Friends Seminary
Edition 2
January 2016
Friends Seminary Separately Incorporates from the Immigration: Bigotry in Politics New York Quarterly Meeting By SABRINA EDELMAN ’16
After ten years of negotiating, Friends Seminary separately incorporated from the New York Quarterly Meeting on December 6, 2015. This marks the beginning of a new relationship with the New York Quarterly Meeting (NYQM). Principal Bo Lauder stated, “I could not be anymore excited for our school and the Quarterly meeting.” For the most part, the separation will not affect the day to day lives of students
By NAHID MAHMUD ’17
or faculty, Lauder said. The use of shared spaces such as the Meeting House will remain the same. However, there may be a minor tuition hike. Regarding this tuition hike, Lauder stated, “There is typically a tuition increase each year and, in all candor, the terms of the separation will have an impact on tuition. We are
working now to ensure that over the next three years the costs associated with the separation will have as limited an impact as possible.” In addition, Friends Seminary can now proceed with the major renovation that will begin this summer, which will allow Friends to add more programs.
Inside
Continued on page 2
FIVE WAYS TO COPE WITH STRESS
BARS OF THE MC AND VERSES OF THE BARD
HAMILTON INSPIRES A REVOLUTION ON BROADWAY
2015 FALL ATHLETICS RECAP
PAGE 4
PAGE 6
PAGE 8
PAGE 10
It’s easy to say that the reason why Republican responses to immigration reform are so extreme is because Republican ideas are inherently conservative when the real problem lies in the fact that Republicans approach immigration the same way they approach terrorism: by playing on the fears of the public. After the Paris terrorist attacks on November 13th, the topic of immigration has been brought to the forefront of political debate and not for the right reasons. Following militant group ISIS claiming responsibility for the Friday the 13th attacks and rumors that one of the Paris attackers was a Syrian among the wave of refugees entering Greece in early October, more than 31 state governors across the United States indicated that they would attempt to block any future refugees from settling in their states due to fear of granting access to terrorists. Subsequently, on November 19th, The House of Representatives passed a bipartisan bill that would halt the resettlement of Syrian and Iraqi refugees in the US and would require the FBI directory to certify a background investigation on all refugees despite much democratic opposition from the Senate and President Barack Obama. With the topic of terrorism taking front and center stage, several politicians were more than willing to speak on the topic of immigration. Republican presidential candidates jumped on the opportunity to use the attacks as grounds to further their own political agendas regarding the Syrian migration crisis. Despite being the son of a refugee, Senator Ted Cruz pledged to introduce legislation that would ban Muslim Syrian refugees from entering the country. Rival presidential candidate Jeb Bush agreed and suggested that the United States only accept Christian refugees from Syria. When asked by a reporter to explain exactly how he would distinguish Christian
Continued on page 3