DESIGN STUDY

P R E S E N T A T I O N G R O U P 4

ADAM ZHARIFF QAMEIL BIN ZAMRY

2020312085

AHMAD SAFWAN BIN AHMAD RAZAN

2020385807

AZZRI FAZRIL BIN ROSMAN

2020916259

NURUL NASIHAH BINTI MUHD NOOR

2020108193

SYAZWINA ZAFIRA BINTI ZAMANUDDIN

2020130413

Sit Dolor Amet

De’ GARDEN LOUNGE A

D E S I G N

T H I N K I N G

A P P R O A C H

01

02

03

04

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 2 DESIGN BRIEF

CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN PROPOSAL

• Student Lounge • Student Lounge and Cafe • Design thinking Module • Architecture Design process

• Issues • Aim & Objectives • Site Location

• SWOT Analysis • Target user • Questionnaire Survey • Case Study

• Design Concept • Diagram Sketches • Perspective view

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

What is Student Lounge?

• Student lounge are room/space designed to give a student a space for relaxation & study.

• “The primary function of a student lounge space is to provide a welcoming area in which students feel comfortable to socialize and spend downtime.”

(Academia Group, Western USC Strategic Planning Survey)

Student Lounge with Cafeteria • Our idea is about providing a space that offers not just delicious food, but also a pleasant atmosphere that extends the learning experience.

• We know college students love food. Wherever there’s a food, people will gather. Students lounge will be enhanced by leveraging this space to be more easily adapted and multi-purpose social spaces that combine food service, individual work space, group meeting space and relaxation with facilities.

DESIGN THINKING MODULE ✓ Analyze ✓ Problems/Issues ✓ S.W.O.T Analysis

✓ Demonstrate ideas ✓ Storyboard ✓ Keep simple

✓ Observation ✓ Deep-dive ✓ Survey & Interview ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Brainstorming Generate ideas Share Ideas Solutions

✓ Presentation ✓ Ready for improvement ✓ Client Approval

ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PROCESS

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN • Space Program • Site Analysis • Building Schedule • Budget Estimation • Codes & Regulation

SCHEMATIC DESIGN • Design alternative • Schematic Sketches • 3D rough models

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

“This design is rarely a linear process.

Sometimes, one typically moves back and forth between the phases, allowing ideas from more detailed designs to influence and modify the overall design direction until final design has been agreed by all parties.”

•3D Models • Cost Estimation Update • Arrangements and Circulation elements •Outline Specification • Doors, Windows & • Interior Elevations Partitions Assembly • Reflected Ceiling • Fixtures and Fittings plans • Interior Finishes • Site Plan • Materials and • Floor Plans building envelope • Elevations • Sections

DESIGN OUTPUT •Construction Drawings & Approval • Contractor provide final pricing • Review shop drawing • Works with fabricator

CHAPTER 2 DESIGN BRIEF

GENERAL ISSUE EXISTING STUDENT LOUNGE

UNUTILIZED SPACE Isolated space that is not constantly used by the lecturers/ students and only be used as shortcut walkway from classes to classes. .

INSUFFICIENT FACILITIES & AMENITIES Insufficient facilities & amenities especially for items like furniture (tables/chairs) for convenient study will likely cause non-ergonomic study space for students who wish to do group discussion in between classes. The insufficient of wireless internet also will contribute to the area to remain unutilized.

NO CLEAR DEMARCATION AREA No demarcation or proper signage in this area that makes it look less attractive and have less aesthetic value. .

9

AIM & OBJECTIVES

01

To provide conducive study & discussion area that is available for 24 hours

02

To provide sufficient amenities and facilities

03

To provide aesthetically pleasing spaces with nature concept

04

To provide ergonomics' study area

10

AIM & OBJECTIVES (cont’d)

05

To have demarcated area for activities

06

To maximize spaces to accommodate students’ needs

07

To minimize the cost by using cabin container

11

2

1

Site Location

1

CURRENT LOCATION SUDENT LOUNGE

2

NEW PROPOSED LOCATION

Site View

CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

“A

SWOT Analysis had

been done to study anything that can potentially impact the success of a new project. Besides that, in order to know what is the perceptions and opinions of FSPU students regarding current student facilities, a simple

Questionnaire Survey had been conduct toward the people that include Undergraduate Students, Post Graduate Students, lecturers and Supporting Staff at FSPU, UiTM Shah Alam�

S.W.O.T ANALYSIS STRENGTH

WEAKNESS

A beneficial quality or attribute of a subject •Systematic area •Green Environment Vibes •Big Space •Centre of Faculty

Those characteristics of a subject that gives disadvantage relative to others •Disorganized during Raining Season •Pricey Lounge Café •Exposed to Malaysia High Temperature •High Maintenance

OPPURTUNITY

THREATS

External factors that could give a subject a competitive advantage •Available open space at faculty •Student Attraction •Accessible from Outside •24 Hours Facility

Refer to factors that have the potential to harm a subject •Limited seat during peak hour •Insignificant during semester break •Establish current student lounge •Overpriced food & beverage

TARGET USER

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

POST GRADUATE STUDENTS

LECTURER

SUPPORTING STAFF

DEMOGRAPHICS

CATEGORY 2: POST GRADUATE STUDENT

CATEGORY 1: UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT

37.5% 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

6 5

4

S1

S2

S3

37.5%

Lorem Ipsum

From 40 numbers of respondents interviewied from 3 sessions (Morning, Afternoon and Evening), 15 respondents (37.5%) are from Undergraduate Student.

6 5

4

S1

S2

S3

Lorem Ipsum Lorem Ipsum From 40 numbers of respondents interviewed from 3 sessions (Morning, Afternoon and Evening), 15 respondents (37.5%) are from Post Graduate Student.

DEMOGRAPHICS

CATEGORY 3: ACADEMICIAN & LECTURER

CATEGORY 4: SUPPORTING/ ADMIN STAFF

15% 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0

10% 2.5

3

2

2

2

1.5 1

1

1

1

S1

S2

0.5 S1

S2

S3

Lorem Ipsum Lorem Ipsum

From 40 Numbers of respondents interviewed from 3 sessions (Morning, Afternoon and Evening), 6 respondents (15.0%) are from Acedemician & Lecturer.

0 S3

Lorem Ipsum Lorem Ipsum From 40 Numbers of respondents interviewed from 3 sessions, (Morning, Afternoon and Evening), 4 respondents (10.0%) are from Supporting & Academian Staff

CURRENT FACULTY FACILITIES ARE ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY

FINDINGS 1

➢

5% of respondents Strongly Agree current faculty facilities are environmental friendly

➢

5% of respondents Agree that the current faculty facilities are environmental friendly

➢

20% of respondents Not Agree that current faculty facilities are environmental friendly

➢

70% of respondents Strongly Not Agree that current faculty facilities are environment friendly

5% 5% 20%

70%

Strongly Not Agree

Not Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

FINDINGS 2

CURRENT STUDENT LOUNGE ARE CONDUCIVE AND FIT FOR PURPOSE

➢

60.0% of respondents said that they did not have experience use the student lounge due to it is provided to the postgraduate student

➢

No respondent Strongly Agree that the current student lounge are conducive for use

➢

5.0% of respondents Agree that the current student lounge are conducive for use

➢

5.0% of respondents Not Agree that the current student lounge are conducive for use

➢

30.0% respondents Strongly Not Agree that the current student lounge are conducive for use

30%

60%

5% 5%

No use

0%

Strongly Not Agree

Not Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

CURRENT CAFÉ SUITS THEIR PREFERENCE

FINDINGS 3 5%

➢

5.0% of respondents Strongly Agree current café are really suit their preference

➢

5.0% of respondents Agree current café are really suit their preference

➢

40% of respondents Not Agree that current café are really suit their preference

➢

50% of respondents Strongly Not Agree that current café are really suit their preference

5%

50% 40%

Strongly Not Agree

Not Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

FINDINGS 4 What people wants?

PERCEPTION

Aesthetic & Functional Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

Insignificant

Good Vibes

Discussion Space

Modern

Complexity

Postgraduate

Big Space

Pretty

Integrated Student Lounge

Cool

Academician & Lecturer

Relevant

Green Building

Outdoor Concept

Variety

Supporting/Admin Staff

Hygiene

Entertainment

Reliable

Simple

Undergraduate

Case studies

“Several had been made to investigate contemporary reallife situations and has provided a foundation of application of ideas and extension of methods. This case studies are highlighted based on the issues that been highlighted by the respondents during the questionnaire survey. The information will be the basis in preparing the Design Proposal” ”

CASE STUDY 1

GOBOX CONCEPT, KL •

GOBOX CONCEPT is a container food center with an open air concept.

It’s located a stone’s throw away from KLCC and it’s a mere 300m walk from KLCC to GOBOX CONCEPT.

•

GOBOX CONCEPT, which is a play on the words “go” and “box”, is essentially a box-shaped food court housing 10+ food stalls.

•

GOBOX CONCEPT includes 2 storey containers that designed as a food stall and also dining place at the second level.

•

GOBOX CONCEPT also open concept food center that suitable place for enjoy the dishes and also suitable for gathering place.

CASE STUDY 2

RESTAURANT BRIX 0.1 •

A sculptural building in Bressanone / Italy is the landmark in the Lido Park and is the home for the restaurant & bar Brix 0.1

•

Like a landmark the building fits inside the natural environment. A simple, but plastically shaped building opens consciously like a funnel to the pond and framed so visually beneficial the shore as well as 2 forward, protected trumpet trees.

•

This pavilion thus forms the backbone of the overall composition and becomes the new attraction in the park. The new restaurant BRIX 0.1 in the Lidopark is created in a spatial interplay with a pushed in cuboid space volume, in which the service facilities are accommodated.

•

Spacious glazed windows allow views and views into the new restaurant and link the exterior and interior, making the visit to the park an experience. The skin of volume is formed by corten steel´s leaves that makes an elegant coating for the restaurant

•

Inside a front-cooking kitchen finds a dialogue with the tables of the clients showing the preparation of her prestigious food. In the night the construction becomes a lantern and the water, almost by magic, turns into a mirror for the structure.

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN PROPOSAL

DESIGN CONCEPT 01

03 ATTRACTIVE

05 MEET

Provide and Attractive Place that have a great and attractive view

RELAX

Provide a place where student can spend their time

Provide an open space at the foyer of the propose building to studnt relax their mind

NATURE

EAT

Provide a development that maintain, remain and improve the nature

02

Provide an attractive place for eating

04

“To design a student hub that consist of element Attractive, Nature, Meet, Eat, & Relax�

DESIGN PROPOSAL

De’ Garden Lounge

DESIGN PROCESS

Bubble Diagram

DESIGN PROCESS

Activities Diagram

DESIGN PROCESS

Schematic Diagram

DESIGN PROCESS

Main Building Cafe

Proposal Design

Annex

Amphitheater

Design Overview

✓ This design proposal consist of 2 parts of site consider ‘Area A’ and ‘Area B’ with the size each of them is 625m2 (total 1250m2) with dimension 25m length with 25m width. ✓ ‘Area A’ for this proposal will involve eight (8) numbers of container and for ‘Area B’ will involve two numbers’ of containers which each of them are 6meters length (20feet) ✓ ‘Area A’ locate with Main Building that consist of Café and Open Space Area while ‘Area B’ are Annex that consist of Open Concept Student Lounge complete with mini library. ✓ Both of the ‘Area’ will come out with free wi-fi amenities, open concept study area, and for ‘Area A’ have 24 hours café.

✓ Both of the ‘Area’ will include outdoor natural space for outdoor activity where for ‘Area B’ we remain the Amphitheater and improve the aesthetic value of that place. .

Annex

Main Building

35

Main Building

Main Building

Main Building

✓ 1 Storey Café with Flat roof ✓ Closed- air Cond Café ✓ 3 Storeys Open Concept Container ✓ Wi-fi Amenities ✓ Outdoor Tables

Annex

✓ 1 Storey Café with Flat roof ✓ Open Concept Student Lounge

Annex

✓ Wi-fi Amenities ✓ Outdoor Tables ✓ Mini Library

EXTERIOR VIEW Main Building

EXTERIOR VIEW Annex

INTERIOR VIEW

INTERIOR VIEW

The estimation cost for this project is approximately RM403,000.00

PRELIMINARIES

BUILDERS WORK & EXTERNAL WORKS

FURNITURE & ASSOCIATED WORKS

MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL WORKS

CONTIGENCIES

9%

64%

9%

9%

10%

RM35,000

RM258,000

RM35,000

RM35,000

RM40,000

Allowance of 10% from the builders work

Including Structural & Architectural Works

External & Internal

Allowance for mechanical and Electrical Works

Allowance for contingencies

CONCLUSION

OBJECTIVE

CONCLUSION

STATUS

TO PROVIDE CONDUCIVE STUDY & DISCUSSION AREA THAT IS AVAILABLE FOR 24 HOURS

ACHIEVED

TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT AMENITIES AND FACILITIES

ACHIEVED

TO PROVIDE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING SPACES WITH NATURE CONCEPT

ACHIEVED

TO PROVIDE ERGONOMICS' STUDY AREA

ACHIEVED

TO HAVE DEMARCATED AREA FOR ACTIVITIES

ACHIEVED

TO MAXIMIZE SPACES TO ACCOMMODATE STUDENTS’ NEEDS

ACHIEVED

TO MINIMIZE THE COST BY USING CABIN CONTAINER

ACHIEVED

De’ GARDEN LOUNGE

G4.com