HARPER'S
NEW MONTI-ILY ~fA.GAZINE. No. ceXL.-MAY,
1870,-VOL, XL.
OUR BARBARIAN BRETHREN. and moral culture." The absence of justice fairly implies barharism-savageism. Tried by this standard, how appears the civilization of the elder world in its contact, during the last nearly four hundred years, with the barbarism of the younger world? Let us see. When this continent was discovered bv Europeans it, was inhabited mostly by a coppercolored people, from the borders of the Arctic Ocean to the most southerly cape of Patagonia, At and toward each coltler extremity of the longitudes the inhabitants were wild and uncultivated, and so they were in harmony with the rugged aspects of nature. In the more central regions they were tame and more refined. From the head waters of La Plata to the thirty-sixth degree of north latitude, many of the useful arts flourished. Science was not a stranger. Society had prescriptive laws. Agriculture brought food from the earth in abundance. Historical knowledge in the form of traditions was carefully cultivated, and pictographic literature was red uced to a svstern. In Peru and Mexico, where" population was more profuse, there was a civilization as advanced as that of Rome at the fall of the Tarquins, or of Egypt in the time of the shepherd kings. They who founded the City of Mexico more than five hundred years ago were as enlightened as were the inhabitants of the British Islands at the time of the Saxon invasion. And when the civilized ruffian from Spain sent word to the barbarian Emperor of the Aztecs that he and his companionshad "a complaint, a disease of the heart that only gold could cure," and that they were coming for the remedy, the doomed people had a code of laws, Prescott says, "which evinces a profound respect for the great principles of morality, and as clear a perception of those principles as is to be found in the most cultivated nation." It was Montezuma, the Barbarian, who executed these laws. It was Cortez, the Civilized Man, who, in his hunger and thirst for gold, plundered that emperor's treasury, destroyed the liberties of his people, put the monarch in chains for no offense but patriotism, broiled his successor on a gridiron, and attempted to convert his two million subjects to Christianity by the persuasions of gunpowder, glittering
I
i
THE
NORTH
AMERICAN
W
INDIAN.
What is a CivilHAT is a Barbarian? ized Man? These questions perplex the philosopher and the Christian philanthropist. Great facts in human history deny the usual definition of the terms ; and very often Barbarism and Civilization, so called, are revealed in contradictory relations as alternate dwellers in the same place and with aspects identical. Sometimes the Barbarian seems to be the Civilized Man. Sometimes the Civilized Man seems to be the Barbarian. So the chronicles of nations tell us. The chronicles of our republic afford notable examples of the fact, which give pith and pertinence to the question sometimes seriously asked, "Is civilization a good or an evil?" "I love to think that Justice can do no wrong," once wrote the good Count De Gasparin. Justice, the soul of the Golden Rule in Christian morals, is the essential condition and solid substance of a true civilization, which Guizot has defined as "both a state of physical well-being and a state of superior intellectual
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1870, by Harper and Brothers, in the Clerk's Officeof the District Court of the United States, for the Southern District of New York. VOL.
XL.-No. 240.-51