Portfolio

ENRIQUE LÓPEZ OROPEZA Architect, Designer & Filmmaker

ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO Selected Projects 2012-2020

ENRIQUE LÓPEZ OROPEZA Master of Science in Architectural Design

Hola! Thank you for stopping

by to check my portfolio of projects.

I’m a master graduate architect from Politecnico di Milano.

Currently I’m looking for a position in a studio that allows me work with a variety of techniques and with a passionate team that looks to move forward in the practice of architecture. I’m hardworking and passionate in every project I involved with. I also appreciate working in team as I’ve found is the best way to share knowledge and ideas.

I’ve been involved in a great number of study trips and workshops where I’ve had the privilege of been under the tutelage of incredibly skilled and knowledgeable professors that have helped me to gain proper sense of criticism and perspective in the design process.

I’ve chosen selected projects that I believe show my skill in every level of architectural design, ranging from interior all the way to urban.

As showed in my Work Experience section, you’ll notice that I have been able to practice in diverse studios and offices that have given me a sense of reality and purpose as an architect.

I strongly suggest to review my Personal Works since it presents other practices that in my opinion are linked directly with the profession.

There you’ll see some of the films, publications and drawings that I’ve worked on during this past years.

I hope you enjoy the projects I’m incluiding in this portfolio. If you need more info about any of them don’t hesitate to contact me as I’m looking forward to hear from you.

ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO Selected Projects 2012-2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

01. PERSONAL INFORMATION Curriculum Vitae

02. ACADEMIC WORK Urban Factory A rethinking of Monterrey’s Industrial downtown

Politeama: Open Plaza The transition of an old theater to an open, public space.

Churrascaria Grill House Interior design of a restaurant in Rio de Janeiro

03. PROFESSIONAL WORK Boutique Avril Montparnasse Arkose Andromede Ilot 46 Hostaria Urbana 12 Rue Charles de Gaulle, Alfortville Barilla’s Pavilion Bois D’Arcy Apartments Water & Earth Museums Casa A+E Design Ursus & Fafnir Designing Labs Ephemeral Music Festival

04. PERSONAL WORK Publications & Films Drawings & Sketches Visualizations

ENRIQUE LÓPEZ OROPEZA Birthplace: Guaymas, Mexico.

January 11th, 1991

CONTACT e-mail: enrique.lo.oro@gmail.com Phone: +33 0 618 777 296

behance.net/enriquelo /in/enriquelo

ACADEMIC FORMATION 2017

-Master Degree: Architectural design

2016

-Exchange Program: Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, UFRJ

2013

-Bachelor Degree: Architecture

Politecnico di Milano, Italy.

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Tec de Monterrey, Mexico.

-Workshop: Cátedra Legorreta-Tagliabúe Monterrey, Mexico.

2012

-Diploma: Portrait of a City, MARCO Museum

2011

-Workshop: International workshop of architecture

Monterrey, Mexico.

Barcelona, Spain.

WORK EXPERIENCE 2020

-Atelier du Pont:

2019

-MU Architecture:

2018

-AND Studio:

Interior design.

Revit architect.

Architectural design.

2016

-Atelier Forte:

2015

-Roma 212:

Conceptual design & representation.

Architectural design.

-WRKSHP: Architectural design.

2014

-Analitek:

2013

-Alejandro Miyar Arquitectos:

Project design, planning & pricing.

Architectural design & construction supervising.

EXTRA ACTIVITIES 2016 2013

-Walk N’ Roll: Documentary (76 min) Director, producer & writer.

-The Bubble: Documentary (28 min) Director & producer.

-EFECTO: Monthly magazine

2012

Column writer.

-ACCME: Monterrey Film society President.

-Sie7e: Film congress Logistics.

SKILLS, TALENTS & LANGUAGES AutoCAD Sketchup Revit Rhino 3D Max Photoshop Ilustrator Blender InDesign Keyshot Premiere

Comunication Leadership Organization

Team work

Work

Perspective

English Spanish Italian

Producer

Hobbies

Director

Traveling Sports

French Portuguese

Film & Photography

2

PERSONAL INFORMATION

ACADEMIC WORK

PROFESSIONAL WORK PERSONAL WORK

3

02. Academic Work - Fourth Year Bachelor

URBAN FACTORY A Rethinking of Monterrey’s Industrial Downtown

Tecnológico de Monterrey - 2012 Competition-Finalist project 28

URBAN FACTORY Top 5 Finalist Project Monterrey, Mexico.

Monterrey is a city that thrives by its industry, a characteristic that dates back to almost 100 years ago. It’s a city that after its colonial and traditional style of architecture turned towards the american suburb and began to expand in area tremendously.

Consequently, the city center began to be less and less attractive to investors and even the government which is gradually it decayed into one of the most insecure areas in the city.

To this, it’s also important to remark that the Monterrey is the city with the most number of cars per person in latinamerica which complicates even more the mobility to any area of the city.

An open competition was open in Monterrey by the National Architecture Academy in order to reorganize the way its downtown works. This competition was open to every university in town with the purpose of brainstorming in the subject of how to solve this problem which has also replicated in other zones of not only the metropolitan area but also other cities in the country.

The project was developed and explained in a series of points that could help to organically both understand the problem and take it as a natural starting point for the improvement of such historical site.

TOP: Historical photographs MIDDLE: Proposed volumetry BOTTOM: Current site moodboard

5

1. Localization and connection The first step is to began the study of not only Monterrey but also its whole metropolitan area in order to find out nodes that exist but also those that could be developed in the future; as well as the lines used for transport and connection.

2. Distances and methods The next step was to approach closer to the actual site but first to focus on different layers of distances. The time and experience required by bus, bicycle and walking are quite different between them however that doesn’t mean they can’t complement each other.

6

URBAN FACTORY Top 5 Finalist Project Monterrey, Mexico.

3. Forgotten buildings As this is such a historical site, there’s a great number of buildings with great historical significance yet for some of the reasons listed above it fell into decadence. Those were listed and identified in order to protect them.

4. Statistics Research led to some hard data bout the existing site that helped to understand the characteristics and needs of the users in the site.

5. Industries & Factories As mentioned before, Monterrey is an industrial city. And this site includes some of the oldest factories that at some point used to be the thriving force of its society. Even more than the rest of the historical buildings, these factories are the heart of the area and therefore the project.

7

Master Plan The project takes advantage of the square blocks that is so predominant in the site and uses it as an opportunity for playing against the typical expectations one might encounter with such regularity. Open spaces, change in density and green corridors become the main characteristics that define the new area.

Those building in a darker shade of blue represent the increase in density and height. Most of the increase can be seen in the constructions near the main streets as a way to also incorporate commerce in the ground floor and living in the rest so that there’s movement at any time in the day.

The circles mark the industries and factories that as they used to work before are now the heart that define where to put certain uses. The main open and green areas for example can now be found as an extension to the industries and work as a backyard of different activities.

The new distribution of users and transportation per street is found in the sections where the priority is given to pedestrians and bicycles.

With the increased height of some buildings now it’s also possible to notice how the elevated metro line is no longer as prominent.

RIGHT: Density in section BOTTOM: Mobility in section

32

URBAN FACTORY Top 5 Finalist Project Monterrey, Mexico.

Actual site vs proposed density comparision

10

PERSONAL INFORMATION

ACADEMIC WORK

PROFESSIONAL WORK PERSONAL WORK

11

02. Academic Work - First Year Master

A SYMPHONY OF SPACES The transition of an old theater to an open, public space.

Politecnico di Milano - 2016 Prof. Arch. Ing. Cristina Palini

12

A SYMPHONY OF SPACES Como lake. Italy.

Como is one of the main tourism cities in the north of Italy. Right in the heart of the city there’s an abandoned neoclassical theater with a most interesting history just as the city where it’s located itself.

Politeama started as a classical opera theater since it was built at the beginning of the XX century. It worked fine by a couple of decades however another theater in Como, the Teatro Sociale gradually became the official gathering place for the arts so Politeama had to reconsider its original purpose.

In order to still survive it changed it’s main function to that of a film theater with occasional plays and operas though in a much smaller scale than when it opened its doors. It was until the first years of this century when it officially closed and it has not been used since.

Tourism however has been increasing every decade and the value of every building and land here is treasured. In that, and in many other senses, it’s a shame that such a building and in such location has no purpose. That’s where this master degree project comes in and the idea is given to turn it into something that works in many levels: a community center.

13

TOP: Manifesto (Link to booklet) MIDDLE: Site analysis BOTTOM: Section model

“Bringing down walls� is a moto used for this project in the sense that the experiment was made about what happens once the spaces are opened.

A community center should have a wide variety of options as to what kind of activities can be performed in it. So, the plaza in front of the existing building is taken as a reference of why open spaces can keep working and hosting people as to the existing building which is completely closed to anyone.

The main concept lies in having a sequence of semi-open spaces, each one with different height, materials and therefore functions to be hosted in them. The heart of this plazas is the one where the main seating hall used to be but now the seats are optional so that they do not interfere with whatever the users use it for.

The first encounter with an open space from the original facade is that of the plaza in front of it though now the flooring is treated so that they both become part of the same. The last plaza is a double court with two different levels hosts two different functions. The ground level one is meant to be used by the school users in the first levels. The high ground one though is part of the art gallery existing in that floor.

14

A SYMPHONY OF SPACES Como lake. Italy.

Here a vertical block of transportation is found twice each one with stairs and elevator. The stairs count with a very special way of experience them since you can literally see through them since they are made out of opaque glass.

23

Called the climax not only because of its existing qualities but also because is from here that the first communication and contact with the new area is made. Now the previous stage is being literally brought down and being accessible to people.

A hug void is designed right in the middle of the courtyard in a sense remembering buildings as the Pantheon or the climax of this building itself where the importance of natural light is regarded as essential.

TOP: “Coda” section MIDDLE: “Climax” section BOTTOM: “Preludio” section

24

A SYMPHONY OF SPACES Como lake. Italy.

Main hall view (Climax)

18

A SYMPHONY OF SPACES Como lake. Italy.

The most striking new part of the project is that of the new volume in the back of the building . It’s purpose is to help the theater no longer having the treatment of a back and a front. This new part is where the materials and the form are meant to contrast with the existing building.

This new face has a direct relation with the original language of the building though. For its design the visual vertical proportion was taken as a starting point and from there an experimentation excercise was made in order to slim it down and give a sensation of lightness.

Metallic new facade TOP: Facade composition BOTTOM: Model

U-glass panel Existing facade

19

TOP: Facade design logic BOTTOM: Construction detail

28

A SYMPHONY OF SPACES Como lake. Italy.

Preludio interior view

Back entrance & open plaza (Coda)

22

PERSONAL INFORMATION

ACADEMIC WORK

PROFESSIONAL WORK PERSONAL WORK

23

02. Academic Work - Second Year Master

CHURRASCARIA GRILL HOUSE Interior design of a restaurant in Rio de janeiro

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - 2017 Prof. Arch. Marina Lage

24

CHURRASCARIA GRILL HOUSE Interior Design of a Restaurant

The project consist in taking an existing building in the bohemian heart of Rio de Janeiro and propose an upper class grill house restaurant that is not easily found in the area.

The only limitations reside in those presented in the Brazilian rules for restoration which look to protect the heritage of historical constructions.

The main proposed concept for the interior design lies in having a main wall that separates the public from the services, Using it both as a decorative and a structural element. A correlation with a tree is made with its symbolic and formal characteristics: a heavy base that grows both vertically and horizontally. Therefore the main material chosen is wood, combined with neutral colored-concrete and painting in order to not loose focus of what’s important.

Another source of inspiration is that of a library in the sense of the cathedral-like qualities that can invoke in several examples where the furniture showing and storing the books create a sense of verticality and warmness.

In that way, this project also plays with the question “where does architecture ends and industrial design begins and viceversa?�

TOP: Proposed facade modification MIDDLE: Moodboard BOTTOM: Concept diagram

25

Main separating wall

Service levels

Client levels

TOP: Ground floor plan MIDDLE: 1st floor plan BOTTOM: 2nd floor plan

26

CHURRASCARIA GRILL HOUSE Interior Design of a Restaurant

27

RIGHT: Sections LEFT: Wall/Structure pieces

RIGHT: 2nd floor perspective LEFT: Wall detail

28

CHURRASCARIA GRILL HOUSE Interior Design of a Restaurant

Ground floor view

30

PERSONAL INFORMATION ACADEMIC WORK

PROFESSIONAL WORK Boutique Avril Montparnasse Arkose Andromede Ilot 46 Hostaria Urbana 12 Rue Charles de Gaulle Barilla’s Pavilion Bois D’Arcy Apartments Water & Earth Museums Casa A+E Design Ursus & Fafnir Designing Labs Ephemeral Music Festival

PERSONAL WORK

31

03. Work Experience - 2013-2020

PROFESSIONAL WORK Selected Works

36

BOUTIQUE AVRIL Montparnasse Interior and furniture design for a store in on of the busiest spots in Paris.

This project needed to follow strict rules about the feeling and brand identity of Avril, a high end cosmetic company in Paris. With other stores in diverse areas of the city it was encharged to design the new one in Montparnasse station, one of the busiest spots in town.

The project consists in the interior design and arrangement of furniture as well as the detailed design of them. The main concept lies in the contrast between materials bringing out the delicate aspects of them.

The store can be visited in Gare Montparnasse, 17 Boulevard de Vaugirard Level - 1

In Collaboration with Clemence Giai @ Atelier du Pont

TOP RIGHT: Built facade TOP/MIDDLE: 3D Perspectives BOTTOM/MIDDLE: Furniture detail BOTTOM/RIGHT: Built interior BOTTOM/LEFT: Built furniture

33

ARKOSE Pont de Sèvres Interior and furniture design for an indoor climbing sport complex.

Arkose is an indoor climbing company a great number of complexes throughout France. With a new opening in one of Paris neighboord cities, Boulogne Billancourt, there was a need of proposing a new concept.

Excluding the climbing areas, the task was to propose the specific interior design of the bar, restaurant, store, chill area and dressing rooms. The main concept was to use a moodboard based on the aesthetics of Wes Anderson films, specifically “Moonrise Kingdom”.

In Collaboration with Clemence Giai & Zoe Laubeuf @ Atelier du Pont

Shop and entrance Section

Entrance and Bar Section

TOP RIGHT: 3D perspective MIDDLE RIGHT: Main Plan BOTTOM/RIGHT: Sections BOTTOM LEFT: Moodboard

Restaurant Section

Dressing rooms Section

ARKOSE Pont de Sèvres Interior and furniture design for an indoor climbing sport complex.

Shop perspective

36

+151.06

+153.83

1.34

2.62

+151.06

+156.79

1.34

1.40

1.40

144.37

5.54

5.44

Accès Hall D

5.44

+156.79

+158.29

3.28

1.28

0.65

Closion démontable

1.1%

Closion démontable

0.05

0.3%

1.28

144.35

Accès Local OM

+145.52

+158.29

+153.83

+156.79

10%

15%

10%

10%

0.93

ECOQUARTIER ANDROMEDE - LOT46 CONSTRUCTION DE 71 LOGEMENTS

0.72

1.50

0.89

1.03

1.03

0.87

0.80

0.49

EP

0.36

0.36

0.49

EP

V.R.

4.00

V.R.

V.R.

4.01

2.93

3.10

1.33

ETEL

3.11

1.41

2.18

14.10

750 x510

3.35

2.93

750 x510

6.07

EP

5.35

5.35

4.20

3.55

3.55

3.55

3.78

V.R.

V.R.

V.R.

V.R.

V.R.

V.R.

2.50

2.50

0.36

2.50

2.50

V.R.

V.R.

2.50

EP

2.87

0.20

4.10

3.84

1.00

0.90

5.6%

2.83

0.7%

5.25

5.70

5.61

0.7%

0.7%

0.7%

V.R. V.R. V.R.

2.62 2.62 2.62

3.27 4.04 3.27 3.27

0.65 0.65 0.36

0.65

0.81

0.05 V.R.

0.80 0.80

1.00 0.70 1.00

0.80 0.80 0.80

EP EP 2.67

EP

11.60 4.26 V.R.

11.60 4.26

1.60 0.70 1.60 3.84

4.26

1.60

3.87

0.05

0.05 0.90 810 x600

2.65 0.91 810 x600

1.86

810 x600

0.86 0.91

EP 3.87

0.05

0.65 4.57 6.56 0.65 0.73 0.65

12%

037_ANDROMEDE

10%

10%

0.36

V.R.

144.34

Accès Vélo

+156.79

3.65

144.31

Accès Transfo

2.93

144.28

Entrée Parking

2.18

144.27

Entrée Voiture

0.70

144.22

+154.13

ETEL

144.20

69%

69%

Groupement Villa 04

96%

144.13

Accès parking

144.11

Accès cour

144.13

Accès parking

+154.13

144.32

Accès Hall A

2.0%

144.17

96%

3.55

96%

144.26

N33 - T3 - 69.82m²

144.13

20%

Accès Vélo

750 x510

144.13

Accès Venelle

2.0%

96%

37%

144.16

69%

N01 - T3 - 69.75m²

69%

+154.13

3.11

96%

69%

144.26

37%

N32 - T4 - 85.20m²

144.13

144.10

Groupement Villa 01

144.00

96%

HSP= 2.77m

1.41

144.08

96%

69%

37%

144.06

144.26

N31 - T3 - 70.91m²

40%

37%

144.16

N02- T4 - 84.59m²

96%

144.29

Accès Local OM

0.80

EP

69%

144.26

40%

N30 - T4 - 83.36m²

144.06

144.00

144.16

69%

N03- T3 - 69.73m²

69%

V.R.

69%

144.15

N29 - T4 - 83.76m²

143.92

144.05

N04- T4 - 86.05m²

40%

6.73

96%

144.21

Closion démontable

144.04

96%

37%

40%

96%

3.55

144.00

96%

EP

143.95

1.81

96%

0

Accès Venelle

4.00

96%

Rue de la Tramontane

5.47

96%

144.15

0.20

37%

N28 - T3 - 71.48m²

143.95

143.92

144.05

N05 - T4 - 85.24m²

96%

144.18

Accès Local OM

0.05

143.97

69%

1.00

1.00

0.90

2.0%

144.16

0.65

69%

144.15

N27 - T4 - 83.87m²

20%

143.89

143.84

0.20

143.98

144.09

2.63

69%

Groupement Villa 03 143.93

69%

5.25

144.00

N26 - T5 - 94.26m²

143.76

20%

0.90

143.98

144.06

Cotraitants :

MU

Dessiné par :

PLAN MASSE

MODIFICATIONS

1/150

Echelle :

0.36

143.90

96%

144.00

N25 - T3 - 69.27m²

0.7%

143.86

96%

144.00

N24 - T3 - 71.04m²

40%

5.70

143.82

5.47

5.46

143.76

37%

143.88

N06 - T4 - 83.04m²

2.0%

1.00

3.79

96%

144.00

N23 - T4 - 83.63m²

20%

40%

143.76

37%

143.88

N07 - T3 - 70.91m²

69%

96%

144.01

2.50

96%

37%

143.82

40%

5.71

143.80

N08 - T4 - 84.62 m²

69%

96%

143.92

Accès Venelle

V.R.

143.84

69%

37%

143.77

40%

143.80

N09 - T3 - 71.48 m²

69%

5.25

0.20

1.00

V.R.

69%

143.90

N22 - T5 - 94.37m²

143.70

143.70

143.76

EE'

143.80

N10 - T4 - 83.76 m²

69%

96%

143.84

EP

96%

143.90

N21 - T3 - 71.46m²

40%

4.04

143.79

96%

40%

143.64

143.59

Groupement Villa 02

143.59

37%

143.84 96%

96%

143.79

0.49

69%

143.90

N20 - T4 - 87.73m²

143.64

143.54

37%

DD'

143.63

N11 - T5 - 94.98 m²

96%

143.73

1.03

143.75

69%

143.87

N19 - T3 - 68.56m²

37%

40%

143.58

69%

N12 - T3 - 71.49 m²

69%

AA'

EE'

1.28

37%

143.55

143.54

40%

143.58

N13 - T3 - 71.43m²

69%

96%

143.69

2.0%

143.55

BB'

143.58

69%

96%

143.63

DATE

26/06/2019

PRO

1.40

0.90 0.05

3.24 0.05 N18 - T6 - 106.44m²

143.41

143.44

V.R.

N14 - T4 - 84.77m²

96%

DD'

Maitrise d'ouvrage :

93 rue edmond rostand, 31200 toulouse T. +33.5.61.61.61.61.

Saint - Agne Immobilier

Qualiconsult

Bureau de Contrôle :

10%

37 rue du Docteur Héron - 37000 Tours 43, rue Beaubourg - 75003 Paris T. +33.2.47.39.37.07.

F. +33.2.53.66.97.64. contact@mu-a.fr

Mu Architecture

Phase :

1.34

7.85 3.24

2.59 0.92 2.59

96%

3.50

37%

20%

143.48

N15 - T3 - 68.18m²

69%

11.60

6.56

EP

3.24

2.50 2.59

0.05 96%

1.8%

143.41

37%

143.44

CC' N16 - T6 - 106.53m²

69%

96%

143.55

EP

0.36

0.87 0.36

V.R.

0.05 143.55

V.R.

0.36 V.R.

N17 - T6 - 106.41m²

V.R.

96%

96%

143.51

5.35

0.36 2.50 143.51

Accès Local OM

143.49

0.36

1.58 96%

96%

-

-

BB'143.48

0.36

143.35

1.8%

143.42

Rue de l'Autan

5.52

Architecte Mandataire :

JPM Coordination

CSPS :

INDICE

A

037_AND

N° de la feuille :

Plan_00

Rue du Mid i

2.82

4.15

0.36

1.18

0.05

2.20

1.40

0.49

0.18

1.03

2.07

1.40

1.86

5.54

2.64

Entrée 3.07m²

3.11

31.62

1.40

0.20

4.15

143.84

143.69

40%

40%

0.36

V.R.

Ch.1 11.21m²

V.R.

143.98

143.88

19%

Code Affaire :

EE'

5.36

143.79

Accès Hall B

143.73

0.24

0.66

1.40

2.09

1.03

0.18

144.66

0.36

1.20

0.05

2.18

0.36

0.36

2.18

40%

47%

Placard démontable

Placard démontable

Placard démontable

Ch.1 11.23m²

Ch.1 11.23m²

V.R.

10%

1.20

2.20

HSP=3.55m

143.

2.0%

143.80

143.80

Entrée 3.18m²

0.60

0.63

0.32

0.90

0.37

0.70

1.50

143.88

1.20

2.32

2.32

1.55

1.44

16%

Soffite

Entrée 3.17m²

0.70

1.48

1.62

HSP=3.55m

Entrée 4.21m²

HSP=3.55m

0.20

2.32

Soffite

ETEL

Entrée 4.22m²

4.00

2.39

0.20

1.44

0.05

SdE 5.60m²

450 x600

SdE 5.69m²

1.1%

0.63

0.60

0.90

SdE 3.83m²

SdE 5.79m²

1.5%

19%

SdE 3.83m²

0.20

Séjour Cuisine 28.69m²

0.20

1.55

N06 - T4 - 83.04m²

1.65

Séjour Cuisine 29.89m²

N07 - T3 - 70.91m²

0.3

0.36

HSP= 2.77m

6.39

0.34

HSP= 2.77m

0.05

2.31

4.16

2.37

0.20

2.32

1.60

0.05

1.44

Séjour Cuisine 29.45m²

Local Vélo

Local OM

ETEL

ETEL

1.4%

0.45

2.37

1.81

1.00

2.81 1.20

AA'

CC'

CLÔTURES

Moucharabieh en brique de beton blanc type Blaston (1.20) Grillage simple torsion blanc sur poteaux metallique blanc (1.20)

19%

6.53

1.6%

2.0%

0.20

EP

EP EP

EP EP

143.88

1%

1.00

0.24

2.37

0.42

5.12

143.80

143.80

143.80

5.82

37%

37%

2.0%

1.10

6.48

0.20

143.88

2.37

1.78

1.00

1.48

2.37

0.24

12%

EP

37%

37% EP

19.04

4.15

Par vue metal déployé blanc sur structure metallique blanc (1.80)

EE'

N08 - T4 - 84.62 m²

N09 - T3 - 71.48 m²

0.0%

N10 - T4 - 83.76 m²

37%

37%

450 x600

143.80

0.05

1.20

0.36

143.36

Massif arbustif libre Pelouse semée Béton alvéolaire enherbé

5.75

Séjour Cuisine 31.11m²

Séjour Cuisine 30.29m²

4.15

2.81

Platelage bois des terrasses privatives et lisse de finition en bois Terrasse privative: dalle béton sur plots Toiture en zinc Terrasses potagères Enrobé noir clouté Béton balaté gris

Gravier sur terrasses - zone technique Paneaux solaires

EP EP

5.55

19%

1.0%

6.73

0.20

2.37

4.00

0.36

1.20

TOP LEFT: Material & form references TOP RIGHT: Perspectives BOTTOM/MIDDLE: Master Plan BOTTOM/RIGHT: Villa RDC & R+1

1.40

1.21

37

Accés voiture Accés pietons

143.80

1.50

5.75

0.8%

143.88

1%

143.80

1.50

1.50

2.60

37%

37%

0.15

0.20

143.80

1.50

1.50

2.0%

2.60 37%

37%

2.60

0.20

1.1%

143.76

0.36 0.99 0.05

0.36 0.99 0.05

143.88

2.60

5.40

0.20

6.37

HSP= 2.77m

0.36

143.80

143.80

0.0%

143.80

19%

0.3%

143.80

143.80

2.0%

0.20

2.60

0.15

0.20

2.0%

2.0%

143.76 37% 37%

143.76 143.76

1.00

3.01

1.00

1.78

2.37

0.43

1.55

1.40 1.20

0.99 2.53 2.16

1.20 1.40 1.56 3.5% 37% 37%

1.16 1.40 1.59 12%

0.0%

12%

2.39 3.43 0.36 2.39 0.05 0.99

4.15 4.15

Ch.2 11.25m² 1.0%

Ch.2 11.23m²

Ch.2 11.23m²

1.6%

5.36

0.36 0.36

0.9%

0.66 1.40 1.79

1.40 0.11

8.18 600 x600

1.18

Dgt. 4.73m² 0.14 1.40 1.91 1.40 0.76

Dgt. 4.76m² 3.24 2.11 19% 3.5%

Dgt. 4.76m²

2.0%

4.1% 19%

SdB 4.05m² SdB 5.63m² 2.53 0.99

V.R. V.R.

0.99 2.53

600 x600

SdB 4.05m² Ch.1 14.29m²

1.1%

SdB 4.05m²

WC 1.67m²

1.3%

WC 1.65m² 1.83

Espace dressing 1.02m² 12%

SdB 5.71m² Ch.1 13.45m² 0.36 0.99 0.05 1.83 0.20 3.24 0.05 0.92 0.06 1.13

WC 1.67m²

0.05 0.99 0.36

2.0%

Ch.3 11.60m² 1.8%

Ch.3 11.58m² Ch.2 11.14m² Ch.3 11.58m²

Local OM

0.05

EP

2.53 0.36 3.57 0.20 3.75 12%

0.70 0.90 0.20 3.57 0.36

EP

Ch.2 10.47m² Voiture

Sortie

6.73 0.36 0.89

1.40 1.32 0.05 1.16 1.40

V.R.

EP 3.99 1.40

EP 0.46

0.65 3.53 0.36

The studio was beginning to adopt Revit as the main software tool for this type of project so I became responsible to get together all of the ideas and comments from all the different departments and representing them under limited time and to the best of the results.

EE'

19.04

EE'

EP EP EP EP

2.58

Nord Rue du 13.66 2.80

1.95 1.40 5.15 1.40 1.20

Dgt. 1.87m²

In Collaboration with Leia Roberts & Grégoire Dubreux @ MU Architecture

5.44

ANDROMEDE Ilot 46

Design and modeling of a private house

The project consists of an apartment building composed by 30 apartments of diverse capacity and groups of individual houses, located in the surroundings of Toulouse, France.

The goal was to work together with landscape designers, structural engineers, housing promotors, and economists in order to achieve an executive project of the highest standard.

10 9 CC'

AA'

8a

8b

7 5b 4 3a

6

5a

3b

13.50

17% 3.52

2

Jardinière

+142.45

Jardinière

1

6

VH 0.61m²

5

4

3

2

1

VH 0.61m²

VH 0.61m²

VH 0.61m²

5 4

0.20

VH 0.61m²

Sortie vers l'extérieur En attente retour BET Structure

VH 0.61m²

3

471 x772

509 x714

2 1

6.08

48

50

52

5.00

5.15

0.20

54

56

5.00

5.21

0.20

58

60

5.00

0.40

5.20

2.68

0.20

5.13

Place type B

2.63

3.10

18.30 2.50

45

0.51

2.50

2.50

47

49

0.31

2.50

2.50

51

53

2.63

3.30

3

55

57

59

61

0.40

Place type B

3.30

3.30

4

39 E

5.00

5.00

4.20

2.50

43

2.50

Place type B

40

2.53

En attente retour BET Structure

2

6.58

Local vélo 8.52 m²

0.20

0.20

Place type B

0.40

Place type B

11.57

F

46 5.00

2.68

44

0.62

Sortie vers l'extérieur

521 x460

0.30

0.55

2.75

Place type B

2.40

41

5.00

800 x750

4.00

800 x750

4.90

3.27

4.71

Place type B

2.40

42

1

2.50

+142.45

844 x436

400 x231

1000 x231

400 x300

400 x300

1044 x170

1000 x300

En attente retour BET Structure

En attente retour BET Structure

2.17

5.00

1.80

2.17

0.20

1.80

6.40

2.45

0.20

0.20

2.52

0.20

500 x800

500 x1600

2.15

2.17

500 x1050

1.80

D

1.80

500 x400

370 x996

Asc.

1.80

0.20

Asc.

370 x896

En attente retour BET Structure

0.50

En attente retour BET Structure

798 x598

800 x600 910 x600

26

24

22

20

18

16

14

12

Saint - Agne Immobilier 93 rue edmond rostand, 31200 toulouse T. +33.5.61.61.61.61.

Bureau de Contrôle :

6

Qualiconsult

CSPS :

245 x700

0.60

4.90

800 x600

Maitrise d'ouvrage :

4.90

10 Place type B

Place type B

2.40

37

C

5

2.40

28

2.40

30

Place type B

32

5.00

34

3.90

2.40

38

5.00

Place type B

400 x560

560 x460

Place type B

JPM Coordination 560 x460

245 x400

647 x809

Place type B

513 x950

602 x809

503 x950

Place type B

Place type B

Place type B

300 x1000

27

513 x510

25

23

21

300 x400

19

17

2.50

2.50

15

13

504 x510

11

2 Roues

9

300 x800

2.50

2.50

0.53

0.25

2.56

0.25

2.50

8

3.30

29

2.50

7

2.50

2.50

Grille de ventilation 1.83 m²

2.50

Architecte Mandataire :

0.50

2.50

VB

Mu Architecture

En attente retour BET Structure

37 rue du Docteur Héron - 37000 Tours 43, rue Beaubourg - 75003 Paris T. +33.2.47.39.37.07.

F. +33.2.53.66.97.64. contact@mu-a.fr

0.20

0.30

VB

0.20

Grille de ventilation 1.83 m²

0.20

0.40

5.00

31

2.50

0.20

510x510

0.20 En attente retour BET Structure

0.50

B

33

2.50

3.55

35

2.50

5.00

36

4.00

3.30

2 Roues

BB'

A

En attente retour BET Structure

En attente retour BET Structure

Limite du batiment

1

PLAN LOG

2

3a

3b

4

AA'

5a

5b

6

7

CC'

8a

8b

9

INDICE

DATE

A

26/06/2019

10

Code Affaire :

TOP: Underground apartment’s parking level 2.28

2.68

Local vélo 27.14m² 11.93

6.80

Accès Local OM

EP

0.20

5.61

7.03

0.20 0.20

Local OM 12.76m²

PRO

0.20

EP

18.14

Phase :

037_AND

13.82

8.23

CC'

AA'

0.20

7.86

Accès local vélo 0.22

EP

64.82

5.30

144.10

Accès parking

10

4.50

8

0.43

7

6.18

6

VH

Pl.

144.31

0.05 0.36

Terrasse 13.97 m²

V.R.

ETEL

1.30

Séjour/Cuisine 25.20 m²

2.72

1.82

0.66

0.90

3.01

2.97

521 x460

0.45

3.42

0.05

0.05

7.23

LE

EP

0.36

2.78

0.60

3.26

Local vélo 17.46 m²

11.44

5.64

0.05

0.67

0.20

V.R.

5.00

4.39

Pl.

0.67

5.15

8.29 0.20

2.67

144.34

1.50

2.37

Terrasse 16.64 m²

Accès Vélo

Séjour/Cuisine 25.66 m²

A02-T2 44.94 m²

Séjour/Cuisine 26.64 m²

1.20

A03-T2 44.7 m²

2.32

7.26

1.50

0.36

0.20

2.40

1.00

0.47

4.70

C05-T2 45.66 m²

6.02

+145.52

Local Transfo

4.15

Ch.1 12.41 m²

2.90

3.20

2.53

SdE. 5.20 m²

V.R.

3.34

0.05 0.05

471 x772

509 x714

1.20 0.05

Dgt. 2.85 m²

0.05

0.05

0.70

0.52

Placard démontable

Pl.

0.80

800 x750

0.05

800 x750

Pl.

4.46

2.96

2.09 2.91

encoffrement tuyau

encoffrement tuyau

3.37

1.58

Pl.

ETEL

1.50

0.05

0.36

1.20

Pl.

Loggia 12.04 m²

0.47

4.37

4

3.80

VH

VH

et Arrivéee d'eau alimentation electrique

144.31

2.28

Ch.1 11.80 m²

Ch.1 12.66 m²

2.54

VH

HAUT

SdE. 6.38 m²

Accès Transfo

1.25

SdE. 6.50 m²

2.39

V.R. V.R.

VH

VH

EP

1.67

2.14

5

144.02 11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

0.34

Accès parking

1

G

5% 17%

9

1.40

1.78

3.50

144.21

Accès Venelle

11

4.15

15.26

+144.28 NGF

12

Accès Cour

1.40

0.85

4.00

3.50

et Arrivéee d'eau alimentation electrique

144.06

11.07

144.34

0.20

0.05

0.50

1.00

2.14

0.84

4.41

1.07

1.50

1.23

1.50

1.50

0.35

2.37

0.35

0.62

4.14 0.34

Gaz

0.05 0.20

2.49

EP

2.45

2.40

1.50 0.20

1.35

1.63

0.83

1.50

1.50

0.35

2.37

0.57

1.02

1.00

2.51 1.22

0.35

1.00

0.57

0.62 0.84

1.35

1.50

1.50

1.50

0.34

1.60

2.70

2.42

1.80

0.40

1.80

0.77

0.32 0.05

1.20

Entrée 7.13 m²

0.60

8.02

2.80

Pl.

Maitrise d'ouvrage :

3.69 3.11

1.79 4.47

0.20

2.56

ETEL

0.05

2.06

Sdb. 4.45 m²

Ch.1 12.18 m²

Saint - Agne Immobilier

0.05

W.C. 1.81 m²

0.34

0.68

0.20

2.54

1.01 0.05

Pl.

0.05

ETEL

0.05 1.20

1.35 0.70 1.21

BL

isolant termique et acoustique

1.30

1.26

0.07 0.73 0.07 0.05

Pl.

2.52

BL

0.05

V.R.

3.89

93 rue edmond rostand, 31200 toulouse T. +33.5.61.61.61.61.

0.36

Bureau de Contrôle :

1.67

Qualiconsult

3.99

Pl.

CSPS :

JPM Coordination C02-T2 22 m²

Séjour/Cuisine 31.41 m²

C01-T3 64.55 m²

Séjour/Cuisine 26.27 m²

Séjour/Cuisine 28.20 m²

3.51

3.66

4.11

Ch. 2 10.78 m²

Architecte Mandataire :

V.R.

0.36

0.36

EP

Mu Architecture

EP

Loggia 22.83 m²

+145.52 2.47

+145.52

1.97

Loggia 12.35 m²

1.97 2.00

1.64

5.37

510 x510

V.R.

0.36

V.R.

EP

6.41

8.06

Loggia 13.22 m²

2.75

V.R.

V.R.

0.20 0.36

3.38 0.36

2.80

0.36

0.42

4.26

0.36

EP

BB'

V.R.

Pl.

3.65

2.56

0.62

1.35

2.37

1.04

0.85

1.04

Accès Hall B

0.57

1.00

2.51

6.00 1.50

1.04

1.50

1.50

1.50

0.34

2.48

1.00

0.57

0.33

2.37

1.22

1.64

1.85

6.30

1.02

0.35

1.00

0.35

0.83

2.37

0.84

4.26

1.36

1.04

0.62

1.50

1.50

1.63

0.35

1.00

2.11

2.37

1.23

1.35

+144.62 NGF

2.28

1.50

1.50

PLAN LOGE

1.00

7.41

1.07

1.50

1.50

1.50

1.07

65.19

1

2

3a

3b

4

AA'

5a

5b

Rue du Midi

6

7

CC'

37 rue du Docteur Héron - 37000 Tours 43, rue Beaubourg - 75003 Paris T. +33.2.47.39.37.07.

F. +33.2.53.66.97.64. contact@mu-a.fr

+145.52

Gaz

+144.66 NGF

1.62 1.01

1.50

0.20

5.82

1.80 0.36

Sortie Chaudière

Loggia +145.52 14.33 m²

1.85

3

2.37

6.05

0.20

3.23

560 x460

C03-T3 66.08 m²

0.50

1.50

Ch.1 11.72 m²

0.20

V.R.

V.R.

8.39

0.36

5

2.48

6.30

3.23

0.05

8.50

1.20

Dgt. 1.50 m²

W.C. 1.55 m²

Ch.1 11.93 m²

Pl.

2.32

2.32

7.70

4

1.85

0.05

W.C. 1.57 m²

1.68

0.05

1

EP

EP

EP

2

1.85

+145.52

+145.52

0.42

Pl. 1.70

602 x809

2 1

0.50

0.36

EP

Loggia 14.63 m²

1.07

2

BL

Dgt. 3.57 m²

Pl.

0.61

+145.52 NGF

6

8.01 Sortie Chaudière

3.79

3

559 x510

0.34

7

V.R.

V.R.

300 x800

CFO

0.05

0.20

Pl.

558 x950

3.21

3

3.21

1.20

0.40

0.90

Asc.

910 x600

V.R.

4.45

Séjour/Cuisine 27.61 m²

4

5

4.50

4.50

0.05

Gaz

2.56

0.36

Pl.

2.30

4

4.72

0.94

0.05

2.00

SdE. 4.76 m²

0.65

5

3.51

0.05

Sdb. 5.42 m²

3.65

1.25

W.C. 1.22 m²

2.00

Sdb. 5.32 m²

0.24 B02-T3 62.59 m²

300 x1000

7.70

370 x896

3.74

2.49

1.74

2.49

0.05

2.44

0.05

0.42

1.28

0.05

4.00

Pl.

0.20

1

800 x600

6

1.80

0.42

0.61

0.91

Dgt. 1.91 m²

0.05

1.35

0.05

0.70

0.05

CFA

6

2.00

2

7

0.60

0.07

0.05

1.19

4.00

1.59

0.05

1.60

1.30

0.90

0.05

0.05

Pl.

+144.66 NGF 8

V.R.

ETEL

1.30

Entrée 3.98 m²

4.21

0.05

300 x700

SG

V.R.

0.36

0.05

0.65

Ch. 2 10.51 m²

300 x400

3.65

EP

Loggia 13.25 m²

Pl.

3.56

3.65

0.24

AEP

0.62

0.76

Pl.

300 x400

0.05

3

0.61

0.05

1.20

1.98

0.60 8.82

1.20

Gaz

Séjour/Cuisine 27.75 m²

560 x510

Ch.1 11.71 m²

0.05

1.64

1.00

4.26

1.07

0.10

BL

SG

0.34

2.08

plinthe conduit gaz

1.35

0.60

Ch.1 12.74 m²

1.30

2.68

3.65

2.63

0.05

Entrée 3.90 m² 0.05

2.65

3.33

3.40

1.30 3.05

0.38

Ch.2 9.90 m²

0.05

1.96

Pl.

0.60

0.05

4

0.36

V.R.

1.52

BL

BL

3.35

BL

BL

BL

2.27

0.34

2.96

B01-T3 62.7 m²

Sdb. 5.32 m²

2.32

4.26

+145.52

V.R.

0.36

V.R.

ETEL

ETEL

4.00

0.64

Pl.

0.05

560 x950

1.90

1.97

1.22

0.36

0.20

0.24 1.80

1.00

2.46

2.80 Sortie Chaudière

1.88

0.22 V.R.

V.R.

1.30

2.65

EP

Loggia 12.35 m²

Pl.

0.05

0.24

0.95

1.85

0.50

2.99 500 x400

5

1

+144.39 NGF

1.96

1.01

A

1.90

2.48

2.40

2.08

1.95 1.60 647 x809

1.80

0.24

Dgt. 1.91 m²

0.90

0.90

0.95

0.05

1.50

2.31

Ch.2 9.79 m²

1.59 0.91

1.25

Pl.

1.59

1.65

W.C. 1.50 m²

0.05

0.90

0.05

Dgt. 1.50 m²

3.21

3.02 0.14

V.R.

EP

0.34

0.05

V.R.

V.R.

0.42

0.36

0.36

EP

1.05

1.50

2.48

2.40

2.80

6.41

+145.52

1.30

500 x1600

CFO

EP

0.05 1.35

W.C. 1.22 m²

1.60

0.36

0.05

6.56

Loggia 15.88 m²

0.05

3.64

3.24

3.38

V.R.

0.36

EP

1.20

0.05

0.61

Ch.1 11.93 m²

0.20

300 x400

AEP

Hall C

0.20 0.20

Sdb. 5.41 m²

3.65

0.05

3.74

560 x460

A04-T3 66.02 m²

1.30

Entrée 3.97 m²

Ch.1 12.74 m² 3.65

0.20

Pl.

Séjour/Cuisine 31.41 m²

3.40

V.R.

0.37

0.05

EP

1050 x300

0.05

1.42

1.93

2.82

Terrasse 16.07 m²

3.65 0.05

1.44

4.40

Pl.

3.65

4.21

0.22

0.42

Pl.

3.56

Ch. 2 10.52 m²

3.33

0.60

0.05

2.63

0.05

0.05

1.30

0.36

V.R.

1.73 1.30

BB'

0.36

1.00

CFA

1.40

3.24

0.05

0.05

8.50

8.02

ETEL

Séjour/Cuisine 26.24 m²

0.05

1.40

Ch.1 11.02 m²

2.49

2.49

Pl.

Entrée 3.97 m² 0.65

A05-T2 48.06 m²

800 x600

1000 x300

0.40

2.94

1.93

7.87

0.42

0.05

2.40

2.95

A01-T2 21.11 m²

Séjour/Cuisine 28.19 m²

0.60

0.60 0.36 ETEL

2.00

SdE. 4.78 m² 2.30

0.05 1.20

1.65

0.05

0.90

Terrasse 14.44 m²

6

EP

0.36

V.R.

0.05

0.05

Dgt. 3.54 m²

SdE. 5.76 m²

Pl.

2.45 3.23

3.23

1.75

0.20

W.C. 1.58 m²

2.45

0.63

0.05

W.C. 1.49 m²

V.R.

800 x600

0.05 0.90

0.34

0.20

0.32

1.48

1.48 0.05

V.R.

Pl.

0.20

Entrée 2.85 m²

0.05 1.40

3.24

0.15 0.67

1.40

Rue de l'Autan

2.16

ETEL

0.34

Pl.

2.05

2.08

6

2.63

5

4

1.31

3

Terrasse 14.43 m²

0.36

1.07 0.34

2

Terrasse 16.07 m²

2.08

2.70

1.80

1

370 x996

EP

400 x560

+145.52 NGF

0.36

4.22

plinthe conduit gaz

AEP

500 x1050

isolant thermique et acoustique

Pl.

0.22

500 x500

2.95

3.23

17.44

3.88

D

EP

0.36

2.10

2.10

1.50 0.20

500 x800

0.57

1.05

0.34 1.80

Asc.

BL

16.34

+145.52 NGF

CFO

BL BL

2.94

0.20

0.07

2.99

8

12.96

0.05

2.72

7

3.38

0.05

6

0.80

Hall A

0.24 5

0.34

4

0.36

0.05

1.50

2.40

2.40 4.54

3

2.94

144.37

1.96 2

0.15

Accès Hall C

144.32

Accès Hall A

0.50 1.50

BL

1.33

0.50

+145.52 NGF

5.80

Pl.

400 x300

Gaz

Gaz

2.59

2.43

+ 144.32 NGF

0.20

0.40

0.34

0.20

0.37

0.20 0.30

400 x300

1.00

CFA

2.87

1.20

950 x430

1000 x300

0.40

SG

0.50

Pl.

400 x300

0.20

0.05

1

4.17

3.80 3.43

3.23

3.09

0.34

0.20

1.46

3.62

SdE. 5.93 m²

32.43

0.24

Dgt. 2.50 m²

ntane

0.36

1.96

Local O.M.+encombrants 22.84 m² 144.35

Ch.1 11.37 m²

26.20

1.50

0.50

ETEL

3.38

0.36

2.15

1.10

0.10

Terrasse 13.41 m²

0.36

1.20

6.31

Local vélo 25.56 m²

144.35

0.20

V.R.

Local Fibre 6.00 m²

Accès Local OM

1.46

3.77

1.20

144.29

Accès Local OM

EP

2.14

EP

0.22

3.22

2.73 0.34

V.R.

0.20

300 x400

0.34

0.34

0.34

0.34

0.34

0.77

0.22

2.17

1.86

Local O.M.+encombrants 12.45 m²

Gaz

4.12

ETEL

0.34

3.72 0.22

Séjour/Cuisine 24.33 m²

4.17

Rue de la Tramo

0.34

1.70

0.36

2.67

0.20

1.00

C04-T2 44.13 m² V.R.

2.93

1.25

1.50

Pl.

8a

8b

9

INDICE

DATE

A

26/06/2019

10

N

Code Affaire :

Phase :

037_AND

PRO

MIDDLE: Apartment’s Ground level CC'

AA'

15.99 15.20

1.90

12.51

1.58

0.24

13.31

1.90

chéneau

+154.13 NGF

LEGE

11.95

12.19

12.50

12.26

+154.13 NGF

12.43

12.50

Terrasse potagère 147.43 m²

Terrasse potagère 146.46 m²

11.56

17.23

+153.99 NGF

+154.13 NGF

+153.99 NGF

33.74 19.04

0.20 0.36 0.65

1

370 x666

0.36

2.92

0.37

830 x600

1.32

C32-T4 82.82 m²

2.37

0.59

7.36

2.49

0.10

0.78

0.88

3.94

Pl.

Pl.

V.R.

0.05

0.05 0.93

1.69

0.37

0.90

Séjour/Cuisine 32.78 m²

0.60

8.38

0.05

93 rue edmond rostand, 31200 toulouse T. +33.5.61.61.61.61.

Qualiconsult C31-T3 63.84 m²

SdE. 2.75 m²

Séjour/Cuisine 28.11 m²

Ch. 2 10.28 m²

3.65

0.36

V.R.

0.36

Loggia 23.56 m²

2.40

0.05

2.51

2.98 1.81

4.11

EP

3.22

0.24

3.25

0.22 2.74

1.70

2.74

Ch.1 15.22 m²

0.36

+153.83

Architecte Mandataire :

1.01

1.00

1.80

0.97 1.07

0.47

1.00

1.50

1.50

1.23 1.50

0.41

5.58

0.42

1.86

1.40

2.03

1.40

1.85

0.81

6.99

0.81

7.95

0.44

1.84

1.40

2.01

1.40

1.87

0.30

5.60 5.76

1.87 0.34

1.07 6.40

8.54

8.04

2.54

8.46

8.52

1.01

2.11

1.23

1.07

6.61

Mu Architecture

37 rue du Docteur Héron - 37000 T 43, rue Beaubourg - 75003 Paris T. +33.2.47.39.37.07.

F. +33.2.53.66.97.64. contact@mu-a.fr

V.R.

0.36

V.R.

V.R.

2.39

4.41

+155.02

0.36

V.R.

+155.02 0.95

JPM Coordination

BB'

2.51

2.50

0.36

0.36

V.R.

4.80

0.24

V.R.

509 x510

1.50

1.50

chéneau

3.45

0.34

5.41

2.63

EP

Ch.1 14.36 m² 4.32

CSPS :

V.R.

Pl.

chéneau

0.36

Saint - Agne Immobilier

Bureau de Contrôle :

0.34

+153.83

Maitrise d'ouvrage :

2.72

810 x800

3.51

SdE. 2.61 m²

0.05 ETEL

1.43

1.93

1.80

0.34

V.R.

3.36

1.20

0.20 3.16

0.61

W.C. 1.26 m²

0.05 1.20

+153.98 NGF

Dgt. 1.54 m²

Reseaux VMC

2.05

10.89

560 x629

Ch.1 12.36 m²

Sdb. 4.44 m²

0.05

3.65

0.36

700 x800

Pl.

0.05

0.63

1.40

W.C. 1.26 m²

SdB. 5.83 m²

0.05

3.54

Terrasse 71.68 m²

4.11

0.61

Séjour/Cuisine 31.34 m²

V.R.

EP

Pl.

0.90

0.05

A32-T4 82.17 m²

6.41

Loggia 16.37 m²

3.78

0.34

W.C. 1.61 m²

1.20

ETEL

Ch.2 9.88 m²

0.05

Entrée 3.60 m²

1.20

1.20

7.61

0.20

Asc.

2.85

1.40

3.24

2

Pl.

soffite CF1/2h type PROMAT

1.00 3.55 0.60

0.24

1.00

1.40

0.36

0.36

8.72

0.05

Dgt. 1.44 m²

V.R.

3.40

3

0.05

Pl.

1.81

1.20 510 x460

10.86

3.45

0.05

12.58

0.05

1.79

SdB. 6.19 m²

0.90

8.12

2.78

2.36

Pl.

4

3.11

1.30

5

Entrée 7.03 m² 1.23

3.04

BB'

V.R.

0.05

6

1.37

2.94

V.R.

6.71

2.84

Ch.3 9.95 m²

ETEL

2.37 0.60

Pl.

0.36

Terrasse 52.09 m²

Ch.1 11.02 m²

Ch. 2 11.15 m²

Pl.

+153.98 NGF

940 x600

2.68

3.42

3.05

8 7

Rangements

1.50

8.61

8.63

1.95

Séjour/Cuisine 27.27 m²

Ch.3 9.77 m²

1.81

1.61

SdE. 5.33 m²

soffite CF1/2h type PROMAT

W.C. 1.67 m² A31-T2 18.02 m²

1.30

Entrée 4.04 m²

2.70

EP

3.33

Reseaux VMC

0.36 2.31

plinthe conduit gaz

4.96

Lanterneau Accès Technique

1.82

SG

1.40

1.40

1.04

7.88

1.34

Zone spa

Entrée 2.80 m²

V.R.

3.37

0.50

500 x500

4.72

0.36

V.R.

3.15

2.20

0.36 2.20

1.95

1.30

1.00

ETEL

Pl.

400 x560

6.63

500 x1600

1.44

Pl.

CFO

0.20

9

2.40

2.60

19

0.34

4.51 0.36

2.78

18

4.22

0.34

4.80

EP

17

0.34

7

+153.83

Plénum

6

16

10

V.R.

5

15

Lanterneau de désenfumage

4.50

+153.99 NGF

2.63

4

Balcon 12.20 m²

0.24

3

Balcon privatif 12.03 m²

14

1.58

0.20

8%

1.60

2.70 2

13

11

1.21 2.92

12

0.36

0.90

0.87

0.36

8 1

Plénum

1.80

9

370 x866

+153.83

plinthe conduit gaz

2.75

11

AEP

CFA 1.29

4.54

0.36 13

1290 x300

10.00

+153.83 NGF

0.05

14

0.36

15

1.54

16

2.69

17

Asc. 1.78

Gaz 0.40

0.20

3.23 4.22

18

4.73

19

Lanterneau de désenfumage

V.R.

0.20

12

AEP

4.74

500 x1050

+153.83 NGF

3.02

0.72

CFO

500 x720

1.05

4.50

27.20

Rangements

0.50

4.54

2.44

10

EP

1210 x750 400 x300

0.36

28.13

2.00

2.85

0.36

0.98

1.68

1.80

1.40

0.20

0.32

1.50

1.60

1.03

1.50

Lanterneau Accès Technique

1.50

A

4.96

3.32

9.96

0.24

D

3.32

8.22

1.48

8%

8.46 0.24

0.20

0.40

8.28

2.54

1.12

1.50

1.00

8.04

1.40

0.24

0.22 0.40

Gaz

1.48

0.30

400 x300

CFA

0.98

chéneau

+153.99 NGF

3.95

1000 x300

SG

2.05

1.90

400 x300

3.50 1.03

0.50

8.32 4.80 3.77

0.68

12.16

6.40

2.28

2.37

1.00

7.41 1.50

1.50

1.50

1.50

1.50

1.07

9.64

65.17

1

2

3a

3b

AA'

4

CC'

7

8a

8b

PLAN L

10

9

BOTTOM: Apartment’s 3rd level (Green terraces)

38

N

INDICE

DATE

A

26/06/2019

Code Affaire :

037_AND

Phase :

PRO

HOSTARIA URBANA Interior and furniture design of a Tapas Bar in the heart of Paris.

This tapas restaurant and bar is a project that took around 2 months since its inception to the beginning of the work in site. It was a refurbishment project of the exact same function.

The client always had a main idea of what he wanted the place to exude so I worked in a wide range of diverse options of materiality and arrangements in order to find the design that fitted best to the client’s needs.

Besides working on the interior I also designed some of the furniture details such as the decorative elements in the wall and the racks used in bar. You can currently visit Hosteria Urbana in the heart of the 12 district of Paris at 11 Rue d’Antoine Vollon.

In Collaboration with Duccio Cardelli @ AND Studio

TOP: Finished project photos MIDDLE: Floor plan BOTTOM: Material sections

and studio 49, rue des petites Ecuries 75010 PARIS

OSTERIA URBANA

tel: +33.6.17.01.34.01 contact@andstudio.net

DOC:

SCALE:

VERSION:

05/09/2018

01

N°

39 OSTERIA URBANA

and studio

49, rue des petites Ecuries 75010 PARIS tel: +33.6.17.01.34.01 contact@andstudio.net

DOC:

SCALE:

VERSION:

05/09/2018

01 OSTERIA URBANA

N°

and studio

49, rue des petites Ecuries 75010 PARIS tel: +33.6.17.01.34.01 contact@andstudio.net

DOC:

SCALE:

VERSION:

05/09/2018

01

N°

12 RUE CHARLES DE GAULLE, ALFORTVILLE A parisian building with34 Apartments and a commercial space.

The typical parisian building comes with its own rules that need to be respected. These rules were used not as an obstacle but rather as a starting point of the design of this 34 apartments building in Alfortville, a neighbor town of Paris.

Starting from a sketch, an experimentation began with the different arrangements of bricks and the materials that can complement them.

Black metal was used throughout the balconies, joints, roofing and base.

But not all of is shades of dark, for a colourful Portuguese type of tiles is used as a surprise material for the flooring of each balcony that only the residents can experience.

The final result is a design that manages to break the conventions of parisian buildings and pushing forward the experimentation that comes just from the materials.

In Collaboration with Duccio Cardelli @ AND Studio

Pare vue en verre opale

NGF 55,77

35 2,45

2,80

Pare vue en verre opale

2,80

22,99

2,45

2,80

35

+46,98 5 R+5

2,45

2,80

35

+44,18 4 R+4

bardage métallique anthracite

24

2,45

2,80

+49,78 6 R+6

55,44

+55,38 Toiture

35

+52,58 7 R+7

+52,58 R+7

2,45

2,80

35

+41,38 3 R+3

Crèche au fond de la parcelle

52,83

Pare vue en verre opale

NGF 36,28

2,45

2,80

35

+38,58 2 Etage courant

NGF 36,13

commerces

Crèche NGF 32,80

garde corps métal perforé

2,85

35

+32,78 0 RDC

3,50

2,80

2,65

3,00

35

2,80

Commerces au RDC

+35,78 1 R+1

SOUS-SOL

55,77

2,46

2,80

+55,38 8 Toiture

Parking

+49,78 R+6

NGF 29,93

+29,93 -1 Sous-Sol

Coupe AA 12, 3

Pare vue en verre opale

LOGEMENTS

brise soleil coulissant en bois

2,80

12 RUE CHARLES DE GAULLE, 94140 ALFORTVILLE

MaÓtrise d'Ouvrage :

+46,98 R+5

SCI LA MAISON ROUGE 211 rue Marius Carrieu le Castelet, 34080 Montpellier

Architecte :

MODIFICATIONS

5

COUPE ECHELLE:

AND STUDIO

PC

DATE:

01/2019

A

+44,18 R+4

2,80

PHASE:

19,80

EMETTEUR

GSPublisherVersion 0.0.100.100

2,80

DATE

22,99

IND.

PLAN N°

menuserie PVC anthracite

AND STUDIO 65 , rue de Provence, 75009 Paris TEL : 0140 36 65 28 CEL : 06 17 01 34 01 MAIL : dc@andstudio.net

briquette grise

+41,38 R+3 2,80

encadrement gris foncé

Commerces au RDC

+35,78 R+1 3,00

bardage métallique anthracite

+32,78 RDC

ACCES COMMERCES

FACADE NORD

Pare vue verre opale

55,44

+55,38 Toiture

55,77

Accès Piétons CRECHE bardage métallique anthracite

bardage métallique anthracite

2,80

TOP: Street view MIDDLE: Material detail BOTTOM: Front elevation

2,80

+38,58 Etage courant

Pare vue verre opale

40

FA

BOIS D’ARCY APARTMENTS Countryside living outside Paris

This was one of those rare opportunities where you’re lucky enough to have a client that enjoys having playfulness be visible in architecture.

The location is in the small town of Bois D’Arcy right next to Versailles.

The design began taking the typical forms of countryside apartment buildings and putting a twist on them mainly through the choice of materials. A light shade of blush pink was chosen for the exterior concrete facades while having a contrasting dark stone and tiles for both the base and the roofing respectively.

Such contrast is harmonized with the sleek carved through window openings and the wood in them that helps the composition as a whole to stand out from the monotony of this typology of buildings.

In Collaboration with Duccio Cardelli & Luca Amighetti @ AND Studio

Tuiles grises 178,04 NGF 177,00 NGF

3,00

Pare-vue h. 1,8 m 175,00 NGF

Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite

175,00 NGF

174,00 NGF

Tuiles grises

Enduit marron-rose type WEBER 401

3,00

Joints creux 178,04 NGF

172,00 NGF

Menuiseries avec encadrement couleur bois Revêtement pierre

177,00 NGF

171,00 NGF

3,00 terrasse

1,8

m

171,00 NGF SDE 2,49 m2

3,00

h.

-vue Pare

CHAMBRE 3 10,05 m2

2

7,68 m

PL

5

6

7

8

4

12 13

1

14

CHAMBRE 2 12,50 m2

PL

168,00 NGF

SDE 5,44 m2

3,00

3 2

11,75 m2

CHAMBRE 2 13,20 m2

SDE 6,12 m2

15 16

PL

16,94

DGT 2,43 m2

SDE 3,84 m2

WC 1,38 m2

171.00 NGF

DGT 6,04 m2

DRESSING 1,90 m2

SG ERDF

GAZ EAU

CHAMBRE 2 9,51 m2

CHAMBRE 3 11,37 m2

CUISINE

SEJOUR 27,14 m2

DGT 5,49 m2

12,89

3,00

APT 09-T3- 61.3m2

3,15

SEJOUR 23,83 m2 RGT 1,27 m2

terrasse

168,00 NGF

23,09 m2

4,18

SDE 4,91 m2

CHAMBRE 1 9,89 m2

APT 08-T2- 41.3m2

CUISINE CUISINE PL

5,82

21,77 m2

6 11,2

1,64

3,29

terrasse

Nord

7,57

7,25 O

14,83

S

Menuiseries avec encadrement couleur bois Revêtement pierre 175,00 NGF

Grille barreaudée 1.1 m Mur 0.8 m revêtement pierre

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

Barreaudage vertical 1.5 m

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

Portail piétons Abris velos aspect bois Interphone Boites aux lettres

Façade Nord

Feu Clignotant Entrée parking Plantée de graminées et plante grimpantes

Grille barreaudée 1.1 m Mur 0.8 m revêtement pierre

172,00 NGF

175,00 NGF

175,00 NGF

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

Elevation "clôture" Nord

E

7,15

Façade Nord

Joints creux 172,00 NGF

Limite de propriété

CHAMBRE 2 9,22 m2

CHAMBRE 1 11,51 m2

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite Barreaudage vertical 1.5 m Enduit marron-rose type WEBER 401

175,00 NGF

171,00 NGF

CHAMBRE 1 11,49 m2

PTT

WC 1,74 m2 CHAMBRE 3 12,74 m2

Menuiseries avec encadrement couleur bois Pare-vue h. 1,8pierre m Revêtement

175,00 NGF

LL

SDE 5,30 m2

terrasse

174,00 NGF

3 15,0

8 10,3

DGT 2,00 m2

terrasse

Limite de propriété

CHAMBRE 1 11,44 m2

Pare-vue h. 1,8 m

Façade Nord

Joints creux

172,00 NGF

Limite de propriété

CUISINE

SEJOUR 29,15 m2

177,00 NGF

17,65 m2

3,00

4,05

16,56 m2

178,04 NGF 3,00

9 15,4 0 14,2

Barreaudage vertical 1.5 m

Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite Tuiles grises Enduit marron-rose type WEBER 401

175,00 NGF

168,00 NGF

1,51

5,00

APT 10-T4 DUPLEX- 73.3m2

terrasse

175,00 NGF

174,00 NGF

1,29 18,70 11,20

3,00

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier Pare-vue h. 1,8 m

1

Portail piétons Abris velos aspect bois Interphone Boites aux lettres Grille barreaudée 1.1 m Mur 0.8 m revêtement pierre EDF

GDF

Feu Clignotant Entrée parking Plantée de graminées et plante grimpantes

172,00 NGF

NGF Tuiles 175,00 grises

175,00 NGF

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

177,00 NGF

9,20

5,00

RUE JEAN GABIN, 78390 BOIS D'ARCY

175,00 NGF

8,17

3,00

CHAMBRE 2 11,05 m2

terrasse

GDF

1

Feu Clignotant 172,00 NGF Entrée parking Enduit marron-rose type WEBER 401 Plantée de graminées et plante grimpantes Tuiles grisesGarde-corps metallique gris anthracite

7 10,3

RUE

5

6

7

8

4 3

E

WC 2,38 m2

CUISIN

1

175,00 NGF

12 13 14 16

PTT

3,00

CHAMBRE 1 14,72 m2

SEJOUR 37,20 m2

Barreaudage vertical 1.5 m

Menuiseries avec encadrement en bois Joints creux

177,60 NGF 177,00 NGF

168,00 NGF

172,00 NGF

172,00 NGF

3,00

CHAMBRE 3 14,06 m2

175,00 NGF

11,60 m2

Revêtement pierre a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier Enduit marron-rose type WEBER 401

175,00 NGF

21,20 m2

8,15 Maîtrise d'Ouvrage :

SCCV CROIX BONNET 2019

AND studio

72 rue du Faubourg St Honoré 75008 PARIS

49 rue des Petites Ecuries 75010 PARIS

TEL : 01 75 43 89 89 MAIL : syulzari@anahomeigp.com

TEL : +33 6 17 01 34 01 MAIL : dc@andstudio.net

168,00 NGF

Tuiles grises Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite Pare-vue h. 1,8 m

172,00 NGF

171,00 NGF 3,00

O

15,55 S

PC

PLAN R+1 R+2

PLAN N° ECHELLE:

1:100

172,00 NGF 175,00 NGF

Ma

174,80 NGF

Revêtementtype pierre Enduit marron-rose WEBER 401

171,00 NGF

3,00

3,00

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

172,00 NGF

168,00 NGF 3,00

171,00 NGF

Façade Ouest

Enduit marron-rose type1.5 WEBER Barreaudage m 401 vertical

GSPublisherVersion 0.0.100.100

Façade Ouest

3,00

168,00 NGF

Joints creux Revêtement pierre

171,00 NGF

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

Barreaudage vertical 1.5 m

Joints creux

TEL MA

Maîtrise d'Ouvrage :

SCCV CROIX BONNET 201 72 rue du Faubourg St Honoré Menuiseries avec encadrement couleur bois 75008 PARIS Revêtement pierre TEL : 01 75 43 89 89

a definir avec commune Enduit marron-rose type 401pendant chantier WEBERet GPA 172,00 NGF

Joints creux Tuiles grises Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite Menuiseries avec encadrement couleur bois 174,80 NGF Revêtement pierre

168,00 NGF

Façade Est

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

Enduit marron-rose type WEBER 401

168,00 NGF 172,00 NGF

3,00

171,00 NGF

174,80 NGF

Menuiseries avec encadrement couleur bois

168,00 NGF GSPublisherVersion 0.0.100.100

Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite

172,00 NGF

171,00 NGF

174,00 NGF

72 r 750

Façade Sud Tuiles grises Enduit marron-rose type WEBER 401

174,00 NGF

Menuiseries avec encadrement couleur Barreaudage m bois vertical 1.5 Tuiles grises 177,00 NGF Joints creux Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite Revêtement pierre 171,00 NGF Pare-vue h. 1,8 m 175,00 NGF a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

175,00 NGF 3,00

174,00 NGF

SCC

Tuiles grises 177,00 NGF Menuiseries avec Garde-corps metallique grisencadrement anthracite couleur bois Pare-vue h. 1,8creux m Joints 175,00 NGF

174,00 NGF

177,00 NGF

TOP RIGHT: Perspectives BOTTOM RIGHT: Elevations BOTTOM LEFT: Floor plans

Tuiles grises Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite

Barreaudage vertical 1.5 m

174,00 NGF

07

3,00

DATE: 13/02/2019

3,00

PHASE: PC

175,00 NGF

Enduit marron-rose type WEBER 401 174,00 NGF

177,00168,00 NGF NGF

EMETTEUR

AND STUDIO

175,00 NGF

Façade Sud

Joints creux Revêtement pierre

3,00

E

172,00 NGF

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

3,00

2,92

3,00

4,35

177,00 NGF

3,00

172,00 NGF

177,00 NGF

MODIFICATIONS

Nord

3,00

DATE

3,00

IND.

3,00

4,23

Architecte :

174,00 NGF

3,00

1 18,4

3,00

3,11 22,14 m2

RUE JEAN GABIN, 78390 BOIS D'ARCY

Garde-corps metallique Barreaudage 1.5 anthracite m verticalgris

3,00

CUISINE

Façade Sud 12 LOGE

172,00 NGF

171,00 NGF

terrasse

terrasse

3,62

12 LOG

RUE JEAN GABIN, 78390 BOIS D'

Garde-corps metallique gris anthracite Tuiles grises

SEJOUR 32,91 m2

3,00

GAZ EAU

WC 2,34 m2

CHAMBRE 1 11,68 m2

7,57

Joints creux 172,00 NGF

Revêtement pierre 401 Enduit marron-rose type WEBER a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

175,00 NGF

3,00

PL

APT 11-T4- 90.2m2 SG ERDF

terrasse

171,00 NGF

15

SDE 5,29 m2

174.00 NGF DGT 2,45 m2

APT 12-T3- 68.9m2

GDF

174,00 NGF

DGT 6,51 m2 SDE 4,17 m2

EDF

172,00 NGF

CHAMBRE 2 10,37 m2

2

SDE 6,58 m2

Menuiseries avec encadrement en bois

177,60 NGF

172,00 NGF

8,05

DGT 2,45 m2

CHAMBRE 2 11,18 m2

Elevation "clôture" Nord

17,00 m2

3,00

2,50

CHAMBRE 2 13,81 m2

6,03

16,94

Menuiseries avec encadrement en bois

Portail piétons Abris velos aspect bois Interphone Boites aux lettres 175,00 NGF

172,00 NGF

Façade Est

3,00

1,55

11,89 m2

2,32

terrasse

177,00 NGF

9,60

EDF

174,00 NGF 0 14,2

3,29

Elevation "clôture" Nord

3,00

12 LOGEMENTS

16,20 2,00

177,60 NGF

Joints creux Menuiseries avec encadrement couleur bois Revêtement pierre

MAIL : syulzari@anahomeigp.co DATE

IND.

EMET

SCCV CROIX BONNET 2019 72 rue du Faubourg St Honoré 75008 PARIS

PC

TEL : 01 75 43 89 89 MAIL : syulzari@anahomeigp.com IND. EMETTEUR

DATE

AND STUDIO

a definir avec commune et GPA pendant chantier

PC

168,00 NGF

EMETTEUR

Façade Ouest GSPublisherVersion 0.0.100.100

41

Façade Est

P

Maîtrise d'Ouvrage :

AND STUDIO

A

BARILLA’S PAVILLION A tale of two plazas

An international open competition was carried out where the main goal was to take a site in Barilla’s main headquarters in Parma, Italy, and propose a building that would be open to public so that the company’s ideals and work can be shared with the community.

Personally, I cannot separate the concept of a public square or plaza with italian culture. It’s as much part of their identity as their cuisine.

So the plaza was taken as both the starting and main concept for this proposal. If you visit Rome for example, you can see firsthand how every open space is different from the next. Even if there are hundreds of them, every square or plaza has its own identity.

With these ideas in mind the protagonists of the project are two plazas with great differences and purposes between them. While one plaza is open and perfect for weekend markets and open air exhibitions, the other one is covered by a solar receptor and green roof structure that joins the diverse volumes under it while still allowing light to come in throughout the day.

In Collaboration with Duccio Cardelli @ AND Studio

TOP: Aerial view MIDDLE: Floor plan BOTTOM: Plazas perspectives

42

BARILLA’S PAVILLION A Tale of Two Plazas

Covered Plaza View

44

WATER & EARTH MUSEUMS Concepts for Beijing’s South Axis

A competition was carried out for an ambitious urban revitalisation project on Beijing south axis that connects the new development projects to come such as a new airport with China’s Zhaoxian Temple.

Working in collaboration with — we developed an urban strategy that could work with China’s request of having a more impressive and ceremonious feeling passing through the main avenue. An axis where you can experience the culture and influence of China in the XXI century economics and politics.

It was requested to go beyond an urban level detail and even propose the architecture that will be found in key points in the new masterplan.

I was in charge of the design of the Water and Earth museums, with the idea that each will reflect its content and the relation these elements have with China’s ancestral culture.

In Collaboration with Duccio Cardelli @ AND Studio & Agence TER

TOP LEFT: Master plan TOP RIGHT: Connections

45

Water Museum

Earth Museum

Water Museum

Earth Museum

38

URSUS & FAFNIR Projecting concepts

Atelier Forte goes well beyond more than just an architecture lead studio.

The project made here combine sculpture, construction, painting and even philosophy. I was recruited for a specific role based on my experience which is to aid in the conceptual representation through an audiovisual manner.

Ursus is basically a room in the “Stanze” exposition found in Triennale di Milano during 2016. However, there was so much input in the thinking and design of the final product and that’s where I got in. I was asked to develop a narrative in the form of a screenplay that could work in a video which could after the exposition is over, be shown as a way to explain the studio’s ideology.

Fafnir is a project that was already completed and developed by the time I came to the studio. However there was a project that needed to be moved to a new site in the countryside near Rome. During the installation that lasted 4 days I was able to film the relation between the sculpture and the site as well as its construction. At the end, a conceptual video was produced that encompasses the feeling that the project gives when encountered.

In Collaboration with Duilio Forte @ Atelier Forte

RIGHT: Final conceptual video

47

CASA A+E DESIGN Design and modeling of a private house

I had a wide range of activities in “Alejandro Miyar arquitectos”. From conceptual design and research to construction supervision, my main purpose there however was to assist on the architectural level of detail in floor plans and 3D modeling.

The studio had an inclination towards private clients, usually upper class in Monterrey. As such a series of private houses were asked to be designed. I worked mainly in “Casa A+E”. And even though some conceptual and spatial work had been completed I was able to develop the main facade and the detailing of the floor plans.

Also, the choosing of materials was a key stage for both the working studio and the client. Different proposals for the feeling of the interior were delivered until an agreement was made between both parties.

As of 2014 the house was about to start its construction near the Sierra Madre mountains in the suburb area of Monterrey.

In Collaboration with Alejandro Miyar and Mariana Silva.

TOP: Living/dinning perspective MIDDLE: Floor plan BOTTOM: Moodboard

Casa A+E - Interior Perspective

50

DESIGNING LABS Project design and managment of laboratories across the country

During 1 year I worked in a private company where the main challenge was to deliver practical, analitical and creative solutions for chemists and scientists all across the country.

I worked with a team of people from different fields of profesional practice in order to achieve the kind of projects which are not usually taught in architecture school in a limited concept stage time.

0.90 m [35.43"] 1910-A

3.13 m [123.42"]

1910-A

1.89 m [74.41"]

1910-A

1910-A

1910-A

2.59 m [101.77"]

0.94 m [37.03"]

0.30 m [12.00"] 0.64 m [25.02"]

1.83 m [72.01"] 1910-A

0.76 m [30.01"]

0.61 m [23.93"]

1.91 m [75.00"]

1.89 m [74.41"]

1.83 m [72.01"] 3.14 m [123.43"]

51

1910-A

1.89 m [74.41"]

3.20 m [126.15"] 1910-A

1910-A

TOP: Project site MIDDLE: Floor plan BOTTOM: Final lab photos

0.76 m [30.01"]

1910-A

A particular design can be visited in the heart of Fundidora Park in Monterrey, Mexico. Where the steel museum asked to rethink a space they had in their main building and turn it in a interactive and learning space for youngsters and thus wake up their interest in the sciences.

1910-A

The work lead to different trips and direct contact with clients which helped me to understand clearly the project’s needs. A contact with the main furniture manufacturer in North Carolina was also important since I was able to understand the structural composition of my main design tool. Such projects also needed to met certain criteria that goes well beyond the typical living or commercial certifications.

EPHEMERAL MUSIC FESTIVAL Concepts and construction of structures for a music festival

Coming up with structures that define the spaces in a music festival sounds simple. However when the main requirement is to make such structures easy to transport through different cities then the challenge increases enormously. Even though this was the first musical festival of its kind in Mexico, it was no small task since international recognized artists were taking part in it.

During the time in this private studio the great gift was the openness to experiment and work directly in the structures as well of course designing them. Therefore every new idea had to pass through a physical experimentation period.

A great number of ideas where presented but in the end only those who had the characteristics of easy transportation were chosen. A food court area, bar, photo opportunity and charging stations where the main need, the link in each of them: the interaction between metal structure and fabric as well as the use of artificial light.

In Collaboration with Alejandro Madero & HĂŠctor Perez @ Roma 212

TOP: Moodboard MIDDLE: Event publicity BOTTOM: Final project photos

52

Tecate Location - Bar Structure @Hermosillo, Mexico

54

PERSONAL INFORMATION ACADEMIC WORK PROFESSIONAL WORK

PERSONAL WORK

55

04. Personal Work - Selected projects

PERSONAL WORK Publications, films, visualizations & drawings.

42

PERSONAL WORK Visualizations

Renderings and montages made with different programs and techniques for personal/family projects, student competitions and concept art for films.

57

58

PERSONAL WORK Films & Publications

1 1

2

3

“Revelaciones + Alternativas” is both a printed publication and a documentary short film that showcases the problems that come with having an hermetic and closed urban posture towards the area where an important university campus develops. The book became a collaboration between more than 30 persons, whereas the film had a much smaller crew that had the job to do research and interviews for the users of the study location.

Film and architecture and the evolution of the latter are linked in so many ways. This essay goes deep into the first 50 years of film and shows the manner that film directors and therefore society in general feels towards the new style which is modernism. A film compilation was produced where we travel through the decades and witness the evolution of what I like to call “communion” between both practices.

4

5

As a side project I’ve had the privilege of writing films reviews that are posted in sites such as One Paragraph Review. The challenge of this particular site is that, as the name suggests, the main rule consists of writing all of my feelings and critiques towards the films in just one paragraph.

The most ambitious of my film projects so far is that of “Walk N’ Roll (Pequeño Peatón Imprudente)”. This is a long subject film that lasts 76 minutes and touches a great variety of subjects. Linking the actual mexican culture of giving such a worship towards the car with historical facts, public opinions and sociopolitical tendencies. The final film has had exhibition in festival in different countries and has acquired several awards.

During my bachelor’s studies I was given the oportunity to collaborate in a design and architecture magazine. My contribution consisted in developing a column with a subject that I consider was relevant to comunicate which in this case I went towards recommendations of films that had in them exciting and important pieces of architecture.

4

59

3

2

5

60

PERSONAL WORK Drawings & Sketches

Work made with pencil, pen, chalk and drawing tablet during my free time.

61

THE END

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION!

CONTACT e-mail: enrique.lo.oro@gmail.com Phone: +33 0 618 777 296

behance.net/enriquelo /in/enriquelo