Counterpower and Insurgency Presentation

Page 1

COUNTEPOWER AND INSURGENCY

UP 801: Concepts and Issues in Planning and Development

Instructor: Dr. Deyanira Nevarez Martinez

MURP

Escarleth Cucurachi Ortega
|
MSU

Planning as societal guidance VS

Planning as social transformation

Basis of Radical Planning

Analysis and Critique of Radical Planning

A study from participation in Radical Planning

Analysis and Perspective of Planning

Radical Planning & Insurgency

A study from examples in Insurgency Planning

1987 Friedmann 2003 Beard CANADA INDONESIA 2004 Sandercock CANADA 2009 Miraftab BOLIVIA BRAZIL SOUTH AFRICA

1987

“Planning as Social Mobilization”

Planning as societal guidance

VS Planning as social transformation

Social Mobilization Radical Planning

Three Major Sub-Traditions

Utopianism

Social Anarchism

Historical Materialism

What

is the Project?

The emancipation of humanity from social oppression

Who is the Client?

The client is the mobilized community or group

What Knowledge is Relevant?

What Do Radical Planners Do?

1. Critique of the present situation

2. Help communities and groups (already mobilized) to search for practical solutions to the problems perceived by them

3. Devising an appropriate strategy

4. Help with technical aspects

5. Conscious use of social learning

6. Share our experience (video, film, and writing)

7. Must be ideologically committed to the transformative project

8. Ensure the widest participation of all members

9. Put together statements that will serve these several purposes

10. Must never be far removed from the action itself

Could radical planning start from the problems perceived by urban planners?

2003

Learning radical planning: The power of collective action”

1. How does a politically oppressed group learn the skills and gain the experience and confidence to organize against a more powerful repressive force?

Analysis of Friedmann's statements Critique

“It is unclear from his normative model what mechanism or experiences enable a community to arrive at this crucial starting point.”(p.18)

2. How does a community engage in radical planning in extremely restrictive socio-political environments?

3. What is the relationship between radical planning and other modes of planning (e.g., rational-comprehensive, communitybased, and collaborative planning? (p.20)

The Study

INDONESIA

Participation

Mother and child health care clinic

Mobilization

The health care clinic for the elderly

Communitybased planning

The Jumat Kliwon’s repaving effort

Covert planning

The RW’s repaving effort

Covert to radical planning

The Library

1. Conclusions

“…experiences teach vital skills that can be used to organize outside of, and even in opposition to, the State. Participation in State programs taught residents about the limitations of State structures and the power and possibilities of mobilization.”(p.29)

2. “After experiencing success (albeit modest), the tangible improvement of their organizational skills, and increased confidence, residents begin to get a sense of their own agency and become politically conscious. This is a crucial precursor to overt radical action.”(p.30)

3. “It is important, however, to recognize that the mode of planning practice a community engages in moves constantly in different directions along a continuum between societal guidance and social transformation.”(p.30)

Do you think the success of social mobilization is necessary for radical planning?

2004

“Towards a Planning Imagination for the 21st Century”

Do you believe planning must be political? Why?

“…planning practices have always been deeply interested rather than disinterested, deeply implicated in politics and in communicative acts.134)

Three senses in which we are always political beings.

“I see planning as an always unfinished social project whose task is managing our coexistence in the shared spaces of cities and neighborhoods in such a way as to enrich human life and to work for social, cultural, and environmental justice.”(p.134)

The choice about for whom and for what to work

We decide to act strategically

Our apparently technical work itself

Daring to break the rules

“The second greatest risk is to involve the public in decision making (as opposed to mere consultation) because that involves surrendering some control, and people who hold power are not usually predisposed to share or devolve it.”(p.136)

Expanding the Creative Capacities

“Another way of tapping, releasing, and nurturing a creative imagination in planning is by working collaboratively with artists.”(p.138)

Do you believe that a more artistic approach would be beneficial for planning?

More TherapeuticApproach

“When planning disputes are entangled in such emotional and symbolic, as well as material, battles, there is a need for a language and process of emotional involvement and resolution.” (p.139)

What is the current approach that planners use for these kinds of conflicts?

2009

Faranak Miraftab

“Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the global south.”

Insurgent planning is transgressive in time, place, and action.

Insurgent planning is counter-hegemonic.

Insurgent planning is imaginative.

BOLIVIA

First indigenous president

BRAZIL

Disrupt the normalized relations produced through differentiated citizenship

SOUTH AFRICA

Counterhegemonic moves, and vice versa

“The majority of marginalized people take into their own hands the challenges of housing, neighborhood and urban development, establishing shelter and earning livelihoods outside formal decision structures and ‘professionalized planning.’”(p.42)

Which is the role that urban planners play in social movements? Is our intervention necessary or relevant to them?

Picture © Comunal Taller de Arquitectura

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

2020

Black Lives Matter

The start of an iconoclastic antiracist movement

2021

March for Women

Rejection of people to this movement.

“Seven people were arrested for vandalizing statues of Christopher Columbus and Juan Ponce de León in Miami.” (Diario

de las Américas)

2020 THE MURDER OF GEORGE FLOYD

© Diario de las Américas

The government tried to protect monuments against aggression with fences. People, in general, were upset because of the public and private property damage.

What do you think about these kinds of insurgent movements? Are they assaulting the city?

© BBC News Mundo
“ ”
It's okay because paint can be cleaned, but blood cannot.

REJECTION

THEY HAVE HAD ENOUGH

Memorial on the fences that protect the National Palace, for International Women's Day © Cuartoscuro

2021

997 feminicides in Mexico

Women are dying on the streets

People of color are dying on the streets

© ABC News

Are the cities that planners helped to develop contributing to the aggression against vulnerable groups? Which role should urban planners play in these conflicts?

THANK YOU!

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.