Fort Bend Independent

Page 1

VOL 7 No. 34

email: editor@ĩindependent.com

www.fbindependent.com ww .fbindependent.com

Phone: 281-980-6745

FORT BEND FAIR. BALANCED. INFORMATIVE. P. O.BOX 623, SUGAR LAND, TX 77487-0623

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2014

Official newspaper of Fort Bend County, Missouri City & Sugar Land

Sheriff committed to flying military helicopters By SESHADRI KUMAR Even as Fort Bend County Commissioners Court is considering the acquisition of two military helicopters for the sheriff’s department, the program of offering military equipment to local enforcement agencies has come under national scrutiny. Developments in Ferguson, Missouri, have precipitated a crisis so much so President Barack Obama on Monday called for a sharp separation between the nation’s armed forces and local police, and urged a re-examination of programs that have equipped civilian law enforcement departments with military gear. While Sheriff Troy Nehls has not explicitly outlined the advantages of having the helicopters, his office has supplied answers to a series of questions asked by Commissioner Andy Meyers. The helicopters that Sheriff Nehls wants to receive are a 1971 and a 1973 model [OH58], “but this age applies to limited parts of the aircraft, since they have been subject to continuous servicing and replacement of the critical components under the military’s airframe and power plant protocols. This aircraft is the military version of the Bell Jet Ranger and has an excellent record of safety and reliability,” according to the sheriff. Meyers asked: Our Budget Officer did not believe that cost of property, casualty and liability insurance on the helicopters is included in your estimate of $150,000 per year operating cost. Can you explain? RESPONSE: In our research on this we have found that if Risk Management chooses to go to a private insurance carrier on the operational helicopter for coverage it would cost no more than $14,000 per year (this is based on what Harris County is paying for their OH58 Helicopter). We will coordinate all of this through risk management and feel that in most scenarios this would be covered by submitted operating cost projections. The Budget Officer pointed out that the revenue from housing federal inmates is already included in the county’s Budget Revenue and is not additional revenue for budgeting purposes. RESPONSE: It is fully understood that the revenues from

the discretionary housing of federal inmates goes into the County’s General Fund. We are asking that consideration on the use of this revenue take into account the needs assessment(s) presented by the Sheriff in an ongoing basis. We do feel that this is an opportunity to obtain a significant boost to Fort Bend County’s Law Enforcement capabilities while at the same time doing so in a manner that least impacts the taxpayer. The assets obtained (the two helicopters) have a combined estimated value of $650,000+. Yes, we will then have the costs of adding mission specific equipment (one ex. Thermal imaging) as funds are available and approved. The Sheriff is asking that consideration be given to using 20% of the net from housing of outside inmates (ex. Federal prisoners) for the operational and capital needs of this project. “What other equipment is to go on the helicopter? How much does it cost? How do you intend on funding those costs?” RESPONSE: Other equipment is currently expected to include thermal imaging, spotlight, mapping, aviation radio, mobile data computer. Full cost is estimated to be around $480,000. These items will be phased in based upon funding ability (if the 20% inmate funds are approved and if necessary supplemented by amounts from Seized Assets). We are also looking to utilize the same asset program to identify items of this nature that may be obtained at no or minimal cost to the County. “The Army is replacing the function of the Kiowa observation helicopters with Drones, which are much less expensive to operate and maintain. Why should the County not do the same?” RESPONSE: It is true that in military applications drones are taking a greater role. Law enforcement has seen some drone usage; however, the current best practices remain with non-drone type aircraft. There are multiple reasons for this including but not limited to the public’s perception of drones and how this relates to privacy concerns and at this time we feel that manned aircraft gives us the most flexibility and operational capability. This aircraft will have to be

stored in a hangar and maintenance performed by certified helicopter mechanics and the sheriff’s recommendation is that a company specializing in this service be contracted to perform the maintenance on these assets. Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) are calling for an end to the Defense Department program that supplies local police departments with surplus military equipment, such as armored tanks, machine guns and tear gas. A report by the American Civil Liberties Union found the amount of goods transferred through the military surplus program rose in value from $1 million in 1990 to nearly $450 million in 2013. In Louisiana, masked police in full body armor carrying AR15 assault rifles raided a nightclub without a warrant, looking not for terrorists but underage drinkers and fire-code violations. Of the 124 SWAT raids conducted daily across the nation, only 7 percent were in response to extreme circumstances such as riots, hostage scenarios and active-shooter or sniper situations. According to studies, most raids today are to conduct drug searches — many based on tips from unreliable informants. Here’s one weird case that occurred in Orlando, Fla., in 2010. SWAT teams raided nine barbershops and arrested 34 people for “barbering without a license,” according to The Daily Democrat. SWAT teams last August raided an organic farm and community, the Garden of Eden, in Arlington, Texas. Police found no drugs or weapons and filed no charges after their search, which authorities said followed standard procedure. Police say the equipment, which includes free body armor, night vision goggles and scopes, keeps officers safe and prepares them for the worst case. “Is it smart for them to use that stuff and perhaps look like soldiers from Iraq going into a place? Is that smart or over the top? I’d say generally that’s smart. Now, if you use that every time a guy is writing bad checks, that’s getting rather extreme,” said Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Chief Bill Mc-

2014 SUGAR CREEK GARDEN CLUB OFFICERS are working hard for the upcoming year . They are planning many new and exciting programs along with fun activities for all to enjoy. The first meeting for the club will be held at Sugar Creek Country Club beginning at 9:30 a.m with the social hour with the program and business meeting to follow. Standing L - R: Sharon Leonard, President Elect; Helen Rosenthal, Recording Secretary; Marie Fuller, President; Kathy Lukenbach, Membership; Rosemary Jodeit, Treasurer; Jenny Schultz, Corresponding Secretary; Diane Reeves, Parliamentarian. Not Pictured: Nancy Lefler, Programs.

Bird of the Month: Hummingbirds . . . migrating south

Ruby-throated Hummingbirds, particularly females and immature males have taken an early migration ride on the recent dips south of the jet stream. Breezes more like September have brought hummers to our gardens and feeders early. Especially early (usually a winter visitor) is the male Rufous Hummingbird pictured, photographed 8-10-14 at Margaret’s garden in Quail Valley. If you’d like more of nature’s jewels in your garden, we have some tips for attracting and keeping hummers migrating back on the web. Once hummers establish a pattern, they can be doggedly persistent in returning to feeders. Tips on how to attract them to your garden along with more upclose photos by Margaret Sloan click http://traction.typepad.com/birds

FBISD board orders $484 bond election By SESHADRI KUMAR Fort Bend ISD board of trustees on Monday unanimously called for a $484 bond election to be held in November. The election on Nov. 4 will be held as one proposition for the construction, acquisition, and equipment of school buildings in the district and for the purchase of necessary sites for school buildings. It will also contain funds to refurbish or modify existing facilities, and address technology, transportation, and safety and security needs in the district. Early voting will begin Oct. 20. As of July 1, 2014, the first day of the District’s current fiscal year, the aggregate principal amount of outstanding tax-supported debt of the District was $858.78 million and the aggregate amount of outstanding interest on the debt was $448.09 million. The District’s ad valorem debt service tax rate now is $0.30 per $100 of assessed valuation of taxable property in the District. The District intends to issue the bonds authorized by the Proposition over a period of years in a manner and in accordance with a schedule to be determined by the Board based upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the then current needs of the District, demographic changes, prevailing market conditions, assessed valuations in the District and management of the District’s short-term and longterm interest rate exposure. Market conditions, demographics and assessed valuations vary based upon a number of factors beyond the District’s control, and therefore, the District cannot and does not guarantee a particular interest rate or tax rate associated with the bonds authorized by the Proposition. As such, the estimated debt service tax rate is provided

Proposed 2014 Bond Program

Description New Construction and Classroom Additions

$222,384,309

Current Facility Deficiencies

$113,869,021

Educational Adequacy Deficiencies Facility Life-Cycle Needs

$3,826,189 $25,336,856

Construction Total

$365,416,375

Security Cameras

$14,118,000

Security Vestibules

$4,332,450

Window Film

$1,824,915

Access Control including Video Intercom

$3,415,000

Emergency Generators

$3,200,000

Safety and Security Total Bus Cameras and GPS

$26,890,365 $908,369

Bus Replacement

$15,000,000

Transportation Total

$15,908,369

Wide Area Network/Backbone Refresh

$17,281,694

Wireless Network Deployment

$22,152,153

Technology Total

$39,433,847

Land

$18,425,880

Bond Support

$18,082,191

Total Proposed Bond

solely for illustrative purposes and does not establish any limitations or restrictions or create a contract with the voters. The District currently estimates that, if the Proposition were approved and the bonds proposed were authorized and issued in accordance with the District’s currently projected plan of finance, the District’s ad valorem debt service tax rate would be approximately $0.30 per $100 of assessed valuation of taxable property in the District. Committee The board also adopted a resolution to direct the Superintendent to constitute a committee of community members that is representative of the district’s diverse constituency. The committee is expected to work with the Board of Trustees, Superintendent, and district administration to make

$484,157,027

recommendations regarding the prioritization and phasing of the proposed projects to be included in the November 2014 bond election. The committee will work within the framework of the FBISD Facilities Master Plan, FBISD Safety and Security Plan, and FBISD Technology Plan and/or other significant primary and authoritative sources of District information; The school board approved yet another resolution to demonstrate the Board’s desire to maintain proper oversight and accountability for proceeds of voter approved bonds. During public hearings on the proposed bond election, a section of the community sought to postpone the bond election until May 2015, pending the completion of new school boundaries and feeder patterns. See BOND, Page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.