feature
CCTNS: Connecting Police Rajinder Kumar Vij
There has been a paradigm shift in the fundamental concept of governance in the recent years. More emphasis is now being given to the citizen centric services. Automation levels have gained new heights. The service delivery channels have been gradually increasing. Though the private sector has taken a lead in leveraging the benefits of the Information and Communication Techniques (ICT), the governments have also been making sincere efforts to tap its potential by systematic transformation of its traditionally rigid and opaque style of functioning to a more accessible and transparent one. Even the oft criticised police, which perceives itself a victim of digital divide has acquired a better preparedness to reap the benefits of the ICT. The e-Cop application of Andhra Pradesh police and networking of all Police Stations (PS) using Virtual Private Network (VPN) by Karnataka police speaks volumes about the capability of the police to harness the potential of the ICT. It’s time to turn things around, do more with less by using these modern tools in every day policing; know more, in order to make better decisions as well as increase public confidence in police forces, and share information. Therefore, in order to modernise the police force and bring uniformity in dealing with its important functions, the ‘Crime & Criminals Tracking Network and Systems’ (CCTNS) project has been conceptualised by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Government of India (GoI) as a Mission Mode Project (MMP) under the National e-Governance Plan (NeGP). CCTNS- Scope The aim of CCTNS is to create a comprehensive and integrated system for effective and efficient policing at all levels through a nationwide network with a bottom-top approach in accordance
with the principles of e-Governance. The key objectives of the CCTNS project therefore include: • providing enhanced IT tools for investigation, crime prevention, law and order maintenance and other functions; • increasing operational efficiency by reducing manual and repetitive tasks; • better communication and automation at the back-end; • sharing crime and criminals’ databases across the country at state and central levels; • sharing intelligence on real-time basis, and • improving service delivery to the public and other stakeholders The Police Station (PS), a basic unit of policing, has been conceived as a core unit of the project. The First Information Report (FIR) shall now be written and saved in digital format. Evidence pertaining to the scene of crime could also be captured on a real time basis. This would solve the problem of alleged overwriting, cuttings and illegible handwriting to a large extent. Complainants would be able to keep track of their report without visiting the PS. The Chief of Police would be able to talk to a remote PS staff at will. Record-keeping would improve and mundane tasks of report making would be minimised. The project covers all PSs (approx. 14,000) and about 6,000 higher offices that come under the ambit of all states and union territories. However, the states that have already implemented similar schemes of their own, have the freedom of leveraging the CCTNS funds for improving their existing systems. The system components covered under the project include core application software (CAS) to be provided centrally by the National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB), hardware and communication
infrastructure including state-level Data Centres, capacity building & handholding and, digitisation of historical records of last 10 years through System Integrators. Roles and Responsibilities: To ensure proper and timely implementation of the project, NCRB has been designated as the central nodal agency. Besides defining the functional scope of CCTNS and providing specifications, it has been given additional responsibility to develop CAS. Nevertheless, the implementation model is in alignment with the NeGP guidelines of ‘centralised planning and decentralised implementation’. Accordingly, states have to play the lead role in implementing this project. In order for state governments to plan, implement and monitor CCTNS in their own states, they need to constitute appropriate governance structures that include committees like State Apex Committee, State Empowered Committee, State Mission Team and District Mission teams which are already in place. Simultaneously, states are required to select a State Project Management Consultant to advice the State Empowered Committee in preparing a Detailed Project Report, identifying a System Integrator and developing the functional specifications for the enhancement of CCTNS applications not covered by NCRB. Similarly, in order to monitor the progress of CCTNS at the state level and support the state governance structures, states need to engage a State Program Management Unit. The role of SI is unique for the project which would act as single point of contact and accountability for the implementation and performance of CCTNS. It is required to customise and implement the core application provided by NCRB, develop additional functionalities, procure hardware and communication egov
March 2010
21