Report on 1997 ESU America Scholarship - Dan Neidle Three months debating across 35 colleges, 23 states and four time zones was a wonderful experience. The few small bumps along the way were overwhelmed by the variety of our visits and the kindness of our hosts. It would be invidious to pick out names, but particular thanks must go to Trevor Sather in London and Allan Louden in Wake Forest - the two rocks that kept our tour afloat, to mix my metaphors. Bates College, Maine As the first college to host the British team 75 years previously, Bates College kicked off the 1997 tour. For the first and only time on the tour, we were chaperoned - Trevor Sather, Eric Parsloe and his wife accompanied us for the anniversary celebrations. Maine was a perfect start to the tour; the weather, the people and the architecture were only slightly removed from home. We discovered that jet lag was a ‘good thing’ - we would wake up at 8am regardless of how late we had gone to sleep. Bates decided not to choose a motion ‘à la carte’, but chose its own subject: we debated the relevance of the British Monarchy. It was slightly surreal to be debating such a British stalwart in front of a Union Jack and a large audience. We were split; with the traitorous role going to me. Any conceptions that republicanism would be easy to sell to our American cousins vanished once we saw the preponderance of slightly elderly alumni. One of our opponents - Christopher Tiné - was an alumni of the American tour of Britain - he provided us with stiff competition. At the after-debate reception was an elderly gentleman who had opposed the British speakers 75 years before. In a remarkable after dinner speech, he said that had he realised the tour would have continued for three quarters of a century, he would have taken some notes at the debate - as it was, he couldn’t remember a thing about it. A younger woman (graduate of 1933) gave us the compliment of the tour, when she said that our debate had been much more fun than those of the 30s. Emerson College, Boston Emerson was wonderfully located in downtown Boston - which rapidly became our favourite city of the tour. As the only purely communication college in America, Emerson has the reputation of attracting students who want to be famous. We found it hard to get adjusted to the idea of rhetoric and speech taught as academic studies - with an entire building packed with professors of every type of rhetoric imaginable. Our host, Dr Payne, had the perfect approach to hosting a British team - he gave us plenty of advice on what to see but let us essentially look around the city on our own. The debate was in the First and Second Church of Boston. My introduction to American literalism began when someone told me this was because it was on the site of the first and second churches in Boston. Our debate started the Princess Diana theme that was to follow us for the first month of the tour. We debated media regulation against a graduate student and a local politician who told the audience that anyone voting for us was voting against America. We won - probably because their count of the numbers on each side of the House was flawed by several dozen infirm alumni who couldn’t move away from us quickly enough. Just in case anybody had forgotten who Diana was, the debate was followed by a ‘multi-media presentation’ of Diana’s life. Boston College Boston College was very much the serious US-style policy debate college. The culture shock began to hit when we discovered that the successful policy debater spends 20-40 hours a week researching. The shock was increased when we heard the rate at which they spoke think of a shouting match between Pinky and Perky.