No. 3 | 2015
European Wilderness Journal
National Park Hohe Tauern
â‚Ź 7,50 Donation Fee
European Wilderness Journal
The future of wilderness in Europe Dear friends of the wild!
Letter to the editors
During the “Conference on Wilderness and Large Natural Habitat Areas” in 2009 a discussion of an official definition of “Wilderness” was started and finalized in 2012. The European Wilderness Quality Standard and Audit System was defined to state the various subjects and indicators of wilderness.
I am most impressed with the scope of work being undertaken by the European Wilderness Society. I am following the Society’s efforts with Wilderness Verification, the Green Infrastructure plan and the importance of non-extractive values. Keep up the good work! – Dan Mulrooney
This is the official side of wilderness, the side we as the European Wilderness Society and numerous organisations and NGO’s, such as the Wilderness Working Group, the WWF and the WEI, work with or base our work on. But a definition is always just a summary and often a compromise of various different point of views. The 500+ indicators and the minimum of 14 days of field work enabled us to compare three totally different wilderness habitat types against a common wilderness definition. So even if there is our official European Wilderness Quality Standard and Audit System – What is wilderness for us? What do we, every single one of us, mean with the term wilderness? Is it a primeval forest, new emerging areas due to the glacier recession or an abandoned military area? Is it the occurrence of wolf, lynx, bear or eagle? My personal definition of wilderness, while working for the European Wilderness Society, is based on this official scientific definition and quality standards but it is more than that: for me wilderness is where nature is truly master of itself. Where humans don’t play any role in nature’s cycles but where we are part of the bigger picture as we are part of nature – as equals. Humans are a part of nature and not master of it and wilderness reminds us of that. That might be frightening and challenging, but we should take the opportunity to open our eyes and minds to learn from Mother Earth.
Verena Gruber, Trainee
Thank you! Thank you for the increasing number of subscribers who are donating € 50,- to allow us to write, edit, print and distribute the European Wilderness Journal.
2
PEGNet Project This is a project that exactly reflects one of the main priorities as I see it for the protection of biodiverse life as we know it. The other would be targeted protection for species at immediate risk, and their habitat. I’m currently studying environmental science with the OU ( because they don’t do an ecology degree), with the hope of becoming involved in useful projects in the future, so it would be great to be able to help in some way with enabling green corridors in Europe. One obvious species that would benefit is the Iberian Lynx, successfully brought back from near extinction, it’s future looks bleak without enabling them to migrate through green corridors. – Simon Barton PEGNet Project I am a huge advocate for large scale wildlife projects and I believe this is something in the past which had been missing from Europe. We have seen in America and Canada with the Y2Y project that large scale projects can raise the issue of wilderness conservation in the public. The need for a large scale corridor is becoming more and more important with the increase in bears and wolves in Europe. After taking a real interest in the large scale corridors across North America and Africa the opportunity to become involved in a project in Europe would be something truly special for me. I honestly believe that with the increased land abandonment across Europe this vision is achievable. – Guy Bennet I visited Kalkalpen NP in summer 2012. Natural forces shape park’s landscape and increase heterogeneity in very impressive ways. Places like Kalkalpen NP have very great value as reference ecosystems. Such places could also wash our minds from bias of the “shifting baseline syndrome”. After all humans are not the only makers of heterogeneous landscapes. I believe this could be also a great lesson for a new generation of management practices in Natura2000 sites. Kalkalpen NP is a wonderful place in a wonderful Country! – Dario Botti
Wilderness ticker ▲
Annual report The European Wilderness Society is the only Pan-European, wilderness and environmental advocacy organisation whose mission is to identify, designate, manage and promote European wilderness. These past months have been a big success. We developed the European Wilderness Quality Standard and Audit System, launched various online communication tools and organized the first European Wilderness Academy Days in Mittersill. Our most important activities and objectives are highlighted in our annual report. Available either as a download on our website or in printed form from our office.
European Wilderness Society Scholarship
▲
The European Wilderness Society has worked closely with numerous national and regional authorities and NGOs in the Ukraine to assist in the protection of Europe´s last wilderness. As part of our engagement in the Ukraine, the European Wilderness Society awards two half scholarship worth € 6,450 for the postgraduate MS.c. Management of Protected Areas programme for one outstanding and wilderness oriented full-time first-year student from the Ukraine. The scholarships require a thesis focusing on wilderness related management, protection, communication, stakeholder or wildlife issues. The University of Klagenfurt, Austria, offers this international postgraduate MSc programme for dedicated individuals, who want to broaden and deepen their knowledge on protected areas management.
▲
National Park Hohe Tauern wilderness verification
From 28th of July till 6th of August two verifiers of the European Wilderness Society, Verena Gruber and Vlado Vancura, visited the Hohe Tauern National Park in Salzburg for the first field wilderness assessment of the proposed wilderness area around the Großvenediger. Starting from Mittersill, all four valleys of the proposed wilderness have been explored: the Krimmler Achen-Valley, the Ober- and the Untersulzbach-valley and the Habach-valley. Those field trips have been accompanied by the park’s Director Wolfgang Urban or the Deputy Director Ferdinand Lainer who made it possible to discuss most of the EWS – criteria and indicators on site.
School Programme on large carnivores
▲
The European Wilderness Society, in particular our large carnivore expert Gudrun Pflüger, visited several schools in Austria to inform them during a one day program about the large carnivores, especially the wolf, and their important roles in the ecosystems. The kids were able to touch a real wolf fur, compare wolf foot prints, cut out their own wolf masks and compete with several wildlife species in a long jump competition. An other highlight was a howling and marking exercise.
www.wilderness-society.org
3
European Wilderness Journal
Wilderness Academy Days 2015 Research colleagues, wilderness managers and fellow wilderness advocates, you are all more than welcome to participate in this year´s European Wilderness Academy Days Author: Verena Gruber
The
2nd European Wilderness Academy Days will be held in the National Park Gesäuse from September 30th to October 2nd this year. Europe´s most profound wilderness advocates will again convene in Austria to discuss the latest developements on wilderness in Europe. The word “Gesäuse” stands for „wild water and steep rock“ and you will have the chance to experience this unique and wild landscape in the heart of Austria during our field trips on the second day of our conference. You can choose between three different field trips to the new emerging wild areas in
4
the National Park that will give you some interesting insights into the real effect of climate change. Speakers from all over Europe will present interesting topics such as wilderness restoration and connectivity, trans-boundary wilderness, the link between wilderness and sustainable tourism and how to engage the next generation in wilderness protection. Sessions about Natura2000 management, wilderness and green infrastructure as well as about wild rivers and wetlands will bring you new insights to those topics. A presentation about the journey of Ivo the bear will round off our evenings. Vlado Vancura, Director of Wilderness Development,
will present the results of the three European Wilderness Quality Standards Audits this year in three completely different habitats from primeval beech forests, to glacial landscapes to alpine mixed forests. If you have an interesting topic you would like to present at the Wilderness Academy Days please do not hesitate to contact us immediately. For all details concerning programme, registration and accommodation please visit the Website
www.wilderness.academy
See and meet us at the following events September
Wildniskonferenz 2015 Stiftung Naturlandschaften Brandenburg 09.-10.09.2015, Potsdam, Germany Wagnis Wildnis Nationalpark Hohe Tauern 17.-18.09.2015, Mittersill, Austria
Wildnis im Dialog 14.-17.09.2015, Insel Vilm, Germany European Wilderness Academy Days 30.09.-02.10.2015, Nationalpark Gesäuse, Austria
October
Europarc Annual Conference 26.-27.10.2015, Regensburg, Germany Wildnistagung 23.10.2015, Biosphärenpark Rhön, Germany,
www.wilderness-society.org
5
European Wilderness Journal
“Vallachian Vatra” holiday village An innovative green tourism project to preserve unique Carpathian culture and wilderness Author: Constantin Serban and Adela Talpes
Romanian
Carpathian mountains are well known for their wild nature treasures, the biggest population of large carnivores, as well as the breathtaking landscapes. The tourists looking for wilderness will be pleasantly surprised to meet during their hiking traditional wooden house spread among green peaks and shepherds grazing their sheep and goats in the traditional way, same as hundreds of years before, using nature friendly techniques, in close relation with wilderness. They are the descendants of the Vlachs, the Romanized populations of Central and Eastern Europe, named Vallachs by foreign people. The name of “Vlachs” appears for the first time in 976 in Greek chronicler John Skiliţes writings.
Their ability to maintain their lands in a natural state and preserve their traditional way of living should be encouraged. They could also be partners in generating income to improve their life conditions and their children’s education.
Basically Vlachs are present today throughout Europe but mainly in the Carpathian area of Romania, Hungary, Serbia, Ukraine, Slovakia, Czech Republic (there is even a “Vlach autonomous region”) and Poland, a proof for the continuity of Vlachs civilization along the Carpathians.
Those men have that particular form of intelligence which we consider today interesting and even intriguing; brave and from one piece as they seem, they are still authentic and true to their own nature connected to the surrounding nature. Their style has grown from the inside, and it is an expression of their history and living into the mountains wilderness.
Vallachian civilization show striking similarities across the Carpathians in terms of ethnography, folklore and rural economy and it has a common part of the vocabulary, kept both in dialectal archaism and in the mountain toponymy. Unfortunately these traditional shepherds are rarer, due to the modern life style getting even to the high peaks of the mountains and the vallachian culture values are going to be forgotten unless highlighted and valued for the next generations.
Community and wilderness - Vallachian style
Due to the character of their interesting way of economy, the Vallachs were predestined to a traveling, roving, and semi-nomadic life. From time to time, in order to survive and make a living, they had to move from one place to another because there were many of them and the original mountain region could not support them.
Only because the Vallachs lived so high in the mountains, far away from economical and cultural centers, they were allowed to maintain their authentic way of life along with an ancient way of production. It was first of all an unusual way of breeding sheep and goats which were grazed for the whole summer in the mountains, where at the same location milk, wool, and other products were worked up. In the beginning, they did not have villages with permanent buildings. Instead, they constructed a “salas/coliba” for a family and many of these huts for a group of families around a “vatra” or fire pit as the central place of meeting, socializing and making decisions. Sheep and traditional Vallachian shepherding, now slowly dies, “colibas” are abandoned, trails are blocked and springs are clogging, invasive species grow on the lands, less shepherds and donkeys with saddlebags can be seen. Seasonal stables become ruins, many deserted hamlets and entire villages have only few old inhabitants. In many places gaudy reproductions have replaced the icons on glass on the Vallachian houses walls and you can count on fingers the people who know how to make a “tulnic” (traditional musical instrument), a “cerga” (sheep wool blanket) or a mill operated with water.
6
“Vallachian Vatra” holiday village project
To avoid irreversible losing this cultural treasure of the Carpathian heritage, Green-tourism Ecological Association a national environmental NGO focused on tourism from Romania started the “Vallachian Vatra” Project, having the motto: “Return to the roots, a Carpathian people message from the past, found in the present.” The project “Vallachian Vatra” (Vatra Valaha) aims to build a traditional holiday village to express on bio-eco-ethno-logical principles the picturesque and functionality of traditional architecture specific to Vallachians peasant spread across Europe and also the characteristic hospitality of areas currently occupied in the present by the descendants of the Vallachs. The “Vallachian Vatra” village is a green tourism model that gathers around an ancient fire pit/“vatra” all these principles and who aims to facilitate access to authentic traditional Vallachian culture of all those who want to know and live the healthy lifestyles, the millenary traditions, customs and hospitality of the Vlachs. The rural development through this green tourism project proves the applicability of a green business scheme development in the social and cultural tourism and it is the first pilot project in Romania which, besides bio / eco and cultural component (based on secular history and agrarian traditions of Vallachian shepherds) it has a social component based on helping 7 families in poor economic condition on the principle ”provide rod instead of fish.” In the specific rural Vlachs settlements you can always find clean air and clear water springs that come from the Carpathian Mountains. They were for centuries the keepers of the Vallachian material and spiritual heritage, which have taken over and integrated elements of local culture, created, invented and permanently adapted to historical socio-economic conditions.
The pleasure to visit at least some of these rural settlements in hours is impossible today in real conditions of modern society. This can be achieved only by visiting a single centralized site designed as a living museum containing seven of the most representative traditional houses from each Carpathian country, each of them with accommodation facilities and a specific Vallachian craft shop. The “Vallachian Vatra” project is planned to be implemented in a holistic and comprehensive way, combining the promotion of the vallachian life style with conservation programs, health, and education activities that serve the community, the Carpathian nature and the wildlife that are so important to all of us. The first step is the construction of Manor House (building with administrative, meetings and accommodation role) which is going to start next year in the spring, using European funds. For the rest of the village, the association is looking for partners, investors and volunteers. If you want to become their supporter, whatever small, your donation will be of great help. The project initiators hope the success of Vallahian Vatra as a holiday village, offering genuine and sustainable tourism, can make it a replicable model to address the needs of other communities in Central and Eastern Europe.
www.wilderness-society.org
7
European Wilderness Journal
Wilderness assessment Case study Kalkalpen NP, Austria Author: Vlado VanÄ?ura
In
the heart of Austria lies an island of wilderness. A piece of land where for the purpose of wilderness conservation more than 100 kilometres of forest roads have either already stopped being used, abandoned or actively restored. It is a land where not only the park management, researchers and experts can monitor and learn what natural dynamism really means but also where visitors are able to see and explore what spontaneous natural processes without any human intervention or control means to ecosystems.
versity e.g. a recent inventory confirmed the presence of 1500 species of butterflies. Further on a long systematic research revealed that there are also 35 species of beetle which are fully depended on the dead wood. These beetles - wilderness relict species – desperately need dead wood to exist.
Wilderness and biodiversity
The Kalkalpen Wilderness is an excellent example that wilderness is not only to be found in remote parts of our planet or in the far north or at the top of high mountains. It is an area with more than 10,000 ha of wilderness located right in the middle of Europe.
It is a piece of land where for more than 15 years management focuses on wilderness restoration and the reintroduction of lynx. They also were pioneers in permitting bark beetle to thrive without intervention. It is a land where researchers explore surprising biodi-
8
The Kalkalpen Wilderness is thus an evidence that wilderness can be protected also in Central Europe. It is also proof that wilderness protects European biodiversity.
Because of the quality, the Kalkalpen Wilderness was the subject of a detailed wilderness audit with more than 500 indicators carried out by a team of European Wilderness Society verifiers in June 2015.
Wilderness site assessment
The European Wilderness Society wilderness experts spent 14 days in the Kalkalpen Wilderness. Besides a few days in the office to collect all needed information and to discuss difficult issues such as wildlife management or temporary fragmentation of wilderness zone, the team spent most of the days in remote parts of the park. The team was guided and supported by local park wilderness experts including the director of Kalkalpen Nationalpark – Mr. Erich Mayrhofer and many other members of his staff. During the audit, besides the longterm wilderness vision, the
Vatnajökull NP Iceland
Helsinki Oslo Stockholm
Tallinn
Riga Moskva
Vilnius
Minsk Dublin
team discussed park history and zonation, the size of the wilderness zone and management, biodiversity and wilderness restoration and sustainable tourism aspects. The interaction with the highly skilled park staff and rangers provided additional information such as the wildlife management during the winter months or about the strategy of dealing with bark beetle in the wilderness and management zone. The wilderness assessement also included a visit to the highest valley of the Kalkalpen Wilderness which was used as an Alpine grazing area in the past. Spontaneous succession processes was subject of the evaluation together with an assessment of the small pasture - islands within the core zone that are still used by local people for cattle grazing such as the Feichtauhütte (1360m) as well as the lower situated Blumaueralm (762m). The team observed and evaluated also the impact of natural events such as avalanches on forest ecosystems. Combining EWQA Wilderness Diploma and UNESCO’s World Heritage List Kalkalpen Wilderness includes also several fragments of the old growth beech forests (5.250 ha), now inscribed to the UNESCO tentative candidates list of UNESCO’s World Heritage List. Kalkalpen Wilderness thus contributes to the protection of Primeval Beech Forests in Europe, together with other Wilderness candidates Zacharovanij Kraj NP, Ukraine, currently also in a process of EWQA assessment this year.
Berlin Warszawa London
Bruxelles
Bonn
Kiev
Liptovský Hrádok
Paris
Vienna
Uzhhorod
Bratislava Tamsweg
Györ
Budapest
Bern Ljubljana
Druillat
Bucaresti
Sofia
Roma
Madrid
Tirana
Tbilisi
Bak Ankara
Yerevan
Lisboa
Desertas Islands NP, Portugal Garajonay NP, Spain
www.wilderness-society.org
9
European Wilderness Journal
Team in Action
10
We appreciate your donation to support our work! European Wilderness Society IBAN: AT41 1200 0100 0833 8476 BIC: BKAUATWW
www.wilderness-society.org
11
European Wilderness Journal
Bears can coexist with people Lessons from northern Spain Author: Roberto Hartasånchez, President FAPAS – www.fapas.es Translated by: Karin Eckhard
In
the early 80s of the last century, the Iberian Peninsula only had two free roaming bear populations. One of them inhabited the Pyrenees Mountains wandering between France and Spain. The other population survived in the Cantabrian Mountains in the heavily settled area of north central Spain. Each population had no more than 40 bears and they were the last individuals of a species that had for many centuries inhabited a large part of Spain and Portugal. It was during this time in the 1980s when the concerns for the survival of not only bears but other large carnivores, such as wolves and lynx began. With such small populations of bears, it seemed that their extinction was inevitable. Thirty years later and despite occupying a large natural area, that is exactly what happened in the Pyrenees and only with reintroductions of bears from Slovenia does this area have a very small population.
The challenges of coexisting
However, the bears in the Cantabrian Mountains, where scientists believed that they would become extinct, they have persisted despite a less natural area. Its population has expanded to a much larger area of Asturias, perhaps about 200 specimens living in complete freedom occupying an area of about 10,000 square kilometres. Although the future is worrying for this population, each year, there are new cubs and breeding females are boosting the numbers.
Thirty years of work by FAPAS (Fondo para la Protection de los Animales Salvajes) has shown that it is possible. Today the bears live in areas where there are thousands of people. They approach villages and everything seems normal, there are no problems. Conservation work has shown that the bears have survived because of the human activity in these areas taking advantage of obtaining additional food resources. Moreover, the harsh terrain of these mountains, deep valleys and vast forests, many of them had been planted by man, offers a safe haven for bears, though living in the vicinity of a village. The protein source that human activity makes available to bears in the form of carcasses of dead pets that have died of natural causes or have been abandoned in the mountains, has been one of the guarantees of their survival.
Bears have reached this population level with serious genetic problems and continued persecution. In the mountains of Asturias, the bear is protected, but poaching persists and the bear is a coveted target. In addition, the bears supposedly cause damage to agriculture, smash crops and kill domestic cattle. They are considered the enemies of man. One of the biggest problems is that bear territory is also human territory. The Cantabrian Mountains have a high concentration of towns and villages. Several hundred thousand people share and live together with wild animals, including bears which seemed to justify their extinction. Even scientists and specialist also believed it was not possible for bears to live where there are people.
Management of living with wild animals
It was necessary to study and discover the special ecology of the bears who have adapted to living together in the same territory as humans for hundreds of years. This special population of bears is without aggression and with a high rate of fertility. It has only been necessary to focus on combating poaching, which in the past was very intense and still exists today. The other focus was for society to be concerned and to understand that large carnivores such as bears are a sign of social identity of the territory. Asturias, is proud to have bears in the mountains and now killing bears is a crime and socially unacceptable. However, despite these successes, new problems arise which must have a political solution. The European Union has banned that corpses of animals are left in nature, which is generating an unprecedented crisis in territories with wild animals such as carrion, bears, wolves, vultures relying on carcasses as a source of protein. They have lost an
12
important source of food that was presen mestic livestock have multiplied, creating a social opposition to its presence. The Regional Administration authorized the killing of 60 wolves each year without any scientific studies to support this decision.
The political struggle uses these arguments of wildlife damage to their advantage and starts to explain that the problem is too many bears or wolves. After thirty years of work, we could lose everything that we have already achieved if we do not react now. But there are few voices calling for the reverse of the ruling by the EU, domestic animals that have died of natural causes or been abandoned should be left in nature. Vatnajökull NP Iceland
Helsinki
Oslo
Stockholm
Tallinn
The Cantabrian Mountains are something special, a wild world of bears and wolves in the midst of a modern society, an unprecedented natural heritage in western Europe that we have conserved through wisdom and experience. If we do nothing, the region will go the way of the Pyrenees, essential devoid of bears and wolves.
Riga
Vilnius
Mins
Dublin
Berlin Warszawa London
Bruxelles
Bonn
Liptovský Hrádok
Paris
Vienna
Uzhhorod
Bratislava Tamsweg
Györ
Budapest
Bern Ljubljana
Druillat
Bucaresti
Sofia
Roma
Tirana
Madrid
Lisboa
Desertas Islands NP, Portugal Garajonay NP, Spain
www.wilderness-society.org
13
European Wilderness Journal
Complicated wilderness story of Šumava National Park The never ending fight for wilderness Author: Jaromir Blahá
Šumava
– the (much larger) Czech counterpart of the Bayerischer Wald National Park – represents the largest continuous forested area in Central Europe and is one of the most crucial biodiversity sites. To quote IUCN, this national park is “part of the largest, best conserved and most species rich forested area in Central Europe”. It is a vital habitat to some endangered species, including capercaillie, black grouse, lynx, elk and Ural owl. Its peat bogs and waterlogged forests are a wetland of international importance under the Ramsar Convention. Šumava National Park was declared in March 1991 in the central region of the mountain range running along the borders with Germany and Austria. At that time, mayors of the involved municipalities demanded a national park of European importance in accordance with IUCN requirements. The National park extends over an area of 690 square kilometres. Forests form almost 84 % of the area, with meadows and pastures accounting for 7 %. About 1,000 square kilometres of Šumava Protected Landscape Area serve as the national park’s buffer zone and protecting some natural features of the region that lie outside the Park. The entire territory including the Protected Landscape Area was registered as a UNESCO biosphere reserve. The National Park is a mosaic of the remains of primeval forest, peat-bogs and peat meadows, successions of areas with vegetation after former villages, glacial lakes, watercourses and forests more or less changed by humans. There are a few small villages inside this natural complex. The overwhelming majority of settlements ceased to exist after a forcible transfer of the German minority after the Second World War and after closing part of the territory behind the so-called Iron Curtain by the former Communist regime. After the designation of the national park in 1991 there was a unique opportunity to renovate the undisturbed natural processes on a relatively large area in Central Europe, to observe interactions among various ecosystems and to create there a vital space for demanding species such as the lynx and potentially also for wolf and bear. Šumava NP is therefore one of the best opportunities for wilderness restoration in Europe.
Conflicting interests
However, Šumava NP is under heavy pressure from logging and development interests. Crucially, they promote large scale clear-cut logging under the disguise of preventing the spread of bark beetles. The dispute about the national park will determine more than the future of
14
Šumava. The topic has already become the focal point in a wider debate about recognition of wilderness protection as a relevant government policy, with high level political interventions. In 1995, the first zone (core zone) of Šumava NP was reduced from 22% to only 13% and fragmented into 135 isolated parts. The resulting small size of individual fragments does not however allow the main national park goal to be attained – the undisturbed protection of natural ecosystem processes. The National Park Administration responded to the 1995 - 1998 increase in spruce bark beetle population by cutting down trees in a large scale outside of fragmented first zones. This cutting opened the forest canopy to wind, creating plenty of open forest stand walls. Subsequent windbreaks falled down much more trees than were originally affected by bark beetle itself. Large clear-cut areas arose in the National Park. This occurred especially in the high elevations along the border with Bayerischer Wald National Park (above 1,300 metres), but also in other places. In 1999 the National Park administration and the Czech Ministry of Environment allowed spruce trees infested by bark beetles to be cut also in first zones of Šumava NP. Fortunately the bark beetle outbreak
ended but the natural development of habitats for the future was not protected even in primeval forests. This led to extensive protests among scientists and NGOs. Hnutí DUHA – Friends of the Earth Czech Republic organized a peaceful blockade of tree felling in the so called “Trojmezenský prales” – the oldest and most conserved remnant of montane spruce old growth forest in the Czech Republic, where over 1000 trees were marked to be cut down. The blockade lasted for two months and succeeded in stopping the tree logging in the primeval forest. This achievement opened a public debate which addressed not only the problem of the bark beetle, but the general topic of the mission of national parks, as well. Under the threat of further protests the Ministry of Environment took part in discussions with scientists and ecological NGOs. The proceedings led to the invitation of an IUCN expert mission by the Ministry in order to obtain an attitude and recommendation of a suitable course.
Politically influenced management
The IUCN/WCPA expert mission visited Šumava National Park in autumn 2002, after a changeover in the Ministry lead. In 2003 IUCN handed over a report, recommending (among others) the uniting of the fragmented first zones into a few compact units, increasing their area to 30-40% of the park extent within 3-5 years and keeping a basically non-intervention regime. Environmental minister decided to act in accordance with the IUCN recommendation. In 2003 the felling of trees infested by the
bark beetle in the first zones was stopped. In 2005 the NP Šumava administration put forth a new Park strategy based on the fundamental vision: “The Šumava National Park protects a unique mountain scenery in a territory of attractive cultural character, facilitating an undisturbed development of its area and opening it for exploration. It would like to be a place of encounter between the visitors and the natural beauty of wilderness.” But the municipalities refused this new strategy. Similarly, they refused the proposal for a new zonation which would unite the inappropriate fragmentation. Following the hurricane Kyrill in 2007, which completely devastated the stands affected by earlier felling of bark beetle infected trees, the Ministry decided to leave especially montane forests (in first as well in second zones) free of tree logging on an area of over 30% of the territory of Šumava National Park. Following the new outbreak of bark beetle these forests turned into a fascinating wilderness. But after a next change of the Government it came to a turnaround again. The new Minister recalled the Park director and established Mr. Stráský, who refused to take over the already prepared European diploma, dissolved the scientific section of the National Park Council and commenced tree felling in areas left over to wilderness in the past. Logging did not stop neither after appeals from dozens of prominent Czech scientists nor repeated warnings from NGOs, pointing out that the
Park headquarters is violating the Czech Nature Protection Law and other European directives (Habitat Directive, Birds Directive). After this, conservationists, joined by part of the public, began a non-violent blockade of tree logging in the area of “Ptačí potok” (Bird creek) at Modrava moor. During several weeks the participants faced crude actions of special police squads called into action by the Park director. This led to even stronger public protests and a demonstrations before the Ministry of Environment, getting the Minister to stop the felling. Several months later Czech courts had acted and in 2013 have confirmed that protesters, including many members of Hnutí DUHA/Friends of the Earth Czech Republic, who blocked loggers in Šumava National Park in 2011 acted peacefully, legitimately and in complete accordance with the law. Police intervention, however, and the tree-felling itself, have both been deemed illegal. In May 2012, preceding the expected visit of European Committee representatives, the Environmental Minister suspended Mr. Straský as director of the Park and designated the deputy director, responsible for the illegal felling, instead. The upstart director then prepared a new proposal of the management plan, including the downgrade of Sumava NP from IUCN category II to category IV. Along with the Minister they together prepared and put forth a special bill for NP Šumava, legalizing tree felling in areas formerly left to natural development and weakening the protection
www.wilderness-society.org
15
European Wilderness Journal
of the NP landscape against building development. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) warned the past government about a similar proposal that “by accepting the management proposed in the bill, Šumava will not be eligible to retain the IUCN category II status (national park)”. The issue is of significance not only for the future of nature protection in the Czech Republic, but also beyond -- not least in relation to the review of EU nature conservation legislation which is expected to take place in the next couple of years. Re-designation of the Park, which is also one of the key Natura 2000 sites in Central Europe, would be extremely dangerous as a major precedent because of the domino effect. A blatant breaching of Natura 2000 rules in a site of crucial importance, one which has been under protection of both national and EU legislation, would set a dangerous example for other governments. In view of this domino effect this action poses a challenge to the protective status of national parks everywhere. The Environmental Minister and the MPs of the Environmental Comitee of the Czech Parliament obtained a petition letter from 72 directors of European nature preservation institutions (see http://www. sumava-kurovec.cz/include/Dopis%2072%20reditelu.pdf) Thanks to the 2013 fall of the Government, and the subsequent dissolution of the Parliament, the MPs were not able to discuss the bill. The new Environmental Minister confirmed the interest of managing the NP Šumava as an internationally distinguished National Park of IUCN Category II, suspended the director and posted a director, which committed himself to observing the nature conservation laws, stopping all projects which would injure the nature of Šumava. Minister approved a temporary three-year management plan, reducing the non-intervention area to 23%, though, with an additional 5% where action against the bark beetle is allowed only exceptionally and where practically no intervention took place in this year. Therefore a group of senators started to push forward a new draft
16
of a special law on Šumava NP again, based on the worst from all the previous ones. The draft was disastrous: it envisaged no true wilderness zones in the national park and would pave the way for major new development projects such as ski resorts and new building construction, i.e. new hotels, family-hotels, apartment-hotels and similar facilities on 2/3 of the NP Šumava area. Furthermore, the bill proposed to decrease protection of forests in the National Park to a lower degree than is usual in current commercial forests in the rest of the country. This group of senators succeeded in gaining support for their proposal among the Senate of the Czech Republic and passed it as a Senate legislation proposal to the Czech Parliament.
Hnuti DUHA steps in
Hnutí DUHA – FoE CR started a huge campaign to mobilise the public, building on excellent popularity of the national park and a general public support for the protection of wilderness. Development interests have got strong political backing – but they are also deeply unpopular, and many politicians recognise that. This is why the strategy was based on encouraging thousands of people to write to their members of parliament (MPs). Hnuti DUHA – FoE CR already started to develop a network of young people committed to Šumava, who are also ready to visit politicians personally. Tourists in the national park, who are worried about the damage they witness in the existing clear-cut sites, formed another key target group. Hnuti DUHA – FoE CR mobilised the public also through a petition and several concerts for Šumava wilderness with the help of Czech musical groups well known among young people. Dozens of volunteers collected signatures under the petition available on information stalls in Šumava, in cities and during music festivals as well. Hnuti DUHA – FoE CR addressed both the public and MPs using the slogan “a piece of wilderness is in every heart”. People from Hnuti DUHA – FoE CR spent much of time meeting with key MPs persuading them to refuse the draft. Also, they organised additional activities to convince them, like excursions to the national
park so that MP´s could directly see what the felling in contrary to wilderness protection is about, a successful approach in the past. Hnuti DUHA – FoE CR prepared own legislation proposals and together with scientists from the Czech Academy of Science also a zoning proposal suggesting 50% of Šumava NP as core zone – wilderness area (http://www.ejes.cz/index.php/ejes/article/ view/119/56) and proposed strict rules to prevent inappropriate building development and future damages due to mismanagement.
The Šumava wilderness campaign
Thanks to cooperation with Wild Europe an economic study to assess three various scenarios of NP Šumava evolution was applied. The study “An Outline of Economic Impacts of Management Options for Šumava National Park” was carried out by a reputable British company EFTEC, concluding that the expansion of the wilderness to 50% of Park area is economically advantageous as well (see EFTEC study: http://www.sumava-kurovec. cz/include/Economic_Assessment_of_Sumava_National_Park,_eftec,_Final_Report. pdf). So, during parliamentary debates, Hnuti DUHA – FoE CR suggested own proposal as a solution which is both ecologically and economically advantaged. The campaign organized by Hnutí DUHA - Friends of the Earth Czech Republic turned out to be very successful. Over 43 000 people, including well known artists (many of them from Czech National Theatre), musicians and writers signed the petition „For a good law on the Šumava National Park“. Addition-
ally, MP´s obtained over one thousand of personal mails mainly from visitors of the National Park. Renowned Czech musical bands and several musicians directly supported the Šumava wilderness campaign during three “concerts for Šumava wilderness” taking place in Prague and in Southern Bohemia. Hnutí DUHA – FoE CR revealed with the help of media real estate speculations and connections between politicians and businessmen profiting from the bill. The Czech Parliament decisively voted down the Senate´s bill in October. But this is not an end to the debate. The Ministry of Environment is preparing its own novelization of the Nature Protection Act, which should be valid for all Czech national parks generally. Consequently a new zonation will be prepared for NP Šumava. The municipalities succeeded in suing the provisional three-year management plan and the court
obliged the Ministry to withdraw it. However, this judgement is not final yet. The outcome of the described twenty years of controversy about NP Šumava is above all a significant shift in public opinion. Before twenty years, most people agreed with actions against the bark beetle and environmentalists were considered fools trying to protect a feared forest pest. The term “wilderness” had a pejorative touch and was not very popular. Today, “wilderness” is a demanded tourist destination, as well as a label, often misused for marketing purposes. But as the debate, even in academic circles frequently shows the content of the terms “wilderness” and “intervention-free” is not clear to many. Thus, the next suitable step would be an introduction of the definition of wilderness developed by Wild Europe and the certification of the European Wilderness Society and its model application in NP Šumava.
www.wilderness-society.org
17
European Wilderness Journal
Picturing Wildlife The Kalkalpen Wilderness, Austria Fotos by Bart van Engeldorp Gastelaars
18
Wilderness curriculum for aspiring nature conversation managers The European Wilderness Society, Hnutà DUHA – Friends of the Earth Czech Republic, Mountain Wilderness and WOLF Forest Protection Movement have launched a new EU project to enhance adult training opportunities and methods about wilderness and protected area issues. Author: Katrin Schikorr & Anni Henning
Did
you always wanted to learn (again) how to light a fire without matches? To pick the right plants and turn them into an eatable and enjoyable dish? Or to build a shelter out in the woods to stay dry and safe for a night? All this sounds like nature camps for young people, but wilderness trainings exists for adults too, in different forms all over Europe.
project that aims to bring fundamental changes in the public attitude towards wilderness by educating them about the various benefits of wilderness and its importance. Project partners will look into existing wilderness education practices, encourage the exchange of best-practices amongst countries and protected areas, and field test innovated curricula of education programs.
Strictly protected areas are essential places to safeguard our European Natural Heritage and also a source of increasingly valuable biological and ecological information for scientists and the public, to whom wilderness offers wide educational opportunities and a strong emotional experience.
The outcome of the 2-year Erasmus-funded EU project will be a best-practice module on wilderness education methods for adults, as well as guides for professionals and private interest groups resuming the existing training offers.
So there is a lot to learn from protected areas, and the interest amongst adults for on-going training programs on wild flora, fauna and natural habitats and also on how to behave in and how to experience wild places is high. Some protected areas have started to fill the gap of offer and demand, and propose training courses. The European Wilderness Society and three partner NGOs have pooled their experiences in adult training and recently started an EU
Through the project, all partners aim to strengthen adult key competencies, increase the public interest for and understanding of wilderness and thus help nature protection. In the sincere hope to link our ties to nature again, and why not through a self-made meal prepared in a highly enjoyable natural surrounding? Some of the findings will be presented at the European Academy Days 2015 in the National Park Gesäuse.
www.wilderness-society.org
19
Šumava National Park © 2015 European Wilderness Society, ZVR: 305471009 | Dechant Franz Fuchs Str. 5; 5580 Tamsweg; Austria | Phone: +43 (0)676 913 88 04 | Email: info@wilderness-society.org | www.wilderness-society.org | Photo Credits: EWS, Max Rossberg, Gudrun Pflüger, Karin Eckhard, Vlado Vančura, Verena Gruber, fotolia.de., NP Gesäuße, Schloss Röthelstein, Sumac Training, Bart van Engeldorp Gastelaars, Jaromir Blahá, Jim O’Donnell. Kathrin Schikorr | Design: www.diemedienwerkstatt.info, 5580 Tamsweg, Austria | Printed in Austria | All rights, errors and changes are reserved.