EPIGRAM 315

Page 1

Fortnightly 22nd September 2017 Issue 315 Winner of Best Publication and Best Use of Digital Media 2017

University of Bristol’s Independent Student Newspaper

University replaces compulsory consent classes with e-induction

Illustration by Harry Coke

Hannah Wakefield Deputy News Editor On the 6th of September the University of Bristol announced its decision that it will no longer be running compulsory consent classes for incoming students. What remains in the way of education about consent can be found in the e-induction course that new students must complete, although the consent section can be skipped as ‘some people may find it challenging due to previous experiences.’ Consent will still be covered in the residence workshops provided for new students, although these are not mandatory. It is, therefore, possible for students to skip education about sexual consent completely.

The induction defines consent as the following: ‘Sexual consent means a person willingly agrees to have sex or engage in a sexual activity – and they are free and able to make their own decision.’ The induction goes on to explain laws surrounding consent, assault, and rape. Resources have been provided with the help of Somerset and Avon Rape and Sexual Abuse Support (SARSAS) and include a video that uses the analogy that consent is like making tea and a quiz that aims to test students on what they have learnt. Critics are concerned that the resources are both too obvious and patronising, and will not teach the students the information that is crucial to their own and others’ safety. A university spokesperson told Epigram that

Features

Sport 5 ways to not run a half marathon Page 46

www.epigram.org.uk

Are we ignorant of the reality of student debt? Ellen Jones discusses Page 6 EpigramPaper

‘The issue of consent is covered through our mandatory e-induction for all new students living in University accommodation. It’s also covered in our UniSmart presentations which are held for all students during Welcome Week.’ In addition, they have introduced new workshops which cover a ‘breadth of themes relevant to students who are starting University.’ The consent workshops are run in conjunction with SARSAS, who have supported the workshops over the past two years. The response continues: ‘Residences workshops are not mandatory, but it is hoped that this new approach will increase the uptake from students.’ Bristol University’s Intersectional Feminist Society have released a statement responding to

An artist’s map

Arts

the university’s decision, arguing that ‘stopping the workshop at a time when students continue to arrive at the University with scant education on these issues is not only concerning, it is reckless’. They add that information provided in the einduction is too ‘simplistic’ for the complexity of consent, but the main focus of their objections is how it completely fails to mention anything with regards to an LGBTQ+ angle, or how hate crimes are often linked to sexual violence. The University, however, claims to ‘take the issue of consent very seriously and hope[s] these interventions will set a positive tone and culture around sexual consent…’ and adds that the SU are developing further initiatives to ‘ensure that the issue of consent remains firmly on the agenda.’

Comment

and guide to

Uni students shouldn’t vote in

Bristol

uni consituencies

Pages 38-39

@EpigramPaper

Ed Southgate:

Page 10 @epigrampaper_

Download our app!


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.