Quality Experience: Integrated Experience Purpose: by the development and the implementation of integrated experiences we can ensure qualitative transformation and organizational goal achievement. Based on organization's impact model, having integrated experiences is the best experience one member can have looking at the AIESEC platform: that's why we want more people to really live through that experience In order to make it happen, we want to make sure the strategies we use to create more experiences can be fully integrated into our ongoing operation. Strategy Implementation The implementation of this strategy started with the planning phase in July and was presented at IC. Therefore we can consider integrated experiences developed in 4 different blocks: a. Growth in GCDP though our current talent capacity. b. Growth in talent capacity re-integrating the members in the GCDP pool c. Improvement in the EP delivery d. Improvement in the preparation of GIP EP giving them a team experience before their exchange experience. Considering the GCDP peak in Q3, the focus for this quarter was the preparation for the reintegration after the peak. In particular, • Country selection and preparation for project; • Resource creation and sharing: o Reintegration project goal tracking tool, o LC reintegration tracking tool. o Reintegration resource bank • Reintegration coaching & tracking The expected outcome of this reintegration initiative is to reintegrated at least 20% of the members who went on a GCDP during Q3. Channel of Assessment In order to assess the current state of this strategic project we have 2 different possibilities: a. assessment from the network We definitely think that the understanding of integrated experiences and of the reintegration behaviour is increased as key strategy for programme growth looking also at Entities who included it in their Entities’ plan. b. data from the Global Information System 1690 integrated experiences have been lived in Q3. TMP
TLP GCDP 707 310
152 19
96 5
TMP TLP GCDP GIP
GIP 275 126
In this table you can fid the specific datas of the realizations in Q3. In the column on the right the first programme and on the top there is the second programme lived. Eg. 707 is the number of members who lived first a TMP and then went for a GCDP.
Looking at this table, is clear why we don’t focus on reintegration after GIP experience (only 24 members in all the network had this kind of experience) whereas we focus on the reintegration
after GCDP experience which have still lot of potential for the next quarter (among 7155 GCDP realizations in Q3 only 248 EPs were already reintegrated). On the other side we can see a natural high result in GCDP realization after TMP/TLP (707+310=1017 in Q3) and, considering the actual talent capacity, we think this package of TMP/TLP + GCDP can really grow a lot if supported with local incentives and campaigns. Top Entities Contribution: a. TMP/TLP to GCDP 1 2 3 4 5
MAINLAND CHINA TAIWAN BRAZIL GERMANY JAPAN
b. from GCDP to TMP/TLP 162 74 73 62 50
1 2 3 4 5
INDIA BRAZIL COLOMBIA MAINLAND CHINA POLAND
c. from TMP/TLP to GIP 1 2 3 4 5
BRAZIL COLOMBIA UKRAINE MEXICO RUSSIA
35 35 18 17 16
Next step: ü centralized resource information center developed by GST ü Continue the focus on re-integration ü Subproduct development for internal promotion to boost GCDP after a team experience (especially for Entities focused on OGX for the Dec/Jan peak) ü Direct support to specific Entities. Reintegration GCP: Country: Brazil Strategy or Action implemented: ü Reintegration Portfolio ü Continuous MC-LC tracking through RE-integration tracking tool ü EP Preparation seminar ü Focus on Integration ü Local re-integration project manager ü Upsales Challenge ü Customized support Outcome: Re-integration Culture ü 32% EPs approached and reintegrated ü 20% EPs approached but lost (Not reintegrated) ü 48% EPs Un-approached Resource: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6mezv4mgc5yzhxe/wUoeW8OumResponsible: For more details, contact Ivan Pessoa, MCVPTM AIESEC Brazil, (ivan.pessoa@aiesec.net).
34 25 16 16 15