10.2%
WY 5.4%
CO 7.5%
NM 7.8%
Combined State & Local Sales Tax Rates
NV 9.8% CA 11.1%
ID 9.1%
UT 9.3%
AZ 9.0%
WY 8.7%
CO 9.0%
NM 9.8%
All State and Local Taxes as a Percent of Personal Income
Note: Tax rates are as of 2018 and tax burden estimates as of 2015, the most recent comparable data available; severance tax collections are excluded from tax burden analysis. Source: Tax Foundation and Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Census Bureau Survey of State and Local Finances data and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Public Finance
41
Gaining efficiencies in state government State government employment per 1,000 population
8.9
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
6.6
Note: Excludes higher education. Source: Utah Governorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office of Management and Budget
42
Public Finance
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
State of Utah budget stress test State budget could withstand stagflation and moderate recessions; another Great Recession would be more challenging Hypothetical budget gaps vs. reserve availability as a percent of state fund appropriations Total: 57.3% Total: 50.9%
Year 5: 9.3%
2.7% Total: 39.4%
8.0% cumulative: 48.2%
Year 4: 13.1%
Year 5: 6.2% Year 4: 9.4%
19.0% Year 3: 14.7% cumulative: 40.2%
Year 3: 10.6%
Total: 12.5% Year 4: 3.0%
Year 2: 14.5%
Year 3: 6.7%
Year 2: 10.2% Year 1: 3.0% Value at Risk, Adverse Scenario
17.1% cumulative: 21.2%
Year 1: 5.6%
Year 2: 5.9%
4.1%
Value at Risk, Severely Adverse Scenario
Year 5: - 3.0% Value at Risk, Stagflation Scenario
Reserves
Year 1: - 0.2% Reserves Accessibility
Very Difficult
Difficult
Somewhat Difficult
Moderately Easy
Easy
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of Utah Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Public Finance
43
Pray for rain... Mountain statesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; average annual precipitation, 2013â&#x20AC;&#x201C;2017 Inches per year
Idaho
24.1
19.4
Montana
19.1
Colorado
Wyoming
17.4
14.8
New Mexico
Utah
13.8
11.9
Arizona
10.2
Nevada
Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
44
Energy and Environment
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
...but not all at once Frequency of floods and flash floods in Utah 120 Flash Floods Floods 100
80
60
40
20
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
0
Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Energy and Environment
45
Variation in water pricing Residential water bill for 30,000 gallons of water across the state Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
City/District Park City Cedar Hills Washington Terrace Pleasant Grove American Fork Coalville Kane County Draper Riverton Morgan Toquerville North Ogden Saratoga Springs Wellington Pleasant View Fruit Heights Kaysville Salem Alpine Kearns ID Ogden Bluffdale Farmington South Jordan Elk Ridge South Weber Syracuse Vernal Mapleton Price
$ $347.68 $172.76 $151.30 $143.46 $139.80 $130.00 $121.25 $119.50 $119.05 $119.00 $116.21 $115.85 $115.60 $110.33 $108.25 $105.10 $100.05 $98.50 $97.00 $96.55 $94.55 $93.00 $89.55 $88.50 $88.25 $87.10 $87.00 $85.90 $85.50 $84.42
Rank 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
City/District Wendover Gunnison Sandy West Bountiful West Jordan Midvale Area 3 Roosevelt Lindon South Salt Lake Elwood Magna Ivins Herriman Monticello Manila Richmond South Ogden Aurora Midvale Area 2 Fairview Hurricane Bountiful Mount Pleasant Centerville Santaquin Granger-Hunter ID North Salt Lake Woods Cross Washington Midvale Area 1
$ $84.32 $82.40 $80.94 $80.16 $79.37 $78.91 $78.00 $77.47 $77.25 $77.00 $76.87 $76.55 $76.19 $76.10 $75.25 $75.00 $74.87 $72.80 $72.55 $72.50 $70.00 $68.60 $67.50 $67.00 $66.38 $66.01 $64.70 $63.60 $63.17 $63.13
Rank 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
City/District Clinton West Point St. George Logan Taylorsville-Bennion ID La Verkin Vineyard Spanish Fork Sunset Provo - Summer Salt Lake City Mona Cedar City Blanding Payson Kanab Heber City North Logan Bona Vista Water Smithfield Orangeville Tremonton Highland Lehi Fillmore Francis Roy Milford Ephraim Ferron
$ $63.00 $62.35 $61.52 $61.50 $61.41 $61.30 $60.84 $59.20 $58.50 $58.49 $58.11 $58.00 $56.20 $56.10 $55.14 $55.00 $54.61 $54.21 $54.17 $53.40 $51.35 $51.25 $49.86 $48.95 $48.50 $47.50 $47.05 $47.00 $46.62 $46.25
Rank 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
City/District Panguitch Murray Perry Eagle Mountain Clearfield Delta Provo - Winter Springville Brigham City Huntington Orem Beaver Castle Dale Layton Nibley Tooele Wellsville Hyde Park Moab Riverdale Richfield Nephi Grantsville Lewiston Randolph Enoch Oakley Manti Hyrum
$ $46.09 $46.05 $44.50 $44.00 $43.29 $42.10 $41.39 $41.25 $40.96 $40.80 $40.46 $40.20 $40.00 $39.07 $39.00 $37.50 $36.50 $36.00 $36.00 $33.85 $33.50 $33.00 $31.10 $30.94 $30.00 $29.00 $29.00 $28.50 $25.60
Note: Base rates plus the incremental costs for each 1,000 gallons. Source: Utah Governorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office of Management and Budget
46
Energy and Environment
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Dry but thirsty Mountain statesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; domestic water consumption Gallons per capita per day
184
Idaho
169
Utah
156
Wyoming
145
Arizona
126
Nevada
123
Colorado
106
Montana
New Mexico
81
Source: USGS Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2015
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Energy and Environment
47
Top 20 for energy industry jobs Energy industry employment as a percent of total employment, 2017
WA MT 5.22%
OR 3.85%
ID WY 14.38% NV
CA 4.43%
ND 8.86%
AZ
CO 4.79%
NM 5.56%
MN WI
SD
NE UT 4.22%
ME
KS 4.81% OK 6.57%
TX 6.62%
PA
IA IL
OH
IN
MO
KY
WV 6.32% VA NC
TN AR MS
AK 6.74%
NY
MI 4.23%
AL 4.19%
V T 5.56% NH MA 4.31% RI CT NJ MD DE 4.19% DC
GA
SC 3.88%
LA 6.92% FL
HI
14.5%
3.5%
Source: U.S. Department of Energy
48
Energy and Environment
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Energy is one of our stateâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s many exports Utah energy production and consumption Gigawatt hours
50,000
Net generation Consumption
45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000
2018e
2016
2014
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
1982
1980
0
Note: e = estimate Source: Utah Geological Survey
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Energy and Environment
49
Solar gains momentum Renewable energy electricity generation in Utah, 2017 Percent of total electricity generation
10% 9%
Other Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Wind
8% 7%
Geothermal United States, Renewable Sources
6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0%
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration
50
Energy and Environment
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Best air quality is in the fall Salt Lake County average days per week in each air quality category November 2013 to October 2018 0.1
0.03 0.7
1.4
3.0
1.8
2.1 4.2 5.1
3.9
3.9
1.4
Winter (Dec-Feb)
Spring (Mar-May) Unhealthy
Summer (Jun-Aug) Moderate
Fall (Sep-Nov)
Good
Note: Unhealthy air days are characterized by high ozone levels in the summer and high levels of particulate matter in the winter. “Unhealthy” category includes the less severe “unhealthy for sensitive groups” category. Index is based on ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide content. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Energy and Environment
51
Utah 4th healthiest in the nation Health ranking
WA 9 OR 20
MT 22
ND 18
ID 14 WY 26
CA 17
NV 37
UT 4
AZ 31
MN 6
SD 24
KS 25 OK 43
NM 36
TX 34
AK 29
WI 21
IA 15
NE 13 CO 7
ME 23
MO 40 AR 48
NY 10
MI 35
IL 27
OH 39
IN 38 KY 42 TN 45
MS 50
AL 47
WV 46 VA 19 NC 33 SC 44 GA 41
LA 49 FL 32
HI 2
PA 28
VT 3 NH 8 MA 1 RI 11 CT 5 NJ 12 MD 16 DE 30
1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50
Source: United Health Foundation 2017 Americaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Health Rankings Annual Report
52
Health
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Another way to look at quality of life Life expectancy at birth by Utah small area, 2012â&#x20AC;&#x201C;2016 Rich & Cache Counties (except Logan) - 80.7 Ogden - Downtown 74.8 Farmington/ Centerville 83.1
Box Elder County (except Brigham City) - 80.5 Logan 81.8
Brigham City 75.4
Summit County 81.5
Tooele County 77.8
SLC Glendale 74.4
South Salt Lake 73.2
Daggett, Duchesne & Uintah Counties 77.5
Juab, Millard & Sanpete Counties 79.1
Carbon & Emery Counties 74.7
ProvoNorth/ BYU 82.7 Grand County 79.2
Sevier, Piute & Wayne Counties 77.8 Cedar City 78.5 St George 81.4
Avenues 84.1
Beaver, Garfield, Kane & Iron Counties (except Cedar City) 77.3
Foothill/ UofU 84.5
Red Bottom 4 areas with the shortest life expectancy Green Top 4 areas with the longest life expectancy 73.2 to 76.0 (Shortest Life)
San Juan County 79.1
Washington County (except St George) - 81.0
76.8 to 78.6 79.1 to 81.2
N
81.3 to 84.5 (Longest Life) County Boundary
Note: Life expectancy can be used to gauge the overall health of a community. Source: Utah Department of Health, Center for Health Data and Informatics
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Health
53
Variation in Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s uninsured rates pre-Medicaid expansion County uninsured rates, 2016 Percent of population aged 65 and younger without health insurance 6.5 - 8.1
Box Elder 8.4
Tooele 8.1
Cache Rich 9.3 10.2
Uintah 12.9
Carbon 9.4 Sanpete 12.7 Sevier 10.6 Piute 12.8
Iron 11.9
Washington 11.6
11.9 - 13.9
Wasatch Duchesne 9.5 13.7
Juab 10.2
Beaver 12
10.2 - 11.6
14.7 - 17.1 Weber 9.6 State Rate: 9.7 Morgan Davis 6.7 6.5 Daggett 9.7 Summit 20.5 Salt Lake 10.9
Utah 7.9
Millard 13.1
8.4 - 9.7
Grand 13.9
Emery 8.7
Wayne 13.6 Gar field 14.7
San Juan 17.1
Kane 8.6
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Census Bureau Small Area Health Insurance Estimates
54
Health
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Harder to keep up Average annual growth in Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s family income and health insurance costs, 2006-2016
Deductibles
Family Income
0.4%
Family Plan
3.9%
Individual Plan
6.4%
Premiums
Family Plan
2.4%
Individual Plan
1.7%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
Note: Income is median family income; premiums and deductibles represent average employee contributions and deductibles for private-sector employees enrolled in single and family coverage; data are inflation-adjusted (2016). Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Survey data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Health
55
Income and health, a strong correlation Percent of adult Utahns in fair or poor health by income, 2016
Percent of population
Income
27.7%
<$25,000
14.2%
$25,000 - $49,999
7.2%
$50,000 - $74,999
7.0%
$75,000 +
Note: Each square represents three percent of the adult population (age 18+) with fair of poor general health; data is age-adjusted. Source: Utah Department of Health Office of Public Health Assessment Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
56
Health
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Vaccination worries Percent of kindergarteners with an exemption from one or more vaccines 2016–17 school year
6.8%
7%
6%
5.1% 5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
MS WV AL LA IN NY CA DC KY DE RI VA MA TN AR MD IA KS NC TX NJ OK NE SC SD CT NM PA OH FL GA HI NH ND MI MT VT NV WA ME AZ UT WI ID OR AK
0.1%
Note: Non-medical exemptions in Utah rose from 3.6 percent in 2009–2010 to 4.9 percent in 2016–2017. Medical exemptions have remained stable at 0.2 percent. Sample designs vary by state. Medical and non-medical exemptions may not be mutually exclusive, and some children may have both exemptions. Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Health
57
Utah leads single-family housing recovery States with most growth in detached single-family home permits Since pre-recession peak in 2005 72%
Utah 68%
Texas 61%
Colorado 57%
Idaho
56%
Washington 49%
US Oregon
44%
Georgia
44% 40%
Florida California Arizona Nevada
37% 35% 34%
Note: Most recent data is for 2017. Source: U.S. Census Bureau
58
Real Estate and Construction
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Growth in Utah home values far outpacing income growth Ratio of the median value of owner-occupied housing units to median household income, 2017 United States = 3.5
WA 4.8 OR 5.3
MT 4.3
ND 3.1
ID 4.0 WY 3.5
CA 7.1
NV 4.5
UT 4.0
AZ 3.9
MN 3.3
SD 3.0
NM 3.7
KS 2.7 OK 2.7
TX 2.9
AK 3.7
WI 3.0
IA 2.5
NE 2.6 CO 5.0
ME 3.4
MO 2.9
IL 3.1
OH 2.7
IN 2.6
KY 2.9 TN 3.3
AR 2.8 LA 3.5
NY 4.8
MI 2.8
MS 2.8
AL 2.9
PA 3.1 WV 2.8 VA 3.8 NC 3.2 SC 3.2
GA 3.1
V T 3.9 NH 3.6 MA 5.0 RI 4.0 C T 3.7 NJ 4.2 MD 3.9 DE 4.0 DC 7.4
< 2.9 2.9 - 3.4 3.5 - 3.8 3.9 - 4.6
HI 7.9
FL 4.1
4.7 +
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Census Bureau 1-year American Community Survey data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Real Estate and Construction
59
Apartment boom in Salt Lake City Composition of building permits for residential units by housing type, 2000â&#x20AC;&#x201C;2017 Share of residential building permits 0% 14%
1%
1%
2% 8%
15%
19%
9% 13%
11%
59%
71%
74% 69%
75%
21% 14% Salt Lake City Apartments
Balance of Salt Lake Balance of Wasatch County Front Single-Family Detached
6%
9%
Ring Counties
Balance of the State
Condo/Townhome/Duplex
Other
Balance of Wasatch Front = Davis, Utah, and Weber counties; Ring counties = Juab, Morgan, Tooele, and Summit counties Note: Other includes group quarters, mobile homes, manufactured homes, cabins, accessory dwelling units, and any other dwelling unit type not covered by apartments, condominiums, townhomes, duplexes, or detached single-family homes; regions are mutually exclusive. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of Ivory-Boyer Construction Database data
60
Real Estate and Construction
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Retail dives, apartments soar Wasatch Front commerical real estate under construction by property type Percent of total stock 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0%
Apartment
Office
Industrial
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
0.0%
Retail
Note: 2018 as of the third quarter. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Insitute analysis of CoStar Group Inc. data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Real Estate and Construction
61
Double whammy of rising interest rates and home prices Utah median monthly mortgage payment and 30-year mortgage rates 8.14%
6.39% 4.86%
6.04% 5.85%
5.79% 3.59%
$1,225
$1,122
$1,081
$1,009
$1,034
$1,150
$1,425
$1,602
$1,539
$1,316
$1,191
$1,058
$1,014
$1,215
$1,272
$1,312
$1,373
$1,569
$1,929
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
3.66%
Monthly Payment
30-year Mortgage Rate
Note: Median monthly payment is based on median sales price for single-family homes. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of UtahRealEstate.com, Freddie Mac, and Mortgage Bankers Association data
62
Real Estate and Construction
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Utah mortgage debt among highest in nation Mortgage debt balance per capita, 2017 States with highest and lowest rankings
Top Ten
Bottom Ten
HI
$54,680
MI
$23,130
CA
$54,640
IN
$22,810
MD
$50,900
OH
$21,500
CO
$50,900
AL
$21,000
VA
$47,370
LA
$20,820
WA
$47,110
KY
$20,010
OK
$19,830
MA
$45,760
UT
$41,830
AR
CT
$41,790
WV
$15,240
AK
$41,580
MS
$15,230
$18,200
Note: Population is ages 18 years and older with an Equifax credit file; District of Columbia mortgage debt per capita = $62,080. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York State Level Household Debt Statistics 2003-2017
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Real Estate and Construction
63
Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s growth in mortgage debt burden second in nation Growth in mortgage debt balance per capita, 2016-2017 United States = 4.3%
WA 5.5% OR 5.0%
MT 4.1%
ND 4.5%
ID 5.4% WY 5.0%
CA 5.3%
NV 6.4%
UT 7.5%
AZ 6.9%
CO 8.2%
NM 1.2%
SD 4.3% NE 5.1% KS 3.9%
OK 5.7%
TX 5.3%
AK 1.6%
MN 2.5%
ME 1.5%
WI 1.3%
IA 2.3%
MI 3.6%
IN IL 1.5% 3.7%
OH 2.6%
NY 2.8% PA 2.8%
WV 2.6% VA KY 3.4% 3.1% NC TN 4.4% 6.5% AR SC 3.5% 4.8% GA MS AL 4.5% 3.4% 4.5% LA 4.4%
MO 2.9%
V T 1.7% NH 1.7% MA 4.2% RI 3.3% C T 1.3% NJ 2.8% MD 3.7% DE 3.8% DC 4.7%
< 2.0% 2.0% - 3.9% 4.0% - 4.9% 5.0% - 5.9%
HI 4.4%
FL 4.3%
6.0% +
Note: Population is ages 18 years and older with an Equifax credit file; District of Columbia mortgage debt per capita = $62,080. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York State Level Household Debt Statistics 2003-2017
64
Real Estate and Construction
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
What happens in Vegas happens elsewhere too Visitor spending as a percent of state GDP, 2017
WA 3.7% OR 5.4%
MT 9.6% ID 6.5% WY 9.0%
CA 5.0%
NV 26.6%
UT 5.4%
AZ 6.2%
ND 5.7% SD 5.7%
MN 4.2%
NE 4.2% CO 5.8%
NM 7.6%
KS 4.8% OK 4.3%
TX 4.4%
AK 5.5%
ME 6.7% WI 3.6%
IA 4.7%
MI 3.9%
IN IL 4.8% 3.3%
OH 3.1%
NY 5.0% PA 3.5%
WV 5.6% VA KY 5.0% 4.7% NC TN 4.6% 5.8% AR SC 5.8% 6.5% GA MS AL 6.0% 4.6% 5.3% LA 5.4%
MO 4.8%
V T 7.9% NH 5.2% MA 4.2% RI 3.6% C T 4.3% NJ 3.7% MD 4.4% DE 3.0%
< 4.0% 4.0% - 4.9% 5.0% - 6.9% 7.0% - 9.9%
HI 28.7%
FL 10.0%
10.0% +
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Travel Association and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Travel and Tourism
65
Travel and tourism drives over a third of all jobs in six counties Private leisure and hospitality sector jobs in Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s counties, 2017 Percent of total private employment and top ten for job growth
Growth in Private Leisure and Hospitality Employment, Top Ten Counties, 2013-2017 San Juan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30.7% Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26.6% Iron. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23.0% Grand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22.1% Wasatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.7% Box Elder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.4% Sanpete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.3% Millard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.1% Juab. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20.7% Davis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.8%
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of Utah Department of Workforce Services data
66
Travel and Tourism
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Tax exporting County Transient Room Tax revenue Annual change and top ten collectors
County Transient Room Tax Revenue, Top Ten Counties, FY 2017 ($ millions) Salt Lake. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18.3 Summit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$9.5 Washington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$7.1 Grand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$4.7 Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$3.4 Kane. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.5 Garfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1.9 Wasatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1.9 Davis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1.6 Weber. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1.6
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of Utah State Tax Commission data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Travel and Tourism
67
O Canada International visitor spending by country, 2016-2017 $ millions and year-over-year change
Canada
+9.9%
China
-0.5%
France
-0.2%
Germany
+4.0%
United Kingdom
-5.2%
Australia
+7.8%
Japan
+11.0%
South Korea
+13.2%
Brazil
+10.6%
Taiwan
+31.5% $0
$20
2016 2017
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
Source: Tourism Economics
68
Travel and Tourism
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s national parks: efficiency, understaffing, or both? Utah national park and monument indicators Jobs and visits 2,000
National Park Jobs National Park & Monument Visits
18
1,800
16
1,600
14
1,400
12
1,200
10
1,000
2018e
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
0
2007
0
2006
200
2005
2
2004
400
2003
4
2002
600
2001
6
2000
800
1999
8
National Park Jobs
Millions of Visitors
20
Note: e = estimate Source: National Park Services and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Travel and Tourism
69
Taking advantage of the greatest snow on earth Utah skier/snowboarder place of origin and stats
California 10% California 10%
Utah
Utah 37% 37%
International 7% International 7%
Texas5% 5% Texas All other All other statesstates 33% 33%
Florida Florida4% 4% New NewYork York4% 4%
Average age:
Average 40.3 yearsage: 40.3 years
Length ofLength stay: ofnights stay: 5.8
5.8 nights
Stay in Stay in commercial commercial lodging: 67%
Average First time Average lodging rate: visit toFirst time lodging rate: Utah: 33% visit to $431/night
lodging: 67%
$431/night
Utah: 33%
Source: RRC Associates
70
Travel and Tourism
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Utah natural increase continues descent Utah population components of change 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 (10,000)
Total Change
Natural Increase (births less deaths)
2018
2016
2014
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
1982
1980
(20,000)
Net Migration
Source: Utah Population Committee (2010-2018) and Utah Population Estimates Committee (2000-2009)
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Demographics
71
Oh mother, where art thou? Total fertility rate, 2017 Births per woman
WA 1.71 OR 1.56
MT 1.80 ID 2.01 WY 1.86
CA 1.69
NV 1.77
CO 1.63
NM 1.76
SD 2.23
KS 1.93 OK 1.90
TX 1.92
AK 2.02
ME 1.58
MN 1.87
NE 2.06
UT 2.12
AZ 1.79
ND 2.06
WI 1.79
IA 1.94 MO 1.81 AR 1.91
NY 1.65
MI 1.76
IN IL 1.73 1.87
OH 1.83
PA 1.69
WV 1.73 VA KY 1.75 1.90 NC TN 1.77 1.80 SC 1.73 GA MS AL 1.85 1.82 1.79
LA 1.88
V T 1.52 NH 1.51 MA 1.51 RI 1.51 C T 1.59 NJ 1.75 MD 1.75 DE 1.75 DC 1.42
<1.60 1.60 - 1.73 1.74 - 1.83 1.84 - 1.94
FL 1.71
HI 1.89
>1.94
Note: The total fertility rate is the expected number of births per woman based on the current schedule of age-specific birth rates. Source: National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics System Births: Final Data for 2017
72
Utah Demographics
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
South Dakotaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s fertility rate driven, in part, by teen births Birth rates by age of mother, 2017 Births per 1,000 women
147.5 140.3 125.5 121.4
100.3
98.0 87.7 81.8 71.0
50.9 52.5 52.3
22.6 15.2
18.8 10.4 11.9 11.6 0.9 0.9
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
South Dakota
Utah
35-39
40-44
45-49*
United States
*South Dakota does not meet standards of reliability; fewer than 20 births. Source: National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics System Births: Final Data for 2017
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Demographics
73
More new Utahns arriving from Asia than any other region Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s foreign born population Recent arrivals by region of birth 2.7% 2.9% 2.0% Entered 1990-2000
64.9%
16.5%
10.9%
2.7% 2.2% 4.6% Entered after 2000
62.9%
20.2%
7.4%
3.1% 3.3% 5.3% Entered after 2010
Asia
44.5%
Latin America
34.3%
Europe
Africa
Northern America
9.5%
Oceania
Note: 1990-2000 entrance from 2000 Census, through March 2000; 2000 and later entrance from 2007-2011 5-Year American Community Survey Estimates; 2010 and later entrance from 2012-2016 5-Year American Community Survey Estimates. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of U.S. Census Bureau 2000 Decennial Census and American Community Survey 2011 and 2016 5-Year Estimates
74
Utah Demographics
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s capital city population reaches a milestone; still shrinking in proportion to county Salt Lake City populaton 250,000
80.0%
Share of Salt Lake County
72.9%
Salt Lake City Population 70.0% 200,544
200,000
189,454
60.0%
50.0%
159,936
150,000
40.0% 100,000
30.0%
17.7% 20.0% 50,000 10.0%
0.0%
0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2017
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Division Estimates
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Demographics
75
Median-aged Utahns still canâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t run for president, getting closer Median age in Utah and the United States
40
38.1
United States Utah
31.0
30.1
30
28.1
25.1
22.9
23.1
20
19.2
10
0 1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2016
2017
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
76
Utah Demographics
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
From Leave it to Beaver to Modern Family Cumulative change in Utah persons per household since 1920 Persons per household was 4.5 in 1920, 3.1 at last census 1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
-1.2
-1.4 Householding Behavior Contribution
Population Age Composition Contribution
Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis of IPUMS USA: Version 8.0 data
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Demographics
77
Cities with the most- and least-engaged NBA fans.
Most engaged fans
Least engaged fans
Source: WalletHub ranking based on ticket prices, stadium accessibility, fan engagement, and NBA and NCAA team performance.
78
Utah Demographics
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a small world Utah Jazz Facebook followers by country Rank
Country
Followers
Rank
Country
Followers
1
USA
475,791
17
Spain
11,582
2
Philippines
475,570
18
Argentina
11,271
3
India
193,418
19
Greece
10,582
4
Nigeria
57,780
20
Venezuela
10,128
5
Brazil
56,186
21
Thailand
9,208
6
Mexico
51,362
22
Poland
8,213
7
Indonesia
40,491
23
UK
8,152
8
Australia
30,855
24
Colombia
8,077
9
Taiwan
30,836
25
Malaysia
8,032
10
France
30,405
26
Germany
7,437
11
Turkey
22,642
27
Serbia
6,660
12
Kenya
19,133
28
Chile
5,945
13
Italy
17,703
29
Portugal
5,872
14
Canada
14,944
30
Puerto Rico
5,775
15
Domican Republic
14,229
31
Peru
5,713
16
Mongolia
12,872
32
New Zealand
5,209
Source: Facebook
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Utah Demographics
79
Probability of making an informed decision
The whole point
Accurate data and information
80
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
Utah Informed: Visual Intellection for 2019
K E M C . G A R D N E R P O L I C Y I N S T I T U T E S TA F F A N D A D V I S O R S Leadership Team
Staff
Natalie Gochnour, Associate Dean and Director Jennifer Robinson, Associate Director Shelley Kruger, Accounting and Finance Manager Colleen Larson, Administrative Manager Dianne Meppen, Director of Survey Research Pamela S. Perlich, Director of Demographic Research Juliette Tennert, Director of Economic and Public Policy Research Nicholas Thiriot, Communications Director James A. Wood, Ivory-Boyer Senior Fellow
Samantha Ball, Research Associate Mallory Bateman, Research Analyst DJ Benway, Research Analyst Marin Christensen, Research Associate Mike Christensen, Scholar-in-Residence John C. Downen, Senior Managing Economist Dejan Eskic, Senior Research Analyst Emily Harris, Demographic Analyst Michael T. Hogue, Senior Research Statistician Mike Hollingshaus, Demographer Thomas Holst, Senior Energy Analyst Meredith King, Research Coordinator Jennifer Leaver, Research Analyst Angela J. Oh, Senior Managing Economist Levi Pace, Senior Research Economist Joshua Spolsdoff, Research Economist Paul Springer, Senior Graphic Designer Laura Summers, Senior Health Care Analyst Natalie Young, Research Analyst
Faculty Advisors Matt Burbank, Faculty Advisor Adam Meirowitz, Faculty Advisor
Senior Advisors Jonathan Ball, Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst Gary Cornia, Marriott School of Business Theresa Foxley, EDCUtah Dan Griffiths, Tanner LLC Roger Hendrix, Hendrix Consulting Joel Kotkin, Chapman University Darin Mellott, CBRE Chris Redgrave, Zions Bank Bud Scruggs, Cynosure Group Wesley Smith, Western Governors University
Partners in the Community
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Advisory Board
The following individuals and entities help support the research mission of the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute.
Conveners
Legacy Partners
Board
The Gardner Company Intermountain Healthcare Larry H. & Gail Miller Family Foundation Mountain America Credit Union Mitt and Ann Romney Salt Lake City Corporation Salt Lake County University of Utah Health Utah Governorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office of Economic Development Zions Bank
Scott Anderson, Co-Chair Gail Miller, Co-Chair Doug Anderson Deborah Bayle Cynthia A. Berg Roger Boyer Wilford Clyde Sophia M. DiCaro Cameron Diehl Lisa Eccles Spencer P. Eccles
Michael O. Leavitt Mitt Romney
Matt Eyring Kem C. Gardner Christian Gardner Natalie Gochnour Clark Ivory Ron Jibson Mike S. Leavitt Kimberly Gardner Martin Derek Miller Ann Millner Sterling Nielsen Cristina Ortega Jason Perry Taylor Randall Jill Remington Love Brad Rencher Josh Romney
Charles W. Sorenson James Lee Sorenson Vicki Varela Ruth V. Watkins Ted Wilson
Ex Officio (invited) Governor Gary Herbert Speaker Brad Wilson Senate President Stuart Adams Representative Brian King Senator Karen Mayne Mayor of Salt Lake County Mayor Jackie Biskupski
Executive Partners Mark and Karen Bouchard The Boyer Company Ivory Homes Salt Lake Chamber Sorenson Impact Center WCF Insurance
Sustaining Partners Clyde Companies Dominion Energy Staker Parson Companies
Salt Lake Chamber Board of Directors Steve Starks, Chair Linda Wardell, Vice Chair Kim Abrams Matt Baldwin Laura Bogusch Marc Cameron Wilford Clyde John Dahlstrom Spencer P. Eccles
Theresa Foxley Val Hale Kay Hall Gary Hoogeveen Clark D. Ivory Greg M. Johnson Pat Jones Fred P. Lampropoulos Brent Low
Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
I
Thomas S. Monson Center 411 E. South Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 801-585-5618 gardner.utah.edu
I
I
DAV I D E CC L E S S C H O O L O F B U S I N E S S UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
Dean W. Luikart Dr. Donna L. Milavetz Derek Miller Scott Parson Ray D. Pickup Gary B. Porter Craig Wagstaff