Apple v. Motorola Mobility Patent Infringement Presented By:
http://www.premiumessays.net/
Introduction Apple v. Motorola mobility patent
infringement case refers to lawsuits series between the two technology giants. The case started at a time when there were intense patent cases. Samsung and Apple were suing one another in different continents. High Tech Computer Corp was also involved in a patent fight with Apple. http://www.premiumessays.net/
Apple v. Motorola mobility patent
infringement case started with claims. Patent infringement t encompassed several venues in different countries. The litigation fight also involved the rulings of the administrative law. This involved the European commission and United States International Trade commission involvement. http://www.premiumessays.net/
Motorola Mobility Motorola Mobility sued Apple for patent
infringement in October 2010. This complaint was about six patents of Motorola . The firm was seeking remedies from the court for the bar of the U.S imports. U.S imports infringed products and injunction. This would prohibit Apple from importing, distributing and marketing infringing products. http://www.premiumessays.net/
Case
Later, ITC instituted investigations and
Motorola dropped the patent claims for its six patents. Motorola filed two patent infringement complaints against Apple. The complaints were filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. They were also in U.S District Court for the Southern District of Florida. In the complaints, Motorola alleged that Apple had infringed its 18 patents. http://www.premiumessays.net/
Motorola dismissed its Illinois complaints in
November 2010 voluntarily. Later Apple filed counterclaims in the district court of Southern District of Florida. Apple alleged that Motorola has infringed its six patents. This was in the manufacture and sale of settop boxes, mobile devices as well as digital video recorders. Motorola filed a declaratory judgment complaint against NeXT Software Inc. . and Apple. http://www.premiumessays.net/
Motorola sought a ruling that it did not
infringe claim of the twelve NeXT and Apple patents. Apple asserted the twelve patents claims against Motorola. Motorola changed the venue from the Delaware court to Wisconsin. Patent assertions by the two parties were later moved to Northern District of Illinois. In the counter claims at Wisconsin, Apple alleged that Motorola had breached standards commitments. http://www.premiumessays.net/
Apple counter claims at Wisconsin Waiver. Equitable estoppels. Contract breach. Section 2 of Sherman Antitrust Act violation. Contract interference. Unfair competition.
http://www.premiumessays.net/
Apple was seeking declaration judgments. This was due to the terms of Motorola license that
involved standards-essential patents were discriminatory and unreasonable. Motorola had engaged in patent misuse. This did not have injunctive relief entitlement. The patent war between these technology giants did not end there. In April 2011, Motorola filed more patent infringement claims in Mannheim. It alleged that Apple Germany retail had infringed its three patents. Injunctions were granted. This was after the court found that some Apple products had infringed one non-essential and one standard-essential patent http://www.premiumessays.net/
For More Information About Apple v. Motorola Mobility Patent Infringement Visit:
http://www.essaysexperts.net/