What is the role of print in the digital age? The ‘Digital age’ describes the current period of digitalised information, produced by a shift in use from analogue to digital technology. In this essay I will evaluate to what extent magazines may have been impacted by this technological innovation, and the role they therefore now play as a form of mass communication. I have particularly chosen to look at magazines, as I believe, due to their longstanding and unique relationship with readers, they have had perhaps one of the most interesting transformations within the context of print media. The death of print is a rumour that began with the emergence of digital technology, but most of all with the democratisation of the Internet. Fear was struck into the hearts of publishers as this new digital platform was much more effective in communicating with audiences, accessible anytime, anywhere and most importantly for free. In recent years prevalent titles, such as Giant Magazine or I.D Magazine, have either suspended their print editions or reduced their number of regular issues. Some in the print industry try to explain the decline as not as a direct result of the digital age, but a cause of other moving factors compromising their source of revenue. Mary Bemer (2013), president and chief executive officer at the MPA, highlights a key problem in the current magazine industry – which is that of a decline in advertising pages. She claims that print in no way will see decline as a consequence of decreased readership – evidencing numbers such as 91 per cent of adults, as well as 96 per cent of 18-24 year olds, all valuing print over digital. Within the current digital age, however, the amount of different avenues for advertising has caused ‘an advertiser perception problem’ (Bemer, 2013) as companies have lost sight of the advantages of magazines. Lukowitz (2015) produces a very logical approach to this evidence of decline arguing that it may be in light of other factors - like the economy forcing ‘consumers to forgo non-essential products’ (2015). He also argues that ‘if one magazine dies, its not the end of the industry’ (2015), making these claims of the death of print seem completely disproportionate to what is actually occurring. A compelling argument is also Lukowitz’ (2015) claim that we are simply moving into a ‘transcended infinite media age’ (2015). A period which, due to the large number of different platforms, mass media will no longer be controlled by a small number of large companies. In consequence, revenue will be spread across ‘the plethora of options available’ (Lukowitz, 2015) as audiences segment into their preferences for consuming information. It seems therefore that we may be seeing some cuts and closures within the print industry, but it would be hard to conclude that the print magazine is dying out, especially as a direct result of technological innovations. Magazines as a medium for mass communication have been embedded in society for many centuries, offering unique and appreciated opinions on such a wide range of topics – from lifestyle and food to fashion, films and music. Jeff Jarvis (2009), author of ‘What would Google Do?’, argues that unlike newspapers, news websites or programmes ‘magazines have a voice and in this era voice is values’ (Jarvis, 2009). Regardless as to whether magazine content is provided in print, digitally or otherwise, ‘if they continue to find readers across media they will survive’ (Jarvis, 2009). Bemer (2013) similarly claims that magazines will remain relevant as they provide a ‘brand you can understand and trust’ (Bemer, 2013) – which is something readers appreciate especially today, in the face of ‘a tsunami of content coming at the consumer’ (Bemer, 2013). Therefore it feels certain that magazines will remain permanent feature of our society; however this does not much comfort the survival of print as a medium, what will stop magazines simply all becoming digital? This seems a genuine concern when watching a YouTube video entitled ‘a Magazine is an Ipad that does not work’, showing a one year old moving from using a tablet to a magazine – the toddler starts trying to interact with the print magazine as if where a tablet, touching and swiping the surface. The argument is therefore that we are moving into a period when the younger generations have grown up with and used technology all their lives, and so to these ‘digital natives’ (Burrell, 2014) ‘magazines are now useless and impossible to understand’. Burrell (2014), however, offers a