R E P O R T
ROSTAM YAMAN (Ts, Dr)
4
G R O U P ICP814 DESIGN PROCESS
De’ GARDEN LOUNGE A DESIGN APPROACH ADAM ZHARIFF QAMEIL BIN ZAMRY
2020312085
AHMAD SAFWAN BIN AHMAD RAZAN
2020385807
AZZRI FAZRIL BIN ROSMAN
2020916259
NURUL NASIHAH BINTI MUHD NOOR
2020108193
SYAZWINA ZAFIRA BINTI ZAMANUDDIN
2020130413
1
OUTLINE
01
02
03
04
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2 DESIGN BRIEF
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER 4 DESIGN PROPOSAL
• Student Lounge • Student Lounge and Cafe • Design thinking Module • Architecture Design process
• Issues • Aim & Objectives • Site Location
• SWOT Analysis • Target User • Questionnaire Survey • Case Study
• Design Concept • Diagram sketches • Perspective view
2
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
3
STUDENT LOUNGE • Student lounge are room/space designed to give a student a space for relaxation & study. • “The primary function of a student lounge space is to provide a welcoming area in which students feel comfortable to socialize and spend downtime.” (Academia Group, Western USC Strategic Planning Survey)
4
STUDENT LOUNGE WITH CAFETARIA • Our idea is about providing a space that offers not just delicious food, but also a pleasant atmosphere that extends the learning experience. • We know college students love food. Wherever there’s a food, people will gather. Students lounge will be enhanced by leveraging this space to be more easily adapted and multi-purpose social spaces that combine food service, individual work space, group meeting space and relaxation with facilities.
5
DESIGN THINKING MODULE “Design thinking is an ideology and a process that seeks to solve complex problems in a user-centric way. It focuses on achieving practical results and solutions that are technically feasible, economically viable and desirable for the user.�
6
DESIGN THINKING MODULE (cont’d) Empathize (Research Your Users' Needs) We spent time observing and engaging with real users (or people who represent in target group)—conducting interviews and seeing how they interact with an existing product
Ideate (Challenge Assumptions and Create Ideas) We discuss and explore new angles, and think outside the box. We hold ideation sessions in order to generate more ideas in group members.
Prototype (Start to Create Solutions) The aim of this stage is to turn our ideas into tangible product which can be tested on real users. We have to ensure that the final design actually solves the user’s problem and excite to use.
Define (State Your Users' Needs and Problems) We gathered all the findings from the empathize phase and formulate them together as a Problem Statement. SWOT analysis were used to explore strategies, with a focus leveraging strength and opportunity to overcome weakness and threat.
Test (Try Out) We will observe our target user/representative users as they interact with the prototype. Any design flaws will be addressed and highlighted for improvement. We have to go through the empathize stage or run through a few more ideation sessions if applicable prior to approval by client/user. .
7
ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PROCESS “This design is rarely a linear process. Sometimes, one typically moves back and forth between the phases, allowing ideas from more detailed designs to influence and modify the overall design direction until final design has been agreed by all parties.�
8
ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PROCESS (cont’d) 01
02
03
04
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN OUTPUT
✓ Space Program ✓ Site Analysis ✓ Building Schedule ✓ Budget Estimation ✓ Codes & Regulation
✓ Design alternative ✓ Schematic Sketches ✓ 3D rough models
✓ Outline Specification ✓ Interior Elevations, Reflected Ceiling plan, Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Sections, 3D Models ✓ Cost Estimation Update ✓ Arrangements and Circulation elements ✓ Doors, Windows & Partitions Assembly ✓ Fixtures and Fittings ✓ Interior Finishes ✓ Materials and building envelope
✓ Construction Drawings & Approval ✓ Contractor provide final pricing ✓ Review shop drawing ✓ Works with fabricator
9
ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PROCESS (cont’d) CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
RESEARCH AND DETERMINE THE OWNER’S CRITERIA FOR THE PROJECT
EXPLORE DESIGN CONCEPTS. PRESENT OPTIONS AND NARROW DOWN TO PREFERRED CONCEPT
➢ Architect works closely with the client to understand the
➢ It is a rough form as sketches, floor plan studies, and 3d
➢ Finalizing the size of the rooms and spaces, refining the
or physical models. Client/designer meetings are
look, selecting materials, determining the systems, and
➢ The budget should be estimate for construction related
conducted during this phase to make decisions and
deciding on door and window types and locations. This
cost (material, labor, and the contractor’s overhead and
determine a direction for the design to evolve and
phase may also include several client/designer meetings,
profit )and non-construction related cost (consultants,
determine a design direction with which to proceed into
which are critical to finalizing decisions so the detailed
city and bank fees, and insurance). It is also important to
the next phase.
documentation can begin in the next phase
design brief for the building and its requirement
assess if the budget is adequate to complete the project
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REFINE & DEVELOP DESIGN. PRELIMINARY LAYOUT OF STRUCTURAL & MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
➢
Systems consultants will design and draw up their
➢ Great design comes from a building’s relationship to its
portions of the work. Architect to coordinate the work of
site. Thus, site analysis is important to utilized for views,
these various consultants and implement their drawings
sun, land, access and enjoyment.
into the design ➢ All schematic design phase should be updated in further detail.
10
ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PROCESS (cont’d) DESIGN OUTPUT
DESIGN OUTPUT (Cont’d)
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, CONSTRUCTION BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, CONSTRUCTION BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
➢ CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
➢CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
The schematic design and design development phases should be updated in
•To process information of contractor and sub contractors
full detail. Additional documents will also be created and can vary depending
•Review submittals, shop drawings in detail, review these for consistency
on the scope of the project. It may include architectural, structural, civil, and
with the specifications, and make additional selections and decision as
mechanical drawings.
needed.
➢
CONTSRUCTION BIDDING
Appointment of contractor by the client During this phase the project is submitted to the authority for a plan check, which is the process by which authority review the submitted documents for compliance to the zoning and regulation codes.
•Work with fabricators such as the cabinetmakers, finish carpenter, tile installer, etc. to refine minor details during construction •The architect can administer the process of changes during construction by contractor/consultant and prepare the necessary document revisions. •The punch list takes place when the contractor states that they are finished with construction
11
CHAPTER 2 DESIGN BRIEF
12
GENERAL ISSUE EXISTING
UNUTILIZED SPACE Isolated space that is not constantly used by the lecturers/ students and only be used as shortcut walkway from classes to classes. .
INSUFFICIENT FACILITIES & AMENITIES Insufficient facilities & amenities especially for items like furniture (tables/chairs) for convenient study will likely cause non-ergonomic study space for students who wish to do group discussion in between classes. The insufficient of wireless internet also will contribute to the area to remain unutilized.
NO CLEAR DEMARCATION AREA No demarcation or proper signage in this area that makes it look less attractive and have less aesthetic value. .
13
AIM & OBJECTIVES
01
02
To provide conducive study & discussion area that is available for 24 hours
To provide sufficient amenities and facilities
Studying can be challenging especially when the atmosphere is not good. This design is used to produce more fresher and modern look for studying or even group discussion and it available to use for 24 hours.
Wireless internet connection, furniture as well as mini cafĂŠ could help students to be productive.
03
04
To provide aesthetically pleasing spaces with nature concept
To provide ergonomics' study area
Atmosphere can influence the students’ mood and by having this concept, it can help to boost the joyful feeling for studying or even resting.
This is particularly very important to students because it has to do with the body postures. By having sufficient furniture as mentioned above, this could help the student to have an ergonomic study places.
14
AIM & OBJECTIVES (cont’d)
05 To have demarcated area for activities Spaces/ signage should be well labelled as this will help the area to look more organized as well as proper maintenance can be done along the way. For example, the mini café is intended to be used for chillax or lunch/dinner. The tables & chairs are intended for study purpose. Therefore, each spaces have its own functions.
06
07
To maximize spaces to accommodate students’ needs
To minimize the cost by using cabin container
This student lounge is to fulfill the FSPU’s students needs as we walk into the faculty, there are no proper café and there is an old student lounge. This will also help to save some time for both students and lecturers by not having to go out of the faculty to buy meal in between classes/ resting time.
In order to save cost, reusable cabin container was chosen as a structure of a building.
15
NEW PROPOSED LOCATION
CURRENT LOCATION SUDENT LOUNGE
SITE LOCATION 16
Site View
✓ Overall size of the site are 1250m2 with dimension 25m length with 25m width each. ✓ The site are surrounded by the current buildings
17
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
18
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
SWOT Analysis
“A had been done to study anything that can potentially impact the success of a new project. Besides that, in order to know what is the perceptions and opinions of FSPU students regarding current student facilities, a simple had been conduct toward the people that include Undergraduate Students, Post Graduate Students, lecturers and Supporting Staff at FSPU, UiTM Shah Alam�
Questionnaire Survey
19
S.W.O.T ANALYSIS STRENGTH
WEAKNESS
A beneficial quality or attribute of a subject •Systematic area •Green Environment Vibes •Big Space •Centre of Faculty
Those characteristics of a subject that gives disadvantage relative to others •Disorganized during Raining Season •Pricey Lounge Café •Exposed to Malaysia High Temperature •High Maintenance
OPPURTUNITY
THREATS
External factors that could give a subject a competitive advantage •Available open space at faculty •Student Attraction •Accessible from Outside •24 Hours Facility
Refer to factors that have the potential to harm a subject •Limited seat during peak hour •Insignificant during semester break •Establish current student lounge •Overpriced food & beverage 20
TARGET USER
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
POST GRADUATE STUDENTS
LECTURER
SUPPORTING STAFF
21
DEMOGRAPHICS
CATEGORY 2: POST GRADUATE STUDENT
CATEGORY 1: UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT
37.5% 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
6 5 4
S1
S2
S3
37.5%
Lorem Ipsum
From 40 numbers of respondents interviewied from 3 sessions (Morning, Afternoon and Evening), 15 respondents (37.5%) are from Undergraduate Student.
6 5 4
S1
S2
S3
Lorem Ipsum Lorem Ipsum From 40 numbers of respondents interviewed from 3 sessions (Morning, Afternoon and Evening), 15 respondents (37.5%) are from Post Graduate Student. 22
DEMOGRAPHICS
CATEGORY 3: ACADEMICIAN & LECTURER
CATEGORY 4: SUPPORTING/ ADMIN STAFF
15% 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0
10% 2.5
3
2
2 2
1.5 1
1
1
1
S1
S2
0.5 S1
S2
S3
Lorem Ipsum Lorem Ipsum
From 40 Numbers of respondents interviewed from 3 sessions (Morning, Afternoon and Evening), 6 respondents (15.0%) are from Acedemician & Lecturer.
0 S3
Lorem Ipsum Lorem Ipsum From 40 Numbers of respondents interviewed from 3 sessions, (Morning, Afternoon and Evening), 4 respondents (10.0%) are from Supporting & Academian Staff 23
CURRENT FACULTY FACILITIES ARE ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY
FINDINGS 1
➢
5% of respondents Strongly Agree current faculty facilities are environmental friendly
➢
5% of respondents Agree that the current faculty facilities are environmental friendly
➢
20% of respondents Not Agree that current faculty facilities are environmental friendly
➢
70% of respondents Strongly Not Agree that current faculty facilities are environment friendly
5% 5% 20%
70%
Strongly Not Agree
Not Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
24
FINDINGS 2
CURRENT STUDENT LOUNGE ARE CONDUCIVE AND FIT FOR PURPOSE
➢
60.0% of respondents said that they did not have experience use the student lounge due to it is provided to the postgraduate student
➢
No respondent Strongly Agree that the current student lounge are conducive for use
➢
5.0% of respondents Agree that the current student lounge are conducive for use
➢
5.0% of respondents Not Agree that the current student lounge are conducive for use
➢
30.0% respondents Strongly Not Agree that the current student lounge are conducive for use
30%
60%
5% 5%
No use
0%
Strongly Not Agree
Not Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
25
CURRENT CAFÉ SUITS THEIR PREFERENCE
FINDINGS 3 5%
➢
5.0% of respondents Strongly Agree current café are really suit their preference
➢
5.0% of respondents Agree current café are really suit their preference
➢
40% of respondents Not Agree that current café are really suit their preference
➢
50% of respondents Strongly Not Agree that current café are really suit their preference
5%
50% 40%
Strongly Not Agree
Not Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
26
Aesthetic & Functional
FINDINGS 4 What people wants? PERCEPTION
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Insignificant
Good Vibes
Discussion Space
Modern
Complexity
Postgraduate
Big Space
Pretty
Integrated Student Lounge
Cool
Academician & Lecturer
Relevant
Green Building
Outdoor Concept
Variety
Supporting/Admin Staff
Hygiene
Entertainment
Reliable
Simple
Undergraduate
27
FINDINGS DISCUSSION From the survey that had been made to 40 numbers of that involve students, lecturers and other supporting staff, it can be conclude that most of the students said that current faculty facilities are i. Not environmental friendly ii. Current student lounge are not conducive and not fit for purpose, and; iii. Current cafĂŠ nearby the FSPU did not as per their preference in term of location, surrounding and choice. They dream for a development for can resolve their issue that involve Good vibes, Discussion Space, Outdoor Concept and Casual Clean place. 28
CASE STUDY
Case Study
Case studies
“Several had been made to investigate contemporary real-life situations and has provided a foundation of application of ideas and extension of methods. This case studies are highlighted based on the issues that been highlighted by the respondents during the questionnaire survey. The information will be the basis in preparing the Design Proposal� 29
CASE STUDY 1
GOBOX CONCEPT, KL •
GOBOX CONCEPT is a container food center with an open air concept. It’s located a stone’s throw away from KLCC and it’s a mere 300m walk from KLCC to GOBOX CONCEPT.
•
GOBOX CONCEPT, which is a play on the words “go” and “box”, is essentially a box-shaped food court housing 10+ food stalls.
•
GOBOX CONCEPT includes 2 storey containers that designed as a food stall and also dining place at the second level.
•
GOBOX CONCEPT also open concept food center that suitable place for enjoy the dishes and also suitable for gathering place.
30
CASE STUDY 2
RESTAURANT BRIX 0.1 •
A sculptural building in Bressanone / Italy is the landmark in the Lido Park and is the home for the restaurant & bar Brix 0.1
•
Like a landmark the building fits inside the natural environment. A simple, but plastically shaped building opens consciously like a funnel to the pond and framed so visually beneficial the shore as well as 2 forward, protected trumpet trees.
•
This pavilion thus forms the backbone of the overall composition and becomes the new attraction in the park. The new restaurant BRIX 0.1 in the Lidopark is created in a spatial interplay with a pushed in cuboid space volume, in which the service facilities are accommodated.
•
Spacious glazed windows allow views and views into the new restaurant and link the exterior and interior, making the visit to the park an experience. The skin of volume is formed by corten steel´s leaves that makes an elegant coating for the restaurant
•
Inside a front-cooking kitchen finds a dialogue with the tables of the clients showing the preparation of her prestigious food. In the night the construction becomes a lantern and the water, almost by magic, turns into a mirror for the structure.
31
CHAPTER 4 DESIGN PROPOSAL
32
DESIGN CONCEPT 01
03 ATTRACTIVE
05 MEET
Provide and Attractive Place that have a great and attractive view
RELAX
Provide a place where student can spend their time
Provide an open space at the foyer of the propose building to studnt relax their mind
NATURE
EAT
Provide a development that maintain, remain and improve the nature
02
Provide an attractive place for eating
04
“To design a student hub that consist of element Attractive, Nature, Meet, Eat, &33Relax�
DESIGN PROPOSAL
De’ Garden Lounge 34
DESIGN PROPOSAL
The development of this proposal with the basis of element Attractive, Nature, Meet, Eat, & Relax concept and combined with the container concept that involved several containers arranged in an attractive arrangement to suit the needs of the people around FSPU UiTM Shah Alam. This proposal will connect to the future development of Seminar Room and Gallery nearby.
35
DESIGN PROCESS
Bubble Diagram
36
DESIGN PROCESS
Activities Diagram
37
DESIGN PROCESS
Schematic Diagram
38
DESIGN PROCESS
Main Building Cafe
Proposal Design
Annex
Amphitheater
39
DESIGN PROCESS
Concept sketch
DESIGN PROCESS
Internal Sketch
Design Overview
✓ This design proposal consist of 2 parts of site consider ‘Area A’ and ‘Area B’ with the size each of them is 625m2 (total 1250m2) with dimension 25m length with 25m width. ✓ ‘Area A’ for this proposal will involve eight (8) numbers of container and for ‘Area B’ will involve two numbers’ of containers which each of them are 6meters length (20feet) ✓ ‘Area A’ locate with Main Building that consist of Café and Open Space Area while ‘Area B’ are Annex that consist of Open Concept Student Lounge complete with mini library. ✓ Both of the ‘Area’ will come out with free wi-fi amenities, open concept study area, and for ‘Area A’ have 24 hours café. ✓ Both of the ‘Area’ will include outdoor natural space for outdoor activity where for ‘Area B’ we remain the Amphitheater and improve the aesthetic value of that place. .
Annex
Main Building
43
Main Building
44
Main Building
45
Main Building
✓ 1 Storey Café with Flat roof ✓ Closed- air Cond Café ✓ 3 Storeys Open Concept Container ✓ Wi-fi Amenities ✓ Outdoor Tables
46
Annex
47
✓ 1 Storey Café with Flat roof ✓ Open Concept Student Lounge
Annex
✓ Wi-fi Amenities ✓ Outdoor Tables ✓ Mini Library
48
EXTERIOR VIEW Main Building
49
EXTERIOR VIEW Annex
50
INTERIOR VIEW
51
INTERIOR VIEW
52
The estimation cost for this project is approximately RM403,000.00
PRELIMINARIES
BUILDERS WORK & EXTERNAL WORKS
FURNITURE & ASSOCIATED WORKS
MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL WORKS
CONTIGENCIES
9%
64%
9%
9%
10%
RM35,000
RM258,000
RM35,000
RM35,000
RM40,000
Allowance of 10% from the builders work
Including Structural & Architectural Works
External & Internal
Allowance for mechanical and Electrical Works
Allowance for contingencies
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION All the design objectives in this study had been achieved. A complete package of design that include conducive study & discussion area, extra amenities and facilities, Aesthetically pleasing space with nature concept, economic study area, properly demarcation area, a space that had been maximize had been propose in this report.
OBJECTIVE
STATUS
TO PROVIDE CONDUCIVE STUDY & DISCUSSION AREA THAT IS AVAILABLE FOR 24 HOURS
ACHIEVED
TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT AMENITIES AND FACILITIES
ACHIEVED
TO PROVIDE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING SPACES WITH NATURE CONCEPT
ACHIEVED
TO PROVIDE ERGONOMICS' STUDY AREA
ACHIEVED
TO HAVE DEMARCATED AREA FOR ACTIVITIES
ACHIEVED
TO MAXIMIZE SPACES TO ACCOMMODATE STUDENTS’ NEEDS
ACHIEVED
TO MINIMIZE THE COST BY USING CABIN CONTAINER
ACHIEVED
55
De’ GARDEN LOUNGE
G4.com
56