Future directions of corrections

Running Head: FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF CORRECTIONS

1

Future Directions of Corrections Name Institutional Affiliation

By EssaySupply.com

FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF CORRECTIONS

2

Future Directions of Corrections With the increasing number of incarceration, it is critical to strategize mechanisms that would be accommodative to the many offenders in the United States. The best alternatives to the corrections systems would be intermediate punishments programs that involve the implementation of choices such as electronic monitoring, fines, and shock incarceration (Center for Community Corrections, 2009). The usage of these options would offer an alternative to parole and probation though they are accompanied by a lack of data to support relevance.

Shock incarceration involves subjecting an offender to short periods of imprisonment.

The best example of these strategies involves the usage of boot camps that are comparable to military camping because the criminal is kept at the boot camp for a period ranging three to six months. The effectiveness of these programs is comparable and equal to the traditional options concerning its success rate (Pearson Education, 2010).

The other available option is the use of fines as an alternative to imprisonment where there exist fines that are instituted to be paid in installments. This method is, however, structured to be accompanied by a monitoring component to ensure that there is adherence to the protocol.

Studies on the success rate of this alternative remain scarcely established (Pearson Education, 2010).

The usage of electronic monitoring is a strategy in which the officer to monitor the location of the offender through the usage of technology. This method does not, however, prevent crime but only allows checking the criminal’s indulgence in wrongdoing. Again, there has not been much research on how these methods are successful (The Pennsylvannia Code, 2016).

FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF CORRECTIONS In summation, it is noted that while there exist alternative methods to the traditional parole and probation, the lack of research on the success rate of these interventions greatly compromises the implementation of these methods. The methods would thus not be effective though efficiency could be enhanced with more studies on the effectiveness of the programs.

3

FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF CORRECTIONS References Center for Community Corrections. (2009). What is an Intermediate Punishment? Retrieved from http://centerforcommunitycorrections.org/?page_id=35 Pearson Education. (2010). Intermediate Punishment. Probation and Parole. Retrieved from http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_abadinsky_probation_10/81/20955/5364594.cw//5364642/index.html The Pennsylvannia Code. (2016). Intermediate Punishment Programs. The Pennsylvania Code.

Retrieved from http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/037/chapter451/chap451toc.html

4